Slashdot Mirror


User: PatrickThomson

PatrickThomson's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
736
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 736

  1. Re:What's so tricky about WinFS? on Longhorn to be Released in 2006, Sans WinFS · · Score: 1

    Why bother with the win32 filesystem API? this is the perfect opportunity to end all non-microsoft approved software running on windows.

  2. Re:male/female/black/white on MIT Names First Female President · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Precisely! My place of work is in the throes of equal opportunities policies that are simply insane. I appreciate the need to remove any lingering subconcious biases in the minds of those who conduct interviews, but not giving a job to someone because they're not in an under-filled denomination is pure discrimination

    "sorry, we have too many white people, try again next week"

    Honestly, these things are no more relevant than being left-handed.

    Disclaimer: We don't work with members of the public who might have prejudices that affect the ability of, say, black disabled gay women to do the job effectively.

  3. Re:Its an evil plot.. on Half-Life 2 Preloading from Steam · · Score: 1

    I'd rather have it turn into DNF than have a mediocre "Oh. " game, like doom 3. We all know from the trailers that it's going to kick ass, but will playing it really be as fun as we think? They're trying to make sure it is.

  4. Re:Agonisingly true Douglas Adams/John Lloyd quote on Hamster-Powered Night Light · · Score: 1

    if I had the points I'd mod you up, Douglas Adams is the most brilliant writer I've ever read. It was on his advice in a letter in The Salmon Of Doubt that I finally tried Earl Grey tea. And that rarely happpens to me.

    God Speed Douglas Adams, and peace be with you.

  5. Re:Errrr.. on A Flying Leap for Cars? · · Score: 1

    Pff, I don't care, I'm European!

  6. Re:John C. Dvorak on Time to Kill Microsoft Word? · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I never knew that. That's kinda lame.

  7. Re:Errrr.. on A Flying Leap for Cars? · · Score: 1

    What oil crisis? The one the war was supposed to end? The one that happens when a pissed off non-american nation suddenly realises that it has something America needs, and starts giggling? The one that'll be ended with antarctic drilling, once you get those pesky liberals out of the way?

    I'm sick to death of oil crisis this and reduce dependancy on foreign oil that, who gives a flying fuck?

  8. Bah... on A Flying Leap for Cars? · · Score: 1

    What I want to see is a story about the flying cars they promised us!

  9. Re:Next step: diamond on New Solution For Your Transistor BBQ · · Score: 1

    That's pretty cool. I wonder how the heat tolerances for diamond will be like, I know it's a damn good thermal conductor.

  10. Re:Free Beer? on The Product Marketing Handbook for Software, 4th Edition · · Score: 1

    but is it free as in beer?

  11. Re:Simple on 4-inch Telescope Finds New Planet · · Score: 1

    So... Jupiter is made of Flainian Pobble Beads?

  12. Re:John C. Dvorak on Time to Kill Microsoft Word? · · Score: 1

    No, you're partially wrong. for students, yes, tablets are useless. for artists, tablets are a godsend. Try drawing with a mouse. then try drawing with a paper and pen/crayons/charcoal. now try it with a wacom tablet and photoshop.

  13. Re:The Best Protection on Always Use Protection · · Score: 1

    Hear hear, I got my first computer from a family friend, my parents were clueless. After the first 2 or 3 times I called him up he just gave me a windows reinstall disk and said to DIY, so I did.

    And when the time comes for me to hand off some POS pentium 2's to my own little cousins, they'll all be linux'd.

  14. Re:Conflict with Windows License? on Windows Laptops Ship With Linux Media Player · · Score: 1

    What? where? muh? That's just stupid.

  15. Re:Move along on Clouds, The Collaborative Photo Mosiac · · Score: 3, Funny

    Informative? Good God, what kinda moderators do we have, slashdot read - oh, never mind.

  16. Re:This will probably get me flamed, but... on Information Preservation and Data Havens? · · Score: 1

    This is the same thing I see over and over again parroted by all kinds of people... "the FBI won't raid me and steal^Wconfiscate all my computers if I don't do anything wrong" is just bullshit.

    The books are being pirated just like movies and music - the costs are too high to buy it legitimately, but for no reason other than to swell the fat pockets of the professors/printers, or the RIAA/MPAA. It's got to the point when a large number of people think that theft of a copyrighted work is less morally objectionable than the way in which this copyrighted work is being pointlessly exploited.
    The blame rests with both sides, the consumers for doing this in the first place, and the corporations for forcing them.

  17. MOD PARENT AWESOME on Red Brains vs. Blue Brains? · · Score: -1

    Most. Awesome. Post. Ever. and on-topic.

  18. Re:This is like ... on VOIP Progress To Be Hobbled By Wiretap Costs? · · Score: 1

    More to the point, you keep shitting on thier dog instead.

  19. Re:Submitter - Not Silly on Transparent Aluminum Is Here · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, and that reminds me, there's this horrific new danger-chemical being given to children, it's made from hydrogen, the most flammable gas in existence, and oxygen, the pure essense of burning, I mean the safety implications are enormous! stop DHMO now!

  20. Re:RTFS on Austrian Physicists 'Teleport' Light Over 600m · · Score: 1

    Gah, stupid HTML formatting

    I VOTE FOR MANDATORY PREVIEWING!

    blah blah blah fuck you slashdot, if my post seems like yelling then it'll get modded down, you insensetive clods,

  21. Re:RTFS on Austrian Physicists 'Teleport' Light Over 600m · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but no. You can't just add up speeds of light to make stuff go faster, read up on special relativity. Yes, certain quantum effects can happen in two places at the same time, seemingly due to faster than light communications, but no information can be transmitted by this way. I mean it. I could be wrong, but I don't think there's any way to detect if a particle is still entangled without disentangling it, since the observation affects the particle. THe only way to use entanglement to transmit information is the way these people did, by imposing conditions on one particle and _knowing in advance_ to observe the other particle just afterwards. Information cannot go faster than light. Actually, I might be wrong, since time travel isn't actually impossible, but noone's observed it yet, I think there's all kinds of horrible physics about it. It's called "closed timelike curves" nowadays, so they can still get funded for time travel research :)

  22. Re:Obligatory discworld reference on One, Two, Many - Language Shapes Thought · · Score: 1

    Hmm, trolls are silicon-based, right? so a base 4 counting system makes sense, kinda.

  23. Re:Size matters, but it's not everything on Hotmail Means to Double Gmail Storage · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Exactly... Most consumers focus on the one feature that drives the market and is pushed out of proportion to real usefulness, to adopt a "bigger than yours" approach (Case in point: celerons. if AMD came out with a chip that ran at 4 GHz but was shit everywhere else, and found a major supplier, they'd dominate the market overnight).

    Gmail took the two-pronged approach to rope people in initially with the large space, but got them completely astounded by the awesome interface.

  24. Yes, but on Hotmail Means to Double Gmail Storage · · Score: 1

    It's all in German!

  25. RTFS on Austrian Physicists 'Teleport' Light Over 600m · · Score: 1

    No, the communications would still go at the speed of light. this is non-negotiable.

    Also, I don't think reusable particles would be a problem, if you had a gram or so of entangled helium or something, that'd be about 10^20 bits ... of course, it'd be hard to get them in the right order...

    Reusing the particles is also non-negotiable. Once disentangled, only touching the particles together again in a specific manner would entangle them.

    Note: when I say non-negotiable, I mean it. It is not possible. At all. In any way. It's not a very small non-zero probability, it's a probability of Precisely Zero. With infinite zeros after it. Ok?