Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu 8.04 Released

Nate2 writes "The Hardy Heron has taken flight: it's the second LTS (Long Term Support) release of the world's most popular distro. New features include the Wubi Windows installer and Firefox 3 beta 5. Grab a copy here, and check out Linux Format's overview of the release."

678 comments

  1. Started the download 20 minutes ago by Syncroswitch · · Score: 2, Informative

    I seem to be stuck at 98%....

    1. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And ladies and gentlemen, that is why I won't be be 'apt-get dist-upgrade' until next week. I swear, Ubuntu get's the world's worst slashdotting twice a year. I could download the alternate, but meh, I'm not that concerned. As a side rant, last week I installed the Kubuntu 8.04 Remix RC, and after two hours I retreated to 7.10. I have no doubt Ibex will be awesome, and I might even upgrade sooner to KDE4, but as of right now, it's not so good.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    2. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thats why I got the beta a week ago ;) I was thinking ahead to this very day. Course when somethings didn't work right I was never sure if it was the code or if it was the OS. Speaking of if you get a java window that doesn't seem to display anything there is a bug with xgl. bug 48404

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    3. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Syncroswitch · · Score: 5, Funny

      Torrents don't work at work...

    4. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by ChuckSchwab · · Score: 0, Troll

      Uh, yeah, except that: isn't it kind of ILLEGAL to download copyrighted stuff via torrents?

      Might want to watch yourself there, since the RIAA can see stuff like this...

    5. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is...was....err....was that a joke?

    6. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by qualidafial · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I download the torrent and burn it to disc, can apt-get do a dist-upgrade from the DVD?

    7. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      I believe you can actually. Never actually done it, though, so YMMV

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    8. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by archkittens · · Score: 3, Informative

      yes, you just need to set the CD up as a repository in the atp sources list. http://ubuntuguide.org/wiki/Ubuntu:Feisty#Adding_a_CD-ROM_or_DVD_repository

    9. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by somersault · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's it like when the world revolves around you? Do you get dizzy?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    10. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      I dunno TOO much about Linux package management, but you SHOULD be able to select the DVD as a package source and then do a dist-upgrade.

      I've never tried it though. I just download the ISO for possible reinstall purposes later (an old Windows habit... I haven't needed to use it yet) and do an apt-get dist-upgrade when it's avilable, which it doesn't appear to be ATM.

    11. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that would be the poster.

    12. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    13. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Knuckles · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Just download the Alternate CD, burn, pop it in.

      Whatever happened to reading the release notes? I swear this is the last time during this upgrade cycle that I write anything to help people who haven't done their homework.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    14. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by kaens · · Score: 1

      Wait . . . not sure if it was the code or the OS? What?

    15. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bit late for you, but for others (like me) who are starting now--
      remember
      sudo apt-get dist-upgrade

      is a good place to start. I'll DL the iso later.

    16. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Uh, yeah, except that: isn't it kind of ILLEGAL to download copyrighted stuff via torrents?

      Might want to watch yourself there, since the RIAA can see stuff like this... You moron, this stuff is free! They have torrents on their site, for you to use to download their own isos!!!
    17. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 0

      Wait, are you being serious now?
      "Downloading copyrighted works without the author's express written consent is illegal."
      The point is that the Ubuntu team posts the torrents - that sounds like permission to me. Ubuntu is free and open source and they don't really put any limits on its distribution.

    18. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by ryanov · · Score: 4, Informative

      It gotten modded funny because it's really amusing how fucking stupid you are.

      Look at the download page: http://www.kubuntu.org/download.php

      See the link to BitTorrent? Torrents are a sanctioned and encouraged method of download.

      Click the link and read. Educate yourself, Jackson.

    19. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by sholsinger · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, except that the copyright holder, (Canonical LTD) is freely distributing their copyrighted works via torrents because it saves them money on bandwidth.

      The software they're releasing is being released as free and open source. The license strictly affords anyone the right to redistribute the software in any means. This includes torrents. And if I'm not mistaken I believe you also have the right to burn the ISO to a CDROM and charge money for that CDROM.

    20. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have made it clearer. I wasn't sure if my code was broken or if it was the OS. My mistake. The good news in all of this though is that it wasn't my code :)

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    21. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by HigH5 · · Score: 1

      Nah, they're downloading Xubuntu for their own needs...

      --
      Ceterum censeo Microsoft esse delendam.
    22. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I don't know, after all, apparently, it's not express consent when you set up a wireless access point with no password. ;)

    23. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by memojuez · · Score: 1
      Geez, We are talking about Ubuntu aren't we?


      Open the Update Manager | Click Check

      The New Distro will appear as available | Click Upgrade.

      --
      Signature applied for, Patent Pending
    24. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not.

      But it demands an explanation far more tortuous than I am able to build right now.

      It goes something on the lines that the licenses Ubuntu is distributed under allow you to download, copy and share (that's the part with torrents - you download _and_ share at the same time) as long as you don't violate them. And the copyright part is what makes the licenses enforceable: because you can't get, copy and redistribute unless you honor the licenses and doing any of those without honoring them would be a copyright violation.

    25. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Knuckles · · Score: 0

      You missed the question in the post I replied to, "can apt-get do a dist-upgrade from the DVD?". Granted, I also missed the "DVD" part.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    26. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by kkiller · · Score: 1

      That's the most amusing trollbait I've seen all year. Thanks!

    27. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're welcome! --Chuck

    28. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Psh... a guy named somersault talking about dizziness. Theres gotta be humor in there somewhere.

    29. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by MontytheMooch · · Score: 5, Funny

      Torrents don't work at work... Funny...neither do I...
    30. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by HairyNevus · · Score: 1

      Wha--...it.....doyouevenknowwtf--....*brain explodes*

      --
      You were critically hit for no damage. The bruise will look nice, and maybe the scars will make good party talk.
    31. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by qualidafial · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just download the Alternate CD, burn, pop it in. This is a server installation, so it doesn't do anything when I "pop it in" other than mounting.

      Whatever happened to reading the release notes? I'm brand new to Ubuntu and Linux in general, so finding the release notes is a bit like finding the highway plans in the city building's 4th floor basement in a disused lavatory behind a locked door with a sign stating "beware of leopard." Eventually I found the release notes on ubuntu.com but it wasn't obvious where to find it, and it took some time just to navigate there due to the site being unreliable while it's getting the crap beaten out of it.

      I swear this is the last time during this upgrade cycle that I write anything to help people Given your bedside manner, I'd like that in writing.

      ..who haven't done their homework. I've been struggling to teach myself this shit for a long time, and despite trying very hard to learn on my own and use the available resources, I still get lost sometimes. So I ask questions from those who are likely to know. There's no need to be condescending.
    32. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The scary part is that the OP believes this. That means the *IAA actually has the general public believing that torrents are illegal. Here we have proof positive that there is a legal use, as every 6 months the net gets a huge kick in the teeth from LEGAL downloads, but the general public doesn't believe it. Unless we fix that we have lost the war, regardless of the facts.

    33. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Knuckles · · Score: 0

      Not condescending, but annoyed. And when someone is really clueless I am very patient, but you post on Slashdot and run a server, so I assume you are interested in computers and capable of reading docs. This is the, I dunno, 5th Ubuntu release I witness, and time after time people don't do the logical thing. I have spent countless hours on the mailing list to help them out, when all they would have needed to do is:

      http://www.google.com/search?q=ubuntu+8.04+release or, god beware, go to http://www.ubuntu.com/ and follow the release announcement.

      I was a newbie too, but I tried to do my homework before asking other people for help. It's called courtesy.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    34. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      You do realize that :

      Ubuntu is free , and spreading it is encouraged by the authors

      The main reason Ubuntu uses torrents is to cut a bit of the bandwith costs . So in a way , downloading it via torrents , helps them cut costs.

      You were not funny because it's hard to believe anyone on slashdot wouldn't be knowing the above .
      So you must be joking

    35. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by 2muchcoffeeman · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Kubuntu 8.04 Remix installs KDE 4, which is not ready for prime time.

      --
      Prevent Windows piracy. Use Linux instead.
    36. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Informative
    37. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please tell me you are joking and not a /. user who doesn't understand the legality of distributing linux...

    38. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by qualidafial · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you post on Slashdot and run a server, so I assume you are interested in computers and capable of reading docs It's a hell of an extrapolation to assume that because I read slashdot and am interested in computers, that I would have the slightest idea where to look for the release notes, no matter how obvious that may seem to you.

      This is the, I dunno, 5th Ubuntu release I witness, and time after time people don't do the logical thing. I have spent countless hours on the mailing list to help them out, when all they would have needed to do is: http://www.google.com/search?q=ubuntu+8.04+release or, god beware, go to http://www.ubuntu.com/ and follow the release announcement. I was a newbie too, but I tried to do my homework before asking other people for help. It's called courtesy. I spend time helping folks on mailing lists too, but rather than berating them for not reading the docs, I just give them the URL they need. Sometimes folks just have a hard time finding what they're looking for and there's no need to bite their heads off.
    39. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Knuckles · · Score: 0

      It's a hell of an extrapolation to assume that because I read slashdot and am interested in computers, that I would have the slightest idea where to look for the release notes, no matter how obvious that may seem to you. Sorry, I don't see it that way. Is it really that far-fetched to google for Ubuntu+8.04+release or to go to ubuntu.com and click on "Ubuntu 8.04 released" when you want to know something about the Ubuntu 8.04 release?

      I spend time helping folks on mailing lists too, but rather than berating them for not reading the docs, I just give them the URL they need. Sometimes folks just have a hard time finding what they're looking for and there's no need to bite their heads off. You are right, but it can still happen after one too many of these questions. That said, I'd never do that on the list.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    40. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by PMBjornerud · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Torrents don't work at work... What a great opportunity to demand it. Grab the torches and pictforks!
      --
      I lost my sig.
    41. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Silent+Node · · Score: 1

      Yep, I used the torrents and had it come down nice and fast. And I'll seed it for a good while to make sure others have the same experience. FYI: my connection is a weak wifi poached from someone in the area, and I still got 200K+ coming down (pretty much a record for my connection here).

      p.s.: Related to Hardy itself (?):

      After some not-working with the initial install (and both my previous Ubuntu installs), I now have direct rendering via my ATI card...a welcome change, damned if I know why it's working for me now.

      --
      "You can't win. You can't break even. You can't quit." -A. Ginsberg
    42. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by stevied · · Score: 1

      Purely by chance, I noticed the release before it was announced, and rsync'd my beta image to the final version -- and then helped the seed the torrent, of course.

    43. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by glarbl_blarbl · · Score: 1

      This is why I run rtorrent on my file server. Just start it up in a screen session and it can run as long as you want, and just ssh in from anywhere to adjust it or add torrents!

      --
      I use friend/foe to signal strong [dis]agreement instead of mod points. What else are f/f good for?
    44. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      Kinda like Kubuntu 8.04 itself. I've been tracking the beta/RC for some time, and nearly did a spit take earlier in the week when I read it was supposed to go live.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    45. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I had to muck around looking for the torrents on ubuntu.com. They don't seem to encourage torrent downloads at ubuntu.

    46. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by grantek · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if you have anything from Universe/Multiverse it'll still need to access the Internet: http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/upgrading

    47. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by rdavidson3 · · Score: 0

      I would like to thank everyone out there for seeding these babies.

    48. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I got Ubuntu (64bit) Hardy during the Alpha cycle, and as usual, I reinstalled about three days before the actual release.

      You don't need to download a CD to reinstall, by the way. You can do it all through GRUB.

    49. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      That should be offered automatically when he inserts the CD.

    50. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Daengbo · · Score: 1
    51. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      YEah. They really prefer Jigdo, which is a similar tool Debian uses.

    52. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by archkittens · · Score: 1

      it should, but sometimes we forget that errors occur on linux too... no software is perfect once you move past "hello world".

    53. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do if you run torrentflux and a http server. Well, at least I can start the torrent while at work and have it sitting there ready when I get home.

    54. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that :

      CS is a modpoint black hole. Think Andy Kaufman.

    55. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by desmondhaynes · · Score: 1

      Ever seen a movie - first day, first show? :) -- http://techwatch.reviewk.com/2008/04/ubuntu-hardy-heron-8-04-2/

    56. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by couchslug · · Score: 3, Informative

      Try the Ubuntu forums instead, or linuxquestions.org. Nice folks.

      Slashdot isn't really a place to get "help" unless you have a fireproof suit that needs testing while you are wearing it.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    57. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 2, Funny

      Was it worth 3 replies to prove that you're a dickhole, or couldn't you just have kept it as part of your self-righteous, nerdling mystique and let us ponder the possibility of it?

    58. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by phpmysqldev · · Score: 1

      The servers are slightly slow right. Several options though:
      -Try different mirrors and just download the iso (try foreign servers too)
      -Upgrade using apt-get and just run it over night, even on a slow connection this is more than enough time
      -Wait for a month and let the community get the bugs fixed, a more stable version of firefox (ships with a beta as of right now), and download it in a fraction of the time

    59. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by phpmysqldev · · Score: 1

      just upgrade overnight (should be enough time on any connection besides dial up), try different mirrors for the iso, get the torrents, *OR*...
      Wait 2 weeks, let the community work any bugs out, get a newer release of the firefox beta that it currently ships with, and download it in a fraction of time

    60. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the wonderfully obscure tips, Captain Obvious.

    61. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by somersault · · Score: 1

      It was a poor choice.. but when there are 900k other registered users, you get a bit desperate with the name choices!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    62. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      ... no software is perfect once you move past "hello world". ...

      "hollo werld!"

      Ooops, something wrong there. Need to fix those pesky bugs. :-)

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    63. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by k1773re7f · · Score: 1

      BIOLOGICAL INTERFACE ERROR! REF CODE=ID10T
      The system will now shutdown to prevent further damage from the biologic processing unit.

      --
      This sig. intentionally left blank.
    64. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by memojuez · · Score: 1
      Not exactly ... I think you missed my point that ... aren't we being way to overcomplicated for this streamlined Linux Distro?


      Personally, I'm tired of writing code in a terminal window every time I want to do something constructive with Linux. Cuts into my guitar playing time.

      --
      Signature applied for, Patent Pending
    65. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Well, as it turned out he is running a server. There are really no excuses, that's always going to take some involvement. There is no GUI by default on the server, and therefore your method won't work. It will also not upgrade from the DVD, as he asked for.

      I dunno about the terminal, I find it faster for most tasks. And there really are not many needs left, in Ubuntu, where you need the terminal. Not for upgrading, that's for sure.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    66. Re:Started the download 20 minutes ago by memojuez · · Score: 1
      Server? Well that changes everything.


      I still use the terminal too for certain tasks, but gone are the days when we had to almost everything worth doing in it.

      --
      Signature applied for, Patent Pending
  2. Anonymous Karmawhoring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Anonymous Karmawhoring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If everybody is getting their Linux on, who is manning the internet?!?!

    2. Re:Anonymous Karmawhoring! by ant_tmwx · · Score: 1

      Direct links to the metalinks (As Seen on /.) - these list all the mirrors, checksums, and other info and are used by download apps.

      To use them, try DownThemAll! (Firefox extension), aria2 (cross platform, command line), KGet (in KDE4), Speed Download (OS X), GetRight (Windows), Retriever (cross platform, Java) or about 15 other download programs.

      http://releases.ubuntu.com/8.04/ubuntu-8.04-alternate-amd64.metalink
      http://releases.ubuntu.com/8.04/ubuntu-8.04-alternate-i386.metalink
      http://releases.ubuntu.com/8.04/ubuntu-8.04-desktop-amd64.metalink
      http://releases.ubuntu.com/8.04/ubuntu-8.04-desktop-i386.metalink

    3. Re:Anonymous Karmawhoring! by dmcgk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Theo DeRaadt?

    4. Re:Anonymous Karmawhoring! by harrkev · · Score: 1

      If his name is pronounced like I think it is, that sounds like a better name for a mobster than a BSD guy.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    5. Re:Anonymous Karmawhoring! by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      God - Its CRASHING and I haven't EVEN downloaded it yet!! That's it... I was going to get into this whole Linux thing, but I'm going back to my stable Windows environment.

    6. Re:Anonymous Karmawhoring! by R3N3G4D3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sweet, Pirate bay offers a pirated verison of Ubuntu? I'm in!

    7. Re:Anonymous Karmawhoring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fool free open operating systems cannot be pirated. Go to ubuntu.com and join the linux movement

  3. Whats that sound I hear? by Aranykai · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its as if thousands of bittorrent peers suddenly started connecting at once.

    --
    If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    1. Re:Whats that sound I hear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it's the sound of UbuntuDupe firing up his keyboard to remind everyone how lousy his Ubuntu experience was.

    2. Re:Whats that sound I hear? by WwWonka · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its as if thousands of bittorrent peers suddenly started connecting at once.

      Comcast filters...engage.

    3. Re:Whats that sound I hear? by getto+man+d · · Score: 5, Funny

      These aren't the .ISOs you're looking for.

    4. Re:Whats that sound I hear? by Gewalt · · Score: 2, Funny

      UbuntuDupe, is that you? it's ok, really, you don't have to post anon just to make fun of yourself.

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    5. Re:Whats that sound I hear? by qualidafial · · Score: 5, Funny

      I felt a great disturbance in the force, as if thousands of apt-get repositories had cried out in pain, and were suddenly silenced.

    6. Re:Whats that sound I hear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      had my first double face-palm. Left, then right.

    7. Re:Whats that sound I hear? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      It is funny watching the tracker crumble. It runs up to about 5-6 thousand seeders and leechers, and falls down. Then comes back up with 7, (not 7 thousand) and starts growing. :) Never seen a tracker with this much trouble. Perhaps they should post to pirate bay? ;)

    8. Re:Whats that sound I hear? by anonymousNR · · Score: 0

      I felt a great disturbance in the force, as if thousands of apt-get repositories had cried out in pain, and were suddenly silenced. I guess you are right , i couldn't apt-get a 3MB package from morning :(
      --
      -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
    9. Re:Whats that sound I hear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His postings on /. are so genius that it's clear if he can't install Ubuntu the no one can.

    10. Re:Whats that sound I hear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, keep that up and you will be punished - you will have to use Windows Vista!

    11. Re:Whats that sound I hear? by TheBAFH · · Score: 1

      I find your lack of bandwidth... disturbing.

      --
      http://www.grcrun11.gr - MUDA tribute
  4. Kubuntu by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't forget Kubuntu!

    There are some of us who don't (or kan't) run Gnome...

    1. Re:Kubuntu by j3tt · · Score: 1

      I thought KDE uses more resource than Gnome. I haven't tried Kubuntu yet. It might be time to give it a shot ...

    2. Re:Kubuntu by cparker15 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      KDE runs much more smoothly on my laptop than GNOME.

      --
      Have you driven a fnord... lately?

      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

    3. Re:Kubuntu by kernowyon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just to note that the Kubuntu 8.04 release is not an LTS one, because of the upcoming KDE4 apparently. So if Long Term Support is something you really need - and you want Kubuntu - then you are still going to be using 6.06 for a while yet.

      --
      Awful UID - but I have been here ages...
    4. Re:Kubuntu by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? I thought that was true of the KDE4 version (Remix); pretty sure I read that the KDE3 build of 8.04 was LTS.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    5. Re:Kubuntu by M0pper · · Score: 5, Informative

      For those of you that can't run Gnome or KDE, don't forget Xubuntu! (http://www.xubuntu.org) This version of Ubuntu features XFCE as a desktop environment, which is more lightweight then the other two, while maintaining most functionality. Alternatively, you can just get XFCE next to your current desktop environment and set it up so that you can choose which environment you want to use for your session each time you log in. You could then, for example, use Gnome or KDE when your laptop is running from its adapter and use XFCE when running on battery power, to cut down the power usage.

    6. Re:Kubuntu by archkittens · · Score: 0

      KDE has its ups and downs compared to GNOME, but really, we shouldnt be using ether on our laptops :p mine's a compaq armada 7800, with a magical 400 MHz p2 at the helm. runs kubuntu (6.10, i believe) just fine, but has issues with almost every version of stock ubuntu. i attribute that to KDE's better (IMHO) management of resources.

      im waiting to see how KDE4 looks on the desktop before i fudge with my laptop though!
    7. Re:Kubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are some of us who don't (or kan't) run Gnome...

      Or won't.

    8. Re:Kubuntu by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 5, Funny

      (or kan't) run Gnome... Kant runs Gnome, as explained in his Critique Of Pure Usability.

      Kant uses BitTorrent because he asserts that one should download such that the protocol for one's download may scale to serve all downloaders simultaneously.

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    9. Re:Kubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are some of us who don't (or kan't) run Gnome... Please don't leave out xubuntu either in that case... Hopefully at one point there will also be a version that focuses on enlightenment.

    10. Re:Kubuntu by kernowyon · · Score: 1

      Yep - pretty sure, unless things have changed again!
      From the Kubuntu wiki -
      "Kubuntu 8.04, the Hardy Heron, is the next release of Kubuntu, scheduled to be released towards the end of April 2008. This release will introduce the future of desktop computing by incorporating the new KDE 4 desktop as well as providing continued maintenance and support for the KDE 3.5 desktop. With the news concerning the release of the KDE 4 desktop, it was decided by Canonical that Kubuntu 8.04 would not be a Long Term Support (LTS) release."
      and from the actual download page today -
      "There are currently three versions of Kubuntu! Kubuntu 8.04 features the rock solid KDE 3 and is supported for 18 months (until October 2009). Kubuntu 8.04 (KDE 4 Remix) comes with the cutting edge KDE 4 Desktop. Kubuntu 6.06 LTS is our old Long Term Suport version, supported until October 2009."
      I won't link directly to the messages to give the Ubuntu servers a bit of a break ;) But they are easy to find (when the site isn't being hammered!)

      --
      Awful UID - but I have been here ages...
    11. Re:Kubuntu by FromellaSlob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope. KDE3 developer support will expire before three years, so neither version is LTS this time.

    12. Re:Kubuntu by SeePage87 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention all the applications native to KDE bundled in Kubuntu rock the socks off the included applications in Ubuntu. Amarok, K3b, Kate, SuperKaramba (ok, not bundled, but native to KDE), ktorrent, konqueror (maybe not for web browsing), kaffeine...

    13. Re:Kubuntu by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      Yes I will :-)

      (honestly I think Xubuntu is more interesting - personally)

    14. Re:Kubuntu by paulatz · · Score: 1

      18 months are not three years, and KDE3 support will definitely last one more year and a half. Consider that a real non-beta version of KDE4 (aka KDE4.1) will be out sometime this summer.

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    15. Re:Kubuntu by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      I found a huge difference by running XUbuntu on my underpowered laptop. And it was really easy to switch to from regular ubuntu. Something like "sudo apt-get install xubuntu-core" I don't remember the exact command.

      Uses Xfce.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    16. Re:Kubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      K3b is the only one I'd say is superior to the Gnome equivalent. Brasero could change that though (I haven't tried it yet).

    17. Re:Kubuntu by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      You know you can run the apps but not the environment ;).

      Preferences though. I personally find Pan, Totem, and Nautilus to be better than anything I can find in the KDE camp. Credit where credit is due though, I still haven't found a good GTK-based Amarok equivalent. What I really wish though is that they'd port iTunes to Linux. It can't be that hard, and they'd open up their market to a whole 'nother segment.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    18. Re:Kubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You know, good distro have both at the same time. Why changing the os to change the WM ?!?

    19. Re:Kubuntu by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      Have you tried OpenGEU? I'm not generally a fan of Enlightenment but the combination of minimal resource usage and eye candy is really pretty impressive.

    20. Re:Kubuntu by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      Question: Where can i put my snakes.

      Question: I have fully switched to Ubuntu for one of my work laptops and all of my home systems. (I still have windows laptop at work for various reasons)

      I effectively run default desktop 7.10 with Gnome. -- Can I easily swap between DEs? I actually have no idea of the diff between KED and Gnome (ill find an TFA) but how can I choose which to run at startup? (if this is possible)

    21. Re:Kubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Thanks for reminding us that some people are kunts.

    22. Re:Kubuntu by kaens · · Score: 1

      What I've finally settled on is using KDE with fluxbox as the window manager. Fits my usage perfectly.

    23. Re:Kubuntu by kaens · · Score: 1

      Gnome has an equivalent to Amarok?

    24. Re:Kubuntu by wigginz · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was a die hard Kubuntu guy until I installed Hardy (Ubuntu) on a friend's laptop and wow, Gnome really impressed me with it's polish. KDE in Kubuntu seems so thrown together compared to Gnome. Makes sense too, Canonical only pays one Kubuntu developer, all their resources go to making polishing Gnome.

      --
      You may find my appearance and demeanor foolish, but it is you who plays the fool.
    25. Re:Kubuntu by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      What I really wish though is that they'd port iTunes to Linux. It can't be that hard, and they'd open up their market to a whole 'nother segment.
      ...and spend all that time and money capturing the "people who like DRM but use linux" segment.

      Actually, unless you are Gerald Hopkins from Hoboken, NJ, I think I need to update the database of people who fall into that segment. Currently there are 3 people including Gerald.
      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    26. Re:Kubuntu by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you have both DEs installed there should be a button on the login screen that allows for you to choose a session type. I am at work and Slackware 12.0 using KDM as the login manager has a button called menu on the lower right side of the login box. IIRC my laptop at home running Kubuntu has a picture of a menu with no text. I also have the option once I am logged in to switch users which will spawn a new X session on vt8, which brings up the login manager, and I can switch between my two sessions by pressing ctrl-alt-f7 and ctrl-alt-f8.

    27. Re:Kubuntu by neuromanc3r · · Score: 1

      Why would people who have used Amarok voluntarily switch to iTunes? (not trolling, just puzzled and genuinely interested)

    28. Re:Kubuntu by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      yes you can swap. if you have both gnome and kde installed, there will be a menu item on the login screen where you can select the section type (kde or gnome).

      be adived that if you change the session type this way, your profile's scripts (i.e. .profile, .bash_rc, etc) may not be executed.

      the workaround is to create a file in your $HOME directory called .Xsession and put in there the command that starts your desired environment. for KDE it's "starkde". have no idea which command starts gnome.

      /i don't believe in gnomes. i run over them.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    29. Re:Kubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...all their resources go to making polishing Gnome. Boy, I wish I got paid for polishing my Gnome.

      Sorry, the stage was set with all the Hairy Hardon references
    30. Re:Kubuntu by nahdude812 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, you can have KDE and Gnome both installed at the same time. sudo apt-get install kde-desktop. This'll change the bootup logo to be the Kubuntu version, but on the login screen you'll be able to choose your session, and choose KDE or Gnome depending on what you feel like getting into.

      I go back and forth every few months personally. I like the simplicity of Gnome, they make the features I want most easily available to me.

      But then I'll find some corner case which I simply can't do with Gnome (eg Gnome mis-detecting a file type and refusing to let you open it because the file contents don't match the extension), then I fire up KDE for a while, revel in the many, many options to tweak, dork around with those for a while before discovering this stuff actually gets in the way of my productivity when I'm not just tooling around, and end up going back to Gnome again.

      No matter what desktop I'm using, I end up using programs from the alternate environment. For example, I always use Kate as my text editor, Amarok as my media library, and Kopete as my IM client (all KDE apps).

    31. Re:Kubuntu by badpazzword · · Score: 1
      Installing Kubuntu is easy (but I had some trouble in completely getting rid of it when I decided I didn't like it). I'm not sure it's the correct way to go, but you can install the Kubuntu task (Sys > Admin > Synaptic > Edit > Mark packages by task).

