More directly (without induction): if T = 2^(2p+1) + 1: T = 2^(2p+1) - 2 [mod 3] T = 2(2^2p - 1) [3] T = 2(4^p - 1) [3] T = 2(1^p - 1) [3] T = 0 [3] qed
caveat Paypal means "let Paypal be wary". What you were probably looking for is caveatis Paypal(um) Or, more likely, cave Paypal (as in cave canem, beware the dog) Subjonctive is used in place of imperative for the third person.
Like the subject says, could carelessness in encryption have been a non factor even a couple years ago? Does the raw processing power on the average desktop make it that much easier to exploit a mistake or break weak encryption? From my crypto teacher: "you can break css on a wristwatch". The processing power of today's machine is not always a factor.
Also, I recently received a zipped executable named TextDocument.zip from a gmail account. I wonder, have spammers already started using Gmail? Or perhaps a virus impersonating the address? Gmail doesn't allow executables, even inside zip files. So I guess it was spoofed (and it definitely was a virus, spammers only send ads)
Google itself has the feature What? Google doesn't offer partial word search (it would be WAY too expensive!), although it indeed has a "spell-checking" feature.
The courts, however, might rule that one cannot patent things such as this-- there's little-to-no qualitative difference between folks patenting this and me patenting a method for a DDOS or patenting a method used in a computer virus. Depending on the judge, they may be in for a surprise if their patent goes to court. The difference, in this case, would be that the patent is worth going to court for (which means someone else is officially interested in the technology)
I remember thinking "If you mess this up, it'll be your last mistake" I don't know how it was for you, but when I was in the army, I also throwed a hand grenade (offensive, i.e. not much more than a loud "bang", defensive is nasty), I was in some sort of small concrete shelter, of which I could jump out in case I made a "mistake". Outside of war, the army is paranoid with safety (N.B. this was not the US army, YMMV of course)
Same great compression, but when you encode video with it, all the actors end up wearing kilts, speaking with incomprehensible accents and getting into bar fights. And then alien blancmanges can win Wimbledon! Mwahahahahahahahaha!
Not to mention, you can't lend your card to anyone anymore (my mother sometimes lent me her card to go buy something, she just gave me the secret code). Although of course here in the US you almost always have to sign...
to produceth I highly doubt this is correct grammar, even in old english. He is omnicient, which means "All Powerfull" Omniscient means "all knowing", not "all powerful" (that would be omnipotent). Of course He is said to be both...
I think you missed the part, where it pulls your relative location off of the tower you're using. This may speed up the search, but doesn't really change anything about the sheer amount of data (and the difficulty to collect it)
Same thing with Mozilla's custom keywords. And you can do that with most web searches (using http GET, I believe there's a way to use POST but I haven't find any good links).
What Google are you using? I heard google uses several servers with somewhat different databases... I guess that's the reason. I have, in order: opera, mozilla, ie, netscape, safari, wasp, galeon, lynx, "viewable by any browser".
The same happens on google. Who's fishy now? Amazon didn't edit the google results. I don't know what google you're using, but on mine (clicking your link), IE is on third place.
If they wrote their software in Pascal, this wouldn't be a problem. If they used STL string / vector, this would also probably not be a problem. Not to mention, a buffer overflow in Pascal would make the program quit with a runtime error: great security!
Slashdot Mirror
More directly (without induction):
if T = 2^(2p+1) + 1:
T = 2^(2p+1) - 2 [mod 3]
T = 2(2^2p - 1) [3]
T = 2(4^p - 1) [3]
T = 2(1^p - 1) [3]
T = 0 [3]
qed
No only the ending is "unsound", but the whole premise.
Killing a butterfly probably doesn't have more effect than spraying paint on a dinosaur...
of Archimedes burning ships with mirrors ?
caveat Paypal means "let Paypal be wary". What you were probably looking for is caveatis Paypal(um)
Or, more likely, cave Paypal (as in cave canem, beware the dog) Subjonctive is used in place of imperative for the third person.
Like the subject says, could carelessness in encryption have been a non factor even a couple years ago? Does the raw processing power on the average desktop make it that much easier to exploit a mistake or break weak encryption?
From my crypto teacher: "you can break css on a wristwatch". The processing power of today's machine is not always a factor.
IMHO, the metric system is doomed in the US because it's not American
That's why this was designed!
Do you know people play SNES games (at least as old as Warcraft...) on GBAs? And come on, even some games sold today are playable on a 500MHz PC.
Also, I recently received a zipped executable named TextDocument.zip from a gmail account. I wonder, have spammers already started using Gmail? Or perhaps a virus impersonating the address?
Gmail doesn't allow executables, even inside zip files. So I guess it was spoofed (and it definitely was a virus, spammers only send ads)
Google itself has the feature
What?
Google doesn't offer partial word search (it would be WAY too expensive!), although it indeed has a "spell-checking" feature.
The courts, however, might rule that one cannot patent things such as this-- there's little-to-no qualitative difference between folks patenting this and me patenting a method for a DDOS or patenting a method used in a computer virus. Depending on the judge, they may be in for a surprise if their patent goes to court.
The difference, in this case, would be that the patent is worth going to court for (which means someone else is officially interested in the technology)
I remember thinking "If you mess this up, it'll be your last mistake"
I don't know how it was for you, but when I was in the army, I also throwed a hand grenade (offensive, i.e. not much more than a loud "bang", defensive is nasty), I was in some sort of small concrete shelter, of which I could jump out in case I made a "mistake". Outside of war, the army is paranoid with safety (N.B. this was not the US army, YMMV of course)
I wouldn't normally do this, but considering the subject, I will:
It's phenomenon (phenomena is a greek plural)
Same great compression, but when you encode video with it, all the actors end up wearing kilts, speaking with incomprehensible accents and getting into bar fights.
And then alien blancmanges can win Wimbledon! Mwahahahahahahahaha!
Adobe Acrobat
I started using ghostview for pdf since Acrobat (sorry, Adobe Reader) is so damn slow.
Was I the only one that read that "Researchers to climb 'Arafat' to Seek Noah's Ark"
I read "Areat", I guess I play Diablo II too much...
mine mine mine mine mine mine mine mine
So maybe it should be a Microsoft mascot after all...
Not to mention, you can't lend your card to anyone anymore (my mother sometimes lent me her card to go buy something, she just gave me the secret code).
Although of course here in the US you almost always have to sign...
Stenography
I guess you mean steganography.
Patents don't cover a concept, they cover a method.
Unfortunately these days it seems when you patent a method it covers the concept.
to produceth
I highly doubt this is correct grammar, even in old english.
He is omnicient, which means "All Powerfull"
Omniscient means "all knowing", not "all powerful" (that would be omnipotent). Of course He is said to be both...
I think you missed the part, where it pulls your relative location off of the tower you're using.
This may speed up the search, but doesn't really change anything about the sheer amount of data (and the difficulty to collect it)
Same thing with Mozilla's custom keywords.
And you can do that with most web searches (using http GET, I believe there's a way to use POST but I haven't find any good links).
What Google are you using?
I heard google uses several servers with somewhat different databases... I guess that's the reason.
I have, in order: opera, mozilla, ie, netscape, safari, wasp, galeon, lynx, "viewable by any browser".
The same happens on google. Who's fishy now? Amazon didn't edit the google results.
I don't know what google you're using, but on mine (clicking your link), IE is on third place.
If they wrote their software in Pascal, this wouldn't be a problem.
If they used STL string / vector, this would also probably not be a problem.
Not to mention, a buffer overflow in Pascal would make the program quit with a runtime error: great security!