Slashdot Mirror


Google Map Hack & Chicago Crime Data

joepez writes "In recent weeks we've seen some great Google Maps hacks (HousingMaps, Google's own Ride Finder, etc.), but this weekend Adrian has brought us something truly innovative. He's merged Google map data with Chicago crime data to present a once a day updated crime map of the entire city, including some really nice summarized data. Adrian calls the project Chicagocrime.org. How long till we have real time crime data showing up on Google's map? Pull open HousingMaps next to Chicagocrime.org and figure out if that low rent apartment is truly worth it. Or is this all a clever trick on Google's part to build up more and more third parties dependent upon Google?" There's also a cheap gas hack as well.

391 comments

  1. Slashdotted by /ASCII · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not a single comment, and the site is already crawling. I guess some people actually read the articles!

    --
    Try out fish, the friendly interactive shell.
    1. Re:Slashdotted by iocat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is neat, but not actually innovative. Most larger cities have realtime or near realtime updated maps that show local crimes, sortable in all sorts of neat ways. Oakland's is one that is pretty nice. Done with autocad I think.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    2. Re:Slashdotted by holovaty · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd been dreading the possibility that the site would get Slashdotted. Sorry 'bout the slowness, folks.

      Although almost every single page of the site is cached, it's still fundamentally performance-intensive because there's a ton of data and it's very "sticky" content that's addictive to browse. The bottleneck is now at the cache level. Unfortunately I can't do anything about it now, because I'm at work.

      Thanks for the attention.

    3. Re:Slashdotted by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Sorry, slashdot users aren't allowed. You've been too naughty."

      Too funny.

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    4. Re:Slashdotted by VivianC · · Score: 1

      Or it is anti-Slahdotted. All I get from the link is the following:

      Sorry, slashdot users aren't allowed. You've been too naughty.

      --
      Viv

      Gmail invites for ip
    5. Re:Slashdotted by rgfranks · · Score: 1

      LOL -- they are checking the referring URL. Just open a new tab and cut-n-paste the chicagocrimes URL and away you go!

    6. Re:Slashdotted by Baricom · · Score: 1

      Or, click on the address bar and hit Enter.

  2. Prostitution by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you select 'prostitution' you can check out the best areas to go to pick up a hooker. Not that this is of any use to me as I'm a) not single and b) not in the US.

    1. Re:Prostitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to be single to get a hooker? Don't tell my wife!

    2. Re:Prostitution by geoffspear · · Score: 5, Insightful

      or the best places to get arrested trying to pick up a hooker.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    3. Re:Prostitution by ProfaneBaby · · Score: 1

      You mean the worst areas ... Looking for hookers in high traffic areas? No thanks. Best case: lose your car when you get arrested. Worst case: AIDs, etc.

      --
      Video Phone Blogs send video messages straight to the web.
    4. Re:Prostitution by lildogie · · Score: 5, Funny

      > I'm a) not single and b) not in the US.

      Right. Foreign, married men _never_ use prostitutes.

    5. Re:Prostitution by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      I don't think the best area to pick up a hooker would be where there are the most prostitution crimes reported.

      --

      Question everything

    6. Re:Prostitution by turtled · · Score: 1

      Comment was Modded Informative, THAT'S FREAKING HALARIOUS!!! Man, if it were true, er, um, I mean... yes, that is interesting and informative...

      --
      "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
    7. Re:Prostitution by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Actually, you'ld find the best places to get arrested in a sting operation. More documented occurances of prostitution means more cops in the area looking to bust prostitutes and solicitors alike.

      =Smidge=

    8. Re:Prostitution by fungus · · Score: 1, Funny

      Does the map say where we can download Revenge of the Sith?

    9. Re:Prostitution by dextroz · · Score: 2

      ...waiting for someone to hack google cabs to show google cops. Now you when to "really" speed!

      --
      Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
    10. Re:Prostitution by fm6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, Johns tend to be non-local married men.

    11. Re:Prostitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't the places with the highest prostitution crime registred also be the most likely places to get caught, or give you an overview of the lowest class of street hooker?

      I would imagine you should stay away from these places if you want a decent hooker discreetly.

    12. Re:Prostitution by utexaspunk · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have to be single to get a hooker? Don't tell my wife!

      You mean you like that your wife goes to hookers? What, are you impotent?

    13. Re:Prostitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires all public companies to maintain records for three years. Six months is a problem. What happened to Morgan Stanley, however, is not simply that it failed to keep the records. Rather, it kept on saying that it could not find the files. There is a rather reasonable rule of evidence that says failure to produce evidence in your possession without a reasonable excuse for that failure (like there was a non-suspicious fire, or 9/11) can lead to the presumption that that evidence would have vindicated the position of the opposing party. For instance, pretend a supermarket has a security camera that I claim recorded the store clerk beating me. I want the tape to prove the unprovoked attack. If the store says it lost the tape and the judge believes that this was a pretext for destroying evidence, he may make a pre-trial ruling that the tape would show an unprovoked attack against me by the clerk.

    14. Re:Prostitution by Thaelon · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't want to know how you know that.

      --

      Question everything

    15. Re:Prostitution by pixel-fodder · · Score: 1

      ... or if you're a cop - the best place to score some easy arrests ...

    16. Re:Prostitution by chill · · Score: 1

      If you select 'prostitution' you can check out the best areas to go to pick up a hooker. Not that this is of any use to me as I'm a) not single and b) not in the US.

      And... combine this with an online rating system and rate sheet. Lots of potential here.

      I can also see the Google Ads for bail bonds and free clinics. :-)

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    17. Re:Prostitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You only have to archive the emails you receive. Email that is blocked (not put into a junk folder, outright rejected before it reaches the server) need not be archived. There are filters than can do this, one of which advertises on slashdot.

      Of course spam that gets through the filter needs to be archived, but conservative settings on the filter can still block about 3/4s of the SPAM I see with (essentially) no false positives.

    18. Re:Prostitution by sathia · · Score: 1

      can't wait for maps.google to scan italy ;)

      as

      a) i'm not married
      b) i'm not in the usa

      --
      one bug, one crash
    19. Re:Prostitution by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Actually, Johns tend to be non-local married men.

      I thought John tended to be a local name...

    20. Re:Prostitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      an online rating system and rate sheet
      It's been done
    21. Re:Prostitution by bogado · · Score: 1

      >Right. Foreign, married men _never_ use prostitutes.

      Well at least not in chicago. :-)

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    22. Re:Prostitution by keester · · Score: 1

      Awesome. And it has fetish potential. For instance, I searched for prostitution at the car wash. I'm like that.

      --
      Take it easy? I'll take it anyway I can get it . . .
    23. Re:Prostitution by worf_mo · · Score: 1

      Cut him some slack - his wife was looking over his shoulder.

    24. Re:Prostitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's what the men tell me while they're getting dressed..

    25. Re:Prostitution by triso · · Score: 1
      You mean you like that your wife goes to hookers? What, are you impotent?
      No, he's spending 60+ hours a week at work.
    26. Re:Prostitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reading slashdot.

  3. Why not both by millahtime · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Pull open HousingMaps next to Chicagocrime.org and figure out if that low rent apartment is truly worth it. Or is this all a clever trick on Google's part to build up more and more third parties dependent upon Google?

    Why can't it be both. And if there is a way to keep it free the better for me.

  4. Sex Offender's Registry by killproc · · Score: 5, Interesting


    A better implementation for this would be to link to each individual State's sex offender's registry. This data is readily provided and is in the public domain.

    --
    When you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness. So I got that goin' for me, which is nice.
    1. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Great. You want to punish someone forever from one mistake. Way to have a system of justice dude.

      Besides that, you probably don't want to know who really lives beside you.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    2. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by broller · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Better? Sex offender locations are better to know than general crime locations? Not when I'm deciding where to live it's not.

    3. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Gr33nNight · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A friend of mine is labeled a sex offender because when he was 18, his girlfriend was 17 (3 months apart). His girlfriends mother called the policyeabout it and he got arrested. Now he is considered a sex offender.

      Not all sex offenders are child molesters and kiddie rapists.

    4. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Great. You want to punish someone forever from one mistake."

      Depends on the mistake. Raping a 5-year-old? Yes. Or, at least never, ever, ever trust them around children again. No matter what.

    5. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Monoman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you saying he is listed as a sex offender becuase he got arrested? I would think he would have to be convicted.

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    6. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by killproc · · Score: 3, Informative


      Having knowledge as to the whereabouts of known sexual predators in your area is not "punishing" THEM.
      Being the father of two small children, I definitely am interested in the number of sexual predators in my area.
      Having perused my state's Offender's registry, I was surprised by the number of repeat offenders that are still loose on the streets.
      Knowing the areas that had a high concentration of rapists definitely played a part in my house hunting decisions.

      --
      When you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness. So I got that goin' for me, which is nice.
    7. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by dextroz · · Score: 1
      Yes, the system is designed for "you" to get over it and move along. He's paid his dues to society - we don't need another device to add to the already insane paranoia levels in the US and it's Govt who in reality have to deal with *nothing* compared to Europe/Asia.

      There is a reason why there's more boobies in Europe!

      --
      Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
    8. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah. then you can find all of those guys who turned 17 before their gf, and p.o.-ed her dad (CSC - statutory rape, in many states)... and the kids who participated in those "naked mile" events, after finals, durring college (again, CSC -- indecent exposure).
      sickos, every one.

    9. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      Good for you. If they are repeat offenders, call your local political figure and ask them why there are repeat offenders on your streets and what they are doing to either provide rehabilitation or remove them from potentially harming others. I think it's been proven that 'street justice' just doesn't work well.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    10. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Snoop+Donkey+Donk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Our local newspaper had a blurb about a guy who was having problems coaching his kid's soccer team because they did a background check and he came up as a sex offender - he had been arrested during his college days for mooning.

    11. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by rpresser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is that the sexual offender registry lists people who are NOT "known sexual predators". These people, who made a mistake -- for instance, a 19 year old whose 15-year-old girlfriend's dad is a raging lunatic -- are now forever branded as sexual predators, EVEN THOUGH THEY DID THEIR TIME ALREADY.

      Yes, there are child rapists on the list too. But can you tell them apart just from the list? Are you going to bother to try? I doubt it.

    12. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by GlassUser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Having knowledge as to the whereabouts of known sexual predators in your area is not "punishing" THEM.
      Being the father of two small children, I definitely am interested in the number of sexual predators in my area.
      Having perused my state's Offender's registry, I was surprised by the number of repeat offenders that are still loose on the streets.
      Knowing the areas that had a high concentration of rapists definitely played a part in my house hunting decisions


      The idea is all well and good. The problem is that overzealous DAs try to pile up charges and get people put on these things for inane reasons. I know a guy who (along with his friend) had to register on that because they put hand-drawn (and very low detail, unrecognizable if you didn't know what it was) copies of goatse on elementary school property (on a weekend). That's not exactly the same kind of thing as molesting an eight year old girl.

    13. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. You want to punish someone forever from one mistake. Way to have a system of justice dude.

      The reason people don't do a particular crime is for fear of the consequences. Perhaps this will make them think twice before making any "mistakes".

    14. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      YES! And and even BETTER implementation of this would be to link it to government database showing a criminal profile of everyone in the whole country! Heck! Let's put a satellite transmitter in every felon so we can track them!!!

      Please unstick your head from your ass...as another person on this thread pointed out, we have a system of justice for a reason, and when it has worked, we need to let criminals get on with their lives.

      If I was a liberal flaimbaiter, I could even make a case for some racial bias in your statement.

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    15. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Not to sound like a "me too" but the idea occurred to me several days ago, I'm already working on it. (Ever since the wired story a couple weeks ago)

      With Virginia's registry, it includes home and work addresses, so we'd be able to plot their likely route to work on the map too. Maybe they drive by your kids' school. (I hope not)

      Once I figure out how to do all this myself, there are about a dozen maps projects I'd love to do. Most less serious than this one though...

    16. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by _mythdraug_ · · Score: 1

      How is his/her wanting to visualize data provided by the government any more punishment than the data itself?

