Slashdot Mirror


User: Ulven

Ulven's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
215
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 215

  1. Re:Rutan is ready to flight-test the rocket motor on X-Prize Progress Update · · Score: 1

    Now that is sad.

  2. Re:Why the concern? on Phoenix School to Install Face Scanners · · Score: 1

    Prehaps the fact that the charges weren't proved because they were false?

  3. Re:Why the concern? on Phoenix School to Install Face Scanners · · Score: 1
    As long as it's just alleged anything, it's wrong.

    The point in question (in this argument anyway) is not what they were accused of, but the fact that just being accused is enough to get you on the list.

    You don't have to have actually done anything, just have been accused of it.

    Now, tell me that isn't wrong.

  4. Re:Why the concern? on Phoenix School to Install Face Scanners · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Alleged does not mean guilty.

    This sounds that anyone who has ever even been accused of being a sex offender would be in the list. Not just those found guilty.

    As the great great grandparent said, not good.

  5. Re:Finally, an anti-pollution project for Bush on Europe Begins Noise Mapping Effort · · Score: 1

    Which was, I think, the point of your parent.

  6. Re:stupid gap in PHP... on Examining an Automated Spam Tool · · Score: 1

    In the later versions, it's turned off by default.

  7. Re:Fingers on Biometrics: Prepare to be Scanned · · Score: 1

    So tell me, how do you open doors?

  8. Re:"Novel"? on Mozilla Thunderbird 0.4 Released · · Score: 1

    </sarcasm>

  9. Re:Sue? No, use the Patriot Act on Another Worm Targets Anti-Spam Sites · · Score: 1

    No it damn well isn't.

    Why does everything these days have to be due to terrorism? The last thing I heard being described as terrorism was that someone who had defrauded a bank was being held on antiterrorism chargs.

    Fraud is terrorism?

    It's seriously annoying and it can't be just me who finds it so.

    "Ooooh, a bandwagon, let's all get on and some have fun!"

    And for God's sake, don't find any practical or intelligent use for the PATRIOT act. The last thing we want or need is other countrys coming up with their own versions.

    (Any incorrect apostrophies are just looking for attention, and are not to be given any.)

  10. Re:Nothing new here on Maine to Launch Internet Sex-Offender Registry · · Score: 1

    I hope you didn't mean all that.

  11. Re:Unbelievable... on Galileo System To Include Jamming Capability · · Score: 1
    If the Canadians leave a bunch of tanks lying around in Iran after a training exercise (lets say they simply forgot to pack them), and the Iranians use them to attack US forces, does that mean the US forces can't counterattack since the equipment is the property of Canada?

    Close, but a better analogy would be:

    If the Canadians are training with the Americans in Iran, and a fanatic or two hang onto the back of a Canadian tank taking pot shots at the Americas with RPGs. Does that mean the US forces can't counterattack since the equipment is the property of Canada?

    Well, yes it does. Get the Canadians to sort it out. Firing at an ally might cause political ructions, not to mention noone really trusting them to behave on the battlefield.

    Oh, wait, they've already got away with that several times.

    Looks like you win.

  12. Re:time to prove GPL's right in court on Embedded Device Manufacturers Ignoring GPL · · Score: 1

    Ooops, didn't see the previous comment.

  13. Re:time to prove GPL's right in court on Embedded Device Manufacturers Ignoring GPL · · Score: 1

    As opposed to having to expend resources writing a component that could be filled with one that might already be out in the proprietry code domain simply because of the harsh restrictions placed on the availibility of the source?

  14. Re:Incident response times on New IE Holes Discovered · · Score: 1

    Company idiocy or not, that employee is still forced to use IE.

  15. Re:Found out the hard way on Need... More... Power... · · Score: 1

    Did you consider that perhaps he's only renting the house?

  16. Re:That's totally fuct on Transatlantic Cable Fault Disrupts Internet In UK · · Score: 1

    Usually in a shallow trench on the sea floor, or lying on the seabed.

    Lots of insulation and cladding so they don't have to be maintained.

  17. Re:BigBlockMopar in University...Similar event on L.A. County Bans Use Of "Master/Slave" Term · · Score: 1

    Vegetarians are usually quite happy to wear leather shoes, belts and coats etc. After all, the defitition of a vegitarian is just someone who doesn't eat meat.

    You yourself not only don't eat meat, but you don't have anything to do with leather, or eat cheese, eggs, milk etc. You said it yourself, you are a vegan.

    vegitarian != vegan.

    So seeing that the girl in the story called herself a vegitarian, such an observation would be perfectly valid.

  18. Re:watching games might not be so popular. on Documentary about Professional Gaming · · Score: 1

    So runners aren't atheletes either? Or jumpers, or swimmers...

  19. Re:Why Bother: on Apple's iTunes DRM Cracked? · · Score: 1

    Rewritable CD?

  20. What's the difference? on California to Require Paper Voter Receipt · · Score: 1

    So what's the difference between reading a candidate's name on paper, and reading it on the screen?

    Or do the machines speak names out loud?

  21. Re:Hey... on California to Require Paper Voter Receipt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't that everywhere?

  22. Re:It hurts the innocent even more on E-Bombs: Technology Update · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You're right - half right.

    There are two versions of EMPs. One is a relativly low powered pulse that would do as you say.

    However, the other is the one the military are looking at, and is more of a precision weapon.

    Think of the difference between a rifle and a grenade.

    The type of narrowband HPM weapons that the U.S. military is looking at offers everything that e-bombs do not. They're nonlethal, reuseable, and tunable, and they can be fired from miles away. Like a laser, the focused beam disperses only slightly over great distances. With a frequency range that is between about 1 and 10 GHz, they can penetrate even electronics shielded against a nuclear detonation. The deepest bunkers with the thickest concrete walls are not safe from such a beam if they have even a single unprotected wire reaching the surface.
  23. Re:I wonder what the airspeed velocity... on SCO Hints at *BSD Lawsuits Next Year, And More · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    *grin*

  24. Re:Must die? on NASA Debates How And When To Kill Hubble Telescope · · Score: 1

    Voyager, anybody?

  25. Re:A pedant speaks on Mail Server Flaw Opens MS Exchange to Spam · · Score: 0

    Oh, so the French had nothing to do with it?