The English department at Harvard has contacted the DOJ and urged civil prosecution against you for that run on sentence.
In their summary affidavit, they referenced the great harm to any child that read your comment, and now thinks it is okay to have 95 words in a row without a period or semicolon. In addition starting a paragraph with "So" is just bad sport.
Just when you thought it couldn't get worse, it gets worse.
Modded insightful? I thought he was making a joke.
If he wants to take a sledgehammer to his WII than I'm sure he's allowed. However breaking into the OS and cracking software with, lets be honest, the general purpose of playing commercial games for free, then I believe Nintendo has the right to try to stop that activity. Believe it or not, that's hard thing for me to say. I like the ability to tinker and play around with stuff and I hate the general idea of not being allowed to do with paid content as I see fit. The truth is though, if "pirating" was easier to do, with no repercussion, then more people would do it. There is a ton of stuff out there that's free use, but people seem only want to consume the commercial / advertised crap, I included.
I guess it comes down to, what else can a manufacture, software maker, record company, or movie producer do to make money from copyrighted work, while satisfying "I want use as I please" crowd? Is it possible? Probably not...
if you refuse, which is your right, then we can detain you How exactly do you detain someone that does not want to be detained without using force? Lock the store down so no one can enter or exit?
Do you feel they same about James Carvel? The Republicans know he's the real Dr. Evil (Even has a matching bald head). I personally think Rove and Carvel is the same person and every eight years or so, he changes his mask.
Almost everyone agrees that the controller for the WII is a leap forward in terms of interacting with a game. Why has a similar product from MSFT or Sony not been released? Figure it would have been done by now. Are there patent issues?
~Matthew
I always wondered what the "g" stood for in 802.11g... Of course it's what God uses. Man I feel stupid... Now if I could only figure out the whole "N" thing.
Just to throw my 2 cents in as far as "the big hole."
I know I am a rather simpleton, but my life is not that complicated that I need my email client to connect to a calender program.
However I still do not use Thunderbird, for what some may perceive as a trivial reason, but the "only" reason why I haven't taken the plunge. When replying to messages Thunderbird winds up throwing in greater than signs ">" for every line. After 4 or 5 messages back in forth it looks like ">>>>>>>>>>Buy >>>>>>>>>>>Component >>>>>>>>>>>at $3.00 >>>>>>>>>>>Stock" I know the emails gods have created the standard that says you should reply under a message and you must clearly differentiate between messages and reply's with ">", in front of each line, but no one does that in my business. We all reply on top of the previous message and there are no ">" to be found. The messages are seperated with -----Original Message----- From: BeerCur Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 1:21 PM To: Microsemi butt munch Subject: Re: PO X4324 / 10pcs JANS2N6849
It is clear and industry standard. At least you can duplicate the header with extension in TB, but is there a way to eliminate the ">" in Thunderbird... nope, nada, nay... at least I haven't been able to find it. OE, it is in the options.
So we have these vulnerabilities with Outlook Express, Internet Explorer, and other parts of the OS. I'm sure there are a bunch of people... ummm me... that are still using the now unsupported OS's of 98 and ME...
Can Zone Alarm, router firewall, along with Ad-Aware, keep things more or less safe for ME, or is it really time to upgrade?
Though I agree with the underlining logic, it got me to thinking, is a socialism capitalist the same as compassionate conservative? And more to the point of your argument, there are no real capitalist societies in existence, just there are no societies that are absent of some form of capitalism.
At the end of the day we cannot implement theories and pie in the sky ideals; therefore being critical of people that point out the real life consequences is wasted energy except for the scholarly aspect of what is, "is".
They had to find it by a slightly tortured reading of the fourth amendment
I always thought it came more from the reading of the 9th amendment.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The framers realized that progress would transform the society we lived in. This amendment was a reminder to the judicial branch that the basic premise and intention of the Bill of Rights was to limit government's power to infringe on our freedom. The spirit of Bill of Rights therefore should be considered when deciding new constitutional "law" in this every changing world.
If you actually know at least _one_ historical example, _then_ I'll be willing to take your point.
I am reminded of Italy in Northern African / Greece during W.W.II. They had almost every conceivable advantage... However due to poor tactics, and ineptitude they basically got smoked and Germany had to "rescue" their sorry butts... at least for a while.
Re:Click here to download plugin
on
The Onion in 2056
·
· Score: 2, Informative
How about this approach to marketing. You can take photographs of people and use it commercially, without compensating them. The logic... If they didn't want to get their picture taken for commercial use, they would have "bought" the device that would have blurred their image... seems almost Microsoft-evil like.
So now that Twin Prime is Proffered... is it now time put down the chalk and watch some football?
I love
Football on TV
Shots of Gena Lee
Playing with my friends
And Twins
I love
Burritos at 4 am
Parties that never end
Dogs that love cats
And Twins
And I love you too
(Here's to Love Songs!)
I just downloaded Microsoft's /dev/null decoder, and it's 8 gigs...
