Slashdot Mirror


Standard Brewing For PC Card Replacement 'Newcard'

winston_pr writes "The details on the successor to the PC Card is starting to take form with details being given in this article at Nikkei Japan. The standard is scheduled to be finalized in 2003, while the first PCs with NEWCARD slots are expected to ship in the second half of 2004. Will this mean the end of all these crazy SD-card connection based peripherals?"

187 comments

  1. Meet the Newcard... by baywulf · · Score: 3, Funny

    same as the old.

    1. Re:Meet the Newcard... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 3, Funny
      same as the old

      and pray we don't get fooled again..

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    2. Re:Meet the Newcard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fyi: lyrics where this (modified) quote is from. ("Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.")

    3. Re:Meet the Newcard... by NakedChick · · Score: 0

      Is that, like from a song or something? I don't recognize it. But then, what do I know? I'm just a naked chick.

      --
      --
      So I'm naked. So what?
    4. Re:Meet the Newcard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't be for real, right?

    5. Re:Meet the Newcard... by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      What kind of marketing geniuses came up with the "newcard" name anyway?

      I mean, what the hell will the jackasses do in a couple years when it's no longer "new" and they want create another "new" card tech?

      I suppose the answer is obvious: The "Nextgencard"!

      It's to the point that I don't really care about the technology any more, such a shame.

    6. Re:Meet the Newcard... by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      To avoid confusion, the same standard will be followed as with PCMCIA/PC Card:

      NEWCARD will be renamed PCI Card.

    7. Re:Meet the Newcard... by PunchMonkey · · Score: 1

      I think they're taking cue from radio and tv station marketing.

      Here in Ontario, we have a 2 year old radio station that still calls themselves "The New 640 AM", and for at least 10 years one tv station was calling themselves "The NEW VR" (For all I know, they still do).

      --
      I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
    8. Re:Meet the Newcard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At most, this twice as fast as CardBus. And it's not backwards compatible. This "new"-card looks like a big rip-off.

    9. Re:Meet the Newcard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes she is. Unfortunately she is also 53 years old and weighs 248 pounds.

    10. Re:Meet the Newcard... by wrenkin · · Score: 1

      Well, AM 640 is always going under with all their various formats.

      And the New VR is still going strong. Just like the New RO and all the other CityTV-bought stations.

      --
      -- "Is this death or is this Ohio?"
    11. Re:Meet the Newcard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you should know that newcard is only a codename. It's real name will be unveiled in mid September or October

  2. Summary! by RumpRoast · · Score: 5, Funny

    In new computers, things will be smaller and faster.

    Thanks!

    --

    My Ass hurts.
    1. Re:Summary! by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful
      In new computers, things will be smaller and faster.

      No...

      In summary you will now have to ditch all your old grotty cards to get *NEW* cards! New Mobo, new cards, full employment, a chicken in every garage, etc. And you thought you actually had choice in these things?

      Further summarized...

      All your base are belong to us!

      Yes, this means crap like WinModems which may be the only choice for the new standard paint buyers further into a corner, as manufacturers could give a care less as they try to compete in a highly commoditized market.

      Whee.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Summary! by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, this means crap like WinModems which may be the only choice for the new standard paint buyers further into a corner, as manufacturers could give a care less as they try to compete in a highly commoditized market.

      This is the first post I've ever seen that quoted "All your base are belong to us" in which that wasn't even the most bizarre sentence. A mixed metaphor, a mangled cliche interbred with another cliche, a conclusion that simply does not follow from the antecedent, and an example with no logical connection to the assertion being demonstrated -- all in 39 words.

      --
      I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
  3. Old news by philask · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yawn.

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/02/21/2029 22 9&mode=thread&tid=137

    http://www.dpreview.com/news/0302/03022103pcmcia ne wcard.asp

  4. The real name by ded_guy · · Score: 2, Funny

    NEWCARD (development codename)

    Yeah, we all know that when it's finalized they'll call it cardXP.
    --
    In the future, all spacecraft will be made of cheese.
    1. Re:The real name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, we all know that when it's finalized they'll call it cardXP.
      No, Card0ne :).
  5. Decide what you want... by Cap'n+Canuck · · Score: 0, Funny

    Cheaper, faster, more pr0n.

    Pick one.

    1. Re:Decide what you want... by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      its actually one where 'you can have two of three' works fairly well.

    2. Re:Decide what you want... by Cap'n+Canuck · · Score: 1

      its actually one where 'you can have two of three' works fairly well.

      No, this is /.. Pick one. You know which one...

  6. crazy by Boromir+son+of+Faram · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Isn't this the wrong way to go about it? Usually the hardware is built and then the standard is derived from that, guaranteeing compatability. What if the standard requires something that turns out impossible to implement? Everything will be broken. We'd never have cool tech like FireWire, PCI, and SDRAM if hardware producers had to wait for a standard before they even started working on products.

    --

    Boromir, son of Faramir, King of Gondor and Minas Tirith
    1. Re:crazy by ded_guy · · Score: 1

      I may be off base here, but isn't that basically what happened with 802.11a--that it turned out they couldn't implement it? Then .11b was the toned-down but feasible standard?

      --
      In the future, all spacecraft will be made of cheese.
    2. Re:crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article:

      The Personal Computer Memory Card Interface Association (PCMCIA) is writing the standard jointly with standard bodies like the Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association (JEITA). Involved are major PC manufacturers like Dell Computer Corp of the US and Hewlett-Packard Co (HP) of the US; and of course Intel Corp of the US and Microsoft Corp of the US {emphasis mine}.

      Seems to answer yout question, doesn't it?

    3. Re:crazy by Trigun · · Score: 4, Informative

      The 'standard' is being built upon already established standards, specifically PCI express and USB 2.0. The connection interface will have to implement both, whereas the card itself will only have to implement one of the two.

      The remainder of the standard has to do with tolerances for the connection interface, something that should be standardized to prevent rogue cards burning out your bus, or creating too much interference. They also deal with size and shape, as well as trying to standardize the exection mechanism (although this is only a suggestion at this point).

    4. Re:crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, but I don't have time to explain it. Google should answer your question (basically the different letters are completely different working groups that do different things).

    5. Re:crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that sounds like a real larf to manage at the software end of things. Two possible logical interconnects you say? Oh, what fun!

    6. Re:crazy by Mattb90 · · Score: 1

      But for the same reason we had Novell-Ethernet, which meant that there were two Ethernet standards floating about in the early 1980s up until 1988 (Novell and IEEE). This created all sorts of problems, and all because Novell didn't wait for the standard to be completed.

      --
      Mattb90
      Editor, allaboutgames.co.uk
    7. Re:crazy by Trigun · · Score: 1

      I am assuming that they merely plug into their respective busses and the Plug and Play code will take care of the rest. Really an elegant solution IMHO.

    8. Re:crazy by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're totally off base. Both 802.11a and 802.11b are currently available.

