Freedom to travel and be spied upon where ever you go 24/7, oh wait, small ISPs no spying, KILL ALL SMALL ISPs, the corporations must be able to spy on you, including and especially in your home, 24/7, and even when you travel. Moving all of the time, well, welcome to the totally disposable workforce, welcome to the new 'gig' workspace that includes you having to relocate regularly.
Seriously, what a crock, yep, need to move my ISP regularly, wait what, maybe a few times in your life you relocate your home. The all new, spy on all your internet access, which includes VOIP, or internet phone calls for the poorly informed, no longer have any choice, strictly cartel all the way, only the big corporations allowed to play and or course delivering you, your stranglebad, crippled internet connections where ever you go, personalised, strangleband, say something they don't like, they can slow you down to zero.
A pure sign of corruption by corporations, the government auctions off a public asset with zero interest in how much access to that public asset will no cost citizens. All radio transmissions should include to values in the bid, how much they will pay and how much they will charge. The lowest charge with the highest bid wins, not the current straight up corrupt practice, effectively stealing a public asset, via lobbyists to sell at a token price to a cartel member (the negotiate bids before hand) and they bleed the citizens dry with a monopoly. The reality with all the bullshit doublespeak removed.
There is more than one brand of Christianity, some quite disturbed, please be specific. I am sure there is hate for some and simply dislike for others but all religions are deserving of a little derision and mocking, challenged to prove their worth. We all know how readily they are exploited by psychopaths in the most destructive manner imaginable to further the greed and lusts of those psychopaths. Some religion and variants to those religions are worse than others.
Religions and always on devices, always listening and waiting to instruct or inform and inform who and whom, ugh, really quite, ugh. Trust Windows anal probe 10 to produce that feature. The new religion of capitalism and consumerism, monitored 24/7 to reward or to punish, now that's worse than Christianity, except maybe the inquisition phase, pretty much identical to that, just a change of religious branding.
Which is why composite anti-biotics should become the norm. More than one kind in the medication, larger overall dose but the combination should ensure similar side affects are compounded. This to push the bacteria beyond the point where it's DNA can incorporate all the required selective resistances. It can resist any one or two at a time but not multiples of three or more.
How about, burning up advertising dollars because the cheapest product is aimed at the poorest people because that is all that they can afford. Advertising high end, at high cost, too people who can't afford it, for no sales, kind of doesn't make sense. Unless of course your advertising product is not targeted at consumers but at advertisers, convince them that it works and they will pay. So the only question for advertisers, do you have one in your home, why not and are the customers you are looking for more like you, or are they the working poor with little or no disposable capital.
Who tends to do more to preserve their privacy, those with money or those without. Who is the most choosey and will do product research, read articles et at, those with money or those without. Who is the source of by far the majority of Google targeted marketing data, those with money or those without (services provided are super cheap, free in fact, even the homeless with a mobile connection can afford Google services but the advertising aimed at them, well, more to feed their imaginations rather than anything they will buy).
Google advertising, first and foremost, targets advertisers not their potential customers. All that data manipulation is to create bullshit to baffle brains. Did they win the US election with all that power, nope, they had negligible sales impact (consumer to consumer contact, drove that US election).
The solution is create a LinkedIN resume, a fake account to make you look good and nothing more, watch out for existing employers, a LinkedIN account should be considered a sign of intending to quit, ie why did you not deactivate you LinkedIN account, your fired before you can steal our ideas and quit. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
How about a missile strike at the source of high energy microwaves which are harmful to all living things, even in peace time, fully justifiable. Track the damaging radiation back to it's source and kill them before they harm your citizens. Why bother with the artificial bat, if your intent is to microwave people, just microwave them, give them cancer, why do it by accident, you will still be attacked any how. The stupid it burns, just like the higher levels of output required to power, rather than just control the device, real fucking bright.
You had better be bloody careful about what is an attack and what is not. Would not want everyone purposefully firing damaging microwave energy across national borders, or from national territory to international territory. Want to take down a drone, simply power up radar, I mean really power up radar and you will transfer energy into all the drones systems, the more power you feed into the radar, the more readily it will bring down anything and of course deliver cancer across national boundaries.
The guy called for the genocidal elimination of the entire North Korean population, that is a war crime, don't you know, hmm, maybe you think it is cool to entirely destroy a country, every man, woman, child, grandpa and grandma, uncle, auntie, puppies and kittens, every bird in every tree, even all the blades of grass (not to mention polluting all surrounding countries with radioactively for centuries and killings millions there as well). Talk about hate speech, calling for a country to be entirely destroyed is by Twitters own conditions of use is a banning offence. Not that I care about Twitter don't use it, don't read it and think it is a total waste of effort but their selective censorship is quite telling, they are promoting the politically ideology of their owners whilst pretending not to.
