Slashdot Mirror


Options for 'Fixing' A Pirated Copy of Windows

PunkOfLinux writes "My parents are running a pirated copy of windows that my mom received from a teacher at school. My parents want to go legit, and buy a copy of Windows, but they are afraid of deleting everything and having to reinstall all their programs. Seeing as I know you guys will have an answer, I'm going to ask you: What would you do in this situation?"

601 comments

  1. First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would post as anonymous coward...

    1. Re:First of all... by caluml · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, congratulations! You seem to have passed the first step successfully!

    2. Re:First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah funny - and as usual, doesn't answer the question. I don't know why anyone bothers to post a question around here since everyone is a wannabe comedian - 85% of the answer are irrelevant and 5% are just stupid. FINDING the relevant 5% is impossible. At least you didn't say 'First'.

      And plenty of posts actually managed to answer this question for a change, so I won't repeat the answer here.

    3. Re:First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asshole...

    4. Re:First of all... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      really all you have to do to find the right aNSWER is to change you setting to give a high valuation to posts marked as troll, overrated and flaim.\

      Then you only have to navigate thru some bullshit.

  2. Call microsoft by Data+Link+Layer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Call their help support line and you can buy a copy from them. They will tell you how to replace the cd-key, if they can't you can download a cd-key changer from the internet.

    1. Re:Call microsoft by phoebus1553 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Microsoft actually makes a key change tool, although I'm sure it obeys some restrictions while the ones from don't. If you've ever had to deal with the volume licensing support folks, they can occasionally be real people and give you all sorts of tricks and such to make your life easier when dealing with license compliance.

      --
      ----- - The beatings will continue until morale improves
    2. Re:Call microsoft by poolmeister · · Score: 1

      "you can download a cd-key changer from the internet"

      Or you could THIS

      --
      CN=poolmeister.OU=lurkers.CN=slashdot
    3. Re:Call microsoft by Aeomer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Be very careful when downloading key changes - Most if not all contain some kind of malware. Even ones you think you can trust (and there were a few) are loaded up with malware, spyware, viri, trojans etc etc and then re-released. Go with the MS one. In-fact it can be run from the command line and is already built into Windows XP since before even SP1 was available. It's msoobe - and oh yes, there are malware apps that pretend to be msoobe ;-(

    4. Re:Call microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, the Microsoft 'KeyChangeTool' is quite leaps and bounds ahead of any ... third-party ... key changing tools. The Microsoft tool has the ability to transform a Corporate install into a Professional Non-Corporate install. No key changers can do this.

      If you try any of the registry tricks to 'update' your product key, Windows XP Professional Corporate's Activation Wizard will not accept a non-corporate key. The non-Microsoft key changers I ever saw couldn't get around this because there are very specific differences (file based) between corporate and non-corporate versions of Windows.

      In any case, my recommendation to poster is to do what I did: Run the WGA tool, click the link to buy a license online, buy the license, and use the MS keychanger. Takes about 5-10 minutes overall, and you get the creamy goodness of running your very own legit copy of Windows XP.

    5. Re:Call microsoft by ameoba · · Score: 1

      This only adresses the pirated copy of Windows, not the other half-dozen applications that were probably included as a 'bonus'.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    6. Re:Call microsoft by jfelix1010 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Microsoft 'KeyChangeTool' is quite leaps and bounds ahead of any ... third-party ... key changing tools. The Microsoft tool has the ability to transform a Corporate install into a Professional Non-Corporate install. No key changers can do this.

      Why would I want to do this? I'm not necessarily disagreeing with your advice overall, but you make it sound as if changing a corporate install without activation to a non-corp install with activation is actually a good thing.

    7. Re:Call microsoft by ePhil_One · · Score: 1
      but you make it sound as if changing a corporate install without activation to a non-corp install with activation is actually a good thing.

      Because Mom isn't likely to buy the 10 licenses of Windows XP needed to get a corporate key? If she wants to go legit, she'll want a standard single user copy.

      You can argue the benefits of illegally running an unlicensed copy of software is outside the scope of the question.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    8. Re:Call microsoft by penguinstorm · · Score: 1

      Creamy goodness?

      You're obviously running a different Windows XP than I am.

      --
      Skot Nelson music is my saviour / i was maimed by rock and roll
  3. Reinstall by saroth2 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    All you have to do is reinstall.

    1. Re:Reinstall by SpzToid · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not true! You've got the OEM installer that can ONLY wipe out anything pre-existing, and the much more expensive RETAIL installer, which is also capable of upgrading an existing instllation. I learned this the hard way. Everyone in town had an OEM copy of XP home, for about 110 euros a licence. But only 1 or 2 had a RETAIL version, and the price was about 290 euros, which I begrudgingly paid to satisfy a client urgent requirement's, (and then became a more vocal Debian & SuSE advocate). From a business model perspective, what brilliance in making the OEM widely available at such low-cost, while not making it terribly obvious as the this hidden (or not obvious) upgrade 'feature' of RETAIL.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    2. Re:Reinstall by atroc · · Score: 0

      He said he didn't want to go through the trouble of reinstalling.

      --
      Friendly fire isn't!
    3. Re:Reinstall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true! You've got the OEM installer that can ONLY wipe out anything pre-existing
       
      Nonsense. I've used OEM install disks to re-install a legal copy over pirated non-OEM windows installs. Works fine, you don't lose any settings or anything.

    4. Re:Reinstall by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative

      If the dealers are selling the OEM version without any hardware, this would still be an illegal copy. The OEM pricing is set to be lower for computer makers, and is not to be sold without hardware.

      However the 290euros is also a bit high. You should be able to buy a 'upgrade' version instead of a 'full' version. They are the same, but one requires the machine to have had a version of Windows installed on it before or the CD to prove you own it. (There are two types of 'retail' versions in other words, and most people only need the upgrade version which is about the same price as the OEM version give or take 10-15 Euro.)

      Stay way from people selling OEM copies of any company's software unless they are also keeping to the licensing rules and selling it with a new computer or qualifying hardware. The Windows OEM license used to allow it to be purchased if the end user was buying a new hard drive etc.

      If they are just selling the OEM software, with most companies this is illegal and would not help in getting your copy to be legitimate. This is also why OEM software often requires a clean install and will not 'upgrade' as it is not ever to be sold in a circumstance to upgrade anything.

    5. Re:Reinstall by kgruscho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Depends on which OEM... the OEM disks are occasionally quite restrictive, in other cases they are close to the retail version..

      Using a program called nlite to redo your disc still solve many problems

    6. Re:Reinstall by SpzToid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, this is also true. Thank you for the additional clarification. Still, I was struck by how common, practically unavoidable it was, to buy OEM versions on my local-dealer-research/purchase day (as I described earlier), and how difficult and expensive it was to buy a retail (full) version. And what buying the inexpensive version *really* meant, (i.e. it would wipe any existing installation, and probably cause difficulty in getting it exchanged for a more capable, expensive version later). M$ certainly doesn't put much effort in clarifying the situation for the consumer's, here in Amsterdam, the nation's capitol. It's like M$ assumes (and to a certain extent dictates) that everyone purchases an OEM version aspart of a PC upgrade, acting just like it was a business model or something.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    7. Re:Reinstall by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Hum, not in my case. I did install a number of XP Pro OEM discs both "old" and SP2 without wiping anything at all; you don't have to install to C:\WINDOWS - or even to C:\ at all for that matter. It's hardly elegant (you've still got to take ownership of and manually remove/backup all the orphaned user profiles and such) but it won't "wipe out anything pre-existing" either. Nothing will get lost and if you're lucky most apps will still be running fine without reinstallation. Well, it's good enough for me anyway, but I'm not a business.

    8. Re:Reinstall by hey! · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure of the accuracy of what you say, but IIRC you're saying that they have to pay more for the boxed retail.

      The thing is, if you really want to be legit, you have to buy retail.

      That's what proprietary software is: you don't buy software you buy rights to do certain, carefully spelled out things with the software, which remains the vendor's property.

      So, you may think that charging more for a retail license is unfair because the software inquestion is just the same as the OEM liceense, but technically you're wrong. The Retail license gives you more rights, including the right to do exactly what this person is asking. More rights == more value. Paying for less rights than you intend to exercise doesn't make you "legit".

      Personally, if the folks are really paranoid about bad things happening due to the upgrade, I'd offer this as the simplest and safest route to legitimacy: buy a new computer, install your apps, transfer your data over, put a fresh battery in the old mobo, make sure it boots, then shut the old computer off and put it some place safe.

      The reason is this: if a backup is not safe enough for you, if you aren't confident in your ability to recover the old data, then you'd better avoid mucking with the old computer at all.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:Reinstall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If the dealers are selling the OEM version without any hardware, this would still be an illegal copy. The OEM pricing is set to be lower for computer makers, and is not to be sold without hardware."

      Well thats just plain and simple, not true. My school (along with many other schools) offer the OEM version of Windows XP SP2 for $5(USD) by itself. That's right, $5. They have a deal with Microsoft to do so, and every student is allowed 1 copy of the software for $5. The software says "OEM" right on it and its understood that you aren't a manufacturer at the time of purchase. They also did this with Office and some other software.

    10. Re:Reinstall by advs89 · · Score: 0
      If the dealers are selling the OEM version without any hardware, this would still be an illegal copy. The OEM pricing is set to be lower for computer makers, and is not to be sold without hardware.

      Exactly... which is why you sell it with a $5 keyboard.
      --
      Rirelobql xabjf gung EBG-13 vf gur yrnfg frpher rapelcgvba rire, ohg jbhyq lbh jnfgr lbhe gvzr npghnyyl qrpelcgvat vg???
    11. Re:Reinstall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have installed Windows XP Home Upgrade using Windows XP Corp. as the cd to prove I had a "previous" verson of Windows. Worked just fine.

    12. Re:Reinstall by musther · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm, you can't just go and buy the upgrade because it's cheaper! The upgrade is for people who have earlier versions of windows, legally. There are limits on the versions which qualify, maybe 95, 98, ME, 2000 etc. If you don't own a legal version of one of these OS's you can't just buy the upgrade of XP as you won't satisfy the license and it will still be illegal, there's no point then.

      I'm often asked to do things to PC's which turn out to be running a pirated XP. When I tell the owners they usually say something like 'so what'. If I tell them I won't work on an illegal version they think about buying, see the price and make odd noises.

      Come on people, if you can't stand the price, use FLOSS for god's sake.

    13. Re:Reinstall by kimvette · · Score: 1

      It depends. Did you get that OEM Windows from a big-box vendor like Dell, Compaq/HP, etc. or did you get the whitebox OEM? The whitebox OEM is very similar to retail, with the major difference being a slightly different key algoritm and it comes with the system builder components to put Windows into audit mode for customizing the desktop prior to shipment. The big-box vendors OEMs can sometimes be totally different and include items such as spyware preinstalled for your "convenience" (why do you think Dells are so inexpensive?), custom media players, and "value added" trinkets to suck up your system resources.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    14. Re:Reinstall by Spokehedz · · Score: 1
      If the dealers are selling the OEM version without any hardware, this would still be an illegal copy. The OEM pricing is set to be lower for computer makers, and is not to be sold without hardware.

      Sort of... The reseller license says that it has to be sold with hardware--Microsoft Hardware.

      So buy a $5 Microsoft mouse and the 'issue' is taken care of. Simple. We used to do it all the time at my last job. And we were told by the local Microsoft rep that this was perfectly acceptable.
    15. Re:Reinstall by jtev · · Score: 1

      if you have XP installed on the system (legit or not) you can upgrade it to the same version of XP. As long as you don't wipe the hard drive outside of the install process, you can reinstall to your hearts content. You can even do the same type of upgrade as you would do from a previous version, and not lose drivers or programs. I've done this with a legit OEM licence, because I fubared the system, but the licence key was lost.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    16. Re:Reinstall by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      In Europe and the UK, a contract cannot take away any rights given to you by the Law of the Land. The Doctrine of Exhaustion of Rights allows you to transfer software to another computer you own, or to sell it {of course, any copy you retain begins infringing copyright immediately after you sell the original}. Even if an EULA formed a legally-binding contract {which it evidently doesn't} it couldn't take away your statutory rights.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    17. Re:Reinstall by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you have the "name brand disk image compressed into .zip files" OEM CD, then yes, you're right. But you only get that if you have one of a few specific name brands to begin with, which probably means you've got a legit copy of Windows. Hence, it wouldn't apply to this situation.

      If you've got the OEM from Microsoft version, which is what any Mom & Pop store gets, and is also included with Acer, some Dells, and I'm sure a couple of others, then you can do a repair install, upgrade install, or just reinstall overtop. The repair install is what you'd need to do for this situation.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    18. Re:Reinstall by Propaganda13 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They don't want to reinstall because they're don't want to reinstall their pirated copy of Office.

    19. Re:Reinstall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, no. It now says (after Sept. 2005) that you have to buy a complete system:

      http://blogs.msdn.com/mssmallbiz/archive/2005/06/0 6/425681.aspx

      (second half of the answer to question 1)

    20. Re:Reinstall by bhiestand · · Score: 1
      nd what buying the inexpensive version *really* meant, (i.e. it would wipe any existing installation, and probably cause difficulty in getting it exchanged for a more capable, expensive version later). M$ certainly doesn't put much effort in clarifying the situation for the consumer's, here in Amsterdam, the nation's capitol.

      I'm really not sure what you're ranting about. Microsoft's base OEM install CD is identical in functionality to a retail version. OEM stands for Original Equipment Manufacturer. The OEM, the company you buy the computer from, then customizes their own OEM Windows install CDs to make the customers feel like it's special. Or to screw the customers over. They slipstream nifty things in there, like all of the drivers for your hardware, and put their own interface on the install. Sometimes they disable things like repairing and replace them with things like "format and restore original install", but that has absolutely nothing to do with Microsoft.

      An original Microsoft "not for retail sale" OEM CD has the exact same functionality as a retail CD. I've used them to do full repairs, full reinstalls over existing installations without formatting, and command line repairs from the recovery console. A Sony/Dell/HP/Compaq "OEM Windows Installer/System Recovery" CD may or may not.
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    21. Re:Reinstall by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      But you only get that if you have one of a few specific name brands to begin with, which probably means you've got a legit copy of Windows. Hence, it wouldn't apply to this situation.
      or the whole reason they are on corp is the first place is frustration with the crappy big brand oem installation media.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    22. Re:Reinstall by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The thing is, if you really want to be legit, you have to buy retail.
      but people don't really wan't to be legit, they just wan't to do enough to convince enforcement (whether human or automated) that a machine is legit.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    23. Re:Reinstall by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      In Amsterdam, there's mix of retail shops scattered across town, and on one street is a cluster. On the day I need to get the machine setup I visited most of them trying to buy a 'full' version with which to 'upgrade'. I also checked online and saw similar stuff as the shops.

      I had built a new machine from parts ordered online for my friend/client. He had an older machine, and I'd copied over the prior installation from a backup, but I had to 'upgrade' Windows in order to install new drivers. I used the disk he had (OEM) and it would only do a fresh install, wiping any existing Windows system away. (as I recall).

      All over town I could find OEM versions of XP home, sold without hardware (wink wink, nudge nudge; no one 'enforced' this, or cared in the slightest and these stores are as 'consumer-level' as you can get). What I remember was I could not find an 'installer' (a version of windows that would upgrade the existing system, and provide the ability to insert appropriate drivers so the system will work on the new hardware). My only option that I could see, was to spend 290 euros for a full retail version. This was all I could find that wouldn't wipe out the existing system (and I was careful to ask the dealers who sold this stuff all the time).

      To be clear, these windows versions are labelled OEM, or RETAIL. And the nomenclature/function seems to be understood well among these local dealers.

      If I had to do it all over again, I'd probably first look at Acronis backup software, which works really well. I notice they now offer a 'universal restore driver' option. It inserts universal-enough drivers upon restoration of a backup, so that the system will boot up on new hardware.

      Of course, if I had to do it all over again, I'd have all the splendid notes everyone has left too. :-)

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    24. Re:Reinstall by HermMunster · · Score: 1

      There is some misrepresentation going on here about oem versions of windows. Before I clarify, let me just bring up a couple of facts.

      Windows is just a program.

      Microsoft holds no special legal or commercial position that other sofware makes don't hold.

      The OEM agreement is just an agreement. You should bide by it.

      The OEM agreement doesn't tie the software to the hardware. It ties Windows to your motherboard.

      Ok, so you have some facts. What does this mean?

      1) You install that on a computer, say an older one, and it is contractually tied to that motherboard. Even if you bought it with a NIC or a HDD or some RAM, it is still tied to your mobo. In doing so you agree that if the mobo goes out you will replace the copy of windows, even if the software is line for line the same computer program (windows, that is).

      2) You are required to attach the sticker to the side of the case in an easily visible position as per the requirements of Microsoft. That sticker cannot be removed or moved to a new case. Once you apply that sticker, if you choose to replace the case you must replace your license because it is not legal to pull the sticker from the case.

      3) The reason the license is tied to your mobo is because Microsoft feels that if you replace your mobo, the company that sold you the license, which now becomes the support group, cannot, according to Microsoft, adequately support something that important that you didn't sell. Essentially, it is one of support.

      The situation with the case and sticker are just arbitrary. Microsoft does not want to loose out on sales and requiring a new copy guarantees them a sale, that is, if you wish to remain legal.

      Most of the OEM particulars were fleshed out with royal OEMs. These are the likes of Dell, HP, Sony, etc. These companies were looking for a way to guarantee that you, if you were a purchaser of their computers, would have to go back to them for replacement parts. Microsoft was happy to comply as long as those company stringently complied by forcing you to replace your copy of Windows.

      These people are the ones that set/agreed to the requirements for the OEM license which then was carried down, because there was no real representation for all the small systems integrators. Basically, we all have to agree and systems integrators weren't represented.

      You can understand this if you carefully think about that idea of the sticker and the mobo requirements, and then think about the royal OEMs. It will become quite clear.

      Some advice:

      Buy a retail copy. That isn't tied to the mobo.

      If you buy OEM stick the sticker to a piece of plastic, clear plastic, and then attach that to the case instead of affixing it directly to the material that makes up the case. As long as it is properly placed and attached they can't complain.

      If you had a legal copy prior to putting the illegal software on your computer just buy an upgrade. There's no reason to buy the full version.

      Also, remember that Microsoft is a monopoly. They make huge sums of money every quarter. Some poor family that doesn't have alot of disposable income isn't going to be sued nor pursued by Microsoft as long as you don't start mass distributing it.

      Finally, Vista is just a buggy XP with a newer interface and higher requirements centered on DRM.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    25. Re:Reinstall by bumptehjambox · · Score: 1
      Are you going to teach them how to use all of this FLOSS? are you going to be on-call 24/7 to walkthrough the tons of issues they can't handle figuring out for themselves on google? are you going to install their freaking drivers?! ...In reality, I believe you're not even going to make that suggestion, because they won't know what the hell you're talking about. They don't care enough about unenforced law to relearn a new OS, and not have a chance of using any applications they're comfortable with. So, if it has no bearing in this situation, why would you lecture people on Slashdot about this? You're preachin to the choir boy.

      Unless MS is sending me a check for everyone I 'convert'- I honestly could not care less. Its not my duty. They're grown-ups, they can make their own decisions. On top of that, if someone knows Windows enough to navigate and install programs, I feel lucky. I'm not gonna ruin that by sending them head first into the uncharted territory of open source, and giving them nothing but smug responses. If they are on a pirated Windows version, well, its no fault of mine. Should I feel like making a citizen's arrest and losing a client? Maybe. But, I dont. For all intents and purposes its out of my 'jurisdiction'

      *In response to the question,* I say, get Windows on eBay because its about $40 cheaper than retail. One could also suggest waiting for Vista and not buying XP, but I wouldn't.

    26. Re:Reinstall by Jezebeau · · Score: 1

      There's a neat trick to the 'upgrade' versions of Windows. The installation of an older version of Windows doesn't have to have been completed, as I found out when I couldn't find the key after doing a reformat. I installed '98, but couldn't find the key for that either. Despite the fact that I couldn't get into '98, I was allowed to install an upgrade to XP and use the upgrade key.

    27. Re:Reinstall by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1
      or the whole reason they are on corp is the first place is frustration with the crappy big brand oem installation media.
      In which case, they don't need to "go legit", because they already are.
      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    28. Re:Reinstall by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      Having spent a bit of time in Amsterdam and also a lot of time in Belgium - I truly understand what you have experienced.

      Most of the shops I encountered were not always 'well' informed themselves, let alone able to convey information to their customers. Of course there were several shops that 'did' get it, but it was not the 'common' knowledge with the average computer tech let alone the buyer.

      For the majority of my friends, I ended up just finding them a good contact that was an IT professional (like at EDS, etc), and let that person help them.

      To this day, your best bet for information is going sadly going to be to cross reference what any shop tells you with what you can lookup online. But this is true of everywhere.

      The large 'mass consumer' american stores over here can help consumers because in the large store settings, you usually can find at least on nerd that knows what they are doing, even if they are another customer.

      (You could always head over to Wal-Mart in Germany) :)

    29. Re:Reinstall by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      Well thats just plain and simple, not true. My school (along with many other schools) offer the OEM version of Windows XP SP2 for $5(USD) by itself. That's right, $5. They have a deal with Microsoft to do so, and every student is allowed 1 copy of the software for $5. The software says "OEM" right on it and its understood that you aren't a manufacturer at the time of purchase. They also did this with Office and some other software.


      Ok, it is VERY possible what you say is true, as MS does work with educational systems to provide offers like this. In an instance like this MS could drop a bunch of any 'packaging' of Windows, and modify the license for your special circumstance.

      However, having worked in the OEM world for a long time. If you are a business and 'selling' an OEM copy of Windows without hardware, you are breaking the License and the Law. PERIOD.

      The Upgrade version of Windows is about the same price, so there is often little need for businesses to do this, unless the people are building new computer themselves, then it used to be that you could sell the customer a Hard Drive and the OEM copy of Windows to meet the hardware qualifications.

    30. Re:Reinstall by jtev · · Score: 1

      True that it wouldn't "get you legit" but it would make it where WGA wouldn't lock the computer up anymore, wich is the technical problem.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
  4. Change your product key by complete+loony · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    1. Re:Change your product key by NixLuver · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the article you linked to, on Microsoft's KB (Do they still call it technet?):

      "Warning The steps in the article are effective only on Volume License media. If you try these steps on OEM media or on retail media, you will not change the product key."

      AFAIK, this will only work with another volume licensed key. I occasionally have to install windows to test something for one of my moonlighting clients, and no, I don't buy a discrete license for a machine that's only going to have my copy of XP on it for two hours; I've been around the particular treadmill described here. (I own a "legit" XP license for my virtual PC instance; and I rarely start it up, so usually I'm not in violation anyway - one license, one running instance. *shrug*).

      But if the author of the parent post buys his parents a licensed copy of XP from a vendor, it won't be volume licensed, and this trick may not work.

    2. Re:Change your product key by toochoos · · Score: 1

      Yes. I am in the exact same situation.
      I bought a used laptop on ebay (an IBM T40 for the curious), which comes with its legitimate licence sticker.
      But, for some reason, the previous owner has reinstalled XP with a googled serial number.
      I tried to change the key using Microsoft's KB instructions, but it didn't work. Nor with several "tools".
      So, I am definitely stuck or does a solution exist?

      --
      Sorry for me spell bad, not a native but I'll do my best
    3. Re:Change your product key by lightning_queen · · Score: 0

      Figure out what version of Windows that key's for (SP1, SP2, corporate, etc; one way to help narrow it down is to figure out what year that model came out) and get a CD of that version. It'll probably take a little work and digging, but it could work.

      By the sound of your "situation," the laptop's running SP2, so your key is for SP1 (I've had that same problem before).

      Other than that, it'd probably be easier/better to get a legit copy of an OS (if you don't want to shell out a bunch of money, give Linux a try) and stick it on there.

    4. Re:Change your product key by Badfysh · · Score: 1

      As I remember, IBM started using restore partitions instead of supplying CD's, you should check to see if your laptop has one. Don't forget it will be hidden. If it does have one, you could just do a restore.

      --

      I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

    5. Re:Change your product key by toochoos · · Score: 1

      Yes, the restore partition exists, but I don't want to waste three full days of work to restore it properly (I got a complex installation of MSVC + Ocaml + LablGL + LablGTK + some Unix utilities compiled for Win32 but without MinGW which is incompatible with MSVC, etc.). I include also one full day to update properly an old XP and an old (legit) Office 2K...
      For the other reply, it's my only Win32 machine sitting around *nixes... and I dream could just apt-get dist-upgrade this f*ing Windows.

      --
      Sorry for me spell bad, not a native but I'll do my best
    6. Re:Change your product key by ah81 · · Score: 1
      Do they still call it technet?


      technet is oldschool. It was called Technet .Net, but now its called Technet Live..
    7. Re:Change your product key by NixLuver · · Score: 0

      Heh. Well, I got my MCSE in 1997. By 2000 my duties migrated out the Windows component; that's why it's "oldschool" for me. I've not had to do windows professionally for six or seven years. It's only been six months since I got rid of my last windows box at home, though.

    8. Re:Change your product key by Badfysh · · Score: 1

      I think you will have problems then, because I believe your COA number will be within a block of OEM numbers issued to IBM by MS. This means that your COA will only work with an IBM supplied XP CD. Here's the fun part - there are none, there are only restore disks as far as I know.

      --

      I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

    9. Re:Change your product key by ah81 · · Score: 1

      ahh.. actually, it was a joke.. I have no interest in this Microsoft shit either, but if you noticed a while back they renamed almost everything they had to "$product_name .Net", and now they seem to have dropped that, and everything is "$product_name Live!".. it makes me laugh..

    10. Re:Change your product key by toochoos · · Score: 1

      Thanks... It's exactly it. I didn't spend too much time of this, but thanks to Microsoft's KeyUpdateTool, I could change my license number. But... now I need to activate it, which fails because this number is supposed to be pre-activated! I love copy protections.

      --
      Sorry for me spell bad, not a native but I'll do my best
  5. Buy a copy of windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    and just use this tool

    http://download.microsoft.com/download/e/9/c/e9c73 b60-bff1-4f03-b06f-d3cbe8f8d9f4/KeyUpdateTool.exe

    enter in your new key, reboot and you are legit

    1. Re:Buy a copy of windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is it just me, or does that application SERIOUSLY lack nice MIDI music?

    2. Re:Buy a copy of windows by XMyth · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Haha, funniest comment I've read on /. in a while.

    3. Re:Buy a copy of windows by Oscar_Wilde · · Score: 1

      Okay, at the risk of showing my ignorance, why is this funny? Do such programs normally have a soundtrack?

    4. Re:Buy a copy of windows by rivetgeek · · Score: 5, Informative

      You've obviously not pirated much. Most program cracks and keygens are, for some inexplicable reason, created with obnoxious midi loops that auto play when you run them.

    5. Re:Buy a copy of windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a "tradition" dating back to late '80s / early '90s, when crackers (back then mostly on Amiga and to lesser extent, Atari) routinely added colourful "crack intros" to every game they released, complete with simple demo effects, text scroller and catchy music.

    6. Re:Buy a copy of windows by kennygraham · · Score: 2, Informative
      Do such programs normally have a soundtrack?

      CD key generators by several popular groups tend to have midi files that repeat over and over again. Some are supprisingly nice.

    7. Re:Buy a copy of windows by Duke+Blazingstix · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised by the amount of complete misinformation being spread around here.

      The above tool: http://download.microsoft.com/download/e/9/c/e9c73 b60-bff1-4f03-b06f-d3cbe8f8d9f4/KeyUpdateTool.exe (also found, with instructions: http://www.microsoft.com/genuine/purchase/UpdateIn structions.aspx ) is all you need to legitimize your copy of windows. I've used it a number of times on a number of machines, and it WILL convert a VLK (volume License Key, or Corporate) to OEM, and I assume it should do the same for a Retail key. No reinstalls, no loss of data, no fuss, no mess. You are Legit.

      The only thing I don't know is if it will go from a Professional VLK to a Home OEM. But in all practicallity, I'm sure you can find a Professional OEM key for under $100, at any number of hole-in-the-wall computer places.

      As for why they want to do it, who cares. Maybe they have no personal antithapy towards Microsoft. Maybe they want to be able to use Windows Update, or be able to download IE7, or Windows Defender? Maybe they want the warm fuzzies from not stealing? I don't care, I just know it's a dirt-simple thing to accomplish.

    8. Re:Buy a copy of windows by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      Depeche mode MIDI megamix rulin' da nation ^^

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    9. Re:Buy a copy of windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Usually they are mods/s3m, or similar format. But, yeah - MIDI is close enough. :)

    10. Re:Buy a copy of windows by Spokehedz · · Score: 4, Informative

      They are not MIDI loops, they are MOD/C64 Music--as a nod to the demo programmers of decades past.

    11. Re:Buy a copy of windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MIDI? That's odd. They sound more like mod chiptunes to me. I wonder what format most are in.

    12. Re:Buy a copy of windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    13. Re:Buy a copy of windows by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      MOD comes from Amiga, not c64. Right company. Wrong decade.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    14. Re:Buy a copy of windows by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think he meant MODs or C64 music. The "C64 music," was SID files, cleverly named after the SID chip. IIRC, the later SID players supported lyrics complete with a little bouncing ball, and I vaguely remember downloading these files from Q-Link back in my early double digits.

      Anyway, MODs came out in 1987, which is the same decade as 1982 -- the year the C64 was released.

    15. Re:Buy a copy of windows by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      When you're 11 years old, it seems cool to do that crap.

      I know when I was 11, the coolest thing I could think of to do with my newly purchased copy of Borland Turbo C++ was to write a hex editor that played MOD files. That, and all the letters were lowercase and the text on the splash screen blinked. It was 1337.

      When you grow up, you can actually afford to buy your games and software (most of it anyway), so you have no need to be a cracker anymore. Thus the lack of hacks written by people old enough to realize that making any old app play bad music isn't cool.

    16. Re:Buy a copy of windows by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Ouch, you're two for two. I misread and I misremembered. Tehsux.

      I concede, sir, that you are correct on the latter point, and almost certainly on the former (though as I'm not the original poster, I can't be sure, your reading makes more sense than does my own.)

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    17. Re:Buy a copy of windows by ameoba · · Score: 2, Informative

      It predates this and goes back to 8-bit machines, such as the Commodore 64. The sound hardware of the C=64, the SID chip, with both it's limitations and unheard of features (it was only 3 voices and could only do a few basic digital waveforms but it also had analog filters and flexible voice arpegiation), is the basis of the "chip tune" style of music that is still very much popular in the Demo Scene.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    18. Re:Buy a copy of windows by eggsome · · Score: 1

      I got the fright of my life a few years ago, I was physically re-arranging a server in a spaghetti tangled mess that originally would have been called a rack. For various reasons it had to be left on and connected to the network.
      So there I am, delicately trying to move cables about when suddenly *BLAH BLAH BLEEDI BLUU BLAH* blasts out of the speaker next to my ear - one of the admins had remoted in and launched some kind of crack. Didn't know what to think for the microsecond before my brain recognized the sound...

      --
      If they made a movie of your life, would anybody buy a ticket?
    19. Re:Buy a copy of windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you realy want to report accurate info about the demo scene:

      Those sound loops come from FastTracker and FastTracker2 (FT2 is now free !), their file extensions are respectively ".mod" and ".xm".

      Those kind of file are called "modules" (.mod => module, .xm => extended module).

      The best way to play them now is with the BASS winamp input plugin

      If you want to try this out, download modules from all Class Rips by maktone....

      To be fair, of course there's a big C64 demo scene with C64 sound loops (.sid files), but you don't actualy find them bundled in PC warez.

  6. This is Microsoft, just call us by TrekCycling · · Score: 1

    We'll handle it from here, crimin.., I mean Sir. Just call us. Nothing to worry about.

    Seriously, though, I would think one big problem is that to to get legal you're Windows install is going to have to send a new registration message off to Microsoft. Not sure how you do that without a reinstall.

    Maybe if they're on XP Home, buy them an OEM version of XP Pro?

    1. Re:This is Microsoft, just call us by TrekCycling · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Whoop, there you go up above. You can change the key. That's what I get for being a Linux user and out of the loop.

    2. Re:This is Microsoft, just call us by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      Not to point out the obvious, or anything, but you can call Microsoft if you want to register your version of windows. They provided this option for the first version of XP because not everyone had internet access back then. If you're hell-bent on getting a legit version, then call them up and ask if you can register/activate your copy of Windows.

      --
      SRSLY.
  7. If they want it, just buy it by grondin · · Score: 1

    Once they own the license, what does MS care where the original came from? Don't install the Genuine Advantage malware though!

    1. Re:If they want it, just buy it by JayLP · · Score: 1

      I don't understand, what's the big issue with Genuine Advantage? And how do you avoid installing it, and still get updates from M$?

    2. Re:If they want it, just buy it by lightning_queen · · Score: 1

      There's a WGA notification thing. I think that's what he's referring to. If the program detects the copy of Windows isn't legit (which it's been known to do on legit copies as well), then it does things like keeping you from logging in for a certain length of time and adds constant little popups saying "your copy of Windows may be pirated! Get legal now!" It's insanely annoying, but it's not required to get other updates.

    3. Re:If they want it, just buy it by JayLP · · Score: 1

      Ahh okay. I had an old oem installed when I first bought my system, but had a crash.. didn't have the $$$ to cough up for a legit copy, and installed what I was informed was a 'corporate' cd... this worked fine up until i installed the WGA... then it wouldn't let me update at all... So I just never bothered... my problem for using 'unlicensed' s/w. Anyway long story short, I have a legit install now, and everything works great (cept for windows still not seeing 40Gb of my 200Gb(186) drive.. but, it was a piece of cake to install XP pro w/ sp2 over the 'pirated version', and WGA notifications aren't a problem for me. I didn't even have to go through half the troubles some of these poor sods have.

  8. TweakXP by Tinfoil · · Score: 5, Informative

    TweakXP should do that for ya. Buy a new copy and key the serial number you get over the old one. Unless, of course, your parents have a volume license copy right now, and they buy a home version. Then you have to do a repair install.

    http://www.tweakxp.com/tweakutility/

    1. Re:TweakXP by vishbar · · Score: 1
      Buy a new copy...
      Doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of piracy in the first place?
      --
      Ride the skies
    2. Re:TweakXP by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      What part of "My parents want to go legit, and buy a copy of Windows" don't you understand?

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    3. Re:TweakXP by Tinfoil · · Score: 1

      Wise guy, eh? /stooges.

    4. Re:TweakXP by Nakarti · · Score: 1

      That's the other trick I was trying to remember: Upgrade install to Windows XP Home

      Upgrade there should be "Upgrade" as its probably upgrading from XP Professional Enterprise/Corporate Edition

      PS. Slashcode hacks are drug addicts or something because the hash word is opiate more often than not.

    5. Re:TweakXP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The logic in it?

  9. Why bother? by DbZeroOne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are they losing sleep at night feeling like they're taking food out of the mouths of those in Redmond? Do they think their system will run better? Perhaps they feel it's a sin because technically it's stealing? My advice... don't even bother with it. Buy Vista if and when it's released or wait until you get a new computer.

    1. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they feel it's a sin because technically it's stealing?

      It's nothing of the sort. It's copyright infringement. This is a totally different offence to theft and is not similar in any way beyond the fact that you are possessing something to which you are not entitled.

    2. Re:Why bother? by kripkenstein · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More specifically: why now? Is it just because the WGA notice started popping up? I'm curious.

    3. Re:Why bother? by pilkul · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's not *technically* stealing - it IS stealing, and it makes you a criminal. The law is not at all ambiguous in regards to this.

      Oh is it? Show me a passage in any lawbook that equates copyright infringement with theft.

      Also, in many jurisdictions copyright infringement is a tort, not a crime.

