Slashdot Mirror


10 Points About Transgaming's Cedega/WineX

jvm writes "Attempting to raise the level of the discussion, Dan 'theoddone33' Olson has put together a list of ten critical observations that every potential Linux gamer should consider before buying Transgaming's WINE-based product Cedega (formerly WineX). Dan invites credible rebuttals to the points he's raised. The debate over the value of Cedega/WINE as a solution for the nascent Linux gaming community continues..."

275 comments

  1. Slashdotted already? by TelJanin · · Score: 1

    The site seems to be down already (with 0 comments!)

    1. Re:Slashdotted already? by usefool · · Score: 5, Informative

      here are the 10 points if you can't get to the site

      # Performance

      Cedega is designed to maximize compatibility with Windows games. However, many users find that their favorite games work poorly in Cedega, if at all. While TransGaming offers voting services to determine the most popular games, there are still hundreds of games that are not playable in Cedega. For games that are not officially supported by TransGaming, users may find that the performance of Cedega is "hit or miss."

      # Pricing

      TransGaming charges $5 a month for the use of the commercial version of Cedega, yet makes a development version freely available. The commercial version has additional support for games that use copy-protection methods such as SafeDisc, among other features. The commercial version of Cedega requires a minimum subscription of 3 months, and all games that it can be used with must be purchased separately.

      # Progress

      TransGaming's list of supported titles has not grown significantly since the first release of WineX in 2001. Today, less than 10 games have been given a 5-star rating, meaning that they can be expected to run without problems. Many games run with only minor annoyances, but they are not officially supported. TransGaming has also been criticized for slow release times, with 3 month subscriptions starting and ending without seeing a new release.

      # Potential

      TransGaming has stated that their goal is 100% compatibility with Windows games. However, it is highly improbable that they will ever attain this goal. Windows and Direct3D are in active development, and TransGaming developers will always be playing a game of "catch-up", while at the same time trying to find and fix current bugs in Cedega. In a sense, Cedega's destiny is tied to Microsoft as much as it is tied to TransGaming.

      # Priorities

      While TransGaming still offers Cedega to Linux gamers for the time being, it is clear that their primary interests reside elsewhere. They actively produce titles for Mac OSX, and their website advertises plans to support XBox and PS2 in the future. TransGaming has stated that no income from Cedega subscriptions is used to fund their other ventures, but while their finances may not be divided, the same cannot be said of their interests.

      # Promises

      TransGaming began with the promise to release their changes to the Wine project under an "open" license when the number of subscribers reached 20,000. Shortly after this, they introduced code into the project which they are not able to release openly due to contractual obligations. While the current number of subscribers has not been publically announced, it is doubtful that TransGaming would be able to release all of their changes when this milestone is reached. TransGaming has, however, given code back to Wine at various times.

      # Packaging

      While TransGaming offers a free development version of Cedega, they have repeatedly threatened Linux distributions that have offered packages of it to their users. Debian and Gentoo have both withdrawn packages of the development version of Cedega at the request of TransGaming, who stated that they would no longer offer the free version if it was packaged by third-party Linux distributions.

      # Portability

      TransGaming advertises Cedega as the world's foremost portability solution, and they claim that it can be used to migrate applications seamlessly between platforms such as PC, PS2, and even PDAs. These claims are sketchy for a variety of technical reasons. One example is that most PC games use over 100M of memory, while the PS2 has only 32M of main RAM. Cedega's strategy of reinterpreting runtime calls is likely to add more overhead than it can reduce, and is not sufficient for this task.

      # Propaganda

      For as long as TransGaming has had a website, it has been filled with dubious claims about the company, about the game industry, and about porting software. Unsurprisingly, most of these claims paint TransGaming in a positiv

      --
      Uselessful technology (Air-Charged
    2. Re:Slashdotted already? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hmm, is this the best top 10 they can do?

      I see nothing particulary evil or bad of transgaming. Seems like a small company struggling to get along. They provide a service, and some people pay for it. $5 a month is next to nothing.

    3. Re:Slashdotted already? by ScottGant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      # Performance
      The games I play actually run faster on my system than they do on my wife's XP system. I guess I'm doing something wrong.

      # Pricing
      15 bucks...wow...that's like...3/4 of a $20...

      # Progress
      In the 3 months I've "subscribed" to it they've had 2 major releases.

      # Potential
      True, they play catch up with MS...but what else can they do, they have to see where MS is going so they know how to emulate the calls MS is calling for etc etc. They can't just make the shit up and hope MS follows THEM? Right?

      # Priorities
      Oh, so a company can't have two areas where they're branching off? Apple released the iPod, did everyone start screaming saying they were going to abandon the Mac or now their interests lay elsewhere? Come on.

      # Promises
      Sounds like a wash here. No opinion either way. They do release back to the community though, but perhaps not enough it seems.

      # Packaging
      Agreed here. They should let the distos have it as a package at least. The development package.

      # Propaganda
      Sounds like this point is propaganda itself. Notice that he offers no proof that they "fail to hold up under scrutiny". Ok, how so? Honestly, I'd like to know...break it down for me because frankly I'm too lazy. But then again, I don't belive 90% of the claims of any product...even the ones I like. lol (i'm joking people...don't get your panties in a bunch).

      # Prevention
      He states: There is speculation that Cedega... Ok...SPECULATION? So, how is this a bad mark on their part? I could speculate also doesn't make it true. And as we can see, companies are still making ports for Linux. But he did pull it together at the end.

      I don't know...he makes some points to make one think...and they would be worth thinking if it weren't for the fact that Cedega cost me all of $15 bucks and it works great with the games I throw at it.

      And that's kind of a hard thing to complain about...if it works, it works. And for me it works. Doesn't work for you, not much I can do about it. I can't rally around something that works for me and doesn't work for others. I mean, how can I do that? I would just be repeating what others are saying and not going from personal experience: "Boo...down with Transgaming! BOOO...Yes, it works for me on the games I play...but I've heard that others have problems with it...so BOOO!"

      I'd sound like and idiot! Ok...perhaps I already do.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    4. Re:Slashdotted already? by bman08 · · Score: 4, Informative
      I've invested in this product 3 seperate times. So we're looking at 45 bucks at this point, and it's worked HORRIBLY every time.

      They've also been dishonest about not competing with native ports. Yet Quake and RTCW were, last time I looked, on the list of supported games.

      I'm glad you're having such good luck with the product. For me, even games with a '4' rating generall work horribly, or are such a PITA to install that it's not worth it.

      You're also very lucky to get one new release with a three month subscription. I'd feel way less decieved by these guys if they'd just sell the product for 10 or fifteen bucks and not pretend that I was becoming a 'member' of something.

    5. Re:Slashdotted already? by bobstevens_took_my_n · · Score: 1
      Regarding the propaganda point, the author mentioned the following in the Linuxgames.com comments about this article:

      I'm amused that you think that lack of citation makes things not factual. If you live in the US, I sure hope you don't watch/trust the evening news. Here are some citations about "dubious claims", since you are determined not to trust anything I say:

      Dubious claims by Transgaming about Transgaming: http://www.transgaming.com/about.php

      Dubious (as in, just plain false or poorly researched) claims by Transgaming about the game industry, debunked here: http://timedoctor.org/index.php?id=1798 Transgaming did change their page after the article above was posted. The quote won't link to anything anymore since it was when they had their old website.

      I can't find any dubious claims about the native porting process right now, since their website is down, but usually you don't have to look much farther than the Gav States column or the one by the other guy. When they put out The Sims, their claim that their process was better because they could complete a port in 3 months was especially amusing to me, since I had just completed porting a title for Loki in one week.

    6. Re:Slashdotted already? by mAineAc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I purchased it for 6 months. I was slightly disappointed. I am totally surprised that you can not install IE on it and there is not likely to be supported from what I read. Some games, like everquest, require IE for somethings. I was able to find winetools for wine to install IE 6.0 quite easily, why is it sohard for cedega to do the same thing?

    7. Re:Slashdotted already? by TriKster-Abacus · · Score: 1

      I have over 80GB of installed games that work quite well using a combination of transgaming.org's products.

      Point2Play is very benificial to the use and tweaking of many games as well as using older version of winex/cedega with your games. You can choose up to 8 differant versions to game with and everytime a new release has gone public you can add that to your list to choose from.

      It seems that the biggest proponents of transgaming are the ones who have only used the cvs version. MMORPG games (of which IMHO are a super big ripoff http://www.linux-militia.net/modules.php?op=modloa d&name=News&file=article&sid=154 are much more of a threat to gamers and the gaming community then transgaming will ever be.

      Also $5 isn't jack with what you get.

      Finally, people say transgaming hurts the "Linux" community! Where is my Doom3 binary?

      I rest my case

      Thank you

      Sincerely,

      TriKster Abacus

      --
      Linux games http://www.linux-militia.net
    8. Re:Slashdotted already? by grolschie · · Score: 1

      Because the webserver is actually IIS5 running on Linux via Cedega. Amazing eh? ;-)

    9. Re:Slashdotted already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sure, post your name and address here. Also, please post your checking account's routing number so that I might provide direct-deposit of said $5 from my account in Nigeria.

    10. Re:Slashdotted already? by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 1
      # Packaging in short, their cvs server was being choked, and it was costing them lots of money. I don't think it was a bad descision.

      So because the CVS server was being choked they didn't want debian distributing a PRECOMPILED cedega packages, from DEBIAN servers? How does that work? Debian distributing a cedega devel package would cause /less/ load on the CVS server.

    11. Re:Slashdotted already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually IE support for these sort of cases is one of the current voting questions.

    12. Re:Slashdotted already? by GrueMaster · · Score: 1

      The reason that those games are even in their database is because I submitted them for testing purposes. Seems to me that a good comparison for how a game is performing is to play both native and windows versions on the same hardware.

      On that note, both games performed ~2% slower on linux native than they did in winex (at the time I made the comparisons early last year). Kind of odd, don't you think?

      Tobin

    13. Re:Slashdotted already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would suggest immediate chemical castration for this one.

    14. Re:Slashdotted already? by essreenim · · Score: 1

      I have to say, Im using Cedega - I have to as I refuse to use Windows on my machine. It works great, and no need for DX9 install!! - its included. Its not perfect but I'm much more comfortable paying a company like Cedega than paying MS...I may be wrong to be more comfortable, but I dont think so.

    15. Re:Slashdotted already? by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
      Hmm, is this the best top 10 they can do?
      It's the best top ten that they can do of topics that start with the letter "P".
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    16. Re:Slashdotted already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a thought, but game development in .NET could be the ticket for native linux games, through MONO...

      Now if only companies would see the beauty in two platforms for one dev cost...

    17. Re:Slashdotted already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with u all the way.

  2. Cache link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  3. slashdotted already by halo1982 · · Score: 0

    does anybody have a copy of this?

    1. Re:slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't your stop posting your fucking boring signature crap. You think anybody gives a fucking toss about your referral crap.

    2. Re:slashdotted already by Jafar00 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. That stuff is the fast way to having an inbox full of spam. These sign up for free stuff websites go through gratisnetwork.com who proudly announce on their website that "We utilize a number of proven online customer acquisition methods" ie. you "opt in" to get Spam. suckers.

      --
      RebateFX.com - Spread rebates for Forex traders
    3. Re:slashdotted already by Digital11 · · Score: 0

      Hrm, here's an idea: Use an email account that you don't care about. Gmail has done very well in filtering out spam, and since signing up for freeipods.com I haven't noticed an increase in spam either.

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  4. /.ted by mysoulisfarting · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Zero posts and already slashdotted!

  5. RTFA and slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Could someone explain me why if nobody here RTFA, it is slashdoted already? Aah, I know, you all load the link but close the eyes. Evil people!

    1. Re:RTFA and slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually we all go and look at the pretty pictures.

    2. Re:RTFA and slashdotting by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Well, it might be Goat or GNAA...we have to take it down, but can't risk seeing it ourselves....

  6. Re:found slash-dot on osdn personals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hi cyndi, i'm into office but also scat and role playing. let's hook up.

  7. Not a single comment yet.... by -ing+AnonymousCoward · · Score: 0

    ...and the site is already out!

    /. stories should all be classified under "security" ...

    1. Re:Not a single comment yet.... by mjgeiger · · Score: 1

      the list of "list of ten critical observations", but the Transgaming Website seems to be /.'ed? Odd.

  8. Doesn't Work Too Well Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Every time a program tries to access the CD-ROM Cedega crashes in KERNEL32.DLL.wine_get_unix_file_name. I would love to play Red Alert 2 using the official CDs I bought, but I'm forced to use a cracked version off FastTrack.

    1. Re:Doesn't Work Too Well Here by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      hmm, I would love to play red alert2 using the offical CDs as well, but also forced to use a crack.

      And that's on windows.

      I hate cd protection soooo much.

    2. Re:Doesn't Work Too Well Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the box states that it requires Windows 98 or better, and what he's running IS better!

    3. Re:Doesn't Work Too Well Here by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      How exactly does downloading cracks support terrorists? Please explain how me using their bandwidth to download it, puts money in their pockets.

  9. Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by 26199 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have to say I was impressed... I can now play Counterstrike without rebooting, which is very nice. Doom 3 works too. It's cheap, it works, haven't seen any reason to complain.

    It actually makes me think of Linux as a viable platform for games... not a viable platform in five years' time, but a viable platform now.

    1. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by soyuz_2 · · Score: 1

      Actually, CS has been broken since the last update to Steam, unless you install it via point2play. Weird. But all the other games I play work like a charm. Check out Transgamings site for the full list (maybe wait until the slashdotting wears off...).

    2. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ID games will be releasing an Linux binary for Doom3; Unreal Tournament has been Linux compatabile for awhile now, as is NeverWinter Nights. When I use a Linux native version, it sends the manufactures a message that Linux is a viable gaming platform. When I use Cedega, I don't send that message.

      Transgaming has also prevented at least one native port from making it to market, as I recall; I believe it was one of the Kohan series. Perhaps another /.-er can fill in the details?

    3. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by 26199 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I run it via Steam... doesn't that mean I auto-update whenever I play? Still works.

      Actually, that may not be true -- I actually run Condition Zero, not normal CS.

    4. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 4, Informative

      It actually makes me think of Linux as a viable platform for games... not a viable platform in five years' time, but a viable platform now.

      Maybe, unless you want to use WineX to play something that's not an MMORPG, FPS, or RTS game, with a few exceptions - personally, the last time I tried it I couldn't get anything to work but Diablo II and Starcraft, and even then they had several major playability problems.

      More specifically, I tried it about 1.5 years ago, followed the installation directions to the letter. Then tried getting several games (Starcraft, Homeworld, Warcraft II, Diablo II, Civ II, even freaking 10-year old Lemmings wouldn't run right) to work for about a month with almost no success, and cancelled my subscription in disgust.

      I'd love to give it another shot, but the only games people ever mention it working with are the same ones over and over again. As well, their game database lists a massive number of non-working titles still, and if a poster on the linked story is to be believed, they're not even updating the database anymore.

