The story kind of brings to mind this guy, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...., the moron who gifted hundreds of millions of us with lead poisoning to varying degrees. Who created "an elaborate system of strings and pulleys to help others lift him from bed", which promptly strangled him to death. You could just imagine the story where Zuckerberg is smothered to death by his AI when it tries to make his bed with him still in it. A new meme, amusing ways for the Zuckerberg AI to kill Zuckerberg.
From my understanding in the age of unencrypted emails, emails for security purposes are considered postcards. Any business that wires money based upon a postcard deserve to lose that money. Preventive measures that need to be taken, monitoring of all web site registration for looks like addresses and the triggering of immediate investigation and monitoring. Financial institution should also be legally forced to enable regional blocks on money transfers, if you have no intention on sending money outside of your country or only restricting transfer to a list of economic fraud extradition countries, you should be able to do this, to the extent that it should be the default and you are required to take active steps to enable it and do so upon a repeated basis (ie default you country only, next step countries with extradition for economic fraud, then good fucking luck you are going to need it and of course are you fucking nuts as the final setting for Nigeria et al).
Email seems to need a full shake up, encryption, confirmation of originating address location and identity and even hardware locking (emails from known bits of hardware pre established on the server ie trusted user on trusted hardware).
"Anonymous" straight up represents the inherent anarchy of the general public voice as expressed upon the internet, in terms of socio-political activism. So as such the loudest voice generally will reflect the most voices and just like in any crowd the voices on the periphery will reflect all sorts of ideas, often in direct opposition to the majority voice but that is inherently the way of shared public anarchy. All sorts of ideas come and those most shared start to lead but not dominate, other ideas can still enter and older ideas can still come to the fore. The many different voices of "Anonymous" with no real association or any real legal association, provides a mechanism for safer activism, in the age of monitoring everything and analysing every thing you say or do on the internet, that nebulous association under "Anonymous" allows the poisoning of monitoring data bases, who is and who is not, becomes impossible to tell. "Anonymous" is "Anarchy" digitally expressed, what it is and what it will become, well, that is yet for the general public to decide.
Yet factually literally, it is still not as bad as the Bible, The Koran or the Torah, yet government does not do anything serious to reign in those works and force the editing to align with law, especially prior to their distribution to minors. When those works recommend or even worse demand behaviour outside of the rule of law, those who distribute them should be challenged, no excuses). Whether it is an older work or a more modern work they should be held accountable to the same laws equally, especially when the contents are actively taught to minors.
It is not opt-out, that is a lie, more accurately it is once only opt out. That opt out should be routinely repeated and have real spend caps placed upon it via legislation. For Phone purchases a sound legal limit on spends per day should be enforced, say a low $100 per day and a maximum of $500 per day (they should be enforced by law with real legal penalties for the abuse of spending caps), they are simply not secure enough from the manufacturers who would so readily abuse them. If they are going to behave like major financial services they really need to be brought to heel.
Nope, they collude and take it in turns, there is hundreds of millions of tax haven dollars up for grabs and they do not leave that to chance where ever possible. Giving a movie clear released with a shit bucket ton of advertising, no matter how bad the movie is, will give it opportunity to return profit as long as no other movies compete directly with it. They lie cheat and steal, that is how they deal, that is their nature. From some of the most mind bogglingly biased reviews, seriously they were saying greatest movie ever, whilst making excuses for it, can not do both at the same time without lying (that is straight up collusion between the major media corporate empires).
That's a bit mean Jar Jar Abrams did nothing of the sort, just a really bad science fiction story teller. Pretty lame to call a poor remake a new episode though. Lucas got carried away in specific styled story telling, that space opera style he remembered from his youth did not transfer well into the modern era and modern audiences had very little binding to that 1950s story telling style. When it comes to story telling, the marketdroids behind Jar Jar Abrams are working over time on viral marketing, flooding every venue, that is pretty lame as well.
So in this world of modern politics is negotiating a bribe, personal communications or public communications. After all there were a whole raft of donations to a particular politicians foundation from corrupt foreign governments who have actively supported Daesh, a mass terrorist movement, supported also in part by the US and Israeli governments. Secretary of State or Secretary of her own pocket book, because the cash really flowed, millions upon millions of dollars.
