So leave the incompatible marriage first? Not only is it the morally responsible thing to do, but it's also the most legally responsible thing to do (to minimize damages come the divorce).
Cheating is always bad, if for no other reason than it is a betrayal of the vows you made when you get married. The very least you can do in a broken relationship is to end the marriage first before moving on to others.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
The first amendment is about protecting people from government action which aims to prevent them from speaking freely. It says nothing about the socioeconomic consequences of doing so. It can and should be expected that going on record with a controversial viewpoint is going to net you the disapproval of some segment of the population, including (but not limited to) friends, family, co-workers, and employers.
If you want to affect change in society through public demonstrations (of which petitions are a subset), grow a backbone.
On a related note, if they were in business to make a quality operating system, they would have a tough time selling "upgrades."
That's not entirely true. Even in a theoretically 100% bug- and security hole-free OS, there is always room for updates. These updates could include things like support for new hardware (e.g. adding touchscreen support) or adding new features (e.g. multiple desktops).
At the very least, it should be much simpler to search through existing patents/trademarks and avoid the legal landmines as well as find prior art more efficiently when applying for/challenging a patent/trademark.
Except that anyone who has been around kids realizes that giving a child what it wants whenever it decides to throw a fit is only setting themselves up for a child that constantly throws fits. These interest groups are no different.
The FCC rolls over whenever they throw a big stink over something that offends them, so they throw fits all the time with the expectation that they will always get what they want. And it works.
No one suggested that MPEG_LA was the devil. We merely assert that should the MPEG_LA group and the devil enter into negotiations, no translator would be required.
I will never fully understand US standards (despite living here all my life). We show gruesome films like Hostel nearly/completely unedited, but if a single exposed breast is shown, the FCC flips out. Yet, sex is a natural and accepted aspect of human life, while the wanton torture and slaughter of others is (in some states) a capital offense. If some measure of censorship is unavoidable, one would hope we would at least get our priorities straight.
My understanding of that last line is that game companies would simply stop rating games, not that they would stop selling them. The loophole in the bill is that the game companies cannot be held liable for unrated games.
Sierra released the full game for free to coincide with the third game in the series - Tribes:Vengeance. There aren't many servers up any longer, and you'll need to track down the patches for it to play.
Then you get a supreme being that is intentionally trying to make its existence seem unlikely or absurd, but still punishes you for all eternity if you do not believe in it.
Sounds like a loving deity to me.
In either case, the religious text are wrong in some respects, unless you take them metaphorically as the GP suggests.
Truthfully, the hand-holding reporting when it comes to the U.S. Government from U.S. media is less about right/left bias and more about access. To get the juicy stories out in time to "scoop" or at least keep-up with competitors, a news outlet must fall within the good graces of the government.
Sure, you can print an article outlining all the gross incompetence and criminal behavior of the current administration, but then you can kiss any hope of being invited to a presidential press conference ever again. And, when you start becoming the last news outlet to print stories about politics, your readers switch to another news station that gets the stories faster, even if the other station consistently has a pro-administration slant.
The problem with U.S. media isn't one of bias - it's one of business needs trumping journalistic integrity.
I don't know how it works in the UK, but in the USA, most companies practice "at will" employment. Here, you have little (if any) recourse for being fired, excepting special cases related to race, sex, or disability.
Does collaborating on an open standard in bad faith, adding technology to the spec, and only revealing that you hold patents on all your contributions after everyone has started heavily using it count?
You're overlooking something - trial accounts. Someone could set up multiple trial accounts and run bots on them, then funnel all the money to a main account. That's how it generally works on some of the more heavily-botted MMOs.
If I recall, a trial account cannot trade with a full account. However, it may be possible for a trial account to access the auction house. If that is so, the main account would merely have to put some trash items up for large sums of money and have the trial accounts purchase them.
No one who has an opinion worth a damn will ever look at a Liberal Arts major with a 3.8 and think it's equivalent to a 3.8 in chemical engineering.
The clerks handling academic scholarships do.
There are states that offer scholarships that require one maintains their GPA above a certain level. While the types of students who would earn an academic scholarship aren't the types that would switch to a relatively easy Liberal Arts major to maintain the scholarship, it is commonplace to see students taking LA classes to pad their grades and maintain scholarships. This incentive to take irrelevant (but easy!) classes should not exist.
