Slashdot Mirror


Transatlantic Cable Fault Disrupts Internet In UK

An anonymous reader submits "Web traffic between the U.S. and Europe has been hit after an undersea cable developed a major fault on Tuesday. Because the TAT-14 cable network is shaped like a ring, it should be able to cope with one such failure -- but unfortunately the consortium that owns it hadn't fixed an earlier problem, just off the U.S. coast. Just shows how systems with build-in redundancy can still go badly wrong...."

394 comments

  1. Tin foil hat, please. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    LINX, the London Internet Exchange, which carries nearly all UK Internet traffic and over half of Europe's Internet traffic

    I guess the Echelon boys got to go home early that day.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by SkArcher · · Score: 1

      The only thing I noticed was that NTL's DNS servers stopped working.

      I switched to the OpenNIC DNS server and it all works fine, with a little more lag, but nothing serious.

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    2. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by bsharitt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does this mean that there will be packets washing up on the coast over the next few days?

    3. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by Doctor7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Adding in a DNS server didn't do it for me - I tried using the Demon one and couldn't get anywhere (sticking with the default, I could still reach The Register for some reason, but nowhere else). The problem seemed to be that the ntlworld.com addresses were not resolving - mail, news, and web proxy - so maybe OpenNIC had them listed and Demon didn't

    4. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by schon · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that there will be packets washing up on the coast over the next few days?

      No silly, everybody knows they evaporate when they hit the air.

    5. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some locals on the south-coast of England will be looking at my porn on the beach then!

    6. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by sachar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      that and maybe they will find nemo when fixing that fiber.

    7. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by bsharitt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, that's just something the environmentalists has implemented in IPv6.

    8. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yep, they vanish right into the ether.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by ilyag · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, a rescue mission is already on thier way. They are going to fish out the cablewrecked packets from a helicopter as the packets reach the surface, and manually deliver them to the site of their destination.

    10. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by Pieroxy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From the story: Just shows how systems with build-in redundancy can still go badly wrong

      Well, build-in redundancy is just there to let you some time to fix problems before disrupting activity. I mean, if I don't change HDD A on my RAID-1 Array when it is reported to be defective, there is no point in having a RAID-1 Array. The company in charge is responsible. The "build-in redundancy" did its job fine. They just shouldn't have installed a system with redundancy if they didn't plan on fixing non-disruptive problems.

    11. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by sachar · · Score: 1, Funny

      Screw fiber! lets use avian carriers. (RFC1149)

    12. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That earlier "break" in the cable near the US east coast wouldn't have been near the NSA headquarters in Maryland, would it?

      There may now be a new branch on the cable leading to Fort Meade.

    13. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      They just shouldn't have installed a system with redundancy if they didn't plan on fixing non-disruptive problems.
      Well, if you read the article you'll find that the first failure was a) recent and b) in the process of being repaired. Based on the article, there is no problem with the operators obvious.

      Redundant equipment won't protect you against faults that take down the remainder of the equipment before the first is back online. Neither will backup equipment, nor alternate routing. The only thing that will is to get MTBF up and MTTR down.
    14. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      This just point out that editors shouldn't let stories badly written make it to the first page. Granted I should RTFA, but there is no point in showing to me a 5-line summary that is not doing its job (summarizing, that is).
      Instead of "but unfortunately the consortium that owns it hadn't fixed an earlier problem, just off the U.S. coast.", I should have read:
      "but unfortunately the consortium that owns it hadn't had the time to fix an earlier problem, just off the U.S. coast."

      So yes, I am guilty of relying on a poorly written and misleading story ;-(. My bad.

    15. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rely on? Poorly written? Misleading?

      You do know you're on Slashdot, right? :)

    16. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by welsh+git · · Score: 1

      I had similar problems with freeserves nameservers. Strangely, by switching my home box DNS to do DNS requests directly, instead of forwarding them to freeserve, everything worked fine. I was online most of the day via ssh to canada, and I had no problems, other than these dns problems.

      --
      Sig out of date
    17. Re:Tin foil hat, please. by slashnull · · Score: 1

      God help us if they didn't prevent the token from falling out.

  2. Kinda scary.. by iantri · · Score: 0

    I know that there is fault-tolerance, but putting control of most of the telecommunications connectivity of an entire continent is kind of scary..

    1. Re:Kinda scary.. by grub · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, I've read that 5 times now and am unable to parse it. Also babelfish doesn't have Drooler->English translation. Please rephrase.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Kinda scary.. by iantri · · Score: 1
      Damn, should have previewed. That should read:

      I know that there is fault-tolerance, but putting control of most of the telecommunications connectivity of an entire continent in the hands of one company is kind of scary..

    3. Re:Kinda scary.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, much better. Thank you. :)

    4. Re:Kinda scary.. by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

      This isn't one company tho, according to the article it is owned/operated by a consortium of companies.

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    5. Re:Kinda scary.. by iantri · · Score: 0

      It's still amazing though that we could disconnect Europe from the Internet with ease..

    6. Re:Kinda scary.. by Johnnienumlock5 · · Score: 1

      Kinda makes you think what would happen between other contries if connectivity was lost.

      --
      http://www.users.muohio.edu/reamsjp/donate.html
    7. Re:Kinda scary.. by Alranor · · Score: 1
      Or if you read the article (or even the summary at the top) you'll see that it's not in the hands of one company.

      From the article:

      TAT-14 is owned by a consortium of telcos
    8. Re:Kinda scary.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at it another way; you'd be disconnecting North America from the internet, at least as far as Europe goes.

    9. Re:Kinda scary.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is kind of scary that the whole continent of America might be cut of from the rest of the world.

      No worries, guys. We will send you water and food, and hope that you don't feel too lonely.

    10. Re:Kinda scary.. by bugbread · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, we haven't. As of a few years ago, we still had 3 other cables (6 other routes, as they are all ring topologies). We've just shut off some traffic, leased lines, etc. and forced more connections through the remaining lines, causing latency and connectivity for some people. The AC-1, TAT-12/13, and Gemini lines are up and running fine.

    11. Re:Kinda scary.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Headline in an English paper: "Fog In Channel - Continent Cut Off"

  3. Ok let me get this straight.... by Neck_of_the_Woods · · Score: 5, Funny


    We have a link from the US to the UK.

    It is redundant, unless we have 2 faults.

    We have a single fault...but we don't repair it.

    So then we have anouther one!

    I would really like to ask if these guys ever thought of putting together a startup....because let me tell you, they already have the right frame of mind.

    --
    Neck_of_the_Woods
    #/usr/local/surf/glassy/overhead
    1. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by bugbread · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My guess is that the initial problem may have been an undersea cable. Those generally take 2 or more weeks to fix, and if the weather is really bad, they have to pull the boats back in, delaying things further.

      No evidence, of course, but it seems like the most logical reason. Cables like the TAT-14 don't stay unfixed just because someone in management is lazy.

    2. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by JeffSh · · Score: 1

      after reading the article, it says that the first fault happened within the last month, and that it should be fixed within the week.

      these cables lie under several fathoms of ocean, they are not that easy to just fix.

    3. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, they don't get fixed because fixing a broken fiber in 1000M of water is a tricky operation...

    4. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by parc · · Score: 1

      It's very likely that the initial fault has been in the process of being repaired for quite some time. In the best of conditions, it can take a while to fix fiber. Now imagine trying to fix it on the high seas.

    5. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Neck_of_the_Woods · · Score: 1

      I have to agree here on that you can't fix something overnight. I was just pointing out what was best stated below:

      Oh, ho, ho, irony! Oh, no, no, we don't get that here. See, uh, people ski topless here while smoking dope, so irony's not really a high priority. We haven't had any irony here since about, uh, '83, when I was the only practitioner of it. And I stopped because I was getting tired of being stared at.
      -- Steve Martin in Roxanne

      --
      Neck_of_the_Woods
      #/usr/local/surf/glassy/overhead
    6. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by H8X55 · · Score: 1

      I would really like to ask if these guys ever thought of putting together a startup....because let me tell you, they already have the right frame of mind.

      sounds like they work for my company! Actually - we had a fail over option designed after we got a new system that communicates via WAN. the fail over was never implemented because a certain Ops Manager was already over budget. A few months after the sytems was implemented we had some problems with one of the circuits. That manager came banging on my door in the early morning. "We cannot connect to Denver, we're going to have to use the other frame circuit!"

      imagine my delight telling him it was non-existant, due to his constraits, early in the project.

      he couldn't believe that he personally had veto'ed that option just months before.

    7. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by grub · · Score: 1, Funny


      these cables lie under several fathoms of ocean, they are not that easy to just fix.

      It's hold to hard your breath while soldering underwater.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    8. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by gorilla · · Score: 5, Informative

      Remember that fixing faults in undersea cables isn't exactly an activity that you can do in 30 seconds. You've got to get a ship out to the location of the fault, hook the cable, and get it to the surface, and then fix it. There are going to be a limited number of cable ships which have the capability, and they might be busy elsewhere. Even once they start acting on the repair, they are going to take time to get to where the fault is (14 knots cruise speed isn't exactly the fastest ship around the QE2 cruises at 28 knots, and still takes a week to cross the atlantic. Remember a cable ship might be off in the other side of the pacific when it becomes free), and then time to get the cable and repair it. Therefore 'earlier this month' not being repaired is perfectly reasonable.

    9. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by dnahelix · · Score: 2, Informative

      They don't go underwater to fix these cables. A boat follows the cable, pulling it up at one end of the boat, and dropping it down at the other. From what I understand, if a big storm or the like happens, they have to drop it and start over.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    10. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The real problem is in the design of networks. Information networks are designed to be fault-tolerant (famously but erroneously attributed to a desire to withstand nuclear attacks) -- multiple connections and a "mesh" network mean that if nodes break, traffic is routed elsewhere and the network continues to function. This works great, and there's no problem with it. But the problem is, humans don't build networks this way, and economics is against doing so.

      If you're buying a network connection, you buy it from the best provider available, which naturally means network connections become concentrated to a few suppliers, who in turn find economies of scale and provide lower prices, thus attracting more customers. Thus the economics of building networks naturally produces networks that have a few or even single points of failure: we noticed this on September 11th, when the knockout of the huge links through New York noticeably slowed transatlantic traffic, even to sites other than CNN and the other news sites that were being toasted by demand at that point. Centralisation is something that we naturally do because it's economically efficient, but centralisation leads to problems for networks.

      In the energy sector, things are even less flexible, because energy connections are a lot more expensive to set up and difficult to maintain than information links. The US powercut was caused by the cascading failure of a daisy-chain of power stations around the great lakes. Nobody would build an information network that way any more, but it's still the natural way to build a power network. Italy's powercut was caused by a huge reliance on foreign power, supplied by JUST TWO LINKS to France -- one fell over, instantly overloading the second and knocking it out too.

      Yes, we are critically reliant on these fragile networks. And yes, economic realities tend to cause these problems, but not because of privatization: it's simply because humans naturally tend to build poor networks, because those are cheaper -- no matter who pays the bills. To solve the problem, we need to pay more attention to networking theory when building all of our networks, and provide regulatory incentives to build better networks of both kinds.

      Or one day, a critical failure will cause a cascading catastrophe, and it will be nobody's fault. We built the network to fail that way.

    11. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by drakaan · · Score: 1

      I'ts also hard to hold your breath while soldering underwater...[insert rimshot here]

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    12. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      breathe.... in .... out.... in... out.... good... now you really need to find something better to do with your life then flip out over how a post on slashdot was moderated

    13. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by joggle · · Score: 0, Redundant

      He's talking about the problem off of the US coast I presume. The article doesn't say when that problem started, but did say that it would be fixed within a week.

    14. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      these cables lie under several fathoms of ocean

      "Several fathoms" ?!?! That would be what, about twenty feet?

    15. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's hold to hard your breath while soldering underwater.

      Insert gratuitous comment about translating from Drooler to English

    16. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by drakaan · · Score: 1
      The US powercut was caused by the cascading failure of a daisy-chain of power stations around the great lakes.

      True, but if the computer systems that monitor situations like that had been in place and working (there were two systems that were either broken or turned off that were supposed to have prevented it...looking for a link to an article as we speak), the other grid operators could have upped their output enough to prevent it. The outage that happened there didn't have to happen...it'd be like a water system where you increase the output of active water sources when one has a problem that knocks it out.

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    17. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by billimad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cables like the TAT-14 don't stay unfixed just because someone in management is lazy.

      no, but they do if it's up to the French to fix it.

    18. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by bugbread · · Score: 1

      No, if you READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE you would know that the second outage was an undersea fault. The first outage is not explicitly explained (while we know it was a TAT-14 problem, it doesn't say if it was in the undersea section, the landing station, or the short surface span before the landing station).

    19. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Also there's the whole finding where the cable failed.

      I know nothing of undersea cables other than the fact that they're usually jacketed in steel and a shit load of rubber.

      Lets just hope it didn't fail in 7000 feet of water...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    20. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by kiwimate · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why the {expletive deleted} is this modded so high?

      Well, let's see. Perhaps because the parent poster (i) did read the article; (ii) also read the thread here; and (ii) apparently has somewhat better English comprehension skills than someone else I could name.

      You see, it's quite simple. He's talking about the initial problem. You're talking about the subsequent problem. The initial problem, from the article...

      Unfortunately, a part of the cable near the US coast had already suffered a technical fault earlier this month, which meant there was no built-in redundancy to cope with Tuesday's failure. According to BT, the US-side fault should be fixed by the end of this week, which will bring the cable network online again.

      Now, as you'll see, there is no mention as to what the actual problem was, just a guide as to when it'll be fixed which gives us an indication that it is taking some time. This, in turn, was the subject of discussion of the original post.