Something that has 25% DNA different to you, is something that is no longer human, not even a little bit. It is far more likely that DNA delivered in sperm is a variation to the theme, not you specifically but nearly you and every egg is identical baring environmental DNA impact. That combination does not produce random outcomes, that makes no sense what so ever, the only logical variation is in the DNA package of sperm, sperm are likely not identical with tweaks based upon age, hormonal and environmental conditions (real quantum state stuff, where really odd things could happen), in the more background genetic impacts, not so much whether stuff is switched on or off but how much it is switched on or off, what they used to call junk DNA.
As for the original American nations, yeah lots of information is buried basically as a result of guilt with regard to genocide, a entire history buried with it's people. A lie to hide rapacious greed, that still exists to this day, the same lies and the same rapacious greed. Maybe if Americans finally properly reconcile with the members of the original nations perhaps they will stop viciously preying upon the rest of the world but I wont be holding my breath for that one.
Commodity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and https://www.investor.gov/intro.... They tend not to agree. You can not really claim marketing as a commodity, bitcoin worth is an illusion created by marketing because it is backed by nothing but itself. It's worth is an illusion and unfortunately for those investing in it, once the illusion collapses, so will the worth of bitcoins evaporate, held up by those trapped by it, desperate not so sell coins that are worth much less than they paid for them. Bitcoins have no future worth because their worth is purely an act of marketing and either that marketing continues to deliver or it fails. You are effectively betting on marketing, the ability to sell the idea of worth where none exist, zero zilch zip, no worth exist in bitcoin beyond the value the ability of marketing to manipulate the market ie the value of bitcoin is the value of it's marketing. Already banned in some countries and that ban will spread, it is inevitable.
Intel are double big time fucked and make no mistake. They were aware of the fault and continued to distribute product without informing the customer of that quite serious fault. Probably because the CIA/NSA were ruthlessly exploiting that fault for all that is was worth, now it comes time to pay the piper, Intel are fucked, globally majorly FUCKED. They are liable for every CPU sold when they were aware of that fault and did not notify the customer. The biggest worry, any hacks that can be attributed to the fault makes them criminally negligent, youch, custodial sentence time. The second they became aware of the fault, they should have halted CPU sales and fixed the problem, the security ramifications, makes them criminally negligent if that fault was exploited once discovered. Which is why the CEO sold shares, the civil liability for that fault, the global civil liability.
Travel with right credit card (just for that trip), that allows you to draw local currency from secured locations. Have enough in card for entire trip and use local currency for local spend, avoid using the card as much as possible (kill card after trip). When you leave your card details behind, your wallet effectively remain in that country and now you have difficulty challenging claims. Keep in simple. Holiday credit card with cash, withdraw cash to spend, holiday over, so is the card and that account. Seems the safest method.
Is that idea even relevant any more. Perhaps you are still trapped in the lie that US main stream media has any value beyond advertising. They are straight up propaganda, all the big hoop de doop about a first ever guest what ever, so the guest did it themselves instead of paying an editor already on the payroll to do it for them. Who is advertising whom in this piece. Is Time desperate for attention, ohhhh look we have Wee Willie Gates the turd as editor, is Wee Willie, desperate for attention, ohh look I am an editor on yesteryears Time (they are just no longer relevant having dived too deep in the corporate propaganda pool), is it just collusion of the attention whores, mmm, boo hoo no one is listening to us any more, Gates and or Time.
Ahh, the opinions of the elites, what are the worth any more, they only have one true opinion "I want more, More, MORE OF EVERYTHING", this regardless of how much they already have, all they are is greed. Rather sad and something to be pushed into the past, rather than being celebrated in the media from the previous millenniums.
The law enforcers went to the wrong address, the hoax call killed no one, incompetent law enforcers murdered an innocent person. The individual is of course guilty of a hoax call and should face consequences for those actions. Repeated offence, pattern of behaviour, all indicative of someone suffering from a mental condition and the sound consequences should be compulsory medical treatment, if necessary, for the rest of their lives. The law enforcers who went to the wrong address and murdered someone should be charged with criminal negligence, not just for the murder but also going to the wrong address.