      Doesn't exactly make me want to shell out more money. I'm sure there's others like you out there who are happy with it and have everything you want working, but I suspect you're in the minority.

    5. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by 26199 · · Score: 1

      I'll certainly be downloading the native Doom 3... it should be a fair bit faster.

      Similarly I'd buy any native Linux versions of games where available, for the performance boost and to get rid of the slight 'ugh' factor whenever Windows is mentioned...

      When it comes down to it, I can't see giving money to Transgaming damaging the cause; if anything it helps dispel the myth that Linux users expect everything to be free...

    6. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by notanatheist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course it won't be viable in 5 years. Everyone will be using GNUstep by then and BSD will be thought of as "the other OS". For now I'll keep plugging away at gaming on Linux and BUYING games that have NATIVE linux support. Windows on the other hand will still be that overly bloated OS people run so they can try out the latest viruses and spyware. Go Bonzi Buddy!!

    7. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      +1 virtual insightful points!

      Why does Linux need another #@$@$# FPS? How about a good driving game? There are none. No, not Racer, or TORCS... they don't come close to any of at least the NFS series.

      You might as well leave off RTS, though. If the site wasn't slashdotted I could point out that Age of Empires II doesn't work. Last I checked, anyway.

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    8. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by Cybo2002 · · Score: 1

      The CVS copy won't work with Steam, however, I had success with the official 4.0.1-1 release. Updates and runs Steam fine.

    9. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by Plac3bo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I run normal CS via Steam w/o any serious problems. There is still too much lag to be as competitive as I once was on Windoze, but, when I need my CS fix, it gets the job done ;)

    10. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by Trelane · · Score: 1

      I was quite impressed by UT2K4 on Linux. It was rip-roarin' fast, even at 1920x1200!. Well, until those danged ATI drivers crapped out (they always do, after running for about 3 minutes, they get all sorts of horizontal lines chopping up the view and the game becomes unplayable. Indeed, no 3D works from that point on (will get the horizontal lines after a few tens of seconds, length of time is reduced every time I start playing again without rebooting).

      I was also impressed with the Castle Wolfenstein Linux game as well as Neverwinter Nights. If only I had gotten an NVidia (or ATI made drivers that worked for me, or they released the specs or....)

      Generally, I will try to buy a game soon after they release the Linux client (and when budget permits). I may buy a new windows-only game if I hear it was really good and it's on massive discount (e.g. the $10 rack).

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    11. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      or they released the specs

      That wouldn't help. For many kinds of computer hardware, accurate specifications are all that's really needed to enable an amateur to write an open-source driver. But modern video-cards aren't like that. (neither are "WinModems")

      Sure, having "the specs" would let you write a driver that's feature complete, but they won't help you make it fast. And as it turns out, a decent chunk of the engineering effort put in by NVidia and ATI is to write a good driver (just look at the serious improvements existing cards get with newer drivers).

      it was really good and it's on massive discount (e.g. the $10 rack).

      A smart plan, because the only way Cedega will give you reasonable performance is to play a game that came out 18 months before you bought your PC.

    12. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by Britz · · Score: 1

      If You have Warcraft II You can use the graphics from the CD and use http://stratagus.sf.net/ as an engine on Linux.

      Same with Freeciv at www.freeciv.org and Civilization II. Freeciv is a wonderful, stable game using the ruleset of Civilization II and focusing on network play. But beware of the ai. It is very strong as well.

      Starcraft was already playable with "normal" Wine years ago.
      Check http://koti.mbnet.fi/~hoppq/sc-howto.html for the howto. I imagine since Wine has improved over the last years, that Starcraft will work even better now.

      Lemmings should also work on "normal" wine.

      I am sorry that I can't help You with either Homeworld or Diablo II. But using Google You might find a solution.

      Cheers

    13. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what should Trangaming do, make their product BREAK for all games that have native ports? If anyone uses a slow emulator when a native port exists, then they're STUPID. This is not a remotely realistic concern.

    14. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      First of all, thanks for the links. I wasn't really looking for help on running them at this point, but at least it will provide something to fiddle with the next time I get bored in Linux.

      That said, the first two alternatives share a problem that really bugs me about a lot of Linux gaming. Note: this is not an attack on you in any way, only an observation on these projects.

      If You have Warcraft II You can use the graphics from the CD and use http://stratagus.sf.net/ as an engine on Linux.

      Same with Freeciv at www.freeciv.org and Civilization II. Freeciv is a wonderful, stable game using the ruleset of Civilization II and focusing on network play. But beware of the ai. It is very strong as well.


      Sorry, I don't want to play something that's trying to impersonate the game, I want to play the actual game itself. By most standards, these are quite old titles, and it's hard to understand why they don't work yet when stuff like Doom 3, Everquest, and other flashy-graphics advanced titles work perfectly.

      I can't find any pictures of Wargus, but from what I can see of FreeCiv, it's pretty ugly compared to the real game, honestly. And the normal Civ games have always been nice and stable.

    15. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by Trelane · · Score: 1
      But modern video-cards aren't like that.


      Ehm, while true, there is a pool of developers that would work on a card were the specs available. I fall into that category, for one, along with others. Some new devs would also join, were they able to get the specs to their vid card. In addition, the current devs would be more productive and deliver better, more thorough drivers had they access to complete specs.

      Now, if you say that specs are generally obtuse junk, and that you'd be better off not reading them due to their lousiness, then you may well have an argument. ;)

      Sure, having "the specs" would let you write a driver that's feature complete, but they won't help you make it fast.


      Here, "feature complete" means "power management interface" and "3d acceleration". Most everything else is generally known by the devs (is why you can get 2d working under Linux with few problems generally, while you have to have the nvidia/ati binary drivers to actually have usable 3d.

      A smart plan, because the only way Cedega will give you reasonable performance is to play a game that came out 18 months before you bought your PC.


      Incorrect. According to acquaintances I trust, cedega (or was it just wine?) runs some games faster than Windows. But a native Linux version should generally run faster (given the same time investment/knowledge/love as the Windows port).

      The basic point of what I was saying was that, if ATI can't make drivers that people can use, they should give others a chance to step up to the plate. NVidia's drivers have no problems on this same hardware, from what I can tell (from looking at the Dell forums). Apparently Intel and VIA have released Free drivers, and are thus now either in the kernel or in DRI's CVS. If I'd have chosen either of those (plentiful) routes instead of the ATI one, I'd be setting pretty. Guess I'm just a dissatisfied customer. I just hope that they will back up the (only) reason I bought ATI: they give devleopers documentation a little while down the road.
      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    16. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by SirLeNerd · · Score: 1

      Lemmings on the web ...

      http://193.151.73.87/games/lemmings/

    17. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by glitchvern · · Score: 1

      Relic released the source to homeworld. It's not an OSI or FSF approved license due to some non-commercial use and non-redistribution clauses, but who cares, close enough for our purposes right. Here are the patches to the linux port. Everything you need to know to get it working is there. Biggest bug is the lack up networking support. Have fun. :)

    18. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Nifty...I might actually use that once they get multiplayer support working, as it's rather buggy in Windows.

      And re: the web Lemmings link, thanks, but i've got a Windows and DOS (with an old manual covered in passwords) version that runs fine already :) I appreciate the help greatly, but I wasn't really asking for fixes specifically for each game :)

    19. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. According to acquaintances I trust, cedega (or was it just wine?) runs some games faster than Windows.

      Well I've got Cedega right here, and I've never got it to run anything more than 80% as fast as Windows. Sometimes it's not even 5% as fast.

      Sure, it's possible to screw anything up, and I suppose if you damaged a Windows install badly enough, then Cedega would be faster... but even Transgaming won't dare claim it's faster in normal circumstances.

      NVidia's drivers have no problems on this same hardware, from what I can tell (from looking at the Dell forums).

      NVidia's drivers don't work on ATI hardware!

      Apparently Intel and VIA have released Free drivers

      Irrelevant. They're not high-performance chips, so driver optimization doesn't matter.

    20. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by Trelane · · Score: 1
      Well I've got Cedega right here, and I've never got it to run anything more than 80% as fast as Windows.

      On the same hardware? [shrug] Some games work better than others.

      NVidia's drivers don't work on ATI hardware!

      Indeedy. What I meant was this: When I purchased this notebook, I had the option of either buying an ATI or one of 2-3 NVidia cards. The ATI card has been problematic for me and others, while the NVidia card (aside from issues with suspending to disk/ram) works like a charm. That is what I meant.

      Irrelevant. They're not high-performance chips, so driver optimization doesn't matter.

      Not irrelevant to me (and, judging by the XOrg list, others as well). Unlike my ATI card, they work and have the best Linux support. This translates to, "While I may lose performance, I can actually use the 3d functionality!" Not irrelevant at all, chief.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    21. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by Britz · · Score: 1

      Freeciv can be outfitted with the Civilization tileset. From their Website: "The civ2gfx tileset generator can be used to convert your own Civ II tiles for use with Freeciv. We do not distribute Civ I or II tiles for copyright reasons."

      Same with Warcraft II. You can import the graphics from the commercial game. This gives You the look. The feel is a little better then with the commercial titles, because it has been refined.

    22. Re:Slashdotted, but I bought it last month, so... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      It doesn't even do MMOGs that well.

      It took them forever to support EQ, and by the time they did, they only supported an engine that was 2-3 expansion packs behind.

      Same for Dark Age of Camelot - I've heard the "classic" engine works great, but as of Mythics "New Frontiers" free expansion, the classic engine has been completely obsoleted, Mythic is allowing (in fact, if you want to RvR, FORCING) people to use the Shrouded Isles engine even if they don't have the SI expansion. SI doesn't work under Cedega, let alone ToA for most people.

      Same for EVE Online, it doesn't work at all either.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  10. Sincerely, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    deleted

    (well, not really, but I'm sure you get the point)

  11. wtf! by zoloto · · Score: 0

    worst... troll... ever!

  12. What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by marcushnk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sick of these halfwitts sledging a real contributer to the gaming industry in Linux.
    These guys have a good history, yeah its not squeeky clean but so bloody what?!?
    They contributed to Loki's technology, Gavriel is on good Terms with Ryan (Icculus) and there are many other linux NATIVE technologies that owe their success in part to direct help from Transgaming.

    FFS, if you don't like them then DON'T BLOODY use their product, stop stabbing the poor bastards in the back. /rant over
    *mutter grumble* *kicks cat*

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    1. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      How does openly posting their comments on the web constitute stabbing in the back? Its out there for anyone to see, and refute if they are so inclined. You, for instance could have put together a refutation rather than namecalling

    2. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by bobstevens_took_my_n · · Score: 1, Informative

      They contributed to Loki's technology, Gavriel is on good Terms with Ryan (Icculus) and there are many other linux NATIVE technologies that owe their success in part to direct help from Transgaming.

      Well, one-third of that is true, so I guess congratulations.

      Have you considered the possibility that the author of this article might be a real contributor to the gaming industry in Linux?

    3. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by marcushnk · · Score: 1

      Only one third? Name the bits that are untrue.

      --
      "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    4. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by marcushnk · · Score: 1

      Happily using and supporting the games that THEY helped to make work but not acknowledging their contributions is the stabbing in the back that I refer to.

      --
      "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    5. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they do acknowledge the contributions. I think you must have read a different article.

    6. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by bobstevens_took_my_n · · Score: 1

      The part that *is* true is that Ryan and Gav get along. I'm not aware of any contributions made by Transgaming to any Loki technology, and I'm not aware of any native ports that exist because of Transgaming's help. If you care to point out some credible evidence of either of these, please go ahead. However be aware that I am in an excellent position to know things about Loki and the people associated with it.

    7. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      How do you know they "happily use and support the games..?" It's entierly possible they want to play Tie FIGHTER 95, Diablo I, XvT, Final Fantasy VIII, or any of a HUGE other list of games that don't have massive fanboy following anymore, thus don't get the votes to be fixed.

      The only one of my games that I want to play that even WORKS on WineX/Cedega is Diablo II. Their voting scheme may seem like the best idea, but it's a great way to alienate customers who don't live on the bleeding edge of gaming (as someone else posted, RTS, FPS, and MMORPGs get all the attention).

    8. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The author has also contributed to Linux gaming. He's been involved in porting open sourced commercial games to Linux and did work for Loki for a while.

    9. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a feeling that this callenge will go unanswered...there always seems to be alot of BS flying around /. until some one REALLY gets called out.

    10. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by rpdillon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The real problem is that half the people say:

      "Yeah, everything runs great! WTG Trangaming!! Best $15 I ever spent!"

      and the other half say:

      "What a piece of shit! Nothing runs, and I tried 37 games! Screw Transgaming, I want my money back!"

      And that was my finding...that some people get it to work, and other simply cannot (often, but not always, how much time you want to put into trying to work out all the idiosyncracies).

      But that is enough of a problem: if I *pay* for a commercial product, I shouldn't have to pay and THEN find out if some games I want work for me...performance should be consistent. Further, it IS commercial; if I made you pay for software, you'd expect it to work...not that you'd have to spend 6 or 7 hours every so often to get your money out of it.

      Don't get confused: we are used to Linux and other free software (as in beer) that we don't have to pay for, but have to spent hours configuring, learning and tweaking to get it to work sometimes. And its worth it, because we learn, and we get free software, and maybe can give something back to the community.

      But with Transgaming, its NOT free software, and I shouldn't have to spend hours at a time trying to get acceptable performance out of games I *already* paid for once. Now I have to pay twice, AND spend a lot of time screwing around with esoteric settings, and in the end, it may or may not work, and I don't know if it will EVER work.

      Name one other commerical program that charges you monthly (to the tune of $60 a year), simply to use their software which may or may not work as advertised, whose performance varies so wildly that you simply cannot predict whether it will work for you or not until you pay up. I'd say it takes a full work week of my spare time/year to try to set up games I want to play and find out if they will even run - often without success.

      Man, I just convinced myself to go cancel my subscription.

    11. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No aspect of Transgaming's "technology" was used at Loki. In fact, if the earlier poster had checked details at all, you're realize that the Transgaming DirectX patch to WINE was freshly announced shortly before the programmers began leaving Loki for unrelated (to Transgaming, that is) reasons. The programmers at Loki were generally very proud of the "we're building native games, and not depending on a Win32 compatibility API" approach.

      To date, I am unaware of a native game port which uses Transgaming's technology (or even WINE's winelib). Transgaming released (loosely termed) ports for The Sims and a couple Kohan titles. These "ports" were munged Windows executables (headers modified, they wouldn't load under Windows, not sure if this was the primary reason) which still required a winex installation to run. In fact, the winex buried in the installation directory can be used as a normal winex install, if you invoke it manually... Qualifying this as a native port would be akin to saying that "Warcraft 3 was ported natively because you can run it under WineX (now Cedega)", or that "Gauntlet was ported natively because you can run it under MAME".

      (To elaborate slightly on The Sims, I have heard it stated that the reason for the recompile by them was to change one 3D call to be more winex-friendly, but that the binary was otherwise a Visual Studio-built binary with a modified linking scheme. Not having been a Transgaming employee, I cannot assert the validity of this, but it tracks with my understanding of the technologies involved.)

