Slashdot Mirror


$70 Cordless Notebook Mouse with No Scroll Wheel

superfloungmous writes "CoolTechZone.com has reviewed Logitech's latest V500 Cordless Notebook Mouse that uses 2.4GHz wireless technology to transmit signal and has a scroll panel instead of a scroll wheel. The concept behind a scroll wheel is you simply move your finger in up, down, left and right directions to use the function. The mouse has a whopping $70.00 price tag as well. Could this be the end of scroll wheels? Here's a quote from the review, "One of the unique things about the V500 is its scroll panel, and this is the very first mouse to actually use this concept. Throughout our testing, we are nothing but impressed with Logitech's new idea. It worked perfectly, and it's actually better than a scroll wheel in many instances. It looks like the era of scroll wheels is short-lived if Logitech applies the same design to its desktop equivalent products."

372 comments

  1. Pictures? by ebh · · Score: 1, Funny

    Anyone?

    1. Re:Pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Pictures? by ruxxell · · Score: 0
      --
      "when the sun sets on the ghetto, all the broken stuff gets cold"
    3. Re:Pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      you read the article? you must be new here

    4. Re:Pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i tried to, it is \.'d

    5. Re:Pictures? by slughead · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Try Logitech's site if you want a mirror/pictures.

    6. Re:Pictures? by jmcmunn · · Score: 0, Troll

      /.'d you idiots.

    7. Re:Pictures? by ebh · · Score: 1

      You mean the one that doesn't appear on the screen and is not mentioned anywhere in the HTML? I have the first page of the review in another tab (Mozilla 1.7.5) and there is no picture. The site's too slashdotted right now to check in in IE.

    8. Re:Pictures? by BlogPope · · Score: 1
      From the site

      hyper-responsive vertical and horizontal scrolling

      I don't think I want my scroll wheel to be Hyper-Sensitive, It stikes me as more annoying than useful...

      --
      My other car is a Popemobile
    9. Re:Pictures? by carl0ski · · Score: 1

      I wouldnt mind it Hypersensitive doesnt mean it will violently, uncontrolably rock back and forward, Currently an Optical mouse is a hypersensitive device compare it to a Mechanical mouse (aka ball mouse) A current scroll is mechanical also in many cases the exact same wheel with cogs over infra red picks up movement, sometimes you scroll one line sometimes 2 lines at a time. and you have no way to scroll less any other factor than 1. aka no scrolling 1 and a half lines. a good optical mouse can just about be moved by pixels. i remember my last ball mouse in 2000 which sometimes moved an inch other times moved much more making it unresponsive and unreliable.

  2. 2.4 GHz by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hmm.. That's weird. Every time I move my mouse, I get disconnected from my 802.11g network."

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:2.4 GHz by cybersaga · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Hmm.. That's weird. Every time I move my mouse while talking on the phone, the person on the other end sounds like Satan."

    2. Re:2.4 GHz by magefile · · Score: 3, Funny

      That happens to me a lot, and I'm not even using a wireless mouse! ...

      Oh. SHIT.

    3. Re:2.4 GHz by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      ... and every time I talk on my cordless phone, my mouse cursor flips out.

    4. Re:2.4 GHz by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

      It must have Real Ultimate Power.

    5. Re:2.4 GHz by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The thing that bugs me is that it isn't Bluetooth. Bluetooth is 2.4GHz too, but it seems to coexist fine with WiFi, and will work with many more recievers than just the one in the package. I keep a Bluetooth mouse with my laptop, in part because my laptop has an integrated bluetooth reciever.

      A proprietary USB dongle just means something more to break off, more potential wear on the USB ports and such.

    6. Re:2.4 GHz by evilmousse · · Score: 1


      actually, my all-time-favorite computer problem for sheer rediculousness was JUST like that.

      my original 8088, when formatted and a fresh default installation of win3.11, would put my 2400 baud modem and my serial mouse on the same IRQ. or so i was able to deduce after a LOT of work, because the user-experience was that the modem wouldn't work unless the mouse was actively in motion. luckily enough, my external modem had lights on it that made that relationship apparant ^^

    7. Re:2.4 GHz by necromcr · · Score: 0

      There goes network latency (pingtime)..

      --
      No more I say.
    8. Re:2.4 GHz by smitten0000 · · Score: 1

      I have this mouse and it does not interfere whatsoever with my wireless access points. From what I've read it was specifically engineered not to interfere at reasonable distances from the receiver.

      Overall, it is a very nice mouse albeit a bit sensitive under Linux/Xorg

      --
      /. sig.
    9. Re:2.4 GHz by sammy+baby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was thinking exactly the same thing. I just snagged a new laptop with built-in Bluetooth, and it's shocking exactly how few bluetooth travel mice there are out there.

      If you're going to include a dongle in the packaging anyway, why not make it a bluetooth one? The mouse I eventually bought came bundled with one, and I just tossed it. (Okay, actually, I just put it aside.)

      I could see the need for a 2.4Ghz transmitter if this were a presentation remote or something similar, but come on, people. Most of us don't sit fifty feet from our laptops.

    10. Re:2.4 GHz by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Something sorta up this alley...

      Back in the day when I was working on a DOS based, flat file database app; one of the new guys discovered that if you moved the mouse, searchs, updates, maintenance processing, ran faster.

      The logical reason was that the interupt checking to see if the user had hit the space bar to cancel, was firing and not waiting that extra milisecond because the mouse was saying 'nope nothing happening here' quicker than just timing out the interupt. So you just balance the mouse on the SHIFT key and boom, faster processing of long reports!

      The Customer Support people in house were like "We are NOT telling that to customers!"


      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    11. Re:2.4 GHz by ZosX · · Score: 0

      That's funny.

    12. Re:2.4 GHz by Mr+Bill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Although I know you were going for humour here, I just want to dispell any concerns people might have that take your comments seriously.

      I have this mouse, and my Wireless-G router is about a foot and a half away from my mouse, and I have not had any conflicts. It would be silly if Logitech didn't take that into consideration.

      As for the quality of this mouse, I have had it for about 5 months now, and it is amazing. I've only replaced the batteries once, and I use it for at least 8 hours a day, and I rarely turn it off. They got the size right as well for a laptop mouse. Not too big, and not impossible to use like those micro mice.

      This one is definately worth the high price tag...

    13. Re:2.4 GHz by ArsonSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you on the phone with Microsoft support?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    14. Re:2.4 GHz by GroovBird · · Score: 1

      I don't think win3.11 ran on the 8088.

    15. Re:2.4 GHz by Noke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wouldn't say that Bluetooth coesists fine with WiFi (a or g - 2.4GHz). I use a bluetooth mouse with my 802.11g laptop and have very sluggish response from my bluetooth mouse whenever I do heavy data transfers to/from my laptop over the WiFI network.

    16. Re:2.4 GHz by cyb3rj · · Score: 1

      Logitech,

      Why is it that when I move my mouse my phone rings...?

      __
      Customer.

    17. Re:2.4 GHz by GroovBird · · Score: 1

      Ok, so I'm anal.

    18. Re:2.4 GHz by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 1
      "Hmm.. That's weird. Every time I move my mouse, I get disconnected from my 802.11g network."

      That's nothing, every time my cordless phone rings, my new mouse clicks on pr0n! (is that a *bad* thing?)

      --
      Chaos maximizes locally around me.
    19. Re:2.4 GHz by ChetPoint · · Score: 1

      ... *hum* ... on the speakers while printing, anyone? ISA-soundblaster on the same irq as the printer? network goes 'boom' as soon you play a sound (hint: NE2000)

      ah, the good ole days...

    20. Re:2.4 GHz by cob666 · · Score: 1
      I don't think win3.11 ran on the 8088.
      Windows 3.0 REQUIRED a 386 to run in enhanced mode. Otherwise it simply ran in a quasi Windows 2 mode with no 'multi-tasking'.

      Ahhh... the good old days!
      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    21. Re:2.4 GHz by evilmousse · · Score: 1


      absolutely correct, i was mistaken, that was my 486.

    22. Re:2.4 GHz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most routers/access points will work fine. Most routers do have a set of 13 or so channels (where 3 of these do not overlap) to chose from.
      At some companies that use a set of Acess Points and headsets (as certain Callcenters and hotspots downtown), that wont be willing to change channels there can be a decrease of transmission quality or disruptions. I'm curious, Does this mouse have different channel settings for the 2.4Ghz range?

    23. Re:2.4 GHz by LetterJ · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've found the same. Between bluetooth, wifi, microwaves, cordless phones, audio-video senders, these non-bluetooth wireless peripherals, etc. I just don't see how a "wireless future" is any more likely (near term) than the "paperless office". That's not even talking about the shared nature of the wifi itself. Ever transfer a DVD ISO file between to 802.11g laptops? That 54Mbps plummets REALLY fast into unusability.

      There's just too much going on and we haven't really hit complete widespread adoption yet for most of these technologies.

      I had a blog posting about this very thing a couple of days ago.

      http://www.wynia.org/wordpress/?p=100/

    24. Re:2.4 GHz by JohnsonWax · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. That's weird. Every time I move my mouse while talking on the phone, the person on the other end sounds like Satan.

      You mean people on the phone don't normally sound like Satan? Well, people in general, really?

    25. Re:2.4 GHz by todorb · · Score: 0

      that also happens to be the frequency of the water molecule, and that's why microwave ovens work:) all devices that emit radiation at 2450 MHz can be regarded as microwave heaters.

    26. Re:2.4 GHz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A similar thing happens in Windoze & IE (probably windows, but my example uses IE).

      For example, if you expand this article to show all comments at -1, start highlighting at the top & drag your mouse to the bottom of the screen and just let it sit, it takes about 13 seconds (on my PC) to highlight everything.

      If I do the same thing but wiggle the mouse, it only takes about 3 seconds.

    27. Re:2.4 GHz by mxms751 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to work with FoxPro 2.6 and had the exact same expeience with increased speed while 'wiggling' the mouse. No one ever believed me that it was a fact. Glad to know someone else in the world's been there.

    28. Re:2.4 GHz by niker · · Score: 1
      "Hmm.. That's weird. Every time I move my mouse, I get disconnected from my 802.11g network."
      That's funny -- It reminds me of a time I was running a particular version of GNU/Linux (I believe it was some RHL with linux 2.0) and was using a serial mouse and a ISA serial modem for dialup. There was a conflict with the IRQ line being shared by both devices, so the only way for me to dial up and keep the connection was to shake vigorously the mouse: the faster I shook, the faster the internets. Just picture the situation, it was weird even for the user (i.e.: me).
      --
      Moderators: Don't agree? pray tell why.
    29. Re:2.4 GHz by egypt_jimbob · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get out of the house! The support guy is calling from your bedroom!

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    30. Re:2.4 GHz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found in emacs when doing a select of a large block, the scrolldown was horribly slow unless I wiggled the mouse from side to side....

    31. Re:2.4 GHz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a little unusual... there were always problems with external serial ports clashing with internal equivalents, but I never heard of the external ports clashing with each other...

    32. Re:2.4 GHz by Tyrell+Hawthorne · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth is 2.4GHz too, but it seems to coexist fine with WiFi

      There are interoperation issues. I did my master's thesis project programming an iPAQ, using both the Bluetooth and 802.11b radio. Both radios being in that small device leads to problems; when doing a Bluetooth device search the 802.11b radio turns off (very abruptly and not-nice). Also, a researcher at the group I worked for has experienced problems using the 802.11b network while doing Bluetooth searches when the radios are close to each other (on the same desk).

      I've also tried using a Bluetooth headset as headphones with the iPAQ when streaming music over the 802.11b connection, with abysmal results. I think it is because the two radios don't like to work at the same time.

      The way Bluetooth and 802.11b works means that Bluetooth, which is frequency hoping, can work quite well with 802.11b, while 802.11b has more trouble coping with it.

      There is plenty of litterature talking about the interoperation issues. That is not to say that it can work fine, but one can not be certain that it will. My uneducated guess is that if the two radios use separate antennas, preferably in different parts of the device it works better. And of course, the bigger device the better, as they can be further away from each other then.

  3. small nit to pick by justforaday · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of the unique things about the V500 is its scroll panel, and this is the very first mouse to actually use this concept.

    Kensington's been making a mouse with a touch panel in place of a scroll wheel for well over 2 years now. Admittedly it only does the up/down thing (no side to side action). Either way, 70 bucks is still way too much for a mouse of any kind as far as I'm concerned...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    1. Re:small nit to pick by boobert · · Score: 1

      I've been using the kensington since it came out. I love it but do sometimes miss the click of the scroll wheel. I have the wireless and the wired but don't use the wired because it just doesn't seem to respond as quickly. This may have been improved but I haven't tried updating the drivers since i bought it.

      How come kensington never gets any press? I've been using some sort of kensington mouse for almost 10 years now.

      --
      Your ad here ask me how!
    2. Re:small nit to pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheap ass. I bet you didn't mind paying $2000+ for your first 755Mhz machine when they came out.

    3. Re:small nit to pick by theantipop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My theory has always been that you spend the most time interacting with you monitor, keyboard and mouse so why not get an exceptional product that meets all your needs in those area? What good is a $600 video card if you can't see the image or interact with them in a meaningful way?

    4. Re:small nit to pick by -acksaw · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm pretty sure that this has been sitting on my desk for four years now.

    5. Re:small nit to pick by mlk · · Score: 1

      I can only guess that most people just think of the Kensington Smart-Price RSI-inducing Evil Mouse Of Doom?[1]

      [1] I'm sure Kensington do sell good mice, but my hand still hurts from using that pile of shit, I just don't get why anyone would make a mouse in such a stupid shape? Or more to the point, why the company I worked for kept on buying them!?

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    6. Re:small nit to pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Afirmmative, I have one in my drawer as we speak. And what is this mouse gesture stuff. Everytime I try to untangle the mouse cord, shit happens!!!!!

    7. Re:small nit to pick by IdleByte · · Score: 1, Funny

      I got the kensington mouse with the touch panel for free from CDW when I puchased something a long time ago. (years) So this definately isn't something new, but it's nice to see it developed a little further. I'll miss that ever so soft click my mouse gives me when I Rub it's Wheel :)

    8. Re:small nit to pick by dustbin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In addition to Kensington's product that came out in '02, there was at least a prototype displayed at CES a few years before that by Fujitsu. Never saw it for sale in the states, but it looked like production plastics, so it was probably available in Japan.

