BCC: authenticode-support@verisign.com, billing@verisign.com,
channel-partners@verisign.com, clientpki@verisign.com,
consultingsolutions@verisign.com, dbms-support@verisign.com,
dcpolicy@verisign.com, digitalbranding@verisign.com,
dnssales@verisign.com, enterprise-pkisupport@verisign.com,
enterprise-sslsupport@verisign.com, info@verisign-grs.com,
internetsales@verisign.com, IR@verisign.com, jobs@verisign.com,
mss@verisign.com, objectsigning-support@verisign.com,
paymentsales@verisign.com, practices@verisign.com,
premiersupport@networksolutions.com, press@verisign.com,
privacy@networksolutions.com, renewal@verisign.com,
support@verisign.com, verisales@verisign.com, vps-support@verisign.com,
vts-csrgroup@verisign.com, vts-mktginfo@verisign.com,
webhelp@verisign.com, websitesales@verisign.com,
websitesupport@verisign.com Message-ID: <3F68CBB9.2000103@(yay its not a.com).org> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 22:01:45 +0100 From: Andrew Bell <> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030827 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: just me so that primitive spamblockers don't pick up on an empty To: line CC: Spam tracking CC (gives them another address to harvest) Subject: Verisign behaviour feedback Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Its clear that your 'site finder' initiative to break the internet with profit has fallen flat on its face, with many large DNS services now returning NXDOMAIN like they should. Have you got any official response as to why you decided to go ahead against everyone's best interests? Cybersquatting the entire internet like... isn't cool. Nor was sending fake renewal notices.
I'm hoping that whoever reads this puts this to their superiors, or at least has the courtesy to reply. Have a good day,
Andrew
So far I have had 4 O-O-O autoresponders and a thanks for submitting your resume.
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:30:29 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.26 (Unix) mod_gzip/1.3.19.1a mod_perl/1.27 mod_ssl/2.8.10 OpenSSL/0.9.7a SLASH_LOG_DATA: shtml X-Powered-By: Slash 2.003000 X-Bender: Shooting DNA at each other to make babies. I find it offensive! Cache-Control: private Pragma: private Connection: close Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Because they dont get a big scary C+D letter from the mpaa lawyer gang. At most it will be a couple of email complaints to abuse@ (aka/dev/null for many isps) from those who can work out where the mail ACTUALLY came from.
As protest last time a group sent the then home secretary a bunch of encrypted emails. It would have actually been illegal for him to recieve them because of the poor wording in the bill - you had to be able to decode anything that you recieve.
Registrars under their status of registrars are required to HAVE FULL AND PUBLIC CONTACT INFORMATION for anyone who registers. For big biz this ok but for individuals (such as me) it is a big worry.
I was watching a live feed from a popstars-style show the other day and one of the people from the industry itself accepted that the single was a defunct medium. I think they forgot that this was being broadcast to anyone sad enough to watch it.
All of the programmes currently avaliable are in streaming realmedia, catered to the 56k audiance. I could see this initiative falling flat on it's face unless a burnable, portable and high quality format is used.
Well, I cann't reach either caldera.com or sco.com.
Tracing route to caldera.com [216.250.140.125] over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 11 ms 11 ms 9 ms 10.124.0.1 3 9 ms 10 ms 9 ms gsr01-ed.blueyonder.co.uk [62.31.64.33] 4 21 ms 21 ms 22 ms gat-edi-pos.telewest.net [194.117.136.10] 5 22 ms 27 ms 22 ms tele2-gat-pos.telewest.net [194.117.136.6] 6 28 ms 21 ms 21 ms pos5-hsd-gsr1-linx.cableinet.net [194.117.154.18 9] 7 27 ms 21 ms 21 ms 195.50.116.173 8 23 ms 23 ms 23 ms so-1-3-0.gar1.London1.level3.net [212.113.3.25]
9 26 ms 22 ms 21 ms so-7-0-0.mp1.London1.Level3.net [212.113.3.1] 10 20 ms 25 ms 21 ms so-1-0-0.mp1.London2.Level3.net [212.187.128.49]
11 94 ms 94 ms 94 ms so-1-0-0.bbr1.Washington1.level3.net [212.187.12 8.138] 12 134 ms 152 ms 136 ms so-3-0-0.mp1.Denver1.Level3.net [64.159.1.113] 13 * gigabitethernet10-0.hsipaccess2.Denver1.Level3.ne t [64.159.3.122] reports: Destination host unreachable.
Slashdot Mirror
So far I have had 4 O-O-O autoresponders and a thanks for submitting your resume.
I pay to find out about more oppertiunities to spend money but won't spend it. or something
Because they dont get a big scary C+D letter from the mpaa lawyer gang. At most it will be a couple of email complaints to abuse@ (aka /dev/null for many isps) from those who can work out where the mail ACTUALLY came from.
Google access and a new scientist story on the same thing.
It was illegal for him to recieve them. That part of the bill had already been passed into law
As protest last time a group sent the then home secretary a bunch of encrypted emails. It would have actually been illegal for him to recieve them because of the poor wording in the bill - you had to be able to decode anything that you recieve.
Mozilla "Bug" 217601 - patent 5,838,906 embedding of objects in hypermedia documents
where does it mention me, hm?
Registrars under their status of registrars are required to HAVE FULL AND PUBLIC CONTACT INFORMATION for anyone who registers. For big biz this ok but for individuals (such as me) it is a big worry.
The shuttle sff range have been up with the big boys since they got an AGP slot.
Nice try, coward. I'm not in the US either.
This needs to make mainstream press, and DAMN QUICK.
I was watching a live feed from a popstars-style show the other day and one of the people from the industry itself accepted that the single was a defunct medium. I think they forgot that this was being broadcast to anyone sad enough to watch it.
Registering domains with hotmail addresses is against the TOS and hotmail has been known to terminate any found. hint hint.
Must be clueless mods who mod up a CNET 'slashdotting'
They are all in the same data centre, so technically it is still an american service.
About the worst this can do is drive more people back to spy/adware-laden Kazaa. Thats exactly what Sherman want.
Gillette was listed as an attendee. This is the same gillette who took photos of customers purchasing their products using an rfid-triggered cameras.
All of the programmes currently avaliable are in streaming realmedia, catered to the 56k audiance. I could see this initiative falling flat on it's face unless a burnable, portable and high quality format is used.
people/editors need to learn the a tag
until it posted to the front page it was fine for me
it doesn't pop when you load a vid, which is the only time i use it
its actually one where 'you can have two of three' works fairly well.