      I hope this elucidation has clarified the issue for you. Oh yes, one more thing...you're a silly git.

    21. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by daBass · · Score: 1
      There are a few more cables then just the one.

      And no, you don't simply drive a van to where the cable is broken, dig it up and repair it all in an afternoon's work.

    22. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by bugbread · · Score: 1

      D'oh!! Shoulda previewed. I meant to say "an undersea cable cut" (as opposed to a landing station equipment failure, beach cable, or the like)

    23. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by gorilla · · Score: 3, Informative

      Finding where the fault occured is actually pretty easy. Each repeater can be remotely interregated for diagnostics, and they have a TDR built into them to detect exactly where the fault is. So you know it's say 1500m west of repeater #17. Go to that location, and pull it up.

    24. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 or 4 years ago, if they just would've announced this, and started a public offering, they'd be RICH! Now, they just look like they are lazy.

    25. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by EinarH · · Score: 1
      My guess is that the initial problem may have been an undersea cable.
      Probably someone on a submarine that fucked up during the "maintenance" on a fibre cable...

      [/tinfoil hat mode]

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    26. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by grozzie2 · · Score: 2, Funny
      no, but they do if it's up to the French to fix it.

      Actually, if you read the article, you would know. The first fault occurred weeks ago, on the american side. The second fault on Tuesday, on the European side. If the first fault had been fixed when it happened, then this new one would not have brought the system down, so, it appears the facts disagree with your statement.

      The statement should correctly read:
      no, but they do if it's up to the americans to fix it.

    27. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by mikerich · · Score: 1
      All that and it's winter out there. I wouldn't like to be the guy operating the world's most expensive arcade grab machine somewhere in the North Atlantic in November.

      The alternative explanation is that British Telecom have spent the last three days digging a hole at the bottom of my road and gone and cut the wrong cable.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    28. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Shades of The Abyss. Wait where did that crane go?

    29. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Roofus · · Score: 4, Informative

      In case anyone was wondering, TDR=Time Domain Reflectometry.

      http://www.tscm.com/tdr.html

      Basically you just send a pulse using the cable which has a fault. At the point of the fault, the signal reverses its path. By timing how long it takes for a pulse to return, and by knowing the speed of the pulse in the cable, you can figure out how far along the cable the fault is.

      Of course, it can suck if your cable doesn't travel in a straight line...

    30. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, but they do if it's up to the americans to fix it.

      i think this is actually a sign that america is getting ready to invade europe...

      1 cut internet access/communications
      2 invade!
      3 ???
      4 profit

    31. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or...more likely (put your tinfoil hat back on!)...the cia or nsa taping into more undersea cables!

    32. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Settle down, Beavis.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    33. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by gorilla · · Score: 1

      Nice Diagram. I belive TAT-14 is the yellow one which hooks above Britan and below Iceland, and the other half of the ring is the yellow one directly below Ireland.

    34. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This?
      http://customerinfo.telia.net/tt/TT0002347_ english .html

      "There is currently stoppage in some of backbone links between Europe - USA. The traffic is routed through redundant links and will not affect our customers."

    35. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just so as not to create any ill-will, please note that I am not iantri, and my comment above was meant to be humorous.

      Wow I'm in a good mood today :)

    36. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wasn't referring to the new cut. The old malfuncton that took out the redundency but left the single path intact was on the east coast of North America. This malfunction has been there for some time now and is just now getting fixed..

    37. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by TKinias · · Score: 1

      scripsit grub:

      It's hold to hard your breath while soldering underwater.

      Well, yes, but it's harder to breathe...

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
    38. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by afidel · · Score: 1

      nah, since it terminates in the US and is not owned by a hostile foreign government they just tap it by tapping it at the terminating router. They only had to tap the Russian lines undersea because the endpoint was on Russian soil.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    39. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by afidel · · Score: 1

      The only problem is they don't always know WHERE a particular repeater is. They know where they laid it but these cables have a tendancy to move quite a bit, especially after a split.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    40. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's (insert scandalous company here, like Enron) new business strategy:

      1) Cut communication with the outside world
      2) ???
      3) Profit!

    41. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by Beardydog · · Score: 0

      Breathing is the easiest option, but results are generally negative...

    42. Re:Ok let me get this straight.... by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      What's funny to me is how someone sees a bold tag and a 'dirty' word and thinks I actually invested time and emotion in this! pfffttffbftvbtptpt

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
  4. A very british disconnection.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    So that explains my inbox full of random british comments like "My internet's fell of the lolly!" and "I've bloody well lost my connection!" and "Cherrio good chap, the internet's down!"

    1. Re:A very british disconnection.... by Pingular · · Score: 1

      So that explains my inbox full of random british comments like "My internet's fell of the lolly!" and "I've bloody well lost my connection!" and "Cherrio good chap, the internet's down!"
      Heh funny how it's ok for people in the US to make fun of people in England (and you mean England, not britain!), but not visa versa.
      Along the same lines, did you know that rhyming-slang for someone who is predudist against people from America is called Listerine, because in rhyming slang an American is called septic (from septic tank = yank), then anti-septic, and finally Listerine, interesting stuff I thought :)

      --

      When anger rises, think of the consequences.
      Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    2. Re:A very british disconnection.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes because we all know London is a COUNTRY!

    3. Re:A very british disconnection.... by eli1021 · · Score: 1

      Yes and Cockney is English slang for "on the Dole".

  5. Re:No big loss. by Newspimp · · Score: 1

    Wow. What an insightful post.

    "Hey, I hear Ford Explorers used to rollover a lot"
    "Most people have refrigerators."

    What was the ring fault they had lapsed on fixing the previous time, and who's responsible for maintenance on an international line within no clear national boundary (if indeed it failed in the ocean)

  6. That's totally fuct by siphoncolder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Imagine... some big cable that's thousands of miles long connecting continents...

    That's just a weird idea. You gotta wonder who makes those things and how, exactly, they're maintained. Let alone set up in the first place. Do they just sit along the ocean floor? Are they suspended in mid-water? I have absolutely no idea. Just mind-boggling to me, the logistics of it.

    --
    i'm amazed that i survived - an airbag saved my life.
    1. Re:That's totally fuct by confused+one · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's literally one big, long, armored cable drapped across the ocean floor between the U.S coast and England.

      hard to imagine, ain't it.

    2. Re:That's totally fuct by bugbread · · Score: 5, Informative

      The sit on the ocean floor. In low water areas, they are cladded in steel, to prevent anchors, etc. from ripping them up. Recent ones are apparently treated to prevent sharks from chewing on them, which was an old problem. Fixing them involves sending out a big ship that hauls up cable from the ocean floor (they have a lot of slack so that this is possible), hanging the cable across the deck, fixing it, and lowering it back into the water.

      Yes, I'm a WAN administrator, why do you ask?

    3. Re:That's totally fuct by SpaceRook · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. That's really an impressive technology. Kinda creepy, too. All that information streaming through the dark sea bed.....

    4. Re:That's totally fuct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    5. Re:That's totally fuct by Ulven · · Score: 1

      Usually in a shallow trench on the sea floor, or lying on the seabed.

      Lots of insulation and cladding so they don't have to be maintained.

    6. Re:That's totally fuct by PaulGrimshaw · · Score: 1

      Its lays on the ground loosely, IIRC, its because of the cable laying that they found a mountain range under water... apparently they needed much more cable to get over them than they had anticipated for.

      Paul.

    7. Re:That's totally fuct by gr8_phk · · Score: 2, Interesting
      How?

      1) put a big spool of cable on a ship.
      2) anchor the cable to shore.
      3) set sail for the other side of the ocean.

      I had no idea it could be so simple and obvious when I heard it either.

    8. Re:That's totally fuct by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Check out this great article by Neal Stephenson in wired. It talks about running an even longer cable. Beware though. He's in his typical verbose form. The article is 56 pages long.

    9. Re:That's totally fuct by velo_mike · · Score: 5, Informative

      You gotta wonder who makes those things and how, exactly, they're maintained.

      Check out Global Marine Systems the company that laid it, and some of their cool toys (er, if you're into big assed boats).

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    10. Re:That's totally fuct by pla · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's really an impressive technology. Kinda creepy, too. All that information streaming through the dark sea bed...

      Now you know why the high-pressure methane breathing aliens (the ones who live under the sea for convenience of maintaining "atmospheric" pressure in their domes) know all about us, but we know almost nothing about them.

      We've just given them a high-bandwidth line that we have almost no ability to monitor between the two endpoints.


      (For the humor-impaired... Laugh).

    11. Re:That's totally fuct by gorilla · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how impressive it is, considering that we've been doing the same basic thing since 1858. All we've done since then is increase the speed of each link, and the numbers of links in each cable.

    12. Re:That's totally fuct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Search google for tat-14, or better yet, search images.google.com and ignore all the tattoo images coming up.

    13. Re:That's totally fuct by jonnyfivealive · · Score: 1

      personally, im still confused. serious question, not a troll...

      how in the world do you get that far down to reach the section of cable that is miles below the surface? holy crap, that must be one hell of a ship. it must hold a lot of cable to hoist that bidness up and then be able to hold the weight of it all as they work on it. do they just get it up high enough to allow divers to get to it? i agree with the parent of your post, this is absolutely amazing to me.

    14. Re:That's totally fuct by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Read "The Victorian Internet" by I forget who wrote it. It is about the telegraph and how all the things we thought were new in the 90's had really been around for 100 years or so (chat rooms, compression, data security) and it talks about the first time some nut decided to put a big cable under the ocean to connect continents. It is a really cool book!

    15. Re:That's totally fuct by bugbread · · Score: 1

      Speaking of which, undersea cables are repaired by hauling them up to the surface and repairing them on boats. The US Navy has put a lot of money developing a cable repair/maintenance submarine that would allow the US to tap undersea cables without being noticed. All that information streaming through the dark sea bed...

    16. Re:That's totally fuct by jonnyfivealive · · Score: 1
      from their website:
      Global Marine have developed DeepGrab?, a unique Cable Recovery tool capable of recovering to depths of 3m, that existing ROVs are unable to reach.

      3 whole meters?? wow! wish i had something that could go that deep. wait a minute... i can swim that deep holding my breath. perhaps 3Km?
    17. Re:That's totally fuct by bugbread · · Score: 1

      All good questions. The boats are pretty damn big, from the pictures I've seen. They hook two sections of the cable and draw it all the way up onto the ship, performing the work outside of the water (those cables carry pretty big amounts of voltage...wouldn't want to cut them underwater). The US Navy has been working on a submarine (don't know if they built it or not, as I heard about it a long time ago) that would allow work on undersea cables where they lie. The idea was for use in information gathering (in the old days, we called it "spying"). Presumably, though, as with much military technology, it would eventually be used by the private sector for cable repair.

    18. Re:That's totally fuct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The thing that's really going to cook your brain is when you realize that the first one was put in place over a hundred years ago.

    19. Re:That's totally fuct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sit on the ocean floor. In low water areas, they are cladded in steel, to prevent anchors, etc. from ripping them up. Recent ones are apparently treated to prevent sharks from chewing on them, which was an old problem. Fixing them involves sending out a big ship that hauls up cable from the ocean floor (they have a lot of slack so that this is possible), hanging the cable across the deck, fixing it, and lowering it back into the water.

      Back when I worked at JDS Uniphase, I worked on the design & testing for some of the fiber optic components for undersea cables. The undersea companies have very rigorous standards. Once they accept a component (after a LOT of qualification tests) they require that JDS not make any changes in the manufacturing process without the customers's approval. And they require JDS to get the same guaranty from its suppliers for that component.

      The undersea components market is hard to break in to. Cost is not the primary concern, long-term reliability is. Sending out a repair ship to fix a cable is very, very expensive.

    20. Re:That's totally fuct by bugbread · · Score: 1

      That's the article about the laying of the FLAG, isn't it? Great article. Read it when I first got my WAN job, and it helped out understanding what these cables are like immensely.

    21. Re:That's totally fuct by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 0

      ...high-pressure methane breathing aliens...given them a high-bandwidth line that we have almost no ability to monitor between the two endpoints...

      So, what you're saying is, that if we were all high-pressure methane-breathing aliens who lived under the sea, the RIAA would have a snowball's chance in hell of catching us sharing mp3s, right?

      I bet Jacques Cousteau was the p2p king before he kicked the bucket!

    22. Re:That's totally fuct by daBass · · Score: 1

      I don't think there is enough slack to pull them up. They cut them on the sea floor, then drag up one end, atach a new piece, lower it, pick up the other end, connect that to the same piece's other end and lower the whole thing down. Then, ofcourse, you end up with a big loop on the ocean floor.

    23. Re:That's totally fuct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US Navy has been working on a submarine (don't know if they built it or not, as I heard about it a long time ago) that would allow work on undersea cables where they lie.

      That would be the USS Jimmy Carter (while many US presidents have served in the armed forces, Jimmy Carter was the first to serve on a nuclear sub), and other deep-sea vehicles. The US has been in the business of tapping USSR undersea cables for decades.

    24. Re:That's totally fuct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buddy, if you've got to inform people which of your comments are jokes then you're doing something wrong.

    25. Re:That's totally fuct by Laur · · Score: 1

      I'd guess 3 miles, although it's usually abbreviated mi.

      --
      When you lose something irreplaceable, you don't mourn for the thing you lost, you mourn for yourself. - Harpo Marx
    26. Re:That's totally fuct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Slashdot, pal. There's probably people here who believe that sort of thing. I think it was quite reasonable for him to point out that he didn't.