    4. Re:Why bother? by neo8750 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Do they think their system will run better?
      I think that it makes a difference. My friend had a AMD 2200 and had a gig of ram. His system ran fine and dandy till the wga started popping up. Once it started showing up his system slowed to a slow crawl. (Once he applied a wga fix it was up and running just like before the wga ever showed its face) My copy is legit so i couldn't compare results on my system. Did any one else have a problems like this just out of curiosity?
    5. Re:Why bother? by multisync · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they might want to run updates?

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    6. Re:Why bother? by cliffski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see, so as microsoft have made a lot of money, that means its ok to pirate their software? Google have made lots of cash too, is it ok if i use click fraud to screw up adwords?
      These people are obviously happy with their OS, as they want to stick with it, I dont understand why you think they shouldnt pay for a product they clearly use probably every day, or is this just normal slashdot microsoft bashing?
      What is it about products that can be encoded digitally that some people think that their creators dont need to eat?

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    7. Re:Why bother? by cliffski · · Score: 1

      both of them sound wrong to me. And what the fck was a teacher thinking handing out pirated software. Great life lesson there, especially as a warning for all the computer science students who will grow up to see their work copied and dished out for free.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    8. Re:Why bother? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      'Cause they're parents, and they're...you know...older people with morals? And enough money that they're not forced to save $150 or so for tuition or booze?

    9. Re:Why bother? by Bogtha · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I see, so as microsoft have made a lot of money, that means its ok to pirate their software?

      Actually, yes, that's a perfectly valid distinction to make. Copyright exists to promote the creation of new works, by subsidising creators. Over the years, it's become cheaper and easier to create, but copyright holders have been getting more and more protection. The result is that a lot of copyright holders are earning far more than is necessary for them to create new works.

      In these cases, copyright has lost its purpose for existing, and therefore it's reasonable to hold the position that infringing on copyrights where the copyright holder has already earned lots of money is acceptable, while still respecting the copyrights of those that do not make lots of money. Think of it as compensating for the way copyright has been twisted out of all proportion.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    10. Re:Why bother? by cliffski · · Score: 3, Informative

      interesting idea. So is it just you and your friends who get to take the product for free under this system, whilst laughing at the poor schmucks who paid for it and made your actions possible?
      You seem to be arguing in favour of a change in copyright terms, or higher corporate taxes. But rather than lobby for change, you've decided just to take stuff without paying.
      Interesting.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    11. Re:Why bother? by Dausha · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Oh is it? Show me a passage in any lawbook that equates copyright infringement with theft."

      17 U.S.C.A. 506(a) - Criminal infringement of copyright - Any person who willfully infringes a copyright shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, if the infringement was committed for commercial gain, of copyrighted works up to $1000, OR making available a work in production (including movies, music and software) on a computer network against the copyright holder's wishes. There are a total of four criminal offenses under this section.

      18 U.S.C.A. 2319 - Criminal infringement of a copyright - Sets out that you can be imprisoned for up to ten years, depending on the natureof the infrignement.

      So, while there are civil remedies to copyright infringement, there is also the bite of criminal penalties.

      "Also, in many jurisdictions copyright infringement is a tort, not a crime."

      Except in the United States, where there is really only one jurisdiction that matters. The Federal copyright law preempts all state laws by virtue of the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution.

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    12. Re:Why bother? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      So is it just you and your friends who get to take the product for free under this system, whilst laughing at the poor schmucks who paid for it and made your actions possible?

      How is that different to the "poor schmucks" who pay for something during the copyright terms before it falls into the public domain? It has always been the case that some people pay for copyrighted works while others get it for free, going back all the way to the Statute of Anne. This isn't some kind of special advantage infringers are getting, it's been a fundamental concept of copyright since day one.

      All I'm doing is pointing out that it's rational to consider that making a shitload of money is just as significant — if not more significant — a point at which to consider copyright's purpose to be fulfilled as an arbitrary number of years passing.

      What do I and my friends have to do with it? Are you one of those people who cannot consider any opinion short of "copyright is perfect" or "copyright is property" as anything other than an excuse? No room for valid disagreements with copyright?

      You seem to be arguing in favour of a change in copyright terms, or higher corporate taxes. But rather than lobby for change, you've decided just to take stuff without paying.

      I'm not taking anything without paying. I exercise my voting ability in accordance with my views on copyright, among other things.

      Are you saying that I cannot disagree with copyright without spending lots of time with politicians? That voting is not enough?

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    13. Re:Why bother? by causality · · Score: 1
      Great life lesson there, especially as a warning for all the computer science students who will grow up to see their work copied and dished out for free.

      As opposed to being protected by artificial scarcity?
      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    14. Re:Why bother? by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 2, Informative

      you showed copyright infringement is a crime, but where did you show it was *theft*?

      nowhere.

      because it isn't.

      gg.

    15. Re:Why bother? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      you showed copyright infringement is a crime, but where did you show it was *theft*?

      That is just a street definition or classification battle. Why does it really matter? An illegal activity is an illegal activity regardless of whether it is called a tomato or a rose.

    16. Re:Why bother? by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 1

      If someone walks up to you and shoots you in the leg, presumably a crime (assault) has taken place. I'm pretty sure it's not legal, but would you call that theft?

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
    17. Re:Why bother? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If someone walks up to you and shoots you in the leg, presumably a crime (assault) has taken place. I'm pretty sure it's not legal, but would you call that theft?

      No. It is too different. Pirating and theft are very close to each other on the "classification wheel" even if not the same thing, most would agree. It is sort of like arguing if "country music" is the same as "western music". Cases can be made both ways such that bickering is not really worth it. It will depend on personal opinion and personal interpretation.

    18. Re:Why bother? by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      You might be able to call it murder if you can prove that each cell in your leg that was killed could have become an independent being (through whatever means).

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    19. Re:Why bother? by crankyspice · · Score: 1

      Show me a passage in any lawbook that equates copyright infringement with theft.

      Chapter IIIa of Prosecuting Intellectual Property Crimes (my copy is in dead-tree form, but it's also available online: http://www.cybercrime.gov/ipmanual.htm), by David Goldstone: "the criminalization of large-scale copying even in the absence of economic motivation by the No Electronic Theft (NET) Act, Pub. L. No. 105-147, 111 Stat. 2678 (1997). . .

      Also, in many jurisdictions copyright infringement is a tort, not a crime.

      In the U.S., all copyright cases are Federal, and controlled by the United States Code and stare decisis in the Federal District and Circuit courts, and the Supreme Court. http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap3.html#301 17 USC 301. Under the United States Code, copyright infringement can be (depending on the factual circumstances present) either civil or http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html#506 criminal (17 USC 506).

      Many extra-territorial jurisdictions treat, or can treat, (c) infringement as criminal.

      U.S.: http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2006/06/28/1699696.h tm

      Viet Nam: http://vietnamnews.vnagency.com.vn/showarticle.php ?num=06SOC080706

      New Zealand:http://www.times.co.nz/cms/news/2006/07/ar t100012268.php

      China:http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2006-07/1 6/content_641731.htm

      Special Chinese District of Hong Kong:http://www.thestandard.com.hk/weekend_news_de tail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=22887&sid=8816949&con_ty pe=3&d_str=20060715

      I saw something in my news clipping service about a recent -- last week -- India conviction and six month jail sentence for (c) infringement, but can't find it on news.google.com.

      --
      geek. lawyer.
    20. Re:Why bother? by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      being careless about the law is never a good idea.

      big media like to call copyright infringement theft because it's more emotive. they would call it "content rape" if they could get away with it. it also suits their propaganda campaign of making the public think "intellectual property" == "property", whereas historically there have always been specific and intentional restrictions on copyright that do not apply to actual property and which media companies wish didn't apply to copyright.

    21. Re:Why bother? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Civil disobedience by refusing to comply with a law you disagree with has always been a valid method of lobbying for change. For example the UK Poll Tax (aka Community Charge) was successfully defeated by the simple expedient of having large numbers of people refusing to pay it. More than could be dealt with by the courts.

      As a law that's been crafted to favour the rights of business over individuals, there's plenty to protest against with copyright.

    22. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of crap.

      I guess that how you justify your actions... just because a company makes a lot of money on a product does not justify pirating the software. And who are you to determine that 'making a shitload of money' on a product justifies you pirating it? Is pirating Nero bad just because their turnover is less than $x? At what point does the changeover occur?

      And why should this just relate to copyright? If I determine that a lawyer is making 'shitloads of money', his services should be free? No, it's because you can get away with it with software by pirating it. Copying software is a faceless act, you don't have to deal with the people who made the software, or pay their bills, or feed their kids.

    23. Re:Why bother? by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't - copyright controls copying, not removing property such that the original owner will no longer have. It involves potential profits as opposed to physical objects. They're completely different things.

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
    24. Re:Why bother? by flosofl · · Score: 1
      Think of it as compensating for the way copyright has been twisted out of all proportion.

      Naw.. I think I'll still think of your post as rationalizing illegal activities. But nice try.
      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    25. Re:Why bother? by cliffski · · Score: 1

      Don't make me laugh, you are trying to upturn the entire 'pay to consume' business model i presume? Sounds like you would like the next hollywood blockbuster to have a $9.95 total budget, as after they sell 1 ticket, the rest is just artifiical scarcity right?
      Try thinking through the implications to changing the business model.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    26. Re:Why bother? by lgarner · · Score: 1

      Show me, anywhere in copyright or any other law, the definition of "lots of money".

    27. Re:Why bother? by cliffski · · Score: 1

      firstly, no it wasn't unless I'm living in a fantasy land where I get a council tax bill every month. Renaming a tax isnt the same as scrapping it.
      Are you really pretending that people who pirate software are doing so to 'stick it to the man' rather than just so they can get shit for free? Is this high school teacher distributing $300 bits of software to everyone just doing it to undermine the system from within? Or is he just a script kiddie that never grew up?

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    28. Re:Why bother? by cliffski · · Score: 1

      An interesting argument. I presume you would like copyrights term reduced, a valid point, and I would agree with you. How long is reasonbale? shall we say 10 years? lets go amd and say 5 years.
      So you agree that dishing out an operating system less than 5 years old is not a valid protest but just illegal copying for the hell of it agreed?
      And I don't recall many people issuing pirated games and applications waiting 5 years, so that the copyright holder recoups his investment. If they do, they need to seriously rename this '0day' shit.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    29. Re:Why bother? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm in favor of changes to intellectual property law. You talk as if the law is holy or something. But we all know very well there are many bad laws on the books thanks to selfish interests who got rich off the masses and then used that wealth to buy laws. They're the ones laughing at the poor schmucks who waste time lobbying. Can't lobby effectively without a lot of money. The ultimate message that the whole idea of "intellectual property" is seriously broken has yet to sink in. How to get that message across? Don't buy or license their "property" and make sure they understand why! Whether that means pirating, boycotting, or finding alternatives is up to the individuals.

      It'd be a poor world where everything, tangible or not, has to be owned, where it's considered treason against Capitalism to not play the game and haggle, scratch and claw, and account for every penny. I know what such a world is like because I was in one in miniature. I was once in a private school attractive to wealthy and powerful people. I wonder if you know how those people think? Think of the movies Titanic and Dead Poets' Society. Everything has a price. Save a lady from drowning herself? Worth at least a $20 and a dinner invitation, thank you and go away when dinner is over, you've been paid. No, that was not typical Hollywood bashing of the rich, that's really how those people are. One of the crazier things at the school was the system the students had going for software piracy. You had to have a stake. At that school, these children of the wealthy were not going to give away a copy of some computer game, it had to be "paid" for with a copy of something the "owner" didn't have. A copy for a copy. Strange how fussy those students were about "something for something" all while blissfully ignoring the copyrights of the game makers. But they were always two-faced like that. They were as much and probably more into piracy as everyone else. Intellectual property rights are for little people to obey?

      So tell us, where's your righteous outrage on behalf of those people who got screwed into paying for Windows twice, thanks to WGA? To compensate, maybe it's okay for them to pirate Vista when it comes out? Yes, yes, it'd be a lot of fun to drag MS into court and win a lawsuit over this, but it's a lot quicker to just pirate, or pay for Windows again. Saves time, and time is money. Saves on court costs too. 2 wrongs don't make a right, but often a wrong for a wrong is a lot more efficient and cost effective. Admit it, lobbying isn't in the same league as piracy for time, effort, and effectiveness.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    30. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually - that would be battery. If they threatened you first and then shot you that would be assault and battery. You need to do more than watch Law and Order reruns instead of doing your grade 10 homework to offer legal advice.

    31. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      All property is protected artificially. The natural state of affairs is that if I am stronger than you, or have a more powerful weapon, then I can take anything you have.

      Intellectual property is not the same as physical property in terms of its... uh, properties... but it does have a very similar role to play: society as a whole recognises the economic concept, as a means of facilitating interactions between its members, and that recognition works just fine as long as everyone plays by the same rules. People who act selfishly can get ahead temporarily, but they do so at the implicit expense at others, and thus society frowns on them.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    32. Re:Why bother? by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      No room for valid disagreements with copyright?
      Not ones that disrespect the rule of law. If you don't like the rules, change them, but don't pretend they don't apply to everyone.

    33. Re:Why bother? by Lothar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yup. For a while I could not start up my computer proberly. It kept crashing inside one of the windows dll's - can't remember right now which one. After running windows update again it updated the wga again and my computer worked fine.

    34. Re:Why bother? by fireheadca · · Score: 1

      >It's not *technically* stealing - it IS stealing, and it makes you a criminal. The law is >not at all ambiguous in regards to this.
      >Oh is it? Show me a passage in any lawbook that equates copyright infringement with theft.
      >
      >Also, in many jurisdictions copyright infringement is a tort, not a crime.

      Hence 'begging the question'.

      --
      Anyone find /.'s quotes today fitting?

    35. Re:Why bother? by Dausha · · Score: 1

      "you showed copyright infringement is a crime, but where did you show it was *theft*?"

      First, you were not asking to prove copyright infringement is theft. You said, in the GPP, "[s]how me a passage in any lawbook that _equates_ copyright infringement with theft." (Emphasis mine.) So, I only have to show you that both are criminal and both can result in jail time. I have done that. You're trying to claim some argument victory where there is none.

      Also, in your post (GPP) you emphasized that infringement was a _tort_ not _crime_. I pointed out that infringement is both tort and crime. While the law gives the term "theft" a very precise meaning, it is obvious from your post (and its parent post) that you were claiming it is not criminal to infringe---especially when you say "equates." Copyright infringement can get you up to ten years in prison. That makes it a felony. While not all theft is felony, serious enough theft (i.e. grand theft) is. Not all copyright infringement is feloneous---only serious enough theft.

      According to Meriam-Webster, theft "is an unlawful taking . . . of property." According to Wikipedia, "[c]opyright infringement is the unauthorized use of copyrighted material. . . . often referred to as piracy or _theft_ . . . ." Sounds pretty synonymous to me.

      Game. Set. Match.

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    36. Re:Why bother? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      If copyrights are shortened to five years, that means all that good source code from Linux as it existed in 2001 is now free, correct? I can start from a 2001 version of Linux, or any GPL'd software and fork it, adding my extensions, and release it withouth source code.

      That's what you're talking about, right?

    37. Re:Why bother? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Civil disobedience involves explicitly disobeying a law that you diagree with in such a fashion that you are arrested. It has nothing to do with secretly 'cracking' a piece of software and quietly making use of it. Now, if you want to crack your Windows CD and then sit in the main lobby of the Microsoft Building in Redmond running Windows on your notebook computer wearing a t-shirt that reads 'my copy is illegal' and face the consequences, that would be different.

    38. Re:Why bother? by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      I am not GPP.

      you have still not shown copyright infringement is theft, because it isn't.

      wikipedia is not a legal document.

      copyright infringement is not theft. get over it.

      thanks for playing.

    39. Re:Why bother? by lightning_queen · · Score: 1

      Ok then, what about the American Civil Rights Act? That and accompianing laws are a product of civil disobedience. Or how about strikes? The intent there is usually to get more money or benefits, but it's to change something that the people were dissatisfied with. It does work, and has worked, as long as sufficient amounts of people are willing to come together for the same cause, whether that amount be 20 people or 20 million depends entirely on the size of the business. In the case of Microsoft, it's not solely pirating (though that adds to their cost since that can involve the courts and audits and all sorts of fun stuff), it's also the large amount of people migrating to Linux/OSS (businesses especially), using third-party margin software like Firefox, Open Office, and Norton. Windows XP Pro cost in the vicinity of $200USD, Office costs over $325USD for standard and almost $400 for professional edition. Now, an OS costing a decent chunck of change is understandable, since it runs everything on the system and the developers need to eat, but the fact that Office costs almost twice as much as the OS is a little outrageous.

    40. Re:Why bother? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1
      Pirating and theft are very close to each other on the "classification wheel" even if not the same thing, most would agree.

      Erm, not really. The key element of theft, the very thing that makes theft wrong, is the fact that the owner is deprived of his property. That vital element is missing from copyright infringement.

      Think about it: let's say you heard that someone "stole" your car, but when you looked out into the parking lot, you saw that it was still there, exactly how you left it. What actually happened was that some mad scientist pointed a replicator beam at your car and drove off in a brand new copy, leaving your original car undisturbed. Would you be upset? Probably not at all. Certainly not as much as if it had really been stolen--because the whole reason you're afraid of having your car stolen is that it leaves you without a car. If you still have it, you've lost nothing; the "thief" has gained something, but not at your expense.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    41. Re:Why bother? by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      - Vyvian "The Young Ones"

      Pssst: "Vyvyan".

    42. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sophistry

      n : a deliberately invalid argument displaying ingenuity in reasoning in the hope of deceiving someone

    43. Re:Why bother? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      You sir have just earned yourself one green dot, #10 in eight years - limited edition. I wish there were more people like you, who were willing to mock thieves to their faces for their self-serving contrived nonsense.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    44. Re:Why bother? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
      firstly, no it wasn't unless I'm living in a fantasy land where I get a council tax bill every month. Renaming a tax isnt the same as scrapping it.

      I don't know if you are ignorant of the difference or just being disingenuous. The Poll Tax was a tax on people. Everyone over the age of 18 (with a few exceptions) paid the same amount of money within a given councils area. The council tax is a tax on property - it varies depending on the relative value of the home, and is is a fixed amount of money for the property. The council tax is far closer to the rates, which was the system before the community charge came in. So, yes, the poll tax was scrapped and the system reverted pretty closely to the system that pre-dated it.

      Are really pretending that people who pirate software are doing so to 'stick it to the man' rather than just so they can get shit for free?

      No, I was pointing out your error in saying that people who oppose copyright are not lobbying against it by refusing to abide by it. That logically doesn't make any general claim as to why people in general break copyright. I assume you are a programmer - you ought to be able to do logic.
    45. Re:Why bother? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
      Civil disobedience involves explicitly disobeying a law that you diagree with in such a fashion that you are arrested.

      And where in those two words "Civil disobedience" is any such thing "explicitly" stated. It isn't. You perhaps mean "implicit". But I disagree that it's even implicit. As my example of the poll tax showed this is not true. Most of the people who were part of the successful defeat of the poll tax didn't go on demos. They just stayed at home whilst refusing to pay.

      My guess is that you have this association of civil disobedience with visible action on the streets because that's what you tend to see on the media. It's the only time civil disobedience is visual.

    46. Re:Why bother? by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Show me a passage in any lawbook that equates copyright infringement with theft.

      That's a bit like saying that home invasion isn't assault, and then demanding to see a law book that equates home invasion with assault, with one exception: using unlicensed software isn't copyright infringement. Just because there's a more specific version that uses a name involving different words doesn't mean that it's anything different.

      Now, as to why using unlicensed software isn't copyright infringement, let's review, shall we? Copyright is the body of law which governs who is allowed to publish or distribute materials. Copyright infringement of software is the source side of piracy, not the destination side: the people who print illegal copies of a CD and sell them for $5 are infringing copyright. If these parents have not redistributed what they were given, they are not infringing copyright.

      As far as what they actually are doing, well, it's theft, plain and simple. What Microsoft sells are licenses to use its software. The user agreement is used to enforce that someone may not use the software without having purchased a license from Microsoft, a retailer or partner. In this sense, US law quite plainly interprets sold licenses as equivalent to currency, in that they can be transferred, sold, bought, and have a value as representative of another item - in the case of dollars it's the gold standard (or at least once was,) and in the case of software licenses it's the right to use the product.

      In that one may transfer one's right to use software by selling one's license, to duplicate said license - which is prerequisite in the case of using a license one has not paid for - is parallel to counterfitting. You are by using cracked software counterfitting a license. And, if you'll take the time to look, counterfitting in the United States is considered theft from the government.

      That said, nobody was trying to be legalistic. The issue is simple and obvious from the moral standpoint: Company A offers a product it cost $5 to make for $10. You use said product without paying for it. That's boldly obviously theft, your attempts at legal semantics notwithstanding.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    47. Re:Why bother? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      WGA has been required for many important upgrades for several years now. Why are you assuming they're dishonest when what they're trying to do is to pay for something they apparently didn't realize was pirated?

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    48. Re:Why bother? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Uh, because some people prefer being honest? There are a lot of people out there who just don't want to be thieves. Funny, that. It's one thing if you want to look the other way about "technical" theft (as if it's somehow okay.)

      Don't tell other people to not do the right thing.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    49. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you still have it, you've lost nothing; the "thief" has gained something, but not at your expense.
      If you open up the realism just a tad (I know, I know, you talked about beams, that's great) your example of one scientist making one copy is a little questionable if you really want to say something like "not at your expense" and still have this story have any relation to the state of copyright in the world today. More people making copies or perhaps a mad scientist making alot more than one copy? Might make you rethink your expense when it comes time to trade in your car or just use your car in what now is a highway thick with copied cars and virtually no value associated with them.
    50. Re:Why bother? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      What you meant to say, perhaps is:

      because it isn't.

      yet.


      What will you do then?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    51. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's not theft. That's why a law against copyright infringement is called the "No Electronic Theft Act." Moron.

    52. Re:Why bother? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ooooh, but mocking self-righteousness and ignorance is baaaad!

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    53. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but would i really be that sad when it's time to trade in my car?
      i mean sure it would hardly have any value but the new car i would get would hardly have any value.
      wich means that i would not need to pay so much money to switch to another car.

      im all for paying for music that i really want but if they can make music for downloads a virtual no cost.
      why not make that show when they sell the item. if the cost was 1/10 of what it is now people would hardly bother to download and go legit.

      people like to make comparisons with cars. sure a new car costs alot of money to make and true a new song costs alot of money to make and record.
      the diffrence is that each copy of the car costs pretty much while each copy of a tune dosent and it does not show in the pricing.

      when car companies find cheaper ways to manufacture it often shows on the market, but when record companies find cheaper ways to make copies like downloads it dosent show.

    54. Re:Why bother? by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 1

      Eh? I'm not offering legal advice, is there something you've done that you're not telling us?

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
    55. Re:Why bother? by dsanfte · · Score: 1

      Home invasion isn't assault, it's B&E. If you actually assault someone in the home, it's assault too. If you threaten or confine them against their will, or rob them, then it's uttering threats, illegal confinement, and robbery, respectively.

      Stop trying to equate one dissimilar thing with another.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    56. Re:Why bother? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't - copyright controls copying, not removing property such that the original owner will no longer have. It involves potential profits as opposed to physical objects. They're completely different things.

      Because you are screwing a company instead of an individual? Does that mean it is OK to steal copy machines from companies? What if you are an individual who owns stock in that co? Is stealling a million pennies from a million people less evil than stealing a million pennies from one individual?

    57. Re: Why bother? by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1
      As far as what they actually are doing, well, it's theft, plain and simple.
      I don't know what definition of theft you are using, but the last time I looked, theft was the act of depriving someone of their property. When using an unlicensed copy of software, you are not depriving anyone of their rightful property. You could argue that you deprive them of potential property, but that's not the same thing as depriving them of actual property (if it were, no IP laws would be necessary to begin with).

      As for what they actually are doing -- well, I'm not sure. I would guess that the crime is that they said to agree to the EULA without actually following its provisions, which would make it, what, breach of contract?

      The issue is simple and obvious from the moral standpoint: Company A offers a product it cost $5 to make for $10. You use said product without paying for it. That's boldly obviously theft
      I definitely disagree with that. There's neither any criminal offense nor, IMNSHO, any moral sin associated with using things that one does not own. Noone would require you to sign a form of temporary transfer of property or something like that to enter a computer store and play around with the products on display. Taking them out of the store is, of course, a completely different thing (that would be depriving the store of their rightfully owned property). Visiting the store's legally owned premises without their consent (which they are, of course, free to withdraw in case you do something with which they disagree) is also a different thing.
    58. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does that mean it is OK to steal copy machines from companies?
      Are you even reading what he posted?
    59. Re:Why bother? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      You should probably try to find a copy of Henry David Thoreau's book 'Civil Disobedience' before we proceed in this conversation.

    60. Re:Why bother? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      That's the fallacious argument known as "Appeal to authority".
      http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/argumen ts.html#authority

      If you want to argue the toss, then step up to the plate and make your argument. But mentioning the first name that comes up in Wikipedia when you search for "Civil Disobedience" doesn't impress anyone.

    61. Re:Why bother? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      By the way, here's the text you refer to.

      http://www.panarchy.org/thoreau/disobedience.1848. html

      It's an essay that amounts to 46 paragraphs. But you think it's a "book". You've never even seen a copy yourself, let alone read it. Funnily enough one of the very forms of civil disobedience that he practised was not paying the poll tax. The exact same example I used before you mentioned him.

    62. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The moment files are copied from the CD to your harddrive it is copyright infringement.

    63. Re:Why bother? by bit01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What is it about products that can be encoded digitally that some people think that their creators dont need to eat?

      Grow up, child.

      ---

      It's wrong that an intellectual property creator should not be rewarded for their work.
      It's equally wrong that an IP creator should be rewarded too many times for the one piece of work, for exactly the same reasons.
      Reform IP law and stop the M$/RIAA abuse.

    64. Re:Why bother? by FractalZone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "interesting idea. So is it just you and your friends who get to take the product for free under this system, whilst laughing at the poor schmucks who paid for it and made your actions possible?"

      Exactly what has been taken? It isn't like a tangible thing (made of matter/energy) which, when you take it, means someone else is deprived of it. It is information that is expressed as a bit pattern.

      Having had my own software pirated, I had to confront this question years ago. I can't say that I know how the IP issues ought to be addressed, but it is safe to say that grabbing a copy of a program from someone else is very different than stealing or even borrowing their car.

      The worst that software companies can claim as true damages is lost revenues -- that a software pirate would have paid somewhere close to the going rate for the program if he didn't get a free copy somehow. It would be nice if they had to prove that claim in each and every case of software piracy they prosecute. Given that most people who pirate software would not (and could not afford to) pay anywhere close to the advertised prices for it, that would be hard to do.

      It might be quite appropriate if software companies could only demand that they be compensated (at most) for some realistic minimum value they actually put on their software, say the amount they can be held liable for under their own contractual licensing agreement(s). In Microsoft's case, the value of their major software packages is really what, $5, according to the MS EULA? It isn't as if Microsoft is claiming its software will do much in particular...read the whole EULA if you haven't done so already.

      They are as much as admitting that it isn't worth what they ask for it. :-) How long do you think MS would remain solvent if it had to compensate the users of its buggy bloatware when it fails to operate correctly because of a serious design flaw or programming error, the way automakers have to do when their products fail miserably? Can GM limit its liability to $5 in cases where its cars blow up or exhibit sudden brake failure?

      I'm unsure as to how commercial software should be priced, but I think it would be best if the government was not put in the position of penalizing people who haven't done any real harm. That would be very difficult in cases where those who use copied software for other than commercial purposes are concerned. It would be fairly easy in cases where a firm sells product created with commercial compilers, word processors, or editors, or services that depend on commercial DBMS packages. Little Timmy doesn't cost the vendor of Grand Theft Starship: The Revenge of Mario a dime if he snags a copy from his pal Suzi. At worst, if they can show he was clearly able to purchase a copy and did play the pirated one a lot, they ought to get compensated for the street value of the program and Timmy ought to get a citation or something for being a Bad Boy(tm).

      Now, if Little Timmy goes into business selling copies of GTS-RM to all his friends at school for ten bucks a pop, then the penalties ought to be fairly harsh, because he is selling (for profit) what isn't his. Cases where Timmy sells it for just enough to cover his cost of distribution are still questionable, but one could argue that he still profits by gaining goodwill (something accountants think they can actually quantify).

      --
      "You're young, you're drunk, you're in bed, you have knives; shit happens." -- Angelina Jolie
    65. Re:Why bother? by bit01 · · Score: 1

      As far as what they actually are doing, well, it's theft, plain and simple.

      Millions of people disagree. It isn't that simple. Stop pretending otherwise.

      ---

      It's wrong that an intellectual property creator should not be rewarded for their work.
      It's equally wrong that an IP creator should be rewarded too many times for the one piece of work, for exactly the same reasons.
      Reform IP law and stop the M$/RIAA abuse.

    66. Re:Why bother? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      1) The difference between breaking and entering and home invasion is whether an assault occurs.
      2) I'm not.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    67. Re:Why bother? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      There was neither mockery nor self righteousness involved, and I cannot be ignorant of my own opinions by definition. Who are you, and why are you attempting to condescend to me for patting someone who isn't you on the back?

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    68. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother having an argument over US copyright law and how its inforced? anyone with two brain cells to rub together can tell you its a badly broken system.

      Even aside from that, this is freaking /. its all been said, many times. so ill just sum it up ok?

      Yes copyright infringment is a crime, no its not theft (in the case of software copying) since theres no loss of item to the orignal owner.

      useing unlisenced software is NOT copyright infringment (the person who gave it to you is however infringing, IE distribution) its usualy a breach of the DMCA for you poor bastards stuck in america however since chances are you bypassed some kind of protection to install it.

      if i missed anything im sure someone else will quickly point it out.

    69. Re:Why bother? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Haha.

      The guy was an idiot and your were congratulating him on it.

      He did the equivalent of saying that only druggies complain about drug laws, or only speeders think speed enforcement laws are often abusive, or only gun-nuts dislike gun-restriction laws, etc, etc.

      In his self-righteousness, he couldn't even conceive of the possibility that one might make a rational argument criticisizing the state of copyright law without himself being a copyright violator. That's worse than attacking the messenger and ignoring the message, its making up strawmen to impune the integrity of someone you disagree with but can't otherwise justify your disagreement.

      And you thought that was just great. Hoo-rah! Just the kind of behaviour we need more of online.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    70. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was so that they could call it the NET Act. Otherwise they would have had to call it the NECI Act. It just doesn't have the same ring.

    71. Re:Why bother? by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 1

      Business, like many things in life, is a gamble. If you go to a casino, you can't sue the casino owner because you didn't win the jackpot playing slots. If you play market futures, you can't complain if you lose your shirt. Sometimes you'll make money, sometimes you won't. If you can't handle this, you shouldn't be in a casino, market futures, or your own business.

      As for that last comparison... If you really believe that stealing a million pennies from either one person or one penny from a million people is the same thing, you're fooling yourself. One act can put a person far enough in debt that they never dig themselves out, the other will scarcely be noticed. Whether the act is good or evil, perhaps more appropriately termed right or wrong, credit card companies and banks do the latter many times over every day. It hasn't stopped people from dealing with them.

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
    72. Re:Why bother? by stonecypher · · Score: 0, Troll

      Considering that you are accusing great-grandparent of saying things he didn't say, that you can neither spell nor use correctly the word impugn, that you seem to have no grasp of hyphenation, that you don't seem to grasp the concept of a Straw Man, that nobody has attacked anyone's credibility but you, and that there's been no point at which anyone's even attempted to justify their disagreement (don't confuse that with inability,) I think frankly you shouldn't be calling other people idiots.

      Glass houses, and all that noise.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    73. Re:Why bother? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      It's criminal, yes. The specific crime, however, is not copyright infringement, it's theft. Copyright infringement is when you hand the CD to someone else. Usage is not infringement; distribution is.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    74. Re:Why bother? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Millions of people disagree. Hundreds of millions of people agree. What's your point? Theft is theft even if 0.5% of the population have no morals. The fact of the matter is that law is not written through the voice of a small fragment of population insisting what they're doing is okay. There are more people breaking into homes than warezing. They think what they're doing is okay. Is it?

      Just because you can count people in agreement doesn't mean you're in the majority, and if you're not - in this case, you're in a vanishingly small segment of the populace, right up there with molesters and people who take Jerry Falwell seriously, both heinous crimes - then naming how many people agree with you is an indictment, not a supporting argument.

      Wake me when 51% of the population has your back.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    75. Re: Why bother? by stonecypher · · Score: 1
      I don't know what definition of theft you are using, but the last time I looked, theft was the act of depriving someone of their property.

      Which is why I explained how property was being stolen. Please don't reply if you're not going to read.

      When using an unlicensed copy of software, you are not depriving anyone of their rightful property.

      The courts, the law of the land and common sense disagree with you.

      I would guess that the crime is that they said to agree to the EULA without actually following its provisions, which would make it, what, breach of contract?

      Why would you even argue with someone when you don't know enough to shore up your own argument? Go find one of those stories about a big warezer bust. Follow it through to the indictment; they're all freely available online in the US since 1998..2001, depending on what state you're in. Then, look at what crime the warezers are being convicted of.

      I really don't care whether you understand that it's theft; the fact is that under US law it is, and that these people wouldn't be going to jail for theft if it wasn't. Believe it or not, attorneys and judges understand the law better than you do.

      The issue is simple and obvious from the moral standpoint: Company A offers a product it cost $5 to make for $10. You use said product without paying for it. That's boldly obviously theft


      I definitely disagree with that. There's neither any criminal offense nor, IMNSHO, any moral sin associated with using things that one does not own.

      Oh, really? Then what's your address? I have some long distance calls to make.

      Look, really, nobody cares whether you agree or not. Of course you don't agree: you don't make and sell things for a living. The next time you spend $2 million creating a software product, then watch a bunch of sanctimonious nobodies going "omg there's nothing wrong with me using this without paying for it," let someone know. Just because you say it's okay doesn't mean it really is. If you doubt me, mail a copy of your registry and a list of what you didn't pay for to your local DA. You *will* go to jail, no matter how loudly you protest that you've done nothing wrong.

      For all the whining people do about their personal liberties and how it's their right to set the laws of the land, it's amazing how quickly they turn around and insist it's okay for them to break the laws the other people in this country set. You don't get to steal just because you're too arrogant to admit that it's theft.

      Call an attorney and ask if your opinion of something as criminal has any effect on whether it's actually criminal. Try not to take it too hard when they hang up on you, laughing.

      Noone would require you to sign a form of temporary transfer of property or something like that to enter a computer store and play around with the products on display.

      Uh, that's because the store paid for their copies. There's no transfer of property involved. It is for the same reason legal for you to come to my house and use software I purchased. This is a non-sequitor, and arguably a red herring.

      Taking them out of the store is, of course, a completely different thing (that would be depriving the store of their rightfully owned property).

      Oh, so it's okay to steal from Microsoft, just not from Fry's?

      Your morals are inconsistant.
      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    76. Re:Why bother? by geminidomino · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      By that logic, the USA PATRIOT act actually has something to do with patriotism instead of terrorists.

      Moron.

    77. Re:Why bother? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1
      Spelling and grammar flames? Hallmark of a sanctimonius twit, no surprise since you felt the need to publicly attach your lips to the ass of another sanctimonius twit and then proclaim to the world just how wonderful the crap that he spews tastes.

      But let's address your denial:

      cliffski:
      But rather than lobby for change, you've decided just to take stuff without paying.
      Interesting.
      stonecypher:
      I wish there were more people like you, who were willing to mock thieves to their faces for their self-serving contrived nonsense.

      nobody has attacked anyone's credibility

      Do you wish to continue to deny that both you and cliffski are calling bogtha a thief? In fact, his entire response is just an attempt to impune bogtha's character by calling him and his friends thieves, all in response to bogtha's proposition that cliffski's opinion about copyright was not the only moral position available.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    78. Re:Why bother? by cliffski · · Score: 1

      ah youv'e become abusive, no need to debate further then.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    79. Re:Why bother? by cliffski · · Score: 1

      your arguing with yourself here? I have no idea what your talking about. Do you even need me in this conversation?