    17. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by zerbot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In our state, offenders are coded, and level 1 offenders like your 19 year old with a 15 year old girlfriend don't even show up. Some people think I am paranoid and overprotective about my children, I look at the map of level 2 and 3 sex offenders near my house and feel quite justified in that.

      Exact addresses are not given, just stuff like "1900 block of 25th Avenue".

    18. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Kalgash · · Score: 1

      Just under 20% of sex offenders will commit another sex related offense. With approximately 700 000 offenses in the US each year alone the numbers of people released each year who are likely to re-offend is quite high.

      http://www.selfhelpmagazine.com/articles/trauma/of fender.html
      http://www.enotes.com/sexual-violence/

    19. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by h4rm0ny · · Score: 5, Interesting


      A British newspaper did a bit of shit stirring in an attempt to boost sales. They published locations of sexual offenders names and addresses around the country. It kicked off a wave of assaults, cases of mistaken identity and included one woman whose home was wrecked and she narrowly escaped... because she was a peadiatrician.

      You want mob justice? Prepare for trial by gossip, then.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    20. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to say it....but yes, he is a sex offender, because he was convicted of having sex with a 17 year old (which is technically rape).

      So if you have a problem with that law, go ahead and try and change it. How young is young enough for ya?

      Otherwise, he made a dumb mistake and now he lives with it for the rest of his life.

    21. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Oh, okay, I see. You want to punish the 80% of reformed criminals for life because the other 20% are likely to re-offend. Yes, that's much better.

    22. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst lawyer, ever

    23. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by killproc · · Score: 1

      "If I was a liberal flaimbaiter, I could even make a case for some racial bias in your statement."

      um, ok

      I belong to a race, you insensitive clod!

      --
      When you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness. So I got that goin' for me, which is nice.
    24. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Xoro · · Score: 1

      Having knowledge as to the whereabouts of known sexual predators in your area ...

      Wait a minute...now banging a hooker qualifies one as being a sexual predator? Sorry, but I don't see what this transaction -- however seamy -- has to do with your two small children.

      --
      Kill, Tux, kill!
    25. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by LogicX · · Score: 1

      AgeofConsent.com Depends what state this occured in. Young enough is 16 in PA.

      --
      May this post be indexed by spiders, and archived for all to see as my Internet epitaph.
    26. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just under 20% of sex offenders will commit another sex related offense. With approximately 700 000 offenses in the US each year alone the numbers of people released each year who are likely to re-offend is quite high.

      http://www.selfhelpmagazine.com/articles/trauma/of fender.html [selfhelpmagazine.com]
      http://www.enotes.com/sexual-violence/ [enotes.com]


      Ok pervert protector, next time how about citing some better sources than a self help magazine (maybe you need help?) and enotes....hmm, like some credible medical or psych sites asshole..

    27. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by pherthyl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bullshit. If that's considered a dumb mistake, then 30%-50% of college students make the same mistake all the time. You think if the guy is a couple months older than his girlfriend, they're going to stop having sex when he turns 18?

      This does not fall under a stupid mistake.. It's a retarded law that was excercised because of a hysterical mother somewhere.

    28. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Kalgash · · Score: 1

      I said nothing of the sort. I only pointed out the stats that resulted in the formation of the national sex offender registry. I should have made that clear.

    29. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These people, who made a mistake -- for instance, a 19 year old whose 15-year-old girlfriend's dad is a raging lunatic -- are now forever branded as sexual predators

      OK, fine, her dad is a raging lunatic. But did you actually marry said girl? No. OK, then you made a stupid mistake. It's been said millions of times before: Ignorance of the law is no defense in a court of law. Here in the US, we have laws. You broke them. I guess you shouldn't have done so. And BTW, if you (or this magical friend of yours) WERE to be living in an area that I was or was going to be living in, then it would be useful to know. Useful to me because I'd know who's parents could be a potentially bad influence on their own kids as well as mine, and that would give me more power as a parent to make sure my kids were kept safe (doled out in appropriate amounts of "parental decision-making power" of course).

    30. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all sex offenders are child molesters and kiddie rapists.

      Exactly, that's why there's a registry - if you're concerned, the registry lists what they committed, when, and why. It's trivial to figure out whether your neighbor made a mistake and got a teen girlfriend pregnant, or raped his cousin six times.

    31. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Soon-to-be+Has-been · · Score: 1

      No, it's more like exposing yourself to an 8 year old. I have a hard time understanding the right you would assert for your idiot friend's to post obscene material on a school yard, regardless of the day of the week.

    32. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know you have can be within two years of a persons age and it does not constitute as statutory. If you are 19 and your girlfriend is 17 then your fine.

    33. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by jbarr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am certainly not against your idea, but what I don't understand is why we are so eger to have sex offenders' names and locations so easily publically accessible, yet we do not do the same for other criminals? Killers, corporate criminals, etc. Why are these crimes exempt from continued public scrutiny after the criminal has "paid his dues" while sex offenders are not? Yes, sex offenders are a despicable lot, but why do we limit these listings to just them?

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    34. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by floodo1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      its not a matter of ignorance of the law. its a matter of punishment fitting the crime.

      the sex offender database (in most states) is equiv to a single scarlet letter. a letter that carries no information other than sex offender.

      the POINT is that there can be a HUGE difference between a single conviction of statutory rape and a true repeat sexual predator. just as there is a huge difference between offenders who violate children, and offenders who violate adults.

      and i question teh sex offender database on the grounds that if you're giong to go so far as to label sex offenses as worthy of a public database, why not create a database of violent criminals?
      why not create a database of thieves?
      why not create a database of ALL criminals....i mean it would be good to know that the guy next door is a pyro!

      so the question truly is where is the line? why are sex offenders that only ones worthy of a database?

      not to mention that the database is a stop gap solution, not fixing the underlying problem......that the justice system isnt capable of allowing people to pay their penance to society and be done. a justice system that brands people is just a shitty justice system.

      if there is a need for a database, there is a failure in the system. people need to be helped, or kept. if there where no repeat offenders (or very few) then we wouldnt need your "public safety" database!

      --
      I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
    35. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Kalgash · · Score: 1

      I know I shouldn't feed you but here goes...

      OK So I have one comment calling me a pervert protector. And the other implying I am pervert prosecutor. I must be doing something right. As stated in my reply to the other post it is these types of stats that were used to provide proof of the need for the USA National Sex Offender Registry.

      The article from SelfHelp magazine is a pointer to a study done for the "Department of the Solicitor General of Canada Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology"

      SelfHelp magazine is made by the APA "the world's largest association of psychologists"

    36. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sex offenders get their own database because nerds/geeks are infatuated with sex, and they're the ones who write such things.

      I am surprised there aren't databases for pyros and dual-pistol wielding badasses yet.

    37. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Scyber · · Score: 1

      The laws vary by state. While many states have that type of, some still have the hard-line 18 year-old cutoff.

    38. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by jea6 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of doing this. Part of the problem is that, while the data is readily provided, it is not consistently formatted. So, more work.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    39. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pistols owners are powerful politically. That is why they don't have a database of their own.

      That and they are paranoid enough to avoid getting in it. I know more than one person who prefers used pistols just because there is no paper work that goes with the transaction, so the government never knows to look for it. (Not to be confused with those who don't want paper work because they intend to commit a crime with the pistol, that is a different group)

    40. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by aaronl · · Score: 1

      It's not that those crimes are exempt from continued scrutiny, it's that sex crimes have become "special" and subject to punishment above and beyond the handed down sentencing from the judge. I would wager that had this been done for certain other crimanal acts that people would've been going crazy about the cruel and unusual punishment. It means that a sex offender can never finish serving sentence, yet a murderer or thief or whatnot can.

      I think something like this should either be all violent crime (would then not be unusual, but would be cruel), or no crimes. Perhaps you do it to people that are repeat offenders. It probably shouldn't be done at all, regardless. I don't like the idea of people being tracked, and I don't like the implications for harm that can come to someone by having their safety potentially compromised after they already served their jail time. Much like what happened in England, I can easily see some nasty sex-related crime happening somewhere, and a mob injuring/killing everyone on that list.

    41. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by digital+bath · · Score: 1

      ageofconsent.com - some good info there

      --
      find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
    42. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by enjo13 · · Score: 1

      It's interesting how this particular act has really snowballed. Originally the idea behind the sex offenders list was to notify local residents when an offender moved next door. Fair enough really.. It's sad for the offender, but they are after all offenders (although the scope of who is on the list is rather stupid as has already been discussed).

      Now, however, the sex offenders list is being used all over the place. Hell, you can't even get into Six Flags anymore if you are on that list. It's a classic case of a piece of legislation being taken to more and more extremes..

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    43. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by BK425 · · Score: 1

      Err... Maybe I'm out of the mainstream here, but not only do I want to "know who really lives beside" me, but I actually do.
      Try it, it's fun. When people walk by, you say "hello" or "nice day" or words to that affect. Think of it as a handshake or conversational header. If you haven't noticed people walk by, you may have to get a laptop or portable computer with a wireless connection. But with the proper networking you to can become social.

    44. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Styros · · Score: 1

      Why didn't he just wait 3 months? Regardless of whether the law is stupid or not, he could have just waited. It was only 3 months! Have sex now and risk going jail or wait 3 months and it's completely legal. That seems like an obvious choice to me.

    45. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by BK425 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, so the problem isn't the hysterical mom or the predator registry it's that you (and I, if I actually agreed) aren't changing that "retarded" law. Don't fix the band-aids, fix the problem.

    46. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Nautica · · Score: 1

      Yes punish them all, If they did it in the first place the need to punished for life, Wait until it one of your kids or friends.

    47. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Skynyrd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Now, however, the sex offenders list is being used all over the place. Hell, you can't even get into Six Flags anymore if you are on that list. It's a classic case of a piece of legislation being taken to more and more extremes..

      Um, not exactly. Six Flags has simply stated that sex offenders may be removed (or denied entry) to the park. They aren't checking your ID vs a sex offender list.

      All amusment parks have rules about who can come in, and who can't. For example, a stereotypical "punk rocker" (leather jacket with studs, orange mohawk...) will not be allowed into Disneyland because of a "no costumes" policy.

      Six Flags is just trying to cover their ass (and I think they're being silly too), but they aren't denying entry to sex offenders.

    48. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, but it's ok that the recipient of the 'mistake' has to deal with that the rest of their lives? And take their issues out on anyone else that gets close to them? I'd rather not have your justice system, thanks for playing though.

    49. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by part_of_you · · Score: 0
      Why stop at sex offenders? We could map out thieves, murderers, and rapists. This really does give a new meaning to Google. The things that they're building are dinamic enough for others to build onto. I think it's pretty cool, even though it can be taken advantage of by those that would want to misrepresent the accual location of property.

      Lucky for me, my house is out of Google's range, so if I was a sex offender, or any other of the above, I would be out of the radar. Would that make my house much more expensive in the future, or not?

    50. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    51. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      In our state, offenders are coded, and level 1 offenders like your 19 year old with a 15 year old girlfriend don't even show up. Some people think I am paranoid and overprotective about my children, I look at the map of level 2 and 3 sex offenders near my house and feel quite justified in that. The real question though is do you look at those, see there's no one nearby for example and assume your kid(s) are pretty safe? If so you've lowered how secure your kids are and actually raised the possibility they might be attacked. Sex offender lists and such only give a false sense of security. Look at cases from the past few months (mostly from Florida for some strange reason) alone:
      • In one the sex offender had registered but wasn't living where he said he was. Lot of good that list did therel.
      • In another the sex offender was/had been dating the girl's mother. Even if he reported his address correctly it didn't help, after all the girl's mother decided that it was OK to date a former sex offender. In his defense he apparently didn't rape her, just murdered her, but hey that sex offender list sure helped predict THAT didn't it?
      • In the most recent one the girl was raped and left for dead in a trash bin by a 17yo "friend" who was also staying at her Godmother's house. He had only a minor criminal record (for instance he was on probation for throwing a rock through a car window). That sex offenders list sure helped there too didn't it!
      In any case the point is: look at the lists all you want, but if you don't teach your kids to avoid strangers, don't keep an eye on them as much as possible and don't bother to check up on what kind of people they associate with, you're not protecting them any at all. Just telling them to avoid the "1900 block of 25th Avenue" won't help much if the sex offender's staying with a friend on the 1700 block for instance so it's not really useful for anything location-wise. It can give you a sense how many _known_ sex offenders there are in the area, but the problem reallly isn't the known ones, it's the ones who haven't done anything yet you need to worry about -- a lot.

