Slashdot Mirror


Hotmail Means to Double Gmail Storage

deputydink writes "Osviews reports that Microsoft's free email service, Hotmail, is throwing down to Google by increasing the free storage to 2GB! I wonder how choked the Hotmail Plus subscribers will be."

616 comments

  1. WAR! by alaric_uk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holy storage wars!

    1. Re:WAR! by gnovos · · Score: 0, Redundant

      ^H, batman!

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    2. Re:WAR! by Johnny2Bags · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a war, but it's not going to be about storage. Gmail doesn't need to match Hotmail on the 2GB storage (at least yet).

      Hotmail is offering 2GB because that's all they got up their sleves. Gmail is a *huge* improvement over Hotmail on the user interface level. And the Gmail spam filter is pretty awesome.

      Storage is only a factor until a certain degree - meaning that 2MB is nearly impossible to live off of, but beyond 1 GB you are just talking wasted space for most users.

      Some may disagree, but at least in the near future, as far as e-mail is concerned - 1 GB will more than suit 97% of the webmail users out there.

      Right now I don't see Gmail touching their storage level. First and foremost they will focus on the user experience, new features, server availability, etc. Then maybe down the line when they see a large threshold of their users in need of more space, they will either then up the storage on all accounts, or offer paid premium accounts.

      And on an extra note as a Hotmail user, I don't trust anything they are saying right now, they promised more space like months ago and still haven't delivered. I love my Gmail though.

    3. Re:WAR! by Curtman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It may very well be an improvement on the UI. I wouldn't know, its impossible to sign up.

      I was interested when GMail was first announced, but if they're going to make me beg for an account, they can shove it.

      Hotmail sucks big time, but at least its accessible.

    4. Re:WAR! by AzureLunatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I got my 250 megabytes today. Not that my Hotmail account is anything more than a spamtrap right now...

    5. Re:WAR! by manavendra · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree

      However, this isnt' simply about raising the stakes up to attract new users. This is also about retaining the existing ones - millions out there who are tired to Hotmail (simply because it was the first and at one time the only, free email service provider). Add to this those users who are tied to hotmail because of using MSN messenger as well.

      Now with Gmail offering such a vast leap over storage space, a large number of those users would be ready to migrate (no matter how painful it would be) to other email providers. However, if Hotmail provides them similar (or better) service (read storage - since that's the only thing that has been talked about most everywhere), they would have no reason to.

      --
      http://efil.blogspot.com/
    6. Re:WAR! by mgv · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's a war, but it's not going to be about storage. Gmail doesn't need to match Hotmail on the 2GB storage (at least yet).

      On the other hand, apples paid subscription service (idisk) with 100 MB of storage (At $99 /yr) starts to look a little paltry - It will be interesteing to see what they do in response to this.

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    7. Re:WAR! by nzgeek · · Score: 5, Informative

      I wouldn't worry about it. I've got gmail, (bgracewood@gmail.com) and to tell the absolute truth, it really is not all that exciting.

      The spam filtering is okay. I've had one or two legitimate list emails noted as false positives. Nothing new here.

      Forum reply notifications get lumped under one big conversation because Google thinks they are part of a conversation. Err, bzzzzt wrong! Plus the funky javascript preview thing cuts off the most important part of those emails (the link to the forum thread).

      The contacts system is an abomination. You can enter a name and an email and some notes. No room for address, phone or anything.

      Sure it's a beta, but IMHO it's like a 0.4 rather than a 0.9 version.

    8. Re:WAR! by iezhy · · Score: 5, Funny

      My God, 2 Gb of "increase your penis/tits", "buy viagra" and "super xxx site" spams? i wont bare it...

    9. Re:WAR! by nzgeek · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Gmail is a *huge* improvement over Hotmail on the user interface level. And the Gmail spam filter is pretty awesome.


      I'm sorry, but I've got to politely disagree with you here. Gmail (as it stands) is nothing more than an exercise in mild javascript goodness. You can't even say that it's a load-test, due to the closed beta.

      The spam filtering is okay - not awesome. I've had one or two legitimate list emails (as in I asked for them, regardless of how commercial they are) noted incorrectly as spam. I shouldn't have to have the list emails in my address book. Nothing new here.

      Forum reply notifications get lumped under one big conversation because Google thinks they are part of a conversation. Err, bzzzzt wrong! Plus the funky javascript preview thing cuts off the most important part of those emails (the link to the forum thread).

      The contacts system is an abomination. You can enter a name and an email and some notes. No room for address, phone or anything.

      Sure it's a beta, but IMHO it's like a 0.4 rather than a 0.9 version. Nothing to be particularly excited about over a lot of other webmail systems currently available (fastmail, oddpost, hotmail).

      (Yes, I do have Gmail, and I do understand it is a beta. Just stating current facts as I see them. Gmail may very well kick everyone else's asses once it is complete.)
    10. Re:WAR! by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was interested when GMail was first announced, but if they're going to make me beg for an account, they can shove it.

      i was interested too. interested enough to buy an invite from ebay (back before they changed the TOS. now everyones favourite "had to" close down my account. great business plan.

      1. create product
      2. create demand
      3. artifically restrict supply
      4. fuck over the poor users

      real friendly like. thanks for the advanced notice google. all that mail i have/had stored there is now effectively lost. sure, its on their servers and they can see it, but i cant fuckin access it. sort of goes against the whole "never delete an email again" concept

      --
      TIAEAE!
    11. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be confident in Gmail's filters to post your email un-garbled on Slashdot.

    12. Re:WAR! by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 2, Informative
      iDisk is only one part of Apple's subscription service(.mac).

      Along with the 100MB of storage, it includes hosting, several commercial applications, and several discounts on software and subscription. .mac also lets you access your bookmarks from any computer with internet access.

    13. Re:WAR! by taj · · Score: 1



      Tried gmail. Not bad. Never looked at hotmail. I assume its simular at what I look for. I refuse to turn on javascript so gmail is out. Yahoo on the other hand offers an 'old' interface that requires no javascript.

      All I use them for are xmas shopping and so forth. Create the account, order away, check the account in january and forget it. You can always get another one. So I dont see the point of > 2 megs storage either. I'd rather not have my real email on their boxes even if they are reputable. No pop3, imap, ... without paying. And for the sort of money they want for 'extra services' you can get together with some friends and have a colocated box with all the services (and more).

    14. Re:WAR! by mgv · · Score: 3, Interesting

      iDisk is only one part of Apple's subscription service(.mac).

      Along with the 100MB of storage, it includes hosting, several commercial applications, and several discounts on software and subscription. .mac also lets you access your bookmarks from any computer with internet access.


      Yes, I know that. However, its the only bit I'm really interested in, and its way too small. The antivirus stuff will probably be useful one day when there are a few viruses around, and I use my own domain's for eMail.

      But you would have to ask why, as a paid subscription service, they offer 10% of the storage of gMail.

      I would love to use idisk, and when I can offload a significant amount of the 40 GB of backup data I have online, I will do so.

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    15. Re:WAR! by MikeDX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I just read your journal.. Damn dude you are angry!

      I have to admit that large corps rarely have anything human to say to their subscribers (paying or not), take eBay for instance, you can't even speak to a human, its all automated and the people behind it are locked away behind closed doors. Ever tried complaining to ebay? They closed my account for non payment of £1.12. They send emails out with "do not reply to this address" how on earth am I supposed to contact you then? Carrier pigeon? No I have to use the crappy contact system and go around in the endless loop of automated answers.

      I have a theory - The bigger the company is, the bigger percentage of idiots working for said company. Read into that what you will.

    16. Re:WAR! by nzgeek · · Score: 1

      It's more because I consider my gmail account fairly disposable. Important stuff goes to one of my other accounts. I've started using gmail for forums, lists, slashdot, and whatever I don't care whether I receive or not.

    17. Re:WAR! by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      However, its the only bit I'm really interested in, and its way too small.

      What a brilliant comment. So if you only read the sports section of the newspaper the newspaper is a rip-off for having the nerve to charge you for all those pesky other pages and you should go around ranting that it is only a sports section, the rest of the paper doesn't exist?

      The .mac service obviously isn't for you but why are you lying and pretending the part you have no interest in doesn't exist at all?

      Search eBay for "web hosting". You'll find a lot of people willing to give you unlimited storage space for $10/year or even less. Of course if you try one, you'll be back posting what a bargain .mac is.

    18. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some things I really miss in GMail:

      1) No sorting of messages by subject, sender or, most importantly, labels
      2) No label colors
      3) Spam filters not that great (less than 50% recognition of about 100 spam mails per day)

      I use the account mostly for receiving automated notifications and for single-reply "conversations", so GMail's threading view doesn't help me at all.

      There was a period of several weeks when I couldn't tag or delete mail or empty the trash. I attribute this to GMail's beta status, but it certainly wasn't a nice experience.

    19. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GMX offers 1GB free WebDAV storage with their freemail accounts. WebDAV is the technology behind iDisk too, IIRC.

    20. Re:WAR! by Compumyst · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ok, So I hear that the free accounts are being raised to 250MB, and that the paid "plus" accounts are being raised to 2GB. So what happens to the users like me that currently have (from Verizon online dsl) a 25 MB "Premium" account. What will we be raised to (if they ever actually get around to it)?

      --
      What's done's in the past, forever shall last.
      Work is work; life is life; fair is not!
    21. Re:WAR! by Gherald · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow, what a frickin waste of a gmail invite!

      You should use Yahoo for disposable accounts... 100MB is plenty for that shit.

    22. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you see, he likes to have the epenis++ from showing people a gmail address all the while bitching about how shitty he thinks it is.

    23. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I shouldn't have to have the list emails in my address book. Nothing new here.

      bleh, yes you should. You should also create a label for each mailing list you subscribe to

      >Forum reply notifications get lumped under one big conversation because Google thinks they are part of a conversation. Err, bzzzzt wrong!

      For me each forum thread gets it's own conversation. This makes it easy to keep track of the history of a particular thread. Of course, all the forums I subscribe to are phpbb.

      >The contacts system is an abomination. You can enter a name and an email and some notes. No room for address, phone or anything.

      What part of gMAIL do you not understand? This isn't f'in Yahoo lets-add-all-the-features-we-can.

    24. Re:WAR! by mgv · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What a brilliant comment. So if you only read the sports section of the newspaper the newspaper is a rip-off for having the nerve to charge you for all those pesky other pages and you should go around ranting that it is only a sports section, the rest of the paper doesn't exist?

      Whoa, hang back a second here. I'm not saying that the other bits of .mac don't exist. I am just saying that they are of relatively little value to me.

      But the flip side of the coin - are you seriously suggesting that you think that the 15MB of storage for eMails and 100MB of personal storage is enough for you? Well, perhaps it is, but it isn't nearly enough for me, nor is it enough for many others now. And if I subscribe to .mac and never use half the stuff, is this to apple's disadvantage?

      I'm not trying to shoot down apple, I am seriously happy with my powerbook and my wife uses her iBook like she has never used any other computer. They work, and I like.

      However, some things that apple do are crippled deliberately to promote further sales. iSync can sync your personal data to all sorts of stuff - your phone, your PDA, your idisk and your ipod - but not to any other external hard drive. Which is a pity if you want more storage than you can buy in an iPod. Likewise iTunes is the only client to stream audio to an airport express - but I didn't hear anyone on /. complain about the encryption on that being cracked.

      So I'm saying, yes, I want more storage, and I'm not paying money to apple until it offers a gig of storage on the iDisk for a little less than $350 per year (current pricing on website http://www.mac.com/1/mac_faq.html#upgradingstorage )

      And no, you can't get more than one gig on iDisk, probably because with their pricing model they know that nobody will ever take the subscription out.

      In other words - 1 GB iDisk $350 per year. 1 GB gMail - free. Something is wrong there with somebody's pricing model for such a difference to exist.

      And when apple realises this and drops its price a bit, more people (including myself) will pay them money for the services.

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    25. Re:WAR! by IAEBG · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yahoo! Mail has been offering 2GB to their Premium subscribers for the last couple of months.

    26. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you bought a mac. You should expect higher prices and understand you get a quality of email that people who pay less just don't get. Besides, would you rather have the honda civic of email(hotmail) or the bmw of email? Even with less space at its price it is a bargain.

    27. Re:WAR! by krymsin01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Really, it's not google's fault that you went out and bought a beta account, from a third party, for a service that will be available to you for FREE.

      Have some patience.

      --
      stuff
    28. Re:WAR! by jlk_71 · · Score: 1

      I fully agree that Gmail does not have to match hotmail. Their interface is superior to hotmail's. All M$ is doing is giving me more storage for the spam that I have sent to my hotmail email account. I for one, have really fell in love with the Gmail interface and believe that Google has done a great job on it.

      Regards,

      jlk

    29. Re:WAR! by Smork · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm using MSN messenger just fine without a hotmail address. I think you're confusing Passport and Hotmail. Passport can use any e-mail and is not restricted to hotmail addresses only.

      But I can understand the confusion since they seem linked together, in the sign-up process it is very vague...

    30. Re:WAR! by Ba3r · · Score: 1

      Now are we talking big as in profit (i.e. Microsoft), big as in assets (i.e. GM), or big as in people (i.e. US Postal Service)??

    31. Re:WAR! by feargal · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Gmail is a *huge* improvement over Hotmail on the user interface level.
      I beg to differ. Gmail's UI is geared towards low volumes of email. If, like me, you receive thousands of emails a week, a number of major problems rear their heads.
      1. There is no way to distinguish similarily named mailing lists. You can only filter based on "To, "From", and "Subject" headers. Let's examine the options:
        • To: Useless, as people will Cc a list, or the email will be sent to a smaller list which is then redistributed to the larger list. Bugtraq is an example of this.
        • From: Some lists set the "From" header to their own address, others leave it unaltered. In the latter case, the "From" header is useless, unless you happen to have a full subscriber list. Even if you do, you're screwed if somebody is subscribed to two different lists that you are on.
        • Subject: This usually works for lists that insert the list name into the subject. However, there are exceptions. I'm subscribed to the DBMail users list which inserts "[dbmail]" into the subject. I also receive bounce notifications from my mailer daemon which includes "DBMail" in the subject. If I set a filter to match "[dbmail]" in the subject, it ignores the square brackets and so tags the bounced messages as well. It also tags emails on the dbmail-dev list.
        By applying multiple labels I have it working after a fashion. It took way too much time however for such a simple task.
      2. New filters cannot be applied retroactively. If you receive a few hundred emails that need classifying and come up with a filter for them, you then have to manually apply it to the older messages. I still have about 8,000 unclassified emails because they came in before I created filters for them.
      3. Their address book is terrible, and there isn't any way to import an existing one.
      4. There's many more problems, including their stupid lack of a plain HTML version. That one I could understand if they were rushing to a launch date and wanted a feature-rich, IE only version out the door. They do not seem hurried at all though, so they really should have started with a simple standards compliant version and then added the per-browser bells and whistles. I have to go do some work however, so I'll end my rant shortly.

      I know and understand Gmail is in beta. I have reported all the problems I have had months ago. None have been fixed. However, the very fact that you cannot search by a user-defined header baffles me. I can only assume they index the messages by to, from, and subject, and don't cache the rest of the headers in a usable form.

      Shrug. In the end of the day, I don't particularily care, I'll continue using Sylpheed-Claws which copes extremely well. I would have like a web-based backup though for when I'm not near my laptop. I guess I'll have to finish writing my own.

      --
      "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"
    32. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "increase your penis/tits"

      I hope you're talking about two different emails/two different products.

    33. Re:WAR! by Svennig · · Score: 5, Funny

      You wont bare it? Thank god for that!

    34. Re:WAR! by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      I'd argue that they're still different. The amount of space you have for mail is less than a 100MB, its 15 MB. The iDisk space is a webdav volume. I have .Mac, use it for my personal email and for the iSync workflow (5 different macs around). The iDisk i never use.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    35. Re:WAR! by feargal · · Score: 1
      I have a theory - The bigger the company is, the bigger percentage of idiots working for said company.


      I like to call it the fuck-wit factor.
      --
      "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"
    36. Re:WAR! by downbad · · Score: 2, Informative
      Gmail is a *huge* improvement over Hotmail on the user interface level.
      Too bad their "hugely improved" interface doesn't work with Opera, Links, Dillo, older versions of Mozilla, and countless other browsers.

      Hotmail and Yahoo!'s webmail do.

    37. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway, 640kb is enough for everybody...

    38. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you.

      jctorre@avolo.net

    39. Re:WAR! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I keep getting notices that my eBay account is about to be closed. Since I don't have an eBay account, it smelled a bit phishy.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    40. Re:WAR! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Spammy pills, potions and lotions will work just as well for either.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    41. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, let me get this straight:

      You bought a BETA Gmail account off ebay - a pretty stupid thing to do since its easy to get your own one for free - and started using it as your primary email address.

      Now that its gone you're complaining at google for taking away your BETA Gmail account which you bought under dubious circumstances.

      I'm sorry, I have no sympathy for you - you're just an idiot.

    42. Re:WAR! by jhigh · · Score: 1

      My biggest Gmail complaints: 1. Spam filters suck. You mark a message as spam and it's like Gmail ignores you. 2. No Opera support. 3. No groups in your contact list.

      --
      Social Engineering Expert: Because there is no patch for stupidity.
    43. Re:WAR! by anthro398 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Along with the 100MB of storage, it includes hosting, several commercial applications, and several discounts on software and subscription. .mac also lets you access your bookmarks from any computer with internet access.

      Oh Dear Lord! Mac has done it again. Now you can access your bookmarks from any computer! Only a Mac zealot would think this was even worth saying. I mean, it isn't news that I can export my bookmarks from Mozilla, Firefox, insert_browser_here, upload them to any ftp space or, brace yourself, email them to myself.

      Then I, too, can "ACCESS MY BOOKMARKS FROM ANYWHERE!" (cue trumpets) Guess what OS I'm using. Wait. It doesn't matter!

      Well, we probably all just imitated Mac, right?

    44. Re:WAR! by aslate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, if you check your Address Book, there is a link to "Import Contacts" near the top, which if you've been checking the help section and feedback sections, has been listed for ages. They even have a whole guide to importing if you have trouble.

      And, looking at the Help section, they're looking at implementing a plain HTML version too.

    45. Re:WAR! by anti-trojan · · Score: 1

      And which of these features do exist on Hotmail?

    46. Re:WAR! by avdp · · Score: 4, Informative

      3. yes there is, I imported all my Outlook address book into Gmail. Look again, it's a new feature (within the last two months).

      4. their interface works perfectly under firefox. It is not IE only.

      This is a beta service. Except improvements.

    47. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hotmail was quoted as saying:
      "you cannot defeat me because I have the will of a warrior. No Linux-based company has the will of a warrior. The best it can hope for is a honeypot or maybe a printer server. If you fight me, you will lose before you even start."

      (with apologies to Futurama)

    48. Re:WAR! by critter_hunter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Isn't that a known law of business? As a company grows bigger and older, it becomes less and less efficient, especially at the managerial level. Why? Because incompetent managers, fearing for their job, make sure only people who are less competent than themselves get hired. Let's not forget to overpay those suckers to squelch their ambition, further improving job security.

      --
      Karma: Could be worse (could be raining)
    49. Re:WAR! by unborn · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the 2GB deal. Otherwise they wouldn't compare to SBC Yahoo! DSL which provides its users with 2GB Yahoo! accounts.

    50. Re:WAR! by kzinti · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Storage is only a factor until a certain degree - meaning that 2MB is nearly impossible to live off of, but beyond 1 GB you are just talking wasted space for most users.

      You are right, but look at that fact another way: the vast majority of users can't begin to fill 1GB in the foreseeable future. (I got a gmail account some weeks ago, subscribed it to LKML, and every other high-traffic linux list I could find - and it's now at only 15%.) Once capacity gets beyond about 100MB, most users won't come anywhere near their limit in the next couple of years.

      In fact, I'd bet that Google probably doesn't have enough disk space on hand for n users * 1 GB. They're probably under by (WAG) 90%. But that makes sense - why buy all the storage they're going to need right now if most if it is going to sit empty? With disk drives falling in price every day, it makes sense - especially at that scale - to purchase space only as it's needed.

      Therefore, Google's 1GB limit doesn't really mean anything, except as a foil to those few radical cases who see free storage as a chance to mail their pr0n collection to themselves, thus achieving an offsite backup. For most users, the limit might as well be 2GB. Or 10GB. Or 100GB. Given that (a) most users can't use all their space and (b) Google's not buying drives for that empty space anyway, then the limit becomes just a marketing tactic... but a good one, considering how much attention it has gotten for gmail.

      The guys over at Hotmail are just now figuring this out.

      My guess: when gmail is finally opened to the public, it will at least match the free storage of any other service out there, if not exceeding the others. Maybe 2GB, maybe 5GB, but I expect to see more that 1GB.

    51. Re:WAR! by Greedo · · Score: 1

      Whoa, hang back a second here. I'm not saying that the other bits of .mac don't exist. I am just saying that they are of relatively little value to me.

      And I think his point was that why are you paying for .Mac at all when there are other companies out there that are willing to sell you what you do want at a much lower price?

      If you really only need lots of storage space, then a pure hosting provider is going to be much cheaper. Heck, do what I do and hang a server off your DSL line, throw a big hard drive in it, and set up the AFP protocol so you can mount that space from any Mac anywhere you want.

      (And if you need the iSync features as well, I', pretty sure there are a bunch of apps out there that do it without needed .Mac)

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    52. Re:WAR! by TheTilde · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "e-mail and is not restricted to hotmail addresses only. But I can understand the confusion since they seem linked together, in the sign-up process it is very vague..." Sorry. It's not vague at all.At least on the french page. From http://messenger.msn.fr/Download/default.aspx: " Vous devez disposer d'un compte Microsoft .NET Passport pour utiliser MSN Messenger. Si vous avez une adresse de messagerie @hotmail.com ou @msn.com, vous avez déjà un compte Passport.. " Translation= "you need a microsoft .NET Passport account to use MSN Messenger". The Tilde

    53. Re:WAR! by walueg · · Score: 1

      Puhleeze. Give us a little credit. It's more sophisticated than that. The bookmarks sync up automatically and I don't have to go through all those stages that you mention. I can go to any Mac that I can put an account on (friends, work, Powerbook) and duplicate my settings on that machine and all the changes I make in one place get propogated to all the other Macs. Even if I'm using a Pea Sea, I can pull up my personal bookmarks and make all the changes I want and forget about it.

      --
      You are either part of the solution or part of the precipitate!
    54. Re:WAR! by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      "Easy to get your own one for free" - There're a lot of people who'd like to know your secret! (I, for one)

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    55. Re:WAR! by Apathetic1 · · Score: 1

      I suspect MS deliberately keeps this quiet because they want people to use Hotmail - you can use MSN with any e-mail address that has a .net passport. Just go to Passport.net and register

      --

      My username does not make me Apathetic. It's irony, get it?

    56. Re:WAR! by TheTilde · · Score: 0, Redundant
      "e-mail and is not restricted to hotmail addresses only.

      But I can understand the confusion since they seem linked together, in the sign-up process it is very vague..."