      You will be asked if you want to use GNOME or KDE as default, and you will be asked if you want to have the GNOME Ubuntu login screen or the KDE Kubuntu login screen.

      Whichever you choose, you can pick what to run before performing your log in (use the Options button.)

      --
      When ideas fail, words become very handy.
    32. Re:Kubuntu by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      iTunes offers access to the iTunes store. Amarok does not ;).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    33. Re:Kubuntu by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Not all content on iTunes is DRM'd. Even for the stuff that is, in some cases it's by far the cheapest way to get media. I personally LOVE it for buying educational programs from Animal Planet and The History Channel and such. Watch almost any show on there and they'll advertise a DVD afterwards . . . that costs $20-30 because it's a low production run item. With itunes though, production run doesn't matter, so all those shows are generally $1.99.

      The truth is: I was able to easily switch from Windows to Mac OS X where I never quite could go from Windows completely to Linux (I've always had a Linux box around, but never managed to go "full Linux" for more than 2-3 weeks at a time). A major factor in the switch to OS X for me was that iTunes was still available (and worked much better than their Windows version).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    34. Re:Kubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (or kan't) run Gnome... Kant runs Gnome, as explained in his Critique Of Pure Usability. I laughed

    35. Re:Kubuntu by neuromanc3r · · Score: 1
    36. Re:Kubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      For those of you that can't run Gnome or KDE, don't forget Xubuntu! (http://www.xubuntu.org). For those of you who can't run XFCE, there's CP/M!
    37. Re:Kubuntu by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      18 months = non-LTS, Kubuntu 8.04 and 8.04 Remix
      36 months = LTS, Kubuntu 6.06

      don't worry, seems like a lot of posts in this thread are confused about that.

    38. Re:Kubuntu by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Not to mention all the applications native to KDE bundled in Kubuntu rock the socks off the included applications in Ubuntu. Amarok, K3b, Kate, SuperKaramba (ok, not bundled, but native to KDE), ktorrent, konqueror (maybe not for web browsing), kaffeine... Why not have both. I'm running Ubuntu and KDE, with all it's application goodness. All it requires is adding a repo or two and typing sudo apt-get install kde. (or something like that)

      Now I have all that Ubuntu has to offer with the ability to run KDE or Gnome or even KDE apps in Gnome or maybe even Gnome apps in KDE.

      I thought everyone did this.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    39. Re:Kubuntu by theeddie55 · · Score: 1

      But it does! http://amarok.kde.org/en/node/446 :) Says the article published on April 1st.
    40. Re:Kubuntu by 2muchcoffeeman · · Score: 1

      To get rid of KDE after you've supplementally installed it. you can't just get rid of the kubuntu-desktop item in Synaptic/apt-get. Instead, you have to paste the following command on the command line:

      sudo apt-get remove adept adept-batch adept-common adept-installer adept-manager adept-notifier adept-updater akregator amarok amarok-xine apport-qt ark arts debtags digikam dolphin enscript fftw3 foomatic-db-gutenprint gdebi-kde gnupg-agent gpgsm gtk-qt-engine gwenview hplip-gui hwdb-client-kde ijsgutenprint k3b kaddressbook kaffeine kaffeine-xine kamera karm katapult kate kbstate kcontrol kcron kde-guidance kde-guidance-powermanager kde-icons-mono kde-style-polyester kde-systemsettings kdeadmin-kfile-plugins kdebase-bin kdebase-data kdebase-kio-plugins kdebluetooth kdegraphics-kfile-plugins kdelibs-data kdelibs4c2a kdemultimedia-kfile-plugins kdemultimedia-kio-plugins kdenetwork-filesharing kdenetwork-kfile-plugins kdepasswd kdepim-kio-plugins kdepim-kresources kdepim-wizards kdeprint kdesktop kdesudo kdm kdnssd keep kfind kghostview khelpcenter kicker kio-apt kio-locate kio-umountwrapper kipi-plugins klipper kmag kmail kmailcvt kmenuedit kmilo kmix kmousetool kmplayer-base kmplayer-konq-plugins knetworkconf knotes konq-plugins konqueror konqueror-nsplugins konsole kontact konversation kooka kopete korganizer kpdf kpf kppp krdc krfb kscreensaver ksmserver ksnapshot ksplash ksplash-engine-moodin ksvg ksysguard ksysguardd ksystemlog ktorrent kubuntu-artwork-usplash kubuntu-default-settings kubuntu-desktop kubuntu-docs kubuntu-konqueror-shortcuts kvkbd kwalletmanager kwin kwin-style-crystal language-selector-qt libakode2 libarts1-akode libarts1c2a libartsc0 libaudio2 libavahi-qt3-1 libclucene0 libcluceneindex0 libdbus-qt-1-1c2 libept0 libexiv2-0 libflac++6 libgmp3c2 libgpgme11 libid3tag0 libifp4 libijs-0.35 libimlib2 libjpeg-progs libk3b2 libkbluetooth0 libkcal2b libkcddb1 libkdcraw1 libkdepim1a libkexiv2-1 libkipi0 libkleopatra1 libkmime2 libkonq4 libkpimexchange1 libkpimidentities1 libksba8 libkscan1 libksieve0 libktnef1 liblua50 liblualib50 libmimelib1c2a libmodplug0c2 libmpcdec3 libmysqlclient15off libnjb5 libofa0 libopenexr2c2a libopenobex1 libpoppler-qt2 libpq5 libpth20 libpulse0 libpythonize0 libqt-perl libqt3-mt libqt4-core libqt4-gui librsync1 libruby1.8 libsamplerate0 libsearchclient0 libskim0 libsmokeqt1 libstreamanalyzer0 libstreams0 libstrigihtmlgui0 libtunepimp5 libungif4g libxapian15 libxcb-shape0 libxcb-shm0 libxcb-xv0 libxcb1 libxine1 libxvmc1 mysql-common network-manager-kde networkstatus openoffice.org-kde openoffice.org-style-crystal perl-suid pinentry-qt poster psutils pykdeextensions python-kde3 python-qt3 python-qt4 python-qt4-dbus python-sip4 python2.5-dev qca-tls rdiff-backup restricted-manager-kde ruby ruby1.8 scim-qtimm skim software-properties-kde speedcrunch strigi-applet strigi-daemon && sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop

      That will get you back to your pure GNOME install. YOu may have to reinstall some optional software you already installed after doing that. More information here.

      --
      Prevent Windows piracy. Use Linux instead.
    41. Re:Kubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any reason why you can't download/install the standard Ubuntu desktop release and then install/use whatever window manager you want? I.e., FVWM or Enlightenment?

    42. Re:Kubuntu by kellyb9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      For those of us who can't run Ubuntu, Kubuntu, or Xubuntu - don't forget about Window 3.1.

    43. Re:Kubuntu by compro01 · · Score: 1

      no reason at all. just x/k/ubuntu have it already rigged for those 3, so if you want one of those, it's already there and saves you some time rigging it yourself.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    44. Re:Kubuntu by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      I ran the Ubuntu and Kubuntu LiveCDs on very similar low-end computers and Kubuntu would take at least a couple seconds to respond to anything but Ubuntu was zipping along almost as fast as if it had actually been installed.

    45. Re:Kubuntu by Spliffster · · Score: 2, Informative

      i've been using KDE it since 0.7.

      All i can tell you is that kde sucks big hairy mokey balls ina networked (read Xwindow) envorinment. this is why i prefer gtk apps (read gnome).

      my experience doesn't include kde 4. but as far as i can tell kde makes a nice personal computer desktop but remote x really sucks with all the animations turned on by default (even for remote sessions ... argh).

      when i discovered gnome 2 and discovered that remote X doen't have to suck on remote sessions (windows) i dropped kde.

      ok KDE fanbois, time to mod me down. If you want a windows replacement KDe might be fine, if you want to use Xwindow powers .. good luck.

      Cheers,
      -S

    46. Re:Kubuntu by AshtangiMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe I'm the only one, but ITunes is a great music server, and I use it exclusively without ever having gone to ITunes Music Store. There is nothing about using ITunes that demands or requires DRM. ITMS does have most of it's music DRMed (or so I hear) but again this has nothing to do with ITunes the music player/organizer program.

    47. Re:Kubuntu by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      My only beef with that is that they get rid of the awesome fluxbox menu generator and include some shitty one.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    48. Re:Kubuntu by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Because when you install a desktop environment "by hand" so to speak you may not necessarily obtain the same level of out of the box experience as the one offered by the prepackaged one.

      Besides, the GP was not suggesting people reinstall to get another desktop env., he was just saying that you can get XFCE or KDE by default. If you like them it makes sense to download Kubuntu or Xubuntu directly, not get Ubuntu and waste time replacing the desktop.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    49. Re:Kubuntu by wishmechaos · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or you can just use aptitude, which keeps track of that stuff. If you've installed kubuntu-desktop with aptitude, then it's just a simple 'aptitude remove kubuntu-desktop'.

    50. Re:Kubuntu by westyvw · · Score: 1

      Too bad its the ugly stepchild of Ubuntu, and I always had better luck starting with Ubuntu and adding KDE (apt-get install KDE).

      Frankly, I would rather go for a distro that puts its effort into a KDE based system as I prefer KDE over Gnome, but lets not go there now.

    51. Re:Kubuntu by tooth · · Score: 1

      I started with gnome and have now switched over to a very cut down xfce. It's working well so far.

    52. Re:Kubuntu by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Whoosh.

    53. Re:Kubuntu by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Umm, it's the same thing -- sorry to disappoint.

    54. Re:Kubuntu by phliar · · Score: 1

      All i can tell you is that kde sucks big hairy mokey balls ina networked (read Xwindow) envorinment.

      ???

      I've been using KDE since the mid-90s, and I've only had networked environments (yes, including "Xwindow") and I haven't had significant problems, let alone "suck big hairy mokey[sic] balls". In fact since I've been using X11 from the beginning (and before that SunView) you could say that I do want to use "Xwindow powers". I only got a Mac when Apple switched to Unix, so I could continue to use the X11 applications I've been using since '88 or so.

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    55. Re:Kubuntu by westyvw · · Score: 1

      No its not. You have all the configs and settings of Gnome with the parts that make up KDE not KDE-Kubuntu. I am not the first to do this, its not a new idea.

  5. Site down.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    little surprise there!

  6. Slooow! by desmondhaynes · · Score: 0

    Its as if the whole world is at it! And I chose the most obscure download site! :) Guess everyone did that! :( -- TechWatch

    1. Re:Slooow! by desmondhaynes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Its as if the whole world is at it! And I chose the most obscure download site! :) Guess everyone did that! :( -- TechWatch Ok, got the whole file. Give you a tip. Go to the ones where people are sleeping - I chose .tw enjoy. I am going to be busy now! :) Will send some screenshots soon! TechWatch
    2. Re:Slooow! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Give you a tip. Go to the ones where people are sleeping

      This is Linux, not Windows. Try to download from someplace where it's noon.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:Slooow! by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is Linux, not Windows. Don't pretend there's some sort of fire when there isn't one.

      It won't kill you, or cause you machine to become part of some botnet, just because you
      upgraded a week or two later...

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Slooow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent informative.

      'cause he really is. Linux users usually start downloading in the evening, because most users jumping into a new distro are home users - and they don't download while at work or at school.

    5. Re:Slooow! by Gusfm · · Score: 1

      It took me about 1 minute to download it here. Im glad I could ssh to my work`s pc from home ;)

    6. Re:Slooow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you were wondering why you were modded overrated:
      STOP PUTTING YOUR WEBSITE IN EVERY POST!
      Put it in your profile or your signature, not in your posts body.

      I hope everyone with mod points starts modding down the people that feel the need to put useless links in their posts.

    7. Re:Slooow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give you a tip. Go to the ones where people are sleeping

      This is Linux, not Windows. Try to download from someplace where it's noon.

      But... That's what he said?
  7. Slashdotted. by bannerman · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Could someone please link directly to torrent?

    --
    I keep forgetting my place. Jesus is for losers. Why do I still play to the crowd?
    1. Re:Slashdotted. by derrida · · Score: 1, Redundant
      --
      nemesis. Home of an experimental fe code.
    2. Re:Slashdotted. by AlecLyons · · Score: 4, Informative

      wasn't slashdot this time, the things just wildly popular.

    3. Re:Slashdotted. by somersault · · Score: 1

      Maybe MS are just desperately trying to DDoS all the torrent seeds!? I guess it's time for me to add to the woes of the other users :)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Slashdotted. by tweek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Unrelated to your question, I never expected to see a Steve Taylor quote on Slashdot. Bannerman is not one my favorite songs (more of a pre-Squint kind of guy) but Squint was a good album.

      I STILL have the tribute album in regular rotation on the iAudio.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    5. Re:Slashdotted. by bannerman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Bannerman is not my favorite song either, but I like the imagery... the guy that knows he can't change the world but does his little part because it's his thing, does it well, and trusts that the rest will be handled in it's own way. While I can appreciate the Clone/Meltdown era music, I'm not a big fan of the style. The tribute album is so great though. Bride, Sixpence, Starfyler 59, Dighayzeus... just about as much variety as you could ask for. A fitting tribute for one of the best songwriters of the era. His 90s rock was second to none. All of those guys were just amazing. I just wish they had done more. Wade Jaynes in particular is such a talented artist. All of them are outstanding in their own way.

      --
      I keep forgetting my place. Jesus is for losers. Why do I still play to the crowd?
  8. Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm not the kind to diss a distro over most things, but does it actually ship with a beta web browser? (Or is that just an option the user can add?) There's a few things F3B5 just doesn't quite do yet (mostly relating to extensions). I wouldn't want it to be my only choice available via the package manager, or anything.

    (Note that I don't use Ubuntu or plan to use it any time in the very near future, so I really have no idea how easy it'd be to swap things out.)

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 5, Informative

      AFAIK, since this is a LTS (Long Term Support) release, they went with the beta Firefox so there wouldn't be major shocks when Mozilla stopped updating 2.x and Ubuntu updated everyone to 3.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    2. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by tolan-b · · Score: 2, Informative

      As usual with Ubuntu they seem happy to ship whatever state it's in on the official launch date.

      I'm not trolling here, I'm running Hardy myself, but for a supposedly 'hardy' long term support release it's still pretty buggy for me. Sound in Flash stopped working yesterday (for plenty of other people too by the look of the bug on launchpad), I have to re-enter my WPA password every time I boot, and font hinting isn't working for gnome-terminal and KDE based apps.

      Hohum...

    3. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      Yeah I actually realized this after I posted, I guess it makes more sense in the long run. It's not like you can't install firefox2 in the meantime.

    4. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Simple this is going to be the long term support version. Firefox2 is close to being at the end of it's life. Ubuntu doesn't like to update major version during the life of the release so this makes sense.
      I really like FF3. I think it is much better than FF2.
      As to the problem with plugins... Well that is up to the plug in authors.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by LinuxDon · · Score: 1

      You can always download the Linux binary version of firefox. Just untar it to /opt/firefox2 and start running.

      Also, it's easy to delete when you don't need it anymore and are ready to switch to version 3.

    6. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      AFAIK, since this is a LTS (Long Term Support) release, they went with the beta Firefox so there wouldn't be major shocks when Mozilla stopped updating 2.x and Ubuntu updated everyone to 3. agreed. and even mozilla says its ready for prime time ... and for me Beta is just another name.
    7. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by snl2587 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This would be why I usually wait a month or so before I upgrade to the newest version of Ubuntu. I expect open-source stuff to have bugs but they fix most of them; it just takes little time. For now I'm hanging on to Gutsy until the rush dies down.

      As for the WPA password...did you check the Keyring settings? Chances are that a config file was modified, switching the default save setting...if I had to guess.

    8. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by andhar · · Score: 1

      Good point. Also since this release is so fresh, it'll be some time before it gets adopted in an enterprise environment, and hopefully ample time for FF3 to make it outta beta.

      --
      Vaya con huevos, my darling.
    9. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Burpmaster · · Score: 4, Informative

      Firefox 2 is in the software repository, so it's easy to install. Look either in Synaptic or in add/remove programs.

    10. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by ajs · · Score: 1

      They ship both 2 and 3. I think they anticipated that 3 would be out of beta before release, but even if it's another month or two, it's probably worth having version 3 available as a primary choice.

    11. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by deragon · · Score: 1

      I have been running 08.04 for over a month now (started with alpha). Firefox beta is very stable and works well. Most of my extensions are now supported. In this area, you do not need to fear.

      However, I am disappointed by 08.04. Compiz is buggy. Even in normal desktop mode, keymaps are not working properly. It also lacks refinement. Stuff that used to work for me in Feisty Fawn do not work anymore. However, stuff that used to fail now works too. Overall, it is a worthwhile upgrade, but not the quality I expect of a LTS.

      --
      Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
    12. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by cronot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That, and I think FF3b5 is already more stable than FF2 is, aside from the numerous performance and footprint improvements.

      There's the issue with extensions, yes. But there are few extensions at this point that doesn't have a FF3 compatible version, even if in beta. In my case, the ones that doesn't, I was able to replace with another extension that does the same thing, or better. In my case:

      • - Duplicate Tab => Tab Clicking options
      • - All-in-one Gestures (seems abandoned, btw) => Mouse Gestures Redox
      • - Firebug 1.0 => Firebug 1.1b12
      • - Foxmarks (they supposedly have a beta version that works in FF3, but it's only open to a select group of beta-testers - wtf?) => Mozilla Weave (it isn't as smooth, but it works)

      Also, there are a couple of extensions I've just remove since FF3 has the features I've used these extensions for natively.

    13. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by asac · · Score: 1

      exactly ... and remember that even mozilla thinks its ready for prime time

    14. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      from http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com/2008/04/faq-hardy-upgrade.html

      Why is Firefox 3 beta 5 included? It's beta!

              * Firefox 2 will not continue to get security updates from Mozilla long enough to be in an LTS release. FF3b5 is in very good shape, and the final release is due in June. June is also when 8.04.1 is due, which will include all updates up to that point on an updated iso image, and also (I expect) FF3 final.

      btw. LTS means its supported for the next 3 years.

    15. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by tolan-b · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nah it's storing *something* but it seems to be the password in hex form which it's then applying as though it were ASCII or latin1 or whatever they use for passphrases.

      Thanks for the suggestion though.

    16. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Phyrexicaid · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, since this is a LTS (Long Term Support) release, they went with the beta Firefox so there wouldn't be major shocks when Mozilla stopped updating 2.x and Ubuntu updated everyone to 3. In that case, they should have shipped with KDE 4.0.3 and made Kubuntu LTS too
      --
      The meme is dead, long live the meme!
    17. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      Agreed, this is the curse of Ubuntu as far as I'm concerned. I've been having a love hate relationship with it for ages. I'd switch back to Fedora if it had the repositories, I'd switch to Debian (well I have for my desktop) but Etch is too old and Lenny/Sid is currently broken for proprietary nVidia drivers. On the other hand, where it works Ubuntu is lovely, they have enough useful extras that Debian doesn't have to make it worthwhile, but the quality control and willingness to hold back a release is completely lacking. It drives me up the wall.

    18. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by bunratty · · Score: 1

      and even NetApplications reports that users are already switching to Firefox 3.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    19. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by asac · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... or sudo apt-get install firefox-2

    20. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Darundal · · Score: 1

      If you are talking about audio stuff, that is because they switched to PulseAudio as the main audio server. And yeah, there is lots of stuff that doesn't play nice with PulseAudio, but it is a transition that needs to happen.

    21. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by asac · · Score: 1

      ... and it probably will get another boost now that millions of ubuntu users will be using it.

    22. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Lets compare this to "professional production software" where you typically wait at
      least 6 months after a major release before you start using a new version...

              Or PC Computer games where the mantra is "we can patch it after it ships"...

              Choosing not to be the final beta testers is hardly something limited to Linux.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    23. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by deragon · · Score: 1

      Part of it. But will it be fixed in 08.04, or will Canonical tell us that it will be fixed in 08.10? I fear that once a release is out, only security fixes are brought in. In my experience with Fedora and Ubuntu, I always had to wait to the next release to get my bugs fixed.

      --
      Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
    24. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by AlzaF · · Score: 1

      You can change to Firefox 2 in a couple of clicks although that's too difficult for the average user

    25. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Because upgrading the entire frickin' desktop environment is exactly the same as shipping a late beta of Firefox.

    26. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by AlzaF · · Score: 1

      You can change to Firefox 2 in a couple of clicks (sarc) although that's too difficult for the average user(/sarc)

      Damm I need to use preview more often and stop using the sarcastic tag as it doesn't show in slashdot

    27. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Christophotron · · Score: 1

      Mozilla Weave (it isn't as smooth, but it works) I tried Weave, and I can attest to the fact that it most certainly DOES NOT work. I run FF3B5 as well as Minefield, and Weave is just plain BROKEN. BADLY BROKEN. It does not seem to upload anything to the server anymore, ever. Half the time it fails to connect, giving some generic error. I actually think it can't handle the excessive amount of bookmarks I have. It's not anywhere near ready. Don't tell people to use it yet.
    28. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The package called "firefox" will bring you Firefox3, but "firefox-2" will bring you Firefox2. So yes, Firefox3 is the default, but switching to Firefox2 is very easy.

    29. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't feel like logging in to make this comment, but I would just like to state that the combination of FF3B5+Gmail+Firebug = problems.

      i've had it crash quite a few times now. So when checking gmail I use FF2. Although Gmail needs to get itself stable and out of Beta. The length of their Beta is friggin ridiculous. I love gmail, but it def has some bugs that aren't understandable...

    30. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox 2 is also available. Remove 3 and install 2 from the package manager.

    31. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I use WPA2 and it seems to refuse to believe the "2" part.

      Annoying.

      Same with the installation, btw, you cannot (with beta) say "WPA2", only "wpa" (whic did not work in beta, I do not know about final").

      All in all, just annoying, not a biggie.

    32. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by CajunArson · · Score: 1

      Yeah I had the issue with freetype bite me HARD. Everything was fine in Gutsy, and then the library updated without the (theoretically patented) font-hinting enabled. I had to download freetype sources, tweak the header files, and then manually install to replace the packaged version to make the fonts legible.
          Now, for someone like me that's no big deal.. but for a newbie who is seeing ugly fonts on the screen that is not an acceptable solution.

      --
      AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    33. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Explodicle · · Score: 1

      The key difference is that FF 3 is already better than FF 2, but KDE 4 still kinda sucks compared to KDE 3.

    34. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Isn't there a rather large mental disconnect between wanting 5 year super-stable support and running beta software? Though I suppose it's hardly the server application you care most about...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    35. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just use Epiphany? You know, the default GNOME browser.

    36. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Knuckles · · Score: 2

      Ubuntu 8.04 includes Firefox 3.0 beta 5. This was felt to be the best option despite its pre-release status, in light of the extended support lifetime of Ubuntu 8.04 and the importance and complexity of Firefox security updates. Further release candidates and the final release may be considered for post-release updates.


      Release Notes.
      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    37. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      It is pretty easy to swap it out actually, and I'm pretty sure they've used at least RC versions as default in previous releases with no ill effects that I can recall.
      Firefox, and ubuntu in general, update automatically by default so any deficiencies will soon be remedied.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    38. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by scuba0 · · Score: 1

      That's weird, I use WPA2 and has been since 7.10. It works flawless and the new open Intel driver makes it much more stable. Flash I can go for, that's why you shouldn't use the latest version .115 but the .96 or something because the newer one is buggy. The last one I can't answer for...

    39. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Why is Firefox 3 beta 5 included? It's beta! Slashdot has become a gathering ground of complete morons. READ THE FUCKING RELEASE NOTES! http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/804
      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    40. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by superslacker87 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      sudo apt-get remove firefox && sudo apt-get install firefox-2

      Not that difficult.

      --
      I run Ubuntu skinned to look like a Mac on a PC. Go figure.
    41. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Firefox 2 is also available. Remove 3 and install 2 from the package manager. No need to remove v2, you can install in parallel.
      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    42. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by rgo · · Score: 1

      Have you tried installing Hardy from scratch?

      In my laptop usplash doesn't work, I get a text boot screen. I don't know why, but it must have happened because I upgraded from 7.01 to devel in february. I also had weird issues like this updating to devel versions on the past.

      I have never upgraded to stable versions in the past, so I would recommend you to install hardy from scratch.

    43. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FF2 will be supported for 6 months after official release of FF3. Then FF2 will be EOLed.

      http://wiki.mozilla.org/ReleaseRoadmap

      I don't know why Mozilla has such a short overlap of support. But, given those dates, I think it's better that distros released now include FF3 betas, perhaps with an optional FF2 package as well.

    44. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by calc · · Score: 1

      I just got finished playing a video off youtube with sound on Ubuntu 8.04 i386. So if flash isn't working for sound it isn't working only for a subset of users.

    45. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sudo apt-get install firefox-2 firefox-2-dom-inspector firefox-2-gnome-support

    46. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by crhylove · · Score: 1

      Um, yeah. It's the most stable, fastest, smallest foot print browser I've ever used.

      Ever.

      Period.

      So they went with it. Score one for Ubuntu!

      Now if only Adblock Plus would update..... :/

      --
      I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    47. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by bsims · · Score: 1

      apt-get install firefox-2, easy as pie.

      Though I did have to edit my preexisting firefox icon by changing it to /usr/bin/firefox-2 instead of /usr/bin/firefox.

    48. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I'm in the Foxmarks beta program, and it works fine. I think they're waiting for Firefox 3 to get out of beta, but I don't know. Just sign up... they'll probably get back to you in a couple of days with a passcode. It's worth it.

    49. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by DaFallus · · Score: 1

      I have to re-enter my WPA password every time I boot I had to do this with Gnome's default network manager in 7.10. I got around it by installing wicd.
      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    50. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No google browser sync support > oiy

      Honestly, I can't recommend upgrading to this OS until firefox 3 final is out and all the usual suspects have support.

    51. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by rbanffy · · Score: 2, Informative

      "As usual with Ubuntu they seem happy to ship whatever state it's in on the official launch date."

      Sure that's why we had 6.06. Oh. Wait!

      They got ff3b5 in because it's good enough. I have been using it for a couple weeks and I can vouch for it. As for unusable parts, they did not include the KDE4 environment because it is, as of right now, very shaky.

    52. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Funny

      but for a supposedly 'hardy' long term support release it's still pretty buggy for me. Sound in Flash stopped working yesterday

      some people would consider that to be a bonus...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    53. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know if DownThemAll works properly with FF3 yet? I tried 3b5 a few weeks ago and the then-current version of DownThemAll would frequently cause the download dialog box to have the bottom 2/3's or so cut off making it almost unusable.

      Also the then current AdBlock Plus wouldn't install on FF3. I know there are ways around that but I wasn't motivated enough at the time :)

      Do both of these extensions work "out of the box" with FF3 yet?

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    54. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, we need PulseAudio now because they just finished getting Alsa working correctly.

      Sheesh! Why don't we just focus on refining things that work instead of always switching to the latest shiny half-finished things?

    55. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      regarding Foxmarks, the beta isn't that select... they let me in.

      You just have to give them you're email and you'll get a reply in a few days or a week accepting you to the beta program. I think they just want to control the number of users as they are testing things. After all, FF3 made some pretty big bookmarking changes.
      http://beta.foxmarks.com/

    56. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Phyrexicaid · · Score: 1

      Yes. Because upgrading the entire frickin' desktop environment is exactly the same as shipping a late beta of Firefox. Perhaps you're right, but technically KDE 4 is *out* of beta. So it's comparing a late beta inclusion to a release version inclusion.
      --
      The meme is dead, long live the meme!
    57. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Flex+Flint · · Score: 1

      Seconded. I don't think it's extremely popular to "casual users" (last update was in 2006), but it really is a handy tool. People are already pleading.

