The sad part is that in order to have sane, reasonable discussions on the other topics things like money need to be taken out of the equation at the government level. Not just campaign reform, but lobbying as well
Or you could go back another 8 years to a Futurama episode titled Anthology of Interest II and specifically the segment titled Raiders of the Lost Arcade
The problem with cutting out the RIAA to give money to the "owners" of the music is that the RIAA owns the music through the deals made to sign the artists.
It sounds more like turd sandwich vs douche based on both the participants.
I kind of want the "art" stealer to win only to strengthen the first win which could technically make adding text commentary to movies legal when repackaged with a different format. The MAFIAA would sure love that;)
Slashdot Mirror
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
If DRM works why is it that customers generally have a worse experience with products than others that didn't pay?
The sad part is that in order to have sane, reasonable discussions on the other topics things like money need to be taken out of the equation at the government level. Not just campaign reform, but lobbying as well
Unless they rake the pot. If they do it becomes my tip.
If you think that is bad take a look at bronies.
Someone else. Coffee started wearing off a while ago.
IANAL but sounds like one could argue someone signing up as ones self would be identity theft.
I always have some breakfast ready for the occasion.
Or you could go back another 8 years to a Futurama episode titled Anthology of Interest II and specifically the segment titled Raiders of the Lost Arcade
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
One of the videos taken down was their own trailer for the film, so the process has already started.
Someone has to make and start the automatic system.
So make it about the river instead.
But Marlon Wayans, what the fuck were they thinking, Dungeons and Trap Houses?
Dragon Movie. Doubt it would have been worse than the final product, but with a cheaper budget.
If Google wasn't the only search engine we could still find important things like this when we need to know something.
IANAL, but that looks like some pretty damn good precedent there
The problem with cutting out the RIAA to give money to the "owners" of the music is that the RIAA owns the music through the deals made to sign the artists.
They were warned to get off...
There are probably more, but DMCA notices against a company made by the same company are fun in that same way http://torrentfreak.com/micros...
1 USD to the winner of the bet?
It sounds more like turd sandwich vs douche based on both the participants.
I kind of want the "art" stealer to win only to strengthen the first win which could technically make adding text commentary to movies legal when repackaged with a different format. The MAFIAA would sure love that ;)
Except there's the whole criminal contempt factor as well which carries a maximum term of life
https://youtu.be/5FDtJlZbCbQ?t... or for a text summary http://popehat.com/2015/05/04/...
"Not disbarred for this, disbarred for their previous shenanigans"
With a side of a guilty criminal contempt verdict. I'm hoping for life imprisonment.
Am I doing it right?
As a US citizen, where should I begin?
How difficult is it to get CCTV records for a possible defense? The more angles the better.