      Sorry. It's not vague at all.At least on the french page. From http://messenger.msn.fr/Download/default.aspx:

      " Vous devez disposer d'un compte Microsoft .NET Passport pour utiliser MSN Messenger. Si vous avez une adresse de messagerie @hotmail.com ou @msn.com, vous avez déjà un compte Passport.. "

      Translation= "you need a microsoft .NET Passport account to use MSN Messenger".

      The Tilde

    57. Re:WAR! by Greedo · · Score: 1

      Yup, and both of Canada's largest ISPs -- Rogers and Bell Sympatico -- are advertising 2GB of email storage when you sign-up to one of their plans.

      Personally, I'd much rather use that storage space for backups or remote file storage than for webmail. Maybe I should sign up and start emailing myself all my backups as email attachments ...

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    58. Re:WAR! by armando_wall · · Score: 0


      Congratulations... you just gave away your e-mail to the spammers... are you stress-testing the capabilities of your Gmail account?

      The whole idea is crazy!

    59. Re:WAR! by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Increase your mailbox size by 100%!!!"

    60. Re:WAR! by kzinti · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I beg to differ. Gmail's UI is geared towards low volumes of email. If, like me, you receive thousands of emails a week, a number of major problems rear their heads.

      You are right that Gmail is not perfect. Since getting my account some weeks ago, I've been keeping a list of needed improvements - everything from outright bugs (I can tell you how to make it say "displaying items 101-100 of 100") to wish-list items like importing address books, or even importing whole e-mail archives with the correct dates. I have nearly forty such items on my list.

      Despite all its warts, though, I agree with the first poster that Gmail is a huge improvement over Hotmail and other free webmail sites. I've Hotmail, Yahoo, Excite, and a half-dozen smaller providers. None is nearly as good as Gmail. That doesn't mean I want Gmail to stop where it is. Although its javascript-intensive design works fine on Mozilla, I would also like to see a plain HTML interface. Hell, I'd also love to see an IMAP interface, but I don't see that happening. But even as is now, Gmail is better than any free webmail provider I've used.

      I have my account subscribed to LKML and a dozen other high-traffic linux-related lists, some of them with similar names. I don't have much trouble keeping the messages correctly tagged, although I have to admit I look at only a small percentage of them. On occasion, I do see some messages that Gmail can't parse correctly for some odd reason probably related to bad MIME-encodings.

      It would be helpful if Gmail would let us filter messages based on arbitrary headers like Delivered-To:, or the special X- tags that most good mailing-list software adds to messages.

    61. Re:WAR! by shufler · · Score: 1

      Better still, instead of carrying, or downloading and importing your bookmarks, the following sites can be used on any OS, and any browser:

      Yahoo! Bookmarks
      Linkspage.org
      MyBookmarks.com
      iKeepBookmarks.com

      etc, etc, etc.

    62. Re:WAR! by Kethinov · · Score: 1
      Dude. Seriously.
      quoted text
      IS YOUR FRIEND. Stop using quoted text.
      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    63. Re:WAR! by Ugodown · · Score: 0, Redundant


      Some may disagree, but at least in the near future, as far as e-mail is concerned - 1 GB will more than suit 97% of the webmail users out there.

      Just like you'll never need more than 640k of RAM?

      --
      --- to swing on the spiral...
    64. Re:WAR! by TheTilde · · Score: 1

      how lame... I don't post so often on /. and I'm wrong when.
      microsoft .NET Passport don't need a hotmail account...

      I get back deeper underground...

    65. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations... you just gave away your e-mail to the spammers...

      Yep, he'll begin receiving GNAA invites any minute now.

    66. Re:WAR! by mrtroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looking at each of your issues seperately:
      1. 99 of people wont care.

      2. New filters cannot be applied retroactively : This is the first legitimate problem I have found with Gmail. You can do a sample search of your new filter, and then select those email, and then apply label to them (but if you have 100's it is not practical)

      3. You can import a variety of existing address books.

      4. There's many more problems, including their stupid lack of a plain HTML version I do not agree that their lack of a "plain HTML version" is a problem, gmail functions perfectly in IE and firefox, so I dont see the need for a plain text version. With the natural growth of technology, you have to leave some things behind, and I dont see a need for any plain HTML sites now. As a developer myself, I have not worked with "plain HTML" for 5+ years.

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    67. Re:WAR! by mj01nir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's my secret: I asked for an invite on my local LUG mail list. I had an invite within 4 hours. The lone invite that I've had to give out was posted on the same list.

      --
      the no .sig .sig
    68. Re:WAR! by arose · · Score: 1

      I asked for one in my /. sig.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    69. Re:WAR! by stevesliva · · Score: 4, Informative
      • The spam filtering is okay. I've had one or two legitimate list emails noted as false positives. Nothing new here.
      • the funky javascript preview thing cuts off the most important part of those emails
      Google has been tweaking both those features in the past few weeks. I recently noticed a number of mailing lists had been dropped into Spam, even though I had filters set to label them. That isn't happening anymore. And I believe the view message pane has begun showing more of the message w/o having to launch a popup.

      Annoyances: Bad contacts and filters sorting. No notifications of messages in Spam, filter-labeled messages in Spam are hidden from inbox.

      What's nice is that the number of filters is unlimited, versus hotmail's 10, the ability to search your old messages with google's engine, and less obtrusive, even interesting ads.

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    70. Re:WAR! by andy1307 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I got the 2GB storage about a week ago( I am a paying customer). Before that, I saw the "more store coming soon" message for about 2 weeks. I think the hotmail spam filter is pretty good. Most spam goes to the junk mail folder.

    71. Re:WAR! by seededfury · · Score: 1

      Holy spam storage! Now I will be able to save all my hotmail spam!

    72. Re:WAR! by Senzei · · Score: 2, Informative

      More than likely he just does not want to keep anything important on an email system that is in beta status. Granted according to the EULA none of the web email providers are responsible for their systems losing your mail. If I had a gmail account I wouldn't trust it with anything important either. Until its finalized I would treat it as any other piece of beta software, test it as much as possible but don't depend on it for anything.

      --
      Slashdot: Where anecdotes and generalizations can be freely substituted for facts, logic, or intelligence
    73. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...I have one and I know at least 20 others with them. None had to beg, in fact we have extra. I'm not sure why you are having such difficulties.

    74. Re:WAR! by vasqzr · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Some may disagree, but at least in the near future, as far as e-mail is concerned - 1 GB will more than suit 97% of the webmail users out there.

      640k ought to be enough for everyone

    75. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Hotmail account is still stuck at 2 MB, too. Microsoft is promising much but delivering little (actually nothing).

    76. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, if you receive 'thousands' of emails a week, you need a better spam filter because there is no way anyone actually receives that many emails that they actually want. Did you sign up to as many mailing lists as possible to be able to say you receive that many emails? You must be the man.

    77. Re:WAR! by sr1nath · · Score: 1

      Check the Rediffmail. They are offering 1GB now, not just promises.

    78. Re:WAR! by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      The forums you get notifys from must have fairly identical subject lines...I get the same sort of thing from two or three forums and this hasn't happened yet.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    79. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, quite an improvement to Hotmail. Thats a 1000% storage increase. But of course, I will be switching to Gmail once it is open. This will help ease the transition as Google begins its world domination.

    80. Re:WAR! by SpiffyMarc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It'd be nice to dehumanize companies like that, but I contacted eBay via their contact form re: my suspended account, and eBay not only called me on the cell phone number I provided the next day, they called back a few hours later when I didn't answer the first time. Spoke with the eBay rep for approx. 30 seconds, he informed me my account had been reinstated and that was that.

      I've heard horror stories before, but it IS possible to get in touch with people from companies like that, when they need to speak with you. Unfortunately, despite its' perceived convenience to us, if their contact page consisted of a mailto: link and a phone number, and all automated emails were sent from aliases that people watched, customer service would go into the tubes as their overloaded reps struggled to wade through the mass horde of emails and phone calls about things that didn't need to be discussed over the phone.

    81. Re:WAR! by uhmmmm · · Score: 1

      you ever think to use the notes section for storing address, phone, etc? sheesh, just because they provide with something more flexible than a form with just address, phone, etc fields doesn't mean you can't use it like that if you want.

    82. Re:WAR! by Skeezix · · Score: 1
      Hotmail is offering 2GB because that's all they got up their sleves. Gmail is a *huge* improvement over Hotmail on the user interface level. And the Gmail spam filter is pretty awesome.

      I have to disagree with you there. I'm noticing about 15 spams per day getting through. It's annoying enough to keep me from using gmail regularly.

    83. Re:WAR! by Autumnmist · · Score: 1

      Funny. I *WISH* gmail was even better at lumping forum replies together. I switched all my forum notifications over to gmail because I was sick of having to look at an index of 40 identical (by subject line) notifications per day.

      --
      --- "Many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." ~ Ben Kenobi, 'Return of the Jedi'
    84. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but if they're going to make me beg for an account, they can shove it.

      Amen to that, brother! By the time they get around to giving accounts to ordinary humans, there won't be any usernames that I care for anyway. Go to hell google!

    85. Re:WAR! by pnutjam · · Score: 2, Informative

      Comcast has increased Their email storage size to 250MB, up to 7 email address per subscriber.

    86. Re:WAR! by gwynevans · · Score: 1
      only filter based on "To, "From", and "Subject" headers
      Also "Has the words" and "Doesn't have" now.
      Their address book is terrible, and there isn't any way to import an existing one.
      Import's been there for a little while, whereas 'terrible's a value judgement.

      I guess the lack of the plain HTML is because (as I understand it, the bulk of the current implementation is JavaScript, doing a background connection to get the data then a lot of fancy work on the page, rather than pulling raw HTML down. Given that, it's going to be a whole new channel to get a HTML based page system running.

    87. Re:WAR! by mr.cbaker · · Score: 1

      I found importing my contact lists in Gmail super easy - I get lots of emails per day.. maybe not thousands, but 20 or so? It hands them all into nice filters for me and labels them. Google searching my emails rocks. Whenever i think of a piece of information I need, I can just search my email for it. What do I do in hotmail? "Click, back.. Click, Back..." Gmail is super awesome :)

    88. Re:WAR! by ian+mills · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're comparing apples to oranges. The only way Gmail can offer 1GB or space on their email accounts is that the majority of people will probably not use it. And with attachments limited to a certain size, it isn't easy to fill up. However with iDisk, if you're paying for that space you will most likely use it, and since iDisk doesn't have attachment limits it is also easier to fill. That said, iDisk pricing is a bit steep, but comparing it to gmail isn't really fair.

    89. Re:WAR! by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      I do have an account for a few month now, and I have yet to get a proff that it's working to use it. I try on a regular basis to switch my hotmail to this one, but then every time I send an email to my gmail account, it takes from 5minutes to 3 hours to be delivered.

      That is just not acceptable. At all. At least for me.

    90. Re:WAR! by Stone316 · · Score: 1

      Thats fine but didn't they announce way back when that they were increasing the free accounts? My account is still at 2MB.

      --
      "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    91. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hotmail sucks big time, but at least its accessible.

      I don't know aobut that, I get 'server to busy' messages at least several times per week.

    92. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The contacts system is an abomination. You can enter a name and an email and some notes. No room for address, phone or anything.
      So addresses and phone numbers aren't notes, then??
    93. Re:WAR! by manavendra · · Score: 1

      First of all, as someone already mentioned, MS has deliberately kept Passport low-profile, especially since this Passport became Passport to nowhere

      Secondly, I think alike Google, the mailbox size increase has happen selectively, since (I believe) this is still in testing stages. Try keeping your mailbox usage in high 80% and see what happens in a week or so.

      Finally, from the end user's perspective, it doesn't matter whether its passport or just hotmail, most users related MSN messenger to their hotmail account, which is precisely the user base that MS is exploiting and trying to retain

      --
      http://efil.blogspot.com/
    94. Re:WAR! by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      What's your problem with Javascript?

    95. Re:WAR! by plirr · · Score: 1

      They promised 250MB and delivered something like a week or two ago.

    96. Re:WAR! by exhilaration · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yahoo on the other hand offers an 'old' interface that requires no javascript

      Gmail will have the plain-HTML version done soon. Check out the list of stuff they're working on.

      (both links might require a Gmail login)

    97. Re:WAR! by Curtman · · Score: 1

      I get 'server to busy' messages at least several times per week

      Haha. Good point. I'd put that in the category of sucks big time though.

    98. Re:WAR! by segmond · · Score: 1

      £1.12. is a lot of money

      How about 7cents!

      --
      ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
    99. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      important email?

      thats an oxymoron

      if your box was deleted, would it really matter (outside ofthe lost addresses)

      seriously. i am not refering to the, "oh i might need to look at that again stuff"

      do you need it today, tommorow, or the next.

    100. Re:WAR! by mcovey · · Score: 1

      remember, before the storage increase all the hotmail users were used to deleting email to keep within a 2MB quota. I wonder if they'll let themselves go, become spam hogs, then Microsoft will slash storage citing "malicious internet hackers pirating Linux, raising costs" and where will the hotmail users go? I prefer my 80GB of email space (courtesy of Maxtor).

      --
      Amen.
    101. Re:WAR! by Curtman · · Score: 1

      By the time they get around to giving accounts to ordinary humans, there won't be any usernames that I care for anyway

      Exactly. If this bible thumper gets my GMail address too, I'll be pissed.

    102. Re:WAR! by hippycow · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's why only 2 MB of Hotmail storage rocks. It keeps the thing clean and tidy because you don't let cruft accumulate. The other unnecessary 1,998 MB is just going to be piled up spam and the whole thing will become useless.

    103. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The major problem is that one of web-mail's main advantages is that it can be retrieved from anywhere. Not having a version that works on weird kiosk portals, PDAs, etc is a major downside. If I'm only using it from personal machines, I'd much rather use any decent IMAP client that provides more functionality than gmail.

    104. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! 200 MB, 2 GB, 200 GB - it's all just hot air until they actually perform the upgrade.

      My hotmail account is still at 2 MB and I am not holding my breath.

    105. Re:WAR! by monkeyfarm · · Score: 1

      Instead of telling us here about your issues, why don't you use your _*BETA*_ account to tell Google so they can address or improve these areas? Or you could just keep pissing into the wind I suppose, after that's what /. is for.

      --
      What I don't know I just fake...
    106. Re:WAR! by huchida · · Score: 1

      In other words - 1 GB iDisk $350 per year. 1 GB gMail - free. Something is wrong there with somebody's pricing model for such a difference to exist.

      I do agree with you, it's nowhere near enough. I don't plan on renewing my .mac account when the new-computer-trial is up.

      But I think it should be noted that iDisk and gmail serve different purposes. iDisk isn't e-mail storage with all the restrictions that implies, it's basically fancy FTP storage space. I don't have gmail, but I would assume there are restrictions about attachment size... iDisk, on the other hand, has made transfer of huge files pretty easy.

    107. Re:WAR! by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      That's because eBay sucks.

      If you're in the UK, use eBid instead. Run by a couple of guys who respond in the forums, and its fees are a fraction of eBay's ripoffs. Yeah, eBid may go bad if they get as bid as eBay but what're you gonna do? Just have to keep moving to better online auctions until you find one that has a clue and doesn't start to suck.

      I'm sure there're several eBid equivalents in the US. Don't just complain about eBay - boycott them, and drive their shitty business into the ground.

    108. Re:WAR! by kisielk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about you just ask someone? Nicely? A lot of people have GMail invites sitting around.

    109. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, you chose to depend on a beta service, and you got fucked. Sorry, I don't see how Google's at fault, here.

    110. Re:WAR! by Beuno · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hey!
      I've got an idea!
      How about instead of bitching about it, you send a kind email to the gmail staff with these problems, and if your really good, maybe they'll fix it and let you live happy ever after with your @gmail

    111. Re:WAR! by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're mostly paying for the other stuff. If you don't find any value in the other parts of the service, you probably shouldn't use the service at all.

      The situation is similar to buying a $4000 PC just for the $1000 RAID array it comes with and leaving the rest unused. :P

    112. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Gmail is a *huge* improvement over Hotmail on the user interface level.
      I beg to differ. Gmail's UI is geared towards low volumes of email. If, like me, you receive thousands of emails a week, a number of major problems rear their heads.

      Your post makes little sense. The statement with which you claim to disagree is that GMail is an improvement over Hotmail. But none of your points have anything to do with comparing GMail to Hotmail -- instead you're comparing GMail to a completely seperate, non-webmail client.

    113. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a deep breath and think about what you're bitching about. You complain because your GMail account was shut down? Expecially since GMail was your primary e-mail account?

      Here's a flash: They DIDN'T create demand. *You* did. You are the one that went out and payed for a beta product. *You* are the one that agreed to the TOS which, in part, reminded you that this is a beta product. *You* are the one that used this beta product as your 'primary' e-mail account. Everytime you looked at your GMail inbox - did you ever once notice where it says "BETA" at the top-left in the logo?

      Sounds to me like you're being unreasonable here. Too much anger at Google for your own problems.

    114. Re:WAR! by pudding7 · · Score: 1

      How do you know he hasn't done that? Just because he's typing here, doesn't mean he can't or hasn't said the same thing somewhere else.

    115. Re:WAR! by jekewa · · Score: 1
      Amen. I only use my HotMail account for things that I know I don't care about or will probably end up in the hands of the spammers, and because it's required to get into the IM system to chat with my less-savvy friends.

      Otherwise, I run my own mail server with blacklists and SPAM filtering, further filtering with my mail client, leaving me very few junk mail messages to actually deal with. As far as I know, no false positives have been lost. The server ignores suspected servers, andthe spam filter throws away any high-scoring mail, leaving low-scoring spam for the mail client to handle, which gives me a chance to find mail I would want to keep (very, very, rare), tossing the rest in the trash can so I can peruse them.

      I have a web mail client, too, so I can check in from anywhere I can't fire up my client or shell in.

      Also, I don't worry about space. I'm casual (OK, lazy) about deleting mail, and after several years of not deleting what should probably be deleted I've only accumulated a couple hundred MB of crap. (Yes, it's sorted automatically into folders by sender or content.) That includes old "let's have lunch" announcements as well as mail with large attachements. The server's got another 50GB of space on it (slowly being eaten by web server and mail logs), so I'm not too worried about running out any time soon.

      1 GB would suffice and give me another few years to fill up. Then I'd probably have to get rid of those lunch invites from 1998...

      --
      End the FUD
    116. Re:WAR! by Smork · · Score: 0

      I understand that hotmail/msn addresses automatically have an associated .NET passport.

      My French is not so good but if I understand correctly it says "if you already have a @hotmail.com or @msn.com address, you already have a .NET passport" right?

      Where does it state that a hotmail/msn e-mail address is required for .NET passport? Nowhere. How would I otherwise be able to have a .NET passport without a hotmail address? :)

    117. Re:WAR! by Senzei · · Score: 1
      Actually I meant important as in reciepts from online purchases, time-sensitive things like friends/family travel plans, or maybe work-related correspondence for which you would appear unprofessional asking for a resend, especially to a different email address. I'm not talking about backing these things up. Obviously with any of these services if you want to be sure the information is there you print it. My point is that if gmail goes through some kind of server hiccup related to it being in beta and you never recieve Aunt Irene's flight info you would just be SOL wouldn't you?

      There are forms of email correspondence that are important.

      Thinking: Free
      Posting an intelligent response: Free
      Not having to post as AC so people can't laugh at you directly: Priceless

      --
      Slashdot: Where anecdotes and generalizations can be freely substituted for facts, logic, or intelligence
    118. Re:WAR! by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      As you now know, posts like this work too. ;)

    119. Re:WAR! by maniac_inside · · Score: 1

      Anyone else getting this message

      We're just too dern'd popular these days...

      We've had to take the site offline for some maintinence.

      Please bear with us and come back soon.

    120. Re:WAR! by FewClues · · Score: 1

      I believe that his anger is what got his article posted. I tried to make a civil post without all the expletives he used and it wasn't deemed publishable. My complaint was that I had paid Mandrake $165 for software that they refused to ship because I lived in a high fraud area (Texas). But maybe if I'd strewn the page with vulgarity I might have made print. It was my purpose to alert others to a potential problem as was the case with this rant about Google. I'll be surprised if this makes it either.

    121. Re:WAR! by Yewbert · · Score: 1
      And on an extra note as a Hotmail user, I don't trust anything they are saying right now, they promised more space like months ago and still haven't delivered. I love my Gmail though.

      One of my free Hotmail accounts has already been upped to 250 MB, but the other hasn't. I wonder what sequence they're doing this in - oldest accounts first? The account that's been tweaked, I've had since 1997 or 1998 - it's one of the first 100,000 or so Hotmail accounts, from long before MS bought Hotmail.

      GMail certainly has the potential to rock, but AFAIC, they're not fully "realized" yet. I'm wishing they'd incorporate a few other new features - mostly, an interface to handle files (sent/received as attachments or just uploaded) separately from any emails to which they're attached, and the ability to designate such files as public/shared or private - this could obviate some of the need for even mailing (and thus duplicating on their servers) large attachments.

    122. Re:WAR! by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, apples paid subscription service (idisk) with 100 MB of storage (At $99 /yr) starts to look a little paltry - It will be interesteing to see what they do in response to this.
      ...
      Whoa, hang back a second here. I'm not saying that the other bits of .mac don't exist. I am just saying that they are of relatively little value to me.

      That sure sounds like you're saying the other parts of .mac don't exist.

      I'm not saying .mac is suitable for me; even if it were free I wouldn't have signed up. I have an account through a webhost that gives me 2 gig of storage and I can allocate it for files or email however I want.

      Other people do find it a useful service as more than just data storage space. Pretending that's all it is because that's the only feature that interests you is being deliberately misleading.

      On the other hand, you raise a lot of good points about apple.

      I find it really annoying that my powerbook came with adapters for DVI and VGA outputs, but the composite one is not included. They sell any of the 3 in their store for $20, since one of the reasons I bought the powerbook was to use as a set-top DVD player, I need that cable. It's disgusting that Apple nickle-and-dime's me on cables the same day I'm spending $1600 on a notebook. The cost of other accessories is also just insane -- $50 for an ordinary USB mouse that only has 1 button?

      Also, I bought the 12" powerbook because I wanted a tiny and portable machine, not because I wanted a low end one. Apple seems to be locked into the small size = inferior notebook mentality. The larger powerbooks have a superior video card, the option of a faster CPU, a lighted keyboard, Gigabit ethernet, and a whole list of other features I lose on my 12" powerbook. The extra $400 for the 15" is a bargain compared to the 12", but size is too important a factor to me.

      Don't consider this an attack on apple; I think my powerbook is the best computer I've ever owned and I recommend Apple to all my friends (some of whom think Apple's brainwashed me). It's just that Apple is really out to screw their customers at times.

    123. Re:WAR! by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      And judging by your current sig, looks like it worked! Congrats! ;)

    124. Re:WAR! by nmk · · Score: 1

      While, for the most part, I agree with your post, there is one more consideration when comparing gMail with iDisk. With gMail, I believe the maximum size of each email is 10MB. Due to this limitation, it would be impossible to save any single file larger than 10MB in gMail. With iDIsk, the size of your files is only limited by the space available in your iDisk.

