But if you're sitting in your car with the doors closed talking on that phone you do have an expectation of privacy. How in the hell would the device be able to distinguish between the two?
Sure, it's great to drive the a good bargain with your suppliers. But, when you drive your suppliers out of business, particularly a sole supplier, maybe it's better to let them make a little money too.
If the company doesn't insist on a license agreement then walk away. Any lawyer worth his weight in rice would insist on a license agreement. If the company can't get that right all on their own they don't know enough about intellectual property to work with.
Just because they can crack a four digit password on an iPhone doesn't mean they can quickly crack a 24 character password. A four digit password can be easily brute forced. That's not true with a 24 character password (emphasis on "easily"). Of course, few people have 24 character passwords.
Can you write the proposal on how having to clean up malware that's going to infect our network because we're using old unsupported versions of IE is going to save money?
Google is undoubtedly considering free meals as a business expense and thus it's paying lower taxes (or in Google's case, getting more money back from the government) by providing free meals. So yeah, he - and I - and you - are helping to pay for those free meals.
1. Yes, 50 vulnerabilities were fixed but some where JavaFX, not the JRE.
2. and yes, a lot where 10s, but because Oracle refuses to give out complete information about the vulnerabilities. If it would many would score lower.
It's bad, very bad, but not as bad as the summary portrays.
Lots of so called open source projects either don't provide a license or provide conflicting license information. For example, we recently looked at a project where the web site says it's MIT, but the code says it's public domain.
Slashdot Mirror
But if you're sitting in your car with the doors closed talking on that phone you do have an expectation of privacy. How in the hell would the device be able to distinguish between the two?
Yes, that's overly simplistic.
Sure, it's great to drive the a good bargain with your suppliers. But, when you drive your suppliers out of business, particularly a sole supplier, maybe it's better to let them make a little money too.
Some just don't know it...
... it will never happen with a Republican Congress.
If the company doesn't insist on a license agreement then walk away. Any lawyer worth his weight in rice would insist on a license agreement. If the company can't get that right all on their own they don't know enough about intellectual property to work with.
"They ONLY other option was to become IBM and that's to simply run around BUYING other companies."
That was Symantec for most of the last ten years.
He likely will be the CEO once the split is complete.
This isn't new...
I'm behind a firewall
now. This is hardly a new concept or a new implementation.
Just because they can crack a four digit password on an iPhone doesn't mean they can quickly crack a 24 character password. A four digit password can be easily brute forced. That's not true with a 24 character password (emphasis on "easily"). Of course, few people have 24 character passwords.
If what they did is legal, so what?
Then perhaps some of those things should be made illegal.
Can you write the proposal on how having to clean up malware that's going to infect our network because we're using old unsupported versions of IE is going to save money?
You can clear that one up...
Google is undoubtedly considering free meals as a business expense and thus it's paying lower taxes (or in Google's case, getting more money back from the government) by providing free meals. So yeah, he - and I - and you - are helping to pay for those free meals.
He had his vision, others had different visions. It doesn't mean he's right and they're wrong.
Amen!
Cops destroy recordings and "lose" devices all the time. Streaming video is the only real solution and not practical in this case.
The cops will just confiscate and "lose" your encrypted memory card.
She wants them to quit so she doesn't have to pay unemployment despite the fact that the company is the one changing the rules.
Nothing new. At the storage company I used to work at we called the 1,000,000 MB number a "marketing megabyte".
1. Yes, 50 vulnerabilities were fixed but some where JavaFX, not the JRE.
2. and yes, a lot where 10s, but because Oracle refuses to give out complete information about the vulnerabilities. If it would many would score lower.
It's bad, very bad, but not as bad as the summary portrays.
Yes, I'm very sure.
The top AV vendors have been using methods beyond signatures (white listing, behavior monitoring) for a while now.
On the one hand, the CIA is not likely to admit they've lost a drone.
On the other hand, Iran has a well documented history of lying about its accomplishments.
Hard to determine the truth here...
Lots of so called open source projects either don't provide a license or provide conflicting license information. For example, we recently looked at a project where the web site says it's MIT, but the code says it's public domain.