Slashdot Mirror


College Students Turn Away From Landlines

prostoalex writes "You're as likely to find a landline in a college dorm as you're an old typewriter, according to this Washington Post article on MSNBC. While roughly 30% of college students had a cell phone 5 years ago, more than 90% have them today, resulting in student directories including out-of-state numbers instead of 4-digit extensions. More trivia on college students: 90% own a PC, 65% have broadband, 62% own a stereo system, 74% have a DVD player, 55% have a gaming system. What the Washington Post article also hints at, is possible tuition hikes due to the landlines dropped so quickly. "Six or seven years ago, telephones on campus were a cash cow," said Glenn Gaslin of Morrisville State College in New York."

383 comments

  1. Beavis and Butthead reference. by Ithika · · Score: 0

    "Uhhh. They wouldn't sack us. We're MTV's cash cow."

    "Plop."

  2. 90%? by Omniscientist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have not met one person here (University of Minneapolis) who does not own a PC. I also have not met anyone else here who runs an OS other than Windows.

    1. Re:90%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a single datapoint & probably know mostly people in technical majors (who are more likely to have a PC). I can be another datapoint. At Northwestern University, the undergrads are mostly well-off & nearly all have PCs. The grad students are less well-off & i would say about 95% of those in engineering had PCs. Many run OS X. One other person I know besides myself runs Linux.

    2. Re:90%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      University of Minneapolis??

    3. Re:90%? by mshawatmit · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thats interesting. I have not met one person here (MIT) who does not own at least two PCs. I've also not met anyone here who runs Windows.

    4. Re:90%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      University of Minneapolis??? What - there is no such institution. I happen to be a staff member at the University of Minnesota on the Minneapolis campus. If you look around, there are a healthy percentage of persons using Macs and even a few Linux users.

      How much time do you actually spend on campus?

      Getting back to the article, every building and most of the outdoor areas on campus have free wireless access for students, faculty, and staff.

    5. Re:90%? by czarangelus · · Score: 1

      I don't know a single person on my campus who does not own a computer, and there's a tv in every room (sometimes it's a crappy 13-inch tv, but there's always one there.) I think I'm the only person in the school who doesn't own a cellphone (I rarely make calls so I just use my girlfriend's,) and, happily, I know at least 5 people running Linux (and the number is increasing every month.)

      I can't imagine what it would be like to not have a computer- I use it for everything. It plays movies, lets me talk with friends, type up papers, and check up on class schedules.

      --
      When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
    6. Re:90%? by Lxy · · Score: 1

      What imaginary University do you go to?

      I'm guessing you mean U of M Minneapolis. If you're looking for non-Windows boxes, have you even looked in the c-sci department? Not only is it crawling with linux geeks, there's even cooler stuff in the super computing center. Be sure to check out TCLUG if in doubt, there are MANY linux using U of M students.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    7. Re:90%? by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 1
      I have not met one person here (University of Minneapolis) who does not own a PC. I also have not met anyone else here who runs an OS other than Windows.

      Wheres the University of Minneapolis? If you're talking about the University of Minnesota _at_ Minneapolis, try CompSci, Education and Art.

      --
      Why?
    8. Re:90%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such University as the University of Minneapolis.

    9. Re:90%? by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
      You dorks really need to read the book Crossing The Chasm - Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products to Mainstream Consumers

      Actually, everyone on slashdot should read it. You won't be able to stop paralleling it with linux, firefox, etc...

      --
      Berto
    10. Re:90%? by trompete · · Score: 1

      He must not be in the IT program. The U of MN's IT program has many students who run Linux exclusively. They have at least a couple labs that are Linux as well.

    11. Re:90%? by LokieLizzy · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure what you're talking about - I don't know more than two people here (MIT) who use 2 computers. I also know someone here who doesn't own a computer at all, and *everyone* I know here runs Windows. You must live in Senior Haus or something.

      --
      My digital rights don't need management.
    12. Re:90%? by cristofer8 · · Score: 1

      At MIT, at least for laptops brought to class, it's about 10% linux, 25% mac, and 65% windows.

    13. Re:90%? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      You should come to St. Cloud, where I know many people who do not have a computer. The computer labs are always packed, so people come around begging to use your computer to do stuff. A Dvorak keyboard works great to keep them away.

      I know one other person with 2 computers here, and they are the only other person I know with their own Linux computer. Browsing the network shares, there is one other computer in the dorms which identifies as OSX running Samba, otherwise it's pretty much Windows everywhere.

    14. Re:90%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously are not at (MIT) because you are blatantly lying.

    15. Re:90%? by Neward+Rylet · · Score: 1

      Drexel University has required all students to have a computer since the mid-80's. It was the first school to do so.

    16. Re:90%? by atomic_toaster · · Score: 1

      When I lived in residence at college, and this is four years ago now, every single room that I visited had a computer, no matter what program the student was in. Granted, some of the computers were ancient and only capable of running text programs. Some people had two or three machines, each running a different OS, as well as one or more gaming systems, a TV, and a stereo (or their surround-sound computer speakers hooked up to all of their devices). If a student didn't have a computer when they moved in, they bought one as soon as they realized how inadequate the computer labs at the school were. No matter how many machines are available for student use at any given school, the administration is always trying to play catch-up with the demand for equipment. It's so much easier to have your own computer. Also, school computer labs are rarely open 24-7, which makes it extremely difficult for students to pull all-nighters, which is a staple for anyone in post-secondary education!

    17. Re:90%? by hatmouse · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Don't get out much eh? Where is the University of Minneapolis?

    18. Re:90%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this fictional "University of Minneapolis" of which you speak? Do you perhaps mean the University of Minnesota (Twin Cities)?
      http://www1.umn.edu/twincities/index.php
      Are you *sure* you're in college?

    19. Re:90%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he hasn't said he's met a non-zero number of people...

    20. Re:90%? by Omniscientist · · Score: 1

      Bahh, I meant University of Minnesota Twin Cities and you know it. I do happen to see a few Mac users, but I have not once seen anyone have Linux or other *nix running in their dorm rooms or on their laptops, even in IT computer classes.

    21. Re:90%? by Omniscientist · · Score: 1
      I'm a first year student in IT, and I do have classes in the compsci building. However I haven't seen any person during compsci lectures running Linux on their laptops, ever.

      And yes I meant University of Minnesota Twin Cities, which is in Minneapolis, so I'm going to call it University of Minneapolis to avoid that awkward title.

    22. Re:90%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a joke. MIT has a reputation beyond its own borders, in case you hadn't noticed:). If one were to choose a school at which to assign every student two linux-OS computers, it'd be MIT or Cal Tech. More people have heard of MIT.

    23. Re:90%? by emidln · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. I have not met one person here who was sober enough to use one of their PCs, regardless of the OS.

    24. Re:90%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know anybody? Everyone at MIT uses Windows.

    25. Re:90%? by stor · · Score: 1

      Hmm yeah well...

      I have a copy of the Gorilla Game, also a Moore book. IMNSHO it's not very compatible with geeks at all.

      Let's face it, most geeks who come across a little graph with a tornado on it will think "this is just a crock of shit"

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    26. Re:90%? by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

      Hehe... At U. of South Carolina I just popped all the keycaps from my model M into Dvorak layout and left the actual output set to qwerty... it's APALLING how many university students don't know how to type properly.

    27. Re:90%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      For the full unshowered *nix treatment, I'd choose Berkeley before Cal Tech.

    28. Re:90%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was a computer engineering student (in the not so long ago... two years) I could not recall anyone I knew who did not own a computer. Even this one horribly inept girl who was so technophobic she used dialup AOL instead of the free high speed access the dorms provided (yes... she had a network card). So I think the percentage of people who own computers is probably right.

      In my program, I can not think of a single person who did not have Linux (or *BSD) on their computers -- although a few of them dual-booted into windows. It was just a practical requirement as all the labs were unix/linux based. And speaking of labs... even those of us with personal computers were in the labs. OMG... I walked all the way to the science tower! I have better duck into the Sun lab and check my email. {I'm not kidding... the number of engineering students who had similar habits was astounding.} We tended to duck into the Sun labs as most of the students were unfamiliar with *nix. For the same reason (people afraid of *nix) the terminals were popular in the library for the students who were familiar with text based mail.

      Starting the second half of my Freshman year, the new engineering building opened up. The labs were beautiful. Linux labs, Sun labs, SGI labs, and so on... even a couple of windows labs for the comp. sci. students -- don't ask why they were big Windows people but they were. But best of all... talk to the right people... plead your case well enough... and you could get 24/7 access by swiping your student ID. Sure, it's a pain to swipe your card three or more times to get to a computer... but it made all-nighters in the labs, working in groups and teams, possible. The all nighter was alive and well.

      Ah, the memories... I can still smell the new carpet, stale coffee, and subtle hint of running electronics.

    29. Re:90%? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Most male college students leave their PS2 at home since it might be a turn off to female college students. Or they can't get work done.

      The video game 55% should be actually alot higher.

    30. Re:90%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much for being an institute of technology...

    31. Re:90%? by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1

      Nah...I don't know many outside Course 6 that owns two PCs.

      And everyone uses Windows, for at least one thing: games.

  3. old news? by headisdead · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the UK, this has been the case for years. When I moved into Halls, there wasn't even a land-line phone available.

    1. Re:old news? by shredwurzel · · Score: 1

      When I was at Lancaster back in 2000, they put phones into all the campus rooms, but they were all done by a private telco, that charged insance prices like 30pence per minute to call freephone numbers and you couldnt phone 999 directly. Mobile phones were basically made cheaper by this, for many students, so most of them went mobile, and the company running it got bought out.

    2. Re:old news? by Vandil+X · · Score: 1

      The United States has long lagged behind Japan and Europe in both mobile phone technology and general proliferation.

      But we're catching up.

      I am among those who switched to mobile-only while in college.

      As a working adult, the only reason why I have a landline phone now is because I'm on-call 24/7/365.

      --
      Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    3. Re:old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ACC? They were utter twats in Manchester, anyway. Only survived at all becuase they got handed the college broadband connectivity business on a plate after their telephone monopoly dried up.

    4. Re:old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I started university in the UK in 2000 and have actually noticed more and more people living in private residences have been getting landlines. The reason is simple, adsl. I've not known one person who got a landline simply for the purpose of voice calls.

      As for those in university accomodation, my university provides network connections on the wall rather than having some useless 3rd party come in to sell us "broadband" that runs at 128kbps for £20pm with no choice to us.

      Hardly anyone in university accomdation seems to get landlines, they all just use mobiles. Except for the few who want ADSL as well as the university connection.

    5. Re:old news? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Heck, it's so old that many people have since graduated and still don't have a landline.

      Of the people I know, maybe 20% have a land line of some form. Everyone else uses mobile exclusively now.

    6. Re:old news? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Heck, it's so old that many people have since graduated and still don't have a landline.

      If you don't have a landline, and you don't like the poorly written filth on cable TV, then how do you get Internet access? WiMax isn't ready yet.

    7. Re:old news? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I didn't say *I* didn't.

      Most of the people I know aren't geeks so don't have DSL or even internet access... I have a landline purely for DSL purposes - never gets used for anything else.

    8. Re:old news? by nikoliky · · Score: 1

      Heck, it's so old that many people have since graduated and still don't have a landline.

      If you don't have a landline, and you don't like the poorly written filth on cable TV, then how do you get Internet access? WiMax isn't ready yet.


      I have not had a landline since I moved out of the dorms 5 years ago. I have also never subscribed to cable television. Yet I have always had broadband. It is possible to get cable broadband without the television service. The serviceperson simply installs a high pass filter in the exterior box. Internet without tv was ridiculously high with Adelphia, but TimeWarner seems to be reasonably priced. And definitely still cheaper than a phone line with DSL.

    9. Re:old news? by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Reason is because of our land mass. It's far chaper to deploy wireless to a land mass roughly the size of 200x800 miles vs 1500x3000 miles.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    10. Re:old news? by mikael · · Score: 1

      As for those in university accomodation, my university provides network connections on the wall rather than having some useless 3rd party come in to sell us "broadband" that runs at 128kbps for £20pm with no choice to us.

      British universities are under political pressure to demonstrate that they can create "spin-off companies". So the first thing that they do is to transfer ownership of the student accomodation telephone system to a company jointly set up by the administration and a handful of almuni graduates from the MBA course. These people then start to reduce network access speeds, increase charges, and lo and behold!, the university has created a profitable spin-off company.

      Until of course, the students switch over to mobiles, Skype, and create their own Ethernet networks by hanging CAT-5 cable from window to window. Then once the company is no longer able to make a profit, the directors sell the now worthless company back to the university and leave with a golden parachute and valuable work experience.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    11. Re:old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...I'm on-call 24/7/365.

      AAAAAARRRGH! Pet peeve alert!!! Please don't use the phrase "24/7/365" ever again. It makes you sound like a jackass marketingdroid.

    12. Re:old news? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      What the article said about landlines being a cash cow for Universities is very true. Clemson put an explicit ban on the program dial-pad back when it allowed you to make free calls over the internet several years ago. They explicitly blocked it from working on their network, it wasn't the consequence of other policies, it was simply "this competes with our long distance call revenue, terminate it."

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    13. Re:old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure its very important to him to keep pointint out that he gets a day off every leap year, he wouldn't want his bosses to forget.

    14. Re:old news? by pod · · Score: 1

      24/7/365? What happens on leap years?

      In any case, don't cell phones work 24x7, and will reach you more reliably any time of day than a land line, or am I missing something here?

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
  4. score one by PoopJuggler · · Score: 0

    for the credit card companies

  5. Stupid business by Quasar1999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hate businesses that assume that you will buy certain services from them because they deem them 'essential', and when all of a sudden you don't, they jack up the price of the services you still do buy from them...

    In this case, tuition will go up because they stop making money on landline sales??? How about my damned cable company (or phone company) that charges me an extra $10 a month because I just want a highspeed internet connection but don't want their cable offerings or long distance plan?

    How can they get away with this BS? It's like those computer stores that 'cash discount' their prices... Play on words to get around rules that prevent them from jacking up the price because you wanna pay by credit card...

    Aren't there laws against this sorta crap?

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Stupid business by Space_Soldier · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Stupid business indeed. However, the reason why they do get away with it is that consumers don't bitch at the Better Business Bureau or to their representatives. Charter Communications is known for this. Sometimes they do take it away from your bill if you are loud enough. Most times they don't, and the tech support will tell you that they do it because they can. They don't even hide. As for phones, mobile phones are more convenient. How much time do students stay in dorms besides sleeping and fucking?

    2. Re:Stupid business by timmyf2371 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I hate businesses that assume that you will buy certain services from them because they deem them 'essential', and when all of a sudden you don't, they jack up the price of the services you still do buy from them...

      In this case, tuition will go up because they stop making money on landline sales??? How about my damned cable company (or phone company) that charges me an extra $10 a month because I just want a highspeed internet connection but don't want their cable offerings or long distance plan?

      I'm not a business expert by any means, but as far as I understand the idea of business it is to have more income than your expenditure. If increasing prices are the only way of doing this, then so be it.

      How can they get away with this BS? It's like those computer stores that 'cash discount' their prices... Play on words to get around rules that prevent them from jacking up the price because you wanna pay by credit card...

      Credit card merchant services typically charge around 3% to process a credit card transaction, so retailers must build this cost into the final cost of the product they are selling. Would you prefer no cash discount is offered to customers who want to pay for a particular product using cash?

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    3. Re:Stupid business by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      How can they get away with this BS? It's like those computer stores that 'cash discount' their prices... Play on words to get around rules that prevent them from jacking up the price because you wanna pay by credit card...

      I am with the previous poster. Credit cards are a convenience for the customer, in which the business is charged about 3% for Visa or Mastercard, another percent or two for Discover, which is yet another fee. They make businesses pay for it because they knew the cards wouldn't take off if customers had to pay the fee.

      In a retail environment where net profit may be a few percent because of all the expenses, it pays to do this if they can to be more competitive.

    4. Re:Stupid business by Technician · · Score: 1

      How about my damned cable company (or phone company) that charges me an extra $10 a month because I just want a highspeed internet connection but don't want their cable offerings or long distance plan?


      I'm in that boat. I don't have broadband because of it.

      The reasoning with cable TV is they get away with it because they can play the broadband card to pull people away from satelite TV. In my area Comcast's penalty is $15, not $10 with a promise to increase soon. The phone company uses it to pull people from Vontage or other VOIP services. The city lets them get away with it because in the case of the phone company, the POTS line pays the city coffers for 911 services. I imagine there are other tie in's for the cable company so the city will protect their monopoly. Since I have POTS and don't include a long distance plan, they have an incentive to try to keep me from dropping POTS when I get broadband which I would certanly do in a heartbeat. My long distance is currently all on a cell phone. It's much better rates. If I got Vontage, then I could drop POTS entirely and use a lower cost cell plan. The phone company knows that and are trying hard to keep it from happening. So at the moment I'm stuck on Dial-up and will remain so for the near future. I'm looking at increasing the bang for the buck, not simply shifting services to a higher cost package.

      Unitl they think outside the box to get me to become a subscriber to broadband, I stick with dial-up and leaching a nearby WAP when I need a large file.

      Someday someone without a tie in to another service will simply offer broadband and make a killing. There is a market for just broadband.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    5. Re:Stupid business by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's because the credit card companies double-dip; they charge you for using the credit card, and they charge the business for running it through. The businesses have decided to just pass the cost on to the customers. Don't feel bad; it's been this way for a long time in the rest of the world, because businesses outside of America thought it was a bunch of crap from the get-go.

      As for the cable companies? Yeah, they're pretty much just screwing you. :)

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    6. Re:Stupid business by calethix · · Score: 1

      " In this case, tuition will go up because they stop making money on landline sales???"

      This is insightful? A university gets its funding from many different sources. If one of those sources gets cut (e.g. they make less money from phone service), then they either have to make it up elsewhere or drop some service they're providing.

    7. Re:Stupid business by big_groo · · Score: 1
      How about my damned cable company (or phone company) that charges me an extra $10 a month because I just want a highspeed internet connection but don't want their cable offerings or long distance plan?

      Buy a tv card, and split the cable. Cable TV for 10 bucks a month. You can even splice the cable and send it to your TV with no degredation in service.

    8. Re:Stupid business by David_W · · Score: 1
      Credit card merchant services typically charge around 3% to process a credit card transaction, so retailers must build this cost into the final cost of the product they are selling. Would you prefer no cash discount is offered to customers who want to pay for a particular product using cash?

      Seeing as the merchant agreement with the credit card company says you can't charge extra for a credit card transaction, and a "cash discount" is just a different way of doing the same thing, I know I would prefer no cash discounts. Most merchants play by the rules fairly; the rest should as well.

    9. Re:Stupid business by Snocone · · Score: 1

      they charge you for using the credit card

      If you're getting charged for using a credit card, then you're using the wrong card. Hell, my main card actually gives money BACK to me out of what they charge businesses for my using it:

      http://www.cibc.com/ca/visa/dividend-platinum-ca rd .html

      I generally cycle $2-3K a month of retail purchases through it, which has been good for a $300-$500 Christmas bonus on the card pretty consistently the last few years.

