There is a whole science field about that: Political Science. Just look for any handbook about political ideologies. You may also want to have a look at Giovanni Sartori's work on conceptualization.
I think that this is biggest news than the article itself. As a sysadmin, i consider the inbox of the mail server write-only. Altering the inbox in any other way except dropping messages in it, should be only done by the user or with the user's consent.
Not exactly. If tomorrow an efficient fusion reactor (which is really clean) is build, we will not have a way to use this energy for transportation. But if we start using efficient electric or fuel cell cars, by the time the fusion reactor starts producing energy, we will not have to change anything - electricity is the same no matter how it is produced.
Not to mention other (existing) sources of electricity. Wind, solar, hydroelectric, tide or wave generators already exist and become better and better each year. If there is a rising need for electricity used in transportation, we can hope that alternative electricity sources will evolve much faster.
The only thing that must be done for the above to become a reality instead of been a utopia, is to not let irrational paranoid financial criteria be applied by greedy conservative petroleum multimillionaires, but instead use simple ecological logic and facts when making political decisions...
But what it'll more likely be is advertising everywhere you look. Like Minority Report, but much more so. With low power displays and cheaply printed electronics - it'll be a quite different world. ... full of mentally ill people. Information overload anyone?
Slashdot Mirror
There is a whole science field about that: Political Science.
Just look for any handbook about political ideologies. You may also want to have a look at Giovanni Sartori's work on conceptualization.
my 4 year old was watching an age-appropriate channel
So, you let an algorithm do the parenting for you? That's what i call real faith in technology!
Google became so big in so many ways that it has it's own social movements now. What's next? Parties? A parliament? A revolution?
I wonder why...
and certainly unneeded to generate wealth.
...but certainly needed to consume wealth.
And that's a joke showing the difference between science and religion.
Last time somebody tried to implement scheduled end-of-life on man-made devices, people died!
NO! NOOOOO!!!
NO!
NO!
NO!
My eyes!!!!
The horror! The HORROR!!!!
A Greek standup comedian, in a (subtitled) video titled "The limits of religion" talks about the story:
http://youtu.be/Xaa9SWjik-g
> A few years ago, that little book was about $4. Worth its weight in gold.
Wow. What kind of exotic material is made of to be so light?
I think that this is biggest news than the article itself. As a sysadmin, i consider the inbox of the mail server write-only. Altering the inbox in any other way except dropping messages in it, should be only done by the user or with the user's consent.
Art history and music makes you a better person, thus a better professional. So simple.
This looks promising:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090127131654.htm
Is there any way to flag slashdot comments as "possible future prior art"? It could be useful. :-)
Since when is Europe a country?
Not exactly. If tomorrow an efficient fusion reactor (which is really clean) is build, we will not have a way to use this energy for transportation. But if we start using efficient electric or fuel cell cars, by the time the fusion reactor starts producing energy, we will not have to change anything - electricity is the same no matter how it is produced.
Not to mention other (existing) sources of electricity. Wind, solar, hydroelectric, tide or wave generators already exist and become better and better each year. If there is a rising need for electricity used in transportation, we can hope that alternative electricity sources will evolve much faster.
The only thing that must be done for the above to become a reality instead of been a utopia, is to not let irrational paranoid financial criteria be applied by greedy conservative petroleum multimillionaires, but instead use simple ecological logic and facts when making political decisions...
I find your lack of bandwidth... disturbing.
This is called ecological fallacy.
Yes.
Now the companies are the pirates.
Keep It Simple, Stupid.
The formating information is already present in the language syntax.
ping marsbase.com.mars.sol.milky.universe1
Better safe than sorry...