Sorry, I wasn't trying to throw up my hands in defeat. I am simply stating that I do not know what the process is for this type of thing here and asking for people who have greater understanding enlighten me.
I've always understood that if an unconstitional law is passed, the supreme court would be the check/balance on enforcement of that law.
However, when the supreme court does something unconstitutional, I don't know/don't remember what the check is in place of that. It's been a long time since high school.
What's the difference? Oh, the big difference would be that they are taking your SHELTER. I forget what that list of absolute needs pyramid they teach in Economics class, but it's something like:
FOOD SHELTER something something
Where food is your absolute most motivating factor, if you don't have any.
Coming in second is your place for you and your family (if you have one) to live. Somebody takes your place to live, then you and your family are directly out in the elements. You as the official protector of your family is biologically/instinctively/logically tasked to do whatever it takes to make sure this does not happen. If you puss out to someone trying to swindle you out of your house with some bullshit legal manuevering, then what are you worth? You can be all the pussy you want, as long as it doesn't affect me. In this case, your pusilanimousness is affecting me.
And as a side-note, I am not a gun nut. I do not, and have not, ever owned a gun. I've shot them a few times, but less than 200 rounds my whole life, most of them wimpy.22 bullets. Never thought I'd really need one, but if people are going to start threatening to take my shelter, maybe I should reconsider?
Basically the courts decision said we are now a communist country. Think about that one for a while.
Have you no values, or are you just a sheep/clone/slave?
What would push you over the edge? Looks like you are a money worshipper, what would you do in the theoretical case that a weird law came along and said your money no longer belongs to you? (And we're not talking higher taxes, or some kind of partial thing like that. Or sued because you did something 'wrong'.) Your money gone, completely, for no good reason except some rich fucker decided he'd be better off with it.
Please explain what you mean by "How it plays out." - With the Supreme Court ruling on it, it's a done issue, isn't it? Can something else can be done?
Absolutely terrifies me. I live in an area where they'd like to put casinos, if that happens, my house is gone in a flash.
I think it's become too late to continue trying to work within the system. Threatening people with no place for their kids to sleep just because some fuckead property developer wants to build another big box is completely against everything I thought America was about.
For a new highway, I can understand it, wouldn't like it, but would understand. But to force someone out of their house to make room for another fucking Walmart is really really wrong.
Same here. WTF are we coming to? Guess it's time to use the 2nd Amendment Citizen Veto - Some rich fucker kicks me out of my house, there's going to be blood spilled. Sorry, my get-along limits stop there.
I'm running out of any will to even try anymore. I cannot even be sure I will have a home tomorrow?
And I suppose if they do, they probably don't even have to give you fair market value, just some predetermined amount that probably favors the rich fucker that wants to put his yuppie shit where my kids bedroom used to be? How's that work?
Absolutely! I would join up in a heartbeat if it were a war on our own soil, or something honorably directly threatening. I would give my life for my country if I knew my death would have a direct effect.
However, I have no interest in risking even my little toe for these current punk-ass "world police" bullshit sand/oil wars.
Oh yes, they merged lately. There was a big press release. Unfortunately after the initial excitement wore off, the stock price has seen a steady decline as investors are too dumb to invest in long term results.
You really missed my point there. I don't think my family SHOULD be killed by Bush's mistakes. But I do find it a greater possibility the way Bush is pissing off the rest of the world by arrogantly fucking with everyone out there.
No, the goverment typically does not base their decisions on what the population thinks. However, our government seems really out of control right now, and I think it's up to people to start using their voting power to pull them back in line before it gets even worse.
Um, the US is supposed to be a democratic republic, so yes, our stile over government was designed to be ordered/dictated by the population. Sure, most pussies are out whining but not voting, so we're getting a shitty deal.
No idea where you get off thinking that I don't think one innocent person ever died in a war. (I'm sitting here trying to figure that one out. Doesn't make any sense where you got that I thought that...)
As anti-war as I am, that still rings with me as "Hey, they had it coming...". They attacked us, sneaky-style even, in Pearl Harbor.
No Bush-like bullshit like we get today about "Well, a bunch of Saudi's attacked us, led by an ex-Saudi in Afghanistan, so let's go attack Iraq based on several lines of bullshit."
