Way to call bullshit without even reading with the paper was about. The sample size was 130,000 roughly. Is that big enough for you?
What the study said was that kids living in climates with lots of precipitation are more inclined to be diagnosed with autism and looked for correlations to try to figure out why. Turns out when it rains a lot, kids spend a lot of time inside and most of the time they watch tv! Read the fucking article and stop filling slashdot with stupid.
The gravitational collapse forces the electrons and protons together forming neutral neutrons. The process actually adds to the proton; it doesn't remove energy.
Debian aims to offer support for version of software that are in it's stable distro. Firefox 1.0.7 I believe is still supported by debian stable, yet mozilla has long stopped supporting it. Debian needs to be able to maintain a patch set to keep unsupported version of firefox stable and Mozilla is unwilling to budge on trademark enforcement (and well they shouldn't.)
Why the fuck do you care how the information is delivered? Shoot the messenger much? The person telling showing you the information is inconsequential when the information is valid.
I really have no idea, but I assume since spamhaus does not seem to have filed any motions, like one for dismisal, the judge just ruled for the default judgement.
RAID is not data backup. It is hardware backup. In this situation the RAID would just have multiple copies of the same file. Data backup is done with tape. Tape you can go back to and get an older version of the file, RAID offers no such solution.
You are incorrect as to why the planets are on the same elliptical plane.
http://www.nineplanets.org/origin.html #3 on that page is the step which explains why the solar system is on the same plane. Pluto being outside that plane is most likely it is actually a kupier belt object and was far enough out from the formation of our sun to not have fully fallen into the accretion disc.
The reason your explanation doesn't work for why the planetary bodies are on the same plane is because they are all in stable orbits. To plane out into a disc they would need to still be falling towards the sun.
Planetary rings are in the ring pattern because they follow the orbit of the object from which they were created, they are not collected and built up from smaller particles but probably the result of the destruction of a large object. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_rings
Don't you get it? Bill Gates is evil and all those billions he is giving to help the world are just to trick us into buying more units of Windows and Office.
The idea of telling another intelligent species that the giant object in space that they created is not a planet because we say so makes me laugh. We can't get a human farther into space than the moon and we get to set the universe's policy on labelling planets? Sagan was right. Humans do want to feel special.
The employers who bother to ask for an SS card or even go as far as to check the number are not the problem. Even if the workers are illegal they are paying taxes so that's at least a good thing. The only crime is being in the US illegally.
The actual problem are the employers hiring illegals and paying them under the table.
The proposed program will only harm actual tax paying workers by collecting informatino that will only help to make them suspects in crimes.
"Why was your fingerprint on the telephone in that bedroom?" "Because I stayed at a holiday inn this weekend."
Something that laid eggs laid an egg one day that hatched into something that was more like a chicken than it's parent. This happened a bunch of times. These continous changes happened over many generations to the point where humans can point and say "That's a chicken."
The filed a lawsuit using his name as the lead defendent. They would not remove his name from the lawsuit even though they had no proof he wanted to be involved and he explicity stated he want to NOT be involved.
They did not comply so he was forced to file a lawsuit to clear his name. Instead of settling, the offending lawfirm counter-sued using Anti-Slapp laws. Now the guy will be in for a boatload of money because some scum bag lawfirm decided to use a few quotes of his from a blog and his name inappropriately for a class action lawsuit.
The headline says they are suing him because that is the news. This guy should be suing the lawfirm, but them suing him? Now that's news.
But you are blurring the line between maintaing secrecy and maintaining secrey about illegal which people of the country should know about. Keeping a domestic spying program a secret is fine with me, if everything involved with it was done legally. But if someone in the program feels the need to leak some information because he feels that something is illegal about the program, the jounralist that reports it should not have to fear repercussions from the government for informing the public and keeping the government in check.
Before now, freedom has been given up. During the Civil War for instance, except you are ignoring an important distinction. The civil war was a concrete idea. It had an end. One side would eventually capitulate. World War 2 would have an end. Someone would surrender. Real wars do not go on forever.
With the War on Terror, how long are you willing to give up your minor rights? 5 years? 10 years? Six generations? The war is an open ended concept that really has no reason to end until the very agencies that told you the treat existed in the first place decides to end it. It is not a temporary suspension of rights. It is a permanent reliquishing of rights to the government until which time they see fit to return them, if at all.
And I meant arms in the context of the late 1780s and early 1790s when the consituation was written and amended. My original post was incredibly unclear and I apologize.
The word usage at the time of the signing of the constitution differentiated between arms which were carried by farmers and the like and ordnance which was heavy weapons such as cannons and their associated munitions.
Nowadays arms means anything from a 9mm to a nuclear missile but projecting our usage of the word onto the meaning of the word 215 years ago, in my humble opinion, should not in any way change the meaning of what was written two centuries ago. If we allow ourselves to use present day definitions of words to define the meaning of something written at a different time then the constitution can be changed by simply changing the definition of words within it.
Slashdot Mirror
11/17 is the release date? What the hell? I saw the commercial and didn't even pick that up. Fuck sony.
We should ban it immediately and never pursue beneficial medical treatments again that Jesus didn't know about.
Way to call bullshit without even reading with the paper was about. The sample size was 130,000 roughly. Is that big enough for you?
What the study said was that kids living in climates with lots of precipitation are more inclined to be diagnosed with autism and looked for correlations to try to figure out why. Turns out when it rains a lot, kids spend a lot of time inside and most of the time they watch tv! Read the fucking article and stop filling slashdot with stupid.