      You may be different, but far too many people supporting these lists look at them as a panacea, a "if only we'd had a list this horrible crime wouldn't have happened". Sorry folks these crimes still get committed regularly even in the states with the lists. Maybe it makes it a bit easier to find suspects after the fact, but that's not going to prevent the crime or bring a child back from death now is it?

    52. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

      Great idea! You can sew the first scarlet letter, then.

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    53. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      The difference here is that some of these folks are mentally unstable and cannot determine what is 'right' or 'wrong.' Consequences have no meaning to them.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    54. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by espo812 · · Score: 1
      You want to punish someone forever from one mistake.
      "It is hardly a radical notion to penalize felons long after they have left prison or completed parole. Laws deny ex-cons the right to hold office, to retain professional licenses (lawyers, for example, lose their ability to practice), or to serve as an officer in a publicly traded company. Felons, by law, can in some cases lose their right to inherit property, to collect pension benefits or even to get a truck-driving license. In fact, in most states, the loss of voting rights does not last as long as other prohibitions." John Lott, The Felon Vote
      --

      espo
    55. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. If that's considered a dumb mistake, then 30%-50% of college students make the same mistake all the time.

      Hell, ever see the movie "Old School"? It depicts a middle-aged guy having sex with a high school student whom he thought was in college. According to the GP, that dude should be listed in a sex offenders registry! Gotta love the criminal "justice" system...

    56. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This service is fucking racist. We all know what it will be used for - demographic profiling - everyone wants to know the highest concentration of blacks in order to stay far far away. "High crime" is just a euphemism for "high concentration of blacks," and I for one am tired of you white folks coming up with new innovations to keep minorities oppessed.

    57. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      yeah, like i said...if...

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    58. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by beavis88 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here (in N.C.) we can get, online, complete addresses along with full color photos. I find that a little creepy, personally.

      If they're that big a threat, I think residence in jail and/or a psych facility is preferable. It just baffles me that people can get so worked up about sex offender registration, but wouldn't dream of raising taxes a little bit to pay for greatly increasing the duration of incarceration.

    59. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait until one of your kids or friends is the "predator."

    60. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, it's not bullshit. that mother is 100% within her rights (since she is the legal guardian of her OWN FUCKING DAUGHTER) to call the police.

      17-year-olds don't get to dictate this type of shit to their parents.

    61. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by rkww · · Score: 1

      peadiatrician - a doctor who specialises in peas?

      The BBC's story about the paediatrician mistaken for a paedophile is here btw.

    62. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In college if you got caught urinating in public twice you were labeled a sex offender. In our college town students would "find a tree" b/w parties. Cops would walk by, see the person and arrest them. I don't think the people taking a leak need to be labeled sex offenders.

    63. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      The age of consent in most of the United States is 16.

      I kind of doubt there is a real person, with a real name, who lives in a real state, who is a real sex offender solely because he had sex with 17 year old girl shortly after his own 18th birthday.

    64. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by coopex · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Exactly. The reason that sex offender's are being given a scarlett letter is because of the overemotional response most people have to it, which is completely retarted. Would you rather have a convicted murderer or a convicted sex offender living next door? Furthermore, the scarlett letter gives a strong implication that since the person did it once, they'll do it again. This only furthers their alienation from regular society, making it more likely that they'll do something that society has deemed unacceptable.

      Congrats, you've turned a molehill into a mountain. Feel free to flame me with posts along the lines of "what if you/someone you knew were a victim".

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    65. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by stmfreak · · Score: 1

      Great. You want to punish someone forever from one mistake. Way to have a system of justice dude.

      No, I want to have as much information that I can about the environment my children play in. Just like I don't allow my (known) AA friends to babysit my alcohol collection. Is that punishing them for past mistakes or just playing the odds that past behavior is a good indication of future behavior?

      Do you have something against insurance companies raising rates on people with multiple traffic incidents to?

      Let's not even argue the fact that many traffic accidents can be correctly classified as accidents whereas few child rapes can be similary explained.

      --
      These opinions guaranteed or your money back.
    66. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Pete · · Score: 1
      Probably because it's one of those laws that you'd think nobody could ever be stupid enough to try to enforce, especially in a situation where it's clearly not appropriate.

      At least I'd think that of such a situation, and I left my teens behind quite some time ago. I doubt the guy or girl in question were more than vaguely aware that there was a "statutory rape" law, and had no idea that it could possibly apply to them.

    67. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by MemoryAid · · Score: 1

      No, he's saying he got arrested because his girlfriend's mom called the police. The bit about being a registered sex offender happened afterwards, though. I think it's clear that a few details were left out in between, probably for brevity; perhaps he can't type very fast....

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    68. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

      What's worse, there are people on the list who were coming from a pub, drunk, and pissed in a park - and got reported for 'exposing themselves'.

      'Sexual predators' - bullshit.

    69. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      Hell, ever see the movie "Old School"... According to the GP, that dude should be listed in a sex offenders registry!

      Old School is a movie. In most of the United States, we don't yet list movie characters in the sex offender registries.

      If you would like to petition to have imaginary people subject to the criminal justice system, please contact your legislators. If you live in California, you perhaps should petition to have a "cyborg robot from the future I once saw on the TV" prosecuted for attempted murder.

      Good luck with that...

    70. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Gr33nNight · · Score: 1

      We both live in Wisconsin. The age of consent is 18. He got charged with stat. rape and convicted.

    71. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by rpresser · · Score: 1

      (a) Not that I care what you believe, but I really was not describing myself. I have never had a 15 year old girlfriend, or younger, not even when I myself was 15. Kindly put down your slander spraygun. And show a little courage once in a while, instead of hiding behind "Anonymous Coward". I do.

      (b) I don't give a damn about your kids. It's your responsibility to give a damn about your kids, not mine, as you very well know.

      (c) Even more, I don't give a damn about your morality. "Potentially bad influence"? If I had children of a certain age, I'd consider slashdot a much worse influence than any neighbor with a minor past could possibly be.

      (d) Just so you know, the attitude you are espousing is known as prejudice -- you are pre-judging someone based on impersonal facts, rather than trying to get to know them. Just substitute the phrase "past sex offender" with "Negro" and see how you look. No? You don't think having black skin is a reason to despise someone? Good for you! (Neither do I.) But it was a different story 100 years ago, or even 40.

    72. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      Could provide his name, so we can look it up in the sex offenders registry and confirm your tale?

    73. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by op00to · · Score: 1

      You're comparing unlike things. Traffic accidents are not crimes. A crime may be committed that causes a traffic accident, but the 'accident' itself is not a crime. Your entire argument falls apart because of this fallacy.

      Thank you, please come again.

    74. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by stmfreak · · Score: 1

      Oh dear, you've caught me in a mixed metaphor.

      If it makes you feel better, allow me to suggest that homicide is to sex crime as murder in the first is to child rape. The post I was replying to originally suggested that one "mistake" should not trouble an individual forever. I disagree when that "mistake" might be categorized as Child Rape vs. Sex Crime or Murder-1 vs. Homicide.

      It has been my experience with these databases that they disclose the severity of the crime and judging from date of infraction and age of offender one can reasonable assume whether it was a case of 19yo boyfriend with 17yo girlfriend or 35yo nutjob with a minor. The difference between these classifications can determine whether or not you would be banned from my house forever.

      As for traffic accidents, there are accidents and there are road rage or drunken stupor induced accidents. Personally I don't see the problem comparing those distinctions to the various distinctions between sex crimes. But if you need it spelled out for you...

      --
      These opinions guaranteed or your money back.
    75. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by rpresser · · Score: 1

      Why stop at sex offenders? Take your "route from home to work" code and make it available for anyone who wishes to stalk anyone else. Make sure to include flags for likely places to hang out while stalking, like McDonalds, bus stops, etc.

    76. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly the point of the movie Strangeland. Sometimes, someone's history should remain just that.. history. However, that said, I'd still rather have a murderer than a sex offender living nearby. The thought of having to wonder and judge if that gaze at my daughter lasted just a little too long.. *shudders* Some things are worse than death.

    77. Re:Sex Offender's Registry by ibjhb · · Score: 1

      It's already been done:

      http://www.floridasexualpredators.com/

  5. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no comments and already slashdotted. i love when that happens. 200 comments where nobody RTFA. not much different than when the site isnt slashdotted i suppose. good day.

    1. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm quite sure it was the promise of pictures that sent everyone scurrying over to the article. Nobody's actually reading it...

  6. Combine the Projects... by DarthVeda · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Combine housing maps and crime maps to discover exactly where not to live in Chicago!

    1. Re:Combine the Projects... by garcia · · Score: 2

      Combine housing maps and crime maps to discover exactly where not to live in Chicago!

      Then the thieves would start using it to determine where to steal great computer equipment from.

    2. Re:Combine the Projects... by Oh-es-eX · · Score: 0

      Or the opposite ! Crooks don't steal in their own street.

      Any crook online to back me up?????? ;)

      Robin.

    3. Re:Combine the Projects... by saskboy · · Score: 1

      And then property values in certain neighbourhoods fall through the floor for almost no reason, leaving many people out thousands of dollars, AND living next to sexual offenders.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    4. Re:Combine the Projects... by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      The city of Austin (Texas) already has this:

      City of Austin Crime Viewer

      It has been VERY useful when looking for a new place to live. I've ruled out some otherwise nice areas because of the high crime, while other areas rose to the top of my list.

      Plus, the city crime viewer has satellite data with higher resolution than Google maps, albeit a bit older. I can zoom in to 1 inch = 100 feet, enough to tell if the house I want to buy had rusted cars in the front yard and a bad roof 3 years ago. I can also figure out if there's enough space to build an addition without driving to it.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  7. My Google Hack Idea by 0kComputer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not sure if this has been implemented yet. Or even how to do so, but I think a cool Google hack would be a graphical trace route program simillar to NeoTrace.

    Not sure how it would make money, but would be cool as hell with those satellite maps.

    --
    Top 10 Reasons To Procrastinate
    10.
    1. Re:My Google Hack Idea by ShadeARG · · Score: 5, Informative
  8. A great idea for the rest of us... by NewbieV · · Score: 5, Informative

    The NYPD uses a system very much like this, called COMPSTAT.

    More about the history of the program here (clicky)

    Here's an excerpt from the NYPD website:
    "Among the Command and Control Center's high-tech capabilities is its computerized 'pin mapping' which displays crime, arrest and quality of life data in a host of visual formats including comparative charts, graphs and tables. Through the use of MAPINFO software and other computer technology, for example, the CompStat database can be accessed and a precinct map depicting virtually any combination of crime and/or arrest locations, crime 'hot spots' and other relevant information can be instantly projected on the Center's large video projection screens."

    --


    "For every right, an equal responsibility..."
    1. Re:A great idea for the rest of us... by Momoru · · Score: 4, Informative

      So does Baltimore City

    2. Re:A great idea for the rest of us... by CrowScape · · Score: 4, Informative

      So does Chicago, and they make it available to the citizens. It's called ICAM. So congratulations Adrian, you created something that already existed!

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    3. Re:A great idea for the rest of us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess this replaces SCMODS...we're on a mission from God, Ma'am...

    4. Re:A great idea for the rest of us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err... what?

    5. Re:A great idea for the rest of us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I typed in 1050 West Addison (Wrigley Field) for 1/4 mile radius and got the following stats for last 2 weeks. Don't know how many were related to chasing down home run balls on Waveland...

      Chart
      Key Crime
      Count CRIME CLASSIFICATION
      Description
      7 PERSON
      3 BATTERY
      3 ASSAULT
      1 ROBBERY
      8 PROPERTY
      1 DECEPTION
      1 DECEPTIVE PRACTICE
      2 THEFT
      1 CRIMINAL DAMAGE
      1 CRIMINAL TRESPASS
      1 BURGLARY
      1 OTHER CRM OFFENSE AGAINST PROP

    6. Re:A great idea for the rest of us... by holovaty · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, CrowScape, I'm familiar with ICAM. Actually, that's where chicagocrime.org gets its data. My site provides a different view of the information.

