And how do you feel when an innocent man accepts a plea bargain because he felt he had no choice but to give a false confession? That is, of course, on of the main dangers in coercing confessions.
If you don't allow us to invade and loot data from your computer, you're a pirate!
How about no. If you're not taking personal responsibility for malware in your ads, including the cost to clear infected computers and compensate for lost data, you have no right to complain if we take security precautions in the form of blocking this attack vector.
Nonetheless, giving away "free" money can still be free if it replaces and costs the same as the current system. If it's cheaper (than the sum total of food stamps, SS, welfare, obligatory medical emergency service, minimum wage, jail time for poverty-induced criminals, homeless shelters, food kitchens,...), then giving away free money actually saves money.
One problem is not Apple offering a 16GB iPhone, it is that those who want more must pay 20 times Apple's cost.
[...] Apple has gross profit margins around 40% and around 56% of their revenue comes from the iPhone. [...] even if everyone were to buy the more expensive product, Apple doesn't receive anywhere close to a 20X bump in gross margins. [...]
I think what he meant was that (price of 64GB - price of 16GB)/(cost of 64GB - cost of 16GB) = 20. Or if you prefer, that 48GB don't cost anywhere close to $100.
However, by my count a cost of $2/GB is not unreasonably high, especially if we're talking higher end solid state memory and include additional services.
That's all well and good, but you're running the test backwards. Unless you think de Vries is looking at the rejected women to make sure that he finds them unattractive, as opposed to looking at the selected women to make sure he finds them attractive. The false positive rate only matters if it doesn't significantly cut down on unattractive candidates. And so long as he doesn't run out of candidates to look over, the false negative rate is a meaningless bug.
Of course, good luck to him if his true love isn't in the habit of uploading her picture, or if lots of people upload photos of supermodels.
Also, one thing that would be really useful is if the algorithm could counter the bad lighting effect.
Also people trying to explain to some star-crossed lover that the target of their affections has all sorts of terrible flaws which they're totally ignoring because love is blind, and they will resent once the infatuation is over.
I have it on good authority that a group of terrorists is actively trying to discourage our children from building neat things. If you do, this group of terrorists is threatening to kidnap anyone who defies them and demand a ransom, or in their language, "bail". This terrorist group appears to be operating with impunity, any leads as to who was responsible would be appreciated.
"immediately report any suspicious items and / or suspicious behavior."
From their behavior, I can tell that the school officials and Texas police department are incredibly suspicious (and also stupid pussies). Perhaps we could have them all sign up with a psychologist to test them for paranoia?
Slashdot Mirror
Oh, someone will distribute it.
Chaos and doom! Watch out for the butterfly effect.
why are you changing the topic to a situation that has absolutely nothing to do with the case and what kind of retards are voting you up?
Because some people are talking about plea bargains in general, rather than about this specific case.
REAL activism occurs in meatspace.
#GoOutside
PS: take your own advice, or STFU.
And how do you feel when an innocent man accepts a plea bargain because he felt he had no choice but to give a false confession? That is, of course, on of the main dangers in coercing confessions.
It's not extortion. It's compelling a person to be a witness against himself.
If you don't allow us to invade and loot data from your computer, you're a pirate!
How about no. If you're not taking personal responsibility for malware in your ads, including the cost to clear infected computers and compensate for lost data, you have no right to complain if we take security precautions in the form of blocking this attack vector.
From the video, it seems there was a list of specific opportunities and some numbers related to them.
I get my news from comedians because comedians are more serious than journalists.
Real libertarians are in favor of liberty. Which he clearly is.
Some anti-government folks mascarade as libertarians; you can tell which those are because they oppose government more than they support liberty.
Any chance this book is available for my IoT toaster, so I can read it while waiting for my toast?
It's surprisingly common for someone to accidentally publish their private signing key.
Why do people think are entitled to other people's money?
Does this mean you are demanding that companies pay their employees everything the company earned from the employee's labor?
Nonetheless, giving away "free" money can still be free if it replaces and costs the same as the current system. If it's cheaper (than the sum total of food stamps, SS, welfare, obligatory medical emergency service, minimum wage, jail time for poverty-induced criminals, homeless shelters, food kitchens, ...), then giving away free money actually saves money.
One problem is not Apple offering a 16GB iPhone, it is that those who want more must pay 20 times Apple's cost.
[...] Apple has gross profit margins around 40% and around 56% of their revenue comes from the iPhone. [...] even if everyone were to buy the more expensive product, Apple doesn't receive anywhere close to a 20X bump in gross margins. [...]
I think what he meant was that (price of 64GB - price of 16GB)/(cost of 64GB - cost of 16GB) = 20. Or if you prefer, that 48GB don't cost anywhere close to $100.
However, by my count a cost of $2/GB is not unreasonably high, especially if we're talking higher end solid state memory and include additional services.
That's all well and good, but you're running the test backwards. Unless you think de Vries is looking at the rejected women to make sure that he finds them unattractive, as opposed to looking at the selected women to make sure he finds them attractive. The false positive rate only matters if it doesn't significantly cut down on unattractive candidates. And so long as he doesn't run out of candidates to look over, the false negative rate is a meaningless bug.
Of course, good luck to him if his true love isn't in the habit of uploading her picture, or if lots of people upload photos of supermodels.
Also, one thing that would be really useful is if the algorithm could counter the bad lighting effect.
Also people trying to explain to some star-crossed lover that the target of their affections has all sorts of terrible flaws which they're totally ignoring because love is blind, and they will resent once the infatuation is over.
I have it on good authority that a group of terrorists is actively trying to discourage our children from building neat things. If you do, this group of terrorists is threatening to kidnap anyone who defies them and demand a ransom, or in their language, "bail". This terrorist group appears to be operating with impunity, any leads as to who was responsible would be appreciated.
There were lots of terrorists involved in this incident. The terrified child vowed never to bring another invention to school.
"Jackass the Fiber Optic Ripper"
"immediately report any suspicious items and / or suspicious behavior."
From their behavior, I can tell that the school officials and Texas police department are incredibly suspicious (and also stupid pussies). Perhaps we could have them all sign up with a psychologist to test them for paranoia?
I'm a certified Lobster Boiler.
Is there anything you can do about self-reproducing laws? Like how people repeatedly make it illegal to murder, to show they are "tough on crime"?
Son, we used to pay money for this crap. Per play.
You sound pretty driven. But even if you run open source on the car, the real question is, "Are the drivers open source?"