"Right to X" in the title of a new law is also a red flag.
Why?
Don't get me wrong, I think the name could be better. But that's because they should have named this bill "right to own property", because having the right to repair is one of the necessary aspects of that.
They don't know when the power is out unless people phone in
So what? They still don't replace the worn-out, unreliable equipment that makes the power go out all the damn time (even on calm, sunny days) in the first place!
Given that the 20 GHz machine isn't actually possible with current technology, implementing your DSF4ME instruction in an ASIC really is your only option if you need it to be that fast.
I didn't say black burglars weren't getting treated more harshly (i.e., unfairly) than white burglars, just that they were getting time served and probation instead of three years in prison. It's hard to tell though, because there aren't any white burglars around here to begin with (or maybe there are, but they don't even get arrested).
What we have here is sort of an international prisoner's dilemma: from each country's perspective, it is against their interest to allow any other country to make their citizens subject to that country's laws... but it is in their interest to make every other country subject to their own laws. So, all things being equal you either end up in a situation where multinational corporations are subject to no laws, or one in which they are subject to the union [in the set theory sense] of every country's laws. Since some country is probably going to assert that position and the other countries will follow suit in retaliation, "union of every country's laws" is the dominant outcome.
On the whole they probably came closer to the center than most people would care or like to admit
The NAZIs were authoritarian centrist. As a libertarian centrist I'm perfectly happy to use the word "centrist" to describe NAZIs as long as people understand that their ideology and mine are opposites along the other (i.e., up/down) axis.
I've been curious about those troll posts and their odd pattern of l33t-speak / typos for some time now. I wonder if it's some kind of coded message or something.
I'm just saying if you are going to give a black teenager 3 years for felony burglary, give a white teenager the same sentence for felony computer hacking. Or decide neither is worth that.
In my jurisdiction, at least, they don't. Black teenage burglars get time served and probation. We've got some local criminals who've gotten arrested literally ninety-plus times, and still can't get the judge to put them in actual prison for any significant length of time.
Heck, I would go so far as to put everything on the LAN side in its own DMZ. If you want your PC to talk to your media player, punch a specific hole in the firewall.
LOLWTF? Does nobody use hubs or switches anymore? It seems to me the best way to keep my LAN data from leaking out my WAN is for the router to not be involved in transmitting it at all...
Another omission pointed out in this Hongkong news pager, translation: the location, while international water, are within the "economic zone" of China
That's a lie. China has no legitimate claim there.
And non-human drivers do not nod their heads. (Which will be a challenge for completely automated systems, maybe need to have an "I am giving you way" light.)
Absolutely not! The entire premise is flawed. Instead, when the vehicle has the right of way, it should simply GO.
Stenography is the form of shorthand a court reporter uses. Steganography is what you're trying to talk about. It's unfortunate that your otherwise-insightful post is undermined by using the wrong word.
Out of the 174 posts on this thread (at the time of writing), there are only five mentioning the words [GPG|PGP|signature|encryption]. This is Slashdot, for crying out loud -- half the thread should be talking about that stuff!
In the long term, the only real way to deal with this is for people to sign their posts with public-key encryption.
Of course, even then you can only detect tampering, not outright censorship/deletion. The only way to fix that is by moving back to a decentralized system out of the control of any particular person, like Usenet.
The problem is not with defining Nazis as "left" or "right," but by the characterization of politics along a single left-right axis itself. Sanders' socialism is nothing at all like Nazism.
I go to the drive-in (the only one left in the city...). It's $9/person for a double feature, I can sit on whatever chair I want, and I'm allowed to bring in my own food and drink (except alcohol).
Slashdot Mirror
That's where your argument breaks down. The human is the operator of the vehicle, regardless of what software it's running.
Why?
Don't get me wrong, I think the name could be better. But that's because they should have named this bill "right to own property", because having the right to repair is one of the necessary aspects of that.
Chromebooks are cheap Linux laptops without the Microsoft Tax. What's not to like, except for the lack of meta key?
And Trump didn't stop there! Remind me, who's his pick for Secretary of Education, again?
They are no less IT professionals than, say, a senior network engineer at Google. Why?
Because nobody will be an "IT professional" until there exists a licensing organization to enforce ethical standards.
I suspect not. Google Glass was about contextual computing and (to some extent) computer vision, but not AR or VR.
So what? They still don't replace the worn-out, unreliable equipment that makes the power go out all the damn time (even on calm, sunny days) in the first place!
Given that the 20 GHz machine isn't actually possible with current technology, implementing your DSF4ME instruction in an ASIC really is your only option if you need it to be that fast.
I didn't say black burglars weren't getting treated more harshly (i.e., unfairly) than white burglars, just that they were getting time served and probation instead of three years in prison. It's hard to tell though, because there aren't any white burglars around here to begin with (or maybe there are, but they don't even get arrested).
What we have here is sort of an international prisoner's dilemma: from each country's perspective, it is against their interest to allow any other country to make their citizens subject to that country's laws... but it is in their interest to make every other country subject to their own laws. So, all things being equal you either end up in a situation where multinational corporations are subject to no laws, or one in which they are subject to the union [in the set theory sense] of every country's laws. Since some country is probably going to assert that position and the other countries will follow suit in retaliation, "union of every country's laws" is the dominant outcome.
The NAZIs were authoritarian centrist. As a libertarian centrist I'm perfectly happy to use the word "centrist" to describe NAZIs as long as people understand that their ideology and mine are opposites along the other (i.e., up/down) axis.
I've been curious about those troll posts and their odd pattern of l33t-speak / typos for some time now. I wonder if it's some kind of coded message or something.
In my jurisdiction, at least, they don't. Black teenage burglars get time served and probation. We've got some local criminals who've gotten arrested literally ninety-plus times, and still can't get the judge to put them in actual prison for any significant length of time.
LOLWTF? Does nobody use hubs or switches anymore? It seems to me the best way to keep my LAN data from leaking out my WAN is for the router to not be involved in transmitting it at all...
IMO, the only practical way to combat this would be to create a vigilante botnet that bricks everything it infects.
That's a lie. China has no legitimate claim there.
Similarly, the phrase "waters facing China" in the quote in the summary is a lie. This was the open ocean, not "waters facing China."
Absolutely not! The entire premise is flawed. Instead, when the vehicle has the right of way, it should simply GO.
Stenography is the form of shorthand a court reporter uses. Steganography is what you're trying to talk about. It's unfortunate that your otherwise-insightful post is undermined by using the wrong word.
The name "Zen" is awesome. They should have just made the codename the brand name too.
Out of the 174 posts on this thread (at the time of writing), there are only five mentioning the words [GPG|PGP|signature|encryption]. This is Slashdot, for crying out loud -- half the thread should be talking about that stuff!
I like it. I've always wanted to see a post modded "+5, Troll!"
In the long term, the only real way to deal with this is for people to sign their posts with public-key encryption.
Of course, even then you can only detect tampering, not outright censorship/deletion. The only way to fix that is by moving back to a decentralized system out of the control of any particular person, like Usenet.
The problem is not with defining Nazis as "left" or "right," but by the characterization of politics along a single left-right axis itself. Sanders' socialism is nothing at all like Nazism.
I go to the drive-in (the only one left in the city...). It's $9/person for a double feature, I can sit on whatever chair I want, and I'm allowed to bring in my own food and drink (except alcohol).