Why is that a dream come true for an enterprise IT manager? You *want* employees to be on facebook? Or are you saying that crazy behavior on the windows platform ensures your job security?
Well, If you are a Christian ( and there are some wackos out there that believe this) that does believe that every thing in the Bible is a binding commandment that they must follow, then yes. These aren't what you would call fundamentalists, but a crazy group of people that follow a good deal of the kosher laws as well as the Christian ones.
If you are not a Christian at all, then you can't really say what it means because you don't beleive any of it anyway. Or at lease you sound very odd telling people who do believe that they should believe something else, but you yourself don't beleive that. Like a mortally obese guy trying to get some thin people to switch gyms.
The problem with moto, is that its been joined at the hip with version for most of Android's existence. So while the razor maxx is nice, the Atrix HD on att sucks eggs in comparison with the maxx's battery life. The Atrix I was great, Atrix II was a minor update and not a top rate phone. They need to take a hint from Samsung and actually release the same phone on all carriers at the same time. Make them fast, give them good screens, and make them hackable. Its not that hard.
FYI, the bible is a collection of books by various authors which most Christians belive to be a document of salvation history, so the evolution of who God is and what his plan for Humanity changes a bit as he revels more of himself until the comming of Christ who fufils and perfects all that came before.
What you are doing is like looking at a history of science book and calling science hyprocritically wrong because Issac Newton's theories are incompatible with Quantum Mechanics.
Validating the morality of future actions based on the morality of current ones does not always lead to good choices. And therefore, shouldn't be used as a valid argument for a particular corse of action.
Per example:
I've already killed 5/6 witnesses to my jay-walking, so I should probably kill the sixth. We already prohibit gays from marriage in this state. Shouldn't we also prevent them from living together?
Did you really just reference Moto RoKR? That's like a cursed/banned word over at Motorola. That phone more than any other is the device that inspired the iphone. Steve Jobs was so pissed off at Motorola's implimentation of a music phone that connected to itunes, that he put the ipad on ice and launched the iphone project.
I think you are talking about their kernels. Which were both fairly flexible robust kernels ( linux and Mach) that have always been high performers. Those really are strengths of IOS and Android.
It can really work both ways, looking at historical versions of operating systems. Symbian was really EPOC 32 which was was run on this thing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psion_5. If that doesn't really look like a modern device capable of multimedia and high performance, well that's because it isn't. IN many ways upscaling an operating system designed for minimal specs is more difficult as devices tend to increase their cpu, graphics, sound, memory, and battery capability, rather than the other way around. Palm tried to do the same thing and bascially failed with their OS 5. Black berry pretty much failed to update its system and essentially restarted with QNX as a base. Nokia pretty much looked at symbian and saw the same thing: its not capable of competing with what users are expecting from modern portable devices.
Software is almost always designed for hardware. Linux is pretty good at getting things that were never designed for it to run. In fact it has a vast repository of drivers for various peices and bits of hardware. The PC is nice in that it has a standard that everyone adheres to and so the surprises are at a minimum. The particular challange is usually based around graphics cards and new technologies things like... thunderbolt. Most of thunderbolt actually works which is kind of surprising. As time goes on you'll see linux catch up and perhaps supass mac osx on the hardware as the individual components inside get adopted by the wider pc industry.
Mod up X1000. The Oatmeal's response to Forbes was a pretty sad juvenile response. Tesla the man deserves better than to be deified. Science deserves better than to have Tesla deified.
Gcc still blows the crap out of LLVM in several benchmarks. LLVM is great for many things as well. GCC needed competition to make sure it didn't get stagnent. Some of us still remeber the egcs period of time. Unless corperate entities were modifying the sources of GCC, I'm not sure why it matters.
In terms of resource usage, that would be a good thing. I remeber reading articles around 98 bemoaning the death of software development. As cpus edged towards the 1 ghz mark, they noted how office 97 worked just as well on a 500 mhz computer as the 950 mhz. What on earth more could you do to an office suite that would require more cpu?
In my experience, calligra's predicessor koffice was always the most lightwieght office suite. If it actually did formating a little better, I would absolutely switch from libreoffice.