      You also get the additional benefit of having iDisk mount on your desktop and Finder like a regular volume. The drag and drop simplicity can't be matched by an online email service.

    125. Re:WAR! by nzgeek · · Score: 1

      I figure with a gig to spare, I don't really give a toss.
      As I've said, this gmail account is basically disposable. No IMAP, no POP... considering I do most of my email via GPRS it's pretty useless for me.

      Fastmail kicks GMail's arse for versatility.

    126. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      +5 Insightful? I guess that is because he irrationally bases Hotmail and praises Google.

      I'm taking names and will ask where you Gmail/Google maniacs are in a year or two when the investors start demanding more revenue for their investments. At that point, Gmail will be just as covered in advertising and all the other things that bother Hotmail users.

      Yeah, don't trust Hotmail and insult them. What you morans forget to think about is the fact that it is a "free" service supported by ads. They both run great services for what they cost.

      Mind you, I see a flamebait mod coming on, but hey.. I don't expect much. The parent post is much like people ripping freeware programmers who use minimal ads in their applications to support their developement costs. Though, I don't expect most folks to see or understand that.

      Like I have said before, I give Google 1-2 years at the most. They will plaster ads top to bottom, do evil things, and people will be all upset.

    127. Re:WAR! by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think this is a fantastic upgrade!

      It will let me go much longer, perhaps weeks, before crap missed by their spam filter fills up my mail box.

    128. Re:WAR! by nzgeek · · Score: 1

      Got it in one buddy. Surprised no one else spotted my gratuitous name dropping.

      Plus I just love to troll the GMail fanboys.

    129. Re:WAR! by nzgeek · · Score: 1

      Riiight. And so it should be up to me to put all my contact info in exactly the right order so I can sort by address or phone number? What!?

      It's a sad day when you're such a GMail fanboy that you have to turn an obvious deficiency in their (beta yes, yes I know) system into some sort of user problem.

      Honestly, are you being serious?

    130. Re:WAR! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Get a blogger account, that is how I got mine.

    131. Re:WAR! by Tesla+Tank · · Score: 1

      Seriously, is it that hard to know the difference between except and expect? Sure they have the same letters, but that's no excuse. Sorry, had a bad day. :(

    132. Re:WAR! by Curtman · · Score: 1

      I tried that after someone else suggested it, and it got me nowhere. Apparently you have to actually use the thing for them to give you invites. But I solved my problem. All I had to do was bitch about it on Slashdot.

      Thanks again Pedro. (No idea what your Slash nick is)

    133. Re:WAR! by avdp · · Score: 1

      I know the difference. Have you never ever made typos in your life?

    134. Re:WAR! by malfunct · · Score: 1

      Premium accounts are plus accounts + extra features. I would expect you would get 2gb of storage.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    135. Re:WAR! by Bri3D · · Score: 1

      It's not exciting...until you look at the # of ads. I have an account(bri3dd@gmail.com) and it it a MAJOR improvement over Hotmail just because I no longer have to download 1MB of flash ads to read my webmail.

    136. Re:WAR! by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

      You forgot: plain text is extremely compressible. 1GB of text messages may only consume 50MB on disk.

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
    137. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... reciepts from online purchases, time-sensitive things like friends/family travel plans, or maybe work-related correspondence for which you would appear unprofessional asking for a resend, especially to a different email address"

      You'd actually rely on webmail for stuff like this?!! Beta or not, for important emails such as the ones you described, why not try using something a little more... oh I don't know... RELIABLE?!

      You acknowledge that you may risk looking unprofessional because that particular webmail is beta but if you look at the big picture, it is _still_ webmail.

    138. Re:WAR! by Tesla+Tank · · Score: 1

      Mostly in IM. I tend to read over what I write while posting something like this. Anyway, enough trolling for one day. I usually just let these stuff slip by, but my fuse is short on Friday.

    139. Re:WAR! by SoulSkorpion · · Score: 1
      I have a theory - The bigger the company is, the bigger percentage of idiots working for said company. Read into that what you will.


      ...surely you mean that there's a fixed percentage? 1% idiot in a 10000 person company is more idiots than a 100 person company...
    140. Re:WAR! by SiNdeRpHYtiK · · Score: 1

      You noted that filters cant be applied retroactively. While I agree with you that they need to fix this, there is a workaround available. That is, just do a search using the same terms that you have set in the filter and then apply the label or what-have-you to all of them. This is my personal mini-fix until they do something about it on their end.

    141. Re:WAR! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      I noticed after a huge post they offered it to me.

      Size does matter!

    142. Re:WAR! by clayanderson · · Score: 1

      In related news, AOL to offer 10,000 free hours for first 30 days.

    143. Re:WAR! by uhmmmm · · Score: 1

      sorry, but i can't see how it'd even be useful to sort by some arbitrarily assigned number such as address or phone number. is that supposed to put your contacts into some actual meaningful order? so, yes, i'm serious, i do think the notes section would be just fine for storing address, phone number, etc.

    144. Re:WAR! by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Well, I've been using my new GMail account for a few days now. I've switched all my mailing list subscriptions over to it, and I have to say that I'm VERY impressed. I may just start using it full time for all my "real" email.

      They really need to open this thing up though even though its still in beta. This invite system is really stupid and will only help MS to keep Hotmail on top.

    145. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As a developer myself, I have not worked with "plain HTML" for 5+ years.
      You're a large part of the problem, right there.

      "Developer"

      Hah.

  2. That'll be nice... by dmayle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    2GB. That's nice and all, but when are they going to actually deliver on the 10MB they promised everyone? I don't use Hotmail, but my girlfriend does, and I'm unable to send her any attachments larger than about 500k because she keeps old emails...

    1. Re:That'll be nice... by REBloomfield · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I had an email telling me about the wonderful upgrades, but I haven't seen any yet, and my box is permanently around 85% full. Even with the spam filter cranked up, they still let threw the odd vew fival attachments that push me over the limit. And as you can see----^ I've moved to gmail...

    2. Re:That'll be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The limit on my wife's hotmail.co.jp account recently increased to 250MB for no apparent reason. My hotmail.com account is still 2MB..

    3. Re:That'll be nice... by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      Is webmail really that popular ?, i have a hotmail account that i use to catch spam but does joe public really use like, want or need a webmail account ?

    4. Re:That'll be nice... by Build6 · · Score: 5, Informative

      considering the integration Outlook Express, Entourage et al have with Hotmail, for many people Hotmail *isn't* just "web"-mail.

      that said, I'm still waiting for the storage upgrade they promised, up from 2MB to whatever. I was going to retire my hotmail account and go elsewhere, but I decided to wait when they announced. It's starting to sound like what they've been known to do in the past - announce vapourware in order to delay migration/movement to elsewhere.

    5. Re:That'll be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The article got it a bit wrong. The free service will be offering only 250mb whereas hotmail plus will give you 2 gig. The free service emails will be limited to 10mb and plus will be 20mb. Still quite far behind Gmail it seems... http://www.imagine-msn.com/hotmail/en-us/

    6. Re:That'll be nice... by baker_tony · · Score: 0

      My hotmail account went to 250MB a couple of days ago... I assume they are moving them over slowly for some reason

    7. Re:That'll be nice... by Threni · · Score: 1

      > 2GB. That's nice and all, but when are they going to actually deliver on the
      > 10MB they promised everyone?

      When are google going to actually deliver the 1 GB they promised everyone?

    8. Re:That'll be nice... by eraserewind · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I use Hotmail through Outlook Express on Windows XP (there goes my credibility). It works pretty well though I have to say, though occasionally multiple accounts confuse it. I keep my Hotmail empty, and immediately move email to my regular inbox (because the quota is still very low)

      It catches most of the junk mail, though I've found that if you get some spam to your Hotmail Inbox it's better to go to the webmail page, and report it as junk mail rather than just deleting it. If you don't report it they continue to let in the same type of email again and again.

    9. Re:That'll be nice... by cygnusx · · Score: 1

      [oh the shame]I have a Hotmail Plus account[/oh the shame] (Yep, I like it for the Outlook integration and Messenger alerts, besides the fact that it's been a great spam-free address since 1997). I've been on a 2GB mailbox since July. Not all Hotmail Plus accounts have been upgraded yet though.

      IIRC the process of rolling the free subscribers up to 250MB will take time. If you don't mind the hassle of changing email, there's always Yahoo (or Gmail if you can snarf one).

      And oh, the Inquirer article the OSViews article was based on contained very little hard facts and no sources. And nowhere does it explicitly say the 2GB is for free (of course, if they do give that to free users, more power to them).

    10. Re:That'll be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try again. The limit on my free Hotmail account got upped to 250MB a few days ago.

    11. Re:That'll be nice... by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      ive been given 250 megs already, though most of the people i know are still on 2... i guess theyre upgrading older accounts earlier (mines what? 7-8 years old?)... 2 gigs will be the plus, not the free...

    12. Re:That'll be nice... by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      1% of 250MB Get Hotmail Plus ^^ its not vapourware

    13. Re:That'll be nice... by ggeens · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend's account also has 2MB, and I have been wondering about when they would upgrade that. Last week, I looked around in the online help, and there they claim they're busy upgrading all accounts.

      If they need so much time to get everyone to 10MB (or was that 25MB?), how long will it go to 2GB?

      --
      WWTTD?
    14. Re:That'll be nice... by pi8you · · Score: 1

      Even though I'm only using it for a throwaway address, it's nice to see that I have gotten the bump up to 250mb like they were talking about. Then again, I seem to recall them mentioning them going through an upgrading a chunk of people at a time, and as I've had my address since August of 97/98(pre-MS) I'd venture a guess that perhaps they're upgrading by creation date.

    15. Re:That'll be nice... by Surur · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      My near 9 year old account was upgraded about a week ago. I went from 85% full (with ruthless pruning) to 1% full. Also the amount of spam I recieve has dropped dramatically recently. I bought Mailwasher pro 6 months ago, but hardly use it anymore, as there isnt anything to delete. When G-mail was anounced, I was ready to jump ship, but very reluctantly, as I had my hotmail address for so long. Now that I've got 250Mb for free, with 10Mb attachments, I no longer feel the urge at all anymore. Competition.... Its great, isnt it. Surur

      --
      Information is the location of things. Computation is moving things around.
    16. Re:That'll be nice... by smacktits · · Score: 1

      I have had my Hotmail account for near enough the same amount of time as you, and I'm still on the 2mb service. I received a Gmail invite from my friend and checked it out, and I have to say that besides the amount of space, it is not that impressive.

      Besides, I use my own domain email for important stuff anyway and I have every important email safely backed up on my array. I do not like the idea of my important mail being on someone else's box, however reputable they may be.

    17. Re:That'll be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've found that if you get some spam to your Hotmail Inbox it's better to go to the webmail page, and report it as junk mail rather than just deleting it. If you don't report it they continue to let in the same type of email again and again.

      Unfortunately they don't let you report or even block all that incredibly irritating spam from some firm called MSN. That's one reason I gave up on them...

    18. Re:That'll be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I bet when more than 10 people actually start filling up their mailboxes up to the 2 Gb limit, there will be service terminations everywhere!

      This is a scam just like the "512 kbps" ADSL line where you would get a notice if you actually used all that bandwidth 24/7 for the whole month.

    19. Re:That'll be nice... by Gumph · · Score: 2, Informative

      of course it is. How else can I read my email when on a course/at a clients site/on holiday?? There are many occasions when it is nice to have email without lugging a damn laptop round with me.
      and as for hotmail and gmail just forget them and use yahoo instead, it has 100 Mb of space and so will do for most people (in fact yahoo has always had more space on offer than hotmail (at least in the UK) since I started using it last Millenium!!!) Plus it has good (IMHO) spam filters that work pretty well now I have 'trained' them.

      --
      'By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes'
    20. Re:That'll be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's starting to sound like what they've been known to do in the past - announce vapourware in order to delay migration/movement to elsewhere.

      Sucker. How does that saying go? Fool me once, shame on you... fool me twice, shame on me... ? But I don't recall how "fool me for the hundredth time..." ends.

    21. Re:That'll be nice... by De+Lemming · · Score: 2, Informative

      For the moment, the Gmail size limit per mail is also 10MB, which in practice (encoding) translates to a max 7MB attachment.

    22. Re:That'll be nice... by Mourgos · · Score: 0

      Not all hotmail users get upgraded at the same time. My account just got upgraded to 250MB a week ago and it's an account I have had since 96.

    23. Re:That'll be nice... by swordboy · · Score: 1

      I'm unable to send her any attachments larger than about 500k because she keeps old emails...

      Have her create local storage with Outlook Express and download all of them. This works nicely. The Mozilla team should come up with some sort of hotmail direct compatibility. Until then, OE works great.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    24. Re:That'll be nice... by RALE007 · · Score: 1

      They're not upgrading by creation date. Out of curiosity I just checked the spambox with them I've had since 96 and it's still 2MB.

      --
      Beware blue cats moving at .99c
    25. Re:That'll be nice... by beaverbrother · · Score: 2, Informative
      When i log in to my hotmail account it tells me:

      This fall, your MSN e-mail will include:

      2GB of storage for your inbox

      20MB send/receive attachment size

      Now: Web e-mail with no graphical ads!

    26. Re:That'll be nice... by Wooo · · Score: 1

      I use Mozilla Thunderbird to view my hotmail account using Hotmail Popper which allows me to save all my hotmail e-mails locally so I never run out of storage

      --

      When life gives you lemons, you squeeze the lemon juice into your enemies eyes and steal his apples.
    27. Re:That'll be nice... by unborn · · Score: 1

      Which makes me think, isn't this an abuse on Microsoft's part to force people to use Outlook, hence Windows, by creating this secret feature that allows Outlook to download hotmail?

    28. Re:That'll be nice... by arantius · · Score: 1

      Just email her a link to a file on http://www.dropload.com/

      Email is a shitty way to transfer files anyway. It's a mail protocol, not a file transfer protocol.

      --
      Health is simply dying at the slowest rate possible.
    29. Re:That'll be nice... by Myself · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the "we'll upgrade you any day now" will probably continue as long as gmail keeps the "beta" tag.

      Consider this: Gmail's huge storage space raised the bar for all the webmail providers. Yahoo and Hotmail are probably spending gajillions on storage hardware right now. Gmail forced the competition to engage in huge expenditures. Once their bottom lines are suitably drenched in red, Gmail can evaporate, lauging all the way. "We told you it was just a beta!"

      Consider as well that Gmail's userbase is limited, whereas Hotmail and Yahoo allow anyone to sign up. I don't know the numbers of active accounts on each service, but the difference is probably orders of magnitude.

    30. Re:That'll be nice... by hedge_death_shootout · · Score: 1

      'unborn' said: Which makes me think, isn't this an abuse on Microsoft's part to force people to use Outlook, hence Windows, by creating this secret feature that allows Outlook to download hotmail?


      You mean the secret protocol everybody knows about?
      The secret Web-DAV protocol?! The secret protocol used by a bunch of non-Microsoft apps to access hotmail?!?!
      Ohmygod, how did you find out about The Secret Protocol!?

      Howwwwww!??!?!??!???!??!1/1/

    31. Re:That'll be nice... by mybecq · · Score: 1
      ... but when are they going to actually deliver on the 10MB they promised everyone

      Look here
      MSN Hotmail
      Sign up now -- It's FREE!
      In addition to all the great features above, coming this autumn for all free Hotmail accounts:
      More E-Mail Storage -- Get a 250MB inbox -- FREE. That's over 125 times your current e-mail storage!
    32. Re:That'll be nice... by illuminatedwax · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one whose Hotmail account has increased to 250MB without me doing anything?

      Perhaps they are upgrading chronologically and since I started my hotmail account in oh, late 1997, maybe I get in before other users.

      And it's not really fair if you have to PAY to get 2GB of space, when Google gives 1GB to you for free.

      --Stephen

      --
      Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
    33. Re:That'll be nice... by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      i guess theyre upgrading older accounts earlier

      I don't know what their order of upgrade is, but I really doubt it is older-first... I've had my account since 1996 and am still on 2Mb. Or if they really do it older-first, then at that pace, it's gonna take decades before someone who just signed up get theirs...

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    34. Re:That'll be nice... by rjhall · · Score: 1

      no, don't!

      You get your SO to move their emails to local storage, and you're in big trouble when the inevitable harddrive smoke happens.
      I may be way out, but I would guess that ALL these freemail vendors back up their stores more often than you (or I) back up our local drives, no?

  3. First! by CobaltBlue612 · · Score: 1

    But doesnt that mean just 150 customers per $100 HHD? :-S

    1. Re:First! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where you get a 300GB drive for $100 . . . please share the info! Otherwise, I think you need to brush up on your math...

    2. Re:First! by CobaltBlue612 · · Score: 1

      Wholesale costs are nothing like retail costs, just ask anyone who bought sells bottled water. Microsoft would need about 400 to a thousand of these to hold their 2 million members, assuming average data can be compressed at a 60% ratio, noone learns to master zipfiles, and 90%+ of people who use it aren't likely to go past 30 or 40mb, they'd still need enough units to get a pretty substantial bulk buy discount, even at wholesale. If you think MS buys its PC spares at Chips-n-Bits, you're sadly mistaken.

    3. Re:First! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      90%+ of people who use it aren't likely to go past 30 or 40mb

      Maybe not at first, but as time goes on people WILL accumulate that much email.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    4. Re:First! by Greventls · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but as they accumulate email, the price of storage will be decreasing. I'm hoping that is how they plan to do this, anyway. I've had gmail for a month, and I'm using 6MB after a month. So Google has 166 months of time until my inbox will be full. I'd hope they plan to upgrade their servers before those thirteen years pass.

    5. Re:First! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Fellow Pittsburgher huh? Hook me up with a gmail invite. PLEASE!

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:First! by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      right thought. a data center cannot purchase 100$ 3 year warranty ide drives. they have raid storage arrays. also the cost of the disk storage in a data center must also include the cost of the backup device, tapes, and possibly, the maintenance of the tapes (rotation, shipped off site, etc).

  4. That means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Storage will increase by 1000%!!!

  5. I'm holding out... by mellonhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    Until they come out with a free service that includes the installation of a server with a terabyte of storage in my basement.

    1. Re:I'm holding out... by Loonacy · · Score: 1

      You mean your parents' basement.

  6. Not choked... by stoborrobots · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Surely the subscribers will simply get yet a larger spam-box...

  7. Can google respond in kind? by Sipos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I see no reason why google won't just increase their space by the same factor. Noone will use more than a few hundred megabytes (assuming you have rules that prevent online backups etc)

    1. Re:Can google respond in kind? by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm guessing that you don't subscribe to mailing lists. Google is great for mailing lists with the conversation feature and the ability to search old mail and being able to apply multiple labels and skip the inbox. My usage goes up by around one megabyte a day with one active mailing lists and two semi-active mailing lists. I could easily see going over a hundred megs in a month if I add a couple of mailing lists to the pool.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    2. Re:Can google respond in kind? by sqrt(2) · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was playing with my Gmail account and it seems that as long as you rename the file to something other than .rar (or whatever archive type you use) you can upload and retrieve the file just fine. WinRAR allows you to brake up archives into parts, so you make a few dozen 10mb chunks, rename to .xyz and store the file on gmail. Someone will probably make a small program to automate all of this after gmail is available to the general public.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    3. Re:Can google respond in kind? by Senzei · · Score: 1
      ....and then google will have to write something to ensure that you are following the TOS for your account. The point of the service is to give you a gig of email, not backup space. This is not gsave or gbackup it is gmail.

      My message to the parent and anyone else of like mind: Don't screw around and risk ruining a good thing for the rest of us.

      --
      Slashdot: Where anecdotes and generalizations can be freely substituted for facts, logic, or intelligence
  8. Great! by BluRBD!E · · Score: 4, Funny

    No I can save ALL of my spam... instead of the daily gigabytes worth.

  9. Next big thing. by Defender2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So storage space is no longer the big attraction, since everybody can get lots.

    I bet the next big thing will be from whoever reaches the 700mb attachment limit ;)

    --
    ...I'll procrastinate tomorrow...
    1. Re:Next big thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The next big thing will be which one is easier to use, has less intrusive ads, and perhaps, which offers the best security/authentication to minimize spam (such as sender-id).

      It's what made Google popular in the first place (the ease of use, that is).

    2. Re:Next big thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      700? CDs are so yeterday, a DVD is a 4.6GB attachment, I'm holding out for blueray sized attachments myself.

    3. Re:Next big thing. by pjt33 · · Score: 1
      Why? 700 milli-bits isn't that much.

      Incidentally, why that particular value? Do you often e-mail ISO images?

    4. Re:Next big thing. by unborn · · Score: 1

      I hope this comment hints you towards the answer:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=118658&cid=1 00 21090

    5. Re:Next big thing. by Senzei · · Score: 1
      No, he probably just does it for DoS attacks on his poor modem-using friends email accounts.

      WTF my email has been downloading for SIX DAYS!

      --
      Slashdot: Where anecdotes and generalizations can be freely substituted for facts, logic, or intelligence
    6. Re:Next big thing. by dapyx · · Score: 0

      You should also note that most pirated div-x movies have 700 MB (to fit on a CD).

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
  10. That's strange by Guitarzan · · Score: 5, Informative

    They haven't even upped the normal 2 meg ones yet...

    Not that I'm really bothered by it, it's just always fun to see huge claims. :)

    1. Re:That's strange by eclectro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They say that they are going to increase the limit on the 2 meg accounts "by the end of the summer", which gives them roughly a month until the first day of fall before I can call them a liar.

      I suspect they are dragging their feet to squeeze all the upgrade money they can from the 2 meg accounts.

      Also, I'm sure that there will be major strings attached, like having to sign in to your account every three weeks or lose it.

      Alternatively, they may be dragging their feet because there are serious technical issues at hand, like with everybody letting their accounts fill with spam, which means they have will actually have to deliver tera/petabytes of storage.

      The only thing I use my hotmail account for is for when people get really pushy for an email, I give them my hotmail address.

      But I agree with an earlier poster, I don't need 2 gigs. Just deliver on 15 megs.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:That's strange by baker_tony · · Score: 0
      My hotmail account went to 250MB 2 days ago, all by itself. Looks like they aren't increasing the size of the accounts all at once.

      I wonder if it's got something to do with how long you've had your account open. I've had my hotmail account for years

    3. Re:That's strange by Curtman · · Score: 1

      "by the end of the summer", which gives them roughly a month until the first day of fall

      This morning the newspaper said there was snow downtown here last night. And its currently 1 degree celcius. Time's up.

    4. Re:That's strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Hotmail account was upgraded to 250M as well, about a week ago. Maybe Slashdot posters are on some kind of shitlist :)

    5. Re:That's strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised that people are saying they haven't had their 2MB accounts upgraded. I've had 250MB account size with 10MB attachments possible since the middle of last month. I first knoticed it when my limit was no longer red but down to 1%. A welcome surprise!