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    80. Re:Why bother? by cliffski · · Score: 1

      oh wow, what a stunningly well argued rebuttal of my post. I guess I've met a true intellectual titan here.
      Anyone stealing other peoples work and pretending its an act of rebellion is in no position to lecture others on maturity.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    81. Re:Why bother? by cliffski · · Score: 1

      tyranny?
      You are equating anti-copying methods of music CDs with tyranny.
      I suggest a holiday in North Korea or somewhere simialr. Then come back and say you equate not being able to copy a britney spears album with tyranny. Or could it be you enjoy talking up the issue as a justification to copy stuff?

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    82. Re:Why bother? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All property is protected artificially.

      He said artificial scarcity. Not "protected artificially."

      The difference is that real property is naturally scarce, or more technically it is rivalrous, and thus inherently "protectable" since there is only one instance to keep track of, either you have it or you don't.

      that recognition works just fine as long as everyone plays by the same rules.

      However, it is both many orders of magnitude more difficult to enforce the rules for information than it is for real property, and it is in conflict with human nature (the natural urge to share knowledge that is probably a key, if not the key to the development of civilization). So, its much harder to enforce and because it conflicts with human nature, people naturally violate it many more times than they do similar rules for real property.

      All that enforcement eventually results in a higher cost - the more society tries to enforce those rules, the more it costs us. Many people believe that the additional costs involved for protecting ownership of ideas are now high enough that they make the model infeasible, that it is a net drain on society that retards progress rather than encourages it.

      People like cliffski, with their heads stuck in the box that hollywood has selfishly crammed it into, can't see that the model is breaking, if not already broken. And what's worse, they can't see that alternative models can, and probably must, take its place. Models that harness human nature rather than oppose it. Instead all you get are ironic comments like "Try thinking through the implications to changing the business model," because his own lack of imagination prevents him from thinking things through enough to come up with a business model that can work given the new parameters of modern digital distribution.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    83. Re:Why bother? by bit01 · · Score: 1

      Fanatics like you give copyright a bad name. Anybody would think you're a lying MPAA/RIAA astroturfer.

      Since I did not say any point of view was in the majority your argument is pointless; a dishonest attempt to redirect the reader. And that's ignoring your meaningless numbers; very few people haven't "pirated" at some time in their lives.

      Every law is balancing the rights of different groups of people. I'd suggest you show a little maturity and acknowledge that simple fact.

      Copyright law as it's currently written is, like software, a creation of the mind, and is only one of an infinite number of possibilities. To pretend that the current law is the only possibility is dishonest. It's reasonable to discuss the many alternatives and to regard the current implementation as unfair and want to change it.

      ---

      It's wrong that an intellectual property creator should not be rewarded for their work.
      It's equally wrong that an IP creator should be rewarded too many times for the one piece of work, for exactly the same reasons.
      Reform IP law and stop the M$/RIAA abuse.

    84. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is simple and obvious from the moral standpoint: Company A offers a product it cost $5 to make for $10. You use said product without paying for it. That's boldly obviously theft, your attempts at legal semantics notwithstanding.

      This would be applicable if I were to take a product without paying for it (ie, stealing), but not if I were simply to copy it. In the latter case, it's morally much less clear-cut. In fact, there's a good case to be made that it's immoral to restrict people from exchanging information (such as copies of software) with each other, regardless of who originally created that information.

    85. Re:Why bother? by Mr2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      your example of one scientist making one copy is a little questionable if you really want to say something like "not at your expense" and still have this story have any relation to the state of copyright in the world today. More people making copies or perhaps a mad scientist making alot more than one copy? Might make you rethink your expense when it comes time to trade in your car or just use your car in what now is a highway thick with copied cars and virtually no value associated with them.

      No economic value, perhaps, but there is still utility value associated with them.

      Frankly, not being able to get anything in exchange for trading in a car, and having to endure longer waits in traffic, would be a small price to pay for living in a world where it's possible. That would be a friggin' utopia! No hunger, because anyone can copy whatever food they want; no deaths during heat waves, because anyone can get an air conditioner, a generator, and all the fuel they need to run it, just by pressing a button; and so on. Of course, we'd have to deal with all that pollution, heat, etc.. but as soon as someone finds a solution to those or any other problems, it can spread across the globe in an instant.

      Similarly, I believe that making it a little harder for certain folks to earn a living by rearranging bits is a small price to pay for living in a world where those bits are freely accessible to anyone with the right tools. (I said harder, not impossible: you'd just have to charge directly for your labor, and expend some effort to find an audience who can pool their money together to pay you. If a political candidate can raise millions of dollars from lots of small individual donations, just by putting a thermometer graph and DONATE NOW button on his site, then it should be easy for artists to do the same.)
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    86. Re:Why bother? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Pardon? That post was a reply to Bing Tsher E (943915). I didn't appear as a reply to one of your posts. If you didn't see his post, it probably means your filter is set to 2.

    87. Re:Why bother? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You mean you've run out of things to argue. You've checked out the difference between the poll tax and the council tax, and you see I'm right. Furthermore you recognise that you've been caught out in a illogical argument.

    88. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      2 wrongs don't make a right, but often a wrong for a wrong is a lot more efficient and cost effective.

      I'd love to know who first trotted out this sillyshit little aphorism.

      In the law, whenever the situation comes up, they simply redefine the second wrong, as in "self defense really isn't murder." Bullshit -- taking a life is taking a life.

      As for the two wrongs argument, you'll generally find it brought up in a case here the first wrong is ongoing. Nobody wants to deal with the original wrong that provoked the second wrong. They'd rather just rail against the second "wrongdoer" instead of dealing with the original (usually greater) wrong.

      That is just motherfucking morally offensive, not to mention pusillanimous. It's usually the weaker party that takes the bad rap, as when the corporations buy shit like the Sonny Bono law, then try to crap all over the little guy who downloads a song.

      How the fuck do the politicians look at themselves in a mirror? The Constitution provided that copyright be granted "for a limited time". The cynical bastards in congress then stood there with their bare faces hanging out and said, "Life of the author plus seventy years is a "limit", is it not?"

      Yeah, so is a million years, you craven fucks. To the lowest pit of hell with all of them.

    89. Re: Why bother? by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Go find one of those stories about a big warezer bust. Follow it through to the indictment; they're all freely available online in the US since 1998..2001, depending on what state you're in. Then, look at what crime the warezers are being convicted of.

      I Googled "warez indictment" and found a number of press releases from the federal government. This one, about the RISCISO bust, is typical:

      All 19 defendants were charged with one count of conspiracy to commit copyright
      infringement, and 15 of the 19 were charged with one additional count each of copyright
      infringement.

      Doesn't say anything about theft. True, I didn't look up the actual indictment, so if you want to prove me wrong, knock yourself out.

      Which is not to say that the Feds don't use the word "theft" in their public statements - they do it all the time. But I don't think anyone is being charged with that particular crime. Not when they can put someone in prison for 46 months for "conspiracy to commit copyright infringment."

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    90. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      That is just a street definition or classification battle. Why does it really matter? An illegal activity is an illegal activity regardless of whether it is called a tomato or a rose.

      Idiot child, it really matters because a criminal of whatever crime must be charged with a specific crime, not just any sweet words you make up.

      The illegal activity called rape or mayhem or torture is not the same as the illegal activity of stealing a bag of balloons from a toy store.

    91. Re:Why bother? by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1
      I'm a copyright holder, and I've made maybe half my income over my worktime from copyright. Copyright infringment is not theft - it is copyright infringment. There are really significant differences, and anybody that equate the two will be unable to think properly about copyright infringment.

      Here's longer discussion.

      Eivind.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    92. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT's a really nice, and moralistically correct response, however, this deals with companies who don't know the world moral at all.
      A nice example for that, is microsoft's tactic for placing it's office package in the market.
      They actually promoted using ms word at home without license, so more people would know how to use it, which does influence compagny decissions towards new software.
      Looking at the same company now, which is paying loads of money toward congress, to make piracy a hot issue, is kinda funny in context.
      Ofcourse u can say, piracy is wrong, and ppl are criminals, but that's a very black and white view of things.
      And a view which is strongly influenced by the media, over the last few years. Don't bother claiming it ain't true, cause no one is wondering why this is all aimed at civilians, and not at companies, why private organisations like the RIAA are conducting business like the mafia, putting pressure on civilians, misusing the law to their own benifit, and again leaving all the medium - big sized companies alone, cause they would be able to pay the costs of the lawyers, which 'ordinary people'can not.

      What would be an intersting question in this context, is: " is a law, still a law if it the outcome of a case going to court, depends on the amount of money invested in it.

      Or even more basic: if ' freedom, and justice for all' is depending on your social state, your sexual preference, skin colour and wether or not you have ahired an expensive lawyer

      We find it all very normal, that you don't start a civil suit against a millionare cause he/she can pay better lawyers.
      What is the law in that? Did we all forget the meaning of 'law'

      Ofcourse the intentions where this system is based on are good, however, at present time, issues like these show that those times are over, and as an individual you are screwed in any conflict with larger institutions.

    93. Re:Why bother? by sparkz · · Score: 1

      No. Counterfitting is the installation of a counter.

      Counterfeiting is "The unauthorized copying or imitating of an item which is later passed on as an original."

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    94. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine then. Reform the IP law. Taking shit that isn't yours is not doing so, and in fact gives them ammunition.

      Look, I do it too on occasion, I just don't consider it a fundamental right.

      (my captcha is "retail". That amuses me somehow)

    95. Re:Why bother? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      just because a company makes a lot of money on a product does not justify pirating the software.

      I offered reasoning to explain one way in which it's justifiable. You are offering nothing but assertions to the contrary. If you think I'm wrong, then how about explaining why you think I am wrong?

      At what point does the changeover occur?

      Good question, to which I have no answer. It's a grey area, not a specific number. But can you agree that if a point exists where enough money has been made to fulfill the purpose of copyright, that Microsoft would have passed that point by now?

      And why should this just relate to copyright? If I determine that a lawyer is making 'shitloads of money', his services should be free? No, it's because you can get away with it with software by pirating it.

      See, this is the problem with arguing against straw men, you forget what makes sense in the context of my argument, and what makes sense in the context of your fake argument that you've wrongly attributed to me.

      You are assuming that I'm starting from the position that I should get free stuff, and using that to reach the conclusion that copyright can be infringed ethically. You have that backwards. I'm starting from the position that copyright is a means to an end, that end has already been reached when a copyright holder has made lots of money, and therefore I've reached the conclusion that copyright can be infringed ethically.

      Now in the case of "I want free stuff", I can see how you might think that I believe a person should work for me for free. But that's not my position, and it never has been, you've forgotten where my argument ends and your straw-man begins.

      In the case of copyright infringement, there is zero work being performed by the copyright holder when I copy something they hold the copyright to. I am not making them work for free. I'm recognising that they have already been compensated for the work that they've done - which is the whole reason why copyright exists. If the purpose for copyright has already been fulfilled, there's no reason to keep applying it.

      If you apply your tortured analogy properly, it would be like the lawyer appointed by a court demanding to be paid by the client, even though he's already being paid by the state. In that scenario, it would be proper to refuse to pay him because he's already been paid.

      Copying software is a faceless act, you don't have to deal with the people who made the software, or pay their bills, or feed their kids.

      Leave the appeal to emotion alone. We're talking about people who have made lots of money already, remember? Don't try and sway the argument with false "Think of the children!" arguments.

      It's not applicable either. Sure, copyright software might be a faceless act, but copying music is even more widespread than copying software, and that involves celebrities who are adored by millions of those people who happily copy their music. The fact that software developers are "faceless" is not a factor, either in my reasoning, or in the widespread copyright infringement that is happening all over the world.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    96. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I don't recall many people issuing pirated games and applications waiting 5 years, so that the copyright holder recoups his investment. If they do, they need to seriously rename this '0day' shit.

      http://arnold.c64.org/

      From my guess, about 10 - 30% of what's on there are re-cracks of 20 year old software so it works with emulators.

      It's obscure, sure, but, if you look around, you'll be VERY surprised at the amount of effort crackers are putting in on really old software.

      That doesn't mean it's popular, though. You're right that a hell of a lot more people are using warez windows XP than playing Impossible Mission on their C64 emulator. But at the same time, not everyone using warez windows XP hasn't paid for it. I'm using warez right now, despite having a valid windows XP CD key stuck to my box because the hacked up version from The Pirate Bay is way better than the one on the CD from Microsoft. Is that wrong? To me it's no more "wrong" than writing in the margins of a textbook, assuming the textbook has been paid for.

    97. Re:Why bother? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      An interesting argument. I presume you would like copyrights term reduced, a valid point, and I would agree with you. How long is reasonbale? shall we say 10 years? lets go amd and say 5 years.

      I'm unsure of what a fair copyright term is, but I'd say something on the order of ten years is fair. It gives developers a chance to profit fairly from their work and make enough money to produce more software.

      I also believe that software should come with buildable source or have it in escrow to qualify for copyright protection, because otherwise it entering the public domain isn't effective in the same way other media passing into the public domain is. It's not usually feasible to use ten year-old binaries for various reasons, but with source availability these problems can be fixed. For instance, I wouldn't like to surf the web with a public domain Windows 95 without the ability to fix its security holes.

      So you agree that dishing out an operating system less than 5 years old is not a valid protest but just illegal copying for the hell of it agreed?

      Agreed, to a point. Copyright works by providing economic incentive to create original works. The term length is merely one way of indirectly limiting the incentive in favour of the freedom of the public. I'm saying that it also makes sense to limit the incentive directly by infringing on copyrights where the holders have already made lots of money from those particular works. So even though the fact that Windows XP is slightly under five years old, I think it's still ethical to copy it because Microsoft have already been compensated for it by making lots of money from holding its copyright.

      I don't think it's clear that there's a way of codifying such a scheme in law, so it's likely that we'll always be stuck with just the term length kludgy workaround. But that doesn't mean that infringing particular copyrights is ethically wrong. I consider it to be in line with the purpose of copyright, not against it.

      In fact, copyright terms that allow copyright holders to become insanely rich actually run counter to the purpose of copyright. Economic incentives are more effective when somebody needs to work to pay the bills. If copyright has made somebody rich, that takes away the economic advantage because they don't need to create more stuff to pay the bills any more.

      And I don't recall many people issuing pirated games and applications waiting 5 years, so that the copyright holder recoups his investment.

      I'm not defending them. But we're talking about Windows XP, which was released about five years ago, and which has made Microsoft hundreds of millions of dollars, which is undoubtedly enough to compensate Microsoft for its creation and subsidise the creation of Vista. So, in the context of the original comment that started this thread, I don't see any ethical reason for the parents to pay for a legitimate copy of Windows XP, for precisely the reason that Microsoft have made lots of money already.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    98. Re:Why bother? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      If copyrights are shortened to five years, that means all that good source code from Linux as it existed in 2001 is now free, correct? I can start from a 2001 version of Linux, or any GPL'd software and fork it, adding my extensions, and release it withouth source code.

      I'm well aware of this consequence and I believe it to be fair. I would like some kind of way of achieving the aims of the GPL — which is, in essence, placing something into "perpetual public domain" — to be handled by law rather than a special-case software contract, but on the whole, I'd vastly prefer reasonable copyright terms with no GPL than the current draconian copyright terms with the GPL.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    99. Re:Why bother? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      Jah-Wren Ryel has it spot on. There's not been a single reply that actually addresses my argument, they all called me a thief or ignored my argument and assumed that my motivation is getting something for nothing. Those attitudes should not be admired.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    100. Re:Why bother? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      You are right, it may be impossible to come up with an objective measure to decide how much money should be the cut-off point. But then again, copyright term lengths are just as arbitrary. Why was 14 years a fair copyright term length but 13 years unfair?

      Can we agree that in this particular case of Windows XP, that Microsoft has made "lots of money" by any reasonable definition of the term "lots of money"?

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    101. Re:Why bother? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      There are some people who believe breaking an unjust law is unethical, and there are some people who believe it is not unethical. I am one of the latter. If you are one of the former, then we disagree at a fundamental level that can never be reconciled without one of us changing our beliefs in this matter.

      I will, however, point out that I believe the world would be a much poorer place if everybody followed unjust laws, and that your belief is in stark contrast to such widely respected lawbreakers as Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks.

      And, because some troll would inevitably claim otherwise, I have to add the disclaimer that I'm not comparing myself to these people in any way, I'm pointing out that by claiming breaking the law is always unethical, you are calling these people unethical.

      The law is a means to an end, not a source of ethics or an end in itself.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    102. Re:Why bother? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      IT's a really nice, and moralistically correct response, however, this deals with companies who don't know the world moral at all.

      I certainly would not go to the length of defending Microsoft's business ethics, though indeed I believe they're a mixed bag. That said, I must be clear in my resolve: there is no point at which the bad actions of another justify bad actions of one's own. Just because Microsoft have in the past been thieves does not excuse to steal from them. This isn't the world of an eye for an eye; if one wishes to look down on Microsoft, one must not engage in the same practices for which one decries Microsoft.

      Ofcourse u can say, piracy is wrong, and ppl are criminals, but that's a very black and white view of things.

      I can also say murder is wrong and murderers are criminals, and that's also black and white. Sure, there are (rare!) cases where this isn't the case, such as the standard issue "I killed a man to stop him from killing 20 others." That all said, it's quite a bit more difficult to imagine a justified case of software piracy. Maybe you're in Turkey, an earthquake has just hit, you're the only engineer left alive in a small town, and you need to pirate some structural safety software so that you can safely shore up a hospital; sure, things like that exist, and I'm not trying to pretend that they don't.

      That said, this isn't one such situation, as are not the vast bulk. Please do remember that these comments are in a definate context, that of one slashdotter's parents trying to legitimize, and in a given single situation, "black and white" evaluations are frequently quite reasonable. There really aren't many cases where there's an overriding ethical concern giving legitimacy to pirating Windows. I'm sure you can come up with a few if you try hard; that said, I'd be highly surprised if more than a dozen such cases happened each year, and indeed modestly surprised if even two happened annually.

      Are there cases where theft is moral? Sure. The canonical example is the Hebrew law that one may enter another's field to eat, but may not leave with supplies; Judeo-Christi-Islamic law recognizes many such issues concretely. (No, I'm not religious; I learned that lesson from Les Miserables. Still, there's the question of audience size, and I bet more people have read The Old Testament than Victor Hugo.)

      That said, the cases where this type of software theft are moral are vanishingly few, and few enough that I feel comfortable skipping to hedge such issues. Is it black and white? No, but in my opinion, it's close enough.

      And a view which is strongly influenced by the media, over the last few years. Don't bother claiming it ain't true, cause no one is wondering why this is all aimed at civilians, and not at companies, why private organisations like the RIAA are conducting business like the mafia, putting pressure on civilians, misusing the law to their own benifit, and again leaving all the medium - big sized companies alone, cause they would be able to pay the costs of the lawyers, which 'ordinary people'can not.

      I agree with you that the behavior of the RIAA and MPAA is intolerable, and indeed I agree with your mobster analogy, not because it's emotionally charged, but because it's accurate; there's a reason they're being sued under RICOH in several states. It's racketeering. (I think you'd do better to refer to the Russians than the Mob, given who does what, but that's neither here nor there.) I also make no claim as regards whether the tactics they're undertaking have a media impact, though if that's their intent, I believe they've managed to go the opposite direction of their intent.

      That all said, I'd like to make it clear that I've resolutely held these views for twenty years, as a result of my upbringing; it's worth noting that the RIAA's first public anti-piracy campaign began in 1993, long after I began to speak out on my beliefs. I am unable to find similar data for the

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    103. Re:Why bother? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Bahahahahhahahhahah. Owned. I r tehsux. U r teh wins. (For someone who complains as often as I do about people's low quality use of the language, that's just hella embarrassing.)

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    104. Re:Why bother? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      You might consider explaining your motives. I find it curious what your motivation for using software you haven't paid for might be, if something other than to get things for free.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    105. Re:Why bother? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      You might consider explaining your motives.

      I believe my motives were quite clear from my very first comment. I was explaining how the amount of money a copyright holder has made from their creation is an important factor when considering whether it is ethical to infringe on their copyrights.

      In short: cliffski said something I disagreed with, and I explained why I disagreed.

      I find it curious what your motivation for using software you haven't paid for might be

      I find it curious too, considering I've not said that I do that. I'm explaining why a particular set of actions can be considered ethical, not trying to justify my behaviour to you. I feel no need to justify myself to you, if I just wanted stuff for free, I'd post a comment like "Yeah, I just want stuff for free, who's going to stop me?", not enter into a discussion about ethics.

      I don't think it's unethical to dance in the nude to "Like a Virgin" while wearing green body paint and slapping my arse cheeks in time to the music. If somebody said that it was unethical, I'd disagree with them too. That doesn't mean I do it myself.

      To be honest, I find it quite pathetic that I cannot disagree with the idea that copyright infringement is always unethical without being labelled "flamebait", "thief", etc. Whatever happened to debate without name-calling? Why not just call me "anti-American" or "terrorist" while you are at it? Where is this "copyright-is-unquestionably-good, anybody-who-questions-it-should-be-demonised" attitude coming from?

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    106. Re:Why bother? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Ah shut up already you damn dirty baby-killer!

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    107. Re:Why bother? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I don't have to consult an online encyclopedia to understand what Civil Disobedience is. Have you ever participated in a political movement that practices CD? Have you even an inkling what you're talking about? Have you read Thoreau's classic work titled 'Civil Disobedience'? How about Ghandi? Studied any of his writings about CD?

      I am not 'appealing to authority' I am simply trying to point you to some of the classic writings about Civil Disobedience so you will stop making a fool of yourself.

    108. Re:Why bother? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you got a clue and read it. Or did you just hyperlink it so you can keep it around as a cite in the future?

      My paperback copy of Thoreau's Civil Disobedience is probably older than you are.

    109. Re:Why bother? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      I believe my motives were quite clear from my very first comment. I was explaining how the amount of money a copyright holder has made from their creation is an important factor when considering whether it is ethical to infringe on their copyrights.

      Yes, but I would like to know more. I'm not being sarcastic, I'm being quite serious; I did read what you said. It's not that I'm saying you're wrong. I just would like further detail, because I have not yet heard a complete enough picture to understand your viewpoint.

      To be honest, I find it quite pathetic that I cannot disagree with the idea that copyright infringement is always unethical without being labelled "flamebait", "thief", etc.

      In as regards being labelled flamebait, I agree; similarly they've marked me troll for disagreeing with you. However, please do remember that I have never spoken about you directly; what others may have said about you notwithstanding, I have not called you anything.

      I find it curious too, considering I've not said that I do that. I'm explaining why a particular set of actions can be considered ethical, ...

      Well, I hadn't meant that actually to sound accusatory, though on second look I can see how it might be read that way. The question wasn't meant in that fashion. Still, I don't fully understand the standpoint.

      I feel no need to justify myself to you

      I wasn't asking you to justify yourself. I have no interest in your motivations. However, you did write what you wrote in such a fashion that suggests you have a more complex belief system than what fraction is revealed in your post.

      I'm not asking why you think something is okay. I'm asking how the belief system works; I don't have enough pieces to put together the picture, and the way it was phrased strikes me as curious, and likely worthy of investigation. I'm coming to you open-handed, just asking how you see things. If you're not willing to explain, that's fine. But I'm not asking you to justify yourself.

      Why not just call me "anti-American" or "terrorist" while you are at it?

      Because I don't treat people in that fashion, as I have not with you. Please do not confuse others' actions with mine.

      Where is this "copyright-is-unquestionably-good, anybody-who-questions-it-should-be-demonised" attitude coming from?

      If I had that attitude, I wouldn't be asking you to tell me how you see things, would I? I'm genuinely interested in your viewpoint. Don't take that wrongly, please. I just want to see the rest of the picture. You suggest that the amount of funds coming into a company alters the ethics involved in making these types of selections. I would like to know why. I'm not insulting you; I'm trying to understand.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    110. Re:Why bother? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If you really believe that stealing a million pennies from either one person or one penny from a million people is the same thing, you're fooling yourself. One act can put a person far enough in debt that they never dig themselves out, the other will scarcely be noticed.

      You never know. That one penny may put somebodies over the threashold. Sounds like you are trying to justify your bad deeds. It ain't working: you did bad deeds. Face them.

    111. Re:Why bother? by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 1

      You're really grasping for straws here. There's no "bad deed" being done. If you can't tell the difference between ripping someone off for $10,000 or grabbing a penny from a million people's driveways, which is the closest comparison, then you might want to back off on the crack a little bit.

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
    112. Re:Why bother? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      My paperback copy of Thoreau's Civil Disobedience is probably older than you are.

      LOL! Having failed with the fallacious appeal to authority argument, you now try the fallacious "I'm older than you" argument. Well, I'm 41. It's possible you're older, and it's always possible you have a book with that essay in it that's older. But not older in any way that helps your argument. That's because you haven't yet made an argument.

      I've stated a fact to you. The UK Poll tax of the 1980s/90s was defeated by civil disobedience. Civil disobedience of the form of people simply refusing to pay it. Most didn't demonstrate, and it wasn't the demonstrations that defeated it, it was the fact that people didn't pay.

      You'll notice, if you have read the Thoreau essay recently, that he discusses the defeat of a poll tax in America by the exact same method. There is nothing in Thoureau's essay that says that civil disobedience is requires demonstrating. If you think there is, then quote it - I've provided a link to the text for you to quote from.

      You are wrong. More than that, you are a bag of wind who tries name dropping in lieu of actually having an argument.

    113. Re:Why bother? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      With your teeming obsession for 'making an argument' you continuously gloss over the arguments I have offered. I have said NOTHING about 'a demonstration is required to commit Civil Disobedience. I simply said that CD is committed in the open, and you valorously face the consequences. Part of the process of debunking the law you oppose is going through the motions of facing the legal machinery down.\

      But I'm sure you have some catch-phrase to label whatever form of offensive evasion I have now committed.

      Really, you belong in the echo chamber of a debating society, dude. It's starting to seem like you've got a well thumbed copy of Robert's Rules of Order next to the keyboard.

    114. Re:Why bother? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Your claim was: "Civil disobedience involves explicitly disobeying a law that you diagree with in such a fashion that you are arrested."

      When I told you you were wrong, your only argument was to read a certain book (actually an essay). I've provided a link to that essay, and it says nothing of the kind. Nor have you been able to find anything to quote from it that helps your argument.

      Just accept that you don't have a leg to stand on.

  10. Buy an OEM copy by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    From a *trusted* on-line vendor. XP home will go for ~80-90 USD, Pro ~140. http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductList.jsp?Thir dCategoryCode=071002 for example. You see it offered for much less, odds are it is a "student" version or "replacement media". OEM it typically what system builders use, so if you use that version in theory it is tied to that system. The $300 retail version can be moved from system to system, but costs a boatload more.

    1. Re:Buy an OEM copy by numatrix · · Score: 1

      That's a great idea, except for one thing. It's not any more legal than running the pirate version.

      OEM copies may only be sold with a new PC. If they're not buying a new PC, installing an OEM copy is against the license agreement. Of course, most folks don't pay attention to that, but poster did say they were trying to be legal, not aiming for "almost, but not quite" legal.

      You can't even transfer your OEM license from one machine to another. Again, nobody pays attention to that, but that doesn't change the fact that if you play by Microsoft's rules and you want to be legal and buy an add on version of XP, you'll be paying just about $300 for a full retail copy. If you paid much less than that, it's either a pirate, or an OEM, and you're still not legal.

      Yes, the rules suck. If you don't like it, don't support microsoft.

    2. Re:Buy an OEM copy by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      OEM copies can be sold with things like computer mice or ethernet cards

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:Buy an OEM copy by (H)elix1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The legit vendors meet the letter of the law by shipping a cable or some other trinket that qualifies the media as OEM. That part is not a grey area. Yup, the transfer issue is why I mentioned the retail version - but you would have to transfer from three machines to break even. If you have more than three machines, odds are the volume pricing is for you...

    4. Re:Buy an OEM copy by technothrasher · · Score: 4, Interesting

      OEM copies can be sold with things like computer mice or ethernet cards

      Judging from Microsoft's 'System Builder' documentation, I don't think you even need to bother doing that. Buying and installing an OEM version of Windows onto your PC is perfectly fine and legal. But by doing so, you've now created a 'new PC' in Microsoft's eyes and so you no longer have access to any support from them, as support for OEM software is to be obtained from your system builder (namely, you, in this case). So you're legal but completely on your own. At least this is the way I read it.

    5. Re:Buy an OEM copy by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      ... or a power cable, or a dead motherboard+cpu ...

      But first, why not try a livecd of ubuntu or suse. If it does what they need, save the money, and spend some of it on hardware upgrades.

    6. Re:Buy an OEM copy by xanadu113 · · Score: 1

      I had MAJOR problems with ZipZoomFly when they were still called GoogleGear. I ordered a CPU, it was received damaged, and they absolutely REFUSED to issue me a replacement or a refund, saying >I

      I never did get my replacement, and they were absolutely the RUDEST people I've ever dealt with.

      In closing, boycott these ripoff artists if you can. Google "googlegear" or zipzoomfly and you'll see LOT'S of complaints.
      http://www.google.com/googlegear.html
      http://www.consumerist.com/consumer/zip-zoom-fly/
      http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/ripoff134267.h tm
      http://shopping.yahoo.com/merchrating/user_rv.html ?merchant_id=1019601

      Caveat emptor!

      --
      -Myke
    7. Re:Buy an OEM copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not anymore, Microsoft changed their XP licensing to match Office in late 2005. You have to buy a complete system now.

    8. Re:Buy an OEM copy by stewwy · · Score: 1

      in some sane juristictions you can. as your rights to sell on cannot be abbrogated by some elua clause

    9. Re:Buy an OEM copy by qaz2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As an individual, how much less on your own are you if you have a retail version?

      I do think one should buy the software one uses (I know I do), but I don't expect
      any personal support from Microsoft; I'm already glad if they fix known (security)
      bugs in a decent time frame.

    10. Re:Buy an OEM copy by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      That's a great idea, except for one thing. It's not any more legal than running the pirate version.

      Of course it is. If you've PAID MICROSOFT for it, then it's legal. You may not be in full compliance if you laid all the details out to to MS; but as far as I know, that's not actually breaking a law. If so, which one? (MS regulations aren't laws.) As for MS claiming you can't transfer licences, that seems to be something you are explicitly allowed to do under the law of many countries, certainly in Europe.

    11. Re:Buy an OEM copy by numatrix · · Score: 1

      It's not legal because:

      In the terms of the license agreement, microsoft stipulates you can only use an OEM license with a new system. The loophole of buying a cable or two doesn't cut it as of Sept 2005. Therefore, just because I've given microsoft money for an OEM copy, it doesn't mean I'm allowed to install it. I can give a toyota dealer money for a prius, but that doesn't mean I'm allowed to take a camry off the lot instead. Just because you can technically install an OEM copy on any old machine, doesn't mean you can LEGALLY install it on any old machine.

      This is an example of contract law, which is, from what I hear, definitely part of the legal system of pretty much every country out there. And it's a good thing, too. Contract law and copyright law are what makes the GPL, etc, enforceable.

      When you agree with a license agreement, you're entering a contract with microsoft. If you don't like the details (I often don't), DONT USE THE SOFTWARE. If more people took the time to read these things and take them seriously, we'd have more reasonable licenses. Until then, manufacturers will continue to say ridiculous things. Fortunately, sometimes the courts rule the some of those things are unenforcable, but I tell 'ya, I'd rather not be the test case. If I don't agree, I don't sign or buy.

      More reading on why buying an OEM copy isn't legal without buying a whole system, straight from the horse's mouth:

      http://blogs.msdn.com/mssmallbiz/archive/2005/06/0 6/425681.aspx

    12. Re:Buy an OEM copy by numatrix · · Score: 1

      Microsoft seems to disagree with you there:

      Excerpted from: http://blogs.msdn.com/mssmallbiz/archive/2005/06/0 6/425681.aspx

      Q. Can OEM Microsoft software be purchased by itself or with "some hardware" such as a hard drive, etc.?

      A. If it is an OEM Microsoft Desktop Operating System (such as Windows XP Pro or Windows XP Home), then it must also be sold only with a fully-assembled computer system as well (as of September 1, 2005), just like OEM server and application software. Prior to September 1, 2005, an OEM Desktop Operating System license could be sold with specific individual hardware components. These specific hardware components were defined as a nonperipheral computer hardware component... A "nonperipheral computer hardware component" means a component that will be an integral part of the fully assembled computer system on which the individual software license will be installed.." So, prior to September 1, 2005, an OEM Microsoft Desktop Operating System license (such as Windows XP Pro or Windows XP Home) could be sold with a hard drive, motherboard, CPU, memory, etc.

      Being that we're past Sept. 1, 2005, it would appear that an OEM copy cannot be purchased (legitimately) without buying a complete system. And incidentally, the OEM license says when you install it you certify that you have the appropriate hardware (post Sep, that'd be a complete system), so you're reponsible for checking that you meet the requirements yourself instead of just trusting a shady vendor selling OEM software.

    13. Re:Buy an OEM copy by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      As an individual, how much less on your own are you if you have a retail version?

      Quite a bit, actually. Microsoft provides 1-800 support for a year and email support for three years. I had to call them for support once because of a media flaw which rendered my shiny new compiler non-installable; they gave me a download link that would work for three days and sent me a new copy to my home address at their own expense. The only thing they made me do was tell them the serial number on the box. I was connected to a human less than thirty seconds after I called, and the only menu I had to go through was "If you are calling for sales, press 1; support, press 2; services, press 3; for any other reason, press 4."

      It was one of the most pleasant support experiences I've ever had, actually, the only better being about the guy who was doing the support (a tech from a long-since dead computer company called Advanced Logic Research, who told some of the raunchiest jokes I've ever heard) rather than the company.

      Microsoft puts a surprising amount of resources into support. I presume it's because they take so much bad PR that they have to be spit-sparkle polished to make sure their cash cows, namely the corporate world, know there's always a timely answer to catastrophe.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    14. Re:Buy an OEM copy by technothrasher · · Score: 1

      Microsoft seems to disagree with you there
       
      Yes, after reading your source, it looks like you're right... You can only legally purchase separate OEM licenses through one of Microsoft's authorized OEM distributors, and they're unlikely to sell to end users.
       
      So then why does Windows Genuine Advantage claim that OEM software installed on a non-bundled PC is licensed? Yes, I know it's because the software isn't smart enough to detect that's what happened. But if you got in trouble, couldn't you argue that Microsoft *directly* told you (through their WGA software) that your license was valid? I suppose they're argue that you knew you were deceiving them and so were committing fraud. Though that isn't necessarily the case. I think you could further argue that you bought the license in good faith from a bad vendor (if that is, in fact, what happened), and that because Microsoft then confirmed that your purchase was valid, it's really now between Microsoft and the vendor.

    15. Re:Buy an OEM copy by numatrix · · Score: 1

      I suspect if you look very carefully at the results of the WGA software there's probably some wording in it such that just because it says the license is valid, doesn't mean your particular use of it is. That would be where they might get you. Who knows. For the few copies of windows I need to personally run, they're covered under a site-license from the University where I work (including multiple work-at-home copies).

      As cliche as it is, it really does serve as extra motivation to move folks to other operating systems. I got my sister and brother in law using Ubuntu. My dad moved himself to a Mac (which, actually, is probably _worse_ from an open/closed perspective in some ways than Microsoft -- but that's a long discussion entirely unrelated to this), and I've been working on getting my little brother to wean himself from photoshop so he can finally ditch windows.