Its not a secret what democrats object to. You sit down and talk about give and take to achieve common goals. Your comment is childish and unfit for serious debate, I just wish you weren't aping elected officials. Sadly, I don't live in a world of reasonable elected officials.
What? I don't understand what you're trying to say. Using terms like "liberal" or "conservative" makes me think that you are trying to score political points instead of dealing with a serious issue. We spend more money than we take in. So it makes sense to increase the amount of money we take in, and reduce the amount of money we spend. Is that not, just plain logic?
That is another good point. You can't tell us how serious the deficit is, and then include tax cuts. That makes me awefully sucspicious of the motivation.
As an Independent voter, I like the fact that he actually has concrete ideas that we can discuss and debate, however it all seems to be moot when you consider that he and the fellow house republicans were unwilling to even begin to compromise to achieve an actual solution. Promoting him, is like promoting gnu hurd. Yeah, its different and maybe theoretically better, but no, its not really ever going to effect anything. Great artists ship.
Yeah, unless you're able to actually devote time to fixing issues within the code its too risky to actually do accounting yourself. I do it myself, but that's do to the specific requirements I have that most people do not have.
I hate Microsoft and all closed environments like Apples, but I think the primary problem with allowing GPL apps specificly is the ambiguity as to who is the distributor that is responsible for providing source code upon request. Is it the app store, or the developer? I think, therefore, that there should be an additional provision inserted into a GPL license that would clarify that for the purposes of an app store distributed app, the author is responsible for providing source code, and any keys used to distribute the app are allowed to remain private.
Have you considred that different people have different ways to define a "superior" method? For my parents, the ease of itunes trumps anything else. For me, I prefer to buy and rip my discs.
I disagree with everything in the article. His definitions, the entire premise, his dislike for green eggs and ham as a culinary masterpiece. He's not even wrong.
Slashdot Mirror
Why is that a dream come true for an enterprise IT manager? You *want* employees to be on facebook? Or are you saying that crazy behavior on the windows platform ensures your job security?
Well, If you are a Christian ( and there are some wackos out there that believe this) that does believe that every thing in the Bible is a binding commandment that they must follow, then yes. These aren't what you would call fundamentalists, but a crazy group of people that follow a good deal of the kosher laws as well as the Christian ones.
If you are not a Christian at all, then you can't really say what it means because you don't beleive any of it anyway. Or at lease you sound very odd telling people who do believe that they should believe something else, but you yourself don't beleive that. Like a mortally obese guy trying to get some thin people to switch gyms.
The problem with moto, is that its been joined at the hip with version for most of Android's existence. So while the razor maxx is nice, the Atrix HD on att sucks eggs in comparison with the maxx's battery life. The Atrix I was great, Atrix II was a minor update and not a top rate phone. They need to take a hint from Samsung and actually release the same phone on all carriers at the same time. Make them fast, give them good screens, and make them hackable. Its not that hard.
FYI, the bible is a collection of books by various authors which most Christians belive to be a document of salvation history, so the evolution of who God is and what his plan for Humanity changes a bit as he revels more of himself until the comming of Christ who fufils and perfects all that came before.
What you are doing is like looking at a history of science book and calling science hyprocritically wrong because Issac Newton's theories are incompatible with Quantum Mechanics.
Validating the morality of future actions based on the morality of current ones does not always lead to good choices. And therefore, shouldn't be used as a valid argument for a particular corse of action.
Per example:
I've already killed 5/6 witnesses to my jay-walking, so I should probably kill the sixth.
We already prohibit gays from marriage in this state. Shouldn't we also prevent them from living together?
Did you really just reference Moto RoKR? That's like a cursed/banned word over at Motorola. That phone more than any other is the device that inspired the iphone. Steve Jobs was so pissed off at Motorola's implimentation of a music phone that connected to itunes, that he put the ipad on ice and launched the iphone project.
I think you are talking about their kernels. Which were both fairly flexible robust kernels ( linux and Mach) that have always been high performers. Those really are strengths of IOS and Android.
