Slashdot Mirror


User: Mushukyou

Mushukyou's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
48
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 48

  1. Re:Woo Hoo!!! on New RTS Based on DotA Offers Native Linux Client · · Score: 1

    I have 10 beta keys to give away, for anyone interested.

  2. Re:It's Called S.E.X on How To Help a Friend With an MMO Addiction? · · Score: 1

    It's all about moderation. I play a buttload of Darkfall Online, yet I can still work, sleep, and find time to f*ck some strange.

  3. Re:Does it explain on The Science and Physics of Back To the Future · · Score: 1

    ...except the part where one goes into the future and sees oneself, which is impossible, since you've left the present, thereby depriving the timeline of your existence between the point you left and the point you arrive again, therefore you're unable to see your future self, since you would BE your future self that left the timeline to begin with.

  4. Re:Cost of Convenience? on Study Confirms Mobile Phones Distract Drivers · · Score: 1

    It's not the mobile phones which are the problem. It's the certain people using them that are. I don't have ANY PROBLEM WHATSOEVER talking on the phone whilst driving. I can fully drive and talk at the same time, no distractions. I don't drink, so I've never been drunk, so I cannot compare the two (No I'm not religious, I'm an atheist). Then again, I'm the king of hand-to-eye coordination and multi-tasking. However, texting is hard as HELL and I try not to do it whilst driving, because it really DOES screw up your driving. I take into account that most people are stupid and incapable of simple things put together, so I can understand why talking on the phone and driving is an issue.

  5. Re:Heh, not so sure on Researchers Claim To Be Able To Determine Political Leaning By How Messy You Are · · Score: 1

    What does it matter where one smokes pot? Why do they have to do it "within their own home"? And same-sex marriages is ok you say, yet you say "it's your bedroom, do whatever you want". You aren't implying that as long as you don't have to see it it's ok, are you? :) I think you label yourself conservative in a very vague fashion.

  6. Re:ok, its not wow on A Look At the Warhammer Community · · Score: 1

    Darkfall will bring down WoW quite a bit.

  7. Re:Positive Changes on Senate Votes To Empower Parents As Censors · · Score: 1

    I'm sick and tired of censorship altogether. I think that all swear words should be allowed on all TV channels and radio. I don't see any reason to not allow nudity on TV. None of these things will "warp" or hurt our children. I'm sick and tired of other people deciding what should or shouldn't be watched by our kids. Why fine radio stations for curse words? So what if they do? So stupid. Why no swears on regular TV? Stupid, stupid stupid. I blame the right wing bastards.

  8. Re:Darkfall Online on Mythic Launches Warhammer Online · · Score: 0

    Oh no way! You CAN have skill-based in PVP! In fact, it's MUCH better than lvl! With lvl you have COMPLETE inequality. With skill-based and a mixture of FPS, you have a LOT more fairness. I don't think you read much about it before you commented. You have to realize that this will be the first game of its kind out. You really can't base it by referring to other games. It'll be out this year, so you shall see!

  9. Re:Hope it does well on Mythic Launches Warhammer Online · · Score: 1

    Well buddy, darkfallonline.com will be coming out this year. I'd like to tell you that it's competition so you can get your hopes up about WoW changes, but to tell you the truth, WoW won't be able to touch it. And let me tell you this, that there are so many changes WoW would have to undergo to even TOUCH what Darkfall will be doing, that you might as well change over to Darkfall once it comes out later this year. So let me tell you this, that WoW is just an AOL for the people that don't know any better. But once Darkfall hits, only the carebears will be left on WoW. Just wanted to give you a heads up before you realize that you have no idea what just hit the gaming community.

  10. Re:Looks Legit on Graduate Student Defends Right To Own Chicago2016.com · · Score: 1

    Why would they have any argument at all, ever? Even *IF* the guy registered chicagoolympics2016.com, it should rest that it's FIRST COME FIRST SERVE. Whoever registers a site first gets the site. That's how it is and how it should be, no matter whom it resembles.

  11. Re:Awesome game on Mythic Launches Warhammer Online · · Score: 1

    It will not compete with Darkfall Online at all.

  12. Darkfall Online on Mythic Launches Warhammer Online · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    www.darkfallonline.com That will be tearing up all of these lame games. It hasn't been widely publicized, but it has everything we've wanted for a long time. Full loot. Full PVP. No levels, skill-based. Build houses, cities.

  13. Re:It's a good thing on RealNetworks To Introduce a Simple DVD Copier · · Score: 1

    The best apps to use for burning, in my opinion, is AnyDVD HD and 1Click DVD Copy Pro. The bay of the pirate...

  14. Re:What are people using to dodge spam? on Facebook & Myspace Taking Some Spammers To Court · · Score: 1

    I want to thank you for the sneakemail knowledge. I've just become a fan. I signed up, checked it out, and paid for a 6 month plan. I went and changed a few sites I have emails with just to check it out. I must say, though, that having Gmail really cuts down on your spam, even without sneakemail.