    12. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by entrigant · · Score: 1

      So instead we should wait... indefinately.. for a finished and polished project that is chasing a moving target. We should expect them to find funding for years of development time before ever making their works available to those of us who want it. In a way I think of myself, as a transgaming subscriber, as a venture capitalist. I am paying them to be able to continue working on their product, and I am more than happy with the speed at which it is being developed.I see no free projects keeping up with their development.

    13. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by marcushnk · · Score: 1

      I can't remember where I read it but I have read somewhere that the transgaming version of Winelib has been used for compiling linux native games (used in the port process).. The loki stuff I have looked and looked and all I can say is I remember reading one of Transgaming staff saying (might have been Gavriel) that they worked on some stuff with loki. It wasn't much but the intent and work was there.

      --
      "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    14. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by Znork · · Score: 1

      It's really not that complicated. You read the forums. You see if anyone has gotten the game you want to play working. If nobody has, chances are it probably wont work. If somebody has gotten it working, and they specify how, then you can be reasonably sure to manage it too, with some work.

      If you actually bother to check the state of the games you want to play you'll find performance _is_ rather consistent.

      "I shouldn't have to spend hours at a time trying to get acceptable performance out of games I *already* paid for once"

      Sortof like installing windows and spending hours at a time reinstalling it, and the correct versions of video drivers and direct X to get acceptable performance out of games you already paid for once, isnt it?

      "Name one other commerical program..."

      Well, Windows would get close to qualifying...

      It's a sad state of computers we have.

    15. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      If somebody has gotten it working, and they specify how, then you can be reasonably sure to manage it too, with some work.

      Funny. I wanted to run a game (2 years old), found multiple positive comments on transgaming.org, paid the $15 for WineX, and then discovered it didn't run at anywhere near a satisfactory level. Performance was bad in all cases, and multiplayer games didn't work at all. A support request to Transgaming told me that "Online play is unsupported".

      Sortof like installing windows and spending hours at a time reinstalling it, and the correct versions of video drivers and direct X to get acceptable performance out of games you already paid for once, isnt it?

      Even assuming what you said is true (worst case), reinstalling a Windows(tm) system is a straightforward affair. It may be time consuming, but that's only a problem if you can't find a book to read while the CD-ROM spins. There's no choices to make, no research needed, no hard work. You just cycle through 4 CD-ROMs, download 500 meg of patches, and away you go. If it doesn't work then, it'll never work until you buy new hardware, and you're not waiting for each month's new Transgaming release to fix an additional 1% of known bugs so you can test it again.

    16. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by bobstevens_took_my_n · · Score: 1
      The Winelib portion is partially true. The Sims and Kohan would be native ports using Winelib, but instead Transgaming just distributed win32 executables and a modified version of WineX to run them. They probably work just as well but if I was in charge I would have used winelib.

      I don't think the Loki part is true. Gav and Ryan compare notes like you said and this is probably what you read about (specifically on Medal of Honor), but the overlap between Loki and Transgaming was pretty small, and I'm sure they didn't collaborate on anything.

    17. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by slide-rule · · Score: 1

      Name one other commerical program that charges you monthly (to the tune of $60 a year), simply to use their software which may or may not work as advertised, whose performance varies so wildly that you simply cannot predict whether it will work for you or not until you pay up...

      ... not counting Everquest? ;-)

    18. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by rpdillon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't think you read what I wrote. I've been subscribing since transgaming started offering subscriptions (with a 5 month gap somewhere in the middle), and what I'm saying is *you can't tell if a game will work by reading those forums*.

      You are sorely mistaken: the game-specific forums have been "archived" because 90% contained people complaining about how X game didn't work. Now, the only forums people can post to are for 5 or 6 major games that work fairly well, and then ONE other forum that serves as a catchall. This makes searching for and finding game-specific information very difficult, and even when I do the hours of research and tweaking, games that are supposed to work (even a little) simply don't (Painkiller comes to mind recently).

      I've been working with Transgaming's products as a subscriber for years, over 5 different distributions on 3 computers. Performance is NOT consistent, and even technical support is NOT consistent.

      Don't demean me and tell me that I didn't bother to read or do the work. I have, and that's why I posted in the first place.

    19. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by rpdillon · · Score: 1

      Touche!

      I played Everquest for years and that was exactly my experience. I stand corrected. =)

    20. Re:What the hell is /. doing posting this tripe? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      4 CD-ROMs? It takes me about 20 minutes to reinstall Windows XP (I've done it twice since I installed it on my current system, sigh) and I install all my drivers from a directory on my hard disk. The only CDROM cycling is when I reload applications, some of which do not survive a windows reinstall because they put things in stupid directories and registry locations.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. Re:Here's the text: by Mateito · · Score: 0, Troll
    1. Don't post as "HTML" if it aint "HTML"
    2. Post article text as AC, or you'll be modded down.
  14. Re:found slash-dot on osdn personals by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    nice except sheap is really spelled sheep... so much for that office 97 spell checker huh? ;)

  15. Windows games = Windows community by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The debate over the value of Cedega/WINE as a solution for the nascent Linux gaming community continues..."

    I think this debate is pointless. If you purchase a Windows game, you are a member of the Windows gaming community, period. It doesn't matter if you play it on native Wintel platform or on Macintosh emulating x86/Windows via Virtual PC - or Linux emulating Windows APIs. The next logical step is to quit all your Linux activity and reboot your computer to MS Windows, the same game will run even better then. The *only* way to build Linux gaming community is via native Linux ports, just as the relatively small Macintosh gaming community does. Mac users got used to waiting months or years for native ports to be released. They don't complain paying premium prices for games whose Windows ports are already in bargain bins. There will be no "Linux gaming community", not until Linux gamers accept similar solution.

    1. Re:Windows games = Windows community by spuzzzzzzz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Mac users got used to waiting months or years for native ports to be released. They don't complain paying premium prices for games whose Windows ports are already in bargain bins.

      Fortunately, id software has a better solution. By releasing Linux binaries of their engines on the web, linux gamers can just buy the windows games and copy tha data files over from the CD. This makes much more sense than releasing a different boxed game for every port and it is probably easier on the developers too.

      --

      Don't you hate meta-sigs?
    2. Re:Windows games = Windows community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The debate over the value of Cedega/WINE as a solution for the nascent Linux gaming community continues...

      Also, I wouldn't really call the "Linux gaming community" nascent. There have been games running natively on Linux since Linux has existed. Maybe the "Windows gaming on Linux community" is nascent, but it's ignorant to characterize the entire Linux gaming community as nascent.

    3. Re:Windows games = Windows community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a matter of fact, they DO complain. A LOT. VOCIFEROUSLY. To the point that I want to beat them with a stick and tell them to shut up and buy a Windows box.

      But I know if I said that, they'd think I'd insulted their religion and come out for blood.

      So tired of it. And you. And this pointless, stupid, peurile, juvenile, slack-jawed "debate."

    4. Re:Windows games = Windows community by ctellefsen · · Score: 1

      Your argument makes no sense. Why should I use Windows for everything just because I need Windows for games?

      I run Linux, because I think it so much better than Windows in every way - except one. And that one thing is the poor selection of games. With Cedega, some of that problem goes away.

      I just do not understand why some people complain about good things. If Cedaga did not exist, I would get LESS from my computer. With Cedega, I get MORE. What is wrong with having choices?

    5. Re:Windows games = Windows community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Fortunately, id software has a better solution.

      id's solution is charity. There's no way that's "better" in the long term.

    6. Re:Windows games = Windows community by shapr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why should you use Windows for *anything* just because you want Windows for games?

      I run Linux, and I think it's much better in every way. I'm happy to purchase native linux binary games, but I am not happy to purchase WineX or games that integrate Transgaming's WineX code to run Windows binaries on Linux.

      For older games, I can just use Wine, and it doesn't cost me anything. For newer games, why would I pay money to be a second-class citizen?

      Dual (or triple or ...) platform development has some great advantages for the extra effort involved.

      In summary, I want to fund *Linux* gaming development.

      --

      Shae Erisson - ScannedInAvian.com
    7. Re:Windows games = Windows community by Wateshay · · Score: 1

      How is Id's solution charity? For every person who downloads the Linux binary, they sell a boxed copy of the Windows version. Some of those, they'd sell anyway, since the people would reboot into Windows to play the game, but not everyone. I'm sure the Linux market isn't paying Id's bills, but it's undoubtedly a noticeable boost to their total sales.

      --

      "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    8. Re:Windows games = Windows community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's charity because id has stated that separate Linux version wouldn't' cover porting costs. So they release a freebie that's subsidized by the Windows market.

      (Actually its not totally charity -- there's a group of server admins that will only provide public servers if there's a Linux port. But as far as average Linux user goes, its charity.)

      Anyway, expecting every game company to give Linux users a freebie version is fantasy-land. So far, its only been a handful of AAA titles.

    9. Re:Windows games = Windows community by ClassicG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The question is not if the Linux version boosts the sales of the game - it's if it boosts the sales of the game -enough- to make up for the man-hours spent making the native Linux version. The sad fact is that the answer to this is quite possibly 'no', and that even if it sometimes might pay off, most game companies don't want to take the risk. Considering the current market, most game companies can't -afford- to take that risk - making a game in the first place is risky enough without the extra development and support costs of a Linux port.

      --
      I game, therefore I am...
    10. Re:Windows games = Windows community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are aware that your whining is what most of us are sick of, aren't you? Most of us linux users don't want to install an OS that has built-in spyware. We don't want an OS that will just suck down all the viruses and extra spyware on the internet that happen to be passing by. I'm happy not being a spam zombie, or part of the massive DDoS network that is the Windows portion of the internet.

      Go back to your games. We have some serious computing to get on with.

    11. Re:Windows games = Windows community by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      "The sad fact is that the answer to this is quite possibly 'no', and that even if it sometimes might pay off, most game companies don't want to take the risk. "

      Its more than a possibility, ID has said many times that they don't get enough money on the linux versions, they do it for one reason alone: "Cause linux gives me a woody" (read the readme that comes with any id linux game sometime)

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    12. Re:Windows games = Windows community by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

      And you do realize what you're doing is being a zealot and using old joks against M$ operating systems?

      I love it how people bash windows. It is getting really old. Yet, Me and many others who know what we're doing and we have zero problems. I got no spyware, I got no adware nor am I anything else you claimed. It's just an operating system, not a damn cult.

      Windows is an OS just like many linux distributions. One is better than the other in some situations. In mine, One completes the other.

      I dual boot with Slackware 10 and XP pro.

      I need Linux cause I love to tweak and learn every bit of it.

      I need Windows cause of Visual Studio, homework and when I don't want any headaches.

      I don't care if you're proud of playing a game on linux after trying to make it work for ten hours after much tweaking. I insert the cd's in and after a few minutes I get to enjoy the product.

      You can rant all you want about how "lame" it is but guess what? Who cares! Doesn't that saying say "if its working, why fix it?"? Ok... if my games work on windows, then why fix it? cuz its windoze? cuz it CAN work faster on linux but you need to break your head open in half? Ah I see.

      Linux will become a competitor as a gaming platform when more companies start doing like Epic Games, id Software and Bioware by provide native binaries. Otherwise, you're still supporting software written natively for the O/S which you love to hate.

    13. Re:Windows games = Windows community by cerberusss · · Score: 1
      The *only* way to build Linux gaming community is via native Linux ports [...] There will be no "Linux gaming community", not until Linux gamers accept similar solution.

      Yeah you're SO right. I use Linux exclusively, but I run Microsoft Office with Crossover Office. So, I am a member of the Windows Office community.

      Your logic is truly astounding. Your moderators too.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    14. Re:Windows games = Windows community by fodi · · Score: 1

      Man, that post is gospel... I enjoy tweaking an OS and playing with my PC too... why? because it gives ME more options... Why people play PC-mechanic when you don't need to is beyond me. People should make the time to enjoy their PC...

    15. Re:Windows games = Windows community by ctellefsen · · Score: 1

      > Why should you use Windows for *anything* just because you want Windows for games? Because it is a fact that many of my favourite games do not run natively on Linux. > I am not happy to purchase WineX or games that integrate Transgaming's WineX code to run Windows binaries on Linux. Why? It is not as if you are giving MS any money, and many of the games run just as well under WineX or Cedega. I just cannot see why having more choices and more software available for Linux would ever be a bad thing.

    16. Re:Windows games = Windows community by angulion · · Score: 1

      OTOH, if Transgaming prospers, it might show game comapnies that there is an interest for games in the linux community. ?

  16. Wrong direction? by usefool · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I purposely built a linux box as a firewall between my other Windows machines and the internet. If I was running linux machines and wanted to play Windows games, I would have built a Windows machine for that purpose too.

    Of course the best solution is a XBox, as it (hopefully) carries many Windows-also titles.

    So if Cedega's fees are higher or close to a XBox or a Windows license, it won't be too attractive at all.

    --
    Uselessful technology (Air-Charged
    1. Re:Wrong direction? by marsonist · · Score: 1

      Is 5 dollars a month close to the price of an XBox?

    2. Re:Wrong direction? by Rectum2003 · · Score: 1

      If your Xbox lasts you 3 years, 5x12x3=180$, so yes it is.

    3. Re:Wrong direction? by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      You have missed the entire point of general computing.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  17. Original Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The original article appears to be: http://timedoctor.org/~theoddone33/10points.html

  18. Mirror by antikarma · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's getting slow, here's a Google cache.

  19. Google's Cache of The Link by unixmaster · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Never learn by your mistakes, if you do you may never dare to try again
  20. That'd be WTE --- WORST TROLL EVAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  21. No problems here with the games I play by ScottGant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, I agree with you.

    I spent my 15 bucks...15 measly bucks...and installed it. It works great for me on the games I play with it...the same ones that I used to play when I had XP a year ago. Everquest runs faster for me than it did on XP...Warcraft 3 runs great, Steam/Half-Life/Counterstrike runs great also...there are some bumps with Steam as it updates itself...but they fix them.

    I have no complaints with my whopping 15 bucks I spent on this. If I didn't like them, or they were not doing what I wanted it to do, then I wouldn't buy it anymore. Plain and simple.

    And besides, most of the other games I play have a native Linux client on them anyway.

    --

    "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
  22. Only a couple of replies... by Hadur · · Score: 1

    Slashdotted, Google cache link

  23. Scott Draeker fan-boy club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's still fighting Loki's old battles? Has anyone kissed Scott Draeker's ass recently?

  24. Explanations and Insights Please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't Wine good enough instead of this non FOSS wine fork?

    1. Re:Explanations and Insights Please. by SQLz · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should try Transgaming's FOSS version...

      http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=17631

  25. Re:found slash-dot on osdn personals by adisakp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't you realize guys will say anything to get laid?? If a slashdot geek is agreeing with you that Open Source isn't all that and MicroSoft isn't really that evil then he must be trying to get into your pants :-) Just like when macho guys tell girls they'd rather go see a chick-flick with them than watch the game. Most men will sell their souls pretty quickly to get some action.

