The fact that I have a router has nothing to do with my choice of OS. It's simple common sense.
It's only simple and common in a complicated area full of fairly rare skill. Let's not confused something you learned with something everyone just knows, okay?
If your computer has been subpoenaed and you destroy it, then you've not avoided jail time at all, because that would be illegal.
I'd like to know what kind of legal situation would arise where it's preferable to destroy the data and go to jail instead of handing it over. You'd have to be covering something pretty bad, and forgive me for saying so, but I have no sympathy there.
I take guesses, try to schedule a bunch of things sequentially, multiply everything by 2.5, and then wheedle the features out of the release in a series of drawn-out arguments with the users. I tend to miss individual goals, but overall everything works out.
Also, I stopped worrying about being right. By the time people worry about it, it's typically too late to do anything useful to fix it anyway.
With your situation, all I can figure is that it'll get better over time, as you gain familiarity with the system. Estimating is always largely guesswork, and only information leads to good guesses.
Is it the random profile directory name breaking things? Or does Windows not carry the user's profile directory around in a roaming situation? I have very little experience with roaming profiles under Windows, so I'm kinda flying blind here.
Sorry I don't have an immediate good answer, but it does seem like there should be a solution.
So then I went and did the math. I rounded my initial numbers up and my answer down, because I'm a conservative. I made the assumption of 200 trillion cells in the human body, and 7 billion people on earth. That would allow for 220 terabits of information to be stored for each cell.
If the current administration did that, I'd applaud the technical achievement.
And now I've taken this entirely too far. Just remember, it does one good to keep in mind that really big numbers don't fit into human consciousness too well.
For what it's worth, I'd suspect that if such amounts of storage were to become available, the current administration here in America could fill it up.
They wouldn't fill it up if they individually tracked every cell in every human's body.
Actually, I could be wrong about that, I didn't do the math. It just sounded like a pithy retort in my mind.
Correct usage would be if his results were the opposite of what was expected (it worked), or his meaning was the opposite of what he said (he expected it to work). Maybe other stuff, I don't know anymore. These damned Slashdot irony wars have burned the meaning clean out of my brain.
Re:Pills that treat every major disease costs $0.2
on
The Cost of the iPod
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Anything to back that one up? I can't and won't say it's wrong, but that's one hell of a sweeping statement to throw out there without even hinting as to its origin.
Slashdot Mirror
Oh, sure, just blithely bring facts into the discussion. I won't stand for it, no sir.
The fact that I have a router has nothing to do with my choice of OS. It's simple common sense.
It's only simple and common in a complicated area full of fairly rare skill. Let's not confused something you learned with something everyone just knows, okay?
But are you cunning?
But you named the competition. You just don't like the terms.
Using the service regularly makes complainting ineffectual. You've voted with your dollars, and they are louder than your voice.
Either scenario seems equally likely, and much more likely than 'Ken keeled over because he couldn't keep his LDLs in check'.
It's only 'much more likely' if you're a paranoia spewing Slashdot fool.
And the shitty condescending attitudes the IT guys give everyone for not sharing the specialization probably has nothing at all to do with it.
-1, Insightful. You win.
It amuses me, how many people don't understand this and think of government as some benevolent protective force.
Wow, you need a hug.
Safari has an interesting habit of shutting itself down on my macs. I guess that's about as good as restarting Firefox.
Why is it so hard to get a woman off?
-------
Who cares?
They pinched the best bits of everybody else's sites and put them together in a manner that made sense.
I'm going to send these guys a few pages out of the dictionary so they can start to figure out where they went wrong.
Yes, babbling, yes. Very good. You've got the chant down, now you just need to figure out when it's applicable.
I'm missing the touche. Do you get different comments?
That was about as disjointed a paragraph as I've ever read. Are you high?
So it's a good thing, except when Microsoft does it. Fantastic. I'll keep that in mind.
Because people like to feel superior to other people. This is especially true amongst nerds, who tend to have serious inferiority complexes.
If your computer has been subpoenaed and you destroy it, then you've not avoided jail time at all, because that would be illegal.
I'd like to know what kind of legal situation would arise where it's preferable to destroy the data and go to jail instead of handing it over. You'd have to be covering something pretty bad, and forgive me for saying so, but I have no sympathy there.
Your computer is broadcasting your IP!
I take guesses, try to schedule a bunch of things sequentially, multiply everything by 2.5, and then wheedle the features out of the release in a series of drawn-out arguments with the users. I tend to miss individual goals, but overall everything works out.
Also, I stopped worrying about being right. By the time people worry about it, it's typically too late to do anything useful to fix it anyway.
With your situation, all I can figure is that it'll get better over time, as you gain familiarity with the system. Estimating is always largely guesswork, and only information leads to good guesses.
Is it the random profile directory name breaking things? Or does Windows not carry the user's profile directory around in a roaming situation? I have very little experience with roaming profiles under Windows, so I'm kinda flying blind here.
Sorry I don't have an immediate good answer, but it does seem like there should be a solution.
So then I went and did the math. I rounded my initial numbers up and my answer down, because I'm a conservative. I made the assumption of 200 trillion cells in the human body, and 7 billion people on earth. That would allow for 220 terabits of information to be stored for each cell.
If the current administration did that, I'd applaud the technical achievement.
And now I've taken this entirely too far. Just remember, it does one good to keep in mind that really big numbers don't fit into human consciousness too well.
For what it's worth, I'd suspect that if such amounts of storage were to become available, the current administration here in America could fill it up.
They wouldn't fill it up if they individually tracked every cell in every human's body.
Actually, I could be wrong about that, I didn't do the math. It just sounded like a pithy retort in my mind.
Correct usage would be if his results were the opposite of what was expected (it worked), or his meaning was the opposite of what he said (he expected it to work). Maybe other stuff, I don't know anymore. These damned Slashdot irony wars have burned the meaning clean out of my brain.
Anything to back that one up? I can't and won't say it's wrong, but that's one hell of a sweeping statement to throw out there without even hinting as to its origin.
It's probably a conspiracy. You should break out a rakish hat and start investigating like an old-timey journalist.