How about instead of being slavers we allow those people to live subsistence existences. We do national parks for animals to subsist free, why do we treat other humans with less rights than that. Now if we want to steal access to the environment away from, deny them more than we deny wild and free creatures, should we not pay penalty for that.
We routinely deny people the right of free existence and deny them the right to access the resources provided by our environment, we steal existence from the. Should we finally stop stealing that, should we not contain our extremely violent greed, after all have will not killed to excess enough yet, the seizing of land, genocide of free living people and the subsequent demand of forced labour.
Living a subsistence existence is a human right, we either allow it as would be natural or pay for it's replacement, pay for what is stolen without consent. How about instead of assigning harmless people to ordinary jobs, we assign aggressively greedy, the blatant thieves of human right to insane asylums, I know which would make life for the rest of us whole lot better and isolating the 1% would certainly do that.
Quite simply the mule no longer serves a purpose. The modern front line military persons chief role will be the intelligent application of close range drone weapons. The soldier will peak from around corners and behind walls, as they direct aerial mines at each other, exploding glide capable (required for range), quad copter drones, launched in close support and a design rate of one per enemy combatant (the more you make the cheaper they become). Launched from the air and ground in mass numbers each soldier on the front line protection their position whilst directing their drone to target, along with many reserve drones. Shoot one down and their detonation created provides cover for the next one to follow in on the same track to the hostile point, one eventually will always get through and then focus shifts to the next hostile point. So the modern soldier needs to carry something to protect themselves, some food, water and the drone control and aiming device. The drones, come in by the truck load, or a large cargo plane release them at altitude behind lines. Either way each targeting drone is linked to a front line soldier, with successive waves ready to go. Aerial mines struggle then the heavily armoured big bombs track in instead. Ain't no need for many executioners on the battle front to mass murder innocent civilians, even when doing it one at a time, rather than WMD style.
I would read that story between the lines. Hmm, spending more on the space program and not many launches. I would consider that a development cycle. Developing new orbit achieving technology costs a lot of money and for commercial and other reasons is kept very secret until the launch or major construction cycle begins but until then all the engineering et al is done in strict secret apart from of course the size of the budget and funnily enough where large portions of that money is not being spent.
So you will hear about a lot of money being spent, you will just not hear where, until they are ready to say. The more being spent and the less being heard, the greater the advance being made, it is just the way of things. Big things are definitely happening in the various space programs.
I thought the viral overdose marketing was way over the top a sure sign of a lacklustre movie. Of course, there can only be one. One record block busting movie per season, this of course a sure sign of cartel like operations. Only one movie, in a group of lacklustre movies at beginning of the school holiday seasons, it seems some how, hmm, conspired to be that way, being able to control release dates and production schedules in order to 'share' the various school holiday starts for the major studios/cinema chains. Spend enough at the top and you control what goes out when.
Script was just bad Saturday afternoon cartoon fair and a poor remake of the first star wars. The 2nd set again dominated and as typical failed to properly advance the story ie you could swap characters around in the action scenes and apart from the climax not much would change. Want to judge the story alone, watch it in low resolution and you will focus in on it or it's lack, Jar Jar earned his name on this movie.
I see you completely missed the bit where the Government of China switched from communism to fascism without changing the name (left wing, right wing, reach around far enough and they touch).
In that case, how big is the universe, which one, the visible universe or the universe beyond our capability to 'see'. So how big is the entire universe at the start, the same size it is now, once it exists it always exist, it just changes. For the universe to exist it must always have existed, so it starts and creates an infinite past, so that it always existed, it's chaos. Something, somewhere, sometime, this from.......
You missed what this story really indicates, there is more of the Slashdot, first post thing going on, then anything else. User the internet long term memory to trace down ideas to the original generator of those ideas, the first poster who sets the idea off. Those people who are least likely to make childish mistakes but still get caught up in being first, someone always has to be first, so it is all about the time track of new ideas, not where they have spread to but where they have originated. A story more about those who hack the wet wear via the internet, rather than hacking the software or the hardware. Make not mistake, a whole lot of wet wear hacking happens on the internet and they can always track the originators, those real first posters. Doesn't stop them from being still being hacked and chasing rainbows, the more you have, the less you have, information overload;).