  7. The end of multiple standards by yourruinreverse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Will this mean the end of all these crazy SD-card connection based peripherals?

    No, of course not. It just adds one more peripheral standard.

    --
    JeR
    1. Re:The end of multiple standards by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Will this mean the end of all these crazy SD-card connection based peripherals?

      No, of course not. It just adds one more peripheral standard.

      Also means getting another pocket or drawer hold more crap in. Smaller, yes, but more diverse.

      "Ah, this model uses Newcard and SD and has an adapter for PCMCIA so you can plug in another adapter for your CF card, blah, blah, blah."

      Funny how more octopus-like compact electronics get when you finally have everything hooked up to it.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:The end of multiple standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Funny how more octopus-like compact electronics get when you finally have everything hooked up to it."

      Duude, you just need IBMs Universal Business Adapter!

      Cheers!

    3. Re:The end of multiple standards by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Duude, you just need IBMs Universal Business Adapter!

      It doesn't work in Europe, need another adapter.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:The end of multiple standards by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Nope, SD is still way smaller than the Type 2 NewCard. It's also a fairly standard on PocketPC and many brands of camera now.

      I don't think that SD on notebook was ever intended for expansion, only for plugging in your camera film or using SD "as floppy".

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  8. Why do we need PC cards anyhow by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can some informed person speculate as to what the purpose of a PC card is in the day of Firewire800? Does a PC card have better bus access or something? Is it a form factor issue (e.g. its not dangling but is sort of part of the laptop?) With laptops getting smaller and PC-cards tending to get larger and bulging outside the chasis, the form factor issue looks less distinct to me. so why PC cards?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Why do we need PC cards anyhow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and PC-cards tending to get larger
      How about you RTFA before posting. Oh wait. That's right. This is slashdot and I have to get my troll post in before everybody else.

    2. Re:Why do we need PC cards anyhow by Quervo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not quite sure I'm informed, but I'll give it a shot:

      Firewire 800 is only 800 M*bits*/s ~ 100M*bytes*/s
      from the article is seems that one way data flow is 250 M*bytes*/s
      so it appears to be about 2.5x as fast. That's one advantage.

      Having a small harddrive (or other small peripheral) that you could access at high speeds (not a lot around, I know: but think of future advances), that wouldn't be dangling around outside your computer. And since laptops are notable not very expandable, but *supposed* to be portable, having something small and fast and not as much trouble as external drives (8lb notebook + 2 lb external drive = too many pounds) is a Good Idea(tm) in my book.

      additionally, there has been some speculation about CPU, memmory, and graphics modules that could be slipped in, but it's not very clear if that's possible or even feasible. But that would be cool if it ever worked.

    3. Re:Why do we need PC cards anyhow by dasunt · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can't speak for other laptop users, but the reason I like PCMCIA cards is that they provide an easy way to swap in and out components, fairly standard (way easier to find a PCMCIA modem then a firewire modem), and the integrated card is harder to break then a dongle, thus leading to the 'bulge' that you speak of for firewire, network, etc cards.

      It would be nice (but I'm not expecting) for the new standard to give the PC Card Redux enough room where it can fit, say, an RJ-45 or two squeezed together USB or firewire ports without a dongle. Instead of a flat card like we have in PCMCIA or PC Card, it would be more of a square peggish looking card. OTOH, the flatter cardbus cards we have today are perfect for miniature hard drives, and memory sticks still aren't made in the largest size as the miniature hard drives.

      As for myself with my old laptop, I'm going to check out the Xircom realport cards. :)

    4. Re:Why do we need PC cards anyhow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and you did it, too! A classic RTFA post, to be sure.

    5. Re:Why do we need PC cards anyhow by chipace · · Score: 3, Informative

      Features sell products... standards can help with uniform driver support. I completely agree with you about their practical benefit. This wouldn't influence me at all.

    6. Re:Why do we need PC cards anyhow by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      NewCard is simply an external module for NextGen PCI-Express devices. Firewire was never meant to be a system bus.

      The USB2.0 based stuff is a nice extension. The fact is that they really don't need firewire in these instances when it's relatively low-bandwidth and no daisy chaining is required.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    7. Re:Why do we need PC cards anyhow by don.g · · Score: 1

      Form factor. There's a big difference between a card you can leave in the laptop (providing extra ports, or with a WiFi antenna sticking out, etc) and attaching a USB or IEEE1394 dongle (particularly if you don't have a nearby flat surface handy), and then possibly having to attach something else to that.

      Of course, PC Cards are more important to me as someone whose primary laptop is a 486SX25 with a single PCMCIA slot :-)

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  9. Re:Yaaaay, lets make a NEW standard! Thatll solve by RazzleFrog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a new standard to replace the old standard being created by the same association (PCMCIA) as the old standard. This new standard will allow gigabit ethernet on a card and will be much slimmer than the old cards. They are also talking about making it built into slimline desktops.

  10. PCI / ISA problem avoidance by kevinbarsby · · Score: 3, Informative

    I hope they avoid similar problems that plagued ISA / PCI motherboards.

    As I recall there were a lot of timing issues with the PCI / ISA bridge which affected system performance.

  11. yeah, whatever... by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most modern laptops seem to come with an array of smartmedia, compact flash, USB, Firewire, integrated 802.11, and integrated ethernet, so I don't see what the big deals is. Granted, it's nice to be able to swap things into the computer, bit if excessive numbers of dongles are going to be required, just give me the device in USB or firewire, and let the device be the dongle. That way I don't have to carry around this metal wafer-type box too.

    the only two PCMCIA devices that I use on my laptop regularly (which is two years old or more) is the wireless ethernet adapter, which doesn't have a dongle as such, and the compact flash reader, because the laptop is too old to have these features built in. Next unit I buy will probably have them integrated.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:yeah, whatever... by British · · Score: 1

      Look on the bright side of using a wireless Ethernet card on PCMICA. When the semi-annual new 802.11x standard comes out, you just buy a new card, instead of replacing a laptop with WiFI built in. :)

    2. Re:yeah, whatever... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Remember a few years ago, when notebooks came with parallel ports, serial ports, keyboard/moust ports - that was viewed as all we needed. Most people didn't use their PCMCIA slots. Now look at notebooks - I have an old dell inspiron, and without the PCMCIA slots it would be useless. You can't just look at technology and say "Well. That's useless to me now." because they're not making it for now, they're making it for further on down the road, when you're gonna look at these NEWCARD things and go "Thank god for them. Now I can plug my new [insert one of the myriad new technology names here] card into it".

    3. Re:yeah, whatever... by gvonk · · Score: 1

      Or get a laptop like mine with a MiniPCI 802.11b card and get the best of both worlds... no stinking antenna sticking out of my slots...

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    4. Re:yeah, whatever... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but can you hook up a coffee can and get 802.11x from your favorite coffee house down the interstate?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    5. Re:yeah, whatever... by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      The NewCard represents somewhat of a paradigm shift. It's effectively directed at ALL segements of the computer marketplace. Basically you would have a very modular capability that could easily be moved between notebooks, tablets, and desktops. In the case of the USB2.0 based stuff, it could even pop-up in handheld devices like PocketPC/Palm and future eBook readers.