No, instead it was 'respectable', no shady bullshit, no pack of lies, instead the straight-out truth - They just fucked with us and killed a bunch of us for no good reason (We weren't in the war at the time, and weren't playing 'Empire' back then either, all this global police force bullshit we pull all over the place these days.) So we did normal, justifiable, CavemanLogic(TM) and hit them right back. And instead of the Cavemen with the sticks and stones that they expected, we instead brought out the attack mammoths that they didn't know we had.
Straight out "we love you too!" warfare, non of the sneaky shit we pull today. So dropping the bombs was a good thing, sorry to the civilians who got taken out, but a population has the responsibility to keep it's government under control, and they failed at that, as we are failing today. A lesson we need to learn.
Also, while going to the theoretical - how many small skirmishs would have taken place from other places if someone didn't just finish it with the big +4 magic Vorpal bomb? After that, people chilled out a bit. Still minor wars, but no world wars for nearly 55 years.
We'll see what we're getting into now. We are fucking with everyone, China's starting to fuck with us. It's going to get really nasty soon, regardless of all the propaganda we're being shovelled. Trying the "Defeat them with Capitalism" trick (that worked with the USSR) a second time doesn't seem to be working so well this time. US v China will be WWIII, and the stage is getting set around us now. Watch what's going on behind the scenes, and ignore the current lies you are being fed by the big media.
Allow me to explain the purpose of the organization of Federalist Rupublic over a true Democracy: In a true Democracy, the people are the leaders. This means that their collective will is *always* carried out, even if that will is counter-productive to the existence of the civilization. A common example of this is when a Democracy bankrupts itself by voting the treasury into its own pockets.
Ah yes, and a Federalist Republic instead bankrupts itself by voting the treasury only into the pockets of the rich via massive tax breaks. That's a lot better.
Dunno about why he's using 8090 itself, but 8080 and 8081 are IANA-designated as alternate ports for HTTP traffic, so it's pretty close. 8090 is officially "undefined" by IANA, meaning use it for whatever you'd like. He's OK, you just need to learn how to do real security stuff rather than being one of those lame "I am SOOOO GOOOD" security dorks that are of the 'script-kiddie' variety, aka worthless. (Oooh, I just got a new email from BugTraq and I'm going to throw a pointless fit so I can feel important, to cover for my feelings of worthlessness at being nothing but a clueless copy&paste security guy. No better than the unarmed rent-a-cop at Walmart saying "can I inspect your package?")
You fucking bullshit firewall monkeys that go by IANA-only NEVER take the HTTP-alt ports into account. There's a lot of stuff out there on the HTTP-alt that isn't handled by your sheep-minded 80/443 (aka corp-hosted) only.
Firewalls should block INBOUND traffic from anything but known ports, but if you're gonna get all "I am MR SECURITY DWEEB" about it, then you should be using stateful inspection for outbound anyway, and traffic to 8080 and 8081 should be inspected, but allowed. Oh yah, and wash your hair this week, it's really stinking.
Sure they do, if "you" is a non-living fictional lifeform known as a "corporation".
I forget which Cola company, either Coke or Pepsi (Probably both), after years of saying their diet cola had (truthfully) One calorie, they realized that the yearly fine for lying about calories is only $500,000/year, and they'd be able to make more money than that by lying and saying that the diet soda had ZERO calories. So for the last decade or so, the company has 'dutifully' paid it's yearly half-million fine to be able to say that they have No Calories.
So, yes, they will let you get away with it, as long as you are a fictional character.
Slashdot Mirror
Sorry, I wasn't trying to throw up my hands in defeat. I am simply stating that I do not know what the process is for this type of thing here and asking for people who have greater understanding enlighten me.
I've always understood that if an unconstitional law is passed, the supreme court would be the check/balance on enforcement of that law.
However, when the supreme court does something unconstitutional, I don't know/don't remember what the check is in place of that. It's been a long time since high school.
What's the difference? Oh, the big difference would be that they are taking your SHELTER. I forget what that list of absolute needs pyramid they teach in Economics class, but it's something like:
.22 bullets. Never thought I'd really need one, but if people are going to start threatening to take my shelter, maybe I should reconsider?
FOOD
SHELTER
something
something
Where food is your absolute most motivating factor, if you don't have any.
