Slashdot Mirror


Mercedes' Futuristic Headlights Shine Warning Symbols On the Road (gizmodo.com)

In its new high-end vehicles, Daimler says it will introduce programmable, "million-pixel" headlights that project warning symbols and driving tips on the road. "The technology, which Daimler calls Digital Light, was demoed as a concept ten years ago, but at the Geneva Motor Show it's finally being introduced as a feature that's 'expected' to be available on certain Mercedes-Maybach S-Class vehicles sometime this year," reports Gizmodo. From the report: Sitting alongside the vehicle's standard headlights are a pair of small monochrome projectors that each feature "a resolution of over one million pixels," Daimler claims, resulting in an "HD-quality" image being projected onto the road surface ahead of the vehicle. Using data from the car's onboard sensors, as well as traffic and obstacle data that GPS devices rely on, the headlights project symbols like a snowflake indicating slippery conditions ahead, a construction symbol reminding drivers to slow down for road workers, arrows for where to turn, and even simple white lines representing the size of your vehicle so you can immediately tell if you're able to squeeze into a narrow parking spot. The ability to selectively switch off pixels means the S-Class' headlights could help drivers avoid blinding oncoming vehicles or pedestrians, as onboard sensors detect faces and windshields and automatically dim the brightness in those areas.

139 comments

  1. Can it show texts? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Funny

    I find it so cumbesome to fish out my phone to read texts, especially at highway speeds. It would be great if this feature will project incoming text messages. Also can it stream Netflix. I have seen the road many times, and there is no plot interest in the road or scenery. Would be great to have something interesting to watch other the road when I am driving.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re: Can it show texts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But then other motorists will read your sexting and see your junk.

    2. Re:Can it show texts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or movies, Apple facetime. the possibilities are endless

    3. Re:Can it show texts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You made my day! ;-)

    4. Re: Can it show texts? by sabbede · · Score: 2

      Duh, that's the whole point.

    5. Re: Can it show texts? by postbigbang · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Watch this get turned into political messages, bad bumper sticker clones, and worse: advertising.

      And for those that shine dick pics: make sure the finish of your car can be protected from deep key scratches. I sadly know a couple of people who wouldn't hesitate..... or cut you off with millimeters to spare.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    6. Re:Can it show texts? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Netflix? Don't be ridiculous. These are pure black and white dots.

      On the other hand, maybe they could display Game Boy games using dithering.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    7. Re: Can it show texts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweet, now we can play Tetris.

    8. Re:Can it show texts? by stealth_finger · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, but it will probably display ads.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    9. Re: Can it show texts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pong should be first.

    10. Re: Can it show texts? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Watch this get turned into political messages, bad bumper sticker clones, and worse: advertising.

      And for those that shine dick pics: make sure the finish of your car can be protected from deep key scratches. I sadly know a couple of people who wouldn't hesitate..... or cut you off with millimeters to spare.

      Hopefully they'll find their way into a cell before they kill too many people.

    11. Re: Can it show texts? by postbigbang · · Score: 2

      If you don't know two crazy people in your circle of friends and acquaintances, your life is dull. Fortunately, the ones I know aren't armed.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    12. Re:Can it show texts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or project a parking inspector to drive at - or Darth Vader, or hated congresscritter
      or speedtrap radar ahead- yeah a radar symbol.

    13. Re: Can it show texts? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Come on, obviously Frogger should be first. You can even have real-life 3D obstacles in the scene!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    14. Re:Can it show texts? by SomeoneFromBelgium · · Score: 1

      Mmmhhh...it's not so great.
      I tested it and I permanently had the feeling that someone was "co-watching" my film over my shoulder...
      Kind of took the thrill away...

    15. Re: Can it show texts? by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      As long as you don't start to see other cars as Tetris pieces, and try to make all the blue ones touch each other.

    16. Re: Can it show texts? by edtice1559 · · Score: 2

      Maybe there's a way I could use this feature to give advice to other drivers. Like "Hey, slow down idiot" or "Next time use a turn signal." I'm sure that would go over well.

    17. Re:Can it show texts? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      I have seen the road many times, and there is no plot interest in the road or scenery. Would be great to have something interesting to watch other the road when I am driving.

      Hey, with this technology, you can project pictures of pedestrians who aren't there right in your oncoming path. If you are skillful enough to "hit" them . . . you will get points!

      Turn your boring drive to work into "Death Race 2000" . . . !

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    18. Re: Can it show texts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or cut you off

      Lorena Bobbitt, perchance?

      millimeters to spare.

      Commenting on the size of someone's manhood?

