It's not about nationality, but foreign governments spreading propaganda aimed at subverting democracy, targetting communities which lap it up and spread it forward. This should be troubling to everyone.
What makes you think this is the technology that will enable that, when they already have speakers and a wireless connection to your car and yet don't blast you with adverts against your will all day?
Why is this such an issue now, though? Where were all these shrill voices proclaiming this guy's innocence when others were in front of these courts? It seems rather convenient to decry the system when "your guy" is being hammered by it.
Maybe because he's dangerous and not doing anything with any competence? It's not a question of even liking his position or not - he can't keep his position straight over the course of hours, let alone a presidency.
The glee is in seeing a dangerous idiot who campaigned to be not corrupt being nailed to the wall by the corruption they encourage.
Judging by the memos, it seems the republicans are hell-bent on misrepresenting what happened. The judges involved are all right-leaning and appointed by republicans. The "smoking gun" timeline they purport is factually incorrect, which doesn't help this seemingly-desperate attempt at misdirection seem legitimate.
We get it - you are scared of people around you, and want a safe space where your preconceptions of the world are not challenged, and you can turn a blind eye to systematic failures of a society which purports to be perfect.
Of couse it's impossible for someone to earnestly want to improve something - they must be "virtue signalling". Also, "antifa" is a movement and not a group. And a protest against racism is only against those in the right who are racist. If you feel they were attacking you, you might just be a racist.
Well, if you guys would stop tying your hands while your children are getting murdered to fuck, maybe you'd get less condecension? "I'm sorry, parents, your children simply had to die, as some paragraph from 1789 written by onmiscient superhumans decreed that from that moment on, regardless of what problems society has, everyone is allowed to have guns. Have more kids and try again."
On average, yes the US is more spread out than Europe. It does, however, have densely populated cities which still lack functional public transport. You're going to need a better excuse, as that one holds no water. I'm sure there are reasons why it wouldn't work in the US, but that's not one of them.
That excuse doesn't really hold water - there are public transport methods which can link sparsely-populated areas with each other -they're used a lot in Germany. The real problem lies elsewhere.
Are you seriously pretending that people don't understand that things which are free at the point of use might still cost money? Are you also suggesting that the financial reports from public transport bodies are somehow invisible to the human eye? Your argument would be very convenient if it were at all based in reality!
Indirect benefits are still benefits. Roads benefit you directly and indirectly, as does public transport. For each person on public transport is one less car on the road in front of your house. The world does not revolve around you, and policies bent on helping the selfish are policies of madness.
Slashdot Mirror
Stephen Hawking was British, so I'm not sure what he has to do with American science...
Lots of hate, no evidence. Sounds familiar.
You're confusing sex with gender. Educate yourself about the differences, re-read what you wrote, then come back and apologize.
It's not about nationality, but foreign governments spreading propaganda aimed at subverting democracy, targetting communities which lap it up and spread it forward. This should be troubling to everyone.
If you laid off the generalisations you might have a better time talking to others.
What makes you think this is the technology that will enable that, when they already have speakers and a wireless connection to your car and yet don't blast you with adverts against your will all day?
Why is this such an issue now, though? Where were all these shrill voices proclaiming this guy's innocence when others were in front of these courts? It seems rather convenient to decry the system when "your guy" is being hammered by it.
Maybe because he's dangerous and not doing anything with any competence? It's not a question of even liking his position or not - he can't keep his position straight over the course of hours, let alone a presidency.
The glee is in seeing a dangerous idiot who campaigned to be not corrupt being nailed to the wall by the corruption they encourage.
Judging by the memos, it seems the republicans are hell-bent on misrepresenting what happened. The judges involved are all right-leaning and appointed by republicans. The "smoking gun" timeline they purport is factually incorrect, which doesn't help this seemingly-desperate attempt at misdirection seem legitimate.
Ad hominem. Try to attack the news, not the person giving it. If it's so biased and broken as you claim, that should be easy.
We get it - you are scared of people around you, and want a safe space where your preconceptions of the world are not challenged, and you can turn a blind eye to systematic failures of a society which purports to be perfect.
You poor little snowflake.
You just decided what the analysts meant. Your argument seems to be one from incredulity. Ouch.
"It would take generations to get rid of all of them" - so you can stop people from having guns, it just takes time.
It's also paralysed by people not understanding the rules and getting angry about things they don't understand. You seem to be such a person.
Of couse it's impossible for someone to earnestly want to improve something - they must be "virtue signalling". Also, "antifa" is a movement and not a group. And a protest against racism is only against those in the right who are racist. If you feel they were attacking you, you might just be a racist.
Well, if you guys would stop tying your hands while your children are getting murdered to fuck, maybe you'd get less condecension? "I'm sorry, parents, your children simply had to die, as some paragraph from 1789 written by onmiscient superhumans decreed that from that moment on, regardless of what problems society has, everyone is allowed to have guns. Have more kids and try again."
Holy generalisations, batman! Your grasp of logic is hilariously troubling.
On average, yes the US is more spread out than Europe. It does, however, have densely populated cities which still lack functional public transport. You're going to need a better excuse, as that one holds no water. I'm sure there are reasons why it wouldn't work in the US, but that's not one of them.
That excuse doesn't really hold water - there are public transport methods which can link sparsely-populated areas with each other -they're used a lot in Germany. The real problem lies elsewhere.
Public transport doesn't stop at the city limits...
Are you seriously pretending that people don't understand that things which are free at the point of use might still cost money? Are you also suggesting that the financial reports from public transport bodies are somehow invisible to the human eye? Your argument would be very convenient if it were at all based in reality!
In Europe grids are far less common, yet public transport seems to work. It also works in sparsely-populated suburbs. Weird, huh? :)
They just count the number of people who use the line and that becomes the justification. Don't get hung up on money - that's not what this is about.
Like people driving on subsidised roads for fun? Your argument needs some work :)
Indirect benefits are still benefits. Roads benefit you directly and indirectly, as does public transport. For each person on public transport is one less car on the road in front of your house. The world does not revolve around you, and policies bent on helping the selfish are policies of madness.
None of that is true. None of it. This is amazing.