Reply to articles not yet created. -1
Reply to articles on websites not yet created -10
Reply to articles on websites on an internet not yet created -existence
Erasure from existence is one hell of a ban.
Has this bandwidth use been confirmed?
Also, I gather this might mean it's alike a video stream?
Aren't there render engines build for browsers? (flash,js,html5)
Would the bandwidth use be less if they would replace the videostream with opengl/directX data?
So the client would still be run remotely, the video wouldn't be a video stream, but instead 3D data, compatible for direct consumption by your 3D card.
No, son. It was a plaything of Politics. Goverments, Music industries, Extremists. Everybody threatened us with sanctions on what we did with the Internet.
There even was a time we would stand to loose it completely as its usefulness was crippled.
Internet's usefulness is directly connected to the amount of people using it. And who would use it if the risks got to high?
We almost lost it all.
Now shut up and finish your introduction game so Google can generate a personalized profile for you. You don't want to receive Viagra ads do you?
...like it did with religion during the dark ages.
Thank Odin you don't get burned alive these days, just sued into bankruptcy.
Perhaps we should stop this whole technology thing.
Or better yet, innovation in its whole.
Or jail smart people. Prohibit brains? There must be a way to stop this copying!
"But since we decided to adopt the leaf as legal tender, we have all of course become immensely rich. But we have run into a small inflation problem owing to high leaf availability. That means the current rate is something like three major deciduous forests buy one ship's peanut. In order to obviate this problem and revalue the leaf, we've decided on an extensive campaign of defoliation and burn down all the forests. I think that's a sensible move, don't you?"
Charles Platt: I know very little about Rick Cavallaro's cart, and am not very interested, partly because Rick has been extremely abusive, obnoxious, and condescending to me.
Suddenly, I wondering why this guy's opinion matters?
So the contract always needs to be followed, even if you find out the company is breaking the law?
You work for a cleaning company that appears to be training assassins?
Yes, you can go to the police to try to get them arrested, but they still get to sue you for all your money?
Is that how it works?
And keep in mind, in this case the 'cleaning company's organisation borders seamlessly into the goverment.
They CAN make you disappear if they really want to.
I want this as well.
Watching if a group fails or succeeds is an entertaining event.
Specially if it's too high level for you.
And in result, you'll want to level even faster.
It's like adverticing:P
You mean it could hit static, non-moving strings very fast?
My sister has this little music box, with a cylinder with teeth positioned so it taps a metal comb with different size teeth. If you rotate it very fast, it also can play very fast.
The point is that this robot hand doesn't do things very fast, it does it in response to realtime observations of.. very fast events.
(like bouncing a pingball very fast)
Did you look at the video?
Churgery without sedation, but also without bloodloss.
"Yeeaauch! It HIT me!"
"No, it removed the cancer from your liver, and sewed you up quite nicely."
"... wot?"
I guess you must REALLY hate computer simulations.
"ZOMG, this is a 2 dimentional picture! Real patients are not 2 dimentional! LOOK! when I cut him here I just get a GAME OVER on my screen".
Interactive tutorials and demonstrations don't bleed so those are useless as well.
But in your defense, reading your opinion what you think is and is not possible in Second Life indicated to me that you have no idea what you can do in SecondLife.
How could you possibly offer a correct opinion if your insight on the subject is incomplete?
I'd create organs from sculptured prims, linked into one object (max amount of prims in one object is 256) and design a protocol to have the organs communicate with eachother via llMessageLinked.
Specific actions preformed on a certain organ would be done by adding the touch or touch_end event scripted in a specific organ.
Depending on what action was preformed, internal actions would be executed and if needed, communicated to other organs to create complecated action/reaction responses.
An incission into a beating heart would have that organ broadcast to all the other organs that the bloodpressure is dropping at a certain speed. Every organ would calculate for itself at what point it would start to fail as well.
At a certain bloodpressure the kidneys would start to fail and liver, and the brain as well.
If left bleeding too long, the simulation would inform the surgeon that the brain was left without bloodflow too long and the patient never woke up despite a succesful removal of a growth of whatever.
Should you want MORE then 256 organs in the simulation, we could set up a message relay design, where we use a relay node to whisper the received llMessageLinked messages to the next link_set of prims/organs.
You could keep adding scenarios to the different organs, and broadcast which scenarios should be en/dis-abled.
And this is just the simulated body itself. We could monitor all the preperation actions of the user. Bringing home the importance of following procedures.
FAILURE! You entered the OR without correctly following the 'Gown Up' sequence.
'Second Life nonsens'.. bahaha.
It's like saying 'C++ nonsens'.
It's nonsense if you design it to be nonsens.