    58. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Flex+Flint · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, FF2 already has the "Restart session" thing. Not the same, but will do for the moment. Anyone glimpsed at similar features in FF3?

    59. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Except that KDE4 is, like I say, the entire frickin' desktop environment. And, having just been released in January, hardly has much in the way of legs on it just yet. Hence, it's understandable why Kubuntu decided to forego KDE4 for this LTS release.

    60. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by thornomad · · Score: 1

      I had a similiar problem with WPA2 as well -- seemed that I had to re-enter my password after each reboot ... then I realized that running an ifdown / ifup sequence just after startup the wireless would start. Which still wasn't fun.

      What I ended up doing was adding pre-up sleep 20 to my /etc/network/interfaces file ... which solved the problem. Things work awesome now.

      So now things look like this:

      auto ath0
      iface ath0 inet dhcp
      pre-up sleep 20
      wpa-psk 8501.....dcf
      wpa-driver wext
      wpa-key-mgmt WPA-PSK
      wpa-proto WPA2
      wpa-ssid myid

      here is the thread

    61. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by jeremyds · · Score: 1

      This is kind of an aside, but the Windows version of FF3b5 has not been stable at all for me and crashes several times a day. I'm not sure if these bugs are Windows-specific, but both XP and Vista have stability problems for me. GMail is particularly bad and I've had to resort to using IE 7 on multiple occasions.

    62. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's dead simple to install Firefox 2. It is available in the repositories. It's a matter of "click" and "apply"

    63. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by gropes · · Score: 1

      New software products and releases always have plenty of bugs. Compare the number of noteworthy Ubuntu bugs with that of the Vista release and I'd have to say Ubuntu comes out way on top.

    64. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be why I usually wait a month or so before I upgrade to the newest version of Ubuntu.

      It's also why people don't wait. :/

      Fiesty had a Guarddog that wouldn't play with NFS, then Gusty has that ide kernel bug that never got patched for 2.6.22-14. But yeah, if you've got an Ubuntu that has everything you use working right now, wait a month or so before doing the update. There's always an extra handful of patches, and there will be some nicely sorted workarounds for newly know issues at ubuntuforums.org. That can save you a lot of time.

    65. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      I have had zero problems with firebug and firefox 3 beta 5 on windows or linux.

      The solution is to disable firebug by default and only enable it on sites where you need it.

    66. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Deanalator · · Score: 1

      From my experience, Ubuntu LTS would have had to stick to and maintain firefox 2 for that entire time period.

      For example, thunderbird 2 was released a few days after feisty went stable, so feisty stuck with 1.5. I waited for 2 months for them to upgrade (really looking forward to the tagging feature). After the 2 months, I asked the devs what was up, and they said they 1.5 was permanent because of the feature freeze.

      I then upgraded to gutsy which busted everything to holy hell because I was unaware that development releases are only supposed to work in the last couple months before they are released.

      I went back to gentoo for 6 or so months to cool down from that experience.

    67. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sudo apt-get remove firefox && sudo apt-get install firefox-2
      Not that difficult. Well, actually "firefox" depends on "firefox-3.0" which is the real Firefox3 package, so removing only "firefox" wouldn't remove Firefox3. Also, Firefox2 and Firefox3 can coexist on the same machine.
    68. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Actually, 6.06 was an abnormality a result of some terrible asian languages support, and being the first Ubuntu LTS ever. Canonical has made a vow to stick by the launch date schedule ever since. Instead of releasing whenever a feature is done, they include a feature in a given release depending on whether it's done or not. Obviously this is a challenge when bugs arise, and it often frustrates people to find out that upstream has fixed the bug in a new release, but Ubuntu won't carry it as it's too late.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    69. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by cecil_turtle · · Score: 1

      Beta is just a term loosely applied, it doesn't exactly have defined criteria. I assure you Firefox 3b5 is much more stable than KDE 4. KDE 4 *should* still be in beta from my experience. Mozilla just seems to have higher standards, and especially so with Fx 3 - they're really taking their time.

    70. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by internic · · Score: 1

      For future reference: this is part of the purpose of the backports repository. Updates and security are, as I understand it, only supposed to fix serious bugs and security vulnerabilities, respectively, so the idea is that software won't change to a new version if you're just using the default repositories. Backports, however, contains some newer versions of select, popular software (primarily desktop applications) for reasons just like what you're talking about.

      --
      "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
    71. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      All in one guestures became http://www.xuldev.org/firegestures/ for me

      I use konqueror most of the time and sure wish mouse guestures were working in kde 4

    72. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by bencoder · · Score: 0

      Are you using the network manager for wireless? If so, then I highly recommend switching to WICD. At least, that's the case if you're running gutsy or earlier, I don't know if hardy has improved the situation with wireless yet, and as GP said, I'm not willing to upgrade for a while.

    73. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      It depends on the mix of apps running. There's some sort of ALSA/PulseAudio pissing contest going on.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    74. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that due to the delay, Edgy Eft had a shortened development period and ended up sucking the meat missle so bad Canonical wouldn't even ship it on CD.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    75. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Ubuntu guys thought of the extension problem and actually most of the more popular extensions that didn't already support Firefox 3 have been updated by the Ubuntu team to work on FF3 (eg. Firebug).

      So "apt-get install firebug" will do the trick until that lazy SOB gets off his ass (this is one of the most popular extensions ever and probably the last to support FF3; goofy).

    76. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by EnterDaMatrix · · Score: 1

      Yeah it ships with the beta, but the beta is still better than the newest stable FF 2, so they deemed it appropriate. Better than dealing with backports when FF 3 is gold.

    77. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by CamD · · Score: 1

      KDE 4 *should* still be in beta from my experience
      IIRC, the sole reason KDE 4 is out of beta is to encourage development on it. The general feeling I've been getting is that 4.1 is to be considered the proper release.
    78. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by westyvw · · Score: 1

      Funny, this is ALWAYS how my experience is with Ubuntu. Slightly odd to annoying, then flaky. Here I have a Debian Sid machine that I have been pulling along for years and it is seems much more predictable then Ubuntu stable.

    79. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by Carlinya · · Score: 1

      The latest version of Adblock Plus for FF3B5 was release about a week or so ago. I've been using it since then, works like a charm. Some ads are still not fully blocked though.

      --
      1 + 1 = 3?
    80. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by phyrz · · Score: 1

      https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usplash/+bug/205990

      does the fix in this bug reports description help your usplash issue?

      --
      Don't point that gun at him, he's an unpaid intern!
    81. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I had all sorts of problems after having upgraded from Edgy to Feisty to Gutsy to Hardy BETA. A fresh install made it act completely differently.

      That said, that sucks. It should just work, and I can't really understand why that should be so hard.

    82. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Or, if you know what you're talking about, aptitude install firefox2.

    83. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by amorangi · · Score: 1

      If you find your disk being thrashed in 8.04 there's a good chance it's F3B5. To fix the problem disable the "suspected attack site" and "suspected forgery site" tracking in preferences.
      This is probably quite a common occurrence.

      You are right - the beta isn't ready for prime time.

    84. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Erm... I don't know what you are talking about.

      I have used 6.06, 6.10. 7.04. 7.10 and now 8.04 and I can tell you 6.06 was, while unremarkable, quite stable.

    85. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was. Edgy was 6.10, and *good lord* that one was hideous.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    86. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Oh no... 6.10 was not nearly as bad as you make it.

      When I meant 6.06 was unremarkable, I was talking about 6.10. And unremarkable it was, for the good and for the bad.

      I could as well have skipped it.

    87. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Well yea you could have skipped it, there wasn't enough time to actually change anything. They just tried to shove compiz by default really hard, and introduce upstart. A few updates and gnome, but no time to do anything remarkable.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    88. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      Nah I'm not reinstalling my OS every 6 months. I can work around bugs, but then I've been using computers for 20 years and running Linux as my desktop OS for about 8 years. Also working with Linux servers for about 10 years.

      So it's easier for me to work around stuff than do a fresh install every 6 months. But for the supposed target audience of Ubuntu ("Linux for human beings") the quality of the QA is poor IMHO.

    89. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      Most bugs only affect a subset of users, they're still bugs.

    90. Re:Firefox 3 Beta 5? Really? by rgo · · Score: 1

      yes!! thanks!! it seems that messing around with partition tables doesn't play nice with upgrading the kernel.

  9. Can't be bothred to use the torrent.. by s0litaire · · Score: 1

    Instead of D/L the ISO i've opted for the web update. Gonna take another hour to d/l the updates so it's probably just as quick as D/L via torrent, burning to CD then running the upgrade... :D

    --
    Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
    1. Re:Can't be bothred to use the torrent.. by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Got the torrent in 45 min, @250kb/s average. God bless the 3700 seeders.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  10. I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by MistrBlank · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's beta. It's also widely unsupported right now and doesn't work with several plug-ins I love to use. I do like some of the built in features of it, and use it on several of my systems, but I don't see it as belonging in an OS Release.

    1. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a Long Term Support release, obviously they didn't want to have to support Firefox 2 for another 5 years.

    2. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

      So, uh, they're going to support a beta Web browser instead? Interesting.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    3. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Tim+C · · Score: 0, Redundant

      So instead they would rather support a beta release?

    4. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by tolan-b · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They'll release 3 final to the repositories when it's released and probably reroll the installer CD I'd have thought.

      They could really do with a bit more flexibility on their launch dates though.

    5. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Tikkun · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ubuntu releases based on a schedule (1 major release every 6 months, 1 release with long term support every 2 years), not when software is completely "ready". The merits of this can be argued by better geeks than I (I'll continue to use 7.10 on my desktop for a month, but 8.04 is going on my lappy pronto).

      If you need completely stable software you should use another distro (Debian comes to mind) or wait a month or two.

    6. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by claytonjr · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, they will support FireFox3, whether beta, rc1, rc2, final...

    7. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      Not exactly... at least not as far as I can presume... they'l support any further beta's, the RC's and finals to come aswell...

      As the AC GP said... "they didn't want to support FF2 for another 5 years" (paraphrase) if they had included FF2 they would have to support that, and either support FF3 aswell, or cut FF3 out of the support...

      So, there decision makes the most sense, besides its not exactly 0m6 fuk diz hard to switch back to, or install FF2 beside it...

    8. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      It's easier to deal with bugs in a beta for 2 months, than it is to deal with security holes popping up 5 years from now in a no longer supported version.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    9. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by snl2587 · · Score: 1

      It's not their fault that Firefox 3 isn't ready yet. It's just like how Gutsy shipped with the release candidate for the Gimp 2.4 and not the final. I could understand if the Ubuntu developers were also responsible for building Firefox, but as it stands there was no reason to postpone the release of the entire operating system just because Firefox was a stage away from production.

    10. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by doombringerltx · · Score: 1

      If making a new spin is an option then why not just ship with ff2 now and then re-spin it with ff3 when it hits release? I've got to say the idea of shipping with beta software as default kind of bothers me.

    11. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Recovering+Hater · · Score: 1

      Beta for a couple of months versus dealing with dead crap for five years. duh.

      --
      My humor is probably your flamebait
    12. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by asac · · Score: 1

      So, uh, they're going to support a beta Web browser instead? Interesting. yes, firefox practically always gets updated to the latest minor release. So from the support side it doesn't really matter ... and if you ask about security support: mozilla lands security fixes they push into 2.0.0.x branches first on trunk. so you will surely get those too ... maybe even before the firefox 2 release that would include those.
    13. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      Mozilla have said FF3 is ready for general consumption. It's still being tweaked but it's fine tbh. I've been using it for a few weeks with no problems.

      The change between FF3b5 and FF3 is far less than that between FF2 and FF3. Ubuntu (and most distros) won't upgrade an app between major version numbers within a release because it's too likely to cause breakage.

    14. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Ambidisastrous · · Score: 1
      It's surprising, but understandable:
      • Since the rc1 of Firefox is due before the end of this month and the final release is due around June 1, it won't be too long before the stable version is in the repositories.
      • Most big organizations wait much longer than a month before trying a major upgrade like this.
      • Canonical was considering releasing a sort of "SP1" disk in early July, which would be the same as an up-to-date Hardy installation at that time. That disk would have the fully baked Firefox 3.
      • Firefox 2 will be deprecated before Hardy's long-term support ends, so FF3 needs to be available in the main distribution.
      • In case of emergency, Firefox 2 is still easily available from the main repository.
      • Firefox 3 is actually a really good browser; for instance, the GUI it uses native Gnome widgets, making Ubuntu look much better and more integrated. Compiz is sketchy too, so we've seen that Canonical will accept a little instability in a desktop app if it's something a typical Ubuntu user would want anyway.

      IMHO, Mozilla's combination of long development times and short support for older releases is acceptable on Windows, where users manually upgrade whenever a new release comes out, but causes problems for Linux distros that include it through a package manager.
    15. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because 2.5 years from now Mozilla may have dropped updates for FF2, leaving Ubuntu to support it by themselves. OTOH, FF3 will be updated to final as soon as it's available in the summer (and to 3.0.0.1, 3.0.0.2, etc. after that) through the standard Ubuntu updating mechanisms. Moreover, Mozilla has declared FF3b4 ready for prime time. The main reason it's still beta is to give extension writers more time to update their stuff.

      This is btw also the reason why Kubuntu is not LTS this time. KDE4 isn't anywhere near ready to be default (in contrast to FF3b5), but KDE3 may not be maintained upstream anymore 2 years from now.

    16. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once FF3 is released it will come down through the system update on your computer (if you are using 8.04).

      Is this hard to understand or are you just being willfully stupid?

    17. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Kjella · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The merits of this can be argued by better geeks than I Just my 2c, I like (fairly) fixed release points, the question is rather how bleeding edge you accept submissions to be. Before Ubuntu I used Debian, and found it fairly frustrating because certain packages would hold back releases so long that other packages would be replaced which again generated new blocking bugs etc. It's much better to ship what's release-ready now even if it's 3 months old than always wait for that package that's "almost" ready. Ubuntu is a little trigger-happy on including the bleeding edge but at least they stick to their release schedule.
      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    18. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Knuckles · · Score: 1
      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    19. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by superslacker87 · · Score: 1

      Well, if people are using their servers as intended, there won't be a reason to have FireFox installed on it. Servers are supported for five years, not desktop. Servers are meant to be headless and connected into remotely, correct? In which case, there is no need for FireFox 2, FireFox 3, or any web browser in the server support any time after April 24, 2011 when the desktop support cycle ends.

      I'm not discounting the argument of FF2 vs. FF3, but if you're going to make the argument, at least make the claim of three years, not five.

      --
      I run Ubuntu skinned to look like a Mac on a PC. Go figure.
    20. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox 2 is available in add or remove programs. I am happy with the Firefox 3 beta, but I suspect you can install them side by side (there was a how to for those who wanted to have this set up on 7.10, to test the beta) and then remove Firefox 2 when 3 is a final release.

    21. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by akahige · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but this isn't a final release of Hardy, either. If you dig through the release notes, you'll see that it's an RC (with a couple of potentially large/annoying bugs) -- which makes you wonder when the full release is due.

    22. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by edmicman · · Score: 1

      Are apps like Firefox even installed with Ubuntu Server? That's Server, not Desktop. Every Ubuntu Server install I've done I've assumed it just has the bare essentials...then I go and install what packages I need to do whatever it is I'm doing. I assumed the client apps (Firefox in this case) only applied to the Desktop version. People aren't installing the Desktop version and using it as a long term server, are they?

    23. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by superslacker87 · · Score: 1

      Are apps like Firefox even installed with Ubuntu Server?

      That was my point.

      If you download the server, you're getting a command-line interface. However, you could just as easily do sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop (or kubuntu-desktop, etc.) and install a graphical front-end to your server. But that defeats the purpose of a server if you ask me.

      FF is GUI, not CLI, therefore will have three years of support. Complain about having to support FF3 for three years, not five.

      --
      I run Ubuntu skinned to look like a Mac on a PC. Go figure.
    24. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "releases based on a schedule (1 major release every 6 months, 1 release with long term support every 2 years), not when software is completely "ready". The merits of this can be argued by better geeks than I..."

      I've always found it curious that the geek world seems to think it impossible to release 100% complete projects on a predetermined schedule. Other industries seem to do it with no problem.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    25. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the FF3 beta does automatic updates. It will eventually run the final w/o the user have to do anything more than agree to install the update when they start FF. Or is that a windows only thing?

    26. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by compro01 · · Score: 1

      not even 2 1/2 years. according to their roadmap, 2 will be EOL'd 6 months after the release of 3, same as it was for the transition from 1.0 to 1.5 and 1.5 to 2.0.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    27. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by compro01 · · Score: 1

      the factually of the statement that the project is "100% complete" is debatable.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    28. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Point releases are meaningless for existing users of any Linux distro with a decent package manager. They just click on "upgrade" and it does what it usually does.

      The hype is there to attract new users (hopefully). These releases also serve as milestone for the distro maintainers. But otherwise...

      What I'm trying to say is that a Linux point release shouldn't be considered the same as old-school releases (get a new CD, wipe, reinstall). With permanent Internet connections and decent package managers all that is in the past, you install once and upgrade forever. Reinstall is only if something really bad happens to the machine.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    29. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Sorry to say that that is not true. Major upgrades often work, but it seems like after one or two of them, you're not going to have as good a copy as those who did a fresh install have. I am speaking from experience here -- some of your personally modified config files and kludges for your new hardware, etc., etc. will come back to bite you someday.

    30. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Point releases are meaningless? What are you smoking?

      People don't want things to break, and things break on the edge all the time. Most people want a cycle like this:
      Day 1: Point release out, verify that it works for you
      Day 2-179: Get security patches, functionality same.
      Day 180: New point release out, verify that it still works for you abd check out new features

      Free flowing upgrades:
      Day 1: Install unstable version
      Day 13: Daily mozilla build fails
      Day 43: KDE module broken
      Day 66: X server doesn't start
      Day 89: Spent half a day trying to use a how-to that was outdated three weeks ago
      Day 111: Dependency conflict
      Day 146: Data corruption bug
      Day 169: Surprise configuration format change

      Ok so I'm exaggerating but one of the best things about running a point release is that many people are running it, meaning most the bugs are found and fixed without you noticing and that there's plenty current how-tos for that version and all of this is mostly made to work together. Now, I have several other repositories to stay closer to the bleeding edge on some specific applications of my choice, but I have no need for making my whole system that way.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    31. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      So what are you saying, never upgrade away from the point-release? Or never do a system upgrade that will take you from an Ubuntu major release to the next?

      I suspect the latter. It makes some sense, I have to admit. There are cases when these major upgrades comes with some trouble. In the same train of thought, some Ubuntu point releases have came across a lot better than others, so as long as Ubuntu keeps offering updates for them you can stick to them.

      In any case, I stand corrected. I had forgotten about the inside-point-release update lifecycle.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    32. Re:I can't understand Firefox3 beta5 by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Granted, it happens, but they're usually very few such kludges, with easy fixes most of them. Personally, I prefer to do the system upgrade over avoiding it due to these little annoyances. But that's me, others may choose to stick to a point release and upgrade inside it, you're right.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
  11. Use BitTorrent by kasot · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Use BitTorrent by Peturrr · · Score: 1

      1000+ seeds for the i386 iso at the moment, I downloaded it with >1mib/s

    2. Re:Use BitTorrent by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Shoot, I was getting upwards of 8Mbps on the i386 torrent. Strangely now that I have the file (only took 20 minutes or so), my upload rate hasn't jumped through the roof like I expected. I'm not even on Comcast.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:Use BitTorrent by BosstonesOwn · · Score: 1

      At the moment Im seeding pretty heavily as well , well over 800 kB a sec going out. Ubuntu fans are bringing my 10 mbit link to its knees.

      But I love using it for this. Helps me keep Verizon on their toes :)

      --
      This package Does Not Contain a Winner
    4. Re:Use BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh, so THIS is why my internet connection was completely shitfucked this morning... :)

    5. Re:Use BitTorrent by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      and if the i386 one doesn't work... just download it for Sparc!

  12. Aumix by Hatta · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Sweet, maybe now I can adjust my volume.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Aumix by Russianspi · · Score: 1

      Um...you could have done so a month and a half ago, as long as you're keeping up with updates. The recompiled .deb was put in gutsy-updates on March 5th...Patch Verified

    2. Re:Aumix by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Oh I see. Last I checked they were just going to wait until Hardy, and I've gotten used to using the volume knob on my amp anyway. But that's good news.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Aumix by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I've never had trouble adjusting my volume in Gutsy. I just
      used the default tools rather than going out of my way to
      use something more obscure.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  13. Torrent-only mirror by rmullen · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Boston University Linux Users Group is providing a .torrent-only mirror that should be able to be easily reached regardless of traffic. It's often difficult to fight through the hordes around the other servers just to get a torrent file, so we felt this would be convenient. We also have a copy of the MD5SUMS if you need it.

    ftp://lug.bu.edu/pub/distro/ubuntu/

    Contains the alternate, desktop, and server torrents for both i386 and amd64.

    Hope this helps.

    1. Re:Torrent-only mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha .. even your torrent mirror is down

    2. Re:Torrent-only mirror by rmullen · · Score: 1

      Let's see how Apache can handle it: http://lug.bu.edu/ubuntu/ Same files.

    3. Re:Torrent-only mirror by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

      Hm, unfortunately I'm getting "connection refused" messages from the tracker. I guess they're getting much more traffic than they expected.. (or something). Isn't it possible to have redundant trackers for a torrent?

      Anyways, the pirate bay link (posted in a comment above), seems to work better, though not exactly blindingly fast. (Aaarr)

    4. Re:Torrent-only mirror by rmullen · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the heads up. At least we tried!

    5. Re:Torrent-only mirror by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

      It's okay, the official mirror seems to be working better now, and I switched to it because it has far more seeds than the Pirate Bay. Also, someone posted a magnet:// link which is supposed to be immune to this kind of thing. (I wish it was supported in more torrent implementations..)

      Cool, thanks! Once I get the ISO i'm going to put it on the server for everyone in my department to grab, instead of everyone downloading it themselves.

    6. Re:Torrent-only mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Boston University Linux Users Group is providing a .torrent-only mirror that should be able to be easily reached regardless of traffic. It's often difficult to fight through the hordes around the other servers just to get a torrent file, so we felt this would be convenient. We also have a copy of the MD5SUMS if you need it.

      ftp://lug.bu.edu/pub/distro/ubuntu/

      Contains the alternate, desktop, and server torrents for both i386 and amd64.

      Hope this helps. Northeastern University College of Computer Science is listed up top under the mirrors. We have a full ubuntu distro mirror. Really fast in case people are on inet2 or in the boston/mass. area.
    7. Re:Torrent-only mirror by rmullen · · Score: 1

      Thanks very much for this - speeds are as advertised!

    8. Re:Torrent-only mirror by anthonys_junk · · Score: 1

      Thank you, very much appreciated.

      --
      Barbara Felden claims prior art on the flip phone, sues Motorola, Nokia.
    9. Re:Torrent-only mirror by Morrigu · · Score: 1

      w00t! Props to the bu.edu LUG. This is exactly what I was looking for. :)

      --
      "We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - Major Mike Shearer, UK
  14. Another mirror here: by D4rk+Fx · · Score: 1

    http://lug.mtu.edu/ubuntu-releases/8.04/ We're doing fine so far, would like to see some more load though!

  15. Bug #188226 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What an excellent decision it was to release with this bug not being addressed

    https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/188226

    1. Re:Bug #188226 by crimsun · · Score: 1

      It has been addressed, and "the fix" will be in the point release.

      I'd like to mention http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e2df9e0905136eebeca66eb9a994ca48d0fa7990, too.

    2. Re:Bug #188226 by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I think that was a bad move, considering some of us run things like BOINC and now have to suffer through months of this. I didn't even REALLY notice something was wrong until I read this and said to myself "that's what all this dragging at random times is!"

    3. Re:Bug #188226 by crimsun · · Score: 1

      If you've a bit of familiarity with make-kpkg (and/or a willingness to read the kernel.ubuntu.com wiki), you can apply the above fix to the source. `apt-get source linux-image-$(uname -r)' is probably the easiest.

      Alternately, you could install the server kernel, but that comes with the caveat of notable config differences. (I prefer this latter method myself because of sheer laziness.)

  16. Great release unfortunately no Abiword 2.6 by splict · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am very happy that there has been another LTS release (and on my birthday)! I've been running the beta and it has been very stable other than than the firefox alpha (which seems to work fine on my debian lenny box).

    I am dissapointed that abiword 2.6 didn't make the cut, though. It is a great release, however the timing of things didn't work out. You can get some context on what happened at one of the developer's blog and the bug report. Seems there was a little tension involved. Also, here are the release notes for Abiword.

    Being an LTS release, I wonder if they can get it backported? I don't think that usually happens with that drastic of an upgrade - is it just security updates that get backported? However, the Abiword team will not be supporting 2.4.x for the next 3 years so I hope that something along those lines is possible.

    Oh well, off to compiling it myself. :)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a yo-yo.-Enoch Root
    1. Re:Great release unfortunately no Abiword 2.6 by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Happy Birthday!

    2. Re:Great release unfortunately no Abiword 2.6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you will probably be able to get the 2.6 debs on getdeb.net in the next couple of weeks if you want to do it that way.

    3. Re:Great release unfortunately no Abiword 2.6 by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      A backport may be likely. The situation for abiword is odd. Their last release was some time ago, and their last major release was in 2005. Additionally, you linked to the 2.6.0 release notes, when 2.6.2 is already out twenty days later. Debian still doesn't have 2.6.x in unstable, so that's an added source of tension. All this is slowly adding up to the typical Open Source poor release engineering. Which isn't bad; just not necessarily LTS material. A long term support distribution has to basically do it's own release engineering in the absence of it upstream.

      Ubuntu does work closely with some software groups to track beta / development releases if they have faith in the upstream schedule and so on. If you want software released days or hours before release in a specific version of Ubuntu, it's best to email ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com and start a conversation, so they know you're a generally reliable upstream committed to quality. It also requires that you have a plan to release far sooner than two weeks notice.

      As far as backports go, it depends on how well an enterprising Ryan Pavlik gets with his work. If you're concerned with this problem at all, you should probably be testing his ppa software and make sure it gets a proper backport request.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    4. Re:Great release unfortunately no Abiword 2.6 by splict · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. As someone comfortable with linux I can install it myself. However, I feel it's important to get it in the hands of people who don't have that opportunity. I'll definitely test out the ppa software and do what (little) I can to help.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a yo-yo.-Enoch Root
    5. Re:Great release unfortunately no Abiword 2.6 by splict · · Score: 1

      Thanks! New Ubuntu and new Lost! It's a good day. :)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a yo-yo.-Enoch Root
  17. Fast Mirror (2 gbps net connection) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://193.147.168.122/ubuntu/

    Please, always check MD5SUMS

    1. Re:Fast Mirror (2 gbps net connection) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I modded this troll, because I don't think we should trust a naked IP address (posted by an AC) with a folder with a few ISOs where the parent directory is the Apache test page.

      What do you think?

    2. Re:Fast Mirror (2 gbps net connection) by polymerousgeek · · Score: 1

      Awesome, thanks whoever you are. Best mirror I could find up until now was peaking at about 40K.

      --
      53 49 47 53 20 53 55 43 4B
    3. Re:Fast Mirror (2 gbps net connection) by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Please, always check MD5SUMS ...from a different server, preferably the official one. That is the most important part of checking MD5SUMS.
    4. Re:Fast Mirror (2 gbps net connection) by ActionDesignStudios · · Score: 1

      Thank you for this! I wanted to mirror this release since I knew the poor servers would be going crazy, and I have about 1gbps of bandwidth free. I downloaded 8.04 from your mirror at around 500kb/s (faster than the torrent was giving me), and am now seeding it through the official torrent!