    10. Re:Stupid business by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      They make businesses pay for it

      Don't let yourself be fooled. The businesses pass the savings on to the customer. I wish more people would grasp this concept and apply it to their thinking of taxes. Maybe we'd get a sane fiscal policy that didn't "pass the savings" onto the middle class.

      because they knew the cards wouldn't take off if customers had to pay the fee

      Sort of like the called pays/receiver pays for long distance charges on cell phone usage. In the end the service provider is never losing money.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    11. Re:Stupid business by SilverspurG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it's because the credit card companies double-dip; they charge you for using the credit card, and they charge the business for running it through

      Just like the internet. They used taxpayer dollars to set it up, 401(k) money to subsidize its commercialization, and now we pay through every possible pocket to use it.

      And the top investors still ran off with all the initial startup capital when the markets tanked.

      And they still can't keep from selling our private information around in every possible database.

      And they still can't stop spam outfits from being profitable.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    12. Re:Stupid business by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Seeing as the merchant agreement with the credit card company says you can't charge extra for a credit card transaction, and a "cash discount" is just a different way of doing the same thing, I know I would prefer no cash discounts. Most merchants play by the rules fairly; the rest should as well.

      What's fair about that? Why the hell should I have to pay a 3% "Visa Tax" for everything I buy if I pay cash? Why should I be forced by a couple of large organizations (Visa, Mastercard, etc) to buy their services bundled with every purchase I make, regardless of whether I use them? Cash discounts should be the norm, and frankly I think the agreement banning passing that cost on should be considered an illegal abuse of a monopoly position.

      --
      Why?
    13. Re:Stupid business by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's like those computer stores that 'cash discount' their prices... Play on words to get around rules that prevent them from jacking up the price because you wanna pay by credit card...


      Those computer stores likely have to pay as much as $0.25 plus 5% of the purchase price as a fee to the credit card company. If they wanted to charge the same price for cash or credit, they're have to raise the price for cash purchases. Online computer sales from small vendors are lucky to have an 8-9% margin, so having to give away 5% to your credit card company would mean they wouldn't be able to stay in business.

      What you should actually be upset about is contracts that credit card companies force on merchants that prevent the merchant from passing on the savings to you when you pay with cash. It's not too long ago that you used to be able to get a 3-4% discount on gasoline if you paid with cash. Now you pay the higher price either way because the credit card company tells the gas station owner that he can't accept credit cards unless the price is the same cash or credit. The same goes for PayPal. Sellers aren't allowed to pass the PayPal fees on to the buyer... For fixed price items this means the price is higher wether you use PayPal or not.

      The situation is even worse with the new Debit Visa cards. The fees are higher for the merchant if the customer doesn't use their PIN than they are for regular Visa charges, but smaller merchants have no leverage to negotiate a contract that lowers those fees, and Visa won't allow the merchant to accept regular Visa cards but not Debit Visa cards. The merchant is also not allowed to charge you more to use the debit card as a credit card, so the merchant is forced to raise all of their prices or to eat the fee.

      It's the credit card companies that are evil... Not the stores that figure out a way to pass the savings on to you when you prevent them from paying credit card transaction fees.

    14. Re:Stupid business by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      " ... we pay through every possible pocket to use it."

      Maybe you're in an alternative universe, but last time I looked, basic cable modem or DSL service is about $30 a month.

      I don't consider that to be a lot of compared to the value we get from the service.

      D

    15. Re:Stupid business by Empty+Yo · · Score: 1
      They aren't charging you more for being a standalone customer. They are charging you full price while they give their customers who have committed to more than one service through them a discount. It isn't illegal to give customers a fiscal incentive in order to buy more than one product.

      If it was, then the value meals you see at literally every fast food restaurant would be a thing of the past. Do you line up to bitch to the manager of your local McD's because the person in front of you in line paid 30% less for their burger because they got it with fries and a drink rather than on its own like you got it?

      That being said, I personally prefer loyalty incentives that aren't tied to how many services you buy or how much those services cost. A subscription service should have a set percentage reduction per year (-10%/year to max of -30%, say) and if you leave for another provider, you start from scratch. That would allow every customer to receive something for their loyalty, and the customers with more services receive a bigger dollar discount compared to someone like yourself with just one service.

      --
      I'll tolerate anything except intolerance.
    16. Re:Stupid business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay moron, nothing like not looking beyond the 3%. If you look at the numbers you'll find that merchants pay something on the order of 5% to 10% for handling cash. Why? Because of the security needed for direct cash handling and of course the fraud that happens as a result of employees slipping a dollar or two here and there. The reality is that credit-cards are cheaper - I know, I own my own small retail chain. I'm seriously considering not accepting cash. Have you ever tried filing an insurance claim because your cash deposits are $1000 away from your register recipts? It just doesn't work. And don't even get me started with bogus bills - that sort of thing happens more than you might think. I hate cash!

    17. Re:Stupid business by nikoliky · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're in an alternative universe, but last time I looked, basic cable modem or DSL service is about $30 a month.

      In Kentucky my monthly Adelphia bill for basic cable modem service, no telvision just Internet, was $59 and some change. Given, $5 of that was for "modem rental" but $55 is still substantially more than the number you quoted. These figures are as of July 2004. At that time I moved to Ohio where I was able to talk TimeWarner down to $35/month with no television service. Their typical price was $45.

      The cost has come down quite a bit for the consumer, but for Rural America(tm) we still get charge out-the-nose. And the last time I checked that includes the majority of the country.

    18. Re:Stupid business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like you have an employee problem

    19. Re:Stupid business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the fact that those rules are allowed speaks volumes about your government allowing unfair contracts.

      it should be up to the shop if they plan to offer any form of cash discount/card surcharge and allowing the cartel of payment processors to enforce differenly is a prime example of government negligence

      monopolys and cartels are very similar in thier effects on a market.

    20. Re:Stupid business by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Comcast charges $65/mo with modem rental in most places - namely anywhere there's no competition. Comcast is now the big guy. Most places you can't get DSL. Most places, you can only get two things, expensive satellite with 1.5 seconds latency, or cable modem.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Stupid business by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Judging by what's been happening to the net profits of the main cable provider in my hometown over the past 4 years, (there was just a big deal in the news about it), it seems that their constant rate hikes aren't being done because of an increasing bottom line or anything like that; it appears that it's just plain greed and the knowledge that most people will continue to fork out the cash.

      After all, you'd expect the profits of a company that is being forced to increase prices to stay afloat to be dropping, not skyrocketing.

    22. Re:Stupid business by bigpat · · Score: 1

      "I'm not a business expert by any means, but as far as I understand the idea of business it is to have more income than your expenditure. If increasing prices are the only way of doing this, then so be it."

      And the idea of a College or University is to educate students, at no profit. That is why they are non-profit institutions for the most part. The idea of Colleges and Universities becoming ivory palaces of graft and patronage at society's expense, not right. Do everyone a favor and next time your private college comes calling for donations, ask them what they are going to do with the money.

    23. Re:Stupid business by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1
      Credit card merchant services typically charge around 3% to process a credit card transaction, so retailers must build this cost into the final cost of the product they are selling. Would you prefer no cash discount is offered to customers who want to pay for a particular product using cash?

      No, I'd prefer the merchants to suck it up. It's the cost of doing business. And in fact, it /is/ against the law, and against the merchant's service contract with Visa/MC, to charge the consumer the 3%. It's shady enough to have the 3% cash discount. It's shady enough that Visa, if they desired, can cancel the retailer's access to the credid card network.

      Back to the suck it up part: If a merchant wants to increase their customer base, they have to pay SOMETHING: Advertisment, better customer service reps, higher quality product-- all of thse are associated with a higher cost of running the business. The credit card is no different. It is a convenience they are offereing to their customers, in order to entice a wider customer base to shop there. That 3% is the cost. So they have to ask themselves: will I make more profit from the increased amount of paying customers to outweigh the 3%?

      If not, they can raise their prices. As long as they ask themselves: Will the increased profit from the raised prices outweigh the loss of profit from customers who won't want to pay the higher price? (If they're product and serivce is good enough, it will...)

      Or they can chose to not raise their prices, and not accept credit cards. As long as they ask themselves: Will the money saved by not having credit cards compensate for the loss of potential sales from credit card only customers?

      So, like I said to the retailers: Suck it up. Do some risk analysis, and chose what is best for your business.

      And to the consumer: The 3% sucks, but does it suck hard enough to go to a different retailer? And, if you really hate that 3%, can you pay by cash?

      So, I suppose the consumers should suck it up too, and learn to be /smart/ consumers.

    24. Re:Stupid business by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      basic cable modem or DSL service is about $30 a month.

      Considering that I paid (through taxes) to implement the system upon which cable modems/DSL provide their service...

      And considering that federal government subsidies for the high-technology market come out of my taxpayer dollars...

      and considering the federal subsidies for infrastructure development...

      and considering that major telecom conglomerates (who laid the cable and subcontract all the copper and fiber lines which carry the network) knew how to maneuver through the stock market debacle (through cooking the books a la Xerox/Tyco/Enron/etc.etc.etc.)...

      And considering that 401(k) funding helped subsidize these businesses into existence and then subsequently tanked (I'm sorry, weren't those business loans which were supposed to be repaid? or do we just use the bankruptcy insurance policies as a proxy to screw the people who paid into those national investment funds?)...

      Even $30 month is crap.

      Say you give your neighbor $1000 so that he can excavate his backyard and grow corn, or tomatos, or whatever... How much is a fair price for him to charge when he sells that stock to you in autumn?

      Just think about it for a few moments.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    25. Re:Stupid business by compwiz3688 · · Score: 1

      How about my damned cable company (or phone company) that charges me an extra $10 a month because I just want a highspeed internet connection but don't want their cable offerings or long distance plan?

      IANA Cable Guy, but my cable company claims that the $10 / month is for the cable maintenance charge. This is usually included with the TV package but not the Internet. At least they're being honest and not charge you an extra $10 on maintenance if you have both the TV and Internet.

    26. Re:Stupid business by appleprophet · · Score: 1

      Maybe doing school work?

    27. Re:Stupid business by Deagol · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's all about the money.

      I attended Purdue University. One year I lived in Carey Quad, which happned to border the football stadium. Our parking lot was pimped out as premium parking during home games, so the actual residents got kicked out (ticketed, otherwise) so the alums could park.

      I lost count at how many poor lot attendants I ripped a new one each Saturyday morning when I'd tried to park in the lot that I paid extra for (above and beyond standard room & board). I finally pitched such a fit in the office that they refunded a substantial amount of my parking fee. :)

      I can't see how they had the right to deny our parking to begin with, but it seems that deep-pocketed alums are worth more than tuition-paying students.

      To this day I laugh my ass off whenever I get a plea-with-the-alums-for-money notice in the mail. Like that evil university will ever get another cent of my money.

    28. Re:Stupid business by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened around 1997 in my parent's town of residence (Huron, SD). It was one of the 'test' towns for cable Internet access, and as cable was fairly new to the town in general and it was a small town, they went with it.

      The first couple years basically gave everyone incredible performance - 500Kbyte both up and down was normal, and you could get about 1.5Mbyte (not Mbit) to any of the other houses in town: in other words, the whole town was basically a WAN. You could even browse SMB shares with impunity. (Yes, this is a potential security problem, but there's no reason, IMO, to not leave it up to the user.) Quite a lot of file trading and music streaming went on through that method. Even the people a good 5 miles outside town limits got hooked up in many instances (if they were along the highway), and possibly further.

      Despite all this, the cable company (Midcontinent) posted massive profits. And, if you'll remember correctly, the cable companies initially promised to decrease prices once they got off the ground and recouped installation and cable costs.

      Well, a couple years went by. Roll around 1999, and they've raised prices (by requiring cable TV as well, unless you verbally bitch slap the reps until they give in as I did). Not only that, but hte cable internet prices are also about $5/month more expensive, and the modems have been capped at 512Kbit/128Kbit to top it off.

      Roll around present day. To make the deal sting, "midconet" is one of the largest cable companies in the US, now that @home has gone out of business and Midco purchased their physical networks in the Midwest. They went from small Midwestern communications company to very large, profitable communications company (dare I say monopoly?) all on the good will of customers. Now, it's not even possible to use anything ICMP related on Midco networks. Things like "ping" are a business service, apparently.

      (The ironic thing is, there's a debian apt mirror hosted by midco which has admirable speeds for midco users. It's all very confusing.)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    29. Re:Stupid business by Deagol · · Score: 1, Interesting
      The BBB is a sham -- it's an organization put together by the businesses themselves. There's no requirement for a business to register with the BBB.

      If you're dealing with a utility or a telecomm company and not getting anywhere, call your states Public Utility Commission (the "PUC"). Whenever I've done this, the Evil Company in question jumps. They may not always concede if the rules with the state are in their favor, but at least you can grin at the knowledge that *somebody* at that company had to deal with a lot of paperwork if you filed a formal complaint.

      My most recent "victory" was against Questar Gas (natural gas utility). Somebody at the PUC convinced them to address my complaint, in spite of the rules siding with them, just so nobody (at PUC or Questar) would need to file the paperwork.

      The State still has *some* teeth in it. :)

    30. Re:Stupid business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No, I'd prefer the merchants to suck it up. It's the cost of doing business. And in fact, it /is/ against the law, and against the merchant's service contract with Visa/MC, to charge the consumer the 3%. It's shady enough to have the 3% cash discount. It's shady enough that Visa, if they desired, can cancel the retailer's access to the credid card network.


      Are you a fucking moron, or a competing business? If you are the latter, I might understand why you have a self interested reason to be oppossed to cash discounts (you run a failing overpriced small town computer business where the employee is a smug conceited asshole (you), or you work in the credit card business). Otherwise, there is no other explanation other than that you are a fucking idiot.
      What is it about the "cash discount" that pisses people off so much..

      You do realize that all these retailers that DON'T offer a cash discount have to have the 3-5% (yes, it is that high for many purchases for NYC area electronic equip retailers) built into their price. Also, since very few people pay in cash if there is no incentive, it's not like the net percentage of their income that goes to credit card merchant fees goes down (in case you were thinking that all the "cash" customers would substansially subsidize the merchant fees for the credit card customers).

      On a second reading I am getting the distinct impression that you don't have a fucking clue how business works.
      Every single cost that a business has to deal has a direct effect on their costs to the consumer. You must be one of those fuckwits that can't understand why a business would send their unskilled labor to China.

      Business does not work by "sucking up", it works by principals of economics. Businesses "suck up", to use your idiotic terms, taxes of all kinds (payroll tax), health care... all those things end up in the price of the finished good... including the merchant fees.

      The irony in this case is that the retailers that offer a cash discount are slightly worse off than those that don't... Those that don't offer it still have to pay the merchant fees, and they get that same income from the cash and check customers, so they get to pocket that. The merchant is actually doing you a favor by offering a cash discount.. and the reason they do it is to compete... offering the cash discount actually helps increase their wanted customer base.

      Another thing to realize, is that small retailers and chains like the tire shop, department store, auto parts store, most restaurants, in your home town only pay 0.5-1.5%, so their is no comparison to the computer stores set up at a computer show (which are paying in the 3-5% range)..

    31. Re:Stupid business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't read your whole reply, but you're already wrong a few ways. First of all, no, everybody doesn't get a 3% hike without a cash discount. The people who pay cash pay part of that too, so it's less than 3%.

      Secondly, you think you shouldn't have to pay that hike because you don't use a credit card. I don't watch TV or listen to the radio, can I get a 20% discount because advertising doesn't apply to me? Probably not.

    32. Re:Stupid business by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      Would you prefer no cash discount is offered to customers who want to pay for a particular product using cash?

      Yes. The 3% is their problem, not mine. By offering CC as a payment form, they are increasing their potential sales. Any place that is cash only or has "minimum credit card" (I thought was a violation of V/MC rules?) restrictions, loses my business. They are too ignorant to realize this, and also lack the necessary business skills to run a profitable company without resorting to such tactics as cash-discounts and minimums. CC Merchant accounts are a service for THEM, not me. I can take my business elsewhere, and do.

    33. Re:Stupid business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, no, everybody doesn't get a 3% hike without a cash discount. The people who pay cash pay part of that too, so it's less than 3%.

      Well you confirm that not only are you a fucking moron, but also functionally illiterate... I addressed this very item in the reply.. so FOAD.


      Secondly, you think you shouldn't have to pay that hike because you don't use a credit card. I don't watch TV or listen to the radio, can I get a 20% discount because advertising doesn't apply to me? Probably not.


      No, not at all.. But being a business owner myself (with a merchant account... and no I don't offer cash discounts because it isn't worth it for my business), I understand that costs have a direct affect on price and TANSTAAFL applies.

      I also believe that if a retailer isn't doing something that causes harm (externalities in economic speak) they have every right to set prices as they see fit.. If they want to offer a discount to customer's paying cash, then I don't see any reason why they shouldn't have that right. Sorry, but I do not shed tears for the credit card companies, or any large company that is run by straight bean counting in the end.

      Your advertising example is perfect actually.. One of my good friends is a local auto dealer that doesn't show up in the weekly newspaper, nor does he advertise much at all on TV... He does a tremendous business because his reputation is impeccable and word of mouth is good enough. (on a number of occassion the NY AG office has fined a number of local dealers for a variety of offenses, and they are published in the newspaper, this dealer has never shown up there). By purchasing from him, I end up getting some non-zero discount because of his lower overhead.. Apparently an asshat like yourself thinks I should pay the newspaper and TV companies money because my evil car dealer of choice doesn't use most of the traditional costly advertising methods of choice.

      You really are a fuckwit.

    34. Re:Stupid business by catacow · · Score: 1

      What's fair about that? Why the hell should I have to pay a 3% "Visa Tax" for everything I buy if I pay cash? Why should I be forced by a couple of large organizations (Visa, Mastercard, etc) to buy their services bundled with every purchase I make, regardless of whether I use them? Cash discounts should be the norm, and frankly I think the agreement banning passing that cost on should be considered an illegal abuse of a monopoly position.


      A few years ago, here in Australia, credit card companies were prevented from stopping merchants from passing on charges. But as far as I can tell, what happened after this was that prices stayed the same, but some merchants now charged a surcharge on top of the existing price. They're now able to advertise something at a price less than what you'll probably end up paying.

      There's info on the ACCC website.

      As a consumer, I preferred the old system, where merchants just absorbed the cost of the CC service. I knew what I would pay for something, and I felt free to make use of all the benefits of paying by CC (interest free period, rewards, insurance, ..)
    35. Re:Stupid business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, one of the most basic laws of economics is that a company should increase prices until revenue starts falling due to fewer customers. If people are still willing to pay for their higher-priced services, then what's the problem?

    36. Re:Stupid business by Bastian · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there's more to life than GDP.

    37. Re:Stupid business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, according to the finance director where I work, a company that accepts credits card payments is not allowed (by contract, I think) to pass the extra 3% CC processing fee on to the customer.

    38. Re:Stupid business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a real company, it costs a lot of money to handle large amounts of cash. It's cheaper for them to pay the 2-3% to visa.

    39. Re:Stupid business by Engineer+Andy · · Score: 1

      It is weird. over here in australia, many retailers have minimum transactions on both CC and eftpos /debit card transactions. I had NEVER encountered this in new zealand. I'm wondering if it is legal or if it is just a way to try and make people pay a minimum (WTF should i need to spend $20 at a bar before tehy will accept my plastic?)

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World" 1 John 4:14
    40. Re:Stupid business by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Well you confirm that not only are you a fucking moron, but also functionally illiterate...