Every reaction will result in a counterreaction.
And with each itteration, things enhance.
Now it is some group of assholes.
When you take this cyber asshattery into the realm of militairy warfare, you can nolonger stick it undert the label of web-security, it becomes a... war activity.
Who would you attack? The zombied systems?
Or just govermental systems of a nation who you PRESUME to be responsible for the attack?
And then the counter attack is made officially by the USA militairy, not an anonymous group.
Nobody wins... except the asshats behind the original attack.
I agree.
He (proffesor) seems think that the gamerules are so important, that simple social rules or netiquette do not play any role in the way he needs to interact.
He knows the PvP area is also used for hero to villain communication yet this did not stop him from disrupting the activities of other players.
It's like being a non-smoker sitting in a smokers-area to talk with a friend who is smoking.
During the conversation, some asshole is blowing smoke in your face.
You ask him to stop blowing smoke in your face but he continues since, "This area is for smokers, so you should not complain". The professor thinks that the other players are there for his amusement, he did not go out to find a villain looking for a fight, he just picked out any random villain dispite his current activity.
I would even go so far to call this man socially inept in an online environment.
If he would be a manager, he would refuse his employees to use the bathroom outside lunchbreaks, because the rules states it. If he would be a cop, he would write out a parking ticket while the corpse still lies in the car. The rules, states he should, and the rules are to be followed.
The funniest moment I ever had was when I made non-cummunitive contact with another player in Quake.
A long bridge seperated us and at first he tried to shoot me.
Instead of returning the fire I just pulled out the axe weapon and turned to hit a wall, turned back to face him and jumped.
For a couple of minutes nothing happened, you could see him thinking, "wtf?".
Then he mimicked the action and suddenly, in the chaos of mass violence, explosions and gore, some players stepped out of the pattern.
The fact that there is communications going on in a PvP zone seems a positive thing. People stepping outside of the ordinairy. Doing something besides following the rules, following the masses.
Unfortunatly, not everyone seems to be able to step out of the pattern.
And are confused when people point that there is something outside of the pattern.
"How about.... not shooting?"
Slashdot Mirror
No points to add +1 Funny. So: Hahaha!
Is the barcode alphanumeric? In that case I claim: "Robert`); DROP TABLE Students;--"
Reply to articles not yet created. -1 Reply to articles on websites not yet created -10 Reply to articles on websites on an internet not yet created -existence Erasure from existence is one hell of a ban.
Has this bandwidth use been confirmed? Also, I gather this might mean it's alike a video stream? Aren't there render engines build for browsers? (flash,js,html5) Would the bandwidth use be less if they would replace the videostream with opengl/directX data? So the client would still be run remotely, the video wouldn't be a video stream, but instead 3D data, compatible for direct consumption by your 3D card.
The future looks limp, or bleak... Perhaps both.
Holy Xerox batman!
No, son. It was a plaything of Politics. Goverments, Music industries, Extremists. Everybody threatened us with sanctions on what we did with the Internet. There even was a time we would stand to loose it completely as its usefulness was crippled. Internet's usefulness is directly connected to the amount of people using it. And who would use it if the risks got to high? We almost lost it all. Now shut up and finish your introduction game so Google can generate a personalized profile for you. You don't want to receive Viagra ads do you?
link to this sleuthing plz.
...like it did with religion during the dark ages. Thank Odin you don't get burned alive these days, just sued into bankruptcy. Perhaps we should stop this whole technology thing. Or better yet, innovation in its whole. Or jail smart people. Prohibit brains? There must be a way to stop this copying!
"But since we decided to adopt the leaf as legal tender, we have all of course become immensely rich. But we have run into a small inflation problem owing to high leaf availability. That means the current rate is something like three major deciduous forests buy one ship's peanut. In order to obviate this problem and revalue the leaf, we've decided on an extensive campaign of defoliation and burn down all the forests. I think that's a sensible move, don't you?"
but the very fact that there is such a thing as a commercial Spaceship factory, it makes me giddy.
Charles Platt: I know very little about Rick Cavallaro's cart, and am not very interested, partly because Rick has been extremely abusive, obnoxious, and condescending to me. Suddenly, I wondering why this guy's opinion matters?
That is, until larger means "being able to pick you off the ground and fly off with you"
Young Einstein wants his reference back.... mate.
If you a referring to the one I think you are, compare the size...
So the contract always needs to be followed, even if you find out the company is breaking the law? You work for a cleaning company that appears to be training assassins? Yes, you can go to the police to try to get them arrested, but they still get to sue you for all your money? Is that how it works? And keep in mind, in this case the 'cleaning company's organisation borders seamlessly into the goverment. They CAN make you disappear if they really want to.