  18. Differences between last week's Release Candidate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I downloaded both the Ubuntu and KUbuntu Release Candidates this past week. Is there a list of differences somewhere or is it fairly safe to assume that the RC is identical to the real release?

  19. Dealing with various issues during upgrade by tmgtmgtmg · · Score: 2, Informative
    I didn't have such a great experience upgrading.

    My video card didn't work, sound didn't work, and, apparently, I use stale software with has been deprecated.

    Either way, here's a review of my adventures:

    http://thomer.com/howtos/hardy_heron.html

    Here's a summary of the woes described on that web page:

    1) to get nvidia to work for a GeForce 8600 GTS (and in my case TwinView, for two displays), you need to download a beta driver straight from nvidia,

    2) to get sound to work you need to run a completely undocumented /etc/init.d/alsa-utils reset,

    3) Firefox 3 (beta) is cool and all, but it does not support various plugins so I downgraded to firefox-2, and

    4) xmms, which is ugly but worked just fine, has been deprecated and its replacement, audacious segfaults and freezes.

    5) I got annoyed by trackerd hosing my disk and my CPU, so I removed it.

    Hope this helps.

    1. Re:Dealing with various issues during upgrade by M0pper · · Score: 1

      3) Firefox 3 (beta) is cool and all, but it does not support various plugins so I downgraded to firefox-2 Just a hint, but the API for Firefox addons hasn't changed a whole lot from FF2 to FF3, so there is a good chance that most of your addons are compatible with FF3 even if they say they're not (at least mine are). You can force FF3 to load your addons anyway by entering 'about:config' in the address bar and then right-click in the list you get and create a new boolean option 'extensions.checkCompatibility' and set it to false. Then restart FF. I'm not saying all your addons will work, but it did the trick for me and I'm using quite a few addons, so you may as well give it a shot, trying won't hurt.
    2. Re:Dealing with various issues during upgrade by tokul · · Score: 1

      4) xmms, which is ugly but worked just fine, has been deprecated and its replacement, audacious segfaults and freezes.
      Gnome uses Rhythmbox and Totem for media playing. I think XMMS is not installed by default in older Ubuntu releases.
    3. Re:Dealing with various issues during upgrade by scuba0 · · Score: 1

      2) May I ask why you are using Alsa and not Pulseaudio which has been made standard in Ubuntu?

      3) I agree with you that it is a shame that more plugins has not been updated but Adblock is really the only critical I need.

      4) It is not Ubuntus fault Xmms has been deprecated, and the old one is still available.

    4. Re:Dealing with various issues during upgrade by crimsun · · Score: 2, Informative

      This bug is due to a long-standing state mismatch with mixer element strings changing between alsa-{kernel,driver} releases.

      For 8.10, we're considering a GUI (if not automated) method to deal with it.

    5. Re:Dealing with various issues during upgrade by Martin+Soto · · Score: 1

      2) May I ask why you are using Alsa and not Pulseaudio which has been made standard in Ubuntu? Pulse is a userland sound server. It just routes sound to the actual kernel-level sound system, which, for most purposes, remains to be alsa. So, if alsa doesn't work, you're screwed anyway.

  20. Terrible. People should know about this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a long-time user of Ubuntu and I am -very- disappointed with how Canonical's volunteers handled the announcement of this release. Not 20 -minutes- before the official announcement was made, anyone asking whether or not the ISO on the main page was indeed the final release (which it was) was banned. Anyone who posted a link to the ISO, the .torrent, or even the MD5SUM of any of the files was banned.
    20 minutes after the release? The channel operators were soliciting people to Digg up the link to the torrents they had just BANNED people from the channel for even talking about.

    This is NOT the way to treat your prospective users!

    1. Re:Terrible. People should know about this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The channel operators

      So wait, let me get this straight: people went on IRC, asked particularly stupid questions, and got banned for it?

      Stop the presses, we've got headline news right here!

    2. Re:Terrible. People should know about this! by Dragonslicer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not 20 -minutes- before the official announcement was made, anyone asking whether or not the ISO on the main page was indeed the final release (which it was) was banned. Anyone who posted a link to the ISO, the .torrent, or even the MD5SUM of any of the files was banned. This is because the files could potentially be modified at any time before the official release announcement. If you download a .iso file an hour before the official release, and that file gets replaced half an hour later because of some problem with the disc image, you're basically screwed.
    3. Re:Terrible. People should know about this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read that post again, carefully. They banned people for posting an MD5SUM of the CORRECT ISO IMAGES. Among other things.

    4. Re:Terrible. People should know about this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. You are the Trollest IRC Troll ever.

    5. Re:Terrible. People should know about this! by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      UbuntuDupe, is that you?

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    6. Re:Terrible. People should know about this! by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't That's great, maybe you can make your first friend then.
      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    7. Re:Terrible. People should know about this! by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Are you a moron? It's obvious you got banned for spamming the link and bogging down the servers because mirrors can update.

      You just made it suck for the whole Ubuntu community that is trying to get it!

    8. Re:Terrible. People should know about this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! You sir AC are a complete asshole. And some how you think posting that IRC log would inspire people to take your side? All that log does is just prove what a rude, arrogant, jerk you are.

    9. Re:Terrible. People should know about this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then read this again, they were *NOT* the correct images, can you not understand THAT?

  21. You can also get it shipped by old_skul · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Instead of doing the bittorrent dance, I started having the disc shipped to me. You can order whatever you need from https://shipit.ubuntu.com/ - they do a great job of getting the discs shipped, free of charge, in a lot less time than what they indicate on the site.

    I ask for 25 discs at a time, put a pile of them on my desk at work, and they're gone in a week. Here, have a Linux, it's free.

    1. Re:You can also get it shipped by dumeinst · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hope you donate to the project in this case

    2. Re:You can also get it shipped by caluml · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *That's* the answer to get Linux on the desktop (and lots of work for people who can support Linux). Flood the nations with free Linux CDs - AOL style!
      Make out it's a time limited free offer - and that it's usually £129!

    3. Re:You can also get it shipped by pebs · · Score: 2, Informative

      Instead of doing the bittorrent dance, I started having the disc shipped to me.

      Physical media that isn't rewritable is a waste. For installing new VM's with Ubuntu, I don't even need to burn a disc, I just need an ISO file. For existing Ubuntu installations I just upgrade. For installing when I absolutely need physical media, burn a CD-RW (probably erasing an old version I had on the disk).

      --
      #!/
    4. Re:You can also get it shipped by isorox · · Score: 1

      For installing when I absolutely need physical media, burn a CD-RW (probably erasing an old version I had on the disk). PXE network build
    5. Re:You can also get it shipped by zuggy40 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IMO it's still not fast enough for those of us that must have the latest, greatest stable version of Ubuntu. However, the shipit disks are a great way to prove that Linux and Ubuntu is professional quality. A burned CD looks illegal, a printed CD in a nice case looks like something worth whatever the cost, then when you tell them it's free, their sold.

    6. Re:You can also get it shipped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you save Ubuntu the shipping costs and just download it once and burn 25 times, or at the very least get 1 and copy it 25 times.

      IMO, if you have the means, which you do if you have a job, you shouldn't be putting the burden of those costs on Ubuntu.

      While you're waiting weeks, I'll have it downloaded in less than 30 minutes now.

    7. Re:You can also get it shipped by silent_artichoke · · Score: 1

      i can haz a linnix?

    8. Re:You can also get it shipped by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      I ask for 25 discs at a time, put a pile of them on my desk at work, and they're gone in a week.

      Sadly my experiences trying that have not resulted in a stunning success...

      maybe working at Subway has something to do with that.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    9. Re:You can also get it shipped by 2muchcoffeeman · · Score: 1

      Physical media that isn't rewritable is a waste. For installing new VM's with Ubuntu, I don't even need to burn a disc, I just need an ISO file. For existing Ubuntu installations I just upgrade. For installing when I absolutely need physical media, burn a CD-RW (probably erasing an old version I had on the disk). Did you not read what he wrote? He's burning them on non-rewritable CD-Rs to give away to people. CD-RWs are rather more expensive than basic blank CD-Rs. I agree with Calumi: The way to get Linux on non-geek-owned computers is to do it the AOL way.

      I have no mod points this week. Can somebody mod Calumi's post "insightful," please? Because it is. Gracias, amigos.
      --
      Prevent Windows piracy. Use Linux instead.
    10. Re:You can also get it shipped by pebs · · Score: 1

      Did you not read what he wrote? He's burning them on non-rewritable CD-Rs to give away to people. CD-RWs are rather more expensive than basic blank CD-Rs. I agree with Calumi: The way to get Linux on non-geek-owned computers is to do it the AOL way.

      Yes, I understand that when I read it, I just don't think its that great of an idea. How many people are actually going to bother to install from those CD's? How many are just going to toss them out like they do with AOL CD's?

      If someone is technically inclined enough to use Ubuntu, just copy the ISO onto their USB key, let them borrow a CD-RW, or give them the torrent URL. You can also have them download and run Wubi in some cases. Handing out CD's like you're AOL isn't going to make a difference.

      --
      #!/
    11. Re:You can also get it shipped by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      So, that's why my gums bleed and I wind up spitting out pieces of plastic whenever I eat there...

    12. Re:You can also get it shipped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Giving it to 25 people is donating to the project

    13. Re:You can also get it shipped by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Don't look gift horse [or Heron] advertising in the mouth [beak], either.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    14. Re:You can also get it shipped by 2muchcoffeeman · · Score: 1

      Yes, I understand that when I read it, I just don't think its that great of an idea. How many people are actually going to bother to install from those CD's? How many are just going to toss them out like they do with AOL CD's? If they're taking an Ubuntu CD off his desk (with permission, of course), the implication is that they're going to put it to use.

      If someone is technically inclined enough to use Ubuntu, just copy the ISO onto their USB key, let them borrow a CD-RW, or give them the torrent URL. You can also have them download and run Wubi in some cases. Handing out CD's like you're AOL isn't going to make a difference. My mother's not technically inclined. She runs Ubuntu. Not every "mainstream user" has a USB key (s)he carries around on a keyring, and even then you have to be sure their computer starts from a USB key. Borrowed CD-RWs have to be returned (ideally); a CD-R, not so much. Torrents are still a foreign language to many mainstream users; just because a user doesn't know what a torrent is they aren't disqualified from using Ubuntu, or indeed any flavor of Linux.

      And I would be willing to bet you that handing out LiveCDs would make a difference. "Take it home and use it to restart your system. It won't do anything to your hard drive until you're ready to tell it to. Give it a test drive. If you don't like it, no harm done. ... Return it? Oh, no. It's yours to keep. I have plenty and CD-Rs are cheap."
      --
      Prevent Windows piracy. Use Linux instead.
    15. Re:You can also get it shipped by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Sounds like he donates users.

  22. I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm running XP at home. I've got two large hard drives, not in a RAID. Were I to download this Ubuntu release, would it be easy to set up dual-booting? What's the best way to do that, assuming I don't want to upset by Windows install in any way? Would I need to use FAT32 on a drive to make it visible to both OSs? Is there a robust method to at least read NTFS in Linux? Would it make sense to install on a USB memory stick or an external hard drive?

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    1. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by tomtomtom777 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm running XP at home. I've got two large hard drives, not in a RAID. Were I to download this Ubuntu release, would it be easy to set up dual-booting? What's the best way to do that, assuming I don't want to upset by Windows install in any way? Would I need to use FAT32 on a drive to make it visible to both OSs? Is there a robust method to at least read NTFS in Linux? Would it make sense to install on a USB memory stick or an external hard drive?

      NTFS read/write access has stable for a long time. No need for FAT32.

      You don't need an external harddisk or usb-stick. Ubuntu won't disturb Windows.

      Just download, burn and boot the live cd, then click the install icon. Ubuntu will guide you smoothly into making some space and dual-booting.

      Don't Panic

    2. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by atlastiamborn · · Score: 3, Informative

      The easiest way would probably be to use Wubi, which installs the ubuntu system as an application inside your Windows install (or something like that, haven't tried it myself as I don't have Windows installed).

      If you choose to install ubuntu on another drive and dual boot your ubuntu install should be perfectly capable at reading your NTFS partitions (helped a friend back up his stufs from a borked XP install just last weekend, worked great), I'm not sure about writing to NTFS partitions though, but it might work.

      --
      I never apologize. I'm sorry, but that's just the way I am.
    3. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by wintermute000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Most modern distros will overwrite the XP bootloader with GRUB the linux bootloader. However GRUB will detect windows and present it as a boot option so its pretty much seamless.

      To prepare, use partition manager in windows to free up some space on one of your drives, then install linux in the free space. As above GRUB will detect windows partition seamlessly.

      If you ever want to revert to windows bootloader, just boot off the XP disk, go into recovery console and type a command which I can't remember but googling will reveal it very quickly (its something like fixmbr).

      NTFS is fine with a driver called ntfs-3g, may not be out of the box but it is usually easily obtainable via an update. In Ubuntu it will be a one-line command to install, same as installing anything (you will love this about linux) as long as you have an internet connection. There will be a general 'install X package' commmand, from memory in ubuntu its 'sudo apt-get XXX'.

      However this will only install the driver, you will probably have to manually mount the windows partition via either the mount command or editing your fstab which is the file linux uses to determine what file systems to mount.

      Personally if its ur first go I would install linux on a spare box to have a tinker first. I went down this path for a year before I was game enough to muck with my 'production' desktop.

      The critical thing is to have another working computer with the internet available so you can look up instructions on the fly whilst you're in linux in case you can't get something to work in linux that also kills your web browsing. Once you have google at your disposal, your issues (barring bad-luck hardware incompatibilities) are all solvable and someone out there will have solved it already and posted a solution for you, often with cut-and-paste commands to follow.

      Have fun, and don't get discouraged - remember it took you however many years to learn what you know about windows, and for the first few weeks it will feel like learning how to walk again. Remember: most of what you know about PCs is actually what you know about WINDOWS, so don't be surprised when things are done differently in linux (on the upside it generally makes perfect sense). But in the long run it will pay off. The great thing is that in linux everything is controlled via human readable text files, no registry hunting required, even if you don't know anything about X you can tell a lot from the config files and tonnes of issues can be solved by a simple and obvious parameter change.

      Disclaimer: above is general linux advice from a Fedora user, I do not use ubuntu so your mileage may vary.

    4. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't had a chance to play with Hardy yet but I have several XP/Ubuntu dual boot setups at home. Installing ubuntu won't bork the XP setup (usually).
      Some issues with dualbooting:

      1.) Sometimes the live CD doesn't like SATA optical drives. (resolved by swapping in a IDE optical drive for installation and then removing it afterwards)
      2.) Sometimes the live CD doesn't like dual monitors. (resolved by disconnecting monitors and using a CRT with 800x600 resolution default, installing, then connecting the dual monitors again)
      3.) Sometimes when installing on a system with IDE HDDs and SATA HDDs on the same system the MBR/grub is put on the IDE drive (whether it is the primary drive or not. Way to fix this is to either install with the IDE drive disconnected or go into the bios and make the IDE drive first in the boot order).

      Feisty and Gutsy both have native reading and mounting of NTFS partitions. Gusty has native writing to NTFS. I haven't had a single problem with reading/writing so far. (been using since Edgy came out) However, in order for windows to see the linux partition you will need software to read/write to it. (I use IFS drives myself. Has a few bugs but still works pretty good.)

      Since Feisty, Ubuntu even has a migration wizard that can import your settings and bookmarks from the windows partition to make an easier transition for you as well.

    5. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

      the short answer is "yes"

      step 1: back up everything, just in case (i typically ignore this step myself, but its good advice nonetheless)

      step 2: burn your ubuntu ISO to a DVD or CD

      step 2.0.1: insert CD into CD rom drive, restart computer.

      step 3: keep hitting 'next' until its done.

      it will ask you to make some new partitions,
      i have only ever set up on a single HD, this is what i did:
      1 will be your winXP partition, 10 gigs is ok. another will be your Ubuntu partition, (mine is EXT3 FS, again, 10 gigs should be ok) and a 3rd will be a partition for your SWAP. (RAM X 2)

      I add a 4th, a FAT 32 shared directory. even though ubuntu can now read/write NTFS, i stick with FAT because i'm not l33t enough to know any better.

      after installation, when you restart, you should have a menu, where you can select winXP, ubuntu, safe mode ubuntu, something else, or some weird diagnostic thingy that never seems to end in 7.10.

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
    6. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Rather than respond to all the responses, I'll just post a general thanks here. I appreciate the answers, and they sound pretty encouraging. My main concern is not breaking Windows, since there are a lot of things I won't be able to do in Linux immediately.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    7. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very easy to setup a dual boot box using Grub, which is the bootloader Ubuntu uses.

      Depending on what options are compiled into the kernel, you can read NTFS volumes, but as far as I know it is still the case that writing to them causes Very Bad Things(tm)

    8. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't disturb Windows in any way. You can install Ubuntu on the same drive as Windows or a different drive if you want. If you install to an external hard drive, then you can boot your Linux install from any PC, so there is that advantage (you don't have to worry about changing drivers when moving from machine to machine, it's automatic). Ubuntu reads (and now writes) NTFS drives by default and it automatically sees them. If you need to do any recovery, it's simple with the Ubuntu LiveCD. Good luck and happy installing :)

    9. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full details can be found at http://justfuckinggoogleit.com/

    10. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran my first Ubuntu for 6 months on a 20GB partition(including 1GB swap)

      Best way? This is my opinion:

      Get yourself at least 20GB free diskspace, and with that I mean that the space isn't in ANY partition(aka unpartitioned space), if you don't have that you can use GParted on the LiveCD to shrink one of your existing partitions, or perhaps you just want to format a whole hard drive to use it for Linux... your choice, at any rate get that space(this is the hardest and most risky part by the way, shrinking always worked for me, but I have seen reports of corrupted data... backup, just to be sure)

      After that just pop in the Desktop CD, boot from it, chose partitions(I always do it manually, can't comment on the automatic options) and have it install all by itself.

      Reading NTFS works out of the box in Linux(not as fast as windows, but good enough for all my needs), writing to NTFS needs to be installed manually(search for NTFS-3G) and is a bit slow, but acceptable(heck I ripped a DVD to an NTFS drive!), windows cannot read any of the major filesystem, but it never mattered to me as Ubuntu can read/write NTFS.

    11. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by jma05 · · Score: 1

      Writing to NTFS works fine. I did work with a Wubi install this way. I wish Wubi added a mount point to its disk image in Windows though.

    12. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can read and write NTFS partitions in ubuntu. To properly resize one you must defrag it first from windows. Following the resize, it will run scandisk your next boot into windows. I recommend using a Gparted livecd to do the partitioning. During the install process choose manual. I usually create 3 partitions. It makes re-installation much easier. Depending on your space available for your windows install I'd create a 5-12 GB "/" partition for your programs. A 10-?? GB "/home" partition for your data, and maybe a 4 GB swap partition. The advantage of this is that if you re-install you will only have to reformat "/", and all your data will still be there, just not your programs. During this time period is when you can set mount points for your ntfs partitions. Sometimes it chooses random stuff but you can select something like "/media/windows".

    13. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be extremely easy to setup dual booting. If you don't want to disturb your existing XP install then you'll want to resize the partition to make space for Ubuntu (there's a free live CD called PartEd Magic that can do this with aplomb) and then install Ubuntu.

      Grub will automatically detect your XP install and you can then choose which OS you want from the Grub menu after BIOS finishes loading.

      You do not have to use FAT32 formatting. Ubuntu can read/write NTFS partitions out of the box since 7.10, just don't expect Wine to be able to run Windows programs from an NTFS partition.

    14. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by AlzaF · · Score: 1

      You can try it out via the 'wubi' option which installs ubuntu in your XP parition. This bypasses the difficult part that noobs experience of having to resize and create new partitions. After it is installed you boot into windows and are presented with an text option screen to either load windows or ubuntu. This is the same screen after a system crash and you have an option to go into safe mode.

    15. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you install Ubuntu it detects your existing Windows installations and automatically puts a multi-boot menu for you.
      So, yes. It IS easy. Actually itÂs all done for you.

      Ubuntu can read/write NTFS partitions "out of the box" without any problems, so you won't need FAT32 either.

      Just keep in mind that you'll need a partition of at least 4GB for Ubuntu, but that's also easily handled from the ubuntu install, it'll even let you cut unused space from your Windows partition to create the new one.

      To sum it up... go ahead! It'll be both easy and painless...

    16. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should try out Wubi. It lets you install Ubuntu as it was just another application in Windows. It's setup up as dual-booting automaticly, and if you don't like it you just uninstall in Windows.

    17. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by trav242 · · Score: 1

      tomtomtom777 has it right, but don't forget to make a backup of your important data...

    18. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by JustinOpinion · · Score: 1

      The information given by the other posters should be enough to get you going. However note that if you run into problems, the Ubuntu Forums are remarkably fast and helpful, especially for "first time user" type questions.

      You might also want to take a look at this tutorial, which has nice screenshots showing the steps you'll go through (it hasn't yet been updated for 8.04, but it should be very similar to what you'll see with the current installer). It explains in particular how to set up a dual-boot, so that you can keep using Windows while trying out Ubuntu.

      Good luck, and have fun!

    19. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by TobascoKid · · Score: 4, Informative

      In 8.04, you can use the Windows based installer (Wubi) instead.

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
    20. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Bohabo · · Score: 1

      Try Wubi, which I believe is included in this release. It installs Ubuntu to a disk image on your current filesystem and boots into it via the Windows bootloader. If you don't like it, you can uninstall it from Windows like any other program. I don't think it supports the Hibernate feature, and of course NTFS isn't as efficient as ext3, but it's by far the easiest and safest way to set up a dual-boot between Windows and Linux. Your NTFS drives will read under Ubuntu just like any other hard drive.

    21. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      I've had the Ubuntu installer (and things like qtparted/gparted) break NTFS partitions to the point of being unbootable by resizing them to free up space. Has this been fixed?

      I found out later that you need ntfs-resize (part of ntfsprogs package) to resize NTFS safely, and for some reason, it was not included by default, IIRC.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    22. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by xtracto · · Score: 1

      NTFS read/write access has stable for a long time. No need for FAT32.

      The problem with NTFS in 7.10 is that you can not access a NTFS drive if you turned of your windows marchine via "hibernation". Ubuntu wont mount such a partition.

      A work around is to manually mounting it on read only mode (via the command line mount -r ). However that is a complete turn off from a usability POV (remember, we do not want to go to the console, no, not even once).

      That is one of the main reasons why I save all my documents and info in a FAT32 partition. Windows and Linux happily interact via that. And I can have MyDocuments in the same place as /home/xtracto.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    23. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by xtracto · · Score: 1

      What I find annoying about grub and Fedora/Ubuntu (the two I have experience with) is that every time you update your kernel, a new item with the new kernel is added to the GRUB menu. Until you end having like 10 different linux kernels (each one with its corresponding "safe mode") in the start menu.

      While I know you can remove them from the grub/menu.lst I think it is quite cumbersome. There should be an option (which can be configured in some screen, not some obscure file flag) that allows you to remove the previous kernel versions one your Ubuntu is updated... after all, we are completely certain that being Linux, the new version will Just Work (aren't we?)

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    24. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows partitions are mounted automaticaly in Ubuntu and links placed on the desktop. AFAIK write to ntfs is enabled.

    25. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm brand new to Linux. I started with Gutsy about two months ago. I'm in the finance profession, so I don't know too much about computers, other than I like screwing around with them.

      I made a dual boot XP/Gutsy box. I was a little nervous at first, but it was cake!! I used an older laptop, so I didn't have the SATA/IDE issues, nor was I using a dual monitor setup.

      I've got XP on its own NTFS partition, Gutsy on its own ext3 partition, an NTFS partition for file storage accessible by both OS's, and the ext3 Linux swap. Still evaluating/getting used to Ubuntu and like it a lot so far. Looking forward to eliminating the need for dual boot.

    26. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Hatta · · Score: 1

      (remember, we do not want to go to the console, no, not even once).

      Why the hell not? The fact that it's so damn hard to get everything done with a GUI speaks volumes. The CLI is quite simply the superior interface. If the GUI were better, we'd be programming with them.

      Why is it that everyone thinks the CLI has cooties?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    27. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Geekner · · Score: 1

      Is NTFS support still that complicated for any desktop distros? I've been using the newest Knoppix to backup NTFS drives at work, it's so easy I managed to get my co-workers to do it. Knoppix has ntfs-3g built in, and will automount with it. Thanks to dbus, KDE (and gnome, last I checked) should auto-recognize the drive and be able to mount it for you.

      I haven't used ubuntu in a while, but I'm pretty sure they have at least some NTFS support without modifying anything. As for installing packages, thats why they have the "Add/Remove Programs" option on the application bar.

      Ubuntu isn't that hard, please don't make it sound that way.

    28. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by columbus · · Score: 1

      I've set up about 7 windows / linux dual boot machines. Most of the time the process is incredibly easy. The Ubuntu installer is the best OS installer I've ever used and it can take care of everything by itself. It can do the hard drive repartitioning, linux installation, grub installation, secondary OS detection & grub configuration. It's possible to use the Ubuntu install cd to transform a windows-only machine into a windows / ubuntu dual boot machine in about 15 minutes.

      However, it doesn't go smoothly 100% of the time. I ran into snags with 1 of my dual boot installs that ended up needing the hard drive reformatted (multiple times). I'm still not positive what went wrong - it might have had to do with WinXP sp0 & high volume SATA drives. Anyway, there is reason for caution, and your desire not to upset windows in any way is justified.

      Several other posters have very good suggestions on a cautious approach to doing the installation. wintermute000 suggested tyring it out on a second machine first. That's probably the safest way to do it. The most reliable test would be a second machine with identical hardware specs of the first one. If all goes well on your dry run, you can be pretty confident that it will work just the same when you do it on your primary machine.

      If you are in a home environment, you probably don't have duplicate hardware & likely don't have a second machine. If you don't have access to a second machine and still wish to continue, I would put forward the following caveat. The standard things that happen during the Ubuntu install process that carry the most risk to an existing windows installation are repartitioning, and rewriting the master boot record. With that in mind, atlastiamborn's suggestion is probably a good one. From what I read, the wubi install mode does not do any repartitioning of the hard drive and does not affect the master boot record. The mbr points to the windows bootloader, and the windows bootloader calls grub, which loads linux. I haven't tried a wubi install yet, so I can't vouch for it for sure, but the specs match what you're looking for pretty good.

      From what I read, there is a performance hit associated with a wubi install, pribably related to reading & writing to a NFTF(windows) file system. If you try out Ubuntu with wubi and you like it and want more performance, here is what I'd do.

      Back up your data before you touch your hard drive on your primary machine. You probably won't need to use your backup data, but better safe than sorry. If something goes wrong during an OS install, it can mean that you have to format your hard drive (this is really rare). Leave your original windows installation unmolested on hard drive 1. Don't do any repartitioning & don't touch the MBR. Dedicate hard drive 2 to ubuntu. This means reformatting hard drive 2 with an EXT3 partition and probabably a small swap partition (2x the size of your RAM). The ubunutu installer can handle this. However, you would want a non-standard install in that you would want to have the MBR (untouched) call the windows bootloader which would call grub which would boot Ubuntu. I've never done this type of install before but I know it is possible. Perhaps someone else on this forum can help you.