  15. ok how about... on Facebook & Myspace Taking Some Spammers To Court · · Score: 1, Troll

    ...Craigslist and Hot or Not next? You know, women never get these fake ads, but men do all the time. I told a couple of women about the fake ads we get, and they say they get nothing. I guess only men are stupid?

  16. Re:Sigh on Blizzard Unveils Wrath of the Lich King Cinematic · · Score: 1

    Just get ready for Darkfall Online. It's going to be the WoW killer. In fact, no other MMORPG will be able to touch it until Mortal Online comes out in some years. But Darkfall should be coming out by the end of this year after YEARS of making it. They were the fans of early UO. Anyhow, I'd bet $5 it's not gonna be a flop like that crap that just came out and flopped. It's going to be better than Warhammer as well I'm sure.

  17. Recycling costs more than it's worth on China to Build a Zero-Carbon Green City · · Score: 1

    There are only a couple of things worth recycling, and one of those are aluminum cans. Paper, cardboard, plastic bottles, all that crap - are NOT worth recycling and costs us more in both resources and money than to make it new/fresh. You hear people talking all the time about how one should "use less paper, save trees!". Yet, we have 1/3 more trees than we did back in 1920. This whole "recycling" crap is all just a bunch of hype to make people feel all fluffy. Most people are too lazy to look into exactly what it takes to recycling all the materials we recycle. If they did, they wouldn't be recycling.

  18. Re:Grow some brains on Liquid Crystal Phases of DNA, Beginning of Life? · · Score: 1

    Evidence is never proof. Yes, it is. You have to give evidence for your god. You have none. Go fish.

    Any jury has to BELIEVE evidence and witnesses presented on either side. This isn't a courtroom.

    They cannot KNOW. That's nice. It's still not a courtroom. To know is to have knowledge. To have knowledge is to have evidence. Give some.

    You also have to believe the evidence for or against God, you also cannot know. No, you don't. Belief by definition is irrational. You shouldn't use beliefs. You should use knowledge and ideas. I can rephrase what you've said: "You also have to believe in the evidence for Flying Spaghetti Monster..." See how much sense that makes? We have no evidence for the FSM, just like we have none for your god. It's just a story.

    You have elevated your deluded, limited logic above all other evidence that has been or ever could be presented and made up your feeble mind. Um, "deluded, limited logic"? You are so stupid. How is logic limited, and how is it deluded? You have no idea what you're talking about. Logic and reasoning is the only way we know anything. The only evidence you'll find for your god has to be scientific. Feeble mind? Man you're an idiot.

    I'd hate to have you on a jury, because you are severely biased by what your perverted logic has concocted in your little head. You're a fucking idiot. I'm very objective and a critical thinker. I'd be perfect for a jury. Please don't think my calling you an idiot or anything of the like is an expression of any type of inability to comprehend nor deliver. It is just me being intolerant of someone who doesn't know how to think intelligently.

    You repeatedly state: "There is no God" as if you know that. I say there is no god as surely as I say there is no Peter Pan. What part of that do you have a problem with?

    You are totally dishonest in making such an assertive statement. Does that mean I can't say there is no Peter Pan?

    More honest would be, "I believe there is nor God". That makes absolutely no sense. Congratulations.

    Better yet would be: "I don't know if there is or not. Present me with the evidence you believe you have for God and I'll consider it." I don't know if there is a god or not. But logic says we must dismiss an idea which holds no merit. If you present me with evidence, I'll look at it. But until then, I dismiss it like I do the Easter Bunny. I'm an atheist, and I'm without belief in gods. It's the most logical position to have.

    Centuries ago, before Jesus Christ walked on Earth, David wrote about you: "The fool has said in his heart, There is no God" (Psalm 53:1) Newsflash: Jesus never existed. Newsflash: The buybull was written by unknown authors and re-edited over time. And if a fool can figure out there is no god, what's your excuse?

    I believe God authored the Bible. That's because you're a gullible, ignorant fool who should be living in a cave. You have no idea what a god is, no evidence for one, and no logical reason to think any god had anything to do with some stupid book we pulled out of our asses a long time ago.

    He never defends His existence therein, That's because the authors couldn't defend it, since they made it the fuck up.

    but calls the likes of you a fool. Of course! They can't have intelligent people running around showing how gullible people are... so they tell you to not pay attention to those that know better than you, because they want to keep you stupid and obedient.

    To me, being called a fool by the Creator of the Universe is frightening. To me, being told by some fruitcake that they think there is some intelligent creator to the Universe is disturbing.

    It ought to be the same to you. You're an idiot.
  19. Re:Grow some brains on Liquid Crystal Phases of DNA, Beginning of Life? · · Score: 1

    What you are really doing is elevating your logic and common sense into the position of God. There is no god.

    Do you know everything that could be known? Obviously not. I don't have to, though, to toss a hypothetical, flimsy idea such as a deity.