    19. Re: Can it show texts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it is you?

    20. Re: Can it show texts? by sabbede · · Score: 2

      Being able to project a message to the car in front of me is a long standing dream of mine. Something like, "It's 55mph here idiot", or "Put down your phone fuckwad". Also the bit about turn signals you mentioned.

    21. Re: Can it show texts? by sabbede · · Score: 1
      Oh god, they would be used like bumper-stickers. Crap.

      As for "dick pics", that is a favor to everyone around. They can't see my genitalia while I'm sitting in my car and that just isn't fair to them.

    22. Re:Can it show texts? by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

      It would be great if this feature will project incoming text messages

      I'll allow it, if it uses the Star Wars Crawl effect.

      I've seen plenty of people reading the newspaper, and once or twice someone reading a novel,[1] while driving. This would be really convenient for them.

      Another good use: project 3D illusions to fool oncoming drivers. Fun for the whole family!

      [1] My favorite: On Colorado 159, between San Luis and the New Mexico border. At night a very dark road, one lane in each direction, no median, breakdown lanes, or guard rails. 65mph speed limit, rarely enforced. With 17 miles of open horse range - and, yeah, I've seen horses on that road. I was driving it late one night when I came up behind an old Honda Civic with the interior lights on, doing about 40mph. As I passed it, I saw the driver had a book propped on the steering wheel. Didn't even glance my way as I went by.

  2. Broadcasting to others what you see. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Interesting idea in theory,
    However the car is broadcasting data to the public, that an individual may not want to share. Lets say it is linked to the GPS and shows where to turn, for the most part that will be great, because it is like an enhanced reality display, except for the fact everyone else knows where you are going.

    Or if you see the warning displayed and you failed to take the accurate action leaving to a traffic ticket, because you don't have the excuse you didn't know about the road condition.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re: Broadcasting to others what you see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You should be letting other drivers know where you are going anyway, it's called using a turn signal.

    2. Re: Broadcasting to others what you see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I never indicate. Wouldn't want to risk anyone knowing ahead of time which way I'm turning.

    3. Re: Broadcasting to others what you see. by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was thinking more about stay straight for 30 miles. Then turn right you have reached your destination.

      Turn signals are to tell people what you are going to be doing with your car. Vs telling where you car wants to be. Also this could give confusing information if the car says turn right and you decide to ignore that particular GPS request so the onlookers don't know if you just didn't use your turn signal, or you are going straight.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Broadcasting to others what you see. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea in theory, However the car is broadcasting data to the public, that an individual may not want to share. Lets say it is linked to the GPS and shows where to turn, for the most part that will be great, because it is like an enhanced reality display, except for the fact everyone else knows where you are going.

      This privacy concern is becoming more and more irrelevant. Social media narcissists always seem to feel the need to tell the world what they're doing and where they're going every minute of the day. You could probably find out where the person is going by looking at their social media accounts. It's easy to find them online since the vanity license plate is their fucking Twitter handle.

    5. Re:Broadcasting to others what you see. by Malc · · Score: 1

      Or if you see the warning displayed and you failed to take the accurate action leaving to a traffic ticket, because you don't have the excuse you didn't know about the road condition.

      I don't have much sympathy for somebody getting a traffic ticket in this situation. Maybe they should also be forced to retake the driving test too?

    6. Re: Broadcasting to others what you see. by shortscruffydave · · Score: 4, Funny

      You should be letting other drivers know where you are going anyway, it's called using a turn signal.

      The car in question is a Mercedes - your argument is invalid

    7. Re:Broadcasting to others what you see. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I am a proponent on Innocent until proven guilty. And living a life not worried that the state will find a way to arrest you or fine you for every lapse in judgement.

      Because the issue are often far more complex. So the car tells you the road is icy, but where is it icy? So you may had been checking on your right side for ice, while your car hit the Ice on your left side, causing you to spin because you were breaking trying to look for the ice.

      Now if the police came, and saw the car saying it was icy, you could be ticketed for not doing enough or not the right thing. Vs. if you didn't know about the Ice, and you didn't cause any damage, then you will probably be let off, with a warning to remember it is slick out there.

      Draconian approach to laws, normally keep the honest people afraid. Vs. trying to prevent people from doing such an act.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Broadcasting to others what you see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You only know what you see, and you only see the narcissists. They may be one in 10k and you won't even know about the others because that's how they like it.

    9. Re:Broadcasting to others what you see. by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      except for the fact everyone else knows where you are going.

      How is that any different than turn signals we are supposed to use now?