      A couple of corrections to earlier posts. Ntfs-3g has been supported native in Ubuntu since Ubuntu 7.10. No need to do any extra install steps for this; it's already there. Ntfs-3g allows you to read & write to an NTFS(windows) partition. This is awesome for a dual boot machine. fixmbr is a lousy utility. Your master boot record contains data for up to 4 primary partitions. fixmbr is totally windows centric - it assumes 1 NTFS parition for the whole hard disk. If you run fixmbr, you will whack your whole primary partition table (at least this is what I did with an old windows XP install CD - maybe fixmbr has gotten smarter in recent versions). Don't use fixmbr except as a last resort. If you use fixmbr, you will definitely have to reinstall linux & you will probably have to reinstall windows too.

      Hope this helps.
      Good luck.

      --
      friends don't let friends teleport drunk
    29. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      You should be fine. If you're running RAID (specifically what they refer to as fakeRAID which is almost always the case for home users), you can have big problems where it will actually wipe out your boot sector and prevent you from starting either OS. However, that's easy to fix with a windows recovery console where you can tell it to fix the boot sector and it will at least give you your windows partion back. You still wouldn't have access to the ubuntu partion though. At least this is my experience.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    30. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ntfs-3g is present right out of the box, no extra installation needed. Been since gutsy, last year.

      Enjoy!

    31. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by DraconPern · · Score: 1

      posted a solution for you, often with cut-and-paste commands to follow.
      Worst suggestion I have heard in a while.
    32. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by EriDay · · Score: 1
      Top response to googling "howto dual boot ubuntu" http://www.matthewjmiller.net/howtos/dual-boot-linux-and-windows
      (slashdot seems to be having trouble with my markup)

      This is what I think is missing:
      1. He stresses system rescue CD. Ubuntu is live, and has partitioning software. I find no value in system rescue CD.
      2. Step 8 - Resize your Windows partition by shrinking it to your desired size - Not enough information here. When you defrag your disk, you may find some unmovable files. To get around unmovable files:
        • Turn off virtual memory ControlPanel/System/Advanced/Performance/Advanced/ set virtual memory to 0 (you can set it back after partitioning).
        • Disable hibernation - ControlPanel/PowerOptions/Hibernate Uncheck Enable Hibernate. (you can reenable after resizing your partion).
      Now defrag your disk, then continue with step 8.
    33. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's always VMWare. You can run a Virtual Machine and then install Linux virtually to practice. Once you're sure it's your OS of choice you can still install it as a real OS.

    34. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by badpazzword · · Score: 1

      No. You open your Synaptic/Aptitude and remove and possibly purge all the old kernel packages (they start with "Linux"). This magically removes the GRUB entry and frees up space.

      --
      When ideas fail, words become very handy.
    35. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by RegTooLate · · Score: 1

      "Pretty much seamless" is a key phrase here. I installed Ubuntu on a second drive to dual boot. Turns out that Linux and Windows intrepret my SATA and IDE drives differently so when GRUB was installed, IDE drvies were 0-3, then after it booted, SATA was 0-3. Nuked my whole system. All I had to do was change the boot parameters but that is hardly a simple process. Buyer beware of simplicity. Ubuntu is the easiest thus far but it isn't for the technically inept.

    36. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      This post reads like a troll, but I'll bite just in case it isn't. Yes, it's easy to install Ubuntu on a two-drive, non-RAID, NTFS Windows machine. Ubuntu will prompt you on how to make sure your drives are setup correctly for dual-boot and all of that. I run Windows XP and Ubuntu in exactly the same setup as what you're describing and everything works just fine.

      In fact, Ubuntu works so well that I only reboot to Windows to play the occasional video game, but I haven't even done that in months due to how annoyed I get with the crash-proneness of Windows XP. (besides, Wii, PS2, and a Mac keep me entertained enough as it is)

    37. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The least intrusive way to try this version of Ubuntu is to download the ISO and run its WUBI installer from within Windows. You won't need to repartition any disks or change your MBR. It adds a boot menu option for Ubuntu within your existing boot.ini and uses a file on your NTFS disk as a virtual hard disk.

    38. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by xtracto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll give you an example of why not:

      Right now, in your Linux machine, open a terminal window and install that program to create music with music sheet and then play it. Something similar to GuitarPro.

      So, what will you do? first, you have to know how do you *install* things (the command to install??? aptget? apt-get? apt_get? or aptitude or optitude?? mmm lets tray install? or was it depackg? or dpkag? or rpminstall? or yam? or yem?

      After you find one of those commands who do not return "bash: auptda-get: command not found" you have to guess what is the sub-command (or parameter) that will actually install whatever you want to install... mmm lets try dpkg install... o shit no luck, dpkg get mmmm dpkg add??

      Well, you know that there are some stuff called man pages which tell you some information. mmmm lets see "man..."

      What manual page do you want?

      Oh crap, what page number i should use for the installation of programs?
      and so on and so on...

      until you know that apt-get install will install your program... but you have one problem
      "apt-get install guitar program" just tells you that there is no program called guitar program so, what is your program called?? how do you know your what is your program called...

      aah well. That is only for installing a program. Imagin trying to do some more complex tasks.

      The fact that you think it is very easy to use the command line is because you already know what to type. The probelm with the command line is that when you *do not* know what to type you have 256^n (number of keys ^ number of letters to type) different possibilities to try.

      Whereas in a GUI you either have checkboxes or lists or whatever (unless you use one of those open source frontends that, when you go to the configuration screen, they just give you a blank text box asking you to input the parameters... shit, WHAT PARAMETERS?)

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    39. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by khayman80 · · Score: 1
      It's a good thing you're not using RAID. I tried to install Kubuntu 7.04 on my machine, which uses software RAID 1, last May. I followed pretty much the same procedure that others in this thread have recommended you try.

      The result was that my computer wouldn't boot into any operating system AT ALL, not even back into windows.

      In the end I decided to buy a THIRD hard drive, replace one of the mirrored drives with the new one, and completely reinstall windows. I gave up on the idea of using Ubuntu on my desktop once I went through this hellish ordeal. Note: I use Ubuntu 7.04 on my laptop (in fact, I'm typing this post in it right now). It's nice. I like it a lot.

      If anyone is thinking about installing Ubuntu on a system that uses software RAID, I HIGHLY recommend that you read the following thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-457631.html

    40. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Kelz · · Score: 1

      When I tried to install 7.10, the live CD wouldn't work for some reason (I have pretty up to date hardware), and I had to use the alt CD to install. Then X wouldn't configure, and after reconfiguring it whenever I logged in GTK would boot me right back out saying it couldn't write something.

      Any idea whats going on, and is any error like that fixed in 8.04?

    41. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Make sure the resized partition will not be over 75% full when done. Run defrag before starting. This eliminates most of the problems and makes the process much faster. I have lost no partitions when done this way, other than an early Hardy beta. Do not expect a beta to be safe. :)

    42. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone think there has to be a winner? Which is better; A hammer or a screwdriver? Anyone who smugly dismisses either if a fool.

    43. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once we know how to use the command line, the GUI just gets in the way.

      I take that back.

      Once we know how to use the command line, the GUI just gives us multiple visible command lines in many windows.

    44. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      It's already there; you can limit how many kernels you want to keep. Always keep at least one update back (just so you're sure you can boot something).

    45. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Kelz · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. In order to make a real usable (to the general populace) OS, you have to make the install process easy.

    46. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      This post reads like a troll, but I'll bite just in case it isn't. Yes, it's easy to install Ubuntu on a two-drive, non-RAID, NTFS Windows machine. Ubuntu will prompt you on how to make sure your drives are setup correctly for dual-boot and all of that. I run Windows XP and Ubuntu in exactly the same setup as what you're describing and everything works just fine.

      In fact, Ubuntu works so well that I only reboot to Windows to play the occasional video game, but I haven't even done that in months due to how annoyed I get with the crash-proneness of Windows XP. (besides, Wii, PS2, and a Mac keep me entertained enough as it is) You thought my "I want to run Linux" post was a troll? I thought it was pretty Slashdot-friendly, considering I _want_to_run_Linux_!!! I've used Ubuntu on a lot of work computers, but the OS has been transparent to me for the most part, and I've never had to install or uninstall anything. Now I want to try it out at home. Seriously, after like fifteen people came and gave me great answers very quickly, I'm impressed that you then concluded I was trolling. I just guessed (correctly) that Slashdot would be a great place to ask for this sort of advice.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    47. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by stevied · · Score: 1

      I've been using Linux for about 14 years (and DOS and AmigaDOS before that), so I'm not exactly an anti-CLI zealot, but I have to say .. I do find GUIs are easier for exploring an unfamiliar program or system. (Imagine being plonked at a UNIX command prompt with no prior knowledge. What are valid commands? "help" won't tell you much, at least in bash.) Once I've gained familiarity, of course, I'm itching for something I can script. The answer seems to be to provide multiple interfaces to any sizeable program or system component. With good design, it's not exactly hard.

    48. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      I recently set up ubuntu/windows dual boots for several computers in my house. The ubuntu CD made it easy to setup the dual boot, but I did run into a few issues here and there that took a bit of work to solve.

      I would seriously consider making the small investment and getting "Practical Ubuntu". I wish it had come out before I started my installs instead of once I was almost done. I still bought it, because it seems like a great reference.

      Slashdot reviewed this book recently:
      http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/04/02/1319237

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
    49. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is mostly outdated advice. NTFS is fully working by default, and the Ubuntu installer resizes windows partitions itself. There is even a Windows installer when he inserts the CD, if he doesn't want to repartition anything (but it'll be a bit slower and sleep won't work). Thanks for scaring him away.

    50. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by xtracto · · Score: 1

      You raise a good point. Weeeeell, let me put it this way:

      The GUI is a winner for desktop operating systems (that is for the average PC use of browse/write/play/and do other niceties with the computer [niceties for which, in Windows you have lots of shareware/freeware/crapware and even plenty of malware!)

      the CLI is a winner for server and other specialized tasks (like for example processing several output data from a simulation for statistical analysis in R and then echoing such thing to format using awk/python to get it ready to use in Latex!).

      I have done both of them. And each one of them is *really* useful in their own way. In this case, the story is about Unbuntu 8.04 which usually is supposed to be *the* most friendly Linux Desktop distribution. Therefore, the GUI would win in this discussion.

      However, as I said before, there are some GUIs in Linux land which are worthless. Plenty of times I have seen a config GUI which is just a text box asking you to write the command line options... what is that GUI good for then? (the most fresh example I remember was a CD/DVD burning app... the fact that I can not name a recent/concrete example is a good thing :))

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    51. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who are running Vista, it can resize NTFS partitions. (Control Panel -> Administrative Tools -> Computer Management -> Disk Management)

      When I used ntfsresize to make space for Linux, then upon my next boot into Windows, Vista noticed that something had changed and then spent a long time checking that everything was consistent. I've never had that happen with XP.

    52. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you can just use wubi, and not worry about any of it

    53. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Toby_Tyke · · Score: 1

      It's easy. And if you get stuck, I'm sure ubuntudupe will offer you a few tips on getting help and advice.

      --
      "I realise this is not a very popular opinion but it's the truth, and there for needs to be said" -Bill Hicks
    54. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Toby_Tyke · · Score: 1

      If the GUI were better, we'd be programming with them.

      If the CLI were the superior interface, we'd be doing desktop publishing with it.

      [End Sarcasm]

      The superior interface is entirely determined by the job you're trying to do and the circumstances you're doing it under. You think a CLI is always better than a GUI? OK, I have a folder containing 300 images, and I need to copy all the ones with cars in them to another folder. I can do that with a GUI in under a minute ( thumbnails of images, ctrl+click, copy paste) Try it with a CLI.

      And of course, apart from some jobs just being faster in a GUI, there's also the learning curve. I can set up a wireless network with iwconfig in about 10 seconds, way faster than using a GUI, but only because I already know what to type. If I was given a different CLI config tool for setting up wireless, I would have to read the man pages and learn a new set of commands. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure I could figure out any wireless set up GUI in a matter of minutes. If I only need to do it occasionally, it's not worth the investment of time and effort to learn the CLI tool.

      --
      "I realise this is not a very popular opinion but it's the truth, and there for needs to be said" -Bill Hicks
    55. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Hatta · · Score: 1


      If the CLI were the superior interface, we'd be doing desktop publishing with it.


      I do. It's vastly superior to any WYSIAYG (What you see is all you get) word processor.

      You do have a point that random access selection of files based on visual inspection of their contents is better done in a GUI though. Until someone writes image-grep that is.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    56. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by weighn · · Score: 1

      * if struck by any CLI hassles which u give repeated examples of, google the correct command;
      * over time you will become more proficient in the CLI and not need google;
      * over time you will become more efficient on your Ubuntu machine and actually save time;
      * if the CLI still bothers u, try Applications > Add/Remove. Its been in Ubuntu since I switched from Windaz at 7.04;
      * did your sock-puppet mod u insightful?

      --
      Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    57. Re:I Want My First Personal Linux Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're playing around, then you can do it in a virtual machine. MS Virtual PC or VMWare's player both are available as a free download and work fine, at least on XP pro. You can get your playable VMWare image from easyvmx.com.

      The other thing you get with a virtual machine is pretty easy backups. If you think you're about to do something truly dangerous, then you can "turn off" the VM & copy the whole thing. That way you can go back to exactly how things were before you started experimenting.

      Enjoy.

  23. But KDE 3.5 by Epeeist · · Score: 1

    If they are putting this beta into an LTS then I must admit I don't understand why they can't put KDE 4.0.3 in.

    1. Re:But KDE 3.5 by muszek · · Score: 1

      muszek@bobek:~$ apt-cache showpkg kdebase-kde4
      Package: kdebase-kde4
      Versions:
      4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2 (/var/lib/apt/lists/gb.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_hardy_universe_binary-i386_Packages)
      Description Language:
      File: /var/lib/apt/lists/gb.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_hardy_universe_binary-i386_Packages
      MD5: af13bce3425ece20e3962f2a9c210d3a

      Reverse Depends:
      kdebase-dev-kde4,kdebase-kde4 4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2
      kdebase-dbg-kde4,kdebase-kde4 4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2
      kde4-core,kdebase-kde4 4:4.0.0
      Dependencies:
      4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2 - dolphin-kde4 (2 4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2) kappfinder-kde4 (2 4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2) kdebase-bin-kde4 (2 4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2) kdebase-data-kde4 (2 4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2) kdepasswd-kde4 (2 4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2) kfind-kde4 (2 4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2) konqueror-kde4 (2 4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2) konqueror-nsplugins-kde4 (2 4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2) konsole-kde4 (2 4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2) kwrite-kde4 (2 4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2) libkonq5 (2 4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2) kdm-kde4 (2 4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2)
      Provides:
      4:4.0.3-0ubuntu2 -
      Reverse Provides:
      Well?
    2. Re:But KDE 3.5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because Kde4.0.3 isn't even a beta-quality replacement for KDE 3.5 yet. Kontact isn't ported yet, Konqueror has SSL issues, and Plasma and xrandr don't get along.

      Now I'm not knocking KDE, 4.0 was always intended to be a stable release of the LIBRARIES, not the apps. But that means it's still not ready for end-users yet.

      Presumably Firefox is in better shape than this.

    3. Re:But KDE 3.5 by qaldune · · Score: 1

      If they are putting this beta into an LTS then I must admit I don't understand why they can't put KDE 4.0.3 in. Your comment is a living proof of talking on something which you absolutely don't know about.
    4. Re:But KDE 3.5 by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Read the fucking release notes and you might just learn something. Sheesh. http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/804

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    5. Re:But KDE 3.5 by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      I have been trying to use parts of KDE4 in my 8.04 and they are much farther from finish than Firefox. Firefox just works. I can't say the same about Kate (kate-kde4 package). I had to install 3.5 alongside it so I could work.

  24. Curious about Ubuntu by UberHoser · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well more than curious. It looks pretty slick.

    And I am really not asking to be flamed here, but can someone tell me why I might want to move from Windows to Ubuntu? Either for home (World of Warcraft has to run on it) or from work?

    (Puts on asbestos boxers)

    --
    Guns are for wimps... Use a crossbow.. this way you can pin them to their chair when you go postal.
    1. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      haha, I asked the same question about open office (why use it over ms office). prepare to get flamed.

      Although, ubuntu is great if you want to mess around in linux. But if you don't know why you'd want to switch away from XP ... and you don't know why you'd want/need linux, then there probably isn't much point.

      All that aside... It is really REALLY easy to dual boot - it does it automagically when installing for you... and it is cool to try (at least once - and the first one is free... oh wait, they all are...)

    2. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by chunk08 · · Score: 1

      -Stability: Ubuntu runs the Linux kernel, which is far more stable and when it does fail, fails more gracefully. The worst problem I've ever had was X locking up, and I can X and restart it without rebooting.
      -Security: Ubuntu has no ports open by default, and lets you know whenever its opening one. It also forces you to run as a regular user, and upgrade your privileges to "root" (the unix/linux admin) when you need to.
      -Speed: Ubuntu has very little "extra" and what is there can easily be turned off. The linux kernel is much more efficient than the windows kernel.
      -Easily available applications: Ubuntu comes with a full office suite (compatible with Office up to 2003), email client, IM client, and graphics and photo editor. Its the best you can get for free.
      As for WoW, if you are that addicted, see if it runs under wine. Maybe you should run Ubuntu to help you get over your addiction...
      Abestos boxers? This was aimed for the face [joke]

      --
      Do away with our corrupt tax code. Support the Fair Tax
    3. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by cptnapalm · · Score: 0

      I think WoW runs under Wine, but it may require some setup. Once I was a gamer, thus dual booted, but I'm so tired of the upgrade treadmill that I just bought a PS3 so I no longer really care about PC games.

      As for why you might want to, why not just download the ISO and run the LiveCD and test out for yourself?

      If you like it, great! If not, then at least you gave it a shot.

    4. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by cptnapalm · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "If[...]you don't know why you'd want/need linux, then there probably isn't much point."

      Oddly, I didn't know why I'd want/need linux (aside from being told it was a lot less crash prone than Win 95) until I had been using it for awhile. It was only after getting comfortable with it that I really started poking around and discovered the myriad of neat things I could do with a home computer that I never thought of doing because, on Windows, it wasn't just there.

      It is like WAY back when I had a C64 and it came with BASIC so you could write your own programs. Because it was just there, I did. With DOS 5, Windows 3 and 95, it wasn't just there so I never even thought about doing anything like that.

    5. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      I hear WoW is quite solid under wine. Don't want to start myself, however.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    6. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Well, XP isn't more crash prone than linux, in my experience. If, for someone else, that experience is different, then they may want to investigate linux for that reason.

      I've investigated linux for the sake of curiosity. That suited me fine.

      But your argument has a flaw. Your desire to explore and tinker was the driving force behind acquiring linux - what you needed was information on what you'd be able to do with linux - and if you'd understood that linux allowed you to do these things, you would have understood that you wanted it.

      It wasn't linux that you needed to make your choice, rather - it was information. Once you had that information (through experience), you then knew that you wanted linux.

    7. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by wampus · · Score: 1

      Stability - 8.04 managed to hang my system hard, no cursor, no keyboard, hell, the numlock light didn't even respond. Its been a long time since Windows has done that to me. I would have gotten over it, but this was during resizing my primary NTFS partition... luckily during the fsck, but still not a good sign. I had just decided to actually install the thing instead of stopping after a glaring failure in the LiveCD like happened the last two releases I tried. I also liked how the package manager in Kubuntu locked my repos then crashed. Very user friendly. It continues to crash when I tell it to break the locks. Guess I need to reboot?
      Security - This is the same system everyone hates Windows Vista for shipping with. OMG, my password again!??!? Yeah, your password again, you are installing a driver. But its great when Linux does it. I personally don't like the sudo for everything approach. To me, its the same as doing everything as root.
      Speed - Meh, I haven't thought about this in years. I run a relatively modern PC. My Celery 1200 is a little creaky running XP, but it does the job.
      All those same free apps are available on Windows, btw. If you don't know why you should switch, why bother?

    8. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      1) You "can X and restart it without rebooting" but can a novice?

      2) true

      3) Compiz is enabled by default. That is not a "very little' extra.

      4) And none of those are on parity with the Windows/Mac equivalents.

      5) Yeah, WoW runs under WINE. Many games do. It is just that many don't run with a damn under WINE and even if someone else got a particular game running under WINE, there is no guarantee anyone else will be able to or that it will run worth a damn for someone with a different system.

      Oh, and the so-called "fair tax" of your sig is a regressive tax that increases the tax burden on the poor and decreases it for the rich. A better one is a hybrid flat rate income tax and a national sales tax.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    9. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by aug24 · · Score: 1

      1) Security.
      2) Not giving money to The Man (unless you buy support and The Man is Mark Shuttleworth).
      3) Solidity.
      4) Predictable interface (ever thought about how un-predictable Windows behaviour is since you learned it?)
      5) Earning your geek badge.
      6) Better out-of-the-box driver compatibility than Windows.
      7) A change is as good as a rest.
      8) Still having the money you didn't give to The Man.

      (1), (3) you won't actuall notice, (4) you will.

      But you don't know what else is out there till you try. Try a Mac, try Ubuntu, try Solaris/X86, try an IBM/3090 block mode mainframe ;-)

      Just try.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    10. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Try it and decide for yourself (that's what the LiveCD is for). There are a million perfectly good reasons to switch to Ubuntu, and a million more to stick with Windows. It comes down to personal preference and needs.

      Personally, I find Linux to be, overall, faster, more stable, more secure, and more open (ie, far easier to hack and customize). Of course, the price is right, too. And the vast universe of software freely available, right at my fingertips, means I spend more time using my computer, and less time hunting around for software to do what I need to do.

      Incidentally, WoW is a platinum certified application for Wine, so you should be able to get it working quite nicely on the Linux side.

    11. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by jemtallon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, the obvious reason you might want it is because it's cheaper - both in being free software and generally being able to run on cheaper hardware. Beyond that, though, it's all just personal preference.

      Five years ago, I'd have recommended that you only move to Linux if you like to occasionally tinker with your computer. Or maybe if you like to occasionally remap things to be more productive or write your own scripts and bots. Regardless, in the years past, Linux was fun mostly because you got to look under the hood and play with it.

      Ubuntu has done a good job of abstracting that in recent years, though. For the most part, it should be about as easy a change moving from Windows to Ubuntu as it would be in moving to a Mac or, from what I've seen, XP to Vista. That tinkering aspect is still lurking just beneath the surface, though. 99% of everything you want to do will be possible in easy point-and-click style. But be prepared when you download some old third-party software that isn't in the standard repositories that you may be expected to open up a terminal window and run some "make" commands or something in order to install it. That's just where Linux culture was pre-Ubuntu and still is for many.

      That being said, I think Ubuntu is quite a bit more fun than Windows. All of the free software helps a bunch at work as I don't have to fight for money to buy new things all the time. There's also all of the eye-candy that you get with Compiz - some of which is just good for bewildering your friends (ie: raining desktop) but some of which is very useful for productivity (ie: desktop cube.)

      Another good side to Ubuntu is the community. When you have a problem, run a quick Google search for it and you're likely to find a few forums where it's already being discussed. For the most part, the RTFM style of Linux "help" has abated in recent years and most people are happy to help where they can.

      So in the end, it depends greatly on your personal preferences and what you expect from your OS. It also depends on what you expect for support and how much you're willing to do yourself when something breaks. If you've got a little time to play with it, Linux can be a lot of fun. If all you want from an OS is that it "just work" out of the box and you don't care what it does as long as it runs Office and gets you to Facebook... well Linux still might work but you're less likely to enjoy it.

    12. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      The easy answer these days: Microsoft is EOLing XP, and no one wants Vista. If you're being forced to switch to something that's new with different hardware compatibility lists and less-than-perfect backward compatibility, why not make a clean start with a system that has a future?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    13. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by Mex · · Score: 1

      "And I am really not asking to be flamed here, but can someone tell me why I might want to move from Windows to Ubuntu? Either for home (World of Warcraft has to run on it) or from work?"

      If you're fine with Windows, don't bother.

      If the time comes when you think 400 dollars for Windows Vista is too much, try Ubuntu.

    14. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1

      well the main reason has to be one of morality.

      everything we do has moral repercussions. if you sanction microsoft, what sort of message is that you are giving others? that it is okay to be dependent and be unable to know what your computer is doing? You can also trust free software not to spy on you.

      in other words, just by asking the question you demonstrate that you either don't know what free software is about or do not regard these goals as good.

    15. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by zoward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Where to start? Let's see:

      - It's free.

      - I can reinstall it, move it new hardware, run it on multiple boxes without having to get on the phone and beg someone for an additional license.

      - Most of the applications I use daily come with the base install of Ubuntu (office apps, web browser, IM client, etc).

      - When they don't, I can easily download and install full-scale robust applications safely from the internet in seconds.

      - updating to the latest versions of software after reinstalling from disc can be done in one pass rather than having to launch an updater multiple times (eg, Windows Update).

      - all of the software on the entire machine can be updated from one source all at once. No need to go to separate company websites and log in for updates.

      - WoW runs fine under Ubuntu with WINE. I've been running it that way for a couple of years now.

      - Since it can connect to a Microsoft VPN and run a remote desktop client, I can use Ubuntu at home to take over my Windows desktop at work, so I can work from home using Ubuntu.

      - Privilege separation, combined with the fact that Ubuntu is not targeted by malware makers, makes it more secure to run than Windows. No need to pay ransom to Norton or McAfee to be safe on teh intraweb either.

      - Ubuntu at this point seems to require about half the memory footprint of Vista. YMMV.

      Since I don't run any very specific software that requires Windows, I can't imagine why I would want to.

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
    16. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by Wylfing · · Score: 2, Informative

      The main reason why I think people should give Linux (esp. Ubuntu or Fedora) a try is that once you get used to doing things the "Linux way" you start to realize how much it sucked to be using Windows. It's hard to quantify...I've been using Linux on my work and home desktops since 2001, and using Windows now feels clunky, clumsy, and irritating. Maybe a lot of it has to do with how you train your brain to work around all the horrible quirky behavior of Windows, and once you're away from it awhile you notice how awful it really is.

      And by the way, World of Warcraft runs just fine.

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    17. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! My name is Justin too! Don't worry, the little penguins speak to me too.

    18. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      1) You "can X and restart it without rebooting" but can a novice? To answer your question, yes. In fact, it's so easy that there were people asking for the feature to be turned off, because users might trigger it accidentally. If a user tries ctrl-alt-delete, most distros will reboot the machine, so even that isn't a real problem.
      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    19. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      1) You "can X and restart it without rebooting" but can a novice?
      oh man, so simple!! CTRL+BackSpace

      Yeah, WoW runs under WINE.
      ... and that's all you need.

      4) And none of those are on parity with the Windows/Mac equivalents.
      I disagree but what would I know, I only use it to write all my papers. Hopefully I'll progress to the stage you're at and be able to criticize software I haven't even used in years..
    20. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by DeadManCoding · · Score: 1

      Agreed on the WoW point. I can run WoW under WINE just fine. Some of the configs will be a bit menacing if you've never used Ubuntu before, but I have gotten through those configs. My frame rate wasn't quite what I wanted, but that's a user error, not a system error. Additionally, the Ubuntu forums have quite a bit of info on getting Warcraft to work under WINE.

      --
      "The only constant in the universe is change." - Unknown author
    21. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by badpazzword · · Score: 1
      For the novice:

      1) You "can X and restart it without rebooting" but can a novice? Ctrl-Alt-BackSpace.
      --
      When ideas fail, words become very handy.
    22. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by cptnapalm · · Score: 1

      It could have been Malibu Barbie's Dream Operating System if it would have crashed less than Windows 95. But it wasn't MBDOS that was available as an alternative, it was Linux. But it was not Linux I was looking for, specifically; it was just Something Not Windows 95.