Coming in second is your place for you and your family (if you have one) to live. Somebody takes your place to live, then you and your family are directly out in the elements. You as the official protector of your family is biologically/instinctively/logically tasked to do whatever it takes to make sure this does not happen. If you puss out to someone trying to swindle you out of your house with some bullshit legal manuevering, then what are you worth? You can be all the pussy you want, as long as it doesn't affect me. In this case, your pusilanimousness is affecting me.
And as a side-note, I am not a gun nut. I do not, and have not, ever owned a gun. I've shot them a few times, but less than 200 rounds my whole life, most of them wimpy
Basically the courts decision said we are now a communist country. Think about that one for a while.
Have you no values, or are you just a sheep/clone/slave?
What would push you over the edge? Looks like you are a money worshipper, what would you do in the theoretical case that a weird law came along and said your money no longer belongs to you? (And we're not talking higher taxes, or some kind of partial thing like that. Or sued because you did something 'wrong'.) Your money gone, completely, for no good reason except some rich fucker decided he'd be better off with it.
What would you do then, bright boy?
Please explain what you mean by "How it plays out." - With the Supreme Court ruling on it, it's a done issue, isn't it? Can something else can be done?
Absolutely terrifies me. I live in an area where they'd like to put casinos, if that happens, my house is gone in a flash.
I think it's become too late to continue trying to work within the system. Threatening people with no place for their kids to sleep just because some fuckead property developer wants to build another big box is completely against everything I thought America was about.
For a new highway, I can understand it, wouldn't like it, but would understand. But to force someone out of their house to make room for another fucking Walmart is really really wrong.
Same here. WTF are we coming to? Guess it's time to use the 2nd Amendment Citizen Veto - Some rich fucker kicks me out of my house, there's going to be blood spilled. Sorry, my get-along limits stop there.
Absolute fucking bullshit.
I'm running out of any will to even try anymore. I cannot even be sure I will have a home tomorrow?
And I suppose if they do, they probably don't even have to give you fair market value, just some predetermined amount that probably favors the rich fucker that wants to put his yuppie shit where my kids bedroom used to be? How's that work?
Absolutely! I would join up in a heartbeat if it were a war on our own soil, or something honorably directly threatening. I would give my life for my country if I knew my death would have a direct effect.
However, I have no interest in risking even my little toe for these current punk-ass "world police" bullshit sand/oil wars.
Isn't that 'anthropomorphizing'?
transitive senses : to attribute human form or personality to
intransitive senses : to attribute human form or personality to things not human
Oh yes, they merged lately. There was a big press release. Unfortunately after the initial excitement wore off, the stock price has seen a steady decline as investors are too dumb to invest in long term results.
Um, did you just hear that Wooshing sound?
You really missed my point there. I don't think my family SHOULD be killed by Bush's mistakes. But I do find it a greater possibility the way Bush is pissing off the rest of the world by arrogantly fucking with everyone out there.
No, the goverment typically does not base their decisions on what the population thinks. However, our government seems really out of control right now, and I think it's up to people to start using their voting power to pull them back in line before it gets even worse.
Um, the US is supposed to be a democratic republic, so yes, our stile over government was designed to be ordered/dictated by the population. Sure, most pussies are out whining but not voting, so we're getting a shitty deal.
No idea where you get off thinking that I don't think one innocent person ever died in a war. (I'm sitting here trying to figure that one out. Doesn't make any sense where you got that I thought that...)
Is that some programming language I've never heard of?
Or is it some new version of 9-Lives cat food that turns cats into hackers?
Or do you mean "DashDash DashDashDash DotDashDot DotDotDot Dot DashDotDashDot DashDashDash DashDotDot Dot DashDashDotDotDashDash DashDotDashDash DashDashDash DotDotDash DotDot DashDotDot DotDot DashDashDash Dash DashDashDotDotDashDash DashDot DashDashDash Dash DashDash DashDashDash DotDashDot DotDashDot DotDot DotDotDot DashDotDashDot DashDashDash DashDotDot Dot DotDashDotDashDotDash" (Secret message inside - convert 'Dash' to '-' and 'Dot' to '.', enjoy)
As anti-war as I am, that still rings with me as "Hey, they had it coming...". They attacked us, sneaky-style even, in Pearl Harbor.
No Bush-like bullshit like we get today about "Well, a bunch of Saudi's attacked us, led by an ex-Saudi in Afghanistan, so let's go attack Iraq based on several lines of bullshit."