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    10. Re: Broadcasting to others what you see. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      That's good, but not good enough.

      When I get in my car, even I don't know where I'm going.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    11. Re:Broadcasting to others what you see. by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea in theory, ... However the car is broadcasting data to the public.

      In the UK it is illegal to display unofficial road signs, including painting them on the road, even if they are "true". For example many people have tried putting up their own speed limit signs where roads pass through their village, and I have been told am not allowed to put up road works signs when I cut my hedge which is on a country road. These projected signs would seem to fall into the same category; at best they are a distraction to other motorists. What's wrong with a heads-up display, or have the marketing droids already milked that one to death?

    12. Re:Broadcasting to others what you see. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      You only know what you see, and you only see the narcissists. They may be one in 10k and you won't even know about the others because that's how they like it.

      One in 10K doesn't even come close to the number of users who regularly use social media on a daily basis. Hell, one out of every four humans is on Facebook. And when you look at how society now rewards narcissism (e.g. YouTube millionaires and sponsored Insta-celebrities), it's not hard to understand why so many people participate in oversharing.

    13. Re: Broadcasting to others what you see. by dbialac · · Score: 1

      I'd hack it to project messages into the rear-view mirror of the car in front of me. Things like, "There's no traffic, the speed limit is 55, you're going 30. Speed up."

    14. Re: Broadcasting to others what you see. by gnick · · Score: 1

      When I get in my car, even I don't know where I'm going.

      That's the worst part. I get in my car after lunch to go back to work and BAM! The car drives me to the bar. Same bar every time. I think it's a problem with Toyotas because this isn't the first one I've had with this problem. I don't think my boss recognizes this car-fault and I'm running out of excuses. Maybe this car could project a line for me to follow so that I don't have to rely on the lane stripes which always seem to show up double?

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    15. Re: Broadcasting to others what you see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first question from the police in the situation you describe will be check whether the driver was exceeding the posted limit. The next thing will be to determine if they were driving at speed appropriate for icy conditions.

      As a driver, the first thing you should do when thereâ(TM)s an ice warning is ease/come off the power, and then avoid making wild manoeuvres. Telling the police that you were looking around so much you missed something that you drove in to wonâ(TM)t get you very far.

    16. Re: Broadcasting to others what you see. by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Not putting on your turn signal tells people you are going straight. You still need to use and observe other people's turn signals. I doubt many other motorist or pedestrians would be at a good vantage point to read these projections anyway. First because they are on the ground in front of the vehicle and second because they will be projected for the driver's vantage point and will look distorted to others.

    17. Re: Broadcasting to others what you see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lane stripes which always seem to show up double?

      Invest in an eye-patch and one set of stripes will disappear. Safety first.

    18. Re: Broadcasting to others what you see. by magarity · · Score: 1

      That's why I never indicate. Wouldn't want to risk anyone knowing ahead of time which way I'm turning.

      If someone steals your car with this tech it will be the equivalent of running from the cops at night with LED blinky shoes.

    19. Re:Broadcasting to others what you see. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Or if you see the warning displayed and you failed to take the accurate action leaving to a traffic ticket, because you don't have the excuse you didn't know about the road condition.

      Or if the system gets it wrong and displays a warning when there isn't a reason and you react badly. I'm not sure I/we need more, possibly confusing, visual distractions when driving.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    20. Re: Broadcasting to others what you see. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      This is why serious offensive drivers learn to turn their turn signals on randomly and then leave them on for extended periods of time without actually turning or changing lanes. Only by actively engaging in disinformation can you truly keep other drivers on their toes.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    21. Re: Broadcasting to others what you see. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      or the classic 'indicate right, move left' combo.

      Don't forget turning on foglights at night to make sure they're looking at your car too.

    22. Re: Broadcasting to others what you see. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You think those people use their rear view mirrors?

  3. The only real innovation would be fewer cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fewer and smaller cars. Invest into comfortable transport with a smaller overall footprint.

    It's time that those industrial dinosaurs go out of business. They are costing us far too much.

    Blinky lights is just a distraction.

    1. Re:The only real innovation would be fewer cars by demon+driver · · Score: 1

      Yes. They are costing us and the whole planet too much, but still we need them to successfully maximize their profits so a little bit of money gets through for us to live off.

      And as long as the system is one with the latter as a rule, and with money as a prerequisite for being able to feed ourselves, there will never be a real remedy for the aforesaid.