You people are just such shallow thinkers, tracking is not the problem, the real problem is making you a non-person, you can not buy anything, you can not enter anywhere, you can not ride anything, you cease to be a digital human being and they don't even need to lock you up. Just kill you like an animal when you finally lose it after being hounded and harassed 24/7 and blame you for it. They can not only hold you digitally hostage but your entire family. Extreme digital extortion, obey or be digitally destroyed. The true difference between freedom and slavery, either you need to continually ask permission to do anything or you can maturely decide for yourself. Every time you spend money with a card, you are not spending what you own, you are asking permission to buy something, think about that!!!
To say it is China 'only', is really inaccurate, there are a whole bunch of countries with similarly repressive regimes. You can understand their need to do so though. You have hundreds of millions working in poverty, working extremely hard, for bloody little recompense, this cheered on by western corporations (the idiots are cheering their own demise, fools) and keeping a lid on that social injustice takes real effort but that lid is loosening all of the time and they simultaneously seem to be easing off whilst applying more controls. Other regimes around the place are just down right evil or just becoming that way (lipstick on a very greedy pig, looks at us).
What it means is rapidly rotating encryption keys and different keys for different users (1 per, have fun untangling that mess) and user to user encryption keys, completely separate from user to server encryption keys. You can not give them a copy of what you do not have.
That would be Jar Jar Abrams I gather because that seems to be the new nick name developing for him after this lame remake of the first star wars movie. There are a lot of pissed off stars wars fanatics out there, even worse than the star trek ones. As for the red armed C3PO, yeah we get that, red matter, red arm, Jar Jar is not just giving trekkies the finger, he is giving them the whole arm, really lamely arrogant as Jar Jar is doing it with other people's money.
Why you shouldn't watch the first Star Wars before watching this lame rehash because the first one had an interesting well told story and this took that story, mind boggling managed to dumb way down and did a real horrible job of telling it. I think Abrams will really regret doing star wars, Jar Jar what a nickname to carry for the rest of your life, ugh.
Narcissism properly, is a social development issue born of a genetic lack of an autonomic empathic response, basically they lack the learning trigger to feel others emotions in order to properly socially develop as they mature, from child to adult.
So this result reflects the change in nature of geek events. As they have become 'cooler' so non-geeks are latching on to public events to pose as geeks in order to be seen as 'cooler'. The 'real' geeks and nerds are staying in the background or simply not going to the more commercial psuedo geek and nerd events.
So now you have loads of wanna be celebrities going to those events hoping for their splash of fame, that will lead on to their dream, "they always knew they would succeed and are special", as is typical of any pseudo celebrities, now there is a trend of them just faking being geeks and nerds.
In the case of a government forum, anonymity would come via legislation, very tough legislation. So the forum managed by the electoral commissions and the penalties for attempting or exposing the identity of users other than via warrant similar to exposing the anonymity of voting and registration fraud similar to electoral registration fraud, so fines and custodial sentences. You don't have to be so uptight with security when there are real severe penalties for attempting to cheat the system.
There is a way around that of course. Non-binding continuous voting on a government created and presented forum, where registered citizens can use a government provided pseudonym, to put forward and discuss ideas, as well as discuss proposed policy and then informally vote or more accurately rate proposed policy. You require pseudonyms because some people are very reactionary and react very poorly to people disagreeing with them, so real people's names are hidden behind the government provided pseudonym but because full records are kept, contributors are held accountable for any unacceptable things they write. So it becomes a third house of government, a public forum in your home, where to get to exchange ideas and opinions that form the basis (not the actual legislation), just the basis of future legislation.