    27. Re:That's totally fuct by velo_mike · · Score: 1

      3 whole meters?? wow! wish i had something that could go that deep

      From the website: many hundreds of kilometres of cable successfully buried to 3m, or greater, burial depth. I thought the same thing when I read it but the 3m is in substrate under a billion f***ing meters of water.

      btw, love the sig, especially when they're on old dodge omni's, ford festiva's or rabbits...

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    28. Re:That's totally fuct by zBoD · · Score: 1

      > (For the humor-impaired... Laugh).

      The moment you said that, it was no more funny.

      --
      BoD
    29. Re:That's totally fuct by Avihson · · Score: 1

      It is a shame that they stopped teaching history in school.
      I read stories about Fields and the Great Eastern in grade school, back when I was a lad... well I admit that it was almost current events! Ok, the centennial of the cable was a current event!

      Just think, from the 1860s until the 1960s cable was the only secure method of transcontinental communications available to the general public.

    30. Re:That's totally fuct by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Supposedly the NSA has 2 subs for the purpose of snooping trans-continental underwater phone lines.

      Also, the Navy has been able to tap underwater phone lines for a while, there was a famous mission, Operation Ivy Bells, where a US sub tapped a secret underwater military phone line in the USSR.

    31. Re:That's totally fuct by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      What I'm curious about is, how do you repair a fiber-optic cable? Once you cut it, even if you stick them together you've made a boundary. Does the light carry accross? Or do they fuse it together or what?

    32. Re:That's totally fuct by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      It's "buried to 3m...burial depth"? Time to fire the editor, or we'll have balls thrown to a 20m throwing height, and cars driving 50 km of driving distance, jets flying at a speed of 600mph airspeed.

    33. Re:That's totally fuct by Noizemonger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you want to know more about this subject, there is an great article by Cyberpunk Writer Neal Stephenson on Wired in wich he describes the laying of a BIG intercontinental Communication-Cable. As a self proclaimed "Hacker-Tourist" he visits a lot of the construction sites all around the world giving colourful descriptions and a lot of well researched background infos about this rather arcane but fascinating subject. A great read. Find it on: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.12/ffglass.ht ml

    34. Re:That's totally fuct by mikerich · · Score: 5, Informative
      how in the world do you get that far down to reach the section of cable that is miles below the surface? holy crap, that must be one hell of a ship. it must hold a lot of cable to hoist that bidness up and then be able to hold the weight of it all as they work on it. do they just get it up high enough to allow divers to get to it? i agree with the parent of your post, this is absolutely amazing to me.

      Yes you need a big hold and run the cable over the stern. These ships tend to have grapples to latch on to cables and haul it aboard for maintenance.

      The first successful TransAtlantic cable was laid by Great Eastern designed by Slashdot's patron saint - Isambard Kingdom Brunel.

      She was the biggest ship in the World for almost fifty years, and SIX times larger than any ship afloat (that was Brunel's Great Britain which was itself TWICE the size of any other ship).

      Bearing in mind she was launched in 1857 here are the statistics:

      • 680ft long
      • 120ft over the paddle wheels
      • gross tonnage - 18,914 tons
      • displacement over 27,000 tons

      She had a single screw, twin paddle wheels and six masts (her steam engines which were the biggest in the World (naturally) were still novel technology), a complete double bottom and double hull which was internally compartmentalised. She could have carried 4000 people from Britain to Australia and returned without refuelling.

      What happened to her? Brunel could barely launch the ship, she had to be slid sideways into the Thames, rather than float her from a dry dock. It took three months to get her into the water. When she was afloat she had cost more than three times the original budget and the Eastern Steamship Company who commissioned her was on the edge of bankruptcy.

      When she was fitted out, she was put to sea on trials. Brunel was aboard, but the effort of constructing Great Eastern had almost killed him. He suffered a massive stroke and was taken ashore. Shortly afterwards, off of the South Coast, Great Eastern suffered a massive explosion in one of the water jackets surrounding a funnel. Five men died and the ship had to be put in for repair. Brunel was told the news, and almost immediately lapsed into a coma, dying a few days later.

      Finally she was put into service, not on the Australia run which had proved unprofitable, but on the North Atlantic. She never carried more than a tiny fraction of her passengers and was reknowned for rolling in heavy weather. One story does stand out, she hit a reef whilst travelling at full speed on the approach to New York. Her bottom was cut open along a greater length than that of Titanic, not only did she not sink, she continued her voyage without loss of life and arrived safely in New York where she was repaired.

      Eventually the cost of running Great Eastern became too great and in 1864 she was sold to the Telegraph Construction Company for the purpose of laying the TransAtlantic cable. She was the only ship in the World capable of holding the entire cable - it took more than 5 months just to load the cable into her holds. The first attempt in 1865 was almost successful, but the cable broke in Mid Atlantic in more than 6000 feet of water.

      So what did they do? They went back to Britain, picked up another cable and laid the first truly successful cable in 1866. Better than that, Great Eastern found the broken cable (no I have no idea how), spliced it and got that working as well.

      Great Eastern's importance to the British Empire can't be underestimated. She laid the cables that joined Britain to the African colonies, the Eastern part of the Mediterranean, India and Australia. Without them, the British Empire could not have been governed.

      And the ship? Well she was replaced by a custom built cable carrier Faraday in 1874 and laid up in Milford Haven, South Wales. She hung around there for twelve years before being t

    35. Re:That's totally fuct by velo_mike · · Score: 1

      I was more bummed that the careers page came up empty. I figured hey, if I can't get a job coding, maybe I could get a job laying pipe. Nope, nobody wants to pay me for that either.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    36. Re:That's totally fuct by mikerich · · Score: 1
      Read "The Victorian Internet" by I forget who wrote it.

      It's by Tom Standage, and I agree - it's a brilliant book, highly recommended.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    37. Re:That's totally fuct by The+Ego · · Score: 1

      One good (very long) article on submarine cables (by Neal Stephenson):

      Mother Earth Mother Board

      It basically answers all the questions you had in your post. I had noted this article when it appeared and only got to reading it a month ago. A bit too verbose for my taste, but worth the time nonetheless.

    38. Re:That's totally fuct by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      mikerich... is that a pseudonym for Jeremy Clarkson?

    39. Re:That's totally fuct by siphoncolder · · Score: 1

      Overrated my ass, Moderators. Look at the good comments I've generated. Look at the amount of conversation.

      --
      i'm amazed that i survived - an airbag saved my life.
    40. Re:That's totally fuct by ryanw · · Score: 1

      thx for the story... With all our current "technology" around us it's hard to fathom doing tasks like this and getting onto the moon with nothing but nuts and bolts.

    41. Re:That's totally fuct by mikerich · · Score: 1
      LOL!

      You go wash your mouth out!

      It was so depressing that Clarkson made such a good case for Brunel in 'Great Britons'. For a while I had to reconsider my deep-rooted dislike of the man...

      But then I went back to loathing him, his perm, his patronising attitude and 'Top Gear'. My vindictiveness would only be deepened if he was employed to do one of those bloody Freeview adverts!

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    42. Re:That's totally fuct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That seriously ruined the joke.

    43. Re:That's totally fuct by bridson · · Score: 1

      Who makes these things ... the main players nowadays are Alcatel , NEC and Tyco but there are others.

    44. Re:That's totally fuct by bridson · · Score: 1
      how do you repair a fiber-optic cable? Send out a ship, power the cable down, cut the cable, grab one end and pull it up, buoy it off, grab the other end, splice it to a new cable section, recover the other end, splice at that end, test and drop. The splicing generally can be fusion splicing where the fibre is accurately aligned and actually melted until it flows together (~ 0.03dB loss) or a mechanical splice where the ends are effectively clamped together (~ 0.3dB loss). Not sure which they use nowadays at sea for repair.

      Contrary to what many have said there is not often a 'lot' of slack - the above method ends up inserting some new cable and hence the initial cut. The strain of pulling up the uncut cable would probably break it anyway.

  7. Say it ain't so! by Sanity · · Score: 4, Funny
    With the Brits off the Internet, who are we going to rely on to correct our grammar? Who is going to tell us that every plot of every US scifi show was done in the 70's by Dr Who? Who is going translate Alan Cox' Welsh weblog for the rest of us? Who will fight the other side of the "Who invented the first computer?" debate?

    This really is a great loss for the Slashdot community.

    1. Re:Say it ain't so! by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      Not to worry. Us Canucks are still here. We even have the 12 hour time difference.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    2. Re:Say it ain't so! by Malc · · Score: 1

      How about an expat living in Canada? Hahar: for my skills are kept sharp by their resistance to the onslaught of American spellings and date formats! Okay, so part of the time - they seem confused as to which to go these days: whenever I drive past Canadian Tire I think of people getting sleepy, not the bits of rubber on my wheels.

    3. Re:Say it ain't so! by angusr · · Score: 1

      Who is going to tell us that every plot of every US scifi show was done in the 70's by Dr Who? Actually, most of them were done in the 60s by Doctor Who. 40 years of doing all the plots first and with 1/1000th the budget.... And Babbage.

    4. Re:Say it ain't so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reports of us Brits being off the net have been greatly exaggerated

    5. Re:Say it ain't so! by lga · · Score: 1
      With the Brits off the Internet, who are we going to rely on to correct our grammar?


      Well I'm still here. I just had to change my DNS servers and I was back online. That cable wasn't the only connection across the sea you know.

      Steve.
    6. Re:Say it ain't so! by arevos · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm from Britain, and I'm still here :)

      As regards to who invented the first computer, I'd imagine it was more a debate between the German's Z3 and Britain's Colossus. The Z3 was Turing-complete, but only if you hacked it a bit, and it wasn't originally designed to do that, nor was it likely to have ever run that way (if I recall, it involved literally forking the punch tape, and taking advantage of a bug in the mechanical reader to similate an "if" function). Colossus was Turing complete computer, and was designed that way.

      Z3 was finished on May 1941.
      Colossus was finished in January 1944.
      ENIAC was finished on February 1946.

      The US created the second or third computer. Depending on how you figure it, it was Germany or Britain that created the first.

      Personally, I'd vote for Colossus, as the Z3 was never intended to be Turing-complete, and probably never used that way. But then, I'm biased :)

    7. Re:Say it ain't so! by kongo09 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the Brits were cut off - it was rather the rest of the world! Remember the saying: "There is fog over the Channel, the poor continent got cut off."

    8. Re:Say it ain't so! by adrianbaugh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Er, if the Brits are off the internet then you're not going to be able to read AC even in the original Welsh. As far as I know (living 12 miles from the border) Wales is still a part of Britain (despite the best-laid plans of the English to cut it loose and float it off into the Irish Sea ;-P)

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    9. Re:Say it ain't so! by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2, Funny

      It'll take more than internet disruptions to keep us Brits from correcting your grammar mistakes, and translating Alan Cox's blog.

      Though I don't speak a word of welsh, and my grammar probably isn't that hot.. so you'll just have to make do with the company :D

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    10. Re:Say it ain't so! by bongholio · · Score: 1

      You can always get you britism fix when you read about fibre .

    11. Re:Say it ain't so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live near Bristol and I claim Concorde 216.

    12. Re:Say it ain't so! by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Whoever modded this flamebait really needs to read this.

  8. Time to by confused+one · · Score: 1

    lay some new cables... Why run one when two or three will obviously be better.

    1. Re:Time to by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 0, Redundant

      tee-hee - you say "lay"

    2. Re:Time to by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

      You know this kind of fibre isn't cheap don't you? :)

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    3. Re:Time to by Fembot · · Score: 1

      as far as I know it was a ring in the first place (but unfixed fault somewhere near us south coast), and they have redundancy both ways round it too. And i'd like to point out (http://www.tat-14.com if it were actualy working) that we brits wern't actualy cut off from the net. The only trouble I noticed really was logging into msn was impossible at one point, but most places that are actualy worth the time I spend on them are either in the UK/Europe or have mirrors over here somewhere already.

    4. Re:Time to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why buy one, when you can buy two for twice the price, eh?

    5. Re:Time to by gorilla · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since this one is named TAT-14, it's not suprising that there are other TransAtlantic cables. There are currently active 8 different cables that AT&T use crossing the atlantic TAT-8 through TAT-14, and BUS-1. Cables TAT-1 through TAT-7 are retired.

    6. Re:Time to by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Yes I do. I'm also aware that there are numerous other cables already in place.

    7. Re:Time to by confused+one · · Score: 1
      i'd like to point out ... that we brits wern't actualy cut off from the net

      I know. I originally read about the problem on theregister.co.uk

    8. Re:Time to by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Only 8! We'd better get on it right away! That's not enough bandwidth to support my p2p connections...

  9. Hmmmmm by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

    Well I use AOL and everything seems fine here in London.

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
    1. Re:Hmmmmm by CaptainBaz · · Score: 1
      Well I use AOL
      Hmm, you would say that though, wouldn't you...
    2. Re:Hmmmmm by bugbread · · Score: 2, Informative
      My network diagrams show:
      • AC-1
      • Gemini
      • TAT-14CN
      • TAT-12/13CN

      Taking into account redundancy, that's 8 cables. There may be more, as my cable map is a few years old.
    3. Re:Hmmmmm by lordrich · · Score: 1

      The very fact that you have to use AOL surely means that everything is not right! Who in their right mind would use AOL out of choice?

    4. Re:Hmmmmm by arevos · · Score: 1

      Everything okay here, too, but some sites seem to be down. Moonpod software for one.

    5. Re:Hmmmmm by gorilla · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here are some more. Still not complete though.

    6. Re:Hmmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMFAO

  10. I was suprised this wasnt in by Pingular · · Score: 5, Informative

    the article, but here's the link to the linx (badum tsh) website, with another news site for the article.

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
  11. Re:No big loss. by sonicattack · · Score: 1

    Ok, sometimes comments on Slashdot are a bit US-centric, but I think we have a winner!