  4. We need new headlight regulation by hackertourist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Current regulations are in the shape of 'no more than 55W (assuming halogen and ignoring more efficient lighting options that would produce far more light at that power level), light bundled in shape X'.
    As a result, modern headlight systems are usually fine when viewed from straight ahead, but become uncomfortably bright when viewed from an angle (encountering such a vehicle on a curvy road, or cresting a hill). All too often I can't see shit because of that.

    1. Re: We need new headlight regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who wants to see âoeshitâ anyways? ;-p

    2. Re:We need new headlight regulation by sabbede · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wouldn't mind some lumen limits. I've been blinded too many times myself.

    3. Re:We need new headlight regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      N. America could do with the same headlight lighting pattern as in Europe, where there's a sharp cut-off to prevent dazzling and an up sweep to light the edge of the road, which makes it easier to drive curves in the dark when there are oncoming vehicles. The downside is that N. American roads tend to have more overhead signs, which don't get lit up so well.

      Oh, and maybe a real driving test so people don't use their lights inappropriately, some real enforcement to discourage those who continue to do so, and a real annual vehicle test and certification to catch shitty lighting modifications.

    4. Re:We need new headlight regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone that installs blue tinted PIAA headlight bulbs is trash. No taste what so ever. /flame on

    5. Re:We need new headlight regulation by mjwx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wouldn't mind some lumen limits. I've been blinded too many times myself.

      Brightness isn't the problem. It's vehicle height and headlight adjustment (as well as lazy people driving with their high beams on). Too many vehicles are being made stupidly high in the SUV craze but don't have their headlights adjusted downwards to prevent blinding drivers in normal sized cars. Manufacturers don't do this because it would make their vehicles unsafe to drive at night and lets face it, SUV drivers are terrible at the best of time.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:We need new headlight regulation by speedlaw · · Score: 1

      US Headlight regs have always sucked. Back in the day, we'd toss the US DOT lights and insert E code lights. A 55/60 H4 plus a 100 watt H1 on a separate relay and switch took you from city to the ability to spot deer on farm roads. Today I am convinced the base lights on most normal cars are like the base stereo. It is designed to make up buy the upgrade. US headlight regs still suck but unless you get the HID option, you still aren't as good as the H4 setup I bolted on back in the 80's. My current car has HID which swivel with the steering wheel. I thought it was a gimmick at first, but now, miss it in other cars. The only problem with current headlights is you cannot replace them easily....I"m told Corvette guys still retrofit E Code lights to their cars on the C6 and C5 models......

    7. Re:We need new headlight regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (as well as lazy people driving with their high beams on).

      DING DING DING! We have a winner!

      In darker months, I can look forward to an overwhelming majority of other drivers just leaving their high beams on while we're going through residential areas and I'm trying to keep watch for pedestrians and animals. Doesn't matter if they're tailgating me (because no one drives less than 20mph over the posted speed limit...) or parked near an intersection so I can't even see the sidewalks, highbeams everywhere!

      I actually started keeping count of other drivers who did not have their high beams on in a low-speed residential area, 5 in 2017. Out of over 180 vehicle encounters. Not counting parked vehicles with no sign of activity.

    8. Re: We need new headlight regulation by hey! · · Score: 1

      If it is heading toward you, you probably want to see shit.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:We need new headlight regulation by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      I'm in Europe - the sharp cutoff and upsweep are what's causing the problems.
      The upsweep illuminates the road and oncoming traffic when you're going through a righthand curve. A hill, bump or slight misalignment puts oncoming traffic within the cutoff.

    10. Re:We need new headlight regulation by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      As a result, modern headlight systems are usually fine when viewed from straight ahead, but become uncomfortably bright when viewed from an angle (encountering such a vehicle on a curvy road, or cresting a hill). All too often I can't see shit because of that.

      This! My pet peeve is when the two vehicles are at different heights or angles. In the hilly Northeast, its a sort of roulette. The oncoming car's lights might be focused on an area that isn't an issue, or you might be able to count the veins inside your eyeball. Some times I think that the people who designed these damn highly focused headlamps never ventured out of Northwest Ohio, where the land is utterly flat.

      A different issue is the stupid blue lights. It has been known for a long time that visual acuity is at it's worst in the blue part of the spectrum. The human eye is most sensitive and vision most acute when using green light. The slightly yellow light of regular lamps isn't quite as good, but suffices, and red isn't super, but all of the other colors are better than blue.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:We need new headlight regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That blindness goes double for those friggin' blue sons a bitches.

    12. Re:We need new headlight regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brightness isn't the problem. It's vehicle height and headlight adjustment (as well as lazy people driving with their high beams on).

      You don't see the self-contradiction? Brightness *is* a problem. I'm blinded far more frequently by low slung go-fasties with those gods damned high power blue lights.

