Some people clearly use more than one platform. It says so right in your quote, "the percentage of developers who use Java as one of their principal programming languages".
There's a difference between declaring that your site doesn't work in one particular browser, and declaring that your site requires one particular browser. Fact is, IE is seriously flawed, from security to basic CSS, and the sooner people realise it and move to better browsers, the better it'll be for the web as a whole.
They're probably calls to Windows API functions added after Windows 95. Firefox doesn't claim to work on 98 anyway, so it's not exactly a problem; if you're using a 10 year old operating system, you have a lot more to worry about than a web browser.
You can in a sense. If you pay someone to do stuff for you (like a maid, cleaner, gardener), then you gain more free time, but at the expense of having to pay their wages.
Re:Getting rid of the surprize factor
on
IE7 Details Emerge
·
· Score: 1
I doubt it, it's worth more to them in the long if people think they're actually doing something. It might help hold off the hoards of people switching to other browsers if they think IE might have a new version soon.
The opposite seems to be happening here. We've had a free newspaper called Metro in London for years now, which is quite popular amongst business types. And more recently, The Evening Standard has created a free version of their newspaper.
Same here, but you'd never be able to fit the components into a package that small. The smallest portable DAB radio I've seen is about the size of a normal iPod, not to mention it'd probably double the cost of the thing.
"Maybe AOL with their proxy systems, but I can't imagine why would a regular ISP highjack the html stream to insert their own content (not imposible, just unbelievable)."
Aparently it's a company called Adzilla. Quote:
"Problem iss solve-d. ISP tells me that this is intentional, and just something being tested. Company called Adzilla has software for ISPs that can insert custom content into specific pages, so ISPs can do things like sell very cheap broadband, with the cost supplemented by their own targetted banner ads on pages."
"The person reporting the ads seems to be the only person seeing them. Therefore, "Person" is reporting ads, not "People." And it could very well be spyware."
Not spyware, but I've seen cases where some ISPs have teamed up with ad providers to insert ads randomly into pages, that's probably what that was.
Slashdot Mirror
Some people clearly use more than one platform. It says so right in your quote, "the percentage of developers who use Java as one of their principal programming languages".
ctrl + a, ctrl + c.
On a serious note though, I see your point. You can't see what you're selecting, since you're actually selecting text that's behind the flash objects.
Duh, it's newspeak. Doubleplus good :D
There's a difference between declaring that your site doesn't work in one particular browser, and declaring that your site requires one particular browser. Fact is, IE is seriously flawed, from security to basic CSS, and the sooner people realise it and move to better browsers, the better it'll be for the web as a whole.
Where's the unicode support for the win32 port then?
Can't you just remove the yellow ink or something? Or am I missing something important here?
Another name for a red panda, according to the Firefox devs.
it's post like this that make me glad to browse at -1, funniest thing I read all day.
Nonsense, everyone knows the moon is made of Wensleydale Cheese :P
IIS 6 already uses XML for all it's configuration files.
Nonsense, everyone knows FF is Final Fantasy.
ok, I've made myself feel a bit silly now. anyway, try number 2:
http://www.mono-project.com/
You could at least check the url before you post.
n o-project.com/</a>
<br>
<a href="http://www.mono-project.com/">http://www.mo
They're probably calls to Windows API functions added after Windows 95. Firefox doesn't claim to work on 98 anyway, so it's not exactly a problem; if you're using a 10 year old operating system, you have a lot more to worry about than a web browser.
There's this:
Max-width in IE.
it uses IE css extensions with javascript.
You can in a sense. If you pay someone to do stuff for you (like a maid, cleaner, gardener), then you gain more free time, but at the expense of having to pay their wages.
You mean php?
I doubt it, it's worth more to them in the long if people think they're actually doing something. It might help hold off the hoards of people switching to other browsers if they think IE might have a new version soon.
The opposite seems to be happening here. We've had a free newspaper called Metro in London for years now, which is quite popular amongst business types. And more recently, The Evening Standard has created a free version of their newspaper.
Same here, but you'd never be able to fit the components into a package that small. The smallest portable DAB radio I've seen is about the size of a normal iPod, not to mention it'd probably double the cost of the thing.
We brits like to call it BOGOF, pronounced "bog off" :)
I'm pretty sure once Safari is supported, Konqueror will be too, don't they use the same rendering engine?
http://www.hymn-project.org
"Maybe AOL with their proxy systems, but I can't imagine why would a regular ISP highjack the html stream to insert their own content (not imposible, just unbelievable)."
Aparently it's a company called Adzilla. Quote:
"Problem iss solve-d. ISP tells me that this is intentional, and just something being tested. Company called Adzilla has software for ISPs that can insert custom content into specific pages, so ISPs can do things like sell very cheap broadband, with the cost supplemented by their own targetted banner ads on pages."
"The person reporting the ads seems to be the only person seeing them. Therefore, "Person" is reporting ads, not "People." And it could very well be spyware." Not spyware, but I've seen cases where some ISPs have teamed up with ad providers to insert ads randomly into pages, that's probably what that was.