      Also, look again at that link I posted -- OEM copies purchased before September 2005 didn't have the same requirements. So it's entirely reasonable that your OEM copy of Windows was purchased before then. I doubt the WGA software can tell the difference, thus the decision to classify the license itself as legal. Again, I'm sure there's some legal loophole that Microsoft has in the fine print of that program that tells you that the results don't really count for anything, or are subject to certain conditions, blah, blah.

    16. Re:Buy an OEM copy by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      l it. I can give a toyota dealer money for a prius, but that doesn't mean I'm allowed to take a camry off the lot instead.

      Why does everyone here use car analogies? Anyway, what's happening is you're giving the Toyota dealer money for a Prius AND TAKING A PRIUS. What you do with the Prius once you've paid is none of their business.

      This is an example of contract law

      IFF the end-user had actually SIGNED a contract. And I must take any legal advice from MSDN with a grain of salt.

    17. Re:Buy an OEM copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is an OEM Microsoft Desktop Operating System (such as Windows XP Pro or Windows XP Home), then it must also be sold only with a fully-assembled computer system as well

      I hope that's a typo, cause that's pushing it for home builders... I recently bought an entire computer (except the video card) from Newegg, as well as an OEM copy of XP... then put it together myself. From your link and that quote, that means I "own nothing"... can I ask newegg for a refund now?

    18. Re:Buy an OEM copy by numatrix · · Score: 1

      I never sign a copy of the GPL when I use GPL licensed software, but I'm still covered by the terms. Or would you argue that because I didn't sign anything, I don't have to follow the GPL?

      Repeat after me: "use constitutes acceptance"

      Listen, I don't ~like~ the situation, as I've said many times before, this is one of the many reasons I just don't run microsoft software. But it is what it is.

    19. Re:Buy an OEM copy by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I never sign a copy of the GPL when I use GPL licensed software, but I'm still covered by the terms. Or would you argue that because I didn't sign anything, I don't have to follow the GPL?

      The GPL is about publishing; and it gives you ADDITIONAL rights over and above copyright. So you can not accept it, but then you're governed by ordinary copyright, and you basically can't use and certainly can't distribute the software at all.

      Repeat after me: "use constitutes acceptance"

      Since written contracts have been found to not be binding because they were unreasonable in taking away normal rights, I think this is again something that corporate lawyers tell you is the law. Or do you have a non-MS source for this "rule"?

    20. Re:Buy an OEM copy by numatrix · · Score: 1

      Using software beyond the scope of a particular license may very well be struck down if taken to court, and I certainly agree Microsoft is going to want to sell that argument as hard as they can. But are you willing to go to court to be the test case over it? Because it's gonna be a case by case decision, you can't just say, well clearly all contracts of this nature are unacceptable and unenforcable since it seems reasonable to suggest that some software license restrictions probably ARE valid, whether or not they all are. So who's going to volunteer to be the test cases to find out which is which?

      Again, the whole point of this thread was that poster's parents are trying to do the "right thing". If by "right thing" they wanted to steer well clear of getting into legal trouble, then buying an OEM copy against the license restrictions is clearly not their best bet. If by "right thing" they want to do the minimum necessary to have some legal argument that might (or might not) stand up in court, then by all means, suggest they go for the OEM license.

    21. Re:Buy an OEM copy by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      But are you willing to go to court to be the test case over it?

      Of course not; we've all heard of BSA "Audits", and such. You don't pick arguments with an 800 pound gorilla. That's a separate issue from whether it's legal. Similar to the RIAA suits; hardly any of which have gone to trial because it's just too huge a risk to go to trial, even if you win you know they'll just appeal and continue to harass you forever.

      If by "right thing" they wanted to steer well clear of getting into legal trouble

      I think they'd be perfectly safe with an OEM version (with an uncompromised serial number); MS is not auditing home users, the absolutely worst case scenario is they'd have to pay an upgrade (sidegrade?) to a Home version or whatever.

      But like many others here, my advice to "fix" it would be to spend a little more and get a Mac Mini. Perfect for domestic users who aren't deeply into gaming.

  11. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by LoonyMike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, it's easy to google for it, provided you already know that the solution relies in a key changer.

  12. Over-under by mj01nir · · Score: 5, Funny

    Over-under on the number of "install Linux over it" posts: 36.

    --
    the no .sig .sig
    1. Re:Over-under by gwbennett · · Score: 1

      I just switched my mom and dad (56 and 61) from Win XP Pirate Edition to Ubuntu and they both love it... It is worth a thought. Especially with the Live DVD option, try before you write.

      --
      Where is this free beer everyone on Slashdot keeps talking about?
    2. Re:Over-under by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      For an ex-Windows user with no special accessibility/language requirements, Kubuntu may better fit the bill. KDE's default layout is more Windows-like and allows you to do more without opening terminal Windows.

    3. Re:Over-under by gwbennett · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough I was using Gnome when I posted that comment, and in the time since have switched to KDE, and I do like it better than Gnome and the 2 others I tried. (P.S.: Second day with Ubuntu...love it)

      --
      Where is this free beer everyone on Slashdot keeps talking about?
    4. Re:Over-under by LeBleu · · Score: 1

      I'm curious what you would need to open a terminal window for under regular Ubuntu but not Kubuntu. I just recently installed Ubuntu on a used laptop I bought, and I am very impressed. It is leaps and bounds above the usability of any previous Linux distro I have dealt with. I really haven't seen anything an ordinary user would do that you need to use the terminal for. They seem to have an amazing set of easy to use control panels for everything.

      The funny thing is, installing Ubuntu and getting the built in wireless on the laptop to work was all a cinch. I didn't even have to use any of my linux/unix administration abilities to accomplish it. I still don't have Windows working right on the laptop, including the wireless not working. (I grabbed the wireless driver that was on the harddrive before I wiped it, but that was an XP version of the driver, and I only have a Windows 2000 license. I later installed the Windows 2000 driver, but now I seem to have two copies of wireless support installed, and can't figure out how to uninstall it even in safe mode.)

      --
      --LeBleu

      If you're reading this you're part of the mass hallucination that is Kevin the Blue.

    5. Re:Over-under by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      IME, Ubuntu's wireless support is excellent. If your network is WPA encrypted (and it should be), you will need to manually edit /etc/network/interfaces and add "wpa-" lines for WPA Supplicant (which is already installed - even on Server!) but that's about it.

      As for what's accessible in GNOME vs what's accessible in KDE, you're probably quite right (both DEs have come a long way in the last few years) especially as far as Ubuntu's concerned. Don't forget, though, that Ubuntu's developers tend to work around GNOME's deficiencies by introducing special applications. The a la carte menu editor, for example, isn't normally bundled with GNOME.

    6. Re:Over-under by nitromatt · · Score: 1

      Installed Debian 3.1_r1(sarge) over WIN XP on Dell Latitude C600. Not sure how long it stays like this but debian gnu/linus is running great.

  13. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by Nerftoe · · Score: 1

    Perhaps he did not know what search criteria to use.

  14. Do a repair install. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A repair install will not clear the registry, but it will ask you for a new license key. That should be enough to make it legit.

  15. Do NOT fear the Windows Reinstall. by mikelieman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IF your folks are worried about a reinstall, they're NOT ready to survive a catastropic harddrive crash.

    Much less full reload to clear an infection.

    --
    Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
    1. Re:Do NOT fear the Windows Reinstall. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Never fear. You can change your product key. Buy your good copy of windows and use its key, then you have a legit copy, key and when your at your time for a reinstall its all good. The media itself is not what microsoft cares about its the license that causes 80% of the price of windows.

      to change your key youll have to reactivate windows.

            1.

                  Click Start, and then click Run.
            2.

                  In the Open box, type Regedit, and then click OK.
            3.

                  In the left pane, locate and then click the following registry key:

              HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\WindowsNT\Cu rrent Version\WPAEvents

            4.

                  In the right pane, right-click OOBETimer, and then click Modify.
            5.

                  Change at least one digit of this value to deactivate Windows.
            6.

                  Click Start, and then click Run.
            7.

                  In the Open box, type the following command, and then click OK.

              %systemroot%\system32\oobe\msoobe.exe /a

            8.

                  Click Yes, I want to telephone a customer service representative to activate Windows, and then click Next.
            9.

                  Click Change Product key.
          10.

                  Type the new product key in the New key boxes, and then click Update. If you are returned to the previous window, click Remind me later, and then restart the computer.
          11.

                  Repeat steps 6 and 7 to verify that Windows is activated. You receive the following message:

                          Windows is already activated. Click OK to exit.

          12.

                  Click OK.
          13.

                  Install SP1 for Windows XP. (if you dont already have it or higher.)

      If you cannot restart Windows after you install SP1, press F8 when you restart the computer, select Last Known Good Configuration, and then repeat this procedure.

    2. Re:Do NOT fear the Windows Reinstall. by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

      Yeah, surrrrre, "my parents".

      Looks like somebody accidentally installed the WGA update.

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    3. Re:Do NOT fear the Windows Reinstall. by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

      That was my very first thought as well. In general, it is amazing how little some people value their data.

    4. Re:Do NOT fear the Windows Reinstall. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WGA gives you links to purchase a new key for XP, so if he installed WGA, there is no reason to be asking about it here, since it would have told him the answer he's looking for.

    5. Re:Do NOT fear the Windows Reinstall. by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      That's ridiculously hard. What would be wrong with Control Panel->License->(a text field for changing the key) ?

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    6. Re:Do NOT fear the Windows Reinstall. by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

      Since this was bound to come up exactly once in the life of 1 in 2 million people, I'm kind of glad my routine search for what I'm looking for in Control Panel doesn't include a useless-to-virtually-everyone icon.

      Unless I'm wrong and changing your OS product key happens all the time. Is that a normal business function that I don't get?

    7. Re:Do NOT fear the Windows Reinstall. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      IF your folks are worried about a reinstall, they're NOT ready to survive a catastropic harddrive crash.

      Much less full reload to clear an infection.


      Why not? They could have a RAID1 array and be doing a complete backup of their entire harddrive every night to a remote location, and it still wouldn't change the fact that their Windows install is not legit and that they might have to do a complete reinstall of Windows and all their programs to rectify it.

    8. Re:Do NOT fear the Windows Reinstall. by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      It doesn't need to be obtrusive, but the instructions above are ridiculously hard. Since it is rare, you can sort of hide it but it should only be one thing to do (open window, edit key, "okay", ???, profit!). Why should you need to open regedit? Why should you need to restart the computer. Why should you have to type multiple, arcane commands?

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
  16. Don't bother by Goodgerster · · Score: 0

    Just keep using it. WGA can't tell. If you buy a copy, WGA will only say it's pirated, so why spend the £90?

  17. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should probably remember to google the key before you use it too. See if it belongs to someone. Someone stupid even.

  18. use the opportunity to switch to Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are not a lover of entering license number, viruses, spyware, and worse, my advise is: Backup your stuff and switch to Linux. Any good distro e.g. Ubuntu will do and you'll enjoy your computer again.

  19. You're lucky that I decided to share this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, there is one thing you could do. Go pickup the computer, and your parents - then drive to the nearest steep cliff. Once you're there, throw both parents off the side, and then throw the computer over after you hear them land. Once that's taken care of, stab yourself in the chest with your car keys until you draw blood, then jump off the same cliff.

    That solution might not exactly match what you were expecting, but I think you'll find it to be quite satisfying given the context of voluntarily running a Microsoft operating system.

  20. All posts above have answered this question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean really. The problem is solved in one of the posts above.

    I think we can now safely turn over the thread to jokes along the lines of 'now that they saved their data, they're gonna lose it again to hackers using zero-day or javascript exploits'.

  21. Well, try this. by AnXa · · Score: 1

    Just buy the windowsXP and don't install it. It leaves you out of your guilty feeling.


    For real, At first I would download a cdkey changer which allows changing the cdkey without reinstalling it. Yes it's piracy software used to broke windows security.

    But I'd really recommend waiting for Windows Vista, since it will be about as expensive as Windows XP. And does contain a lot of important security and useability fixes.

    Althought, I'd really just love to see how well Linux can survive in your home. Novell has come up with really good distro with SUSE 10, and ubuntu doesn't do that bad job either. Or just try Fedora Core.

    Try one of these... :)

    --
    -Seeing the problem is ½ of solution-
    1. Re:Well, try this. by kahrytan · · Score: 1


      Screw Microsoft. If your parents don't play windows games, then they should just upgrade to Linux. For newbies, Linspire CNR might be a good alternative option. or just stick to [K|X]ubuntu.

      --
      \
  22. Microsoft does not know the alphabet. by students · · Score: 2, Funny
    In a VB (eww!) script in parent's link:
    Wscript.echo "Correct usage: Cscript ChangeVLKey.vbs ABCDE-FGHIJ-KLMNO-PRSTU-WYQZX"
    Back to kindergarten, Microsoft.
  23. WGA by immorak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm stuck with the WGA screen when i turn my computer on. Anyone have a work around?

    1. Re:WGA by BigumD · · Score: 1

      Buy a copy of Windows?

      --
      --The space between my ears was intentionally left blank--
  24. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is the quintessence of a slashdot post.

    it takes the earliest opportunity for a cheap and pointless shot at microsoft, then gives answers that are partly wrong, mostly overelaborate, and entirely redundant.

  25. Failsafe by wjcofkc · · Score: 0
    All of the excellent reccomendations aside, it sounds like your parents are neophytes that would be baffled by many of the avenues suggested thus far. That statement is not meant to be an insult.

    The simple solution? By an external hard drive that is at least twice as large as your system hard drive. Then simply drag and drop the root windows directory, or maybe you can even drag and drop the c: drive over to the external drive. All data is now safe. Buy a legit copy of Windows, reformat the local HD and install your new copy. Then you can bring all your data back by dropping into corresponding folders. Applications on the other hand, would likely need reinstalled. At least your apps are legit, right?

    Furthermore, regularily back up important files from the local HD to the external.

    Also, whatever filetypes need saved are likely all going to be workable on a Mac or Linux.

    Good Luck, William aka Mac fanboy fighting hard to keep my post from turning into an offtopic advert for Apple

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  26. Careful before you buy by insecuritiez · · Score: 4, Informative

    For all the people saying just buy Windows and change the key - there is a good chance this *wont* work. In principle changing the key does work - the trick is getting a legal key for the version installed.

    Your parents probably installed a Corporate copy of XP. This doesn't take the same keys as Home so they can't just walk down to Best Buy and get a key that is going to work.

    In fact, there are a number of different key types including:

    * XP Home
    * XP Home OEM
    * XP Pro
    * XP Pro OEM
    * XP Corporate
    (and more)

    Assuming your parents installed Corporate, they still need to buy a legal copy of Windows, yes, but they won't be able to pop the key in and go on their merry way. They will need to do what is knows an a "In place install". This isn't the cleanest way to do things but will make sure all their files are left intact (all settings including the entire registry are lost). Boot off the new disk:

    The first menu is going to ask you to install, go to the recovery console, or quit. Choose install by hitting enter.

    The second menu is a license agreement, hit F8.

    The third menu is going to show the existing Windows installation, choose to install on top of it. You will be warned about an existing Windows install there and be given the option of deleting the existing %systemroot% folder and continuing.

    Choosing this option will not delete anything on the drive other that what is in the windows folder. All of their files will still be available by navigating to the "Documents and Settings" folder.

    I know it is a dirty mess but it is the only way to go from one version of Windows to another while still retaining the contents of the hard drive.

    1. Re:Careful before you buy by Barny · · Score: 1

      Also theres windows XP Pro "Update" version...

      The easy way around most of this is to get the OEM version for the windows you have installed, do a software repair (boot from cd, enter at first screen, f8 then "R" to repair) and then it will take the OEM CD key as normal :)

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re:Careful before you buy by insecuritiez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A "repair" will often fail when repairing between different versions of Windows (Home/Pro, Media Center/Pro, etc). I agree that a repair is a lot cleaner than what I suggested but it is less likely to get the job done. Between the different versions, (home, pro, media center) and the different sub versions (upgrade, full, OEM, corp) the number of Windows CDs needed for people who do this daily is ridiculous.

    3. Re:Careful before you buy by Mr.+Essen · · Score: 0
      Choosing this option will not delete anything on the drive other that what is in the windows folder. All of their files will still be available by navigating to the "Documents and Settings" folder.

      I know it is a dirty mess but it is the only way to go from one version of Windows to another while still retaining the contents of the hard drive.
      This will also delete the registry, and you will have to reinstall all the programs. If they don't have too much data to save, it's better to backup it and format.

      They can use the Backup utility for this purpose. This will save all their documents and settings.
    4. Re:Careful before you buy by daoine_sidhe · · Score: 1

      The version you refer to as Corporate is actually nothing more than a volume license edition...In other words, the version that just about everyone is using pirated is Windows XP Professional, Volume License Edition. The key here is Professional- To go 'Legit' so to speak, without losing installed programs, preferences, or data, they would need to buy a copy of Windows XP Professional (Home or Media Center editions will not work, they won't 'find' their copy of windows to 'repair') and then do the in-place repair installation, (boot to cd, skip first repair option, at the point you would normally install or partition, you will also have the option to 'repair' an existing installation) using their new product key at the point it asks for it. I've helped a few people go 'legit' this way when linux or a clean install was not an option. This has the added advantage of essentially converting the volume license install into a standard, legal install, without losing anything other than a few Windows Updates that will need to be re-installed.

    5. Re:Careful before you buy by gte910h · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've done this sort of install before

      CAVEAT: Make *sure* you copy all data out of user directories before doing this. You will *not* be able to access them sometimes.

                                      --Michael

      --
      Want to see every step I took to start my company? http://www.rowdylabs.com/blogs/pitchtothegods
    6. Re:Careful before you buy by KDingo · · Score: 1

      Not to mention to run WindowsUpdate the very second the install is complete. A Windows reinstall reverts from all the updates you had from the previous install. They probably aren't sold anymore, but if you're reinstalling a pre-SP2 copy, Windows will be particularly vunerable to anything and everything. Either way, do run WindowsUpdate.

    7. Re:Careful before you buy by jowaju · · Score: 1

      Indeed, the number of versions is absolutely staggering.

      XP Home OEM Full
      XP Home Retail Upgrade
      XP Home Retail Full
      XP Pro OEM Full
      XP Pro Retail Upgrade
      XP Pro Retail Full
      XP Pro Corp (VLK) Full

      Also within each OEM group you have specific OEM vendors:

      XP Home OEM (Vanilla - not tied to any OEM in particular)
      XP Home OEM (Dell)
      XP Home OEM (HP)
      XP Home OEM (Compaq)
      XP Home OEM (Sony)
      XP Home OEM (IBM/Lenovo)
      XP Home OEM (Any of the other 100 or so OEM vendors big enough to have their own OEM version)

      Then there's a matching XP Pro version of each of these as well. Add in all the Service Pack slipstreamed versions and that's a lot of CD's to keep up with (or one heck of a multiboot CD).

    8. Re:Careful before you buy by julesh · · Score: 1

      If you find you can't, you should be able to get at them with the recovery console.

    9. Re:Careful before you buy by SuperMog2002 · · Score: 1

      Just wait for the version fun when Vista comes out!

      --
      Sunwalker Dezco for Warchief in 2016
    10. Re:Careful before you buy by SuperMog2002 · · Score: 1

      An excellent point, but if you find yourself in this situation, you can usually escape by logging on as administrator* (administrator itself, not a normal user account with administrator access). Administrator adds a context menu item to take ownership of files, which will override the security preventing you from getting to those files normally. *On XP Home Edition, to log on as administrator, you must boot in to safe mode.

      --
      Sunwalker Dezco for Warchief in 2016
  27. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by Ned_Network · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://www.google.com/search?q=Windows+XP+Key+Ch anger
    This was the first thing I tried when a customer approached me with this problem. And it didn't work. Repeatedly.

    I guess that "+5 informative" needs some "-1 overrated" side-salad, huh?

    I'm pretty sure the reason it doesn't work is that the version of Windows supplied under the genuine advantage program is different from the version that my customer's nephew installed. I believe it was Windows XP Professional Corporate Edition that was installed, and I'd guess that the CD supplied by Microsoft when she clicked on the "Get Genuine" link was either OEM or retail (it was certainly Windows XP Professional, and was a hologrammed CD).

    The way I fixed this was to do a "repair install" of Windows XP. This worked perfectly & retained all the user's settings and documents, although I was pretty nervous about doing it and a number of drivers did require reinstall. Honestly, if you're undertaking this, be prepared to back everything up with a Knoppix CD & a portable hard-drive and to do a format-reinstall if necessary.

    Ned.

  28. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by Surasanji · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't your Wife's Brother's Cousin be your Wife's cousin too?

  29. The obvious answer? by Skiron · · Score: 0, Troll

    Install GNU/Linux. All the worms and trojans would go too.

  30. Great comment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is about the first sensible comment here. The bigger problem than using the pirated Windows is that apparently they don't have reliable (any?) backups. What are they going to do when the HD suddenly craps out? Once you've prepared for that (i.e., good backups!) your stated problem (fear of reinstalling) becomes moot.

  31. If it's a pirated version of XP by Khyber · · Score: 2, Funny

    Turn that pirated version in to Microsoft and give them some info on how you obtained it, and they'll get you a legit copy of Windows in return, plus a small nominal charge, of course.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:If it's a pirated version of XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you actually purchased it, have a 'real' looking CD... etc.

      A burned CD marker'd 'Windows XP' is not going to get you a real CD key. A copy some friend gave you is not going to get you a real CD.

      And only 5 copies per location as well. Dealt with a local business that had bought a dozen machines from a 'white box' vendor.. all had xp pro oem on them.

      White box vendor basically told them 'Here's where I got the windows... (website) if you think there's a problem take it up with them, it's not my problem'.

      (website) was selling xp pro OEM for $75 a copy.
      (I fully believe Microsoft is going to make it his problem in a big way)

      There's a process you can go through on Microsoft's website, we sent them 5 copies with the information (where they got them, where their supplier said he got them) and the copies of XP (which if I hadn't taken the time to label them you couldn't tell the difference from legit. The CD's looked right, the manual looked right, the sticky label looked right) and got 5 keys/CD's back from them which we used to validate those 5. The other 7 or so we got a decent deal on a 15 pack and gave them a decent price on 7 of them. We also went through the validation website and used the downloadable Genuine Advantage changer.

      Now has come the nasty part. In the interests of being totally honest, they felt they should contact them about the 2003 server w/ more licenses. Had to call Microsoft for that, and sure enough, that was pirated too. Looks genuine as hell. They made a deal with them, they sent in all the documentation, got a new key for 2003, but did have to buy the addon licenses.

      A final note, it has to be the same version. Windows XP Home OEM to Windows XP Home OEM, Windows Corp > Windows Corp. Etc.

      If you are going to switch versions, you will have to do a reinstall.

    2. Re:If it's a pirated version of XP by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 1

      No, they're supposed to give you the 40 sheckles of silver, not the other way around.

  32. Vista by jdbartlett · · Score: 2, Funny

    Upgrading XP? Why not just wait for Vista?

    See you in a few years.

    1. Re:Vista by JustNiz · · Score: 0, Troll

      Becuase vista is gonna suck.

    2. Re:Vista by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      Whereas XP is king of the OSes, right? Especially with all that SP2 added security! That solved everything! Microsoft may as well stop right there and call it good - I think they've made the operating system we'll all be using for the next 100 years!

      I don't think technically-savvy XP users have delusions of OS superiority. The reason they still use Windows is compatibility phobia/lock-in. Why invest in a system that's in the process of being superseded? Microsoft support will continue for a long time, but not with the new features and dedicated applications of Vista.

    3. Re:Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because his parents probably have less than the 2 GB RAM necessary for it to run well...

    4. Re:Vista by DrRotmos · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I hear it's being bundled with Duke Nukem Forever, because they are being simultaneously released.

    5. Re:Vista by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      That's memory bandwidth. 2 GB/s.

      For PCs to qualify as Vista "capable", they need at least 512MB RAM. 1GB is considered "premium ready".

      Until the last couple of years, most cheapo PCs came with only 256MB RAM. Upgrades are dirt cheap, though.

    6. Re:Vista by GeeksHaveFeelings · · Score: 1

      See you in a few years.

      Does it really take that long to boot?

    7. Re:Vista by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> Whereas XP is king of the OSes, right?
      Nope, that would be Linux :-)

      >> Why invest in a system that's in the process of being superseded?
      I agree. However vista will still suck because of all the extra drm and minimum required hw specs that means they'll probably have to upgrade their hardware too. My reccomendation: let the try out linux instead. That way, it won't cost a thing and they'll actually end up with a good operating system that won't lock them out of their own hardware.

    8. Re:Vista by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      That is a good point. General computer users probably just use regular office apps, photo management apps, and maybe some music. Kubuntu is probably the best way for a Linux noob to go.

  33. Just rename the old folder by Phasys · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Rename the old windows folder (to something like windows.old) Install new windows (in folder c:\windows or whatever) Reinstall old applications Copy old document folders to the new document folder or link old folder to "my documents" Copy favorites. Done. Delete old windows folder.

  34. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, so it's the html that's stupid, not you.

    Thanks for clearing that up.

  35. Not all keys work for all versions of windows by stoilis · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind that the key changing method doesn't always work, I already tried it for the exact same reason.

    There appears to be more than one version of Windows XP Pro. There is "Retail" and "OEM". There are situations where keys from one product version doesn't work on others.

    For the legitimate key to work you need to make sure that your cracked version of windows will be able to use the new key, orelse you may end up with a useless new version of windows.

    I contacted Microsoft's support for an official answer on the issue. They informed me there are in fact three versions of Windows XP Pro and one cannot use keys from one on another.

    I actually returned my new legitimate version of windows and keep using the pirated one since I am too bored to format my PC right now...

    1. Re:Not all keys work for all versions of windows by tech_guru5182 · · Score: 1

      There are also multiple OEM versions of Windows, with seperate codes. The big vendors each get their own pool of codes, and there are several different pools of codes for local vendors to use.

      --
      BAN BPL! Keep the radio spectrum free fro
  36. They should start from scratch by sunking2 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Afterall, they shouldn't have what is on there now. Why do they expect a mulligan?

  37. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by Jekler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm absolutely amazed. When you already know the answer and derive keywords from the answer you already know, searching for the solution is trivial!

  38. Why buy it? by fsapo · · Score: 0

    www.ubuntulinux.org and be happy :)

  39. Windows Genuine Advantage Talkback by tsvk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Now that Windows Update and certain Windows downloads require you to validate your copy of Windows before accessing the services (the Windows Genuine program), people have of course started having troubles with invalid product keys, etc.

    To help people sort out their Windows license problems, Microsoft have put online the Windows Genuine Advantage Talkback bulletin board, where Microsoft offers advice for people with license troubles.

    An interesting utility that I found mentioned there on the bulletin board is Microsoft Genuine Advantage Diagnostic Tool, that shows lots of information about the license / product key of the current Windows installation.

  40. Try windows update, they sell keys there by stikves · · Score: 1


    I tried to update one of my friends' laptop, but it failed the activation check. Apparantly he did not install from the original cd that came with his computer (there is a genuine sticker below the laptop so it does have a legal license), but instead used a "corporate version" he got from another friend.

    Windows update offered selling a legimate key for retail price. I guess they do this for non-volume versions too.

    So all you have to do is engage windows update, get the check failed and follow the corresponding links to get a legal key for its price.

    (PS: I did not buy the key, and he could not find his original cd. So he has a legal license that sits as a sticker below his laptop and an illegal copy of windows which he cannot update properly).

    1. Re:Try windows update, they sell keys there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have your friend contact the laptop's manufacturer to get a replacement Windows install disk. It will work with the key he already has. And, it will probably only cost about 10% of what a windows cd & license would cost.

    2. Re:Try windows update, they sell keys there by stikves · · Score: 1

      Yes, they sell CDs for cheap. But they still "charge" even if that's small.

      We already have a license, and we have the CDs: the "pirated" one, my laptop's cd and several others from my uni's MSDN subscription (every possible Windows XP version actually: home/pro, retail/volume, plain/sp2). However none of them works with "his laptop's" key. I guess it only works with manufacturer's CD.

      MSDN does not allow sharing keys with friends, :( we have everything but still no genuine windows installation. And it's not logical to pay for some something which provide no functionality :)

  41. Re:simple by AirRaven · · Score: 0

    Or, for a comparitively cutting edge experience, give Xenix a try!

  42. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Whatever they do, don't ask the neighbour's teenager "computer expert",
    and thirdly the teenager is, well... I wouldn't.


    And why exactly is a teenage incapable of knowing how to perform an operation such as this? Personally, I'm 17 and I believe I qualify as the "teenager computer expert". Oftentimes, in my experience, and teenager is more likely to be able to handle something like this, as we've grown up with computers, and many of us are very familar with it's inner workings.
  43. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

    Since he may need to reinstall anyway, might as well put it off until Vista is released and use its beta in the meantime:

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/windowsvista/downloads/p roducts/getthebeta/

  44. Maybe they like security updates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously you've not heard of WGA. You must be new here.

  45. Magical Jellybean Software by AndresCP · · Score: 1

    Google "Magical Jellybean Software" and get that key extractor/changer. Silly name, good results.

    --
    "Just because you're eloquent doesn't mean you aren't a fucking crackpot." -Wavebreak
    1. Re:Magical Jellybean Software by ArghBlarg · · Score: 1

      Yow -- when I tried to download that program my Avira freaked out -- you sure this is legit?

      --
      ERROR 144 - REBOOT ?
    2. Re:Magical Jellybean Software by ares284 · · Score: 1

      I use it all the time. It's harmless, and a good piece of software to keep on your thumbdrive. Comes in handy if you're going to reformat and can't find the original license. Just run this lil gem, then write it down, and there you go. There are perfect, legitimate uses for this jellybean.

      -Ares

  46. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

    Oh wait, the beta's not available any more. D'oh!

  47. P2P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cheapest and easiest solution: fire up a copy of your favorite P2P client, and download one of the bajillion WGA cracks.

    Be sure to scan it for viruses, and check the version # of the crack vs. the version # of LegitCheckControl.dll in system32.

  48. XP Pro Corp to Home = No Repair by Eddy+Da+KillaBee · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's one small problem I've run into at my job when we sell customers an XP Home license to get them off of Corp: you can't do a repair installation from Windows XP Pro to Home. That's a problem because most of the customers we deal with want to save money and don't want the Pro license, although the Pro license gives us the option to Repair, and therefore keep their files, settings, etc.

    Anyone know of a possible way to get around this, other than having to reinstall Windows XP Home from scratch?

    1. Re:XP Pro Corp to Home = No Repair by Tekzel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Only way I can think of is using "Aloha Bob PC Relocator". You clone the pro drive to another system, and do a repair install on it to get that one up and running and use that one as the "old pc" in the relocation, then install the new windows on the customer's system and use that as the new pc, then do a network relocation. Pain in the ass, but it would work.

    2. Re:XP Pro Corp to Home = No Repair by FyreMoon · · Score: 1

      You could try through the recovery console to rename the windows folder, then install XP to the drive. It will request you install that copy of windows to that new name, change it back to c:\windows. Windows should then proceed to install a new copy of XP Home to the drive and ignore the old windows folder. You have to reinstall anything that relies on the registry for its settings, but the data will be intact.

    3. Re:XP Pro Corp to Home = No Repair by Kahless2k · · Score: 1

      MS has a key changer on their site: http://www.microsoft.com/genuine/purchase/UpdateIn structions.aspx
       
      Wont work with an OEM Key, but it does work for retail keys -> I've successfully changed several keys for customers of mine using this tool (you DO need a legit key though).

    4. Re:XP Pro Corp to Home = No Repair by Ned_Network · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There's one small problem I've run into at my job when we sell customers an XP Home license to get them off of Corp: you can't do a repair installation from Windows XP Pro to Home. That's a problem because most of the customers we deal with want to save money and don't want the Pro license, although the Pro license gives us the option to Repair, and therefore keep their files, settings, etc.
      If I caught this in time, I'd just tell 'em to buy the Pro version. Here in the UK XP OEM Home is about £60 and OEM Professional about £80 or £90. Provided I was happy & confident (not a given) that repairing with the OEM Professional version of XP would work then I'd tell 'em to buy the Pro and that extra expense would be covered by time saved paying me to muck about with it.

      But in situations like this, I think there's a lot to be said for a format & reinstall. Don't get me wrong - I think this can be a massive cop-out on many occasions, and I believe that lots of people do it too easily because it's easier than analysing and learning about a problem - but in a situation where I'm not sure how Windows will behave (am I sure that Pro will repair the particular pirate version of XP that they have?) then format-and-reinstall is a very proven solution.

      On a system that's otherwise working fine, and has been for some time, then I'd rather spend an hour or 90 minutes removing malware or a virus, or fixing an "inexplicable" browser problem than doing a format-and-reinstall. But when I have to do a format-and-reinstall then it's a VERY straight-forward process - I back up everything on the hard-drive with a knoppix CD to my portable drive, copy the back-up to another machine, dd the drive with a few zeros so that the Windows install starts on a blank sheet, and let it get on with things. I charge this at three hours of my time, but I'd guess that I probably only spend two or two-and-a-half actually sitting at or waiting on the machine because I base this fixed price on being able to take it away and leave it running in the corner of my study for a couple of days. Thus the customer gets a "brand new" machine with all a fresh operating system, all the Windows updates, I reinstall any software disks they give me, drag & drop My Documents back into place (and explain how to search the "Old Stuff" folder I've copied back to their hard-drive from my portable disk), reimport their address book & emails; when I take the machine back I check their printer and broadband works and the customer is usually like "Wow! It's never been this fast before!!"

      I'll say again that this isn't always the best way to resolve problems, but many users don't have innumerable programs installed on their machine, nor such a customised desktop or set of preferences that it'll take them long to get things back to a way they're comfortable with. Often there is so much crap installed by the OEM at the factory that users have never experienced a truly fresh install of XP before!!

      Ned.

  49. Clean reinstall without loss of data by QuantumFTL · · Score: 2, Informative

    Digg had an article recently about how to perform a windows re-install without loss of information. This may be of use to you.

  50. Move to Thailand by aapold · · Score: 1

    Aside from being pirate heaven, a legit copy of thai windows xp costs about $3.50.

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  51. Install a free operating system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...then you will never be trapped by something like this again. Linux or BSD are just as easy to use for most ordinary tasks, and once installed are solid and reliable for ordinary users to access web sites, and to do simple word processing tasks. The majority of users do not need any more, and it is certainly an act of crass stupidity to pay for Windows licenses to do just these things.

  52. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the OP meant brother's wife's cousin

  53. A post about installing windows? by kbox · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Must be a slow news day.

    This just in: Local man dies of natural causes

  54. It's simple... by yakhan451 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... all you have to aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all.

    1. Re:It's simple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... all you have to aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all.

      I'm gonna throw a f--k--g chair at you. Then I'm going to revoke your current Window's key.

      Steve Balmer

  55. Re:Simple... by AngryUndead · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microsoft will be dropping retail support for XP in December 2007 or January 2008, and corporate support in December 2008

    You are dead wrong. Stop spreading the FUD. What I think you meant to say is that you won't be able to buy a copy a year after the release date of Vista. According to Microsoft, mainstream support for Windows XP will end two years after Vista has been generally available. So, we're looking at the end of 2008 or beginning of 2009 at the very least (depending on how bad Vista slips), followed by extended support for quite a few years, 3-5 from looking at the information they have.

    Take Windows 98, for example. They've supported that for eight (8) years now. Windows XP will probably not enjoy that level of support, but it still bodes well for the future of that system. Windows XP is in no way "soon to be dead". Especially with the huge amount of government use it gets. The government certainly won't be switching to Vista as fast as it comes out, I'd expect that to take at least one year. Until then, Microsoft can't piss off one of the biggest buyers.

    Anyway, I tend to ramble, but I think I've made my point about that.

    So why not take a small portion of the money that you'd spend on a soon-to-be-dead WinXP disk, and buy a nice big shiney 250 gig hd ($100) and load ubuntu, suse, or another real OS on it?