      You are an inspiration to us all.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    41. Re:Stupid business by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      The majority by space, but isn't the majority by population urban?

      That aside, it genuinely costs more to provide service in areas with low population density, because the infrastructure is shared by fewer people. Simple enough.

      I would argue that the price of broadband is a fairly minor expense for the overwhelming majority of people who would want it in the first place, and that's true even if it's $59 a month.

      Think about what you pay for your car and car insurance for a reasonable contrast.

      D

    42. Re:Stupid business by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There's another big reason for cash discounts that I'm really shocked no one has mentioned yet: by receiving payment in cash, it's very easy to evade taxes on it. This is especially popular with small businesses, especially contractors.

      Of course, considering their tax rate is 51% off the top, I can't blame them for doing it.

  6. Welcome to the Undergraduate Experience by MacBorg · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm a freshman at BU and on a floor of 45 students, there is ONE landline (owned by a non-US student), everyone has computers - and a few of us have more than one. There is roughly a 5:1 windows to Mac ratio... although it's a little squewed because a couple of us have desktops and powerbooks. Everyone, unless they're non-US residents, has cell phones. Over 50% of us have iPods, use iTunes and share music. Yeah, we're hardware-laden students... and I love it!

    1. Re:Welcome to the Undergraduate Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone, unless they're non-US residents, has cell phones.

      That is interesting. In many non-US countries, cell phone ownership is much higher than in the US. What countrie(s) are they from?

    2. Re:Welcome to the Undergraduate Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking hell.

      You can see where the belief that students are loaded ass holes out to have a good time at others expese comes from.

      When I was at uni we were all careful to make sure we could eat

    3. Re:Welcome to the Undergraduate Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      As an international student, I use a landline for incoming calls. International calls to a mobile are prohibitively expensive, even if you use a calling card.

      Having said that, I own a mobile as well, but the need for one is a lot less when you already have a landline.

    4. Re:Welcome to the Undergraduate Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wheres this dorm exactly? i could use some extra cash for spring break, ill bring the large sack =)

      -Larry Wilson

    5. Re:Welcome to the Undergraduate Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      although it's a little squewed because a couple of us have desktops and powerbooks.
      Any of you have dictionaries in there?
    6. Re:Welcome to the Undergraduate Experience by De+Bas+Meister · · Score: 1

      I'll echo this. I'm a grad student at BU; the grad students are more likely to have a landline as well as cell phone (trying to save on minutes and not do overages), but it's almost unheard of an undergrad not having one. Even among the international students, most of the Asian students have one...

    7. Re:Welcome to the Undergraduate Experience by contagious_d · · Score: 1

      I am a Junior at USA (erm... South Alabama. Go ahead, laugh, we actually have really good CS and IT programs to match our amazing beaches). We have free telephone and broadband in the dorms, so I don't know of a single person here without a landline. There are, however, a lot of people without computers. It gets on my nerves having to say "Hell no you can't come over and install Kazaa on my computer!" about twice a day.

      --
      - /home is where the food is.
    8. Re:Welcome to the Undergraduate Experience by Pantheraleo2k3 · · Score: 1

      QEMU, Windows, a Copy-On-Write Filesystem, and charging for time and bandwidth may help your nerves somewhat. Take their warez hostage if they don't pay up, and you could make some decent money.

  7. It makes me wonder... by leaffan34 · · Score: 1

    how many students still have books today?

    1. Re:It makes me wonder... by shadowkoder · · Score: 1

      ~$300 (aka 2) worth per quarter.

    2. Re:It makes me wonder... by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      The only time I've ever had to look at a text is when an instructor has assigned homework from questions in the book or I just didn't go to class and needed to read what they would've lectured on. At ~$600 per semester, they are rather expensive for such little use.

    3. Re:It makes me wonder... by v4mpyr · · Score: 1

      Ditto. The only books I ever bought in college were the few data structure and algorithm books I still use today as reference guides. For everything else I either did not buy it at all, or if the professor was known for textbook related activities we would get a bunch of people to pitch in a few bucks and share one copy of the book.

      Sure as hell beat the alternative of paying ~$100 for a book then getting ~$5 when you try to sell it back to the bookstore at the end of the semester.

    4. Re:It makes me wonder... by rob_squared · · Score: 1
      " how many students still have books today?"


      Too many, because everyone's too lazy to scan a book into a pdf and sell it for $5 to other students.

      --
      I don't get it.
    5. Re:It makes me wonder... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I spent a fortune in books in my first year.

      By the second year I'd wised up that:

      (a) most lecturers didn't even use the books, and those that did gave out photocopied notes.
      (b) for homework purposes the library had several copies
      (c) half the books were written or co-written by the lecturers an they were getting a cut.

      So for the second year I bought no books at all. Didn't miss them.

    6. Re:It makes me wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or

      (d) you can order most books from overseas for less than 20% of the cost of buying them in North America, including shipping.

      Probably "illegal", but IMO no less immoral than the way books are currently sold to students.

    7. Re:It makes me wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where? Can you please give an example? I would like to save 80% on my textbooks.

      Thanks,
      Brian

    8. Re:It makes me wonder... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      I've found this to be true. However I've found two problems with dropping text books from my expenditures.

      (a) I can never predict accurate WHICH classes will not require any books, and some most definetely do. (b) Although the class never makes the books necessary, or in some cases relevant. The books they choose are usually excellent references that offer a wealth of knowledge that had I not read, I would not have aquired.

      I could have gone the last trimester without texts, however I could have also missed out on some of the valuable educational experiences I found in them.

      I find the opposite could also be quite true. Often I could do without the instructor and simply read the text, at least for many of the more academic courses. Want to go to university on the cheap? Goto a public library and start reading.

  8. Technology evolves by Gareth+Saxby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As technology moves on, there's not a lot else to be expected really. The cheap and widespread availability of wireless communication means that more students will be inevitably taking the easier option; who wants to be tied down while making a phone call?

    To be frank, a change like this doesn't count as news, it's enevitable with evolving technology that things will change. This is just one of the many steps that are happening towards the much larger changes that are bound to come.

  9. PAYGO by lxt · · Score: 2, Informative

    Certainly in Britain, where "Pay As You Go" phones took off far, far earlier than the US, it's been like this for a very long time. A student can buy a pay as you go phone now for £20, and all the major networks do various bundles / deals enabling you to buy cheaper airtime etc. etc.

    It's far more attractive than a contract, and calls are normally cheaper on the mobile than on the uni phone system anyway.

    1. Re:PAYGO by Toresica · · Score: 1

      Calls are normally cheaper on the mobile than on the uni phone system anyway.

      Not if using the uni phone system is a mandatory fee for those living in residence as it is here.

      As for me, I use my phone about once a month and was actually contemplating not getting a telephone at all once I moved out of residence.

  10. That's great and all ... by jdwest · · Score: 5, Interesting

    except when one rings during my lecture.

    Never fails, despite warnings to the contrary. So I INSIST that they take the call -- right then, right there. I see a few others stealthily reaching into their backpacks to turn theirs off.

    I don't have any problems ... for the rest of the semester, at least.

    --

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
    1. Re:That's great and all ... by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Informative

      give it a few years.

      around here _EVERY_ student in the lecture hall has a phone in their pocket, the lecturer has a phone and i'm betting that some have even multiple phones.

      and it's not a problem.

      another note: not one of my friends who have moved like me out from their parents have landlines - there's just no point in getting one.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:That's great and all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thats nothing. I was once at a play where a mans cellphone went off, and the actors stopped the play while it was going on to politely and emphatically ask the man to answer the call. He did, and as he did so, I saw plenty of other people reaching to turn theirs off. I sure did..

    3. Re:That's great and all ... by Dayflowers · · Score: 1

      That used to happen alot around here as well. When I first joined college, I'd say that about 80% of the students had cellphones (keep in mind that this was back at the end of 2000). You'd usually hear one or two cellphones ringing during classes. It was annoying as hell, but very very frequent.

      Nowadays its quite rare to see that happen. I imagine the habit of takin' off the sound has caught on. I'd say it took some time to happen, though... hehe

      --
      I am a speak english. Do you not? - Saroto
    4. Re:That's great and all ... by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      You're evil. You should instead harangue the student, throw one of them out, and teach everyone else a lesson. It's common courtesy to turn that off before entering the class. It's akin to someone suddenly bursting out monotonously, for no reason other than they're idiots.

    5. Re:That's great and all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Never fails, despite warnings to the contrary. So I INSIST that they take the call -- right then, right there. I see a few others stealthily reaching into their backpacks to turn theirs off.
      A masters professor I know has a simple way of solving this problem - if your phone rings you drop one letter grade. He doesn't have a problem with cellphones.
    6. Re:That's great and all ... by danila · · Score: 1

      That's a good illustration of why most objections to new technologies are usually groundless (if you look deep enough) irrational fear of change.

      What about MP3s? They can kill the music! We need to ban P2P.
      What about cellphones? They can cause cancer and disrupt our way of life! We need to block phone calls in movie theatres.
      What about cloning? It kills babies and can harm our human dignity! We must ban medical research.

      And the list goes on and on. In the end, though, everything is inevitably just sorted out somehow, through good old adaptation, accomodation and plain common sense.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    7. Re:That's great and all ... by Xophmeister · · Score: 1

      Hmm... Cool idea: I might try that!

      --

      Christopher Harrison

    8. Re:That's great and all ... by Stween · · Score: 1

      Somebody's phone going off is always rather amusing.

      It's even funnier when it's the lecturer's wife phoning him to see when he'll be home that evening.

    9. Re:That's great and all ... by nkh · · Score: 1

      I imagine the habit of takin' off the sound has caught on. I'd say it took some time to happen, though...

      Not for me, it is called "respect" and it comes from the education. Unless you're really sick or handicaped and forget to turn your cellphone off, I can't think of any excuse for someone not to do this.

    10. Re:That's great and all ... by Carmody · · Score: 4, Funny

      I always want to take the phone and answer it - "This is so-and-so's professor. He is in class now."

      The reason I don't do it is because I'm afraid of "This is his dad. His *weep* his mother just *weep* passed away and we need him to *weep* come now to identify the... the... *bawwwwwwwwwwwl*"

      --
      God is real unless declared integer
    11. Re:That's great and all ... by daviddennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll bet the humiliation coming from that experience is a lot more effective than any harangue.

      That's why he does it.

      D

    12. Re:That's great and all ... by Ayrehtek · · Score: 3, Funny
      One of my professors would make the student give him the cellphone, and he would take the call for the student! It was hilarious to listen to some of the conversations.

      " Hello? ... No, this is his/her professor. He/she is in my class right now. ... Ok. I'll let him/her know to pick it up from the store on the way back. ... Bye."

      Hilarity ensures...
    13. Re:That's great and all ... by yabos · · Score: 1

      I like it when the Proffs say, turn your cell phones off, and then THEIR cellphones go off. That's happend before when I was writing a few exams.

    14. Re:That's great and all ... by omega_cubed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, one of my professors does it much differently...

      Prof: ... and the superlocrian scale here
      ---BRRRRRRIIING---
      [Amanda looks up all embarassed]
      [Prof walks over to Amanda, picks up the cell phone from next to her handbag.]
      Prof: Yo.
      Phone: ...
      Prof: What you want?
      Phone: ...
      Prof: Yeah! This is Horatio. What you want with my woman?
      [the other end hangs up]

      It never fails to amuse... (funny how some students just don't learn).

      --
      Engineers also speak PDE, only in a different dialect.
    15. Re:That's great and all ... by mikael_j · · Score: 1
      I've had a couple of profs who would throw temper tantrums every time a phone rang or someone got an SMS, even when doing labs. But most of the ones that were actually liked by the students didn't really care as long as you handled it sensibly (if your phone rings and it's not from someone important then you hang up and turn off the sound), in fact, I've had a couple of profs who themselves have interrupted lectures to answer their phones, but then I'm in Sweden and from my experiences of studying in other countries I've gotten the impression that in many other countries college/university students are treated like grade schoolers are treated here, shut up, pay attention and do as you're told at all times...

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    16. Re:That's great and all ... by DirePickle · · Score: 1

      Most phones have some sort of vibrate, so there's no real need to have a ringer on during a lecture. And even if you don't, it's courteous to turn it off unless you're expecting some sort of emergency. It's distracting to hear a series of annoying ring-tones during a lecture. It's aggravating for the professor and other students.

    17. Re:That's great and all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh boo hoo, it broke your concentration of being an asshole primadonna lecturer huh? Lighten up Francis.

    18. Re:That's great and all ... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've gotten the impression that in many other countries college/university students are treated like grade schoolers are treated here, shut up, pay attention and do as you're told at all times...

      Being a (soon to graduate) college student in the US, I can say that aside from one or two exceptions, I have never had a professor with that attitude. If you kept in mind that you're expected to practice some common courtesy, like stepping outside to take calls, and turning phones off during exams, things were just fine.

      Which countries/schools did you study in where you found it to be otherwise?

    19. Re:That's great and all ... by Epistax · · Score: 1

      Being a student I can tell you I don't like cell phone interruptions either. Luckily the vibrate on my phone is quiet enough so not even someone sitting right next to me can hear it. I do want to point out that in my case, it's not always a student's cell phone that interrupts the class. The professors forget too.

      As for me, I never change away from vibrate so I never forget to change it to vibrate. I also turn it off during tests.

    20. Re:That's great and all ... by estes_grover · · Score: 1

      except when one rings during my lecture....

      Ah, training for the interrupt-driven business life. You'll find that in the business world guys take cell calls while sitting on the john...read the blackberry message while standing at the urinal. Couldn't tell ya want things are like in the ladies room, though.

    21. Re:That's great and all ... by operagost · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dad doesn't know what Mom looks like? And he's a weeping sissy?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    22. Re:That's great and all ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My phone is on vibrate most of the time that I'm out of the house. I have it set to change itself to loud when it's on the charger. I've never taken a voice call in class, but I have done some SMS. Sometimes it's time-critical, and if you step out you'll miss something. I can't help it if the porn on my phone's desktop distracts other students :D

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:That's great and all ... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Considering that about 99.99% of the conversations I overhear on cell phones is just inane chatter, the chances of this happening are *extremely* low.

      And no, I don't have a cell phone.

    24. Re:That's great and all ... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      See, now while that might be effective, and funny, I would be royally pissed if a professor did that to me. Its mine phone, he has absolutely no right to touch it, nor does he have any right to talk to the person calling me. He DOES have the right to toss me out of his class, but thats his call.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    25. Re:That's great and all ... by Chiisu · · Score: 1

      superlocrian? is that super awful to the ears? ;)

    26. Re:That's great and all ... by Neward+Rylet · · Score: 1

      It's amusing but I wouldn't call it hypocritical. You're taking their class, not the other way around.

    27. Re:That's great and all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its mine phone

      Why do I have the feeling you'll never set foot in a college classroom? You won't have to worry.

    28. Re:That's great and all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's not as bad as the policy of this one professor at my school: if a phone rings during lecture, he makes the student had him the phone, and answers the call.

      If the other party hangs up before he can answer it, or if the student in class turns the phone off, the present party is required to buy a bag of candy for the class.

      Failure to bring in candy can result in not being allowed to take the midterm/final.

    29. Re:That's great and all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that's harsh, wait until you actually get a full-time job.

      (<sotto voce> Luser.)

    30. Re:That's great and all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd be surprised how low standards are getting.

    31. Re:That's great and all ... by lsmeg · · Score: 1
      Its mine phone
      Why do I have the feeling you'll never set foot in a college classroom? You won't have to worry.

      Maybe he's German...? ;)

      --
      It's OK! I'm a limo driver!
    32. Re:That's great and all ... by mikael_j · · Score: 1
      I didn't say it wasn't annoying, I just pointed out that it's equally impolite to throw a fit because someone forgot to turn off the sound, that's the sort of thing you shouldn't do to an adult (and college students are adults).

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    33. Re:That's great and all ... by CrystalArchangel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's happened. I was in the middle of a Psych class, and someone in the front row's cell phone went off. As they were scrambling ot find it and turn it off, the professor walked up to the person (still lecturing), stopped, picked the phone out of their hands as they finally found it, and answered it.

      "Hello?"

      "No, she's in class right now, and can't take you call, can I take a message?"

      "All right, I'll let her know. And just so you know in the future, she has class Tuesday and Thursday from 1-2:30, so please don't call during those times."

      He then handed the phone back, and let her know it was Bob, and their dinner date for that evening was still on.

      I'm fairly sure I don't remember a single other cell phone ringing in class that entire semester.

    34. Re:That's great and all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that certainly describes the way employers treat their employees in North America... but wait, grade-schoolers isn't really the right analogy, I think slave is the word you're looking for...

    35. Re:That's great and all ... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Not sure where else you've studied, but it's my experience that this is predominantly the case in the US - at least in the Midwest.

      There's not much rational thought like there is in the Real World. If you're late by 10 minutes for a final exam because of a traffic accident or something like that, you still don't get to take the exam. Or, if you're late for class, don't come to class. Stuff like that. Nothing so reasonable as "you're adults, make adult decisions, and I won't treat you like children".

      Granted, maybe that's the mindset of most of the professors anyway. Most US students are children still, as they've been forcefully kept back socially throughout high school.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    36. Re:That's great and all ... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Dude, there's hardly any reason to have a ringer on a cell phone at all. A ringer is there in order to inform you you've got a call - not everyone around you. With a cell phone, it's almost invariably in your pocket, on your hip, etc. - unless you're a female trend setter and have to have it in a purse. But I digress.

      Just put the damned phone on vibrate. That's my policy. It drives me batty how many different tones phones have, how irritating most of them are, etc. - and not just in a classroom; anywhere.

      It would be simple enough for the person to hit *key combination* and de-activate the vibrate function when they go back to their rooms and put the phone on their desk, etc.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    37. Re:That's great and all ... by wintermute1000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My math professor answered his phone during lecture once. He talked for about a minute, exchanging pleasantries, etc, then hung up and said, "I get to go to the symphony tonight!" The class was in hysterics.

      I know another professor who elaborately staged an event where he made it look as though he snatched a student's phone out of her purse and stomped on it. He heard rumors about himself at other colleges in the area within a few weeks. Apparently the act of violence made a big splash.

    38. Re:That's great and all ... by recursiv · · Score: 1

      Good luck with your education.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    39. Re:That's great and all ... by stor · · Score: 1

      Sorry for my slightly offensive tone, but...

      Noone would care or sympathise man. Everyone would just think you're a self-righteous wanker who doesn't care that he's interrupted the entire class.

      Why is the act of turning off your phone so difficult?

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    40. Re:That's great and all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Perhaps you don't understand the concept of being thrown out of a class. Unlike high school, if you get thrown out of class you may not be allowed back in. Since you are paying to be there, I hope you'd prefer to be embarassed rather than thrown out.

    41. Re:That's great and all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's happened in a few classes I've attended. They always apologise. On top of that, it's almost always business, rather than the usual banal crap.

    42. Re:That's great and all ... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Yeah well even if he is a wanker that doesn't make it ok for someone else to take his stuff.

      Would you think it's ok for a cop to just grab your phone? Or if GWB had the SS take yours because you are taking a call during his speech.

    43. Re:That's great and all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because it's not at all inconvenient when you're paying for a class, and miss something important because someone next to you has a phone ring.