So it actually just lessens damage to the skull, distributing the impact over a wider area of the skull but as it acts like a solid, it transfers the full force of the impact to the brain, in fact more than without the helmet, because deformation of the skull would actually absorb some of the force. The gel has zero shock 'absorbing' ability when it acts as a solid as claimed, it transfer all the force to the surface being protected it just distributes it over a wider area. Thick foam under a deformable helmet is probably better for the brain, as the inertial load is reduced and energy is dissipated in the deformation of the helmet and it's heavy duty foam liner. Likely this material should be banned from contact sports as too much inertial impact load is transfer to the brain, you saved a bump on the head but did more damage to the brain instead, not a good way to go. The thicker the layer of foam, the more it deforms, the less the impact of your brain against your skull.
People tend to miss the bigger picture. The bigger picture in this case, are ads winning customers or losing customers. Pretty easy to tell, if you and you are not alone, were targeted with an ad in this fashion, they would lose a customer. If the ads are not selling anything, than why pay for the ad. A lot of ads are now about convincing advertisers that ads work, not about selling anything to anyone, except ad space to advertisers. Right now jam a compulsary ad at me and you will lose a customer, no ifs buts or maybe, be wildly rude when trying to sell me something and your product is done, finished, wont be buying it and likely wont be buying anything else from your company.
It seems like they have gone insane recently believing all the digital ad B$ and lost sight of, is that ad gaining customer or losing customers.
They are a premium product but the price in no way justifies the premium. Much like Miele prices are over the top, they are premium, but the price does not justify the premium. I still buy Miele, they are reliable, that reliability not quite justified by the price but, there is no product really in-between, so they can charge more. Pretty much same as Apple, they could charge less but they charge more based upon effective marketing. Other products are much cheaper but they are build much cheaper. There are no products in between hence allowing Apple to push up it's margins for a limited market, and add a bit more for perceived exclusivity. I just wanted a washers to last well over a decade with no hassles, so paid substantively extra versus other brands. Apple does not fit there as computer do not last decades and phones are actively designed to fail. Really for Apple to charge extra, they should allow user replaceable batteries and screens, they should do more to justify the price because reliability is most certainly not there, say compared to Miele products in their market segment.
High capital cost, that large finned heat sink and radiator heat exchanger would not be cheap, but fan less is a temptation. You would also need to mount the GPU to it and it does require a redesigned motherboard, CPU and GPU one side and everything else the other side. Then using copper instead or even something weird like diamond dust in aluminium composite. The dust might not be that expensive and it would hugely improve thermal conductivity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... (think of the diamond as the aggregate and the aluminium as the binder, hmm, sparkly). The fins could be quite large protruding a couple of centimetres from the base and you could have a fan mounted to it, to run intermittently. Probably only suite the Apple market, the price range to justify it and claim superiority on the rest of the market, could look quite cool dependent upon shape and arrangement of fins. It would be a major visual feature of the product and quite heavy, relatively speaking.
That difference in expression is clear, there is harassed and HARASSED. So a fly buzzing around your head harasses you, you would not call the police to shoot that fly off your head, especially absolutely not American Law Enforcers who would empty a whole magazine at your head to shoot that fly. Lots of stuff is harassing behaviour, but only some stuff is actually criminal. First question to be asked, is can you simply avoid that harassment, walk away, block someone on the internet, simply avoid the place where harassment occurs. If you can not avoid it and it comes to you, then that ads a capital, like Harassment. Next up is how harmful is the actual harassment, what does it actual entail, harassing someone by walking up to them and beating them versus just shouting at them, obviously add in direct physical contact and that is actual HARASSMENT.
Then there are question of one versus many. One person acts and you ignore it but tens of thousands act and that is harassing but individually still not harassment, that tends to be the flip side of gaining the public eye. Seek to or accidentally gain the public eye and you could become exposed to group harassment, which is still only minor from their perspective, still individual and subdued but from yours, major, because yeah, that public eye thing is a nasty place, you can lose just as readily as you can win. So avoid the public eye, you you want to avoid public harassment, which upon an individual basis is not actually harassment.
The onus is always on the individual to avoid harassment because there are places where it 'WILL' occur in real life or on the internet, whether it be flies or people. A measure of sensible response is required, especially for digital harassment where people reach for it, pull it down, get it from the internet and download it into their lives. Simply stop that and the harassment becomes non-existent. Actively seek the harassment, pursue and inflame it, makes you the perpetrator not the victim. Target a group, harassing a group so they harass you back, means you are not the victim you are the perpetrator.
