Heh. It surely sounds to me like you took all the wrong lessons from that course. I mean, a lot of people do, but I'm not sure that's a problem with that course itself.
You make it sound as if the choice were between simple-but-incapable and featureful-but-complicated. I'm absolutely not convinced that this is anything but a result of shortsighted convenience. This is a massive false dichotomy.https://developers.slashdot.org/story/18/08/04/055254/the-problem-with-programming-and-how-to-fix-it#
Slashdot Mirror
As if SpaceX wouldn't take a bite if the government offered them a bit of the ballistic missile pie.
They wouldn't because they're not interested in solid rockets.
If by "he" you mean Agent Orange, it's not for his lack of trying. Plus he has at least two more years to wreak havoc.
You make it sound like Tesla isn't able to swap one cell type for another. I doubt that is the case, especially since they foresaw this.
Even easier - maybe she already has one!
After all, there have never been any troubles in Ethiopia before the invention of the Internet.
Which are...long chains?
IFS Zephyr carries a few dozen passengers including the protagonist.
You forgot the...goddamned Mongorians!
I think that was a Mariner.
I love daisy duck!
We both quack together during a leisurely fuck.
balls deep in feathers and it feels so right!
...something tells me you're not quite so bright?
Exactly.
I love how people refer to rural areas as backwaters.
Yep, that's what the word means.
What, Air Force One doesn't have a bar?
What if it's an Emacs vs. Vim argument?
Not, but it might cheer up some Venezuelans. Worth the shot.
Heh. It surely sounds to me like you took all the wrong lessons from that course. I mean, a lot of people do, but I'm not sure that's a problem with that course itself.
You said "CRUD and productivity applications". That's exactly what this system is supposed to simplify.
Was exactly my first thought. Now just fire phasers at the disabled cells!
Couldn't they let her laugh again? That would be even simpler and more disturbing to the buglar.
Have you read the STEPS reports in the Writings section?
Nobody seems interested in exploring and developing new standards to make CRUD and productivity applications easier again.
Some people do...
You make it sound as if the choice were between simple-but-incapable and featureful-but-complicated. I'm absolutely not convinced that this is anything but a result of shortsighted convenience. This is a massive false dichotomy.https://developers.slashdot.org/story/18/08/04/055254/the-problem-with-programming-and-how-to-fix-it#
Maybe you did. To me it sounds more like one of the many calls for removal of accidental complexity from programming. That's not "dumbing down".
For example, Caché has had its own SQL interface since a long time ago.
Still don't believe they exist. No one is really that stupid.
What about Apollo hoaxers? Are they too stupid to exist, too, or would that be Apollo denial denial?