      The NewCard will also add capabilities to notebooks that simply weren't possible before using Card-Bus. For example, laptop graphics could be easily upgraded to newer capabilities. TV/radio, etc.. capabilities will be very easy to add or swap out with a desktop.

      Just remember that this is an EXPANSION format, not an interconnect format. 10BT, 802.11, Firewire will still be important for interconnection of standalone devices (MP3 players, PocketPC, DataArchives, networks, etc..)

      Regarding SmartMedia, MemStick, CompactFlash, etc... I don't think these were ever really meant for expansion on laptops when PC-Cards are available. Rather, they're meant primarily as floppy replacements, especially in conjuction with digital camera use (digital film).

      SecureDigital/Memory Stick will still be relevant for expansion in handhelds. The bandwidth of NewCard is just way too much for handheld devices to handle.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  12. The card that most makers want... by blcamp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someday, the peripheral that hardware and software makers may want on all PCs is the Credit Card reader.

    Want your next Windows Update? Please insert your Credit Card into the reader. What, this is Linux? SCO needs another swipe of your card, please.

    Why stop there? I can see it now: "CNN... the most trusted... and expensive... name in news."

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
    1. Re:The card that most makers want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "CNN... the most trusted... and expensive... name in news."

      Or, more accurately, "CNN... the most trusted... and expensive... name in editorial opinions."

    2. Re:The card that most makers want... by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Integrated Smart Card readers are available on many notebooks. IBM provides them on a lot of their notebooks as a security token.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  13. Forced Obsolescence by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hmmm so PCMCIA cards are being phased out next year .. and PCI slots are already on the gone list for next year ( express PCI ) ...

    I guess they need to make everything obsolete to sell more hardware and keep the PC market afloat.

    Next round of software will be the same: It will require some special hardware components only available in the new machines ( can you say 'trusted computing'? )

    Bah.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Forced Obsolescence by colinleroy · · Score: 1

      Next round of software will be the same: It will require some special hardware components only available in the new machines ( can you say 'trusted computing'? )

      Next round of proprietary software may be the same, yes; but I doubt my 4 years old 400MHz powerbook will be able to run gnu/linux with free software before it physically breaks (few years more?).

      --
      blah
    2. Re:Forced Obsolescence by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Yeah man, my 8 bit ISA cards and MFM drives still work just fine, all PC hardware should be maufactured so I can still use them!

    3. Re:Forced Obsolescence by Microlith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah let's NEVER update the technologies we use.

      133MHz PCI is good for everyone, forever!

      8MHz ISA is the most anyone needs!

      Any of that NEW stuff is just a thinly veiled attempt to STEAL OUR RIGHTS AWAY FROM US AND MAKE US SLAVES.

      *cough*

    4. Re:Forced Obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8MHz ISA? You'll use S-100 and like it, young man!

    5. Re:Forced Obsolescence by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      I guess they need to make everything obsolete to sell more hardware and keep the PC market afloat.

      The Pentium 90 I bought almost ten years ago had PCI slots in it. PCI has been a performance bottleneck for years already -- AGP slots have been standard in desktops for years, because PCI graphics cards just couldn't handle the necessary throughput.

      This is not artificial "planned obsolescence"--it is actual obsolescence.

    6. Re:Forced Obsolescence by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      and of course... 640K is all anyone will ever need!

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    7. Re:Forced Obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, but Al Gore invented the Internet!

    8. Re:Forced Obsolescence by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Consumers make products obsolete. Believe me, most companies would prefer to put out the same shit every year and pocket R&D money.

      Rather, your just looking at the evolution of computer technology. It's actually a lot better these days. In the beginning buying a Computer carried the risk that your entire platform would become obsolete without possibility of migration (Commodore 64, Atari, Apple2, etc...)

      Ultimately, the PCI Express/NewCard is meant to bring a level of convergence between desktops and portables thus providing savings for the industry and the consumer. It also makes expansion easier as many people would rather not open their computer to install a PCI card.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  14. More info: by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 4, Informative
  15. PC size Unchanged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It would be nice to FINALLY have some smaller cards. This would allow for easier shrinkage of the computer box. I mean come on! how long has the beige box been around....15-20 years!? and mostly the same size. Look at cell phones, calculators, PDAs, walkmans, etc.. I know the micro PCs are making some headway, but probably 95% are still the same damn size. I for one would like to go to something smaller.

    Yes, Yes, Yes I know I'll get some links to micro form PCs and iMacs, but it still remains accurate that most Computers are still bulky large boxes with a spaghetti collection of wires attached to a monitor. How about Plug-in motherboards thru a slot on the back of the monitor, iMacs are definately onto something(no I don't own a Mac), but that's only the first step. Maybe these cards will help it along.

    1. Re:PC size Unchanged by Loosewire · · Score: 1

      arnt we talking about lappy's here not desktops?

      --
      Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
    2. Re:PC size Unchanged by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      PCs have stayed pretty much the same because the majority of PC owners want something upgradable, and something they can fix themselves without a 200x jewelers loupe and nerves of steel.

      Various folks have tried the iMac concept, IBMs little goofy thingamajoo comes to mind (was it the S series?) People dont have a problem with the standard sized box, and slots they can use.

      MicroPCs have their place, and that niche will expand. But I cant see any reason I would want my main desktop to be anything but what it is, something I can put together and take apart by myself without a lot of headache.

      I've built a couple flexATX form factor PCs for my kids, and they're fun, but it's a bitch to work even that small, I wouldnt want to work with anything much smaller. My big tower desktop, I can replace a video card or add a HDD in about 2 minutes.

      If it ain't broke, dont fix it.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  16. Pet Peeve by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a pet peeve of mine when people call something the New Whatever. It sounds like it is planned for obsolesce. Like they don't think anyone will use the standard or equipment after 3 years.

    1. Re:Pet Peeve by hey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No that *my* pet peeve. Have about the "NT" (New Techology) OS? Not so new any more is it. I don't think New York and New Delhi are so new any more.
      Still users are aways calling files new this or new that. Then they come back in a year and say what's that?

    2. Re:Pet Peeve by RickL · · Score: 1

      Or art nouveau. And what about 20th Century Fox? Naming something "New" or giving it a date will only make it seem outdated faster.

      Mozart, Bedthoven and friends were smart. They called the modern music of their time "classical". That way, in the future it wouldn't seem outdated and stale, but rather elegant, refined, and well, classic.

    3. Re:Pet Peeve by slim · · Score: 1

      It's a pet peeve of mine when people call something the New Whatever. It sounds like it is planned for obsolesce.

      There's plenty of placenames that make the same mistake: Newtown, Newport, New Street, New Road etc. OK when it "just happened", but some of these places are planned towns from the 60s and 70s. Surely they would have known that one day their town wouldn't be "New".