It must be in your face, inescapable and have a physical nature either in threat or action. Keep in mind criminals feel harassed by the criminal justice system, the police actually do actively harass them, the courts set out to and functionally do harass them and correctional services harass them to reform them. The most harassing entity on the planet is the various third arm of government, the judiciary. So always beware, which harassment is the greater and is the action balanced.
I suppose it would also not include, spreadsheets, cad/cam machines, animation, coding et al. Lots of people spend twelve hours a day in front of computers, lots as in large numbers, not lots as in large percentages but when you start with 7 billion, even a tiny percentage is millions.
However there measure is not a measure of productivity but a measure of technological based time wasting, definitely not one of producing some thing other than perhaps large measures of social angst https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... So the most productive week for, hmm, disrupting actual productivity?
Looking at the design, I am surprised, that Apple hasn't altered the design. In reality the CPU should be attached to the back plate and then the motherboard fitted over it. This would allow the entire back plate to be the heat sink and heat exchanger, obviating the need for a fan. I am surprised desktops have also not made this change. There is no reason the entire side of a PC tower could be a solid piece of finned aluminium obviating the need for a fan. Simply fit the CPU to the side plate and fit the motherboard on top, so CPU on one side of the motherboard, whilst all other bits on the other side, no fan required, as you have over a square foot of heat sink and a few square feed of heat exchange from the fins.
It was lower because they were selling stock, when CEO start dumping stock, yeah buddy, it certainly does not improve stock prices. Not to forget mister mutton brain, if they sold it for a profit then they made money, they just made less money if they would have waited and found out the bug has less of a fiscal impact. So yeah, really, really, really, looks like insider trading and failure to prosecuted would really, really, really look like rampant corruption. Oh so public, it's going to be really, really, really hard to slime out of this one. About the only way, prove they were unaware of the problem.
The only free market, the nomadic system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... Capitalism was built upon slavery, an inherent requirement of capitalism is that people can be starved to death, denied access to resources if they do not conform ie work for others. You are actively denied the ability to work for yourself under capitalism ie hunt and gather the only true version of free economics. If you attempt to hunt and gather you will be imprisoned until the day you die or are simply shot outright. Capitalism is slavery or death.
How successful has capitalism been, hmm, world wars, hundreds of millions dead, mass starvation, global terrorism, all the product of capitalism, ugly indeed. Now no effort required, simply capital, rich means remaining rich, earning an income for nothing other the existing capital, no effort, no contribution to society, simply a big ole fat parasite.
So M$ vs Google, ohh look, one pack of greedy capitalists parasites complaining about the other pack of greedy capitalists parasites, doing what they do because when they do it, it's good for them but when others do it, it's bad for them.
Unproductive land. Visit surveyor, visit land brokerage, slice of piece of unproductive and sell it, no taxes. So exactly how much land is now a rich person tax cheat, you know funnel non-farming income, through a farm, to cheat on taxes, I hear it is a favourite hobby of the rich and greedy. For a farmer, have unproductive land, than who is kidding who, fucking sell it, why pay taxes on unproductive land.
Do you know what is the most effective birth control, alimony. Google wants to fix it's shit, than charge for uploads to access advertising review. Free uploads no ad revenue, want ad revenue, pay for the upload so many cents per minute. Stick up a movie, to gain ad revenue, pay and then get caught in the first thirty days before any revenue and lose your upload investment cost. It becomes a balance between paying for uploads and earning ad revenue, slows things down, makes it more manage able. It wont stop everything but it will slow it all down and shift goggle cash flow (they'll pick up income early before paying ad revenue). People will of course be more careful when it comes to uploading content if they want ad revenue because of the initial investment, they can still practice with free uploads with no ad revenue to gauge audience numbers and see whether the upload investment will generate an ad revenue return.
Problem is, they are not the problem. They are all idiots but simply publicly on display idiots. The deep state and shadow government are in control of everything except the silly goings on in the white house and trumps twitter feed. How many decisions has Trump made that have impacted anything what so ever, especially in terms of foreign policy, probably zero. Although shooting off his mouth and twitter have undoubtedly messed up a lot of deep state and shadow government plans, by making them look really bad (on purpose on by accident still hard to tell). Trump certainly has done one thing, expose the deep state and shadow government, pretty much in full public view now, most can see the corruption now. The war industrial complex, the entirely corrupt fourth estate main stream media, corporate control, the horror of hollywood and it's part in controlling feeding the corrupt, with the sexually exploitable. All one giant shit show on full display, still pretending it is holier than holy and only being holey as in the PR is now full of holes and leaking the truth all over the place.