      The interesting point about the Logitech design is their best ergonomic feature isn't being noticed - it isn't even called out by Logitech. The very small sensor they're using lets them push the sensor way up to the front of the mouse. It's long been known that the mice "feel" more responsive the closer you get the sensor to a point midway between the fingertips that are guiding the mouse. Most sensors have been too big to fit up there, so they're positioned farther back, where they don't move as far as the fingertips do.

      Real ergonomics is too subtle for marketing, I guess. Maybe it's because the "ball forward" concept was originally used to promote the Microsoft Dove Bar mouse http://www.ideo.com/portfolio/re.asp?x=12328 and the standard Apple ergonomic mouse of the ~90s.

    9. Re:small nit to pick by justforaday · · Score: 1

      My first machine was a whopping 60MHz. And 2grand for it did hurt...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    10. Re:small nit to pick by bhtooefr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How funny ;-)

      First, there's the mouse.
      Then, there's the trackball, which is put into laptops.
      Then, somebody at IBM realizes that the trackball is too big, and puts in the TrackPoint (pointing stick).
      Next, somebody else also figures out that the trackball is too big. They use a touchpad.
      Microsoft (this is debatable, though) puts a sort of one-axis trackball in their mice for scrolling.
      IBM sees it, and puts a TrackPoint in the top of their mice for two-axis scrolling.
      Then, Kensington and Logitech decide to put a sort of touchpad in the tops of their mice for one or two-axis scrolling ;-)

      So, every major pointing device after the mouse (except for the touchscreen) has been strapped onto the top of a mouse for scroll functionality ;-)

    11. Re:small nit to pick by precize · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think we all know what's next...

      A mouse on top of a mouse.

    12. Re:small nit to pick by justforaday · · Score: 3, Funny

      Great, just what we need -- more mice...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    13. Re:small nit to pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damnit.. where's a picture of mice doin' it when you really need one?

    14. Re:small nit to pick by jgarland79 · · Score: 1

      The wireless kensington version is only $50 and has been out for atleast a few years http://www.kensington.com/html/4768.html

      --
      Microsoft Windows runs on stress and frustration.
    15. Re:small nit to pick by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Thank you for pointing out the obvious punch line that I almost missed.

      Now I have to clean the coffee out of my nose.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    16. Re:small nit to pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One can only hope that Logitech's panel works better than Kensington's scroll pad. Mine got so frustrating that I volunteered mine to a coworker.

    17. Re:small nit to pick by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      which will lead to the latest all-in-one from Apple, the iMouse, combining an entire PC in a slideable package

    18. Re:small nit to pick by ebuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Next they will implement a mouse that handles all of it's navigation through the touchpad. That way you wouldn't need to move the thing around on your desk.

    19. Re:small nit to pick by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      4.7MHz @ $8K /w colour screen, 132 column dot-matrix printer, 2 floppy drives

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    20. Re:small nit to pick by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      My first PC was 33MHz and cost $2300.00. I still have it as it has never had anything other than software problems. It's maxed at 136MB RAM, with a 4GB HD. I can also use the case as a step stool. The thing weighs about 40lbs and is solid. Cool!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    21. Re:small nit to pick by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      IOGear 4D Cruiser is a pretty nice mouse but not wireless yet. This uses a track ball rather than a touch pad for scroll directions (horizontal and vertical). I've been using it for about a 1.5 years at work and have seriously considered getting one for home (if my mouse ever dies). I seem to recall the price being under $20 (USD).

    22. Re:small nit to pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      60 MHz? So? Hell, that's 486 or even Pentium level speed. You thought people here were supposed to think that's "quaint"?

      The first computer I bought myself, a C=64, had a 933 kHz CPU.
      (The fastest computer I own today has a more than two thousand times higher CPU clock frequency, but it's already outdated and doesn't feel much faster than the C=64.)

    23. Re:small nit to pick by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Instead of a keyboard, it will have a single button for inputting text via morse code.

      --
      My other car is first.
    24. Re:small nit to pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather get rid of mice all together. Just put a virtual mouse on my screen. Make it a touch screen, and I could click the virtual buttons with a stylus!

    25. Re:small nit to pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's mice all the way down.

    26. Re:small nit to pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm waiting for a mouse and microwriter/cykey

      very fast touch typing very quick !

      http://www.old-computers.com/museum/computer.asp?s t=1&c=558

      http://www.bellaire.demon.co.uk/newcykey.htm

    27. Re:small nit to pick by HardCase · · Score: 1

      VIC20, baby! With a cassette drive, too! Back in 1981 or 1982, you could've had one too, for a mere $250 (plus another $75 for the tape drive). I even bought a single sided, single density floppy for it. What was I thinking? Ack! I'm pretty sure that at some point I bought a monochrome monitor, too. Sheesh.

    28. Re:small nit to pick by GCP · · Score: 1

      What I need from Apple is a Mac laptop with a built-in TrackPoint (eraserhead) with three buttons under the space bar, just like the IBM ThinkPads and Dell laptops have.

      Using a laptop with one of these, after you get used to it, is so sweet that I don't have any desire to get an external mouse. It's so much nicer to leave your hands on the keys, especially when you really are holding it in your lap (at the airport, on the sofa, etc.)

      I'd rather use a Mac, but it has to be a laptop, and until Apple makes a laptop with a TrackPoint, or allows a licensee to make one, I'll stay with my ThinkPad.

      --
      "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
    29. Re:small nit to pick by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      A mini-mouse...

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    30. Re:small nit to pick by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      TRS 80 Model 1, Level 2 with all the power of a Z-80 (1.78 MHz)
      And I got all that at the bargain price of A$799, plus the value of a junked television, two radios and about fifty blisters, burns and assorted injuries trying to cobble together a stepdown 240V 50hz to 110V 60hz power supply stable enough to stop the thing instantly crashing when it was switched on.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    31. Re:small nit to pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pinky, are you thinking what I'm thinking?

    32. Re:small nit to pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that just puts a really perverse twist on the whole thing... : p

    33. Re:small nit to pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm working on this concept, which may or may not be the greatest invention of the millennium: The recursive mouse. It's a mouse which has a mouse on top of it for additional control which has a mouse on top of it... Ok, you got the point.

      Maybe I should patent the idea.

  4. whooping! by dark-br · · Score: 1

    So "whooping" goes not only for supercomputer processing power description but also to wheeless mouse prices! :)

    1. Re:whooping! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whopping, not whooping.

    2. Re:whooping! by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think the word you're looking for is "whopping", unless you have whooping cough, or are getting your ass whooped.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    3. Re:whooping! by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Christ Almighty on a shingle. The fans in my PC are loud enough already without having my cpu going around and whooping all the time.

      Are water cooled cpu gags going to be the next hot mod?

      KFG

  5. keep reading by soupdevil · · Score: 1

    I read just the first line of the title and thought 'Wow! $70 for a cordless notebook! That's cheap.' But I guess that's not quite so cheap for just the mouse.

    1. Re:keep reading by circusboy · · Score: 1

      "Time = Money, Money != Time."

      it does if you write it like that...

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    2. Re:keep reading by soupdevil · · Score: 2, Funny

      Which is why I'm a musician, not a programmer, I guess.

  6. This is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... old hat!

    My boss has had one of these for at least two months.

    Stupid Taco, /. is for new news.

    1. Re:This is ... by madaxe42 · · Score: 1

      As opposed to 'olds' :)

    2. Re:This is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course, how silly.

      I'm sure CmdrTaco needs advice from an AC on what his OWN SITE is for.

  7. sounds like the iPod interface by binarstu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This sounds remarkably like the interface that Apple has devised to allow scrolling through menus, volume control, etc. on their iPod line of products. This isn't surprising, because the interface works extremely well and is very intuitive.

    1. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 1

      The iPod wheel is linear like a scroll wheel, even though its layed out in a circle - this sounds more like the touchpads that have been on most laptops for the last ten years, but dropped onto the top of a mouse.. pretty good idea actually, I hate using a mouse without a scroll wheel, and the side to side control would be a nice addition. got to get that price down though!

    2. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by dhakbar · · Score: 2

      What?

      How are these two interfaces similar at all? I don't see how they're remarkably like each other. One's a panel with four directions, one is a wheel with two directions and four buttons. What the hell is remarkably alike?

    3. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by Thijs+van+As · · Score: 1

      Well, weren't laptops first with the touchpad mice?
      Anyway, it was also Apple who introduced them on the laptop market with their Powerbook series (IIRC).

    4. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it sounds more like a regular mouse scroll wheel without moving parts.

    5. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by magefile · · Score: 1

      I disagree - I've used horizontal scrolling on my PowerBook, and it's horrible. Always screwing things up when you try to scroll, even going back and forwards in the browser history ... might be different on a smaller pad, but I'm not sold on it.

    6. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by DarkSarin · · Score: 4, Informative

      People like to complain about the price, but remember, kids, that the $70 is from logitech. Newegg has it for $49 (out of stock) and other places have it for as little as $29 (after rebate).

      Shop around--you'll get it at a reasonable price. NEVER buy directly from the manufacturer--you pay more, and they make a higher percentage profit off your purchase!

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    7. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by ArsonSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      They are both objects. Smaller than a bread box. Not related to a giraffe.

      Actually they are almost exactly the same.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    8. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, no. No, it isn't. It's like a touchpad, except built into your mouse.

    9. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by dhakbar · · Score: 1

      I must say, you've forged an impenetrable wall of logic which I dare not dispute.

    10. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      sounds nothing like the ipod interface. the ipod interface is more like the current scroll wheel, just turned sideways so you can keep scrollig without lifting your finger. the touch sensativity is so that it does't have moving parts. some ppl will mod anything interesting. i know, i know. mod me down for not giving apple credit where credit is not due.

    11. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by binarstu · · Score: 1

      Currently mice use a mechanical wheel to allow scrolling of menus, browser windows, whatever. Logitech is replacing this with touchpad technology to allow you to scroll by merely moving your finger.

      This is exactly what Apple did with the touchpad interface to their iPods. Yes, the layout and actual use of it is likely somewhat different. That's not the point. As an interface concept it's very similar to what Apple has done with the iPods.

    12. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the ipod interface is more like the current scroll wheel... the touch sensativity is so that it does't have moving parts

      Umm, yeah... isn't that exactly what Logitech is doing? Sounds like they are pretty similar.

    13. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's really fucked up, here going to a city with manufacturers to buy is cheaper than buying in your home town, in fact you end up saving a nice amount of money. Of course, it's only good if the factories are in your country :P

    14. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by shmlco · · Score: 1
      NEVER buy directly from the manufacturer--you pay more, and they make a higher percentage profit off your purchase!

      Nice philosophy. Lord knows you never want people making products that you actually want and buy to make money...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    15. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by naoursla · · Score: 1

      Although they don't really have a choice. If the company sold it directly for less than the MSRP then no retail stores would want to stock it and they would lose sales.

    16. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by Trepalium · · Score: 1
      Shop around--you'll get it at a reasonable price. NEVER buy directly from the manufacturer--you pay more, and they make a higher percentage profit off your purchase!
      While I can sympathize with the first point, the second one boggles the mind. Why would you not want the manufacturer of the product you use to make money?
      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    17. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by Saeger · · Score: 1
      He didn't say that the manufacturer shouldn't make money -- because they do, by selling in volume to the better-priced resellers -- he said that you shouldn't buy directly from the manufacturer because it's almost always a ripoff, and it is. (Obscene profit margins aren't efficient either.)

      Nothing boggling about it.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    18. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by Neoncow · · Score: 1
      Reference: 20 qusetions (A good way to pass some time at work)

      Try playing a game with mp3 player as the object. Took it 28 guesses to find it for me. Tried to post the results, but slashdot thinks question marks are lame.

      And yes, it asked the breadbox question.

    19. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by softends · · Score: 1

      Paying more is stupid, but what's wrong with giving Logitech a better percentage profit? I do that for music - I prefer buying artists' CD's at their shows so they get a higher dividend over their label, a retailer, etc.

    20. Re:sounds like the iPod interface by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Being a modern consumer means spiting anyone who tries to make money, haven't you heard?

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  8. Laptop touchpads have this as well by shailesh17 · · Score: 3, Informative

    A similar scroll pad exists on the synaptics touchpad that comes on compaq's presario R3000 laptops - but just does the up/down movements. It works nice but I still prefer the wheel on standard mice cause it provides better control over speed.

    1. Re:Laptop touchpads have this as well by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      Dell laptops have that too. It is great so I don't have to click and drag a scroll bar while using a touch pad.

    2. Re:Laptop touchpads have this as well by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The latest revision of powerbooks have a scrolling function built into the touch pad as well(and you can go left and right), you just use 2 fingers instead of one when you want to scroll. I use it and it's quite useful IMO.

    3. Re:Laptop touchpads have this as well by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Enable horizontal virtual scrolling in your Synaptics control panel.

      That should do the trick ;-)

    4. Re:Laptop touchpads have this as well by j-cloth · · Score: 1

      I also prefer the scroll wheel over my R3000 scroll pad (nice computer otherwise, though, eh?). Not for sensitivity, but because it can't be used as a 3rd button. I love being able to click a link with the scroll wheel/3rd button and have it open in a new tab.

    5. Re:Laptop touchpads have this as well by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Most laptops already have this; some have a separate area drawn on the touchpad for scrolling, otherwise you simply slide your finger along the right edge of the touchpad to scroll. It's amazing how people I show this too that have used their laptop for over a year and didn't know it.

      --
      What?
    6. Re:Laptop touchpads have this as well by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      Having used both the scroll "area" and the two-finger scrolling on the new PB, I can say that the two-finger scrolling is by far the better solution.

      Having a section of the touchpad devoted to scrolling reduces the overall pointing surface of the pad. It also can cause misreads and accidental scrolls. The two-finger method is much more comfortable and can easily do horizontal scrolling as well.

      It's great that a similar solution exists for the older laptops too.

    7. Re:Laptop touchpads have this as well by Darth+Maul · · Score: 1

      I've been ruined for normal trackpads now. I have a new Powerbook with this ultra hoopy trackpad scrolling, and it was amazing to me how quickly this became a natural motion for me; like it should have been like this all along. Now I cannot use a "normal" laptop...

      Great device.

      --
      --- witty signature
    8. Re:Laptop touchpads have this as well by dcam · · Score: 1

      Thinkpads too. Or at least my T41 has it, along with trackpoint.