  26. Re:Way to go slashdot! by t0c · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I don't see what goatse has to do with this story.

  27. my reason why i dont use it.. by grusapa · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. Re:my reason why i dont use it.. by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      That's my reason I don't buy Ati :)

    2. Re:my reason why i dont use it.. by MarcQuadra · · Score: 3, Informative

      You know, you dont HAVE to use ATI's driver. I have a RADEON 7500 and it's totally 100% accelerated for 2D and 3D by completely free drivers that reside in the kernel and XOrg builds.

      ALL RADEON cards have full 2D acceleration in the latest from XOrg (and xfree as well, IIRC). The 3D support usually lags a while behind the hottest cards.

      Right now the best ATI card you can get fully-free 3D acceleration on is the RADEON 9200, which ain't a bad card at all.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    3. Re:my reason why i dont use it.. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      "fully free" - Are you sure?

      Last I checked, S3TC was highly patent-encumbered and was an issue even on older Radeons. (Which is why UT2K3 wouldn't work with ATI cards for a while.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    4. Re:my reason why i dont use it.. by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      Well the drivers from ATI are closed, but if you run an RV280 or older (IIRC), you can use the driver from XFree/XOrg that's been written by and for the open source community. The newer cards are only 2D acceleratesd, but the RV280 and older drivers have full 3D acceleration.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  28. -1 Flamebait? by marcushnk · · Score: 1

    And the orginal story isn't?!?!
    WTF is wrong with you people.. get the facts the READ them.
    Transgaming is not the enemy, WE are.

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
  29. TransGaming helps Linux gaming by kravlor · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Disclaimer: I am a TransGaming subscriber.

    I decided to try out TransGaming's Cedega product shortly after it was released. In addition to their modified wineserver, they have come out with a game manager, Point2Play. This tool has made it _easy_ to install and configure games.

    I think that the fact that TransGaming has been able to successfully negotiate with vendors providing copy-protection and other proprietary code for use with Cedega is a big step towards making Linux a more predominant gaming platform. (I was pleasantly surprised to find that some of my titles, such as Warcraft III, ran better with the Cedega emulation!)

    While I prefer the idea of native Linux builds of games, there are also many (older) titles that simply will never be ported over. The best thing that we can do at this point is to vote with our wallets. For now, that means TransGaming will keep getting my subscription!

    1. Re:TransGaming helps Linux gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am in two minds about Cedega/Transgaming, I am a casual gamer. I have a couple of games i like to play from time to time. I dont routinely go out and buy PC games, my games console has that privilege. Trouble is that unless you play a lot of windows games regularly under linux its an expense (albeit a small one) that isn't worth it in the long run. I confess to using the version that is floating around on BitTorrent. I only play a couple of games and subscribing for support and the "voting system" is just not worth it for me. Transgaming do provide a free version via CVS that has a couple of things missing, I think the point2play system (which makes installation easier, (the bittorrent version point2play doesnt work for me anyway because I dont subscribe) and the copy protection stuff (which they are unable to open-source anyway for obvious legal reasons). You can have Cedega for free if you are prepared to use CVS. In fact if you want to play Doom 3 under linux until recently the only way it could be done was with the CVS version. There is nothing stopping you from grabbing the CVS version producing a binary and floating that on p2p.

      Having said that I am rather hippocritical because I beleive that if people want linux to be successful as a gaming platform, one has to support the companies that are trying to provide it, and that means in most games paying money for it. Like it or not, linux is a minority platform in the gaming arena and pirating the only commercial/native linux games that are floating around is just plain wrong. Linux / Open Source people (myself included) are so used to getting stuff for free that it seems weird to actually pay for a piece of software. Transgaming have created a service model for their product which should be the primary mode of income for them. When you pay for your transgaming subscription you are mainly funding the services that they provide for you. Games dont really lend themselves to a service model and that is why games companies need to make money of the product. Its wrong to say that they are freeloading off the open source thing because they are providing a service and not just a binary product.

      I think its important to recognise the need to support the things that you love or want, even if it doesnt fit the ethics of "Software Freedom". Free and Not-Free can exist together, it seems silly and self rightious to think otherwise.

      Nick ...

    2. Re:TransGaming helps Linux gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the reason linux goes nowhere. Enjoy your "scene".

  30. Re:Mirror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    $ whois technewslive.info
    NOTICE: Access to .INFO WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in
    determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the Afilias
    registry database. The data in this record is provided by Afilias Limited
    for informational purposes only, and Afilias does not guarantee its
    accuracy. This service is intended only for query-based access. You agree
    that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that, under no
    circumstances will you use this data to: (a) allow, enable, or otherwise
    support the transmission by e-mail, telephone, or facsimile of mass
    unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations to entities other than
    the data recipient's own existing customers; or (b) enable high volume,
    automated, electronic processes that send queries or data to the systems of
    Registry Operator or any ICANN-Accredited Registrar, except as reasonably
    necessary to register domain names or modify existing registrations. All
    rights reserved. Afilias reserves the right to modify these terms at any
    time. By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy.

    Domain ID:D6166037-LRMS
    Domain Name:TECHNEWSLIVE.INFO
    Created On:03-Sep-2004 02:57:33 UTC
    Expiration Date:03-Sep-2005 02:57:33 UTC
    Sponsoring Registrar:R263-LRMS
    Status:ACTIVE
    Status:OK
    Reg istrant ID:C5231896-LRMS
    Registrant Name:Dong Bird
    Registrant Organization:Gay Nigger Association of America
    Registrant Street1:3750 Coit Rd.
    Registrant City:Richardson
    Registrant State/Province:TX
    Registrant Postal Code:75080
    Registrant Country:US
    Registrant Phone:+1.9722342322
    Registrant Email:lastmeasure@gmail.com
    Admin ID:C5231899-LRMS
    Admin Name:Dong Bird
    Admin Organization:Gay Nigger Association of America
    Admin Street1:3750 Coit Rd.
    Admin City:Richardson
    Admin State/Province:TX
    Admin Postal Code:75080
    Admin Country:US
    Admin Phone:+1.9722342322
    Admin Email:lastmeasure@gmail.com
    Billing ID:C5231901-LRMS
    Billing Name:Dong Bird
    Billing Organization:Gay Nigger Association of America
    Billing Street1:3750 Coit Rd.
    Billing City:Richardson
    Billing State/Province:TX
    Billing Postal Code:75080
    Billing Country:US
    Billing Phone:+1.9722342322
    Billing Email:lastmeasure@gmail.com
    Tech ID:C5231897-LRMS
    Tech Name:Dong Bird
    Tech Organization:Gay Nigger Association of America
    Tech Street1:3750 Coit Rd.
    Tech City:Richardson
    Tech State/Province:TX
    Tech Postal Code:75080
    Tech Country:US
    Tech Phone:+1.9722342322
    Tech Email:lastmeasure@gmail.com
    Name Server:NS1.DOMAINSITE.COM
    Name Server:NS2.DOMAINSITE.COM
    Name Server:NS3.DOMAINSITE.COM
    Name Server:NS4.DOMAINSITE.COM
  31. Re:Way to go slashdot! by HBI · · Score: 1

    Perhaps a black hole of Linux gaming?

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  32. F*** 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Download the cracked version from BitTorrent, f**king b*st*rds, trying to make money from the scene.

  33. Re:WINE is not just for "basic apps." by Curtman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That is very true, however its a truth about WINE, not necessarily about Cedega. WINE is also very useful for its debugger, which is an extremely good reverse engineering tool along the lines of SoftICE. As well as winelib, which is a library that you can use to assist you in porting Windows code to Unix. I've used both, and had great success with them. Cedega on the other hand is a toy strictly for playing games. And WINE isn't limited to 16 bit applications.

  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. Thoughts on the article by sloanster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article raises some good points, but is focusing on the wrong things - Lets face it, transgaming wine/x is a neat hack, and what it does is very cool.

    I am a pretty regular gamer, and have wasted far too much time on 3D FPS titles like q3a, RtCW, ut2004 etc - and I have the doom3 linux version pre-ordered. I use linux, and really don't have any plans to set up a pc just for gaming, as the games I like are available natively on linux. I feel that the market should decide the success of transgaming - if you like it, feel free, but count me out, thanks!

    The reason I'm not interested in in running windows games in linux via wine is that if we take that to its logical conclusion, there will be no market for native linux games - idsoft has it right, their games are written in a portable fashion, and have pretty much the same performance on linux/X11/DRI as on the simple pc GUI used by ms windows. Let's face it, once a gamer plays native linux games, he will be dissatisfied with the emulated variety, and it would be a real shame if that's all there was.

    All in all, the wine solution is a nice hack, and useful as a temporary kludge, but we are sunk if that becomes the norm and all game development becomes ms windows centric, and we become the new OS/2, inhabiting a shrinking niche and dying a slow death. Fsck that! The native linux gaming market is the thing we need to support with our wallets, if we want to see it thrive.

    1. Re:Thoughts on the article by malkavian · · Score: 1

      The point is not to make everything in the future emulated, it's simply to get the games that current windows gamers use playable on Linux, where possible..
      Yes, I want, and will pay for, Linux native games.
      But hey, where games aren't around that are Linux native, I think it's worth my money per month to get games I play regularly working without rebooting all the time.
      Cedega gives us something NOW to get a group of people gaming, who can then push for native new releases.
      And then, at least, there are SOME figures a business can analyse and say "Yes, there are indeed some Linux gamers out there. It may be worth supporting the platform".
      Without numbers, many businesses will simply say "We don't think there's a market. Do you know of any that use Linux as a gaming platform? No? Oh well then, lets ignore it".
      It's a start. A hack. A temporary solution.
      But for now, it'll do for me until I get the chance to be offered a choice to pay for a linux version.

    2. Re:Thoughts on the article by Shelrem · · Score: 1

      As a loyal Transgaming subscriber, i have to refute this argument. You say that "We are sunk if [running Windows games via wine] becomes the norm and all game development becomes ms windows centric." Guess what? Almost all of it already is. Wine allows those of us who want to play specific computer games to do it under Linux instead of Windows. I buy the Linux version of games that have them, though in the case of Neverwinter Nights, for example, i still need wine to run the editor tools (and the native binary is rather unstable, crashing about every two hours for me).

      Because of this, Wine helps grow the potential gaming market on Linux so that when native releases do happen, there are more of us to buy them. If Wine were to work perfectly, why care if games aren't developed for Linux natively? The fact of the matter is that it doesn't, which means that native ports will always be preferable, and thus there will be a market for them. Right now, i know of few to no companies that make money on sales of their Linux client ports, and most games that have Linux ports have them because someone within the company wanted one. I'm hoping this changes, but it won't without a larger gaming community on Linux and Wine helps that by providing a more viable platform for gamers.

      Saying that we demand native ports right now is putting the cart before the horse. Native ports are great, but the market needs to grow before we'll impress anyone with Linux sales, so just sit back for now, buy the Linux games that have native ports and emulate whatever you need in the mean time rather than dual-booting.

      b.c

    3. Re:Thoughts on the article by sloanster · · Score: 1

      If wine/x fills a need for you, great - it's just not for me. Lord knows, I spend way too much time gaming anyway. I don't have enough time to explore, let alone play, all the native linux 3D FPS games out there - but I get my fill of it with a handful, basiclly ut2004, RtCW, and that old standby, Q3A.

      Shelrem said: Guess what? Almost all of it (game development) already is (windows centric).

      Fact is, linux does have a presence, a mindshare with the game developers. That's why I can go to the store and buy a copy of ut2004, install it on my linux system and start playing without any hassle. That's why idsoft has made available linux versions of every one of their titles from doom on - and games based on the Q3A engine are easy to port to linux. If we lose that, and end up stuck with merely trying to run windows games under emulation, what happens when microsoft fscks us with the next version of windows? or attacks wine in the courts? and don't think they're not going to do it. That's why I see wine as a useful but temporary kludge. To depend upon it long term is a dangerous game, which will end at some point.

      Malkavian said: Without numbers, many businesses will simply say "We don't think there's a market. Do you know of any that use Linux as a gaming platform? No? Oh well then, lets ignore it".

      Exactly - and when we buy native linux games, we generate those numbers - but when we buy windows games, we send a very different message.

    4. Re:Thoughts on the article by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      Get real, how many game makers will have incentive to make a Linux port while Linux is only 1-5% of the market?

      When Linux is going to have > 20% (or put here any large enough number) than game makers will not risk not providing a Linux port. Till than, Linux community has to fight to get to that 20% and this is one of the ways "look it runs ms office, it runs your games".

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    5. Re:Thoughts on the article by sloanster · · Score: 1

      Get real, how many game makers will have incentive to make a Linux port while Linux is only 1-5% of the market?

      Gee I dunno, why don't we ask atari, activision and idsoftware, for starters. The fact is, linux does have a foothold, albeit a small one, in the form of native linux versions of games from these vendors, and that foothold needs to be encouraged, because it's the only foothold that's of any substance.

      Your argument is self defeating, because if the game vendors want to do it your way, all they need to do is ignore linux - after all, if linux users want to run games, they can just struggle with an emuated version of the windows games, right? OS/2 went that way and died, I want to see much better things for Linux.

    6. Re:Thoughts on the article by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      I don't know... your argument looks like putting the carriage before the horse. Linux will not get market share because game makers make software for it (because in *general* they don't and you can't deny that), Linux will get market share if you can run your favorite (already existent) games on it, and then when Linux will have a larger share game makers will have to make Linux native games (they will not risk depending on WineX and its quirks when a big percentage of gamers run Linux) Anyway I think it's a poor argument to say that game makers don't make games for Linux because there is such think as WineX. There might be one or two cases when a company decide not to release a Linux version because of that, but this is not the big picture, there are other reasons, Linux not having a big market share being one of the most important. How to get more market share: being more compatible. How? WineX. If you hope for game makers to help Linux and release Linux native games only because they find the penguin cute... too bad, I don't think it's very likely.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    7. Re:Thoughts on the article by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      we are sunk if that becomes the norm and all game development becomes ms windows centric

      It already is MS Windows centric and has been for a long, long time now.

      we become the new OS/2, inhabiting a shrinking niche and dying a slow death. Fsck that!

      You've been misled. Go ask any of the people really involved with the OS/2 scene back then, most of them say Windows compatibility was a strength not a hinderance. The reason people wrote Windows apps was because it had a higher market share, and because unlike for OS/2 the Win32 Platform SDK was free so it was much more economical to develop software for Windows. Linux has no such disadvantage.

    8. Re:Thoughts on the article by Deternal · · Score: 1

      You are generally right - but for the heck of it, where can you get a Linux native version of Doom3? Last time I heard about that from ID they would only release the binary but not a Doom3 Linux boxed version.

    9. Re:Thoughts on the article by sloanster · · Score: 1

      You are generally right - but for the heck of it, where can you get a Linux native version of Doom3

      It will be available through the usual channels, for instance tuxgames.com - as soon as the linux version and installer are finished.