Freedom to travel and be spied upon where ever you go 24/7, oh wait, small ISPs no spying, KILL ALL SMALL ISPs, the corporations must be able to spy on you, including and especially in your home, 24/7, and even when you travel. Moving all of the time, well, welcome to the totally disposable workforce, welcome to the new 'gig' workspace that includes you having to relocate regularly.
Seriously, what a crock, yep, need to move my ISP regularly, wait what, maybe a few times in your life you relocate your home. The all new, spy on all your internet access, which includes VOIP, or internet phone calls for the poorly informed, no longer have any choice, strictly cartel all the way, only the big corporations allowed to play and or course delivering you, your stranglebad, crippled internet connections where ever you go, personalised, strangleband, say something they don't like, they can slow you down to zero.
A pure sign of corruption by corporations, the government auctions off a public asset with zero interest in how much access to that public asset will no cost citizens. All radio transmissions should include to values in the bid, how much they will pay and how much they will charge. The lowest charge with the highest bid wins, not the current straight up corrupt practice, effectively stealing a public asset, via lobbyists to sell at a token price to a cartel member (the negotiate bids before hand) and they bleed the citizens dry with a monopoly. The reality with all the bullshit doublespeak removed.
There is more than one brand of Christianity, some quite disturbed, please be specific. I am sure there is hate for some and simply dislike for others but all religions are deserving of a little derision and mocking, challenged to prove their worth. We all know how readily they are exploited by psychopaths in the most destructive manner imaginable to further the greed and lusts of those psychopaths. Some religion and variants to those religions are worse than others.
Religions and always on devices, always listening and waiting to instruct or inform and inform who and whom, ugh, really quite, ugh. Trust Windows anal probe 10 to produce that feature. The new religion of capitalism and consumerism, monitored 24/7 to reward or to punish, now that's worse than Christianity, except maybe the inquisition phase, pretty much identical to that, just a change of religious branding.
Which is why composite anti-biotics should become the norm. More than one kind in the medication, larger overall dose but the combination should ensure similar side affects are compounded. This to push the bacteria beyond the point where it's DNA can incorporate all the required selective resistances. It can resist any one or two at a time but not multiples of three or more.
How about, burning up advertising dollars because the cheapest product is aimed at the poorest people because that is all that they can afford. Advertising high end, at high cost, too people who can't afford it, for no sales, kind of doesn't make sense. Unless of course your advertising product is not targeted at consumers but at advertisers, convince them that it works and they will pay. So the only question for advertisers, do you have one in your home, why not and are the customers you are looking for more like you, or are they the working poor with little or no disposable capital.
Who tends to do more to preserve their privacy, those with money or those without. Who is the most choosey and will do product research, read articles et at, those with money or those without. Who is the source of by far the majority of Google targeted marketing data, those with money or those without (services provided are super cheap, free in fact, even the homeless with a mobile connection can afford Google services but the advertising aimed at them, well, more to feed their imaginations rather than anything they will buy).
Google advertising, first and foremost, targets advertisers not their potential customers. All that data manipulation is to create bullshit to baffle brains. Did they win the US election with all that power, nope, they had negligible sales impact (consumer to consumer contact, drove that US election).
The solution is create a LinkedIN resume, a fake account to make you look good and nothing more, watch out for existing employers, a LinkedIN account should be considered a sign of intending to quit, ie why did you not deactivate you LinkedIN account, your fired before you can steal our ideas and quit. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
How about a missile strike at the source of high energy microwaves which are harmful to all living things, even in peace time, fully justifiable. Track the damaging radiation back to it's source and kill them before they harm your citizens. Why bother with the artificial bat, if your intent is to microwave people, just microwave them, give them cancer, why do it by accident, you will still be attacked any how. The stupid it burns, just like the higher levels of output required to power, rather than just control the device, real fucking bright.
You had better be bloody careful about what is an attack and what is not. Would not want everyone purposefully firing damaging microwave energy across national borders, or from national territory to international territory. Want to take down a drone, simply power up radar, I mean really power up radar and you will transfer energy into all the drones systems, the more power you feed into the radar, the more readily it will bring down anything and of course deliver cancer across national boundaries.
The guy called for the genocidal elimination of the entire North Korean population, that is a war crime, don't you know, hmm, maybe you think it is cool to entirely destroy a country, every man, woman, child, grandpa and grandma, uncle, auntie, puppies and kittens, every bird in every tree, even all the blades of grass (not to mention polluting all surrounding countries with radioactively for centuries and killings millions there as well). Talk about hate speech, calling for a country to be entirely destroyed is by Twitters own conditions of use is a banning offence. Not that I care about Twitter don't use it, don't read it and think it is a total waste of effort but their selective censorship is quite telling, they are promoting the politically ideology of their owners whilst pretending not to.