      --
      meh
  9. First??? Im not sure about that. by falcon5768 · · Score: 5, Informative
    ummm unless I am mistaken there is already a mouse with a scroll pad.

    http://www.macmall.com/macmall/shop/detail~dpno~46 3024.asp

    been out for at least a year now too.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    1. Re:First??? Im not sure about that. by buttersnout · · Score: 1

      what its first to do is have a scroll panel. it can scroll sideways too. this isn't really all that new as mac powerbooks have been able to do this.

    2. Re:First??? Im not sure about that. by 0kComputer · · Score: 1

      Yep, also looks like the scrolling technology thats in the iPods

      --
      Top 10 Reasons To Procrastinate
      10.
    3. Re:First??? Im not sure about that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone else find it slightly amusing that a Mac supplier's web site is hosted on IIS?

    4. Re:First??? Im not sure about that. by Splab · · Score: 1

      The touchpad on my asus b1500 has been doing it for 3 years...

    5. Re:First??? Im not sure about that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Not really.

    6. Re:First??? Im not sure about that. by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      especially since its just a division of a much larger PC supplier.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  10. Kinda like this kensington one then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Kinda like this kensington one then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IBM mice (mine was a Scrollpoint II) a while ago had a little joystick that scrolled in any direction and varied speed with how hard you pushed it. My mouse wasn't very durable, but my Dad had the same thing and it worked really well. No picking up your finger to scroll a lot.

  11. Ugh to scroll panels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scroll panels, like all touch pads, just don't seem to work that well for me. They don't always register the touches I intend, and seem too jittery when I do intend to touch them. I'm glad my laptop has a scrollpanel beside the touchpad, but I'm generally much happier when I turn off the touchpad and just use the mouse.

  12. Now if only by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They'd put a small scrollwheel within the touchpad on the mouse, then I could scroll around inside of large forms in a window that I'm scrolling around with.

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    1. Re:Now if only by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      What might work better is if, on top of the two main mouse buttons, they'd put smaller mice that are moved by the fingertips. And those mice could have even smaller scrolling touchpads. So you have the main mouse that your arm/wrist moves to control the main cursor, and its scrolling touchpad controls the main scrolling. You have two smaller mice that your fingers move for controlling two secondary cursors, whose scrolling touchpads control other kinds of scrolling, like region scrolling within a scrolling main document, or inscribing scrolls with mystical runes, which could be called scrolling. And the buttons on the mini mice could be used to call up ultra-context sensitive menus, or even sensitivity menus to help during online conversations with your girlfriend. Of course you'd need to get a third eye installed and get all your eyes able to operate independently so that you can track all three cursors in different directions. Heck, might as well get a fourth installed while you're at it in case any new cursor innovations come along. (Plus, it gives new meaning to the phrase "four-eyes.")

      Yessir, that would be the perfect mousing interface. Don't even get me started on the keyboard.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
  13. User preference differ by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Funny

    I like touchpads, but a lot of people don't. Some people like the Thinkpad nipple, but I don't (there's only one in the middle, and I can't get used to that :-).

    I think it would be harder to keep from making mousing mistakes with a scroll pad than a wheel, which requires more effort to engage.

    But still, people who like touchpads will probably like the scroll pad. People who make mistakes with touch pads probably will not like the scroll pad, either.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:User preference differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the Thinkpad nipple. I don't ever have to take my hands off the keyboard---it's great. Of course, a mouse is still pretty much required for games and graphics work, but I find the trackpoint (nipple) at least offers better control than the touchpad for day-to-day mousing.

    2. Re:User preference differ by TobyWong · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I bought a Panasonic toughbook W2 and I've absolutely fallen in love with the touchpad.

      It differs from your average touchpad in that it's a circle and you can scroll by rotating your finger around the outer edge (think of an ipod volume control mechanism). Since it's a circle you can scroll endlessly without having to lift and reseat your finger like you would have to with other touchpads or with a mouse wheel.

      I wouldn't use it for gaming by for scrolling through documents, webpages, etc its fantastic.

      --
      - Toby
    3. Re:User preference differ by chrismcdirty · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've used a few Thinkpads at my previous job, and I didn't like using the nipple as the mouse. But if you were a fan of the nipple for scrolling, I'd suggest an IBM ScrollPoint II mouse. It makes scrolling easy, as all you have to do is lean the little joystick down or upward, left or right. Made viewing web pages real nice to have an analog control for the scrollbar using only a finger. It's too bad it wasn't more widely supported in games. Many I played didn't even recognize it, and most that did recognize it had it calibrated way to sensitively, to the point where the slightest touch would send my weapons into a frenzy.

      --
      It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    4. Re:User preference differ by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      I thought what you are calling the "nipple" was actually known as the ClitMouse. (??)

  14. Miserable editing by nganju · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The concept behind a scroll wheel is you simply move your finger in up, down, left and right directions to use the function.

    I think you mean scroll panel, not scroll wheel. Does anyone even read these before posting them?

    --
    There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
    1. Re:Miserable editing by Punko · · Score: 1

      state of the art mice have scroll wheels that tilt left and right.

      The poster is correct.

      --
      If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands
    2. Re:Miserable editing by nganju · · Score: 1


      I don't think that was the original intent. The new technology being introduced in this article is the scroll panel; that's what he's trying to explain. Why would the poster want to explain what a scroll wheel is? If that was his original intent, then that's even dumber than the original typo.

      --
      There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
    3. Re:Miserable editing by nganju · · Score: 1

      I don't think that was the original intent. The new technology being introduced in this article is the scroll panel; that's what he's trying to explain. Why would the poster want to explain what a scroll wheel is? If that was his original intent, then that's even dumber than the original typo.

      --
      There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
    4. Re:Miserable editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does anyone even read these before posting them?
      You must be new here.
    5. Re:Miserable editing by kfg · · Score: 1

      It's possible to be correct by accident.

      KFG

    6. Re:Miserable editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry, obligatory post follows.

      Does anyone even read these before posting them?

      You must be new here.

  15. Tactile feedback by guyfromindia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One think I like about scroll wheels is the tactile feedback.. (bumps when you roll the wheel)
    It gives me a perspective on how much I am scrolling.
    without it, I am not sure it will be a good experience..

    1. Re:Tactile feedback by md81544 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I bought a microsoft cordless mouse last year - and the scroll wheel has no "bumps"! I agree with you - it's an odd sensation not having them there. But you do get used to it. It's annoying though when you're playing Counterstrike and you use the scrollwheel to select weapons - you have to be careful not to overshoot the one you wanted.

    2. Re:Tactile feedback by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      The tactile feedback on my mouse is too loud, especially when scrolling up. A touchpad would not have this problem.

    3. Re:Tactile feedback by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      that would be audible feedback, not tactile feedback.

      --
      -mkb
    4. Re:Tactile feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      same thing with an otherwise excellent Logitech MX Laser, et perfect mouse but no damn bump on th wheel.

      and oh yeah, please logitech do a nice laser mouse ++ features wathever NO_CORDLESS first, it's still a pain to play FPS with a wireless mouse....

    5. Re:Tactile feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but if you can play a FPS with a cordless mouse I'm not sure I would trust you considering you probably suck.

      Give me a ball-mouse with a clickly scroll wheel thankyouverymuch.

    6. Re:Tactile feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dunno if you're bound by tradition to use a ball mouse, but i use an optical mouse in ut2k4 and i don't do so badly.

    7. Re:Tactile feedback by enosys · · Score: 1
      I use an IBM ScrollPoint II mouse. Instead of a scroll wheel it has a what looks like a button but functions like a miniature joystick. The harder you push in any direction the faster you scroll. This joystick is kind of like the mice on some old IBM laptops which looked like a pencil eraser and were near the J key except that it's wider.

      This has absolutely no tactile feedback for the amount of scrolling. I don't find this to be a problem when scrolling in ordinary applications. There is almost never any need to scroll text with total precision. It's an advantage sometimes because if I need to scroll a lot I just need to keep it pushed in that direction. It's is however useless for selecting weapons in games.

    8. Re:Tactile feedback by packetl0ss · · Score: 1

      Something like this?

    9. Re:Tactile feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah well, but it's not laser...

    10. Re:Tactile feedback by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know how many people use this function, but it's pretty common these days on MS boxes. If you click the scroll-wheel button, it changes your cursor to a little up/down (and right left on some applications) cursor link that lets you scroll by moving your mouse up and down. Think I saw it first on office, years ago.

      The thing is, I HATE it. There is a fine line between scrolling a little faster and SCREAMING down to the bottom of the page. It's seriously annoying.

      So, my question is, how does this touchpad deal with the speed question? I'd like to have more control than is currently possible with the wheel, but I don't want to have it spastically jumping around the screen when I brush it.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    11. Re:Tactile feedback by justinmikehunt · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I've had some customers with those kind of mice, and they're weird when you first use them.

    12. Re:Tactile feedback by EngMedic · · Score: 1

      It's annoying though when you're playing Counterstrike and you use the scrollwheel to select weapons - you have to be careful not to overshoot the one you wanted.

      And you've hit directly on the reason i like my scroll wheel and not touchpads. Games let you bind stuff to mousewheel{up,dowm} and middle click. These are normally really helpful things, too, like flipping through weapons and reloading. Getting that to work well with a touchpad is dodgy at best.

      --
      filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
    13. Re:Tactile feedback by Thu25245 · · Score: 1

      I have a laptop with a scrolling trackpad, and don't find the lack of tactile feedback to be an issue when scrolling with it.

      The problem is, there isn't always a correlation between the number of "clicks" of the scroll wheel and the movement of the page. It varies from OS to OS, app to app, and sometimes document to document, depending on how scrolling is implemented. I do like the feel of "definiteness" that the bumps give, and I think a wheel without bumps might be disconcerting.

    14. Re:Tactile feedback by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      Anytime you feel like getting your ass handed to you by someone with a cordless mouse, feel free to look me up in UT2k4. The name is Frack. I use an MX700 and it's better than every corded mouse I have used except for Logitech's MX 510.

      If you know anything about the underlying technology, you would know that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about (not that that's new on /.)

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    15. Re:Tactile feedback by eyeye · · Score: 1

      I used to like the MS intellimouse explorers but after a new style MS mouse with no bumps and worse placed buttons and to boot it was faulty. I returned it and got a logitech mx1000 which I have no real complaints about but is still not perfect. There are too many unusable buttons and the back/forward would be better of it was bigger.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    16. Re:Tactile feedback by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      It (the middle-click autoscroll) does suck in MS Office and in IE and in most Microsoft products I've tried (they all must use the same crappy library).

      It also used to be a Moz/FF extension, but has been added in to the main code. They actually got it right, however, and there are nice medium speeds (one thing they didn't get right was that in the *nix versions middle-clicking is also supposed to open a location from the X selection, so if you start autoscrolling and don't stop by clicking in the little circle it tries to open that location, which is usually just some random string that I previously selected in an xterm; in about:config you can filter for middlemouse I think to find an option to change middle-click behaviour).

      Opera has excellent autoscroll (uber-smooth), or at least did the last time I tried it.

    17. Re:Tactile feedback by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      This joystick is kind of like the mice on some old IBM laptops which looked like a pencil eraser and were near the J key except that it's wider.

      On some old IBM laptops? I do believe they're on every single IBM laptop ever made. It's only recently that they've begun adding touchpads to some models along with the trackpoint.

      Oh, and it's positioned between the G, H and B keys (apart from on the obscure dual-trackpoint ones), and it most certainly rocks ;)

      --
      Eat the rich.
    18. Re:Tactile feedback by Broege · · Score: 1

      Well, this mouse actually has the feedback - it has a built-in speaker so you can 'hear the wheel scrolling' when using the panel. BTW - it's not a new device, my friend got it for the last Christmas.

      --
      homepage: www.tls.pl
      signature: not found
    19. Re:Tactile feedback by frikazoyd · · Score: 1

      This mouse makes a "click" sound every step that it goes down, to simulate that tactile feedback. It is really easy to use, and you get a feel for how far "one click" is pretty quickly. It is just about the same as using your average scroll mouse. Honestly though, the side-to-side scrolling on this mouse is much smoother than other side-scrolling mice that I've used. I like it a lot better.

    20. Re:Tactile feedback by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      There is a fine line between scrolling a little faster and SCREAMING down to the bottom of the page. It's seriously annoying.

      Are you using Win2k or XP? Windows 2000 has serious problems with the middle click scrolling, while Windows XP handles it in a much smoother way. I've used XP pretty much exclusively at work for years. Lately I went back to Windows 2000 for a couple of weeks while my machine was "upgraded", and the poorly handled middle-click scrolling drove me insane! If you're stuck with using Windows, try upgrading to XP, hopefully that will fix your problem!

  16. Kengington "Scroll panel" by Formz · · Score: 1

    It's the Studio Mouse Seen here: http://www.kensington.com/html/4769.html Or Wireless: http://www.kensington.com/html/4768.html As said earlier, they've been making them for years.

  17. scroll-thingy by fanblade · · Score: 1

    They installed a trackpad on top of a mouse. What's next, a mouse on a trackpad?

    1. Re:scroll-thingy by ValentineMSmith · · Score: 1
      We've got one of those, too.

      Mods, before you go modding down, note the mouse towards the bottom of the page. Also note that it is tracked by the pad, not by an LED, laser, or ball.

      --
      Karma: Chameleon - mostly influenced by bad '80s New Wave music
  18. Doomsday? by myspys · · Score: 1

    what's with the submissions that get accepted?
    "Could this be the end of scroll wheels?"

    do they always have to ask these kind of questions? "is/could this be the end of [insert product/feature]?"

    and am i the only one who prefers the feeling of the wheel? (in a non-sexual context, of course)

    1. Re:Doomsday? by duguk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Could this be the end of rethorical doomsday predictions in /. articles? :D

      Ok, ok, I'm sorry.

      D

    2. Re:Doomsday? by theantipop · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing about the sensationalist morons who submit that kind of flavor text. "Could this be the end of..." Grow up.

    3. Re:Doomsday? by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      If they stoped, just imagine... this could be the end of people asking for the end of people saying this is the end of something!

      And this is just the beginning.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
  19. Nothing new by SolidGround · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "One of the unique things about the V500 is its scroll panel, and this is the very first mouse to actually use this concept"

    Yawn. I've been using one of those for ages.

    Microsoft calls it tilt wheel, Logitech calls it scroll panel. Potato, potatoe.

    1. Re:Nothing new by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      Logitech also has a tilt wheel.

    2. Re:Nothing new by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      NO, logitech also makes a tilt-wheel mouse, much like microsofts version. This is a step beyond that.

