So, please do show us what law she's disregarding.
Did she break the law? Probably. Did she disregard the law? Almost certainly. But the fact that she apparently destroyed any incriminating evidence (if there was any) makes that difficult to prove. To main point is that she was not the one to decide what should be archived and what should be destroyed.
So what do you suggest they do instead? Quite trying and continue to let a half-million children die each year? Sometimes progress happens one step at a time.
One of the biggest problems in American education is that teachers have to teach 30 students with different learning styles at the same time.
At some point that is pretty much an irreducible problem.
The problem is easily solved, but the solution is not politically correct: Don't jumble 30 students of all different capabilities and intelligence levels together.
Instead they system tends toward mainstreaming so the little snowflakes get exposed to people who are special, instead of getting an education.
1400 years from now they will pick up the faint television broadcast signals of the Milton Berle Show and I Love Lucy. Then they will conclude that there is no intelligent life on Earth and point their antenna elsewhere.
His comments indicate vision. Decades ago it was necessary to have caching and virtual memory, but with modern chip design he sees that it's no longer needed; instead of trying to fix yesterday's problem with yesterdays solution let's move on to solving the problem as if there was never a need for caching and virtual memory in the first place.
There is plenty of evidence that the "minimally invasive" nature of robotic surgery means fewer infections and faster healing. Overall it's significantly better, but there's obviously still room for improvement.
I've interviewed people who looked good on paper but were completely devoid of people skills in the interview.
Another red flag is someone with a PhD in some technical field (say geophysics) looking for a job in some unrelated field (i.e. Linux and Unix systems, whatever that means). The education would get the person past an HR screening, but in person I wouldn't be surprised if that person turned out to be a whacko.
Yup. I worked in a place where they searched briefcases and women's purses. Phones, mp3 players, etc. were left at the door. Coming out they searched again to make sure you weren't carrying any classified papers.
The searches were mostly to stop someone from inadvertently bringing a device in and getting caught with it (it would be destroyed); you have a clearance so they trust you will try to obey the law. Of course if someone really wanted to they could smuggle something in the way Snowden did.
What happened on Okinawa between April and June of 1945 was a foreshadowing of what would have happened if the main island of Japan was invaded. Hirohito thought the allies wouldn't dare invade the main island because of the losses they would suffer; he didn't care about Japanese losses. When the atomic bombs were dropped he realized that the Allies could crush him without significant losses. That ended WWII.
In Philadelphia, the traffic reports would often mention backups caused by "Roving Pothole Crews". It's bad enough when you know where a pothole is, but when they take evasive action it gets really tough.
Not really. Meta-materials can be made with a variety of properties. Some science fiction buff made a long stretch to compare them with a mythical material in an old movie. But what the movie predicted (quite obvious really just a super hard, transparent shield) and what meta-materials really can be made to do are entirely different.
Sorry to hear of your relative's problem. But really, the next time she needs surgery she should go to what? A butcher shop? A hairdresser? You really think someone without a license is a better choice?
Slashdot Mirror
So, please do show us what law she's disregarding.
Did she break the law? Probably. Did she disregard the law? Almost certainly. But the fact that she apparently destroyed any incriminating evidence (if there was any) makes that difficult to prove. To main point is that she was not the one to decide what should be archived and what should be destroyed.
Not me. Mile is a perfectly good unit of measure.
They ignore it in French. Germans have umlauted letters. I Have no idea what a Chinese Scrabble set would look like though.
They were all just repeating rumors that were flying all over the Beltway.
So what do you suggest they do instead? Quite trying and continue to let a half-million children die each year? Sometimes progress happens one step at a time.
I think they mean it's small enough that it wouldn't become a gas giant, but it has enough gravity to hold an atmosphere
One of the biggest problems in American education is that teachers have to teach 30 students with different learning styles at the same time.
At some point that is pretty much an irreducible problem.
The problem is easily solved, but the solution is not politically correct: Don't jumble 30 students of all different capabilities and intelligence levels together.
Instead they system tends toward mainstreaming so the little snowflakes get exposed to people who are special, instead of getting an education.
1400 years from now they will pick up the faint television broadcast signals of the Milton Berle Show and I Love Lucy. Then they will conclude that there is no intelligent life on Earth and point their antenna elsewhere.
His comments indicate vision. Decades ago it was necessary to have caching and virtual memory, but with modern chip design he sees that it's no longer needed; instead of trying to fix yesterday's problem with yesterdays solution let's move on to solving the problem as if there was never a need for caching and virtual memory in the first place.
Language is hard. Even if you aren't translating between two of them.
The "robot" is operated by a human surgeon. Think arthroscopic surgery versus open incision.
That's apples to oranges - you can't compare the malfunction rate of the robotic device when a robotic device isn't used
What you can compare is outcomes, how often the patient recovers without complications. Robotic surgery is a clear winner there
There is plenty of evidence that the "minimally invasive" nature of robotic surgery means fewer infections and faster healing. Overall it's significantly better, but there's obviously still room for improvement.
I've interviewed people who looked good on paper but were completely devoid of people skills in the interview.
Another red flag is someone with a PhD in some technical field (say geophysics) looking for a job in some unrelated field (i.e. Linux and Unix systems, whatever that means). The education would get the person past an HR screening, but in person I wouldn't be surprised if that person turned out to be a whacko.
No, the bigger problem is someone being burned alive because a drone interfered with the firefighting.
Its wrong, illegal AND immoral.
That's your opinion, Which is worth what you charged for it.
Why bother taking pictures? Most phones can store files the same as a thumb drive
Yup. I worked in a place where they searched briefcases and women's purses. Phones, mp3 players, etc. were left at the door. Coming out they searched again to make sure you weren't carrying any classified papers.
The searches were mostly to stop someone from inadvertently bringing a device in and getting caught with it (it would be destroyed); you have a clearance so they trust you will try to obey the law. Of course if someone really wanted to they could smuggle something in the way Snowden did.
What happened on Okinawa between April and June of 1945 was a foreshadowing of what would have happened if the main island of Japan was invaded. Hirohito thought the allies wouldn't dare invade the main island because of the losses they would suffer; he didn't care about Japanese losses. When the atomic bombs were dropped he realized that the Allies could crush him without significant losses. That ended WWII.
In Philadelphia, the traffic reports would often mention backups caused by "Roving Pothole Crews". It's bad enough when you know where a pothole is, but when they take evasive action it gets really tough.
Not really. Meta-materials can be made with a variety of properties. Some science fiction buff made a long stretch to compare them with a mythical material in an old movie. But what the movie predicted (quite obvious really just a super hard, transparent shield) and what meta-materials really can be made to do are entirely different.
Sounds like it is not a taxi company if you can take away their taxis (cars) away and they can do something else.
How it that different from any other taxi company?
I never read monospaced posts. Can someone summarize what the parent said?
Besides which, once they start reusing stages, they'll know they're good because they've already flown once.
Know they're good? After all the heat and stress every part on that booster has endured you don't think there's a chance that it's degraded?
Sorry to hear of your relative's problem. But really, the next time she needs surgery she should go to what? A butcher shop? A hairdresser? You really think someone without a license is a better choice?