  12. First Cable by General+Sherman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Honestly, this reminds me of the first transatlantic cable. They kept getting faults and they couldn't figure out what it was. Turns out the paying-out machine had the cable rubbing against some fine metal shavings which would occasionally get stuck in the casing and ground the cable to the sea-water.

    I wonder what happened to this one?

    --
    - Sherman
    1. Re:First Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember being able to call US 800 toll free numbers using the cable from UK call boxes for free. IIRC you put a 0 after the us code.

      much fun at university calling up companies from US magazines.

    2. Re:First Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fishing nets in deep water and big anchors in shallow water are the main culprits.

      FYI, for some history on the TAT's

      http://davidw.home.cern.ch/davidw/public/SubCabl es .html

    3. Re:First Cable by e980238 · · Score: 1

      Yeah but this cable cannot be grounded or whatever since it is fiber and no "electrical" signals are going through it.

    4. Re:First Cable by rcw-work · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is borderline unrelated, but any long-haul fiber cable (that would need repeaters) will have power running through it - usually at a very high voltage.

    5. Re:First Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if i recall the fiber optic cable itself is designed so it can carry a very high electric voltage and it is used to power undersea equipment such as repeaters

  13. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should try running Mac OS X with a .Mac subscription. I should provide all the tools they need to avoid this problem in the future.

  14. Strange... by cperciva · · Score: 1

    I'm in the UK, and I haven't noticed any problems. I've even had a realaudio stream running without interruption.

    1. Re:Strange... by plumby · · Score: 1

      I didn't notice any specific difficulty accessing US sites, but that was probably because NTL's cable internet service was entirely down all night (certainly in Nottingham) last night. I assume it was unrelated to this.

    2. Re:Strange... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NTL's DNS was down, transfer for me was the fastest it's been in a while:) Pity it can't be like that all the time.

    3. Re:Strange... by AchmedHabib · · Score: 1

      Well, I have had some strange problems that I could not figure out, I just got the impression that my ISP had started to suck again.
      What I see is that most of the time, everthing works, but from time to time, a site seems to be unavailable, but before I get to trace it, it starts working again.
      It is not often, just from time to time and when I started monitoring my line, it had perfect uptime with no packet loss. but this will explain a lot.

    4. Re:Strange... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      WHAT!!!???? SPEAK LOUDER...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  15. Damn by FrankoBoy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There's indeed a big risk of electrocution for the ocean here. Imagine the mass extinctions such an accident could cause ! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH !

  16. Eh? by Walterk · · Score: 1

    So, I'm in Britain, and obviously not doing my work, as I'm supposed to, and I wasn't on tuesday aswell, but I didn't notice any fault?

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    this was all over the service provider lists yesterday...

    The latest from the rumor mill....

    FYI, for some history on the TAT's

    http://davidw.home.cern.ch/davidw/public/SubCabl es .html

    still seeing decent ping times. anyone detect an actual outage or issue? Best info we have is that there are two outages. One has existed
    for the last 3 weeks or so between Tuckerton (New Jersey) and Bude (UK). It takes out the "southern path" across the atlantic.

    There is a second outage between Bude (UK) and Katwijk (NL). For circuits that landed in London or France this (should have) taken out the redundant path for those circuits.

    Circuits from Tuckerton (New Jersey) or Manasquan (New Jersey) to Katwijk (NL), Norden >(DE), or some city in Denmark who's name I
    forget should still be up on the northern path.

    > So, if you're in London or France your circuits are likely to be down, however some people in those locations used Contentinal capacity to link up to Katwijk, in which case they might still be operational.

    I confirm that France is having some problem with TAT14.

    France Telecom International Backbone (Opentransit) is currently running with
    non TAT14 capacity (10G) and one oc48 direct to Copenhagen (that is ok).

    We (Opentransit) are currently not experiencing any congestion but are implementing a new 10G circuit to secure our topology until TAT14 is back to life (one leg at least).

    Both problems are undersea issues, so don't expect speedy resolution if you are down.

    Yep .. i heard days ... not hours :-(

    -Opentransit (France Telecom)

  19. The redundancy didn't go wrong.. by Keck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just shows how systems with build-in redundancy can still go badly wrong...."

    Um, the built in redundancy worked as it should, apart from the maintainers not fixing the first fault. Their maintenance is what went wrong. Nobody will ever be able to afford or build a system like this with so much redundancy that you aren't required to maintain it.

    --
    A computer without Microsoft is like ice cream without ketchup.
    1. Re:The redundancy didn't go wrong.. by bugbread · · Score: 1

      True, but if the initial problem were, for example, a cable cut, it would go to show how built-in redundancy can still go wrong. It takes around 2 weeks to repair an undersea cable fault. More if there's bad weather. I'm not saying that this is the case this time, but it is a possibility.

    2. Re:The redundancy didn't go wrong.. by Keck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's no different than single redundancy going wrong, but twice :) I think what I was trying to say was that people are expecting redundancy to be a sure-fire guarantee against bad things happening and taking you out, which is foolish at best. It's just a means of reducing your chances of a failure where the risk of downtime justifies the much larger cost.

      Long story short, I thought the commenter was showing some level of ignorance in implying that "built-in redundancy" isn't supposed to "go wrong".

      --
      A computer without Microsoft is like ice cream without ketchup.
    3. Re:The redundancy didn't go wrong.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He/she didn't imply that (but perhaps you inferred it?). In fact he/she cited this case as a demonstration of the opposite:

      Just shows how systems with build-in redundancy can still go badly wrong....

    4. Re:The redundancy didn't go wrong.. by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --I wonder why they don't develop cable-fixing submarines, then.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    5. Re:The redundancy didn't go wrong.. by bugbread · · Score: 1

      Agreed, then.

    6. Re:The redundancy didn't go wrong.. by DrPepper · · Score: 1

      From what I've read nothing went wrong. Two faults have happened on the cable very close together (in time), and unfortunately the repairs on the first fault have not been completed before the occurance of the second fault.

      This isn't bad maintenance or anything - it's just pure bad luck. Two faults in the same period is unlikely, but sometimes does happen. When a fault happens, it will takes days to get hold of a cable ship, go out there (assuming good weather), find the cable and replace the faulty stretch.

      The only way to reduce the risk further is to build a third link...but then that costs more. I imagine a cost/benefit analysis showed it to be unnecessary, especially given that there are alternative routes.

    7. Re:The redundancy didn't go wrong.. by gorilla · · Score: 1

      They've got them.

    8. Re:The redundancy didn't go wrong.. by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      They've got them - But they tend not to sit around idle. Let's say there are a dozen of them in the world (probably within an order of magnitude). You now have to get the sub, with it's tender from wherever it is (and it probably has to finish what it's doing first) to the break - now what makes it more fun is that there usually isn't spare cable just sitting around - each cable is custom. Now you have to go to where the make the cable, have some spare cable made and loaded onto your ship (remember, the cable is usually direct loaded - aka, it comes out of the wire factory right into the ship), now you have to go to the area of the break, and go GET the cable, and fix it (probably splicing in a new section).

      To make all this worse, the North Atlantic (and off NJ is the North Atlantic as far as this is concerned) in the winter is a nasty place. Today is the 1st day in the last 2 weeks that has not had a gale warning out for the contenental shelf in that area. Not exactly the kind of conditions conducive to working on the cable

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    9. Re:The redundancy didn't go wrong.. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Um, the built in redundancy worked as it should, apart from the maintainers not fixing the first fault. Their maintenance is what went wrong.
      Um, reading the article makes it quite plain that the repair for the first fault was in work when the second fault occured. What 'went wrong' was the time between failures being less than the time expected.
    10. Re:The redundancy didn't go wrong.. by Keck · · Score: 1


      We agree. I didn't say they're bastards or anything, just that this is an inherent risk of any system, that it will fail, and redundancy is only as good as the time before a single fault is fixed.

      --
      A computer without Microsoft is like ice cream without ketchup.
  20. Noticable impact by rf0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It was definitly noticable as our customer reported

    1) Website traffic down at least 30%
    2) Around 75% packet loss from the EU -> US
    3) Slow delivery of email

    Basically it caused a massive amount of headaches and you have to wondered WTF didn't they fix the first problem when it came up. Its like running a RAID Array on one disk.

    Well least things seem to sort of be getting back to normal

    Rus

  21. Hmmmmm by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

    Never noticed! Just how many transatlantic cables are there anyway?

  22. No... by PSaltyDS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Just shows how systems with build-in redundancy can still go badly wrong...."

    No, it shows how well designed redundancy can be overcome by bad management decisions! Engineering brought low by bean counters... Gee, when has that ever happened before?!

    Any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
    1. Re:No... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      "We must launch tomorrow, i dont care if the O-ring has never been tested at these temperatures, i went to Harvard business school where they taught us advanced concepts like "buy low, sell high" so i know more" :P

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:No... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >Engineering brought low by bean counters

      How good is the engineering solution when it can be brought low by bean counters?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    3. Re:No... by zenyu · · Score: 1

      How good is the engineering solution when it can be brought low by bean counters?

      The easier it can be brought low by bean counters the better it is. Engineers are trained to create solutions that are absolutely the lowest cost solution that meets the specification. So with the perfectly engineered bridge if you spend a dime less it will fall into the sea. In real life you build in wide tolerances because it's cheaper than a perfect spec. Cutting that dime may just increase the odds of failure from 0.001% to 5%, so you will probably get away with it a few times. It's probably still unwise, but we can't expect business school graduates to reach the level of mathematical competence that your average English major does.

  23. *sigh* by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

    When will people learn?

    The most redundant systems can still break, if you have your head in your ass and don't keep them up.

  24. Favorite Quote: by Asprin · · Score: 1


    She added that the Internet was not broken, as traffic was rerouted through other networks.

    Au contraire. The Internet *IS* broken, regardless of damage to this particular cable.

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  25. Well, that's consortiums for you. by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Funny
    Can't they get some quantum wormhole tunneling dealy-widgets-whatzits going so we don't need cables anywhere anymore?

    Man, the FBI is going to have to interview *every* *single* *fish* in the area for Al-Queda connections.

    No one will even suspect the dolphins because they are supposed to be, like, higher mammals or something.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Well, that's consortiums for you. by tuffy · · Score: 3, Funny
      Man, the FBI is going to have to interview *every* *single* *fish* in the area for Al-Queda connections.

      I had no idea "Finding Nemo" was a crime drama...

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    2. Re:Well, that's consortiums for you. by Reteo+Varala · · Score: 1

      You kidding? Those beady little eyes, the perpetual grin? They're out there, laughing at us, I tellya! They got no respect for the law!

    3. Re:Well, that's consortiums for you. by Fembot · · Score: 1

      nah.. the dolphins are the ones doing the interviewing it looks like :-)

    4. Re:Well, that's consortiums for you. by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1
      No one will even suspect the dolphins because they are supposed to be, like, higher mammals or something.

      We at the Dolphin Workers Union protest the thinly-veiled insinuation that we are responsible for this problem. While we dolphins are experts at undersea communication, humans have promised us fish only for finding the big shiny balls marked "Death to Infidels".

      It's comments like those that deter better interspecies relations.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    5. Re:Well, that's consortiums for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No one will even suspect the dolphins because they are supposed to be, like, higher mammals or something.


      bring the dolphin in for questioning.

    6. Re:Well, that's consortiums for you. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Dolphins are known to be rapists and murderers. It shouldn't be hard to play them up as terrorists.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  26. Re:Skin Tight Scuba Suits Driving You Nuts by iantri · · Score: 1

    I don't know about Linus, Alan, Richard and the KDE team but considering the size of most geeks there could be a lot of pressuring involved to get them into scuba diving outfits! ;)

  27. one more thing... by CaptainBaz · · Score: 2, Funny

    You forgot the tea advocacy :-)

    1. Re:one more thing... by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      they dropped that attempt a long time ago.

      Now they advocate "american parties" instead; aimed at replicating the famous Boston Tea Party, but substituting the tea for americans. Quite fun actually.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    2. Re:one more thing... by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      They dump Americans off the side of a boat? Sign me up!

  28. Statistics by Etherwalk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anybody have hop count & RTT statistics?

    1. Re:Statistics by philkerr · · Score: 1

      I was wondering why I was having problems yesterday evening. My DSL provider, Pipex, is normally 100% and this explains the slightly wonky connection yesterday.

      I've no firm statistics but my average ping to my hosting co. in the midwest is normally 130 to 160 msec. Yesterday it was 450 to 550 msec with about 25% packet drops.

    2. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not informative - it's a question. It didn't inform me of anything.

  29. Why only 2 cables? by RalphBNumbers · · Score: 1

    You only have to loose one, and suddenly you have no reduandancy.

    I would think for such an important link, there would be at least 3 (so you still have some redundancy durring repairs if one fails).

    --
    "The worst tyrannies were the ones where a governance required its own logic on every embedded node." - Vernor Vinge
    1. Re:Why only 2 cables? by bugbread · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because they're amazingly expensive. The TAT-14 cost 1.5 billion dollars to build.

  30. Re:Oh well by Newspimp · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah. You know it. The Internet was our gift to the UK after beating them in the revolution?

    WTF are you on? The Internet is a global communications tool; not a private club we let people in and shut them out when we don't like them. What is up with idiots saying "screw them" on this? Great way to fostger international peace and harmony; but cutting them off and saying "fuck off blokes". Geez... I wonder what the response would be if France were cut off for a bit....

  31. Re:No big loss. by jamonterrell · · Score: 1

    Obviously it would be the company or group of company that owns it and reaps all the money for selling pieces of it off to ISPs and IAPs on both sides of the pond.

    To think that the US, UK, French, or any other government could actually accomplish something of that magnitude would just be naive.