    44. Re:That's great and all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in Sweden college is free, I believe they're talking about changing the rules so that foreign exchange students have to pay tuition since they aren't paying taxes in Sweden.

    45. Re:That's great and all ... by ezeri · · Score: 1

      I'm realy curious where you are going to school. I haven't had a single profesor anything like that. I could show up half way through class and they wouldn't care at all. Of cource I'm in California, not the midwest, but I just have a hard time believing that it could be that different.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now. - Ed Howd
    46. Re:That's great and all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but thats his call."

      Are you trying to be punny again?

      P.S. Take a sedative and relax. Your little, godless world will end soon enough.

    47. Re:That's great and all ... by stor · · Score: 1

      Yeah well even if he is a wanker that doesn't make it ok for someone else to take his stuff.

      So it's OK for one student to interrupt a class that's paying good money to learn? For the sake of his/her social life? And then get all huffy when they're stopped by the professor?

      I do get your point thought. If I was a professor I probably wouldn't take a risk like that. Legally I'm not sure of the situation wrt temporary confiscation at an educational institution but practically you could get into trouble: you could accidently drop the phone and break it for instance. If I was in charge I'd want to investigate using mobile phone signal blockers in the lecture theatres.

      Regardless my sympathy lies with the professors and the rest of the class rather than the wanker with the phone.

      Would you think it's ok for a cop to just grab your phone? Or if GWB had the SS take yours because you are taking a call during his speech.

      Problem with analogies is that you lose all accuracy: it's a very different situation. I could do the same to you:

      Would you think it's OK for a dude to come into class with a blazing stereo, refuse to turn it off and threaten to sue the professor if (s)he touches it?

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    48. Re:That's great and all ... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      It's ok for the professor to have them removed, but unless they have signed something saying that the university can confiscate it if necessary, it's illegal to just grab someone's stuff.

    49. Re:That's great and all ... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised how backwards this Midwest is. Truly.

      It's not entirely common - I did paint it that way - but it does happen. You just learn which professors are going to end up treating you like a child, and don't take their courses. That's about all that can be done (and complain loudly to those that listen).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  11. Should have never been a cash cow by zotz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    '"Six or seven years ago, telephones on campus were a cash cow," said Glenn Gaslin of Morrisville State College in New York.'

    And here we see a basic problem. Trying to earn more than a fair return because you have monopoly power in a certain situation.

    They should never have been a cash cow in the first place, just a service provided to students with a modest rate of return.

    all the best,

    drew

    --
    FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    1. Re:Should have never been a cash cow by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      What you probably don't understand is the defintion of "Cash Cow" - earnings are not reinvested, but are paid to the owners/stakeholders (in a publicly traded company, this would be as dividends). This does not imply that the students were charged more than they should have been, or more than was fair.

    2. Re:Should have never been a cash cow by zotz · · Score: 1

      You know, it seems you may be right there, but if so, I think it was also misused by the person in the article.

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+cas h+cow&btnG=Google+Search

      Google define seems to back up your understanding, I have most often heard it used where it also means something you can draw an unwarranted/extra large amount of cash from.

      Some of those Google links do seem to refer to large profits being produced by a cash cow and hence my point would still stand in those cases.

      The schools found themselves with a monopoly position with respect to phones on campus and thus milked the students for large sums of money.

      Those Google links seem to often refer to customer loyalty when in this case it was more of a monopoly situation. So was it wrong to call it a cash cow?

      all the best,

      drew

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    3. Re:Should have never been a cash cow by oasisbob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure how the situation is on other campuses, but at my school, long distance was never a cash cow. They used to offer optional services through AT&T, but most students abandoned the plan when Cosco et al started offering really cheap calling cards. (This was years ago.) The university wasn't making enough to make the billing overhead worth it.

      The problem now for us is just the opposite: our on-campus telecom group charges outrageous rates for long distance, making it expensive to call students on their cell phones. (We're talking connect fee + high per minute fee...) Because it is so expensive, it is prohibited in many departments to call students back on their cell phones.

      So while we escaped one classic phone company rip-off, we're still ensnarled in another.

    4. Re:Should have never been a cash cow by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm going by the business school definition - I double-checked my finance book to see what it said about it. From a marketing perspective, the classic Boston Consulting Group growth-share matrix defines cash cow as a low-growth business that does not need new investment to establish market share. I'm sure in common usage, however, that it can take on more than one meaning.

    5. Re:Should have never been a cash cow by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      And here we see a basic problem. Trying to earn more than a fair return because you have monopoly power in a certain situation.

      This is true in spades if you've ever had occassion to use the landline in a hotel room lately.

      The exhorbitant charges are motivating guests to bring their cell phones, especially as roaming charges are fading away.

      The insidious part is that some hotels have been accused of running cell phone jammers on their premises to drum up business for their landline scam.

      And that's all apart from the practice of using weird 3rd party long distance providers that charge an arm and a leg, give some back to the hotel, etc.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  12. Jesus Christ! The article headline should be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "College Dorms Extremely Lucrative to Burglarize"

    It's like Best Buy with beds and showers!

    1. Re:Jesus Christ! The article headline should be... by ettlz · · Score: 1

      I believe in this case it's "Grand-Theft Moto".

    2. Re:Jesus Christ! The article headline should be... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Are stolen cellphones really worth anything? I wouldn't think so, considering they're always included with the service. And who wants a used cellphone, they're kind of personal. For that matter I'm surprised they don't transmit a UID that would make tracking a stolen phone all too easy.

    3. Re:Jesus Christ! The article headline should be... by recursiv · · Score: 1

      I believe they do.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    4. Re:Jesus Christ! The article headline should be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there's a big trade in network-unlocked phones, particularly for Pay-As-You-Go customers. These are usually legal, because a contract/service phone belongs to you at the end of your term (usually a year) - or in the case of PAYGo, as soon as you buy the unit. However, the legality of network-unlocking is a little hazy, as most networks aren't fond of people getting a phone cheap on one, and using it on a better tariff on another.

      Anyway, this is a long-winded way of saying, "Yes, there is a known market for stolen cell phones, and probably a rather large trade in them." For examples of mobiles/cells on sale legit or otherwise, check out eBay (particularly in Europe).

  13. What an insult! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You call me an old typewriter again and there are going to be fisticuffs.

    1. Re:What an insult! by Principal+Skinner · · Score: 1

      You're an old typewriter. :-P

      Actually, the /. post clearly implied that we readers are NOT old typewriters ("You're as likely to find a landline in a college dorm as you're an old typewriter"), so cool off and beat your fisticuffs into plowshares (or, better yet, into old typewriters!)

      --
      one hundred twenty
      is just enough characters
      to write a haiku
  14. Land Lines as a Cash Cow by Noksagt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What the Washington Post article also hints at, is possible tuition hikes due to the landlines dropped so quickly. "Six or seven years ago, telephones on campus were a cash cow,"
    As it is, they many universities still overcharge for land-lines. The department I worked in has begun cutting service from under-used department phones, including ones they installed in rooms to have phone conferences. They are also looking (only somewhat seriously) into ways to have grad students share phones across different offices.

    Why can't Universities run more programs at or near cost, rather than try to bilk as much money as possible out of people?
    1. Re:Land Lines as a Cash Cow by jdwest · · Score: 1

      Many universities have changed to a more business-oriented model - for better or for worse.

      Students are perceived by some administrations as a "product," and if the university makes a good product, then others will go to that university. All with the ultimate goals that donations and prestige will follow.

      --

      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
    2. Re:Land Lines as a Cash Cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The department I worked in has begun cutting service from under-used department phones, including ones they installed in rooms to have phone conferences.

      That is ridiculous. Don't they have a PBX? Internal lines/extensions cost next to nothing. It's only the external lines that cost a lot.

    3. Re:Land Lines as a Cash Cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I can agree with this 100%. About two years ago my university assembled a Board of Trustees to govern the entire campus. Guess who the college administration invited to be on the board? Business empire owners. The CEO of Darden Resturants (owner of Olive Garden, Smokey Bones BBQ, Red Lobster, etc.) is on there. The Chairman of the Board is the man who managed Walt Disney's theme park empire for 30+ years.

      Now they're running the university as a for-profit business, cutting down on existing educational programs to fund new programs in partnerships with major businesses. The college has just partnered with Electronic Arts to open a digital media school so that EA can hire employees right out of the college. The board members decided we need a stadium, so he's trying to set up the stadium's location to trap people along a "main street" of retailers on-campus... just like Disneyland et al. The Darden CEO expects to bring his restaurants to campus and shut out existing small business owner restaurants on-campus. Money money money... they can smell it in the water. The students are just means to an end.

    4. Re:Land Lines as a Cash Cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That is ridiculous. Don't they have a PBX? Internal lines/extensions cost next to nothing. It's only the external lines that cost a lot.
      Having appropriate technology that allows cost minimization unfortunately does not equate to having good pricing structures that reflect this.
    5. Re:Land Lines as a Cash Cow by Noksagt · · Score: 1
      Students are perceived by some administrations as a "product," and if the university makes a good product, then others will go to that university. All with the ultimate goals that donations and prestige will follow.
      This seems fine. But then they should strive to maximize the quality and rate of good students leaving the University. Phone service is required to speak with both collaborators and with vendors. It is against a University's interest to price it outside of the reach of students & they have little excuse to do so if they're making a buck on it to boot. Similar statements good be made for many of the business services Universities price outrageously. One could easily make the argument that some should be run at a loss--as the cost of producing good students and good research.
    6. Re:Land Lines as a Cash Cow by rsborg · · Score: 1
      Now they're running the university as a for-profit business, cutting down on existing educational programs to fund new programs in partnerships with major businesses. The college has just partnered with Electronic Arts to open a digital media school so that EA can hire employees right out of the college. The board members decided we need a stadium, so he's trying to set up the stadium's location to trap people along a "main street" of retailers on-campus... just like Disneyland et al. The Darden CEO expects to bring his restaurants to campus and shut out existing small business owner restaurants on-campus. Money money money... they can smell it in the water. The students are just means to an end.

      Sorry to hear you're a Trojan. No offense, but I met a lot of total pricks that had one common attribute: They went to USC, and loved it. I'd suggest you transfer to a different school, unless you plan on going to grad school (in that case, your grad school is what counts and what you generally care about, not your undergrad campus).

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  15. What I always wondered... by The-Bus · · Score: 1

    was with prices dropping from the "insane" level to the "almost reasonable" level, do any college students have plasma/LCD televisions? That's one place where it would actually make sense, space-wise, to have a slim TV. I would imagine that the risk of it being stolen would be extremely high. I would find a way to bolt that sucker in, somehow.

    Anyone in college or dealing with college students in dorms know what the popularity of the LCD/plasma TVs is? From the smaller 13" ones to the 40- and 50-inchers?

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:What I always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      College is one place where it doesn't make sense to have a TV at all. For most people, this will be the only four years of their life when they live close enough to other people that they can walk outside at almost any time of day and find someone to talk to. Why waste any of that time inside a dorm watching TV?

    2. Re:What I always wondered... by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      Just because it doesn't make sense doesn't mean they don't do it --- and here I'm Going to Make a Generalization(TM) and say that females are worse at this than males. I can't even begin to tell you how many girls/women would just sit and watch whatever crap was on TV when I was in school. During the day, at night, on weekends. And this wasn't just fat girls, this was pretty much across the board.

      I never understood what was so exciting about turning on the TV. Certainly there's worthwhile stuff on there, but just to turn it on to "see what's on"? I only ever do that if I am ironing because I have no other choice.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    3. Re:What I always wondered... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I still think plasmas and LCDs are too expensive from a college student perspective. Plasmas are probably too large unless you get a 30" model, if they exist.

      For a couple years in college, I just had a TV tuner in my computer, with a VCR acting as the real tuner with a good remote.

    4. Re:What I always wondered... by jhtrih · · Score: 1

      Well on my floor (a total of 15 rooms or so), I know two people with LCD TV's, both about 24 inches. As for plasma, we have one in our student center (well more like the 15+ that I can remember right now) and they all are 50 inches or bigger. If I ever get kicked out, I'm stealing one of those suckers.

    5. Re:What I always wondered... by TapTapTheChisler · · Score: 1
    6. Re:What I always wondered... by tepples · · Score: 1

      do any college students have plasma/LCD televisions?

      Do a PC, a cheap LCD monitor, and a $50 PCI TV-in card count? Or are you talking about 27" or larger diagonal measure?

      Anyone in college or dealing with college students in dorms know what the popularity of the LCD/plasma TVs is? From the smaller 13" ones to the 40- and 50-inchers?

      At Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, every student has a laptop with an attached LCD monitor and a DVD-ROM drive.

    7. Re:What I always wondered... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think that most students would be better off with a projector. You can get an XGA/1000 lumens unit for $900, it's small enough to lock up somewhere, and you get a couple thousand hours out of a bulb. It's the kind of thing that you can get years of use from, so if you are very careful to not get it stolen it's not a bad investment. Plus, you can milk a lot of gratitude out of doing movie nights and such. (You'll have to, if you want to pay for lamps.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:What I always wondered... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Not any that I know of. Actually, the trend seems to be moving to not having a TV at all, being that there is nothing to watch on it anyways. Now, if I could only convince the school to not force everyone to pay for cable TV that a sizable portion of the residents never watch, it would be even better.

    9. Re:What I always wondered... by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 1

      Forget that. Get one of these:

      http://www.usbhdtv.com

      Voila, your notebook PC is now a HDTV PVR too. Sure, it can be a bit finicky, but the price is right. These work particularly well if your notebook has a widescreen display.

      Yes, it's Windows only, but what can y'do.

    10. Re:What I always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really is generally true.. I'm female, but the vast majority of my housemates and floormates over the last few years have randomly watched TV. We have two TVs in one dorm room right now, and my roommates are watching something as I read /.

      I watch the Daily Show, and that's the only thing I turn on the TV for. I hate just leaving it on and zoning out..

      But it also means that I don't have much to say about various TV shows that other people watch.

  16. "cash cow"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Impossible! University is a noble institution, dedicated to learning, and teaching people "how to think". (lol) They are not a cult, reaching for as much money as possible while garanteeing nothing in return, and creating a job market where flipping burgers demands a bachelor's degree. No, this is your fault. Universities are blameless.

    1. Re:"cash cow"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I agree wo needs fancy book lernin anyhow? Only leftie egghead scientist types is all! I lernt all I nede in coon hunting skool, fer sure!

      Wazzat? Cleanup in isle6?? be rite ther boss!

  17. not here by PerlDudeXL · · Score: 1

    not over here in good old germany.

    DSL is only sold with a landline telehone contract. Cable isn't widely available as well.

    the telco/isp regulation agency hasn't done anything against that situation. the last mile is usually still owned by the Deutsche Telekom as well.

    1. Re:not here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you can't say DSL is really overpriced because of that reason.

    2. Re:not here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will change as with number portability, very soon you can get ADSL without paying for line rental at the national telco. You will be able to chose the provider and they will most likely offer no monthly rental on landlines that use THEYRE ADSL service as a sweetner to move to theyre service, just dont use it for voice calls and you are fine.

    3. Re:not here by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Excuse me? You didn't really look hard.

      If you speak of T-com you may be right but it's just one of your options.

    4. Re:not here by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      That's kinda true in the UK.

      To get DSL you need a voice line... that said, voice lines are relatively cheap (about £11 a month now that they've forced everyone onto option 1...). The last mile is owned exclusively by BT but there are ways of reducing the costs by eg. routing through call18866 for analogue calls.

      Cable though is available in many areas but it's patchy (eg. NTL are available on the opposite side of the road to me but not this side.. there's even an NTL green box outside my window but they say there's no planned date for connection within the mext 5 years).

  18. Surprised? by LinuxHam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With most of the major carriers offering free minutes for calls between *any* of their customers (not just those on a family plan), is it any wonder that so many students are showing up with cellphones? I was expecting to see commentary about carriers linking up with campuses in advertising arrangements. I would expect Verizon and Cingular/AT&T to turn campuses into battlegrounds reminding everyone that all calls to any other user on their network is free all day, every day, encouraging the students to convince their friends to all use the same carrier.

    I remember using the community phone in the dorm hallway 16 years ago. I'm shocked that practice went on for another 11 years!!

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
    1. Re:Surprised? by Cheeze · · Score: 1

      "I remember using the community phone in the dorm hallway 16 years ago. I'm shocked that practice went on for another 11 years!!"

      HA....

      I remmeber standing out in the cold because we didn't have halls. Our dorms opened up to the outside. $5 worth of quarters would get me about 10 minutes on the phone, and the call was barely going 200 miles. What a luxury it would have been to stay inside my warm dorm room talking as long as I want.

      Oh, and this was the mid-90s, right before cell phones became popular and relatively cheap.

      --
      Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
    2. Re:Surprised? by superflippy · · Score: 1

      I would expect Verizon and Cingular/AT&T to turn campuses into battlegrounds
      More often than not, when I walk by the student union at the university where I work, some cell phone company has a table set up out there with a big promotion going. They're definitely aggressive about courting new customers.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
  19. Feasibility by davegroupie101 · · Score: 1

    It doesn't even make sense for most college students to shell out extra funds for a landline, and that's only for local service. Once you start added on long-distance, it's not very beneficial for the student who has a phone. At the University of Arizona, most students don't even have an landline off-campus. The providers down here at chomping at the bit to dry out our wallets via landlines; therefore, our cell phones end up serving for multiple purposes.

  20. Turing away from Landmines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Need more coffee to parse story titles better.

    1. Re:Turing away from Landmines? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      I read it that way, too. The summary was starting to seem like researchers had found that college students had some mystical power to avoid landmines in their dorms, even when concealed beneath crusty laundry and slithering pizza.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    2. Re:Turing away from Landmines? by aiabx · · Score: 1

      My brain also read it as landmines. I thought someone was making some kind of strange right-to-bear-arms point.

      What I find interesting was that I didn't boggle at the notion that students were as likely to have a land mine as a typewriter.
      -aiabx

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
    3. Re:Turing away from Landmines? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Wait, hold on, I thought it said they were as likely to have a landmine as they were to *be* a typewriter?

      Or was it the Gentle Reader who is presumed to will have been a typewriter if the student had a landmine?

      If the student turns away from the landmine, does that mean the rest of the students will face six more weeks of Intro to Accounting?

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    4. Re:Turing away from Landmines? by Limburgher · · Score: 1
      I was thinking they meant the students were undergoing a cessation of their use as an educational tool.

      I can just see a cluster of co-eds walking across the quad, when one trips a mine and half the group flies into the air in a flurry of legs and papers.

      Might be a bad thing to see on a campus tour. Enrollment would certainly suffer. "Our largest problem here at MIT is one of attrition due to casualties. . ."

      --

      You are not the customer.

    5. Re:Turing away from Landmines? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      But surely one could argue that the thinning of those students unable (or unwilling) to spot irregularities in the normally immaculate campus lawns are simply a wasteful drain on the financial aid systems?

      I mean really, is there a better educational tool than high explosives?

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    6. Re:Turing away from Landmines? by Limburgher · · Score: 1
      Immaculate? Where did YOU go to school? At Augustana in Rock Island, IL, USA, we left burn marks. After one prank, grass died in 2 concentric circles, and didn't come back until the following summer, after 2 reseedings.

      I doubt the dean would have noticed a few blast craters.

      --

      You are not the customer.