  9. I doubt that was their intention... by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or is this all a clever trick on Google's part to build up more and more third parties dependent upon Google?

    I doubt that Google intended on getting third parties dependent on GMaps. If they really wanted that to happen they would have released an open API rather than having to have people poke around in the code to figure out how it all worked.

    Yeah, you can do some REALLY neat stuff with GMaps now (and even some of the things I suggested should be available when it first came out) but I just don't think that it was Google's main intention.

    If anything, they just want to be a player in the same markets as Yahoo and MSN and not have to link to their competitor's mapping products.

  10. Wow... by DeionXxX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm just simply amazed by both of the tools mentioned (the Crime Data and the Housing Maps)... we really live in interesting times. Why do these hacks work so well? Has google built an API to access these maps and to plot points on them, or have the developers of each of these hacks reverse-engineered the Google maps interface and figured out how to place stuff on them?

    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And have what, 20% unemployment rate? No thanks, I'd rather work 20% more then not at all."

      Then perhaps you should move out of the U.S. to Sweden which has a lower unemployment rate.

      http://www.nationmaster.com/red/graph-T/lab_une_ra t&int=-1

    2. Re:Wow... by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      anyone know what the hell this guy is talking about? I tried following the thread but.. well .. there isn't one.. or maybe I need to go back and reset my .. thing that you reset to see lower posts.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    3. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume they're running a script that pulls posts from other articles and reposts them randomly.

    4. Re:Wow... by Wanker · · Score: 1
      Has google built an API to access these maps and to plot points on them, or have the developers of each of these hacks reverse-engineered the Google maps interface and figured out how to place stuff on them?

      It would be the latter-- reverse engineering of the maps and Javascript Google uses to drive them.

      Details at:
      http://libgmail.sourceforge.net/googlemaps.html
    5. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For another cool real estate related google map hack you can check out http://www.cytadia.us/ and do a search for a home (don't forget to ask to display your results on a map) :)

  11. Real Time Crime by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 5, Funny
    How long till we have real time crime data showing up on Google's map?


    <obligatory>
    It's already been done


    </obligatory>

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    1. Re:Real Time Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you probably want to look at Congress for that one.

    2. Re:Real Time Crime by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 1

      Ha...I'm surprised DHS hasn't required Google to avoid displaying high profile, tempting terrorist targets (T^3) yet...

      --
      The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    3. Re:Real Time Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 5 years too late...

    4. Re:Real Time Crime by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1

      When I feel that way, I simply go to my happy place.

      --

      "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    5. Re:Real Time Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      email can be faked or altered so easily

      Actually, I've come to the opposite conclusion. I don't know every e-mail system, and I don't know what Morgan Stanley was using, but I have administered serious e-mail systems for about 15 years, and I can tell you that in many, it is in fact very difficult to insert a fake message into the message store in the right place, with the right semantic context. Don't forget that in all these cases the recovery is from (presumably) dated and logged backup tapes, possibly under the observation of opposing counsel's expert, and under penalty of perjury. So go ahead, tell me how you insert (or even alter) a message into a multi-gigabyte message store coming off a tape that's been archived and logged at Iron Mountain for the last five years. Will it have the right SMTP transit headers? The correct "In-Reply-To:"? What about the context of the message? Are you replying to someone? Do they later reply to you? Does it all fit together? This is a distinctly non-trivial exercise. Possible, yes, but maybe only theoretically so. And the grunt doing the recovery is *very unlikely* to want to risk going to jail to cover up some fraud he was probably never associated with.


    6. Re:Real Time Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll notice that the tops of those very important buildings are obfuscated.

    7. Re:Real Time Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      should have been the Capitol Building

    8. Re:Real Time Crime by Loether · · Score: 1

      From what I can tell it's just the Capitol Building that has an artificially low resolution. The Pentagon, for instance, shows up clearly. Capitol Building

      --
      TODO create witty sig.
    9. Re:Real Time Crime by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1
      You'll notice that the tops of those very important buildings are obfuscated.

      I think that same thing can be said for most of the inhabitants as well.

      --

      "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    10. Re:Real Time Crime by identity0 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure it's required by DHS, but I did notice in the Google Maps (the regular one, not satelite), that the Pentagon is unlabeled. This despite other landmark buildings and even the "Fashion center at Pentagon City" being clearly labeled.

      If you're curious, it's at that five-sided blank spot just north of Ronald Reagan airport, between where I-395 crosses the Potomac and Arlington cemetary.

    11. Re:Real Time Crime by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Haha, when I went there, I was like, "Oh cool, we have 1337 days until Bush is gone! It must be a sign that we have only 'leet' days of putting up with him!" but then I thought for a second, and went "Oh shit, we have to deal with him for 1,337 more days?!"

      Funny how certain numbers get your hopes up...

    12. Re:Real Time Crime by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      If I was living in the States I'd feel so much safer now. Thank you, Google, for valiantly fooiling future Terrorist attacks by pixelating the top of some well-known buildings with well-known positions.

      </sarcasm>
      Seriously, though, what exactly is that supposed to accomplish?

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    13. Re:Real Time Crime by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      Conceals the occassional orgy.

  12. Poor suckers. by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was able to tell the moment the Slashdot story went online... the chicagocrime.org site suddenly stopped responding. And it's not like we could have linked to a mirror.

    So you'll just have to take my word for it -- it was pretty cool. I found out that there were three reported crimes at Chicago cemeteries, for example -- a theft, a trespassing, and a vandalism. Crimes at airports included a "theft by lessee" -- looks like there's somebody at Midway who you shouldn't get your rental car from.

    The gas station link is holding up better, though. Hope it's not hosted at a gas station... kablooie!

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Poor suckers. by TheLetterPsy · · Score: 1

      I this at the gas link:

      FORBIDDEN:
      Site Owner, Please contact your support center for assistance.


      Oops, looks like someone overstepped their bandwidth limit. Anyone got a mirror or cache?

    2. Re:Poor suckers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK I am not allowed to export goods from the USA if I know they will end up in Cuba. So what loophole does Mr. Softie exploit?

  13. Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to http://www.arjis.org./ We've had the same thing in San Diego County for several years now.

  14. While not nearly as cool... by hwyengr · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Chicago Police Department already has a web interface, called Citizen ICAM, which displays the same info. I do believe that the new site is compiling its data from ICAM. You can check out ICAM at http://12.17.79.6/

    1. Re:While not nearly as cool... by johnamus · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Saint Louis Police Department has a similar interface at 64.218.68.50/stlouis/newslmpd/viewer.htm

    2. Re:While not nearly as cool... by johnamus · · Score: 0
    3. Re:While not nearly as cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should offer to contract with them. Clearly their in-house IT is too expensive. Yet another opportunity for corporate outsourcing...

    4. Re:While not nearly as cool... by Oh-es-eX · · Score: 0

      FINANCIAL IDENTITY THEFT It really happens almost every day apparently.

  15. The police could use it if ... by aaronmcdaid · · Score: 3, Funny

    It would be really useful if it could tell where the crime was about to occur .. in advance

    1. Re:The police could use it if ... by fritzenheimer · · Score: 1
      It would be really useful if it could tell where the crime was about to occur .. in advance

      "Mr. Marks, by mandate of the District of Columbia Precrime Division, I'm placing you under arrest for the future murder of Sarah Marks and Donald Dubin that was to take place today, April 22 at 0800 hours and four minutes."

      RFM

      --
      RFM
    2. Re:The police could use it if ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the question. The answer is keep it, for a while.

      Email records can be subpoenaed just like anything else. If it benefits your case, it would be nice to have, if it hurts our case, it would not be so nice to have.

      When I write computer use policies, I recommend keeping it for 1 to 2 years. Depending on the type of business that might get extended out much longer. A start-up company might want to keep it 10 or more years to cover any possible arguments with their VCs over who owns the IP.

      So why not keep it forever? Unless you want to have the lady sueing you for sexual harassment making your companies email part of the public record, you might want to set some limits.

      The key is to document, in writing, what that limit should be. For example, maybe put it in your companies Computer Use policy. You have one...right?

    3. Re:The police could use it if ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We have a red ball...

      Imagine a world without murder...

      Just six years ago the homicide rate in this country had reached epidemic proportions... It seemed that only a miracle could stop the bloodshed.

      But instead of one miracle, we were given three: the precognatives.

      Within just one month under the Precrime program, the murder rate in the District of Columbia was reduced 90 percent...Within a year Precrime effectively stopped murder in our nation's capitol.

      [Director of Precrime, Lamar Burgess] In the six years we have been conducting our little experiment, there hasn't been a single murder.

      And now, Precrime can work for you!

      [U.S. Attorney General Vincent Nash]: We want to make absolutely certain that every American can bank on the utter infallibility of the system. And to ensure that whit keeps us safe, will also keep us free.

    4. Re:The police could use it if ... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Within the next 3 hours, Tom Cruise will sit down at a table with a director discussing a Phillip K. Dick script treatment...

    5. Re:The police could use it if ... by SpecBear · · Score: 1


      It's been done, but they still have a few bugs to work out.

    6. Re:The police could use it if ... by mikael · · Score: 1

      Seriously, this idea has been implemented. For certain crimes (mugging, burglary), it is possible to predict the likely area from the analysis of the times and locations of previous crimes. The New York police were using this to catch muggers.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:The police could use it if ... by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 1

      It would be really useful if it could tell where the crime was about to occur .. in advance

      Easier done than said. Just put a big, red, flashing dot on The Honorable Richard J. Daley Plaza.

      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
  16. From looking at this page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And noting that it doesn't appear at all, I can only conclude that there is no crime in Chicago.

    It must be a wonderful place to live!

  17. Cheap Gas Hack? by johnamus · · Score: 0, Troll

    A more appropriate title would be comparitively relative inexpensive gas hack. Gas at $2.00 a gallon is not cheap, and the slow pace the oil companies are using in rolling back prices suggests they are scaling back prices slowly in order to find the highest price consumers are willing to pay.

    1. Re:Cheap Gas Hack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      U forgot about the dead Iraqi.....

      1 gallon of gas = $2 and a dead Iraqi.....

      certainly not cheap......but lotsOpeople don't seem to mind

  18. Apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You still have a lot to learn about women.

  19. OT: SimCity by Stibidor · · Score: 4, Funny

    I haven't been able to connect to the site yet, but I'm wondering how closely it resembles the crime map view in SimCity. :)

    Ah, what a great game...

    1. Re:OT: SimCity by glass_window · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Who knows, but I can't wait to be able to check out my land value, my water coverage, my electric coverage, my air polution, all through the handy interface of google maps!

    2. Re:OT: SimCity by Phoex · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't be all that hard to implement I bet, the biggest hurdle would be convincing people and cities that the weather stations, traffic cams and appraisers are necessary every 100 feet or so.

      --
      00110100 00110010
  20. You have the right to remain sexy... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    A true public service for undercover-cop fetishists!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  21. The Fickle Slashdot Opinion by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "Or is this all a clever trick on Google's part to build up more and more third parties dependent upon Google?"

    It's amazing how fast a company can go from being Slashdot's little darling to suddenly being suspected at every turn of being the new EvilEmpire(tm).

    Guys, these people are making wonderful tools and making them available for free, and letting people mess with them. They're probably reading comments like that slack-jawed, thinking "man, you just can't win with that crowd!" Give em a break! :)

    -M

    1. Re:The Fickle Slashdot Opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah more Google astroturfing....should we give Microsoft, SCO, RIAA and Apple a break too?

    2. Re:The Fickle Slashdot Opinion by joepez · · Score: 1
      Actually it wasn't my intention to suggest an EvilEmpire move at all. In fact I think it is a very intelligent business decision on their part.

      I'm an ex-techie turned suit and I proposed my last question as food for thought, not an indictment of Google. By putting out features like Google Maps, and not releasing an API, but making it hackable, Google gains valuable insight into customer needs. They learn the kinds of things that people would want to see in an API, and more importantly they get a ton of free product concepts/demos without spending a $.