RAGE! raaaaaaarrrgh!
I want this as well. Watching if a group fails or succeeds is an entertaining event. Specially if it's too high level for you. And in result, you'll want to level even faster. It's like adverticing :P
You mean it could hit static, non-moving strings very fast? My sister has this little music box, with a cylinder with teeth positioned so it taps a metal comb with different size teeth. If you rotate it very fast, it also can play very fast. The point is that this robot hand doesn't do things very fast, it does it in response to realtime observations of.. very fast events. (like bouncing a pingball very fast) Did you look at the video?
Churgery without sedation, but also without bloodloss. "Yeeaauch! It HIT me!" "No, it removed the cancer from your liver, and sewed you up quite nicely." "... wot?"
{{Citation needed}}
How should one respond to this then?
I guess you must REALLY hate computer simulations.
"ZOMG, this is a 2 dimentional picture! Real patients are not 2 dimentional! LOOK! when I cut him here I just get a GAME OVER on my screen".
Interactive tutorials and demonstrations don't bleed so those are useless as well.
But in your defense, reading your opinion what you think is and is not possible in Second Life indicated to me that you have no idea what you can do in SecondLife.
How could you possibly offer a correct opinion if your insight on the subject is incomplete?
I'd create organs from sculptured prims, linked into one object (max amount of prims in one object is 256) and design a protocol to have the organs communicate with eachother via llMessageLinked. Specific actions preformed on a certain organ would be done by adding the touch or touch_end event scripted in a specific organ.
Depending on what action was preformed, internal actions would be executed and if needed, communicated to other organs to create complecated action/reaction responses.
An incission into a beating heart would have that organ broadcast to all the other organs that the bloodpressure is dropping at a certain speed. Every organ would calculate for itself at what point it would start to fail as well.
At a certain bloodpressure the kidneys would start to fail and liver, and the brain as well.
If left bleeding too long, the simulation would inform the surgeon that the brain was left without bloodflow too long and the patient never woke up despite a succesful removal of a growth of whatever.
Should you want MORE then 256 organs in the simulation, we could set up a message relay design, where we use a relay node to whisper the received llMessageLinked messages to the next link_set of prims/organs.
You could keep adding scenarios to the different organs, and broadcast which scenarios should be en/dis-abled.
And this is just the simulated body itself. We could monitor all the preperation actions of the user. Bringing home the importance of following procedures.
FAILURE! You entered the OR without correctly following the 'Gown Up' sequence.
'Second Life nonsens'.. bahaha.
It's like saying 'C++ nonsens'.
It's nonsense if you design it to be nonsens.
I kinda like making no-nonsens in LSL.
Every reaction will result in a counterreaction. And with each itteration, things enhance. Now it is some group of assholes. When you take this cyber asshattery into the realm of militairy warfare, you can nolonger stick it undert the label of web-security, it becomes a... war activity. Who would you attack? The zombied systems? Or just govermental systems of a nation who you PRESUME to be responsible for the attack? And then the counter attack is made officially by the USA militairy, not an anonymous group. Nobody wins... except the asshats behind the original attack.
I agree. He (proffesor) seems think that the gamerules are so important, that simple social rules or netiquette do not play any role in the way he needs to interact. He knows the PvP area is also used for hero to villain communication yet this did not stop him from disrupting the activities of other players. It's like being a non-smoker sitting in a smokers-area to talk with a friend who is smoking. During the conversation, some asshole is blowing smoke in your face. You ask him to stop blowing smoke in your face but he continues since, "This area is for smokers, so you should not complain". The professor thinks that the other players are there for his amusement, he did not go out to find a villain looking for a fight, he just picked out any random villain dispite his current activity. I would even go so far to call this man socially inept in an online environment. If he would be a manager, he would refuse his employees to use the bathroom outside lunchbreaks, because the rules states it. If he would be a cop, he would write out a parking ticket while the corpse still lies in the car. The rules, states he should, and the rules are to be followed. The funniest moment I ever had was when I made non-cummunitive contact with another player in Quake. A long bridge seperated us and at first he tried to shoot me. Instead of returning the fire I just pulled out the axe weapon and turned to hit a wall, turned back to face him and jumped. For a couple of minutes nothing happened, you could see him thinking, "wtf?". Then he mimicked the action and suddenly, in the chaos of mass violence, explosions and gore, some players stepped out of the pattern. The fact that there is communications going on in a PvP zone seems a positive thing. People stepping outside of the ordinairy. Doing something besides following the rules, following the masses. Unfortunatly, not everyone seems to be able to step out of the pattern. And are confused when people point that there is something outside of the pattern. "How about.... not shooting?"