'ER' yes, have you not heard of universal health care, public housing, full social welfare benefits at rates 10 times that of food stamps, more inclusion and less ostracising from economic failure, full government training programs, cleaner environs, better quality of infrastructure, far higher quality of policing, better consumer protections, more effective public transport, lower crime rates, far more accessible higher education. America is number one only if you are more focused on greed rather than quality of life. Suck it up, when it comes to quality of life America is not even in the top ten and is in a race to to the bottom, good luck dude but sure hold onto American Exceptionlism as long as you want for all the good it will do you.
There is a distinct probability that the German court would be infringing copyright treaties that the German government has agreed to. The photographer owns those all copyrights to those photos, as they were taken with consent, published or unpublished.
There is only one reason and one reason only why nuclear wars do not break, the rich douche bag fuck head psychopaths in charge who do not give a crap about the rest of us beyond how they can exploit, use and abuse us, would also be killed. If you think for a second that those posing douche bags would willingly spend their lives in a bunker, hole in the ground instead of posing about in yachts and mansions, you are really naive.
This is exactly why they have banned political assassination, instead they prefer all out war with the poor dying, in a game of political assassination the douche bag psychopaths would be the first to die. Just like in nuclear war but when it comes to the rest of use suffering and dying in their wars, they basically get off on being able to get us to kill each other.
Take terrorists all over the world, they can not be that stupid as to not realise that it is the rich and greedy who exploit their countries and yet they never attack the rich and greedy, just run around killing poor and middle class who have very little to do with the conflict. It is seems really suspect, that terrorists always attack nobodies and continually ignore the rich and greedy who actually would have real influence on those outcomes in those regions that produce terrorists.
These pseudo celebrities are nothing but fabrications of PR=B$ studios, with a manage public personality used to sell products that in reality has very little to do with their true narcissistic self serving nature. Which when exposed, disrupts their ability to believably lie about the products they are meant to sell and thus ending their career of self serving deceit, so says family man comedian Bill Cosby, hey, hey, hey, want some candy:|. So exposing pseudo celebrity lies is a crime because it impacts advertising revenues, although in reality it is of benefit to society because it exposes the rampant deceit, immorality and down right disgusting nature of that industry.
Slashdot Mirror
The story kind of brings to mind this guy, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...., the moron who gifted hundreds of millions of us with lead poisoning to varying degrees. Who created "an elaborate system of strings and pulleys to help others lift him from bed", which promptly strangled him to death. You could just imagine the story where Zuckerberg is smothered to death by his AI when it tries to make his bed with him still in it. A new meme, amusing ways for the Zuckerberg AI to kill Zuckerberg.
From my understanding in the age of unencrypted emails, emails for security purposes are considered postcards. Any business that wires money based upon a postcard deserve to lose that money. Preventive measures that need to be taken, monitoring of all web site registration for looks like addresses and the triggering of immediate investigation and monitoring. Financial institution should also be legally forced to enable regional blocks on money transfers, if you have no intention on sending money outside of your country or only restricting transfer to a list of economic fraud extradition countries, you should be able to do this, to the extent that it should be the default and you are required to take active steps to enable it and do so upon a repeated basis (ie default you country only, next step countries with extradition for economic fraud, then good fucking luck you are going to need it and of course are you fucking nuts as the final setting for Nigeria et al).
Email seems to need a full shake up, encryption, confirmation of originating address location and identity and even hardware locking (emails from known bits of hardware pre established on the server ie trusted user on trusted hardware).
"Anonymous" straight up represents the inherent anarchy of the general public voice as expressed upon the internet, in terms of socio-political activism. So as such the loudest voice generally will reflect the most voices and just like in any crowd the voices on the periphery will reflect all sorts of ideas, often in direct opposition to the majority voice but that is inherently the way of shared public anarchy. All sorts of ideas come and those most shared start to lead but not dominate, other ideas can still enter and older ideas can still come to the fore. The many different voices of "Anonymous" with no real association or any real legal association, provides a mechanism for safer activism, in the age of monitoring everything and analysing every thing you say or do on the internet, that nebulous association under "Anonymous" allows the poisoning of monitoring data bases, who is and who is not, becomes impossible to tell. "Anonymous" is "Anarchy" digitally expressed, what it is and what it will become, well, that is yet for the general public to decide.