    4. Re:Pet Peeve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean Gnu/York, Gnu/town, Gnu/port, Gnu/Street, Gnu/Road, etc? :P

    5. Re:Pet Peeve by Dman33 · · Score: 1

      Very true... but remember: .old is always old.

  17. NEWCARD??? by barureddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know about the rest of you, but I have not noticed the bandwidth limits of my pcmcia card. Granted I don't run a gig-bit ethernet, video equipment (firewire takes care of it), or scsi cards, but I don't use my laptop to do that kind of stuff. What I have noticed is the slowness of my laptop hard drive, which will not be able to handle all this new bandwith anyways. Though it is always nice to have more bandwith and smaller cards, there are more important things that need to addressed.

    P.S.
    I hope this NEWCARD uses less power.

    1. Re:NEWCARD??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, it's like NEWCOKE. That didn't even last 6 months in the market. Can we expect a re-release of PCMCIA Classic about 6 months after NEWCARD is released? :)

    2. Re:NEWCARD??? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Yes, 3800 RPM drives do kinda suck. That's why 2.5" inch drives are now available in 5400RPM and 7200RPM.

      I've noticed that computer hardware does not advance altogether. One area surges ahead and then others catch up to take advantage. Three years ago, the main bus was holding everything hostage. Now it's the PCI bus that's really the slowest component. PCI-Express was built for expansion has reportedly has about 15 years of growth ponetential.

      The computers coming out in the next few years will be really exciting as the entire infrastructure will have been swapped out to technologies that have great bandwidth headroom.

      Out
      --------
      Serial, PS/2, Parallel, IDE, Floppy, PCI, Single Channel Single Access RAM, PC-Card (legacy ISA), CD-ROM, square tubes displays, low-res LCD

      In
      --------
      USB2, Firewire, Serial ATA, Flash Cards, PCI-Express, DVD, Double/Quad Channel DDR2 RAM, NewCard, Wireless, Wide Screed high-res LCD panels

      Your old laptop should work for a while. But when you go to upgrade ... WOW!!!!

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    3. Re:NEWCARD??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THERE IS NO SUCH WORD AS

      ANYWAYS !!!!

      AAAAAARRRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

    4. Re:NEWCARD??? by barureddy · · Score: 1

      Thank you for informing me. I will not make that mistake again.

  18. Big PC - small cards. by Channard · · Score: 0

    Or more likely, with Newcard, you will have smaller and sleeker card peripherals which no one will appreciate due to them being a standard big PC case. This is hardly big news unless someone can sweep the board with a standard smaller PC - perhaps around the size of a PS2. And make it cheap enough to be adopted by the mass market.

    1. Re:Big PC - small cards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A small form factor PC? What would you want one of those for?

    2. Re:Big PC - small cards. by Trigun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That really is the purpose of the newcard. Plug and play peripherals which can plug in on the desktop, while the rest of the PC is located under the desktop.

      From the article:The concept for the NEWCARD Console, an external peripheral allowing expansion cards to be swapped in and out easily, was also shown. The idea is to have only the display, keyboard, mouse and NEWCARD Console on the desktop, with the PC main unit made as small as possible and stored under the desk or otherwise out of the way.

    3. Re:Big PC - small cards. by Channard · · Score: 0
      That really is the purpose of the newcard. Plug and play peripherals which can plug in on the desktop, while the rest of the PC is located under the desktop.

      Yes, but the big PC still has to sit somewhere - and it's still taking up a lot of room somewhere. It's a nice idea - which sounds rather like having a USB hub on your desk - but the PC could still do with a bigger - or rather smaller - revolution.

    4. Re:Big PC - small cards. by Trigun · · Score: 1

      But you're moving the guts of the PC out of the PC. Now you get an integrated nic, graphics and sound mobo, and storage. Everything else will plug into the Newcard hub.

      So now all you need is a small form-factor box strapped under your desk, with all the peripherals on your desktop. How well this is going to work is beyond me, but the possibility is there.

  19. Why not just embed everything but the cpu/gpu/ram? by Salden · · Score: 1
    I mean, we have to buy new motherboards every couple of years anyway. Today's new pc owner only has a video cart installed in their AGP slot, a cpu and ram. Why not make GPUs socketed and just get rid of the slots?

    Most other peripherals can be attached externally via usb or firewire.

  20. The standard is scheduled to be finalized in 2003 by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

    Not long to wait then!

  21. Or maybe the SD Cards are here to stay by DOsinga · · Score: 1

    Second half of 2004 is still some time away. I see all kind of devices around me in the shape of SD Cards or Sony Memory Stick, from modems to GPS cards. Mini Memory Stick works in my phone. It wouldn't be the first new standard that didn't make it because there was already something else that did the job and had the marketshare.



    Support a lawyer free internet top level domain
    Sign the .ianal top level domain petition.
  22. PCMCIA stands for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    People Can't Memorise Complex Irritating Acronyms

    1. Re:PCMCIA stands for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHO STFU! ROFL PCMCI != PITA, u AC!

      BRB G2P (gotta pee)

    2. Re:PCMCIA stands for by SpookyFish · · Score: 1

      I always thought it was:
      People Can't Memorize Computer Industry Acronyms

      I think I like your version even better!

    3. Re:PCMCIA stands for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without RTFA'ing, I see NEWCARD is in all-caps. I'm sure it stands for something obscure and retarded.

  23. anyone else see brewing and think ...? by simong_oz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heh, so much for RTF! I saw the words "Standard Brewing" in the subject and without bothering to read further immediately clicked through to a story I thought was going to be about one of my favourite subjects - beer! I was not amused ...

    --
    "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
  24. Headline by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did anyone else read the headline and think this was about some kind of peripheral that calibrates beer-making machines?

    1. Re:Headline by MarkGriz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I reread the headline several times, thinking "what the hell does brewing have to do with PC cards?"

      Mmmmmm..... Beeeerrrr.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    2. Re:Headline by avalys · · Score: 1

      No. Even if you're a drunken, blinded squirrel with Alzheimer's, it's impossible to read that headline that way.

      ***ALERT***
      Your blatantly obvious attempt at a +5 Funny moderation has been detected!
      ***ALERT***

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
  25. Brewing Standard by Anders · · Score: 3, Funny

    I did not get further than "Standard Brewing" before I thought of RFC 2324, namely the Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol.

  26. steps by Bubba-T · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Step one create a new standard and milk the licensing as long as your can.
    Step two repeat step one.

  27. Oh great! by Inflatable+Hippo · · Score: 1

    Now driver support will become even crappier since the same number of engineers will be split across NEWCARD and PCI versions of every new product for several years.

    I suggest that it be a licensing requirement for NEWCARD devices that the details of how to access the cards functionality be published.

    At least the open source community has a fighting chance of providing the kind of support that most card manufacturers ought to be.

    1. Re:Oh great! by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Device support in linux rocks! It's even better with BSD!