  21. Back in the old days by NetDanzr · · Score: 2, Informative
    I transferred to a US college in January of 1997 and graduated in May of 2000. Back then, the following was commonplace:
    • Laptops. We all got a Texas Instruments Extensa 510. Pentium 100, 8MB of RAM, 710MB HDD, Windows 95. Linx as a browser, PINE for e-mail. We all had a 14.4 modem that we got with the computer. Mine still works, and I'm still using it, but only with DOS.
    • Phones. We all got landline phones, and very few of us had cellphones initially. Cellphones became increasingly popular after phone provider initiated a $20/month charge, because most students spent less than that on phone bills. I didn't care - my phone service got canceled after it turned out that they spent more on the stamp for sending me the bill than what I paid them. Since then I used a calling card and a public phone, until now, when I started a grad program at Georgia Tech and realized that Tech has removed all public phones from the campus. I'm wondering what wireless provider paid them to do so...
    • Home entertainment. TVs were not too common; only about a quarter of the students had them. I remember watching the Nagano Olympics with a hundred or so other students in the student center - a pretty common sight. Stereos were much more common - about one out of two students had them.
    • Other electronics. By far the most common devices were small fridges and coffee makers. After all those were the sweet innocent times when we didn't go to bed with a dozen of standby lights flashing at us from all directions, and when we were happy in our ignorant bliss.
    1. Re:Back in the old days by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      Since then I used a calling card and a public phone, until now, when I started a grad program at Georgia Tech and realized that Tech has removed all public phones from the campus. I'm wondering what wireless provider paid them to do so...

      Are you kidding? This is not a GATECH campus issue. Try finding a payphone anywhere in Atlanta.

      There are hardly any left, and where there ARE payphones, there will be one where four or five might have once been -and it probably won't be a Bellsouth phone so there's no telling what the cost-per-call will be. Some of them was $1 for three minutes of local calling! Insanity.

      Where have all the phones gone? The reason is simple: Atlanta has one of the highest rates for cellphone usage in the country. Anybody worth two nickels has a cellphone. Nobody in Atlanta used payphones anymore so the telcos uninstalled most of the coin phones.

      All the telcos expected payphones to be cash cows for, well, forever. None of them expected $40 all you can talk cell planes, or prepaid plans that were far cheaper than coin phones. None of them realized people wanted to use phones on the go.

      Payphones are obsolete just as phonebooths went obsolete in the 70's.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    2. Re:Back in the old days by NetDanzr · · Score: 1
      Are you kidding? This is not a GATECH campus issue. Try finding a payphone anywhere in Atlanta.

      Well, in that case I should consider myself lucky for living in Dekalb County. We still have payphones here, and I'm still taking advantage of them, even though I have a cell phone. Force of habit, I guess...

    3. Re:Back in the old days by RasputinAXP · · Score: 2, Informative

      During the same time period (Fall 96-Spring 00) I was in college, too...

      Computer: P-133, 32 MB RAM. Win 95 til I upgraded to a grey market copy of 98SE. Networking was accomplished with a 9600 baud ROLM dataphone. Serial cable. Opened a direct connection into the IRIX machine we used TIN, Lynx and PINE from. About 50% of the campus was using a computer in their rooms, but very few had Dataphones. There was a waiting list. I applied in Sept. when I got there and had it in November.

      Phones: All landline, running on the aforementioned ROLM digital system. 10 cents a minute long distance. Local was free. Dial 8 for your long distance code, please.

      Home Entertainment: I knew nobody without a TV in their rooms. Nobody. Nor a stereo.

      Other: Nearly everybody had a fridge in their room. Some had the MicroFridgeFreeze as I did my sophomore year, a combined microwave, fridge and freezer.

      My knees are gettin' creaky.

  22. Universities should work with Cell Provider by kfstark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not have students get a University sponsored cell-phone with a few special features:
    1. push-to-talk capability within Univ phones
    2. free instant messaging within Univ phones.
    3. Bluetooth and/or cable for internet access using the cell phone.
    4. Free calling to/from a student's home town.(this would need a DID in student's home area code)
    I'm sure there are more features that student's would love to have and be willing to pay for. Also, a cell phone company would love the contract to be the sole supplier to a college campus.
    --Keith

    1. Re:Universities should work with Cell Provider by Taco+John · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even better, as things like AT&T's CallVantage service get bigger, use VoIP service to deliver more to the cellphone users. Charge students maybe $100 for the year, if they want, for a system where calling your dorm number will call your cellphone instead. Work with the cellphone companies to make these all local calls (not a big deal since everyone has free long-distance anyway). That way your parents have a local number to call you with (your original cell phone), and you have a local number to keep in touch with all the students and professors. Campus and town employers might like it too, since they are loathe to make long-distance calls to their student employees.

      Speaking of VoIP, companies are getting closer to phones that would be able to seemlessly switch between cellular and Wi-Fi access. That would be another possibility, students with those phones could buy really cheap VoIP minutes from the University to use while on campus. This requires that every square inch of the campus (well, almost every square inch) be covered with wi-fi access, but that's already been done on some smaller campuses (Wake Forest)

    2. Re:Universities should work with Cell Provider by Technician · · Score: 1

      4. Free calling to/from a student's home town.(this would need a DID in student's home area code)

      That's why I'm considering Vontage. I can set up the number in any areacode. Outgoing calls to US and Canada are free in the $25 plan. My only hangup is finding an affordable broadband provider that doesn't rook you for not subscribing to their other services (POTS, Cable TV, whatever)

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Universities should work with Cell Provider by scolby · · Score: 1

      Except that this would never work, because most students come to college already owning a phone and a service plan, which they would be extremely unwilling to change. Believe me, I'm in college, and change is equivalent to a profanity. By the way, I also wonder about the "90% own PCs" statistic. I've seen more and more Macs popping up on campus in recent years. Plus the design majors use Macs pretty exclusively.

    4. Re:Universities should work with Cell Provider by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      AFAIK just about everyone but sprint (and maybe nextel) is on gsm1900 now, and I believe adding another gsm band. I have a quad-band phone so it's pretty irrelevant to me, but I'm on T-Mobile which is GSM1900 and I can roam on AT&T and Cingular (same thing now?) for free.

      Having a sole supplier, on the other hand, would mean that only one technology would be supported. CDMA? TDMA? GSM? It makes more sense to just lease some space to any cellphone provider who wants in. They could also add a number of micro cell sites, but I don't know which would be more cost effective.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Universities should work with Cell Provider by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Because the cell provider would undoubtably want to be the sole partner in this, and that would lock students in with an offer they can't turn down with a provider they would never have considered before.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    6. Re:Universities should work with Cell Provider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would the wireless carrier do that? Why would they offer more for less when you'd sign up regardless?

    7. Re:Universities should work with Cell Provider by Patik · · Score: 1
      Also, a cell phone company would love the contract to be the sole supplier to a college campus.
      That would be impossible. Students could still purchase a phone with any other provider in the area.
    8. Re:Universities should work with Cell Provider by teknomage1 · · Score: 1

      They meant computers in general.

      --
      Stop intellectual property from infringing on me
    9. Re:Universities should work with Cell Provider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the AV Technician for the local convention center and everyone from food servers to managers have Nextel phones that have hacked SIM cards so that we can only call a cetain list and can only DC certain users. The system is also set up so that we can't receive incoming calls from anyone but the user list. The direct connect feature is priceless in a 2million sqft center like that. Plus, unlike regular two-way walkies, no one but the intended recipient hears you.

  23. Re:What is the utility of this information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The utility is to educate people like you about the
    free market and its possible offerings.
    In USA there are regulations that keep the prices up.
    Many people want to regulate the market.
    We don't want that - We want freedom.
    Free to Choose :-)

  24. It's just indicative of where phone use is headed. by jcostom · · Score: 4, Informative
    Look at say, Finland. The vast majority of folks there use a mobile as their primary phone. With LNP now available here in the US, particularly the ability to migrate a landline number to a mobile, this trend will only increase.

    Take my wife & I as an example.. We had 2 landlines here in our house. One was ours, the other is paid for by my company (I work from home). During a 2 month period, our home phone got shut off no less than 5 times. And before you start to think it - no, we paid the bill each month, on time. Each call to Verizon customer service was greeted with an endless sea of automated menus to troubleshoot your line. Thankfully, you can keep mashing down the 0 key to get a human on the phone.

    Each time this happened, we were told that we could expect to see a technician at our house in some ridiculous amount of time, usually 3-8 days. Then, mysteriously, the line would start working again. The explanation was always some inane excuse like, "someone unplugged your line at the CO" or "we had a mux that failed". We complained about rotten service to CS reps, Supervisors, Supervisors of Supervisors, and even to the office of Ivan Seidenberg (the CEO of Verizon for those who don't know). Know where it got us? Nowhere, fast.

    Tired of the crap, we voted with our feet. We were spending about $50 a month for the Verizon line, plus about another $35 for my wife's mobile. We popped over to the Cingular store and got a couple of phones on a family plan. I got a new number and we ported the home phone number over to the wife's mobile. Now our phones cost about $65 a month. We can call any Cingular customer (now including AT&T Wireless users) for free, have free nights & weekends, 850 min/mo and rollover. No coverage problems around here, and it all "just works".

    And hey, if you decide to do something like this - make sure you port to a carrier OTHER than Verizon Wireless. That is, if you're doing it because you're sick of Verizon. Otherwise, if you're happy with them, do whatever you feel like.

    --

    The unsig!
  25. True by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I hear many a conversation about not even knowing one's dorm phone number because all the students use is a cell phone.

    Since dorm phone numbers change every year, it is just easier to keep one phone number I suppose. As a person without a cell phone (very odd for a technophile and a college student, I know), i personally find the damn things annoying, it's like AIM, but one that's everywhere. Sure, you can turn the damn thing off, but then you've got voice mail. Sometimes you do just need to cut off the world. // end jealous rant.

    1. Re:True by trompete · · Score: 1

      In all the dorms I lived in, the phone numbers were in order of room number. It was kind of scary, but you could always figure out someone's phone number by adding their room number to a base.

    2. Re:True by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My current phone and my last phone both have AIM on them, how do you like that? I don't use it though, I refuse to get involved with AOL. When I feel rich enough to spend $20/mo on internet access I'll probably start IRCing from it, though. I can use it with my laptop too, and I'm about to buy a mercedes (from my girlfriend's uncle, so don't start crowing about how I ought to be driving a toyota as a po' student.) I carry it everywhere with me, often even around the house, and I have a noise-cancelling headset so I can actually use it in the car without sacrificing a hand to it. The best thing about a cellphone is that you can almost always be reached, you can more or less always reach someone else, and you can always claim that you were out of reach. There are plenty of places I go that I have no signal, but if I were worried about being contactable I could step out and check my voicemail, but on the other hand I can always just say that I probably had no signal and that's about the end of that. It's perfect :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  26. I'm dropping mine too... by Jigabug · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm not a college student, but I'll shortly be giving up my landline too.. Why? Cost. I'm paying about $30.00 CDN/mo for a landline, and about $50.00 CDN/mo for my wireless. I make/get maybe 10 calls each month on the landline, where the wireless is about 10-fold that. Most of my landline calls are just people trying it before they call my cell. Also, my cell has caller ID, voicemail, and call waiting, plus the ability to send/get text messages and e-mail. My landline can't do that.... or it can do some if I pay more money. I'll pass.

  27. Gouging students for services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I attended Columbia University, we had to pay extraordinarily high fees for a simple phone line. Apparently, back in antiquity, IBM pawned off a ROLM system onto the university and then students were foisted with the bill. Yup, a fancy office phone system in every room all over the place. And you got charged for every single inane service that was available. If there is anything I took away from my experience after 4 years, it is the fact that I got nickel and dimed at EVERY turn and that all those little fees probably added up to quite a lot. So it makes for some interesting (albeit short) conversations when the alumni association calls me at dinner time asking for donations (for a school with an endowment of $4-5 BILLION).

    Do I sound disgruntled? Who me? :-)

    Cheers,

  28. Are we missing the real reason? by bigtallmofo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could the lack of landline phones in dorms be because of the busy life that college students live? Who has time to answer a landline phone in your own dorm room when you're getting drunk until 5 am and sleeping in a different person's bed every night?

    Beyond that, dorm rooms are for sleeping and you certainly don't want some annoying phone ringing when you're there.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Are we missing the real reason? by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Also, don't forget the main difference between a Landline and a Cell Phone.

      For a Landline, when you call the number, you are calling the location.

      For a Cell Phone, when you call the number, you are calling the person.

      So, on a campus, when you don't always know where someone is (library, quad, so-and-so's room, class, his/her own dorm room, etc), Cell phones can be extremely usefull in not having to call around to a few different places (not all of which might have phones). The dorm phone on the other hand seems way more limited.

      Hey, you might not even WANT to talk to the roommate.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  29. Oh, landLINES. by What'sInAName · · Score: 3, Funny

    Glanced the headline briefly, and thought that university administrator were getting desperate for methods to keep college students on campus.

  30. what about Australia? by danimrich · · Score: 1

    I'll be going to Canberra for half a year to study (July-December). Could slashdot readers "down under" recommend a (mobile?) phone carrier and option that doesn't cost an arm and a leg? I have an unlocked GSM 900/1800 phone that I could bring.

    --
    where's all that Karma?
    1. Re:what about Australia? by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

      We only have 4 GSM-based providers... Telstra, Optus, Vodafone and Virgin.

      Each has good plans for certain segments of the population... If you are only down for a short time, and unlikely to have many Australian people to contact regularly, then a cheap prepaid option (from any of the four) will probably suffice.

      If you're heading to Canberra, are you going to be spending much time outside the city? GSM service falls off pretty sharply outside the urban centres in Australia... Also, Telstra is generally the most expensive in any category, but has the best coverage outside the city areas...

      Incoming calls are not charged in .au...

      If you outline your expected call usage, a better opinion can be given...

      I have been a vodafone customer for many years now, with no complaints ever... but that's not to say that they're the cheapest for everybody...

    2. Re:what about Australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half a year could be problematic - most phone contracts have a minimum term of 12 months. Unless you make a lot of calls, you'll probably be best picking up a cheap pay-as-you-go SIM card.

    3. Re:what about Australia? by danimrich · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your help. I probably won't be spending a lot of time outside urban areas-I'll be at the Australian National University most of the time.

      Looking at one of my cellphone bills:
      25 minutes to fixed lines
      53 minutes to mobile phones in other networks
      24 minutes to mobiles in the same network
      (These values are calculated from the connection fees. My provider charges me for every 30 seconds. The total time of calls per month is less than above.)

      I expect the call volume to drop to about 80%. To call home (Austria), I am looking at Skype and SIP and I'll have people call me (there is a firm called TeleDiscount which offers calls to Australian mobiles for 0.182 Euros per minute). I don't think I will make a lot of international calls, so I should be fine with the type of prepaid/plan you'd recommend to an Australian (with the exception that the contract can't last for longer than 6 months).

      It is good to hear that there is no charge for incoming calls.

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    4. Re:what about Australia? by haakon · · Score: 1

      Vodafone's prepaid capped plans or similar from the other networks (other than Telstra) would probably do you then. You have chosen a fortuitus time to come to Australia in relation to mobile phone pricing.

      Late last year Vodafone started offering a capped monthly plan (0 $79 you pay, $80 $500 or so is then free)for post paid and pre paid. This combined with giving away a sim card with each Sunday paper one weekend was play to grab market share. All the other providers had to cut prices and start offing capped plans to maintain their market share.

    5. Re:what about Australia? by StonedZero · · Score: 1
      I am a low volume user in Australia.

      I use Vodafone Prepaid about 30 AUD a month at 1c for 1 second. Works well for me.

      Some friends of mine, who were in Australia for just 3 months, got prepaid with Virgin. Some bought a new mobile phone in Oz. The others they just swap in a new sim.

  31. it's a much practical solution by john_uy · · Score: 1

    i think that most students spend their time outside of dormitories anyway so why pay for something that you do not use? i am not surprised at this.

    --
    Live your life each day as if it was your last.
  32. laws against this sorta crap.. by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    yes, and the law (and contract between merchant and business) is VERY CLEAR, you cannot charge a surcharge for credit cards (which by the way, cost merchants money) but you can in fact give a discount for cash-- the laws make it so that you can't advertise an item as priced for 20$ less than every merchant in town- and then in small print add +% for credit cards.
    http://www.retailers.com/eduandevents/ask/askcharg eforcredit.html
    The difference between a surcharge for credit (which is illegal) and a discount for cash (which is legal) is the advertised price--a retailer cannot charge a credit card customer more for an item than its advertised price. note- this is a US only law, the UK is different.

    further, have you considered- you aren't being charged extra for not having other services from that particular carrier, you just aren't getting a bundled discount? if I want cable, part of the costs are suppling me with cable, and part of the costs are billing me for the cable.. if I take another service from the same company (internet access) the only additional charge is supplying me with internet access, billing can be included in the billing of the cable- therefore it does not have to be charged to me- if I add voip or regular pots telephone service, once again, I need only be charged for the service, not the billing.

    yet if I take ONLY the internet service, they must cover the costs of billing.. these include financing the debt, covering bad debt, payment processing, mailing the bills, and disconnection if service is terminated with prejudice.


    The truly amazing thing about big business, is that they are willing to discount for bundled services SO much, I expect big biz to be greedy beyond belief.. a ten dollar discount for loss of one bill is a good deal...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:laws against this sorta crap.. by David_W · · Score: 1
      further, have you considered- you aren't being charged extra for not having other services from that particular carrier, you just aren't getting a bundled discount?

      You know, I've thought about this before... you are essentially correct. However, I think the reason why people have trouble with it is because these service companies don't itemize the bill "correctly." For example, on my cable bill I have 3 line items (excluding taxes and such): One for basic cable, one for extended cable, and one for cable internet. With that setup I think many people view it as double dipping (I pay for the line as part of basic cable and cable internet). However, if there was a fourth line item which essentially covered having the cable line connected (overall administrative stuff like billing would go in here too) it might make it easier for people to understand.

    2. Re:laws against this sorta crap.. by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      you just aren't getting a bundled discount?

      That's a marketing ploy. It's a logical fallacy. It makes sense that if you get the whole bundle, it costs the company less in bookkeeping and setup and anything else the marketing department feels like adding on.

      But... that's just not the way it works. RR in Milwaukee and Comcast in Chicago told me that, to get cable internet, I MUST subscribe to digital cable or pay an extra $20/mo. Comcast here on the East Coast was happy to give me standard cable, cable internet, and no extra "no digital cable" surcharge. The hook? All three have come up to the same price within $10/mo.

      I'm not longer buying any excuse cooked up by marketing departments or by people who are thinking about it logically. The only real explanation is,"Yes, they're coming up with any cock-and-bull story possible to justify fleecing us for every dollar we're worth". And to think we're subsidizing those industries with tax money to boot.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    3. Re:laws against this sorta crap.. by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      to get cable internet, I MUST subscribe to digital cable or pay an extra $20/mo

      well, that does raise an eyebrow. in my view, if they required basic & internet for the discount, that should be enough.. requiring extended services for the discount does indeed seem over the top...