Yet factually literally, it is still not as bad as the Bible, The Koran or the Torah, yet government does not do anything serious to reign in those works and force the editing to align with law, especially prior to their distribution to minors. When those works recommend or even worse demand behaviour outside of the rule of law, those who distribute them should be challenged, no excuses). Whether it is an older work or a more modern work they should be held accountable to the same laws equally, especially when the contents are actively taught to minors.
It is not opt-out, that is a lie, more accurately it is once only opt out. That opt out should be routinely repeated and have real spend caps placed upon it via legislation. For Phone purchases a sound legal limit on spends per day should be enforced, say a low $100 per day and a maximum of $500 per day (they should be enforced by law with real legal penalties for the abuse of spending caps), they are simply not secure enough from the manufacturers who would so readily abuse them. If they are going to behave like major financial services they really need to be brought to heel.
Nope, they collude and take it in turns, there is hundreds of millions of tax haven dollars up for grabs and they do not leave that to chance where ever possible. Giving a movie clear released with a shit bucket ton of advertising, no matter how bad the movie is, will give it opportunity to return profit as long as no other movies compete directly with it. They lie cheat and steal, that is how they deal, that is their nature. From some of the most mind bogglingly biased reviews, seriously they were saying greatest movie ever, whilst making excuses for it, can not do both at the same time without lying (that is straight up collusion between the major media corporate empires).
That's a bit mean Jar Jar Abrams did nothing of the sort, just a really bad science fiction story teller. Pretty lame to call a poor remake a new episode though. Lucas got carried away in specific styled story telling, that space opera style he remembered from his youth did not transfer well into the modern era and modern audiences had very little binding to that 1950s story telling style. When it comes to story telling, the marketdroids behind Jar Jar Abrams are working over time on viral marketing, flooding every venue, that is pretty lame as well.
So in this world of modern politics is negotiating a bribe, personal communications or public communications. After all there were a whole raft of donations to a particular politicians foundation from corrupt foreign governments who have actively supported Daesh, a mass terrorist movement, supported also in part by the US and Israeli governments. Secretary of State or Secretary of her own pocket book, because the cash really flowed, millions upon millions of dollars.
How about instead of being slavers we allow those people to live subsistence existences. We do national parks for animals to subsist free, why do we treat other humans with less rights than that. Now if we want to steal access to the environment away from, deny them more than we deny wild and free creatures, should we not pay penalty for that.
We routinely deny people the right of free existence and deny them the right to access the resources provided by our environment, we steal existence from the. Should we finally stop stealing that, should we not contain our extremely violent greed, after all have will not killed to excess enough yet, the seizing of land, genocide of free living people and the subsequent demand of forced labour.
Living a subsistence existence is a human right, we either allow it as would be natural or pay for it's replacement, pay for what is stolen without consent. How about instead of assigning harmless people to ordinary jobs, we assign aggressively greedy, the blatant thieves of human right to insane asylums, I know which would make life for the rest of us whole lot better and isolating the 1% would certainly do that.
Quite simply the mule no longer serves a purpose. The modern front line military persons chief role will be the intelligent application of close range drone weapons. The soldier will peak from around corners and behind walls, as they direct aerial mines at each other, exploding glide capable (required for range), quad copter drones, launched in close support and a design rate of one per enemy combatant (the more you make the cheaper they become). Launched from the air and ground in mass numbers each soldier on the front line protection their position whilst directing their drone to target, along with many reserve drones. Shoot one down and their detonation created provides cover for the next one to follow in on the same track to the hostile point, one eventually will always get through and then focus shifts to the next hostile point. So the modern soldier needs to carry something to protect themselves, some food, water and the drone control and aiming device. The drones, come in by the truck load, or a large cargo plane release them at altitude behind lines. Either way each targeting drone is linked to a front line soldier, with successive waves ready to go. Aerial mines struggle then the heavily armoured big bombs track in instead. Ain't no need for many executioners on the battle front to mass murder innocent civilians, even when doing it one at a time, rather than WMD style.