      Now if I can only figure out why the fuck my printer, mouse, modem, network, wifi and video card dont work with my l337 slackware box.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Oh great! by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Newcard is based on PCI Express, which uses the same drivers as PCI.

  28. Keeping up with the standards by RickL · · Score: 2, Funny

    Floppy disk: $.10
    CD-R: $.50
    256 MB SD Card: $50
    Wifi PCMIA card: $50
    Having to keep up with the standards: priceless

    For everything else, there is NewCard

    1. Re:Keeping up with the standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'll pass on the 50c CDR, but I want that 50$ 256MB SD card!

  29. Didja know... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Do you know what's SOOOOO great about standards??

    There's sooooooo many to choose from!!

    (PoOO! Tang!!) Thankyou Thankyou. I'll be here all night.

    --
  30. Stupid name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, sure it's just a prototype name but I hate it when companies call something "new-whatever." What happens when it's old technology?

    It's the same as calling your computer something like "cheetah." It's sounds stupid as hell when the PC is obsolete and slow.

  31. Re:Why not just embed everything but the cpu/gpu/r by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    Because then ytou'd have craptastic mobo's like Intel Itanium made for nVidia chipset.

    Trust me, none of these companies would want to make something that simple.

    --
  32. NuBus? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Remember NuBus? For Mac, which now use PCI, it's the OldBus.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  33. we need them because by abhisarda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    because there are millions of laptops that are not equipped with USB 2 ports. Thats why there are PCMCIA USB 2 cards.
    Many laptops have only 1 USB port( those made before 2002).
    If you already have a USB mouse, where can you plug in that webcam, USB external keyboard etc?
    Many laptops made before 2002 do not have Firewire ports. If you want to use the iPod and camcorders, you need a Firewire PCMCIA card.

    Take 56k modems and 10/100 ethernet ports. Again, older laptops do not have them onboard. You need PCMCIA cards for that.
    Then you have the case of wi-fi. Unless your laptop is a Centrino, there is no way of going wifi without a wireless card.

    Firewire 800 is "only" in the Macs now. It might come to the PC soon but it will take a while to come to laptops(~6 months). Firewire 400 is the norm for laptops.

    1. Re:we need them because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you already have a USB mouse, where can you plug in that webcam, USB external keyboard etc?

      Into your USB Hub. I thought that was the entire point of USB, in fact.

      A new hardware standard is not going to help anyone with an old laptop either; they won't have NEWCARD slots to plug in their USB 2.0 and Firewire NEWCARD's anyway, will they?

      You've missed the point of new standards like NEWCARD completely.

    2. Re:we need them because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't only for Macs at the moment. You can get FW800 PCI cards quite easily on the net for PCs. See http://www.orangemicro.com/ they sell them.

      In fact, these were out before Macs even had FW800.

    3. Re:we need them because by Zaak · · Score: 1

      Then you have the case of wi-fi. Unless your laptop is a Centrino, there is no way of going wifi without a wireless card.

      Not quite true. There are a lot of laptops with mini-pci slots which accept an 802.11 card.

      TTFN

    4. Re:we need them because by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem with Firewire on PC is that laptop vendors don't want to ship with the full-size 6-pin connector as Apple does. This is extremely impractical as disk drives and similar devices won't self-power from 4-pin slots.

      Even the PC cards are limited as they cannot get the necessary juice from the PC card interface. The best solution I've seen thus far involves hijacking power from the PS/2 port (rarely used) and plugging it into the side of a CardBus card.

      USB2.0 by comparison is always powered. Firewire's 4-pin CE interface is causing major problems with acceptance for peripheral interconnect. Lets hope when vendors go to Firewire800 they will opt for the new 8-pin interface instead of the unpowered 6-pin(800) interface.

      Firewire has a LOT to offer over USB2. Intel kinda fixed the game, but Firewire is definitely here to stay.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    5. Re:we need them because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel kinda fixed the game,

      Intel completely fixed the game. They promised they were going to include FireWire in the PC'99 specs and then, once Apple started shipping iMacs with USB 1.1, turned around and stabbed Apple in the back. Intel actually has a history of this sort of behavior, which is why they are such good bed buddies with Microsoft.

    6. Re:we need them because by nvrrobx · · Score: 2, Informative

      I purchased my Dell Inspiron 4150 in February of 2003. It only has one USB 1.1 port. It also does not have FireWire (I bought an SIIG FireWire PCCard)

      Something to note on laptops with FireWire: For a lot of devices (like my ADS Pyro 1394 WebCam) you still need an external, powered hub. The laptop does not provide 12V of power to FireWire devices.

      FireWire is _not_ a norm on laptops!

  34. If I get a NEWCARD sound card... by BigBadBri · · Score: 4, Funny
    will it talk NewSpeak?

    Doubleplusgood!

    --
    oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  35. Re:Why not just embed everything but the cpu/gpu/r by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Theres more to the video card than just the GPU, you'd need a new RAMDAC for higher resolutions and faster refresh rates and whatnot, and the memory interfaces video cards use get faster and faster, so that's probably not practical.

    But I'm with you in concept.

    I've always wondered why the northbridge and southbridge cant be socketed. What technically would prevent me from pulling the SiS 645dx chip out of the computer I'm using now, replace it with a pin compatable 648 that will let me use the fancy new HT enabled processors?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  36. If only this new standard could last as long as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Slot 1, it would be a success.

  37. Future Legal Issues by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While that may be true today, dont be suprised if in the near future the 'homeland security' department will mandate you use 'approved hardware and software' before you can get online. And use of anything other will be considered criminal...

    Then watch it expand to other conutries..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Future Legal Issues by maxume · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why stop at conutries? I say we take it all the way to the coconutries?

      --
      What the fuck?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Future Legal Issues by pmz · · Score: 1

      'approved hardware and software' before you can get online.

      Now that our infomation is in the cross-hairs, a security-regulated Internet will be much much more dangerous than other forms of regulation, such as that imposed on cars. While regulation on cars can be argued for safety reasons (tempered glass is a good idea, for example), I don't see this argument regarding information. The only reason for a security-regulated Internet is government empowerment. This is something to very seriously keep in mind in 2004.

      If citizens fear their own government, then who are the real terrorists?

  38. Where's the DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I specifically requested hardware DRM!
    Bicches! Give the customer what we want!

  39. MOD PARENT DOWN DOWN DOWN! by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    -1: We already know what a joke linux "device support" is.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  40. Re:Why not just embed everything but the cpu/gpu/r by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    I beleive you want an Nforce2 chipset it's not socketed but todays new PC owner dosent change out there video card. But otherwise slots are usefull for neatness sake if nothing else and high speed busses. The fastest external connector is firewire 800 at 100MB a sec half duplex (Not entirly sure ont hat bit) It cant deal with GigE speeds. PCI at base does 132MB a sec and can clock much faster and wider currently to around 1024MB a sec thats 4 GigE adapters running full out to get buss saturation. And most systems that implement PCI-X run multiple buses of it for more potential speed. Firewire 800 is porbably fast enough for nearly everything a home users needs to do except gigabit networking but dosent scale to servers.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  41. Acronym Soup. by ---- · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Finally, a new consumer computer technology that is not acronym based!

