It's all about control. It has nothing to do with money really -- it's about power. And since MS doesnt control Firefox they want nothing to do with it.
I'm not talking about just drunk. I am talking about being so drunk that you can't tell the other person involved is also that drunk. I just cant imagine being that drunk and still being able to do ANYTHING, let alone have sex. Thus, you probably weren't that drunk and were taking advantage of the other person. Like I said, it may be possible, but I find it all highly dubious.
But what about cases where both individuals were drunk but it's somehow the man's fault because the woman was too drunk to say no?
I find it hard to believe that any man could be so drunk that he is still sexual functional while being totally unaware that the woman is not "with it" enough to consent. I'm not saying it's impossible, but you wouldnt want me on your jury.
It was my understanding from the article that the technology was patented by the company he worked for, but licensed super-cheap to the big boys. Stupid stupid stupid.
The Solution:
Rather than bottling up the frustration with technology and entering into "techno-frustration denial," we propose to let the user vent in safe, controlled, and vicarious ways.
I think a better solution would be to throw angry people into a pit and let them bludgeon each other to death with computer parts. Sort of like ThunderDome but with keyboards and mice instead of chainsaws and giant hammers...
At a company I used to work for, there were several instances of stuff being stolen, and in all cases it was the janitorial staff. I think the stereotype is justified.
Slashdot Mirror
You mean all this time I've been watching Friends because I really don't have friends in real life?
Can you pay the outrageous bills with virtual money?
It's all about control. It has nothing to do with money really -- it's about power. And since MS doesnt control Firefox they want nothing to do with it.
China's implementation of Broccoli With Beef is pretty cool too.
This will morph into some sort of Low-Carb Cannibalism Diet when they really run out of food...
I'm sure hanging around other chickenshit anonymous cowards is much more interesting...
I'm not talking about just drunk. I am talking about being so drunk that you can't tell the other person involved is also that drunk. I just cant imagine being that drunk and still being able to do ANYTHING, let alone have sex. Thus, you probably weren't that drunk and were taking advantage of the other person. Like I said, it may be possible, but I find it all highly dubious.
but not see around one
Speak for yourself.
It'll cover the drugs and hookers, that's for sure.
And equivalent to Rosie O'Donnell's post-Xmas scale reading.
But what about cases where both individuals were drunk but it's somehow the man's fault because the woman was too drunk to say no?
I find it hard to believe that any man could be so drunk that he is still sexual functional while being totally unaware that the woman is not "with it" enough to consent. I'm not saying it's impossible, but you wouldnt want me on your jury.
It was my understanding from the article that the technology was patented by the company he worked for, but licensed super-cheap to the big boys. Stupid stupid stupid.
I've seen free software that isn't open source. I agree.
Let off some steam!
Soylent Brown-With-A-Slight-Hint-Of-Opalescent is flies! FLIES!
What a waste of beer. Is free unlimited clean energy really worth the price??
But replace "The Machines" with "The Roombas"
What about snowboards?
Xbox cannot be given. Xbox must be earned.
The Solution: Rather than bottling up the frustration with technology and entering into "techno-frustration denial," we propose to let the user vent in safe, controlled, and vicarious ways.
I think a better solution would be to throw angry people into a pit and let them bludgeon each other to death with computer parts. Sort of like ThunderDome but with keyboards and mice instead of chainsaws and giant hammers...
It's more like 1/2 if you ask me. Either it will hit us, or it won't.
It also means that 6.2% of Americans aren't getting gouged or ripped-off by the telcos.
One of the side effects of the treatment is shriveled genitals, so I don't think it will be a problem.
At a company I used to work for, there were several instances of stuff being stolen, and in all cases it was the janitorial staff. I think the stereotype is justified.
That must be why there are so few people in prison.