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    when almost every college has wired internet in every dorm, why would anybody pay for a campus phone? the only phone i'm planning on having next year is a $20 broadvoice plan, with unlimited calling in the US and any other country i might call.

    by comparison, verizon starts at $40 for 450 minutes, sprint starts at $35 for 300 minutes, cingular starts at $30 for 200 minutes - and that one doesn't even come with unlimited mobile-to-mobile or nights and weekends, and t-mobile, low-cost stalwart starts at $20 for 60 minutes, or $40 for the slightly less spartan 600 minutes.

    oh, and all of those plans charge for incoming minutes too.

    sure, having a broadvoice phone means that i can't use it outside my dorm room. (in practice, i could buy a wi-fi phone for $100 that would allow me to use it anywhere on campus, but i'll leave that aside for now.) but what's the disadvantage in walking down the street talking to actual people standing next to me, as opposed to irritating everyone else who has to hear one side of my conversation and missing out on any number of chances to meet new people?

  35. Bush's fault by Rollie+Hawk · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    If Bush and Michael Powell hadn't ruined the telecom industry, this never would have happened.

    --
    Before any liberals are tempted to mod up one of my comments, a word of warning: I'm actually making fun of you.
  36. No extra charge at MSU by DestroBIG · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here in Michigan (MSU), they provide landlines for free to students in the dorms. If you ask for a phone they will even give you that. Also, does TFA assume that if you have a cell phone that you don't have a landline? Cable TV is also provided for free to those who live in the dorms. I know they aren't technically "free" but you don't pay extra so you're a fool not to use either service.

    1. Re:No extra charge at MSU by TooTechForYou · · Score: 1

      You don't pay any extra that you can see. It is most likely a charge within your dorm fee. It's not so much that you don't pay extra for using them, it's more that you don't pay any less for not using them.

      --
      -- Nic
    2. Re:No extra charge at MSU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good work. You've said absolutely nothing more than the parent said. Here in (Uof) Louisville, it's the same way. It's all provided and becomes a contradiction to their statistics.

    3. Re:No extra charge at MSU by PitaBred · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh, local service is free. It's the long-distance to home and such that is what they've been feeding off of up until now. And now that people use cell phones for that stuff, it's making them much less money.

  37. I'm in high school by Primal_theory · · Score: 1

    and i already have all this stuff! Computer: Check (really nice check) Cell Phone: Motorola V505 Laptop: Check Dvd player: (i have my own gaming room complete with large tv and sony 6.1 surround!)

    --
    Your skill in reading has increased by one point!
    1. Re:I'm in high school by TooTechForYou · · Score: 1

      Get ready to downgrade when you get to college. A large TV and surround sound don't fit well in a dorm.

      --
      -- Nic
    2. Re:I'm in high school by Primal_theory · · Score: 1

      I've heard, but i can always try, and i might buy a better tv by then, the one i have right now is nice, but nowhere near as good as my 27 inch... The big one is a 46(?) inch sony wega hidef projection, and it looks nice but anything that isnt hidef on it sux... my 27 inch sony wega hidef looks soo much better, by the time im in colledge, i might just buy a really nice crt and watch tv on that!

      --
      Your skill in reading has increased by one point!
    3. Re:I'm in high school by David+Horn · · Score: 1

      and i already have all this stuff! Computer: Check (really nice check) Cell Phone: Motorola V505 Laptop: Check Dvd player: (i have my own gaming room complete with large tv and sony 6.1 surround!)

      No girlfriend: Check.

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    4. Re:I'm in high school by Primal_theory · · Score: 1

      Hey im a nerd!
      And i infact do have a gf
      her name is sara she has brown hair she likes the color green and carrots she goes to my school she lives 4 blocks away from my house

      --
      Your skill in reading has increased by one point!
    5. Re:I'm in high school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as soon as judge lifts that restraining order, you are SO asking her out:-)

    6. Re:I'm in high school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel stupider for having read that.

    7. Re:I'm in high school by Neward+Rylet · · Score: 1

      I'm a college freshman and I don't even have a TV in my dorm room. I've got a TV card (that hasn't been working) in my computer. I don't know my landline phone number either. Like the article says, I use my cell phone for everything.

  38. OMG... my old school! by Garion911 · · Score: 1

    I'm a graduate of Morrisville (class of 92!), and I can tell you why students have cell phones... Its in the middle of nowhere.. 20 minutes at 75mph to the nearest McD's.. --Everything-- is a long distance call.. I think you could call Hamilton as a local call, but that was about it. Cazanovia, the nearest decent size town, was long distance..

    Of course, when I was there, we didn't have phones provided by the college my first year.. You could get a phone, but you had to order through the local phone company.. You did have pay phones, one or two for each dorm... My second year, the college provided the phones.. Now i know why...

    Ah the memories... Pool at Chat and Spew... Beers at the Fort... Of course, NY Pizza was the best pizza in town (I still remember the number! 6849090..).. And damn it, they should have kept the computer room on the 1st level of the library!

    --
    Slashdot is like Playboy: I read it for the articles
  39. These example student names are becoming too much! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Max Bender and Lauren Fox? "Maximum Bender" and "Low rent Fox"? Oi! Either their parents need to be beaten with the cloostick or the author of the freaking article does.

    This may not be humorous, but it passes for humour here.

  40. Not a fan of cell phones by RootsLINUX · · Score: 1

    I'm one of the 10% of college students that do not have a cell phone. Well, grad student but student all the same. I hate people that just yap yap yap into their phones whenever they have nothing that immediately requires their attention (especially those "queens of gossip" as I like to call them). Sitting on the bus I've practically heard people's life stories from hearing them talk on the phone. I just find it annoying I guess.

    On the otherhand, I know they are useful in times of emergency and when you are trying to meet up with someone somewhere, but that isn't enough justification for me to go get a cell phone. In the first place, I don't like talking on the phone so I don't do it that much. I have my landline in my apartment mostly so I can connect to DSL, that's about all I need these days. ;)

    --
    Hero of Allacrost, a FOSS RPG for *NIX/*BSD/OS X/Win
  41. This is how they do this. by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1, Flamebait


    I hate businesses that assume that you will buy certain services from them because they deem them 'essential', and when all of a sudden you don't, they jack up the price of the services you still do buy from them... ...How about my damned cable company (or phone company) that charges me an extra $10 a month because I just want a highspeed internet connection but don't want their cable offerings or long distance plan?

    How can they get away with this BS?

    Aren't there laws against this sorta crap?


    Well, there WERE laws against this sort of crap, but then deregulation came around. The FCC doesn't get into consumer issues anymore, it is more concerned about showing tough to Johnny Sixpack about their supposed outrage with nipples and man-ass that they show on NYPD Blue. The FCC is not concerned with the a la carte offerings bill, because they (and by they, I mean the corporate cronies that get placed in the FCC by the system) have shot that thing down a bazillion times... all in the name of deregulation. "Why should companies be beholden to the government?!? If they regulate our prices, we'll go bankrupt!"

    Deregulation of the basically five giant corporate entities that control all of the telephone, cable, and broadband access out there is not a good thing, even though idiots everywhere that haven't taken a basic econ class say it is. Then they did it. Simply put, all deregulation does in that situation is to break the contract of fairness between the public and the giganto-corporations. Let's all deregulate water! Hey, how about electricity?!? Imagine that!

    Lower prices!
    (for a short while until you forget the old times)
    Better services!
    (unless you get a dispute and you have no fair use contract with the city, and they won't run service to your area and business)
    Corporations can do it better than the government!
    (until the corporations slash maintenance to give money to another part of the corporation, leaving you with jacked up prices on basic services and shitty service)

    Remember kids. Deregulation is a good thing. Especially with essential services such as power, light, phone, and water. I'm sure you'll love the way that you used to call the city council about infrastructure and get a response, and now you get to call INDIA. I'm sure the call representative in INDIA will really care about your cable problem.

    This scam is about as good as having a political party that slashes the basic military infrastructure budget for infrastructure and not stealth bombers, forcing the military to subcontract basic services, and then forcing in a two party system an administration that owns said military subcontractors so they can engage in a no-end, non-specific war overseas, and then have no accountability for cost overruns, thus making tens, if not hundreds, of billions in cost overruns that are unaccounted for, and checked by their stockholders.

    Ooops. Did I say that outloud?

    1. Re:This is how they do this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooops. Did I say that outloud?

      Indeed you did. Your attitude has been noted.

  42. Re:It's just indicative of where phone use is head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hey! Verizon Landline is totally separate from Verizon Wireless. They don't have a single person working for them in common AFAIK. They are owned by some of the same people, but just because Verizon landline is a bunch of rotten asshats, don't lump us in with them.

    Disclaimer: I work for Verizon Wireless

  43. Obvious.. by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
    Educational institutions show where future markets are heading. We are a VERY early minority in lots of technologies.

    It's obvious that this would happen. I live with 3 guys, and had 3 roommates last year too. We all have/had cellphones. Last year, my one roommate came to me asking to get a land line because he was going over his minutes with his cheating liar girlfriend, who was by far the worst person I've ever met in my life.

    Like most of you other college slashdotters, my wallet DOES have a bottom. I told him hell no, it would end up costing me about $100 a year so that his retarded lazy-eyed girlfriend could call, let the phone ring 4.5 times and leave blank messages on the answering machine.

    $100 ~= 10 cases of cheap beer (we drink Natty Light, haha)... I already have a cell phone, I'll keep my beer, thank you

    --
    Berto
  44. Not true by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
    This is not true! There is absolutely no problem to get a DSL only contract. For example from those folks:

    http://www.q-dsl-home.de/

    True, there has to be a physical line installed in your house. (Though it hasn't to be in active use) But show me a building in Germany without a phone line installed.

    Also you can have phone from one company (like http://www.nordcom.net/) and DSL from another. Or just use the installed landline for DSL with QSC like I do and have a mobile phone from o2 http://www.o2online.de/o2/index.html like I do. o2 has the Genion option where at home your mobile acts like a normal landline phone, meaning you are reachable through the local area code for the usual rates and are able to phine out for cheap. This so called "HomeZone" often has a diameter of a few kilometers! Like in my case :) I can go inlineskating being still reachable through the "Landline" number :)

    Old lady Telekom isn't your only option, you know ...

    1. Re:Not true by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

      All those plans above look like they cost the same as or more than Arcor, which will give you flatrate DSL and ISDN with three phone numbers. Why would anyone take those?

      --

      One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
  45. Hotels are going through the same thing by duncan · · Score: 1

    When I was going through the checkout process the other week the guy ahead of me had phone changes. The guy behind the counter sounded stunned as he asked "You have a phone bill here. Is that right?"

    The customer responded that he had to send some faxes from his laptop and forgot the cord to go to his cel phone....

  46. Re:What is the utility of this information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The utility is to educate people like you

    I can't believe that garbage got modded insightful.

    Answer the question.

  47. cell site == cash cow by just+someone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Universities have cell phone users
    cell phone users need cell sites
    cell phone companies pay money to let people house their cell sites.

    so cell sites generate cash. Only problem is that cash probably does not go into telecommunications, and that that cow is more of a calf.

  48. Re:What is the utility of this information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The purpose of posting this article is to fill time on a Sunday.

  49. Small wonder by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    When I was in college (mid-80's), I hated the idea of having to pay a new hook-up every semester. I also hated trying to figure out the phone bill - who made what long distance call. And then you have room-mates who don't claim their calls, or don't pay on time, or who hogged the phone all day.

    If they had cell-phones now, like they had then, no doubt about which way I'd go. Not to mention the convienience of have a phone with you everywhere you go.

  50. Failure to keep up with the times by whitis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Another case of a monopoly doing themselves in.

    The universities are moaning about their loss of revenue from the land-line cash cow but it is their own fault. If they had installed sufficient 802.11g wireless routers throughout campus (as well as around the bars off campus) and provided wireless VoIP service, they could have undercut the cell phone providers. People who live off campus don't buy land line service from the university, anyway, and the ones who live on campus rarely stray off campus so they could be tempted by a service that allows unlimited calls (some cellular companies offer unlimited calls by they have limited coverage but systems with reasonable coverage charge exhorbitant rates for daytime minutes). And the system could be setup to deliver calls to your PC when you are in your dorm room. A typical university already has much of the infrastructure. It already has a high speed network. It already owns the buildings where the access points would be installed. It already has right of ways in the form of steam tunnels located under the sidewalks allowing access points to be added between buildings easily. It already has a PBX with trunk lines to connect to landlines.

    No, the school wouldn't have a monopoly but it would be competing against cell phone services that cost more than the university charged for land lines.

    Bandwidth would be an issue so they would need to go with lots of access points with small antennas located inside buildings or along sidewalks rather than a few access points with big antennas on the roof.

    1. Re:Failure to keep up with the times by KenSeymour · · Score: 1

      After reading the article, I got the impression that their PBX infrastructure was aging and that they had trouble getting replacement parts.
      They consider spending a million bucks to upgrade the land line. But because almost no one makes long distance calls anymore, they don't think they could re-coup the cost.
      You could charge a flat fee that covers the cost, but then it would be so high that no one would opt in.

      So the universities are getting out of the phone business. Why should they try to compete in the phone business? They are in the education business.

      --
      "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Failure to keep up with the times by qweqazfoo · · Score: 1
      Have you ever actually used a wireless VoIP phone? I have. They suck balls. You get about half an hour of talk time on battery. Even without talking, they use so much power to just stay on the network taht you have to charge them EVERY day.

      That's just where the fun starts. The phone is about TWICE the size of a normal cell phone. It doesn't work well with NAT. If you've got any type of authentication system for your wireless (like many Unis have) you'll have to hack your network for the phones to route. Combine that with the fact that many Unis have several wireless networks (early adopters, different depts or colleges owning the network, etc.), none of which were designed for VoIP, and you've got MAJOR problems.

      I even talked to our Cisco rep about combining a cell phone and a wireless phone. He said power was the main issue. I didn't really understand this, until I tried to use the dang things. This a technology that is far FAR away. So in the end, you've got a wireless phone that costs 3 times more than a cell phone, is twice as large, gets a tenth of the battery life, and you still have to carry a cell phone for when the thing doesn't work or you're off the network.

  51. Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this comes as a shock to anyone? My kid has had a cell phone since he was 10. Now an article on how many gradeschoolers have phones - that would be cool.

  52. Poor Students. by Aspherical+Cow · · Score: 1

    62% own a stereo system, 74% have a DVD player, 55% have a gaming system.

    What percentage are on financial aid?

    1. Re:Poor Students. by drxray · · Score: 1

      A second hand playstation costs about $20... besides any electrical goods are likely to be presents from parents - I had a PC and stereo but lived a very frugal life, and still have a debt of over $20000.

      non-ugly version

      --
      Slashdot - Mutual Assured Discussion
  53. Good old days: 1987 by Blaede · · Score: 1

    * Laptops. Are you kidding? There might have been one, or two people who had a C64 to play Space Taxi, but this was still a pipe dream. If you wanted to use a computer, you had to trudge on down to the computer lab and mess around on the 20 Mac Pluses avalable for use. Oddly, there was only 2 PC based machines to use. Only the teaching computer labs had PCs. The exciting point came when the English department opened up their brand spanking new computer lab with 40 Mac Plus SE/20s, complete with a dot matrix printer ensconced in a plexiglass enclosure (to reduce the printing noise). There were rumors that the English grad students had access to a laser printer, but no one ever was able to verify that for us. A desk attendant was at the ready to scan your floppy disks for any viruses before allowing you on one of the Macs. Those fearful of computers could still check out an electric typewriter.

    * Phones. We all got landline phones connections as well included in the dorm cost. This was the year they ripped out the old black wall mounted rotary phones (they were tossed in an unused foyer, and I grabbed me about 5 to take home), and you had to provide your own. About 10% of the residents had a cordless phone.

    * Home entertainment. About the same as your era, TVs were not too common; only about a quarter of the students had them. Every dorm had a TV in the common living area. Even though a neighbor would probably have a TV, students would go down to watch Letterman, munch out and whatnot. Stereos were much more common - about two out of three students had them.

    * Other electronics. Also like your era, by far the most common devices were small fridges, popcorn makers and coffee makers. The more adventurous would install a microwave oven (banned by the residence rules) in their closet. Since the RA was not allowed to open your locked closet door during a room check, this would "hide" it from him with relative safety. After all those were the sweet innocent times when we didn't go to bed with a dozen of standby lights flashing at us from all directions, and when we were happy in our ignorant bliss.

  54. Parent isn't offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that the topic itself is off-topic for slashdot, this qualifies as highly incisive ironic humour. It's a shame when mods beat down posts they just don't understand.

  55. only reason to have a landline by wk633 · · Score: 1

    DSL. As soon as the Telcos are forced to offer DSL without a voice line, it's going out. And if they try to hike the price, I'll move to cable. Since I don't have cable tv, cable broadband is the pricier option.

    The ONLY calls we get on the landline are ones we don't want. Verizon selling something, non-proffits calling for money, politicians begging for votes.

  56. How Dare You! by kid_wonder · · Score: 1

    ...as you're an old typewriter

    I happen to be a rather new typewriter, thank you.

    --

    "Oh, you hate your job? There's a support group for that, it's called everyone, they meet at the bar."
  57. cash cow by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    "Six or seven years ago, telephones on campus were a cash cow"

    like the meal plans at colleges. they make it so expensive and force you to get it if you live in the dorms. they only give you crap food and give you so little to eat. the cafes are only open for a short period of time so if you have classes during those hours, it's your lost.

    1. Re:cash cow by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      like the meal plans at colleges. they make it so expensive and force you to get it if you live in the dorms. they only give you crap food and give you so little to eat. the cafes are only open for a short period of time so if you have classes during those hours, it's your lost.

      Man, dunno where you went, but the biggest problem with dorm food back when I was a lad was there was too _much_ food, causing the infamous Freshman Fifteen (or more)... Seconds, thirds, salad bar, dessert bar, etc..

      But yeah, the scrambled eggs and waffles were prefabricated and yankee goulash was pretty f???ing vile.. Even after I got off the plan I would still pay cash for breakfasts on occasion, since the fried eggs were fresh and you could get as much bacon and sausage as you could cram down... Mmm.. Breakfast...

    2. Re:cash cow by Huogo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where you go (went?) to college, but here at UCONN, the dining halls are open constantly from 7:15 to 7:15, and if you manage to miss dinner, we have "grab and go" open until 9:00 or so. We do have to have a meal plan, but have options for anywhere between 300 meals/semester (19 per week) to 160 per semester, so if you don't plan on eating there much, you can get the cheaper mean plan.

  58. Re:Blilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have already been raped once? Oh my, I hope the police caught the man who raped you. Did you seek councling after you were raped? I hope you are doing ok now.

  59. US Public colleges highly motivated to play telco by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

    Where I live, the state university system decided to spend lots of bond money on their own switching equipment, so as to provide (and of course charge for) local phone service in the dorms. They did this about 8 years ago. I am guessing they had maybe 5 years of solid revenue until the cell phones proliferated and the game was over. I understand why they did it. Dorm phone service had been a giant cash cow for the phone companies (charging "installation" fees for the same lines every semester). It was just too juicy a target to pass up.

    The REAL motivation was that state bond money was essentially a gift from Santa Claus -- the agencies that received the money were never obligated to pay it back. Operating money was the hard-fought budget battle that took place every year. Well, it seems that the snazzy new phone gear was purchased with bond money, and the fees paid by students became part of the operating budget. Unless the university system starts losing money on operational costs, the demise of the local phone cash cow is left for the taxpayers to deal with. My guess is that the taxpayers will spend the next 30 years paying for the state university phone network.