      It is, also, designed with portability in mind.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    3. Re:Nothing new by djdanlib · · Score: 1

      Wheel:Panel::Apple:Orange

  20. What the!!!! by kaje103 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was on google searching for dicks and assholes and I get linked to this stupid /. site!

  21. WORKING MIRROR by dsginter · · Score: 1
    --
    More
  22. Server's down by fanblade · · Score: 1

    Insert jokes about them hosting the site on their new mouse in this thread...

  23. Whopping price tag? by ROFLMAObot · · Score: 0

    I think I paid somewhere in the realm of 80-90 dollars when I got my Logitech MX700 with the two year insurance, and it was probably one of the best peripherals i've ever purchased for my computer. Logitech makes good stuff and it's worth every penny to invest in their durable and reliable products.

  24. I never thought I'd see the day... by InVinoVeritas · · Score: 1

    Where a mouse cost 20% of a new computer.

    1. Re:I never thought I'd see the day... by REggert · · Score: 1

      Where'd you buy a $350 "new" computer?

      --

      cp /dev/zero ~/signature.txt

    2. Re:I never thought I'd see the day... by justinmikehunt · · Score: 0

      There was an article on /. a couple days ago talking about how PCs have hit the $300 mark.

    3. Re:I never thought I'd see the day... by slthytove · · Score: 1

      http://tinyurl.com/8z96f

      WalMart has been having sub-$300 computers for a couple years now... that page is sub-$200, and they all include desktop, keyboard, mouse, CD-ROM, and an OS.

      Meanwhile, Dell offers "Desktops starting from $299" and Gateway offers them from $499 with an LCD monitor. $350 won't get you top-of-the-line, but it can certainly get you a "new" computer.

    4. Re:I never thought I'd see the day... by InVinoVeritas · · Score: 1

      A little bargain basement website... http://www.dell.com/

    5. Re:I never thought I'd see the day... by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      If you're going to get a $350 computer, you might want to pick up one of these mice, instead.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
  25. This mouse was release half a year ago by 28B · · Score: 1

    The releasedate of this mouse was October 18, 2004 according to Cnet.

    Hey look! It's that new Gameboy Color!

    http://reviews.cnet.com/Logitech_V500_Cordless_Not ebook_Mouse/4505-3148_7-31144953.html

  26. Can someone answer this question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want a trackball with a secondary trackball instead of a scroll wheel/panel.

    Does anyone know anyone that makes that?

  27. No middle click! by thule · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since there is no way to press down on that panel, that means there is no middle click for us X users out there. That middle click turns into the command for left scroll.

    Other than that, the mouse is pretty nice. No moving parts except for the right/left buttons. When the mouse is in off mode, the right/left buttons dis-engage.

    1. Re:No middle click! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no reason a double tap on the touch pad of the mouse couldn't be interpreted as a single click or a triple tap as a double click. This is already done on standard touch pads.

    2. Re:No middle click! by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      Since there is no way to press down on that panel, that means there is no middle click for us X users out there

      Why not? Does the scroll wheel itself detect when it is depressed? No, the depression is detected by sensors built into the assembly holding the scroll wheel, not by the wheel itself. There would be no difference in putting in sensors to detect the depression of the entire panel assembly... not that you need to since the panel software, much like touchpads, is easily capable of discerning the difference between scrolls and double-taps.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    3. Re:No middle click! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Since there is no way to press down on that panel, that means there is no middle click for us X users out there.

      You've never used a touchpad on a laptop, right? You can click on these pads, just tap it, you can also double click of course. If you want to drag something, double-tap it but hold on the second tap, and move your finger around the pad.

    4. Re:No middle click! by lahvak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was the first thing I disabled on my laptop. I kept accidentally clicking on things while moving my mouse pointer around. At least on my Gateway laptop, the touchpad is very bad at distinguishing between movement and "clicking".

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:No middle click! by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Most touch pads can interpert a tap as a click. I doubt that this one will lack that ability, especially since the ability is implmeneted on the software side.

    6. Re:No middle click! by thule · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell the mouse only generates an event during movement over the sensor. Using xev I could see these movements get turned into buttons 3, 4, 5, 6(?). So moving your finger to the left generated a "middle click" or button 3. Moving your finger up and down generated "buttons" 4 and 5 (as do other wheel mice).

      Now maybe the mouse had a "button 7" that means a tap, but I didn't see that behavior. I decided to return the mouse since moving my finger to the left to generate a single "middle click" was pretty much impossible.

    7. Re:No middle click! by gilzreid · · Score: 1

      I use this mouse with X and have it set up so that 'scroll left' = middle click. Works fine! You just need to have

      Option "Protocol" "IMPS/2"
      Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"

      in your xorg.conf file.

      Scroll right however, does nothing at the moment, but it does register in xev as button4.

    8. Re:No middle click! by ShortBeard · · Score: 0

      Well, back in the day when I drove a two-button mouse I would just chord the buttons for a middle click.

      When I got a four-button mouse I had two chords!
      I was now a singer-songwriter.

  28. Another company that makes no-scroll-wheel mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's another company that makes mice with no scroll wheel! They're better and they just work!

  29. How's this going to work with Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows uses a three line scroll when using the wheel, which in most cases is very precise. Imagine playing $FPS and selecting the wrong weapon because that precision isn't there? Now I can blame Logitech for my poor performance instead of teh lag.

  30. I have one by radish · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The "wheel" works pretty well, it's certainly nice to scroll up and down with, no complaints there. I also like the other design aspects of the mouse - like the tiny transmitter which fits inside the mouse for safe keeping. What I really don't like (being a Firefox user) is the lack of a middle button (which of course a wheel usually doubles as). It's very irritating to lose my middle-click open new tab function. If I had realised you couldn't use the touch pad as a button, I wouldn't have bought it.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    1. Re:I have one by justforaday · · Score: 1

      You can ctrl-left click a link for the same effect. Not as handy, but it's an option...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:I have one by hikerhat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Some people don't have their other hand free when using firefox.

    3. Re:I have one by ElDuderino44137 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info !!
      I too like the middle wheel click.
      Would suck to be w/o it.
      I'll order the Microsoft Wireless Notebook mouse today.
      It has a wheel.
      And the transmitter stows in the mouse as well.

      -- duderino

    4. Re:I have one by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's very irritating to lose my middle-click open new tab function. If I had realised you couldn't use the touch pad as a button, I wouldn't have bought it.

      Pester the maker for a driver update, there is no hardware reason why it won't work, provided they have just thrown a laptop touchpad in there (which accept clicks nicely).

    5. Re:I have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Because they are firmly stroking their genitalia with the other?

  31. Thinkpads by MikeJ9919 · · Score: 1

    While I know some people aren't as enthusiastic, I really like the Thinkpad trackpoint. Since most newer models come with both trackpoint and touchpad, the software lets you configure the trackpoint for pointer movement and the touchpad for scrolling. It's glorious...for long web pages, I don't even have to move my hand...just my thumb. My hands can stay on the keyboard.

    1. Re:Thinkpads by bogie · · Score: 2, Funny

      "It's glorious...for long web pages"

      "My hands can stay on the keyboard"

      Yea right. ;)

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  32. PowerBooks already have this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are a PowerBook user, then no doubt you have already become addicted to this feature (and unable to use any other computer as a result).

    Just place two fingers on the touchpad and drag in any direction.. it scrolls in the direction you drag. .. of course.. you also end up looking like you are stroking your laptop.

    1. Re:PowerBooks already have this by VaticDart · · Score: 1

      The problem with the PowBook's two finger scroll thing is that it's too sensitive in either direction. I tried having both axes engaged, and just got tired of accidently scrolling left-right when I wanted to go up-down. I can see how it would be a very nice feature for someone who regularly scrolled in all four axes, but for most people who just go up-down, the left-right thing is better left disengaged.

  33. On the Logitech Site by lapsan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is a link to the Logitech page about this mouse:

    http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/products/details /US/EN,CRID=2146,CONTENTID=9508

    It doesn't even look like a touchscreen 'scroll' panel as much as a flat button with up, down, left, right capabilities.

    They've got a flash online demo of sorts to check out to see how it works. Doesn't even look as "fancy" as the Kensington touchpad mouse people have mentioned.

  34. Whopping? by ottffssent · · Score: 1

    I'm having trouble making an informed buying decision here. Perhaps the collective /. wisdom could assist?

    On the one hand, this mouse's $70 price tag (quite reasonable for a quality mouse, I think) is 'whopping'. On the other hand, 90-odd teraflops worth of supercomputer is 'whopping'. I really only have room for one whopping piece of consumer electronics in my home, and I'm torn between the two. Perhaps we could petition the manufacturer to have the mouse's designation changed? Or could we instead express the supercomputer's processing power in terms of the number of LoCs per hour it could perform a simple regexp on? Would that still be a whopping number? Perhaps the only hope for it is to buy the mouse with euros?

  35. Relative costs by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    A scroll wheel is really cheap, it's just like the roll sensors, only turned upwards. Maybe 50 cents added cost. A scroll panel is a much more comlex device, with a capacitive or resistive transducer, x-y driving and sensing electronics, and a/d converters. Several $ I'd guess. By the time these costs go up the manufactiring and distribution and retail paths, we're up to many $ difference. It's hard to see paying that much more for a solution to a non-problem.

  36. Damn english :) by dark-br · · Score: 1

    Damn language when a double "o" or a double "p" can make the diff between my ass being whooped or my comment being funny :)

    1. Re:Damn english :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that they totally left "wheeless" alone. May as well add double "L" to that list also ;-)

  37. Cute mouse, but it lacks tactile feedback by TheRealElbadoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bought one of these because of its extemely compact usb receiver. My older laptop's USB plug is recessed in the case so that most other wireless receivers would require an extension cable.

    This one's small enough that it plugs right in. I'm half-tempted to try and see if I can fit it inside the laptop's case. (BTW, why don't laptop makers include wireless mouse capability? OK, so Bluetooth might count, if there are any good Bluetooth mice...)

    Unfortunately, the mouse suffers from a lack of tactile feedback. It has a slightly audible "tick" when you're scrolling, but I really miss the physical "bump" of a real scroll wheel. Perhaps they could accomplish the same thing by adding some little ridges on the scroll surface?

    A little center dimple, like you find on calculator and phone "5" keys would also help in positioning your scrolling finger.

    It could also use a third button. Two just ain't enough!

    This is good enough for a compact laptop mouse, but I'd wait until they refine it some for desktop use.

    1. Re:Cute mouse, but it lacks tactile feedback by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      OK, so Bluetooth might count...

      MIGHT count? Hello, that's exactly what BT was designed for - low power consumption for wireless, low bandwidth devices. If you need a BT mouse, it doesn't get much better than a MX900 (which you can use WITHOUT the BT hub they give you). Otherwise,there are a ton of BT mice out there in varying sizes depending on your needs.

    2. Re:Cute mouse, but it lacks tactile feedback by TheRealElbadoo · · Score: 1

      Oops, sorry. I had seen a review of the Logitech BT mouse (don't know if it was the MX900 or a predecessor, if there was one). I don't think it got a very good write-up, and I haven't followed up on it or looked for other BT mice.

  38. New advertiser: CoolTechZone.com by DogDude · · Score: 1

    I had never heard of these guys before the other day when Slashdot had another article from them. It looks like their new advertising campaign is going great. Does anybody know what it costs to get Slashdot to start pointing to your own web site as "articles"? I don't personally have a business that would benefit, but I do have a friend who may be interested in doing the same thing that these guys at CoolTechZone.com have obviously done.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:New advertiser: CoolTechZone.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You gotta sleep with CmdrTaco and I, for one, wouldn't wish that upon anyone for the whole world.

    2. Re:New advertiser: CoolTechZone.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compulsory homosexual intercourse with the Slashduh staff is the reason why there are so many ad^H^Harticles about Apple products. Products for heterosexuals don't have the same good chance of getting on the Slashduh frontpage.

  39. Gamers won't be buying them by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

    FPS gamers are used to the scrolling function for switching between weapons. I doubt the scrollpad will be very useful for this function.

  40. Double Slashvertisement: CoolTechZone by Evro · · Score: 1

    Lots of stories pointing to "CoolTechZone" lately. Do they have some kind of deal with Slashdot/OSDN? This post seems to be a Slashvertisement both for the mouse and the site.

    http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aslashdot.org +cooltechzone

    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:Double Slashvertisement: CoolTechZone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, i noticed the same thing but the few articles that I have read from them seemed to be thought provoking. From the first few impressions, it seems like a credible site.

  41. $70 ?!?! by dgos78 · · Score: 0

    My girlfriend just picked up a decent computer for $300, monitor and all. For $70, that mouse had better predict where I want to go.

    --
    SYS 64738
  42. Yeah but, by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    1. Does it work with Linux?

    By that I mean can you adjust the sensitivity of the touch pad? I'm sure it will "work" but can you adjust it??

    I was using a "natural" type keyboard that had a serial Synaptic touchpad built in. Under M$ I could set a LOT of options on the touchpad, like turning off taps and setting the sensitivity. Under Linux, no adjustments were possible at all. I absolutely despised tap to click and the ultra sensitivity. It was so freaking annoying that I quit using it totally.

    I just bought an HP wireless optical USB mouse, 800dpi, 5 buttons, scroll wheel, etc.. Can't set the extra buttons to do anything but besides that it works damn nice. Got it at wallyworld for $30..

  43. Nah... by j0nkatz · · Score: 0

    Didn't like it. I usually rest my middle finger on my mouse which made it hard with this mouse, not to mention the fact that there is no third mouse button.

    --
    Don't mod me, bro'!!!!
  44. k6-III 500 's pleny for trolling slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't upgraded to a 755MHz machine yet, you insensitive clod!

  45. Available for less.... by jea6 · · Score: 1
    --

    sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    1. Re:Available for less.... by Bassman59 · · Score: 1
      " Also available from Dell with a $20 mail-in rebate:"

      fuck rebates. I won't buy anything that has a mail-in rebate. Either take the $20 off at point-of-sale, or I won't buy the product.

  46. I've had one for a couple of months... by ralf1 · · Score: 1

    and its absolutely fantastic. I haven't owned a lot of notebook mice, so can't make comparisons to the oft mentioned Kensington or others, but its accurate, comfortable, battery life has been great (still on first set), small enough to put in a pocket (not that I do, just making a point), and looks very cool to boot. And it runs out of the box with SuSE 9.3, so yes it does Linux too.