I would read that story between the lines. Hmm, spending more on the space program and not many launches. I would consider that a development cycle. Developing new orbit achieving technology costs a lot of money and for commercial and other reasons is kept very secret until the launch or major construction cycle begins but until then all the engineering et al is done in strict secret apart from of course the size of the budget and funnily enough where large portions of that money is not being spent.
So you will hear about a lot of money being spent, you will just not hear where, until they are ready to say. The more being spent and the less being heard, the greater the advance being made, it is just the way of things. Big things are definitely happening in the various space programs.
I thought the viral overdose marketing was way over the top a sure sign of a lacklustre movie. Of course, there can only be one. One record block busting movie per season, this of course a sure sign of cartel like operations. Only one movie, in a group of lacklustre movies at beginning of the school holiday seasons, it seems some how, hmm, conspired to be that way, being able to control release dates and production schedules in order to 'share' the various school holiday starts for the major studios/cinema chains. Spend enough at the top and you control what goes out when.
Script was just bad Saturday afternoon cartoon fair and a poor remake of the first star wars. The 2nd set again dominated and as typical failed to properly advance the story ie you could swap characters around in the action scenes and apart from the climax not much would change. Want to judge the story alone, watch it in low resolution and you will focus in on it or it's lack, Jar Jar earned his name on this movie.
I see you completely missed the bit where the Government of China switched from communism to fascism without changing the name (left wing, right wing, reach around far enough and they touch).
In that case, how big is the universe, which one, the visible universe or the universe beyond our capability to 'see'. So how big is the entire universe at the start, the same size it is now, once it exists it always exist, it just changes. For the universe to exist it must always have existed, so it starts and creates an infinite past, so that it always existed, it's chaos. Something, somewhere, sometime, this from .......
You missed what this story really indicates, there is more of the Slashdot, first post thing going on, then anything else. User the internet long term memory to trace down ideas to the original generator of those ideas, the first poster who sets the idea off. Those people who are least likely to make childish mistakes but still get caught up in being first, someone always has to be first, so it is all about the time track of new ideas, not where they have spread to but where they have originated. A story more about those who hack the wet wear via the internet, rather than hacking the software or the hardware. Make not mistake, a whole lot of wet wear hacking happens on the internet and they can always track the originators, those real first posters. Doesn't stop them from being still being hacked and chasing rainbows, the more you have, the less you have, information overload ;).
You people are just such shallow thinkers, tracking is not the problem, the real problem is making you a non-person, you can not buy anything, you can not enter anywhere, you can not ride anything, you cease to be a digital human being and they don't even need to lock you up. Just kill you like an animal when you finally lose it after being hounded and harassed 24/7 and blame you for it. They can not only hold you digitally hostage but your entire family. Extreme digital extortion, obey or be digitally destroyed. The true difference between freedom and slavery, either you need to continually ask permission to do anything or you can maturely decide for yourself. Every time you spend money with a card, you are not spending what you own, you are asking permission to buy something, think about that!!!
To say it is China 'only', is really inaccurate, there are a whole bunch of countries with similarly repressive regimes. You can understand their need to do so though. You have hundreds of millions working in poverty, working extremely hard, for bloody little recompense, this cheered on by western corporations (the idiots are cheering their own demise, fools) and keeping a lid on that social injustice takes real effort but that lid is loosening all of the time and they simultaneously seem to be easing off whilst applying more controls. Other regimes around the place are just down right evil or just becoming that way (lipstick on a very greedy pig, looks at us).
What it means is rapidly rotating encryption keys and different keys for different users (1 per, have fun untangling that mess) and user to user encryption keys, completely separate from user to server encryption keys. You can not give them a copy of what you do not have.
That would be Jar Jar Abrams I gather because that seems to be the new nick name developing for him after this lame remake of the first star wars movie. There are a lot of pissed off stars wars fanatics out there, even worse than the star trek ones. As for the red armed C3PO, yeah we get that, red matter, red arm, Jar Jar is not just giving trekkies the finger, he is giving them the whole arm, really lamely arrogant as Jar Jar is doing it with other people's money.