    Of course, the path of least resistance is to use Internet access to subsidize the loss of phone revenue. The colleges can still surcharge the hell out of Internet access. That puts a band-aid on the problem, but only to the extent that students can be prevented from sharing via Wi-Fi.

  60. As a college student by Helios1182 · · Score: 1

    My electronics include: - A cell phone - A landline that works for local calls (provided free in the dorms) - A 24" Flat CRT TV - A Computer (with a tv tuner since I didn't have a regular until last month) - A Game Cube - A DVD player - A Microwave - A Coffee Maker - A Coffe Grinder

  61. Telemarketers must be losing bigtime by DustyShadow · · Score: 1

    I just moved to a new place and the only reason we have a landline is because it was a package deal for cable + internet + phone. It's actually cheaper than without the phone line. Before we even knew the number or given it out we had people calling it. They were obviously telemarketers. The line was up for about 2 days and it started ringing right away. This is my first landline in several years and I'm sure I will never use it. Are cell #'s not allowed to be given out to telemarketers? I bet that changes soon.

  62. Not Likely to Be an Issue... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    ...for long. With VoIP+wireless phones coming, the universities will be able to charge for the backbone usage. Networks are the new "cash cow".

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  63. I dunno by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
    When I got QSC it seemed the better offer. Important point: I don't need ISDN with DSL. And as I need a mobile anyway nothing comes close to o2s Genion. Also I often heard of billing trouble with Arcor. But I didn't check their offers for a long time. You also have to consider technical differences between the DSL products, QSC seems to be more efficient than Telekom DSL. But I'm just a normal user. Next time post a link.

    I don't have anything to do with either companies.

    1. Re:I dunno by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah sorry, I should have posted a link. I guess I also kinda sounded like an ass in that message.

      http://www.arcor.de/privat/dsl/index.jsp

      29.95 euros/month for 1 megabit speed with 1 gig download (same as QSC), or 39.95 for flat rate (cheaper). Arcor also adds only 5 euros for 2 megabit, and 10 euros for 3 megabit, and QSC adds 10 euros for each. The arcor packages also come with ISDN, though if you never use that I guess it doesn't matter.

      The only billing trouble I've had with Arcor is they recently lowered their prices, and didn't automatically switch me to the new pricing plan. I need to call them and ask them to, but I'm worried they'll make me commit myself to another year of service if I do. Which is probably no problem, but I still don't like when companies do that.

      --

      One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
  64. Tution hike fearmongering by call+-151 · · Score: 1

    What the actual article said was just that landlines had been a cash cow- the word "tuition" does not appear in the article. And for good reason- usually, the dormitory/residence expenses and tuition are kept separate and some effort is made to balance things according to expenses. A reasonable college/university would not raise tuition to subsidize caviar in the cafeteria and would not expect to fund a new science lab with increased dorm fees.

    --
    It's psychosomatic. You need a lobotomy. I'll get a saw.
  65. old news everywhere by globaljustin · · Score: 0

    I live in a house full of ski and snowboard bums in colorado, and we have all been land line free for about 3 years now. 6 people in the house, all with their own cell phone, and we all share wifi

    ~j

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  66. More trivia for you by adeydas · · Score: 1

    1. 10 years ago most of the televisions at home were black and white, now they are colour.
    2. 10 years ago college kids moved on buses, now they have their cars.
    3. 10 years ago people wrote science papers on paper, now they use laptops.
    4. 10 years ago engineers drew building plans directly on a blue print paper, now they use CAD.
    5. 10 years ago I was ten years younger, now I am ten years older.
    Now if that's not news, tell me what is!!!

    1. Re:More trivia for you by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      10 years ago most of the televisions at home were black and white, now they are colour.

      I'm pretty sure color had been invented by 1995.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
  67. Re:Don't forget the rest... by symbolic · · Score: 1


    Credit companies have turn to tactics like usuriously high interest rates, and STEEP increases in interest rates based on nothing to do with your relationship with the company. The consumer credit market is quite staturated, so the only way these companies can show any real revenue growth is to keep coming up with more innovative ways to screw their customers. My advice...stay away from credit cards except for absolute emergencies. Accepting a credit card these days is like shackling yourself and giving them the key.

  68. lighten up professor tightass by globaljustin · · Score: 0

    Hey,

    Dr. feelgood, why don't you just ignore the occasional cell phone call instead of wasting student's time dealing with it in class?

    From all my time teaching in high school, I found it best to ignore a ringing cell phone. Most students are embarased when their cells ring in class.

    If you make a big production out of disciplining a student, your students, especially if they are in college, will not respect you.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:lighten up professor tightass by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      Very, very, true. Except maybe that very few students "respect" their teachers anyway, so it really does not make much difference, eh?

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:lighten up professor tightass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You apparently don't go to the University of Otago. We have some really cool professors down here, who are well respected by the students.

  69. Sweet... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    .... campus phones were such a cash cow racket, especially the long distance rates.. Luckily my family was somewhat clueful in the day and I could send them email via internet-fidobbs gateways with only the occasional call for emergency fundage ;)

    And with increasing manditoriality of computers (laptop required policies) on campus and dorm ethernet/campus wireless, it would be silly to not be running some cheap VoIP and/or Skype..

    Between this and eBay for textbooks, it's fun to watch all these excessive student ripoffs get the rich fisting they deserve...

  70. No surprises there by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Yup, most students have a PC, a game console, a TV, a cell phone, and broadband Internet... ...but they're all adamant that they can't afford to spend money on software.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:No surprises there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, if students tried to buy every piece of software that they wanted to use, do you think they could afford it?

      I'm a Computer Science and Arts and Technology major, if I bought all the software that I feel it is nessecary to use to be profiencent with all the stuff out in the field, it would probably put me out of well over $30,000.

  71. Sounds like bullshit... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    I suspect that a student that received a lower grade for this reason could have it reversed very easily.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Sounds like bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What with kids and their phones?

      If they miss a call, are they afraid, they'll have to call back later?

      oh, the horror!

  72. Re:It's just indicative of where phone use is head by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    We did the same thing, going from SBC to T-Mobile. We pay $80 for two lines, a pile of SMS, and the same number of minutes with no rollover, which is a little less value, but we can roam on AT&T/Cingular networks for free so it's not all bad. SBC had our land line down for three days when they knew the problem was between the pole and the demarc, so we cancelled our service and rolled down to T-Mobile. There was a while when we had one phone from them, actually, and the land line was actually costing us more than getting the second phone.

    Incidentally, we recently upgraded to Motorola V300 phones, they're super slick. You can load the software from V500 and V600 phones on them, turn on mpeg4 video clips (as if there were a purpose to that) and so on. My phone went from dual-band gsm to quad-band and I turned a bunch of other stuff on as well. You can even load java apps into it yourself after a little hacking, easily done with a tool called p2kseem.

    Moving away from landlines is the surest way to get more cellphone coverage. I encourage everyone to do it so we can abandon the stupid copper plant and let the phone company focus on providing fiber for high-bandwidth connections around town. I wouldn't mind buying broadband from them if I could do it cheaply without their crappy phone service.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  73. I'm Trying To Parse This Sentence by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    > You're as likely to find a landline in a college
    > dorm as you're an old typewriter...

    Well, I'm definitely not an old typewriter...

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:I'm Trying To Parse This Sentence by Principal+Skinner · · Score: 1

      If you expand the second "you're" to "you are", it's actually a perfectly good sentence that means "...as you are [likely to find] an old typewriter." It's just not a good place to make that contraction: when spoken, the word "are" in this case would be given at least equal weight to the word "you", so it doesn't really work to shrivel it up to the consonant suffix "'re".

      --
      one hundred twenty
      is just enough characters
      to write a haiku
  74. Landmines? by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else read this as 'College Students Turn Away From Landmines'?

    I've heard of some pretty crazy dorm pranks, but that seems a little extreme.

    1. Re:Landmines? by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 1

      Did anyone else read this as 'College Students Turn Away From Landmines'?
      I've heard of some pretty crazy dorm pranks, but that seems a little extreme.


      Those VMI kids have all the fun.

    2. Re:Landmines? by k512-arch · · Score: 0

      YES oh god, and then afterwards realized it was landlines, then searched for other people talking about landmines, and then found this. man, do i love the internet.

  75. That's so cute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming from a 12 grade student, you don't mind if we, uh, study your comments before we laugh at you?

    The only thing you've taught in high school is how to roll a blunt to the rest of your stoner friends.

  76. "time critical". LMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sometimes it's time-critical"

    The only thing for a student that is "time-critical" is to pay attention in class. The rest is about wasting your time socializing.

    Spare us the "time-critical" nature of your existence. Your mummy and daddy pay for your life, so that pretty much sums it up.

  77. [rolling eyes] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "because of the busy life that college students live"

    Busy trying to do what....get laid or drunk?

    Please. You make me laugh.

  78. You're not alone by falser · · Score: 1

    I'd say 90% of cell phone conversations go like this:

    "Hey So-and-so, how are you doing? Ya I'm doing fine. So whatcha up to? That's cool. Nah I'm not doing much. So that's cool. Anyways give me a call tomorrow. See-ya."

    Frivolous, superficial, ego-boosting conversations that sound like teenybopper gossip. It's funny to watch a person with cell phone "play" with their phones when no one is calling. They fiddle with it, and play a little game with an anxious look on their face - you know they can't wait for that next call, their next fix. And then they end up just calling some random person for no reason at all to talk about nothing.

    I actually own a cell phone. But I got a pay-as-you go plan to augment my Vonage home phone. I get the mobility benefits from the cell, and low long distance plan & out-of-country phone number (Canadian line while living in US) from Vonage. My total monthly fees for phones have never been as low as they are for me now.

  79. Re:"time critical". LMAO by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    Actually, you pay for my life, assuming you're an American taxpayer. I also take out student loans, which I will be paying back for the rest of my life if I don't get a decent job. I've actually been focusing on things that will make me employable again, though, so I'm not too worried about that. Besides going to school full time I spend about 16 hours a week working for the IT department as a peon for federal work study money, so I'm had very cheaply. On the other hand, my only health insurance is medi-cal. Essentially I'm an employee of the state, paid (poorly) by the federal government, given health benefits, and spending a whole lot of time training. Gotta love the community college system, even though it is falling apart at the moment.

    Anyway, I repair computers for money, buy and sell computer stuff, and buy, repair, and sell automobiles - that part is going slowly right now... sometimes I need to be in contact with people.

    Anyway, if mummy and daddy were paying for my life, I would be a whole lot more relaxed and probably get better grades... my GPA is only 3.51 or something :P

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  80. I have two words for you ... by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

    "land line." Thank you for your attention.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  81. American students don't know how lucky they are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi!

    I'm a UK student and I haven't even got the option to get a landline where I live! All we've got here is a payphone in the hall! I thought I'd take this opportunity to explain how lucky you Americans are to have a fraternity system.

    English Universities are so dull by comparison. Like most students in England I had to rent private accommodation for my second and third years, but it never occurred to us to build a whole culture around collectively renting a rather dilapidated house in Clapham. It wasn't even single sex accommodation, so we couldn't engage in the fun and games of para-homosexual activities - Girls just don't have the same grip on your loyalties as your Greek brothers. ;-)

    And while cliques certainly form in English Universities, the are all much too boring to come up with the idea of hazing. I fondly recall diving off a weir and almost drowning when I was 12 because everyone said I was chicken. If only it had been possible for me to gain respect in later life through similar tests, and if these tests could have been combined with pseudo Masonic rituals culminating in the awarding of a little badge, then that truly would have made my time at University worthwhile. And while I still have friends from University, these friendships seem so hollow compared to bonds of fraternal brotherhood since they are not based on solemn vows of fellowship, mutual sacrifice, group solidarity and owning the same poxy little badge.

    Then there's sheer joy alcohol seems to bring fraternity members. By the time I went to university the delights of getting dangerously drunk at parties had started to seem mundane. But to American students in fraternities, the bravado of excessive alcohol consumption is a an exciting new and illicit game where you can prove yourself worthy to all your male friends and simultaneously circumvent college alcohol policy - thereby proving what a rebel you are too. Gosh.

    I am also rather fond of the references to ancient Greece. It reeks of a history far nobler and grander than anything a British University can instill its students with, and the wearing of togas must make it seem as authentic as a ploughman's lunch.

    I think what I am trying to say is that Fraternities give young Americans the chance to grow up in their own time, and that it is regrettable that no similar opportunity is afforded to European Students. In particular, I find it sad that even some American students forego the opportunity to wear togas and claim to be Greek. Really this should be mandatory, so every graduate will be secure in the knowledge that they have gained something much more valuable than a degree from an American University - a little badge with some Greek letters on it.

    Although I am not American, I admire the system so much that I would dearly love to become an honorary member of a fraternity. I have set my heart on becoming an alumnus of Theta Omicron Sigma Sigma Epsilon Ro Sigma. I do so hope this is possible.

    As you see, you should really stop complaining because you don't even know how lucky you are compared to European students...

    Cheers!
    -Kate. ^_^

  82. or you could... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just get rid of phone charges, and allow people to use IP cell phones on the wireless network.

    http://www.dartmouth.edu/comp/resources/network/ te lecom/

  83. I think we're forgetting one thing by philipgar · · Score: 1

    This entire article seems to forget one thing. The income from a university on phones was never that that great. The article says that it was in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.... As far as I can tell from a university thats nothing.

    The average private universities tuition is rapidly approaching $30k/year (not counting room and board). I know my school is just off from that (But I'm a grad student so I don't worry as much). With costs like that the university doesn't care about a few hundred thousand dollars. Accept 4 more students and its done.

    Its especially scary when you factor in that the school claims that tuition accounts for less then half of its income. Granted much of this tuition goes to cover financial aid for other students (note I said financial aid as scholarships are now reserved for athletics).

    But as far as dropping land lines.. I don't really like that idea. I was one of those hold outs. I didn't have a phone until a year ago after a couple car problems when I broke down and got one. But I still know people without cell phones. And no these aren't the anti technology crowd, but the comp e's and comp scis. They just don't want to be reached all the time. Granted their the same people who didn't answer their phones half the time anyways. I think their biggest excuse is why should I pay $50 a month for a phone.... If i need to call someone I can borrow someones phone, and if they need me well they can try around or leave me a message on aim.

    The assumption that everyone has a phone is just overrated.

    Phil

  84. Cell phone plans are still too expensive by melted · · Score: 1

    I will switch to cell phone exclusively when my wife will be able to talk for hours every day (as she currently does) for the price that we currently pay for landline + cellphone. BTW, we pay $10 for cellphone (special offer, 30min a month) and $37 for landline, all taxes included. So get us 3000 minutes for $50 and we're switching.

  85. When I Was An Undergrad at BU... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and dinosaurs roamed the Earth (1982), I had to beg for a separate landline for my CRT terminal, to dial in to the campus mainframe. I was in an apartment with 5 roommates, and no way I could tie up the single landline.

    I had to petition for an interview with the dean of the College of Liberal Arts to explain why I needed the absurd luxury of my own line.

    Ah, memories.

  86. Re:It's just indicative of where phone use is head by jcostom · · Score: 1
    While yes, it's certainly a distinct legal corporation, Verizon owns a majority share of Verizon Wireless. The rest is owned by Vodafone. There may be other tiny minority part owners in the Cellco Partnership (the name Verizon Wireless is a DBA for Cellco), but I'm not aware of any.

    So those "asshats" own most of your employer...

    Since I was particularly po'd at Verizon, I didn't see the need to continue lining their pockets when I made the choice to move to mobiles.

    Disclaimer: The guys I know that work at VZW are nice guys. Verizon losing my few $$ won't put any of those guys out of work.

    --

    The unsig!
  87. Good for them by fleener · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dorm landline phones suck anyway. In my dorm, you paid the phone company an activation fee at the beginning of the semester. If you stayed for the summer, you had to move to a special dorm and pay another activation fee. Then at the beginning of the next school year that fall you paid another activation fee as you moved back. Two activation fees every year just for the privilege of doing business with you? No thanks.

  88. Doubtful this is why tuition is so high... by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

    While this may account for a VERY small (like, 1% of 1% of 1%) drop in income for colleges, I wouldn't so as far as to blame cell phone use for the recent tuition hikes.

    Let's assume that students pay $20/mo to the college, plus long distance. I'd say that maxes out at $50/mo, times 8 or 9 months, or about $400/year. And depending on the school, a small percentage of students actually live on campus.

    Sadly, tuition costs have doubled in some smaller colleges and universities. The $400 hardly makes up for that increase.

    --
    -David
  89. Other interesting statistics by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1
    Only 0.0001% of college students own a screwdriver, can opener, or stapler. That 0.0001% is me. The 99.9999% is every one else, who come to me to borrow my screwdriver, can opener and stapler.

    Executive summary: Stop buying $300 cell phones, and take a trip to the dollar store, you mooches!

  90. Readable version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  91. This is NOT news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You people seem not to understand the principle that less is more.

    Let me try to help you :

    fewer worthless articles = less BS the reader has to wade through to get to something useful.

    This is all of my time you get to waste today.

  92. This is EXACTLY why we got my daughter a cell by gminks · · Score: 1

    My daughter is a freshman in an out-of-state college. The long-distance plan attached to her dorm-room service was quite simply outrageous.

    She doesn't use the phone service, which is included in her room charge, to call us. She either calls us on her cell and has us call her back on the landline, or IMs us and we call her back. She uses the cell for true emergencies.

    Maybe less students would see the need to have cell phones if the long distance plans offered with their phone service were more affordable.

    On-campus college costs are a HUGE ripoff. Don't even get me started on the meal plans!

    1. Re:This is EXACTLY why we got my daughter a cell by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I think I'm getting you started on the meal plans. :)

      I'm one of those students that's paid for my own college. I was in a roaming-about stage for a while, and lived in the dorms at SDSU (That's South Dakota State - one of the cheapest schools in the country - not San Diego State, unfortunately) - which requires a mandatory meal plan selection.

      Of course, they obligingly added the cost of the plan to my dorm costs - about $850/semester, if I recall correctly. I did the math at the time, and dorm costs were about $350/month for a setup which essentially required the beds be elevated 6' off the floor in order to have any room whatsoever. The $350 doesn't have the $850/quarter added in, either.

      Now, consider all this in light of the fact that a person can get a single-bedroom appartment in Brookings, SD (the town the campus is in) for $350 without even looking too hard. It's even possible to find comfortable and new(ish) 2 bedroom appartments which cost less (per of 2 people) for a 12 month lease than the dorms: no irritating "moving day". Just put your clothes in the car and go home (or stay for essentially free, as you've already paid for a full year).

      Now, consider that freshman and sophmores are required by the school to remain in the dorms, and upper-classmen are given discounts for such foolishness.

      Back to the meal plan again:

      Now, in contrast, my experience at a liberal arts private college were somewhat different. Much more expensive up front ($27k/year), but all but around $7k of that was covered by grants and school-provided scholarships for me. I seem to recall the meal plan was a bit more reasonable (it was either around $1200/year or per semester), but it was also per-diem, all-you-can-eat. The phone plan at this school was, IIRC, $40 for the year (long distance not included). My parents would call me, or I'd call them collect (via a 1-800 number my dad set up which allowed someone to call him at his own long distance rates instead of the caller's - might want to look into it, I believe it was fairly inexpensive for setup.)