      All companies would like to be in a similar position, create the core platform (maps) and then enable 3rd parties to generate a large portion of the support through their efforts, thus achieving market dominance. Just look at iPods as an example (wasn't by chance that all those 3rd parties sprouted up around the iPod).

    3. Re:The Fickle Slashdot Opinion by Momoru · · Score: 1

      For me personally its just been a few things here and there...for one thing Google has grown in size to be hundreds of times what it originally was. Its also now a public company. Those two things mean that even if Sergey and Larry really wanted to do no evil, not everything can still reach their approval. Google has bought like 20 companies since going public...and things have started to slip through, like the Google Web Accelerator, which wreaked all kinds of havok...or the move away from "not being a portal" with the new personalized "my google" page. Sure all this stuff is free and great now...but its a company, its out to make money. Suppose their ad revenue dried up? Someone's gotta pay for those free cafeteria lunch and dinners...maybe some suit decides they should start charging for access to the map program api, since everyone is using their bandwidth on it... but meanwhile all these people have been linking into them. Or maybe they decide to stick huge advertisements in there....cuz they need to show their investors 20% growth this quarter...

      There is no reason to trust Google as if it were different from any other company out there. Thats just plain naive. If anything, because it's growing so fast and spending money like crazy, while not diversifying its revenue, its an even more scary thing.

    4. Re:The Fickle Slashdot Opinion by wootest · · Score: 1

      Anyone should have the right to feel upset and bothered about any one company. Google isn't special. I personally don't feel particularly upset and bothered by Google, because I don't think that they've done anything to deserve that. However, some people blow opinions like those off on the basis that anyone that's asking "what did company x ever do?" is somehow irrationally supporting company x - proving that company x actually did something wrong is apparently left as an exercise to the reader.

      I believe that you earn your critics - being on your guard is good and recommended, but placing everyone in the "sneaky, no-good evil-doers until proven differently" bin by default seems cynical and not particularly logical.

    5. Re:The Fickle Slashdot Opinion by mconeone · · Score: 1

      Google's ad revenue dried up? Where could it possibly go? The only way I can see this happening is if a new search engine comes out which is better than google. Could that ever happen?

    6. Re:The Fickle Slashdot Opinion by Momoru · · Score: 1

      Why not? It happened to Alta Vista, Lycos, AOL and to some extent Yahoo. Do you really think there will be nothing to top Google ever? Personally I already think that Clusty provides a more useful search.

    7. Re:The Fickle Slashdot Opinion by claygate · · Score: 1

      I think they might not be reading anything here and actually working on wonderful tools to make freely available.

  22. The big picture by RealProgrammer · · Score: 5, Interesting
    (er, so to speak)

    Or is this all a clever trick on Google's part to build up more and more third parties dependent upon Google?

    I think it's just a case of people using tools in ways their creators didn't envision. As Perl's Larry Wall says, that's the mark of a good tool.

    Another way to look at it is that if you serve people, they become dependent on you. Google is trying to build its business by offering services and getting people hooked.

    I, for one, welcome our new information infrastructure servant overlords.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:The big picture by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Funny
      I, for one, welcome our new information infrastructure servant overlords.

      Best. Overlord. Quote. Ever.

      *prepares quote on banner to hang on entrance to NOC*

    2. Re:The big picture by Gondola · · Score: 1

      Obviously your username is not very accurate ;)

  23. No crome in Mom's basement : ) by essreenim · · Score: 0
    Come on. They're not interested in reading the article. They just want to see if the rumours are true..

    Crime is always a hot topic.

    "Hmm, My moms basement is a nice refuge from the world, but what about all the deadliness I'm missing out on in the real world...."

  24. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -20 Un patriotic

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But deeply American. Sadly, nowadays the "patriots" are the ones who want to destroy the Constitution.

  25. Not at all new by Wabin · · Score: 5, Informative
    While this might be neat because it integrates with Google, the concept is not at all new. When I was shopping for condos in Chicago a few years ago, I looked at the Citizen ICAM site (forgive the slashdotting...), which actually has a somewhat better interface for search, in my opinion. It may not look as slick as google, but it does allow you to look over a range of dates, and the map icons identify the type of crime.

    It let me see that one prospective condo was right in a corner of fairly low crime, bordered by much higher crime. I could have guessed that visiting the neighborhood, but it was nice to see somewhat empirically.

    --
    Most exciting phrase in science: not "Eureka!" but "Hmm... That's funny..." -Asimov (abridged for \. limits)
  26. Not new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of cities have online crime maps. If your doesn't, ask your city council. They almost certainly have the technology for internal use within their police department; and it's in the interest of the community to share the info.

  27. Google maps with craigslist - Howto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    a howto which describes, how to combine Criagslist with Google Maps similar to the site mentioned inn the summary (http://www.paulrademacher.com/housing/)

    1. Re:Google maps with craigslist - Howto by ganhawk · · Score: 1

      Mod Parent up.

      Its a python program/tutorial for displaying dallas craigslist listings on Google Map.

      --
      Python script to convert photos into "artsy" portraits: http://p2pbridge.sf.net/pyPortrait/
  28. Real Time Cell Phone by crudeawakening · · Score: 0, Troll

    Soon someone will come out with a site that displays your location (taken from your cell phone) in real time. Then they can pull this up with real time crime and solve crimes in real time without invetigating.

    1. Re:Real Time Cell Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft obviously also has distributors outside the United States, and it's perfectly legal for them to sell to Cuba.

      Or even Microsoft Canada. We don't buy into the isolationist argument up here, and we don't get our knickers bent out of shape trying to "prove" that communism doesn't work but undermining Cuba at every opportunity.

  29. Way back when... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    I was looking for an apartment. I was new to the area, so I had a real estate agent help me. When I asked her about whether the area was "good" or "bad," she replied she was not allowed to give that kind of information.

    As it turned out, the area was "bad." I wonder if she just didn't want to tell me, or is there really such a restriction?

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    1. Re:Way back when... by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the real estate agent cannot tell you good or bad since it is up to interpretation. What they can do though is give you the numbers and people that can give you that information. A good realator will give you that info and tell you to look into it.

    2. Re:Way back when... by fritzenheimer · · Score: 1
      When I asked [a realtor] about whether the area was "good" or "bad," she replied she was not allowed to give that kind of information.

      In the U.S., real estate agents are forbidden from making "discriminatory limitations on communities or locations of housing" under the Fair Housing Act. Your stated desire for a "good" neighborhood could be interpreted in some areas as a "discriminatory preference" for a white neighborhood -- especially if there's a correlation between ethnicity and crime in your area.

      RFM

      --
      RFM
    3. Re:Way back when... by sowellfan · · Score: 1

      I believe that there is such a restriction, which pretty much sucks, IMHO. But that's exactly why there's a need for services like this. Here in Jacksonville, Florida, the Sheriff's office has an online crime rate thing, but the only problem is that it doesn't show the crime at individual points - it shows a half-mile radius that you can move around, which makes it hard to tell which actual streets are bad, etc.

      I'm really curious what the real-estate agent groups out there think of developments like this. It seems to me that it'd make for more fluctuations in prices, as people learn how to use tools like this and educate themselves (since the real estate agents can't or won't).

    4. Re:Way back when... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      Your stated desire for a "good" neighborhood could be interpreted

      Or it could be interpreted as a desire for a neighborhood where people in trucks don't shout obscenities at pedestrians, for no apparent reason, other than picking their inheritance from the shallow end of the gene pool. Or kick holes in doors, because it's less boring than standing on the street corner waiting for something to happen. Or shoot people for $3 and the thrill of it, mostly the thrill, and a deep formless anger.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    5. Re:Way back when... by fritzenheimer · · Score: 1
      Or it could be interpreted as a desire for a neighborhood where people in trucks don't shout obscenities at pedestrians, for no apparent reason...

      I understand; I was just stating why the real estate agent was constrained.

      RFM

      --
      RFM
    6. Re:Way back when... by bmalia · · Score: 1

      My realtor suggested driving by the neighborhood on different days at different times and just observe.

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    7. Re:Way back when... by duckpoopy · · Score: 1

      Does it also tell you where that Jacksonville smell is the strongest?

      --
      word.
    8. Re:Way back when... by sowellfan · · Score: 1

      It's funny, I hadn't noticed that in quite a while until the other day when I went to an architect's office down at the Riverplace tower. I guess they're close enough to the plants that you can smell it if the wind is right.

      It was a lot worse back in the 80's, though. I guess the paper mills are getting better technology.

  30. PLEASE make Coral links mandatory by LanMan04 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How hard is it for the editor who posts these stories to the front page of Slashdot to replace them with Coral Cache links?

    Seriously, just make it an automated process or something. ALWAYS make it a Coral link.

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
    1. Re:PLEASE make Coral links mandatory by crudeawakening · · Score: 1

      Then what happens when Coral gets slashdotted? What if they don't want to pay for all the extra bandwidth?

    2. Re:PLEASE make Coral links mandatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because of the dynamic nature of this site, it can't be coral cached properly.

    3. Re:PLEASE make Coral links mandatory by peterjm · · Score: 1

      if this is the coral that I'm thinking of (coral distrubution network or some such garbage) then it's basically a poor mans akamia. They're not goign to be /.'ed any time soon.

      There is of course the other issue that coral is essentially using the bandwidth of its participants (lots of universities and whatnot). That bandwidth is paid for by state taxes and student tuition, all that good stuff, and should most definately not be going to fund a commercial enterprise like slashdot.

    4. Re:PLEASE make Coral links mandatory by TheDormouse · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a job for Firefox + Greasemonkey to me.

    5. Re:PLEASE make Coral links mandatory by hab136 · · Score: 1
      Seriously, just make it an automated process or something. ALWAYS make it a Coral link.

      Not unless they switch to port 80. Some of us surf at work, and can't access 8090 or whatever stupid port they decided upon.

    6. Re:PLEASE make Coral links mandatory by Marthisdil · · Score: 0

      That's like getting them to um, not post dupes...or post stupid stories....i.e. not gonna happen

  31. Larger Scale by deadmantyping · · Score: 1

    This is actually a great project. It would be great if there was some way to adopt this on a much larger scale, covering as many large cities as possible, thus making it incredibly useful to tourists who are visiting cities. It shouldn't be limited to just American cities either. Obviously this may not be reasonable, considering the amount of work it would entail, and also I am not aware of how difficult it would be to get crime data for cities in other countries, but it certainly would be something worth looking into I think.

    1. Re:Larger Scale by Manchot · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering what kind of effect a large scale version of this could have on crime rates. Since it would be easier to check them, less people would move to crime-ridden areas, and the ones who do would be on their guard much more, especially those who notice spikes in crime at certain times. At the same time, the more intelligent criminals would try to do their business in areas where people are less on-guard (i.e., low crime areas). Presumably, it would even out crime rates quite a bit.

  32. And for my next Google Maps Hack... by davidwr · · Score: 3, Funny

    A geographical map of sites unreachable due to the Slashdot Effect.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:And for my next Google Maps Hack... by trandism · · Score: 1

      Or maybe a map of sites unreachable due to the IE-only effect.

      And then a DDoS on them by the community

      (I feel activist today)

      --
      www.lemonodor.com A mostly Lisp weblog
    2. Re:And for my next Google Maps Hack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this snippet sums up a lot of the recent Linux "migration" stories:

      Although Windows is used on about 90 percent of the world's personal computers, some governments and large organizations have switched to the free Linux system or have threatened to do so to get discounts.

      Which is sad, since I've had a fairly painless transition to Linux a few years ago. Given the state of WINE these days, there's very little that a Linux-only box can't do that a Wintel box can.


  33. Next, movie capability? by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting
    COMPSTAT has been doing this for years for the NYPD. They sometimes run the last month as a movie, looped, and watch it for a while. Trends pop out. Patterns appear. Crooks aren't that tactically creative.

    The trick is to come up with a visual representation so that if some crook is hitting South Side liquor stores about once a week, somebody sees it. In classical policing, that's not likely to be noticed unless the crook commits all their crimes in the same precinct on the same shift.

  34. No they don't by millahtime · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I guess some people actually read the articles!