    10. Re:Thoughts on the article by Deternal · · Score: 1

      I'm just going out on a limb and quoting Todd Hollenshead here:

      Mac and Linux: Unfortunately I don't have dates for either of these. However, Linux binaries will be available very soon after the PC game hits store shelves. There are no plans for boxed Linux games.

      As seen in his plan update on the release of Doom 3 Todd plan file.

      So I'm wondering what this is? Tux games buys a win32 game, repackages it on dvd along with the linux binary and an installer?

    11. Re:Thoughts on the article by sloanster · · Score: 1

      So I'm wondering what this is? Tux games buys a win32 game, repackages it on dvd along with the linux binary and an installer?

      Yeah, and IIRC they did something similar with RtCW...

    12. Re:Thoughts on the article by Deternal · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clarifying.

  36. MOD PARENT UP - INSIGHTFUL, INFORMATIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yo baby, anti-slash is hung like a motherfucking HORSE. Forget these lunix nerds...

  37. Re:found slash-dot on osdn personals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do you do scat-eating, or just scat-smeering?

  38. Would a better idea be... by blahplusplus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... to develop a "wrapper" (forgive my bad terminology if its wrong, I couldn't think of the name!) so that you could run two OS's at the same time and task switch between them like you do with windows programs?

    I never got the whole "linux bit" windows is Mass market, linux will never be MASS MARKET! I'm sorry it just wont at least not for a long time. It may become mass market in emerging markets and developing countries but Consoles come first, then windows, then if you're lucky linux gets the scraps. Why anyone would want to run games on - non-native systems does not make very much sense to me, can't you just dual boot?? Is it really that difficult to wait reboot, and wait ~20-40 seconds for XP to load and run the game? If this is your leisure time you waste all of maybe 2 minutes, 1 going into windows, 1 rebooting and going back into linux.

    1. Re:Would a better idea be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > can't you just dual boot??

      Not if you don't even own a copy of Windows, you can't. It's not cheap. Ok, you could pirate it, but I'd rather just stick with Linux.

    2. Re:Would a better idea be... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      ... to develop a "wrapper" (forgive my bad terminology if its wrong, I couldn't think of the name!)

      I think "VMWare" is the name you're struggling for.

    3. Re:Would a better idea be... by entrigant · · Score: 1

      There are many of us that queue of a lot of work for our pc to do when we are not there, or maintain other such continuous jobs. This is when rebooting becomes an inconvenience. When I have over 20 applications running all doing a job I want done having to close all of them properly, reboot, then boot BACK into linux and restart EVERYTHING is a royal pain, and sometimes just not possible. As a general rule of thumb it is a bad idea to just assume because something is not so for you, does not mean it is not so for others as well.

    4. Re:Would a better idea be... by DashEvil · · Score: 1

      Can you please explain to me why you seem to think that rebooting to Windows is better than not having to reboot at all?

      --
      -If God wanted people to be better than me, he would have made them that way.
    5. Re:Would a better idea be... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      Well think about it: You want to run games on linux made for windows, but who's developers did not design it (explicitly) to run on linux or 'the best' on linux.

      No rebooting would be good, but thats why I mentioned switching between TWO os's in realtime as if you were switching between applications, then there would be no need for emulation under another OS because switching to windows OS would take less then a few seconds ideally.

      Really having to run games on linux is just pandering to whining gamers. If you want to game dedicate a machine exclusively to gaming and one exclusively to linux. God knows the hardware is cheap enough. I know this doesn't apply to all cases where one might want to play games on linux but if you do most of your gaming at home and have a job I don't see what the problem is.

  39. Can be useful... by punkrockguy318 · · Score: 1

    Cedega is very nice if used correctly. Some people (like me), when buying Cedega just say "Wow! I'll buy this an I'll be able to play my collection of Windows games! Oh boy!". Sorry, Cedega doesn't work like that. You may be able to play 10% of your library. You need to plan. Like this. "Wow! Warcraft 3! I want it! Aww man, it's Windows only. Hmm, let me see if it works nice on Cedega. Wow it's a five, i'll shell out $15 for cedega and buy WarCraft." You don't want to do this: "Wow! No one lives forever! I can't wait to go home and play it... I'm pretty sure that it will work, I have cedega." Cedega is nice if you purchase games that are supported. Don't count on it to work on games, make sure they are 4/5 or 5/5

    1. Re:Can be useful... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      And then you realise ATI doesn't work with Cedega at all, and that you have to re-buy your graphics card to get the Cedega support.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  40. Re:Way to go slashdot! by desplesda · · Score: 1

    I don't see what goatse has to do with this story.

    Please hand in your geek card on the way out.

  41. Games that work under WineX/Cedega by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since the article is slashdotted, here's a list of games that I run successfully under WineX 3.2.1 (not even the current version):

    • Age of Empires II
    • Icewind Dale
    • GTA 3
    • GTA: Vice City
    • Baldur's Gate II
    • Diablo II
    • Starcraft
    • Warcraft II BNE
    • Fallout II
    • Max Payne
    • Thief (Gold)
    • Thief II
    • Deus Ex
    • Grim Fandango
    Not all of these work perfectly; for example BGII network play is not available. However, for the most part these are totally playable and sometimes even run better than the same games running under Windows. I really wish Transgaming would put more effort into supporting older games, but I guess more gamers want to play Counter Strike 2, not Diablo I.
  42. Who the fuck is Dan 'theoddone33' Olson? by neil.pearce · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Subject says it all.

    1. Re:Who the fuck is Dan 'theoddone33' Olson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Linux to Windows game porter who feels threatened by Cedega.

  43. Stop whining. by ctellefsen · · Score: 2

    Complain, complain, complain. A short rebuttal of some of the more ridiculous points:

    #Performance:

    Complaining that unsupported games don't always work is ridiculous. That is what 'unsupported' means.

    #Pricing:

    Boo hoo. Complaining that you have to buy the games is just STUPID. Did you expect to get your games for FREE? They cost millions to make, you know. And it isn't Transgaming who makes them.

    Also, it seems to be a negative thing that they give things away for FREE.

    #The rest

    I'll stop here, since it does not get any better.

    Transgaming is a company, and in the business of making money. If you don't like their product or policies, you are free not to buy from them.

    Other people, who really like that a company works hard to give us something we really want, will certainly keep on subscribing. I am very happy that Transgaming exists. The other possibility would be that they did not exist, and I would not be able to play a lot of my games on Linux. I find it really hard to see how that scenario is better.

  44. Doom 3 but no QuickBooks? by copponex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is sad... people can play Doom 3 on their linux partition, but they can't run QuickBooks?! It makes me wonder of the linux community *really* wants the desktop business market.

    I have my boss and all employees on Firefox/Thunderbird. I've removed the little E icon but pinned it to the start menu for dumb sites like Ingram Micro and - unbelievably - slashdot. If there were a bit of software similar to a multi-user GnuCash that could import quickbooks files, I cannot tell you how many businesses I could have switched by the Q4.

    We have a small window of time before MS breaks all the wine/crossover compatibility with Longhorn. Don't miss it.

    1. Re:Doom 3 but no QuickBooks? by reverius · · Score: 1

      WineX (Cedega) is a tweaked, commercial, GAMING-only version of WINE. While they are putting a lot of commercial effort into making it a product, their product is for gaming only.

      CrossoverOffice might be a better bet to rant about/rag on for getting QuickBooks support, but for the majority of users, that still isn't nearly as important as Microsoft Office and the Adobe products. Those are for the most part working with CrossoverOffice, and many users are quite happy with it.

    2. Re:Doom 3 but no QuickBooks? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Instead of trying to emulate (yeah, wine is not an emulator, I know) an existing project, people is the oss community tried to make their own product. I haven't tried GnuCash, but I see how it could work if you could move your data to it. That is where the GnuCash people should be working. But I don't think it's up to the open source community to make it able to run windows apps. Saying that linux can't be a contender because you can't run QuickBooks might be the wrong way to look at the problem. Another way could be that Intuit could make their next version compatible with wine and thus crossover.

      I've had good luck with crossover. I can run Microsoft Office and Orcad PSpice without any problems. I try to stick with openoffice, but there are times I need word and so I use it.

      I understand your gripes with linux. I hate those responses that shout back at people who can't get linux to fit their needs and lable them stupid. Everyone here asks why people don't switch to it over night as if they were dumb, but then people try and it doesn't meed their needs. I guess the only thing people who can't contribute directly to projects like GnuCash would be to contact Intuit and ask them to think about making their app compatible with wine. It's a start.

    3. Re:Doom 3 but no QuickBooks? by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      I agree wholeheartedly. I'm doing my best to support Codeweavers, but it's hard sometimes. I get especially frustrated when I see them concentrating an entire release on making iTunes work instead of something like Quickbooks.

      I noticed in their bug list the other day somebody asked them to support UPS Worldship, which is a *simple* app that would be perfect for running on Linux. Their response was "no" without even considering it. A similar request for iTunes was greeted with "hellz yeah". *sigh*

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    4. Re:Doom 3 but no QuickBooks? by speeDDemon+(nw) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Totally agree on this point.

      I have approximately 300 business's that I support, Almost ALL (99%) run windows configurations of some sort. Why ? not because of games ? Not because of office support, but because here in australia, Since the introduction of the GST it is practically IMPOSSIBLE for a business to run without using either Intuit's QuickBooks / QuickPos / QuickFuel, or MYOB Accounting / Premier / etc.

      Most of these companies are not in a position to switch to linux until these products can work under linux. (Whether native or emulation)

      The only real way for them to switch to linux ? When they have approximately a 10pc peer network that can be moved to a Terminal Server + Linux Clients + rdesktop. This is only a recent option as Quickbooks & MYOB only just recently started 'officially' supporting terminal server.

      The problem here, You are still throwing approximately $4k (AUD) at microsoft to enable your clients to run a free OS *sigh*

      Games may drive alot of home users, Corporates can consider porting / developing Linux native products. Small business Dont care about games or OS (windows or linux) *primarily* and only wish to Be Safe(tm) on the internet/email and run their accounting software.

    5. Re:Doom 3 but no QuickBooks? by copponex · · Score: 1

      I wholeheartedly agree.

      The problem is that there is no open source equivilent to QuickBooks. There's nothing close, except for Fishbowl (closed source add-on, $5000 for a 10 user license) which runs on java and only provides order procurement/fulfillment cycles.

      If there were anything like Openoffice/Firefox/Thunderbird (seamless translation, easy to install, easy interface to adapt to, completely compatible file format) both Intuit and Microsoft would be hurting. Even the $5000 10 user QuickBooks uses a flat database! ANYTHING on postgresql or mysql would be faster and more stable.

      It's just so frustrating to see millions of small business customers with money in their pockets ready to dish it out to Intuit and/or MicroSoft for their next "upgrade," and the perfect solution on the OSS side of the fence just waiting to be created.

      If I knew how to do anything besides basic scripting, I'd be all over it. By the time my chops are good enough, I'm afraid the window will have passed.

    6. Re:Doom 3 but no QuickBooks? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      You make a great point. Small businesses rely on small software packages that are proprietary and will only run on windows. I have some experience in software for small law firms. They pay lots of money for this custom software that they couldn't work without.

      I think in the next few years, we might see a transition from windows to linux. I think the first thing software developers should be looking at is if their programs will run in at least crossover. If they run out of the box with wine, then even better.

      I'd rather see them push for linux specific versions of their software, but I understand the cost involved. And I feel the same way you do. If I could help in coding I would, but I just don't have the knowledge and the only thing I can do is use OSS and tell people how good it is.

    7. Re:Doom 3 but no QuickBooks? by lakeland · · Score: 1

      A cheaper option, is to use vnc. Sure, you can't have two people running the same application at the same time (unless you set up two windows boxes) but the money you save on software enables you to buy an extra box.

      Ideal up to about 10 clients, anyway.

    8. Re:Doom 3 but no QuickBooks? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Disclaimer: I work for CodeWeavers.

      I agree wholeheartedly. I'm doing my best to support Codeweavers, but it's hard sometimes. I get especially frustrated when I see them concentrating an entire release on making iTunes work instead of something like Quickbooks.

      Actually, we are almost always working on multiple things at once. Often quite a few of us are working on bugfixes for large, corporate proprietary apps - this is mostly separate to our CrossOver work where we focus on the home/enthusiast Linux users market. The contract work we do for such programs isn't public but the patches go back to WineHQ immediately just the same as work for CrossOver does.

      Often these bugfixes are the sort of thing which affect many GUI desktop apps, including things like QuickBooks. So you could say we are working on it in an indirect way.

      But I know, I know, you want us to work on QuickBooks specifically, so it runs in CrossOver. Believe me, we'd love to do that too - the only Windows machine in our office is used by the secretary (or as we call her, our Chief Non Geek). She's said she'd be happy to run Linux. So why doesn't she? Right, you guessed it - we use QuickBooks ourselves.

      Unfortunately, being a (small) company that isn't exactly rolling in money, we have to focus entirely on what our customers are most willing to pay for. As you can see from our top voted apps list iTunes comes first by a long way with 118 votes, and QuickBooks Pro comes in at number 22 with 16 votes. We can't magically divine what CrossOver users are willing to pay for, so we have to go via these sorts of lists.

      I hope that explains our slightly odd focus. Unfortunately Linux on the corporate desktop hasn't taken off yet: given the huge resources Red Hat and Novell are marshalling behind it I'm hoping it has to happen soon, but currently, it hasn't. That means Wine development is driven mostly by personal users.

      I noticed in their bug list the other day somebody asked them to support UPS Worldship, which is a *simple* app that would be perfect for running on Linux. Their response was "no" without even considering it

      Our bugzilla isn't public so I guess you are talking about the C4 site I linked to above. Our experience shows that there is no such thing as a "simple" app when it comes to Wine - even very straightforward and apparently simple programs can make use of obscure functionality or hit edge-case bugs in Wine that mean they don't work right. By definition if somebody asked us to support it, it doesn't work correctly. We can either choose to spend the time tracking and fixing those bugs, or the bugs that affect high profile, popular apps.

      Fortunately we're supported by (and in turn support) the Wine community. We resync with WineHQ regularly (every few weeks usually) so it's definitely possible that a fix for UPS Worldship will make it in from there, or we'll fix it in the course of making other apps work. We term this "collatoral damage", somewhat flippantly - basically it means that as we work on improvements for one program, all the others start working better as well. For example, Office now runs about 50% faster (according to officebench) in the upcoming CrossOver 3.1 relative to 3.0 due entirely to optimizations developed whilst working on iTunes.

      OK, I hope I explained how we set our priorities well enough. Thanks for supporting us and the Wine project!

    9. Re:Doom 3 but no QuickBooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We term this "collatoral damage", somewhat flippantly - basically it means that as we work on improvements for one program, all the others start working better as well.

      So basically, it's collateral undamage?

    10. Re:Doom 3 but no QuickBooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IAmTheRealMike:

      Thanx for the post. Your post is exactly the reason why I love codeweavers (installed their free RPMs quite some time ago, run some big windows app under them without a hitch!) and despise transgaming. I mean, can you take someone serious who writes bollocks like cross-pollination == technical synergy?