      There was not yet the desire to explore and tinker. The guys that mentioned Linux touted the open nature of it, but all I cared about was "Does it crash less?" Getting a yes, I was on my way.

      If it wasn't Linux, but OS/2, MacOS or something else, then I almost certainly never would have gotten the tinkering bug for the same reason that I did not get it when I had Windows 95: lack of immediate availability.

      So I only knew that I wanted Linux because of what it did beyond what my initial desire for "crashes less". If it wasn't available then, I would currently be a content and clueless Malibu Barbie user now.

    23. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 1

      Linux is crack for nerds and malware-free web browsing for grandmothers.

      Personally I just set up a dual boot between Linux and Windows if I feel the need to access some Windows games or other apps. I used to hack Wine to run Windows apps and was looking into virtualization but with the risk of Windows malware executing in my Linux environment I generally don't go there anymore.

    24. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The top three reasons why I use Ubuntu:
      1. Multiple desktops!

          Multiple virtual desktops are a godsend when it comes to multitasking, allowing you to have way too many windows open and not be overwhelmed, or group your tasks into categories (i.e. Internet apps on desktop 1, office on desktop 2, music on desktop 3, and an empty desktop 4 for anything else). It's what Mac OSX's 'Spaces' was copied from.

      2. Ease of use

          I've nearly forgotten how to install programs on Windows because its so easy to install stuff in Ubuntu. If you know what you're looking for, you just open up a terminal and type 'sudo apt-get install packageiwanttohave', or, if you prefer GUIs, just open synaptic package manager, and you can search, browse, and install applications. The apps auto-magically add themselves to your menu, and off you go. Oh and the programs are free, just like the OS.

      3. compiz

          The compiz window manager adds effects like windows that wobble when you move them, and live previews, as well as transparency and a host of other plugins. This isn't really all that useful, but it's a great way to show off the abilities of linux. (and a good way to give your video card something to do while you browse the net).

      These are just my personal favorites. There are many, many more features that I'm sire you'll come to love about Ubuntu.

      As for WoW, yes, it runs in linux using something called 'wine'. In fact, a lot of windows applications run in linux under wine, and this is handy if you just can't find a linux alternative to your favorite program. For a How-To on install WoW, go here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=579378

      If you're still nervous, just download an install disc and boot into its 'Live Session', which lets you try out a basic install without having to actually install it to your harddrive.

      happy computing.

    25. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Do I have any huge compelling reason that you can't do under Windows? Not really, but things I like:

      1. Easy to find apps, easy to install apps, easy to keep a box updated. Through "Add/Remove Programs" you can search and find plenty useful applications without ever wondering if you're downloading some crappy ad/spy/mal/nagware. Single control center to update the whole machine.
      2. Pro and con: If Linux recognizes your hardware, it's a lot smoother than a clean Windows install if you do those, I often buy in parts. If you buy preinstalls I guess that that doesn't matter, but then Linux doesn't come with all the trialware and crap. On the downside, if Linux doesn't like your hardware it's anywhere between annoying and impossible to get it to work.
      3. It's stable, and doesn't get dragged down. On Windows, though XP wouldn't crash for me anymore it'd get slow over time even if I shut down all apps. Still I'm talking about weeks here so if you turn it off every day it doesn't matter but for a torrent box it's a nice feature.
      4. It's free, install it on as many boxes you want and switch hardware as much as you want, no activation or license fees. Or in the other case, no need to chase around every few weeks for a new WGA crack just to keep your machine updated.

      Still, for the most part it's "as nice" as Windows, no more. You still have Firefox, OpenOffice, GIMP and plenty other of the same applications on Windows. Even platinum rated games under WINE tend to run no better, just equal to Windows. Most media do (with some extra codecs you're asked if you want to install) play as well as on Windows. I was happy with XP, but XP is going out of support. Plus, at least in my case there was quite a few things on the last box I didn't pay anything for, I'm still not paying anything but now it's legal and I don't need to visit any shady places. In short, if it's good enough it's easier and better. I guess it depends on how hard you're tied to Windows-only applications.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    26. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ah, dumbass, I use it regularly.

      Now go dig you little head out of your ass and when you grow up, you might find that there are people who know things you don't.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    27. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      And how many novices know that?

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    28. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      ah, so getting what you wanted (less crashes) led to learning more ... which led to a desire for linux. good thing you already had it. the point is, if he doesn't know why he'd leave windows, and doesn't have a compelling reason to get linux... then there isn't any point.

      You left windows for a crash free environment (95 was bad. XP isn't.) You ended up wanting to tinker as well. It might be fun for you (or for him), but you can have a lot of fun 'tinkering' with an XP box as well.

      Although, I thought of a good reason not to switch to linux.
      You'll become a freetard if you do. make yourself a hackintosh ;)

    29. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by tehdaemon · · Score: 1

      How many novices know it? My guess is at least 3 more, just due to the GP post....

      T

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    30. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by badpazzword · · Score: 1

      All the novices that read my post. Where in the Windows Vista manual do you learn about Ctrl-Alt-Canc?

      --
      When ideas fail, words become very handy.
    31. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by cptnapalm · · Score: 1

      As I put in my direct reply to him, if he's curious, then he ought to just grab a live CD and give it a test run. In my replies to you, I'm just chatting with you.

      I didn't have a PC at all for two or three years and when I got one it had XP. Ran fine; no significant problems. As it had been so long since I had done anything, I was initially content to just use XP. Didn't last :)

      Although initially I wasn't thinking about Linux at all, somebody somewhere mentioned a Debian based distro called Ubuntu. So, I figured what the hell and installed it on 1/10th of my drive... then that ran out of room so redid the install with 1/4 and ran out of room. Six weeks after my initial "curiousity install" I just got rid of XP because I simply didn't like it as much as Ubuntu. Nothing was wrong with XP, just prefered something else.

      One interesting thing that I have discovered since that time (about two years ago) is that the Unix-ness of Linux I really dig. I like a lot of the other stuff as well, but I really like my shell and pipes and all that good stuff. So I have Solaris on my laptop and Ubuntu on my desktop... well I kind of have to have Solaris on my laptop as it is an UltraSparc machine that no Linux will run on. (It was the single most bizarre laptop I'd ever heard of... I couldn't resist...)

      Background story of me and my old 386: It came with DOS 5 and Windows 3. I hated Windows 3. Passionately. I rather liked DOS; it did what I told it to do.

      Now that I think about it, I believe that what kept me from being one of those people who (way back in the day) complained about Windows but stuck with it was the fact that I had previously made a choice regarding my operating environment; when I realized I hated Windows 95, it didn't occur to me that I had no other choice, so I started asking around. And as I had previously rejected a graphical environment for a text one, the (then) necessity for command line stuff didn't bug me at all.

      One positive Windows 95 memory I have was of using LiteStep as the gui shell. I made an interface only I could use :)

    32. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That question doesn't strike me as particularly trollish, so I'll do my best at answering with my reasons.

      Firstly, this page here http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=11329 says that WoW will run just fine in OpenGL mode, so if that's your only main constraint, you're good for home.

      Now as to why you'd want to. I have always seen one of the major advantages in the Linux way of doing things as being the system of packaging. When you use Ubuntu, you can forget about all the searching the internet for a program that may or may not work, and then trying to install it. When I want something, I can just start up Synaptic and type in a few words to search with. When the results come back, I click the checkbox next to the app I want, and it gets installed and set up for me automatically, and in all ordinary cases, can be expected to work perfectly right away.

      Another traditional advantage of Linux is security. I've never personally had a problem either way with this, but I have noticed that it's a lot harder for some of my less technically inclined friends to screw up an Ubuntu system than a Windows one.

      And my final item is updates. The entire software stack is continually being improved, and Ubuntu has a little taskbar notifier to automatically let you know when any piece of software on your system, no matter how small, can be made better.

    33. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      I'm using slackware and XP ... I like ubuntu, but for all the hassle of setting it up (I've got wireless card 'issues') I might as well go for something more fun. I love to tinker too - Osx has been my latest hobby horse. I'd have left it installed on all the computers (and it has problems with wireless too... but given the circumstances), but my wife said 'Why do we pay for wireless cards if we're just going to run cable through the house?'

    34. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Main reason for Linux for me, you never have to visit a wares site ever again, and I can do everything I want/need with he distros I have chosen with out being crippled by some licensing issue saying I can do something just because you've only installed standard edition, not ultimate.

      At home on old hardware, a server with vmware server, web server, database, file serving , DNS, DHCP, imap mail server and all easily installed.

      Impossible or expensive to set up with windows XP 8)

    35. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by cptnapalm · · Score: 1

      My previous laptop had Intel wireless so it wasn't a problem under Ubuntu. A friend has a Broadcom chipset and things were a little stickier.

      Slackware may truly said to be venerable. The oldest and still highly respected distro.

      I have been curious about OS X and I've toyed with getting a Mac laptop, but there are two things: 1) I love my Tadpole's keyboard; it has a Sun UNIX layout and the keys have a good feel to them. 2) OS X is the selling point and, having not used it, I'm hesitant to throw that much cash down on one. While OS X has me curious (as the terminal is easily accessible), Apple's reputation for making long lasting hardware is a real (potentially) selling point. If I wind up not liking OS X and I wipe it for some other Unix, I don't know if that would void the warranty...

      Who says off topic is bad? :)

    36. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Ooo, i'd like a sparcbook. macs seem to have good resale value, but I'm not sure if it has to do with the hardware inside... or the logo outside. Now that they're intel, you can get a comparable laptop from lenovo for cheaper (and I prefer lenovo anyhoo... i've had 2 good experiences w/ them)

    37. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by westyvw · · Score: 1

      You know this is an interesting question. I dont care for Ubuntu very much, Gnome drives me nuts, and it all feels so Toy like. I always am concerned that no one will really see the power of Linux and how good it can be if they use Ubuntu. HOWEVER, it seems to be popular perhaps for some of the very same reasons I dont like it.

      I use Linux at home and ran a business with linux servers and linux on the desktop. My wife and child use linux. WHY? Because windows is a pain in the neck. My software is community tested and approved by my distribution (I use Debian and KDE). Windows gets in my way, Linux combines things to work with me. I started writing a long paragraph explaining the pro's and cons' but screw that.

      Its all one simple fact: Linux is development for developers and users. Microsoft just wants to screw you and make a buck. For example in music and forced upgrades, and DRM, and closing source of drivers, well you get the idea. Its that simple. The sooner off the crazy train that is windows the better.

    38. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by k1773re7f · · Score: 1
      Well there are currently only a dozen or so viruses for Linux. Linux's design, being based on Unix is truly multiuser and more secure than in Windows. I am not one to say that Linux will never be compromised. But it requires more work to crack a Linux box that a Windows box. I still run clamav on my internet facing machines.
      But all in all Linux is more secure. Also, if a user does get a virus, the damage is limited to the specific user's data. So if you share your computer with your child, and that child goes to a bogus game site and contracts a virus, the damage done by the virus is limited to the childs files.
      How in the world do Windows Users live without multiple virtual desktops? This is a great usability feature missing in Windows that Unix has had since it's first GUI desktop environment.
      WoW is one of the Windows Games that runs fine on Linux under WINE. WINE is a port of the Windows API to Linux. My daughter plays Zuma, Bejeweled and a host of other games on my Linux Laptop.
      Things that might trip you up.
      Accelerated 3D Graphics is my biggest personal pain. I am strongly addicted to DOOM3. It runs fine on the desktop machine that I specifically built to be a Linux gaming machine with NVIDA graphics using the proprietary NVIDIA Graphics Driver. But DOOM3 is unplayable on my prebuilt laptop using ATI Graphics and the ATI Proprietary 3D driver. Having said that, most other 3D apps run fine on both, including WoW.
      • Some people seem to have problems with Wireless Network. I haven't had problems with that in a couple of years.
      • New harware may not be supported under Linux until a Kernel hacker produces a driver for it.
      • Some Windows applications will not run under WINE. These are mostly games or heavily graphic apps.

      Now, I left MS Windows behind for Linux in 1996 and never looked back. I have never had a malware issue on Linux. In that time my famliy has lost 7 Windows machines to viruses and worms.
      --
      This sig. intentionally left blank.
    39. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by euxneks · · Score: 1
      1. No spyware, malware, viruses, Ubuntu is much more secure. That's not to say it's uncrackable, just much, much harder to crack than windows.
      2. Slick - look up compiz fusion on youtube
      3. Internet works the same (we have flash if you absolutely have to have it)
      4. Email works the same (unless for some god-forsaken reason you have to connect to Exchange and use their calendar)
      5. NO MICROSOFT - this may seem a little radical, but as another commenter said, there's this unquantifiable "ick" in windows that you forget about. It's like you're being brainwashed to use their system, and you have to just "accept it". Frankly it's irritating and highly obnoxious.
      6. Probably the one I like the most: Completely free to try and use.
      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    40. Re:Curious about Ubuntu by illudrae · · Score: 1

      I play World of Warcraft and I recently switched my home laptop from Windows Vista to Ubuntu Hardy Heron 8.04.

      I switched because my little laptop has 1 GB of RAM. I couldn't afford more. Also, I found Vista to be slow, clunky, paranoid, stupid and amazingly hard to work with. You can't customize it, you can't tweak it, and WoW on 1 GB of RAM on a 512 MB shared memory video card was playable, but just barely. A number of other things that one would assume would work didn't (Media Player doesn't come with DVD codecs, so movies didn't work), and the Vista TV-interface thing (no idea what it's called) hiccuped playing my DVD's.

      I know my laptop isn't a fast box, but let's be reasonable here, you don't need a ton of power to run a DVD player. The fact it froze and hiccuped playing my Law and Order: SVU DVDs is inexcusable.

      I realize that I could have loaded XP. But then I would have had to find a copy, get a friend to give me a key, and still not have Office or the DVD burning software that came with Vista for my drive. There aren't any free DVD burning software solutions for Windows.

      So, I loaded up Ubuntu 8.04, after copying off all my stuff to a USB drive. I loaded Wine onto Ubuntu (via Add/Remove), and it installed the package and configured it and put Wine in my main menu. Then I copied my WoW directory into my new Program Files and double-clicked the WoW.exe icon.

      The Blizzard downloader decided I needed the patch they'd just released, so it downloaded it and installed it and started WoW as per normal. I logged in to test performance.

      It ran about the same speed as on Windows, and I was disappointed, before I realized that Ubuntu had decided to crank my resolution as high as my LCD would support. On Vista, I'd had to turn down my resolution to 800x600 to get it to run anywhere near 20 fps, and that was with effects, spell effects, death effect, textures...basically everything turned off. If I had it set to 1024x768 or anything higher and ANY effects turned on, I could take a step and wait 20 seconds for it to catch up.

      On Ubuntu, with all effects turned on, at the highest possible resolution, it ran about 20 fps. Still not terrific, but definately playable given that my video card is piddly. I'm sure that if I turn it down and remove some effects, it'll run better.

      Ubuntu's not for everyone...but I was amazed to find that my little cheap laptop from Wal-Mart worked out of the box (I had to load a newer driver for my wireless card, but it was literally one click), and that my new interface is both shiny, pretty and FAST.

      Plus, Ubuntu comes with all sorts of free software...I spent hours upon hours loading and unloading anything that looked cool. In the process I found a ton of cool games and other neat utilities and music players and burner software...

      Anyway. If you're not sure about switching, there's a tool called WUBI (http://www.wubi-installer.org) that will load a complete Ubuntu install into a file on your Windows drive...then you reboot onto the "Ubuntu" side and play to your heart's content. Wubi comes with the latest Ubuntu, or you can download it for free.

      I made the switch for good. I'd tried previously in the past to switch to Linux, but found myself going back to Windows for "one or two things." Now, Ubuntu is my primary at work and at home...I've yet to rebuild my big machine with it, cause that one still runs XP, which works for right now.

      Now, I never have to switch back...cause the only game I play regularly works under Ubuntu...seamlessly. And in the event I need something that Wine can't handle, I can load up a virtualbox for free.

  25. Torrent download by dramaley · · Score: 1, Informative

    I found a nice page for downloading all the .torrent files that doesn't seem to be overwhelmed yet. It even lists torrents for the 8.04 DVD and PowerPC versions!
    http://torrent.ubuntu.com:6969/

    --
    ----- "I'm still sane on three planets and two moons."
    1. Re:Torrent download by dramaley · · Score: 1

      Why the heck did i get modded troll? The site i linked to loads quickly (despite being ubuntu.com) and lists all the torrents. I'm currently downloading the DVD versions using the torrents i grabbed on the site i linked to.

      --
      ----- "I'm still sane on three planets and two moons."
  26. Features by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Informative

    So from the review there are several new features here that might be of use:

    • - Wubi - for improved installation experience.
    • - Compiz - now enabled by default, for some eye candy as well as an expose clone and nicer application selection using tab.
    • - Vinagre - a new, built in VNC client that uses zeroconf for local auto-discovery. (Man I hope this works with OS X's implementation.)
    • - Brasero - CD/DVD burning application.

    So it sounds like a couple of useful new features and probably more the review did not cover. opefully I'll give it a test run tonight.

    1. Re:Features by desmondhaynes · · Score: 1

      From: http://techwatch.reviewk.com/2008/04/ubuntu-hardy-heron-8-04-2/ [reviewk.com] -- Ubuntu 8.04 includes GNOME 2.22, the latest version of the popular open-source desktop environment. There are many new features and significant architectural improvements in GNOME 2.22, including GVFSÃ"a completely redesigned virtual filesystem abstraction layerÃ"and PolicyKit, a secure privilege elevation system that is safer and more flexible than the anachronistic gksudo mechanism. Ubuntu now also includes PulseAudio, a powerful new sound server with support for network transparency and advanced mixing capabilities. Although PulseAudio has a lot to offer on the desktop, it still suffers from some transitional issues and integration weaknesses in this release that manifest themselves in certain configurations. One particularly significant feature included in this release is Wubi, a Windows-based installer that allows Ubuntu and Windows to coexist on the same partition. Wubi installs a fully functional Ubuntu environment into a folder on the Windows filesystem and sets up a boot menu that allows the user to enter Ubuntu at startup. Wubi doesnÃ(TM)t require the user to partition their hard drive and it makes it possible to uninstall Ubuntu directly through the Add/Remove Programs utility in Windows. There are a handful of new applications included by default in this release, such as the Transmission BitTorrent client, the Cheese webcam application, and a new CD burning program called Brasero.

    2. Re:Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is Brasero, like a less featured crappy version of K3b?

    3. Re:Features by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      What is Brasero, like a less featured crappy version of K3b?

      They're both pretty full featured. K3b is clean but not as user friendly. They both have features the other lacks. K3b is also a audio/video ripping applications, whereas Brasero has more options for burning stuff and integrates better with the OS and other applications. I'd say it comes down to your use cases, but I'd lean towards Brasero for novices.

    4. Re:Features by spinkham · · Score: 1

      Close, it's a GNOME less featured crappy version of K3b.

      One of the major inefficiencies of having GNOME and KDE as dueling implementations is the poor copies of best in class Linux software they each make of each other. Of course, some of us just install the best from each project instead, and end up with a nice setup.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    5. Re:Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brasero is not a good choice unfortunately...
      I tried to burn a dual layer DVD and it told me that it couldn't since it required some extra plug-ins and a search on the Package Manager revealed none available (at all).
      Also, it requires as much free space in the temporary folder as the .iso file that you are burning which is a complete waste since the ISO format doesn't need decompression or the like...

      Installed GnomeBaker and it works like a charm: dual-layers are fine and no need for extra free space when burning an .iso file !

      Thanks for reading

    6. Re:Features by Locutus · · Score: 1

      I had a CD-RW Brasero would keep choking on and ended up just going to the CLI and cdrecord.

      It was on an 8.04 beta partition and I didn't want to bother with installing k3b. I will be sticking with k3b in my standard partition.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    7. Re:Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some of us just install the best from each project instead, and end up with a nice setup.
      Some of you should make a nice distribution. Seriously. I think there was a Fedora hybrid a long while back, but I haven't heard of on recently. Two competing desktops is nice and it helps keep Linux fresh, but still, enough is enough.
    8. Re:Features by HappySmileMan · · Score: 1

      So do I, I have the KDE desktop with Amarok, K3B, Konversation, Kopete, KMail and KTorrent running now (and obviously a browser, Opera, though I think I'll probably switch to FF since I'm just trying it out)

    9. Re:Features by civean · · Score: 1

      One major thing I'd just like to mention: If you have an ATi card, run a laptop of any kind and use the preloaded open source drivers, compiz will refuse to start. This is a check that was put in for some reason during the beta stages. To prevent this (especially if you know your card works) you have to comment out the lines 270-278 in the compiz config script. Don't ask why they did it, no one knows...

    10. Re:Features by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

      I'm running 7.10, and am just amazed at the quality of the Linux desktop these days.

          * Compiz Fusion is awesome. I'm just amazed at how well it works, with no crashing or rendering errors. I can even play 3D games in a window without any problems.
          * Brasero and all the other CD burning apps suck. I tried them all, and still had to resort to the command line for some things. Nero for Linux works perfectly, and is cheap.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    11. Re:Features by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      In its defence, there's something to be said about making applications as easy to use as possible, which is the Gnome way.

      That said, Brasero is a bit ridiculous in that regard. It's probably just me, I like a bit of looking under the hood in my burner app. So if you're like me and want something Gnome'ish then I recommend you try GnomeBaker, it's a happy medium between the absolute simplicity of Brasero and the ton of stuff in K3B.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
  27. No, Hairy Hadron. by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, it's Hairy Hadron, which is actually a new kind of subatomic particle predicted by stringy-hair theory. It's the particle that makes hippies and geeks smell the way they do. It can also give you telapathetic powers. People will know you're pathetic before you even walk into the room.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by Slashidiot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hairy Hardon? C'mon, be serious, this is slashdot!

      --
      Tis women makes us love, Tis Love that makes us sad, Tis sadness makes us drink, And drinking makes us mad.
    2. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by RayMarron · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought the codename for that release was "patchouli".

      --
      ON DELETE CASCADE
    3. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Man, fucking patchouli. The only substance known to man that can make BO smell WORSE. It's like it highlights the BO, circles it and draws little arrows pointing to it, just in case you missed it.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    4. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely it's Hairy Hard-on, a new kind of subatomic particle that is protected by stringy (pubic) hair?

    5. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought the codename for that release was "patchouli". Gesundheit!
      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    6. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha. At first glance I thought you said 'hairy hardon' which takes on a totally different meaning.

    7. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I thought it was named 'Hairy Hardon'

      What a blunder...

    8. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by kaens · · Score: 1

      I once spilled a bottle of patchouli musk on myself. It was horrible.

    9. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Funny

      You totally miss the point.

      You wear the patchouli. Some women go "Ewh, gross!". Some like it.

      The ones that like it will still have sex with you when you just came off a marathon coding session and haven't had a shower in a while.

      Those are the ones you want to go out with.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    10. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by spun · · Score: 1

      Have you SMELLED those women? I mean, I personally like a little funk in the junk but WHOAH! Smell so dense it's a SOLID, man. I'm talking curds.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    11. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's what chain smoking is for...

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    12. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Someone gave me a tube of hemp-based, patchouli-scented skin lotion once. Thanks. Not only do I have still dry skin, but now I smell like a freakin' hippie from 20 yards away. I couldn't even walk into a coffee shop without someone inviting me to recite poetry.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    13. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hairy Hardon?

    14. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Boy, so much talk over this release name... And to think they passed on calling 7.04 "Flatulent Flamingo"... Now THAT would've generated some discussions!

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    15. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by thegnu · · Score: 1

      my girlfriend smells fine, and will still bang me even if i'm stinky.

      hooray for me!

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    16. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, she's all right. Drags her teeth a bit though...

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    17. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. by thegnu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, she's all right. Drags her teeth a bit though... You've just been spoiled by the flawless blowjobs your mom gives.
      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
  28. Wireless still doesn't work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've tried installing the last 3 versions of Ubuntu on my HP Pavilion 6000. None of them work with the wireless out of the box.

    I was told this version has much more support for the Pavilions, but sadly it was the same thing again.

    No wireless.

    I don't want to take the time to figure out how to get it to work, so I'll be staying with XP for now.

    Which sucks, because I really want to get off Windows.

    1. Re:Wireless still doesn't work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Wireless still doesn't work. by Traxxas · · Score: 1

      Which sucks, because I really want to get off Windows. If you really want to leave windows then take the time to figure it out. Sometimes you have to work for things you want. HP notebooks don't like the POS Gnome Network Manager that is default, use http://wicd.sourceforge.net/download.php and you should be good. Don't be a lazy whiner.

    3. Re:Wireless still doesn't work. by Locutus · · Score: 1

      I've got the zv6000 and got it working by going to the website the dialog box mentioned, got the two files and ran the script. poof, up came the broadcom wireless card.

      It is still much easier than the previous releases though still not a one-click simple install. Close to it and just requires reading a paragraph asking what driver you really want.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    4. Re:Wireless still doesn't work. by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Did you file a bug at launchpad.net ?

      You can complain on slashdot all you want but unless the guys that actually fix Ubuntu know then your whining is pointless.

    5. Re:Wireless still doesn't work. by pdusen · · Score: 1
  29. Awesome news! by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Fancy that... an open source team releases a product on time, as promised, and delivers the feature sets they promised.. meanwhile, the leading closed source competitor.....

    I'm really looking forward to upgrading my Linux box to this new release, but judging by the posts, I shall wait a few days for the downloads to die down.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Awesome news! by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Fancy that... an open source team releases a product on time, as promised, and delivers the feature sets they promised.. meanwhile, the leading closed source competitor.....

      I know you were trying to make a humorous point, but...

      Let me make some minor adjustments:

      Fancy that... an open source team releases a product on time, as promised, and delivers the feature sets they promised [regardless of the quality of the release].. meanwhile, the leading closed source competitor [usually waits until most of the pressing issues are taken care of, and usually face ridicule for the bugs still released].....

      So what was your point ;)?

      I use Ubuntu and I will wait and allow the early downloaders to report all the issues that haven't been ironed out yet before I update.

      I'm a bigger fan of we will mark it released when it's ready, than the let's release it on an arbitrary date that fits within our version numbering system.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    2. Re:Awesome news! by tjstork · · Score: 1

      I know you were trying to make a humorous point, but..

      And it was, just a joke. I'm not into the whole "Open Source and save the planet and trees" mindset. I like Linux because it is a cool operating system, nothing more than that. It's free, and that's cool. And, there's some stuff about Windows that I like too.

      --
      This is my sig.
    3. Re:Awesome news! by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      And it was, just a joke. I'm not into the whole "Open Source and save the planet and trees" mindset. I like Linux because it is a cool operating system, nothing more than that. It's free, and that's cool. And, there's some stuff about Windows that I like too.

      Cool. We're on the same wavelength.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    4. Re:Awesome news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fancy that... an open source team releases a product on time, as promised, and delivers the feature sets they promised [regardless of the quality of the release].. meanwhile, the leading closed source competitor [usually waits until most of the pressing issues are taken care of, and usually face ridicule for the bugs still released].....

      Sorry to say it what a dickwad. There was no reason to go after the one guy like that. And you have a serious chip on your shoulder if you can say that with a straight face after seeing Vista.

      The only reason Vista released when it did was so software assurance would not be tits up after 6 years. Who would want to go to there CFO and say "Hey, I know I got SA for 3 years, and we got jack for it. So we did another 3 because longhorn will be cheaper this way. So now, I am going to ask for 3 more yars so we can get Vista, even though it would have been cheaper to buy it retail than to have paid for SA 3 times."