Something that has 25% DNA different to you, is something that is no longer human, not even a little bit. It is far more likely that DNA delivered in sperm is a variation to the theme, not you specifically but nearly you and every egg is identical baring environmental DNA impact. That combination does not produce random outcomes, that makes no sense what so ever, the only logical variation is in the DNA package of sperm, sperm are likely not identical with tweaks based upon age, hormonal and environmental conditions (real quantum state stuff, where really odd things could happen), in the more background genetic impacts, not so much whether stuff is switched on or off but how much it is switched on or off, what they used to call junk DNA.
As for the original American nations, yeah lots of information is buried basically as a result of guilt with regard to genocide, a entire history buried with it's people. A lie to hide rapacious greed, that still exists to this day, the same lies and the same rapacious greed. Maybe if Americans finally properly reconcile with the members of the original nations perhaps they will stop viciously preying upon the rest of the world but I wont be holding my breath for that one.
Commodity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and https://www.investor.gov/intro.... They tend not to agree. You can not really claim marketing as a commodity, bitcoin worth is an illusion created by marketing because it is backed by nothing but itself. It's worth is an illusion and unfortunately for those investing in it, once the illusion collapses, so will the worth of bitcoins evaporate, held up by those trapped by it, desperate not so sell coins that are worth much less than they paid for them. Bitcoins have no future worth because their worth is purely an act of marketing and either that marketing continues to deliver or it fails. You are effectively betting on marketing, the ability to sell the idea of worth where none exist, zero zilch zip, no worth exist in bitcoin beyond the value the ability of marketing to manipulate the market ie the value of bitcoin is the value of it's marketing. Already banned in some countries and that ban will spread, it is inevitable.
Intel are double big time fucked and make no mistake. They were aware of the fault and continued to distribute product without informing the customer of that quite serious fault. Probably because the CIA/NSA were ruthlessly exploiting that fault for all that is was worth, now it comes time to pay the piper, Intel are fucked, globally majorly FUCKED. They are liable for every CPU sold when they were aware of that fault and did not notify the customer. The biggest worry, any hacks that can be attributed to the fault makes them criminally negligent, youch, custodial sentence time. The second they became aware of the fault, they should have halted CPU sales and fixed the problem, the security ramifications, makes them criminally negligent if that fault was exploited once discovered. Which is why the CEO sold shares, the civil liability for that fault, the global civil liability.
Travel with right credit card (just for that trip), that allows you to draw local currency from secured locations. Have enough in card for entire trip and use local currency for local spend, avoid using the card as much as possible (kill card after trip). When you leave your card details behind, your wallet effectively remain in that country and now you have difficulty challenging claims. Keep in simple. Holiday credit card with cash, withdraw cash to spend, holiday over, so is the card and that account. Seems the safest method.
Is that idea even relevant any more. Perhaps you are still trapped in the lie that US main stream media has any value beyond advertising. They are straight up propaganda, all the big hoop de doop about a first ever guest what ever, so the guest did it themselves instead of paying an editor already on the payroll to do it for them. Who is advertising whom in this piece. Is Time desperate for attention, ohhhh look we have Wee Willie Gates the turd as editor, is Wee Willie, desperate for attention, ohh look I am an editor on yesteryears Time (they are just no longer relevant having dived too deep in the corporate propaganda pool), is it just collusion of the attention whores, mmm, boo hoo no one is listening to us any more, Gates and or Time.
Ahh, the opinions of the elites, what are the worth any more, they only have one true opinion "I want more, More, MORE OF EVERYTHING", this regardless of how much they already have, all they are is greed. Rather sad and something to be pushed into the past, rather than being celebrated in the media from the previous millenniums.
The law enforcers went to the wrong address, the hoax call killed no one, incompetent law enforcers murdered an innocent person. The individual is of course guilty of a hoax call and should face consequences for those actions. Repeated offence, pattern of behaviour, all indicative of someone suffering from a mental condition and the sound consequences should be compulsory medical treatment, if necessary, for the rest of their lives. The law enforcers who went to the wrong address and murdered someone should be charged with criminal negligence, not just for the murder but also going to the wrong address.