    13. Re:We need new headlight regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention, people with extremely bright headlights seem prone to thinking window tint laws are for dummies and tinting the hell out of all their windows. Pretty soon they will be using leaded glass and pumping those headlights up to x-ray frequencies.

    14. Re:We need new headlight regulation by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You don't need to limit the lumens, you need to control the beam direction. If you've been blinded either someone has their high-beams in your face (already illegal in most of the world) or their lights aren't dipped enough (already illegal in most of the world) or their lights have been modified with an illegal beam pattern (err redundant, but already illegal in most of the world).

    15. Re:We need new headlight regulation by laurencetux · · Score: 2

          " ' Brightness isn't the problem. It's vehicle height and headlight adjustment (as well as lazy people driving with their high beams on).'

      You don't see the self-contradiction? Brightness *is* a problem. I'm blinded far more frequently by low slung go-fasties with those gods damned high power blue lights."

      I would submit to the court that the problem of the HeadLight Brightness is related to the problem of the (lack of) Driver Brightness.

    16. Re:We need new headlight regulation by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Some of the bikes in the NYC Citibike system have something like this. They project a bright green picture of a bicycle onto the road in front of you. I assume this is so cars can see you coming - not for you to look at. But it's super bright and annoying as hell. Now, part of that might be because the projector is mounted on the handle bars, so the image moves around as you swivel the front wheel. But still, imagine a road full of cars projecting bright lights onto the street. Uggh.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    17. Re:We need new headlight regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Colour temperature is important too. Why the super-high bluish-white temps? At night!? Yeah,because we can market it as "starlight"... whatever! Warmer colors (yellowish-white) would be better for both the driver and those who get blinded by that light.

    18. Re:We need new headlight regulation by Cederic · · Score: 1

      High beams are a non-issue here. Maybe 1 in 50 cars would fail to dip them when they realise you're coming the other way. Most drivers dip them before you're even in their beam.

      It's the dipped headlights that are aiming at oncoming drivers' eyes and not the road that are the problem. People coming over hills or a humpback bridge are manageable, the cock that's driving his penis extension behind you lighting up the inside of your car with his dipped lights is the issue.

    19. Re:We need new headlight regulation by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Or they just came over the brow of a hill, or over a humpback bridge, or they hit a pothole, or the road just isn't as flat as Holland.

      Yeah, can't imagine any scenarios in which a stupidly bright light would never shine in another driver's face.

    20. Re:We need new headlight regulation by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Or I'm driving a compact and coming the other way is a lifted pickup or bigass SUV.

    21. Re:We need new headlight regulation by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Your issue is not the lumens. Any headlight that can suitably light the road will already blind the oncoming driver. This is precisely why variable dipped beams and projectors were invented in the first place.

    22. Re:We need new headlight regulation by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And if his beam his your eyes than his height is already illegally setup. A new law doesn't fix this.

  5. No more Dazzling by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    I think most of it is just gimmicks except for the highlighting pedestrians and not dazzling other road users which are going to be a big improvement for road safety.

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  6. This will be used for advertising. Guaranteed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hungry? Subway Restaurant ahead in 2.7 miles."
    "Gasoline level 27%. Shell station ahead, take next left."
    "Watch CBS prime time tonight for Survivor finale!"

    Fuck that. Do not want. I'll need Adblock for my car.

  7. Terrible idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better idea would be to project it on the screen, augmented-reality style.
    The whole 'it will be distracting' argument applies to both ideas, but at least this one will consistently not blind people.
    Facial recognition provably isn't perfect, not even fucking close!

  8. Total waste of nonsense. by sabbede · · Score: 1
    It's monochrome, meaning you can only project old black and white movies with a hacked Benz. Lame.

    Make it color and I'll be impressed.

    1. Re:Total waste of nonsense. by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      A black and white 1024 X 1024 almost HD DLP projector.

      Yay!

  9. That's a good idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like for more of you to stop driving cars, so there is less congestion for ME!!!

    1. Re:That's a good idea. by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      We are honoured to have Jeremy Clarkson on here! Although I suspect James May is having to make the computer work for Mr. C.

  10. Warnings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will display warnings?

    I wonder... Do they mean:

    "Warning, I am going to yield"
    or
    "Warning, here comes an asshole who doesn't care about traffic regulations"?

  11. Why is this better than HUD? by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is really bizarre. I'm not sure why projecting onto the road is better than using tried-and-true technology like HUD (Heads up Display). Surely it would be better to project warnings etc. via HUD vs. onto the road? I have a HUD in my BMW and it is one of those technologies that I found genuinely useful and non-obtrusive.