      Why have they upgraded mine and not others I wonder? Has anyone else been upgraded?

    6. Re:That's strange by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Did they specify the northern hemispher's summer, or just 'summer' which could easily mean this comming summer in Australia...

      --
      You never know...
    7. Re:That's strange by eclectro · · Score: 1


      Well, they are located in Redmond Washington, which means they fall under the influence of the northern hemisphere.

      Thusly the first day of fall happens on the atumnal equinox which is around sept 22.

      Don't ask me which direction the toilet water spins when Bill G. uses the bathroom though.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    8. Re:That's strange by Zarendahl · · Score: 1

      I just checked my ancient Hotmail account, and it has been upped to 250MB. They are following through, by going for the oldest users first. I appreciate the fact that M$ is finally trying to toe the line, but sometimes it's to little to late...

    9. Re:That's strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i got a mail from them (hotmail staff) saying that my account was being upp'd but i didnt see any change until a friend of mine sent me a 2.4 meg attachment. I thought my account must have locked out and logged in to hotmail (i use outlook) to delete it directly from server instead of waiting for the download).. and guess what it was upp'd to 250 megs... not too bad... atleast when i delete my email on hotmail.. i know its deleted.. not too fussed about gmail...

    10. Re:That's strange by Holi · · Score: 1

      Strange, how long have you had a hotmail account. I've had mine since mid '97 and I am still at 2 megs.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    11. Re:That's strange by Zarendahl · · Score: 1

      I have had it since Hotmail was started roughly.

      Back in '95... So they may be going by seniority for this. My account is so old, they DON'T deactivate it after 30 days. It takes 90 for me.

    12. Re:That's strange by Holi · · Score: 1

      Yeah I've gone months without checking in, never even got a warning about deactivation. I think it has to do with pre-Microsoft accounts, but hey thats just my guess.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    13. Re:That's strange by descil · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I'm not a microsoft proponent.

      Do you have any idea how long it takes to migrate storage? Hotmail is adding a boatload of terabytes to their servers; in order to promise every hotmail user 250 megs, assuming their published 30 million number is right... let's assume 1/10th of their users use the full storage; 3 million. Now some quick math brings that up to 750 000 000 megabytes, or 750 terabytes. That's a lot of arrays to put into an environment; they probably have to set up a new room just to store the new servers to handle the load. A month! Oh my. I'd be surprised if the purchase order got finished in three weeks. Cabling up that many servers? Gonna take another week at least. Bringing them all online, served up to the hotmail servers (remember, they're using a decent backend, not windows) shouldn't take TOO long, but is still going to take another two weeks to work the bugs out.

      Finish in a month? I'll be amazed. Maybe if they started last month they'll be finished in a month. And, to think of it, they probably did.

    14. Re:That's strange by FarHat · · Score: 1

      They've upped my most ancient account (I think I got it within a week of hotmail opening) to 250 megs. Another account that I got a couple of weeks after that still shows 2 Megs.

      -F

      --
      At the intersection of computation and biology.
  11. Unlimited by neilmoore67 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some of the storage space figures being bandied around are so outlandish that it wouldn't surprise me if someone trumps them all by offering free unlimited storage space (perhaps they already have).

    They can always boot people from the service if they use too much space anyway. :-)

    --
    You've probably noticed that people's noses get bigger as they get older. That's because old people are huge liars.
    1. Re:Unlimited by HungSquirrel · · Score: 1

      It's easy to offer "unlimited" email storage space. Text is easy to compress. It's attachments that are the kicker.

      --
      $ whatis themeaningoflife
      themeaningoflife: not found
    2. Re:Unlimited by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am wondering why nobody has done this yet. With a limit on attachment size and a good spam filter, most people's mailboxes will stay rather small.

      Of course, it will be the people that do receive lots of mail (I receive about 100 MB/month) that first jump on it.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    3. Re:Unlimited by Peepsalot · · Score: 1

      Nobody has done this because someone would come along and create a program that splits up entire hard drives into attachment size pieces, and mails them to their account for a free online backup drive. You gotta set a limit somewhere.

  12. GMX offers 1GB free and 8GB for paying customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Webinterface, POP3/SMTP, server-side filtering and forwarding included.

  13. Good business by pubjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft paid, what, $400 million for Hotmail. Then they must have paid quite a bit to port the back end to Windows. Now they are going to have increase the hardware of the back end considerably to compete with Gmail. And it's a free service.

    Is that good business?

    1. Re:Good business by CharonIDRONES · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All I have to say is that it would be the funniest thing, EVER, to see that Google at April 1, 2005 (the first announcement of Gmail was 1-4-04) is just like 'April Fools suckas'

      -Brandon

    2. Re:Good business by antimatt · · Score: 1

      When you have cash cows like Windows and Office going for you, you don't exactly have to pinch pennies with your other services.

      As the joke goes, the 900-pound gorilla sleeps wherever it damn well pleases.

    3. Re:Good business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is. It is about ripping a new one to competition. nad when there is no competition left, you can do whatever you please.
      Sometimes this is called Japanese bussiness model. Also, MS pulled that one in OS and in browser market. so, it must work.

    4. Re:Good business by CdBee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They're probably terrified that Google Gmail will become a universal sign-in system to compete with MSN Passport - which, after all, is the real business reason to get people onto Hotmail.

      Microsoft wants to control Online Identity services and Instant Messaging. Google has the ability to be a significant threat to that if they decide to enter the market. (I'm hoping they will)

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    5. Re:Good business by eclectro · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're probably terrified that Google Gmail will become a universal sign-in system to compete with MSN Passport - which, after all, is the real business reason to get people onto Hotmail

      Agreed. Also there is all that "life is better with the butterfly" crap that they have to try and justify.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    6. Re:Good business by pilybaby · · Score: 1

      Plus they also get a benifit of promoting their other services through their tie ins with MSN on the hotmail site. It's all about getting hits.

      I don't understand who needs a gig or more for e-mail. If you really have that much e-mail you obviously rely on it for your livleyhood and thus wouldn't trust these services with it, well at least I wouldn't.

    7. Re:Good business by Jade+E.+2 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Microsoft paid, what, $400 million for Hotmail. Then they must have paid quite a bit to port the back end to Windows.
      I was under the impression that Hotmail still used IIS web servers talking to the original Solaris backend. That was way back when they had only had it for a year or two though... Could be different now.

      OK, googled it, found these: In 1998, the attempt to migrate to NT apparently failed. And in 2002, they appear to have tried again.

      Anybody know if it worked?

    8. Re:Good business by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      Yea, will that be before or after their share price tanks to US$0.50 or after they get sued for fraud, if they do what u suggest?

      I'm one the lucky bloggers who got invited to gmail, and I fell in love...the only problem is that I'm still hanging on to my other accounts.."just in case"...I hope to eventually give up the habit that is HotMail, but in the meantime I'm still checking it occasionally.
      Gmail rock however. And the thing I find funniest the whole hubbub about the fact that gmail 'scans' your e-mail and provides you with relevant ads. The ads are nice and inconspicuous, and they actually are sort of relevant...and this gets amusing at times...also I think they technology they use to display those ads is already in use on blogger and a gazillion other websites...though yes, those sites aren't as "private" as webmail....
      Anyhoo, gmail rulz, hotmail used to be good until it became teh sux0r and here's my Trubute to the ObviousGuy: I don't get it (The Whole Idea is Crazy!)

    9. Re:Good business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, how about releasing version 4.0 of a web browser (including tight OS integration), distributing it for free, and then wiping out the competition...sound familiar?

    10. Re:Good business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      it was freebsd actually

    11. Re:Good business by Genoxide · · Score: 1

      Of course it's good business.. Just imagine this scenario.. If you have a couple of million users, how much do you think you could make by say... Letting advertisers spam your users?? And if the users want to avoid the spam, you can let them pay for an upgraded service with a somewhat functional spam filter, and collect your money that way! Not to mention the banner ads.. DON'T even get me started on the banner ads.. ;)

    12. Re:Good business by vidnet · · Score: 1

      1. Start free email service
      2. Spam! Spam! Spam!
      3. Profit

    13. Re:Good business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      AFAIK, the front end web servers were moved from FreeBSD/Apache to IIS, you're right (See here), but the backend was, and could still be, Solaris. (See parent poster's references.)

    14. Re:Good business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hasn't MSN Passport all but failed? I don't think I've seen any online retailer -- or any other site, for that matter -- use Passport the last couple of years.
      Match.com (AKA slashdot personals, during their brief tenure as such), Ebay, and CareerBuilder are all linked in to passport.

      Of course, on all of those it's optional and secondary to the primary login system. Plus Match.com and CareerBuilder both also support AOL Screen Names, so I'd guess that's actually the nearest competitor for single sign-in solutions...

      (Hmmm, let's see, I've just admitted I've used Match.com and CareerBuilder somewhat recently, I think 'Post Anonymously' would be a good thing to check...)

    15. Re:Good business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just purchased my airplane ticket from expedia.com by using MS Passport.

    16. Re:Good business by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Well you would do, what with Expedia being a company that was formed by Microsoft. Passport was implemented on the site before the compnay was sold off.

    17. Re:Good business by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Yes passport failed. There used to be a page on microsoft.com that listed the sites that are using Passport. I found it about 6 months ago, but it doesn't seem to be there any more (I wonder why?). From memory there were 86 sites listed - but most if the list was padding. MSN was listed for each separate country they operated in, so was ebay and various others. By the time you'd eliminated these duplicates, it was down to less than 50, and many of those were Microsoft sites (MSN, Hotmail, Expedia etc.). This was 3 years after Microsoft set out to make Passport the universal sign on for ecommerce sites on the internet. I believe you can say that's a failure.

    18. Re:Good business by luferbu · · Score: 1
      > and here's my Trubute to the ObviousGuy: I don't get it (The Whole Idea is Crazy!)

      In case you missed it, it refers to the Slashdot post number 10 million

    19. Re:Good business by vrt3 · · Score: 1

      AFAIK they migrated in 2000.

      --
      This sig under construction. Please check back later.
    20. Re:Good business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Thanks to archive.org, you can find the list here.

    21. Re:Good business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Hotmail site was converted from FreeBSD running Apache Web services to Windows 2000 Server running Microsoft Internet Information Services 5.0
      (from the link)

      The linked article only talks about moving the front-end (the Web interface to the email servers) from FreeBSD/Apache to Windows 2000. There was no mention of replacing any email programs (qmail for Hotmail, I think) or infrastructure.

    22. Re:Good business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the japanese business model you determine what price you want the product to sell at once you're selling a million units a year, and then start selling them at that price, thus taking a loss on the first units, but getting to a million units a year faster. In the american business model, you try to get fewer customers, who pay more. Neither model inherently involves ripping anybody's asshole.

    23. Re:Good business by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      And IIRC, they had to double the number of Windows *cough* servers to get comparable performance as when it ran on BSD.

    24. Re:Good business by nine-times · · Score: 1
      'They're probably terrified that Google Gmail will become a universal sign-in system to compete with MSN Passport - which, after all, is the real business reason to get people onto Hotmail.'

      I think it's a little paranoid, but I sometimes wonder with stuff like this though- is it a real "business decision", or is this part of a world view that Microsoft has, that it should be in control of everything. It seems like a lot of Microsoft's decisions seem to be aimed at increasing control over consumers and increasing the consumers dependance on their products, whether it makes money or not. They'll only be happy when they've interwoven their products in everything, so that no one product will work without all of them, and make it so no competitors' products can work with any of it, and made their products necessary to have a bank account or use the internet or go to the bathroom.

    25. Re:Good business by subsentio · · Score: 1
      They're probably terrified that Google Gmail will become a universal sign-in system to compete with MSN Passport

      If you believe that Google really has a "don't be evil" philosophy (which I don't but a lot of people here seem to) then this is not something to worry about. Attempting to become a universal sign-in system would be pretty evil, IMO.

    26. Re:Good business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend of mine works for a vendor whose products are used in Microsoft's Hotmail environment. According to him, Microsoft just recently gave up on their latest attempt to make the Hotmail stuff run on Windows. So, it's back on Solaris.

  14. I'll believe it when I see it by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So far, it seems like it is all rumors.

    First we heard that they were going to up to 250MB. Hasn't happened yet. Now 2GB. I'm not holding my breath.

    If Hotmail would actually filter spam, and do something about the headache-inducing interface, -that- would be an improvement. Thank goodness for gotmail!

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    1. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK Hotmail Japan accounts have been upgraded to 250MB.

    2. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do filter SPAM. In the last month or so, the amount of SPAM that my HM account receives has dropped by about an order of magnitude.

      1. The rules for what goes to "Junk mail" instead of inbox have been tightened.

      2. They now seem to eliminate a lot of SPAM in the MTA so that it never shows on the end-user's display. (Hope they're not throwing away anything important :-/)

    3. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have increased size to 250 MB now. At least it displays that message. I haven't checked whether it works or not!

    4. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry I don't know about your account, but my hotmail account filters spam brilliantly. Simply set your settings to "Receive e-mail from contacts only". That gets rid of all the crud, but of course also turns up a few false-positives, which you can remove from the Junk Mail folder. But Hotmail also allows you put certain domains/addresses into the safe list. Yes Microsoft sux, but let's be a little more objective. Hotmail isn't bad. It's just beginning to suck in comparison to Gmail.

    5. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Enygma42 · · Score: 1

      I've just given my girlfriend a gmail account (she used to use hotmail) and she can't beleive the reduction in spam.

      Having a GB is nice but not the most important thing.

      The Gmail interface is really nice too.

      --
      "hehe, website" - Homer Simpson
    6. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by RogueProtoKol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course there's a reduction in spam, it's a brand new account!

    7. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Laser+Dan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hotmail filter spam??! They SEND spam!
      I got a hotmail account to use MSN, I have never used it but its full of spam anyway. Expected with hotmail really.
      What really pissed me off though was getting an official hotmail message with ads for ING, SEEK, Virgin credit card, some Xbox game, and down the side are instructions for blocking spam: " Ensure you are protected against unsolicited e-mail by setting up your junk e-mail filters. Follow these simple instructions...blah"

      What's even more hypocritical is down the bottom of the email it says "As an MSN Hotmail member, you have received this e-mail to inform you of updates, changes to the MSN Hotmail service or special news and information from MSN. Our policy has always been to send e-mail messages only to announce such information, and we'll continue to honor this policy. Thank you for being an MSN Hotmail member."

      I would complain to them if it would do any good, but if they were to read all their hate mail they would need a dedicated department for it!

    8. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      But doesn't the fact that you get false positives whenever anyone new sends you an email rather diminish the benefit of a junk mail folder?
      The whole point of the junk mail folder is that you can just ignore it entirely, except to clear it out every so often. If new emails end up in it regularly, you have to trawl through it anyway, which is time consuming, especially on a slow webmail site like Hotmail.

    9. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Enygma42 · · Score: 1

      Ya but she only set up her hotmail account about three weeks ago (she's kinda new to this) and she's getting 30-40 a day!

      Maybe she ticked or ignored a few important checkboxes but she's bombarded with crap every day. She doesn't leave her mail address on message boards and only emails about 3 people.

      --
      "hehe, website" - Homer Simpson
    10. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my hotmail account filters spam brilliantly. Simply set your settings to "Receive e-mail from contacts only"

      That isn't what most people mean by spam filtering: it's a totally dumb solution (in the technical sense). Speaking purely personally, about half the ham I get comes from first-time contacts. So as far as I'm concerned a brute-force approach like that would make the problem worse, not better.

    11. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      i'd recommend hotwayd instead of gotmail.

    12. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Suchetha · · Score: 1

      actually that MAY be bcause hotmail signs you up to a few magazines and stuff by default when you sign up. you should be able to go through your membership settings and un-sign-up. personally i have found hotmails spam catcher to be pretty good, it stops a few false positives now and then (and then i white list it) but on the whole it seems to stop spam. and i've had the account for 8 years (since early 96) with the email addy being plastered all over the internet and usenet

      Suchetha

      --

      learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
      or one out of three ain't bad
    13. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by heletek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not sure what everyone's talking about, but my hotmail account has been upt to 250 megs for at least a week now, can't remember exactly when they turned it on.

    14. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by nathan+s · · Score: 1

      They upped mine yesterday to 250; funny thing is, I have two accounts and only the first is increased. Starts with an M.....second one is a T...am wondering if they do it alphabetically.

    15. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by A+Bugg · · Score: 1

      It's certainly not alphabetically, mine begins with an A and I haven't been upgraded yet.

  15. Gmail will still be better by Jeff85 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ahh the wonders of competition.

    But Hotmail still lacks all the great features of Gmail such as labels, conversations, and keyboard shortcuts. Hotmail won't be nearly as good as Gmail is.

    --
    Fetch Text URL - Firefox Extension
    1. Re:Gmail will still be better by jobe999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. Hotmail is going to be cluttered with ads. Microsoft needs to learn that simplicity = success.

    2. Re:Gmail will still be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and hotmail also lacks gmail's feature of storing all your emails and contact information forever to build a profile of you to sell to marketers.

      I'm not paranoid, if I were I'd have said "the government" instead of "marketers" ;)

    3. Re:Gmail will still be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My yes! Of course! Hotmail would *never* do such a thing.

  16. You know -- by mrbad101 · · Score: 1

    Did they pick the name 'Hot' mail, because of it being a 'hot' service, or 'hot' as in full of hot air. They promise big, and deliver little.

    1. Re:You know -- by dn15 · · Score: 1

      Unless I'm mistaken it is just a play on the idea of an HTML-based mail interface. I think it was originally written as HoTMaiL before Microsoft bought them out.

      (Yes, I know you were being sarcastic. :))

    2. Re:You know -- by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 1

      They chose hotmail.com because hotmale.com was already taken.

      Duh.

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
    3. Re:You know -- by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      Hotmail wasn't started by MS. Pls get yer facts straight. It was started by a dude called Sabeer Bhatia, who ONLY made US$ 400 Mill off the deal. Those days hotmail was already #1, way before MS stepped in. IMO, they improved the UI initially, but now it's as clunky as everything MS produces. Gmail rules!

  17. Come on now... by Suhas · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder how choked the Hotmail Plus subscribers will be
    ...it's not the first time that Redmond has screwed it's customers.

    1. Re:Come on now... by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Windows has done that at least twice per version.

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
  18. why? by Tetsugaku-San · · Score: 0

    noone needs a 2gb limit . . . I use my hotmail ac all the time and it's kept at less than 30% full, so thats about 600k of mails, I delete allt he rest otherwise it's impossible to find the ones you actually need :)

    1. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How stupid of Microsoft not to consult you first, heh?

  19. Let's see, by lucason · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have roughly all mails I've ever sent and received still in my archived folders. About 1.4Gigs worth of mostly useless correspondence. But hey I just can't part with it.

    I've had some close calls with busted HDrives and other panic situations. But I'ts still there.

    Now they are trying to tell me that all my mails since 1994 (or indeed from now until 2014) can be stored on web at no cost.

    Doesn't anyone else have a "(good + good) (b + b) true" feeling?
    I've defenitly got a "b-lieve it when IC it" feeling.

    I'm especially interested in the "catch"...

  20. Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... upgrade your girlfriend.

    1. Re:Easy... by beaverbrother · · Score: 2, Funny

      Personally I'd like less storage space rather than more in this case.

  21. ...so? by startled · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The coolest thing about gmail is the software itself, not the storage. It's excellent. I wish we had it at work-- no more searching for that e-mail someone sent you 6 months ago that you're sure you put in the "coding" folder-- or was it "scripting", or "ai", or "todo"? You could always use that global e-mail search function that only takes about 20 minutes. But hey, you're too busy slogging through tons of other e-mail you just got, because your filters suck.

    I don't see why I'd WANT to keep 2 gigs on my hotmail account, unless they make it as full-featured and easy to use as gmail.

    1. Re:...so? by pdamoc · · Score: 1

      FYI Opera's M2 email client already does this searching thingy (more about it) and not having to download emails especialy the ones with attachements is a *good thing*.

    2. Re:...so? by vitalyb · · Score: 1

      Exactly. 1GB is just a theoretical limit, it was made just to make the impact it did on the web-mail market.

      The strength in GMail is in its blazing quick DHTML code and only because of it I seriously considered to stop completly using my ISP POP3 service.

      Currently I am only waiting for a legitimate way to check the Inbox without entering the GMail site, but it will come too.

    3. Re:...so? by RWerp · · Score: 0

      In my opinion, they'll never put such excellent software in Hotmail. The reason is simple. MS is doing it only to push Google out of business, because they're unable to make a search engine better than Google. That's why they give 2 GB, to make it look as a better offer than gmail.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    4. Re:...so? by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      Well I just wanted to say that it doesn even look like a better offer. If the issue really was just space, then there'd be other alternatives. Gmail really has a good UI, and it runs at light speed compared to Hotmail. Plus it has those label/search features....I don't care if Hotmail offered me 5 GB, I'm a gmail convert thru-and-thru and there's no going back!

    5. Re:...so? by absolut_kurant · · Score: 1

      If you're using Outlook, then I can't recommend the LookOut searching software enough. Searches gigantic mail folders in no time, and it's free (as in beer). You can find it here.

      --
      Yes.
    6. Re:...so? by R.Caley · · Score: 5, Funny
      no more searching for that e-mail someone sent you 6 months ago that you're sure you put in the "coding" folder-- or was it "scripting", or "ai", or "todo"?

      Gee guys, whatever happened to grep?

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    7. Re:...so? by tetrode · · Score: 1

      This type of software also exists for the Windows/Outlook combo, it is called Nelson Email Organiser. Google for it, download the full functional trial, become addicted and buy it.

      This is what I did.

      It runs on top of Outlook, leaving your .PST files handled by MS Outlook, and building its own index.

      To give a few examples you can search all your .PST's at the same time; they are fully word indexed. A search for e.g. 'slashdot' takes 2 seconds, 7 items, 'GNU': 2 seconds, 31 items, 'software' 20 seconds, 6884 items... (21 .PST files totalling 3 Gb)

      You can have the notion of active mail, mail per date, per user, per attachment (sorta like virtual folders), so if I want to search for a mail I usually remember a few attributes of that mail, either who sent it to me, more or less when, some words in the mail, attachments, etc. With the incredible search function I find any mail under a minute.

      I'm with 3 cow-orkers and in the beginning (they didn't realise that I had Nelson Email Organiser) they were constantly amazed at the speed I retrieved e-mails that we were looking for. Now they know better - they ask me to retrieve an e-mail that was send to the 4 of us.

      Very recommendable software. Stable (1 crash in 2 months). I don't work there, I'm just a happy customer

      Mark

    8. Re:...so? by trout_fish · · Score: 2, Funny
      C:\WINDOWS\system32>grep
      'grep' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
      operable program or batch file.
    9. Re:...so? by R.Caley · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      C:\>grep
      Usage: grep [OPTION]... PATTERN [FILE]...
      Try `grep --help' for more information.
      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    10. Re:...so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.. so... Why can't I middle click on a message and open it in a new browser window on gmail?

      Why the infantile interface that forces you to work in the same window?