    --
    I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
  32. Re:Silly Limeys... by Phil+John · · Score: 1

    Thats strange...I seem to have the internet up just fine! However I was running into a lot of problems with NTL's borked transparent cache last night, so set up a proxy server on one of my dedicated servers over in germany and was able to browse. Ntl offer the worst service I've ever encountered. I've stopped using their dns servers and set up a caching nameserver on my FreeBSD router/firewall it's that bad.

    --
    I am NaN
  33. probably was a startup by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 3, Funny

    It probably was a startup, y'know, back in the ol' under-water-cable boom of 1999. But then the bubble burst, and all the people that dropped out of college to lay cables on the ocean floor had to find real jobs.

    1. Re:probably was a startup by flippet · · Score: 1

      But then the bubble burst

      You could have made such a good pun out of bubbles bursting and underwater cables if you'd tried, you know... :)

      --
      "Cattle Prods solve most of life's little problems."
  34. Phones too by gr8_phk · · Score: 0

    There is a brit in the office next to mine, and he is having trouble calling his mates back home.

  35. It all seems ok to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in the UK, (Kent) and i've not noticed any problems at all :)

    The fact i'm posting here helps to prove that :)

  36. Wanna make sure I have this straight. by lkturner · · Score: 1

    Someone posts a link to a news story. Said news story discusses failure of major comm link between US and UK resulting in loss of Net connection. Said link points to server that is located *IN* the UK. Brilliant. I know that not *all* slash dotters are in the US - but the majority probably are.

    1. Re:Wanna make sure I have this straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey I'm in Canada. I know this still doesn't affect my ability to connect to the UK. But those of us up here in the Great White North surf slashdot too.

    2. Re:Wanna make sure I have this straight. by arevos · · Score: 1

      A link is severed between the UK and the US, but by no means are the US and UK cut off from each other. I'm from the UK, and I can still post.

    3. Re:Wanna make sure I have this straight. by Avihson · · Score: 1

      And from the US I can still surf The Reg

      The internet routes around damage by design.

  37. Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I think some people are wondering why they can still get to the Web even if they are in London?? A lot of Companies would have bought bandwidth with more than one provider, our company in Ireland have access to the states direct and through Germany etc. etc. However if you decide to save a few $ by putting in access with one provider...................BANG!!

    1. Re:Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      " think some people are wondering why they can still get to the Web even if they are in London?"

      Why can they still get to "the Internet"? Maybe because the Internet exists outside the continental USA? It's not something the FCC keeps in a shed in Iowa FFS!

  38. Re:Oh well by reality-bytes · · Score: 1, Troll

    While there was a bit of a routing problem on Tuesday, we were doing fine without stateside connectivity.

    Contrary to popular belief, a section of "internet" severed from the states does not cease to function.

    In fact it may even function better ;)

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  39. Oh no the Internet almost broke? by hellfire · · Score: 2, Funny

    She added that the Internet was not broken, as traffic was rerouted through other networks.

    I read this and I couldn't help but think of a CDW commercial:

    Clueless pointy-haired boss to the camera: "Fred? I think I just crashed the Internet."

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Oh no the Internet almost broke? by RevMike · · Score: 1

      I read this and I couldn't help but think of a CDW commercial:

      Did you notice that there was a young blond woman in that ad campaign that was also one of the "Dell Interns"? They've since replaced her on the Dell commercials.

  40. You'd Think by The+Dobber · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because the TAT-14 cable network is shaped like a ring

    That on a geeky, tech oriented site such as this, we could have a slighty better description.

    1. Re:You'd Think by PhukLunix · · Score: 0

      To be more technical : it's torus shaped

    2. Re:You'd Think by cyco_penguin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, doughnut shaped might have been a better description. Mmmm. Doughnuts. Drool...

    3. Re:You'd Think by spektr · · Score: 1

      Because the TAT-14 cable network is shaped like a ring

      That on a geeky, tech oriented site such as this, we could have a slighty better description.


      OK, the cable has the shape of the intersection of a 3 dimensional space with a 4 dimensional hyper-torus. Satisfied?

    4. Re:You'd Think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but this description fits nicely :

      one ring to rule them all ...

    5. Re:You'd Think by David+Kennedy · · Score: 1

      On a geeky site like this "shaped like a ring" IS a good description.

      I used to work in optical telecomms until the industry collapsed, and the phrase "ring network" is common parlance.

      They're not unfashionable in favour of mesh networks, but basically almost all existing high-cap networks are inter-linked ring topologies.

  41. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This should explain quite a bit. Neil Stephenson's

    Mother Earth Mother Board.

    .forsight

  42. Re:Oh well by Fembot · · Score: 1

    The way ICANN is run it makes me wonder somtimes....

  43. That's Strange, I'm in the UK by Mirk · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's strange, I'm in the UK and SlashDot is hosted in America, so according to this story, I should be having problems -- but in fact, everything is working just fiFgfdgf3gf4h32hh%$$$424452

    --

    --
    What short sigs we have -
    One hundred and twenty chars!
    Too short for haiku.
  44. Traffic hit? What traffic hit? by sznupi · · Score: 1

    Been NOT working lately...browsing /. etc. All fine and smooth - I can still hear you guys. Without any slowdowns. Oh yeah, from Poland btw.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  45. Re:Oh well by arevos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have you considered the irony of posting such a comment in a web based discussion forum, considering that the creator of the web is British?

  46. Here in the center of London... by mdemeny · · Score: 1

    Seems my connection is just fine. In fact, if someone hadn't told that there was 'widespread disruption to Internet services in the UK' I would not have noticed.

    Perhaps it's only an issue for certain networks/ISPs?

  47. Re:Silly Limeys... by Pingular · · Score: 2, Informative

    Silly Limeys...
    You relise you call us limeys because we used to eat limes to prevent getting scurvy, while your teeth fell out and you eventually died of Scurvy from lack of Vitamin C. Ironic that the very thing that saved many sailors lives is a (semi)insult you now use against us!

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
  48. Just wiggle the cable! by MrNybbles · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why not do what my friend Mike does when he has a problem with a bad cable and just jiggle it a little? It works great for his monitor cable so why not for a giant bundle of fiberoptics/wires/whatever in the ocean? What could possably go wrong? Jiggling the cable has got to be cheaper than going down to BestBuy and buying a new cable and running it from the US to the UK. Don't get the extended warrenty though, it's not worth it!

    --
    Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.
    1. Re:Just wiggle the cable! by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just remember next time your on a plane - one of those 1000's of wires will have at one point stopped working and the first thing the engineer will have done is jiggle it, then when it worked they would have signed the form and moved on.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:Just wiggle the cable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please sign up for English 101.

  49. It's not all that bad... by silvaran · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't know what everybody's complaining about. I mean we've got these big, thick cables connecting us to our friends in the west. I'm in the UK and I'm not having an$**!#@j pr83

    NO CARRIER

  50. Re:Silly Limeys... by Fembot · · Score: 1

    I was wondering... was the problems with their caches last night caused by all the threads that do the actual work being blocked waiting for things to time out??

  51. actual information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    One failure, occured on Oct 30, 2003, has existed for the last 3 weeks or so between Tuckerton (New Jersey) and Bude (UK). It takes out the "southern path" across the atlantic.

    The new failure is between Bude (UK) and Katwijk (NL). For circuits that landed in London or France this (should have) taken out the redundant path for those circuits.

    more info at

    www.tat-14.com /.s since yesterday actually

    http://www.kddiscs.co.jp/e/business/02_15.html
    http://davidw.home.cern.ch/davidw/public/SubCables .html

  52. Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Because the TAT-14 cable network is shaped like a ring

    That on a geeky, tech oriented site such as this, we could have a slighty better description.

    That was my first thought too. I must have been reading Slashdot too long - I read "ring shaped" and I imediately visualise a certain website beginning with goa and ending in tse.cx

  53. Underwater soldering by ENOENT · · Score: 1

    At least there is cold water readily available for when you pick up the soldering iron by the wrong end.

    --
    That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
  54. Oh, come on, mods... by Des+Herriott · · Score: 1

    Speaking as a Brit, this isn't flamebait, it's funny!

    1. Re:Oh, come on, mods... by Tet · · Score: 1
      Speaking as a Brit

      Ahem... being the pedant that I am:

      Brit: n. a native of Great Britain

      Great Britain: n. an island comprising England and Scotland and Wales

      I suppose you might sneak through on a technicality, being resident in GB, if not exactly native... :-)

      How are you doing anyway?

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  55. For those who are too lasy to GooGle: TAT-14 by B5_geek · · Score: 5, Informative


    About the TAT-14 Cable Network
    This transatlantic cable system is in full service, connecting the United States to the United Kingdom, France, The Netherlands, Germany, and Denmark.

    The cable system is a dual, bi-directional ring configuration using DWDM multiplexing with 16 wavelengths of STM-64 per fiber pair. The system also utilizes reverse direction protection switching in the event of failure of the service fiber.

    It has a dual route, transatlantic capacity of 640 Gbits on 2 service fiber pairs backed up by 2 protection fiber pairs. This configuration provides a capability of transporting 4,096 STM-1's or approximately 9,700,000 circuits across the ocean.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
  56. Moderators on crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Whichever humorless twats are responsible for thi:
    30% Overrated
    20% Flamebait
    Deserve to be flogged in meta-moderation.
  57. Read The Article by Ever+Dubious · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It isn't like the US-side fault was just being ignored: "According to BT, the US-side fault should be fixed by the end of this week, which will bring the cable network online again." Given the logistics of repairing a fault, and without knowing when the US-side fault occurred, it is difficult at best to imply that the cable operators were somehow negligent in their actions.

  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. Undersea cables are not easy to work with! by David+Kennedy · · Score: 1

    I notice most of the Didn't-Read-The-Article crowd seem to be missing that this is an undersea cable. They're Not Easy to work with, and besides, this outage is a great excuse to point you to Neal Stephenson's great geeky essay
    Mother Earth, Mother Board

  60. A book like this by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1

    I remember reading a book like this from one of Tom Clancy's junior authors. The whole story was about cartel's splicing into undersea fiber cables and moving the data elsewhere. I definitely have to check my library when I get home.

    --
    This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
  61. *We* Canucks are still here. by Shenkerian · · Score: 1

    If you're going to promise to correct others' grammar, use it correctly yourself. We Canucks are still here.

    --
    You tell me how "whilst" differs from "while," and I'll stop calling you a pretentious jackass.
  62. Re:Silly Limeys... by zaffir · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Funny, then, that you brits are infamous for your horrible teeth.

    --
    "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
  63. Re:Silly Limeys... by Phil+John · · Score: 1

    Thats a damn good point, didn't think of that! I assumed it would be a another problem with their dns servers (which are needed by the caches too) mucking things up. Oh well, it seems to be back up now which is all that matters! I always find it funny though that whenever stuffs not working with ntl you can almost always get nthellworld.co.uk up...just shows that lots of people on ntl think it sucks and visit that site to vent/find out whats wrong/find a solution ergo its almost always cached!

    --
    I am NaN
  64. US Navy Cable Ship by PSaltyDS · · Score: 4, Informative

    The USNS Zeus (ARC-7) is the Navy's cable laying and repair ship. The cable is laid mostly on the surface of the bottom, but at vulnerable points and at both ends (near shore) is its ploughed in to the mud/sand on the bottom. When a cut or fault occurs, the location of the fault is determined with a TDR or O-TDR, the same way it works with a land based cable. They know the cable length to the fault and have a survey map of where the cable was layed. It is physicaly located with side-scanning sonar and robotic submersibles, then hooked and brought on deck for repair (each end in case of a break). Once repairs are complete, the cable is unceremoniously shoved over the side, or re-ploughed depending on the location and mission of the cable.

    Any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
    1. Re:US Navy Cable Ship by travisd · · Score: 5, Informative

      ...actually when there's a non-break fault they frequently have to cut the cable to get it to the surface -- there's not enough slack when it's 2 miles below the surface. They cut and then splice new cable to give them enough slack.

  65. Not really.. by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

    a) The article says it's a consortium

    b) There's more than one cable ...

    The cable companies (well, NTL anyway :-) seem to have had problems. I just set up squid on my colocated server at Level-3 and never noticed anything more. Is it still ongoing ?

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  66. Map of Trans-Atlantic Cable Network 14 (TAT-14CN) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a map that I found which shows the "ring" of TAT-14...

    TAT-14 Cable Route

  67. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Haha, check your facts...

    Al Gore is not British.

  68. Re:Silly Limeys... by Pingular · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Funny, then, that you brits are infamous for your horrible teeth.
    Hey, 'you yanks' are infamous for being fat (I'd say overweight, but lets not beat round the bush), quick to anger, stupid (I'd say unintelligent, but again...), insensitive, vain and greedy, yet believe your country, with the highest rate of gun crime in the developed world, is somehow thoughtful and wise. Funny old world.

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
  69. Dammit!!! by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...web traffic between the U.S. and Europe has been hit...

    I guess that means no underage swedish lolitas for me today...*sigh*

  70. Re:Oh well by RevMike · · Score: 1

    While there was a bit of a routing problem on Tuesday, we were doing fine without stateside connectivity.

    Contrary to popular belief, a section of "internet" severed from the states does not cease to function.

    Besides, there is plenty of redundancy in the net. However if Europe were truly and completely cut off from civilization I'd imagine a "Lord of the Flies" scenario.

  71. RTFA by rlthomps-1 · · Score: 1

    According to BT, the US-side fault should be fixed by the end of this week, which will bring the cable network online again.