    People Can't Memorize Computer Industry Acronyms for crying out loud!

    /* ---- */

  42. Very interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    For those who can't be bothered to read the article, the new interface is basically USB + PCI-Express. This means that 2 new things become possible; cards that can use the USB interface become very cheap so we should see a load of cheaper devices appearing as cards. Secondly, PCI-Express cards are possible.

    One thing I was wondering is, is there any chance people could fit a graphics card into this form factor. Then you could upgrade the graphics of too-slow laptops.

  43. Re:Yaaaay, lets make a NEW standard! Thatll solve by egriebel · · Score: 1
    This is a new standard to replace the old standard being created by the same association (PCMCIA) as the old standard.

    ObWho: "Meet the new boss/Same as the old boss"
    --
    ACHTUNG! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen.
  44. Re:Why not just embed everything but the cpu/gpu/r by SpookyFish · · Score: 1

    Socketing the NB/SB likely wouldn't be worth it, you couldn't do more than minor changes. With new features like Serial ATA, 32-64-128 bit interfaces, DDR, and the like, pinouts change and layout of the traces can be critical.

    Sure, people could try to plan ahead but it would add cost now, and historically doesn't work out because things move too fast to anticipate everything.

  45. Re:Why not just embed everything but the cpu/gpu/r by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    True, new features cant really be added, but it might be worth it to support faster CPUS and RAM. Like my 645 example would let me use a fancy shmancy new CPU, perhaps with an 800mhz bus, and true DDR400. A 50 dollar upgrade rather than a 200 dollar mobo replacement.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  46. I think I'll wait for NEWNEWCARD by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    'cos that is bound to be better and cheaper

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  47. Simpsons by CGP314 · · Score: 1

    I predict that within 100 years computers will be twice as powerful, 10,000 times larger, and so expensive that only the five richest kings of Europe will own them.

  48. Thought this was already tried by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1

    Sounds strikingly familiar to NUBUS.

    --
    This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
  49. That unsightly bulge by swb · · Score: 1

    Firewire800 would be a cool idea, and to eliminate the bulge, why not add a new "compact card" interface standard to firewire800?

    You can then have your internal, PC-card-style card, except it connects internally to a firewire800 bus. No unsightly bulges.

    You could make an external adapter to plug the cards into on machines that only had external firewire ports; such a system could even be used to bridge (albeit clumsily) new "firewire compact card" devices into a machine with standard PC cards: add firewire PC card, connect external firewire card adapter to firewire port, lather, rinse repeat.

    Other than desktop-system bus (PCI-X or whatever the new PCI bus is called these days), its unfortunate we can't standardize on a good internal/external bus standard like Firewire.

    1. Re:That unsightly bulge by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Apple learned it's lesson about introducing competing standards. Adopting PCI and other standard PC components has provided a definite benefit of cost.

      Apple wants to stay "PC component" compatible. Introducing a competing "next-gen" PC-Card standard would only cause problems.

      Beyond that the biggest benefit of Firewire over USB is it's daisy chaining capability (peer-to-peer) capability. This really can't be exploited in small expansion cards.

      Firewire is here to stay (as was SCSI before). However, I would expect must Firewire growth to occur in professional level applications and Video applications. For example, as Firewire (some variant) becomes the standard Video interconnect standard, those bulky DVI connectors will be replaced by compact firewire cables.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    2. Re:That unsightly bulge by swb · · Score: 1

      Beyond that the biggest benefit of Firewire over USB is it's daisy chaining capability (peer-to-peer) capability. This really can't be exploited in small expansion cards.

      The advantage to firewire over "nexgen" or whatever the new standard for PC cards is that you wouldn't need a seperate bus protocol and all the support for it.

      Plus the cards would be usable outside of the slot by a simple adapter on an external firewire bus, enabling backwards compatibility with non-firewire PC card systems (pc card -> fw adapter -> fw bus pc card).

      And it doesn't have to be firewire or just in an Apple context, either. It could be USB2 or anything else. But just ONE bus protocol, with perhaps many interconnects (A, B, compact, whatever).

    3. Re:That unsightly bulge by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      In the article, they mentioned that external "docks" for computers would become available. This is effectively what your describing with firewire.

      The big difference is that the NextCard is actually a direct extension of the systems expansion bus. You cannot accomplish this with Firewire as it was never intended to be the systems main way of expansion.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  50. Old macs had "NuCard"? by Photo_Designer · · Score: 1

    IIRC old macs had a slot called a "NuCard" slot. Just a bit-o-trivia.
    -Chip Frisby

    1. Re:Old macs had "NuCard"? by Photo_Designer · · Score: 1

      IGIDRC (I guess i didn't remember correctly) Yes, it was NuBus not NuCard. Remember the 80's when it was cool to spell new "nu". Now it is about as cool as legwarmers and fanny packs.

      -Chip Frisby

    2. Re:Old macs had "NuCard"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard about Nu-metal?

      Don't throw away the legwarmers yet!

      (fanny packs might take a while though)

    3. Re:Old macs had "NuCard"? by sammaffei · · Score: 1

      How about "Personality Slots" on mid-90s Macs? Now there's a totally marketing saturated product name.

      --

      Political correctness is the newest form of slavery.

  51. Only interesting bit by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    US PC manufacturers promoting NEWCARD hope to use the new media in desktop machines as well as notebooks. Chuck Stancil, Personal Systems Group, PC Desktop R&D, Advanced Technology Business at HP, is eager: "Cases for desktop machines are shrinking steadily, too, and the smaller we can make an expansion slot, the better." Didn't they say that for PCCARD as well? Would be nice to drop the screwdriver, but what aout the price-difference?

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  52. Typos!! by nurb432 · · Score: 0

    Geeez. ever seen a typo before?

    In context it would have been easy to see it was supposed to be ' Countries'

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Typos!! by maxume · · Score: 1

      I saw it was a type, after I read it as coconutries the first time...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Typos!! by maxume · · Score: 1

      typo...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Typos!! by Dman33 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Am I the only one craving a coconut brownie after all this talk about Coconut Trees?

    4. Re:Typos!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny... I always make that typo.

  53. Newcard naming problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word 'new' is relative and it ceases to refer to new technology once the thing is released. GNU newlib has this naming problem, as did Windows NT (Windows New Technology). You then have the problem of what to call even newer technology in the future. You can no longer call it 'new'. You also get the sort of problem Microsoft faced: Windows 2000 was built on NT Technology, or New Technology Technology for the acronym impared. Possible product name alternatives for the word 'new' include: Nu, Niew, Noo. These nonsense words infer newness without commitment to being new. i.e, Windows Niewerest Technology.