    Because most users just want ease of use and familiarity. I love gentoo myself, but every Linux install that I've done so far has been tweaky, finicky, and just plain difficult at times. I like to play with it and learn, as it relates to my profession, but most users just don't want to put up with that. Windows, for the majority of users, just plain works.

  56. further questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    from what I understand you are saying -

    your parents have a copy of windows they know is pirated, but now want to go legit. they want to do so without having to clear their PC and lose all the settings/etc. they've accumulated over the years with all the installed programs and so forth.

    leaving aside whether clearing everything may be a good idea anyway (accumulated cruft, malware etc.) - what do you mean, about not having to reinstall software? are we talking *legit* software? it seems a bit strange to have pirated windows, but legit applications (particularly if the application would have cost a lot more than the windows licence). if the intended path is to get the windows legit, but you've still got heaps of pirated applications, then you've got more problems than you realise you do. unless, of course, it's a calculated gamble that you are more likely to be hit by enforcemeny from MS, than by the various other application vendors.

    i think what you need to do is to write down the cost of "properly going legit" - all the applications you want to use, etc., total it up, and decide if you have that kind of money. and then decide if you are prepared to go into a completely free environment - any one of the linux distros.

    although it IS "free as in freedom", as a practical matter, free as in beer makes a big difference too, potentially even more. you'd have to go through hassle and pain learning a new setup, and the features may well be worse off etc. for particular applications (GIMP != Photoshop, but seriously, if you can afford the price of photoshop you're not in the common group). but some times that's what it means to go legit. I mean, I look at the price tags of a lot of things that I want, and then I realise, "shit, i'm poor". but, you know, this is how the capitalist system works. and then maybe you can think a bit more about, what does it really mean to have a system where the cost of producing something is X, but the price of it may be X + "arbitrary number determined for profit maximisation", vs what could be determined as a "fair price".

  57. What I would do... by peterfa · · Score: 1

    I'd boot to that CD and install it as an upgrade. It will replace all the important files, yet not one thing personal will be changed. You might wonder if it realy did anything. This solution also fixes pain=in=the=ass driver issues too.

  58. Re:Options... by rylin · · Score: 1

    Hello muppet.
    Why the fuck would you take care to point out acronyms and provide correct capitalization for most products - yet spell "Windows" "'winders"?
    Also, what are the "intranetz".

    I hate you.

  59. Best way I know how. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy the copy of Windows you want. Not upgrade, full version.

    Put in disk.
    Boot to disk.
    At the first prompt, Enter.
    Next screen F8
    Next screen R

    Repair install. Fixes lots of problems. Change key during setup.

    You cannot do Home over Pro. You can do Pro over Home.

    Update.
    Done.

  60. Secret Code Here by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    up up down right left right right up enter

    Done!

    1. Re:Secret Code Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you get 30 lives for that one.

  61. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by Tim+C · · Score: 3, Insightful

    a number of drivers did require reinstall

    It's actually alluded to on the page that you linked to, but it bears spelling out explicitly:

    The repair install option returns Windows to the state it is in when freshly installed from the CD used

    In other words, while you keep all your settings, files, etc, it wipes out any drivers, service packs or other updates that you have installed since installing from the CD. An XP SP1 install CD used to repair an up-to-date XP install is going to wipe out SP2, and a whole host of other updates.

    That's why you had to reinstall the drivers - they weren't on the CD so they were nuked.

  62. Obligatory Linux Plug by doodleboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I know most folks hate computers and just want to get whatever they're used to so they can get their work done with the minimum amount of thought. For those people shelling out the money to get legal with Microsoft is probably the best way to go.

    But there are a lot of Windows users out there, let's call them "cheapskates," who can't see the sense in paying twice as much for software as they paid for their entire computer. I bet Microsoft's cracking down on piracy will drive a lot of users to Linux. Especially as they learn that Linux is so polished now that it's as easy to install and use as Windows. And it doesn't have to cost a dime. No piracy checks. No phoning home behind your back, no locking you into proprietary file formats. No spyware. No viruses. No other unacceptable bullshit.

    There are many excellent Linux distributions, but I happen to use Ubuntu. It's free, it's fast, it's stable, it's secure. It's just better. XP is a bloated, creaking pig. How can it be worth anything when the superior alternative is free?

    1. Re:Obligatory Linux Plug by robpoe · · Score: 1

      Excuse me for a second.

      So, Ubuntu doesn't cost a dime.

      Does it: Play DVDs out of the box? Play MP3s out of the box? Work with Microsoft / Apple DRM music files out of the box?

      No. It doesn't. For something to be even considered useful, it needs to be able to do the above three things. Or else it's WORTHLESS IMO. Sure, you can bring up Ubuntu, find some site, download XMMS with the MP3 plugins. Then you gotta troll Google to find out how to play DVDs .. and you're just screwed when it comes to DRM'ed files because THEY DONT MAKE THE SOFTWARE FOR LINUX. Oh yeah, how about my mouse?

      Can I re-program it's multiple buttons by clicking on an interface and saying "do this with this button and do that with that button"? Nope. I have to drop to a terminal, edit an xorg.conf file and restart X, to test. If I futz the file up, my X is trashed.

      In my Dell notebook, the wireless card in it works only once. When I close the lid and suspend the computer, then re-open the lid and come back to the OS -- Linux cannot figure out what to do with the Wireless card. It TRIES to use it .. but it doesn't work as it should.

      While I understand how much better Linux is because of security, usability is FAR less than what people are willing to admit. Linux has a LOOOOONG way to go before it's ready for prime time on the desktop.

      For a server? Hell yes, slap Linux on it. Desktop? I think not.

      --
      = Grow a brain...
    2. Re:Obligatory Linux Plug by doodleboy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Excuse me for a second. So, Ubuntu doesn't cost a dime. Does it: Play DVDs out of the box? Play MP3s out of the box? Work with Microsoft / Apple DRM music files out of the box? No. It doesn't. For something to be even considered useful, it needs to be able to do the above three things. Or else it's WORTHLESS IMO. Sure, you can bring up Ubuntu, find some site, download XMMS with the MP3 plugins.

      http://easyubuntu.freecontrib.org./ Takes a couple minutes to run, installs pretty much every codec out there along with apps to use them with. It's crushingly difficult. And so hard to find too--it took almost a whole minute to find the link on the Ubuntulinux wiki.

      While I understand how much better Linux is because of security, usability is FAR less than what people are willing to admit. Linux has a LOOOOONG way to go before it's ready for prime time on the desktop.
      Which linux distributions have you tried? How much have you used them? Because I'm sensing a lack of familiarity. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Stick with Windows if you're more comfortable. Just don't assume that what's right for you is right for everyone.
    3. Re:Obligatory Linux Plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardware and drivers is only a small part of the problem. Software is MUCH more problematic for anyone I know (me included).

      I'd rather pay 96$CAD for XP Home then trying to get a couple dozen of kids games working under WINE. Or my income tax software. Or basically anything I need and use... Everyone I know needs some apps which are windows only (specialized music apps, dev tools, you name it). Not to mention games (I don't play any on my computers, but so many people do).

      If someone only browsed the web and emailed, then yeah, that'd be easy, but that's never the case (ok, perhaps that's the case of everyone's grandma here on slashdot...)

      "Just use WINE"? No thanks!

    4. Re:Obligatory Linux Plug by �berhund · · Score: 1
      Does [Ubuntu]: Play DVDs out of the box? Play MP3s out of the box? Work with Microsoft / Apple DRM music files out of the box?


      http://easyubuntu.freecontrib.org/ will take care of most of that for free. As for buying DRM encumbered music for a music player that will handle MP3s, well, I'm told there are ways to handle that, too. But so far, DRM is mainly a tool to lock you into buying from the same place.

      But we can play the same game with Windows:

      Excuse me for a second.

      So, Windows costs quite a bit.

      Does it: View and edit MS Word and Excel docs out of the box? (OpenOffice) High quality image editing? (Gimp) Instant Messaging? (Gaim) Email Calendaring? (Evolution) Desktop Publishing? (Scribus)

      No. It doesn't. For something to be even considered useful, it needs to be able to do the above things. Or else it's WORTHLESS IMO. Sure, you can drive to CompUSA and shell out another thousand dollars for all that stuff. ($230 just for MS Word?! WTF?)

      And what about my hardware? Every other driver I install adds some annoying program to my system, which runs something at startup.

      And Windows makes it *so* much easier for programs to simply run themselves. So now I shell out another couple hundred dollars for antivirus, antispyware, firewall, etc. And my system still gets infected! If I'm lucky I can get it off with help of my Windows guru friend, but eventually I have to reinstall the whole thing just so I can stop being a spambot.

      While I understand that Windows is eaiser because people are used to it, usability is FAR less than what people are willing to admit. Windows has a LOOOOONG way to go before it's ready for prime time on the desktop. If you disagree, try testing the 2 OSes on people who have never used either.

      For a server? Hell, no. Desktop? Questionable there, too. Yeah, I just love supporting all my Windows friends and family every time the get another fracking virus. I've taken to telling most people that I'm a Linux guy, and don't know much about Windows.
      --
      -Uberhund
    5. Re:Obligatory Linux Plug by robpoe · · Score: 1

      Hey. I'm not flaming Linux here. I love it. What I don't love everyone sitting here and circle jerking about how good they think something is already, when there's vast amounts of room for improvement.

      For instance: Will Linux run QuickBooks? No. Old versions under WINE, but that's a kludge at best. Quickbooks, like it or not, is the industry standard for small business accounting. I'm not going to a CPA with a Linux only datafile and expect him/her to be able to read it.

      GAIM isn't the silver bullet. Have you tried using it? Have someone invite you into a multi-user chat room on MSN. You won't get the invite, nor will you be in the room with the others.

      OOo is good "enough" for writing letters to Mom. Try to do advanced forms with it? Not happening. Or try to open a document from a state agency, that is a complex document. Not happening. Yeah, sure, they should use PDF (or ODF) but most states are locked into M$. Want proof? I can hook you up with an IT director for a state in the U.S. who will argue till he's blue in the face that Outlook / Exchange has a lower TCO than any other email solution.

      Be locked into DRM from a certain vendor? Nice. What if I wanna use iTunes? Napster? Sorry, Windows / Mac only on iTunes, Windows only for Napster. And no, buying illegal music from allofmp3 or whatever isn't the ticket.

      --
      = Grow a brain...
    6. Re:Obligatory Linux Plug by franois-do · · Score: 1

      Installing Videolan ( http://www.videolan.org/vlc/ ) is the easiest solution : all the codecs are included, and it will work just as well on either Linux or Windows. Who wants to change his/her applications just because he/she changes the operating system running under ? No kidding ! This is 2006, folks, not 1996 anymore !

      --
      Signature omitted in order to save space. Thanks for your understanding.
    7. Re:Obligatory Linux Plug by BarryLoper · · Score: 1

      If you had installed Windows before, you would know that it doesn't play DVDs out of the box. It won't play MP3s out of the box either. It sure as hell doesn't play Apple DRM files out of the box.

      If your Windows does these things out of the box it is because of 3rd party software installed and configured by your OEM. I never bought an OEM Linux computer, but I would assume that the OEMs would do that sort of things for Linux too.

      I won't argue that both MS and Linux can be a big PITA to use, but I just wanted to point out the flaw in your logic.

    8. Re:Obligatory Linux Plug by robpoe · · Score: 1

      actually, it WILL play MP3 files out of the box. And it will play WMV DRM files out of the box..

      --
      = Grow a brain...
  63. XP's No-Reformat, Nondestructive Total-Rebuild... by Browzer · · Score: 4, Informative

    "...how to completely rebuild, repair, or refresh an existing XP installation without losing data, and without having to reinstall user software, reformat, or otherwise destructively alter the setup."

    http://www.informationweek.com/showArticle.jhtml;j sessionid=STKGFAI0KVUKAQSNDLPSKH0CJUNN2JVN?article ID=189400897&queryText=nondestructive+

  64. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by Jediman1138 · · Score: 1

    Exactly. I'm 18 and was A+ certified last year at 17. Now I don't claim to be the end-all, be-all of computer knowledge, but I know what the fuck I'm doing. I hate that people generalize us older teens with computer know-how into a category of pretenders that think they know a lot because they can change wallpaper and know a few shortcuts. The true techies don't show off, it's just what we're good at and what we enjoy. Just because we're young doesn't mean we have any less expertise than the recently trained technician at the local shop.

    --

    nothing.can.stop.me.now

  65. Re:Simple... by BronsCon · · Score: 0

    But, for those who've been pirating all allong? Oh, never had support? What's to lose? NOTHING! Guess, with support being dropped so soon, there's no point in going legal if you're not already. If you've made it this long, just keep on truckin'.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  66. Obvious: Sysprep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Use sysprep(found on the xp cd in tools/reskit/deploy.cab or just search the cd for deploy.cab)
    extract sysprep.exe and run sysprep.exe -reseal.

    when the machine reboots you can enter the COA from your legit copy of XP. no fuss, no muss. and your installed apps will still be there.

  67. Re:Simple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Definition of a troll, anyone on either side of the MS vs Apple debate. ...or someone who uses a Mac tagline in relation to windows (Windows, for the majority of users, just plain works.) ...or someone referring to a Mac as a toy ...or someone who says linux is "tweaky, finicky and just plain difficult", er, windows blue screens? trying to find features in word? Can we not put this debate to bed, Apple users like Apples, MS users like MS, both sides of the debate think the other side are missing the path to heaven, or do we need to go drink the cool-aid?

  68. Answers: by Stray1 · · Score: 1

    Punkoflinux you have 2 real options if you want to go all 'legal' with your copy of XP- 1 CHANGE THE KEY. depending on the version of xp, you can only replace a key with that type. Meaning a volume license key can only be used if that was the original, same for xp retail. if retail is the case just purchase a new copy and use a cd key changer to change the key. 2 REINSTALL using the MIGRATION WIZARD. if its not retail, well, you really cant legitimately purchase avlk key so you can reinstall. "The migration wizard is actually pretty cool in the sense that it will take all your 'personal' files and put them into one archive. throw that on a disk and THEN reinstall. note the problem with any system reinstall is that programs are usually orpahned, and you will have to reinstall them as well. question: is this computer a dell?

  69. The only reliable way to reinstall by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only reliable way to reinstall anything is to buy a second HDD, replace the HDD, make a new install, copy your valuable data to the new HDD and put your old HDD into the fireproof armoured container placed in a cool deep place far enough from the Middle East. I had a lot of trouble assuming that "c:\Program Files" contains the program files and no application data, while there was an application holding it's data in Program Files. I was lucky enough to have written beforehand a duly registered report "I need a spare HDD for reinstalls" and to have received the written instruction "You don't need a spare HDD for reinstalls, you only save the files the operator explicitly asks for". It costed operator an additional week to reenter data.

    1. Re:The only reliable way to reinstall by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Amen. Before a major system update, always, always, always do a clean system backup and archive it: you may need it 3 weeks or a month from now. A new hard drive is a good way to do it, too, and allows easy reverting if things break down harshly.

      I actually like using removable hard drive bays in testing rigs for just this sort of swap and update.

  70. If worse comes to worse... by Ichigo+Kurosaki · · Score: 1

    You can always get a wga crack

    *disclaimer: I run legit windows*

  71. "Dual"-boot Ubuntu, buy CrossoverOffice by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 1

    That is sort of a reflexive answer here on /. but it's definitely something to consider.

    Their cheapest course is to buy a new hard drive and install Ubuntu on it (mounting the old Windows drive of course), then buy CrossoverOffice to run their old apps. CrossoverOffice costs $35 -- it's a beefed-up WINE that runs a lot more than naked WINE and has a nice GUI installation procedure. I put "dual" in quotes because they probably won't want to boot into the Windows environment again.

    I just had to install a new copy of XP on a recycled box, and frankly the installation procedure is tedious, hard to understand, and slow compared to modern Linuxes. It also doesn't come with practically anything useful -- I had to go get basics like a PDF viewer and a non-Internet Exploder browser.

    1. Re:"Dual"-boot Ubuntu, buy CrossoverOffice by robpoe · · Score: 1

      Linux didn't come with anything useful. How do I watch DVDs or play MP3s without having to go get software to do it?

      --
      = Grow a brain...
    2. Re:"Dual"-boot Ubuntu, buy CrossoverOffice by B2382F29 · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe the answer lies in the responses to your other trollpost

      --
      Move Sig. For great justice.
    3. Re:"Dual"-boot Ubuntu, buy CrossoverOffice by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

      Xover Office supports only a few apps - and there are a lot of very common ones - like Quickbooks where only certain versions are partially supported - which makes it useless for that purpose.

      These folks may not be power users - but it's a safe bet that there is plenty on their system that Xover won't support - now or in the forseeable future, as Xover development moves at a snail's pace.

      Don't get me wrong - I love Ubuntu - but I've been in a cycle of "try Linux - evaluate it's shortcomings - delete Linux and reinstall windows" ever since my first ZipSlack foray in '96. Ubuntu is just now approaching "viable desktop replacement" status. I'm thinking of implementing it in a mixed WinTel/OSX environment for select users. Linux still can't replace my Exchange Server, though Hula is close.

      OpenSource is a neato idea, but the financial realities preclude it for both n00bs and those that need to run specific biz apps.

    4. Re:"Dual"-boot Ubuntu, buy CrossoverOffice by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 1

      Hmm... Actually, total n00bs would do better in a modern user-friendly Linux than in Microsoft Windows (which has stayed pretty byzantine, while Linux keeps getting smoother) -- the problem/advantage (depending on whether you advocate open source or Microsoft) is that there are hardly any complete OS virgins left anymore -- enough people use Microsoft Windows that n00bs (rightly or wrongly) feel more comfortable using it.

      Certainly there are more specialized biz apps written for Microsoft Windows than for anything else, and for collaborative doc prep Microsoft Office (in a homogeneous Microsoft environment) still wins -- the markup and collaborative features just aren't available anywhere else. On the other hand, for tooling around at home, the Ubuntu environment has long been superior -- full-featured, clean, largely proof against malware, easy to back up, and posessed of a journaling file system. I'd rather set up my grandmother with Ubuntu than Windows any day -- if only to spare her the "ROCK HARD C0KZZ" popups my other family members complain about.

    5. Re:"Dual"-boot Ubuntu, buy CrossoverOffice by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

      We *almost* agree on this.

      I think Linux is only a version or two away from being viable from a technical perspective.
      Things in Ubuntu largely "just work."
      Other distros seem to be coming along as well.

      I except RH from this - they have made great strides in backing away from the home/small biz sectors by forcing folks into either RHEL - which is too costly in many cases - or Fedora - where RH doesn't particularly care about functionality or stability.
      RH has become the M$ of Linux.

    6. Re:"Dual"-boot Ubuntu, buy CrossoverOffice by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 1

      I must admit I'm sort of puzzled by the position that you (and a lot of people) have that Linux distros are "only a version or two away from functionality" -- I use MacOS, Linux, and Microsoft Windows on an almost daily basis, and both MacOS and the KDE Linux GUI are much more usable to me than Microsoft. Within XP I'm always wondering where the heck my files got put, or how to do (where is something trivial in either of the other to OS'es), or why my .doc file isn't opening correctly, or why this PowerPoint presentation doesn't display the right fonts, or how to change all the file names in such-and-such folder in some trivial way that doesn't involve clicking and typing a hundred things, or why my workstation seems to think it's in battery mode...

      Would you mind, terribly, pointing out, say, five specific things that work better in Microsoft Windows than in X Windows/Ubuntu? (I say five because at least two -- DVD playback and WMA playback -- are obvious DRM issues).

      Cheers,
      Craig

    7. Re:"Dual"-boot Ubuntu, buy CrossoverOffice by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"Linux didn't come with anything useful. How do I watch DVDs or play MP3s without having to go get software to do it?"

      Well, that is certainly a troll.

      A modern Linux distro comes with *hundreds* of useful applications to do the majority of things typical users want. Watching DVD's can't be done in MS-Windows either, without installing an application. As for mp3, Mandriva supports that right away.

      I have installed dozens of MS-Windowses and hundreds of Linuxes. When you install XP, you end up with a single browser, and a very small handful of utilities. In just about the same amount of time, I can do a DVD install of Linux that has 4 browsers, several Email clients, 50 games, two full office suites, two major graphics editors, several MP3 players, etc, etc.

    8. Re:"Dual"-boot Ubuntu, buy CrossoverOffice by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

      1> Drag and drop functionality - windows still has much better application integration - one of the benefits of closed source - you can shove developers into a sandbox of your choosing.

      2> Audio/Video in general - aside from drm issues, Windows has better driver availability, and opensource linux vid drivers pretty much universally suck ass with regards to frame rate.

      3> Faxing - in windows, it just works

      4> Laptop setting. I honestly haven't tried wireless in Ubuntu yet - but in the last version I tried of Mandriva, wireless was not it's strong suit. Home wifi with no mobile platform? sure. Hooking up to an open access point to send an email? Not happening for a n00b.

      5> Synchronization with other devices (pda/smart phone.) Not truly an OS issue - more of an app issue, but from a user perspective - there isn't much difference.

      Don't get me wrong - I am chomping at the bit to go opensource with a client who supports the idea, is willing to spend a moderate amount to get there, and is willing to put up with a few speed bumps. Unfortunately, we can't ditch Quickbooks Enterprise yet. I would dearly love to. If the equivalent were available opensource at the same cost - or even a little more - they'd be all over it. I have an exchange server in place that all I have to do is edit our mx records to implement. I've been avoiding it because I don't want users tied even more strongly to MS. I really want to give Hula a fair shot.

    9. Re:"Dual"-boot Ubuntu, buy CrossoverOffice by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 1

      Thanks! That helps me understand a lot better what people are concerned about. Specifics good, flames bad. :-)

      Cheers,
      Craig

  72. Site License? by hedwards · · Score: 1

    It really depends upon whether or not it is actually pirated. MS sells site licenses, and at some schools
    teachers who work teaching online classes do from time to time get copies for conducting school business.

    Apart from that sort of thing, it probably makes sense to go legit. MS does charge waaaay too much for their
    software, but they do have a right to be paid. Or you could always try to switch to anything else.

  73. Re:Simple... by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

    Or a Western Digital Caviar SE16 WD2500KS 250GB for $79 ($69 after MIR).

  74. knoppix tohd=/dev/hda1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This lets you leave your old windows files right where they are and simply replace the OS. The safest answer by far. Nothing to lose.
          Hint, first boot normally from the Knoppix CD and save your settings like printer, network, wallpaper etc using the included "save configuration" script and then boot with

    knoppix tohd=/dev/hda1 myconfig-scan

            If that satifies them, then you can eliminate the need to type at boot by either setting up grub for them or creating a vfat boot partition and use loadlin to boot or doing a simplified remaster that only changes the isolinux.cfg file that allows you to pass custom boot commands from the CD itself.

  75. Avast there matey, ship ahoy! by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    So you want to change the Pirate Edition of Windows XP into a legit edition. School facility giving out pirated copies of Windows XP is a new one on me. Anyway you might have to back up all data files, and then do a reinstall because the pirate version of Windows has modifications in it if it was gotten off of a P2P file sharing network, and possible your copy you bought might not match the one the school faculity gave your parents. I think the repair option to reinstall the OS should do the trick, just save your data files first in case it eats the hard drive and forces you to reformat.

    Shiver me timbers, arrrrrrrhhhhh, what have ye got against pirates anyway? :)

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  76. For the love of god....it's TOO EASY by gx5000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I love all these Pseudo Tech offering advice, it always boggles my mind... 0- Buy a Copy of Windows (whatever version you have installed)or buy a key from M$ 1- Reboot in safe mode 2- Do a search for WPA.* (WPA.DBL, WPA.BAK)They're in C:\windows\system32 3- Delete these file 4- Reboot into normal mode, you will warned that you have blabla time to activate 5- Click to activate, select by phone, select change key (bottom of form) 6- Enter new legit key 7- You are returned to activation screen, click Activate online 8- Do a search and backup the wpa files for future needs 9- Done

    --
    End of Line.
    1. Re:For the love of god....it's TOO EASY by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      Except that most pirate copies are based off of the corporate edition and:
      a: don't need activating, so you can't do this trick
      b: don't have serial numbers compatible with any other copy of XP, and so
      c: you'd need to buy a corporate edition key, which are very expensive, and you probably need to be a business to get one.

      Leaving the classic "Repair install":
      Boot off of the cd, press f6 and install sata / raid drivers if you need to, then ask to install windows and then ask to repair the current install (I think that's it). You'll probably need to re-install all your drivers afterwards, but not software and you won't lose your documents.

    2. Re:For the love of god....it's TOO EASY by gx5000 · · Score: 1

      You're right they don't NEED this trick but if you delete the files you'll be in the same boat and will be able to re-Validate. The fact that a corporate key is more expensive is besides the point. We were asked how, not how on a budget. But most will likely "borrow" a legit Corporate key from work anyways ;-) Cheers

      --
      End of Line.
    3. Re:For the love of god....it's TOO EASY by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      I said "CAN'T" do the trick, not "don't NEED to". They can't because corporate edition doesn't ask about activating / validating (at least not normally). It does seem to have those wpa files, so whether it asks about activating if you delete them is a completely different point. (Which would probably prove me wrong about the trick not working though, but hey, I'm at work using a legal corp pc atm). Incidentally, you can get Windows keys for free if you attend a university that's part of the MSDNAA (Microsoft Academic Alliance), and join some programming course. I got several XP keys, various Visual Studio keys and even got a free and completely legit key for each edition of Windows Server 2003. But I'm using them, so no, you can't have one.

    4. Re:For the love of god....it's TOO EASY by ViperG · · Score: 1

      I did that but i wasn't in safe mode, worked fine.

      --
      Black Sky
      2D Elite Inspired Game
    5. Re:For the love of god....it's TOO EASY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      simpler: 1. run "wgatray -u" to uninstall the service 2. delete the registry key: "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\Notify\WgaLogon" 3. reboot (naturally)

    6. Re:For the love of god....it's TOO EASY by gx5000 · · Score: 1

      Humm lemme see, server here, server there, PC's everywhere... I must be at work too but why are those serials keys soooo similar to the ones I have at home on my Network ??!!! Must be that two year stint I did at M$ Canada...? Cheers ;-)

      --
      End of Line.
  77. google it first lam0r by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why ax slashdot

  78. Re:Simple... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "According to Microsoft" .... yeah, tell that to all the banks whe were GUARANTEED support for NT2K, and Microsoft cut it off prematurely because "it wasn't worth it to fix the security issues so close to the end of the products' lifetime" - 2 months.

    The same policy will be applied, much more aggresively, with Vista, because of economics.

    1. their first decline in revenue
    2. continue to bleed money from the XBox
    3. just gone through their biggest hiring expansion - more salaries to put more pressure on the bottom line
    4. stock buyback is also putting a crimp on the cash horde
    5. vista aka longhorn aka blackcomb is now 5 years late, and what's worse, they don't have a clue as to what will cme after Vista
    6. credible threat to their biggest cash cow - ms-office - from openoffice
    7. most people don't need to upgrade, they're more-or-less happy with what they have, they just want it to work better
    8. macs are cool again
    9. continued security exploits == zero credibility
    10. the continual erosion of browser share indicates a growing acceptance of 3rd-party software as "just being better"
    11. removal of almost all the significant features that set vista apart from xp
    12. linux desktops are now more useable, as well as much more secure, than windows, and trying one out is as simple as sticking a live cd in the tray
    13. cash and resources diverted to trying to get zune off the ground
    14. the PIPE Fairy deal with SCO may very well end up leading back to Redmond HQ next fall

    There's a lot of speculation that Microsoft will have to orphan the Xbox - the 360 will be the end-of-the-line. This would have been unthinkable a year ago, but the financial situation has changed a lot, and a recession would pretty much seal its fate.

  79. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by SuperDre · · Score: 1, Informative

    Uhm... option 1 is ofcourse no option...
    Option 2, I've seen too many 'professional companies' FU this simple task of replacing the OS, so you loose both your money and your files..
    Option 3, it's better than option 2 as you only loose your files.. LOL...

    The best option I always use is, zip all your drives, and back them up to CD's or dvd's (or to another computer if you have one), then completely reformat you system and install windows (never reinstall over a copy), and then start installing the programs you need and copy back the files you want.. (Normally after that I even start removing unnecessary files from the zips so I keep a backup of the old files for a while, until I need the space)..

  80. If you need/want to do a full reinstall by ralf1 · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    "Would you, could you, with a goat?" Dr Seuss
  81. Reinstalls do a computer good. by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    If milk does a body good, then reinstalls do a Windows or OS X system good. In my many experiences reinstalling a year+ old OS from scratch gets at least 10% performance back from the hardware. And it probably frees up a considerable amount of disk space. And this is an extremely easy friendly-neighborhood-geek thing to do, and scores you just as many (if not more) friend points than doing the difficult things like tracking down bizzar drivers for obscure hardware.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  82. If it's fully functional right now, try this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I just used this method to save time setting up a bunch of XP Pro Retail machines with a single image on a few MacBooks running Parallels Desktop. Dunno if it will work for you if the copy of Windows your parents have is already activated, I didn't activate the copy I used until after changing the product key for each machine.

    First, have a legit copy (actually just a legit product key) for Windows.
    Once you have that, launch the "Activate Windows" application. I don't know where it lives on the drive once you activate Windows and it vanishes from the Start menu.
    When the activation app opens, click "I want to activate by phone" or the closest similar option.
    In the dialog that opens, there should be a button to change the product key. Click it and enter your legit product key.
    Save the changes, and back out to the point where you chose activating by phone, and instead choose activate online.
    The computer will phone home and activate, and after that WGA should be satisfied with your legitimatudity. :-)

    If, when you find and launch the Activate Windows application, it just tells you 'this copy of Windows is already activated' and quits, you're SOL for using this method-- if that happens I'd suggest you look for the unnamed, MS-unsanctioned utility Thurrott used to change his product key so he could appease the Man.

  83. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by MSFanBoi2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Buy a Mac? YOu honestly advocate going out and spending at least 600 bucks (of couse that would require at least another 512 MB of ram, a keyboard and a mouse and possibly a new monitor0, not to mention the costs of replacing software as well as the loss of all the data on the Windows based PC? Lets not even get into the costs of getting them familiar with the Mac over the PC.

    Linux? Once again, they loose most, if not all their software, and probably the same with the data.

    Sorry when a person asks for help getting a copy of Windows LEGIT, they are not asking to move to another OS.

    What your post is, is nothing more than rabid fanboism at it's best.

  84. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by NeoThermic · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else find it slightly odd that google suggested a correction to the key? Is google giving you hints as to non-used XP keys? :)

    NeoThermic

    --
    Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
  85. Rather than make a mess of the drive... by Krokus · · Score: 1

    They could do what I did: buy a second hard drive, make it the master and the old drive a slave, install the legal copy of windows on it. Now all their old files are on the second slave drive and they have a fresh install of windows on a clean hard drive.

    A slight added expense but hard drives are pretty cheap these days.

  86. What to do.. by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    1> Backup data. Thats the first thing I'd do. Documents, pictures, etc.. Burn them to a CD or copy them to external media like an external USB hard drive.

    2> Wipe the system completely with a full reformat.

    3> Install the legit copy of windows.

    4> Restore the backup data after installing new legit anti-virus software and make sure it's fully updated and scanned the backups.

    5> Profit!

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    1. Re:What to do.. by caluml · · Score: 1

      Dude, they said they were running a pirated copy of Windows, not that they were infected with spyware and troja.... Oh, OK, I see.

    2. Re:What to do.. by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Maybe you didn't notice, but the speciic question was "how do I fix this without reinstalling?"

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    3. Re:What to do.. by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      As much as it would be nice to fix this without reinstalling. I don't know where that pirated copy of Windows came from. I can't say for sure that it's 100% safe from the original CD and that the OS could have been compromised on the burned install CD. There isn't a 100% way to fix this without reinstalling. It could be made legit I'm sure, but you never know with a burned copy.

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  87. Pointless to go legit, admit to the police instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you're proposing would be like dumping a stolen DVD player and buying a new one. Whether you do it or not you are still guilty of having stolen something, and a judge on a bad day could even say that you were trying to cover your tracks by dumping the evidence. In the case of copyright infringement the penalty is $250,000, whether you hide your crime or not. Pay the fee, and only then do you become legit.

  88. Simple by DJHewi1025 · · Score: 1

    Get linux. DUR!

  89. Re:Alternative by robpoe · · Score: 1

    I don't know about his parents, but my parents have close to 1.6 TB of disk space (and I'm the geeky one!)

    They do more than browse and play games and email.

    They'd notice..

    Parents are not stupid..

    --
    = Grow a brain...
  90. How is this news worthy? by aoptik · · Score: 1

    It seems that this post should be in a forumn or billboard? Is this what slashdot has come too?

    1. Re:How is this news worthy? by Preacher+X · · Score: 1

      This is a vewry very common question as of late. With the genuine (dis)advantage tool released many users who didn't even know thier 3 year old whitebox, built by bobs computer shack, was pirated, are finding thier windows all but unusable. I believe slashdots intent here was to address this issue for the many people that are going to run into it.

      Personally I have never felt that ANY "ask slashdot" post was intended to be "news" as much as it was meant to be a community awareness post. Help one guy specifically and many others in the overall.

      --
      "And the heathens with their ways of trickery and deceit shall not prevail over the will of the righteous"
  91. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    teenagers aren't as bad as A+ certs. If your resume boasts the A+, MCP, MCDST, or E.C.P.I. diploma I wouldn't even consider you to touch a client's machine. I actually prefer a bright young geek that I can train myself, who admits he knows nothing to begin with. seen that mistake made too many times and honestly I've never spoken to an A+ stooge with a clue (though don't get me wrong I'm sure they exist.) I've seen the A+ practice tests, probably about 8 years ago now, and I'm sure today if it has changed at all (I'd heard it didn't) but it's likely even easier because know one needs to know the default I/O address and IRQ of com1 any longer. I'd wager my mother who has difficulty using MSN Messenger could pass the A+ with a few hours prep; that doesn't mean I'd put her to doing something as simple as a Windows install.

    Hard experience in any field is the only teacher I respect.

    right now I have a phone stooge / general meat shield to seperate my techs from my clients because let's face it, most techs aren't people people. this idiot boasts an A+ and a CS degree and much related experience so my bosses decide to hire him, I backed them up because he appeared to be a people person and we were looking for a stooge, not a full time tech. It's been over a year and I still won't let him touch a client's box. what's worse is he scares off clients with his lack of knowledge because he's not confident enough to BS his way through a conversation, and after a year I believe it's starting to be a case of cause and effect with declining business. the bosses won't let me fire him though because he's always on time in the morning (i.e. there before they are.) :| Just remember that, you A+ ppl. Get to work 15 min. early.

    then again, I was one of those teenage "computer experts" way back when. I recall others too, and have met quite a few hobbists in related fields over the years who are self-proclaimed experts, (coders are the WORST for this and IME know the least,) and you will quickly learn the key to finding one worth his salt is the one who is NOT willing to help you with your problems, and not overly eager to mention they even know anything about computers in the first place.

  92. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen, where do you think all of the crusty old professionals started out? Down on the bottom as punk-ass know-nothing teens like the rest of us of course. Hell, its likely that your average young enthusiast knows more about computers than some starting CompUSA tech (bash prompt/compile from source, anybody?).

  93. Re:Simple... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    Its getting crazy. I've got 2/3 of a TB of storage, and most of it is just sitting there, a lot of it not even partitioned (every once in a while, I throw a new distro on a spare partition and give it a test-drive).

    I can buy a terabyte for less than I paid for my original 80 gig.

    They should be backing their stuff up anyway - so why not to a nice new drive running linux?