    11. Re:...so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      grep "while loop" rcaley/coding/mbox 33269: How do you code a while loop? I haven't the foggiest idea.

    12. Re:...so? by rtaylor · · Score: 1

      Yeah... Grepping through 10GB of compressed, mime encoded mail because they send you their frigging messages as word documents, stored on a laptop harddrive is oh so useful.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    13. Re:...so? by gwynevans · · Score: 1
      Just out in Beta - the official Gmail notifier

      Windows system bar - See other ./ thread for discussions.

    14. Re:...so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    15. Re:...so? by R.Caley · · Score: 0
      Grepping through 10GB of compressed, mime encoded mail because they send you their frigging messages as word documents, stored on a laptop harddrive is oh so useful.

      When the mail comes in it's either from a complete waste of space, in which case delete it, or it's from someone you have to put up with, dispite their Word addiction, in which case you save it as plain text.

      The tough case is people who send attached sncreenshots of wordpad windows. `Losing' the mail is probably the best option in this case.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
  22. Email! The next kazaa! by Moocowsia · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well now with all the spam going around we can start using free email accounts as our next p2p app. Yay!

    --
    Moo!
  23. i drive past hotmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I drive past the secret hotmail bunker in [REDACTED] washington every morning, but I have yet to see the long line of freight trucks delivering so many harddrives.

    1. Re:i drive past hotmail by Build6 · · Score: 1

      i'm sure they deliver them at night. i mean, if I knew that many hard disks were coming in, I'd round up all my mini-driving buddies and pull an ocean's-eleven...

  24. Obligatory Lousy Joke by jimicus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yes, but do they run it on Linux?

    1. Re:Obligatory Lousy Joke by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      Only in Japan.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
  25. Good, because I've grown weary of those... by crashnbur · · Score: 1

    ..."Your Hotmail Account is Almost Full" system emails that try to persuade me to upgrade!

  26. I'ts true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am hotmail subscriber and have 1%/2000 mb used :) Also there is no longer ads if you've subscribed.
    It costs 20$ / year. For free you get 250mb and ads.

  27. Couple a megachips... by lilmikey1982 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ehh, I dunno. I call BS on that. I know that Microsoft will eventually have to increase the limit of space given, but I somehow doubt that a company that was charging money for a tiny bit of space is all of a sudden going to just give out 2 GB for free. Do we know who the contributor was? Also... in the article it says that Microsoft won't bother us with graphic ads. Again, BS. I see more ads on Hotmail than I do on some pr0n sites. I highly doubt they'll just drop them.

    1. Re:Couple a megachips... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      they have to do *something*.

      Since gMail arrived on the scene and totally flipped their world upside down, hotmail was happy to try and squeeze the life out of your free account.

      It was a money making scam, the game is up.

      If they want to keep mindshare now they have to change their product offering.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  28. bad interpretation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't get gb's of storage as part of the 'free' account...get some sleep.

  29. Stocks wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's buy tons of Google stocks waiting for the inevitable announcement of the new 4GB Gmail storage.

    Yawn.

  30. Mail based filesystem anyone? by ubeans · · Score: 1

    2GB you say? Time to write a hotmail filesystem module for Linux :)

  31. ridiculous by Omniscientist · · Score: 0, Redundant

    wtf do you need 2gb for? recieving files but that'd take forever to download a 1 gb file from hotmail lol. man that's scary. 2gb only means lots, and lots, and lots of SPAM. and more spam and MORE SPAM.

  32. Obligatory Lousy Joke Combo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, I, for one, welcome our new Gigabyte bearing overlords for YOU!

  33. now it comes to the point - by teemu.s · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whos more evil? The Devil whos heading towards World OS Domination or the Devil who wants to provide you personalized ads by reading your mail ...

    1. Re:now it comes to the point - by descil · · Score: 1

      There is only one devil.

      Google for World President!

  34. It's not just about storage size by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The storage isn't the biggest reason why I love gmail so much, it's the features that it brings with it. The ability to search through my mail, the technique of orginization using labels, the conversations being kept together and easy to read. Doing active development and being active on mailing lists gets a lot easier when I can click on a conversation, read the last six emails in that thread and get up to speed on what the problem is. Hotmail may go to 2GB, but that's nothing without all the other features that gmail offers.

    --
    "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
  35. Size matters, but it's not everything by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In my opinion, 1 GB is already so much that other features matter when I decide what mail service to use. It's not like a 10 GB mail service is 5x better than a 2 GB one. And it's not like this change would make Hotmail twice as good as Gmail.

    I'm not saying this just because I like Gmail, since I *would* consider another service if Gmail just offered 20 MB while another offered 1 GB. It's just that these storage spaces are no longer an issue for me at 1 GB.

    More like the opposite -- risking having so much mail and suddenly something bad happens to the online service.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Size matters, but it's not everything by dn15 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Size matters, but it's not everything"

      True, but you're probably not the average computer user. The average user will look at it and see the 2 GB mailbox size without regard to the fact that it has the (IMHO) not-so-great Hotmail interface.

      It's aimed at the same people who want a 3.5 GHz computer for $299 but don't care that it runs Windows instead of Linux or Mac OS X.

    2. Re:Size matters, but it's not everything by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that a linearly increasing storage space for email has an exponentially decreasing effect on your choice of webmail provider?

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:Size matters, but it's not everything by PatrickThomson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly... Most consumers focus on the one feature that drives the market and is pushed out of proportion to real usefulness, to adopt a "bigger than yours" approach (Case in point: celerons. if AMD came out with a chip that ran at 4 GHz but was shit everywhere else, and found a major supplier, they'd dominate the market overnight).

      Gmail took the two-pronged approach to rope people in initially with the large space, but got them completely astounded by the awesome interface.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    4. Re:Size matters, but it's not everything by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      If you'd turn it into a formula, yes, that would probably be what you'd get. :-)

      500 MB - 1 GB is likely to be more than enough for my needs.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    5. Re:Size matters, but it's not everything by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I'd once again like to put emphasis on that the more storage space they offer, the more interested I am in their *other* featuers, like I said in my first post.

      It's not like I go, "oooh these providers all offer 1 GB, then their other features don't matter", like it seemed you implied when I re-read your post. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    6. Re:Size matters, but it's not everything by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know. :-/

      *swears about the Megapixel frenzy on digital cameras -- what about ... err, general quality?*

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    7. Re:Size matters, but it's not everything by mgv · · Score: 1

      If you'd turn it into a formula, yes, that would probably be what you'd get. :-)

      500 MB - 1 GB is likely to be more than enough for my needs.


      Yes, I'd say that 640 MB of storage should be enough for anyone. :)

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
  36. too good to be true? by tulimulta · · Score: 1
    The original newspiece is from The Inquirer:

    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=17949

    No sources are cited.

  37. Not Free by peterpi · · Score: 4, Informative

    This applies only to the Hotmail Plus service, which is not free.

    1. Re:Not Free by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Which essentially makes it an apples to oranges comparision. It's like saying I have 60 GB of possible e-mail storage because I store everything to a local HD. :)

    2. Re:Not Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wish the slashdot editors, yes cowboyneal that means you, would start to at least skim through the articles to make sure the information is true.

      saying "we regard this as the responsibility of the submitter and the audience." (as in FAQ) is just an excuse, these editors don't have other jobs, do they? i'm sure they can get off their lazy ass and do this.

    3. Re:Not Free by GoofyBoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Paid Hotmail = 2 gigs (now)
      Free Hotmail = 250 Megs (in fall)

      http://news.com.com/Hotmail+to+offer+250MB+of+free +storage/2100-1032_3-5245523.html?tag=nl

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  38. Blurb wrong... by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Informative

    They are increasing their limit for the free subscribers, but to 250MB. Hotmail plus or whatever, which is like $10 a year, gets the 2GB bump.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Blurb wrong... by LucasALC · · Score: 1

      They said that a long time ago, yes. I don't know why this should be new to anyone.

    2. Re:Blurb wrong... by BluRBD!E · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, you need to spend that $19.95 a year on a sense of humour. ;)

  39. It's not about storage! by rfernand79 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Well, I hope somebody tells M$ that GMail is not only about storage. The interface is so clean and fast that it's hard to consider any other options, let alone the search capabilities, which I have found really useful. On a sidenote, some friends and I were discussing on how useful it would be to have that search power in our existing Yahoo! Group (which we created back when it was eGroups). We have a lot of content (other than forwarded jokes) worth mining into as the years have passed.
    This is a war, yes. but I maintain my claim: the winner will not be who stores the most junk, but he who provides the best tools to manage it.

    1. Re:It's not about storage! by rob.sharp · · Score: 1

      Whilst I agree that the interface is very very good, it uses so much Javascript that I can't access the service using Series 60 Opera on my phone...

      At least Hotmail offer a wap portal, however bad it is...

    2. Re:It's not about storage! by drskrud · · Score: 1

      I agree. One of the things I like most about Gmail too is how they place their (limited) advertising in unobtrusive places (just like they do with their search engine) while Hotmail is riddled with pop-ups and flashy banner ads and irritating little organizational features...

      After Gmail, I wonder if Google will take a shot at the Instant Messaging arena...

  40. Few points by numist · · Score: 1

    First.. the google ad system is MUUCH less annoying than MSN's practice of popups (yes, I know, get google toolbar) and annoying large image and flash ads.

    I have had a gmail account for a while now, and I am using 15 MBs of it. You dont know how hard it is to try and burn away storage in an email account like that.

    Sure, 2 GB is twice as big, but no one will ever use it. Doubtful that anyone will ever use even 1GB of storage in email. That coupled with the ad system makes msn a big loser without major overhauls that our fisher-price pal M$ is probably not willing to do.

    Plus, MSN will probably want to charge $6.99 a month for the storage...

    insert weak rimshot here

    1. Re:Few points by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      Forget the Google Toolbar for Internet Explorer, just Get Firefox - The Browser, Reloaded.

      Oh and if you want to pay for 2GB go with Yahoo! Mail. Far better than Hotmail and the same price. :-)

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
    2. Re:Few points by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

      get mozilla/firefox then go to www.mozdev.org. grab flashblocker and adblock.

      happy browsing.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
  41. My Hotmails 250Mb :) by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    So ya-boo sucks to the rest of you... admitidly I've had the account since around 98' so I was probably early on the list.

  42. What devil? by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess it is about equal with the devil that "reads your email" to determine whether or not it is spam. The personalized ads thingy is probably just an add-on module to their spam filter. Two faces of the same program. Nothing to see here, move along...

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
  43. The "free" accounts do NOT get 2GB! by LinuxKnight · · Score: 5, Informative

    RTFA... misleading /. headings strike again...

    Reading the deeper linked article from the top linked article, which is: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=17949/ It does not specifically mention the "free" snotmail account gets 2GB.

    Reading M$N's page about it, http://www.imagine-msn.com/hotmail/en-us/ it looks like the M$N Plus accounts will get 2GB, which means the ones you pay $19.95/mo for. This is NOT the free snotmail account getting 2GB. These will get 250MB. Not GB, MB.

    Jeez the /. editors need to do a little more fact checking eh? But /. editors actually RTFA??? Naaaahhhhh.

    Google is still ahead in the actual FREE email storage space war. 100MB for Yahoo, 250MB for M$N. ... so, anyone got gmail beta invites? ;)

    --
    -----------
    LinuxKnight
    1. Re:The "free" accounts do NOT get 2GB! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Reading M$N's page about it, http://www.imagine-msn.com/hotmail/en-us/ it looks like the M$N Plus accounts will get 2GB, which means the ones you pay $19.95/mo for.

      Hotmail Plus costs $19.95/YEAR, not $19.95/month.

      Jeez the /. editors need to do a little more fact checking eh? But /. editors actually RTFA??? Naaaahhhhh.

      You go first.

    2. Re:The "free" accounts do NOT get 2GB! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2GB for $19.95? I have a paid account at GMX (a German provider) that now gives me 5GB for 3 Euro/month, that I can use to store files, too. If you pay 5Euro/month you even get 10GB. Plus free SMS/MMS, fax, virus checking :)

    3. Re:The "free" accounts do NOT get 2GB! by fiber0pti · · Score: 1

      It's $19.99 a year, not a month.

    4. Re:The "free" accounts do NOT get 2GB! by uberchicken · · Score: 1

      My free Hotmail account is at 2000Mb, so yeah, you're right. Are you a hard disk manufacturer?

    5. Re:The "free" accounts do NOT get 2GB! by passionplay · · Score: 0

      Dude - it's $19.95/annually and it comes with a bunch of other perks.

    6. Re:The "free" accounts do NOT get 2GB! by ctk76 · · Score: 1

      How can Google be ahead in service that they haven't even launched yet? I'm frankly getting a little weary of waiting for their e-mail service. Now that Yahoo's increased their storage to 100MB and other major players poised to upgrade their quotas as well, Google's storage space doesn't look all that attractive anymore.

    7. Re:The "free" accounts do NOT get 2GB! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a paid account at hotmail and indeed they bumped it to 2GB last week. Then again i also have a gmail account and working with it is a dream, it so fast!

    8. Re:The "free" accounts do NOT get 2GB! by anynameleft · · Score: 1
      "Google is still ahead in the actual FREE email storage space war. 100MB for Yahoo, 250MB for M$N. ... so, anyone got gmail beta invites? ;)"

      You only want 1 GB of storage? Then why not try GMX ? It offers 1 GB of storage for free, and in contrast to GMail, it is available today.

    9. Re:The "free" accounts do NOT get 2GB! by hippycow · · Score: 0

      I never quite understood the GMail "1 Gigabyte" either. If the deal is that you can't delete your old messages, then eventually you'll hit that limit. Then what?

  44. No thanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! 2 Gigs?! That gives you room for lots of spam! Thank you, Microsoft!

  45. gmx.de has 1 GB and WebDAV access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Pft, hot air everywhere. In germany gmx.de offers 1 GB free storage, POP3 access and WebDAV for your files. Simply type webdav://mediacenter.gmx.de/ in Konqueror and up- and download your files. Great free service.

  46. My hotmail account is now 2Gb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just logged in (I use the account about once a month) and its true, my account usage is 1% of 2000MB.

    Time to fill it up with something uncompressable and see if it really is 2Gb.....

    1. Re:My hotmail account is now 2Gb by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      How odd. I just logged in to mine (which I never use) ant it's stil @ 2MB.

      But I've got a Free Calendar now!

      (like whoopie, Yahoo has offered that for ages).

      2GB or not, I'll stick with my paid Yahoo account w/2GB and POP access.

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  47. Yeah... by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

    A few weeks ago they said they were going to up their storage to 250MB. Now they say they're going to up it to 2GB. Guess how much space there is now. 2 lousy megs. I'll believe they're giving 2GB mailboxes when I see it.

  48. i knew it by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

    you have to pay for this :P 19.99 euro/year for this 2GB baby. And 'this' being Hotmail Plus.

    1. Re:i knew it by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, i forgot to post The url that has all the info. Click on 'See offer deals'.

  49. No problem. by cablepokerface · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since you are posting on /. your girlfriend problem must be hypothetical.

    1. Re:No problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ho ho, hee hee, i can hear that joke a million fucking times and it's still funny.

      oh wait, no it isn't.

    2. Re:No problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it was!

  50. Fastmail have had this for a while now... by rob.sharp · · Score: 1

    http://www.fastmail.fm

    And they offer a really excellent service too! Secured IMAP, webmail, domain aliases...

    No, I don't have shares, but yes, I am a customer!

    Rob.

  51. I wouldn't know. by geordie_loz · · Score: 0

    Send me an Gmail invite, and maybe I'd agree and mod you up!

    1. Re:I wouldn't know. by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Send me an Gmail invite,

      Mod down all those twats who beg for Gmail accounts in every story mentioning them; and also those showoffs offering them. Everybody will havwe a Gmail account in a couple of months.

    2. Re:I wouldn't know. by geordie_loz · · Score: 1

      Are you american?... only you seem to lack a sense of humour.

    3. Re:I wouldn't know. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      >Are you american?
      Not American.
      >... only you seem to lack a sense of humour.
      How so? I don't think anyone was making a joke.

    4. Re:I wouldn't know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liar. You only have +1 karma, which never gets mods. Pathetic. And don't bother saying "sense of humor" again, that's even more pathetic. Go away, eh?

    5. Re:I wouldn't know. by nikolic · · Score: 1

      The facts are that GMail doesn't exist for most users. Google has waited too long between announcing the offering and producing something to be used.

      "Invites" aside, the facts are that GMail does NOT yet exist since it is only available to those willing to buy an invite from EBay.

      Google previously had the potential advantage of more storage --- and now it doesn't.

      E-mail is the single largest traditional offering that a service provider may offer to encourage customer loyalty. Google offering such an advantage quickly may have caused quite a stir. This is because the "old regime" (MSN, Yahoo, AOL) may have to fight for the loyalty that they had won early in the game. This would have caused a lot of market movement and pressure.

      Having seen this threat, they have adjusted. There is no longer a reason that a consumer should switch even if the option was actually available --- which it is not.

      As a consumer of services, I no longer care about it. Frankly, it isn't worth talking about any longer. GMail is already dead in the water.

    6. Re:I wouldn't know. by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      At this point, I think the "storage wars" between mail providers are more hype than substance. The only real result I've seen is Yahoo giving users 100MB of storage, which is great. I've benefitted from that already. With GMail being an exclusive club (sort of) and hotmail failing to deliver on a previously announced upgrade, I'd be surprised to see anything come of this. Besides, hotmail is a pain in the ass to use. Between their clunky interface and worthless spam filtering (not to mention their own spam), I'd take a 100MB Yahoo account any day. Besides, who would actually use 2GB anyway?

  52. That's not enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I want a Trillion bits of storage! (*pinky to corner of mouth*)

    And a frigg'n shark with a lazer!

    1. Re:That's not enough... by Gumph · · Score: 1

      (*pinky to corner of mouth*)
      Egad Brain! looks like no more taking over the world for me!!!
      narf!

      --
      'By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes'
  53. Yet data storage remains constant. by NubKnacker · · Score: 1

    Funny thing is, while my Yahoo! Email account provides me with 100MB of storage space, my geocities account still gives me 15MB. I don't get the logic behind it. I wonder how long before Google starts providing hosting for free, like Geocities, but with a LOT more storage space.

  54. Big deal... by chary · · Score: 1

    The benefit of GMail isn't the raw space, it's the searching tool. I filter several accounts into my account purely so that I can pluck what I need at a moment's notice.

  55. Missing the point by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is it just me or does this just show that Microsoft is missing the point. Yes, it's nice that they will offer 2GB, but honestly, who cares whether you have 1GB or whether you have 2GB? The real advantage is Gmail's interface. Furthermore, Google said Gmail would have 1GB mailboxes and it did. Microsoft said weeks ago that they would increase the mailbox size to 250MB and now has upped that to 2GB. Guess what though, all mailboxes are still 2MB!! 1,000 real MB is more useful than 1,998 phantom megs.

    1. Re:Missing the point by Lost+Dragon · · Score: 1

      > who cares whether you have > 1GB or whether you have 2GB? The same people who buy Intel over AMD soley because the clock speed is faster. For a lot of people, if they don't know any better and the service works "ok" - perception makes reality.

    2. Re:Missing the point by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      "Guess what though, all mailboxes are still 2MB!!"

      bullshit

      mines up to 250 megs as of... tuesday?

    3. Re:Missing the point by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      Mine is still 2 megs as of yesterday.

    4. Re:Missing the point by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      neither are most of my friends accounts... (some are though) its just that you stated "all" accounts were still on 2mb... theyre not

    5. Re:Missing the point by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      Okay, you're right, I was just speaking on what I've seen though. My mailbox nor those of any of my few friends foolish enough to still use hotmail have had their sizes increased.

  56. Not that I've used either... by bkhl · · Score: 1

    ...but it seems like they would also need to add some features to compete with Gmail. I mean, it's not like a lot of people will even get above the 1 GB limit for a while. (Or so I hope.)

  57. Hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I can save all those email's promising coupons for viagra

  58. A note from Microsoft. by iamdrscience · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Hotmail Users,

    I.O.U. 1,998 Megabytes.

    Sincerely,
    William H. Gates

    1. Re:A note from Microsoft. by SEE · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cheapskate. You could at least have made the IOU for 2,046 megabytes . . .

    2. Re:A note from Microsoft. by stud9920 · · Score: 1

      Hay guys, if you forward this email to ten people in your adress book, Bill Gates will give 1 megabyte to little timmy who has cancer.

    3. Re:A note from Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1,998 megabytes should be enough for anybody ;)

  59. 2GB doesn't solve Hotmail's problems by TheFairElf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hotmail is possibly the worst of the major email providers right now. Which other email provider occasionally gives you the message "service unavailable, try again later"? I started moving away from hotmail after the time I desperately needed to get to an email and it would continuously give me this message. My other peeve with Hotmail is that the junk mail folder counts towards the measly 2MB, so most of the time my mailbox is overflowing. Even if they give 2GB of space (when they do give it), I'm still moving away from them. Yahoo and GMail are definitely better alternatives.

  60. No Problem!!! by serutan · · Score: 1

    No need to worry about Hotmail going down. Hotmail runs under BSD. Where do you want to store 2Gb today?

  61. Yes, but by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

    It's all in German!

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    1. Re:Yes, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all in German!

      na, und?

  62. Great... by zarthrag · · Score: 1

    Even MORE room for all of the microsoft ads and spam! Gee, what will I ever do without them? I use my hotmail account as a catchall for places (read: nosey websites) I wouldn't trust with my real email address. I don't fill that pithy 2MB often, and when I do, simply deleting the mandatory Microsoft stuff is fine. GMail doesn't intrude much, is easy to use/organize, and is simply superior. MS could offer a terabyte of email for all I care. I'm not so much as batting an eye.

    --
    Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
  63. MS/Hotmail missing the point. by digital+photo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think adding more space is missing the point.

    Improving the user interface, fulfilling promisses to the userbase, and making the process of web-email more straightforward should be their focus. Not supersizing their accounts.

    Taking a look at the hotmail site, I am reminded of college bulletin boards where advertisements and flyers are stapled to the wall haphazardly, each trying to grab your attention when all you really wanted to find was that note your friend left you on the board.

    Google's Gmail is the information frontdesk at a five star hotel where you walk by, ask if you have any messages, and get on with your life.

    If MS/Hotmail is just throwing space/money at the problem, then they are missing the point entirely and will just be wasting money. Not that that's stopped them before or that that seems to matter to them much.

  64. coincidence? by beware1000 · · Score: 1

    google goes public yesterday
    microsoft announces 2 gig email today

    sounds to me like someone is trying to lower the others stock prices....

  65. The link seems down ? by mskadu · · Score: 1

    I cant see it, says "Database problem" !

    --
    -- Mskadu (Blogs: http://mskadu.blogspot.com/ and http://mytechieself.blogspot.com/)
  66. Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention gmail is just a beta test now & google can pull out of it whenever they want without too much moaning from users, whereas if bigger places like yahoo, hotmail ..increase their services & then retract (ie. cause google closes gmail for reason xyz) they'll have way more ppl moaning :)

    Not to mention all the bigger places where more thinking about how to make money off their services (since they where loosing money) until gmail came along & blew their subscription plans.

