Its spec says up to 18,000,000 (18 million units) can be added per year. This means the value of ETH can dilute itself by a factor of 18 million every 12 months.
No. It means that by the end of the year it can dilute by a factor of 1 + ( 18e6 / X ), where X is how many there were at the start of the year.
18 million in yr 1, add another 18M = 36M - factor of 2. Ding dong, Auld Lang Syne, add another 18M, 54M - factor of 1.333' and so on.
Imagine four people are sitting in a bar talking about something. Something that they know about. There's a band playing. Someone sitting two tables away gets absolutely ratfaced and in the morning writes down what they think they overheard and posts it on teh interwebs.
I haven't yet found a symmetrical trackball that's as good as my old racist-against-caggies MS one. It's almost as if you can't be all things to all folks.
This incessant dogwhistling about censorship just cheapens the term and distracts from actual censorship.
When the town has one newspaper and it won't print your article there's absolutely zero practical difference between that and teheeberlgubmint banning your article. In both cases, it doesn't get read.
And yet from a constitutional POV one is censorship and the other isn't.
Of course what really matters is the content. If it's stuff you agree with being impeded it's censorship. If it's stuff you don't like it's editorial choice and "their sit, their rules".
The trick is that the people you met are going away from St Ives, is it not?
You could argue that overtaking and passing are also meeting. You could equally argue that there are specific words for those, and if that's what the protagonist means he should have used them.
Slashdot Mirror
No. It means that by the end of the year it can dilute by a factor of 1 + ( 18e6 / X ), where X is how many there were at the start of the year.
18 million in yr 1, add another 18M = 36M - factor of 2. Ding dong, Auld Lang Syne, add another 18M, 54M - factor of 1.333' and so on.
6) Lennart Poettering
I wonder how many users of high end gaming rigs use them for other stuff, like actual work, and how many use another OS for that?
I'm sure it's not 100%, but it's more than 0.
Imagine.
Imagine four people are sitting in a bar talking about something. Something that they know about. There's a band playing. Someone sitting two tables away gets absolutely ratfaced and in the morning writes down what they think they overheard and posts it on teh interwebs.
That last sentence was certainly creative.
Their's allot off it a bout.
I haven't yet found a symmetrical trackball that's as good as my old racist-against-caggies MS one. It's almost as if you can't be all things to all folks.
Yeah, but he was talking about Greece.
When the town has one newspaper and it won't print your article there's absolutely zero practical difference between that and teheeberlgubmint banning your article. In both cases, it doesn't get read.
And yet from a constitutional POV one is censorship and the other isn't.
Of course what really matters is the content. If it's stuff you agree with being impeded it's censorship. If it's stuff you don't like it's editorial choice and "their sit, their rules".
I'm an echidna, you insensitive clod!
TFYF.
In other words, you write it more like code.
The problem with natural languages is that both operator precedence and conditional scope are ill-defined.
It's true, I've worked with a few and they write comments in code like:
# Check, that the File is open
Having said that it isn't just them. plenty of native speakers write "That man, is the captain" and such crap.
I hope and pray that someone isn't Lennart Poettering.
[citation needed]
What are his views on systemd and Creimer?
oy vey, a frosty psit already!
That's just awful!
It should be the creators.
The internal name of systemd was "project shitbrain".
It doesn't seem that infeasible to me. Are you assuming that the entire budget of the accounts department goes on SOX compliance?
If they cause those things, shouldn't they be called design unethicists?
If they're supposed to prevent them then they aren't doing a very good job.
It has zero reason to even be a thing, let alone a thing people get paid for.
There are these things. Bags, I think that's the name.
Aseembled? We don't need to steenkin' aseemble!
The trick is that the people you met are going away from St Ives, is it not?
You could argue that overtaking and passing are also meeting. You could equally argue that there are specific words for those, and if that's what the protagonist means he should have used them.
A fucking what? Is that what people do when they fail the exam to be UX facilitator?