    If not, you cannot know there is no God any more than a religious person can know that there is. I only claim to "know" there is no god insofar as I can "know" that there is no Peter Pan or Tooth Fairy.

    hey don't have all knowledge either. Both can only BELIEVE. It's a logical conclusion to dismiss deities. Without proper evidence nor definition, it's tossed. Just like the Easter Bunny or magical Unicorns.

    Are you God or something? There is no god.

    Does your belief give you the right to trample on the belief of other people just because YOU believe their belief is ridiculous or illogical? I don't have beliefs. I have knowledge and ideas. Anyone has the right to trample on anyone's beliefs if said beliefs are irrational and without merit. It's the duty of a good citizen to point out fallacious statements. If it doesn't hold up to logic, it must be confronted. I would love to hear any argument against this - really, I would.

    There isn't and there has never been a culture that did NOT have some sort of religion. This can be easily argued, but why? It has nothing to do with the topic we are discussing.

    In your human pride, you worship your intellect and logic. I don't worship such things, I only use them. You're an idiot.

    Humans are an incurably religious creature. Many are religious, but it's not necessary to be human. In fact, we are more human without religion.

    Maybe, just maybe, that might tell you something about the Biblical assertion of humans being made in the image of God. You can shove your buybull up your ass.

    An image stamped on a coin is pretty hard to obliterate. Nobody can do it without certainly destroying or severely damaging such a coin. This image of God in man is very hard to obliterate. We will rid ourselves of delusions, ignorance and gullibility to such a degree, someday, that nothing of what you say will pertain to our societies anymore.
  20. Re:Grow some brains on Liquid Crystal Phases of DNA, Beginning of Life? · · Score: 1

    Then I would call you ignorant. You can call a well educated man ignorant if you'd like, that's fine, but you'll look like a fool in the process.

    If you were as wise as you indirectly claim, then you would realise that there are so many more questions about everything than answers. What the hell does this have to do with the conversation?

    Not so amazingly, science cannot explain many things. Correction, science hasn't as of YET explained everything.

    Whatever we dig into, we open more questions and unexplainable phenomena. To use the word "unexplainable" makes you the ignorant one.

    The wisest I know are agnostic and are open to interesting interpretation. You must not know very many wise people, then, because agnosticism means you believe something to be unknown or unknowable. You must still be either theist or atheist. Agnosticism has to do with knowledge, theism/atheism has to do with belief - they are separate animals. I am open to many things, so it looks like you not only needed to be educated on agnosticism, but on atheism as well.

    And they certainly don't religion-bash. Religion is bad for mankind.
    It kills our people, slows scientific progress, and separates people into unnecessary groups that cause self segregation.
    Without religion, the world would be a much, much better place (I'm not saying a paradise, but much better). It's good for mankind to "bash" religion. Very good. Before you respond to someone that knows their shit, think beforehand and make sure you know what you're talking about. Who's the ignorant one now?
  21. Grow some brains on Liquid Crystal Phases of DNA, Beginning of Life? · · Score: 1

    Religion *is* very old, and it sucks all ass. The reason why we religion bash is very simple. Religion attempts to brainwash mankind into thinking we already have all the answers to the ultimate questions. Science is the only way to find out what exists externally from ourselves. This being the case, religion is bullshit and must be trampled on whenever possible. The reason why science doesn't care about gods is because we made up gods. Science doesn't care about the things we make up - just like Unicorns or Fairies. The logical position is to be an atheist. The alternative is to sacrifice logic, common sense, and to basically be wrong.

  22. Don't buy anything on Options for 'Fixing' A Pirated Copy of Windows · · Score: 1

    Tell your parents it's pretty ridiculous to throw your money away just so you can "feel good" about giving Microsoft a little bit more money that they don't need. Piracy. It's what's for lunch.

  23. Re:Console vs. PC on Online Consoles Marginalizing PC Gaming? · · Score: 1

    PC games are always better than console games, hands down. The graphics/video can always be higher/better... the controls are better... like playing FPS, you need a MOUSE for that.. not a stupid controller. And even if there was preference for a controller - you have one for your PC right there *easy*. I dislike people who are so narrow-minded to think that somehow console games are going to be better than PC. This is obviously false. You can upgrade your PC, but you'd have to buy a new console. There's just no good arguments, whatsoever, for a console game to be better than a PC. If someone thinks otherwise, I'd love to hear it. But I have a feeling all I'm going to hear are just stupid stories of "oh, it's harder to play on my PC because I want to surf, to do this, do that".. BS argument #1. .."It's easier to use controllers for this or that type of game".. BS argument #2. etc etc. The only reason why game-makers put out games for console first is - HELLO - they are PAYED ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF MONEY TO DO SO. Like GTA, they are payed big bucks to push out their games on console first.. otherwise they'd make it for PC, because PC is where the power is at. Anyone that thinks otherwise is an obvious noob that never did any serious quaking of any kind.