    Also all the bigger places will have to fork out way more $$ to up their services (since higher user base) than google ..coldwar sabotage anyone?

  67. Microsoft miss the point by delomelas · · Score: 3, Informative

    But Microsoft have of course completely missed the point - it sure is nice to have a lot of storage space, but where GMail really wins is in ease of use and speediness of the site...

    1. Re:Microsoft miss the point by SteveXE · · Score: 0

      I dont think the gmail system will be as fast once its open to the public.

  68. more storage for my spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow - the more storage they give us the more space we'll have to keep our spam!

    Who needs to buy the stuff to may things bigger now?

    My only beef with hotmail is that I had an hotmail account before Microsoft bought the server and I've not been able to log into it since... Grrr!

  69. Filtering that is like not filtering by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You are correct that it classifies most spam as spam and puts it in the "Junk Mail" folder.

    Unfortunately, the Junk Mail folder counts against your storage allowance, so for me it is almost as bad as not filtering it at all. Also, I guess I have one of those easily guessed user names, so I get a lot of spam.

    I could allow "Contacts Only", but then everything that isn't a contact goes to junk mail, and a lot of mail that isn't spam (but also isn't from a contact) goes to junk mail, and again, it is just like not having a spam filter.

    And the interface does suck

    I'm sorry you read this as a knee-jerk anti-MS rant, I think I am looking at this fairly objectively. BTW, I have had a Hotmail account since long before MS bought it.

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
  70. Both interfaces (hotmail and gmail) are screwed. by spacefight · · Score: 1

    You can't open a message into another tab/window, neither in hotmail nor in gmail. What's left is to copy and paste the same URL to another window but hey... Well, at least Google is working on an plain HTML Interface instead of their IMHO crappy dhtml interface.

  71. Idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can't mod in a thread you've posted in.

    1. Re:Idiot by MrNiCeGUi · · Score: 1

      You can if you have multiple accounts(no, I'm not the parent poster).

    2. Re:Idiot by geordie_loz · · Score: 1

      D'oh

  72. you can see it by Suchetha · · Score: 2, Funny

    i got 250MB in my hotmail inbox RIGHT NOW

    if you email me or something i'll mail you a screenshot

    cheers

    Suchetha

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
    1. Re:you can see it by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

      And I'll email you a screenshot of my account that was just upped to a whopping 2MB...

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    2. Re:you can see it by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      same here... i think older accounts got hit first... (mines 7-8 years old), you cant just create that much space in an instant? how many users does hotmail have? definitely over 10 million... lets say they allocate 50 megs per user at first (most users wont even use that much) thats how many hard drives that they need? with error checking and the like... we're talking hundreds of thousands of drives... its going to take a while (how many users are on gmail?)

      and i think hotmails spam protection is more than decent as long as you dont have your address plastered all over the net...

    3. Re:you can see it by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      they would simply increase the quota. They don't actually allocate 50 physical megs...they /allow/ it. They can do that all at once easily enough - they only have a few types of accounts. Simply change standard level to having 2Gb quota, and bam - done. Even if it /were/ done per user, that would be a simple perl script to parse whatever database its in and change that entry on everything. I've updated millions of records in relatively short order myself, and I didn't have the sort of hardware MS has when I did it.

    4. Re:you can see it by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      my point is, they probably dont have the physical capacity for that ammount of information on the hotmail servers at the moment... theyll need to upgrade the file storage servers more than a little... increasing capacity by 12400% isnt an inconsiderable feat... especailly at that scale

    5. Re:you can see it by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      If no one's using it they don't need to increase it. Similar idea to broadband providers only having enough bandwith for a % of users to attain advertised rates at a time

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    6. Re:you can see it by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      people see the increased space theyll stop deleting their forwarded mails with large attachments (most hotmail users recieve a lot) and larger attachment allowances will do little to stunt this growth... id say soon enough the average user will have roughly 50 megs taken up (for every 4 people who delete most of their mail im sure theres one wholl have their box stuffed)

    7. Re:you can see it by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      average user will have 50? Not a chance. Hotmail will still auto-delete spam and other things from your folders after X days. If the *average* user didn't delete anything for 6 months, they'd still not be at 50Meg.

    8. Re:you can see it by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      average users will be getting "funny" pics and videos forwarded to them on a nearly daily basis... usual size is about 0.3 megs i guess... limited mainly by the size of attachment restrictions hotmail had imposed... the 2 meg videos people send over messenger or link will be able to be sent... hotmail is mostly used for the trivial... the trivial tends to be bloated

  73. Yes, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    SGIES (St. George's International Email Services) is now offering "Free 5GB Email Services" and:
    POP3/IMAP/SMTP/Webmail Services WAP Access Ad-Free / Virus Free Auto Message Responders Auto Forwarders Mail Rules/Filtering SSL Access


    Unfortunately, it doesn't work right now (and maybe it will be /.'ed in the next future ;)

    Cheers

  74. Hotmail's poor interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The biggest advantage of gmail is the possibility of searching for email without having to manually sort it, and it is just that which makes the 1GB of storage attractive and useful. *If* hotmail go with the 2GB, I'd be curious to see what else they'll change to allow people to make any use of this available storage.

  75. Charset support by erikdalen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hotmail is unusable anyway as long as it only supports receiving mails in ISO-8859-1. It silently ignores the charset defined in the mail headers.

    2gb is nice though. But I already have a real mail server with ~10GB storage :)

    --
    Erik Dalén
  76. The "free" accounts do NOT get 250MB! by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just logged into my Hotmail account directly (I rarely do this any more, thanks to this), and found that my mail limit was upped from a paltry 1MB to a whopping 2MB!

    Seems like there is a kind of "reverse FUD" thing going on here...

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    1. Re:The "free" accounts do NOT get 250MB! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumbass! RTFE(mail). They're not pushing out the 250MB until fall.

      -1 for you.

    2. Re:The "free" accounts do NOT get 250MB! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm funny. I've got 250MB... up from my previous 2MB, I'm using 1%

  77. Free German service has better than that... by killbill! · · Score: 5, Informative

    GMX, a German ISP and free e-mail service, is offering 1GB for free. Bump that to 5GB for 3 EUR/month or 10GB for 5 EUR/month.

    However the fun doesn't end here, as they also offer automatic POP/IMAP e-mail retrieval, custom filters for automatic redirection, SMS/MMS alerts, up to 15 aliases...

    Oh, and did I mention you can use your capacity as an iDisk-like network disk and share your files with other GMX members? I think they even have a Windows plug-in to mount your storage account as a network drive in the Explorer.

    Alas, AFAIK it's in German only. I for one, welcome our new German overlords...

    1. Re:Free German service has better than that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GMX "MediaCenter" is accessible via WebDAV, which is an open standard and the inner workings of iDisk too. Clients are available for all the usual operating systems (it's just HTTP made to look like a shared filesystem protocol anyway).

    2. Re:Free German service has better than that... by killbill! · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip, didn't know about this. They only provide a Windows WebDAV client IIRC.
      Good news for the MS-free crowd (/eyes his iBook)...

    3. Re:Free German service has better than that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      too bad, that only the paid accounts offer IMAP access..
      on the other hand, 36 euro per year isn't that bad, and 5 gig is decent storage..

      i've been using their free offering for quite a while now, and have never been disappointed.
      they totally pwn gmail on all accounts...

    4. Re:Free German service has better than that... by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      I'm having trouble with their mail.gmx.net smtp server. It doesn't seem to respond. Am i doing something wrong?

      What about webdav access some AC posted about? How would i access gmx with it?

    5. Re:Free German service has better than that... by killbill! · · Score: 1

      Weird... works perfectly here.
      The From: field must contain an @gmx.net addresse though, and their authentication scheme requires you to provide your customer number (just log in using the webmail to get it if you don't remember it).

      Or could it be that your ISP is anal about their customer using other smtp servers?

      If you're using another WebDAV client that the one they provide, host is https://mediacenter.gmx.net (login is your e-mail address).

    6. Re:Free German service has better than that... by Jaeger- · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the great post.

      Just signed up for an account on GMX.net. And I've suggested it to a couple friends who don't have GMail yet. VERY nice.

      --
      E V E R Y T H I N G I W R I T E I S F A L S E
  78. Wow, 2GB spam! by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow, 2GB spam!

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  79. Obligatory FireFox plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hotmail has graphic ads? I don't see any.

  80. Sooner or later by davmoo · · Score: 1

    Maybe one of these days Hotmail, Yahoo!, etc, will figure out that its not the space, its the search and organization facilities.

    I own a server. My server has dual 120 gig hard drives. I can have dozens of times more space than Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo!, etc, offers by using a server I already own. But I still use Gmail because I can't duplicate their searching and cataloging abilities. And until Gmail's [laughter]competitors[/laughter] can offer that same capability, I'm not even the slightest bit interested in their offers at any price, even free.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  81. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  82. The jokes on them then ;) by beuges · · Score: 1

    My passport login is my gmail address :D

  83. Re:GMX offers 1GB free and 8GB for paying customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make that up to 10GB for 4.99 EUR (or 5GB for 2.99 EUR). Even the free 1GB accounts include the WebDAV accessible "MediaCenter", in case you want to fill up the space with pictures, songs and other files, which you can then share with other GMX users.

  84. Do It Yourself... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Linux/BSD server connected to your broadband link.

    2. Dynamic DNS service on your IP address from your ISP.

    3. Procmail & fetchmail grabbing mail from the ISP mail server.

    4. Strong firewall rules & SSH-only access with public & private keys.

    5. Carry around your private key with Putty on a USB memory stick and / or a floppy disk.

    I have 160GB of storage and can get to my email form just about any PC in the world. Plus I haven't got to worry about "yet another email account".

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:Do It Yourself... by stud9920 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe in you alternate universe, PC fans are noiseless.

      Maybe in you alternate universe, it is OK to spend tens (hundreds ?) of Watts to power an otherwise useless machine.

    2. Re:Do It Yourself... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Maybe in you alternate universe, it is OK to spend tens (hundreds ?) of Watts to power an otherwise useless machine.

      So you're obviously that "green" a person that when you get up from the TV at night to go to the toilet, you turn off the TV and light in your sitting room, go to the toilet, come back and turn them both on agian before sitting down, do you? Plus you must use low wattage light bulbs throughout your house and you cannot use a microwave oven because it is far more energy efficient to cook all of you food "en masse" in a large gas oven. Do that, then you have a right to complain about my server wasting a few hundred watts.

      As to "otherwise useless", the same machine hosts a few of my web sites, acts as an SFTP server for a few of my buddies to use, occasionally gets fired up as a Doom, Unreal Tournament or Quake server, handles about a dozen email accounts shared between my girlfriend and I, acts as a syslog server to the rest of my home network and has a firewall on it also.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    3. Re:Do It Yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It is not financially efficient to be your own webmail provider. The power consumption of even a lowly Pentium costs more than luxurious commercial webmail. That doesn't even include your time, because like it or not, offering _anything_ on the wild wild net requires that you keep up to date with bugfixes for all software which handles unsafe data. That means SSH, mailsucker, webmail-scripts, webserver, dynamic DNS software and your OS.

    4. Re:Do It Yourself... by stud9920 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Let's sum it up :

      * turning my TV on and off for such a short time significantly shortens the MTBF of the components, and is therefore environmentally nefast.
      * I do use low wattage bulbs, for the reason that I have a low amount of current available, so if I wat to see something, I have to use mini-TLs; plus they're cheaper on the long run.
      * I do not have a microwave oven because it's far to easy to heat junk food with one.

    5. Re:Do It Yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Depends. I can see both sides of this arguement

      I do it for fun and for education. I have set up a linux server I believe to be secure in that it is updated with the latest security patches at least daily via the automatic update facility and more frequently if I catch the announcement email and do it myself.

      The server can be ssh'ed into from my internal network and from my workplaces NAT'd address. Because we have a VPN solution I can VPN into work and SSH to home, which is convenient.

      It also provides secure POP, SMTP, web, and storage via SFTP. Is it a lot of work? Some; I do check the logs, do patches manually when I catch them as I said, configure, and reconfigure; but that is part of the educational factor.

      If your only motivation is to have virtually unlimited email storage, it probably is not worth it. Not to mention you wont have some of the fancier features that something like gmail might provide. If though, you want to provide yourself with a few other services, and a learning experience, then I would argue that yes, possibly it would be good to set yourself up at home.

    6. Re:Do It Yourself... by rtos · · Score: 1
      Yes, there is always the "the energy costs are to high" argument. An it certainly is a valid argument, so let's see how much it would actually use.

      Here's a fairly typical system. It's overkill for mail, but I'd say it's what most people are running for "home email and UT" type servers. If anything this example will overestimate the costs.

      Small server
      Celeron or Pentium III / 1-1.8GHz / 256MB
      Power: 60W on, 15W standby, 2W off
      Monitor: None
      Always on (24/7)
      That works out to be about 435.1 KWh/year. So the parent poster was correct in saying "hundreds of KWh" if he meant on a yearly basis.

      According to the DoL BLS, the average price of electricity for 2004 is somewhere around $49 per 500 KWh. So that's about $0.098/KWh.

      0.098 USD/KWh x $435.1 KWh/year = $42/year
      ... $3.55/month
      So basically to get equivalent services, you'd need to find a host willing to provide a P3 box with unlimited bandwidth, root access, email MTA of your choice, UT and other game servers, ssh access, MySQL and anything else you can think of... all for about $3.55 per month.

      If you find such a host, please let me know. I think I might be interested in signing up. :)

      --
      -- null
    7. Re:Do It Yourself... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Probably true that it's not financially efficient but I enjoy the experience, not least staying one step ahead of the script-kiddies.

      I've not used Gmail but had a Hotmail account for a while and just found it slow & cumbersome - as well as a complete spam-bucket.

      With procmail and a decent recipe script (that's taken me a few weeks to get right I might add!) I now don't see any spam on my home server and can do all wierd and wacky things with forwarding mail to work (when I'm there) etc.

      Add up all the time I spent configuring Outlook rules, folders and filters and I've probably saved time in the long run.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    8. Re:Do It Yourself... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      I think we're getting off-topic here with the energy argument so let's just call that a stalemate.

      By all means argue that a home server is too complex for a normal user to configure because I full accept that as a valid argument.

      However, if the end result is to have global access to email as easily and as quickly as possible, then SSH-ing to my home server and firing up Mutt in a terminal is definitely for me - not least because my mail's already been filtered, de-spammed and sorted by procmail so my time spent actually reading and replying to the stuff is much less anyway.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    9. Re:Do It Yourself... by stud9920 · · Score: 1

      metafekt.com does that. Except for the game service. But the EPA will forgive you if you turn on your server when necessary.

    10. Re:Do It Yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bandwidth

      Add $x/month for Internet access.
      Then, the cost of running your own server is comparable to paying for hosting with a virtual server or dedicated host.

    11. Re:Do It Yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Heh. Yeah, because you know if I paid to have my email and services (see above) hosted somewhere I wouldn't need to have home internet access!? Wrong!!

      Hosted or not, I'll be getting the same internet access/service at home. So it's a wash.

      Cheaper to run it at home.

    12. Re:Do It Yourself... by scarolan · · Score: 1

      That is, until you're on vacation or a business trip, and there is a power outage in your area shutting down your email server. Or some other problem crops up - the dynamic dns stops working or whatever.

    13. Re:Do It Yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've found that a bog standard P3 takes more like 200W -> 1753kWhr/year -> $175 per year

      And you've still got to include other costs such as depreciation of the equipment, bandwidth, maintanance, and availability.

      I think you'll find it much cheaper to buy that service than to run your own. Personally I use a colo rack mounted system using UML - I get high availability for less than $10/month.

  85. Is this even true? Where is the announcement? by tod_miller · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I traced the story to theinquirer.net/?article=17949 and there is no utterence as to the validity of the story.

    This may be a way of theinquirer.net getting some advertising out of /.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  86. Re:Missing the point--try reading Gmail offline by blastedtokyo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Mine's up to 250MB...and it's been like that for about 3 weeks now. Guess they have a lot of servers to update.

    The big plus to hotmail over gmail right now if that hotmail supports rich clients. You can use it without ads and with full offline support through Outlook or Outlook Express. Try pulling out the cable and reading your Gmail. That and you can actually get a gmail account without groveling or buying one on ebay. Incidentally, I did get one a few weeks ago but am already relegated to a really long login name that isn't firstname.lastname because every permutation was already used up!

  87. You forgot some extra steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5. List on NASDAQ
    6. Profit!

  88. 2GB FAT limit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how they'll work around the 2G limit this time, as it's always been a pain for them. Disk partitions, files, AVI's, now mailbox.

  89. 2 gig over 1 gig by jeff+munkyfaces · · Score: 1

    doesn't really excite me.

    what i really want is attachments over 10Mb...

  90. hotmail UI sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so why would I use it, instead of gmail's excellent UI and labels. for mailing lists and discussion groups, the threading is awesome.

  91. Yahoo silent player by vivekg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does anyone noticed that prices reduced for Yahoo biz mail http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/bzinfo/prod/bemail/ compare_mail_packages.php and Yahoo web hosting http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/bzinfo/prod/wh/comp are.php, which includes tons of space ($11.99 pm == 25 EMAIL ID [ 2 GB each], 2 GB hosting space, and other stuff). Wow they are ahead of every one
    Many services now crossing 1 gig mark, (http://fearside.org/~vivekgite/gmail-watch/ look right side Bigger the better - MailBox); EAST or WEST gmail is best of free email, but for "Small Business" yahoo rocks.

    --
    The important thing is not to stop questioning --Albert Einstein.
    1. Re:Yahoo silent player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow!!! That is amazing

    2. Re:Yahoo silent player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as hotmail, consider ... no way
      Gmail free and good reputation ... geeks mail
      Yahoo all in one offer ... cool

    3. Re:Yahoo silent player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think decaf is the solution to all your webmail needs.

    4. Re:Yahoo silent player by jbarr · · Score: 1

      Yes, but my MAJOR problem with Yahoo Mail (and just about everything else that is Yahoo) is the annoying, flashy, irrelevent ads taking up valuable screen space. And short of purchasing Business Email from Yahoo, there is no account that is "ad-free" If I'm going to pay for a service, I damn well better not be bombarded with ads.

      Gmail's implementation (whose success is yet to be determined) provides unobtrusive, typically relevent, and often useful ads that are presented in a non-insulting way making the whole experience very pleasant. To back-pedal a but on my above statement, I would pay for Gmail even if it included ads because the presentation is professional and non-intrusive.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    5. Re:Yahoo silent player by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1

      dude, how many adblockers do you need to be developed before you figure out how to use one?

    6. Re:Yahoo silent player by jbarr · · Score: 1
      dude, how many adblockers do you need to be developed before you figure out how to use one?
      You're missing the point. The very fact that you even have touse ad blockers with Yahoo Mail is illustrative of the annoyance that their service is. Gmail simply doesn't require the use of any ad blockers.
      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    7. Re:Yahoo silent player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -- And short of purchasing Business Email from Yahoo, there is no account that is "ad-free"
      -- If I'm going to pay for a service, I damn well better not be bombarded with ads.

      You're wrong. YMail Plus is $20/yr and is ad free. It also has 2gb of space. I think it's worth it. The spam guard works great and I can get it on my cell phone if needed. I don't get the gmail lovefest going on.

  92. Only for Hotmail Plus by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    So this is just a reaction to Yahoo!s already available 1GB of storage for subs.

    Yahoo IMHO is one of the better email providers right now. I see little point in penis length comparison between Yahoo! and GMail, except for lack of ads (which doesn't bother me so much, sometimes colourful is nice... I don't think the extra Kb's are killing my connection)

    Google is a clean interface, and searching etc. I don't search my emails - I really think people should realise that email is not a storage format, and you should increase the signal:noise by extracting pertinent information into a real format.

    URLs: FireFox Browser Bookmarks
    Emails: Thunderbird Contacts
    Events: Sunbird Calendar
    Tasks: SunBird again? I use Rainlendar but SunBird seems to do a tasty job.

    Tell me that GMail search is better than using real tools with real semantic data - it just isn't.

    Internet search is tricky. Your own searching is harder because you *know* what you want, you have to find it, not a reference to it, or something relevant to it.

    Email has two components, communication and documents. Communcation can contain document information - like a rough draft, which you can copy paste into a word processor. [OpenOffice].

    Documents again should be stored in a file system, not a POP3 or IMAP (or web interface) system. it should allow for collaboration and permissions and backups. (and saving back to the document).

    Communication contains triggers such as 'Do this' or 'Here is my sexy pic'

    You should either: create a task (or remember it) or save the jpg into your private folder, or a USB drive...

    Then delete the email. Email is like a file transfer/IM bastard child that never goes away, always leaves a ghost 'transfer 100% complete' dialogue and never cleans its logs.

    Keep the internet tidy, delete your email.

    This has been a public service announcement.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  93. Like this post, that article was Anonymous!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm.. For you guys that actually take the time to think, it was an anonymous reader writing in with zero references, zero credibility and no specific dates given as to when this project will come to fruition, or anything other than conjecture. Why should anyone believe it's true?

    I'm still waiting for my Hotmail inbox to provide consistent access rather than increased storage ... this is a load of crap.

  94. Microsoft using windows servers eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I would hate to scandisk and defragment all of that hdd space.

    1. Re:Microsoft using windows servers eh? by smallguy78 · · Score: 1

      Of course you're aware that raid disks don't need degragmenting

      --
      Nothing costs nothing
  95. Regular e-mail by Universal+Indicator · · Score: 1

    Doesn't anyone out there use regular ISP-provided e-mail anymore? I have all the backup e-mail storage space I want on my own Personal Computer. How many people honestly need instant access to an old e-mail from two years ago from anywhere on the web?

    1. Re:Regular e-mail by dn15 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      " I have all the backup e-mail storage space I want on my own Personal Computer. How many people honestly need instant access to an old e-mail from two years ago from anywhere on the web?"

      Quite true in many cases, but there are good reasons for using webmail (combined with IMAP, if possible!) It is great to have consistent layout of saved mailboxes available on multiple computers, for example. It's also nice to have saved messages available when out of town, if you don't use a laptop. Finally, your address stays the same if you switch ISPs, and even keeps working if you don't have any internet service for a while.

      That said, I would not use a web-only mail service myself. I'm just saying there are uses for it. Personally I have my own domain name, set up with IMAP and SquirrelMail pointed at it -- all the advantages of webmail without the annoyances.

    2. Re:Regular e-mail by TheHawke · · Score: 1

      The problem that many ISPs had was with their POP software that could NOT provide web-based services until here lately. The ISP I work for has that capability, coupled with some mondo antispam filtering, we've managed to keep several hundered thousand spam from hitting our client's boxes.

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  96. It will be in the next version, then delayed by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Informative
    Welcome to MS marketing my friend. MS always does this. Don't switch, don't buy something else, don't go to the competitor. We will have it all in the next version and MORE!!! Then the next version comes close to release and most of it will have been delayed into the next version.