Another way... Flashblock http://flashblock.mozdev.org/
Also I use MVP Hosts to take care of the "bad" (like Double Click) IP's out there. http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm
These two simple things alone, make browsing faster and safer.
The English department at Harvard has contacted the DOJ and urged civil prosecution against you for that run on sentence.
In their summary affidavit, they referenced the great harm to any child that read your comment, and now thinks it is okay to have 95 words in a row without a period or semicolon. In addition starting a paragraph with "So" is just bad sport.
Just when you thought it couldn't get worse, it gets worse.
Modded insightful? I thought he was making a joke.
If he wants to take a sledgehammer to his WII than I'm sure he's allowed. However breaking into the OS and cracking software with, lets be honest, the general purpose of playing commercial games for free, then I believe Nintendo has the right to try to stop that activity. Believe it or not, that's hard thing for me to say. I like the ability to tinker and play around with stuff and I hate the general idea of not being allowed to do with paid content as I see fit. The truth is though, if "pirating" was easier to do, with no repercussion, then more people would do it. There is a ton of stuff out there that's free use, but people seem only want to consume the commercial / advertised crap, I included.
I guess it comes down to, what else can a manufacture, software maker, record company, or movie producer do to make money from copyrighted work, while satisfying "I want use as I please" crowd? Is it possible? Probably not...
Never Mind the Bollocks , move along
Do you feel they same about James Carvel? The Republicans know he's the real Dr. Evil (Even has a matching bald head). I personally think Rove and Carvel is the same person and every eight years or so, he changes his mask.
One man's hero is another man's terrorist.
~Matthew
Need
A
Mirror
Of
The
Article
PACAOS leads to NAMOTA.
Almost everyone agrees that the controller for the WII is a leap forward in terms of interacting with a game. Why has a similar product from MSFT or Sony not been released? Figure it would have been done by now. Are there patent issues? ~Matthew
I always wondered what the "g" stood for in 802.11g... Of course it's what God uses. Man I feel stupid... Now if I could only figure out the whole "N" thing.
Just to throw my 2 cents in as far as "the big hole."
I know I am a rather simpleton, but my life is not that complicated that I need my email client to connect to a calender program.
However I still do not use Thunderbird, for what some may perceive as a trivial reason, but the "only" reason why I haven't taken the plunge. When replying to messages Thunderbird winds up throwing in greater than signs ">" for every line. After 4 or 5 messages back in forth it looks like
">>>>>>>>>>Buy
>>>>>>>>>>>Component
>>>>>>>>>>>at $3.00
>>>>>>>>>>>Stock"
I know the emails gods have created the standard that says you should reply under a message and you must clearly differentiate between messages and reply's with ">", in front of each line, but no one does that in my business. We all reply on top of the previous message and there are no ">" to be found. The messages are seperated with
-----Original Message-----
From: BeerCur
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 1:21 PM
To: Microsemi butt munch
Subject: Re: PO X4324 / 10pcs JANS2N6849
It is clear and industry standard. At least you can duplicate the header with extension in TB, but is there a way to eliminate the ">" in Thunderbird... nope, nada, nay... at least I haven't been able to find it. OE, it is in the options.
Star Trek... I hear Gordie wants the eyedea all to himself.
Thanks, for the information / advice.
So we have these vulnerabilities with Outlook Express, Internet Explorer, and other parts of the OS. I'm sure there are a bunch of people... ummm me... that are still using the now unsupported OS's of 98 and ME...
Can Zone Alarm, router firewall, along with Ad-Aware, keep things more or less safe for ME, or is it really time to upgrade?
Though I agree with the underlining logic, it got me to thinking, is a socialism capitalist the same as compassionate conservative? And more to the point of your argument, there are no real capitalist societies in existence, just there are no societies that are absent of some form of capitalism. At the end of the day we cannot implement theories and pie in the sky ideals; therefore being critical of people that point out the real life consequences is wasted energy except for the scholarly aspect of what is, "is".
Does this mean "ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ" is a recognized command?
I always thought it came more from the reading of the 9th amendment.
The framers realized that progress would transform the society we lived in. This amendment was a reminder to the judicial branch that the basic premise and intention of the Bill of Rights was to limit government's power to infringe on our freedom. The spirit of Bill of Rights therefore should be considered when deciding new constitutional "law" in this every changing world.
If you actually know at least _one_ historical example, _then_ I'll be willing to take your point.
I am reminded of Italy in Northern African / Greece during W.W.II. They had almost every conceivable advantage... However due to poor tactics, and ineptitude they basically got smoked and Germany had to "rescue" their sorry butts... at least for a while.
It's called flashblock
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/
Very handy program for Firefox
~Matthew
How about this approach to marketing. You can take photographs of people and use it commercially, without compensating them. The logic... If they didn't want to get their picture taken for commercial use, they would have "bought" the device that would have blurred their image... seems almost Microsoft-evil like.
So now that Twin Prime is Proffered... is it now time put down the chalk and watch some football? I love Football on TV Shots of Gena Lee Playing with my friends And Twins I love Burritos at 4 am Parties that never end Dogs that love cats And Twins And I love you too (Here's to Love Songs!)