    For example, it shows turn by turn directions projected onto my windscreen, so I don't have to move my eyes or head. The location is just perfect and doesn't obstruct anything.

    Would be great if we could understand the rationale Daimler used to project vs. HUD. I'm sure there's a reason, I just can't figure out what it would be.

    1. Re: Why is this better than HUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first thing that came to my mind was focal distance. Your eyes don't need to refocus onto a close HUD using this system. You see it as you naturally scan the road vs having to take your eyes off of them to glance at a HUD.

    2. Re: Why is this better than HUD? by jgdnavy · · Score: 3, Informative

      A proper HUD will be optically collimated so that the focal length is infinity, negating the need to refocus.

    3. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by 4im · · Score: 1

      Also, HUD is where it should be - within the car, no distraction to others around it.

      Imagine if everybody projected $WHATEVER onto the road... overlapping, rendering things unreadable anyway.

      Beamers are nice gadgets, but I don't see a sensible use for them around a car, most
      especially when it's moving in traffic.

    4. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

      Would be great if we could understand the rationale Daimler used to project vs. HUD. I'm sure there's a reason, I just can't figure out what it would be.

      The HUD is one of the few few features in newer BMWs that I would like to have in my '11. I've driven loaners with it and found it useful (would be more useful with the tach, which they reserve for M models IIRC). And of course the HUD works fine in the rain, fog, and any ambient lighting condition. I'm not sure how well these projectors will work in the daytime on a snow covered road. Seems like a solution to a problem that is already better solved.

    5. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      I can: cost. a hud would require a much more expensive precision engineered windshield and windshields are commonly replaced. I have already heard problems with current forward-collision detection systems that point a camera out the front window. Buy a cheaper aftermarket replacement? Well its properties are different and the system goes nuts and doesn't work.

    6. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why projecting onto the road is better than using tried-and-true technology like HUD (Heads up Display).

      As a BMW owner, you must know the importance of projecting your status symbol as far as possible!

    7. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There wouldn't be a Slashdot story if it was just another HUD.

    8. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by turp182 · · Score: 2

      This is a feature that it says will be limited to the Maybach line of vehicles.

      They start at $160,000 USD.

      They have to find new features to add in order to keep the cars attractive to prospective buyers.

      And they have to do this year after year to make existing customers interested as well.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    9. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      This is really bizarre. I'm not sure why projecting onto the road is better than using tried-and-true technology like HUD (Heads up Display). Surely it would be better to project warnings etc. via HUD vs. onto the road? I have a HUD in my BMW and it is one of those technologies that I found genuinely useful and non-obtrusive.

      They probably could avoid the HUD patents.

      I've driven a BMW with HUD. It's awesome, inobtrusive, and very natural to use. The only thing is that I wish it would display more information. Bet it's not available to others due to a bazillion patents.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    10. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is really bizarre. I'm not sure why projecting onto the road is better than using tried-and-true technology like HUD (Heads up Display). Surely it would be better to project warnings etc. via HUD vs. onto the road? I have a HUD in my BMW and it is one of those technologies that I found genuinely useful and non-obtrusive.

      They probably could avoid the HUD patents.

      I've driven a BMW with HUD. It's awesome, inobtrusive, and very natural to use. The only thing is that I wish it would display more information. Bet it's not available to others due to a bazillion patents.

      Toyota Prius has a heads up display, it's even better than BMW, it shows your GPS map and turn, it shows the hybrid system indicator throttle position, etc.

    11. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      Would be cool if they could actively avoid illuminating snowflakes in a snowstorm so you could see.

    12. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Olds had a HUD back in 1988. It was standard in the top of the line Bonneville in 1992. Cadillac improved it with thermal imaging (to identify people/animals at night) in 2000. The Prius also had one several years ago (and still does). I doubt BMW patents are keeping other companies from implementation.

    13. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      link since I forgot it in the post above:
      http://autosofinterest.com/2015/03/16/general-motors-head-up-display-history/

    14. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that for Maybach's costumers cost is NOT an issue...

    15. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Cost is always an issue. There are most likely numerous other reasons as well. I've never seen a HUD that didn't look like vector graphics from the 80s and luxury brands are 20% functionality and 80% refined image. Additionally they are probably planning ahead and see this as a possible common feature in consumer vehicles in the nearish future and wanted in on the ground floor. Can't let Ford introduce such a whizbang feature.