      Best wishes,

      Tels

    11. Re:Doom 3 but no QuickBooks? by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Sorry to seem persistent, but this is what I was referring to. There are actually three support tickets on your public website that ask for UPS Worldship. I used it as an example because I have some experience with it. It is by no means a popular app, and, as you said, you will probably never have fanatical customers banging down your doors asking Codeweavers to support it. An app such as this, however, could be just as important to the future of Linux on the business desktop as something like Office.

      Notably absent in your description of Codeweavers' main focus is the small/medium business market. I can't imagine why this is. These are the types of companies that *most* need a product like Crossover to bridge the gap between Windows and Linux. These are also companies that will probably never consider Linux without a product such as Crossover. They are also the types of customers that never post on Linux websites asking for special treatment. They are literally the silent majority of businesses.

      What I'm saying is that, as a consultant who has direct access to small businesses and what they want and need, I tend to shake my head much of the time at the decisions that Linux support companies make. I realize that you are "following the money" so to speak and working on the applications that you are commissioned to do. But I also realize that focusing work on proprietary, in-house apps for large companies will never get Linux into the vast majority of businesses. There is often only a small window of opportunity for Linux and Open Source adoption in many of these small businesses. This opportunity comes at moments like these, when major competitors to OSS are busy playing catch-up on security and pricing (and even features) and breaking all compatibility with Open Source in the process.

      I also realize that pushing Linux adoption in businesses, small businesses in particular, is very much a "one machine at a time" and "one company at a time" process. Quickbooks is a great example of "one company at a time" because, as you pointed out, there are literally thousands of small businesses in the US alone that cannot or will not switch to Linux because of that one last application, which most often is Quickbooks. To me, UPS Worldship seems to perfectly fit the "one machine at a time" paradigm of Linux adoption. Putting Linux on a standalone, single-purpose PC in a business filled with Windows desktops could give a new perspective to both users and administrators as to the benefits in reliability and manageability of Linux and OSS.

      When my clients can't copy and paste in Word or the wrong document prints with multiple documents open, or something like prelink still isn't properly disabled by cxoffice after having been in use by major Linux desktop distributions for almost a year, I sometimes wonder how making iTunes work, regardless of the benefits in speed, is anything but a distraction for a company that got it's start making Office work on Linux.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  45. If it's not a blockbuster, you're out of luck by Torp · · Score: 1

    Civilization 3 doesn't work.
    Laser Squad Nemesis is unplayable, while it works pretty well with the 'normal' wine.

    I can afford to spend weekends in Windows, playing the latest and greatest 10-hour-gameplay FPS... but for the two above, which have a lot of replay value and are going to stay on my hard drive for years, i'm out of luck.

    --
    I apologize for the lack of a signature.
    1. Re:If it's not a blockbuster, you're out of luck by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 0

      And herein is one of Cedega's major problems. Until it supports Simcity 4: Rush Hour and C&C Generals: Zero Hour, I'm gonna stick with Windoze (although stable, secure Linux is tempting).

    2. Re:If it's not a blockbuster, you're out of luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Civ3 works perfectly for me. And what's the problem with LSQ if it works in Wine, run it in Wine then.

  46. Spyware? by JurgenThor · · Score: 1, Funny

    When I use a Linux native version, it sends the manufactures a message that Linux is a viable gaming platform. When I use Cedega, I don't send that message.
    So your typical linux games are spyware, but Cedega acts like a firewall? ;0)

    --
    GENERAL PUBLIC SIGNATURE (GPS) Any replies (derivatives) of this post must also use the GPS
  47. Isn't this counterproductive? by Asmor · · Score: 1

    I'm a Windows fanatic, but I've got to question how useful a Windows emulator is to the, as the article put it, nascent Linux gaming community. Companies might see that Linux is starting to become more common and might be worth porting games over. But is it really worth porting games over if someone else is gonna do the hard work for them and Linux users will buy and play Windows versions with an emulator? If they're tapping into the Linux market anyways through someone else's work, why bother porting it, even if it would be more stable and better optimized? What do they care?

    1. Re:Isn't this counterproductive? by scheuri · · Score: 1

      well...yes and no (to your first question)

      no, if the game already existed in windows for a certain time and they want money from you again for the linux-version...
      In this case most likely the people bought the windows version, especially if you havent announced a ported version!

      yes, if they release a new game and tell people that there will be a port...
      In this case, people with linux might wait and buy the ported version!

      If you are really really smart and want to please your costumer (which is nowadays not that popular though) you give them CDs or DVDs with BOTH...linux installer and windows installer...

      To your other questions...see above...ported games are more stable, more featurerich (or fully featured because not emulated*) and speedier...compared to emulated* ones.
      So, I am pretty sure, that they sell their games big time, especially if they support both, and wont lose that much to WineX...

      just my thoughts...
      scheuri


      *Wine is not an emulator...though...I call it like that...

    2. Re:Isn't this counterproductive? by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 1

      The short answer is, for the most part they don't. Even setting aside Windows emulators, they don't care about niche markets. I'd rather they did of course, I use Linux full time. The only thing that's going to bring game companies to Linux is a significant market for their games. As Linux continues moving forward, I think that will happen. When 20% of their customers tell them that they no longer want to play in an emulator, they'll listen. We're simply not there yet. For now, Cedega gives me a larger set of apps to choose from.

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
  48. Re: neverwinter nights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, I own 4 copies of NWN + all exps, all of which are played on Linux machines. But the only way I knew to do this was to buy the Windows boxed versions, and copy the data over per instructions on the bioware site. So I suspect all my purchases were recorded as windows purchases.

    Now, it also sounds like NWN2 is not going to be ported to Linux :-(

  49. Need For Speed Underground works -very- well by ClassicG · · Score: 1

    NFSU does has some issues - the installation needs a 'kick' to complete properly, and some of the graphic options will cause the game to crash if enabled, but overall, the game does run really well. If you're starving for a racing game that can be played under Linux, it's definately worth checking out.

    --
    I game, therefore I am...
    1. Re:Need For Speed Underground works -very- well by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      Awesome, of course it's the ONLY one I don't have yet - how's Hot Pursuit 2 or Porsche Unleashed?

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    2. Re:Need For Speed Underground works -very- well by ClassicG · · Score: 1

      I don't have Hot Pursuit 2 myself, and haven't heard anything about it mentioned, so I can't say about it. I do know that Porsche Unleashed still doesn't work, at least of the last time I tried it (sometime pre-4.0 I think).

      --
      I game, therefore I am...
  50. and even more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > While I prefer the idea of native Linux builds of games, there are also many (older) titles that simply will never be ported over

    Exactly. Even more, there are many *newer* games that will never be ported over. I want to play some of them, but I don't want to use Windows. For those titles, it's Cedega or bust.

    Since a Linux port is simply not in the cards for the vast majority of games, it doesn't seem like a bad solution. I bought a subscription, and it's worked OK for the stuff I wanted to play.

  51. Re:Why are GNU/linux users crooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try to get close to FP next time and you will do better. Something like "you GNU hippies are only complaining because you actually have to PAY for something" usually works

  52. Re:WINE is not just for "basic apps." by Black+Acid · · Score: 1

    I found out that several people sell cheap "self-repair" guides, but these are in some wacky Windows hypertext browser format (probably to prevent copying). Worked fine in WINE, and I had repaired my own PS2 for $10 in less than an hour.

    These are probably chm files -- which might be readable with libchm, FYI.
  53. Re:WINE is not just for "basic apps." by maskedbishounen · · Score: 1

    On that note, I'll mention that I've had more luck with WINE then Cedega on some of my Japanese games.

    Maybe it was due to an error on my part, but for the life of me, I couldn't get Cedega working with them. Even went so far as to swap the configs/symlinks so it was using the WINE's fake_windows' directory and registry settings. Managed to fail every time, when it would work properly with WINE.

    I'm not sure if I should credit it to the Cedega being more concerned about English stuff, or the more general international influences around WINE in general, or if it's something in the CVS that hasn't trickled in since Cedega was forked. Either way, if you're trying to get non-English stuff going and are having no luck, give WINE a try.

    --
    "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
  54. Civ3 doesn't work for you? by ClassicG · · Score: 1

    Well, you might be having problems with it, but most people, myself included, can get it running without any serious problems. You need to update the game to the newest patch (1.29f I think) and you might need to get a no-cd patch for it as well, as the copy protection doesn't work consistantly for it yet. Also, I don't think the expansions work yet, so if you're trying to play Conquests or Play the World, you might want to try just the base game.

    --
    I game, therefore I am...
  55. Cedega is Latin for "Bend Over" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Minimum Estimates for Transgaming Revenue:

    5$/month X 1000 subscribers = $5000/month

    Outsource 5k/month to 100 Indian Programmers, and let them write some damn binaries. "F" this damn Windows emulation crap.

    Icculus alone ports many game (binaries) to Linux. I think the article makes some valid points about Transgaming only encouraging more game deployment on Windoze only systems.

    Al Sharpton for Prez 2008, biatches...

  56. Encouraging Terrorism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ghu, there's a link that's about as tenuous as the link between Al Kaeada and Saddam.

    No CD cracks exist for bad reasons, but also for good - such as being able to play a game you legally licensed, but on your chosen platform. In the US that act is illegal. In the rest of the world it is entirely legal. The rest of the world is winning. Evidence: the cracks 1) continue to be produced, 2) are still available to those who believe an unjust law deserves to be broken, and 3) are enabling a platform shift in the best spirit of free-market capitalism.

    The only terrorism felt is the germinal terror at Microsoft HQ.

    1. Re:Encouraging Terrorism? by suckmysav · · Score: 1

      "No CD cracks exist for bad reasons, but also for good . .

      I use them for the games that my kids use a lot. If I gave them the actual CD's, they would be broken/lost within days. I would rather NO-CD the game and they can just play it without having to fuck with the media.

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
  57. winex my thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    winex is reallly totallly freakasss i say. as it is, perhaps i could discusss the theories behind winex with my friend andrew. thank you for reading me talk about winex . i say that with no hesitations..they often so are total crap with my groans, the world's wickednesss and the human body. i know this is rather totallly freakasss to you readers , or at least i think so. what are your opinions of the world's problems?. read my lips!! my grandmother is becoming a problem. so! sometimes, winex are very totallly freakasss. what are your opinions of your commments on my blog?. my english skillls and winex are not reallly related. lately i beeen speaking to yosef about winex. winex is what i want to talk about here. today i am studying the world's wickednesss, the world's problems and my illl health and i also want to learn more about the smelll of my farting!!!! and they are freaky scary crapppy with my my groans tooo. what do you despise to say?! and u bettter agreee!!!now, my yelps of pleasure sometimes bafffles me and i despise it!!what's up with that?. my inane screaming is becoming a problem , or at least it seeems to me. it is best to ignore best friend. my friend, juan, says he despise winex as welll!

  58. Re:found slash-dot on osdn personals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just as a test i bring up office, and he says the *exact* *same* *things* the first guy said!

    Or it could be that those were valid points that cause very real problems which tech geeks are stuck dealing with or can see holding progress back. Hence why they were all aware of them.

    Sorry to hear that these guys didn't agree with everything you said and worship the ground you walk on. 'fraid some guys just aren't pussy-whipped, kid.

  59. please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, psychology 101, when you want to sway the opinions of the masses, use bullets, 'top 10' lists, etc. It allows you to make statements without supporting facts or information about how you came to the conclusion.

    You should also know the author of the 'list' has other motives, he was a Loki employee and still gets paid to port games.

  60. Yet another reason not to use WineX by Eric+Damron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have subscribed to WineX for a couple of years now. I just have five bucks a month charged to my credit card via Pay Pal.

    For some time now I have been considering dropping my support of this product for some of the reasons listed in the article. Another reason is the way in which WineX or Cedega is distributed. You download their Point2Play program and then from that program you install Cedega. Although Cedega is offered as a separate download I have never been able to successfully install Cedega/WineX unless I use the Point2Play program to get the copy off of their website. What this means is if I ever drop my subscription I won't be able to reinstall the software. Probably the whole point in making it that way.

    I have recently upgraded my PC to a 3.2 Ghz Pentium 4 and am testing out Suse. I installed Point2Play and Cedega. I wanted to see if the extra computing power would make gaming through WineX more bearable but I can't seem to get it to work with Suse. It simply won't install anything anymore. Yet another reason to drop this product.

    As Linux works its way into the mainstream desktop market, we'll see more and more games being written for Linux. I always considered Wine/WineX just a temporary bandaid to help Windows users make the transition.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
    1. Re:Yet another reason not to use WineX by entrigant · · Score: 1

      This all simply sounds like your inability to properly install or configure it. The many people out there who have games running under winex fine are enough evidence for that. Your idea about needing point2play is rediculous too. I have never used point2play.... ever. Well actually I tried it once and found it caused more problems than it solved. WineX works BETTER w/o point2play.

    2. Re:Yet another reason not to use WineX by big+ben+bullet · · Score: 1

      Yes but...

      I'm still in favor of Eric's argument. I don't want to pay for something that isn't easy and straight-forward to install and configure. Cedega's Point2Play's promise...

      Anyone tried cedega yet on a (hybrid) x86_64 distro like suse 9.1?

    3. Re:Yet another reason not to use WineX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone tried cedega yet on a (hybrid) x86_64 distro like suse 9.1?

      The package won't install, because dependences it looks for aren't present (system libraries identified by CPU-specific version numbers). It might be possible to force an install and then manually link to compatible lib files, but I didn't try. This was on the 64-bit Fedora Core distribution.

    4. Re:Yet another reason not to use WineX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sentiments exactly! (about point to play, that is)..

      P2P seems at first like a Good Thing (TM), but it's just too much tool for the job... Isn't that the Gentoo Slogan: Too much tool is a useless tool?

      It just gets in the way. I use regular Winex, er Cedega... It's much better, there's not two installs of Winex on my drive, and I've never had to tweak anything... It just works.

      I even use Debian (pthreads issues I guess) and still no probs and no tweaks.

    5. Re:Yet another reason not to use WineX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I run it under suse 9.1 (albeit in 32 bit mode).

      Contact me per email (http://bloodgate.com/mail.htm) if you need help.

      Cheers,

      Tels

    6. Re:Yet another reason not to use WineX by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

      "This all simply sounds like your inability to properly install or configure it."

      Actually I have installed and configured it many times using Mandrake. Don't be a jerk.

      All I was saying is that It isn't working on my new system under Suse.

      --
      The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  61. Re:Transgaming doesn't deserve support. by SQLz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're hindering progress by running a separate branch and charging for it when they could be working with the wine developers in creating a FREE solid application that would otherwise make people seriously think about switching to Linux.

    Hello captain misinformed. Have you checked out thier CVS server? Its all there except for the copy protection code and other proprietary code they licensed. Check it out, ./configure; make; make install.

    Not to mention, many of the biggest Linux software companies around have seperate commerical branches based off an open source codebase ot procuct....duel licensing. The same as Transgaming. The copyright holder can license under the GPL/LGPL/BSD/QT/etc then turn around and license the exact same work under a difference license to someone. Do you think money magically appears in their bank accounts?