You weren't buying enough pharmaceuticals.
The gravitational collapse forces the electrons and protons together forming neutral neutrons. The process actually adds to the proton; it doesn't remove energy.
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages .pl?keywords=firefox&searchon=names&subword=1&vers ion=stable&release=all
I don't know what you're talking about. Firefox 1.0.4 seems to still be supported.
Debian aims to offer support for version of software that are in it's stable distro. Firefox 1.0.7 I believe is still supported by debian stable, yet mozilla has long stopped supporting it. Debian needs to be able to maintain a patch set to keep unsupported version of firefox stable and Mozilla is unwilling to budge on trademark enforcement (and well they shouldn't.)
Why the fuck do you care how the information is delivered? Shoot the messenger much? The person telling showing you the information is inconsequential when the information is valid.
Oh how I loved Beyond Good and Evil
The server is giving you a second chance to abort and come back to the light
Billing!
And then what? Twiddle his thumb? Commission a new phishing scam? It was something to do for this guy which is interesting.
Myspace only recently started to require stronger passwords. My password for the site has no number in it.
I really have no idea, but I assume since spamhaus does not seem to have filed any motions, like one for dismisal, the judge just ruled for the default judgement.
RAID is not data backup. It is hardware backup. In this situation the RAID would just have multiple copies of the same file. Data backup is done with tape. Tape you can go back to and get an older version of the file, RAID offers no such solution.
You are incorrect as to why the planets are on the same elliptical plane.
http://www.nineplanets.org/origin.html
#3 on that page is the step which explains why the solar system is on the same plane. Pluto being outside that plane is most likely it is actually a kupier belt object and was far enough out from the formation of our sun to not have fully fallen into the accretion disc.
More information is available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accretion_disc
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protoplanetary_disc
The reason your explanation doesn't work for why the planetary bodies are on the same plane is because they are all in stable orbits. To plane out into a disc they would need to still be falling towards the sun.
Planetary rings are in the ring pattern because they follow the orbit of the object from which they were created, they are not collected and built up from smaller particles but probably the result of the destruction of a large object.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_rings
Don't you get it? Bill Gates is evil and all those billions he is giving to help the world are just to trick us into buying more units of Windows and Office.
The idea of telling another intelligent species that the giant object in space that they created is not a planet because we say so makes me laugh. We can't get a human farther into space than the moon and we get to set the universe's policy on labelling planets? Sagan was right. Humans do want to feel special.
No. But for some reason people will still spend $600 on a console that has already been beaten when it hasn't even gone into full production yet.
The employers who bother to ask for an SS card or even go as far as to check the number are not the problem. Even if the workers are illegal they are paying taxes so that's at least a good thing. The only crime is being in the US illegally.
The actual problem are the employers hiring illegals and paying them under the table.
The proposed program will only harm actual tax paying workers by collecting informatino that will only help to make them suspects in crimes.
"Why was your fingerprint on the telephone in that bedroom?" "Because I stayed at a holiday inn this weekend."
Eggless birth? what the hell?
Something that laid eggs laid an egg one day that hatched into something that was more like a chicken than it's parent. This happened a bunch of times. These continous changes happened over many generations to the point where humans can point and say "That's a chicken."
I think the big issue is when there become so many content creators hoping to make a buck and not enough consumers.
The filed a lawsuit using his name as the lead defendent.
They would not remove his name from the lawsuit even though they had no proof he wanted to be involved and he explicity stated he want to NOT be involved.
They did not comply so he was forced to file a lawsuit to clear his name. Instead of settling, the offending lawfirm counter-sued using Anti-Slapp laws. Now the guy will be in for a boatload of money because some scum bag lawfirm decided to use a few quotes of his from a blog and his name inappropriately for a class action lawsuit.
The headline says they are suing him because that is the news. This guy should be suing the lawfirm, but them suing him? Now that's news.
You sir, are a hero. Thank you for your work.
But you are blurring the line between maintaing secrecy and maintaining secrey about illegal which people of the country should know about. Keeping a domestic spying program a secret is fine with me, if everything involved with it was done legally. But if someone in the program feels the need to leak some information because he feels that something is illegal about the program, the jounralist that reports it should not have to fear repercussions from the government for informing the public and keeping the government in check.
Before now, freedom has been given up. During the Civil War for instance, except you are ignoring an important distinction. The civil war was a concrete idea. It had an end. One side would eventually capitulate. World War 2 would have an end. Someone would surrender. Real wars do not go on forever.
With the War on Terror, how long are you willing to give up your minor rights? 5 years? 10 years? Six generations? The war is an open ended concept that really has no reason to end until the very agencies that told you the treat existed in the first place decides to end it. It is not a temporary suspension of rights. It is a permanent reliquishing of rights to the government until which time they see fit to return them, if at all.
We have always been at war with Oceania.
I meant ordnance, sorry.
And I meant arms in the context of the late 1780s and early 1790s when the consituation was written and amended. My original post was incredibly unclear and I apologize.
The word usage at the time of the signing of the constitution differentiated between arms which were carried by farmers and the like and ordnance which was heavy weapons such as cannons and their associated munitions.
Nowadays arms means anything from a 9mm to a nuclear missile but projecting our usage of the word onto the meaning of the word 215 years ago, in my humble opinion, should not in any way change the meaning of what was written two centuries ago. If we allow ourselves to use present day definitions of words to define the meaning of something written at a different time then the constitution can be changed by simply changing the definition of words within it.