  94. PIRATED TO LEGIT XP WITHOUT DESTROYING FILES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok this will only work if it is an pirated to legal copy of XP, any older OS won't work like this (but there is a way). Boot up off the install disc. Go through the installation untill it tells you there is already a copy of windows installed, it'll ask you if you want to install over it or repair it (hit "R" I think), select repair. It will look like a normal fresh install and ask you for your CD key, input the new legit one. When the install is done, you will have a fresh legit copy of Windows, ALL your personal files will be intact, and any cracks for the XP registration will have been removed. When you start up Windows it will as you to activate.

    I've done this many times, if you do it exactly like this it will work.

    P.S. Any upgrages will have to be redownloaded and installed unless they were included on your new copy of XP. (SP1, SP2, security updates, etc...)

  95. 2 options by Yoweigh116 · · Score: 1

    1) Call Microsoft, as was already mentioned. I know this works for activating Office on multiple machines. 2) Disable the Security Center service and it will never come back. Yay! Also kills the antivirus warnings.

  96. Re-installing Windows is like going to the Dentist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's somewhat painful and time consuming. But you shouldn't be afraid. Every 6 months is a good rule of thumb.

    (I'm totally slacking on a 1.5 year install and it sucks).

    I should really just take a Ghost/dd image of my new laptop once I get it properly tweaked.

  97. call microsoft by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, really, call Microsoft. They will give you all of the legit, legal options. I've seen them sell media-less CD-keys for Windows for as low as $50.

  98. you pull up your sleeves, and help them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to set up their PC and reinstall all their programs. Simple. After all you ARE a slashdotter, right?

  99. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by TheSpoom · · Score: 2, Informative

    Contact Microsoft.

    Seriously, it's pretty easy for them to change the product key / product ID of an installation, and you won't have to reinstall anything. Plus, I doubt they'll care that much that you pirated in the first place if you say you want to purchase a legal version now.

    It probably doesn't apply to you, but if your mom didn't know she received an illegal copy, she could actually get a complimentary Windows license. However, she'd have to rat out said teacher, would have to have bought the counterfeit Windows (and have a proof of purchase), and the counterfeit itself would have to be "high quality".

    Otherwise, the prices are still quite cheap by Windows standards. See Microsoft's Genuine Windows XP FAQ for more details.

    To get the kit, go through Windows Genuine Validation, either by attempting to download something that requires validation or by installing the Windows Genuine Notifications update and subsequently getting the nag screens (which link to a more info page which should allow you to get the kit).

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  100. That's the best advice I've read... by astrosmash · · Score: 1

    Seriously. I know it seems like Vista will never come, but in 7 to 12 short months it will be here. We've all had to tough it out in XP for over 5 years now. Certainly it's worth it to wait a few more months, and once it's out (and it's any good) it will make XP seem obsolete.

    I haven't actually had the opportunity to use Vista yet, but I have been using OS X for about two years now and if Vista is anything like OS X then it will definitely make XP seem outdated in comparison.

    Wait for Vista.

    --
    ENDUT! HOCH HECH!
    1. Re:That's the best advice I've read... by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      While we're on the subject of prolonging updates, now that you've mentioned OS X, I'd like to offer related advice to would-be Switchers: unless your hardware needs replaced wholly, wait for Leopard! (Or at least for its preview next month!)

    2. Re:That's the best advice I've read... by monoqlith · · Score: 1
      Your comment has a few spelling mistakes. Let me fix them for you.

      Seriously. I know it seems like Vista will never come, but in 7 to 12 short years it will be here. We've all had a good laugh at Microsoft for over five years now. [...]

        I haven't actually had the opportunity to use Vista yet, but I have been using OS X for about two years now and if there is truly no chance it will be anything like OS X then it will definitely make XP seem usable in comparison.


    3. Re:That's the best advice I've read... by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

      This is sarcasm right?

      No one comes out in favor of Vista on /. (or the rest of the World)

      --
      spoonerize "magic trackpad"
  101. Do the RIGHT THING - back up your data by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    You're supposed to back up your data ANYWAY, so have them get an external Hard Drive, and copy all their files to it. I assume they did the right thing and still have copies of the installers and serial numbers for their software. Once everything is copied over to the external drive, reinstall Windows and then reinstall the software. After that, copy files over to the root drive from the external and bingo - done. It's a hassle, but if they want to be all legal and square with the world AND PROTECT THEMSELVES FROM A DRIVE CRASH, they should do it that way, and this is a good opportunity for them to back their stuff up.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  102. Seeing as I just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...helped my gf do a dual-boot setup on her new Acer laptop this weekend, I can safely say that some things (playing MP3s) are trivial, since they're an apt-get away on Debian. 90% of her hardware was automatically recognized; the stuff I did have problems with were the special keys/buttons on her laptop (lots of fun with showkey and xmodmap) and the DVD playback issue as you pointed out, and finding the proper wireless drivers (more my fault for trying to use the wrong drivers than a Linux problem). Funny enough, it wasn't too hard to get the DVDs playing fine, including menus, but her 915GM graphics card driver has some sort of contrast issue which is currently being addressed in the Ubuntu/Debian bug resolution process.

    Otherwise, she seems quite happy being able to do things in Gnome that she can't do in Windows (far more customizable, can do gradient backgrounds instead of single-color, lets her set up FTP to her website in Nautilus without needing extra appz, xscreensaver is generally nicer than the boring crap from Windows, etc), and she was pleasantly surprised to find out that version 2 of OpenOffice does almost anything that Word can do now. (She'd previously tried OpenOffice but had some problems with it.) Since I already helped her migrate to Firefox and GAIM when she was still using Windows, she was right at home with the internet, and she's using Thunderbird now instead of Outlook Express (which she hated).

    Overall, it's not as bad as you make it sound, unless you have some obscure (or really new) hardware to deal with. I think in the future as hardware vendors get more accustomed to supporting Linux, this problem will tend to fix itself. In the meantime, she seems pretty happy with the dual boot setup.

    p.s. re: the DRM'd files, just don't use them! She has gigabytes of music that plays just fine on XMMS. For every DRM'd file out there you can probably find three other non-DRM'd rips.

    1. Re:Seeing as I just... by robpoe · · Score: 1

      Gaim itself is an issue. Won't do conversation windows in MSN for one..

      --
      = Grow a brain...
  103. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your tech knowledge is irrelevant. People don't like teenager geeks because teenage geeks are often arrogant know it alls who lack the real world experience to know how to properly behave in many common social situations. Teenagers in general are pretty annoying. Teenage geeks often are even more obnoxious.

    As an adult (32 years old) I have to admit that I really don't like teenagers and don't want to have to deal with them. When I am at a movie, restaraunt, store, etc where I have to be around teenagers I find them to almost always be incredibly obnoxious. Sure, not all teenagers are like that. You might be one of the good ones. But enough of them are that I would rather just write off the entire age group until they grow up and mature a little.

  104. Re:Reinstall MOD DOWN by SexyJesus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The MS OEM restrictions TheNetAvenger describes are no longer part of the license.

    I just bought the OEM version of Win XP a few weeks ago and was surprised to find the restrictions a thing of the past. The real difference between the retail and OEM version licenses is that the OEM license is non-transferable and tied to a single system, while the retail version can be uninstalled from one computer and installed on another.

    Regarding activation and hardware modifications, MS allows some flexability, but the intent of the OEM license is to tie the software to the system on which it is orignally installed.

  105. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by denebian+devil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, but I find it interesting that the US Fish and Wildlife Service has a Windows XP key uploaded in plain text onto a freely accessible ftp server. The government supports piracy!

  106. Microsoft provides a tool by lcreech · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's call Sysprep. It allows you to delete the the licence key and install a legit one for the system. I make image copies of my drives, and use linux to dd them, with Sysprep you can remain legal.

  107. Microsoft Confidential; Do not distribute. by entendre+entendre · · Score: 1

    Apparently Microsoft doesn't want anyone to download the diagnostic tool they posted on their web site. (See the next in the lower left corner.)

  108. Repair Install with a Legit Key by eleven357 · · Score: 1

    We get computers all the time that come in the shop with this problem. Our solution is a repair install with a purchased key.

  109. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by NickFitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The directory containing that file also has an Office 2003 key :-)

    --
    Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
  110. Doesn't work depending... by ArielMT · · Score: 1

    WGA accused my office's only Windows box of being pirated. We got a new key, one we had to pay for again, and we tried this tool. It left our machine in an even worse state: unable to boot because of a missing extraneous set-up file, a file that was perfectly readable from both the CD and HDD copies of that file.

    We had to do an XP repair install anyway to get the new key accepted.

    --
    It must be Windows. It needs half a gig of RAM and a hardware-accelerated graphics card just to run Solitaire.
  111. Microsoft should have foreseen and mitigated... by foniksonik · · Score: 1

    Microsoft should have released a Migration tool for anyone who wanted to "Go Legit" and should have used a big ad campaign to let everyone know about it....

    This tool should be available for $50 or less... should be a bootable disk with a new Genuine Serial Number on it and should simply be able to reset the computer to using that new serial.... without a backup, without a reformat, etc. etc.

    They would have seen a huge demand for this and would have made a ton of money....

    Idiots.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  112. Not in the US (Try windows update, they sell keys) by ArielMT · · Score: 1

    If you follow the online links from the WGA fail page, you'll be asked to select your region. If you select United States, you'll be told rather bluntly that there's no way to buy a new key online.

    --
    It must be Windows. It needs half a gig of RAM and a hardware-accelerated graphics card just to run Solitaire.
  113. X-Setup Pro by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

    X-Setup can do this, note that the latest versions are shareware, but the latest freeware version, 6.6, has the functionality. It's a plugin buried in there somewhere, shows you your product key and allows you to change it.

  114. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's also horribly slow on today's new systems, but at least its GENUINE

    ugh

  115. And yes, how do i clean my toilet. by gnufied · · Score: 1

    yes please answer me.

  116. Microsoft Windows Product Key Update Tool by Mario+B · · Score: 1

    This tool (Windows Product Key Update Tool) does exactly what you want

  117. No-Reformat, Nondestructive Total-Rebuild Option by MercuryCC · · Score: 1

    I would look into a repair installation as described above.

    For detailed instructions with screenshots, check out the article, Langa Letter: XP's No-Reformat, Nondestructive Total-Rebuild Option.

    The article claims that "this option lets you completely and nondestructively rebuild, repair, or refresh an existing XP installation while leaving already-installed software alone (no reinstallation needed!)."

    Screen Twelve of this walkthrough shows that you enter a product key, which should resolve the O/S-laundering scheme you seek.

    As always, there is no guarantee, so you should back up your important data.

  118. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by deepb · · Score: 1

    Anybody else find it ironic that this post was made by "MSFanBoi2"? It's really nothing more than "rabid MS fanboism", at best.

  119. check your PID / CD label / Channel ID by bushwhacker2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you have the original install CD that was used, put in the your CD drive and look at the label that shows in My Computer. Write it down.

    Then head over to http://www.tacktech.com/display.cfm?ttid=342 and find out which exact version of XP it is. If it is not SP2 click the other links for SP1 and SP0, etc, until you find it.

    Once you have a volume label you'll know what was installed and it will help you find the right solution, legal or not (your choice).

    If you don't have the CD, things are a bit trickier:

    1. Right click my computer > properties > general and you should see something like the following:

    System:

    Microsoft Windows XP

    Professional or Home or Media Center, etc

    Version 2002 or something

    Service Pack 2 or something

    Registered to:

    Name

    Company

    XXXXX-YYY-ZZZZZZZ-AAAAA (This is your Product ID, not to be confused with product key)

    2. Find out which version you are running using the channel ID (YYY above):

    # 000 : Other (includes some retail, upgrade and evaluation versions)
    # 007 : FIXME : Retail
    # 009 : Not for resale - bundle
    # 011 : Upgrade (XP Home?)
    # OEM : OEM (This does not specify royalty or normal OEM)
    # 270 : Volume License
    # 296 : MSDN
    # 308/347 : Microsoft Action Pack subscription
    # 335 : Retail
    # 640 through 648, 652 : Volume License (usually generated via 270 CID in setupp.ini)
    # 699 : Volume Windows XP Tablet Edition
    # 071 : FIXME : Unknown.

    Source: http://wiki.djlizard.net/Product_IDs

    Good luck!

  120. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by RemovableBait · · Score: 2, Informative

    And if you know you don't qualify for their free offer, you don't even have to contact Microsoft to get your key changed.

    They actually make a little tool for updating your product key, so you can avoid googling for key changers (which may lead you to potentially dodgy websites).

    If you go and buy a boxed/retail copy of the Windows version you are currently running (eg, Home or Pro), you can update the product key by following these instructions. Or, instead of buying a retail version, you can buy the WGA kit or licence code direct from Microsoft by following the parent poster's advice.

  121. "repair" the install by meetmeonaholiday · · Score: 1

    I agree with most of the people here that purchasing a key online is the best direction to go.

    However, if you can't or don't want to for some reason, you can still buy the same version of Windows XP that you have installed and reinstall without losing any files or programs. Basically, using the installer you can "repair" a broken install of Windows XP and the installer will replace system files on your computer, but nothing else will be messed with. See here:

    http://www.informationweek.com/shared/printableArt icle.jhtml?articleID=189400897

  122. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by causality · · Score: 1
    I'm absolutely amazed. When you already know the answer and derive keywords from the answer you already know, searching for the solution is trivial!

    As though it would take anything more than high school-level research skills to find such an answer via Google. This really is just another case of RTFM only it would be more accurate to say "quit being willfully helpless".

    Some people like to assume that everyone either is a helpless moron, or should be -- and I would agree that many people are, and would vehemently disagree that anyone should be. This is why I view this kind of helplessness as pathological, and if you intend to solve problems for these people you must consider whether you are really helping them or merely enhancing their dependence on others by handing out easy answers ("teach a man to fish" versus "give a man a fish"). That is, if the idea is for people to learn and grow in their understanding and eventually come to master the equipment that they use on a daily basis. If that idea is not to your liking then the current status quo where no one is ever expected to learn anything should be ideal to you.

    I much prefer to give people enough credit that they can be expected to solve their own problems or make arrangements (i.e. hire a tech) for someone else to do so, and then question the individuals who, from time to time, insist on using free, community-supported resources prior to exhausting other available options first. When you expect that everyone is so unable to take care of their own issues, you tend to get what you expect.

    Sorry if this is a bit of a rant, but I notice that self-sufficiency is on the decline.
    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  123. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

    Why are suggestions to use Linux being modded offtopic? The topic is that an operating system isn't "genuine" and he's seeking advice on proofing his computer from legal scrutiny. What better way to do that than by installing an operating system that's free?

  124. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    http://www.google.com/search?q=Windows+XP+Key+Ch anger

    This was the first thing I tried when a customer approached me with this problem. And it didn't work. Repeatedly.

    What, Google didn't work? That's a new one.

  125. Not so hard by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

    Just buy a copt related to the pirated copy you have. (If you have a pirated copy of Windows XP Pro, Home, Media Center Edition, etc) and just use that product key. It's pretty simple to change the product key, and Microsoft can help you with that over the phone. But I've found it's also easy to do an XP Repair with your pirated key and then when you get into activation, call Microsoft and give them that the legit product key with the activation number and they will provide you with a key to fully activate and validate your system. Good luck!

    --
    "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
  126. Would you by any chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have some v1agr4 for me?

    1. Re:Would you by any chance by pookemon · · Score: 1

      Somehow I don't think you understood the joke...

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    2. Re:Would you by any chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah I don't get it but would greatly appreciate someone explaining it for the ignorant.

  127. Wait for Vista by vux984 · · Score: 1

    If you are going to spend full price on a Microsoft Operating system just to make it legit, you might as well buy the new one. I'd wait for Vista, or even get the Vista beta if you wanted to do something right now.

  128. Why pay? Get it free and semi-legit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call the microsoft support number 1-888-895-4395, tell them you're trying to install a new copy of XP but it won't take the CD KEY. When they ask "Have you installed this on a machine before?", tell them no. Then they will give you a CD Key, and you will have paid zero dollars. GG tech support outsourcing.

  129. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by giorgosts · · Score: 1

    Fresh install of legit copy to a new hard drive (or partition with partition magic) and simply drag and drop the personal files and use microsofts' transfer of personal settings. In case you use a new HD you'll be left with extra storage afterwards..

  130. Crack || Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, You can either download a "warez" version of windows online (torrents tend to work well). These versions are usually very likely to work, and sometimes even come with a bunch of updates installed, sometimes even with the Office suit.

    You can also start crawling "crack" sites for a good activiation crack or anti WGA software. Make sure you don't get too much ad/spy-ware from these sites. They tend to be full of it.

    Or, you can go legit and install linux (which is FREE!!). If you are afraid of loosing data, get another harddrive from ebay, and install linux on it. "Rescue" all the data from the other drive, format it, and have a few extra gigs of space for future use.

    I would go for the linux solution, but i guess it is a personal choice, based on ethics and corporate values, and, most of all, the desire for the best (linux).

  131. Buy an OEM version, do a repair install. by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1

    The legal method to handle this is to purchase an OEM version of Windows Xp. You then perform what is known as a "repair" install. The cdkey change tools will not work. You must do the repair install. That method will not change any of the settings or loose programs. http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/XPrepairinstall. htm

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
  132. Just restore from backup by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    but they are afraid of deleting everything and having to reinstall all their programs.

    Just reinstall, and then restore from backup. If that isn't an option (because they only backup data and not programs) then I assume they have at least backed up their /var/lib/portage/world file, so just use that to re-install their programs. ;-) Ok, obviously there isn't a "Gentoo Windows" yet, but I assume they have some sort of semi-automated process for reinstalling packages from a restored list-of-what-I-have-installed. Because if that weren't the case, then nobody would have ever said "Linux isn't ready for the desktop" as though implying that MS Windows is nearly as ready.

    If this advice seems impractical because restoring things from backup isn't trivial, then perhaps you have uncovered their real problem.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  133. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by kimvette · · Score: 1

    The key changer will work if you had been sold an illegitimate retail version and bought a new retail version to replace it, PROVIDING it is the same SR level, however if you were sold an illegitimate OEM version and purchase a retail version, even if the same SR level, the key will likely not be accepted.

    Do a repair installation - IF the retail boxed version you purchased is at least as new as what is installed on the machine. If it came with an OEM SR2, and the retail box is the original release or SR1, you stand a good chance of fudging everything up.

    Best solution? Buy the new box, call Microsoft if it refuses the key, ask to speak to a supervisor and demand a working key for the OEM release since you now have the license to back up the use of it (aside from the fact that you OWN it, not license it, being a commodity good, but it'll cost more money than you and I to take Microsoft to court over that whole fiasco).

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  134. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by kimvette · · Score: 1

    I noticed that right away. Someone report this to Microsoft's anti-piracy hotline and drop a line to a big media company while you're at it. It'd be fun if it lands in court and then Microsoft, in retailiation, ends up more closely scruitinized for its business practices to ensure that they are abiding by their antitrust agreements. :D

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  135. Just buy a copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any perticular reason to "fix" it? If they buy a copy then that should be sufficient. I know that I've used the same cd key in network environments simply because it's too much of a pain to track everything and make sure you get the right key with the right machine during builds/formats/etc...
    At the end of the year, just make sure everything matches up. That's how they do enterprise licensing, anyways. They don't even have keys, a lot of times, for that reason.
    JJ

  136. It's called a repair install. by lee+n.+field · · Score: 1

    Boot the legitimate Windows install disk. At some point early on you'll be given the option to do a repair install, or to install a new copy of Windows. Choose repair install.

  137. Re:Change your product key - Solution by h4rdc0d3 · · Score: 1

    As already pointed out, this method only works with the VLKs. To change the key in any version of XP, use the Magical Jelly Bean Keyfinder.

  138. Re:Simple... by Joe+U · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked, Windows 2000 is still supported. It will be until late 2009.

    Do you mean Windows NT 4? That was supported after the cut-off date.

    Do you mean Windows ME? I doubt it, because that was a consumer OS, and since most banks run NT, that wouldn't make sense.

    So, what banks are running NT2K? And more importantly, what is NT2K?

    Here's 14 random predictions, that I know will come true too. (uh huh)

    1. Revenue will increase in the next year with new releases.
    2. Xbox will eventually kill PS3
    3. More workers = more products = more profits.
    4. Higher stock value
    5. Next Generation OS already in alpha.
    6. New office features and lower price point will = rapid adoption.
    7. Lower upgrade prices = rapid adoption.
    8. You should have said "Macs are hot again" after the fan problems.
    9. First MacOS worm to wipe out 50% of all connected Macs by 2008.
    10. IE 7.5 wipes out Mozilla.
    11. Additional features will set Vista apart from XP.
    12. Linux still requires more work to be as user friendly as Windows or Mac.
    13. Zune kills iPod in 5 years.
    14. Find out that Steve Jobs made deal with devil next fall.

    You might as well just pick some lottery numbers, don't try and predict the future.

  139. do the dirty work... by spiritraveller · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What would you do in this situation?

    Whenever I have to reinstall windows (or more often, linux since my main computer runs a different distro about every week), I do an audit of all my data.

    First, write down what you need to keep: emails? accounting data from Quicken? config info from other applications? bookmarks? Get it all down and back up everything to an external drive or a CDR.

    Second, reinstall the OS and all applications. If you went through the whole harddrive, directory by directory, you should have saved all the config files and data files that you needed. If you didn't, then you should have gone more slowly and carefully.

    It is best to do a reinstall anyway, because if they've been running Windows for a long time, they probably have a lot of cruft... left-over services and other junk from programs they don't run anymore that are slowing down their machine... and there's always the possibility of malware lurking in the shadows.

    A reinstall takes care of all those things. Tell them not to be afraid, just patient and careful.

    1. Re:do the dirty work... by twitter · · Score: 1

      Whenever I have to reinstall windows (or more often, linux since my main computer runs a different distro about every week), I do an audit of all my data. First, write down what you need to keep: emails? accounting data from Quicken? config info from other applications? bookmarks? Get it all down and back up everything to an external drive or a CDR.

      A Linux recovery is much easier in the rare case you have a need because all user information and settings are in one place.

      1. "tar cvf your_user_name.tar /home/your_user_name"
      2. use konqueror to drag and drop that archive to another box or k3b to write a dvd.
      3. reinstall, move your home back and untar it as root (tar xvf archive name)

      If your distro was bright enough to have a separate home partion, the above steps are not needed. Just use the old partition with the new distro. Applications and settings are not hard to get anymore. In a pinch, just give them Mepis and be done with it. If it runs off the CD, it will run on the hard drive and installation takes about 20 minutes.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    2. Re:do the dirty work... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      If your distro was bright enough to have a separate home partion, the above steps are not needed. Just use the old partition with the new distro. Applications and settings are not hard to get anymore. In a pinch, just give them Mepis and be done with it. If it runs off the CD, it will run on the hard drive and installation takes about 20 minutes.

      btw there is nothing to stop you deleting everything except /home from a partition then moving /home's content to the root dir and then using that partition (possiblly after resizing) as your new /home

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:do the dirty work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:do the dirty work... by Monkier · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much what I do when I rebuild.. Rather than backing everything up on CDRs/external drive, I usually have the luxury of buying a new HD for the fresh install (they are _very very_ cheap these days). Once the fresh install is in place, connect the old drive and drag over all the "data" files (quicken, bookmarks, etc). Run like this for a week or two..

      Once you are confident you've moved over everything - format the old drive (if you really want the extra space). Or pull it out and put in somewhere safe for backup.

  140. Is it just me, or...? by sogod · · Score: 1

    I don't understand what so special your parents could keep in WinXP format. Install any Linux brand for them which has the same look and feel, and they will be happy! Some Word documents? OpenOffice is COMPATIBLE! Excel spreadsheets? ditto. Photos, pictures? Could not Linux reads jpg files? Or do they develop in Visual Studio 2005 :-)? Why on the Earth do they need WinXP? Steps: boot from Linux LiveCD and show them that they can read their files and that OpenOffice could replace Microsoft Office. Backup data, install linux, restore data back and be all happy.

  141. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the solution.

    It's not exactly obvious, but I can vouch for this method. It works.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a much smarter way to do that. Validate using the "validate by phone" method and you'll be given the option to change the serial.

  142. Upgrade from 200 to XP keeps everything. by ArghBlarg · · Score: 1

    I recently had to upgrade friend's PC from Win2k to WinXP, and if you insert the WinXP install disk on a running Win2k system, it will detect and give you the option to upgrade instead of a fresh re-install. It kept most programs, registry entries, bookmarks and all user accounts intact. It was painless. MS actually got that 'right' in my opinion.

    Not sure how a WinXP -> WinXP install would go, but if there's a 'repair' facility it probably will be nearly as painless.

    --
    ERROR 144 - REBOOT ?
    1. Re:Upgrade from 200 to XP keeps everything. by J_Doh! · · Score: 1

      Um No. I ran the repair facility on a licenced version of windows home that had coped it in the neck from some faulty hardware. After the repair completed there were reminant files all over the place, the AV thought it was still installed but failed to run properly .... reinstall. Also windows had now been registered too many times (mind you all on the same hardware) so new key required ... Damn another hoop to jump through. Every program was still there but upon starting it ..... weirdness. Data was on a seperate partition, so solution with windows as always nothing beats a full reformat and reinstall. You just cant tell what the shit is doing or has done. Oh and further to this, the user is now on an Ubuntu / XP dual boot ..... Guess which OS is booted more often for the home user.....?

      --
      To secure peace is to prepare for war ...
  143. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by lanswitch · · Score: 0

    I used RockXP on a number of occasions, on XP Home and XP Pro. It allows you to change the key, and it's very simple to use. It can be found on http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/OS-Enhancement s/RockXP.shtml .
    The website of the developer (http://www.korben.tk) seems down at the moment

  144. run sysprep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sysprep gets a windows box ready to be imaged .. after you run sys prep it turns off. when you turn it back on you now have to enter the product key

  145. I fear the re-install by RebornData · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry to go on an off-topic rant here, but...

    I'm a consultant who helps small business and home users. I can't tell you how many times I have talked to customers who (in the past) have had another tech come along and do a re-install without understanding all of the implications.

    There is value in a machine's configuration! The customizations, tweaks, and even icon arrangements people create to make their systems work and lives easier are time-consuming to recreate, and there can be a major loss of productivity if they have to re-do it all from scratch. I'm a professional, and it's not uncommon for it to take me 3-5 hours to do a good job of getting all of the software, utilities, and configuration changes done for a typical business machine. Just because you can rebuild your own gaming rig from scratch in two hours (because you do it once a month) doesn't meant that this is a course of action that makes sense for everyone.

    This is why I always recommend *full* backups of the entire system... not just "important" documents. And it's why I do a full re-install as an absolute last resort. I can count the number of re-installs I've been forced into in the last *year* on one hand.

    The good news is that if you know what you're doing (unfortunately many techs don't) VERY few problems require a rebuild. It's very possible to clean off even the "worst" infections fairly quickly, with high confidence that everything is gone. I charge a two-hour flat rate for *any* infection cleanup (including kernel rootkits), and that usually works out to my advantage. Hard drives often have only failed in a few sectors... I commonly am able to image the failed drive to a new one, and repair the windows install using a combination of sfc, system restore, misc subsystem fixes, and (in the worst cases) a repair re-install.

    The benefit to the user is that they get their machine back *exactly the way it was*, the same day, without a large repair bill. The benefit to me is that the customer is happy and calls me back the next time they have a problem... instead of cursing me the whole time they are trying to rebuild their system the way they had it.

    If you are a tech and haven't learned this stuff, you are doing your customers and yourself a disservice.

    -R

    1. Re:I fear the re-install by Baricom · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm a professional, and it's not uncommon for it to take me 3-5 hours to do a good job of getting all of the software, utilities, and configuration changes done for a typical business machine.

      But a typical business machine is precisely the kind of machine that you should be able to re-image. The advantages of roaming profiles are enormous, and machines should be set up to use them. If they are, then repairing a virus or spyware infection would be a simple matter of rebooting with the image CD in the drive.

      The good news is that if you know what you're doing (unfortunately many techs don't) VERY few problems require a rebuild.

      True, but in many cases, a reimage can be faster. Even if configuration isn't saved, it might be worth the tradeoff to reimage the machine than to spend the time poking through the registry, tracking down media, and so forth.

      It's very possible to clean off even the "worst" infections fairly quickly, with high confidence that everything is gone.

      The worst infections tend to change system files to install hooks that a typical cleaner can't find.

      If you are a tech and haven't learned this stuff, you are doing your customers and yourself a disservice.

      I know this stuff, and having done it both ways, I'm pretty comfortable saying that a reimage on a properly managed machine is faster and more likely to rid the problem than a manual repair.
    2. Re:I fear the re-install by carterhawk001 · · Score: 1

      I can count the number of windows reinstalls ive done on my personal machine in the last 4 years on one finger. I've used PMagic to copy my install partition from a 30gig to a 60 gig to a 120 gig as i needed more space. Until a week ago I had never needed to reload windows, then something spazzed out and I reinstalled on a new drive, start fresh and all that.

    3. Re:I fear the re-install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not talking about a "properly managed machine"....he's talking clients that likely have little or no structured IT and most/all technical support is ad hoc via misc employees, computer shops, hourly PC repairmen, and consultants (maybe) with no knowledge retained in-house as to configurations or customizations.

      Roaming profiles? duh, me stupid but don't you need a server for that? Many, many, many places don't have servers, can't afford, don't want them, and wouldn't have the budget install and maintain (or pay for it be done for them). They have various networked PCs with or without network connectivity between them.

      What you're saying is correct but there's serious work wrapping some discipline and structure around rolling out, managing, and supporting PCs. There ain't a chance in hell that lots of workplaces have not yet and may never hit the tipping point for thinking they can use or afford that kind of structure.

    4. Re:I fear the re-install by wookie+geek · · Score: 1

      Sorry but I gotta call bullshit on at least part of this. You say you can clean any infection including kernal rootkits in a flat 2 hours without a re image. I don't think so. Obviously you have no idea of what you are talking about on that topic. I wonder how many folks you have "helped" and left totally compromised.

    5. Re:I fear the re-install by mikelieman · · Score: 1

      "There is value in a machine's configuration! The customizations, tweaks, and even icon arrangements people create to make their systems work and lives easier are time-consuming to recreate, and there can be a major loss of productivity if they have to re-do it all from scratch"

      That's what ROAMING PROFILES are for. IF it's a business context with more than 4 PC's, they should be logging into a linux box, and have that windows stuff stored on the backed-up-nightly server.

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
    6. Re:I fear the re-install by Sandcastle · · Score: 1

      I can count my re-installs over the last few years on one finger. A hard drive finally started flaking, so a reboot from a firewire drive with an image from the day before -> format internal drive -> run rsync(x) -> go to the pub. Then again, Mac users (and *nix users) often have more enjoyable things to do than re-install windows.

      --
      The fact that a fish swims in water does not make it an expert in fluid dynamics. GogglesPisano (199483)
    7. Re:I fear the re-install by ameoba · · Score: 1

      ...and having worked doing desktop support in a larger corporate/academic environment, if you're not billing hourly, any system that take more than about 30 minutes to fix is a prime candidate for reimaging.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    8. Re:I fear the re-install by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Which is very relevant because we're talking about home computers.

    9. Re:I fear the re-install by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      Seeing as Steve Ballmer tried for 2 days to clear a friends PC of nasties and then:

      "lumped the thing back to Microsoft's headquarters and turned it over to a team of top engineers, who spent several days on the machine, finding it infected with more than 100 pieces of malware, some of which were nearly impossible to eradicate. "

      Source

      You are either:
      a) shithot at what you do (and should probably send your resume to Microsoft so you can teach them all you know)
      b) not cleaning these machines as well as you think you are.

    10. Re:I fear the re-install by the_womble · · Score: 1

      Surely Windows must have some way of saving a user's settings for restoration after backup? Otherwise how would people keep their settings when they buy a new PC? I mean an equivalent of copying the config files from the user's home directory in Linux.

    11. Re:I fear the re-install by Tschepsit · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with this statement. I've been forced to re-image my work machine 4 times within the last year by our support group. After XP SP2 hosed my machine again a couple weeks ago, I've resolved not to call our IT support people anymore - I'm pretty confident I could do a better, faster job than they could. As-is, I lose a good three days of work time whenever this happens. Why? Because the standard image doesn't include most of the applications that I need to do my day-to-day job. Many of those applications are ridiculously slow to install and set up, so there is a mandatory two-day recovery time after each re-image. Why does it take a full day to do an image in the first place? Because the IT support guys go through an insulting standard script of Control Panel->Uninstall Program->uninstall/reinstall random crap every. single. time.

    12. Re:I fear the re-install by RebornData · · Score: 1

      For slightly larger companies, you're absolutely right. Imaging is great where it's practical. But for very small companies (15 computers) and home users, it rarely is. They've typically got a scattershot collection of machines with OEM licenses, different HALs, etc... Most small businesses this size are only buying 1-2 machines per year. Moreover, because of the diversity of roles within the company, few computers have the same software installs... the bookkeeper needs Quickbooks.

      In addition, people need to have privileges to do their own maintenance and software installs, since they don't have on-site IT help to go to when they need their new PDA hooked up, or want to install an update to their accounting program. So no matter what I put on the image, it's going to be badly out of touch with what the user actually needs.

      The good news is that a backup system that can back up every bit on every machine is affordable, since the total data storage is usually well under .5TB. I push those *hard*. But even then a full system restore is a pain because most backup systems don't cope with the proprietary boot sectors and hidden system partitions found on most major OEM installs these days. And a lot of small business folks are cheapskates and have to suffer a hard drive failure before they recognize the need for a real backup system.

      So I've gotten pretty good at repairs...

      -R

    13. Re:I fear the re-install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "lumped the thing back to Microsoft's headquarters and turned it over to a team of top engineers

      "Microsoft's headquarters" "top engineers" buahahahahahaha. that's a good one.

    14. Re:I fear the re-install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you are a tech and haven't learned this stuff, you are doing your customers and yourself a disservice.


      On average, I have to recover a PC about 3 times a week. I've got a decent warchest to tackle even pesky problems. But I rarely do them anymore, as I think they are a disservice to the customer. The parent poster here claims that they can clean anything and everything (even kernel rootkits) in two hours or less. This simply isn't true. It is such a pie in the sky claim that I would rank it in the league of "I can get from San Deigo to New York in 3 hours! Every time!"

      You are sipposed to show up at the ariport two hours early, but you are a veteran so you cut that down to 45 minutes. But it still takes an hour to drive to the airport and an hour to drive from the airport to your final destination. You're now 2-3 hours into it, not counting flight time.

      If you are honest about the effort it takes to repair a seriously infected Windows PC and you charge fairly, it is almost never worth it to the customer to pay for the job. Four hours of tech support may give them a clean computer that is still four years old and still doesn't have enough RAM, or that DVD drive they would really like. Another $100 would have bought them a brand new computer with better performance, better features, the latest OS, and better peace of mind about whether the PC is clean or not.

      Then you can talk to them hosnestly about paying you to secure their new PC. You know--reinstalling Windows to remove all the factory-installed spyware. Adding virus and spyware detection, firewall, etc. Doing the initial Windows Update... You could do all that in an hour or two.

      In the end, the bill goes from $200 to $400-600. But it is honest. And the customer is $500-600 ahead of where they would have been. And you make the same amount of money for easier work and a much happier customer.
    15. Re:I fear the re-install by nine-times · · Score: 1

      You're right, the configuration has a value, but that often is usually relatively small in comparison to the value of documents themselves. Sometimes, the configuration is, in fact, the problem.

      Also, if everyone is doing what they're supposed to, you should only need two things to get a system back the way it's supposed to be:

      1. Original install disks
      2. Your home directory (in Windows, your folder in "Documents and Settings")

      To the extent that this is not true, someone is doing something wrong, be it Microsoft, some software developer, or the user. It's true that any one given problem should be able to be solved without wiping and starting over, but if you walk in blind to a situation to a desktop that's generally buggy and unstable, sometimes a system-wipe is the best solution, and users should be ready for that. However, if the entire profile is backed up, all sorts of things (including color schemes, icon placement on the desktop, desktop wallpaper, etc) are saved. In Windows 2K, I've moved just the profile to a new machine, and the user didn't know the difference.