So it actually just lessens damage to the skull, distributing the impact over a wider area of the skull but as it acts like a solid, it transfers the full force of the impact to the brain, in fact more than without the helmet, because deformation of the skull would actually absorb some of the force. The gel has zero shock 'absorbing' ability when it acts as a solid as claimed, it transfer all the force to the surface being protected it just distributes it over a wider area. Thick foam under a deformable helmet is probably better for the brain, as the inertial load is reduced and energy is dissipated in the deformation of the helmet and it's heavy duty foam liner. Likely this material should be banned from contact sports as too much inertial impact load is transfer to the brain, you saved a bump on the head but did more damage to the brain instead, not a good way to go. The thicker the layer of foam, the more it deforms, the less the impact of your brain against your skull.
People tend to miss the bigger picture. The bigger picture in this case, are ads winning customers or losing customers. Pretty easy to tell, if you and you are not alone, were targeted with an ad in this fashion, they would lose a customer. If the ads are not selling anything, than why pay for the ad. A lot of ads are now about convincing advertisers that ads work, not about selling anything to anyone, except ad space to advertisers. Right now jam a compulsary ad at me and you will lose a customer, no ifs buts or maybe, be wildly rude when trying to sell me something and your product is done, finished, wont be buying it and likely wont be buying anything else from your company.
It seems like they have gone insane recently believing all the digital ad B$ and lost sight of, is that ad gaining customer or losing customers.
They are a premium product but the price in no way justifies the premium. Much like Miele prices are over the top, they are premium, but the price does not justify the premium. I still buy Miele, they are reliable, that reliability not quite justified by the price but, there is no product really in-between, so they can charge more. Pretty much same as Apple, they could charge less but they charge more based upon effective marketing. Other products are much cheaper but they are build much cheaper. There are no products in between hence allowing Apple to push up it's margins for a limited market, and add a bit more for perceived exclusivity. I just wanted a washers to last well over a decade with no hassles, so paid substantively extra versus other brands. Apple does not fit there as computer do not last decades and phones are actively designed to fail. Really for Apple to charge extra, they should allow user replaceable batteries and screens, they should do more to justify the price because reliability is most certainly not there, say compared to Miele products in their market segment.
High capital cost, that large finned heat sink and radiator heat exchanger would not be cheap, but fan less is a temptation. You would also need to mount the GPU to it and it does require a redesigned motherboard, CPU and GPU one side and everything else the other side. Then using copper instead or even something weird like diamond dust in aluminium composite. The dust might not be that expensive and it would hugely improve thermal conductivity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... (think of the diamond as the aggregate and the aluminium as the binder, hmm, sparkly). The fins could be quite large protruding a couple of centimetres from the base and you could have a fan mounted to it, to run intermittently. Probably only suite the Apple market, the price range to justify it and claim superiority on the rest of the market, could look quite cool dependent upon shape and arrangement of fins. It would be a major visual feature of the product and quite heavy, relatively speaking.
That difference in expression is clear, there is harassed and HARASSED. So a fly buzzing around your head harasses you, you would not call the police to shoot that fly off your head, especially absolutely not American Law Enforcers who would empty a whole magazine at your head to shoot that fly. Lots of stuff is harassing behaviour, but only some stuff is actually criminal. First question to be asked, is can you simply avoid that harassment, walk away, block someone on the internet, simply avoid the place where harassment occurs. If you can not avoid it and it comes to you, then that ads a capital, like Harassment. Next up is how harmful is the actual harassment, what does it actual entail, harassing someone by walking up to them and beating them versus just shouting at them, obviously add in direct physical contact and that is actual HARASSMENT.
Then there are question of one versus many. One person acts and you ignore it but tens of thousands act and that is harassing but individually still not harassment, that tends to be the flip side of gaining the public eye. Seek to or accidentally gain the public eye and you could become exposed to group harassment, which is still only minor from their perspective, still individual and subdued but from yours, major, because yeah, that public eye thing is a nasty place, you can lose just as readily as you can win. So avoid the public eye, you you want to avoid public harassment, which upon an individual basis is not actually harassment.
The onus is always on the individual to avoid harassment because there are places where it 'WILL' occur in real life or on the internet, whether it be flies or people. A measure of sensible response is required, especially for digital harassment where people reach for it, pull it down, get it from the internet and download it into their lives. Simply stop that and the harassment becomes non-existent. Actively seek the harassment, pursue and inflame it, makes you the perpetrator not the victim. Target a group, harassing a group so they harass you back, means you are not the victim you are the perpetrator.
