Exactly. Why people fawn over people just because they died is mystifying. There are plenty of heros in the computing industry, but he wasn't one of them.
He was also a huge patent troll with his Interval Research. It did a lot of harm to the industry, but so did Microsoft, so I guess that should be expected.
What consumer would consider net neutrality to be bad? There is literally no reason to want to get rid of it if you are a consumer. The only people for it are the ones that want to charge more.
Ending world hunger includes educating people. This will reduce reproduction. The idea that hungry people won't reproduce is silly. Just look around. He OP is right: the megalomaniac Internet "moguls" need to focus on Earth, not outer space. No one is living anywhere else but on Earth. We can't: we evolved to live here and our entire physiology depends on it.
Well everything is "AI" now, so this fits in. I am developing a "hacking AI". It scans networks looking for vulnerabilities. Totally innovative. I call it nmap.
No it doesn't require much. What they call "AI" isn't very complex at all - they are just applying well known techniques to data. Same crap that people were doing in the 1960s.
You must be kidding. You can pair a hololens/whatever with the latest i9 or whatever and it will make no difference. There are no ways that we know of to radically increase computer power. That train left the station along with Moore's Law years ago.
Not sure what you are talking about. The UK has been decreasing emissions since 2012, while the EU has been increasing theirs: https://www.reuters.com/articl...
Why do you think that more is possible? Moore's Law is dead. Do you think processors are going to get faster? Also, Spectrum was never "valued" at $6 billion.
Why uncomfortable? From what I understand Musk welcomes them and considered selling Tesla to them. What makes you think he is "uncomfortable" with them? Seems like best buddies to me.
They are also a 5% owner of Tesla, and apparently Elon Musk has discussed further investment with them and also selling the company to them. I guess he likes those guys.
No. There were more than two candidates. The OP is right. If you voted for Obama you are voting for the status quo. And don't give me that BS that "there are really only two candidates". No, there weren't. You just liked "your guy", and like a good SJW perception is reality.
Exactly. Why people fawn over people just because they died is mystifying. There are plenty of heros in the computing industry, but he wasn't one of them.
He was also a huge patent troll with his Interval Research. It did a lot of harm to the industry, but so did Microsoft, so I guess that should be expected.
He was too busy filing patent lawsuits to worry about stuff like that. Just another businessman being a businessman.
You must be kidding.
You forgot he was a big Patent Troll. He won't be missed or remembered.
What consumer would consider net neutrality to be bad? There is literally no reason to want to get rid of it if you are a consumer. The only people for it are the ones that want to charge more.
Ending world hunger includes educating people. This will reduce reproduction. The idea that hungry people won't reproduce is silly. Just look around. He OP is right: the megalomaniac Internet "moguls" need to focus on Earth, not outer space. No one is living anywhere else but on Earth. We can't: we evolved to live here and our entire physiology depends on it.
I'm opening my checkbook now. Just tell me the number to write.
Well everything is "AI" now, so this fits in. I am developing a "hacking AI". It scans networks looking for vulnerabilities. Totally innovative. I call it nmap.
If (person_bought(amazon_fire_tv))
{
suggest(amazon_fire_tv)
suggest(other_crap)
}
Brilliant AI.
No it doesn't require much. What they call "AI" isn't very complex at all - they are just applying well known techniques to data. Same crap that people were doing in the 1960s.
And I have invented a machine that can diagnose illnesses based on a drop of blood. Doctors are trying to jump on the VC bandwagon.
Bingo. Plus it is run by computer to rebalance the funds so the load fees will always be low.
You must be kidding. You can pair a hololens/whatever with the latest i9 or whatever and it will make no difference. There are no ways that we know of to radically increase computer power. That train left the station along with Moore's Law years ago.
50k per bedroom? Employers want you to share a room through AirBnB? What planet do you live on? 50k per bedroom would be very cheap.
Not sure what you are talking about. The UK has been decreasing emissions since 2012, while the EU has been increasing theirs: https://www.reuters.com/articl...
The UK has done a good job reducing emissions since 2012. Unfortunately the EU has not, and has been increasing their emissions.
Why do you think that more is possible? Moore's Law is dead. Do you think processors are going to get faster? Also, Spectrum was never "valued" at $6 billion.
Why uncomfortable? From what I understand Musk welcomes them and considered selling Tesla to them. What makes you think he is "uncomfortable" with them? Seems like best buddies to me.
You know who else hated the "shorts"? The Enron guys. They HATED them. They used to call them terrorists and un-American. Sounds familar.
You must be kidding. Billy Graham? Pat Robertson? Same people, different names and bank accounts.
Jerked out the rag under Elon Musk? They bought 5% of Tesla at that point. They love Tesla and Elon. Apparently the feeling is mutual.
They are also a 5% owner of Tesla, and apparently Elon Musk has discussed further investment with them and also selling the company to them. I guess he likes those guys.
No. There were more than two candidates. The OP is right. If you voted for Obama you are voting for the status quo. And don't give me that BS that "there are really only two candidates". No, there weren't. You just liked "your guy", and like a good SJW perception is reality.
Exactly. And if the EU believes that climate change is going to happen why did they increase their emissions in 2017 and further in 2018?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-carbon-climatechange/eu-carbon-emissions-rose-in-2017-eurostat-idUSKBN1I50YU
I mean they signed the Paris accords.