    16. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by careysub · · Score: 1

      Ah. So the real purpose is to advertise to others that you are rich when its dark and they can't see your car.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    17. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by turp182 · · Score: 1

      Do you think the first autonomous cars will be low end models?

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    18. Re:Why is this better than HUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just can't figure out what it would be.

      Royalties.

  12. Drive in Movie Theator anywhere! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then if someone can hack it it, we can use them to project low resolution movies. Drive in movie theater anywhere!

  13. HD-quality? by jddj · · Score: 0

    Why this continued bullshit about "HD-quality"?

    1 million pixels is just about VGA-quality.

    1. Re: HD-quality? by jddj · · Score: 1

      Ok, checking myself: if you think 720p is really HD, then good, your Benz can do that,

  14. Not up North by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see this even working in snowy states. The sensors and projector will be blocked by snow and mud, no matter where you place them on the vehicle. I think the kind that reflect off the inside of the driver's side glass was probably all the technology we "needed".

    If I can't see that it's snowing outside then I probably shouldn't be behind the wheel. Then again, if they could project a Bulls-Eye on that suspected terrorist, it may be worth a second look!

  15. Augmented reality terrain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if it ever hit the market, but a few years ago there was supposed to be this laser projection bike light that would project a grid of dots on the ground in front of you so that you could see the shape of the terrain you were heading toward. That would be more useful than anything mentioned in the article apart from shutting off pixels for oncoming drivers.

  16. What could go wrong? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    We are taught to 'keep your eyes on the road' but this is not what that means. Anyway, it sounds like just one more unnecessary thing in the car that will cost a nice markup to fix.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:What could go wrong? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Anyway, it sounds like just one more unnecessary thing in the car that will cost a nice markup to fix.

      Exactly what I was thinking. Headlights are expensive enough to replace already - plus, making them more complicated will almost certainly increase the frequency they need to be replaced.

      Not that Benz owners aren't already used to paying through the nose for simple car repairs...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  17. Solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A piece of tape, or clip the wires.

  18. Driving for dummies now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does a MB driver need all these hand holding features just to drive their cars? How much does all this fancy safety features add up in repair costs?

  19. How bright does it have to be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean if you've ever used projectors, you know they barely work on a reflective white surface in the dark. How in the hell is this going to work on asphalt? Oh right, it has to be so bright as to blind anybody coming at you over a hill.

  20. Like the selective dimming by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

    for other drivers/pedestrians, but the info should use HUD. Doesn't Benz offer this as an option? I know GM, Lexus and Honda offer it. I imagine the patents GM filed when they first offered it have expired by now. Its been in their cars for 20 years or more. The current car I have offers nav directions on the HUD. Works great.

    1. Re:Like the selective dimming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How could GM have any patents on HUDs? HUD's have been around for a very, very, very long time in military jets. Getting a patent for putting a HUD in a car is like getting one for fitting a wheel to an auto-mobile instead of an ox-cart.

  21. Terrific by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    Mercedes drivers are already well known for finding new ways to do the stupid thing in the road. This extra distraction will only give them more opportunities. I am looking forward to the autonomous car era, if it is only because current Mercedes drivers will not be at the wheel.

    1. Re:Terrific by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      Just follow the line on the road Gramps!

  22. Oh no! by Joe+Branya · · Score: 1

    Advertisements for hemorrhoid treatments; Amber Alerts; "Happy Birthday!" messages; strobe lights to accompany music streams; political adds; soft core porn; hard core porn; racial slurs; state laws deciding which slurs are traffic offenses; biblical verses; prohibitions on Arabic language headlight messages in Alabama; being fired for headlight crimes; going to court and claiming that your headlights were hacked by neo-Nazis..... and... Trump tweets.

    I think I'll just drive in daylight and take Uber wearing a blindfold

  23. Use in combination with long distance sensing by mattr · · Score: 1

    So far not useful. What would be useful is to have a lidar or radar system that can actually detect deep potholes and deer, paint it with a laser, and use the headlight projectors to indicate where it will be and where you should move the car, assuming the car is not smart enough to avoid them itself. Car mountable projectors actually could be powerful enough to fully illuminate a deer but what happens in fog? The headlights could at least alert you to something the car can detect while keeping your eyes at the long distance focus.

    1. Re:Use in combination with long distance sensing by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      "paint it with a laser" my ass.

      Blow it up with a laser. Mmmm. Venison.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  24. Emoticons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Using data from the car's onboard sensors ...

    Just think of all the emoticons that can be broadcast to other drivers: Driver is single, driver is getting a hand-job, driver isn't wearing a seat-belt, driver changes lanes without signalling, driver just spent 3 hours at a pub / white supremacist rally / Justin Beiber concert.