  54. This is so lame I can't stand it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    NEWCARD supports both PCI Express and USB 2.0 as internal interfaces. While the slot (host) must provide both PCI Express and USB 2.0, the card only needs to implement one. As a result, there will be two types of cards: PCI Express cards directly connecting to the PCI Express interface, and USB cards directly connecting to the USB 2.0 interface.

    Okay, let me provide some predictions here and now. Manufacturers will create NEWCARD (the lamest code name since "Project Pink") slots which support either only one or the other, and users will have endless headaches because certain devices won't work. "It says NEWCARD on it, why won't it work! This stupid scribble-pad has a NEWCARD slot on it, right!?"

    Creating USB 2.0 peripherals that slip into a slot is only going to create yet another annoying connectivity product, an external USB-only NEWCARD addon for USB 2.0-equipped PCs. Of course, it will (as I just said) be USB-only, so only some devices will work, and likely not all of those which use the USB interface for communication, because I am willing to bet that some of those cards will get some other signal off the other bus, perhaps for additional power.

    While supporting USB 2.0 makes sense from the standpoint that it will make it easier to make some types of peripherals into NEWCARD devices (If only I could put a variable in here, $REAL_NAME_OF_NEWCARD) it will in the end lead to confusion on the part of consumers. Computers are supposed to be getting easier to use.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:This is so lame I can't stand it by cokane · · Score: 1

      For your first point, I do not believe manufacturers would be able to advertise it as NewCard if they don't provide USB 2.0 and PCI Express. Just like how you cannot advertise CardBus support if you do not actually have a CardBus bridge.

      Basically, this new slot is comprised of a USB 2.0 bus connection and a PCI Bus connection. They have shared Management pins and power (both common features to any PC Card).

      This will make it easier, rather than having to go out and buy an external USB 2.0 device or PCI Express device and wonder what the difference between this USB 2.0 burner and PCI Express burnere is, this provides a unified interface for both. If the manufacturer decides that the peripheral will benefit from the added bandwidth and infrastructure in the PCI Express solution they can use that interface. It also seems that they would have the option of using both interfaces simultaneously.

      So they have created a "Credit Card" replacement for PCMCIA that is smaller, lighter, and less power-hungry. It has better power management and is a direct connection to the host bus (rather than using that horrible CardBus bridge or PCMCIA pseudo-ISA/EISA controller). It supports a faster bus and will probably have a much higher success rate for any notebook user. I'm sorry, I just don't see your point of view, it's like you made everything up.

    2. Re:This is so lame I can't stand it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      This will make it easier, rather than having to go out and buy an external USB 2.0 device or PCI Express device and wonder what the difference between this USB 2.0 burner and PCI Express burnere is, this provides a unified interface for both. If the manufacturer decides that the peripheral will benefit from the added bandwidth and infrastructure in the PCI Express solution they can use that interface. It also seems that they would have the option of using both interfaces simultaneously.

      I believe you are missing my whole point, sir. USB is a low-speed serial interface - even USB 2 is low-speed by the standards of the day, when you consider that 1394 is up to 800Mbps and will soon reach 1.6Gbps, and that everything is relative. PCI Express is a high speed bus. They fill completely different needs. Yet here is an attempt to make them both do the same thing.

      Any laptop which has NEWCARD will also have USB 2.0, so there is little reason to use NEWCARD rather than straight USB 2.0 for a device which is designed for USB 2.0. The only reason, in fact, is that a USB device necessarily exists outside the computer, because of the location of a USB 2.0 port. The example you cite of an external CD burner is complete nonsense because it is entirely nonapplicable. No one will be creating devices which can plug either into a USB 2.0 port or a NEWCARD socket, because if they are external, you might as well plug them into USB 2.0 every time.

      No, the only devices which really benefit from such a design are storage devices, or maybe GPSes or Wi-Fi NICs. However, those devices stick out of the port anyway so that they can present their antenna to the outside world. Hence the only devices I can see (besides, again, storage) which really benefit from being essentially an internal USB device would be Wi-Fi NICs or GPS devices with an external antenna only.

      It's nice that they have come up with a PCI-based laptop expansion, which will certainly provide unparalleled levels of bandwidth to devices added to a laptop, enabling all sorts of new applications, assuming you can shoehorn enough data through a device that small to make it worth it, while still making it inexpensive enough for people to want to purchase it. I hope they are spending as much time worrying about how to keep NEWCARD devices cool as they are wanking around with USB, but I sincerely doubt it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:This is so lame I can't stand it by mad+flyer · · Score: 0

      > It's nice that they have come up with a PCI-based laptop
      > expansion, which will certainly provide unparalleled
      >levels of bandwidth to devices added to a laptop, ...

      Same as cardbus with an external pci bus extender (magma system for example) it seems...

      Just marketting babbling for now... and maybe in 5 years the only standar pushed by "big brands" to screw everyone (good way to force everyone to change peripherals and include 'trusted computing' inside)

  55. Why is this better than USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've read the article, and it seems to say that cards will be basically small USB devices, maybe with a differently shaped connecter, and with some extra PCI express stuff. It goes on to say that the extra PCI express stuff is the hard part on both the card and the host, and will delay implementation.

    So besides introducing a new standard just to make money, what actual advantage does this have over straight-up USB 2.0, which we have already ?

    1. Re:Why is this better than USB? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      The advantage is that instead of hanging off the back of your computer, a Newcard device goes inside the computer and takes up less space.

  56. Re:Why not just embed everything but the cpu/gpu/r by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

    1. why even make it socketed? Just build it in completely. The card matches the MB anyway, and by the time a new card comes out, its gonna require AGP10x or a newer model CPU anyway.

    2. No because thats too much engineering for 1 company. Specialization is what is bringing all the great advancements. So as long as we can break out the video card, their will be more advancement.

    3. You are better knowing the price for each individual piece and paying for them individually then paying one lump sum. The smaller you can break it down, the less money they can hide from your notice. Remember that when they try to add your tax and insurance into your mortgage payment.

  57. Re:Clearly it will be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, I get the -1 while the cock gobler below me who posted the exact same thing a full quarter of an hour later stays at 0. Suck my fucking cock, whichever queer has the moderator points.

  58. Naming scheme by gadwale · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a great naming scheme! I hope whoever came up with this name in the Marketing dept. got a good raise...

    NEWCARD 2 years later
    NEWERCARD soon
    NEWESTCARD and then
    NEWERTHANTHENEWESTCARD after that
    BRANDSPANKINNEWCARD a while later
    SHINYNEWCARD eventually
    NEWASCANBECARD

    At least it is better than Fullspeed, Highspeed and Doublespeed.

    -Adi Gadwale.

    1. Re:Naming scheme by lucifer_666 · · Score: 1

      doubleplusgoodspeed? (sorry :-)

  59. Why not USB? by mcrbids · · Score: 1

    PC-Cards really should be put on the USB bus, with a special (flat) connector.

    Really, is there any reason *NOT* to do this? That way, PC-Cards can be slid in and out "hot", just like USB stuff can be. This also reduces R&D, cost to delivery, and the USB standard is already well supported, allowing manufacturers of existing USB stuff to come out with "card" versions of their stuff.