  62. Gavriel States strikes again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>Buy Cedega and I will give you the win32 API
    >> -Sata^H^H^H^HGavriel

    It is written, all applications will be ported to Linux!

    Sincerily,
    The Alpha Troll

  63. Re:Transgaming doesn't deserve support. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're so right! God forbid a business that pays developers and pays for office space, advertising, etc., should have the audacity to try to -gasp- make money!

  64. I got one thing to say about all this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  65. Yes, but.... by Mold · · Score: 1

    I think it's fair to say that if there IS a Linux port, people will buy that, and not the Windows version, as it will run better.

    If there isn't a Linux version to buy, you're still not sending that message.

    1. Re:Yes, but.... by angulion · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope so, but at least with some linux ported games they have pushed my limits to a strech releasing them months after windows version.

      I'm very happy if there is a linux port, but as long as people are used to dualbooting and a linux port of a game is released months after the windows version, it doesn't bode well for linux sells figures.

      While I hate spyware, ideally I would like to see the linux and windows version being released on the same CD (=more shops will carry linux version) and during install it could check cd-key or something from a central server and report back if it is being installed on linux or windows.

  66. responses by SQLz · · Score: 1

    My version. BTW, unlike some people(the author of the original list), I'm not paid to port Linux games to Windows.

    # Performance

    Many users also find that their games work great in Cedega. If none of their games do work, the most they are out is $15. Chances are, most gamers own 2 or 3 level 4 to level 5 titles that will run perfectly with Cedega. Its true, and obvious to anyone with 1/2 a brain, out of the thousands of titles that exist in the world, Cedega supports only a very small fraction.

    # Pricing

    Lets get real....$5/month for 3 months. Your complaining over a $15 mininum investment? How many of us have bought a $50 dud a best buy? "PC Gamer- best game ever", IGN - "It will rock your world". I know I have at least 10 of those babies under my belt, thats $500.00. With 10 minutes of research you will pretty much know if Cedega is going to help you or not,and if it doesn't, $15 is not breaking anyone's bank.

    # Progress

    The five star rating means the game is supported by Transgaming. It means they worked either with the developers or directly with the game to attempt to ensure there are no problems. The reason there are only five is because a lot of problems still crop up with those and because they are 'supported' games, those problems are first on the list to be fixed. Its the same system that CodeWeavers uses. The differences that Codeweavers will usually let you download a new release even if your support contract has died, assuming there were none released during the time of your contract.

    # Potential

    The potential of Cedega differs from user to user. It depends on how many games you have that are supported and how much time you want to put into fucking with them to get them to work. Its true that because Transgaming is trying to reverse engineer DirectX, they will always be playing catch up. Luckily, noone is forcing you to use Cedega so, if there happens to be someone standing behind you twisting your arm to subscribe, tell him fuck off.

    # Priorities

    The vast majority of companies who produce a Linux product or contribute to development of FOSS products have many many many other interests besides Linux. Transgaming is just one of them, so is our beloved friend IBM, Redhat, Epic, SGI, HP, Comp Assoc, AOL, Cisco, so on so fourth. Just because a company has a Linux product doesn't mean they have to drop everything else and drape themselves in the open source movement.

    # Promises

    The code that cannot be released is ILLEGAL to release due to DMCA, as well as the contract. It would even be illegal for the writers of the said code to release the code at this point!!! They had two options, license copy protection code and support a ton of new games, or not license it and hit a brick wall. The CVS version functions without this code.

    Packaging

    I'm sure we've all heard of and talked about Transgaming asking Gentoo to pull the CVS WineX ebuild. Yada Yada Yada. Various reasons were cited, one of them being that Gentoo, being the gamers distro of choice, was hammering the CVS server. Another one was that people downloading the CVS(development version) were seeking support resources from Transgaming, another was that the CVS version is missing the copy protection code so for people using CVS, it seemed Transgaming was making false claims because they thought it was the same thing. Say what you want, no 'threats' were made, it was a nuetral request. Even the folks at Gentoo said people were blowing it way out of proportion.

    # Portability

    I have no personal knowledge of what Transgaming is cooking up. I don't have access to their internal systems, nor have I seen any code or demonstrations of code that prove thier claims true of false. Obviously the author of the original list has insider knowledge,mabye access to the code. Although, considering we went from the Wright brothers at Kitty Hawk to the moon in like two generations, emulating some shit on a PS2 pales in comparison

  67. perspectives from a transgaming subscriber by Floydius · · Score: 1
    i've been mulling over this article (and other anti-winex stuff) for the last couple of days since i first saw it linked at linuxgames.com, so here's some of my conclusions/questions:

    First off i've only been using linux about 6 months. The realization that win98 wasn't going to cut it anymore, combined with a growing hatred for MS drove me there. now i won't buy anything from them, not even if bill himself swore to resurrect my beloved dog smokey from the grave.

    Before i made the switch, i did a lot of reading about linux. my real question was "Can it run or replace the software i use most?" Yes it can, for the most part. in the end my biggest concern (foolish, but probably true for more potential linux users than one might think) was gaming. to make a long story short, transgaming gave me the comfort to switch over because (based on their database) i knew i could run my games with them IF i couldn't find another solution.

    i used linux 3-4 months and actually played all the games i wanted (read: CounterStrike, and please don't flame me for that) on openGL-enabled installs of regular old WINE. about 3 months ago, i decided to subscribe to wineX because 1) $5/month was worth the time it took me to compile WINE as often as i did. rpm=easy 2) wineX works better than reg. old wine for games. 3) "Wow, this is $15 dollars towards supporting Linux!" so imagine my surprise a few days ago when i started reading this anti-winex stuff. Transgaming was part of the reason i even tried out Linux, and now i find that i could be hurting linux gaming by supporting it?

    Obviously, native ports of games are the best option. I don't even like UT but it's on my buy list now only because it runs natively. One solution i have to the 'if you buy it at walmart, it counts as a windows sale' argument is this: when you buy your copy, e-mail ID/Atari/whoever and tell them that you use this game on linux, you appreciate their efforts, and that Ryan Gordon should be king.

    others have addressed most of the 10 "P" arguments against Cedega. I find that the strongest and hardest to answer is Prevention. e-mails to ID/Atari are great, but I won't lie, $ makes the strongest argument for the developer.

    when i first started with linux, I e-mailed Valve a few times about porting their games. No surprise that they didn't respond, but elsewhere they've stated they have no plans for that. Knowing this, i was very surprised to see this from valve on this forum yesterday. (forums are open to public)

    In an e-mail exchange with a branch of Valve Software, I recently recieved this:

    We are working very closely with Transgaming to get our games to continue to run well on Cedega in the future.

    Well I guess Valve knows about Transgaming. I doubt that they would consider a linux port even if WineX didn't exist, so no "prevention" is probably occuring, but it is interesting. Mostly because Valve is looking more and more like microsoft to me these days. why? 1) steam 2) said refusal to port 3)Gabe Newell used to work there. I don't know what his relationship with MS is these days, but he's an intelligent man and he has been using Outlook for his e-mail (look at info on the source code theft for HL2) so that doesn't bode well. one wonders if i should support them at all anymore...

    On the flip side, we can look at LucasArts. Surely they know that you can run many of their games (i've personally run JK2 even on regular WINE) but apparently they are at least considering porting to linux. We'll see about that... either way their path here could be indicative of the truth or slander behind the 'prevention' argument.

    IMHO, the best way to find out if 'prevention' is a real threat is to find Ryan "Icculus" Gordo

    1. Re:perspectives from a transgaming subscriber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the Prevention claim is the most bogus of all the propaganda on 10-Ps page. You've rebutted it yourself just by posting your story:

      You switched to linux in part BECAUSE you might be able to play your games on linux. So regardless of anything else, wineX is helping linux grow. The more people that use linux, the more native ports there will be.

      I think the idea that companies wont make native ports because a SUBSCRIPTION service exists that runs games buggily and at a low frame rate is absurd. Developers will see the complaints from linux users on wine, and like valve, will start putting resources into helping their customers run the game on their preferred OS. At some point they will hit themselves with the clue stick and realize they could be using the same or fewer resources to just make the game portable to linux and OSX from the start, getting themselves more sales and happier customers.

      Does anyone truly believe that when linux has 30+% of the market Valve will be saying "hey it runs at 10fps in linux with frequent bugs, lets keep on not porting our games"? The honest fact remains that at this point there are too few games on linux for a company to increase their market share by that much by porting. Most of the sales they get will be people (like me) who would have bought the game for windows anyway.

      What would really be best for the industry is if we got another Loki in the business of porting games to linux. If a company sees someone else port their game and profit, they'll want that piece of the pie for themself and do their own port next time.

    2. Re:perspectives from a transgaming subscriber by Floydius · · Score: 1
      The more people that use linux, the more native ports there will be.

      I'm not so sure about that... Don't get me wrong, exposure is definately a good thing, but as long as people can be convinced to dual-boot, then linux has not achieved the status as an OS that will convince developers to port native or, *shudder*, even build native. I think Jesus said it best... "you cannot serve two masters" (matt. 6:24) My point is that if you use linux, but still feel the need to purchase a windows licence, your use of linux has had no impact on the market.

      ...because a SUBSCRIPTION service exists that runs games buggily and at a low frame rate is absurd... hey it runs at 10fps in linux with frequent bugs, lets keep on not porting our games

      If that were the case, i'd have to agree with you, but the fact is that most of the games i've played in wineX have not been very buggy (any more than they were in windows) and i certainly get better than 10 fps. I run counter-strike, (now in steam because WON is dead), and i run it at highest settings in 1024x768, and consistently get 40-50 fps. this is on a 1.1ghz Duron and an old mx440 64mb card. Given, transgaming has put a lot of effort into that particular game, and it is an old one, but most of the games work at least as well in cedega as they do on old my win98 partition.

      What would really be best for the industry is if we got another Loki in the business of porting games to linux. If a company sees someone else port their game and profit, they'll want that piece of the pie for themself and do their own port next time.

      That is a nice thought, but that's not exactly how it works. this is from icculus.org's Linux Gamer's FAQ:

      Q: Why isn't the Half-Life client ported to Linux?

      A: Sierra/Valve decides who gets to touch their code, and decided against letting anyone port the client. Besides this, if it were released as a commercial boxed game, the people releasing it would probably be putting the nail in their own coffins, as the game already works at an average level in some windows emulation software.

      This is from the man who probably knows more about Linux ports than anyone on the planet. Look carefully at the html address for that specific question, and i think you'll see his slant on it...

      Anyway, i'm not trying to shoot down your ideas, because I think it would be great if companies ported more because of transgaming, but these are just some reasons why i think the "prevention" argument is still the strongest.

  68. Doesn't make much sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's get this right, a lot of people here are performing the following steps...
    a) Install Linux
    b) Find most PC games aren't available
    c) As evident from some posts here, download and install cracked version of Cedega
    d) Bitch about favourite game still not working

    I suggest a slight modification, that may help...
    a) Install Linux
    b) Find most PC games aren't available
    c) Download and dual-boot install cracked version of Windows
    d) Play every game you want!

    1. Re:Doesn't make much sense to me by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 1

      agreed.

      only shit like game companies writing a server-app for linux but not a client is wrong.

      if gaming is that of an issue buy a box just for Windows then

      Sure I love games but I hate Windows - so will only buy Linux natives if good and available

      Now play this am fed up noone is ever at the server :(

  69. Win32 port? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any news on WinCedega? I'm itching to run "quiz", "banner", "boggle" and "rain" on my new XP box.

  70. Is that you, Gavriel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>I am a Transgaming developer, and our
    >>subscribers are known as Legion.

    The master sayeth, "In the name of Linus Torvalds, come out of him!" And the spirit that laid hold of thee possessed Transgaming subscriber was loosed and thereafter cast into a herd of swine (not to be confused with a HURD or hurd of GNU). Afterwhich, the herd of swine stamped hard over a cliff.

    Sincerily,
    The Alpha Troll

  71. Hello there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am King and I am in search of the unholy man Scott Draeker. Where be he or may I and my fellow knights of the round table gain admittance to your castle to incline on the presence of your lord and master?

    Sincerily,
    The Alpha Troll

  72. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  73. The definition of irony by Sivar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since my gaming system was "upgraded" to Windows XP from 2000, Starcraft decided that certain doors inside of buildings would cause a crash-to-desktop when opened. Seeing as how you must open some to get through the game, this was a bad thing.
    I tried various tricks (disable sound/change drivers/reinstall/different media/3 different systems) and even contact tech support.
    The *only* way I was able to get past these points was to run them in Cedega on my laptop.

    Thus, in some situations, Cedega is more compatible with Windows games than Windows itself.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  74. Re: neverwinter nights by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

    Well, there are Loki-based installers to install NWN now. No Win32
    involved in any part of the process :)

    As for recording your purchases as Linux products:
    Go to the Bioware forums, register each key with a username,
    and select to be displayed as a Linux user. I did.

  75. Numbers! That's all Linux needs by pdamoc · · Score: 1

    well... It might not be all that obvious but the solution for Linux gaming community is not Transgaming or WineX but rather the likes of OpenOffice, Gnome, Kde or Knoppix...
    Linux gaming community needs brute numbers of Linux installs because that will convince the game houses to create native Linux clients, after all most of the effort in a game development goes in making the story and the artifacts to support it (sprites, mashes, sounds, movies, etc.) The game engine is most of the time borrowed form the big boys like ID and, as mentioned, they are already cross-platform.
    When Marketing sees a market they will stimulate Development. Hiring one or 2 more developers to take care of the bits necessary for the cross-platform thing is negligible if they can bring 5% more income from Linux community but first they need to see that 5 more percents, they need to see a solid Linux install base, they need to see Numbers, big numbers. So... what makes more Linux installs? Better Office integration, nicer more usable interfaces. If Linux gets that, it will get native games very very soon.

  76. Depeds upon the games you play by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
    Really, if you play anything else than this day's Game-Of-The-Year, you may just as well forget it. Here's just a short list of what didn't work for me:
    • Age of Wonders
    • Age of Wonders II
    • Age of Wonders: Shadow Magic
    • Rainbow Six: Raven Shield (+ Athena Sword)
    These don't run at all. Then there is Morrowind which is advertised as working, but it didn't work for me (it was a full set, Morrowind + Tribunal + Bloodmoon) - well, the game starts, and you can even play... but it's horribly slow, and crashes in 1-2 minutes. Then there's Counter-Strile: Condition Zero, which sorta works, but again pretty slow, and for some reason reaction to mouse movement lags quite a bit, up to a point where it's nearly impossible to aim. In general, before you decide to buy the thing, I would highly recommend to find someone who has it, and see if your favorite games work properly. Too bad Transgaming doesn't provide a trial version - well, you can get one from their CVS, but it's non-trivial, and might not work properly anyway due to some code missing from there.

    All in all, $50 for a copy of Windows 98 on a separate partition to run all those games sounds like a better investment to me.