      My ideal backup solution, on any platform, is this:

      • keep all original disks and documentation so that you can reinstall your system from scratch, if need be
      • after an initial clean install of all necessary applications, and after configuration, make an image of that machine that can be reapplied whenever you want
      • backup the user's home directory to an external hard drive on a regular basis
      • backup the user's home directory to DVD once in a while (maybe a couple times a year), and store an archive.
    16. Re:I fear the re-install by RebornData · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a justification... "if they haven't made the appropriate precautions... they get what they deserve".

      This really misses the point. The scenario you describe is so far removed from the way non-geeks (ie, most people) understand and interact with their computers to be laugable.

      This is squarely Microsoft's and other vendor's fault:

      1. For not including recovery CDs with every computer (don't make the users burn their own recovery media) *inside the case*, where it can't get lost.

      2. For writing crappy software that doesn't store files in the profile, exclusively.

      3. For putting critical data (e-mail, browser configurations, etc...) in literally hidden directories that an average user doesn't even know is there. For putting user preferences in a registry file that can't simply be copied by the user to back them up.

      4. For creating a convoluted software installation system, which prevents one from simply copying a folder to move an application from one computer to another.

      5. For not making easy-to-use backup a truly integrated part of the OS, that you have to work hard to avoid and gives *useful* error messages when it stops working.

      I could go on, but users are already being punished every day simply by having to use these incredibly confusing, unreliable machines for things that are really critical to them. The last thing we should do, as the technological elite, is blame them.

      -R

    17. Re:I fear the re-install by RebornData · · Score: 1

      There's no way Ballmer (if he's doing his "day job") has any real experience cleaning up malware. In fact, most regular corporate IT people don't really either, because (as so many have pointed out) a re-image is a much better route, if you've got the infrastructure and organization in place in advance.

      There certainly are engineers at MS that could run circles around me, and I'm sure can easily clean up any of the widely-distributed infections my clients are likely to get (as opposed to the scary 0-day stuff used in corporate espionage).

      But can you imagine what a mess that machine must have been in after Ballmer trying to fix it for two days? I doubt the infection was the real problem by that point. But who's got the cajones to tell that to him?

      I've actually been to Redmond a few times- and not for conferences. The MS campus is really nice, but I wouldn't want to work there. :-)

      -R

    18. Re:I fear the re-install by RebornData · · Score: 1

      Well, I didn't think I was doing anything that unusual, but given how many people are shocked by my claims of removing infections quickly, maybe I should start a training course! See one of my earlier posts in this thread for a summary of my technique... the reason why it doesn't take so long is that I don't use long-running (and often inneffective) file scanners.

      I am constantly aware of how important it is to make a computer repair cost-effective... that's one of the reasons I charge a flat two-hour (not four) rate for cleanups, so that if I run into something that's truly novel, I can take the time to (a) do the right thing by the customer and (b) educate myself so that I'll know how to do it in the future.

      But for more serious / time consuming problems, I do have a threshold for which it's "not worth" fixing a computer... what you've said is absolutely right in some cases. I don't do what I call "band-aid" work... I want to be sure that the customer is going to be fully satisfied with the result, and it just doesn't make sense to invest a lot of time into older machines.

      -R

    19. Re:I fear the re-install by brufar · · Score: 1

      Theres a "file and settings transfer Wizard " in Windows XP that will back up your settings for use on a different machine..

      Or in the case of the network I am working on.. converting the users from local logins and pass thru auth.. ** sigh**
      to domain logins. but of course theres no easy way I have found to move the users local profile to their domain profile so I am using this 'tool'.

      Downside of the tool is it does not maintain icon positions on the desktop.. (users are such a bunch of whiners.. just move em back !!)
      It also fails to transfer the password for their email account that is setup in Outlook or Outlook Express..

      Other than that it seems to work pretty good.

      Sure wish you could just just check a box and say convert local profile to domain profile for this user.. at least for step one of htis process.

      --
      far...out
    20. Re:I fear the re-install by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I'm inclined to agree that this isn't the users fault. However, like I said, if saving the user profile and install disks isn't good enough, someone did the wrong thing. Very often, it is the vendors fault. However, there are users who, no matter how many times you tell them, they won't store their personal files in their own profile. I've known Mac users and Windows users who, in spite of all my advice, insist on putting personal files in the dumbest places-- in the root directory or their Applications/Program Files. Those users are simply doing the wrong thing.

      I also agree that Microsoft has screwed up by not making this easier. I agree with every one of your points. However, I don't agree that my suggestions are impossible for non-geeks to achieve.

      My "ideal" backup solution is actually easily achieveable in OSX (though in Windows, less so). Buy a nice big external hard drive. When you've installed everything you want and configured what you want on your internal hardive, download a copy of Carbon Copy Cloner, and clone your hard drive to the external hard drive, thereby making it a full-bootable copy of OSX. Next, use carbon copy cloner to create an image file of your desired configuration. I've taught some pretty non-technical users how to do all this.

      If you ever need to restore, you boot from your external hard drive and use Carbon Copy Cloner to copy your image back to your internal drive. It's really pretty simple.

      Now, once a week or so, connect your external hard drive and drag your entire home folder to that drive. As long as you've been storing all your files in there, you've just backed up everything you need to. Burning to DVD is a little trickier because you'll probably need to span disks, but if you don't want to manage that manually, you can buy a little backup program to help you.

      And that's it. Of course, most users simply haven't learned (or been taught) how to use their computer properly, but that's not entirely the vendor's fault either. Even the non-savvy should be able to buy an external hard drive, and drag and drop their home folder, if someone would just show them how.

      Regardless, my early point remains: full system backup are generally not necessary. As long as users have learned to keep their important files in their profile, keeping install disks and backing up user profiles is sufficient. Imaging the system will help save time, but a pre-built restore disk is more trouble than it's worth. Users need an imagine system that's easy to manage, so that they can keep their restore-point up-to-date as their system changes.

      Anyway, all of this is extremely off-topic. What's slightly more on topic, however, is that Microsoft has made the "imaging" portion of my backup strategy difficult, though their poor hardware detection scheme and their piracy prevention schemes. Plus, you generally need to buy expensive 3rd party applications, or else use another OS to do the imaging. They've made it so it's difficult for even an experienced user to back things up appropriately.

    21. Re:I fear the re-install by GWBasic · · Score: 1
      When SP2 for XP came out, I delayed installing it on my personal laptop as the Windows installation was showing its age. When the time was right, I restored my laptop from its system CD, and re-installed everything. Such a task ended up taking me a few evenings to get everything "right".

      A few months later, the laptop's hard drive showed its age and crashed on me. Again, it took me a few evenings to install everything. This time, however, I learned and made a ghost CD before I started copying gigs of personal documents.

    22. Re:I fear the re-install by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Actually there is a way to change the profile from a local user to domain user without losing anything. You need to fix the file permissions on the users directory so the new user has full access, then load the user registry hive from the current profile, and give the user full permissions there as well. Finally, there are a couple of registry settings to change; basically you're just telling windows that this profile belongs to this SID.

      Its really pretty easy, and you don't lose ANYTHING.

  146. Maybe you should backup? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    If the information is so important that you don't want to reinstall from scratch maybe you should be doing backups incase you break the system attempting to fix it or you have some hardware failure or some virus.

    Then when you have a backup you can just go the easy route and reinstall everything from scratch and restore the backups.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  147. So tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this a crack for? :-)

    1. Re:So tell me... by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 2, Funny
      What is this a crack for? :-)

      My sanity.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
  148. Re:Simple... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Revenue will increase in the next year with new releases."

    Not certain, and definitely not equating to profits, which are down.

    2. Xbox will eventually kill PS3

    Wii is the one to watch.

    3. More workers = more products = more profits.

    Total bullshit. What's happened was predicted a decade ago. Microsoft has already picked all the "low-hanging fruit", and now needs more bodies to squeeze more revenue out of marginal products.

    4. Higher stock value

    The current prediction is a flat stock value, because of the buyback. Its been estimated that without the buyback, the stock would have lost about 20%. This buyback is confverting an asset with actual value (cash) into an asset with no intrinsic value(stock). But it was either do the buyback or lose even more, as the assets that are held as stock would have lost even more value.

    5. Next Generation OS already in alpha.

    No its not, and it won't be within the foreseable future. http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/06/28/HNwinsuc cessor_1.html They haven't even got a clue as to where they want it to go, except for some vague mumblings about "better multiprocessor support".

    Heck, even a year after they "deliver" Vista, they still won't have delivered what was slated to go into it originally under the name "blackcomb".

    6. New office features and lower price point will = rapid adoption.

    Nope. They're in a bind on Office pricing. Lower the price, cannibalize revenues from existing customers. Maintain the price, lose existing customers. Besides, there are no "must haves" for the vast majority of users in the current version, never mind a hypothetical future upgrade. Their only option at this point is to continue to bleed slowly.

    7. Lower upgrade prices = rapid adoption.

    Same problem as #6 above. They simply can't afford to lower the price - it will mean less $$$, without increasing sales. That's the problem with being a near-monopoly - you're your own worst competitor. Even Microsofts' own employees are saying there's no real reason to upgrade.

    8. You should have said "Macs are hot again" after the fan problems.

    And yet they've doubled their laptop sales, then doubled them again. They're now 12% of all laptops sold. Microsoft is going to miss the "back-to-school" surge next month, so expect to see mac laptops rise to between 15 and 20% by year-end, as Microsoft also misses the pre-Christmas sales. Expect desktops to follow, as users begin to demand seamless compatibility between their mac laptops and their home desktops.

    9. First MacOS worm to wipe out 50% of all connected Macs by 2008.

    ... as compared to the current crop of viruses and trojans, which have, on a statistical basis, either wiped out, or caused their owners to wipe out, Windows several 100%? Dream on

    10. IE 7.5 wipes out Mozilla.

    IE is bleeding market share every month. The people who have changed will never go back, because the trust is gone. Microsoft has actually already lost the browser wars - its just taking tie for the news to spread from the head (early adopters) to the rest of the body.

    11. Additional features will set Vista apart from XP.

    People don't care any more. They don't buy an OS for its features - they just want to use it to do their work, play games, surf the net, etc. Windows95 was the last "gee whiz" release. Those days are gone. They'll never be back. Even the features that wer yanked from vista are not "must-haves" any more - and there will be free 3rd-party replacements for anyone who doesn't wan

  149. Don't buy anything by Mushukyou · · Score: 1

    Tell your parents it's pretty ridiculous to throw your money away just so you can "feel good" about giving Microsoft a little bit more money that they don't need. Piracy. It's what's for lunch.

  150. Do it professionnally by Coeurderoy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well since the slave loves his/her collar.
    1) Check out all the software that are installed "on top of windows".
    2) Backup all data
    3) check the licences of all your "non Windows" sofware
    4) Make sure you have a licence for a virus scanner and a spyware scanner
    4a) if now buy
    4b) buy all non windows software you need and do not have a legal licence for.
    5) contact your hardware makers and try to get or buy a legal version of Windows made for your hardware
          if you have an invoice and the original key (sticker on your pc) you should be able to get this
    6) pay the upgrade for what ever version you want
    7) install the original windows and all the drivers
    8) go to each of your periferal HW vendor site and check if there is an upgrade for your driver
    9) install your recent windows version
    10) install the virus scanner and run it
    11) connect to the internet
    12) upgrade the virus scanne and run it again
    13) install the spyware scanner
    14) upgrade the spyware scanner
    15) run it
    16) upgrade windows online
    17) re run the viruse scanner and the spyware scanner
    18) re install all your junk windows compatible software
    19) reload your data (you did check that the bakcup worked right ?)
    20) install a bakcup manager and train your parents
    21) remember they are your parents you cannot charge them 500$ for the day you lost
    22) remember they are your parents you cannot take a cut on the 400$+ of software licence they had to buy
    23) try to invoice the stupid moron that gave them the pack of crufty junk in the first place
    24) you can mutter sotto voce against the people that have the intellectual laziness to prefer this aggravation to running a free platform (that of course also has its own hasles but at least you are free so the hasles is to stay that way not to lineup bill and steve's pockets and flush democracy down the drain.
    25) good luck

    11) install the

  151. Save your configuration? by MarkByers · · Score: 1

    Backup ~

    Job done.

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
    1. Re:Save your configuration? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right on. This is a failure on the part of Winders.

      I can backup my (Unix) home directory and get every configuration required (for a desktop). It is all *right there*.

      Windows has shit all over the place. C:/Windows, C:/Whatever... Some apps put personal info in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE rather than HKEY_CURRENT_USER. Windows is still light years behind Unix and OSX in this respect.

    2. Re:Save your configuration? by RebornData · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I happen to be of the opinion that most modern UNIX variants do this wrong as well... back when I was doing UNIX sysadmin stuff at Rice University, we had a beautiful software installation convention called /usr/site... the upshot was that by forcing all applications (at compile time) to use version-specific install paths to refer to their own support files.

      For example, say /machinename2 is your software install partition.

      Each app is installed in a directory /machinename2/appname-version.

      There's a directory called /user/site which has symlinks like this:
       
      /usr/site/appname-version -> /machinename2/appname-version
      /usr/site/appname -> /user/site/appname-version

      Rather than putting executabels in /usr/local/bin, you instead put symlinks like this:
       
      /usr/local/bin/executablename -> /usr/site/appname/bin/executablename

      Same thing for /usr/local/lib, /usr/local/etc... etc... ALL of the references to the app or app files in the system are symlinks to /usr/site/appname/...

      The app is compiled to refer to use the install prefix as /usr/site/appname-version.

      The beauty of this sytem is that you can easily have multiple versions of an app installed simultaneously. Need to put a new version into production? In most cases, all you need to is change /usr/site/appname to point to a different /usr/site/appname-version. Same thing with a "downgrade".

      This is actually a slightly simplified version of what we used, since it can be extended to "do the right thing" in environments where you're supporting multiple processor architectures off a single /machinename2 software installlation NFS share. If you google /usr/site, you can find complete documentation here.

      -R

  152. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by FyreMoon · · Score: 1
    Of course, if you have SP1 as your initial XP CD, download SP2 and the latest autopatcher bundles before you start.

    Make sure you are behind a firewall or physically disconnected from the internet when reinstalling SP1. Upgrade to SP2, the slipstream all the patches from the latest autopatcher bundles and your computer has theb latest XP patches on it ready to hit the net.

    http://autopatcher.com/

  153. Depends on legislation, Germany at least differs by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    A few years ago, a dealer in germany did exactly that - sold OEM copies of Windows separately from hardware. Microsoft sued him and the lawsuit went all the way to the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany's highest court for non-constitutional issues). In that court, Microsoft lost.
    The court found that the EULA was not binding, and Microsoft did not have a separate contract with that dealer that explicitly barred him from selling the OEM versions without hardware (that way, they could have made their OEM rules binding even in Germany).

    Since that time, Microsoft has given up selling "OEM" software in Germany. What you can buy instead are "System Builder" versions. Those come without documentation and support, but Microsoft does not try to legally bind them to a certain hardware.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  154. Re:Change your product key - Solution by Cramer · · Score: 1

    Wrong. The "Magic Jelly Bean" uses the exact same scripts found in the KB for VLKs. And the key changer actually says so, if you weren't inclined to click the little underlined blue text.

  155. Re:Simple... by nsayer · · Score: 1
    This buyback is confverting an asset with actual value (cash) into an asset with no intrinsic value(stock).

    Minor nit: One share of stock does have an intrinsic value: the sum of the valuation of the assets of the company, minus its debts, divided by the number of shares outstanding. That is, if the company were liquidated, it's the amount each share would be paid from the pile of money left over. Typically, of course, the share price is many times higher than that, because a company is generally worth far more as a profit-generating enterprise than as a mere sum of its parts.

  156. Re:Simple... by Joe+U · · Score: 1

    Sorry, My predictions are right, yours are wrong, and the world will end on Thursday.

    Do you actually think you're the first person to predict the demise of Microsoft (or Apple) and have a list of points that make sense?

    You can not predict the future, you can only guess based on trends. The key word is guess.

    And of course Microsoft will never again be what it was, everything changes, don't expect them to die a slow death though.

  157. Re:Simple... by lightning_queen · · Score: 1

    Actually, Microsoft ended support for Win98 and ME as of June 2006, and will be ending suport for XP SP1 in October. Win2k entered the extended support phase and will only receive security patches until 2010.

    I'm guessing XP Home won't be supported shortly after Vista comes out, mainly because new systems will most likely have Vista on them. XP Pro will probably still be supported, and may get lucky and keep the support for as long as Win2k has, depending on how much it's used on servers (one of the main reasons, I think, why Win2k is still supported).

    Because most users just want ease of use and familiarity. I love gentoo myself, but every Linux install that I've done so far has been tweaky, finicky, and just plain difficult at times. I like to play with it and learn, as it relates to my profession, but most users just don't want to put up with that. Windows, for the majority of users, just plain works.

    Aside from Gentoo, what versions of Linux have you installed and what kinds of computers were they on? Although I think every expert has some sort of tweaks they do to a given OS to make it run better, my experience has taught me that Windows can be as finicky, if not more so, than any of them. It's amazing the number of changes, processes that are turned off, and crap that's uninstalled before a computer leaves the store when a customer gets a customization on their new computer.

    Ok, so they may have to get used to a new way of installing programs (though, for a Mac, that's as easy as putting a file in a certain folder, which is nice), and may have to deal with a couple new names because of copyright restrictions, but it's not really anything that anyone can't handle if they take 10 minutes to learn their way around it. It's been proven that young children can learn their way around a totally new OS in about 5 minutes, even if their home computer is a different OS, but I guess that just goes to show you the deteriroration of a person's willingness to learn as they get older.

  158. Give M$... by Tinned_Tuna · · Score: 1

    ... The finger, and install Linux (or get your phone call, one or the other ;-) ) I think Ubuntu would be best here.

  159. Go Legal Without Losing Everything by thelizman · · Score: 1

    You will first have to buy an equivalent version. If they're already using XP Home, then just buy XP Home. If they're using XP Pro, then you have to figure out if they're using a volume license version, oem version, or retail version. Then you have to buy the right version license. (If it's volume license, you're out of luck: complete reinstall required.)

    Once you have this, log in with the administrators account. In the registry, navigate to HK_LOCAL_MACHINE -> Software -> Microsoft -> WindowsNT -> Current Version -> WPAEvents. Right click on OOBETimer and select "Modify". Change any of the values in there, and close the registry.

    Next, go to Start->Run and type "c:\windows\system32\oobe\msoobe.exe /a" without the quotes. Click to register by phone, and on the next page click the button to change your Key (or license, my memory gets hazy at this point). Enter in your new LEGAL license key, and click Next. It should generate a new system id. Cancel out of the screen, reboot, and you should be able to do legal things like get updates from Windows Update without running into WGA blocks.

  160. Re:Simple... by lightning_queen · · Score: 1

    Wow...you missed the sarcasm in the post you're responding to (note the "uh huh")....

  161. Doctrine of First Sale by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 1

    To my knowledge, the U.K. is the only country in which this practice is illegal. In the U.S. the courts have repeatedly held up (1) the doctrine of first sale -- you can sell a physical artifact you bought and (2) the doctrine that incidental and temporary copies made in the course of using software do not activate copyright law.

    Provided you don't agree to the "EULA" or such rot, you aren't bound by it.

    IANAL.

  162. The case for pirating Windows is justified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your only use for Windows is testing web pages in IE or MS Office configurations then I'd argue you're justified in pirating Windows. Since M$ used illegal tactics to create their Windows/IE/Office monopoly we who would like to do away with Windows but are forced to use it to work around IE's flaws should not, in principle, have to pay the evil empire a cent. M$ should be forced by law to provide some kind of online equivalent of IE browser testing (Java or .NET app) so that web developers don't have to pay the M$ tax and have their noses rubbed in it because M$ chooses to flaunt standards.

  163. Once tained, always tained... Replace the OS! by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1

    First of all, we DON'T know if the original Windows CD has been hacked with a low-profile portknocked encrypted backdoor trojan running GOD-knows what stuff the spammers, lurkers and hackers want. This kind is virtually impossible for anti-virus program to detect.

    Secondly, a keylogger could be silently copying all your keystrokes (password and all). It doesn't have to send them over the net, but it might do an innocuous ping to the hackers' headquarter.

    Thirdly, it could randommly mess with your data (just a tiny bit) to make you lose productivity, but not enough to think that one needs to reinstall Windows.

    Do yourself a HUGE favor and buy a legitimate copy of Windows. The pain of reinstalling is worth it in the long run.

    If you are curious as to how many trojans are out there (complete with a snapshot of their console GUI), check out http://www.megasecurity.org/

  164. Don't have to install over top, do a repair..... by gethoht · · Score: 1

    What you posted is not entirely true,
    Mod parent down please...

    If you have a machine that has the corporate version, you don't have to install over top of it. You can do a repair install. Just boot off the OEM version, and on the third prompt, select R for "repair" instead of installing over the current windows. This leaves the registry intact, all your programs the way they were, and lets you enter a new key as part of the installation process.

    The only time you would have to a fresh install is if you went from pro to home.

    I had an unfortunante incident with one of our suppliers that left us with a bunch of their corporate versions of windows on our customers machines. Customers started getting WGA errors all over the place, and we've found this to be the quickest legal method to deal with it. Magic Jellybean doesn't work because the windows versions are different.

    This was noted a few posts up by the way....

    --gethoht

    --
    All things are subject to interpretation, whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and n
  165. Re:Simple... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    Microsoft currently has about $3/share in cash holdings. That is going to go down as the share buyback continues, and as their revenues continue to decline.

    One of the problems of evaluating how much Microsoft would be worth in a sale is that there aren't too many people who wold be potential buyers. Its too big. So it would have to be split up, and that causes a further problem - they've spent so much time pushing the "its so integrated" angle that there isn't any easy way to do a proper split-up of assets to sell off the individual divisions. There's going to be imparement no matter what.

    Then there are the parts that look like they'll never make money - Xbox being one of them. Nobody will buy that, even for the proverbial "$1.00 + future considerations".

    The Office division? Without any tie-in from the OS, there's no real incentive to go Ms-Office as opposed to Corel, or OpenOffice, or any other suite.

    The server division? Competition there is fierce, and linux and bsd both have better reputations in terms of cost and reliability.

    The consumer OS (Vista) division (because lets face it, Microsoft's XP and Vista are consumer OSes) Support is an ongoing expense, and the cost is going to continue to rise. We saw this with XP - the more complicated the code base, the more bodies you have to throw at it. Vista is going to be a code support nightmare (okay, it already is).

    Nope, the shareholders are on a roller-coaster ride. They've gotten to the top, and now they're on the way downhill. There'll be other peaks, but none will be as high as that first one, and the overall trend is downhill from now on.

  166. The same as always? by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1

    Gee, I don't know.. install it on a new harddrive, make a backup first. How is this any different than upgrading or reinstalling for any other purpose? Stupid Ask Slashdot, really.

  167. Re:Simple... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    I fully expect them to die a slow death over the next 2 decades. It's the other side of the "revenue explosion" Charles Simonyi spoke about when talking about Window's future in the early '80s. He was right then, and the same principle holds true today. Sharp rise, plateau, then descent is the way that curve works, and Microsoft is right on course.

    Anyone who believes that Microsoft will still be the dominant player in the market doesn't understand commoditization, growth curves, and market saturation.

  168. just change the key by crashelite · · Score: 2, Informative

    first get a legit key for ur OS that u are running
    then
    here is how to change the key
    1.
    Click Start, and then click Run.
    2.
    In the Open box, type regedit, and then click OK.
    3.
    In the left pane, locate and then click the following registry key:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\WindowsNT\Cu rrent Version\WPAEvents
    4.
    In the right pane, right-click OOBETimer, and then click Modify.
    5.
    Change at least one digit of this value to deactivate Windows.
    6.
    Click Start, and then click Run.
    7.
    In the Open box, type the following command, and then click OK.
    %systemroot%\system32\oobe\msoobe.exe /a
    8.
    Click Yes, I want to telephone a customer service representative to activate Windows, and then click Next.
    9.
    Click Change Product key.
    10.
    Type the new product key in the New key boxes, and then click Update.

    If you are returned to the previous window, click Remind me later, and then restart the computer.

    --
    (yes i know i suck at spelling fell free to correct my grammar and/or spellin i dont care, im still not going to change
  169. Can you say Scrooge? by lightning_queen · · Score: 1

    You were a jock in high school, weren't you? Or do you even remember high school? Let's see...you're 32, and aside from the fact that you don't have the guts to post with a username, that would put you in high school in what? Class of 1992? Hmm...so that means the geeks in your high school were probably tinkering with any A/V equipment your school had, probably working with the 5" floppies and the few computers your school probably had at that time, and don't forget the typewriters, they probably fixed those, too. And they did all this despite the fact that you and your buddies tried to shove them in a locker on a daily basis, belittle them, tell them they were worthless and noone cared about them (despite the fact that they practically ran the school, and pretty much run the country, but don't generally gloat about it because they're not that high-profile), and generally made their life a living hell. Treat people like professionals and they'll act like professionals (ask any Kindergarten teacher). And perhaps it's not them that need to grow up, but you're the one that needs to grow up (or perhaps you don't like teens because you're afraid of getting old?) and realize that they're the future and you'll be relying on them sooner than you think.

    That aside, to the teen geeks who posted: The real geeks don't gloat about what they know or can do, aren't generally arrogant, and usually make their knowledge known through things like fixing the family computer and their parents tell friends and neighbors. I've had run-ins with people who bring their computers in after "the neighbor kid who knows a lot about computers" was done with it, and that's generally what happens. That's not to say, however, that all teens are like that. As one of them, I know what it's like to be told "you don't know anything, you're just a kid." Make your accomplishments based on what you know, learn everything you can, those certs and a college degree are a definite plus and can help fill in gaps that "real world experience" may not teach you. Also, work on people and communication skills, both written and verbal. A geek with good communication skills is virtually irreplacable. And also prove wrong people's ideas of "teenagers are obnoxious brats who think they know it all but lack any real world experience."

  170. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe his family tree don't branch.

  171. What "professional companies" do you speak of? by lightning_queen · · Score: 1

    The companies I've worked for tell the customer to either back their files up themselves, or let the company do it, otherwise the company is not responsible for lost files. The OS is then replaced, and if anything is FUBAR, the company has to fix the problem at no cost to the customer and the company eats what would have been the profits.

  172. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by Elbowgeek · · Score: 1
    Many thanks for that info, it's something I've been looking for for a looong time.

    BTW, I went to your web site and got the following error:

    Warning: main(./pm/inc.sfx.inc): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/networkn/public_html/pm_inc.php on line 26 Warning: main(./pm/inc.sfx.inc): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/networkn/public_html/pm_inc.php on line 26 Warning: main(): Failed opening './pm/inc.sfx.inc' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/networkn/public_html/pm_inc.php on line 26 The information is set incorrectly in the following file: "pm_inc.php" Please open "pm_inc.php" with a text editor and correct the path. You'll find instructions located inside that file

    I am particularly interested in your site as I am doing some work with wireless and Ubuntu Linux.

    Cheers

    --
    Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
  173. JUST DOWNLOAD IT AGAIN FROM MININOVA.ORG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Seriously just re-download Windows XP From www.mininova.org, MUCH SMARTER IDEA

  174. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by lightning_queen · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting, too, that he seems to have little knowledge of what an Apple computer requires as far as hardware. Otherwise he'd know that a standard USB mouse and keyboard, and a standard monitor generally works with most Macs. He'd also know that most third-party software (ie - not MS brand, though even some of them are Mac supported) generally has Mac support from the beginning, AND that documents themselves are OS-independent and only require a program that can read said format (such as Open Office being able to open, edit, and create MS Office files such as Excel spreadsheets and Word documents). And if he paid ANY attention to the post he replied to, he'd know that the poster didn't suggest JUST Mac or Linux, but offered Windows options as well.

    He'd also know that buying any decent, new computer usually entails paying at least $600 after everything is said and done...

  175. Do Complete Backups *First* by billstewart · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If they're running a new enough version of Windows to care about the problem, but are afraid of reinstalling all their software, they probably aren't the type of people to do good backups, but their system should support external USB drives. So they should go spend $100-150 to get an external hard drive, drag&drop all their data onto it, and see if there's a good backup program that'll do something useful with installed programs (any recommendations?).

    *Then* they can think about doing a Windows key update or if necessary reinstalling.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  176. Re:Don't have to install over top, do a repair.... by insecuritiez · · Score: 1

    > The only time you would have to a fresh install is if you went from pro to home.

    "Corporate" is just Pro with a Volume License Key (VLK). Going from Pro->Home is no different than Corp->Home. You can't repair between versions without running into trouble.

  177. Re:Depends on legislation, Germany at least differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel sorry for germans and their lack of freedoms, then. In the US, we have far greater freedom to contract. It's a beautiful thing.

  178. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MadTux.org sells Linux-friendly wireless cards – although not sure if they'd work with Ubuntu, it has horrible wireless support last time I checked. May as well just get a more wireless-friendly Linux, I hear Ultima's pretty good, might be better for you :-P

  179. It does sound like a "parents"/teachers thing by billstewart · · Score: 1
    It doesn't sound like what _my_ parents would have done, but it does sound a lot like what minimally-computer-literate parents might have done, especially if they were upgrading a Win98/WinME machine to XP as opposed to, say, buying a barebones machine with no OS on it and building it from scratch. I've got a cousin who's a really bright history teacher, but she had trouble figuring out how to do things on the Internet with her school-provided Macintosh back in the mid-90s, and depended on other teachers to help set the thing up. At least it wasn't a PC, where there's some excuse for it being difficult.

    I was really annoyed to have to buy a full-price copy of XP when my mother-in-law's computer needed to be cleaned up a few years back, but there didn't seem to be any point in trying to reinstall WinME, especially when she'd lost her install disk and I'd have to bring mine over from home on my next trip - I didn't want to mess with any licensing-police issues, and it was especially insulting because WinME hadn't fixed any of the problems Win98SE or Win98 had on my machines so I felt Bill Gates had ripped me off. At least XP let us run her machine in non-administrator mode so she'd have more trouble getting new spyware.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  180. Isn't there an option? by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

    Try to visit a site that requires WGA, fail it, and there should be an option to pay Microsoft to make the copy legit. I believe it was $150 or so.
    Honestly, I'd just backup and reformat.

  181. That'd be dumb.. by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Troll

    This guy obviously works for Microsoft. Don't people recognise astroturf anymore?

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  182. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  183. Or ? You could simply fix the install by Solosoft · · Score: 1

    If you have a copy of Windows XP which is pirate you could simply just crack the wga and if it ever becomes a problem (legally) you have a Windows XP license and working CD key ? would that still mean you pirated windows or is it legit. Like if I had 4 pirated Windows XP machines and bought 4 licenses at a later time would it make all my XP installs legit ? (I don't care about the wga or the key crap ... some nifty cracks and such fix those up really well)

  184. Black & White by Lord+Balto · · Score: 1

    The world isn't always either/or. Both propositions could be true. Personally, I find HTML much more flexible than its perverted evil twin, CSS. Now there's something that's really stupid.

  185. Product Key Update Tool by dtfinch · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think if you own a valid product key the exact same edition that you pirated, you can download a product key changer from MS that'll let you substitute your valid product key in place of the pirated one. They offer it in the WGA support forums to people who's systems came with XP, but later reinstalled the same exact edition with a pirated key. http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=50346&clcid =0x409

  186. Re:Division Bell = Waaaay off Topic by robertc5 · · Score: 1

    I think it was. Unless they reform the band.

  187. Re:Change your product key - Solution by h4rdc0d3 · · Score: 1

    I work at a company who does a LOT of computer repairs. I can assure you that this program works for every version of XP. We use it quite often.

  188. Um - she works for a school! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Schools if they're subscribed under the right program actually give teachers the ability to use the school's enterprise copy of software (office, XP etc) at home.

    I know, i used to work at a school and this was explicitly covered by Microsoft and trumpetted by the education department.

    All she needs to do is find out if she's under that program and then change/fix up her install as plenty of other people have detailed.

  189. Blackmail! by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

    Just blackmail the teacher into buying a legitimate copy of Windows for them! After all, after you've committed the dread act of piracy, what's a little extortion and blackmail? Just ask yourself: What Would Jack Sparrow Do?

  190. Install Linux by yg5565 · · Score: 1

    After downloading firebird, migrating all of their email and backing up all data. Go ahead with your installation and restore their data. Problem solved.

  191. you're not a lawyer, are you? by macadamia_harold · · Score: 1

    As far as what they actually are doing, well, it's theft, plain and simple.

    No, because infringement of intellectual property is a civil offence, while theft is a criminal offence. If you don't understand the distinction, you're obviously not qualified to be making any commentary on this subject.

    1. Re:you're not a lawyer, are you? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      It only becomes infringement of intellectual property if they're redistributing. Intellectual property laws only cover publication and distribution. Frankly, I think you should probably watch the tone you give off; it's not a complex topic, and for you to look down on someone after making a mistake like that does not reflect well on you in public, especially given that you've reacted so badly to something that was written in a pleasant tone.

      Given that I've got seventeen credits in law from Rutgers New Brunswick, which (I suspect) is 17 more than you have, I think you'd also do well to stop pretending what you learned between YRO and CSI makes you an expert.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  192. Easy To FIx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy A Legal Copy of The Same Release XP Pro or XP Home then follow the instructions in this tech bulletin http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb; en-us;Q328874 You basicly go in and deactive windows through regedit then change the product key to a legit one using the activate windows routine. No need to reinstall. Only works on SP1 or higher

  193. clean and keep by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    Sounds great.

    Especially great for you because you're going to be back in another month to six months to do it again.

    1. Re:clean and keep by RebornData · · Score: 1

      I offer a money-back guarantee... if the infection predates my previous cleanup, the second cleanup is free.

      If someone is stupid enough to get re-infected after sitting through the well-honed lecture I give while cleaning up their machines, I'm happy to take their money again. It's happened twice in memory, and both of them were teenagers of wealthy parents that really didn't care. Most "normal" folks are scared to death of getting infected, and get religion after I tell them about keystroke loggers and such. Although getting the right software on the machine is a big part of staying safe, modifying user behavior is the really important change.

      -R

  194. reinstall ... by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    one of the linux based systems. Seriously.

    Buy them a new HD for the Linux, swap the HDs so you have the original safe-and-sound, and install, what, RH? SuSE? Ubuntu or Knoppix?

    Show them where all the software they will use instead of the Microsilt is and show them how to do what they want to do. (Firefox, one of a couple of options on e-mail, openoffice?)

    Hang the original HD off as a slave and set it up so they can mount it read-only and get at their old data. Or maybe copy the old data to a special /olddata partition so the old drive can be saved as backup.

    Make a date once or twice a week to come show them how to do what they can't figure out. You need the excuse to visit anyway, and you'll find after the second week that you actually do visit more than do geekly things.

  195. buy them a mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unless you're going for some sort of "payback" angle. then, by all means, pay money for admitance to MS hell.

  196. Re:Depends on legislation, Germany at least differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a joke, right?

    In this country, we have 'contracts' nobody ever really agrees to-- EULAs -- and courts who make decisions by reading the Bible. The German courts held what any rational court in an actually civilized country would hold.

  197. KeyUpdateTool.exe by speeDDemon+(nw) · · Score: 1

    One simple executable. Called the KeyUpdateTool.exe provided by microsoft. It will update a 'pirate' version of Windows XP with the new CD key you provide. It is non destructive and has worked flawlessly on the 10 machines I have had to use it on. Your mileage may vary but I would recommend this option to all who purchase a valid license.