    Can anybody think of a reason why this wouldn't work?

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Why not USB? by netdemonboberb · · Score: 1

      Problem is that USB is too slow of a bus architecture. So is Firewire. With external devices or hard drive connectors, a long serial cord is better than a ribbon or parallel connector. For cards that you slide in, all is really necessary is a way to hot swap them (like PCI-X can do) and be able to slide them in through the back of the case in the same way as you slide in cardbus cards to the laptop.

      If this includes dongles, though, I'm going to scream! ::Goes and reads the standard::
      Dongles are evil.

      --

      Volunteer Mozilla developer, RPI Student.
    2. Re:Why not USB? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, that's what Newcard is.

  60. To ease the transition and reduce confusion... by default+luser · · Score: 1

    All standards will revert to the following names:

    PCMCIA: Newcard Low Speed
    CardBus: Newcard Full speed
    Newcard: Newcard High Speed

    Thank you for your time.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  61. Stupid name! by pyite69 · · Score: 1

    Won't the NEWCARD standard be old in a couple of
    years?

    1. Re:Stupid name! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After they launch NewCard they'll all realize how lame it was and switch back to "CardClassic."

  62. Is this anything like NuBus? by n1ywb · · Score: 1

    Anything with "new" in it's name is doomed, because soon it's no longer new and then the name is contradictory.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
  63. I like all these new standards... But... by netdemonboberb · · Score: 1

    They neglect a lot of important things in these standards. Foremost, they neglect Linux when creating these standards. Most of these standards become proprietary licensed patents and the hardware they are based on them only has drivers written for Windows by the hardware manufacturers.

    Secondly, we need standards for things like CD/DVD burners, drives, and bus architectures and many other things that lately seem to more commonly cause hardware conflicts than not. I am having a conflict with my EHCI and OHCI, along with my DVD-RW drive and one of my firewire busses. Are these guys too lazy to implement standards correctly? If they don't start doing this, standards will mean absolutely nothing. When you leave out part of the standard in your implementations, you are causing problems for everyone.

    The other thing is that we need to come up with a replacement for the basic layout of motherboards. We shouldn't have jumpers on boards -- everything should be "jumpered" in Bios. They could replace those jumpers with non-volatile flip-flops or SCRs if they need it close to the devices it jumpers. We need a replacement for the pins for the case front headers like the speaker pins, etc. I believe we should just have one large connector that fits over a whole bank of pins. If you aren't using a pin, you just don't connect it to anything on the motherboard, but the pins will always be in standard locations. That way you can just connect one large connector to the board instead of tons of little connectors. I don't know about you, but my hands are not small enough to be able to do this easily. I'm sick of a mess of power connectors in my case. There has to be a better way to do this.

    When it comes to processors to save space on motherboards, they should start using tiny slotted (I don't mean like slot-1 but like a tiny fcpga chip that has all its connectors as a slot) processors with two sided fans that slip over them like a sleeve. This would also mean they could cool both sides of the die.

    When it comes to external devices, I'm sick of the mess of power cords. I believe that these devices should have DC power inputs and you should be able to run a daisy chained power cord between all of them.

    There are a million things they could fix with computers standards, but before they make computers faster and more powerful, they should tackle the problem of the fact that a lot of the devices within computers like jumpers, connectors, and external devices still use ancient methods that are suboptimal at best. What good is Firewire and USB when you still must run power cords to all your large external devices? They need to look at the big picture more.

    --

    Volunteer Mozilla developer, RPI Student.
  64. Another complaint by netdemonboberb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why are all these standards created behind closed doors? They should get more input from users of their hardware.

    --

    Volunteer Mozilla developer, RPI Student.
  65. IDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    isnt this supposed to be announce at IDF? next month?

  66. NextCard of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ask any MIT graduate what the dormitory built after "New House" was. The administration will tell you that it is "500 Memorial Drive", but that's because they refused the student nominated name of "Next House" for it.

    Of couse it's all the administrations fault for not finding a big alumni donor to put their name on it.

  67. And as a close #2... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    ...video resolutions

    Video Graphics Adapter
    Super Video Graphics Adapter
    eXtended Graphics Adapter
    Ultra eXtended Graphics Adapter

    And with the funny little laptops, they've sometimes added a W for Wide too... so you have something like

    Wide Ultra eXtended Graphics Adapter - WUXGA

    Face it, "super" VGA isn't that super anymore, and the resolution is just as easy to understand. Never understood why they started with those Friendly But Useless Abbriviations (FBUA) in the first place.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:And as a close #2... by EverDense · · Score: 1

      And with the funny little laptops, they've sometimes added a W for Wide too... so you have something like

      Wide Ultra eXtended Graphics Adapter - WUXGA


      Your Mum said my 16inch by 10inch WUXGA was a good size.

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
  68. bad nomenclature by sstory · · Score: 1

    Labeling technology with superlative names is a dumb idea. When it gets outdated it sounds stupid. When a 'supercollider' is surpassed, what do you call its replacement? When things NEWCARD is slow, creaky, and obsolete, what do you call it's replacement? NEWERCARD? EVENNEWERCARD? This isn't my idea, many people have said it. It's just a bad idea to name things in that fashion.

  69. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Newcard doesn't use a seperate bus protocol -- it's PCI-Express and USB2 (both of which will be standard PC components).

  70. So you'd like it to be this way....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you'd like it to be this way....?

    I accidently fry my monitor by pouring a beer in the back and short the EHT transformer to the cable going to my embedded video chipset. Replace motherboard.

    Some clown crashes into a pole outside my house and the resulting snaggle of power/telephone lines send high voltage through my modem and frys my ethernet or USBn chips. Replace motherboard.

    Drop my video cam, and not notice that it will send smoke causing current through my video capture chipset - until it does. Replace motherboard.

    Accidently kick the shit out of my floor standing box when some prick TKs me for the twentieth time in W:ET, and crack motherboard (and toe). Replace motherboard. Replace case. Replace toe. Join anger management group.

    OK so the last one is stretching it a bit, but I think you'll see the pattern. If one small inexpensive component breaks, I don't want to buy a whole new mobo to fix it. From the HW manufacturers side, they don't like the single point of failure factor.

  71. What's the point? by Johnny+Go+Faster · · Score: 1

    Part of me thinks the PC slot is cousin the the cartridge slot on old Tandys, C64s, Atari 800s, etc. It's outlived it's usefullnes on new machines. New laptops come with on-board modems, ethernet, wi-fi, firewire, etc. While I understand this is somewhat short-sighted of me, I can't help asking, "What the hell PC card does anyone need today anyway?" Oh yeah, and computers will never need more than 4GB ram.

  72. die boomer scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >same as the old
    >and pray we don't get fooled again..

    I really really hate boomer classic rock scum music.

    After 10,000 listens and all of the filler times it is in a tv/movie soundtrack, the music sucks.