    The older people will remember MS promising the sky to stop people from adopting OS/2 and the younger can look to Longhorn. Not even close to release yet and it is already being stripped and things MS promised to be in XP but really where in Longhorn are now definitly going to be in "who cares". WinFS anyone? How long has MS been promising a better filesystem?

    This little announcement grabbed MS a few headlines. None of the media will be coming back to MS in a few weeks and ask them why they haven't delivered. Journalists ain't even smart enough to question goverments on breaking campaign promises. Far easier to copy paste the next press release.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  97. "Hotmail Means to Double Gmail Storage" by jonasw · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure Gmail will be very grateful.

  98. Not for free.... by kg4czo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just checked my pam ridden hotmail account that I've had since before M$ bought it and they're actually offering 250MB to freeloaders. The 2GB is for paying customers.

    Yay! 250MB of SPAM to delete every day! :P

    1. Re:Not for free.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Just checked my pam ridden hotmail account that I've had since before M$ bought it and they're actually offering 250MB to freeloaders. The 2GB is for paying customers.

      True, the unreliable CowboyNeal is pulling a Michael Moore on us. He wrote 'the free email service Hotmail' and 'increase to 2GB'. But he doesn't say that the 2 GB is for free accounts.
      Must be a slashdot anti-Microsoft thing, to deliberately mislead the readers like this.

    2. Re:Not for free.... by spleck · · Score: 1

      Finally, someone actually looks at the facts.

      I RTFA and it talks as if they have some kind of secret inside information. The Hotmail Plus link has been showing up on the Hotmail website for days now. And it clearly says you can PAY for 20MB attachments and a 2GB inbox. They also announced free calendars now that Sunbird is out. Free customers will get 250MB and 10MB attachments... eventually.

  99. Don't you love corporate thinking? by zaxios · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Gmail looks like it might become popular!"

    "Oh, that's no problem. Gmail's got 1GB, we'll respond in kind and give all those bastards TWICE as much!"

    "Wow, Johnny, if 1GB is good, imagine how neato 2GB would be!"

    Talk about linear thought. Google does something new, so Hotmail's solution is to replicate that something new + 1 (except entirely without the newness). And of course they leave out in their plans all the things more complicated for committees to understand, like Gmail's improved usability. "Google has 1GB!" is probably as much they could grasp of the situation, because it's certainly all they've responded to.

    1. Re:Don't you love corporate thinking? by mr_sas · · Score: 1

      uhm, i'd suggest that they understand the public better than you...johnny Q Consumer see's 1gig email storage vs 2 gig and which is he more likely to go for?

      it's like some kind of dick measuring contest.....who has the biggest mail quota.

  100. But ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "1 Gig should be enough for anyone!"

  101. Thank you Google! by uberchicken · · Score: 4, Funny

    I love it. Google pilot a big-box email beta system, and we all get 2Gb Hotmail.

    Thank you, thank you, thank you, Google of Sherwood.

  102. Does anyone care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't
    It may be 2GB but it's still Hotmail.
    Gmail is far cooler and the layout is the best web based one i've ever seen. Hotmail is slow and crappy, gmail is fast and lovely.
    I don't care if Hotmail does 100GB, i'll stick with my Gmail.

  103. I simply don't get it by jonr · · Score: 1

    What's the big deal with web-based mail? It is slow, ineffective and you are lucky if you get a decent handle. (mailto:isyewf656@hotmail.com). IMAP rules all the way.
    J.

    1. Re:I simply don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dipshit. It allows those of us that use more than one computer to get to email from anywhere in the world. How hard was that to think through?

      Show your boss this thread. He might want to review your contract.

    2. Re:I simply don't get it by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      Yes. It allows you to get your email SLOW and INEFFECTIVELY from anywhere in the world.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    3. Re:I simply don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another dipshit. How is it INEFFECTIVE? And qualify/quantify how SLOW it is.

    4. Re:I simply don't get it by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      Slow and Ineffective go hand in hand. If you dont know how slow web based mail can be, you arent qualified to open your mouth, dumbass. If you cannot check it regularly and consistently without loading times and popups/forced pre-ads as per mail.com, it's become 'both' to an appreciable degree. This is also the main reason web-based mail is not the defacto standard in the corporate environment. Hey AC, go get yourself an account, or at least a real job, kthxbye.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
  104. Time for a new file system by Krisbee · · Score: 1
    Two gigs of mail at M$

    Somebody put together an SMTP based file system please!

  105. Re:Gotmail hasn't been working by TheFairElf · · Score: 1

    Gotmail stopped working sometime in february and hasn't been updated since last year.

  106. Articals are just plain wrong. by achilstone · · Score: 1
    The 2gb, 20mb per e-mail, no picture ads option is the "Hotmail plus" $19.99 per year subscription which is already available.

    The "coming soon" sometime in autumn promised freebie option for standard Hotmail will be 250mb, 10mb per e-mail.

    http://www.imagine-msn.com/hotmail/en-us/

  107. NOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOT!

  108. Microsoft FUD as usual by stu72 · · Score: 3, Interesting


    This is the second time that Microsoft has made grandiose announcements about how much space they will give away for free, but nothing has really changed - Yahoo stepped up to the plate immediately and gave everyone 100 MB.

    Let's look at that more closely; Yahoo said they were going to give everyone 100 MB, then they did it. Microsoft has promised always promised the moon but we're all still waiting.

    Why put up with it? Try out Yahoo mail - it's really really good, and it's really really 100 MB. Right now. Not tomorrow, or "soon", now.

    Why does anyone, let along /.'rs, put up with it?

    1. Re:Microsoft FUD as usual by charliekowalchuk · · Score: 1

      I already posted this, but...

      My hotmail account has been upgraded to the 2 GB size for a full TWO weeks now. Theres no "Soon" about it.

    2. Re:Microsoft FUD as usual by glwtta · · Score: 1
      Try out Yahoo mail - it's really really good, and it's really really 100 MB.

      I think they've done quite a good job recently. I've had a yahoo account for a few years and was paying the $20 a year for the 25MB. When the whole gmail thing appeared I was thinking I'll give it a shot when it's out of beta. But then Yahoo went and dumped 2 gigs on me and at the same time the interface improved and became a lot faster; so now it's more like "fuck it - I'm fine with Yahoo".

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    3. Re:Microsoft FUD as usual by maniac_inside · · Score: 1

      Are you sure. I still haven't got that promised 100MB. I am still stuck with 6MB. My mail address is imanpreet_arora@@yahoo..co..in Though I have got it on my .com mail address.

  109. Goes to show what the lack of competition can do by KageMonkey · · Score: 1

    This just goes to show what technology and services can be offered in the presence of competition, which would not have been provided with the absence of competition. Now, we can only imagine where the world would be if Microsoft had competition in the OS market.

  110. This is old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The moronic Slashdot editors strike again. When did you wakeup. Hotmail did this WEEKS ago....welcome to the real world you doodoo heads.

    Nothing to see hear except a bunch of dopey editors.

  111. Microsoft "innovating" again? by caluml · · Score: 1

    "Innovation" strikes again.

    1. Re:Microsoft "innovating" again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not yet, last i checked google was still in business...

  112. Big deal by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hotmail is big, fat, slow and bloated i only use it because i still get emails there, my 2MB of space is always full and waiting for it all to load if im on a slow connection or pc is just torture. Gmail is super fast, efficiently designed and a pleasure to use. Hotmail could offer 100GB and Gmail would still be in the hearts of many, even so with all the money going into google right now they could probably keep their space higher than Hotmails for a long time..

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  113. Billy made a comment like yours some time ago. by bronney · · Score: 1

    >1 GB will more than suit 97% of the webmail users out there.

    Dude,

    640k ought to be enough..

    Not against you btw, this brute force attempt by hotmail cracks me up. They deleted my valuable folders some time ago and I am kinda pissed. Except that I need my passport for the msn people, i don't logon much anymore.

    -bron

    1. Re:Billy made a comment like yours some time ago. by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      If you're ticked off at them the way to get back isn't by not using their free service (ha, they probably *want* us all to stop using hotmail for free), but it's to use hotmail as much as possible, increase the server load, store huge attachments, etc. That's why, despite how horrible the free hotmail has been to me, I still use it for my throwaway address.

      Not that I'm suggesting slashdotting MSN or anything ;-)

    2. Re:Billy made a comment like yours some time ago. by plumby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seems unlikely. I'm guessing their business case for Hotmail is at least partly based on advertising revenue, and this is usually largely dependent on number of (independently verified) page hits, so the more you use them, the more demand they get for (and the more they can charge for) advertising space.

    3. Re:Billy made a comment like yours some time ago. by Igmuth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So, just block the ads. I would be impressed if even Mircrosoft was powerful enough to say, "2% of users didnt' actually view the ads, but pay us for them anyway!"

  114. Maybe then I could FINALLY find... by timek · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... a penile enhancement product the truly performs wonders,

    ... a former minister of a third world company who really needs my help moving millions out of his country,

    ... a home mortgage rate that is too good to be found at my bank,

    ... prescription Viagra for next to nothing,

    ... singles in my area who will put out on the first date for a coke and hamburger,

    ... and all of the amazing products that are too revolutionary to find except through unsolicited electronic communications.

  115. That's odd... by Sirius25 · · Score: 1

    By the sound of things here Hotmail is still in the process of doing the 250MB upgrades.
    I had been waiting on mine forever, but it jumped up to 250 ~a week ago, or so.

    I'll still use gmail 98% of the time, but it's nice to know they won't delete my legacy account if i get in the 2MB range.

    About the upgrades, i'm not sure how/if they sort the process, but i've been a user since back in the HoTMaiL days.

  116. Why email and not webspace? by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    Is 2GB of space really much use for email? 2GB webspace would be more useful to most people, although it would be abused by many for mp3s, videos etc..

    Do people really need 2GB of funny/sick/naughty videos?

    1. Re:Why email and not webspace? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Wake me up when they upgrade to 250Gigs storage space, then I can email a tar of my HDs to myself every now and then and use it for backups. :)

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  117. WOW 2Gb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should be just about enough to cope with the amount of spam Hotmail accounts recieve!

  118. Just went live! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just checked my hotmail and the 250MB seemed to kick in while I was using it!

  119. But what's better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    (a) 2 gb of mail storage

    OR

    (b) sex with a mare ?
  120. "service unavailable, try again later" by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2, Informative

    Which other email provider occasionally gives you the message "service unavailable, try again later"?

    Well, GMail, sometimes. But it's still good enough that I don't care :)

  121. some good posts by BlackShirt · · Score: 1

    Google is a clean interface, and searching etc. I don't search my emails - I really think people should realise that email is not a storage format, and you should increase the signal:noise by extracting pertinent information into a real format.

    URLs: FireFox Browser Bookmarks
    Emails: Thunderbird Contacts
    Events: Sunbird Calendar
    Tasks: SunBird again? I use Rainlendar but SunBird seems to do a tasty job.

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=118658&op=Repl y&threshold=2&commentsort=0&tid=95&mode=nested&pid =10020897

  122. Re:WAR! [flamebait] by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

    As far as storage levels go:
    I think maybe I am agreeing, I just feel the need to alaborate, and I am pretty drunk so dont take it to seriously.
    I dont think either expect most users to use this storage so its just a marketing game. Put in big disk arrays, calculate for 1/100th usage, profit!
    You dont honestly believe that they alocated 2GB just for your sorry ass do you?
    Oh wait, this is possibly google I am talking about, we cannot knock them. Of course they have my 2GB waiting for me as soon as I subscribe. IMAP,FTP,HTTP as far as the eye can see. Is this still just web based? Crap, now we have to build a google/hotmail network filesystem to leverage my personal 2GB.
    The point is we see 2GB and a war going on. The general public (which they both cater to) sees higher numbers that they will never use, it just seems better. This becomes a numbers game and it will get far better before they are done.

    In genereal its a good thing when someone releases some retrictions, so in in general its a good thing. I wonder though, do the some 50% windows servers that hotmail runs on, do they count that high? Or is this just a bluff...

    Next up: Google OS based on Debian, optimized for crawling!

    --
    I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
  123. Of course! by Ilgaz · · Score: 3, Funny

    They got DoubleSpace installed on Hotmail servers! They just lack a bit conventional memory, thats all...

    Phear MS technology you Google!

    1. Re:Of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Drivespace, you copyright-infringing insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Of course! by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      "That's Drivespace, you copyright-infringing insensitive clod!"

      It was on purpose too, hihi ;)

  124. Gmail slashdotted? by duelin_markers · · Score: 1
    Reading this item reminded me I hadn't checked my Gmail this morning. I open a new tab for it, and lo! and behold:
    Server Error
    Gmail is temporarily unavailable. Cross your fingers and try again in a few minutes. We're sorry for the inconvenience.
  125. This is not a troll by xaoslaad · · Score: 1

    Can someone please tell me why on earth you need 1 GB or 2 GB of storage space?

    I've had a hotmail account for about 7 years now and I have never had it get more than 20% full. If I'm subscribed to lists I delete the emails after I read/reply.

    If I say oh darn, I want that info again I generally know where the archive can be found & searched.

    What are people storing in email that is so huge. With attachments limited in size to 10MB it doesn't seem like an effective storage for software etc. I simply cannot fathom; someone care to shed some light? Is it every joke/humor email they've received stored away; what, what, what? I feel like I'm missing out hehe.

    1. Re:This is not a troll by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      What are people storing in email that is so huge.

      Remember, these are the people of the "Outlook" generation! :-)

      I pose the same questions to buddies at work who store all their documents as attachments within emails within an Outlook *.pst file. Not only have we had frequent occasions where PST files have grown to bigger than 2GB (so Windows cannot actually access them anymore) but these things are stored on laptops who's hard drives can fail at any moment!

      Much better to save out the attachments, put them neatly in folders and back them up occasionally - most email simply isn't worth keeping anyway.

      Sorry, but if you need 2GB for email storage then you're probably far too lazy to manage attachments properly.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    2. Re:This is not a troll by Thrymm · · Score: 1

      Shit I am still way under 5mb which yahoo used to limit users a while back. Hard Disk storage is so cheap now, buy a 20gb drive and use it for backup. I wouldnt keep any emails which I need in the future online and in theory out in the open.

  126. gmail by QuaZar666 · · Score: 0

    if anyone wants a gmail account one is up for grabs at gmail@mailinator.com

    - Qua

  127. thank you!!! by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Excellent! MS are giving me, er, are going to give me, more email space :)

    Combined with that great new file system that Microsoft gave, er, says that they are going to give me, my computing experience will be fantastic! Real soon now!

    Take that, you smug GMail and Linux users; sure, you're laughing now, but just wait, I'll have the last laugh, um, real soon now ...

  128. Re:GMX offers 1GB free and 8GB for paying customer by Analog+Penguin · · Score: 1

    I've been using GMX for years, and literally had no problems. Even when they switched to the all-German interface, I manage to make my way around (had a little German in high school). But I can't remember the last time I had a problem with it. Softhome also has similar decent service, but not quite as good, nor as reliable.

  129. Ebay uses passport by samael · · Score: 1

    I use it to sign into Ebay when I've forgotten which user-id/password combo I used when I signed up.

  130. It's not all about storage! by jbarr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Gmail is certainly not all about storage. It's about the Search, Labels, Conversation, and lightning-fast interface leveraging that storage space that lets me manage my email in ways I never could before. I have yet to find a (free) Web-based email service offers the speed and flexibility in managing my emails that Gmail does. I have emails dating back to 1998, and Gmail lets me find the information I need quickly. And Gmail's ads are non-intrusive and often useful. Hotmail could provide a terabyte of storage, but the intrusive, flashy ads make the experience nothing short of annoying. Even if Gamil charged for their service, I'd pay for it because of its functionality. It truely is in "the Google way".

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:It's not all about storage! by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      I have emails dating back to 1998, and Gmail lets me find the information I need quickly

      How did you import your archive? My e-mails are in Thunderbird format..

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
  131. Cost of disk space vs. cost of engineering & m by otisg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Precisely. You can think about it like this:

    Disk space is cheap. When you give users 2GB of disk space, they don't really use it all up. The disk space is not pre-allocated and immediately consumed. Thus, 2GB is really more about users' perception of Hotmail's offering, and this positive perception comes at a low price (again: disk space is cheap)

    On the other hand, it costs a lot to pay a few dozen developers to add valuable, innovative new features, such as GMail's labels.
    It also costs a lot of money to market Hotmail, to evangelize and to hype it, which is what people are doing with/for GMail for 'free'.

    In conclusion, it's easy and not that expensive to just throw 'we offer 2GB' on the site, but it is expensive to add features and market the service.

    --
    Simpy
  132. I already have 250 MB ... by arhar · · Score: 1

    ... am I the only one? Maybe they're doing it in order of seniority, since I've had Hotmail since early 1997 ...

    1. Re:I already have 250 MB ... by Borg_5x8 · · Score: 1

      Me too, and I'm also at 250MB :-\

  133. Re:Gotmail hasn't been working by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

    Hmm, that's funny, I used it yesterday.

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
  134. The big winners... by Albigg · · Score: 1

    Are the storage companies. I know that space is probably allocated on the fly, but the HPs and EMCs must be licking their chops. I don't consider myself a heavy email user, and I'm already approaching 10% GMail capacity.

  135. Shhhhh .... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Even if Gmail charged for their service, I'd pay for it because of its functionality.

    Quiet, you fool! ;)

  136. Wow 2Gb of spam!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow 2Gb of spam!! Dear Mrs. Moboumi and Brenda Jones You can send me more phising mails and spam now. thanks Hotmail.

  137. Re:GMX offers 1GB free and 8GB for paying customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed, I've had an account there since the time they had multinational interfaces. Since they upped the accounts to 1GB, I have no real reason to switch to gmail. I haven't checked (and most of the website docs are out of date now), what size are messages limited to now?

    AC because I don't remember my /. acct

  138. Not even 100MB - 15MB! by wirefarm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, .Mac comes with 100MB of online storage, but you can only use 15 of that for mail.

    I have a .Mac account that cost me 13,900 yen per year and unless they up that to at *least* 1GB by renewal time, I won't be renewing.

    Yes, it includes other things, like a virus checker. WTF?
    I don't need a WebDav server for files - I use Samba over an SSH tunnel to my home server. It's a lot faster and more convenient.
    The other things they offer, like game trials and discounts on magazines really strike me as the kind of thing I could get for free if I dug around.

    I just wrote them a note to let them know how I feel about it:

    Hi.
    My .mac account is up for renewal soon and I don't think I'll be renewing it.
    The quality of the service has been great, but simply put, 15MB is too little storage for email.
    I have little use for the other 85MB of storage, except for occasionally putting up a .mov or .mp3 that I create. I tend to feel resentful when I get that "over quota" message on my email, when I have paid for other storage that I cannot use as I like.
    For $99 a year, it really should be something like 5-10GB.

    Thanks,

    Jim
    http://www.wirefarm.com

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  139. IMAP SEARCH by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

    Or, for that matter, the wonderful 'SEARCH' command supported by good mailservers like Cyrus IMAPd. Server-side keyword-indexed searches through message bodies are all good.

    1. Re:IMAP SEARCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here here, brother. I pay $40/year for 80MB when I could get 2GB for free. Why? Because POP is sooooo 1990's and IMAP rocks (especially the server-side search).

    2. Re:IMAP SEARCH by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

      My preferred solution:

      $ grep imap .muttrc
      set spoolfile=imap://127.0.0.1/inbox

      Admittedly that's at work, but still. I'm a big fan of running my own mail (especially, I suppose, since they pay me to do it anyway).

  140. Welcome to June 24th, 2004 by AssFace · · Score: 1
    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  141. Ebay's telephone numbers by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Informative
    I don't know I did a search on google for ebay telephone numbers, and found this:

    Ebay's telephone numbers

    Ebay Phone Numbers:

    (408) 558-7400
    (408) 558-7401
    1-800-322-9266
    1-888-749-3229
    1-408-37 6-6554 FAX

    Spokesperson: Kevin Pursglove, 408-558-7458
    Hours: 7:30AM - 5:30PM PT M-F

    Employee's Extension: press 1
    Dial by name directory: press 0
    Customer Service: press 2
    Operator: press 3

    May be dated, obsolete, your milage may vary, you have been warned.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  142. Google / Yahoo by smallguy78 · · Score: 1

    According to a times article, http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,8209- 1224582_2,00.html (stats in the newspaper edition) Yahoo has over 256m email users, google under 1m. It doesn't mention MSN, but the search engine figures speak for themselves: 43% Google, 31% Yahoo, so I imagine the rest is msn, altavista...

    I wonder how many users Hotmail has - 100m atleast. Multiply that by 2gb, and that's a huge upgrade.

    --
    Nothing costs nothing
  143. No Faith... by moojin · · Score: 1

    I remember the problems that I had accessing my Hotmail account when they tried to swith from BSD to NT the first time. I could not sign on for days or it was very very slow. Then they switched back to BSD. I encountered similiar, but not as serious, problems when they switched to W2K. I wonder what it will be like when they switch from 2MB to 2GB? I really hope that history does not repeat itself.

    --
    Why did I lurk so long before registering for a Slashdot account? I could have had a Slashdot ID of less than 100000.
  144. gmail offer by Jude+T.+Obscure · · Score: 1

    LinuxKnight If you do in fact want a gmail invite, let me know via email in my profile. I have a spare you're welcome to play with.

  145. 1975 called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they want their flat-text data formats back.

  146. It's not about storage by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    Nice to see that Hotmail wants to get some press coverage, but I think that hackers agree that Gmail is not about storage space. It's about providing a better email service.

    Hotmail can up their storage space, but unless they manage to curb the spam problem (choice between lots of spam or missed emails) and fix their slow interface, Gmail is street lengths ahead of it even though Gmail is ostensibly in alpha stage.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  147. Woo hoo! Even MORE sucky service!!! by swordgeek · · Score: 2

    Welcome to the supersized nation. It doesn't matter if it's bad service, just as long as it's BIG!

    Hotmail went steeply downhill after MS bought them, and has never recovered. There are better and more respected services out there. Who CARES how much storage they'll give you?

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  148. well by djfray · · Score: 1

    A while ago they promised free storage of up to 250 MB, and said it would happen at least a week ago. I'm starting to distrust their reliablility.

    --
    This sig is o Unfunny o Funny
  149. Storage schmorage! by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

    What about attatchments? Can i send a big file to myself and then be able to get to it from some other place? 2 Gb would be useful if that was the case but to have that space to store a bunch of spam and not being able to use it for something productive sounds pretty lame.

    The biggest problem i encounter when dealing with other peoples mail is that i cant send any big attachments.

    So, how big mail can Gmail or hotmail deliver?

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  150. .Mac-Apple are you reading this?? by MacGod · · Score: 1

    As a .Mac subscriber, I'm beginning to wonder how useful my $100/year subscription really is. And before everyone writes back to tell me of all the other features, yes, I know they're there; I just don't tend to use them.