    The author of the /. post made it sound like they were ignoring the problem, when in fact they appear to be working on it. These things don't get fixed within hours, this cable is at the bottom of the ocean! Yeah, redundacy can fail but I don't think it is because of laziness of the telecoms or anything. They just got unlucky and had two failures close enough together where the first one couldn't be fixed in time to keep the network up.

  72. More than one cable system by bvark · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's more than one cable system linking US with Europe, it just happens that several carriers (Above.Net being one) only have capacity through TAT-14.

    Other carriers have working circuits on TAT-14 and another link (e.g. Apollo, Tyco, AC-1, Gemini) and may have some degraded service (depending on whether their transatlantic links are less than twice the size of their peak demand). FranceTelecom OpenTransit is an example of one of them.

    Interestingly, not many EU ISPs use TAT-14 North route, since it has a propagation delay of around 110ms (which is 40ms or so more than TAT-14 South from the UK and more than most other transatlantic cables)

    Most ISPs in Europe that I can see are fine. Certainly the big international transit ISPs (Sprint, L3, C&W, MCI et al) aren't showing any more trouble than normal.

    At the risk of being accused of Karma whoring, This page and This wired article from the late 90s are are good summary and a great story about undersea cables, respectively, despite being a little out of date.

  73. Re:Must be Bush and the Republicans'fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea it's Bushy, AssholeCroft and Rummy's fault! All of us here on slightdick should write protest emails, after all we've done such a good job stopping the RIAA, SCO and Microsoft.

  74. THANK GOD! by mrtroy · · Score: 1

    "Vanessa Evans, of LINX, the London Internet Exchange, which carries nearly all UK Internet traffic and over half of Europe's Internet traffic, said she saw a drop in traffic of around two gigabits per second. At its peak, LINX sees 32 gigabits of data every second. She added that the Internet was not broken, as traffic was rerouted through other networks. " OH THANK GOD! I thought the internet was broken!

    Please, Vanessa, tell me the sky isnt falling either.

    --
    [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
  75. I prefer the term... by csoto · · Score: 1

    "wanker," personally. "Limey wanker" is a bit more specific. :)

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  76. Problem ticket #1 : GOATSE DOWN!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    goatse.cx was taken down by this!!!

    1. Re:Problem ticket #1 : GOATSE DOWN!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      The cannonical slashdot response is : "No it isn't, I just checked."

      This is just proof why redundancy works!

    2. Re:Problem ticket #1 : GOATSE DOWN!!!! by RickL · · Score: 1

      My lunch thanks you for saying "taken down" and not "went down" in reference to goatse.

  77. How do they know where the break is? by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

    Whats even more amazing is that they can get an accurate reading of a break in the fibre from thousands of miles away and know exactly where they need to pull it up.

    Always wondered how they did this. You couldn't run a copper with it to get the resistance as that would go open circuit with a break.

    Have they got some sort of clever trick where they time a reflection from a broken face of the fibre?

    It's got me stumped.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  78. tracert slashdot.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Tracing route to slashdot.org [66.35.250.150]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1
    2 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 172.25.47.254
    3 8 ms 36 ms 10 ms glfd-t2cam1-b-ge93.inet.ntl.com [80.4.30.133]
    4 36 ms 8 ms 8 ms gfd-t2core-b-ge-wan61.inet.ntl.com [62.254.207.165]
    5 8 ms 7 ms 23 ms gfd-bb-b-so-300-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.29]
    6 13 ms 9 ms 9 ms bcr1-so-2-0-0.Thamesside.cw.net [166.63.211.149]
    7 163 ms 170 ms 150 ms dcr2-loopback.SantaClara.cw.net [208.172.146.100]
    8 149 ms 180 ms 152 ms bhr1-pos-0-0.SantaClarasc8.cw.net [208.172.156.198]
    9 149 ms 150 ms 149 ms csr1-ve243.SantaClarasc8.cw.net [66.35.194.50]
    10 151 ms 171 ms 159 ms 66.35.212.174
    11 * * * Request timed out.

    Trace complete.

  79. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While there was a bit of a routing problem on Tuesday, we were doing fine without stateside connectivity.

    Contrary to popular belief, a section of "internet" severed from the states does not cease to function.

    In fact it may even function better ;)


    Like "Channel shrouded by fog, Continent cut off."

  80. Re:who by fsmunoz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No need to mod down IMHO, it is actually a very funny part of the Holy Grail:

    ARTHUR: How do you do, good lady? I am Arthur, King of the Britons. Who's castle is that?
    WOMAN: King of the who?
    ARTHUR: The Britons.
    WOMAN: Who are the Britons?
    ARTHUR: Well, we all are. We are all Britons, and I am your king.
    WOMAN: I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective.
    DENNIS: You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship: a self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes--
    WOMAN: Oh, there you go bringing class into it again.
    DENNIS: That's what it's all about. If only people would hear of--
    ARTHUR: Please! Please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle?
    WOMAN: No one lives there.
    ARTHUR: Then who is your lord?
    WOMAN: We don't have a lord.
    ARTHUR: What?
    DENNIS: I told you. We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week,...
    ARTHUR: Yes.
    DENNIS: ...but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting...
    ARTHUR: Yes, I see.
    DENNIS: ...by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs,...
    ARTHUR: Be quiet!
    DENNIS: ...but by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major--
    ARTHUR: Be quiet! I order you to be quiet!
    WOMAN: Order, eh? Who does he think he is? Heh.
    ARTHUR: I am your king!
    WOMAN: Well, I didn't vote for you.
    ARTHUR: You don't vote for kings.
    WOMAN: Well, how did you become King, then?
    ARTHUR: The Lady of the Lake,... [angels sing] ...her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water signifying by Divine Providence that I, Arthur, was to carry Excalibur. [singing stops] That is why I am your king!
    DENNIS: Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    ARTHUR: Be quiet!
    DENNIS: Well, but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just 'cause some watery tart threw a sword at you!
    ARTHUR: Shut up!
    DENNIS: I mean, if I went 'round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away!
    ARTHUR: Shut up, will you? Shut up!
    DENNIS: Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system.
    ARTHUR: Shut up!
    DENNIS: Oh! Come and see the violence inherent in the system! Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
    ARTHUR: Bloody peasant!
    DENNIS: Oh, what a give-away. Did you hear that? Did you hear that, eh? That's what I'm on about. Did you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?

    Blatantly offtopic, I know, but couldn't resist to share.

    cheers

  81. Whose fault? by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Funny

    Whose fault were these faults? Were these faults the fault of the oceanic faults? I've heard some people say that these faults were the fault of faulty maintenance, but it seems to me that you can't fault them for the faults. Now perhaps that's a faulty assertion, but I really believe that the fault of the faults lies squarely upon the techtonic faults and not the fault of this supposedly faulty maintainers. I really doubt that the faults are their fault.

    I'm sorry.

    ...this post was all my fault. :-(

    1. Re:Whose fault? by Colonel+Panijk · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I've wondered what happens when the mid-Atlantic rift opens up a little right under a cable? It probably doesn't do a cable much good to be dunked into molten magma, or to be stretched to the breaking point if it's lucky enough to be suspended over the rift itself...

  82. Sounds like a job for Ripley... by guzzloid · · Score: 1

    "We've lost contact with [Britain]...

    "Look, we don't know what's going on out there. It may just be a down [transatlantic cable]. But if it's not, I want you there...as an advisor. That's all.

    "You wouldn't be going in with the [ISPs]. I can guarantee your safety..."

  83. ditto by real_smiff · · Score: 1

    yep i'm also in the UK and i've been maxing out my bandwidth for the last couple of days, browsing US sites and so forth with absolutely no reduction in service. This story came as quite a surprise! So the system must be more redundant than we're giving it credit for. Or i should thank my ISP. Or we got lucky :)

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  84. A fly on the wall would likely have heard.... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny
    As TAT-14 is a dual, bi-directional ring of cable, a single serious fault should not be enough to break it, as traffic would still be able to flow between the countries on the ring. Unfortunately, a part of the cable near the US coast had already suffered a technical fault earlier this month, which meant there was no built-in redundancy to cope with Tuesday's failure.

    I can hear it now:

    "Hey boss, half of the cable just failed. We need to get on this right away".

    The cable's still working, right?

    "Yeah, but if something else goes wrong, we're screwed".

    Look, that cable hasn't failed in ten years; let's put off repairing it until January. That way it won't affect our 2003 budget.

    But these things generally happen in pairs, and with no back up - well, we're taking an awful risk. If something else fails, most of Europe - well, I don't have to tell you the consequences. Plus, remember..the weather in January -

    cuts him off-- Not gonna happen! Put it on the schedule for mid January!

    Hopefully that manager is no longer employed....but don't be surprised if he winds up at Clear Channel! He sounds like just their kind of guy!
    1. Re:A fly on the wall would likely have heard.... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      "the disruption occurred between France and the Netherlands and disrupted a range of telecommunication services."

      not on mid atlantic as some seem to believe.

      "France Telecom will send a cable ship out to fix and repair the problem,"

      you can't fix it overnight, it takes time.

      "Tuesday's failure affected BT's voice calls, rather than its data services, but it is understood that a number of Internet service providers experienced faults."

      "She added that the Internet was not broken, as traffic was rerouted through other networks."

      redundancy of the internet does work.

      "It is understood that many other UK ISPs also suffered problems yesterday. NTL warned its customers that, due to a major server outage, ntl:home Internet customers on all packages may currently be experiencing problems with all Internet access, including Web browsing, email, ftp and newsgroups."

      now i don't know why this all wasn't said much clearer on the slashdot posting, since nobody bothers to rtfa anyways. it takes time to fix these things and no there's no need to start yelling at PHB DID IT PHB DID IT or "what, isn't there redundancy on the system wtf?!??". it's just a cable that went bad and needs to be fixed(and will be fixed).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:A fly on the wall would likely have heard.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hopefully that manager is no longer employed....
      Hopefully *your* employer does not require anything more complicated than flipping burgers. Taking a moment, and a bit on initiative, and actually reading the article makes it very clear that the summary was wrong, and the repair to the first failure is in already in progress.

    3. Re:A fly on the wall would likely have heard.... by rocker_wannabe · · Score: 1

      That sounds about right to me. If power companies wont upgrade the electrical grid because there isn't any incentive then why would a mere bit-carrier be worried about some cable downtime. The crew that actually has to fix it gets overtime, right?

      "Penny-wise and pound foolish. It's the American way!"

      --
      "Meaningless!, Meaningless!" says the Teacher. "Utterly meaningless!"
  85. Re:Oh well by wooger · · Score: 1

    Hmm,

    How much longer do you think it'll be until more servers are located outside the US than inside?

    Europe does have a far larger population than North America, as does Asia.
    I suspect in a few years time it would be the US that suffers more from being cut off, than the rest of the world.

    That is, apart from the fact that they all speak foreign.

  86. The more things change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a poem about undersea telegraph cables written by Kudyard Kipling way back in the 1800's.

    The Deep-Sea Cables
    by Rudyard Kipling

    The wrecks dissolve above us; their dust drops down from afar --
    Down to the dark, to the utter dark, where the blind white sea-snakes are.
    There is no sound, no echo of sound, in the deserts of the deep,
    Or the great gray level plains of ooze where the shell-burred cables creep.

    Here in the womb of the world -- here on the tie-ribs of earth
    Words, and the words of men, flicker and flutter and beat --
    Warning, sorrow and gain, salutation and mirth --
    For a Power troubles the Still that has neither voice nor feet.

    They have wakened the timeless Things; they have killed their father Time;
    Joining hands in the gloom, a league from the last of the sun.
    Hush! Men talk to-day o'er the waste of the ultimate slime,
    And a new Word runs between: whispering, "Let us be one!"

  87. I beg your pardon? by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

    Are you in some way attempting to imply that America is the embodyment of civilisation?

    Are you being ironic??

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:I beg your pardon? by RevMike · · Score: 1

      Are you in some way attempting to imply that America is the embodyment of civilisation?

      Are you being ironic??

      Neither. I am trolling for slashbots who are certain that the US is uncivilized and that Europe holds the keys to some future Utopia.

      You examined the bait closely and decided nibble but not bite hard enough that I could set the hook. Good for you. :)

    2. Re:I beg your pardon? by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

      Well, I was working on the principal that Europe isn't the embodyment of civilisation either ;)

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  88. I have the answer... by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

    Wireless. I hear it's quite popular.

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  89. Re:Silly Limeys... by wooger · · Score: 1

    Yep,

    But can you explain why the Aussies call us Poms ?

    Can't think of any explanation.

    Stupid bunch of convicts.

  90. Only the dark colored fish ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... with funny accents.

  91. Cheap management, not lazy management by swb · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're new here, aren't you? Management is cheap, not lazy. Redundancy means that when something breaks they save money by not fixing it, not that they can keep running while they do fix it.

    They delays in repair may also be due to the bids they have out to fix it: A Greek sponge diver, the "Polynesian" pearl diver from an unnamed Florida amusement park and a crew from Bangalore with no diving experience or equipment, but a willingness to follow the diving script. There's also a chance that an unnamed "muff diver" may be employed as well, but executives are downplaying it as part of their don't ask, don't tell policy.

    Management originally wanted the crew from "Ghost Ship" because the chick was hot, but when they found out it was only a movie they had to look elsewhere.

  92. Re:Oh well by bugbread · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind, too, that most connections from Asia to Europe go through America (much more reliable that connecting via India, the Middle East, etc.), so when a US - Europe cable goes down, Asia loses some connectivity to Europe as well.

  93. Noticed around 9pm last night by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

    My friend had a few high bandwidth transfers operating from the states last night (circa 150Mbps total)

    He lost one and two others dropped to around 50Mbps for a few hours so there was a noticable drop, presumably while the major routers sorted themselves out.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  94. Here's how they do it - wired article by daBass · · Score: 1

    This massive Wired article from way back in '96 follows the FLAG cable project around the world an gives a complete history of undersea cables and the technologies used to make, lay and operate the cables.