It must be in your face, inescapable and have a physical nature either in threat or action. Keep in mind criminals feel harassed by the criminal justice system, the police actually do actively harass them, the courts set out to and functionally do harass them and correctional services harass them to reform them. The most harassing entity on the planet is the various third arm of government, the judiciary. So always beware, which harassment is the greater and is the action balanced.
I suppose it would also not include, spreadsheets, cad/cam machines, animation, coding et al. Lots of people spend twelve hours a day in front of computers, lots as in large numbers, not lots as in large percentages but when you start with 7 billion, even a tiny percentage is millions.
However there measure is not a measure of productivity but a measure of technological based time wasting, definitely not one of producing some thing other than perhaps large measures of social angst https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... So the most productive week for, hmm, disrupting actual productivity?
Looking at the design, I am surprised, that Apple hasn't altered the design. In reality the CPU should be attached to the back plate and then the motherboard fitted over it. This would allow the entire back plate to be the heat sink and heat exchanger, obviating the need for a fan. I am surprised desktops have also not made this change. There is no reason the entire side of a PC tower could be a solid piece of finned aluminium obviating the need for a fan. Simply fit the CPU to the side plate and fit the motherboard on top, so CPU on one side of the motherboard, whilst all other bits on the other side, no fan required, as you have over a square foot of heat sink and a few square feed of heat exchange from the fins.
It was lower because they were selling stock, when CEO start dumping stock, yeah buddy, it certainly does not improve stock prices. Not to forget mister mutton brain, if they sold it for a profit then they made money, they just made less money if they would have waited and found out the bug has less of a fiscal impact. So yeah, really, really, really, looks like insider trading and failure to prosecuted would really, really, really look like rampant corruption. Oh so public, it's going to be really, really, really hard to slime out of this one. About the only way, prove they were unaware of the problem.
The only free market, the nomadic system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... Capitalism was built upon slavery, an inherent requirement of capitalism is that people can be starved to death, denied access to resources if they do not conform ie work for others. You are actively denied the ability to work for yourself under capitalism ie hunt and gather the only true version of free economics. If you attempt to hunt and gather you will be imprisoned until the day you die or are simply shot outright. Capitalism is slavery or death.
How successful has capitalism been, hmm, world wars, hundreds of millions dead, mass starvation, global terrorism, all the product of capitalism, ugly indeed. Now no effort required, simply capital, rich means remaining rich, earning an income for nothing other the existing capital, no effort, no contribution to society, simply a big ole fat parasite.
So M$ vs Google, ohh look, one pack of greedy capitalists parasites complaining about the other pack of greedy capitalists parasites, doing what they do because when they do it, it's good for them but when others do it, it's bad for them.
Unproductive land. Visit surveyor, visit land brokerage, slice of piece of unproductive and sell it, no taxes. So exactly how much land is now a rich person tax cheat, you know funnel non-farming income, through a farm, to cheat on taxes, I hear it is a favourite hobby of the rich and greedy. For a farmer, have unproductive land, than who is kidding who, fucking sell it, why pay taxes on unproductive land.
Do you know what is the most effective birth control, alimony. Google wants to fix it's shit, than charge for uploads to access advertising review. Free uploads no ad revenue, want ad revenue, pay for the upload so many cents per minute. Stick up a movie, to gain ad revenue, pay and then get caught in the first thirty days before any revenue and lose your upload investment cost. It becomes a balance between paying for uploads and earning ad revenue, slows things down, makes it more manage able. It wont stop everything but it will slow it all down and shift goggle cash flow (they'll pick up income early before paying ad revenue). People will of course be more careful when it comes to uploading content if they want ad revenue because of the initial investment, they can still practice with free uploads with no ad revenue to gauge audience numbers and see whether the upload investment will generate an ad revenue return.
Problem is, they are not the problem. They are all idiots but simply publicly on display idiots. The deep state and shadow government are in control of everything except the silly goings on in the white house and trumps twitter feed. How many decisions has Trump made that have impacted anything what so ever, especially in terms of foreign policy, probably zero. Although shooting off his mouth and twitter have undoubtedly messed up a lot of deep state and shadow government plans, by making them look really bad (on purpose on by accident still hard to tell). Trump certainly has done one thing, expose the deep state and shadow government, pretty much in full public view now, most can see the corruption now. The war industrial complex, the entirely corrupt fourth estate main stream media, corporate control, the horror of hollywood and it's part in controlling feeding the corrupt, with the sexually exploitable. All one giant shit show on full display, still pretending it is holier than holy and only being holey as in the PR is now full of holes and leaking the truth all over the place.