Here's the problem: The people who would be doing the prosecuting are the very same people who told the guy to press the button.
We're unfortunately in a bit of a bind. The branch of government designated to enforce our laws has no regard for them, and the only other branch of government that could do something about it is too spineless and fractured by party politics to lift a finger.
The current administration is trying real hard to out-do Nixon as the most criminal Presidency in our nation's history, and if anyone were to actually do some investigation into it, we may even find that it has been a success.
We just need a brave set of 16-17 year olds to make out in front of the camera to convict the perpetrators of this program under child pornography laws.
Or 4) They say it is theirs, demonstrate that it is legal, and use it as advertising. "We can game the rules to get you more money on your investments!"
Not that many people care about ethics when presented when more money as the alternative - just look at corporations the world over who will circumvent and even break the law, calling it merely a cost of doing business.
The situation in the US is not the way you are portraying it. Foreign workers are well paid (by definition, given the kind of visa they need to enter the country) so they are not driving salaries down
Where have you been? I remember auto-lock functionality in N64's Goldeneye. There are plenty of FPS console games that at least allow it (and many default to using it).
Why raise wages, when you can convince Congress there is a desperate shortage of labor, so that you can import labor from overseas and bully your workers over wages by tying a work visa to a stick and holding it in front of them?
People need to read the statement for what it is. "There is a labor shortage [at the wage we are willing to pay]."
A government agency that had the foresight and intelligence to place their classified material only on systems that had no access to the outside world would also be one that didn't run un-patched windows boxes and could tell when they were compromised long before days, weeks, and especially months passed.
I have no such confidence that there wasn't at least a little classified data on the compromised machines, given the gross incompetence shown here by the Pentagon. Remember this is the same agency that has released PDF documents with blacked-out sections that could be revealed by cutting the text and pasting it elsewhere.
Slashdot Mirror
So leave the incompatible marriage first? Not only is it the morally responsible thing to do, but it's also the most legally responsible thing to do (to minimize damages come the divorce).
Cheating is always bad, if for no other reason than it is a betrayal of the vows you made when you get married. The very least you can do in a broken relationship is to end the marriage first before moving on to others.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
The first amendment is about protecting people from government action which aims to prevent them from speaking freely. It says nothing about the socioeconomic consequences of doing so. It can and should be expected that going on record with a controversial viewpoint is going to net you the disapproval of some segment of the population, including (but not limited to) friends, family, co-workers, and employers.
If you want to affect change in society through public demonstrations (of which petitions are a subset), grow a backbone.
On a related note, if they were in business to make a quality operating system, they would have a tough time selling "upgrades."
That's not entirely true. Even in a theoretically 100% bug- and security hole-free OS, there is always room for updates. These updates could include things like support for new hardware (e.g. adding touchscreen support) or adding new features (e.g. multiple desktops).
At the very least, it should be much simpler to search through existing patents/trademarks and avoid the legal landmines as well as find prior art more efficiently when applying for/challenging a patent/trademark.
Except that anyone who has been around kids realizes that giving a child what it wants whenever it decides to throw a fit is only setting themselves up for a child that constantly throws fits. These interest groups are no different.
The FCC rolls over whenever they throw a big stink over something that offends them, so they throw fits all the time with the expectation that they will always get what they want. And it works.
No one suggested that MPEG_LA was the devil. We merely assert that should the MPEG_LA group and the devil enter into negotiations, no translator would be required.
I think you mean homonyms.
I will never fully understand US standards (despite living here all my life). We show gruesome films like Hostel nearly/completely unedited, but if a single exposed breast is shown, the FCC flips out. Yet, sex is a natural and accepted aspect of human life, while the wanton torture and slaughter of others is (in some states) a capital offense. If some measure of censorship is unavoidable, one would hope we would at least get our priorities straight.
My understanding of that last line is that game companies would simply stop rating games, not that they would stop selling them. The loophole in the bill is that the game companies cannot be held liable for unrated games.
A quick search for "starsiege tribes download" revealed several sites with the game.
Here you go: http://www.download.com/Starsiege-Tribes-full-install/3000-7441_4-10294998.html
Sierra released the full game for free to coincide with the third game in the series - Tribes:Vengeance. There aren't many servers up any longer, and you'll need to track down the patches for it to play.
