But where can I get the source code of the plugin itself? (I mean, not the rendering engine for this plugin, but the IE plugin part that glues it to IE) Can't find it in the Google Code page.
Assuming both JPEG aren't at the lowest (or very low) quality:
1. Take image A, create 10 or 20 more copies using different levels of quality (5, 10, 15, and so on). 2. Compare each of them with image A, from lowest to highest quality. 3. Stop where the diff no longer change with the previous image, then we can assume image A is at the previous image's quality level.
That is correct, 35mm will have more resolution you ever need to transfer to 1080p.
However, I do notice when viewing older movies ( 90s) in HD, there is more noise (film grain). Perhaps back then the cameras and lenses aren't as good as they are now. HD resolution makes the picture sharper, but also the noise will be more noticeable...
Why not, if what you're paying is for full TV show episodes, or movies, all of them in 720p. Not going to be bad at all. Youtube also needs to provide a download option, or unlimited # of viewing per account.
For the love of all things binary, I thought it was common knowledge that you cannot compare rated R movies to PG-13 movies. Every single Batman & Spider-man movie has been rated below R.
Let's compared it with Sin City then. Data from imdb:
Watchmen Released: March 6, 2009 Budget: $100,000,000 (estimated)
Opening Weekend $55,214,334 (USA) (8 March 2009) (3,611 Screens) £3,243,001 (UK) (8 March 2009) (419 Screens)
Today we take the Internet for granted, but it could go down any time from over logging. We have to prevent this by using the Internet when truly necessary, and to only view Internet porn twice a day... max.
For the first and only time, something that has "leaked" to the internet has been completely and utterly removed from it. You need to be quicker next time.
You're wrong.
Google has been doing this since a couple of weeks ago with their Gmail's Undo sent mail. When you Undo a sent mail, Google will stop the internet, grab your email from its recipient, then resumes the internet!
I fully expect the first true AI To be entirely written in JavaScript...
JavaScript is obsolete and inefficient. CADIE thinks you should use INTERCAL.
DO:3 <- '"'"'"'".1$':1~#32768'"~"#1109$#1"'$':1~#128'"~#2735'$
':1~"#546$#0"'"~"#43679"'$':1~"#1365$#0"'"~"#1023$#63"'$
'"'"'".1$#0"~#34959'$':1~"#0$#1170"'"~#11007'$':1~"#0$#2925"'"~
"#2005$#255"'
Slashdot Mirror
Use advanced search or learn the syntax.
It's interesting that 4 of top 5 supercomputers are running AMD, while 402 of the Top500 are running Intel.
What's the cause of this? Value? Energy-saving? Performance?
But where can I get the source code of the plugin itself? (I mean, not the rendering engine for this plugin, but the IE plugin part that glues it to IE)
Can't find it in the Google Code page.
Follow the links on the Chromium project: http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/chrome_frame/
...and also a waste of power.
I just thought of a possible way to compare...
Assuming both JPEG aren't at the lowest (or very low) quality:
1. Take image A, create 10 or 20 more copies using different levels of quality (5, 10, 15, and so on).
2. Compare each of them with image A, from lowest to highest quality.
3. Stop where the diff no longer change with the previous image, then we can assume image A is at the previous image's quality level.
Do the same with image B.
File size may not be accurate if it has been converted multiple times at different quality, or if the source is actually lower quality.
The only way to properly compare is if you have the original as the control.
If you compare between 2 different JPEG quality images, the program won't know which parts are the artifacts. You still have to decide yourself...
You can call it a Blag if you like...
^^^ Just my 2 cents.
Sorry, but you need 13 cents (USD) to help~
That is correct, 35mm will have more resolution you ever need to transfer to 1080p.
However, I do notice when viewing older movies ( 90s) in HD, there is more noise (film grain). Perhaps back then the cameras and lenses aren't as good as they are now. HD resolution makes the picture sharper, but also the noise will be more noticeable...
Here's a short indy game that has unique storytelling and gameplay, using interactive poetry: Today I Die.
Well at least you'll be less attractive to zombies when you have smaller brain...
You can take a superconducting magnet from the LHC to build your own warp drive. Just be careful not to fail the test after the aliens notice us.
Why not, if what you're paying is for full TV show episodes, or movies, all of them in 720p. Not going to be bad at all. Youtube also needs to provide a download option, or unlimited # of viewing per account.
Why not just change the name and the story and release it?
Or, turn it to a documentary movie or a machinima.
The xkcd forum users actually registered and recreated those tweets on the comic: listing.
For the love of all things binary, I thought it was common knowledge that you cannot compare rated R movies to PG-13 movies. Every single Batman & Spider-man movie has been rated below R.
Let's compared it with Sin City then. Data from imdb:
Watchmen
Released: March 6, 2009
Budget: $100,000,000 (estimated)
Opening Weekend
$55,214,334 (USA) (8 March 2009) (3,611 Screens)
£3,243,001 (UK) (8 March 2009) (419 Screens)
Gross
$106,418,446 (USA) (12 April 2009)
Source: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0409459/business (TFA data may be more current than this)
Sin City
Released: April 1, 2005
Budget: $40,000,000 (estimated)
Opening Weekend
$29,120,273 (USA) (3 April 2005) (3,230 Screens)
£2,452,299 (UK) (5 June 2005) (395 Screens)
Gross
$74,098,862 (USA) (7 August 2005) <- 129 days after opening
$12,300,000 (Worldwide) (5 June 2005) (except USA) <- 66 days after opening
Source: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0401792/business
I have no friends:
:(
Perhaps you should join Twitter...
To get $6 billion at $10 each, we will need 600 million Slashdot members...
Maybe it's time to open Slashdot.cn
Today we take the Internet for granted, but it could go down any time from over logging. We have to prevent this by using the Internet when truly necessary, and to only view Internet porn twice a day... max.
Yep, you missed it.
For the first and only time, something that has "leaked" to the internet has been completely and utterly removed from it. You need to be quicker next time.
You're wrong.
Google has been doing this since a couple of weeks ago with their Gmail's Undo sent mail. When you Undo a sent mail, Google will stop the internet, grab your email from its recipient, then resumes the internet!
Temp fix: putting flame decals on his cane to make him appear faster.
I fully expect the first true AI To be entirely written in JavaScript...
JavaScript is obsolete and inefficient. CADIE thinks you should use INTERCAL.
:3 <- '"'"'"'".1$':1~#32768'"~"#1109$#1"'$':1~#128'"~#2735'$
DO
':1~"#546$#0"'"~"#43679"'$':1~"#1365$#0"'"~"#1023$#63"'$
'"'"'".1$#0"~#34959'$':1~"#0$#1170"'"~#11007'$':1~"#0$#2925"'"~
"#2005$#255"'
- CADIE
http://code.google.com/creative/cadie/
IS this an april fool joke by google ??
No it's not.
Now, try your Chrome 3D. Slashdot looks much better in 3D!!
Hey dude, you're suppose to drop something too. That way someone else can pick it up, and the chain won't be boken.
As stated on the warning page.