    No they don't RTFA, it's just lunch time so your companies network is being maxed out.

  35. Damn, I knew gas was expensive.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I thought it was just the war or something...I didn't think cheap gas was actually forbidden now. Must be the damn treehuggers.

  36. Apparently... by Gardenhead · · Score: 1

    Apparently my neighbors in the next block have a pretty serious TRO violation problem. =S But, I'm happy to see that there hasn't been any crime on my block of Chicago. Even though I've seen this site before, it's still cool, especially with satellite options.

  37. What is the deal? by Zebra_X · · Score: 1

    Or is this all a clever trick on Google's part to build up more and more third parties dependent upon Google?

    Probably, yes but WTF? Google is offering a service, you can choose to use it, or not. Go build your own if you don't like the fact that a Company is doing it (GL HF). Not every product or service offered by a company is some sort of hidden conspiracy to steal our lives and take our money. I also fail to see how "novelty" products such as these constitute a "dependency" on the google map service.

    1. Re:What is the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All we need is another multi billion dollar company with a reason to lobby for invading Cuba...

    2. Re:What is the deal? by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

      I fear that Chancellor Google is the Sith Lord we've been looking for...

  38. Coral has it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  39. Real-time crime maps by sachmet · · Score: 1

    Real-time crime maps have already been done by the guys at rancidbacon.com. So you can see a near real-time Seattle crime map. Well, the crime reporting, not the crime as it's taking place

    1. Re:Real-time crime maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " How do I get to call you a moron?

      The judge reckoned that given their stonewalling that they would lose the case, knew it, so therefore started hiding emails, then when that didn't work, deleted some.

      Now, given that deleting information when under investigation is a serious criminal offense, that seems to have been reduced to "you fail it"."

      How do I get to call you a moron? You think people should be convicted based on a judges hypothesis? What ever happened to evidence, and the burden of proof on the prosecutor.

      Your anti-corporate bias has blinded you. If this was a person being sued by the RIAA, your opinion would be different, if you're like the average /.e

  40. GeoSpatial Applications. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.geovista.psu.edu/grants/nci-esda/public ations.html

    "The project will leverage GeoVISTA Studio as an environment for building and testing software applications focusing on exploratory spatial data analysis applied to cancer and related risk factor data."

    http://www.geovista.psu.edu/research/healthvisuali zation/index.html

    " Dynamic geovisualization methods extend traditional cartographic approaches for representing georeferenced health statistics and related information in at least two ways: by emphasizing the use of maps and other representation forms to construct knowledge (not just to present it) and by dynamically linking the visual map display with both the underlying geographic data structures and the system users (resulting in maps that change in response to changes in data and/or to actions on the part of users)."

    http://www.geocomputation.org/2000/GC018/Gc018.htm

    "One barrier to the uptake of Geocomputation is that, unlike GIS, it has no system or toolbox that provides easy access to useful functionality. This paper describes an experimental environment, GeoVISTA Studio, that attempts to address this shortcoming. Studio is a Java-based, visual programming environment that allows for the rapid, programming free development of complex data exploration and knowledge construction applications to support geographic analysis. It achieves this by leveraging advances in geocomputation, software engineering, visualisation and machine learning."

  41. Oh my... by The-Bus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'll tell you what the real crime is... not submitting any mirrors! We're going to get arrested for arson on this guy's server.

    Mirrordot came up empty but there does seem to be a Coral Cache available.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  42. cheap gas.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FORBIDDEN:
    Site Owner, Please contact your support center for assistance.

    thanks.

  43. Need a Hack by LinuxMacWin · · Score: 1

    What I want is someone to hack google maps to display full screen (1024 X 768) or nearly on 90% of the screen. The challenge is that even if you set the browser to full screen, the map height X width is fixed.

    It should be a very simple hack. Let us know if someone has already done it.

    1. Re:Need a Hack by Anonymouse+Cownerd · · Score: 1

      Meedio with the GoogleMaps module can do this, though not on a webpage.

      --
      http://www.rayn.net . Funny. Stuff.
  44. The real crime... by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 1

    "Server found alive after being mercilessly buried by slasdotters."

    --
    Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
  45. Wapiti Watch by yipper · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I live in a resort community in the Colorado rocky mountains. Every fall we have a few weeks
    of elk (wapiti) mating season where tourist type folks drive around looking for the herds of elk.

    I think it would be really cool to have a google maps app on a website where people could click on a map to show where they saw elk.

    How would I go about doing that?

    1. Re:Wapiti Watch by coopaq · · Score: 1
      I think it would be really cool to have a google maps app on a website where people could click on a map to show where they saw elk.

      I'd tell you but I think you want to do some online hunting ;)

      Remote Control Hunting

    2. Re:Wapiti Watch by yipper · · Score: 1


      But the remote-control eating doesn't seem like it really would satisfy.

  46. legal? by bendawg · · Score: 1

    Is this even legal? Obviously, these are "good" causes, but what if someone was to create a commercial product based on a google maps hack? Would that even be legal?

  47. no doubt a cool hack but... by avi33 · · Score: 1

    The data source (city of chicago ICAM) already runs a searchable, mappable, filterable crime map:

    http://12.17.79.6/ctznicam/ctznicam.asp ...and it's not slashdotted.

    1. Re:no doubt a cool hack but... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      As well as having a more useful interface for those of us who actually *live* here, as opposed to the /. gawkers.

      "Oh my god, big city crime! Aaagh!"

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  48. CWI Hosting ...bad bad!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems the cheap gas hack was being hosted at CWI hosting. I had such a terrible experience with it. One day they decided that we are using too much resources and we should upgrade to stand alone server. They would not define what is 'too much'. The worse part was that they didnt even let us point the DNS to some other hosting provider, they simply froze our account. We had to do DNS transfer before the website got operational again. HORRIBLE work ethics!!

  49. Google Hack I'd like by Deanasc · · Score: 1

    I wish someone would show the sales rates of birth control superimposed over a map so I can find easy women. Actually that would probably backfire. Women smart enough to take charge of their bodies probably have higher self esteem then I could crack. What did Jay and Silent Bob say about abortion clinics?

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
  50. This place has always had carwreck value. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fun to watch, but nothing of actual worth being produced.

    AC

  51. Poor Jobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to see GoogleMaps(TM) combined with a Job Board. Then you could see were all the jobs are in relation to you, and even better if they're colored according to type.

  52. heh. the other night by Harper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I whipped up a google maps hack of geolocation of Illinois registered sex offenders: http://demon.dopeman.org/sexOffenders/ It was amazingly easy.

    I used all of the tutorials and shit that the rancidbacon peeps created. made it rather simple. actually delightful.

    now if i was only mapping locations of something cool.. rather than depressing things.

    stupid maps.

    --
    Producing satire is kind of hopeless because of the literacy rate of the American public. - Frank Zappa
    1. Re:heh. the other night by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      There seems to be a lot of crime at:

      1060 West Addison Chicago, IL

      =P

      I call it "the dusty baker effect"

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    2. Re:heh. the other night by hwyengr · · Score: 1

      It was probably the Illinois Nazis looking for the Blues Brothers.

    3. Re:heh. the other night by _mythdraug_ · · Score: 1

      Suggestions for enancement...
      1) Different colored location icons for "Sexual Predator" and "Sexually Dangerous" and "Sexually Violent" people.

      2) Include thumbnail image from the state's list in the popup bubble.

      3) Simple link for pulling all ~19500 registrations:
      http://www.isp.state.il.us/sor/search_all.cfm , just submit the blank form (after changing # per page to 500).

  53. Is slashdot broken? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    Why are there all these Sarb-ox postings mixed in as replies to the Google crime hack? Even browsing at -1 I don't see the trail.

    1. Re:Is slashdot broken? by sachmet · · Score: 1

      Crapflood. They happen. The trolls are fishing again...

    2. Re:Is slashdot broken? by GoClick · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has finaly broken. Yup they used a 32 bit Int for the IDs of comments and recently passed the 4,294,967,296 mark, since Slashdot hasn't seen a single code update in the last 8 years it's just randomly started replacing quotes.

      No I'm totally full of crap.

      I think it's just incompetent people and trolls

    3. Re:Is slashdot broken? by friedmud · · Score: 1

      I don't know what's happening... but I don't think it's trolls. I seem to be seeing a lot of the same comments repeated over in different stories... it is really weird, I would be interested in finding out what is broken.

      Friedmud

    4. Re:Is slashdot broken? by satanami69 · · Score: 1

      It's just some bored admin working OT to stay in complience with the new SB act. He's probably just blowing off some steam.

      --
      I really hate Dan Patrick.
    5. Re:Is slashdot broken? by tpearson · · Score: 1

      Seem to just be trolls - notice that all of them are posted as ACs and the new word verification thing

  54. OT: SimCity-GeoCity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You laugh, but SimCity would make a nice interface for GeoSpatial data.

  55. ./ed by t0ny747 · · Score: 0

    Both links are down so I whent to http://mirrordot.org/ and look at this Presently sustaining 0 parallel Slashdottings. Far out! . Any other mirrors any one knows about?

    --
    Taco?
  56. The Fickle Slashdot Opinion-Netcraft:Trust is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Guys, these people are making wonderful tools and making them available for free, and letting people mess with them. They're probably reading comments like that slack-jawed, thinking "man, you just can't win with that crowd!" Give em a break! :)"

    The root to all this is simple. We don't trust others. Do you all trust the geek next door? How about the one in the next city? How about the one that goes on to create a company, that provides a free service, and constant improvements?

  57. Politics in software licenses by fritzenheimer · · Score: 1
    Anonymous Coward wrote: Another reason is that putting any political agendas in software licenses is not leagally right

    JGAA's anarchist political agenda is the central point of his WAR FTP Daemon software license. I wasn't aware there was a problem with his license. Can you elaborate?

    GNU's license can also be interpreted as political support for communal ownership. Even the word "copyleft" has a connotation of political progressiveness. I'm sure others can give similar examples.

    RFM

    --
    RFM
  58. Portland Oregon already has something better by pdxaaron · · Score: 3, Informative

    We already have PortlandMaps. You can see crime maps, tax maps, appraised value, bus routes, upcoming road improvments, much better satallite imagery... Google Maps has nothing on these guys. Every city should have something like this.

    1. Re:Portland Oregon already has something better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah we are pretty proud of our little PortlandMaps service, apparently our users like it too as we get over 40,000 unique users a month.

      Though its good to see other innovations in Internet mapping. Google Maps has a very impressive interface, even if it is just a very big tiled image. ;)

      Btw, we are just now rolling out internal web mapping services for the Police that make our external crime mapping look very primative. Some day soon it may be available to public, but obviously the data is very sensitive so not all of it will.

      Have fun catching up guys!

      PortlandMaps Team
      (lowly municipals workers)

  59. Gas at $2/gallon *is* cheap. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just you wait until it's $6.50/gallon.

    --
    Deleted
  60. T^3 by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1
    tempting terrorist targets

    Why can't I shake the mental image of Homer Simpson drooling "Tempting targets...mmmmmm"?

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  61. Re:Prostitution *worldwide* now on google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Right. Foreign, married men _never_ use prostitutes.

    And I thought maps.google.com is only available for the US (and UK)! But your answer implies that you found that secret back door ;-)

    Please tell us! Everywhere on the world men want to find hot chicks via a mouse click on googles maps...

  62. Ehhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't Microsoft Canada sell to Cuba?

    In any effect, computers aren't very popular in Cuba. A business partner and I looked into creating an island wide public access wireless network and found there was no interest, not even the gov't was interested in getting online.

    Most people in cuba are pretty down to earth and very hospitable, provided you're a Canadian. However, MOST of them don't really care about computers. Some do.

    1. Re:Ehhhh by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      Probably not. I'm sure the US gov't would make life hell for ANY us-born company to sell to Cuba, regardless of how many other nations they're occupying.

      And speaking of cubans not caring about computers... I just fixed one's computer while he sat here and intently watched my every move. Then he screwed me out of getting paid. Then he had the nerve to call later that night and tell me he was going to pick me up so I could hook up his printer.

      Not solely based upon that small interaction with him, I'm not very fond of cubans in general.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
  63. Michael, is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, you probably had children with the express intentent of gaining improper access to children.