      What kind of asshat could even take Microsoft seriously after Micorosft put Vista out in the state it was? They were fucking smart for getting rid of the BSOD early in the dev cycle.

  30. Hope they fixed the problems I have with the RC. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    I did a network update to the RC and my network stopped working. I have posted messaged on the forums and still no joy.
    I am using an Nforce4 motherboard so I would think that there might be a lot of cranky people out there if it isn't fixed.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  31. The world's most popular distribution? by repetty · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    >> it's the second LTS (Long Term Support) release of the world's most popular distro.

    The world's most popular distribution? No, that can't be right. I've never used it.

    1. Re:The world's most popular distribution? by asac · · Score: 1

      I never used Windows XP nor Vista. Still its probably the most popular OS. Welcome to the club of niche product users, I guess :)

    2. Re:The world's most popular distribution? by cptnapalm · · Score: 0

      That made me laugh. :)

    3. Re:The world's most popular distribution? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many library of congresses worth of people use Ubuntu? How many football fields the CDs Ubuntu has sent out could they cover?

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:The world's most popular distribution? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder how many library of congresses worth of people use Ubuntu? How many football fields the CDs Ubuntu has sent out could they cover? How many people are there in the library of congress at any one time? A hundred?
    5. Re:The world's most popular distribution? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      If this were a fark thread, you'd have started a cascade of *facepalm* macros just now.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  32. I upgraded by Blice · · Score: 4, Informative

    I upgraded from 7.10 to 8.04;

    I like the new compiz-fusion plugins it includes.
    Includes 3d windows for the cube (Where the windows stick off of the walls), this new "Shelf" plugin, that makes it able to shrink the size of windows to a thumbnail where you can dock them to the side of your desktop or wherever. They also have an "Error notification" plugin which is neat- Gives you an alert whenever any program has an error, and you can specify how serious an error has to be before it notifies you. The notification is just a little popup on your notification area.

    In the new Gnome, I really really like the new VNC client. It has a "bookmark" section to the side, and it has tabs. Tabs for VNC! I love it. The other really useful thing it has is a "VNC scanner", which scans computers on the domain for VNC ports to connect to, and gives you a nice list. Besides that, there isn't really much else great about the new Gnome- They try to keep things "simple" (A.K.A., not much customization to be done.)

    I've had a couple problems so far with Ubuntu 8.04, though. The first noticeable problem was that only one window on my desktop had a border. I.E, if I switched from one window to another, the window I switched to would lose it's border and title bar, and the new window would get borders and a title bar. I fixed this by installing Xgl, apparently I didn't have it.

    The other issue is these odd black dots.. They consist of maybe four pixels making a block. There's about 10 of them in a row on my screen, even when I do the cube and other things, they stay on top of everything. Even in my log in window. I have no idea what's causing it.

    And, finally, my sound isn't working now. But I see a lot of people are having this problem.

    Oh, and one more con- The "Unlock" button for network manager is really annoying. I'm not sure why it was needed, maybe someone can enlighten me?

    1. Re:I upgraded by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      With the black dots, are you sure you don't have some dead pixels?

      And the Unlock button is part of something called PolicyKit, a finer-grained permissions system to replace gksudo.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    2. Re:I upgraded by Blice · · Score: 1

      The dots blink when the screen is refreshing. Like, if I click they blink. If a movie is playing they blink off and on. When I do the cube they blink. etc.

      I guess I can live with PolicyKit. Having to just enter your password vs. having to push a button and then enter your password. I just hope they don't make it any more annoying than this- I don't want UAC for Linux...

    3. Re:I upgraded by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      I'm running on Gutsy Gibbon right now, but for some reason my Update Manager won't recognize that there's a new release available. What do you have to do to network upgrade?

    4. Re:I upgraded by Blice · · Score: 1
      Go into terminal and do

      sudo apt-get update And then...

      sudo upgrade-manager -c The -c argument says "Check for any and all updates".
      If that doesn't work, go to System > Administration > Software Sources; make sure your repositories are correct.
    5. Re:I upgraded by Blice · · Score: 1
      Sorry to double post, but I forgot one other thing you can do-

      sudo update-manager --devel -release
    6. Re:I upgraded by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      What should the repositories look like when correct? All I've ever done is add a few third-party repos, which I've temporarily disabled for the upgrade.

    7. Re:I upgraded by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... upgrade-manager -c seems to recognize the distro upgrade. Why doesn't starting through the GUI do that?

      Sorry for all the questions, I'm a Linux oldbie but an Ubuntu newbie.

    8. Re:I upgraded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the black dots, are you sure you don't have some dead pixels? Moreover, do you still see them when you look away from the screen?
    9. Re:I upgraded by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      The button will appear only after you read the release notes.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    10. Re:I upgraded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably to reduce strain on their servers. it will probably show up in the GUI after a couple days delay. this way casual users (the majority) won't see it there, but those who are power users will hit the commandline and force it to upgrade

    11. Re:I upgraded by quincunx55555 · · Score: 1

      Also, from first-hand experience, back up all your data and burn a CD of the new Ubuntu release. I will only upgrade Ubuntu from a fresh install from now on. The last time I attempted to upgrade from one major version to the next my machine was basically hosed. If something is going to totally mess up my computer, it's going to be me doing it with full intention!

    12. Re:I upgraded by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      That "Unlock" button replaces more annoying gksu dialog :) It is PolicyKit, which has been integrated within most of new distros. It replaces old sudo with extended, desktop oriented right management.

      I kinda like it.

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    13. Re:I upgraded by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Actually, I did the upgrade yesterday and it went over just fine. Took a damn long time, but now it runs like a dream.

      Looks nice, too.

  33. New Icon by somegeekynick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slashdot should start using Ubuntu's symbol instead of Debian's. Oh and, I'm downloading via the torrent right now.

    1. Re:New Icon by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Ubuntu is the most widely used linux distro on the planet and it seems like every second story on here about Linux involves Ubuntu. Show them a little love! Disclaimer: I am a happy Kubuntu user.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    2. Re:New Icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it shouldn't. Debian is still the foundation upon which Ubuntu and many other distributions are built. If Debian would cease to exist, it would greatly disrupt the development of many distributions, including Ubuntu. Also, Debian is still widely used on its own, especially on servers.

      For more information see Ubuntu and Debian

    3. Re:New Icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I somehow understood that you wanted the Debian logo to be replaced with the Ubuntu one in genral. But - of course - you meant that Ubuntu stories should have the Ubuntu logo instead of Debian logo, which is a reasonable request. So forget what I said in my previous comment :)

    4. Re:New Icon by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Slashdot should start using Ubuntu's symbol instead of Debian's.
      Oh, you'll burn in hell for that one, buddy. That, or you'll reincarnate as a heron, whichever you believe in.
      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
  34. Synergy users beware by bdigit · · Score: 2, Informative

    This bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/188226 causes synergy to sputter along unless its started under sudo or you recompiled your kernel with a different scheduler enabled.

    1. Re:Synergy users beware by ahecht · · Score: 1

      A fix for that bug was accepted about an hour ago, and should be included in the next build (8.04.1?)

    2. Re:Synergy users beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh. Daniel Hahler's writing is as bad as Google's translator.

      It seems the problem is that "nice" settings aren't passed on to children if the user is changed.

  35. Magnet URL is for i386 iso is below by Danathar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, the tracker is overloaded, but that's why we have DHT!

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:PKBGTUMADMQD7FXO7PLIZPGWQBLPRTEE

    1. Re:Magnet URL is for i386 iso is below by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

      *thanks*

    2. Re:Magnet URL is for i386 iso is below by PMBjornerud · · Score: 1

      Yes, the tracker is overloaded, but that's why we have DHT!

      magnet:?xt=urn:btih:PKBGTUMADMQD7FXO7PLIZPGWQBLPRTEE BitTorrent is so robust, it's a tank, it's a bunker, it's a mountain range.

      That's small enough to write down on a piece of paper and post at the local store.

      Hmm... Maybe I should do just that!
      --
      I lost my sig.
    3. Re:Magnet URL is for i386 iso is below by Danathar · · Score: 1

      If I were pirate bay I'd just move to a 100% DHT model. Don't even have links to torrents, just have the Magnet URI's.

  36. Very Impressed by Oxy+the+moron · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been running Hardy right up from Alpha 2 until the RC. It's a quality release. Only issue I've had so far is that the sound on my laptop (Vostro 1700, uses Intel HDA) is almost impossible to hear unless the sound is up all the way. I've read a few things to try and get it fixed, but that's not too high priority right now.

    The installation is clean, it did a fantastic job auto-detecting my 3D hardware and setting up Compiz on both laptop and desktop (Intel X3100 and GeForce FX5500 respectively), and it's easy enough for grandma to use.

    Kudos to the Ubuntu team.

    --

    Proudly supporting the Libertarian Party.

  37. So, KDE3 or KDE4? by Kimos · · Score: 1

    What are the risks or limitations of running KDE4?

    1. Re:So, KDE3 or KDE4? by arevos · · Score: 1

      KDE4 is essentially still a beta release. Expect instability, at least until they get 4.1 or even 4.2 out the door.

    2. Re:So, KDE3 or KDE4? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      You mean like the FireFox version included.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    3. Re:So, KDE3 or KDE4? by Kimos · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Firefox is beta, but is being released with Ubuntu LTS. How much worse is KDE4? Is it missing features, or just a bit unstable which is much more problematic for a window manager than for a web browser?

    4. Re:So, KDE3 or KDE4? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      The Firefox beta is mostly done, though, and ready for regular users. KDE 4.0 isn't really intended for normal use. The basic framework is done, but a fair amount of functionality that will be implemented at the application level probably won't be ready until 4.1. I've heard from a few people that KDE 4.0.3 is stable, but it may be missing some configuration options that currently exist in KDE 3.5.

    5. Re:So, KDE3 or KDE4? by JustinOpinion · · Score: 1

      From playing around with KDE4 (this was 2 months ago), I found that it is stable enough, but it is missing features and lacks some polish. KDE 3.5 is great because of the amazing customization, tons of solid applications, and other add-ons (e.g. panel items). But KDE4 doesn't have many widgets or panel items yet, and many of the customizations are not yet coded. There are not yet any KDE4-specific features or applications that are "must have" (that don't exist in KDE 3.5).

      I personally found it to be too primitive for constant use, although it was fun to play with. Luckily you can have KDE 3.5 and KDE4 installed side-by-side (and pick the one you want at login), so it's easy to keep it around and try it out every so often, without losing your KDE 3.5 environment.

      KDE4 has lots of neat ideas, and I'm still expecting great things from it... but for me it's not quite ready for prime time.

    6. Re:So, KDE3 or KDE4? by Bohabo · · Score: 1

      Firefox 3 beta 5 is practically a release candidate, the beta being generally more stable than the latest Firefox 2 stable release. KDE4 is pretty much for developers at this point. It has some cool new features, but it also has lots of bugs and design flaws, and isn't very usable yet.

    7. Re:So, KDE3 or KDE4? by Kimos · · Score: 1

      Luckily you can have KDE 3.5 and KDE4 installed side-by-side (and pick the one you want at login), so it's easy to keep it around and try it out every so often, without losing your KDE 3.5 environment. Ah! That's a sweet little bit of information. So would I install the standard KDE3 release of Kubuntu and then pull KDE4 from the repos?
    8. Re:So, KDE3 or KDE4? by JustinOpinion · · Score: 1
      The procedure I used was (on 7.10 - Gusty Gibbon):
      1. Edit /etc/apt/sources.list and add:

      deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/kubuntu-members-kde4/ubuntu gutsy main
      2. Install using:

      sudo apt-get install kde4-core

      Then I get the options during login. It's possible that things have changed now that 8.04 has been released. Obviously you would have to use "hardy" instead of "gutsy" in the above deb line. In fact, it's quite possible that in Hardy, the standard repositories already include "kde4-core". So, my best guess is that if you install a standard Kubuntu 8.04 (with KDE 3.5), and then do "sudo install kde4-core" you will then have the option between KDE 3.5 and KDE 4.0 at login.

      Hope that helps.
  38. wubi by johnwbyrd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some quick notes on wubi, since this is Slashdot and it's probably the neatest part of the new release. Wubi has existed for a while but this is the first ubuntu that includes it as part of the distro.

    Wubi permits you to install and dork around with ubuntu from within Windows. It has a comfy GUI front-end that creates a virtual partition within a Windows file, sets up the boot manager, downloads Ubuntu and installs it within the virtual partition. Ubuntu then boots and mounts the virtual partition within the Win32 file system. The installed Ubuntu can see the old Win32 file system and optionally read and write it. Windows sees the virtual partitions as a couple large files. And Wubi avoids making any partition changes to the target disk. All pretty cool actually, and significantly lowers the barriers to test-driving Ubuntu. See http://wubi-installer.org/ .

  39. WUBI, office Windows Ubuntu Installer by lazy-ninja · · Score: 1

    Easy dual-booting with no upsetting windows? Try Wubi. http://wubi-installer.org/ This is the official windows installer for Ubuntu 8.04. It is linked off the (now hard to reach) ubuntu download page. Ubuntu 8.04 supports NTFS read and write.

    1. Re:WUBI, office Windows Ubuntu Installer by windsurfer619 · · Score: 1

      Just be careful with Wubi. It's running a file system inside a file system, so hard reboots are a system killer.

  40. And the 64k question... by Raxxon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does it still have buggy sound support for the sound hardware on the eeePC? I was rather annoyed by it for the last beta release and I can't really see them having fixed it in such a short time which is sad as it otherwise ran quite well...

    1. Re:And the 64k question... by crimsun · · Score: 1

      ALSA as shipped in linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24 (aka lum) does not fully support that hardware, no. It certainly works with hg tip (alsa-{kernel,driver}). Look for something in linux-backports-modules-2.6.24 (lbm).

  41. Slashdot Effect crashed the server!!!!!! by Doug52392 · · Score: 1

    I got an HTTP 503 error ("Service Temporarily Unavailable"). Guess the Slashdot Effect strikes again!

    Btw I wasn't downloading it, I like my current Debian setup better :)

  42. Nvidia ... Is ... Hell by saudadelinux · · Score: 1

    1) to get nvidia to work for a GeForce 8600 GTS (and in my case TwinView, for two displays), you need to download a beta driver straight from nvidia, It's funny...but when I had my previous laptop, it had a lowly ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 w/64MB DDR (it was several years old before I was mugged and it was taken) but it NEVER froze up the machine ... EVER. Nvidia drivers on Ubuntu freeze the machine at any given time, for no reason at all. They're even troublesome under Windows. Once the new laptop reaches its EOL, I'll never buy anything with an Nvidia card again.
    --
    I didn't think the house band in Hell would play this badly.
    1. Re:Nvidia ... Is ... Hell by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Strange, I'm running a T61 with an nvs140m in it, with the beta nvidia drivers no less (though I ran the stable drivers for a long time), and it's solid as a rock. 2D performance is excellent (well, assuming you stick with the 171 driver), and 3D is top notch as well.

      Meanwhile, ATI has a history of creating incredibly shoddy drivers (there's a reason MythTV devs tell you to avoid them like the plague). Oh well, there's a reason the acronym YMMV came to being.

    2. Re:Nvidia ... Is ... Hell by Vendetta · · Score: 1

      My T60 has ATI video, and the drivers are HORRIBLE. I particularly like the "you can't click on anything but everything is still running you just can't do anything to it" bugs that I've seen on multpile ATI-based systems. Only fix seems to be the old ctrl-alt-backspace. I'll do my best in the future to ensure that none of my laptops, or the company I work for's laptops, have ATI adapters in them. Screw ATI and their shitty, shitty drivers.

    3. Re:Nvidia ... Is ... Hell by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      I have about 50 Ubuntu desktops in production. My experience has been the opposite. However, I only use the official drivers in the repos.

    4. Re:Nvidia ... Is ... Hell by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I've found older ATI cards like the 9000 series work really well in Linux, and the open source driver seems to support them well so you don't have to run to the ATI one. Probably one of the better solutions if you don't want to use a binary blob driver or one of Intel's integrated solutions.

  43. Hopefully they fixed all the RC bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I tried to install the latest RC maybe a week and a half ago... I couldn't

    For one, I couldn't install it at first. The GUI installer was coming up monochrome green, and you couldn't see half the buttons. That was after the first few attempts where X would fail to start period. It's not like I have new bleeding edge stuff I was trying to put it in, just an Athlon64 3200+, ATI 1300Pro, 500GB PATA w/windows XP, and a 160GB SATA where Ubuntu was *going* to go. Other distro's work and install fine (except one where GRUB was being a bitch, maybe because of the two different hard drives?)

  44. 4 Different DVD ISOs? by EmagGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On the tracker, I see four DVD ISOs each for x86 and x64 with the same name and different hashes, and slightly different sizes. Anyone know what gives?

    1. Re:4 Different DVD ISOs? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      two are alternate installs for x86/x64 and the other two are desktop installs for x86 and x64.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  45. Evolution and Exchange Server by timbck2 · · Score: 1

    As a side note (knowing full well that this isn't a support forum!), can anyone give me any hints on how to get Evolution working with an Exchange server on Kubuntu 8.04 beta?

    I put in my username (with domain) and OWA URL like so:

    FOO\First.Last
    https://webmail.blah.com/exchange

    then I click "Authenticate", enter my password, and I get an error dialog:

    "Evolution Error: Could not configure Exchange account because an unknown error occurred. Check the URL, username, and password, and try again."

    I know I typed the URL and my username and password correctly.

    I'm running Gnome 2.22.1 (Kubuntu 8.04 beta, "out of the box", with all current updates applied). Where does Evolution put its log files? Maybe I can find something useful there...

    --
    Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    1. Re:Evolution and Exchange Server by michaelwigle · · Score: 1

      I'm running Ubuntu 7.10 (downloading update as we speak). But here are my settings which work just fine:

      Username: mwigle
      OWA URL: http://cabexch1/exchange
      Auth type: Plaintext password

      The user name does not match my e-mail address. It's the user name I log into the domain with. Note also I don't include the domain info.

      Hope this is helpful.

    2. Re:Evolution and Exchange Server by timbck2 · · Score: 1

      The user name does not match my e-mail address. It's the user name I log into the domain with. Note also I don't include the domain info.

      Hope this is helpful. AFAIK, my username (on our Exchange domain, which is completely separate from the domain I log into otherwise) is the same as my email address (minus the @ and everything following).

      And in exchange-connector-setup-2.22, it doesn't show me the option to choose Auth type. Any clue why that is?
      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
  46. dl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can DL your favorite distro here : ftp://ftp.daupheus.com/UBUNTU/

  47. What's new in the server edition? by MK_CSGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What's new in the server edition? All the articles I've seen so far are desktop-centric.

  48. Question: by Pojut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone here with a D-Link wireless PCI card have any networking issues with this release? I know that when the previous one came out, I was having some issues getting Ubuntu to recognize my wireless card... WDA-2320, if I'm remembering correctly.

  49. Question is... by Crazyswedishguy · · Score: 1

    ...does it run Linux?

    --
    This space up for sale.
    1. Re:Question is... by qualidafial · · Score: 1

      ...does it run Linux? </headdesk>
    2. Re:Question is... by Crazyswedishguy · · Score: 1

      Did I just hear the loud "wooosh" of a joke flying over someone's head?

      --
      This space up for sale.
    3. Re:Question is... by qualidafial · · Score: 1

      Did I just hear the loud "wooosh" of a joke flying over someone's head? More like the whoosh of a baseball bat as I back your joke into the corner and beat it senseless.
    4. Re:Question is... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Yes, via KVM or Xen (among others)

  50. Has anyone tried a dist-upgrade? by octaene · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I see lots of replies about ISO mirrors and download sites, but has anyone tried to perform a distribution upgrade from 7.10 yet? Any news on that? I assumed I'd give that a shot maybe tomorrow when server loads aren't quite as busy...

    1. Re:Has anyone tried a dist-upgrade? by qualidafial · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe I'm doing something wrong but apt-get dist-upgrade on my server says there's nothing to upgrade. Maybe that's normal for a server without X installed.

    2. Re:Has anyone tried a dist-upgrade? by AlzaF · · Score: 2, Informative

      I did a dist-upgrade a few days ago and everything works fine apart from mucking up the screen resolution (everything looks so big). As it took 500+Mb to download, for the sake of an extra couple of hundred meg, you can download the ISO and have a CD for backup.

    3. Re:Has anyone tried a dist-upgrade? by isorox · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've just installed a 710 server through apt-cacher. It went fine. I then tried installing 300k of debs I'd not used before and it crawled. That was using gb.ubuntu

      I dont recommend it.

    4. Re:Has anyone tried a dist-upgrade? by AlzaF · · Score: 1

      When I upgraded Xubuntu, a kernel upgrade was performed so there should be some sort of upgrade?

    5. Re:Has anyone tried a dist-upgrade? by nahpets77 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I did it 3 days ago using adept as recommended:

      $ kdesu "adept_manager --dist-upgrade-devel"

      The upgrade completed without any problems

    6. Re:Has anyone tried a dist-upgrade? by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      You should not use apt-get dist-upgrade. Read the instructions for christ's sakes, esp. if you are running a server.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    7. Re:Has anyone tried a dist-upgrade? by qualidafial · · Score: 1

      You should not use apt-get dist-upgrade. Read the instructions for christ's sakes, esp. if you are running a server. From reading the apt-get man page I thought that dist-upgrade was used for upgrading to a new release. I see now that this is incorrect, thank you for clearing that up.
    8. Re:Has anyone tried a dist-upgrade? by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Sorry for being rude, it's just that I've seen too many users who don't do the obvious, to read the instructions.

      It is still possible to edit sources.list manually and to use dist-upgrade. But then one needs to manage problems manually, too. And those will occur just like they have always done, in any distro.
      The new Ubuntu-provided tools are set up for a specific upgrade path and "know" about common issues, and so they make it much easier.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  51. Any word on PS3 yet? by HiVizDiver · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This seems to indicate that it WON'T work, but that information is a month old. Anyone have a better experience?

    1. Re:Any word on PS3 yet? by HiVizDiver · · Score: 1

      Well, digging around, it sounds like it will install and MOSTLY work, but that there are some things that are still (or that were working and GOT) broken - like Bluetooth, for example. Pffft... what would you want Bluetooth to work on the PS3 for anyway? Oh right... the controller... ;-)

  52. IS there a configuration... by tjstork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That would, say, let me run ubuntu off of a live CD on a Windows machine but still be able store some stuff on the Windows machine? Like, if I have a company notebook, and I want to run Linux on the train, could I do that... without putting Linux on it?

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:IS there a configuration... by SeePage87 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, and there's two ways to do it.

      The first way would be to set up a persistent directory on your windows partition. I think that just amounts to a folder in c: or called casper-rw or something. You should look up "ubuntu persistence" on google to get better instruction

      The second method is new to Hardy, and it would involve using Wubi to install Ubuntu without formatting your drive or changing the partitions. My understanding is it creates a disk image file on your windows partition that ubuntu can boot from and save files, etc, to. I guess it's supposed to be just as good as regular install, with just a little less resilience to hard shutdowns. I'm not sure what it does to the bootloader, so you might want to look into that before your wreck anything

      I haven't done either, exactly, though I did do the first making a bootable pendrive with persistence. Hope that helps.

    2. Re:IS there a configuration... by AlzaF · · Score: 1

      You can run Ubuntu off the live CD and save files to the partition that contains XP. The XP partition will be stored in /media/sda1 or something similar, not c:\ or My documents.

    3. Re:IS there a configuration... by zoward · · Score: 1

      Not sure if this meets your needs or not, but Ubuntu 8.04 is fully capable of reading and writing to NTFS partitions, so you should be able to read to and write from your windows drive or partition.

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
  53. legality, legality... by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Uh, yeah, except that: isn't it kind of ILLEGAL to download copyrighted stuff via torrents?
    Is...was....err....was that a joke?

    That could be either a joke or someone who is just underinformed. Being as torrents get the most attention (in the mainstream, at least) for illegal traffic, it shouldn't surprise anyone to encounter people who actually believe that all torrent traffic is illegal.

    And of course, there are copyrights involved with Ubuntu Linux. However most of them are more than a little bit more permissive than those on "Enter Sandman".
    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  54. We also have a copy of the MD5SUMS if you need it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nooooooooooooooooooo!...

    Download the .iso from an unofficial source by all means, but please, for the love of all things unixy, check them against the official md5sums and not ones you get from the same source that you get the .iso or .torrent from. Official PGP signatures, would be even better.

    Disclaimer: By no means am I inferring anything about The Boston University Linux Users Group, whom I respect and trust just as much as anyone else I don't know and have never met.

  55. Re:We also have a copy of the MD5SUMS if you need by rmullen · · Score: 1

    This is very sound advice - our storage of the MD5SUMS is mostly for our own internal purposes when we start burning the images to disk. No need to trust us!

  56. I call bullshit! by mutube · · Score: 1

    2) to get sound to work you need to run a completely undocumented /etc/init.d/alsa-utils reset,
    It's not undocumented, the instructions are right here *

    * See point #2
  57. It locks up my laptop solid..... by stonewolf · · Score: 2, Informative

    I started testing 8.04 at alpha 3 and have tested every version since. I am sad to say that that every version I have tested locks up solid after 5 to 10 minutes. The bug has been filed and is being experience by quite a few people on a lot of different hardware.

    I have put 7.10 back on my laptop and I will not be updating to 8.04 until the lock up bug is reported as being fixed.

    Of course, it is working just fine on a lot of other hardware... So, do your self a favor and burn a live CD and test it for a few hours before you do the final upgrade and do a very careful and complete back up before you upgrade.

    This is the first time I have had *any* problems with stability of an Ubuntu release and I have been using it for several years now and I have tested a lot of alpha and beta releases. I hope this is the last time I have any trouble with an Ubuntu release.

    Stonewolf

    1. Re:It locks up my laptop solid..... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Then you need to run a full memtest on your RAM. Most lockup issues are purely hardware related, and about 90% seems to be RAM invovled, so check your RAM, then your CPU. Memtest86+ should do everything nicely for your RAM testing.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:It locks up my laptop solid..... by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Could you link to the bug and is it a video problem or what?

  58. Getting it done on time is not an FOSS attribute by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    Fancy that... an open source team releases a product on time, as promised, and delivers the feature sets they promised.. meanwhile, the leading closed source competitor.....

    When projects are on time they are usually either better defined and managed or features were dropped. Proprietary or open source has nothing to do with it.

    I've been on time with proprietary products. Agree on a set of features when starting, sort them with respect to importance, work only on that list in order. When the great new ideas pop up during development they go to the end of the list, even the company president's and the client's. If the client pushed we asked which agreed upon features would they like to drop or if they preferred the delivery date could be moved back. In other words changes have a cost. A year long development project with six programmers needed only 3 weeks of light overtime to deliver the agreed upon functionality on time. Well, mostly agreed upon, some things didn't work out as well as expected (Mr Design meet Mr Reality) and alternatives had to be used. There were regular deliverables during development so that quality control was in full swing for most of the development. The downside, if we were late we would have been missing the least important agreed upon features.

    Well, I suppose a pissed off client was another potential downside. Was the client a frustrated with the "changes have a cost" attitude? Yes, but only to a small degree since we explained why we were doing this and to do otherwise would put their very hard deadline at risk. In the end they viewed us as professional and honest.

    We started working on the great new ideas that went to the end of the list as soon as 1.0 shipped, while 2.0 was being discussed with the client. 2.0 would retain the same look and feel and was adding only new functionality. We finished the list two months later.