  198. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by Ned_Network · · Score: 1
    Many thanks for that info, it's something I've been looking for for a looong time.
    A pleasure. :D

    BTW, I went to your web site and got the following error:
    Warning: main(./pm/inc.sfx.inc): failed to open stream:
    I am particularly interested in your site as I am doing some work with wireless and Ubuntu Linux.
    Oooops.
    * blushes *
    Yup, I do know about that, and I'm sorry for not fixing it sooner.
    Basically, I'm not a web-designer, so it's not very "interesting" to fix, I have loads of other things to do right now, and Linux hardware isn't really my main business, more of just a hobby.

    What that page would tell you is that I sell 54 Mbps, 802.11g wireless network cards featuring the Ralink 2500 and the prism54 chipsets, which are both VERY well supported with open-source drivers under Linux.

    The Ralink 2500 cards are £29 + p&p, available in PCI & cardbus versions and are supported by the rt2500 driver (which is now shipped by many distros, including Ubuntu).
    The prism54 wireless cards are £39 + p&p and available in PCI only but as well as operating as a normal wireless network card they'll also do "master mode". This allows a regular Linux PC to operate as a wireless base-station - not ad-hoc mode, but proper master-mode, FWIW. The prism54 driver has been part of the main 2.6 kernel tree for some time.

    I'm based in the UK but can ship within the EU. Email me for more details.

    Ned.

  199. C'mon! What's all the fuss here? by EqualOrLesserValue · · Score: 0

    On the serious side: download http://www.magicaljellybean.com/keyfinder.shtml's keyfinder. No need to reboot the system, no need to even install the file! Just change the number to the new valid one, save it and you're totally legit.

    On the funnier side... the only way to fix Windows XP is to completely remove it for something better... like an OpenSource operating system.

    --
    The trouble with Karma is: it always gets worse.
  200. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by MSFanBoi2 · · Score: 1

    Considering that last post came from my MacBook, I would have to say plenty.

    1.) Unless the PC in question is very new, chances are it has a PS2 style keyboard, and more than likely a mouse, which don't work on a Mac without the PS2 to USB adapter, which doesnt work on all systems and on some systems doesn't work 100%

    2.) Quite a few monitors are not digital out there. Sure you can use the adapter, but it looks like crap.

    YOU STILL HAVE TO REBUY SAID SOFTWARE for the Mac. THus it costs money. Unless you advocate piracy, in which case not only are you blinded by the Apple RDF, you are also a theif...

    Don't let your Apple Koolaid cloud your vision TOO much... huh?

  201. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your age is irreleavent. People don't like tired old people, because they are often whiney attention-whores who lack the open mind to properly evaluate a person's potential aptitudes. People over 30 are generally annoying anyways. People over 30 who look down on those younger than them are often even moreso.

    As a teenager (19 years of age) I have to admit that I really dont like age-ist assholes like yourself. When I am trying to get work or make social connections I find small-mindedness to be incredibly obnoxious. Sure, not everybody over 30 is like that. youre just one of the bad ones. But don't make me write off an entire age group (and have to look foward to turning into something like you) just beacuse of a few puerile pricks.

  202. ho hum by TaGirl_Keri · · Score: 1

    Step 1.. Tell them you installed the new copy, but you didn't. Step 2.. Sell new legit copy to someone else. Step 3.. Profit

    --
    My fav units are dead Mavs
  203. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by Centurix · · Score: 1

    I think some families wish they could rollback and fork.

    Maybe these families use VSS.

    --
    Task Mangler
  204. Reinstall by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

    Reinstall the system with known-good media. If the OS is pirated, it probably has activation cracks, and who knows whether it has a rootkit or other malware installed. The safest thing to do is to get a new, OEM copy of Windows XP (must be purchased with hardware, but "hardware" can include a power splitter). Newegg sells legit copies for $90, which is a lot less than the retail price. You get the holographic CD and the COA, along with a valid product key, so you know that it's genuine.

    You cannot upgrade from an OEM CD, nor would you want to. The system should be considered insecure because it is not in a known state. You wouldn't install from Fedora media with the wrong sha1sum; why would you install from an unknown copy of Windows?

  205. Mod parent up. by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is the answer. I have also seen that if you install the new 'check if my copy is legal' tool that MS wants to auto-download through Windows Update, if it detects a pirated version, it will offer to let you buy a legal key for a decent price. ($150 for my [legal] full copy of XP Pro that it incorrectly thought was pirated.)

    Also, if you need to go through re-activation, and it doesn't like your key, it will offer to sell you one.

    And, if they bought the computer from a store and the store sold them a pirated copy, MS will even (under certain circumstances) let them convert to a legal key for free. (You must be willing to rat out the place you bought it from, though, providing detailed information.)

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  206. How do they check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right now, you can purchase an OEM copy of XP2 from Newegg for $137.99. You don't even have to purchase additional hardware as was required in the past. Does MS assume people are going to follow the EULA?

  207. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by Slackwise · · Score: 3, Informative
    7/31/2006,0:18:32 [WARNING] Contains signature of the dropper DR/PSW.RAS.A!
    C:\Documents and Settings\Lance\Desktop\RockXP.exe
    [INFO] The file will be moved to quarantine.


    Dipshit.

    --
    (define (reduce f l) (if (null? (cdr l)) (car l) (f (car l) (reduce f (cdr l)))))
  208. Nearly every post above me is wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow, reading through all these posts makes me really question Slashdot members.

    Really, really, really.

    (1) You can't just change the product key. Corp uses volume licensing keys, and will not accept a XP home, home oem, pro, pro oem, or mce key.

    (2) You do not need to do a reinstallation, or an "in place install", as neither will keep your existing configuration. You could do an in place install and copy over the registry hives, but there are easier ways.

    (3) To buy MS OEM software you no longer need to purchase hardware alongside. This has been the case for at least a year. Check NewEgg for proof.

    Now, as some people have mentioned before, a REPAIR installation is the easiest answer.

    You must buy a copy of XP Professional for this to work. XP Home won't repair corporate editions, as corporate editions are XP pro.

    OEM or retail. It doesn't matter.

    Slide in CD, boot to CD, install SATA driver via F6 if applicable.

    Blah, google for screen shots and detailed directions. Its really quite simple, you act like you're going to do a fresh install and the install program finds the existing OS. But, I digress, I don't want anyone attempting this on those lame directions alone.

    After the repair install you will need to

    (1) Active Windows

    (2) Install drivers

    (3) Download all updates

    (4) Sit back, caus everything else is the same.

    WHALLA, legit Windows.

  209. Installing = copying = possible infringement by Deathbane27 · · Score: 1

    The act of installing software makes a copy. That is copyright infringement unless you have authorization with the copyright holder. That authorization comes through a contract, typically the End-User License Agreement. If you're not complying with that contract, including the payment for the liscence, you do not have authorization to copy the software to your hard drive, and are commiting copyright infringement by doing so.

    --
    If it ain't broke, it needs more features!
    1. Re:Installing = copying = possible infringement by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      The act of installing software makes a copy. That is copyright infringement unless you have authorization with the copyright holder.

      This is a subtle misunderstanding. It's not the act of making a copy which infringes on copyright; it's the act of distributing a copy. In fact, US law permits you to make a certain number of copies, depending on media, for archival without copyright holder's permission. You may, for example, back up your installer CDs, no matter what the EULA wants to tell you. You may not, however, put that backup online; at that point it becomes distribution, which is copyright infringement. Similarly, you may not hand said backup to your friend Tom, because that's distribution, and that's copyright infringement.

      I am certainly not suggesting that using unlicensed software is legal; you are correct to indicate that it is criminal. You are simply annoting the wrong law.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    2. Re:Installing = copying = possible infringement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right from the beginning of Title 17:

      Subject to sections 107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following:
      (1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords; ...


      versus what you said:

      It's not the act of making a copy which infringes on copyright; it's the act of distributing a copy.

      Wrong, although actually, that violates it too:

      (3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending;

      See the US Code

  210. No, don't pay MS! by Dion · · Score: 1

    It's better to use a Free system and leave the non-free stuff alone.

    If you must use non-free software then it's better to not pay for it, because if you pay them then they will just keep making non-free software.

    --
    -- To dream a dream is grand, but to live it is divine. -- Leto ][
  211. Here's an original idea by vga_init · · Score: 1

    Just have them pick up a legitimate copy and not install it. Technically they've purchased a license to run whatever version of Microsoft Windows they have, and as far as I know this license is granted as such so that the machine might run it. If you already have Windows on the machine, don't bother installing anything more--just tuck your new copy away on the shelf and don't put it on any other computers. It's not like the "pirated" copy is any different than any other Windows system of its version except by product key and maybe a couple other unique identifiers, but if anyone calls you on it, say "I have a license to run this software!"

  212. You are so very wrong. by Dion · · Score: 1

    You simply have the wrong idea about what is the right thing to do:

    The Right Thing to do is to use only Free software.
    The Wrong Thing to do is to award purveyers of non-free software.

    Using non-free software without paying for it, is slightly less wrong than paying for it, so it's the preferable choice, if you absolutely have to use that software.

    Using Windows awards Microsoft with a larger marketshare, that's the reason you shouldn't use windows, pirated or not.

    --
    -- To dream a dream is grand, but to live it is divine. -- Leto ][
  213. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by spysmily1 · · Score: 1

    I googled smarta** and it lead to this post.

    --
    Videogames made me kill people...I also eat mushrooms to grow bigger.
  214. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by elvum · · Score: 1

    Have you even read the OP? It implicitly asks for solutions that don't involve "deleting everything and having to reinstall... programs". I think that answers your question.

  215. WGA Diag tries to silently install boot checker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch out though - the WGA Diagnostic Tool looks useful but also tries to install the WGALogon test to run at boot time... why am I not surprised?

    Thanks to SpyBot TeaTimer for catching that one...

  216. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by steeviant · · Score: 1

    "teach a man to fish" versus "give a man a fish"

    I prefer the adage "Set a man a fire, and he will be warm for a night, set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life".

  217. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by Duds · · Score: 1

    But you DO know this because when it first fails WGA and every subsequent time, MS offers you the chance to buy a licence and go legit and say they'll email you a key changer.

    It's a pointless pointless article really about on the level of "My PC says press the any key. What do I do now?"

  218. And now they work for sony.... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    re Redsector and Psygnosis, those cool 17yo hackers from 1989 now work for sony making their
    cool expensive Amiga30000, called the PS3

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  219. Reinstall ?... by karot · · Score: 1

    Well, since you ask, personally I would grab a copy of [Favourite free O/S] and install it in place of [Monopolistic evil O/S]... *SLAP* sorry, wrong thread :)

    Although they are improving dramatically with each release, I still believe that Windows installs go "mouldy" - They get slower, eat more memory and become generally less stable with time. The latest set of Windows versions does this quite slowly, unlike Windows 95/98/ME, where you could almost see it happen.

    The reason for mentioning this is that if you buy a Windows XP upgrade CD, you will be able to "refresh" the mouldyness, and provide a new CD key in one go by upgrading your existing XP to the CD XP - This will probably then need a whole slew of updates downloading, but the end result is often noticably smoother running.

    Just my 2p

    --
    Enjoy Y2K? Roll-on Year 2037!
  220. Hmm.. by GothicX · · Score: 0

    First Backup all documents and for sure I will install Ubuntu Linux v6.06 LTS on their pc.

    --
    Music is the sedative for mind...
  221. Re:Let's get the answer out of the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "When you already know the answer...." "...the solution is trivial!" State the obvious much? I could be wrong here, but I believe the point of the "article" is that he does not already know.

  222. Qualifying hardware (Re:Reinstall) by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    Many smaller computer shops will only sell you a copy with a qualifying hardware purchase--in most cases, a case mounting screw (for around $0.06 USD) will suffice.

    I'm sure it is not what Micro$oft intended, but I've not seen their legal team beating down the doors of any Minneapolis/St. Paul computer shops where this happens...

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  223. For me...it's like this... by infosec_spaz · · Score: 1

    If you are going to run windows, buy it, if not, go get an OS that is free, as in freedom and beer. Then you do not have to worry about this kinda shit. There are hundreds of Linux distros out there for free, format, install (it only takes about 25-30 mins now a days) and try them out. Repeat as necessary to find the one you want to use.

    --
    ----- I have bad karma for a reason! -----
  224. Weird... by SimDarth · · Score: 1

    Never thought I would see so many slashdotters defending Microsoft. It's like the Twilight Zone...

  225. Re:Simple... by nsayer · · Score: 1

    All of that is true. I was only speaking in the abstract about the dictionary definition of "intrinsic value."

  226. Simple - Ask the teacher for a new computer. by FellowConspirator · · Score: 1

    Honestly, is a new computer with a legit version of Windows too much to ask? Especially if the alternative is being ratted out as a supplier of bootlegs of Windows and facing stiff fines and serious jail time.

    I guess the only drawback would be that your parents have also committed a felony and would be facing the same punishment. Incidentally, you just asked the question non-anonymously. I suppose that's a confession of sorts. Lets hope law enforcement or Microsoft don't read this site...

  227. You should look before you leap... by RebornData · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, I really do know what I'm talking about. The theory is simple: all malware has to get launched. There are a limited number of places in windows something can stick itself to get launched at boot time. This is what tools like HijackThis and autoruns allow you to look at. If you use them frequently enough, it's pretty easy to pick out what doesn't below.

    Kernel rootkits made this a bit more challenging, since you can't trust what Windows is telling you about what you see through these tools. The answer to that is to boot to trusted media (like a BartPE disk) and check out the potential autostart locations from that. Since the malware isn't loaded, it can't make the system lie to you.

    Thanks to the newer kernel rootkits that hide files in NTFS alternate data streams, you have to scan for those as well from trusted media. But that's doable- there are tools which work from BartPE which will enumate files with ADS streams, and you can also check for ADS paths in the list of drivers which load a boot-time. Then when you think you've got it clean, throw a sniffer on the machine's LAN connection and see if anything unexpected happens.

    Thus, it's really quite possible to manually discover and "kill" most infections with a reasonably high degree of confidence, if you have enough practice and experience. The level of assurance isn't high enough for a corporate server, but it's usually sufficient for home users and in small businesses, considering the cost of a from-scratch rebuild.

    I do admit I'm a bit more qualified than most techs who do this... I've got a computer science degree, and have been doing IT stuff professionally for 14 years. You've got to have a pretty solid grasp of windows internals to do this well.

    -R

    1. Re:You should look before you leap... by Ravenscall · · Score: 1

      I love seeing people like you pwn the n00bs.

      --
      You say you want a revolution....
  228. Pirated Windows software by solo6 · · Score: 1

    They wouldn't have bought it from Best Buy, by any chance? My friend bought a PC from them that came with a copy of Office 2003 - but in BETA version. Apparently the store was swept by an epidemic of "Huh? I dunno." disease when he called to demand a real version as advertised.

  229. the "Best" way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Best way to fix windows is to run Linux.

    Then there is no wories about licensing.
    What a load off.

    And get this MS got payed, 99% of the time,
    when you bought your PC any way. Go figure.

  230. Re:Reinstall MOD DOWN by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

    The MS OEM restrictions TheNetAvenger describes are no longer part of the license.


    You could be correct; however, I was under the impression that for the OEM to uphold their license with MS that they had to tie the OEM copy to a piece of hardware that would be used in the computer.

    So even if the OEM License itself does not still say the Hardware requirement, the OEM may have to agree to uphold the hardware requirement License in order to purchase the OEM copies from a Vendor.

    However, everyone check on this. If the hardware restriction is lifted it would be a good deal for people that don't have a previous Windows version. However if you already have a copy of Windows (as most people that purchased a computer do), then the Upgrade version would be the best, as the installation allows the OS to be Upgraded and you don't have to do a clean install as you do with the OEM version.

  231. Copyright is a useful compromise by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    The difference is that real property is naturally scarce, or more technically it is rivalrous, and thus inherently "protectable" since there is only one instance to keep track of, either you have it or you don't.

    Sure, but I think you're looking with a very narrow view here. Most laws have little to do with property or scarcity of resources at all, but they all operate on the same basic principle: society is improved if everyone follows a particular law. (I'm glossing over the precondition that laws are made well, which obviously isn't universally true.)

    However, it is both many orders of magnitude more difficult to enforce the rules for information than it is for real property, and it is in conflict with human nature (the natural urge to share knowledge that is probably a key, if not the key to the development of civilization). So, its much harder to enforce and because it conflicts with human nature, people naturally violate it many more times than they do similar rules for real property

    Agreed again, but the fact that a law is easy to violate and this is widely abused does not mean that the law is not in the interest of society, nor that we should not try to enforce it and to punish those who do not obey it.

    Take an extreme case: someone who is truly determined to kill another human at any cost will often be able to commit the murder, and we know that people do get murdered. We cannot make people invulnerable, nor provide sufficient resources to protect every individual all the time. Should we therefore accept that the law against murder is flawed, because it cannot be perfectly enforced? I hope we'd agree that such an argument would be inappropriate.

    Something that is perhaps closer is speeding: speed limits in many countries are widely broken by drivers, and speeding is often portrayed as a "victimless crime". Moreover, in many cases, this is justified: the fact that a particular speed is above the specified limit does not automatically imply that it is an inappropriate speed for the driving conditions at a given time, and a skilled and experienced driver may well be in a better position to judge this than a road planner working to a rule book several years previously.

    Now, here's where the parallel really cuts in: in an ideal world, we might do away with arbitrary speed limits, in favour of enforcing dangerous/inconsiderate driving laws rigorously. Where speeding is dangerous, it would still be an offence, but where it is reasonable but for the law, it would cease to be illegal. However, it would be much more difficult for our legal systems to act against those who are driving in a dangerous or inconsiderate fashion under this scheme. Thus speed limits are, if you like, a concession to pragmatism.

    A parallel view exists for things like copyright: clearly not all infringements of copyright violate the principles the laws are supposed to protect, though they may violate the letter of the laws intended to represent those principles in more concrete terms. For example, we have no way of telling that Joe Public really does only rip MP3s of new tracks to see whether they're any good, and honestly buys the music for anything he downloads that he wants to keep. I'm sure some people do do this, and I'm equally sure that many more do not. However, the economic impact of the abuses may be significantly damaging to society.

    Again, in a better world, we would perhaps have some mechanism by which a consumer could sample copyright works for long enough to identify their value to that consumer, and then opt to pay the asking price or not. Having paid, they would then receive a secured version that allows them to use the material fairly without limitation, but completely prevents sharing it in unfair ways to the detriment of the people whose hard work went into producing it. Of course, such a system could never work with Big Brother-scale surveillance of any use of copyright materials, which

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Copyright is a useful compromise by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry, typo: that should obviously have read "such a system could never work without Big Brother-scale surveillance of any use of copyright materials".

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    2. Re:Copyright is a useful compromise by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Agreed again, but the fact that a law is easy to violate and this is widely abused does not mean that the law is not in the interest of society, nor that we should not try to enforce it and to punish those who do not obey it.

      You've sidestepped my point that enforcement is highly expensive. And I'm not just talking about tax dollars spent on law enforcement efforts. There are at least two other factors -- digital restrictions like WGA impose a cost all on their own too, and restrictions on the free flow of knowledge (for example, the current scientific publishing model where the journals claim copyright on the work of the scientist, thus preventing the widespread distribution of new scientific knowledge that would otherwise happen naturally). When the cost of a law exceeds the benefit of the law, surely that must be justification to change the law.

      Take an extreme case: someone who is truly determined to kill another human at any cost will often be able to commit the murder, and we know that people do get murdered. We cannot make people invulnerable, nor provide sufficient resources to protect every individual all the time. Should we therefore accept that the law against murder is flawed, because it cannot be perfectly enforced? I hope we'd agree that such an argument would be inappropriate.

      It isn't a case of being perfectly enforced, it is a case of being reasonably enforced. Murder, like theft of real-property, is inherently self-limiting - its really hard to kill more than a handful of people at a time. Such events are exceptionally rare, and the laws on the books do not impose a significant cost on society.

      Digital information naturally lends itself to unlimited redistribution, and despite all the laws to the contrary, such redistribution happens hundreds of millions of times per day and the laws that make such redistribution illegal have a very high cost.

      Now, here's where the parallel really cuts in: in an ideal world, we might do away with arbitrary speed limits,

      Speed limits are a poor example. The reason being is that the laws on the books in most, if not all states, say that speed limits must be set via a process of evaluation of driving behaviour by the local department of transportation (often the limit is suppossed to be a speed that covers the 85th percentile of drivers during a survey when there is no posted limit). In other words, the law already says that speed limits are not suppossed to be arbitrary, and in fact one relatively unknown way to get a speeding ticket thrown out of court is to have the limit ruled as illegal - you ask the prosecutuer to prove that the limit is legal by producing the survey results, they should be on file in the local county or town records, no survey, no ticket.

      Now, these details have not stopped many towns and neighborhoods from posting arbitrarily low speed-limits, but that does not mean the law has been followed.

      Just to fill in the details on that - in many states there are indeed default limits that are defined by characteristics of the road - 2 lane vs 4 lane, etc - and the surrounding land - dense residential, industrial park, open country, etc. So you might still point to those limits as being arbitrary, but my contention is that because they are defined by the characteristics of the area in conjunction with a well studied baseline that they are rarely arbitrary as is is the case in speed-traps and what-not.

      I realize I've strayed far from your point, but I felt that simply saying, "Speed limits are not a good example of useful but arbitrary laws" without backing that up would be unfair. I guess I could have focused on the fact that unlike copyright, speed limits impose little cost on society instead, probably would have been simpler. The opportunity cost of laws and their enforcement against murder, speeding and even theft of real property are quite small in comparison to the opportunity costs of copyright law.

      In a perfect world, of course, ever

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  232. Re:Depends on legislation, Germany at least differ by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    Actually, Microsoft had the freedom to make a separate contract that would have barred the dealer from un-bundling the OEM software. The court explicitly stressed that point.

    But under German law, this requires a contract that is signed before the sale, or at least "standard business conditions" that are clearly visible to the customer before buying. An EULA that is only visible when installing the software does not cut it, as it fails the standard of "visible before buying".
    Most EULAS for off-the-shelf software are of that type and thus unenforcable. I have never seen one that was printed out on the box, which might make it enforcable.

    Another complication is if the software goes through several hands. Even if the EULA is binding for the original buyer, it is doubtful if it can be enforced against the new owner, since he was not party to the original contract. In our example, the original buyer might be the wholesaler and the new owner might be some small software shop that likes to unbundle OEM software.
    At that point, it becomes quite difficult for the software manufacturer to ensure all dealers are under a contract not to ignore the EULA. I guess Microsoft did not want to deal with that and simply gave up.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  233. Re:"What would you do in this situation?" by lightning_queen · · Score: 1

    First of all, just because you posted from a Mac, that doesn't mean you own a Mac. For all we know, you posted from a friend's computers because it was the only thing available.

    I'm not saying every piece of software does this, but I own several that use the same disk to install on Windows AND Mac. So no, you don't ALWAYS have to rebuy your software. Some of it, I have no doubt, but possibly not all of it. Like I said, third party software (software that's not owned by Microsoft or Apple) sometimes has this capability. Also, OSS is a viable option, whether or not people like to admit it (and no, I'm not saying everyone should switch completely over to OSS, but unless you need capabilities found only in a certain proprietary title, OSS is a good alternative to things like Office). Not to mention that the biggest compatibility problem with Macs in the past was that they ran on the PowerPC architecture, so it wasn't merely a different OS, but different hardware as well. That point it moot now, and developers only need worry about a different OS in the future.

    You're argument about the PS/2 mouse/keyboard has merit, but adapters are fairly cheap, and I know for a fact that Dynex adapters from Best Buy work on Macs (I bought one to use on an iMac that I had, and according to the website, they're even compatible on Sun platforms). Again, you're right in the fact that many monitors aren't DVI, but you can get a 19" DVI LCD for less than $200 (or pay $20 for an adapter that may work for their purposes). So, for the price of a new HP or Gateway with similar specs (and I can pretty much guarantee you, that if you go into an electronics store to buy a computer, you'll come out with more than just the machine, tack on a service plan for around $100, and possibly some sort of security setup for at least $80, that $800 computer has now become a grand), you can now have an Apple. Not to mention the money you'll save from not having to update subscriptions of NAV and Spysweeper (or having to buy them at all).

    I don't have the proverbial rose-colored glasses on when it comes to Apple or OSS, I simply keep an open mind about viable alternatives, which both are, and try to correct the FUD and other crap that I see about them, while still acknowledging any downfalls I find (and you may want to check that MacBook and make sure it's battery hasn't been recalled, by the way). Your points work both ways, whether switching from Mac to Windows or vice versa, which is probably why more people don't switch either way (then you have geeks like those of us on /. with Macs, Linux boxes, and Windows machines galore).

    And another thing, you might have more credibility to the Mac/OSS people if your name wasn't "MSFanBoi2", which implies bias in favor of Microsoft, and was more neutral, instead.

  234. No such implication by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

    Sorry it took so long to respond, I saw your reply early this morning but had to head off to work. (I make it a rule to avoid Slashdotting at work!)

    Actually, the OP said "they are afraid of deleting everything and having to reinstall all their programs". Fear can cause reluctance, but doesn't mean a solution should be overlooked as "offtopic". Some people, for example, are afraid of doctors. This doesn't mean we should overlook encouraging a trip to the hospital in the unfortunate circumstance of a heart attack.

    To take our example further, diet is a factor that contributes to some heart problems. A patient may be reluctant to change their diet, even to one that will help preserve their life. However, this doesn't mean we should overlook encouraging them to eat more healthily.

    The decision to keep using Windows may not be life-threatening. However, fear of a fresh install (which, unless a corporate license is made available, may be required anyway) should not stop us from encouraging a properly planned switch to a more stable, secure operating system legally available for $200 less than retail Windows XP and free from the constraints of a Windows license. Certainly, we shouldn't regard such a recommendation as being "offtopic".

  235. I'm sorry but you're delusional. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think you are purposely lying to us. However, I think you are lying to yourself and then repeating that misinformation to us. I've seen several hundred home computers that were so messed up it would take a team of Windows engineers to rebuild it in a week, and even then you still have to wonder.

    I hear where you are coming from, I came from there too. If something is broken I like to know what and why. As frustrating as it is to me, I have accepted that with a Windows install you have to learn to let go. There are thousands of files just to name a few, trying to repair an install on 99% of home computers is like trying to fix a network adapter with spare parts. Sure, there might be a 2 cent part that will do the trick, but you'll spend hundreds of dollars in man hours trying to save the 20 bucks a new card would cost.

    Even if we were to assume that it was possible and reasonable to rid the install of malware, this does nothing to address the issue of the digital dust that all but the most maticulously tended Windows installs suffer from. From the very first boot, Windows starts collecting dust. Although most of it is harmless and merely soaks up hard drive space, over time it does erode system performance.

    It still amazes me to this day the performance boost gained by a fresh install of windows, and I'm one of those paranoid freaks that routinely instpects my system to make sure nothing is running unless I want it to be running.

    In the end, a clean install gives us something that is unattainable in any other facet of our lives, it makes our computers brand new again. In our cars we have out station presets, our seats and mirrors adjusted just so, and all the other various customizations we've added to make the drive more comfortable. I think most people would gladly start from scratch if they could just snap their fingers and make the car new again once a year. You're trying to say wiping down the dash and spraying some new car scent under the seats does the same thing.

    As far as time and effort, you clean and repair an install head to head with me installing from scratch and I will beat you every time. In regard to speed AND quality.

    Do not get me wrong. I long for the day that a reinstall is rendered completely unnecessary. I can assure you however, that day, is not, today.

    1. Re:I'm sorry but you're delusional. by RebornData · · Score: 1

      Nowhere have I said that a new windows install is never necessary, and I am certainly aware of the virtues of a clean install. I'm not saying I never do them, but rather that in most circumstances that I find myself in as a consultant, I rarely find them necessary or in the customer's best interests. BTW- I'm speaking exclusively of Win2k and XP here... the story is completely different for previous versions, which I rarely encounter these days. If the registry is corrupted and there's not a recent system restore backup available, or if they hard drive has failed badly enough to prevent grabbing a good image, or of the customer truly doesn't care for their configuration or data and there's a quick OS restore function... then I'll happily do a re-install.

      But what gets my goat are consultants who do them because they think they know best, without taking into account the customer's actual situation and needs. I know this happens frequently because of the horror stories I hear from my clients. I feel confident that I'm not leaving behind the same unwitting "trail of destruction" because my business is driven entirely at this point by repeat business and referrals- I'm actually turning away business these days. And my rates are higher than average. If I were not meeting my customer's needs, I doubt they'd be coming back as they do.

      I'll offer two possible explanations for what clearly is a massive cognitive gap between us:
      1. I guess I really just don't find cleanups that difficult or time consuming. If they took 3-4 hours then I'd be agreeing with you. But what I commonly find is that, especially with recent fast machines, I can do a cleanup in 1-1.5 hours, including install of decent protection software. I'm really not kidding. And I'm not getting called back for re-dos (which I don't charge for) because the machine is still infected. When I compare that with the cost, risk, and time involved in a rebuild, it rarely makes sense to do the latter.

      2. There are aspects to my business which may differ significantly from most. First, I work in a rather affluent area, and typically on-site... I'm not a "carry-in" shop. Most of my clients are not "grandma" types who just do e-mail and web... many are work-at-home professionals, and thus have comparatively elaborate systems. Another generalization... they prefer "full service" rather than "fast and cheap". Thus, when I do a rebuild, I'm not leaving folks with a bare windows install- rather I'm putting the machine back as close to the functionality they previously had, which typically includes office suite, e-mail client (configured for their host), A/V, anti-spyware, backup, printer drivers, digital camera / photo software, and personal finance software, just to name the most common things. So a rebuild is typically a more expensive, elaborate affair than the typical carry-in shop does.

      Anyway, I would love to take you up on your offer of a "rebuild" vs "cleanup" face-off... sounds like fun! Name the time and place (as long as it's in Metro D.C....). You give me a badly infected machine. I'll give you a typical "real world" configuration scenario from one of my customers. Of course, to be fair, you get to wait while they track down the install media in a badly-organized file drawer with software dating back to 1992, only to discover their daughter probably took it with her when she went off to college. And call their accounting software company for the product key they've lost. And find their ISP dialup information they use when they're on the road but forgot to mention before you started the re-install. And... and...

      -R

  236. Get Ubuntu or Kubuntu - backup files - use LINUX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get Ubuntu or Kubuntu - backup files - use LINUX.

    Hey for what your parents do... OpenOffice, FireFox, Scribus, Gimp, Gwenview (Kipi Plugins) and Linux will do for them better than Windows.

    If they want to watch DVDs... hey, get a live CD that does that or use a DVD player that is dedicated for this as it is easy to operate.

  237. Here's the easiest way by Freetime000 · · Score: 1

    Buy a new copy of Windows with a legit key. You just need the key. Go to the following REGISTRY key and change one of the bits to de-activate windows. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\WPAEvents "OOBETimer" This will allow you to re-run the activation tool which has a button to change the serial. %systemroot%\system32\oobe\msoobe.exe /a Choose to activate over phone and you'll get the button to change the serial. Enter the new serial then just exit the tool and reboot. No need to complete activation. After reboot all is well.

  238. Re:Don't have to install over top, do a repair.... by Havokmon · · Score: 1
    "Corporate" is just Pro with a Volume License Key (VLK). Going from Pro->Home is no different than Corp->Home. You can't repair between versions without running into trouble.

    Right, but you can upgrade Home to a Pirated Corporate, then Repair install the licensed OEM Pro over it ;)

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  239. Re:Don't have to install over top, do a repair.... by insecuritiez · · Score: 1

    True. I was operating under the assumption that the new legal copy of Windows would be Home, not Pro.

  240. Dont trust 'windows' at all..use Linux to backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trust windows to only want to spy on you, your family, your computer....or computers, etc. Trust windows to always want to put more back doors into your system than it already has, and it you are using 'XP' that is quite a lot. Did you know that XP will allow microsoft to silently download or upload anything from your computer without your permission? All it needs to do is be on and be able to find an active internet connection. Much preferably high speed!
    Now the way to save your data is to get a version of linux with kernel 2.4, not 2.6. Kernel 2.6 removed the security feature 'shred' from its implemetation of its KDE file browser 'Konqueror', so it may have other insecurities as well. A good version is SuSE 9.0. This was still made by SuSE when it was an honest German company and not yet bought by the corporate monopoly and predatory litigator Novell. SuSE 9.0 will make room for itself on your hard drive and install itself with its 'YAST' program. Just be carefull not to allow it to totally wipe your drive which is possible as a choosable menu option in the install routine for those who want to operate an exclusively linux system. YAST will tell you in the partitioning part of the install routine that it will load and mount the windows partitions of your existing windows system so that these can be read under linux. Once linux is installed, you can then use linux to back up all your personal data that you had saved under windows. Only now these actions will not be covertly reported to microsoft. Just because you have a microsoft system given to you does not make it any less microsoft's, as their soul-less intents are in every line of the millions of lines of code that make up the thousands of files of this most gigantic collection of malware that the computer industry has ever produced and foisted on an unwitting and largely unwilling public. Microsoft wedged its foothold in the public's door by selling it initially for fifty dollars and being able to run many games..and knowing what a sound card and a joystick was. IBM never figured this out, and the fools from IBM collaborated with microsoft to make this monster yet never caught on. IBM's OS/2 had much of the collaborated code, but these abilities left with the microsoft engineers when they parted company with IBM. To this day microsoft is good for only playing games. Their spying has rendered it useless and untrustworthy for anything else. In our house we treat microsoft products as hazardous materials. All of our microsoft products are software we purchased in local stores for cash. They have never been registered. We will not have an XP machine except for one laptop that retains it only because microsoft conspired with the laptops' video hardware manufacturer, S3, to not release the specifations of its hardware so that linux drivers can be written for it. Microsoft even locked out its other products such as Win2000 from the video system on that laptop. Microsoft than secretly downloaded software on it that disabled file and disk checking programs from functioning, probably as these programs may have been a threat to their covert activities. This after the 'services' section was edited to specifically turn 'off' these 'features' like background downloading and 'updating'. This laptop had to be totally reformated and the disk shredded nine times and each file 39 times so that its malware was completly dead. Upon reinstall, this XP was also absolutely denied the internet by the hardware router and by misconfiguring the addressing. And I and my machines were and are nobodies. No job! Not millionaires! Not Arabs! Not anybody!!! What would they plant on somebody that they figured was 'usefull' to them. So all our 'windows' are locked out of the internet forever. My grandson would like to play some on line games using windows, but I know that this is another way that windows spies on ordinary users. One wonders what on earth they would do with all that useless data. But then there is Kroger with its 'Kroger Plus' cards th

  241. best sysad by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the delayed reaction, but we used to have a saying, that the best sysad was usually the first true black hat in.

    There are at least two games in play here, and it sounds like you're pretty good at shutting down the rape-and-pillage crowd.

    These days, many of the moderately skilled crackers are more interested in not letting people know they are there, so they tend to just hide their own private back doors instead of risking exposure by tightening boxes down, especially MSWindows boxes that come cheap anyway. A skilled cracker is also likely to examine the potential host and only drop a private back door on a box that looks especially valuable for some reason.

    You're taking a gamble, when you just clean the box, that the box in question is not "interesting" in the quieter game.

    I think, if I were you, I'd at least make rich kids and people who have repeats pay for a re-install, installation of a router with a firewall if they don't have one, and setting up and training them to use a non-admin user account.

    I'd be pushing them to get off MSWindows, too.

    It's a game of odds, but I'd be trying to get my customers to play the better odds.

    1. Re:best sysad by RebornData · · Score: 1

      You know, it's always entertaining when people like you presume to offer me security advice. I know you mean well, but really... chances are I've been doing the IP security thing a LOT longer than you have.

      Go read some of my other comments in that thread. My technique would most likely catch any such "private back door". The main risk is that the black hat is using a truly novel rootkit stealthing technique that hasn't been disclosed publicly... but word of those tends to spread pretty quickly, so that risk is pretty small.

      -R