No, instead it was 'respectable', no shady bullshit, no pack of lies, instead the straight-out truth - They just fucked with us and killed a bunch of us for no good reason (We weren't in the war at the time, and weren't playing 'Empire' back then either, all this global police force bullshit we pull all over the place these days.) So we did normal, justifiable, CavemanLogic(TM) and hit them right back. And instead of the Cavemen with the sticks and stones that they expected, we instead brought out the attack mammoths that they didn't know we had.
Straight out "we love you too!" warfare, non of the sneaky shit we pull today. So dropping the bombs was a good thing, sorry to the civilians who got taken out, but a population has the responsibility to keep it's government under control, and they failed at that, as we are failing today. A lesson we need to learn.
Also, while going to the theoretical - how many small skirmishs would have taken place from other places if someone didn't just finish it with the big +4 magic Vorpal bomb? After that, people chilled out a bit. Still minor wars, but no world wars for nearly 55 years.
We'll see what we're getting into now. We are fucking with everyone, China's starting to fuck with us. It's going to get really nasty soon, regardless of all the propaganda we're being shovelled. Trying the "Defeat them with Capitalism" trick (that worked with the USSR) a second time doesn't seem to be working so well this time. US v China will be WWIII, and the stage is getting set around us now. Watch what's going on behind the scenes, and ignore the current lies you are being fed by the big media.
Um, go to the used CD store and buy a copy, it's probably there. 2112 WAS released on CD.
I thought what you are calling the "nipple" was actually known as the ClitMouse. (??)
Anything like that in Firefox or IE? Tried it in Firefox (R-e-p-tab-tab-tab-tab) and it didn't seem to work.
The concept of a free market is absurd. Don't buy into the bullshit.
Allow me to explain the purpose of the organization of Federalist Rupublic over a true Democracy: In a true Democracy, the people are the leaders. This means that their collective will is *always* carried out, even if that will is counter-productive to the existence of the civilization. A common example of this is when a Democracy bankrupts itself by voting the treasury into its own pockets.
Ah yes, and a Federalist Republic instead bankrupts itself by voting the treasury only into the pockets of the rich via massive tax breaks. That's a lot better.
Come on Mr Sheep, tell us another one...
No, attempted impregnation of your hand in the airplane bathroom does NOT make you a member of the Mile High Club. Sorry...
Yah, waaa, it's all about you.
Go suck a turd.
I wouldn't pay for Solaris either. The words sucky, archaic, primitive, lame come to mind...
Dunno about why he's using 8090 itself, but 8080 and 8081 are IANA-designated as alternate ports for HTTP traffic, so it's pretty close. 8090 is officially "undefined" by IANA, meaning use it for whatever you'd like. He's OK, you just need to learn how to do real security stuff rather than being one of those lame "I am SOOOO GOOOD" security dorks that are of the 'script-kiddie' variety, aka worthless. (Oooh, I just got a new email from BugTraq and I'm going to throw a pointless fit so I can feel important, to cover for my feelings of worthlessness at being nothing but a clueless copy&paste security guy. No better than the unarmed rent-a-cop at Walmart saying "can I inspect your package?")
You fucking bullshit firewall monkeys that go by IANA-only NEVER take the HTTP-alt ports into account. There's a lot of stuff out there on the HTTP-alt that isn't handled by your sheep-minded 80/443 (aka corp-hosted) only.
Firewalls should block INBOUND traffic from anything but known ports, but if you're gonna get all "I am MR SECURITY DWEEB" about it, then you should be using stateful inspection for outbound anyway, and traffic to 8080 and 8081 should be inspected, but allowed. Oh yah, and wash your hair this week, it's really stinking.
See this for more info:
a dMessage.aspx?MsgNum=168
http://klomdark.servebeer.com:443/MessageBase2/Re
Sure they do, if "you" is a non-living fictional lifeform known as a "corporation".
I forget which Cola company, either Coke or Pepsi (Probably both), after years of saying their diet cola had (truthfully) One calorie, they realized that the yearly fine for lying about calories is only $500,000/year, and they'd be able to make more money than that by lying and saying that the diet soda had ZERO calories. So for the last decade or so, the company has 'dutifully' paid it's yearly half-million fine to be able to say that they have No Calories.
So, yes, they will let you get away with it, as long as you are a fictional character.
Why are there all these Sarb-ox postings mixed in as replies to the Google crime hack? Even browsing at -1 I don't see the trail.