    • iDisk storage-other than (infrequently) sharing photos with friends, I really don't use the online storage space at all. And 100MB isn't enough to do anything too too interesting. Plus, there's no server-side scripting supported (that I can tell anyway), so I can't even build a real website on it.
    • Virus protection: I buy a Mac partly because there are no viruses. Plus, I have Norton SystemWorks anyway, so I have their protection if I need something
    • iCal, address book etc sync: I only have one computer, so this doesn't do much for me

    Really, all I use is the email. I can access it via Pop/IMAP rather than just webmail, which I quite like, but that 15MB is starting to look smaller by the day!

    --
    "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
  151. Hardly free by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

    You have to pay to get Hotmail plus. It's not free (like gmail).

    "Get MSN® Hotmail® Plus for only 19.99/year"

    it's a subscription service, and it's cheaper to buy your 2GB for you PC than to rent it from hotmail.

    T.

  152. Yeah, this needs to be pointed out to people by charliekowalchuk · · Score: 1

    Yeah, all these articles are wrong, the story needs to be updated! You have to pay $20 a year for the 2GB of email storage.

  153. In Post-Soviet Russia... by genka · · Score: 0

    They offer free POP3 and IMAP email with unlimited storage. They start with 40MB mailbox, but as soon as you have less than 10MB left, you can push a button on a web-interface and add another 40. Rince, repeat.
    Bad news for those too lazy to learn Russian: Engish inteface is rather skimpy. http://www.hotbox.ru/

  154. This News is WAY old by charliekowalchuk · · Score: 1

    People are complaining about when this is going to happen. Maybe they're doing this in waves or something, but I've had my hotmail plus service for 3 years now (yes, okay, I admit it, MS leechs 20 bucks a year from me, but thats all I swear! ^_^)

    But they told me about the upgrade at the begining of the summer, they sent out an email telling me about this way back in June! Anyway, I'm telling ya, my email account has been upgraded to the 2GB of stoarge for TWO weeks already.
    (On a side note, I went from 90% full on my old 10MB account to now it reads "less then 1% FULL".)

  155. Stick with Google or Yahoo mail by ylikone · · Score: 1

    Don't encourage microsoft hotmail, unless you like all the email you get to be html formatted so they can include stupid backgrounds and pretty fonts.

    --
    Meh.
  156. Imagine by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    two billion spams of that...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  157. New backup storage solution by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, can I tar all my data and e-mail it to my Hotmail account as a backup store?

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  158. I have 2GB on Yahoo right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have Rogers ISP in Toronto and you get a 2GB Yahoo email with the service. So technically, not free but...

    I think Sympatico is getting in bed with Hotmail but I don't know the details.

  159. Google's morals are worth something, after all... by alispguru · · Score: 1

    Both Google and Microsoft are offering free email with lots of storage. Google is going to pay for its service by delivering targeted ads, based on examination of your email contents.

    People appear to trust Google with that information, largely because Google has a reputation for "not doing evil". They had the opportunity to deliver skewed search results for short-term profit, and didn't take it.

    Microsoft can't offer a similar service, largely because nobody would trust them with that information. Microsoft has a reputation that's basically the opposite of Google - market share first, profit second, ethics when it doesn't conflict with either of those (say - The Three Laws of Microsoft?).

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  160. Mail2Web Anyone? by stevemm81 · · Score: 1

    There's a great service called mail2web that will allow you to access any pop3 via the web. Of course, that means you have to trust them not to read your email, so it's probably not good for a privacy freak, but they wouldn't use webmail anyway, would they?

  161. Spam by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    Except, with hotmail you know that 1.5 GB of that 2 GB (at least) will be taken up by spam. Not worth it to have a hotmail account, no matter what the storage capacity. I've had good luck with the 100 MB Yahoo mail to use for transfering largish files, but will prolly go Google once its available for the masses.

  162. Proof that Microsoft software is a bad idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft software is garbage, and I'll prove it.
    The Microsoft Corp. is a collection of liars, thieves, and cheaters who's only motivation is money. They could care less about the safety and security of the people who use their software.

    Here are a few links to help you see the truth:

    The US government is telling people to stop using Microsoft's software.
    Microsoft has lied and got caught trying to fake evidence in court, and they lie to people about TCO (total Cost of Ownership) statistics.
    The Microsoft Windows operating system is dangerous for eveyone.
    Using Microsoft software is a bad idea for people and the internet as a whole. Don't believe me? Click the above links and read the articles for yourself.

    How much more proof do you need to throw Microsoft Windows, and other MS software, in the garbage and switch to Linux?

  163. Re:Missing the point--try reading Gmail offline by The_DoubleU · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't call reading e-mail with Outlook a BIG plus.
    Can I use mozilla/any other mail client to read my Hotmail account offline??

    --
    What power has law where only money rules.
  164. Why not offer unlimited. by blanks · · Score: 1

    2 gigs is at the point where 99.9% of your customers will never use this much space, why not offer UNLIMITED! space, and only restrict daily data transfer, space costs these places nothing, but transfering emails does. Unlimited space, and up to 100 mb email transfer a day.

    1. Re:Why not offer unlimited. by isbhod · · Score: 1

      never say never. Granted it might take a while, but i'm sure eventually some pack rat type person will use up the 2GB

  165. MS Missing the Point? by White+Roses · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of posts here saying that MS missed the point of GMail. Doesn't everyone realize that the very definition of "the point" is "something MS missed?"

    --
    Do not touch -Willie
    1. Re:MS Missing the Point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the point they missed was the point where GMail reads your mail and spams you based on it's contents, then that's a point WELL MISSED!

    2. Re:MS Missing the Point? by White+Roses · · Score: 1

      Mmm, sour grapes. Don't have an account, do you?

      --
      Do not touch -Willie
  166. hotmail blows by Glog · · Score: 1

    I don't care if they gave me 20GB - Hotmail blows! Their interface is retarded and I keep getting those stupid emails from Hotmail Staff. In addition, Hotmail - much like IE - has long lagged behind other providers in the number and quality of features provided. So until they get their act together it's Yahoo and Google for me.

  167. 2GB is great and all... by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

    ...but where Hotmail really kicks ass is in its spam filtering. It works so well, even much of my legitimate email is auto-deleted.

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
  168. 2 mb... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... ought to be enough for everyone.

  169. 2 Gb storage by JRO-CDN · · Score: 1

    I think the real problem is getting messages there. I know that it is intended to allow users to keep all of their old emails, but it would be nice to send and receive larger emails too. I know that for me, anything over 15-20Mb can't be send without the 'whoops' message from gmail and most other emails servers won't let emails with a size larger than 10Mb anywhere near the outgoing queue. Can you say 'bounced'.

  170. woo, more spam! by AllNicksWereTaken · · Score: 0

    As any Hotmail user knows, Hotmail has this mysterious magical ability to fill up with spam the very millisecond you sign up for an account.

    That doesn't happen to Gmail.

    I believe I speak for many when I say
    "Good try, Bill."

  171. PHP websites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me or are sites written in PHP always either down or obnoxiously slow? Why don't we have a slashdot article to yap about that. It really stinks because cool sites are usually owned by cheap people who use PHP.

  172. only cost hotmail $0.50 by peter303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Disks in my area can be had for as little as 25 cents per gigabyte. Presuming a user actually uses the full two gigs, ad revenues would probably pay the $0.50 in a short time.

  173. 2MB now versus 1GB when?? by clickety6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The big advantage to me is that I can get a hotmail account or two right now - I can't get a Gmail account. And that's the same for 1000's of other users.

    So right now, a 2Mb free hotmail account is much more atractive to me than a 1Gb but-you-can't have-one-yet Gmail account !

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    1. Re:2MB now versus 1GB when?? by delirium28 · · Score: 1

      The big advantage to me is that I can get a hotmail account or two right now - I can't get a Gmail account. And that's the same for 1000's of other users.

      So right now, a 2Mb free hotmail account is much more atractive to me than a 1Gb but-you-can't have-one-yet Gmail account !


      Yes, but I can also get a Yahoo! Mail account with 100MB and no wait, which is still a lot better than a 2MB hotmail account.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    2. Re:2MB now versus 1GB when?? by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Or you could get a GMX.de freemail account with 1 GB, no wait, a web interface and POP3/SMTP access, a rather efficient spam filter, and something like a shareable web-based file storage area.

  174. Re:Missing the point--try reading Gmail offline by displaced80 · · Score: 1

    httpmail plugin for Mac OS X's Mail.
    Dunno about other platforms, but it's open source, so the chances are good.

    --
    What's the frequency, Kenneth?
  175. YES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy spamburger! Instead of getting 2 Megabytes worth of spam, now I can get 2 Gigabytes of spam! Yay for me.

  176. My account has been upped to 250MB by bawol · · Score: 1

    No one else has commented on this, but my 2MB account was recently upgraded to 250MB.

    I'm not sure how they choosing who to upgrade. I've had the account long before MS bought them, and am constantly at the 2MB limit.

    My account has been this way for about a week or two. Has this happened to anyone else?

  177. Hotmail is up to 250mb for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They must be upgrading accounts in batches or something. My account has been at 250 meg for a week or two now. I'd give gmail a try, but no invite... Course someone could send me one at lbeckm3@hotmail.com if they so desired!!

  178. Just a matter of time.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Hotmail account that I have had for years just got upgraded to 250mb a few days ago.

  179. More like.. by gphinch · · Score: 1

    Dear Hotmail Users,

    I don't know what you're complaining about, 640k should be enough for anybody.

    Sincerely,
    William H. Gates

    --
    in bed.
  180. Hotmail Storage by DirtyLiar · · Score: 1


    Over two months ago I read a story saying that Hotmail would up it's storage from 2meg to 200meg, and I'm still waiting for that.

    So I'll believe this only when I see it.

    --

    THINK! It's patriotic

  181. it's just you... by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    Stop visiting sites made by your next door neighbour's 12 year old son.

  182. M$ == B$ by Teknikill · · Score: 1

    M$ is full of crap. They said they would increase the storage limit, and now they are saying it again. Hotmail is STILL at 2mb.

    I use the WWW::Hotmail perl module to forward my email to Google Mail anyway. So in a sense, I do have 1gig of space with hotmail.

    -Xantus

  183. Slashdot is MY Email. UNLIMITED Storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've decided I'm giong to use /. as my Email. All I have to do is post in a consistent place (say first story of the day) and use a bozotic keyword to search for (i.e. slashmail).
    The only problem is that everyone can see the nasty notes my g/f and I exchange...but this is /. , so maybe noone will understand it ;)

  184. If you want to switch by Phantasmo · · Score: 1

    Try FastMail instead. The Guest level account was enough for me (it's certainly far better than Hotmail!) but I upgraded to Member and now Full is starting to look pretty good.

    600MB of storage for $20 a year. Also, 20MB of public/private file storage, and the sweet subdomain addressing feature (which has managed to keep me spam-free for two years!)

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
  185. /. effect by 5m477m4n · · Score: 1

    /. claimed another victim osviews.com:

    We're just too dern'd popular these days...

    We've had to take the site offline for some maintinence.

    Please bear with us and come back soon.

    --

    ---
    Those who can, do
    Those who can't, teach
    Those who don't know how, supervise
  186. .Mac vs gmail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you would have to ask why, as a paid subscription service, they offer 10% of the storage of gMail.

    That's not fair. Apple has been offering the e-mail service since it was iTools pre-OSX. Back then there WAS no gmail. Back then 10MB was a decent e-mail service. Of course if you want apple to bump up the space that's arguable but to go around wondering why on earth they ahve such a small space in comparison to Gmail. That's just not thinking clearly

  187. Just 97%? by ElForesto · · Score: 1

    I'm an e-mail packrat. I have about 5 years worth of e-mail and attachments saved, and it totals maybe 70MB. These storage wars are not differentiated from checkbox feature wars in video cards. Except maybe the latter results in something useful over time.

    --
    There is a difference between "insightful" and "inciteful" other than spelling.
  188. Re:WAR! [flamebait] by Proc6 · · Score: 1

    Hmm. Your comment made me think, someone should write a P2P file sharing app that keeps all the slices of the files as specifical serialnumber'd (subject line?) attachments on emails stored on hundreds of free email accounts.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

  189. Hotmail storage now at 250MB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just logged in.. not surprised, but my limit is now 250MB.

  190. Sure, it worked. They did a study on it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was internal only, but hackers at securityoffice.net leaked it. I have a mirror here, please mirror it yourselves and don't slashdot my server!

  191. Stopped using hotmail by $exyNerdie · · Score: 1

    I stopped using hotmail years ago due to loads of spam coming in and one month expiration interval, I had multiple email accounts for different uses, friends, family, domain registrations, etc. and if you don't use hotmail (unpaid version) for a month, they delete all your email and make the account inactive. I switched to yahoo that had a much longer inactivation period and 50 times better spam blocking. Eventually I switched to Gmail... I would never use hotmail unless they guarantee inactivation period to be 12 months instead of 1 (and give me a free gift certificate to amazon.com!!) . I think Gmail had that period set to 9 months...

  192. blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All my emails that I explictly checked to save in the sent folder got deleted because of a change in policy on hotmail to start deleting old emails for "my benefit". I do not trust hotmail after that and have used my account as a spam address.

  193. Re:Cost of disk space vs. cost of engineering & by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another clueless individual who spouts the "Disk Space Is Cheap" mantra without real knowledge of back-end usage.

    IDE disk space may be cheap, but it is utterly worthless in a multiuser, multidisk, multi-access environment. SCSI and Fiberchannel RAID or SANS arrays are whats needed by any company worth its salt. Needless to say, the RAID and SANS are an order more expensive for the needed performance. Software and IDE RAIDs are not fast enough when you talk about the numbers of users that Google and Hotmail have to support.

    As for Google's search engine technology, that's a different matter entirely. They need CPU cycles and RAM as well as disk, so clustering machines with a single IDE disk or single disk per IDE channel is sufficient for their task. When you have 50 users or even 5 users simultaneously accessing that 250 GB IDE disk, you'll be left waiting for your data. Even if it's a 40 GB drive with 2 users, you'll notice a delay. IDE is just not scalable.

  194. What's your point? by _newwave_ · · Score: 1

    Hotmail works just fine with Firefox, as well.

    1. Re:What's your point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who talked about hotmail? This was obviously to show that the grandparent was factually incorrect.

  195. Different format? by Hobadee · · Score: 1

    Can I get those 2 gigs in FTP format instead of email format?

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  196. What's really happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I imagine they'll be upgrading them by cluster. The accounts are spread out over clusters of db hosts. It wouldn't make any sense to add users to machines until they're full and then start provisioning onto the next machine. It should all appear random to end users. I can't imagine how much work is going into this by the guys who run the datacenters that hotmail runs out of. This is a large increase of either disk size in the arrays or number of db nodes. Either way, someone has put in a lot of OT on this lately (yeah, I know they don't get paid overtime). Glad I'm not involved with this one.
    I could tell you more, but then I'd have to kill myself.

  197. There's only so much you can do. by billybob · · Score: 1

    Too bad their "hugely improved" interface doesn't work with Opera, Links, Dillo, older versions of Mozilla, and countless other browsers.

    That's true. One of the big problems these days is there's only so much you can do with plain jane HTML. Gmail's interface "experience" depends heavily on javascript. And they've done a good job of trying to support as many modern browsers as possible. Mozilla, Firefox, IE, and Safari all work flawlessly. And those are the main browsers on the "main three" operating systems: Windows (IE), Mac (Safari), and Linux (Mozilla/Firefox). This probably accounts for 98-99% of all users out there. That's pretty damn good if you ask me.

    I haven touched Opera since the 6.0 days, one hte reasons I stopped using it was because their javascript support was horrible. Personally I dont like web sites that depend on javascript, however Gmail is really the first one where I can understand the use of it. It makes it feel much more like an actual application on your desktop as opposed to the standard webmail interface. A lot of sites that depend heavily on javascript are dependent on it in a stupid way, eg 99% of them could get by without it. With Gmail I feel differently however.

    If they wanted to support all browsers, including old outdated ones and ones that didnt support javascript well or at all, it would have come at a huge cost to the interface experience. It would just be another yahoo or hotmail account. And if that was the case, the only difference between gmail and the others would have been their storage size, which now most of the others have matched or exceeded, so there would be no advantage at all. Which would have made Gmail totally pointless.

    --
    Joseph?
  198. More room for Spam! by Spruce28 · · Score: 1

    Great! When my Google account fills with spam I can switch to Hotmail! I currently forward all the spam from my Mail server to my gmail account so I can search through it all to look for real email. I currently use up 26% of the 1 GB available in 9024 messages! I figure I have 111 days to figure out what to do then / see what gmail does when I reach the limit. The Google search function is great to look through rafts of spam!

  199. GMail Spam Filtering is Not That Great by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
    I've used GMail for about 2 months now and I have my primary email at my domain name cc everything to it. Around 95%+ of the "spam" identified by GMail consists of false positivies.

    Mind you, I am careful with my info and I have only received one actual spam to my Gmail account in that time. And yes, it was correctly tagged.

  200. Value added to HotMail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Storage is not everything, as evidenced by the other post today about the GMail watcher Klip.

    Want to monitor your Hotmail account without loggin in over and over again?

    Check out the Hotmail Klip from Serence, it's bundled with KlipFolio 2.6, a free Windows tool that can monitor remote sites for changes so you don't have too. The Hotmail Klip shows you your message body as well, which is more than Outlook does.

    You can download it here at Serence's site.

    You can see some screen shots here.

    (I'm not a coward, it's just too late in the day to create yet another on-line account.)

  201. Even if they offered 500 GB... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... I still wouldn't go back to spam^H^H^H^Hhotmail. Not ever since Micro$oft bought hotmail and took away every single useful feature one by one. Back in 1997, things like auto-forwarding emails and POP3 used to be freely available. There was no time limit set on how often you had to check your account either. Heck, I was away from the Internet for nearly 4 months, and my account still existed. There was even a time when it didn't require cookies. Ah the good old days....

    Then one day I logged in to find all my Sent messages had been wiped out. There were over 300 of them, all used to keep track of things. That was the final straw. I had already switched to the far superior Yahoo and will never ever go back to hotmail.

    For those feeling nostalgic, I found an old page of what Hotmail used to look like. (Disable Javascript first to get rid of that annoying geocities garbage.) Too bad I can't log in or anything.

  202. Too little, too late by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    I had several hotmail accounts, I used them faithfully. I put up with the small size because I had a history with the accounts, and some people could only get ahold of me through them.

    Then Hotmail came out with their "Sign in every 30 days or we'll turf you." I kept up my normal routine, and then I had a busy travel month, didn't sign in, and all my accounts died. I didn't bother reactivating them. As far as I'm concerned, if you're going to take an active, frequently-used account, that has been active and frequently used for years, and turf it because I don't sign in for 30 days, then you don't want my eyeballs on your banners. I could understand turfing after 3 months, or even 6, but 30 days cuts it a little tight for those of us who don't have it as a primary account.

    So, no more hotmail. I still have my original RocketMail account, opened circa 1994, and even though it was bought out by Yahoo! years ago, it still works like a charm. I have my ISP accounts, and I just recently got a GMail account because it's ubernifty... and, frankly, I don't miss Hotmail at all, and "Sorry, we fucked up!" just won't cut it. Maybe with a brick-and-mortar business, but on the CAPITAL-I Internet, those who fuck up become the next "Hey, do you remember...?"

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  203. Where's the one gig? by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

    That's all fine and dandy but I'm still waiting for my first gig Microsoft promissed two months ago. Since they just decieded to offer 2 gb now that is pretty good evidence that they havn't even started trying to upgrade the service yet.. This is obviously just marketing hype to try to take some steam out of Gmail. This is so similar to any other tech field competition like the graphic card and CPU card industry for example... Always paper releases no products till 2-3 months down the line from the "offical release"

  204. My hotmail mailbox is still 2 MB by rahard · · Score: 1

    I've heard this before, but I don't believe it.
    Will they actually do it? When?
    My hotmail mailbox is still a whopping 2 MBytes.

    -- br

  205. Why Then? by LuYu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is it that my "2MB" Hotmail account claims to be 75% full when I have 0.75MB of mail stored (I know this because I have had pretty much the same messages in there as I did before the upgrade to 2MB)?

    I think they are just going to lie about it. Like they do with everything else.

    In any case, I would like to see this tested when they unveil it (like Kevin Rose did with Gmail).

    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
  206. Info source? Anywhere? by clubin · · Score: 1

    Great, great, that's all fine and dandy, but where's the source for this information? Just some more "professional" /.-accepted journalism, I guess.

  207. Oh come on... by tropavantgarde · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Past a certain point, upping your storage does slim-to-nothing as far as competition goes. Maybe a few people will go, "Oh cool! I can store 2 gb! That sounds really cool!" But very few people will even come close to gmail's 1 gb limit, let alone 2 gb.

    Moreover, Hotmail doesn't even begin to compete with gmail as far as the interface, searchability options, multiple labels, &c go.

    Nice try, MS.

    --

    --A witty sig proves nothing.--

  208. Has the poster bothered checking the facts? by lucason · · Score: 1

    http://www.imagine-msn.com/hotmail/en-ww/upgrade.a spx

    I seems to me that this hotmail announcment states that the 2Gigs of storage are for subscribers only.

    So to answer OP's question.... Not that choked....

  209. It just doesn't matter anymore. by nikolic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The facts are that GMail doesn't exist for most users. Google has waited too long between announcing the offering and producing something to be used.

    "Invites" aside, the facts are that GMail does NOT yet exist since it is only available to those willing to buy an invite from EBay.

    Google previously had the potential advantage of more storage --- and now it doesn't.

    E-mail is the single largest traditional offering that a service provider may offer to encourage customer loyalty. Google offering such an advantage quickly may have caused quite a stir. This is because the "old regime" (MSN, Yahoo, AOL) may have to fight for the loyalty that they had won early in the game. This would have caused a lot of market movement and pressure.

    Having seen this threat, they have adjusted. There is no longer a reason that a consumer should switch even if the option was actually available --- which it is not.

    As a consumer of services, I no longer care about it. Frankly, it isn't worth talking about any longer. GMail is already dead in the water.

  210. Not fully true by doublej42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    OK first of all I am a Level 3 tech at MSN. So this is kind of the official line. MSN/Hotmail is nto plannign on giveing there customers 2gb of mail, Well it is but not for free. MSN has already given them 2gb. As for interface, 9.95 per month they made there own e-mail software (ya it's outlook but built for hotmail accounts) and no I'm not selling it. Won't run on linux anyways. but ya hotmail may suck but hell its' free live with it, it will be 250 mb by January. Signed your friendly MSN guy http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=hotmail/e s&HL=MSN_Hotmail_Plus&ST=1&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.ms n.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket% 3den-us

  211. Re:WAR! - advice from a 'deadbeat' eBayer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting anonymously FWIW....

    They closed my account for non payment of £1.12

    That's more than the $1.00 USD threshold that triggers eBay automated billing system. Owe less than that and the automated billing system won't pester you. This is an example of the binary nature of computing. In eBay's opinion, it would cost too much to process billing for accounts that owe less than $1.00 USD.

    PS: Yes, I owe eBay less than $1.00 USD but will pay the next time I try to auction something. Sadly, when money is tight, you must prioritize who gets your meager resources....