  95. this affected the whole of Europe by viktorVaugh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As far as I'm aware the problem wasn't just limited to the UK but to the whole of Europe. One of our transit connection to the US using this Fiber, was disrupted. Following message we received from our transit provider:

    We are currently experiencing a catastrophic failure on the fiber ring that is
    affectively isolating Europe. We are researching the possibility of
    alternative connectivity, and will update you as we get more information.

    One more problem which was caused by this link outage is that our dns-servers (and those of multiple providers) where hit with a lot of dns lookups for lockdown.zonelabs.com (seems zonelabs firewall, queries that name). As the dns-server for that zone wasn't reachable anymore (no more traffic to the abovenet network in the US) the dns-servers had to do a query for each new lookup which caused a huge load. And effectively killing the customer dns servers, impacting traffic even more.

    1. Re:this affected the whole of Europe by ysachlandil · · Score: 1

      The TAT-14 is a ring between the US and Europe. The underside of this ring also connects the UK to the ring. Both failures were in the underside of the ring. The upper part of the ring is fine, and is currently in use.

      This means that the UK cannot use the TAT-14, and some providers in France may have to reroute to Katwijk using landlines.

  96. Neal Stephenson answers your questions by Rev.LoveJoy · · Score: 1
    in this 1996 Wired novella. Warning; 56 pages - great geek read.

    Cheers,
    -- RLJ

  97. Optical Time Domain Reflectometry by Fighting.Cephalopod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's like TDM, but for a fiberoptic line. Tells you within inches of where the break/fault is and can provide details such as what the nature of the problem is (air gap, short, loss of signal, etc).

    Look up OTDR (some made by HP) for further info.

    1. Re:Optical Time Domain Reflectometry by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I have a hand held testing unit that does just that. I use it for diagnostics on my home fiber optic network (love those failed dot com hardware sell offs).

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Optical Time Domain Reflectometry by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

      Aha! Thankyou!

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  98. The First Cable had more problems than that... by Fighting.Cephalopod · · Score: 1

    The engineer in charge of the project, in addition to having it rub against the shavings, also had some peculiar ideas about voltages.

    It was the opinion of this man that the cable should carry the highest voltage possible; the higher the better. Thus it caused some serious problems on the lines.

    Source: The History Channel - gotta love these guys.

    1. Re:The First Cable had more problems than that... by eggoeater · · Score: 1

      Yeah...saw that episode.
      They didn't get it working until the third cable. They were able to morse-code to the UK for a couple days until one of the cable operators (I think on the UK side) thought the signal would come in better if he up'd the voltage to about 1200. Fried it.
      -Steve

    2. Re:The First Cable had more problems than that... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course, there is a significant voltage drop across a line that long, so you have to increase the voltage to get a useful voltage out the other side. The other solution is to use AC power, which should be fine when your data is carried on fiber.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:The First Cable had more problems than that... by amorsen · · Score: 1

      What makes you think AC is somehow immune to (or less susceptible to) voltage drop over distance? If anything, AC is worse, since you don't get to use the full width of a massive cable, and you get hit by inductance and capacitance in addition to plain resistance.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    4. Re:The First Cable had more problems than that... by tempfile · · Score: 1

      The problem actually was deep-sea worms literally eating the organic insulation, causing more and more voltage to get lost. Eventually the signal was so low that the operators decided to up the power. The whole story about the first transatlantic cable is very exciting.

  99. Mother Earth Motherboard by elliotj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've found the whole notion of undersea cables fascinating ever since I read Neal Stephenson's Mother Earth Motherboard

    1. Re:Mother Earth Motherboard by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      Interesting, thanks for that.

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
  100. Mirrored Drives by ryanw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Reminds me of how we went through all this trouble at [UNNAMED CORPORATION] of making sure to mirror the root disks for all 3000+ servers, but nobody setup alerts or notifications of a disk failure. So even though all the disks were mirrored if one drive failed, nobody knew. So we ended up running most our boxes off one drive until the other drive went out. So sure, mirroring delayed a major problem, but the major problem still existed.

    We also had a similar problem with Fiber Storage. For all the servers they had run two seporate fiber runs to each box that needed to use the "SAN". Each server would have two fiber cards installed. This way if one network went out, it would just fall back to the other card. Well, of course, both cables were plugged into the same switch.. Smart. Yes, we did have a fiber switch go out once.

    1. Re:Mirrored Drives by vidarh · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Another thing to be aware of with disk failures: If at all possible USE DISKS FROM DIFFERENT PRODUCTION BATCHES, or even mix disks from different manufacturers. A previous company I worked for had ALL the disks from a specific batch of IBM drives it used in a RAID setup fail one after the other within a short period of time. Now, IBM exchanged them quickly, no questions asked, but that didn't exactly help us when we kept on going days were we were vulnerable because we were one disk down or when IO capacity was shot to hell because the RAID kept on rebuilding the RAID with a replaced disk.

      Average failure rates don't mean a thing until you eliminate factors that could make the average higher for the specific equipment you are using.

    2. Re:Mirrored Drives by ryanw · · Score: 1
      A previous company I worked for had ALL the disks from a specific batch of IBM drives it used in a RAID setup fail one after the other within a short period of time.
      Sounds like we work/worked for the same company. Unless everyone just got screwed by this "mystical batch" of IBM drives. I'm starting to wonder if it was "one batch" or more of a year or two's worth of drives.
  101. Re:Silly Limeys... by spells · · Score: 1

    Prisoners of Mother England

    Least that was the explanation I was given

  102. Re:No big loss. by basingwerk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Reminds me of the Brit newspaper headline - Storm Stops Ferries, Continent Cut Off!

    --
    I stole this .sig
  103. Re:Oh well by zulux · · Score: 2, Funny

    Have you considered the irony of posting such a comment in a web based discussion forum,

    Ahem.....some of us are using gopher.slashdot.org

    And even a few old-timers use ftp.slashdot.org for their fix.

    If you have a low account numbber under 1000 - you can still use slashdot's 1-800 dial-up number with your 300 baud modem. Besure to set your parity to 7 and not 8.

    TTY service to Slashdot has been down for the last year though...

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  104. YHBT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAND

  105. Pointy Haired Bosses at Work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They blamed a lack of an accurate forecast for this unscheduled distruption.

  106. Re:Map of Trans-Atlantic Cable Network 14 (TAT-14C by Xrc65kl · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here are some aerial photos and maps of the US landing
    sites for TAT-14 (and other cables) courtesy of Cryptome's Eyeball series.

  107. But what about... by Craig3010 · · Score: 0

    Uhh....SATELLITES?

  108. Better Solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows XP Home editions System Restore!

    "System Restore actively monitors system changes to record or store previous versions before the changes occurred. With System Restore, you never have to think about taking system snapshots as it automatically creates easily identifiable restore points, which allow you to restore the system to a previous point in time." Like before the break!

    See? Bill Gates could have prevented it!

  109. Singapore is controlled by the enemy??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the essay:

    Q: Why bother running two widely separated routes over the Malay Peninsula?

    A: Because Thailand, like everywhere else in the world, is full of idiots with backhoes.

    Q: Isn't that a pain in the ass?

    A: You have no idea.

    Q: Why not just go south around Singapore and keep the cable in the water, then?

    A: Because Singapore is controlled by the enemy.

    Q: Who is the enemy?

    A: FLAG's enemies are legion.

    - - - -

    Intriguing, huh?

  110. 1 down, 5,999,999,997 to go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Knowing's half the battle."

  111. And 9 month's later... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the second largest baby boom in history happens. Better get it back up quick before people realize there's more to life than the Internet.

  112. Revenge is a dish best served with a light chianti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We still owe you for that.

  113. Re:Silly Limeys... by NotClever · · Score: 1
    Harumph. Fat? Yup, we have plenty of food for ourselves and a large chunk of the rest of the world (if we don't eat it all). Quick to Anger? Puhlease. The world generally has to drag us into wars and such (the isolationist streak is still strong here). Vain? Yup. Greedy? Capitalism is good! Highest rate of gun crime? Maybe, but I'm not sure I'd want to be hanging around in a country like Somalia where the warlords run the place, or the old Soviet Union where they'd just starve people to death. Oh yeah, I almost forgot "Stupid". That one is unanswerable. There are smart people, average people, and stupid people in every nation. Overall, I'd say our standard of living tends to say that we are doing pretty well for ourselves.

    Of course, this whole thing started with insults based on *old* stereotypes, so maybe we should just say that the United States of America will never be an industrial, military, or sea power! :)

    --
    Hell, there are no rules here. We're trying to accomplish something. - Thomas Edison
  114. News headlines tonight... by geeklawyer · · Score: 1

    "undersea cable severed in the UK"
    Rest of the World cut off.

    --
    -he who laughs last, is a bit slow.
    journal
  115. Re:Silly Limeys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NTL Proxys?

    I've NEVER had one, except for about 2 days. I wrote a small script to run TRACE requests against the fucker, I seem to recall you could insert about 4k of garbage before the X-Forwarded-For header. But I heard they removed them all anyway?

    NTL DNS servers suck also, and the newsgroups and the TV service... Shit why am I still with these jokers?

  116. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll never forgive CowboyNeil for not repairing the RTTY gateway feed!

  117. Re:*Us* Canucks are still here. by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
    I are an engineer. Thank's for you're in put, Mr. Grammer Nazi.

    Waiter! Sense of humour for user 577120!

    --
    "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  118. This has happened before by jd · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    The UK suffered a near-total blackout of traffic to the US in 1996, for about two weeks. Part of the problem was a cable fault, but it was made worse by a cascade of router failures at Sprint's end.


    Open Letter to Sprint and anyone else owning a major chunk of Internet backbone:


    Dear sirs,


    Your continued demonstrable lack of understanding of technology, or indeed of the financial consequences of that lack of understanding, are irritating both your customers and your shareholders.


    I will gladly advise you on the correct procedure for operating a network reliably, with optimal performance. I can guarantee superior network performance at a reduced net cost. It is very clear your current technical advisors can do neither.


    If you do not correct the defects in your network in a reasonable time, I shall have no choice but to proceed on determining the viability of, and obtaining captial for, a rival backbone that will be superior in performance and cheaper to maintain than your own.


    In an age where the Internet is de-facto critical infrastructure, but where companies are negligent to such an extreme that even systems with built-in redundancy can catastrophically fail, there can only be two possible solutions. Either existing providers must correct their solutions - this would be the preferred option - or someone must build a system that meets the current requirements of reliability and performance.


    It has been eight years since the last major blackout on the transatlantic line - eight years in which to fix existing problems and develop adequate procedures for such contingencies. Eight years in which you have demonstrably done nothing different to avoid such a crisis.


    Change by choice, or change by market forces. The rest of civilization is growing weary.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  119. Damn, must be fixed already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good things never last...

  120. Re:The lesson to be learned here by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

    The problem happened yesterday; my home connection was very flaky for several hours in the afternoon/ eary evening at least.

    Specifically, the DNS servers, failed to cope well with the loss of major traffic to the net, and name resolution failed a lot.

    Eventually pipex managed to route more traffic via different backbones, and got everything back online.

    Since about 8pm yesterday, I've been running as normal.

    http://www.connection.pipex.net/cgi-bin/nsus/nsu s- display.pl?site=PIPEX&section=Network

    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  121. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When are you idiots going to get it? Canada is the shiznit. We're what a utopian society should be modelled after.

  122. now how are the british going to by Savatte · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    get to goatse.cx? Is there an equivalent british site, like goatse.uk? Now THAT would be redudnacy worth talkin' 'bout

  123. Re:Map of Trans-Atlantic Cable Network 14 (TAT-14C by jdh-22 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Interesting!

    Play with numbers:

    Sprints info on TAT-14

    As stated, the TAT-14 is 16 pairs of STM-64 fiber. With a help from google, the average cost was $6000/km per cable.

    6000 * 16 = $960,000/km For All 16 pairs.

    The total length of the cable is around 15,000km long.

    $960,000 * 15,000 = $1,440,000,000

    The cost of a transatlantic link cost almost 1 and a half billion dollars that is capable of 640Gbits throughput!

    --
    Every Super Villan uses Linux.
  124. AOL?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, they don't call it GBOL over there? And you feel OK using this "American" service? Where's your sense of patriotism?

  125. Re:No big loss. by Espen · · Score: 1

    It's: "Fog in the channel, Europe Cut Off"

  126. Oh. Grow. Up! by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    Look out boys and girls, the US Navy's cable laying ship is coming to port!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  127. Disconnected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely not.

    It's probably not pidgin English either.

    Play by your own rules.

  128. Re:The lesson to be learned here by GoneGaryT · · Score: 1
    eary evening

    ...when we lug ourselves home....

  129. Re:Silly Limeys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prisoner Of Her Majesty (POHM)

  130. Re:No big loss. by TheGreek · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's more along the lines of:

    "Hey, I hear Ford Explorers used to roll over a lot."
    "That's okay. Most people drive a Toyota Camry."

    Now stop being such a goddamned retard.

  131. Re:Rats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I thought it was funny. Pity you didn't log in so I could "friend" you. But then since thinking this post is funny seems unpopular, I haven't logged in either...

  132. How on earth is my parent a troll? by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

    Really?

    I don't get it.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  133. Telewest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a telewest customer in birmingham and i've been having network outages all week.

    Wednesday 19th telewest birmimgham down for several hours

    Friday 21th Partial lost of internet, specifically I lost connection to rackspace UK. After a long chat with telewest, one of their routers / servers had stuffed up. telewest customers could not see a few UK hosting companies.