  59. Ubuntu Studio by De+Lemming · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone here experience with this one? I'd like to give it a try.

    Ubuntu Studio is "a multimedia creation flavor of Ubuntu." It includes applications for audio and video creation and for graphic work. It also has the Linux kernel optimized for low latency.

    http://ubuntustudio.org/
    Download (not accessible at the moment):
    http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/hardy/release
    Torrent mirror:
    MD5: http://mma.users.ubuntustudio.org/Hardy-Torrents/MD5SUMS
    i386: http://mma.users.ubuntustudio.org/Hardy-Torrents/ubuntustudio-8.04-alternate-i386.iso.torrent
    AMD64: http://mma.users.ubuntustudio.org/Hardy-Torrents/ubuntustudio-8.04-alternate-amd64.iso.torrent

    1. Re:Ubuntu Studio by servodave · · Score: 2, Informative

      I set this up on an older machine as a "free" alternative to $600 Adobe video suite. This was for someone at work who needed to do simple editing and converting. It works pretty well for him to scan in videos from a $28 firewire card and convert to a dv stream. It's a nice package, and the audio syths that come with it are a fun way to waste an hour or more.

      The theme is nice if you are into that look. Me, not so much, but the guy at work seems to enjoy bagging about how slick this looks. He also likes to tell everyone how easy it was for him to "setup". (By setup, he means change the default screen display font.)

      Whatever--the install was probably just about as easy as changing the font--Ubuntu found all the hardware on the stock dell machine. That's more than I can say for Windows on the same hardware. (Broadcom network.)

      I'm thrilled he has ditched Outlook and Internet Exploder for default browsing and is using Thunderbird to check his email on that computer. The Windows Vista machine officially issued to him is sitting there untouched for about three months in sleep mode. The clincher for him was after I installed the killer combination of: Automatix/Wine/Office 2003/IE6.0 (via IEs4Linux.)

      I've since burned a few copies of standard 7.10 desktop .ISO for people in the office. At least 2 of the DVD's I burned are confirmed to be installed by coworkers (or their kids) into "old" machines they had laying around their house. Keeping in mind that these "old junk" computers are nicer than my "new" one.

      On my setup at home, I did grab some of the video editing tools included in ubuntu studio (cinepaint and the nonlinear video editor that I'm too lazy to click on Applications right now to get the name of.) Along with the above mentioned killer combo, these are installed into Ubuntu 7.10 and work very well.

      Oh dear God--when did I become a Linux fanboy?

  60. Re: Hardy Heron - Kosher for Passover by SailorBob · · Score: 1

    Very appropriate Hardy Heron being released during the Holiday of Freedom. I can see Linus holding his staff and two tablets with Kernel source inscribed on them singing in a Charleton Heston voice to Bill Gates: "Let my people go!"

    --

    Woopty Doo Basil, what does it all mean?!

  61. Running it now by InlawBiker · · Score: 1
    As a matter of FYI, I downloaded burned and installed it in about 2 hours. :45 minutes of that has been tweaking my desktop, since the eye candy options have moved around some since 7.04 it took me some time to figure it out.

    No problems thus far.

  62. Kubuntu Hardy not LTS by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

    For all Kubuntu fans, the fine print is that the Kubuntu team very unfortunately decided to drop LTS status for Kubuntu 8.04. This really disappoints me, because KDE 4 is not really usable yet (OK, it sucks) and I was really looking forward to 3 years of LTS for the KDE 3.5 series, because KDE 4 looks like it may need that long to get as good as 3.5.x, if it ever does. This has me starting to look around for my next desktop environment. Xubuntu is the frontrunner at this point.

  63. NEW? by 800DeadCCs · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hell, I just upgraded to 7.04 last week.
    Seriously.

    (Box had been un-networked for 8 months).
    I'll wait a month or so; never install day 0... wait until a few more zeros are in the number.

    1. Re:NEW? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Why not 7.10 if you're really wanting to use something near-current?

    2. Re:NEW? by 800DeadCCs · · Score: 1

      You're right, it was 7.10...
      gods, you expect me to remember things from one minute to the next? ;)
      I've been disconnected for too long.

  64. I wonder by Clarious · · Score: 0

    If this version does a better jobs at power management, since gusty gibbon, It has reduced my battery life by 25% compare to Dapple Drake.

  65. Re:What will they call the next one? by Knuckles · · Score: 1
    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  66. Looks like people want it reaaaally bad... by dogganos · · Score: 1

    My utorrent over wine says: Upload speed: 19.3 MB/s... The interesting thing though, is that my server's disk utilization is pure zero! Looks like utorrent or the kernel has cached the whole image and serves it...

  67. Mirror list out of date by hmm_slashdot · · Score: 1

    The mirror list on ubuntu.com is out-of-date; some are down. Use the mirrors listed at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+cdmirrors -- they're checked hourly.

  68. Tip: amd64 version is also for 64-bit Intel CPUs by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 1
    I've seen some confusion due to the "amd64" naming and in order to get more fearless penguins marching to the 64-beat of Linux, here's the thing: the amd64 version is in fact meant for all 64-bit processors using the x86-64 instruction set. That includes practically all current mainstream processors from Intel.


    If you are a fearful penguin you can google ahead on how to deal with potential issues with some proprietary packages, but those issues are few and getting fewer as more users take the leap.

    Also be aware that upgrading an existing 32-bit install to amd64 requires a fresh install (although the most suicidal uptime freaks will find a way...). Old /home can still be reused as usual, unless you loaded it up with 32-bit binaries of course.

    May the .torrent be with you!

    --

    Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

  69. Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have downloaded and installed. Exploring the cool new features, and must say, I am impressed. Detailed report in a while! http://techwatch.reviewk.com/2008/04/ubuntu-hardy-heron-8-04-2/

  70. Release Announcement Server Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you're having trouble with the updater because archive.ubuntu.com is down, you'll want to use a mirror.

    Found no way of changing this nicely, so I added this line to my /etc/hosts file:

    194.169.254.10 archive.ubuntu.com

    That's for gb.ubuntu.com, you might want to make it local.

    Good luck.

  71. wait a little by nguy · · Score: 1

    Generally, Hairy... I mean Hardy Heron seems like a good release. There are two issues I have come across...

    First, a couple of packages messed up the upgrade, so I ended up doing a fresh install.

    Second, Firefox 3 Beta has been an issue for me because some of the extensions I need haven't yet been upgraded.

  72. Me. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    I updated the machines I really want to be ready some two days ago, and I won't touch apt-get for probably another two days.

    So in the meantime, I'm actually getting some work done!

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Me. by compro01 · · Score: 1

      So in the meantime, I'm actually getting some work done! liar.
      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:Me. by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Getting some work done... on Slashdot?

  73. Dual-bootery and disk space by Schwartzboy · · Score: 1

    My work PC doesn't have a torrent client so I'm forced to wait until I head home for the evening, but what kind of disk space requirements are we looking at for Ubuntu? I noticed in the linked article that it can be uninstalled from the Windows add/remove tool, which looks cute, and of course on my 1/2 terabyte primary hard drive on the home desktop it's no problem at all. But for my laptop, which is rocking a mere 80 gigs and has much work-related stuff on it, how much pr0n must I delete if I want to revel in dual-booting goodness?

    --
    "Linux doesn't exist. Everyone knows Linux is an unlicensed version of Unix"- Kieren O'Shaughnessy
    1. Re:Dual-bootery and disk space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure of Ubuntu's exact requirements, but generally for Linux I like 10G to be comfortable (i.e. have plenty of room for all the software I might possibly want to try out), but you'll probably be okay with half that.

  74. Rhythmbox; Exaile by SEMW · · Score: 1

    The native Gnome music organiser is Rhythmbox. If you do literally want a GTK Amarok clone, there's one called Exaile (currently beta).

    --
    What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    1. Re:Rhythmbox; Exaile by kaens · · Score: 1

      Exaile looks pretty decent, I'll reccomend it to the few people I know that use Gnome, don't like Rhythmbox, and don't like mixing KDE and Gnome apps for some reason.

      (plus it's written in python, which means the bar for adding / changing functionality in it is a bit lower)

  75. another mirror of torrents and MD5 - .iso coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://davang.org/ubuntu

  76. Re:Torrent-only mirror - another one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all the *ubuntu torrents and respective MD5s
    http://davang.org/ubuntu

  77. Perfect timing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is perfect timing. I accidentally wiped my Linux partition last night.

  78. I did to escape Virus, Spyware, Malware hell by bsharma · · Score: 1

    Enough of Anti-virals, Spyware removers etc.,

  79. Restarting X: you lose your unsaved work anyway... by SEMW · · Score: 1

    The worst problem I've ever had was X locking up, and I can X and restart it without rebooting. I'd be a bit wary about trumpeting that as an advantage. By far the biggest reason that people don't like it when the computer crashes and they have to reboot is that they lose all unsaved work. And proclaiming that, "If X crashes you can restart it independently without restarting the computer!"; only to have to later (probably after the user installed the horrible ati binary drivers that Ubuntu bugs you to get) sheepishly explain that, actually, yes, all their applications will be killed when they restart X and they have lost their unsaved work, may be a bit embarrasing.
    --
    What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
  80. And the Next Release Name is..... by gral · · Score: 1

    "inebriated iguana"

    --
    Scott Carr
    1. Re:And the Next Release Name is..... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Incontinent Ibex

  81. XP's supported until 2014. by SEMW · · Score: 1

    The easy answer these days: Microsoft is EOLing XP The "EOL" of XP means that they're not selling it any more. No-one's going to switch OSes because their current one isn't being actively sold; if they're running it, they already have a licence. If it wasn't being supported any more, that would be different; but it's still actively supported (they've just released SP3), and will be until 2014. So if there are any people still using XP come 2014, you can use its lack of support to try and convert them over to Ubuntu 14.04 Terrific Tyrannosaurus...
    --
    What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    1. Re:XP's supported until 2014. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      The "EOL" of XP means that they're not selling it any more. No-one's going to switch OSes because their current one isn't being actively sold; if they're running it, they already have a licence.

      But at that point, you're living on borrowed time. If you have to replaced a broken laptop, you'll be getting Vista unless you work someplace with an IT department that will upgrade you to XP. Microsoft has recently demonstrated that they're more than happy to pull the plug on their products, too. Are you that confident they won't turn off the activation servers for XP any time soon?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  82. No problems for me. by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

    Odd. I have an HP nx7400 which has successfully run 6.06, 7.04, and 7.10, in both 32 bit and 64 bit flavors. Never had a problem with the wireless, and it has always worked out of the box. That's an Intel chipset though, which makes it easier. Network Manager worked fine. I've also installed it on other laptops here at work, all of which are Dell or HP, and haven't run into problems.


    When I've done this on Broadcom-based wireless, I've only ever had to click the little thing that says "Use this restricted driver?" or whatever. A few seconds later and wireless is ready.

    In all installs, the only problem I have ever had out of the box was widescreen Intel video chipsets. For some reason, they sometimes don't work until you run a utility called 915resolution which patches the video bios to widescreen resolutions (in my case, 1680x1050). However, I tried the 8.04 beta about a week ago on another HP machine identical to my own and it actually worked at the correct resolution, so I didn't have to screw around with it.

    When I say everything else works out of the box, I mean it -- at least since 7.04. On every machine I've thrown at it, everything has worked flawlessly. Video with 3D acceleration on ATI, nvidia, and Intel (though I have not tried this on the 8000 series nvidia cards), sound, wireless, Bluetooth (which I don't use, but it works), the whole bit.

    I've never had that happen under Windows -- it's always a game of visiting individual manufacturer's sites to find fiddly little drivers which install a bunch of useless garbage alongside themselves, just to get something like the ethernet controller working. Absolutely idiotic. I dread Windows installs these days.

    When I started typing this post, I also started the x86 desktop install of 8.04 on a Dell 600m. It's already done installing (took about fifteen minutes) and everything is already working, except that Broadcom chip but... I just clicked the Restricted Driver thing and now I'm wireless.

    Why anyone suffers through Windows nonsense anymore is truly beyond me.

    --
    mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
  83. Tip for upgrading unusual X setups by SEMW · · Score: 2, Informative

    One tip: if you use any kind of even slightly unusual X setup (such as dual monitors with Xinerama), back up your old xorg.conf and generate a fresh one with "sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg" before you upgrade. When you've upgraded, use new X.org 7.3 tools like xrandr to do whatever it is you're aiming for.

    --
    What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    1. Re:Tip for upgrading unusual X setups by Kelz · · Score: 1

      Would having dual monitors cause the live CD not to work with ubuntu? I had to install it through the alt CD, and had to completely reconfigure X, and now GTK won't start up.

    2. Re:Tip for upgrading unusual X setups by SEMW · · Score: 1

      I had to install it through the alt CD, and had to completely reconfigure X, and now GTK won't start up. If you mean you can't get past the login screen, I've had that happen before: quick fix -- at the login screen, press ctrl+alt+F1, and login at the text prompt; then type "sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg". Then press ctrl+alt+F7 and you should be able to login. Then take a few years to track down whoever invented xorg.conf and shout at them.
      --
      What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
  84. Tracker keeps falling down... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    Of course the tracker keeps falling over. I keep going from a few thousand seeders and leechers to a few hundred and back. I am seeding like crazy, however.

  85. Re:No, Hairy Hadron. BETTER THAN BEING PLASTIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll say 1 thing in favor of geeks/nerds: @ least they're not total f'ing fakes, & actually KNOW SOMETHING OF WORTH (that makes them employeable anywhere, & actually DOING production work vs. b.s meetings & such (mgt. = overpaid babysitters)). The "beautiful people" are some of the BIGGEST F'ING SCUM I've ever met in my life, & largely are scumbags, thieves, & heartless + classless trash. I personally don't judge folks by the width of their wallets, but rather that of their hearts & honesty/class. I don't know about you.

  86. Re:Differences between last week's Release Candida by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    Lots of bug fixes, including the partition editor. I could not install on 2 systems with the RC, but could on a daily point build.

  87. Wubi! by PastaAnta · · Score: 2, Funny

    "There is a new installation option for Windows users. Wubi allows users to install and uninstall Ubuntu like any other Windows application."

    So now I can install Ubuntu with Wine?

    1. Re:Wubi! by pablomme · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was thinking of trying that, it's a good test for wine. I know it's gonna crash on me (even cygwin breaks under wine), but hey, other people play solitaire, I try dumb things out.

      --
      The state you are in while your HEAD is detached... - wait, what?
  88. My First Look by madhusudancs · · Score: 1

    This is my first look at Hardy Heron. You can go through this and leave your comments. http://madhusudancs.info/hardy-firstlook

  89. Ever heard of 'self deprecating humor?' by spun · · Score: 1

    I judge people based on whether or not they get their panties in a knot when someone tells an obviously self-deprecating joke.

    You fail.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Ever heard of 'self deprecating humor?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't mess with the GP poster! He/she/it uses '1' for 'one', '@' for 'at, '&' for 'and'... how much more evidence do you need that you're messing with someone TOTALLY ELITE?!?!? Do you want to get hacked?

    2. Re:Ever heard of 'self deprecating humor?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny part is actually your statement. You're probably one of those stupid, & fake-it-till-you-make-it "plastic people", since you surely sound it.

      You know. The ones who have ADD & demand "brevity" in email (sure, makes sense when the most they know is evident that they bear 10 below plantlife intellectual quotient scores).

      With that type you can't put up technical acronyms even or detail that's required, since they're too unqualified and ignorant to even begin to grasp it. Exceed a 10 word email letter reply and that manager/pointy haired boss type of dolt many times actually gets confused, since he has never even done the job himself. Hard to believe? It's not. There are a lot of "managers" out there that know jack shit, and especially in the computer sciences related fields.

      In fact, it is very funny seeing the "Deer in the headlights" look they get if you use acronyms or technical details to support points you use. You expose that lame ignorance of theirs, via writing an email that's longer than 10 words, and you upset their limited intelligence and also their lack of know how in this art and science and well as expose them as unqualified and undereducated frauds.

      The fact there is so much management out there that haven't even done the jobs of their subordinates astounds myself and many others that actually work in this field. In essence, what the hell are people who have not even installed an Operating System doing running those that handle that puny chore/task and tons more every day, that actually is useful and helpful.

      Much moreso than bullcrap meetings, by the masters of the art of backstabbing politics and horseshit. I agree that many are fakes and slime and have to add that most are about as intelligent as a head of lettuce. Must be nice to get a good paying job with a lame degree like business administration, but then again, being pals with the owser or his kids helps now, doesn't it? Unbelievable.

  90. My Kubuntu upgrade went without a hitch by Krischi · · Score: 1

    On my laptop with an NVidia Geforce 8600M GT, the upgrade from Kubuntu 7.10 to 8.04 went without a hitch. Everything worked out of the box.

    Of course, YMMV.

  91. not troll by gobbo · · Score: 1

    The desktop 386 iso at that site checks out using an md5 from an official mirror.

  92. A few reasons. by crhylove · · Score: 1

    There are a few reasons why Ubuntu is pretty great. First it is Free as in beer. Second it is a living, thriving software project, and probably always will be, because it is free as in Open Source. There is virtually no EOL on a big open source project like this. Beyond those reasons are:

    Open Office
    Firefox
    Pidgin
    Brasero
    Compiz
    Mupen+
    TVtime

    I recommend trying it out on a second machine, or installing it via wubi.

    Much Love

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  93. Woot! by Crazyswedishguy · · Score: 0

    2008 - Year of the Linux Desktop!

    --
    This space up for sale.
  94. sweet! new ubuntu! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its about damn time!

    im updating now...

  95. ^_^ by theaceoffire · · Score: 1

    Took me a second, but here is the link to donate:
    Donate to Ubuntu

    --
    I steal signatures. This one used to be yours.
  96. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Parent post is brilliant. MOD UP!

  97. If you own a laptop, wait for 8.10... by javabandit · · Score: 1

    If you are a desktop user who is using wired networking or *very light* wireless on a very popular card -- just uninstall Firefox 3 (how the fuck do they go out with a buggy, unstable, can't print version of Firefox) and replace it with Firefox 2 -- then you're fine.

    However, if you are a laptop user who wants to use wireless (say on a corporate or university laptop) -- forget it. I own two laptops with popular internal wireless chipsets (one Dell and one IBM), and neither run properly in WPA(2) with PEAP in various combos (TKIP, GTC, etc). This is a complete showstopper.

    NetworkManager is completely broke. So you end up having to try wicd. If wicd doesn't work, then you are stuck running wpa_supplicant from init.d or ifup/down scripts. And at that point, you'll probably realize that the wext driver isn't good enough and then have to resort to ndiswrapper -- and that probably won't work, either. TERRIBLE. Welp... there goes all of your laptop users.

    From what I've read, supposedly these things (buggy wext driver, broken NetworkManager) are going to be worked out in the 8.10 timeframe.

    Desktop users download and rejoice -- laptop users (who use more than brain-dead WEP), stick with your XP installs until later.

    1. Re:If you own a laptop, wait for 8.10... by reaktor · · Score: 1

      I'm using WPA2 personal in Linux. The problem is the chipset of your wifi card. Ralink and Intel work great. Others, not so much.

    2. Re:If you own a laptop, wait for 8.10... by flayzernax · · Score: 1

      I just spent a few hours trying to get wifi to work. It worked fine under xubuntu gutsy... Its borked in Hardy... ndiswrapper "seems" to load the driver... it see's the device... the wifi config utilities see it... It connected once, I installed the resticted nvidia drivers, and it never connected again... even after removing and reinstalling the driver usin a 2wire usb card... I think theres issues with the compatability between the kernel modules and the ndiswrapper-common and utils packages they shipped. Also i think those issues exacerabate any bugs with the configuration software... A nother nifty thing is if I unplug the USB wireless card while its in use by NDISwrapper it hardcrashes the system, blinking lights on the keyboard and every thing fun stuff, stick with gutsy till they sort it out and release 8.05 Since ndiswrapper and wifi is so integral to many users these days, i never would have shipped it in this state personally. BTW you have to even install the ndiswrapper utils off of the cd, and the cd isnt a repository by default... DESKTOP IDIOT USER FRIENDLY MY ASS

    3. Re:If you own a laptop, wait for 8.10... by javabandit · · Score: 1

      WPA Personal is the key there. That's easy, brain-dead WPA.

      In a corporate or university environment, they'll run WPA Enterprise which includes PEAP and some other layer of authentication and key exchange.

      That's where it gets borked all to hell.

  98. Does it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...run WOW out of the box? ...work with my Brother and Canon printers? ...make at least easier to set these up?

    Honestly, I love the look and feel of Ubuntu, but my productivity (and non-productivity) goes static whenever I want to use it for these things.

    Hate XP all you want, but at least it works. /whine (or is that WINE?)

  99. Give it a couple of days by caller9 · · Score: 1

    I installed earlier today apparently right before the deluge of downloads. Not fast enough however to get in before their repository servers started getting nailed.

    If you get it now, it runs fine, installed fine, looks kinda cool, but you will have a long wait trying to install anything beyond default packages. For instance I needed to use a Java app so I started to install the super easy Sun Java 6 installer. Super easy, but the server is dying so I ended up reading over half of the Storm worm infiltration PDF before it was done.

    Other than that, it's worth the upgrade, just trying to warn about the repository servers getting slammed in the face...which is almost a good thing if it indicates the size of the user base on this go round. Bad that it wasn't load balanced better. Then again, why build a stadium to host a game twice a year. Not sure how I feel about that one. Need to beef 'em up eventually if they grow as fast as they hope they will.

  100. new install by spandex_panda · · Score: 1
    I installed a couple of days ago, and everything worked out of the box! samsung printer, belkin wireless card, installed nvidia drivers with no worries, defaulted to 1680x1050 resolution, everything was great. But... the belkin (rt73) drivers seem to be buggy and make the comp slow down really bad, crawl... so I installed the good old serial monkey drivers and everything is good now!

    Ubuntu is great, they take bleeding edge debian software and bang it together so it doesn't hurt too much, my only problems are sound stopping inexplicably (ctrl alt backspace fixes this) and strangely nvidia drivers wont let me set the right refresh rate for my monitor when I enable tv-out, which means I am swapping between 2 xorg.conf's to watch movies on the telly or run smooth lcd monitor.

    I am doing assignments though, running matlab, open office, gimp, firefox 3 and everything very nicely! Everyone should try it, and if you have any doubts or fears use http://wubi-installer.org/ to install from WITHIN windows!

    --
    like phosphorescent desert buttons singing one familiar song
  101. Yay..... by repvik · · Score: 1

    Xen networking is completely broken in Hardy Heron. Joy ;)
    https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/218126

  102. Re:Ever heard of 'self deprecating humor?' SILENCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SILENCE, plastic man

  103. it's good! by drwho · · Score: 1

    I downloaded xubuntu-alternate via bittorrent (finding a site which had a working seed was a problem...finally found it in the UK). After burning the CD, I booted up and installed over my old (broken) 7.10. It seemed to take a long time to install. Even with 784mb of ram 9I know it's not huge these dats0 on my Celeron M @ 1.7ghz, it seemed to be spinning its wheels a lot..times when there was no disk access (either cd or hd). I remember it took a particularly long time configuring the modules. I also had a problem getting DHCP info from my AP, but that very well could be the retarded dhcp servers that many of these APs use. after giving myself a static ip, it went just fine.

    I had been worried that I'd have to do wierd tinkering to get the uncommon screen dimensions on my dell Inspiron 700m to work properly. But no, it worked right from the start.

    Let me say that it's quite fast! snappy browser and desktop performance, much better than my older ubuntu 7.x and much faster than windows XP on the same system. That's even before I move from the generic kernel to a 686 one.

    now, let me see how well everything else works.

  104. slow repositories? by drwho · · Score: 1

    Some wierd stuff...web browsing seems to work fine, but when trying to get stuff from the repository...it seems to lag. Not dns, as that lookup completes pretty fast, and once the connection starts it seems to go well, but there's a lag. I tries switching from US to CA servers to see if that would help, it didn't. Are other people seeing this? Is this just load because of the new release? I am wondering if they've got dns lookup turned on for connecting clients on their servers, because that's the only time I've seen this behavior.

    1. Re:slow repositories? by slider2800 · · Score: 1

      Yea. I installed Xubuntu yesterday in the evening and started installing my favorite stuff via synaptic. Hell, i enabled all the repos and did a package-list update ... and i was like WTF? ... its lagging extremely. I had the Hungarian servers by default, checked the US and the UK servers, but the same lag. I don't know, it could be because of the load. I mean, a lot of people were eager to get 8.04 as soon as it comes out. (including me) and a lot of them start apt-getting stuff after they put the system on their machines. Maybe the lag will decrease with time. I'll check it again after i get home from work.

      --
      return $sig;
  105. Linux Format by goldaryn · · Score: 1

    > Linux Format

    Yeah, that's always been my answer, too.

  106. To whoever modded that "Troll" instead of "Funny" by DrYak · · Score: 1

    *WOOOSH*

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  107. Re:Ever heard of 'self deprecating humor?' SILENCE by spun · · Score: 1

    Oh man, I'm so offended, a whiny AC thinks I'm PLASTIC. Well YOU are totally DUCTILE, you dork.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  108. this is linux season by abhitux · · Score: 1

    this May linux force is coming ...fedora 9 and ubuntu 8.04 !!! wat more can a linux fan ask for ??! !!

  109. Re:Ever heard of 'self deprecating humor?' SILENCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will both of you stop before you get bent out of shape?

  110. for spanish-speaking users by voodoosws · · Score: 1

    for spanish-speaking users who want instructions for upgrading to Ubuntu 8.04, leaving a link here http://fabianperez.blogspot.com/2008/04/actualizar-ubuntu-804-lts-hardy-heron.html

  111. U8.04 breaks VMWare.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...both Player and Server spits the dummy when you try and install. Bad news....

  112. How does 1000 US$ sound? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Add the price of all the software you have to buy for Windows to make it functional and safe.

    I bet $1000 is not terribly off the mark.

    Oh yeah, and then there is the freedom of your data, which becomes yours again.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  113. I'm liking it! by mvanes · · Score: 1

    I have just got finished making the update, I have to say, I'm impressed. I reckon I'm going to enjoy the new apps that they've included, I also like how they've made a point of emphasizing the Avahi protocol. I'm also really liking the new audio configuration panel. The interface is much more enjoyable too. Cooler default wallpaper and boot-options/screen. The transition to Brasero and FF v.3 - seem commendable. Even though I had to no problems with Serp'. I guess I'll have to give Brasero a go. :)

  114. My experience; second try at Linux by MeditationSensation · · Score: 1

    My experience as someone who ran Ubuntu full time for a few months in 2006, and then gave up on it. I'm trying it again on a small partition, dual-booting with XP.

    Problems I noticed:

    * Fonts still look terrible by default. I had to install MS core fonts, clear the font cache (or login/logout), and then change the anti-aliasing method to get them to look as good as in Windows.
    * The idea of shipping with Firefox beta was questionable. I notice things that are broken in it compared to FF 2.x, like the Set Image as Background feature
    * Sound volume seems extremely loud by default for me, which is bad because of the startup sound
    * There should be a list of Compiz keyboard shortcuts. Clicking the Help button on the visual effects page in the system prefs does nothing
    * There should be more advice on partition resizing. I found that if I didn't defrag my NTFS partition before resizing, it took a heck of a long time.
    * A minor thing, but the maximized button icon in GNOME seems "odd" to me, it isn't easy to recognize that the window is maximized for some reason.

    That said, it does feel faster than XP, and it's certainly a lot prettier (except for the fonts issue).