The majority of Macs since 2006 have 64-bit CPUs. Apple doesn't allow some of them to boot into 64-bit mode, but I'm guessing recent versions of OSX have probably eliminated this.
The only thing private industry is efficient at is maximizing profit which implicitly involves exploitation and cost-cutting. If government didn't work at all, the country would be in shambles. Overall, the government works fairly well, and is accountable to the populace. Private industry is only accountable to their shareholders, whose motives are always just "more profit". There are actually a lot of people in government who have the peoples' interests at heart, believe it or not.
That's somehow different than the money you send overseas every single day when you and your materialistic ilk buy cheap imports from China at Walmart?
You didn't even know about said phishing campaign until now, and only because the NSA told you so, but you're confident that you know all the effects and whether or not they were successful.
What's the point of them selling servers? Apple's MO is quality, consumer-facing hardware and software, not a race to the bottom to make IT managers happy.
Slashdot Mirror
She leaked because she's insane, not patriotic.
The problem is that her jury will not get to hear both arguments.
How does dismantling NN protect access to the internet?
"Make", possibly not. "Influence", definitely.
The majority of Macs since 2006 have 64-bit CPUs. Apple doesn't allow some of them to boot into 64-bit mode, but I'm guessing recent versions of OSX have probably eliminated this.
If all of us would stop electing officials who don't mind paying $1.5 trillion for F35s when maybe we could make college free for everyone.
The only thing private industry is efficient at is maximizing profit which implicitly involves exploitation and cost-cutting. If government didn't work at all, the country would be in shambles. Overall, the government works fairly well, and is accountable to the populace. Private industry is only accountable to their shareholders, whose motives are always just "more profit". There are actually a lot of people in government who have the peoples' interests at heart, believe it or not.
How does that address the patent issue?
Or you could just grow up and act professionally at work.
Nothing?
What is the problem with allowing people to make money?
Because people are greedy corruptible pieces of shit.
And they pass the cost of insurance onto the customers, so it's really a free ride for them.
IMO insanity is caring more about who poops in the stall next to you than human dignity.
That's somehow different than the money you send overseas every single day when you and your materialistic ilk buy cheap imports from China at Walmart?
I suspect it's more like nibbling a tiny Cheeto.
You didn't even know about said phishing campaign until now, and only because the NSA told you so, but you're confident that you know all the effects and whether or not they were successful.
I don't see the name Hillary mentioned anywhere.
I would consider Trump a catastrophe.
Which applicants, exactly, are those?
What's the point of them selling servers? Apple's MO is quality, consumer-facing hardware and software, not a race to the bottom to make IT managers happy.
Everything since the Apple IIe is just bloat. The question is which bloat is useful and which is not.
By "most" you mean you. If that's really what the bulk of their customer base wanted they wouldn't sell oodles of them like they do.
Be a good little sheep and don't rock the boat.
Or shovels into Boeing's coffers
And offer to sell you some water for $1000
Perhaps if we had started taxing software in the 80s we wouldn't be in the wealth distribution predicament we are in.