  64. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did you reply to the wrong thing?

  65. You gotta be kidding me by bohemian_observer · · Score: 0, Troll

    So in Chicago, there is crime on nearly every other street at any time a day ?
    Holy god is that really true? Can't believe that.

    I live in a small independent country in the mid Europe and there was no crime around that I can remember, and I am living in a 100k+ city. I can't even remember that police hotline number well, never used it and probably never will. I can walk our dog with my girlfriend to any place here, no problem, never face any kind of crime anywhere.

    So I must conclude that if u speak lang. that nobody in the world can speak and live where winters are too cold for hispanian or negro's ass to withstand then our society is pretty well protected from foreign crime makers. Hell, if I can be incorporated in here, even daytrade on Wallstreet from here, register TM/patent on USPTO from here, watch that HDTV FOX network TV over "torrent" feeds here then Do I really need to live in that "oh" so amazing and flashing U.S. ?

    1. Re:You gotta be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you're a racist. How nice.

    2. Re:You gotta be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do I really need to live in that "oh" so amazing and flashing U.S. ?

      Yes.

    3. Re:You gotta be kidding me by MC68000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Although "negro" is considered offensive (maybe parent doesn't know that), bringing up facts does not make parent racist.

      Blacks are seven times more likely to commit homicide than whites.

      http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm

      Chicago really is a dangerous city. I didn't even apply to the University of Chicago (even though I had a reasonable chance of being admitted) due to the fact that the neighborhood around the college is so dangerous that students can't even leave!

      --
      E = m c^3 Don't drink and derive E = m c^3
    4. Re:You gotta be kidding me by superstick58 · · Score: 1

      I think I remember hearing the other day on the radio that Chicago had its first day without a shooting since something like a decade ago. That said, it's a fun city to visit.

    5. Re:You gotta be kidding me by SecretMethod70 · · Score: 1
      I have lived in Chicago for four years now, going to school at DePaul University. Yes, the University of Chicago isn't in the best section of Chicago, but I think you exaggerate the danger. In the four years I have lived here (admittedly, in a nicer section since that is where my university is located) I have not been the victim of a crime nor have I personally known anyone to be the victim of a crime. I have visited the University of Chicago on occassion with no problems and I frequently take trips to the store late at night.

      Am I careful? Sure. I avoid poorly lit streets that have little traffic when it's dark, and I typically stick to areas that I know. That doesn't mean that I'm constantly looking over my shoulder though. I have walked through the neighborhood of Cabrini Green (an infamous area of public housing in Chicago) multiple times during the day and, at most, received strange looks.

      The point is, yes, Chicago can be dangerous. But it is by no means some place teeming with violence where a resident is certain to be the victim of a crime. A little common sense and most people are fine.

    6. Re:You gotta be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must suck to be that afraid of life that it would deter you from going to one of the best schools in the nation.

    7. Re:You gotta be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are incredibly naive. You are probably a freshamn. I can't even believe you mention Cabrini Green. Are you so you so young you don't realize the vast majority of buildings have come down? Cabrini Green is soon to be no more. There were once many thousands more people living there than there are today.

      Lincoln Park is the safest and wealthiest neighborhood in the city. Chicago however is one of the most dangerous cities in the nation. You may feel very safe in that area, and justifiably so. But that is why the rents are so expensive.

      Rogers Park and Hyde Park however have not seen such triumphant returns from the dark days of the 1970's. The reasons are complex, but at the moment distance from downtown is probably the main reason. I've lived in Rogers Park, and hearing gunshots was not an uncommon occurence. I witnessed many muggings and was present in the aftermath of murders. From what I've heard, things have only gotten worse.

      The University of Chicago has a large campus and can patrol the area around it quite well, but few students live more than a 1/4 mile from campus.

      If you think its so safe, move there and see for yourself. Its a world away from the suburban wasteland Lincoln Park and Old Town have become.

    8. Re:You gotta be kidding me by dr.octogonocologist · · Score: 1

      The University of Chicago is better off without you.

      For those interested, the book "Freakonomics" (in fact written by a University of Chicago economist) does a really good job explaining the socioeconomic reasoning for black crime and crime in general for that matter.

      In response to this post, it also has a good description of why people perceive threats as larger than they really are. (i.e. Swimming pools are 100 times more dangerous than guns to children)

      I'm hoping you avoided your reasonable admission chances at Harvard which had a minimum of 8 times the forcible sexual assault. Though I couldn't give you accurate percentages for aggr. assault due to the difficulty of dividing by 0

      http://www.securityoncampus.org/crimestats/index.h tml

    9. Re:You gotta be kidding me by SecretMethod70 · · Score: 1
      I am a senior actually, and I am well aware of the situation with Cabrini Green. However, it is hardly a "safe" area of Chicago yet. No, it is no longer as dangerous as it used to be, but it is certainly not a nice area at all. Lincoln Park isn't as safe as it used to be either. It's not even close to any of the "safest" police beats.

      Anyway, I never said that one should wander around and feel safe. I said if one uses common sense, it is entirely possible to be safe in Chicago. Few students live more than a 1/4 mile from UofC, but that doesn't mean they never go out of that 1/4 mile radius. They just do so in a more safe manner such as using public transportation as opposed to walking around. As someone with a fair amount of friends there, I know for a fact they don't sit around living in fear becase of where they go to school.

      As for Roger's Park, I know quite a few people there as well, going to Loyola University. They don't live in fear either. And, no, most of us do not live on campus. Again, it's about using common sense. The naive approach is that of the typical suburbanite, thinking that anyone going into the city is in danger for their life. I know a lot of people who came from the suburbs to go to schools such as UofC, Loyola, or DePaul who were told such things. It simply isn't true. Common sense: that's all it takes. Will it prevent ALL crimes? Of course not. Does it enable most people who have the luxery of living above the poverty line the ability to live in the city without constant fear? Definitely.

    10. Re:You gotta be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mother was raped by a gang of teenagers while a student at University of Chicago.

      Granted, this happened in the late 1970's, but the neighborhood hasn't gotten any better.

      Fortunately the perps were caught and convicted, but it changed my mother's life forever.

    11. Re:You gotta be kidding me by bohemian_observer · · Score: 0

      Thankfully I've never met any "negro" or "hispanian" in my life, so that was just an imaginary draw. But as far as I can see the situation in the U.S. today, little racism or rather say protectivism is healthy for a society. At least not allow anyone to enter the country and receive unemployement benefits and make riot in the spare time. U.S. should be more protective I think, we in the world wish U.S. the best, but U.S. poluted with all kind of crime and poverty that view is bad even for us.

      If shooting is not an not an uncommon case during the day in some parts of the city (Chicago in this case) and I can't feel safe then what about my children (?), such a view of life is horrible.

      Hitler gased in concentration camps all other nations in our neighbourhood during the WW2, so all turks, gypsies, jews and others (about 8 million exactly) where whiped out (jews were not a problem but fuhrer was a psycho u know) since then crime thing was rare and only in recent years with foreign workers from south and east like Serbria, Bulgaria, Ukraine the crime level goes up. And if I say low I mean it, we didnt lock our houses here till nineties, no kidding. I would definitely made a "wall" at the Mexico border, open border is very nice thing, but..

    12. Re:You gotta be kidding me by MC68000 · · Score: 1

      It was much more than that. Believe me, I talked to others who had went there, and I got the impression that everyone is depressed an awful lot and because of the bad neighborhood there is nothing to do off campus.

      --
      E = m c^3 Don't drink and derive E = m c^3
    13. Re:You gotta be kidding me by MC68000 · · Score: 1

      I've read Freakonomics and it doesn't discount what I say at all. The most Freakonomics would say is that it is stupid to worry about being murdered if you live in a normal, middle class neighborhood. It does not say that you shouldn't be worried if you are a nerdy white boy walking through an alley in the worst part of Chicago.

      Oh, and those campus crime statistics are irrelevant. I care about the chances of getting mugged while being off-campus, not on-campus.

      I'm excited to go to UF anyway because I get to go for free. I don't regret for a minute passing up a university where I not only would be bored out of my mind due to the inability to leave campus, but also have a $120K debt. Maybe graduate school will be different.

      --
      E = m c^3 Don't drink and derive E = m c^3
    14. Re:You gotta be kidding me by SecretMethod70 · · Score: 1
      To put the comparison in perspective, I looked up the crime statistics for the 1 mile area around DePaul, UofC, and Loyola for the period from April 21, 2005 to May 4. Here are the results (minus domestic crimes and looking specifically at the most significant types of crime):

      DePaul (Lincoln Park):
      139 crimes
      30 on person, 102 on property
      Of crimes on person, 15 battery, 5 assault, 2 crim sexual assault, and 6 robbery

      Loyola (Roger's Park):
      136 crimes
      44 on person, 79 on property
      Of crimes on person, 17 battery, 6 assault, and 6 robbery

      University of Chicago (Hyde Park):
      163 crimes
      49 on person, 91 on property
      Of crimes on person, 16 battery, 15 assault, 1 sex offense (but not crim sexual assault), 8 robbery, 1 attempted robbery, and 1 kidnapping

      I would hardly call these significant differences. Considering the number of people in a 1 mile radius in Chicago, 19 more crimes on person in a 2 week period is a relatively small number. The Lincoln Park area had 2 rapes to Hyde Park's 0 (albeit, it did have a "sex offense") and most other serious crimes on person were within the same general range, with the exception of Hyde Park's higher degree of assault - the lesser of the two charges between assault and battery. The only thing which truly distinguishes Hyde Park in this time period is 1 kidnapping. A serious crime, yes, but I would say it is evened out by Lincoln Park's 2 rapes.

      It's terrible that this crime exists, yes. And it is important to stay safe when in the city, of course. But it is not something that is impossible, and being the victim of a crime doesn't even necessarily have to be probable. If the people I know and I, living in all three of these areas, can spend 4+ years here without being the victims of crime, so can others. Again, it is impossible to rule out being the victim of a crime - sometimes, nothing could have been done to foresee it - but the point is that it is entirely possible to act in such a way to greatly minimize the likelihood.

  66. very effective by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    since, judging by my abilities to connect to the server, some criminals seem to have made off with the server

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  67. How long by GoClick · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How long until some autocratic judge declares that you have to keep all voice mails and record all phone conversations in some ruling?

    Why is it judges can make "laws" with no checks or balances?

  68. 15 minutes of criminal fame... by lost+in+place · · Score: 2, Funny

    > How long till we have real time crime data showing up on Google's map?

    and then the next logical step...

    Dear Google Inc.:

    I was pleased to hear that Google's map data had finally been merged with real-time crime data. To celebrate, I knocked over two liquor stores on the 800 block of Harrison, then mugged a guy over on Grant and committed some minor vandalism around Eastwood. Then I headed on back to my apartment to see my efforts rewarded on your site.

    Imagine my surprise when I got back to my browser and discovered... NOTHING! I kept reloading the damn window every 15 minutes, but not a blip showed up. I cannot express my disgust.

    It used to be the Google name meant something, but ever since your stock price hit $240 you've just been slacking. It's like nobody cares any more. It's enough to make a petty criminal like me lose his faith in humanity.

    Signed,
    -Disgusted in Chicago

  69. Careful! by bahwi · · Score: 1

    I'm sure Maxis will patent this from their use of the tech from SimCity!

  70. Connect The Dots! by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Anyone into creating a connect the dots puzzle?

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  71. Waiting on Iraqi Insurgent hack for the US Army by theurge14 · · Score: 0

    Might make convoy rides a bit smoother.

  72. Dissent is highly patriotic by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    Dissent is highly patriotic. Go read some history. Hell, I didn't even *go* to school, and I know some of these things!

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  73. How long before real estate interests ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How long till we have real time crime data showing up on Google's map?

    How long before real estate interests make him pull the site down or make the agencies providing the crime data stop providing it - or stop providing it in a computer-useful form?