    --
    "Would you, could you, with a goat?" Dr Seuss
    1. Re:I've had one for a couple of months... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you say boot ?? I don't think they design things for that kind of mechanical kicking and abuse.

  47. $70 for a mouse? by ChrisF79 · · Score: 1

    $70 for a mouse?? You sure Apple doesn't make this mouse?

    --
    Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
    1. Re:$70 for a mouse? by Ace26_805 · · Score: 1

      Just google it, comes up as $36.95 from http://www.overstock.com/cgi-bin/d2.cgi?PAGE=PRODU CT&PROD_ID=1498041&cid=25608&fp=F. The MSRP is $59.99. I have no idea where they came up with $70 unless they are including tax in the price as well.

  48. Link by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1
    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  49. How about a WiFi mouse... by slapout · · Score: 1

    ...so I don't have to carry the usb stick around everywhere?

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  50. Wow, that's a showstopper by dozer · · Score: 1

    Mice are already cause a lot of RSI pain, and the scroll wheel makes it significantly worse. It sounds like this pad should help a lot. Instead of curling your finger repeatedly, you can just slide it around. Brilliant.

    But I *require* a middle mouse button. Here's hoping they release a $40, corded, middle-buttoned version very soon.

  51. crash n burn by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
    down goes cooltech's site.
    I nabbed the first page from mirrordot
    There's no doubt that Logitech is one of the pioneers when it comes to peripherals such as keyboards, mice, joysticks and other key components for personal computers. It's almost as if the company has perfected the art of designing peripherals that are nearly faultless in every way. Though Logitech's components carry a hefty price tag, in many cases the product is worth the value. Whenever it appears to be the end of innovation with peripherals, Logitech always have something unique entering the market. Whether the feature is practical or not is not the question, but continuous motivation on Logitech's part to deliver something new with almost every product is exceptional.

    There are numerous notebook mice saturating the market, but the main problem that plagues majority of them is their size. We can possibly understand the manufacturer's desire to make the mice portable considering that they will be used with notebook computers, but they are fairly annoying to use if you have larger sized hands. Not only that, but the ergonomics aren't generally too impressive to begin with. The curvature on the side and possibly even the grooves don't fit in well with such mice. Add these major issues to wire management problems, overall modest performance and you have a mixture of next to useless mice that don't deserve a separate market. Last week, we evaluated Logitech's V200 notebook mouse and although it performed quite well, the ergonomic problems still plagued it. They weren't exceptionally worst, but it's certainly not Logitech's best innovation as far as mice is concerned. Then again, it was the best notebook mouse we had ever tested at the time, so maybe our expectations are too high at this point.

    Today we have Logitech's V500, a supposedly high-end notebook mouse that is designed with ergonomics in mind with the same intuition of comfort that Logitech is known for. As the authority symbol in its product line, you can very well expect to see this mouse with an unexpected price tag. But before we delve into its value, the number one question is if the performance and the ergonomics of the mouse are acceptable for daily use. Is it any better than the V200 we evaluated earlier? Read on and find out...
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  52. Touch panel is cool..but... by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    I love the bump ( queue cheesy 70s pr0n music ).

    Seriously, I love the bump of the mouse wheel. Now, if they make a touch panel that has a similar shape, I'm sold.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Touch panel is cool..but... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I also think a regular wheel mouse bears a striking similarity to a vulva. Funnily enough, I only realized it when a female geek pointed it out to me (the fact, not it). Especially this one (hover over the color choices to see the actual shape).

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  53. Are these guys being paid by Logitech? by GekkePrutser · · Score: 1
    I mean.. A good review is one thing, but this is outright praise :-). I have a few logitech products, and they're good, but I don't think they're *THAT* good..

    Just a quote:
    There's no doubt that Logitech is one of the pioneers when it comes to peripherals such as keyboards, mice, joysticks and other key components for personal computers. It's almost as if the company has perfected the art of designing peripherals that are nearly faultless in every way. Though Logitech's components carry a hefty price tag, in many cases the product is worth the value. Whenever it appears to be the end of innovation with peripherals, Logitech always have something unique entering the market. Whether the feature is practical or not is not the question, but continuous motivation on Logitech's part to deliver something new with almost every product is exceptional.

  54. Why isn't anyone using Bluetooth? by fsck! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why are Logitech and friends not using Bluetooth? It seems the most logical choice--broad compatibility, better utilization of that narrow and crowded frequency range, plus they can at a lower price because so many laptops and desktops already ship with Bluetooth support.

    1. Re:Why isn't anyone using Bluetooth? by Widowwolf · · Score: 1

      now i agree that bluetooth is an awesome technology i do not agree with your point that so many laptops and desktops have them. Most of the time, unless you add on bluetooth, your dont see it much on any laptop or desktop...especially desktops..the only desktops i have seen with bluetooth have been self customized, or from alienware

      --
      ~~"Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~~Dennis Miller
    2. Re:Why isn't anyone using Bluetooth? by zanderredux · · Score: 1
      That's because:
      1. They must pay someone to use Bluetooth and that price tag might not be that friendly
      2. There's already a lot of RF coming out of the laptop
      3. You have to charge both the laptop and its Bluetooth-enabled peripherals, which can prove to be a major hassle
      4. A combination of all previous reasons
      That kinda sounds plausible...
    3. Re:Why isn't anyone using Bluetooth? by eeyoredragon · · Score: 1

      I have yet to find a bluetooth mouse that actually works well. Apple's bluetooth mouse works decently. Macmice's The Mouse BT doesn't work very well at all. (I'm talking about simple tracking here.) The other bluetooth mouse I tried (bluetake I believe) worked pretty good but the left button broke after three days. I have yet to be impressed with a bluetooth mouse.

      Any recommendations?

  55. No, no and NO! by hacker · · Score: 1

    I have only a few complaints:

    1. No middle-click, no third button
    2. No ergonomic feel to the mouse. I don't want my mouse to feel like a travel "soap dish" when I'm using it all day long.
    3. 2 AAA batteries? Have we really de-evolved back into the mid-90's again?
    4. Eats a USB port, when my laptop has onboard 802.11x and Bluetooth

    Nope, this one will definately not be going into my travel bag. I'll stick with my Logitech MX1000 even though 2/3 of the buttons are useless under Linux.

    1. Re:No, no and NO! by osho_gg · · Score: 1

      If your laptop has bluetooth, why not use MX900? That's what I use with my laptop (which has bluetooth onboard) and it works so awesome without having to plug anything into any ports of the laptop. Osho

  56. You knuckleheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iogear has had a 2D scrolling trackball mounted on an optical mouse for years now. See http://www.iogear.com/main.php?loc=product&Item=GM E421&PHPSESSID=6375c6dc2f0083e0512b2b3078a7b759 Sheesh; someone puts a touchpad on something and all of the sudden it "new hotness".

  57. Oohh...I can see where this is heading by bjohnson · · Score: 1

    You're replacing your trackpad with a mouse, with a TRACKPAD on it!

    Next stop, a tiny mouse that you maneuver around on the trackpad of the mouse....

    1. Re:Oohh...I can see where this is heading by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      The Logitech RecursiveTrack!

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  58. MX1000 by brickballs · · Score: 1

    I hava a Logitech MX1000 mouse, and I love it.

    This mouse has a fairly fancy scroll wheel. Its got the regular up and down, plus you can tilt it right or left. but in addition to that there are two buttons, one above and one below. I think Logitech calls these 'cruse control', but what they do is scroll up or down the page really fast.

    I thought it was kind of lame at first, but after I started using it I gerw to like it

    Basicaly, logitech has a habit of building very good quality mice that are actualy worth more than the competition. $70 sounds steep, but if you have to use it every day it might just be worth it.

    --
    "What does slashdotting mean?"
    "You've never heard of slashdot?"
    "I know it makes websites not work."
  59. Too Sensitive / No Feedback. by uberdave · · Score: 1

    The big problem I have with touch sensors is that they react to the slightest touch. When I use a laptop, the mouse pointer always jumps around because I brush the pad with the heel of my palm, or my thumb. I imagine I would suffer from similar problems with this mouse wheel substitute. Occasionally I find myself lightly tapping on my scroll wheel (from habit, or in time to music, or whatever).

    Also, I prefer a little tactile feedback to my input - the light thud as the keys on my keyboard reach the end of their travel, the click of the mouse keys, and (in the case of my mouse wheel) the movement and "ratchetting" when the wheel turns. These things will be missing with the touch pad.

  60. Just what we need... by Hosiah · · Score: 1

    Another new kind of hardware to write drivers for and get OSes to recognize...joy.

  61. But you have to use a receiver by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    One of the things (actually the main thing) I like about using a Bluetooth mouse with my Powerbook is I don't have to have some dongle/receiver sticking out of the side of my Powerbook. If this Logitech mouse were useable without a receiver on notebooks with built-in 802.11b/g, that would make this a much more desirable product - but Logitech's support info says the mouse and receiver are pre-paired at the factory, which implies that you MUST use the receiver.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:But you have to use a receiver by jerw134 · · Score: 1

      So, how exactly would you suggest making a mouse that works over WiFi? What you're essentially saying is "I don't want to take up a USB port for this mouse. Why don't they make a mouse that can plug into an Ethernet port?"

      Bluetooth would be acceptable, but 802.11b/g is impossible.

    2. Re:But you have to use a receiver by grumling · · Score: 1
      I was just thinking about what it might take to have an 802.11b mouse. Let's assume you don't want a TCP/IP stack on the mouse, due to cost. All you'd have to do is develop a protocol and bind it to the 802.11b interface. Autodiscovery may be difficult, but not impossible, if you have a MAC broadcast from the mouse and tie it into the PC somehow.

      However, I doubt it would work with a TCP/IP stack without static IP addresses. Since most NICs only allow 1 IP address at a time (at least with Windows), DHCP wouldn't happen, so it would be worthless on the road.

      Not to mention the bandwidth requirements.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  62. affect the gaming... by nazpyro · · Score: 1

    I use the scroll wheel to do next/previous weapons in a lot of FPS, which is OK since you can physically feel the increments on the wheel. Now with a panel...that's more transparent... hmm.

    1. Re:affect the gaming... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      I tried the scroll wheel for primary/secondary fire in HalfLife.
      It makes great rapid fire with weapons like the pistol, unfortunately doesn't allow continuous fire like machinegun or gauss secondary.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  63. Sucks for Windows users too by try_anything · · Score: 1

    No more middle-click for new tab in Firefox.

    Can someone definitively confirm or deny this? I was almost convinced to try one out.

    1. Re:Sucks for Windows users too by njb42 · · Score: 1

      I can confirm it, at least in the one I picked up from CompUSA a few months ago. I ended up returning it for exactly that reason. Maybe Logitech has updated the drivers by now.

  64. previous versions by cahiha · · Score: 1

    IBM has something called the Scrollpoint mouse, which also gives you 4-way scrolling. There are several other mice with 4-way scrolling as well (tiltable scroll wheel, etc.). Those came out around the same time as the scroll wheel.

    Before that, there were several three button mice with the middle button rebound to scrolling in software (you still get that function today in Windows if you like). I think that's actually perhaps the nicest way of doing scrolling.

  65. Mouse Reinvents the Wheel by writerjosh · · Score: 1

    This mouse has been out for a while, and I bought one a few months back. It's pretty sweet, and worth the money imho.

    The side to side scroll doesn't really work very well, but who really uses that function anyway? The standard up and down scroll is responsive with the only drawback being that sometimes when you touch it for the first time, it jumps up a screen instead of scrolling down. But overall, it's just a matter of getting the dexterity down.

    The hidden USB connector carrying slot is really nice too. It's almost impossible to forget to put it back inside because you have to close the mouse to store it (so you have to put the USB connector back inside for all the lights to go off).

    I never noticed the mouse going dead, so it was always receptive. The design is sleek and looks sharp without a nasty wire getting in the way. This is especially cool at the coffee shop when you don't know what cramped situation you might be in.

    The mouse tracks well on most surfaces (even a stick coffee shop table).

    Overall, it's a good little mouse with a few issues. And for the record, I got mine cheaper than $70 by shopping around (around $60).

  66. Is the Scroll Wheel Gonna Die? by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 1

    No because people use what they like and people like using a mouse with a wheel, especially for gaming... Of course since a recent article said that the PC Gaming industry is finished because of consoles I guess that gaming mice are gonna die too. I for one will not go to a scroll panel because as others have said I like the feel of the wheel.

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
  67. We need a grab button or "hat" controller. by argent · · Score: 1

    I won a Kensington mouse with a scroll panel a year or so back, and gave it away. The lack of feedback is really annoying.

    There's a couple of better alternatives that I've never seen. One is the IBM trackpoint... the button between G and H on thinkpads. It's a small, reliable, and well understood 2d controller that would fit on a mouse really easily. IBM even put a trackpoint on a mouse... they called it a scrollpoint. Unfortunately they only made it into an up/down scroller. *doh*

    The other alternative that's good is a software solution. Logitech came up with a MUCH better idea a few years back. They implemented it in the mouse software instead of the mouse, and that poorly, but the basic idea is good.

    You could configure the middle button as a "grab" button. When you held it down, moving the mouse would scroll the document in all four directions. Unfortunately, it also put an obscure icon down where you clicked and didn't clean it up properly, but there's no reason that part couldn't be left out.

  68. Apple Patents by BrianEnigma · · Score: 1

    That sort of reminds me of a couple of Apple patents, including a mouse with an iPod-like scroll wheel and a mouse with a touch pad instead of a button.

  69. I already have a mouse by StarCharter · · Score: 3, Funny

    What I need is a $70 cordless notebook.

  70. Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by Minstrel+Boy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I don't understand why the majority of wireless mice/keyboards out there use RF rather than BlueTooth. It's a reasonable standard, it's been out there for awhile, lots of notebooks come with built-in BlueTooth - I expected to see all the newer wireless mice start to use it over the past couple of years. Is it licensing fees? Power consumption? Implementation problems?

    KeS

    1. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth is an open standard I believe so licensing fee is not an issue. It's not as standard as you might think it is. The standard is clear but no one follows the rules. For example, Nokia or another cellphone maker, I believe, implements the audio profile for their phones instead of telephony. Most BT headsets use the telephony profile. Their BT headset does both audio and telephony. So you end up with a situation where their headset and only their headset can work with their phones. For a standard to work, people have to adhere to them.

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    2. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      The cheapest Bluetooth dongle costs about the same as a reasonable quality wireless mouse itself. Why - no idea. I guess it's the overhead too - the mouse's wireless transmission protocol is much simpler than Bluetooth.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    3. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by Cyn · · Score: 1

      I suspect it's actually a somewhat unique problem.