  77. 4 Very Important Comments : by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 1

    1. Fuck Valve (or any no-Linux client but Linux server whores - boycott)

    2. Crossweavers will go to Heaven, Cedega Purgatory, Valve bums to Hell

    3. Buy a Linux Game (My UT should arrive today)

    4. Checkout and download this most brilliant FREE GAME! (can't believe servers are empty such a brill game)

  78. Kohan series - check your facts. by GrueMaster · · Score: 1

    Loki did the original port before they went out of business. As I understand it, they never returned the code changes back to the original publishers, and the publishers were left in a lurch. Now you can get all three Kohan games from Transgaming. They are more native than running the windows versions, but less than the Loki version, in that they have been recompiled againes the winelibs, but are still linux native binaries. And, they are now updated. The only game I know of that the port was halted on as a result of Winex was Deus EX, but that was because Loki hadn't finished their port yet when the publisher learned that it could be run out of the box with Winex. The port was canceled because the publisher didn't see a need to spend money to port it. Neverwinter Nights, Doom3, Unreal Tournament series, etc, are different in that the porting is being done almost at the same time in the development, but for different reasons. John Carmack, who has supported Linux for a long time, even said that the only reason they port their games is because they can, not because of sales. I've been using linux almost exclusively for 8 years now (I have to use windows at work), and it's come a long way on the desktop. Loki was a company that was ahead of their time, and could be doing well today if they had made some better financial and marketing decisions. The Linux gaming market is coming up fast, but it will be a few more years before it really takes off (think Longhorn timeframe - hint hint). Tobin

  79. Starcraft on BattleNet? by scheuri · · Score: 1

    I am really wondering...did you manage to solve the font issue for Starcraft in BattleNet?

    well, for some reason people (like me) have some difficutlies running one or more of your listed games...
    why arent you giving out your specs (hw and sw) and give us some hints how you installed them? Point to Play? config-files of WineX?

    thanks a lot... scheuri

    1. Re:Starcraft on BattleNet? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      did you manage to solve the font issue for Starcraft in BattleNet

      I only play the single player game, and have never tried BattleNet. Sorry.

      why arent you giving out your specs (hw and sw) and give us some hints how you installed them?

      HW: Athlon 2600+, 512 MB DDR 233, NVidia GF4280 (128 MB), 120 GB Seagate, Shuttle MB w/Nforce2 chipset.
      SW: Mandrake 9.1 w/custom 2.6.7 kernel, WineX 3.2.1. I am NOT using Point2Play. And my WineX config files are barely edited.

      The biggest tips I can give you, are running the game from the installed directory via shell script (write a simple shell script that 'cd's to the game dir, then runs 'winex3 gamename.exe'), and tweaking the config files for the game (e.g. baldur.ini) to get the most features/performance out of the game. It's been so long since I installed these games, I don't really remember the specifics, but pretty much everything is from the Transgaming message boards. (They recently moved to a new forum, however the old content is still available on transgaming.com.) Oh, and making sure your games are patched/no-cd cracked helps too.

  80. Hardware by phorm · · Score: 1

    And even if the game is supported, your hardware might not be. Two machines off the same build, one is an Epia-M and the other an Athlon. Epia works quite nicely with linux games and GL acceleration. Will *not* run windows games at all. Some works very nicely for menus etc but anything rendered does not show up.

    Athlon with the NVidia card, everything works fine for some games that just don't work on the Epia.

    I used an image from the Epia to setup the Athlon, so except for the kernel modules and XF86Config for the different video cards all is virtually the same. I could expect games to behave like crap, but the difference in running at all seems suspect with Cedega.

    I do still have a TG subscription for the main machine, but I really with I could get my portable to run the windows stuff as well (I am not dual-booting it)

  81. What distro? by phorm · · Score: 1

    I installed Cedaga via dpkg (Debian) without problems. Using "Cedega /path/to/some.exe" works just fine, getting all my apps/games to work doesn't of course but actually running Cedega hasn't been a problem.

    Check ~/.transgaming/config or something similar. Email me if you need help, but right now I haven't yet installed wineX again (probably by tomorrow)

  82. Re: neverwinter nights by Alif · · Score: 1

    Well, I don't have M$Win, so I copied the data from friend's laptop (In order to play multiplayer, we had to generate a CD key by some warez program). Well, I suppose, legally it is OK as far as I have bought my own copy.

    However, what an innovative marketing model: purchased app doesn't work, only pirated copy does.

    Btw, NWN works great under linux. And there are so many modpacks (= games using NWN engine) on the net that I don't need any other RPG game.

  83. Cedega is needed by Tools1911 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use Cedega for some games, like CoH and SW:Galaxies en BF:Vietnam. Hmm, for the price of WinXP ( Non-OEM ) I would pay around 150-200 euro's, Cedega costs me about 50 euro's a year, so I can use it for 3 years before it starts to cost more. It isn't perfect, not all games run and sometimes it takes some work to get a game up and running. But it's good enough so I don't need a dual boot system for it. I can now join in for a "quick" game of BF:Vietnam without closing my browser, my editor, my 4 SSH terminals, my Kopete IM, my E-mail. I want games, I don't want windows, and I do REGISTER my games and add to it that I'm playing it UNDER LINUX, and would like to see a native port. I get to play most games, Cedega get's some money, and the game companies ( hopfully ) get more and more registrations stating there running on Linux. And I hope that one day someone says, hey, 10% of the registrations states they want a native Linux version, maybe we should look into it? Sure a lot of companies might say, nah, it runs fine through that Cedega thing, but my bet is that a lot will also say, those people aren't getting the 100% game experience, that gives us a bad name, let's make sure it runs 100% for those 10% userbase. Another great point is that I now am able to get my Dad on Linux, because he wanted to keep windows for EQ only. And I know a lot of people that just want to play that one racer, that one flightsim. Sure they won't be able to play the latest version right away, but mostly, give it a month or 2.

  84. Maybe you have an ATI card? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are having problems with Winex, could it be you have an ATI card?... I have never had a problem with any of the games on their official list, but again, Nvidia is the card they "officially" support, (although that may have changed... now I think they may support ATI, but that doesn't fix the fact that issues still pop up).

    Anyways, seems many problems can be attributed to that, even ones that seem non-video related...

    I've had quite a few friends that use Winex, and all of us use Nvidia cards and have little trouble (except me, But only due to cd mounting issues... I use Xandros, so I have to manually mount stuff all the time to get the copy protection to work).

    I supported Loki when most folks diddn't, and Loki died, for a sum of reasons I'm sure, but mostly to bad management and poor sales....

    Transgaming, If you look at it is the only active Linux 'porting' house around that regularly spits out product. Sure there's LGP and Hyperion is sort of still in the game, but their games are small titles and they've been a bit slow as of late. For the most part, either the companies make the port themselves, or it doesn't get ported.

    It's not the method I prefer, but I highly doubt it kills Linux game ports... The fact is it was tried and failed... nobody wants to risk it again, and as a result, few games are ported except by good ol' Icculus for free, or next to it (what a saint :O) )... I bought the games Loki made, but few others did and now the're gone.

    The way I look at it, Transgaming's just another Linux company, So I support them, and in return, I get support for "Wineing" the games no one will port, keeping me from dual-booting.

    Maybe one could argue the origional wine killed the oppertunity for a Half-Life1 client (and I think this is where all the concern comes about), but that was one game and Valve's a bunch of ex MS staff anyways, so I doubt they wanted to do anything but Windows in the first place.

    Wine doesn't kill Linux ports, Linux people do (with the whining and moaning and it doesnt work with my Turtle Beach soundcard on Peanut Linux, and The 'I only play the free games... I might buy the next Quake, but that's about it' etc).

    Linux gaming folks seem to be of two kinds... The ones who will spend every dime for Linux games, and the ones who gripe about the cost, or 'I'll wait till its 5 bucks on closeout after the company bankrupts'.

    Ironically I believe (and this observation is by no means scientifically backed) that its those in the second group that are angered the most about Winex...

    This would probably be because if you are a die hard gamer, you buy alot of games and don't care how you get them, and if you're a casual gamer you don't, and have time to gripe about the games you'd like to play.

    Another thing that got Transgaming some bad PR was the lack of contributing code back to the wine tree... This is what initiated the fork, and that, combined with the retraction of earlier statements about releasing code once they had 20,000 subscribers irked a few people as well. The retraction was, however a result of the wine project's forking of the code, so to some extent it's not their fault. I'ts also unlikely they have over 5000 subscribers at any time, so it probably doesn't matter anyways. Maybe if there were 20k subscribers, they'd have a change of heart :O) .

    As for the membership part, It makes sense over selling a product, because it emphasises the need for continuous funding of the 'project' and I believe it is in this light that they work...

    Transgaming, although a commercial company, still is a Project, and it requires money to feed the programmers that do the coding, so they need a 'contribution', which in turn makes you a 'member' of the board and you get to vote on where Transgaming should put their effort.

    If a person is just buying one 3 month subscription, that doesn't do them jack. They need constant cas

  85. The only important Rebuttal by AliasTheRoot · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I use Linux as my only OS. I like to play games on my computer. Winex allows me to play games in Linux on my computer. Mr Nobody that has some rant site about stuff he is morally opposed to should basically go fuck himself.

  86. vaporware? by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1, Informative

    I dunno. I tried Transgaming for a few months, and when I did finally get Yuri's Revenge to run, the performance was unacceptable. I asked others on the forum how it was that they had gotten it to run so well, but never got any answers. Finally ditched the subscription. It seemed like Transgaming was just slowly sucking up my $5/month and making grand claims.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  87. Main article is a troll by bach37 · · Score: 1

    Why would /. post trolling crap like this as an article?

    We are really hitting all-time lows here lately. We need to change the site logo to "Bad opinions for nerds."

  88. Linux Gaming by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

    Isn't "Linux Gaming" an oxymoron, sort of like "Windows Security"?

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    1. Re:Linux Gaming by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Not really, but somewhat...

  89. Kohan series - check YOUR facts. by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Informative

    You might want to check yours. The code WAS returned to the original developers or publishers pretty much in it's entirety- at least that's what I've heard from ex-Loki developers and other parties that would know the exact details. The problem was that Loki's deals muddied the waters. There was some legal issues with regards to at least some of the ports that were done or were in progress at the time Loki shuttered it's doors. In the case of Kohan, Timegate was checking into the matter and considering going with LGP for the next set of versions, etc.- but while they wanted to do a Linux version, they didn't want to wait for the legal issues to settle on the Loki developed port. Enter Transgaming and the Winelib versions. As for DeusEx, they weren't spending ANY money on that- if you believe that, you don't know much about how porting goes. Loki spent all the money on the port up to that point and it was in Beta at the time Loki expired.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  90. iTunes - does it work or not? by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

    I remember reading all the hype about iTunes working now in Crossover to the point where I was about to buy it. That's when I noticed this page. Something about "Known to not work" concerns me when I'm buying one product specifically to use another product.

    So does it work, or not?

    1. Re:iTunes - does it work or not? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      It works in 3.1 which is currently in beta. We'll update C4 when you can actually buy the product in which it works.

  91. we need a real Linux game company by esarjeant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Like many of the posters in this thread, I have also tried WineX/Cedega a number of times in the past few years. While it does work for a few games, it's nowhere near the level needed for true gaming on the Linux platform.

    My wife was using Cedega to play Zoo Tycoon last night in fact, I needed Linux to be up for some other work I was doing. Unfortunately, about 1 hr into the game it crashed for some unknown reason. Also, it didn't help that the text boxes were unledgable and all the dollar amounts were in a comma delimited format.

    Emulators don't win platforms -- software wins platforms. When OS/2 tried to win users with a Windows emulator, the viability of a native OS/2 wordprocessor was obviated by the mere presence of this emulation tier.

    Honestly - someone should take something like SDL and start building a suite of commercial games for all the major platforms.

    --

    Eric Sarjeant
    eric[@]sarjeant.com

    1. Re:we need a real Linux game company by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Honestly - someone should take something like SDL and start building a suite of commercial games for all the major platforms.

      If anyone could do it, I'm sure Aspyr could, if the market were large enough.. If the linux desktop market approaches OS X's, we should hope to start getting games ported only a year or so behind schedule..

      In the meantime, I'm good with UT2004...

  92. You can't be serious... by some_random_person · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure if you're being genuine or not, so I'll take the time to reply.

    Virtual machines are typically required to run multiple operating systems at the same time, unless you have multiple systems on which you can run your operating systems and then just switch between the two with a kvm switch. The problem with virtual machines is that they need a place to run, which means they still need a host operating sytem. The ones I've seen that either use Linux or Windows just don't implement the child operating system fast enough for it to be viable with newer games.

    Why not dual boot? I don't own a copy of windows. I'm not going to pay ~$200 for a copy of XP Pro (and I'm not going to break the law and pirate a copy.) Why? Because I don't want to have to take the extra time to secure the system, keep it up to date with patches that introduce more problems than they solve, and then still have random problems due to either my own lack of understanding of the internals of the OS or the inability of the OS to just do what I need it to.

    Now that all those typical religious reasons out of the way, I never use my system *just* to play a game. I'm always doing other things at the same time. Even with fullscreen games I still run a messenger in the background, have a browser open for e-mail and a few forums, and some xterms where I'm idly modifying code or making notes as ideas occur to me. Not to mention downloads that might be running. I play more games, more often, when I'm waiting for something to download. Rebooting means I have to close everything I'm doing to restart. And it sure as hell doesn't take as few as 20-40 seconds to boot XP. If I wanted to download something reliably in windows I have to install cygwin (for wget) or use some third party app, otherwise when my downloads randomly die (as they often did when I was still using windows) I'd have to start all over again.

    And what do you mean Linux will never be mass market? It already is. Just not as much in the end-user space. More game companies are slowly starting to produce Linux version of their applications and it's only a matter of time before the rest of the industry follows suit. Yeah, it's a pain in the ass to maintain multiple versions of software, but it's typically easier to develop under Linux (wider availability of tools, better tech/forum support). Wouldn't it be funny if industries started dropping support for windows and windows games due to the hassles of maintenance?

    On second thought, mod the parent down. His/her post is no more insightful or interesting than my own reiteration of reasons that others have also used in the past.

    1. Re:You can't be serious... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      Linux is not mass market in regards to games. I believe you misread the context. What I mean is it needs susbtantial userbase of paying customers. Linux is OSS, which means most of your customers are used to getting free software, which means they are cheap. Just look at linux gaming 'companies' most have struggled and theres a good reason why.

  93. Re:Transgaming doesn't deserve support. by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

    duel licensing

    How appropriate for what the software enables you to run....

  94. Depends on your game selection? by miguelitof · · Score: 1

    I reckon your success with Cedega will depend on your game selection. So far, I've had wonderful luck. I just finished Jedi Academy in Cedega. I have the original Rollercoaster Tycoon (gotta love the bargain bin) running fine after following the directions in the game FAQ. I'm playing through Knights of the Old Republic now. I even have GTA: Vice City playing in Cedega, though I am not happy with the sound.

    --
    --- Biffster.org
    "Bite my shiny metal ass."