    Not a purely academic question. My wife noticed that crimes we's heard about from other sources was not being reported in some areas of Silicon Valley and asked the San Jose paper in question about it. The person she reached said that they didn't want to depress real estate values. B-(

    Then they wonder why we don't subscribe these days, and prefer to get our news from the web.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  74. Why? by xant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because sex offenses of a particular kind are actually related to sexual addiction, and there is an extremely high recidivism rate due to the fact that prisons don't treat addiction very effectively, and treating addiction at all is difficult in the first place, and these are people that are extremely deep into their addictions to have committed their crimes.

    Having said that:
    * Why don't we fix the prison system so it does treat addictive behaviors related to sex?
    * Why don't we distinguish between sex crimes that are connected to an addition and those that are not, and not track sexual offenders who are unlikely to commit a new crime?
    * Why are there so many people on the list who don't deserve to be there? (Misguided applications of the statutory-rape laws come to mind, as others have pointed out.)

    Without fixing these problems I am opposed to the sex offender registry, but I do understand why it exists.

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    1. Re:Why? by Maestro4k · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Because sex offenses of a particular kind are actually related to sexual addiction, and there is an extremely high recidivism rate due to the fact that prisons don't treat addiction very effectively, and treating addiction at all is difficult in the first place, and these are people that are extremely deep into their addictions to have committed their crimes. To some extent you're correcct, prisons are quite bad at actually treating the addiction (or any underlying reason for criminal activity) so it's no surprise that there's a high rate of recidivism in general. Granted it is higher with sex offenders, probably because prisons don't seem to even _try_ to treat the problem. The person just spends years in prison thinking about what they wish they could do again.

      However, I don't think it takes a deep addiction to cause these acts, what info I can find with some quick googling indicates that pedophiles (which fall into a class of disorders called paraphilias) and that they litteral don't think the way you and I do. One example given in discussing treatment states "A pedophile observing a young girl wearing shorts may erroneously think, 'she wants me.'" That's not something most "normal" people would think of a female of any age. The more normal thought process would be "I want her" instead.

      The treatments listed don't look terribly useful. All are variations of positive and negative reinforcement. For instance:

      "In olfactory aversion therapy, for example, the pedophile is trained to pair and associate the chain of events preceding pedophilic acts with the odor of ammonia, supplied by smelling salt capsules. In covert desensitization, the pedophile practices imagining the chain of events leading to pedophilic acts, and then inserts imagined negative consequences into the chain."

      This sounds destined for failure because it requires the willful cooperation of the pedophile. You can't be certain they're associating the smells or negative images with what they say they are after all.

      Why don't we fix the prison system so it does treat addictive behaviors related to sex?

      Better why don't we fix the prison system so it treats the underlying problems for all crimes, not just sex crimes. While we're at it why don't we work at reintroducing prisoners to normal society and assisting them in finding work/etc. If they know they can have a better life and we help remove the obstacles in the path for former convicts it would likely help lower crime rates for all crimes.

      Why don't we distinguish between sex crimes that are connected to an addition and those that are not, and not track sexual offenders who are unlikely to commit a new crime?

      Good question for the first part. I know my state doesn't, most of the sex offenders in my area are for statutory rape. (At least the website lists what the crime was if they committed it in state, for out of state crimes it just says unknown, not very helpful). How about we work hard to treat the underlying problems the ones who historically have a high rate of recidivism have and track them through required therapy as a requirment of their parole instead? If they seem to be making progress, or are cured (although I doubt this is possible, I've seen quite a bit of literature flatly state there is no cure for pedohpilia) then we don't track the publically. I have no problem with the police knowing their whereabouts but publishing the info to the world just invites cases of vigilante justice -- often against the wrong targets because the info was out of date.

      Why are there so many people on the list who don't deserve to be there? (Misguided applications of the statutory-rape laws come to mind, as others have pointed out.)

      Frankly because all the avid supporters of laws like this seem to forget there are different level of sex offenders. If you asked them, I'll bet a good 99% of them would tell you all sex crimes are equally horrendous
    2. Re:Why? by Maestro4k · · Score: 1

      Posted AC for the same reasons for not searching for this stuff from work. :) Ahh, oh well, not too big a problem. Forgot to check post anonymously. Doh!

    3. Re:Why? by xant · · Score: 1

      Sorry for lack of links to back up my quotes

      No need, really. It's not as if anything you said is hard to believe ;-)

      We should all be asking the biggest questions though: does the registry prevent crimes? What are the statistics, before and after? Has anyone even studied it?

      The bottom line is we shouldn't have ineffective laws, regardless of what the law is about. If the registry is indeed effective at preventing crime, then we can have a debate, but if it's not, it should be thrown out, period.

      --
      It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better why don't we fix the prison system so it treats the underlying problems for all crimes, not just sex crimes.

      Well quite frankly that isn't their job, nor should it be. And many of the problems a prison can not "treat". In particular the combination of being "poor" and living in a high population density area are the largest indicators of crime. How is a prison supposed to address this? It can't. The moment you make "prison" a place to go get an education and get out of the 'hood to move to a better one when you get out, you have also created a huge demand for prison space.

      While we're at it why don't we work at reintroducing prisoners to normal society and assisting them in finding work/etc. If they know they can have a better life and we help remove the obstacles in the path for former convicts it would likely help lower crime rates for all crimes.

      Actually most states do have programs for these things.

      Posted anonymously to show that yes, it can be done. ;)

  75. Crime Maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Danish Police - though usually in the stoneage technologically speaking are providing a crime mapping service to the public and have done so for a while.

  76. MOD Parent DOWN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a dynamic site. You can't exactly cache a dynamic site.

    too many idiots that don't understand how the net works... and yet they still insist one whining that they can't get what they want RIGHT NOW...

    I'll bet you're one of those people that has an MBA and just likes throwing out keywords and catchphrases to make it sound like you know what you're talking about.

    (normally i don't do this, but i'm only posting anon just in case you're MY current project manager.)

    1. Re:MOD Parent DOWN... by LanMan04 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just becase it's a dynamic site doesn't mean it won't benefit from Coral caching!

      Sure, the dynamic bits still have to get through, but what about all the graphics that get served out? I know that's just bandwidth, and requires almost 0 processing on the sender's part, but it would still help when 250,000 slashdotters descend on a site at once. At least his bandwidth won't max out anywhere near as quickly.

      I was able to use the site via the Coral Caching system (before it got totally zonked) and it appeared to serve data to me correctly. Am I an idiot? I mean, if you submit a novel (as in uncommon) query to the site via the cache and it responds, that proves it's at least working correctly, right? Might help, but it won't hurt.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
  77. click and shoot by operationRedPeace · · Score: 1

    Maybe when our cars take part in IP packet switching we will be able to keep real time tabs on crimes which we happen to see take place. Then the other cars in the city on the network can home in on [RECENTLY STOLEN CAR]. All the geeks can chase down the criminals before the cops get there and we can blast the criminals with our home made stun guns. Better yet we can have an online ui for which the highest bidder gets to trigger the stun gun via one click of a mouse button. ...kind of like a live unreal tournament.

  78. The police already give us this info by MrRoarkeLovesTattoo · · Score: 1

    The Chicago Police have something called ICAM which maps all of the crimes and the general type but not specifics http://12.17.79.6/ctznicam/ctznicam.asp Also, the site link provided for this guy's site wouldn't work for me. Anybody else having problems with it?

  79. Low education + single parent home == high crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A high concentration of low education + single parent households == very high crime rate.

    This holds across all demographic groups.

  80. new york subway stops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now if only someone could do this to place the subway stops on the map.

    where is the info on the API?

  81. St. Louis Crime by Coco+Lopez · · Score: 1

    The St. Louis PD already has something like this, albeit on a proprietary system.

  82. Source Code by ToadMan8 · · Score: 1

    People have obviously done their homework already to hack this thing... where is the community documentation? I want to support GPS's with this, like GPS Drive - that's a sweet app but with google driving direction downloads and maps it'd be truely amazing.

    --
    I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
  83. Google inspired open source maps by Mik3D · · Score: 1

    There is a newly released interface to the mapserver application called Ka-Map that adopts a tiled map approach, similar to Google Maps. Pretty speedy considering maptools.org doesn't have anything close to Googles resources.

  84. Not much else to see! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compare the Illinois category to somewhere like New York over at Google Sightseeing and you'll see why they need to Google map the crimes in Chicago - there's bugger all else going on!

  85. And... by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    And I have a hard time understanding society's interest in hounding that kid for the rest of his days, especially if no kids even saw the ASCII goatse man.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  86. We track our car with it. by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    You can see it here:

    http://www.dashpc.com/map/

    It's probably not the wisest thing to do - but it's a proof of concept.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  87. Slashdotted... by 6lind5ide · · Score: 1

    Sorry, slashdot users aren't allowed. You've been too naughty.

    I have?

  88. Sorry... by cryogenix · · Score: 1

    Sorry, slashdot users aren't allowed. You've been too naughty.

    1. Re:Sorry... by bsquizzato · · Score: 1

      What's the big deal? We just wanted to check out some nerdy news about stuff that mattered.

  89. Innovative? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

    This isn't innovative, Sim City had it in 1990.

  90. The Pentagon? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    You mean this ol' thing?

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  91. spent more time denying than it took to go around by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1

    IDtenT...spent more time trying to deny us than it takes to just go around. Hmmm.. Cut (Control C) ....1 second Alt Tab...2 seconds (too many things open) Paste (Control V) ....1 second Looking like an idiot in front of 10,000+ viewers for no reason than to look like an idiot... timeless -1 for misuse of .htaccess

  92. How does this work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone please explain to me or point me in the right direction on how integrating various data with Google maps works? thanks.

  93. Re: Super Heroes by shambalagoon · · Score: 1

    You know what realtime crime mapping will lead to???

    The dawn of SUPER HEROES

  94. Holy Crap! by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

    This makes we glad to live in a small midwest City (120K). We had one murder last year.

  95. what i want to know is... by DigiBoi · · Score: 1

    when will we be able to type in someone's name and see where they are in real time?

    --
    I put on my robe and wizard hat.
  96. site blocked read below for directions by bluelip · · Score: 1

    Not related to the topic, but needed if you want to get to the site.

    The admin has blocked people coming from slashdot. If you want to get there, you must reload the page or type it into the browser's address field.

    Again, the link is not broken, the admin just doesn't like people sucking up his bandwidth.

    --

    Yep, I never spell check.
    More incorrect spellings can be found he
  97. education for everyone by UlfGabe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    something that is "innovative" is never described that way by anyone involved, to them it was just work.

    these maps are cool, but not innovative, innovative would be if google was able to predict the weather month by month on a farily high resolution (current weather systems do predictions for 200 km square blocks.

    --
    Check journal for info on Anti-TextBook, an idea by me.
  98. California Highway Patrol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already has this built into their website, except that it's updates as the call comes in. Even for things as small as animals in the road. Not to detract from the mans work, but it's not unique to the Chicago area, or an entirely new idea.

    http://cad.chp.ca.gov/

  99. the CHP's websire has this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    built in. By CHP I mean California Highway Patrol. On their incident information page, updated every minute, a map link is preasent for each call shown. Even for trivial things.

    http://cad.chp.ca.gov/

  100. Who's the criminals? by JoeSchmoe999 · · Score: 1

    Sorry, slashdot users aren't allowed. You've been too naughty.

    (Current Website from the link)

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.
  101. Here in Chicago... by Nybble's+Byte · · Score: 0

    walking will keep you healthy, but running can save your life!

  102. usdoj link. by jasonhamilton · · Score: 1

    http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/publications/infores/ statutoryrape/handbook/issu.html Exclusions for rape: Under current laws, depending upon the State, the age differential may be set at from 2 to 6 years older than the minor. Most often, however, it is set at 3 or 4 years. In the survey, the age differentials reflected these variations.

    --
    SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
  103. Where to buy crack in Chicago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  104. Select criminal sexual assault by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    ...and get it done to you for free (if you're not picky).

  105. Is it illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is prostitution illegal in the US?

    If so, which part of it? Being a prostitute, offering one's sexual services for money, or obtaining and paying for such services?

  106. I have one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is my little attempt at informing Florida's residences about local sexual predators..

  107. Oblig by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

    Right. Foreign, married men _never_ use prostitutes.

    In Soviet Russia the prostitute uses you.

    hmm now that don't seem too bad ...

    --
    My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.