Then you get a supreme being that is intentionally trying to make its existence seem unlikely or absurd, but still punishes you for all eternity if you do not believe in it.
Sounds like a loving deity to me.
In either case, the religious text are wrong in some respects, unless you take them metaphorically as the GP suggests.
Truthfully, the hand-holding reporting when it comes to the U.S. Government from U.S. media is less about right/left bias and more about access. To get the juicy stories out in time to "scoop" or at least keep-up with competitors, a news outlet must fall within the good graces of the government.
Sure, you can print an article outlining all the gross incompetence and criminal behavior of the current administration, but then you can kiss any hope of being invited to a presidential press conference ever again. And, when you start becoming the last news outlet to print stories about politics, your readers switch to another news station that gets the stories faster, even if the other station consistently has a pro-administration slant.
The problem with U.S. media isn't one of bias - it's one of business needs trumping journalistic integrity.
I mean, apart from these sites do you know any other site that so blatantly and directly markets themselves to people breaking the law?
whitehouse.gov?
I don't know how it works in the UK, but in the USA, most companies practice "at will" employment. Here, you have little (if any) recourse for being fired, excepting special cases related to race, sex, or disability.
Does collaborating on an open standard in bad faith, adding technology to the spec, and only revealing that you hold patents on all your contributions after everyone has started heavily using it count?
In conclusion, we're all idiots.
Obviously. You should be asking her to play Mario Kart.
You're overlooking something - trial accounts. Someone could set up multiple trial accounts and run bots on them, then funnel all the money to a main account. That's how it generally works on some of the more heavily-botted MMOs.
If I recall, a trial account cannot trade with a full account. However, it may be possible for a trial account to access the auction house. If that is so, the main account would merely have to put some trash items up for large sums of money and have the trial accounts purchase them.
No one who has an opinion worth a damn will ever look at a Liberal Arts major with a 3.8 and think it's equivalent to a 3.8 in chemical engineering.
The clerks handling academic scholarships do.
There are states that offer scholarships that require one maintains their GPA above a certain level. While the types of students who would earn an academic scholarship aren't the types that would switch to a relatively easy Liberal Arts major to maintain the scholarship, it is commonplace to see students taking LA classes to pad their grades and maintain scholarships. This incentive to take irrelevant (but easy!) classes should not exist.
Here's the problem: The people who would be doing the prosecuting are the very same people who told the guy to press the button.
We're unfortunately in a bit of a bind. The branch of government designated to enforce our laws has no regard for them, and the only other branch of government that could do something about it is too spineless and fractured by party politics to lift a finger.
The current administration is trying real hard to out-do Nixon as the most criminal Presidency in our nation's history, and if anyone were to actually do some investigation into it, we may even find that it has been a success.
We just need a brave set of 16-17 year olds to make out in front of the camera to convict the perpetrators of this program under child pornography laws.
Or 4) They say it is theirs, demonstrate that it is legal, and use it as advertising. "We can game the rules to get you more money on your investments!"
Not that many people care about ethics when presented when more money as the alternative - just look at corporations the world over who will circumvent and even break the law, calling it merely a cost of doing business.
The situation in the US is not the way you are portraying it. Foreign workers are well paid (by definition, given the kind of visa they need to enter the country) so they are not driving salaries down
Except that you're wrong.
Where have you been? I remember auto-lock functionality in N64's Goldeneye. There are plenty of FPS console games that at least allow it (and many default to using it).
Why raise wages, when you can convince Congress there is a desperate shortage of labor, so that you can import labor from overseas and bully your workers over wages by tying a work visa to a stick and holding it in front of them?
People need to read the statement for what it is. "There is a labor shortage [at the wage we are willing to pay]."
A government agency that had the foresight and intelligence to place their classified material only on systems that had no access to the outside world would also be one that didn't run un-patched windows boxes and could tell when they were compromised long before days, weeks, and especially months passed.
I have no such confidence that there wasn't at least a little classified data on the compromised machines, given the gross incompetence shown here by the Pentagon. Remember this is the same agency that has released PDF documents with blacked-out sections that could be revealed by cutting the text and pasting it elsewhere.