    Weekend 22-24. Telewests DNS's were not being refreshed as qucikly as normally. A DNS switch usually takes less than 12hrs to take affect at telewest, it took 3 days before the sites I was moving could be seen from telewest broadband.

    Sunday 23-today
    Telewest (blueyonder.co.uk) mail servers are either not accepting connections, or when then do they take a long time to process mail.

    Tuesday
    Large, but not complete loss of the internet, most sites unreachable.

    Not what you need when transferring email and websites over to nice new shiny rackspace boxs. Arrrggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

  134. Why is this news? by synmoo · · Score: 0

    I don't understand why this is making news.
    Cable faults happen all the time. I used to work for an unnamed cable station that had 4 seperate cable faults in a period of about a year. Yes most of these networks have redundancy to varying degrees but faults are actually quite common place.

  135. Re:Silly Limeys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats nice, but it doesn't work now does it? The POHMs would be the ones in Australia, not those of us back in Blighty.

  136. How about the "Send a ship out" Part! by tjstork · · Score: 1


    Screw the usual conspiracy theory jokes. How about, "we'll have your service up once we send the ship out." I can't imagine anything that says "wait a long time" more.

    --
    This is my sig.
  137. Silly Limeys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Intarnet for yu0!!!

    YUO FAEL 1T!!11ONE!

    muh...

  138. Even more tinny foil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't there an article a while back about how the US had made or modified a sub to tap into this? Perhaps they were trying it again and in the rush to get home for Thanksgiving- OOPS!

  139. Brunel's first ship by Slashamatic · · Score: 4, Informative
    Isambard Kingdom Brunel designed and supervised the construction of the Great Western Railway (including locomotives and designing the buildings). This is why the ship was called "The Great Eastern". The GWR was his first railway and the The Great Eastern, his first ship. His range as an engineer cannot be understated.

    The thing is that he tended to run the projects himself, including getting funding. The strain was immense, solving technical issues, managing the projects as well as the finance.

    1. Re:Brunel's first ship by mikerich · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The Great Eastern, his first ship. His range as an engineer cannot be understated.

      An amazing guy - he'd be so depressed if he came to Britain today, not only do we no longer have the fastest trains in the World, but our fastest trains are French and Italian! What he'd say about the West Coast Main Line rebuilding taking longer than the construction of the Great Western is anyone's guess. But he'd find the fact we'd built the fastest airliner then scrapped it for something slower incomprehensible.

      One slight correction. Great Eastern was the third of Brunel's ships. The first, Great Western was the first ship to steam commercially across the Atlantic in April 1838 (she was beaten to being the first steamer fulls stop, by two days by Sirius although that ship was too small for commercial traffic).

      His second was Great Britain launched in 1843 and was the first large iron ship and the first to be powered by a screw. She is now preserved in Bristol and is well worth a visit.

      Great Eastern was the third and largest by far.

      As you say, his range was phenomenal. To produce one revolutionary ship would have been achievement enough, but three? Had he just done ships that would have been a monumental achievement - but to build the World's fastest railway, the World's first large iron building (Paddington station), a series of monumental suspension bridges, flat-pack hospitals, stations, tunnels...

      Incredible.

      And his monument? If you travel across the Royal Albert Bridge between Devon and Cornwall - a bridge so revolutionary that its only recently been proven how it stands up - look up, its there in 6 foot letters.

      I.K. BRUNEL
      ENGINEER
      1859

      What a guy!

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

  140. UK NTL Users last night? by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    Wondering if anyone else experienced very poor DNS service last night? I had to put a bunch of my favourite sites into my hosts file, because their DNS was screwed. The only thing i could get it to resolve was google, and that was at a push. It was fine when I woke up this morning.
    Just wondering if this might have been related?

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    1. Re:UK NTL Users last night? by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
      Yes, NTL's DNS was almost completely screwed last night, although more so in some geographical areas than others. At some point they replaced their normal homepage with one explaining this.

      I've since heard from one of their newsgroups that it was indeed the cable-break that triggered their DNS-failure. Apparently the cable's broken 14km off the coast of Cornwall.

  141. Would it help ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if we cut france out of the loop? maybe it'll give us enough slack to fix the breaks...

    please..

    cut france outta the loop.

  142. Re:Oh well by AchmedHabib · · Score: 1

    Yes, we feel terrible here in England that everyone on the continent and the US have been isolated and now have a crippled connection to the internet.

  143. So, then you might say.... by switcha · · Score: 2, Funny
    As TAT-14 is a dual, bi-directional ring of cable, a single serious fault should not be enough to break it,...

    ...customers may currently be experiencing problems with all Internet access, including Web browsing, email, ftp and newsgroups.

    So....there was just one ring to screw them all?

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  144. Re:Silly Limeys... by balloonhead · · Score: 1
    I think he probably meant ignorant rather than stupid. I'll probably get modded down for this, but Americans are extremely ignorant, though largely this is a result of rather US-centric media.

    Don't even get me started on GWB. Though I am pleased to see most Americans agree with me on that one. Shame Blair doesn't. Prick.

    --
    This idea was invented by Shampoo.
  145. Re:Map of Trans-Atlantic Cable Network 14 (TAT-14C by Greger47 · · Score: 1
    > As stated, the TAT-14 is 16 pairs of STM-64 fiber.

    Nope, the page says 4 pairs of fibre delivering 16 wavelengths each.

    Ofcourse $1,440,000,000 / 4 = $360,000,000 is still heck of a lot of money.

  146. I think we just by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 2, Funny

    /. ed the last of their cable capacity :-)

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  147. you know by abhisarda · · Score: 1

    one can critize slashdot for all the fluff that is modded up and it is valid too.. but comments like the parent make reading it worthwhile.
    This comment would probably be the funniest I have read today(Comment)
    I like Brunel but was able to catch only part of his program on the BBC. I did, however vote for him. The above post provided me information I might have never have chaned across..

  148. Re:Silly Limeys... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    I thought the term 'Limey' was related to the drink 'Lager 'n Lime', and had either one or both connotations:

    1. Since it is a uniquely English drink combination, it served to identify an Englishman to any non-English in the crowd. It might have originally been a result of trying to prevent scurvy; however, it still survived - at least into the 1980s - in every pub I have been to, in the Midlands (Cambridge and points North).

    2. Since mostly women drink it, it serves to put down said Englishman as a 'girly-man', basically a term of derision. You were careful not to mention this. However, I witnessed male bashing of gentlemen who prefered 'Baby-Shams' and 'Lager and Lime' to the stouter ales and bitters - so there is something to be said for the sensitivity of this issue.

    I think these are more closer to the truth of the meaning of 'Limey' - from the perspective of the occidental. That being said, in an effort to foster better relations with our English friends, while living in England I came to the conclusion that people everywhere are generally the same - the terminology is just different (loo vs. restroom, bar vs. pub, wanker vs. bloody wanker etc...)

    (I was part of the peaceful American occupation of Great Britain during the Cold War in the 1980s - thus having several years of practical experience with this subject - and English pubs in general)

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  149. apostrophe correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are attempting to denote possession when you mention "Alan Cox' Welsh weblog".
    However, the apostrophe comes after the 's' only if you are referring to a plural noun.

    You can safely reference it as "Alan Cox's Welsh weblog"

  150. What it means to "go wrong" by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

    When I took a "Special Topics in Computer Networking" class from Evi Nemeth, she told us some stories from the early wiring at CU Boulder. Here's Evi's tip for how to lay out a SONET ring:
    1: Don't squish the ring into a line, even though it's cheaper to dig one trench than two.
    2: Dig a trench, then put a conduit (with your fiber) in the bottom. Lay down a foot of dirt, then a bright orange plastic sheet that says "FIBER OPTIC CABLE: STOP DIGGING"
    3: Lay down some more dirt, then another layer of this plastic

    Instead, what CU did was:
    1: Cut trenching costs by laying both East and West sides of the ring in a single trench.
    2: Lay the two conduits side-by-side, then drape bright orange plastic on top of the pipes, then add dirt.

    At this point, she said they might as well label the plastic as "STOP DIGGING, YOU'VE ALREADY TAKEN DOWN THE ENTIRE NETWORK"

    Which, of course, they eventually did.
    Funny thing is, the backhoe operator had the good sense to stop his work and contact Campus Networking. When the network tech came over, he picked up the fiber and looked at it to see if it was live. Now there's a guy with a black dot in one retina -- the tech, not the backhoe operator.

    --

    1. Re:What it means to "go wrong" by Keck · · Score: 1

      Classic..

      I had a Telecom Professor who reminded us that statistically, the biggest cause of packet loss is "backhoe fade"...

      --
      A computer without Microsoft is like ice cream without ketchup.
  151. SS Great Britain by SamDrake · · Score: 1

    I was lucky enough to have a tour of and dinner on the SS Great Britain, which was also built by Brunel. It's even older than the Great Eastern, being launched in 1843. It was the FIRST ship to have a screw propeller. While only a fraction of the size of the Great Eastern at 3,443 tons, it is still a HUGE thing to see...and an engineering marvel. Truly the "space program" of its day.

    It's presently a tourist attraction in Bristol, England.

    http://www.ss-great-britain.com/

  152. Re:For those who are too lasy to GooGle: TAT-14 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >The cable system is a dual, bi-directional ring configuration using DWDM multiplexing..

    Those DWDM (dense wavelength division multiplexors) are also neat tech.

    Imagine one pice of fiber coming into a block of metal the size of a small cell phone. The fiber ends in a collimator which "aims" the beam into a filter.

    Now these filters are the magic. They are made on circular pieces of clear material in a vacuum chamber. They have a process which puts a film onto both sides. Very tough to do it properly becuase how it goes on depends on how it performs. And dont get me started on how these things are cut into tiny small rectanlges.. The glass is under so much pressure that is looks like a pringle chip. Cutting it can lead to disaster...

    Well each filter is done in a certain way to make it filter the light differently. The first filter basically chops the laser into a really wide band. Well this now refined light goes into another filter which has a certain ability to reflect some frequencies of light, and allow the one u want to go right through with real nice looking shape.

    Imagine these are put at an angle inside the block... so the light bounces off filters... and some goes through right into other collimators! which have fiber attached.

    Doing this passively is a real plus. They work in pairs so u know.

    Imagine the light bouncing off the filters. Everything is angled correctly and hand made to "catch the light in each collimator"

    ----== [] [] ==-out-
    -in-== [] [] ==---

    anyway, Corning made real nice ones. I should know, i made some. We sold them to at&t, MCI, lucent, etc...

    Then the bubble burst, they laid off everyone basically, the high tech testing equipment was taken back from ppl it was leased from, and u know the rest.

  153. Re:Silly Limeys... by NotClever · · Score: 1
    Ignorant of world news? Yeah, to some extent, no doubt. But when you are the world's #1 economic and military power, that's pretty natural. The other thing to consider is the physical size of the United States. When compared to Europe, well, Europe is simply quite small, and it is necessary for people to have a better undstanding on their neighboring nations. Take a look at New York, Cleveland, Tampa, Miami, Atlanta, San Diego, Los Angelos, Seattle, Denver, Columbus, Boston, and so on - all in the same country, but it is just as long of a flight from New York to LA as it is from New York to Paris. Point being, the a reason that American's can be ignorant of much of what goes on in the world is that it simply doesn't matter. Why would I, living in Illinois, care about what happens in Paris more than I do about Philidelphia? This also fits in quite well with the isolationist tendencies that were mentioned earlier.

    Don't know what you're referring to about President Bush. He won the election according to the Constitution (and all the newspaper recounts as well), and he was dealt a pretty shitty hand with the terrorist attacks on 9/11.

    --
    Hell, there are no rules here. We're trying to accomplish something. - Thomas Edison
  154. Re:Revenge is a dish best served with a light chia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought they made up for that when they bombed the Baldwins.

  155. I'm ranting for no reason by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    Just shows how systems with build-in redundancy can still go badly wrong....

    Yes, but generally this only happens when the people runnings things don't replace their backup/redundant thingie when the primary fails. Once you're down to only one link (or ideally, before then) you're supposed to replace all the broken stuff. duh.

    Your argument is like saying, "Someone with a spare tire was stranded on the side of the road after losing one of his regular tires and his spare. Just shows how systems with build-in redundancy can still go badly wrong...."

    duh. We knew that already. And when these things happen, it's almost always because of lack of maintenance on the part of the person running the show. Like in the car example, it's likely the person didn't have air in the spare.

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  156. Titanic anyone??? by tonsofpcs · · Score: 1

    If this "Just shows how systems with build-in redundancy can still go badly wrong....", what did the Titanic 'just show'? Was it not this same thing???? [It would be the same error too - multiple water-tight chambers being opened to water still cause the whole thing to stop working]

  157. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh believe me we *do* celebrate the 4th july.

  158. Some information from Telia Sweden by patte · · Score: 1
  159. Half of All Limeys Fat by The+Turd+Report · · Score: 1

    Read it and weep: http://www.forbes.com/home_europe/2003/11/10/cx_da _1110topnews.html

  160. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excuse me do you actually believe that Al Gore invented the internet...? I mean to believe that you have to be what.... AMERICAN oh my not only are they xenophobes there now delusional.

    Oh and PS Turin built the first computer, oh and also the brits invented radar, if i remember correctly you spent $5 million on trying to figure out a part we brits made while we slept. if i remember correctly we gave it to you.

    g.turfrey@ntlworld.com

  161. Re:For those who are too lasy to GooGle: TAT-14 by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Also interesting is that the beach where TAT-14 comes ashore has been closed to the public for as long as I can remember, but I noticed on Friday that it's now open. It sure makes the area nicer to use for the public, but it's also something worth protecting from "Them".

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)