I don't know why it shows both, but turning on Postfix isn't the problem. The 27.7MB one is the combo updater for earlier systems than 10.3.7 and the other one is for 10.3.7
I don't know about that. If you had to pay for every show you watched it could have the potential to start costing you more than it does now. You could no longer just check out a show to see if it's any good, and if you decide it sucks, change the channel. You'd be stuck watching it to get your money's worth, or paying a buck for something you'll never watch.
So how many people have more than one HDTV in their house? How many people even have ONE HDTV in their house? Plus, they can always upgrade the bandwidth in the future. This tech. is sufficient for *most* homes.
I don't think they use the full bandwidth for the small picture in picture. Plus, this is just the start of it. They can always upgrade the bandwidth in the future.
This has nothing to do with watching TV on your computer. You will require a set top box like with digital TV or satellite. I watched the CES keynote by Gates and you actually only need one main box with remote boxes for the other TVs.
For one thing, instant channel switching from one digital channel to another. Most satellite and digital TV takes a second to switch channels but the MS IPTV is instant.
They also have live previews of the shows in the guide which is pretty cool. So you are watching one channel and you have the small picture in picture at the bottom of the show you are previewing with the guide.
You should watch the CES keynote to see more of it. I hate to say it, but some of the stuff with the IPTV and Windows Media Center looked pretty cool.
The HD is enough to store a few movies, which is sort of like if you went to the store to rent a few movies. You will have them for a day or 2 then they are gone.
Of course, now that people have it on a HD they will think that they should be allowed to keep the whole movie forever for the few dollars they paid for it.
The reason it doesn't play smoothly is because it's doing all the decoding in software. That's like running a game with no 3D acceleration. If Apple were to do this, the would no doube leverage the hardware better.
Slashdot Mirror
It's not going over the internet. It's all on their local network over VDSL. VDSL provides enough bandwidth for the TV.
I like it when the Proffs say, turn your cell phones off, and then THEIR cellphones go off. That's happend before when I was writing a few exams.
You could still use it for regular tv which >90% of people have and for which the Mini will work good enough.
I don't know why it shows both, but turning on Postfix isn't the problem. The 27.7MB one is the combo updater for earlier systems than 10.3.7 and the other one is for 10.3.7
No problems here. Using OSXVNC server.
It doesn't seem live to me using Firefox. If I zoom in, it loads new images.
It does already include Canada.
Well, it's not exactly US only cause I can zoom in to my street in Ontario.
Here, Ontario, they put it at Friday at 9PM. I think they did it on purpose so that they could cancel it due to no one watching it.
But what about all the shows that are on Discovery like all their documentaries & stuff. No one is going to watch any of those based on word of mouth.
I don't know about that. If you had to pay for every show you watched it could have the potential to start costing you more than it does now. You could no longer just check out a show to see if it's any good, and if you decide it sucks, change the channel. You'd be stuck watching it to get your money's worth, or paying a buck for something you'll never watch.
Maybe the poster should do all his work for free. After all, that is what he's asking everyone else to do.
Hmmm, OK, if you click save as in Firefox it says link can not be saved, where as if you click on the link it works.
Links don't work.
BWAHAHA, keep dreaming. You will need a WM9 capable set top box to decode it. They have shown a demo already at the CES keynote.
So how many people have more than one HDTV in their house? How many people even have ONE HDTV in their house? Plus, they can always upgrade the bandwidth in the future. This tech. is sufficient for *most* homes.
Yes, it was a real demo and it worked.
I don't think they use the full bandwidth for the small picture in picture. Plus, this is just the start of it. They can always upgrade the bandwidth in the future.
And erect poles where there are none? There aren't poles on every street, like my street.
This has nothing to do with watching TV on your computer. You will require a set top box like with digital TV or satellite. I watched the CES keynote by Gates and you actually only need one main box with remote boxes for the other TVs.
For one thing, instant channel switching from one digital channel to another. Most satellite and digital TV takes a second to switch channels but the MS IPTV is instant.
They also have live previews of the shows in the guide which is pretty cool. So you are watching one channel and you have the small picture in picture at the bottom of the show you are previewing with the guide.
You should watch the CES keynote to see more of it. I hate to say it, but some of the stuff with the IPTV and Windows Media Center looked pretty cool.
The HD is enough to store a few movies, which is sort of like if you went to the store to rent a few movies. You will have them for a day or 2 then they are gone.
Of course, now that people have it on a HD they will think that they should be allowed to keep the whole movie forever for the few dollars they paid for it.
The reason it doesn't play smoothly is because it's doing all the decoding in software. That's like running a game with no 3D acceleration. If Apple were to do this, the would no doube leverage the hardware better.
The difference is between soliciting for trade secrets and looking at HTML source.
Yep, I meant that the 11K increase they were talking about was the same as 11 C increase.
There is no degrees Kelvin. It's just 11 Kelvin. And it sounds more sciencey. Even though 11K = 11 degrees C.