  25. Ever seen those building crumble projections? by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Some neat effects can be done projecting onto building and statue faces and then suddenly animating them. Imagine the possible panic attack road hazards one could get. Huge cracks opening in the earth with lava bubbling up. A large 16Tonne weight suddenly falling from the above. A wrecking ball swingin down the road towards your windshield. A motorcycle tumbling end over end tossed by the incredible hulk.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Ever seen those building crumble projections? by az-saguaro · · Score: 1

      Godzilla. If this was a Japanese innovation, it would be Godzilla.

    2. Re:Ever seen those building crumble projections? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilda turns left past the dead bodies and runs into ANTS! ANTS!

    3. Re:Ever seen those building crumble projections? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Somehow a flat, 2D Godzilla just doesn't make give the impression you're looking for.

      Now, the next generation of these things with holographic displays should be pretty cool.

      Five years from now.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Ever seen those building crumble projections? by mikael · · Score: 1

      Some of the pavement art artists use perspective to make things look three-dimensional, but only from one angle:

      https://i.pinimg.com/736x/d7/0...

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  26. Engineering vs development by kalpol · · Score: 1

    These are really cool gadgets but it would be nice if the Germans went back to making cars that lasted half a million miles and were serviced more easily, cost be damned. The S-class W126 sedans were luxurious, also had gadgets, and most of those gadgets still worked at 200k miles. But I suppose that's not the lifecycle of a luxury car these days.

    --
    12:50 - press return.
    1. Re:Engineering vs development by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Nobody makes engines that last anymore. Thank 20 weight oil, but you do get an extra 0.1 mpg.

      It's not just luxury cars. VWs are currently the _worst_ cars on the planet for serviceability. First step to replace a brake master cylinder on a new 'bug'...remove front bumper, no bullshit. Just say 'Hell No!'

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Engineering vs development by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      Remove the front bumper for the brake master cylinder? What do you have to do to replace the heater core, take the wheels off?

  27. Finally! by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    and even simple white lines representing the size of your vehicle so you can immediately tell if you're able to squeeze into a narrow parking spot

    So no more parking in two spots like an incompetent jackass?

  28. Hacking? by kubajz · · Score: 1

    Just wait until someone hacks this and displays anything they want to all the other cars around :)

  29. Mercedes Vison by Zorro · · Score: 1

    Peon, Peon, Peon, Peon, Peon, Dog, Peon, Peon, Peon, Cop, Peon, Bob, Peon, Peon.....

  30. Probably won't fly in the USA by Khyber · · Score: 2

    We have laws regarding public address systems in vehicles, the ability to broadcast images on the road will probably be similarly regulated and this feature won't make it into American cars for the same reasons PA systems are banned in non-emergency vehicles.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  31. Re:This will be used for advertising. Guaranteed. by dave420 · · Score: 1

    What makes you think this is the technology that will enable that, when they already have speakers and a wireless connection to your car and yet don't blast you with adverts against your will all day?

  32. Warning to other drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warning Symbol: "Look out, someone who thinks they own the road and can drive like a maniac is coming" ;-)

  33. Disengage Targeting computer by PPH · · Score: 1
    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  34. Arrows where to turn by PPH · · Score: 1

    I can see this going horribly wrong. What if the arrow you are seeing on the pavement is being projected by the car next to you? Why not just a heads-up display for this sort of thing?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Arrows where to turn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, too, am curious about how the annotations work when multiple vehicles attempt them, although the "Don't blind oncoming traffic" bits are still welcome.

  35. I don't understand the benefit by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    I don't see the benefit of this over a HUD.

  36. Perfect projection material by jmcwork · · Score: 1

    Projecting onto a road or highway makes perfect sense. I have often thought that a slab of asphalt or concrete (maybe even dirt or gravel) would make an ideal projection surface for my home theater.

  37. Terrible Idea by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    It's a terrible idea to allow the owner of a motor vehicle to modify the road signs and symbols.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  38. Messages to tailgaters by sglines · · Score: 1

    I hope it can be set up to say, "Backoff asshole - stop tailgating."

  39. Projected scenarios ... by seshadribpl · · Score: 1

    Which brings up an interesting idea: How about posting a sign in a school area which says Speed Limit 100 MPH? Will the smart sensors and AI gear lookup my activities over the night, figure out how I painted that, and light up the road with an ultra bazillion-pixel projection that says: LOL ??? Or, will it (shudder) faithfully follow the sign? Or, launch a trunk-mounted missile to take out my zip code? :)