      Yes - lots of notebooks come with bluetooth. Lots of desktops and notebooks also don't.

      So, do we make two versions, one that comes with a bluetooth usb dongle, and one without? Or do we sell it as just the one set, and people who have bluetooth grumble because they're paying for something they don't need?

      What about support issues, where the problem is their existing bluetooth dongle doesn't actually work right. Okay, those are mostly thwarted by including the (extra $) transmitter.

      I think it comes down to this: Using their own RF and sending standard HID mouse commands as if it were wired is a much smaller support headache than using a bluetooth HID profile and trying to muscle around that. It's possible there are other concerns - size, licensing, etc. - after all, 2.4ghz is what bluetooth operates on, so why aren't they using it?

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    4. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by ElDuderino44137 · · Score: 1

      Why use BlueTooth for anything that doesn't use it benefits. RF is cheaper ... 'cause it's been around for ever'ish. That being said ... why would anyone spend time and considerable money developing ... stereo BlueTooth headphones? When RF signals have been doing the same thing for years. What? Do I need my mp3 security encoded?

      -- duderino

    5. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by 241comp · · Score: 1

      They are available. Why they are not more wide-spread? I don't know.

    6. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bluetooth is pretty much the same thing, but with a full protocol built on top of the wireless. It's overkill for a mouse, since having a bluetooth mouse would mean giving it the bluetooth equivalent of a MAC address.

      That said, there are bluetooth mice out there, just in case somebody would want to navigate their bluetooth headset and bluetooth phone with it too.

    7. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heh :) Only the AC comes close to a correct and comprehensive answer :)

      Bluetooth is overkill and way too expensive for a mouse. It's also too complex. Why use a tech which is more difficult to integrate than RF when you only need up/down/left/right/buttonclick info to be sent; why use a tech which eats a lot more power than 'just' RF; why use a tech which is more expensive than RF, as bluetooth means having to buy a chip and integrate it wilst RF only needs a transmitter/reciever antenna hooked up to some logic?

      In short, using RF means using the propper tool for the job, instead of using the equivelant of a jackhammer when you could use a tiny screwdriver to unscrew something.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    8. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      That being said ... why would anyone spend time and considerable money developing ... stereo BlueTooth headphones?

      Emm, because they have mp3 capable PDA/phones and don't want to untangle the headphones whenever they want to make a call/listen to music? Yeah, it is tech overkill, but so is a lot of stuff. Being able to pull out the 'phones and just have them work would be rather handy.

      The tangle pisses me off, so I've resorted to velcro tie-wraps for them. I did consider the stereo headphones (yes, they are available), but they were a tad bulky/expensive. Give it time...

    9. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Nokia or another cellphone maker, I believe, implements the audio profile for their phones instead of telephony. Most BT headsets use the telephony profile. Their BT headset does both audio and telephony. So you end up with a situation where their headset and only their headset can work with their phones.

      Sounds like something Nokia would do. They are the Microsoft of the phone world, completely non-interoperable with anything else, and full of vendor lock-in. Try migrating your contacts to another manufacturer if you fancy a laugh.

    10. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by screensaver400 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why? Because RF isn't standardized. It isn't built into any computers like Bluetooth is. I have a Powerbook, and all I want is a Bluetooth v500, because I don't want something sticking out of the end of my 'book. If Bluetooth is overkill, fine. Make me some kind of standard that will be internal in laptops, and will support wireless mice and the like. Also, by your complexity argument, all mice should use a serial port, since USB is really overkill. But I'm just nitpicking there. ;-)

    11. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by rreay · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth radios are more expensive than analog radios. BT radios use more power. BT radios that go to sleep need up to 10 seconds to reconect.

      That being said there are BT mice available.

    12. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by doombob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you ever tried to develop any kind of hardware to use Bluetooth wireless? It's not fun or easy. In one of my senior design classes, we tried to implement wireless sensors that would use Bluetooth to communicate with each other and a base station, and it was next to impossible. We spent most of the year trying to get the Bluetooth to transmit the data we wanted correctly rather than working on any other part of the project. Our professor still gave us an A since he felt sorry for us.

    13. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but I do know that my two Bluetooth mice both last much longer on their batteries than any of my three non-Bluetooth wireless mice.

      I don't get it either. Especially for a notebook. I want a mouse that 'just connects' wirelessly. I don't want to deal with a funky dongle sticking out the side (or back) of my notebook. I just want to pull the mouse out, hit 'Power', and go.

      As for the complaint that it takes a long time for Bluetooth to connect? I have a Bluetooth mouse that takes less than 2 seconds to 'wake up' from sleep. And it only goes to sleep if I don't move it or click a button for 10 minutes. If I haven't touched it in 10 minutes, an extra 2 seconds after clicking a button isn't going to kill me. And a Bluetooth headset for my phone that I can be talking on less than 5 seconds from being all the way 'off'.

      I can sympathize with the 'difficulty' aspect, but come on, I don't want a funky dongle hanging off my notebook. (At least recent mice have a place to store the dongle in the mouse itself, so you don't have to worry about losing it, as long as you remember to put it back in the mouse.)

      My Bluetooth mice? Apple's, and the Macally BTMicro. (The base is just a charger, and only needs to be plugged in to the wall, not the computer. Although, come to think of it, having the charger base powered through USB, with an optical 'passthrough' would be kind of cool. Use it as a 'wired' mouse to charge it, then use it wireless on battery.)

      And claims of Bluetooth usable up to 30 feet? I get more than that. In fact, I have an 802.11g base station approximately 3 feet above my Bluetooth-enabled desktop computer, and if I take my notebook computer away from that room, while using a Bluetooth headset to listen to music from the desktop, the notebook loses it's 802.11g connection before the headset loses it's Bluetooth connection. (Likewise, I can use Bluetooth to transfer files slowly between the desktop and laptop farther away than with the 802.11g.)

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    14. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by aclarke · · Score: 1

      I'd really like to see a bluetooth natural keyboard. You know, one that looks like this one but uses bluetooth. Does anyone know if one exists?

    15. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by jfanning · · Score: 1

      Close, but no cigar.

      This was only an issue at the first generation of Bluetooth headsets when no third parties were producing them. Nokia made their phones to support the handsfree profile which had more features. Ericsson supported the headset profile. Hence their headsets wouldn't work with each others phones.

      But nearly every headset produced now supports both headset and handsfree profiles and there are very vew problems. Although I guess the general advice now would be to get at least Bluetooth v1.2 products as these have better performance and audio quality.

    16. Re:Whatever happened to BlueTooth? by ElDuderino44137 · · Score: 1

      Okay ...

      Did a little research.
      found:
      http://www.bluetake.com/products/BT420EX.htm

      Interesting.
      But extreamly expensive for what they are / provide.

      cheers,
      duderino

  71. Just like Apple by RobDogAlpha · · Score: 1

    Apple has made an overpriced mouse without a scroll wheel for years and no one ever complained...

  72. wonder wheel not turning any more by bl4z · · Score: 1

    at first i was impresed by the "new wheel" but then i found out that i got no middle button (firefox -> open link in new tab) and after like 14 days wonder wheel stoped working... now im back to mouseman travel :/

  73. Me too! by CoyoteLab · · Score: 1

    I picked one of these up a couple weeks ago when my laptop touchpad buttons stopped working reliably. One thing to keep in mind is that it's pretty damn small. This (and the stow-away USB receiver) makes it very nice to pack in a laptop bag, but it takes quite a bit of getting used to. I regularly find that my middle finger is resting on the central "scroll panel" which results in unexpected scroll-ups. Also, for those still trying to figure out how it works from just the pictures, the scroll panel itself doesn't move, nor does the whole "panel" detect your fingers movement. There are 4 arrows on the panel, and when you "flick" them, it scrolls. It takes some getting used to, but then so did migrating from the old thinkPad touchstick to the new(er) touchpads.

  74. MX900 by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Logitech's MX900 mouse uses Bluetooth, but yeah, why they don't use it more often is beyond me too. Must be a cost issue of some sort. FWIW, I use a Microsoft Bluetooth mouse with my notebook. Logitech's mouse is supposed to be a bit nicer. Shame HP only provides Bluetooth radios with their Configure-To-Order notebooks and not with the gazillions they sell at retail. I always encourage people to add the Bluetooth option when helping them buy notebooks.

    1. Re:MX900 by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Logitech's MX900 mouse uses Bluetooth, but yeah, why they don't use it more often is beyond me too

      Are all MX900s in the bluetooth edition?

      I know this time last year they had the Cordless MX desktop for about $100 and also one marked bluetooth for $200. The non-bluetooth edition made it's way to closeout shops for about $50 or so, where the bluetooth edition stayed at at $200 for the pair.

      But why don't they make more? Who would spend $200 on the bluetooth edition when the $100 were 100% mechanicaly the same?

      Needless to say I have the MX900 non-bluetooth. Very nice mouse, very nice button placement. Paid well under $100 for both the mouse and keyboard. I like the idea of Bluetooth, and would go Bluetooth if it wasn't double the price.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  75. Are you sure about this one? by argent · · Score: 1

    IBM sees it, and puts a TrackPoint in the top of their mice for two-axis scrolling.

    The IBM "scrollpoint" mouse I tried looked just like a trackpoint on a mouse, but it was only an up-down controller. I'd love a full trackpoint on a mouse, do you have an actual model number for the 2-d version?

    1. Re:Are you sure about this one? by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      The IBM mo18b has a 2-d scroll button. The third button is positioned to be acutated with the thumb.

      I found a couple on froogle, but it doesn't look like they're in production anymore.

  76. Not Willing To Give Up My Double-Click by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Until it will reliably and easily send a double-click on a single tap without false positives, I won't be a convert. Using my middle mouse button for the double-click has been my most favorite setting ever since five minutes after I got my first pre-scroll wheel 3-button mouse many years ago. I will not give this productivity enhancement up easily.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  77. RE Wireless mouse by anand78 · · Score: 1

    Stay at leat a mile away from wireless mouse. I got the Mx Laser Logitech wireless mouse. It worked well for 1 week after which it decided to freeze on me at random. I was told Monitor radiation can be one of the problems. However after 2 replacements I did what I should have done to start with - I use a wired mouse.

  78. IBM has the best mouse ever. by chopper749 · · Score: 1

    IBM Scrollpoint It's only $21, too.

  79. how I wish for a sane mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The one with two ears, and a small tail...

  80. Not Really $70... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several places, including Newegg have this mouse for $49.99 - just go to pricescan

  81. First were keys. by SharpFang · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First of all were keys. Separate. One press, one effect.
    Then keys on top of keys. Shift plus a key... And keys on top of keys of keys. Double bucky :)
    Then, paddles. One manipulator - one rotary wheel, plus a key. Two of them, separate. Plus one key on each.
    Then came standard joystick, essentially four keys connected into one. Plus one separate (fire).
    Then came mouse. Two paddles connected into one. Plus two keys on top.
    About the same time came analog joystick. Two paddles connected into one, but with ability to return to original position by itself. Sometimes better than mouse, sometimes not. Of course, keys on top.
    Then some aberrations like trackball (mouse on its back) or driving wheel with pedals (2 paddles mounted in specific positions), mousepad without mouse (touch tablet), mousepad without mouse on top of keys (touch pad) micro-joystick on top of keys (trackpoint), etc - marginal use. And all with lots of keys on them.
    Then they added another paddle on top of the mouse. Wheel mouse.
    Analog joystick evolved. Two more joysticks were added in paralell (PS gamepad).
    Sometime along yet another paddle was added to top of mouse. (a4tech etc 2-wheel mice).
    Some more aberrations. Paddle on top of keys (keyboards with scrollwheels), Joystick on top of joystick (multiple levels of freedom), triple paddles (steering wheels with throttle), touch tablets on top of screens (touch screens), etc.
    Now we learn Logitech put a joystick on top of a mouse.

    Still waiting for mouse on top of a mouse (trackball instead of wheel), mouse on top of a joystick (trackball again, seemed like xbox2 would have it but not), and whatever comes next, following the pattern.

    Remember: keys and paddles.

    And of course screens on top of screens (windows).

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:First were keys. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still waiting for mouse on top of a mouse (trackball instead of wheel), mouse on top of a joystick (trackball again, seemed like xbox2 would have it but not), and whatever comes next, following the pattern.
      How did you post to slashdot from THE PAST?!? Both of those devices have been around. Some company makes an optical mouse with a trackball on top u can use as either trackball or mouse. And I'm sure Madcatz used to have an analog flight stick with a trackball on the left palm rest. I still have my version without the trackball.

  82. Iffy ergonomics.... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 3, Interesting
    As someone with a personal and professional interest in ergonomics, I'm not too happy about this.

    First up, scroll wheels are a Bad Thing to start off with as they encourage unnatural movements of the middle finger while holding the rest of the fingers static.

    Secondly, things like zero-travel buttons and trackpads all too often prove far too sensitive -- any small twitch is interpreted as a meaningful movement. The result is that the user tenses up to avoid making any inadvertant movements.

    As all computer-people should know: tension is the root cause of many an RSI.

    HAL

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    1. Re:Iffy ergonomics.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume that people use the scroll wheel with their middle finger.

      I find it is faster, more comfortable for me to use my index finger for both my left click, scroll wheel and scroll wheel click. I have the scroll wheel click assigned to expose - show all, so it is used quite a bit.

      My middle finger gets used only for right mouse clicks.

      Anyone, to make a short post boring...don't assume that people are using the device in a way that makes sense. On the flip side, I'm sure my banjo playing would do wonders for my ability to use three fingers on the mouse.

    2. Re:Iffy ergonomics.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "... as they encourage unnatural movements of the middle finger while holding the rest of the fingers static."

      Not for us with girlfriends...

    3. Re:Iffy ergonomics.... by StarManta.Mini · · Score: 1

      Secondly, things like zero-travel buttons and trackpads all too often prove far too sensitive

      Have you actually used this mouse? My understanding was not that the buttons were zero-travel, but rather that the case flexed to allow them to travel. (Granted, I haven't used it either)

      And since when do trackpads prove too sensitive? I've never felt that way about any trackpad.... well, I take that back. I feel that way about the crappy trackpads they put in most Windows laptops, but Apple's trackpads are flawless. Again, have you used it, or is that just a generalization? I want to give this mouse a spin.

    4. Re:Iffy ergonomics.... by toddestan · · Score: 2, Informative

      First up, scroll wheels are a Bad Thing to start off with as they encourage unnatural movements of the middle finger while holding the rest of the fingers static.