Why you shouldn't watch the first Star Wars before watching this lame rehash because the first one had an interesting well told story and this took that story, mind boggling managed to dumb way down and did a real horrible job of telling it. I think Abrams will really regret doing star wars, Jar Jar what a nickname to carry for the rest of your life, ugh.
Narcissism properly, is a social development issue born of a genetic lack of an autonomic empathic response, basically they lack the learning trigger to feel others emotions in order to properly socially develop as they mature, from child to adult.
So this result reflects the change in nature of geek events. As they have become 'cooler' so non-geeks are latching on to public events to pose as geeks in order to be seen as 'cooler'. The 'real' geeks and nerds are staying in the background or simply not going to the more commercial psuedo geek and nerd events.
So now you have loads of wanna be celebrities going to those events hoping for their splash of fame, that will lead on to their dream, "they always knew they would succeed and are special", as is typical of any pseudo celebrities, now there is a trend of them just faking being geeks and nerds.
In the case of a government forum, anonymity would come via legislation, very tough legislation. So the forum managed by the electoral commissions and the penalties for attempting or exposing the identity of users other than via warrant similar to exposing the anonymity of voting and registration fraud similar to electoral registration fraud, so fines and custodial sentences. You don't have to be so uptight with security when there are real severe penalties for attempting to cheat the system.
There is a way around that of course. Non-binding continuous voting on a government created and presented forum, where registered citizens can use a government provided pseudonym, to put forward and discuss ideas, as well as discuss proposed policy and then informally vote or more accurately rate proposed policy. You require pseudonyms because some people are very reactionary and react very poorly to people disagreeing with them, so real people's names are hidden behind the government provided pseudonym but because full records are kept, contributors are held accountable for any unacceptable things they write. So it becomes a third house of government, a public forum in your home, where to get to exchange ideas and opinions that form the basis (not the actual legislation), just the basis of future legislation.
'ER' yes, have you not heard of universal health care, public housing, full social welfare benefits at rates 10 times that of food stamps, more inclusion and less ostracising from economic failure, full government training programs, cleaner environs, better quality of infrastructure, far higher quality of policing, better consumer protections, more effective public transport, lower crime rates, far more accessible higher education. America is number one only if you are more focused on greed rather than quality of life. Suck it up, when it comes to quality of life America is not even in the top ten and is in a race to to the bottom, good luck dude but sure hold onto American Exceptionlism as long as you want for all the good it will do you.
There is a distinct probability that the German court would be infringing copyright treaties that the German government has agreed to. The photographer owns those all copyrights to those photos, as they were taken with consent, published or unpublished.
There is only one reason and one reason only why nuclear wars do not break, the rich douche bag fuck head psychopaths in charge who do not give a crap about the rest of us beyond how they can exploit, use and abuse us, would also be killed. If you think for a second that those posing douche bags would willingly spend their lives in a bunker, hole in the ground instead of posing about in yachts and mansions, you are really naive.
This is exactly why they have banned political assassination, instead they prefer all out war with the poor dying, in a game of political assassination the douche bag psychopaths would be the first to die. Just like in nuclear war but when it comes to the rest of use suffering and dying in their wars, they basically get off on being able to get us to kill each other.
Take terrorists all over the world, they can not be that stupid as to not realise that it is the rich and greedy who exploit their countries and yet they never attack the rich and greedy, just run around killing poor and middle class who have very little to do with the conflict. It is seems really suspect, that terrorists always attack nobodies and continually ignore the rich and greedy who actually would have real influence on those outcomes in those regions that produce terrorists.
These pseudo celebrities are nothing but fabrications of PR=B$ studios, with a manage public personality used to sell products that in reality has very little to do with their true narcissistic self serving nature. Which when exposed, disrupts their ability to believably lie about the products they are meant to sell and thus ending their career of self serving deceit, so says family man comedian Bill Cosby, hey, hey, hey, want some candy :|. So exposing pseudo celebrity lies is a crime because it impacts advertising revenues, although in reality it is of benefit to society because it exposes the rampant deceit, immorality and down right disgusting nature of that industry.