      Overall, despite the up-front costs, I felt like i got fleeced a lot less at the private school (wihch I might as well mention - Juniata College in Huntingdon, PA). It was in just as much of a backwater town, but had a fairly lively and literate college campus (whereas a school in SD definately will not). I thought it was quite a good school, and I'd recommend it to anyone looking for a good school. I just couldn't afford it for subsequent years. :P (Grants and scholarships fully covered my tuition at SDSU).

      BTW... let me know if you read this so I can feel like I didn't completely waste my time writing it. :P

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  93. Hope you're lying. by abulafia · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you actually run a company and have that sort of problem with employees, you're clearly doing something wrong. (Yes, I do run a company and manage several employees.) hints: accounting processes and methodologies aren't just for bean counters, and small business is as much about finding the right person for a role as it is about watching the bottom line.

    And as a consumer, if I cannot pay cash, I will go somewhere else. I rarely buy on plastic, for several reasons. That includes the time I purchased a car with cash, but that's a different, if amusing, story about how the state likes to know about certain commercial transactions.

    --
    I forget what 8 was for.
    1. Re:Hope you're lying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a CISSP and have an MBA from Harvard. I have insane processes; however, when you own more than a few retail shops you've got to put a lot of faith in the fact that your employees will do the right thing. Processes don't work if they aren't followed.

      What am I suppose to do? Fire the store manager everytime a few dollars comes up missing? Please! It's hard enough to find good folks. My experience is typical, so typical in fact that if you go read the Visa merchant site info you'll see they point to cash handling as a real problem.

      Also, what is the cost of those processes? If I spend 100 hours every month across all of my stores (46) on cash handling processes I'm out a lot more than the 3% VISA charges me! Seriously, cash sucks.

    2. Re:Hope you're lying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I'm a CISSP and have an MBA from Harvard. I have insane processes; however, when you own more than

      Ah, poor you... All that education and you can't anything better than PR grunt at Visa.

      a few retail shops you've got to put a lot of faith in the fact that your employees will do the right thing. Processes don't work if they aren't followed.

      You must be hiring gypsies and transients than if they can leave that fast. Sorry, but the high school kid that lives with his/her parents isn't usually going to risk the criminal charges and public embarrassmant over a couple dollars. (oh yeah, I have dealt with cleptomaniacs on two occassions in the past 20 years, but I didn't lose 10% of my income to it)
      Unless your turnover is so amazing and you're hiring transients, there is no way that you should be losing ANY substansial am

      If accounting is done regularly, a discrepancy is found instantly, and whomever is responsible is caught.

      Having run family retail businesses for 20 years (in a family that has done it for 80), I can tell you that shoplifting is a WAAAYY bigger problem than employees handling cash (and reading the police blotter in different localities has only been consistent with my experience).


      What am I suppose to do? Fire the store manager everytime a few dollars comes up missing? Please! It's hard enough to find good folks. My experience is typical, so typical in fact that if you go read the Visa merchant site info you'll see they point to cash handling as a real problem.

      Yeah that site isn't biased or anything.. Why would Visa's site have any bias towards handling plastic and against other forms of payment??

      Shithead.

      And tell the boss that you fellate daily to stop pushing these VISA funded materials into public schools that teach kids it's OK to carry a credit card balance.. You're right, 3% is nothing compared to the price of private school to keep my kids away from you crooks.

    3. Re:Hope you're lying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Another wanker on Slashdot who thinks that his experiences are the only way things go. It's stroppy little cunts like you that make me want to stop reading this site. It's a shame it actually has useful and interesting information on it.

      Go jerk off about your authority elsewhere.

    4. Re:Hope you're lying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Another wanker on Slashdot who thinks that his experiences are the only way things go. It's stroppy little cunts like you that make me want to stop reading this site. It's a shame it actually has useful and interesting information on it.

      Go jerk off over your "authority" elsewhere.

  94. where do you people live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 35 years old. Neither at the house I grew up in, nor at my apartments, nor in the house I live in now have I ever picked up a phone that was supposed to be working and not have it be working.

    Although I appreciate how nice a cell phone is (I have one too, just switched to Cingular), I pay $14/mo for my land line. And you crow about how great your $85/month cell bundle is?

    Cells are great. But if yall you want is basic service, landlines are far cheaper right now.

    Personally, I'm not for putting the landline people out of business, because they'll always be providing broadband to me, even if I do go 100% cell for my phone. Despite the hype, wired bandwidth will always be higher than wireless bandwidth. So that's where I'm getting my data from for the forseeable future.

    Also, as a final note, if you switched to a cell phone company because of their awesome customer service, you've entered bizarro world. The only companies I've used that are worse at customer service are cable companies.

    1. Re:where do you people live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you don't pay $14 a month for your phone line, at least, not *anywhere* in the US. Why? The fees that phone companies pass on down to us, the "FCC fees which may or may not be regulatory" cost that much themselves. Then the phone company will want a profit too, ya know. So no, your phone line is NOT that cheap.

  95. Re:Don't forget the rest... by bnenning · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My advice...stay away from credit cards except for absolute emergencies. Accepting a credit card these days is like shackling yourself and giving them the key.

    Or you can just pay off your balance every month, which means you don't pay interest, but do get some level of fraud protection and often cash back.

    --
    How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  96. What is the utility of this information, cowards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cowardly anonymous moderators,

    Answer the question with words and not mod points please. It's perfectly topical.

  97. GSM1900? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GSM1900 is out there. But of the majors only T-Mo uses it as their primary bandwidth now. Cingular just switched to AT&T's 850MHz spectrum, and thus GSM850 is their big thing, although they maintain 1900MHz coverage where the 850 isn't great or sufficient.

    Verizon and Sprint don't use GSM at all. Nextel uses a system that is similar to GSM, but isn't GSM either.

    As to roaming on AT&T and Cingular, don't get addicted to that. Cingular (/AT&T) will surely end that agreement as soon as they can. It doesn't benefit them anymore, now that they have the old AT&T/Cingular One towers they have fantastic coverage with just their own system.

  98. Okay, its $20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For $20 with taxes and all fees, you get a landline with unlimited usage.

    Cell phones are probably 5x that amount for an equivalent plan.

    Satisfied? His point is perfect. Cell phones are a lot of money. Too much for a student to piss away money when they should pay for college instead of taking loans.

    Oh, how much money you kids piss away on *nothing*. PC's, iPods, and Cellphones. You could pay for a year of college if you dropped this kind of bullshit.

  99. Landmines in dormitories? by DruggedBunny · · Score: 1

    Oh, man, I was reading that as 'landmines' and wondering why on Earth a student would have one in his dorm. I got halfway through the comments before realising. I'm having a slow day today.

  100. free long distance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my senior year (just this past year), my college gave free long distance on landlines in the dorm rooms.

  101. Stop the socialism by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Here in the USA, we are no socialists. If you feel "ripped off", then don't pay for the services. So as long as there is competition in the area, keep the fucking government out of the free market!!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Stop the socialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What competition?? I have exactly *one* choice if I want cable TV, or broadband internet. I can go w/ dial-up access, or satellite, but that isn't really the same thing as competition for cable, just like a private limosine (sp?) company is not really competition for a taxi service.

      Besides, the point is the government is already involved in this market. My tax $$ subsidized the building of the infrastructure these companies are now gouging me to use. I didn't volunteer this money, nor receive anything in exchange for it. The government took it from me, with the implied threat of harm if I refuse to give it, then gave this $$ to telecommunication companies w/o my permission or consent.

      In the US, there is plenty of socialism for CORPORATIONS, there is just very little government subsidization of private citizens.

    2. Re:Stop the socialism by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you said about subsidization. In fact, I will go further with this.

      Again, keep the government OUT of the free market. The governments job is to serve the people with the citizens tax dollars. The only link corporations should have is with it's customers whome they support and vise-versa. The moment you get government involved with corporate activity, then it becomes a two-way street of nightmare perportions.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  102. Fewer land lines = fewer cordless phones by FuturePastNow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And that means less interference with wireless networks.

    When I was a college student, my PC was my stereo, DVD player, and gaming system, and now it's my television as well. I've never tried VOIP, but it could be my phone someday, too.

    --
    Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
  103. Technology evolves-Cheaper is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "As technology moves on, there's not a lot else to be expected really. The cheap and widespread availability of wireless communication means that more students will be inevitably taking the easier option; who wants to be tied down while making a phone call?"

    Cheaper is relative. I ended up dropping my cellphone for two reasons. One the cost was killing me. Two the pattern and amount of calls I was making didn't justify the cost.*

    *You'd be correct in that I could have changed plans to save money, although it wouldn't have been the best. Mainly because I was grandfathered into my old plan, and the new plans weren't the best when you look at the total package.

  104. Fools by Jack+Comics · · Score: 1

    IMO, anyone who relies entirely on their mobile phone without at least having a land line as a backup is a fool. Mobile phones are great, don't get me wrong. They're small, they're convenient.

    However, does anyone here remember September 11, 2001, and/or the New York blackout of August 2003? Land lines worked well. However, mobile phones, including mine, did not work at all. If all you had was a mobile phone and you wanted to try to reach a loved one, you were screwed. I, as well as many others, learned from both experiences that it's completely foolhardy to solely rely on a mobile telephone.

    --
    "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
  105. Are you sure... by notthe9 · · Score: 1

    this isn't from the "No Shit" department?

  106. Verizon broke our phone line and charged us by LemonFire · · Score: 1

    I can relate to your story about Verizon. Our neighbors had a problem with the landline, so Verizon sent out a technician.

    The technician fixed our neighbors line and broke ours. So we called up Verizon using our cell phones to complain, let me tell you, it's very nagging to be put on hold by Verizon while your valuable plan minutes ticks away. After explaining the situation Verizon sends out two guys to fix our line.

    On our next phone bill there was a charge for fixing our line. This really upset me and I had to call back again to Verizon to get this issue resolved, it took me 20 minutes to explain and to get Verizon to admit that they screwed up. Verizon got to be the worst phone company I ever dealt with and this wasn't the fist time that I've had problems with them.

  107. Meh. by SenorChuck · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am employed by a small college IT department, and let me tell you - it's very frustrating to contact students to let them know that you've repaired their account when the phone number listed in the directory doesn't have a phone attached.

    Every dorm room has a landline provided at no additional cost to the students, yet it seems that only about 20% of the students actually have phones connected. I'm sure it doesn't help that students must provide their own phones.

    --
    A wise person makes his own decisions, a weak one obeys public opinion. -- Chinese proverb
  108. Call the waambulance. by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    "Student directories including out of state numbers!" Oh no! There's no reason the school's PBX can't be set up for an extension for each student which is forwarded onto their cells. Hell, you could even allow them to change the forward online -- good for co-op semesters and vacation.

    The only "problem" is that the local telcos are pissed because the schools cut deals with them to offer packaged service to the students (which usually sucks, is one-size-fits-all, and often comes with fixed rates from 5-10 years ago which are outrageous even compared to cellular).

    Landline is going to die anyway. People are going to realize that the ability to have their home phone number also be portable is better than having to hand out multiple phone numbers to everyone just so they can reap the easy access benefit the telecommunication age is supposed to bring.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  109. Re:It's just indicative of where phone use is head by autophile · · Score: 1
    And hey, if you decide to do something like this - make sure you port to a carrier OTHER than Verizon Wireless. That is, if you're doing it because you're sick of Verizon.

    I was rockin' to your post until I read this. As any telecom afficionado knows, Verizon landlines are handled by Verizon Domestic Telecom, while mobile is handled by Verizon Wireless. They use completely separate equipment, service centers, and billing systems.

    I've never had a problem with Verizon Wireless. And I have a plan that's $40 for the first phone, and $20 for each additional. Back when Cingular hadn't changed its name from Cellular One to rid itself of the bad publicity its bad service got, billing mistakes turned my service into a nightmare, so I switched. Never had a problem since. So there! :)

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  110. Apartment Telephone Directory by krunk4ever · · Score: 0

    One thing funny does happen when friends drop by w/o notice or when the UPS guy tries to deliver something when you're not home. Since the telephone directory that you ring up is usually a landline, there shouldn't be any problems when you're not home. But like my friend who lives across from me in my apartment ccomplex, has the directory system dial to his cell. Works fine when you're at home, but when you're not at home, you still get those calls and if you do pick up, you'll have to explain you're not really at home and that the directory system is calling your cell.

    I guess then again, w/ caller id, you'll know if it's the telephone directory system calling you, and you just won't pick up if so.

  111. Actually it's the best place to watch TV .... by dustpuppy · · Score: 1

    It's a heck of a lot more fun watching some TV shows with a group of friends. For instance, at my College, I have a group of students who come around every week to watch The Apprentice and The Amazing Race where we can collectively hurl abuse/ridicule etc at the contestants.

  112. Three words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got three words for you:

    amazon dot com

  113. Buying books for university... by mwooldri · · Score: 1

    Depends on the university. The university I am at now (NC A&T) - most of the lecturers are using books they didn't write or have any input into (with the exception of one course), and they pretty much lecture from the book. So a book I have found was absolutely essential... and no they don't photocopy the book periodically and hand it out and no they don't keep copies of the text in the library.

    However, at the Uni of Dundee, the library did keep some copies of the texts and the lectures weren't always straight out from the book; you were encouraged to take notes. I say did, because that was some years ago!

    So at the uni I am at now, books are essential.

    Mark.

  114. Re:University of Minneapolis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you all really are lame to jump on him using "University of Minneapolis", give it a break. A dozen fricken replies, yeah yeah he took a shortcut, deal with it.

  115. I heard about it from the IS people... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
    I heard about this at one Information Systems reception during Parent's Weekend at my school. Apparently the school used to buy long-distance in bulk at 13 cents a minute, sell it for 25 cents... and they made millions every year. These days they buy them for 3 cents, sell them for 5, and there's practically no use of them anymore; they make thousands.

    Incidentally, they are now pushing Cingular Wireless phones with a "special" university offer every year at orientation (and with the mailings before) and looking (for the future) into some way to combine their wireless network with some PDA/phone they can give to all students as part of their "incoming freshman" technology package. There's nothing particularly exciting on that front yet, though...

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  116. am I the only one ... by psmurf · · Score: 1

    who read that as college students turn away from landMines?

  117. College Cell Phone Companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elminate dorm phones. Give all students cellphones w/ supercheap LD rates and free calls between all student phones. Put a tower or whatever on campus and around town to provide perfect coverage. Lots of money to be made!

  118. Tuition? by man2525 · · Score: 1

    I didn't see the word 'tuition' once in the article.

    Tuition hikes have a great deal more to do with a lack of state funding than on-campus telephone usage. Some states cover(ed) 3/4 of college tuition for state residents. States are reallocating their budgets to provide social services in place of federal government programs that have been gutted to shore up money for federal tax breaks.

    My state also relies on legalized gambling in the form of a state lottery to provide small scholarships to students. It works pretty well. Desperate and uneducated people buy between $5 and $20 in lottery tickets weekly which, in turn, pays for white surburban kids to go to college. Its a wonderful example of the lower and middle classes working together, which is good because neither one will be seeing much in the way of the aforementioned tax breaks.

  119. Broadband? by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

    65% have broadband

    I live on campus and have a 100 Mbps Ethernet drop into the school's backbones (primarily a T3). I'd say it qualifies as "broadband," but faster and without upload caps.

    I thought this was pretty much the case on any college campus? All resident students get Internet access?

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  120. Surprising? by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

    I'm in my first year at college, and have noticed the same thing the article's pointing out.

    We all get a phone number with local service for free. Long distance is pretty cheap.

    I've never paid more than a couple dollars a month. (I'm thinking most of it's in administrative fees, too.) If it's a local call, I use the landline: it's free. (The college absorbs the cost, technically. To me, though, it's free.)

    But the reason I use my cell phone so much (besides the fact that my parents foot the bill *grin*) is that cell phone providers offer so much that my school's phone service doesn't.

    All of the US is a 'local' call as far as my cell carrier is provided. So, unless I know I've used up most of my minutes, I use my cell phone for any long distance calls, because there's no additional cost.

    The "Free Nights and Weekends" thing is a huge draw, too; late-night calls are always done on the cell phone.

    I still have a landline phone, though. Some don't. It's especially great on campus, as intracampus calls are free as well.

    It really shouldn't be surprising that fewer people are using landline phones. At least on my campus, they haven't even tried to keep pace with cell phone plans.

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  121. kids these days -- are effing rich! by peccary · · Score: 1

    I feel like an old fogie -- when I was a sophomore in college, *two* students in my dorm had PCs. I was one of them. By the time I was a senior, probably a dozen did. Maybe half the students had stereos. One had a TV in his room. One had a private telephone. One had a laserdisc player but no TV. A few had those little refrigerators.

    Now it sounds like most all of the students are ensconced in their own little den of luxury.

    Where did all this wealth come from? It can't be just that the prices of consumer electronics dropped, because phone service hasn't dropped in price that much.

  122. dorm phones were a ripoff by msblack · · Score: 1

    Our campus telecom office doesn't seem to understand telephone pricing. Students could get a free dorm phone with free local calling but paid the AT&T undiscounted rate for long distance. That was based on mileage bands which worked out to about $0.35 a minute to New York. Campus offices are charged the same rate. All this despite the fact that they negotiated cheaper rates from the long distance providers. The unfairness of these rates in the dorms fell on deaf ears. Now they don't offer long distance service in the dorms and we lost a lot of money to buy computing and network equipment. Oh, and our campus provides free cable TV and 10/100 Ethernet in all the dorm rooms.

    --
    signature pending slashdot approval
  123. Re:What is the utility of this information? by Peter+Danenberg · · Score: 0
    I can't believe that garbage got modded insightful.
    You'd be amazed what the Trough deems insightful.
  124. Re:It's just indicative of where phone use is head by jcostom · · Score: 1
    I was rockin' to your post until I read this. As any telecom afficionado knows, Verizon landlines are handled by Verizon Domestic Telecom, while mobile is handled by Verizon Wireless. They use completely separate equipment, service centers, and billing systems.

    I would think that any "telecom afficionado knows" that Verizon Wireless is in fact mostly owned by Verizon Communications. Cellco, the actual name of the company is a partnership between Verizon Communications and Vodafone.

    Like I said before, the guys I know that work for VZW are nice guys, but if I'm making a decision to not support a specific company with my business, why would I support a company that is owned in no small part by the company I'm trying to "punish"?

    --

    The unsig!
  125. In other news by nexus987 · · Score: 1

    In other news, use of carrier pigeons by college students is down 100%. Use of quill pens has also dropped dramatically. The sky is blue. Why is it news that land lines are steadily moving towards extinction?

  126. Oh sure by lorcha · · Score: 1
    Because making up a college name is so much less confusing than using it's actual name.

    Let me guess. You're from Iowa.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  127. In other news-DiniLines. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Why is it news that land lines are steadily moving towards extinction?"

    Ask yourself what is it that Cell Phone Towers connect to besides cellphones?

  128. Re:What is the utility of this information? by millennial · · Score: 1

    That's funny... I could have sworn that free market economics supports the industry's right to choose more than the consumer's. A theoretical free-market economy removes all restrictions on companies that don't directly protect the public. This means, for example, that cigarette and alcohol companies would be allowed to sell directly to children.

    I just wrote a paper for my college-senior-level Business Ethics class on this very subject. Every student in my class came to the same conclusion: free market economics is an inherently flawed concept.

    By the way, your comment was not insightful. It was basically a troll.

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.