      I don't know about you, but I always use my index finger to scroll the scroll wheel on my mouse. Never really gave it any thought, it just seems natural to me. The only thing the middle finger is used for is right clicks.

    5. Re:Iffy ergonomics.... by redd+robber · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do people use their middle finger on the scroll wheel? I use my index finger on the scroll button, shifting it to the left button when I need to click left. My middle finger is used for the right button.

      Maybe because I started with a two button mouse?

      Is this better ergonomically?

      Maybe this is also why I suck at counterstrike?

      Too many questions,

      Redd

    6. Re:Iffy ergonomics.... by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      I do this too. Forefinger is used for left-clicking, scrolling, and middle-clicking, my middle finger is used for right clicking only. The way I hold my mouse makes middle finger scrolling ridiculously uncomfortable!

  83. Left unsaid... by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 2, Interesting
    the era of scroll wheels is short-lived if Logitech applies the same design to its desktop equivalent products...

    ...and they drop the price by an order of magnitude.

    It will be interesting to see if they can get the manufacturing costs down to $1-3 to adapt into a mouse. A quick check shows most touchpad mouse alternatives bottoming at about $30. How much of that is on the retail end (market demand & cost of stocking less popular goods) and the manufacturing end (dedicated USB stuff, case - stuff that goes away when integrated into a mouse) is anyone's guess.

    An engineering challenge, to bring the concept of a touchpad onto a mouse for a low cost, but with the right price pressures (especially from competition) I wouldn't mind dropping an extra buck or three on this. Not too much more than that, though.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  84. Not $70 at PC Connection by invisik · · Score: 1

    Get them from my friend Bryan x71071 at PC Connection for $29.99 after $20 rebate. In stock and ships today!

    Looks cool, I'll probably try one. Though I would like it more if it had bluetooth.... :/

    -m

    --
    http://www.invisik.com
  85. Mandatory Motorhead Reference by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    http://www.darklyrics.com/lyrics/motorhead/1916.ht ml#7
    I'm gonna live in L.A. drinkin' all day,
    Lay by the pool
    And let the record company pay,
    Talking to the devil on the batphone
    All of the time...


    Clearly, Lemmy should run to replace der Governator in California, as his grasp of local issues is so clearly demonstrated.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  86. It's not innovative enough for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm waiting for the $70 mouse with a built-in qwerty keyboard!

  87. Touchstream, where art thou? by Tufriast · · Score: 1

    All I can say is that the Touchstream LP is still far superior that this crap.
    It ended the era of mouse and keyboards altogether. However, some mysterious entity has bought out Fingerworks, the maker of the Touchsctream LP. I am very angered by this as I cannot get my hands on a touchstream now for less than $700.00. Fingerworks's other products (mouse PADs that acted like mice) were also a lot better.
    And yeah, they were worth the $100-$330.

    --
    Help me, help you. - Jerry McGuire
  88. You mean like mouse balls going away? by WareW01f · · Score: 1

    Could this be the end of scroll wheels?

    Seriously folks! I just finally switched over to an optical scrolly wheely mouse thingy as I found one in the discount bin at the local Micro Center. (like $7 wahoo!) Before that I was using the serial mouse (at least it was only 9 pin) mouse from like '93. Why, because I don't play "twitch" games, and I've been a pro at the both-button-press-for-the-third button for years. (That and the X10 driver that I pulled on my last box update didn't play well with the mouse. :) I'd say the same for my keyboard. I've been through countless boxen, as many kernels (more actually) and never saw the need.

    Not to pull out the old "They don't make 'em like they used to crap." (well, they don't and they don't cost what they used to either) But the long and the short of it is until you can't buy them at Walmart (VHS anyone?) they ain't goin' anywhere.

  89. overrated / insightful by ElDuderino44137 · · Score: 1

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    I love that,
    -- duderino

  90. I have one too. by lemonylimey · · Score: 1

    I like the convenience of pop-out transmitter and the comfort-factor of the expanding design, but the scroll panel is annoying. As radish says, you can't middle click in firefox, so I've ended up with one hand on the buttons on my Thinkpad for clicking and the other hand on the mouse for cursor movement.

    The other annoying thing about the scroll panel is that you have to be very careful about where you rest your finger. I've found that as I'm reading, my finger starts to relax and all of a sudden, I'm looking at the top of the page again.

    The final point of irritation is the position of the optical sensor, which is right at the front of the mouse. I understand that they had to put it there because there isn't anywhere else for it, but it does give a very strange cursor response.

  91. Sorry, Win3.0 was the last to run in Real Mode by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 1
    ...couldn't have been an 8088. Or maybe you were thinking of Win 3.0. Either way, fun as they were (?), thank goodness that exact set of problems rarely lifts it's head anymore. Seems companies always seemed to assume that they had exclusive rights to claim a particular IRQ. Sure, you could jumper it for another, but the driver was hard coded. For a short while, adding a second IDE channel and NIC was a real hassle as IRQ's 9, 14 and 15 seemed to be favored by other niche cards. Then again, I guess the more things change, eh?

    Meanwhile, 2.4Ghz seems to be quickly becoming practically useless. I think I have five devices all vying for that space in the evenings...

    1. Re:Sorry, Win3.0 was the last to run in Real Mode by evilmousse · · Score: 1


      you're right, i it must have been my 486. i think the 8088 only got as far as a cga monitor and some ascii gui over dos3.something before i moved up. my bad. memory fuzzy...

    2. Re:Sorry, Win3.0 was the last to run in Real Mode by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Seems companies always seemed to assume that they had exclusive rights to claim a particular IRQ

      And many still seem to assume they'll have exclusive use of certain system .DLLs. There's a certain megalomaniacal theme here..

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  92. Trackpoint? by Steve+Fuller · · Score: 1

    I sure hope IBM^H^H^HLenovo will release their TrackPoint Mouse for those who hate touchpads.

    1. Re:Trackpoint? by Steve+Fuller · · Score: 1

      The missing link: TrackPoint Mouse

  93. why, slashdot, why? by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    Why, by all the gods, doesn't slashdot let us edit our frikkin' comments after we've posted them? I don't get it--other sites let you do that, and the slashdot editors themselves can and do edit their articles after they've posted them...

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  94. Powerbook trackpad / Firefox? by slthytove · · Score: 4, Informative

    I assume your browser history problems occur when you are using Firefox, as I had the same problem when I got my new Powerbook. Thinking something was fishy, I investigated a little bit, and it turns out that the behavior is due to (IMHO) a poor choice for default horizontal scrolling behavior in Firefox.

    If you want to change Firefox to actually scroll side-to-side, open up Firefox and enter the URL "about:config"

    Enter a filter of "mousewheel" so you're only seeing settings relating to the mousewheel.

    Set mousewheel.horizscroll.withnokey.action to 0 (the default value is 2, I believe). You may also want to try adjusting the values of mousewheel.horizscroll.withnokey.numlines and mousewheel.withnokey.numlines to get a more comfortable feel for how screens scroll in Firefox (and make sure to set the .sysnumlines values for each of those to "false," otherwise your changes won't have any effect).

    After I got those settings fixed, I found scrolling with the Trackpad in Firefox to be quite handy, though for some reason it still seems touchier than Safari. Oh well - I guess not enough of Firefox's developers are Powerbook users, and I lack the initiative to make a positive change.

    1. Re:Powerbook trackpad / Firefox? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's what worked for me with Powerbook trackpad + Firefox:

      1. go to about:config
      2. set mousewheel.horizscroll.withnokey.action = 0
      3. set mousewheel.withnokey.sysnumlines = false
      4. set mousewheel.horizscroll.withnokey.numlines = 1
    2. Re:Powerbook trackpad / Firefox? by magefile · · Score: 1

      Your guess was right. However, I don't really like horizontal scrolling, and (especially b/c of the PB's wide aspect ratio) I rarely come across a site where it's necessary.

    3. Re:Powerbook trackpad / Firefox? by slthytove · · Score: 1

      My PB is only a 12" model, so I find myself scrolling horizontally quite a bit. :-)

      In case you want to disable horizontal scrolling in Firefox, you can do so with the same config option mentioned above. Set mousewheel.horizscroll.withnokey.action to 4, and sliding horizontally on the trackpad should not affect your browsing in any way.

      You may want to set it to an even higher value in case another scrolling option is released in the near future. Right now, 0-3 are used to specify actions. If you set it to a really high value, such as 1000, I think you'd probably be fine.

  95. Sounds good: good riddance by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    The scroll wheel was always an annoyance: most of them were too tall, and I kept bumping my finger on them reaching across to the left mouse button.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  96. You think that mouse is over priced? $700 Mouse by AlltheCoolNamesGone · · Score: 1
    --
    M$ it's whats for diner!!!!!
  97. BUY THIS MOUSE FOR $30 by infiniti029 · · Score: 1

    For everyone complaining about the price of this, buy.com has this mouse for $30 after rebate, with free shipping. http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=10386550 &loc=101&sp=1 Enjoy!

  98. First? I think not. by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

    I have a cheap $10 optical cordless mouse here, with a "scroll panel". I got it about half a year ago at a local mom & pop computer shop. I can't remember the brand right now..

    --
    Not All Who Wander Are Lost
  99. Re:YHBT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At this point, timecop paused and deposited a quart of Gaynigger seed into Steve Jobs' mouth.

    Please use SI units and their derivatives, not your American medieval non-standard arbitrary nonsense.

    1 US quart = 0.94635295 litres

    Would it really have been that hard to write "a litre of Gaynigger seed"?

    kthx.

  100. $70??? by kmartshopper · · Score: 1

    $70 might be the MSRP... Fatwallet and others have picked this up for much less than $70. Try buy.com ($29.99 AR).

  101. There's always Kensington's by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    I've used this mouse for a year and it's been great.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  102. here it goes again by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

    Is it me or is there always a super hyped geek techie who always predict the end as we know it of certain piece of hardware when something knew comes out?
    Scrolling with a touchpad can be bothersome ,leave the scroller!

    --Dump that technology on Macintosh--

  103. who fucking cares?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can't even do an optical mouse with 3 plain simple buttons. That's all *I* want in a mouse.

    Until technology "advances" that far, screw 'em.

  104. Thank you MirrorDot! by atlaz · · Score: 0

    http://mirrordot.org/stories/5457f02cf8d8fb8064003 720ce6dd5b8/index.html

    the mirrordot.....

    again, slashdot should just link to Coral, MirrorDot or host the webpage themselves.

    How many years must they kill with traffic?

    Is it only because they believe in the fallicies of "click count" and "banner ads"??

    Is this why we must drive traffic into a dead end?

    again and again and again and again.

    --
    read more rants: thunt.net
  105. Sounds better than it is by sigemund · · Score: 1

    I got all jazzed-up about this mouse a few weeks ago, and decided to pick one up for my new laptop. One week later, I sold it to a friend.

    As far as the mouse is concerned, it's really pretty good -- it tracks great, the buttons feel nice, and the RF receiver fits into the mouse, which can collapse. But it just wasn't for me -- the mouse was too small -- if I were just using it once or twice a week, it'd be okay, but every day for 5 to 8 hours was just too much with such a small design. I could never really find a comfortable position when holding it. After three or four days, I realized that my hand was starting to tense up a bit, and it was becoming sore. I decided not to keep trying to get comfortable with it, and just went back to my old mouse. I think my hand might just be a bit too big for that mouse.

    IMO, the scroll-pad is overrated. It's a very neat thing, and at first you are very impressed with it. But over time, the novelty wears thin. The most immediate problem is that it doesn't work as a middle-button -- as a Firefox user, I don't like to do without a middle-button. Then there was the problem with finger position. You kind of have to acclimate yourself to using the scroll-pad -- if you start your finger in the middle and move one direction or the other, you're okay. But if you start from the top of the pad, then scroll down, a lot of times it'll go up for a second, then not scroll at all. I found it sort of frustrating having to be even slightly precise with something I use so much and so quickly. Then, since you can't touch the pad without it scrolling something, you can't really position your hand over it. With a scroll-wheel, if you inadvertently touch the wheel, nothing happens. If you accidentally brush the touch-pad, you're going to scroll somewhere. It makes your hand position a bit more difficult, and I think that's part of why I could never really get comfortable with that mouse.

    Oh, and there's this annoying clicking sound -- it's a neat sound, but I would love to be able to turn it off . . .

    If you have a smaller hand, this might work for you, but for me, I found the mouse too small, and the touch-pad to be a lot more flash than substance. It is definitely the best-looking mouse around, I just think it's a bit lacking on comfort.

  106. I bought one of these back in January by trentfoley · · Score: 1

    I bought it from CompuHQ and had it delivered to my door for $66.89.

    I got this mouse as a backup / portable mouse. Most of my clients use laptops and it is damned handy to have this thing around.

    However, I would not use it as my primary mouse. I guess it is an ok mouse, however it seems too
    small in my hand. Also, it is easy to accidently cause the scroll panel to activate.

    I must admit, the ticking sound generated when sliding your finger over the scroll panel is disturbingly enjoyable.

  107. owned and operated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i found myself picking one of these V500s up about two months back. What follows could be consider my amature review.

    the purchase decision centred on small wireless mouse with scroll wheel a nice to have. i looked at two or three options in-store and found the idea of left-right interesting, since i rely on a few horizonal organized spreadsheets. yes the CDN$80+ price was higher than the competition but they didn't have even the physical scroll wheel.

    i figure a mouse is a mouse, however this little device has a high density of value. the design engineers are clever and innovative. the mouse nestles nicely in the palm of my hand and allows me the use the heel of my thumb as a natural rest. Logitech designed the v500 for left or right handed use, right down to the scrollpad. the wireless mouse uses a usb stick smaller than a common memory stick and protrudes out from my laptop about 3cm (little more than an inch). this little stick hides away in the body of the mouse to prevent loss. and there is a little black pouch for all of it, including a spare pair of batteries. the scroll works very well with a little configuring. when a scoll is enacted, the mouse responds by emitting an audible click (much like the click a physical scroll wheel). you have to listen for it, but for first time users that little click helps. the horizonal scroll is harder to master. i found the default 3line scroll too fast and ended up at the far end of my spreadsheets too often. the configuration software included a setting to reduce (or increase) the number of lines scrolled. the mouse itself almost floats on three (assumed) silicon pads, requiring very little effort to more on finished surfaces. the standard optical mouse difficulties on reflective surfaces still exist, but i find textured surfaces, including pantlegs, respond better than with other optical mouse alternatives. finally, i was pleasantly surprized to find the power drain on the batteries does not require a large store of reserve AAA batteries close by. Two months of medium to heavy use (i left the mouse on overnight more than a few times) and i only replace the batteries once.

    i orginally purchased the v500 as something to submit as a business expense but quickly disliked the idea of possibly having to give up this mouse. i'm keeping this mouse and i would have to say that that's a positive review.

