People in the right lane are going at the speed limit already. If you couldn't use the left lane for travel, then you couldn't use it at all!
If the right lane is going the speed limit, then the lane isn't yet saturated with traffic. So there isn't any need to use the left lane.
I think most people would like others to keep right out of courtesy, not neccesarily due to legal reasons. Just because something is legal doesn't mean you should do it.
. 3 years is not a data set to base public policy OR firm geo science upon.
You base public policy on whatever data you have available. When you have large unknowns, you do a risk assessment and then decide if that possibility of destroying the planet is important to you or not.
There are a huge number of idiots talking about gold right now. Be careful who you listen to. The most insightful commentary I have found recently is from Paul Van Eeden
Although I appreciate.conf files' readability, sometimes I want to store prefs which are a little more complex.
The configuration section doesn't have to be just a list of name-value pairs. You can design your own config sections with the full hierarchial functionality of XML. Look up the IConfigurationSectionHandler interface.
Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap....requires a court order
Unfortunately this statement is true. Since the statement only applies to the wiretaps that the government talks about. The secret ones being ones they don't talk about. Sort of a Clintonesque defence.
The NASDAQ will almost certainly go up because you've replaced losers with winners, but that makes it hard to use yesterday's numbers with tomorrow's numbers to help visualize the overall trend.
If you believe this then you should invest in an index fund, which would then give you an almost certain result. However I believe your logic flaw is to assume past performance is a guarantee of future returns.
The symtoms of the medical problem you mention sound familiar to me, and I would like to read more. Can you direct me to a more complete description of this problem?
And knowing is half the battle! Any help on keeping the mind clear of the crud and pulling any useful info from the class?
Go there to learn fundamental concepts of programming. Learn things like debugging, algorithms, encapsulation, threading etc... These will naturally transfer to any language. Go with a positive attitude, even if it is "just VB" or you won't learn anything.
Yeah. Unless the bad guy notices that your bangs don't sting. And/or pulls his own gun.
Your logic is flawed.
Well considering the OP asserted that his intent is not to take a life under any circumstances, and to use his gun as a deterrent, I don't see a problem with this logic.
Peer reviewed journal submitted research is mostly unavailable on the public internet, thus I couldn't possibly submit that to you.
The evidence I submitted is the most credible that can be produced in this situation, and you rejected it. By setting your standards impossibly high, you can reject any argument I could possibly come up with.
Some kooks claim the sky is blue, yet nobody on slashdot can provide me with any evidence of this. Can you?
I never had to even cock the weapon. I've spoken with dozens of people who've defended themselves with arms without firing. Thieves base their crimes on believing people are unarmed.
Load it with blanks. The bangs will encourage a fast retreat. And if the bad guy disarms you, you won't get shot.
(despite your renunciation of nuclear physics, geology, biology, and genetic engineering)
The US seems more eager than ever to accept science as it relates to blowing stuff up, so I don't think that's gonna be a problem. Group A is more like the "cobalt bomb" cult from planet of the apes.
Glory be to the Bomb, and to the Holy Fallout. As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be. World without end. Amen.
Slashdot Mirror
People in the right lane are going at the speed limit already. If you couldn't use the left lane for travel, then you couldn't use it at all!
If the right lane is going the speed limit, then the lane isn't yet saturated with traffic. So there isn't any need to use the left lane.
I think most people would like others to keep right out of courtesy, not neccesarily due to legal reasons. Just because something is legal doesn't mean you should do it.
He manages the whole internet with only two guys. And management still complains. What hardasses.
Are you sure what you're carrying on about has anything at all to do with science?
No. It has to do with public policy.
. 3 years is not a data set to base public policy OR firm geo science upon.
You base public policy on whatever data you have available. When you have large unknowns, you do a risk assessment and then decide if that possibility of destroying the planet is important to you or not.
And why can't he be marked all three?
They used a radio button in the GUI.
Google doesn't pay for linking to them and uses advertising to subsidize their non-payments.
Most people WANT Google to link to them, and even pay Google for the privilege. Why is this different?
And the aperture is never so small as to give noticeable diffraction anyway.
Small aperture can induce diffraction, noticeably softening your photos. Optimal sharpness in most lenses typically occurs around F8.
There are a huge number of idiots talking about gold right now. Be careful who you listen to. The most insightful commentary I have found recently is from Paul Van Eeden
Not true. The speed of light is a constant, even near a black hole.
So how come Lene Hau claims to be able to reduce the speed of light?
Although I appreciate .conf files' readability, sometimes I want to store prefs which are a little more complex.
The configuration section doesn't have to be just a list of name-value pairs. You can design your own config sections with the full hierarchial functionality of XML. Look up the IConfigurationSectionHandler interface.
(You should see my friend's stereo speakers.)
Are they like this?
The density of stupidity in this post is truly impressive. Surely the dumbness power of this post could nullify any possible reply.
Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap....requires a court order
Unfortunately this statement is true. Since the statement only applies to the wiretaps that the government talks about. The secret ones being ones they don't talk about. Sort of a Clintonesque defence.
Did the tech wreck of 2001 teach you nothing? The only thing completely stupid is to assume things don't change.
The NASDAQ will almost certainly go up because you've replaced losers with winners, but that makes it hard to use yesterday's numbers with tomorrow's numbers to help visualize the overall trend.
If you believe this then you should invest in an index fund, which would then give you an almost certain result. However I believe your logic flaw is to assume past performance is a guarantee of future returns.
The symtoms of the medical problem you mention sound familiar to me, and I would like to read more. Can you direct me to a more complete description of this problem?
And knowing is half the battle! Any help on keeping the mind clear of the crud and pulling any useful info from the class?
Go there to learn fundamental concepts of programming. Learn things like debugging, algorithms, encapsulation, threading etc... These will naturally transfer to any language. Go with a positive attitude, even if it is "just VB" or you won't learn anything.
Yeah. Unless the bad guy notices that your bangs don't sting. And/or pulls his own gun. Your logic is flawed.
Well considering the OP asserted that his intent is not to take a life under any circumstances, and to use his gun as a deterrent, I don't see a problem with this logic.
OK here's one:
Evidence
Peer reviewed journal submitted research is mostly unavailable on the public internet, thus I couldn't possibly submit that to you.
The evidence I submitted is the most credible that can be produced in this situation, and you rejected it. By setting your standards impossibly high, you can reject any argument I could possibly come up with.
Some kooks claim the sky is blue, yet nobody on slashdot can provide me with any evidence of this. Can you?
and yet, mysterously, i've never seen a gun nut able to present evidence of this.
Evidence.
Evidence.
Although I'm not a nut so perhaps this doesn't count.
I never had to even cock the weapon. I've spoken with dozens of people who've defended themselves with arms without firing. Thieves base their crimes on believing people are unarmed.
Load it with blanks. The bangs will encourage a fast retreat. And if the bad guy disarms you, you won't get shot.
I've always wanted to BOINC a green skinned alien.
That's the sound of a thousand slashdotters trying to make a "shark with friggin laser beams" joke before I do.
The true geek would have made the "house full of popcorn" joke before either of us.
(despite your renunciation of nuclear physics, geology, biology, and genetic engineering)
The US seems more eager than ever to accept science as it relates to blowing stuff up, so I don't think that's gonna be a problem. Group A is more like the "cobalt bomb" cult from planet of the apes.
Glory be to the Bomb, and to the Holy Fallout. As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be. World without end. Amen.