Slashdot Mirror


User: DashEvil

DashEvil's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
261
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 261

  1. Re:One /. article for every beta? on FreeBSD 5.3-BETA6 Available · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hey, Gopher boy.

    Check the schedule again. :) There will be a BETA7.

  2. Re:Apache on OpenBSD 3.6 Song Released · · Score: 1

    You are incorrect. They changed the license as of Apache 1.3.31 as well.

    Besides, incase you missed teh memo, OpenBSD.org isn't even hosted on a OpenBSD box; it's hosted by a NetBSD based service.

    I do not believe Theo has too much control over what web server serves his pages.

  3. Re:Am I ready to take the BSD plunge? on FreeBSD 5.3-BETA6 Available · · Score: 1

    But the majority of them do -- including KDE and GNOME.

  4. Re:Real time ? on Animated Short - This Wonderful Life · · Score: 1

    I watched the Ruby demo render in real time on my friends ATi Radeon x800. I'd have to say we're a lot closer than you would think.

  5. Re:Anyone knows? on FreeBSD 5.3-BETA5 Available · · Score: 1

    SCHED_ULE + PREEMPTION = Unusable for me.

    Programs freeze and cannot be killed.

    kill -9 does NOTHING to them, and they aren't zombied.

    Oh, and then my computer arbitrarily decided to reboot.

    Yea, it wasn't much fun. But the developers don't seem THAT interested in ULE + PREEMPTION crash reports because they are so frequent and easy to generate that the developers are having NO trouble getting test cases.

  6. Re:Worse ... on Cringely: MS To Hurt Linux Via USB Enhancements · · Score: 1

    Open Specs != Open Source.

    I'm not asking the people that make, say, PCI, to release the knownledge required to MAKE the interface. I only want the knownledge required to COMMUNICATE with the device that I am purchasing.

    I do not understand why you find that so unreasonable.

    "If Sun wants to open source Solaris 10, more power to them. I am, however, disturbed by the Slashdot mentality that open source and open protocols are the only way to go and that anyone who doesn't follow the suit is an evil monopolist. That's blind faith. That's religion. That's coercion." -- You should be modded offtopic.

    P.S. I'm going to take your steering wheel away from your car and replace it with a device that only I know how to operate. You want to go somewhere? You need ME, and you can only go where I say.

    I mean, who the FUCK are you to tell car manufactures how to make their cars?

  7. Re:64 bits is awfully big already on ZFS, the Last Word in File Systems? · · Score: 1

    Is there really that much trouble in having a header in a filesystem that specifies how many bits it is and being able to fine-tune how many bits you want these pointers to be at filesystem creation?

  8. Re:I was talking about this just the other day on Ubuntu Linux Preview Released · · Score: 1

    C'mon. Get to work! This ain't no union shop!

  9. Gnome on GNOME 2.8 Released · · Score: 1

    Have they fixed Gnome-terminal yet?

    It was, as of 2.6, absolutely unusable. Gnome has some really nice features. But I always hear of how nice it is compared to KDE because KDE is bloated.

    Why is it then that KDE 3.3 out performs Gnome 2.6? ESPECIALLY when you are in their respective terminals.

  10. Bah on Running Ancient UNIX On Nintendo Gameboy · · Score: 1

    Is there any version of *nix for the Palm Pilot that isn't hopelessly outdated? heh.

  11. Re:5.3 question on FreeBSD 5.3-BETA3 Available · · Score: 1

    Not from what I've heard. Everyone on the -current mailing list seems to be preping for the first -stable release.

  12. Re:5.3 question on FreeBSD 5.3-BETA3 Available · · Score: 4, Informative

    6.0-current has already been branched. When 5.3 hits it will be -STABLE.

  13. Re:Would a better idea be... on 10 Points About Transgaming's Cedega/WineX · · Score: 1

    Can you please explain to me why you seem to think that rebooting to Windows is better than not having to reboot at all?

  14. Re:great advances in window managers on X.org Making Fast Progress · · Score: 5, Informative

    afaik they use `layers' to draw the screen now. So a foreground window doesn't actually draw over a window in the background. This means you can drag windows over other windows without the background app having to redraw itself.

    Ever notice how if you have a transparent menu open with a xterm/etc under it and, say, you're compiling something, that the text in the transparent menu doesn't update? `Fake' transparency refers to what we've been using now, which is basically taking a screenshot of the app and then pretending that your window is transparent by using the screenshot in the background of the window/menu. This real transparency means that it's not handled by the application, it's handled by X, and since the contents under your window weren't overdrawn, it can just.. you know... render it properly.

    That's what I got from it, anyway.

  15. Re:Can't get to openbsd.org on OpenBSD Vulnerabilty · · Score: 1

    ...and it's not a remote hole.

  16. Re: on FreeBSD 5.3-BETA2 available · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Have you submitted a bug report of any kind about this? That is what the BETA is for, and it is why it has the BETA tag.

    While I respect your opinion, I do wish you would hold judgement until the final release is made.

  17. Re:this is surprising? on XP2 Spotted In The Wild · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hey. I hate Windows as much as the next guy, but if you want to make a compelling argument you should at least be fair.

    Windows XP came out in 2001. Do you really need me to tell you that running a RedHat distribution from 2001 would be suicide right now?

  18. Re:Does it run linux? on The Power of X · · Score: 1

    (why yes i know i am AC, but i am not posting anything that ANYONE will disagree with)

    I'm sure (s)he would disagree with that.

  19. Re:Doesn't the DOJ have better things to do... on Justice Dept. Raids Homes of File Swappers · · Score: 1

    That doesn't degrade the parent posters argument in the least. If you think he/she has no reason to be confident in their argument, why don't attack that instead of trying to attack their rightful desire to remain anonymous.

  20. Re:Wha? on How Google Could Overthrow AIM · · Score: 1

    Or, even better yet, they could just use wxwidgets.

  21. Re:Poor Google on Google's IPO Trading Defies Dutch Auction Logic? · · Score: 1

    ""People with elective needs (surgery to remove that unsightly wart on your big toe, for example)" Why should a public health care system cover cosmetic surgery? That's fucking retarded."

    It doesn't. Read what was said again. It was about waiting rooms, not health care.

  22. Re:93% of canadians prefer their healthcare to our on Google's IPO Trading Defies Dutch Auction Logic? · · Score: 1

    Yea man. Humanity has survived how long without fridges, medicine, doctors, pizza pops, guns, and computers. TOSS IT ALL!

  23. Re:Who's got a scorecard? on IBM Files for Partial Summary Judgement vs SCO · · Score: 1

    See what ignorance got you!

    Have fun in nowheresville!

  24. Re:3D Realms? on Life After Doom · · Score: 1

    But BUILD wasn't competing against Doom. It was competing against Quake, which had jumping.

    Quake Engine > Build Engine.

  25. Re:bad advice on Desktop FreeBSD Part 4: Printing · · Score: 2, Informative

    You run X as root regardless. It's SETUID.