  108. No scroll wheel? Excellent! by allanc · · Score: 1

    Now if they just take away a couple of those buttons, it'll be perfect for my Mac!

    (I kid, I kid! I use a three-button mouse on my Mac and support Apple's decision to stick with a one-button mouse)

  109. Headlines and other crap by fm6 · · Score: 1
    This is a news site, guys. That means you're supposed to know how to write headlines. "No Scroll Wheel" makes it sound like they just left it off. Try "Cordless Notebook Mouse with 4-way scroll panel."

    Also, consider editing submissions that make silly whines about cost. $70 is not that much for a cordless mouse. There are cheaper onces, but not with this feature set.

  110. The good and the bad... by Willy+Nily · · Score: 1

    I've had a V500 for the past oh.. eight months. The closest thing I could compare it to is... a Chow (dog). It runs forever (pair of batteries that came with mouse lasted 6 months). It wanders (the scroll bar BLOWS). And it seems to have been dropped on it's head at birth and developed a mind of it's own (the scroll bar BLOWS). You can forget about trying to get it to do what you want it to do (the scroll bar BLOWS). On the good side, the USB dongle is very compact and fits neatly inside mouse for storage. It does not interfere with 802.11x or Bluetooth. Also, I've never had any disconnect issues with it like some older wireless accessories I've had from Logitech. Aside from power consumption, I don't know why they didn't use bluetooth for this. When I originally purchased it, I did evaluate other bluetooth mice. In spite of havign to deal with the added dongle, the V500 came out a clear winner. Unlike the bluetooth ones, it never disconnects or needs to be connected (via bluetooth manager). All in all, aside from the scroll bar (it BLOWS), this has been one absolutely sweet mouse for travel use with laptop.

  111. This thing SUCKS by Jakobud · · Score: 2, Informative

    I got this a few weeks ago interested in the unique features it offered. What a waste of money. I hated it almost immediately.

    Ergonomnics - The shape of it is like a small box. About as non-ergonomic as you can get. Convinced that it was 'cool' product that I just had to ease myself into, I forced myself to use it and got used to the weird shape after a few days. But my hand began to hurt pretty easily from being in such an akward grip all the time.

    Scroll Pad - The whole 'scroll pad' thing.... Not a good idea... It's interesting and new and unique, but if Logitech replaces all their scroll wheels with these things I'd have to start buying other mice. I had an incredibly difficult time with it in some cases. It is good for scrolling up or down on long documents or webpages. But it is HORRIBLE for when you need precision scrolling. Like if you know you need to move the scroll wheel up exactly 3 "clicks", it is virtuall impossible, unless you get lucky.

    EXAMPLE - You are playing some FPS game and you use the scroll wheel/pad to change weapons. You are using the pistol and you have to scroll up 2 "clicks" to get to the shotgun. With this mouse, GOOD LUCK!. You will either overshoot or undershoot almost everytime and end up with the wrong weapon in your hand. Impossible.

    COLLAPSING - A cool unique feature is that the wireless receiver can fit into the bottom of the mouse and it collapses upon itself for easy storage/travel. A cool idea that works very well.

    NO MIDDLE MOUSE BUTTON - I use the middle mouse button all the time in my field of work and can't use this mouse without it. Logitech decided it was a good idea to get rid of it for some reason. Probably cause making a clickable scroll pad was too complicated. Anyways, BAD MOVE.

    Overall I give this mouse a 3/10 (10 being the best). I like the collapsing feature, but there are too many other problems with it. Too uncomfortable, scroll wheel too difficult to work with, and no middle mouse button.

    In my opinion, if you want a really great and comfortable mouse, buy the Logitech MediaPlay mouse. I own 3 of these things for my computers. It's wireless. Perfect for either left or right handed folks. Very ergonomic. And the wireless is very responsive. IMHO this is the best mouse Logitech has released since the original 3-button MouseMan many years ago...

  112. I've got one by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    I've had one of the V500's since they were released. It works great, doesn't mess up my wi-fi setup, and the side scroll is great on the road in photoshop

  113. Wheres the Bluetooth? by Laurance · · Score: 1

    If this thing at bluetooth it might be worth it. But it does not, it is just like evey other "cordless" mouse that needs a port to plug into, making it worthless in my eyes.

  114. Hate to dissapoint you... by Akardam · · Score: 1

    But someone out there makes a unit that can be switched between being a trackball and being a mouse, so I suppose it's close. I don't recall who makes/made it... I want to say Microsoft, but I could be wrong. I had a customer who had one of them and the first time I saw it she laughed when I gave her a look of whisky tango foxtrot.

  115. Anyone use this with Adobe Illustrator, Quark, etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've noticed on my G4 powerbook, and on my friend's Dell notebook, scrolling with a trackpad in many graphics programs results in the screen scrolling erratically. Has anyone used this mouse with these programs?

  116. I just returned one by subtropolis · · Score: 1

    Funny - i just now got back from returning one i bought the other day. I wanted it for my ibook so i didn't need to cart along my regular mouse. It seems like a nice device.

    In any case, it didn't work. The cursor would move on the screen but i couldn't select or click on anything. I downloaded the driver (the OS X one doesn't come on the CD - somewhat strange) the amusingly named "logitech control center" and something called the connection utility, for when the receiver loses the signal. They both error, not recognising that the USB receiver is plugged in. I couldn't find out anything about bad drivers for OS X. If anyone knows anything let me know.

    Oh, and i got my $ back.

    --
    "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
  117. fishy business at slashdot by kencurry · · Score: 1

    Okay,

    After seeing stories lately that call into question the credibility of blogs/newsstories/PR campaigns:

    We have here a link to CoolTechZone.com, masquerading as a story about a new logitech mouse (w/ scrollpad or whatever).

    Why is the link NOT TO LOGITECH's SITE?

    Someone should speak up, or am I the only one who thinks this is quite suspect?

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
    1. Re:fishy business at slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the only one. What you don't understand is CoolTechZone is not a blog, it's a tech site like AnandTech, FiringSquad, Hardocp. Just because they have a few editors doesn't mean they are a blog.

      Secondly, this is not a PR pitch. It's a damn review of the stupid mouse.

  118. kensington by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, kensington has had a mouse like this for over a year and a half, it was wireless or wired, and meant for Mac, it's like $85 and uber sexy

  119. Not a problem ... by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

    as many touchpad users on laptops already know. I only have two buttons on my Tosh, and it's set by default to emulate a third button when you press both together.

    I was stuck on a laptop with a whacking great bar between the mouse buttons once ... clearly not designed by a Linux user ...

    --
    "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
  120. Been out since 1999 by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

    Big deal. I've been using a Logitech cordless mouse with my notebook since 1999. Its USB, but I stuck the reciever on the back of the monitor. The only problem I've had are baggage security screeners eyeing the blue bulge on the side of my laptop suspiciously.

  121. Trackball user alert. by Qxz86 · · Score: 1

    As someone who uses a trackball full-time when given the choice, I know a bit about tactile feedback, and I really don't like the idea of not being able to feel that nice sensory input of a trackwheel spinning on a mouse or any other input device. Touchpads are annoying enough with their ceaseless errors in detection. Now we have to put up with this on our separate devices? I'll stick with my three-button Logitech Trackman, thanks. At least this way I can open and close my Firefox windows without a ton of extraneous movement and an extra click.

    --
    Blah.
  122. You can have my scrollmouse by m50d · · Score: 1

    when you pry it from my cold dead fingers. It's the best mouse I've ever had, something that feels like it's actually trying to help me. Scrolls horizontally and vertically (works in everything except gtk1, but gtk1 sucks so that's understandable. Side note: why don't people upgrade?). It's been through 3 different computers. You're not having it!

    --
    I am trolling
  123. Why I avoid Logitech by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    I had a Logitech Quickcam Express I bought in 1999. When XP came out I looked around for 2000/XP versions of the driver for this camera and found that Logitech seems to have a habit of ending support for their products when new versions of Windows come out. So when Longhorn comes out they won't issue new drivers. Instead they'll quickly repackage all their products in a new plastic housing, write new drivers that work on Longhorn, and package them as new advanced Longhorn-compatible products. If you approach them asking for a driver for your current equipment they'll give you some crap about how it's "not advanced enough for Longhorn" but they will give you a coupon toward the purchase of the model with the new Longhorn-compatible plastic housing.
    I eventually found an XP/2000 driver for my camera on a site where a guy got so pissed off he reverse engineered his and wrote a driver for it himself. It works really well. I got a new Logitech camera in the mail as a piece of promotional junk from the cable company when I switched ISPs, and I haven't even plugged it in because this one and its driver work so well.

  124. Re: no middle finger for scroll, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the only unnatural finger movement is one that you cannot perform

  125. Oh my.... by pi_rules · · Score: 1

    It just occured to me that I've "Drank the Kool-Aid(tm)" so to speak. All this hooplah about it costing too much and I've got a bluetooth mouse from Apple that's got ONE FREAKING BUTTON and it was $60. And I like it.

    It all started out so innocent. Ooo... look at the pretty iBook... Ooo... Master Steve has given us Tiger, we must upgade... oooo... look at the pretty mouse.

    The new Macs are white... cocaine is white. Coincidence? I don't think so.

  126. Refresh rate? by Solandri · · Score: 1

    It may have something to do with Bluetooth's refresh rate being limited to something like 85 Hz. I know Logitech prefers a 125 Hz refresh rate on their mouses.

  127. Long range & WLAN interference by BiDi · · Score: 1

    I am using this baby for quite some time now with my Centrino and the only problem that I'm getting is the interference while there is heavy network traffic. The cursor starts skipping and is not so smooth anymore. But that's only when there is 100% congestion on b-type connection. And because laptop is not my dedicated tero-torrent-ized machine in my network that is not a big deal.

    As well that's nothing that a quick LAN cable to router couldn't fix for those 5 minutes of copying files. Make that 1 minute as LAN is 100Mbit and WLAN-b is only 10. ;)

    I've been using it with my live teaching lessions in class flawlessly and I can walk 15 meters across the class and still show with mouse pointer on the big screen everything I want my students to see.

  128. Has audio feedback and no middle-click by oe1kenobi · · Score: 1
    BTW, the V500 does have audio-feedback directly from the mouse. I didn't notice it at home, but when I brought my V500 to the office it was quiet enough to hear the little 'tick's that it makes when you scroll.

    My major problem with the V500 is the lack of a middle click button. Hopefully in later models you can tap on the scroll panel to do a middle-click, but currently you can only do slide left, right, up, or down.

    BTW, You can change the slide-left and slide-right as programmable buttons if you install my UberOptions mod for SetPoint. It works for any Logitech SetPoint-controlled device (all the newer keyboards and mice), and enables editing of all the buttons and adds all sorts of options.

    --
    -Richard L. Owens
  129. A mouse with a trackpad on top by noidentity · · Score: 1

    What's next, a mouse with a mini-mouse on top, with a scroll wheel on that?

  130. hrmm.. by Danzigism · · Score: 0

    for now, this is for people who are gadget crazy and just want to buy new things.. i'll stick with my optical G.E. mouse that i bought for $10 at target.. its flawless and the scroll wheel works great.. once that mouse is $10, then i'll buy it..

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  131. Other use for a finger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Both my wife and GF really like it when I make unnatural movements with one particular finger while leaving the others more or less static... can be highly useful from time to time.

    AC to protect my domestic situation !

    1. Re:Other use for a finger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As one of the three slashdotters with access to females, i'm sure your wife will have no trouble guessing it's you.

    2. Re:Other use for a finger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, she doesn't even know what /. is. It's the GF I worry about, might be upset that I spend time with my wife...

      Yah, unusual for a /.'er maybe, but not THAT unusual.

  132. aesthetics=wow by softends · · Score: 1

    Gotta love Logitech's design team. They've always been great, but this time they must have hired a European. EU's MX900 (gray/white) was way cooler than ours was.

  133. You joke, but I have exactly that problem. by Gordo_1 · · Score: 1

    I have a Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer for Bluetooth. It positively cancels out activity on my (alebit old) 802.11b home network whenever it's in motion and I have network monitor and file transfer progress dialogs to prove it. Now, it doesn't actually kill the connection, but it definitely interferes severely.

    Above and beyond that obvious problem, the bluetooth implementation in this mouse is poorly thought out -- Microsoft felt they needed to get this product to market in time to cash in on the bluetooth craze as enthusiasts like me thought they'd use bluetooth technology to actually improve some aspect of the mousing experience. The result?

    The mouse driver only comes on CD, and is not downloadable from Microsoft's website. Now, where did I put that CD? Oh well, bye bye mousy.

    It doesn't work in Linux -- no drivers and it doesn't even attempt to emulate a regular USB mouse from the computer's perspective.... even though the base bluetooth receiver plugs into a USB port.

    I can move my mouse pointer on screen when I'm at the neighbor's house down the street. What possible good can come of this gross misappropriation of wireless technology? Well, how about positively gluttonous battery consumption. Even when the base station and mouse are kept within 2 feet, I have to swap and recharge 2400mAh NiMH AAs every 4 days or so on a home computer that is only in use evenings and weekends.

    Thank you Microsoft!

    1. Re:You joke, but I have exactly that problem. by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      The driver is downloadable on microsoft.com here. It took me about a minute and a half to find it.

  134. first to use this concept? by ALpaca2500 · · Score: 1

    "One of the unique things about the V500 is its scroll panel, and this is the very first mouse to actually use this concept."

    maybe the way it's done on this particular mouse is new, but it's not really a new idea to replace the scroll wheel with something more functional... microsoft's and even some of logitech's have the backward and forward, side to side wheel. kensington had a mouse with a scroll pad, similar to the creative zen micro. we just got some mice at work that have a trackball instead of a wheel. (though it doesnt work as well as i had hoped).

  135. Are you kidding me? by Stopher2475 · · Score: 0

    Yeah, $70 for a mouse. Please go die of cancer. Personally I like the wheel and woudn't want a mouse without a scroll wheel but I'd never pay that much for a cordless mouse much less would I pay a $50 premium to get a wheeless cordless mouse.