You forgot their commanding lead with ~26% of global market share in the mobile market. That's about 12.5M users based on global smart phone penetration.
That's my response to any site that attempts to block access to "unsupported" browsers. I email every contact address I can find and tell them their developers are morons and the site works perfectly well with other browsers. I don't know how the decisions are made at any of them, but a number of sites I've done that with stopped their abjectly stupid policies of actively blocking browsers they deemed "unsupported."
Not only is it built-in, it's been built-in for years, and masking tends to work even on sites that try their level best to prevent browsers other than IE/Firefox from even loading their content. Sites also typically work perfectly when you mask as IE or Firefox.
Developers who try to lock out browsers that display the site perfectly well are morons, and should be fired for their ignorance.
Interestingly enough I have yet to encounter a single failure among the CD-Rs I have used in the last 12 or so years. Granted none of them are really cheap, but they're not the super-expensive varieties either.
You should load it because the adview provides the revenue for the sites you use. If you think they are paid per click, you know nothing about web advertising. They're paid per impression, and if everyone blocks the ads, free sites go away.
If a site is unusable, fine. Blocking everything just because you can means you're either ignorant or selfish.
Their cognizance of the penalties is irrelevant once it reaches that point. If they can't control themselves, they get incarcerated. If they can, they don't. Pretty simple compared to the status quo now.
Crimes that involve consensual activity between the participants. Like prostitution. There is no victim as long as all parties are willing to engage in the transaction. Possession and use of drugs are also victimless. This is not to excuse criminal activity as a result of impaired mental function from drug use, any more than legalization of alcohol excuses vehicular homicide as a result of driving drunk. It's a pretty easy definition to follow.
Which means it's not a loophole, and you still have to comply with in-state regulations. This comment does nothing to refute anything in the previous comment.
What are the better alternatives for defense? I hear that a lot, but nobody seems to have an actual answer. Tasers are limited in the number of attackers they work against. So are pepper spray devices.
Yeah, prisonplanet.com is pretty loony. However, the audio is exactly as advertised. You're a moron to disregard a factual clip just because of the site hosting it.
The fact that it was a NATO response is irrelevant to my point: the claim that it was limited to air strikes is false. There where 16,000 US troops on the ground.
30-35 miles is well within the transmission range. 100-150 miles is not, which is how far a significant amount of the population in rural areas are from transmitters. There are far more rural areas in the US than there are urban ones.
While I don't really support US intervention in other countries, it's false to claim the US only bombed the country. I personally know two people who were on the ground in Bosnia. What one saw and personally did there as an Army Ranger turned him against the US military permanently.
This isn't to say the Serbs didn't do most of the work freeing themselves, just a rebuttal against the claim that the US only used bombs there.
Apple doesn't have a monopoly in the smartphone market. Symbian phones account for 3 times the market share Apple has, and Blackberry phones account for 1.25 times the market share.
The attempts by large groups to dominate the weak occurred long before capitalism, and will continue should capitalism ever cease to exist. It is simply one model of domination. There are many more in existence.
That's pretty much my take on it as well. There's no way they'll dry up a source of money as large as the income tax. It gives them too much power to throw away. The only way it would ever disappear is by force.
Slashdot Mirror
If it said "gross income," they would have no legal leg to stand on not to pay him. I almost guarantee the contract said "net income."
That word does not mean what you apparently think it means given the sentence you used it in.
You forgot their commanding lead with ~26% of global market share in the mobile market. That's about 12.5M users based on global smart phone penetration.
Bah, my bad for not previewing while using angle brackets.
6 < 11
60 > 11
No.
6 11.
That's my response to any site that attempts to block access to "unsupported" browsers. I email every contact address I can find and tell them their developers are morons and the site works perfectly well with other browsers. I don't know how the decisions are made at any of them, but a number of sites I've done that with stopped their abjectly stupid policies of actively blocking browsers they deemed "unsupported."
Not only is it built-in, it's been built-in for years, and masking tends to work even on sites that try their level best to prevent browsers other than IE/Firefox from even loading their content. Sites also typically work perfectly when you mask as IE or Firefox.
Developers who try to lock out browsers that display the site perfectly well are morons, and should be fired for their ignorance.
Interestingly enough I have yet to encounter a single failure among the CD-Rs I have used in the last 12 or so years. Granted none of them are really cheap, but they're not the super-expensive varieties either.
You should load it because the adview provides the revenue for the sites you use. If you think they are paid per click, you know nothing about web advertising. They're paid per impression, and if everyone blocks the ads, free sites go away.
If a site is unusable, fine. Blocking everything just because you can means you're either ignorant or selfish.
Most advertising revenue is paid per adview, not per click. There may be additional revenue per click, but that is not the primary payment source.
Pretty much.
Their cognizance of the penalties is irrelevant once it reaches that point. If they can't control themselves, they get incarcerated. If they can, they don't. Pretty simple compared to the status quo now.
Crimes that involve consensual activity between the participants. Like prostitution. There is no victim as long as all parties are willing to engage in the transaction. Possession and use of drugs are also victimless. This is not to excuse criminal activity as a result of impaired mental function from drug use, any more than legalization of alcohol excuses vehicular homicide as a result of driving drunk. It's a pretty easy definition to follow.
Most people don't understand that. The violence in the US is cultural. It has nothing to do with what weapons are available to whom.
Which means it's not a loophole, and you still have to comply with in-state regulations. This comment does nothing to refute anything in the previous comment.
What are the better alternatives for defense? I hear that a lot, but nobody seems to have an actual answer. Tasers are limited in the number of attackers they work against. So are pepper spray devices.
Yeah, prisonplanet.com is pretty loony. However, the audio is exactly as advertised. You're a moron to disregard a factual clip just because of the site hosting it.
The fact that it was a NATO response is irrelevant to my point: the claim that it was limited to air strikes is false. There where 16,000 US troops on the ground.
30-35 miles is well within the transmission range. 100-150 miles is not, which is how far a significant amount of the population in rural areas are from transmitters. There are far more rural areas in the US than there are urban ones.
While I don't really support US intervention in other countries, it's false to claim the US only bombed the country. I personally know two people who were on the ground in Bosnia. What one saw and personally did there as an Army Ranger turned him against the US military permanently.
This isn't to say the Serbs didn't do most of the work freeing themselves, just a rebuttal against the claim that the US only used bombs there.
640k should be enough for anyone.
That really depends on how corrupt the city is.
Apple doesn't have a monopoly in the smartphone market. Symbian phones account for 3 times the market share Apple has, and Blackberry phones account for 1.25 times the market share.
The attempts by large groups to dominate the weak occurred long before capitalism, and will continue should capitalism ever cease to exist. It is simply one model of domination. There are many more in existence.
That's pretty much my take on it as well. There's no way they'll dry up a source of money as large as the income tax. It gives them too much power to throw away. The only way it would ever disappear is by force.