It can really work both ways, looking at historical versions of operating systems. Symbian was really EPOC 32 which was was run on this thing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psion_5. If that doesn't really look like a modern device capable of multimedia and high performance, well that's because it isn't. IN many ways upscaling an operating system designed for minimal specs is more difficult as devices tend to increase their cpu, graphics, sound, memory, and battery capability, rather than the other way around. Palm tried to do the same thing and bascially failed with their OS 5. Black berry pretty much failed to update its system and essentially restarted with QNX as a base. Nokia pretty much looked at symbian and saw the same thing: its not capable of competing with what users are expecting from modern portable devices.
Software is almost always designed for hardware. Linux is pretty good at getting things that were never designed for it to run. In fact it has a vast repository of drivers for various peices and bits of hardware. The PC is nice in that it has a standard that everyone adheres to and so the surprises are at a minimum. The particular challange is usually based around graphics cards and new technologies things like ... thunderbolt. Most of thunderbolt actually works which is kind of surprising. As time goes on you'll see linux catch up and perhaps supass mac osx on the hardware as the individual components inside get adopted by the wider pc industry.
Its not up to me to figure out their buisness plan. If they die, they die.
Mod up X1000. The Oatmeal's response to Forbes was a pretty sad juvenile response. Tesla the man deserves better than to be deified. Science deserves better than to have Tesla deified.
Trying separate the shtick from the man is a fools errand.
Gcc still blows the crap out of LLVM in several benchmarks. LLVM is great for many things as well. GCC needed competition to make sure it didn't get stagnent. Some of us still remeber the egcs period of time. Unless corperate entities were modifying the sources of GCC, I'm not sure why it matters.
In terms of resource usage, that would be a good thing. I remeber reading articles around 98 bemoaning the death of software development. As cpus edged towards the 1 ghz mark, they noted how office 97 worked just as well on a 500 mhz computer as the 950 mhz. What on earth more could you do to an office suite that would require more cpu?
In my experience, calligra's predicessor koffice was always the most lightwieght office suite. If it actually did formating a little better, I would absolutely switch from libreoffice.
Its not a secret what democrats object to. You sit down and talk about give and take to achieve common goals. Your comment is childish and unfit for serious debate, I just wish you weren't aping elected officials. Sadly, I don't live in a world of reasonable elected officials.
What? I don't understand what you're trying to say. Using terms like "liberal" or "conservative" makes me think that you are trying to score political points instead of dealing with a serious issue. We spend more money than we take in. So it makes sense to increase the amount of money we take in, and reduce the amount of money we spend. Is that not, just plain logic?
That is another good point. You can't tell us how serious the deficit is, and then include tax cuts. That makes me awefully sucspicious of the motivation.
As an Independent voter, I like the fact that he actually has concrete ideas that we can discuss and debate, however it all seems to be moot when you consider that he and the fellow house republicans were unwilling to even begin to compromise to achieve an actual solution. Promoting him, is like promoting gnu hurd. Yeah, its different and maybe theoretically better, but no, its not really ever going to effect anything. Great artists ship.
Well, we can't all drive 93 escort wagons. Some of us have to drive the Chevy Caprice classics.
Yeah, unless you're able to actually devote time to fixing issues within the code its too risky to actually do accounting yourself. I do it myself, but that's do to the specific requirements I have that most people do not have.
I hate Microsoft and all closed environments like Apples, but I think the primary problem with allowing GPL apps specificly is the ambiguity as to who is the distributor that is responsible for providing source code upon request. Is it the app store, or the developer? I think, therefore, that there should be an additional provision inserted into a GPL license that would clarify that for the purposes of an app store distributed app, the author is responsible for providing source code, and any keys used to distribute the app are allowed to remain private.
Who the hell would run windows 8 on a server in the first place?
Well, No, yes and maybe. FAQ is useful. http://wayland.freedesktop.org/faq.html#heading_toc_j_8
Have you considred that different people have different ways to define a "superior" method? For my parents, the ease of itunes trumps anything else. For me, I prefer to buy and rip my discs.
I disagree with everything in the article. His definitions, the entire premise, his dislike for green eggs and ham as a culinary masterpiece. He's not even wrong.
Anyone that changes his name to Dotcom, has already committed a crime against good taste. He should be sentenced to 10-20 years in a Filipino prison.