None of the articles (that I've found) say *how much* more this disagreement indicator would cost. I can make one for under $100 USD. (I'm estimating, of course.)
Too bad marrying a hot Slovenian fashion model half his age didn't check those boxes...
Melania may be a model because she worked as one, but her primary occupation is good ol' prostitute. Rich-kid Trump bought her. He even bought the use of her womb. I'm not putting a value judgment on the activity. I'm just clarifying.
Are you aware that when US came to Europe, Germany was already being defeated...
Germany was losing on the Russia-front and slowly losing step in Europe...
Without the US, it would have taken one or two more year but Germany would have been eventually defeated...
And US soldiers were no angels... they raped many women... And after that, US "helped" Europe with Marshall's plan which consisted in lending Europe money to have Europe buy them thing that it should have been able to quickly produce... making Europe indebpted by the way.
So Europe would probably have been better without US intervention...
I don't know if Europe would have "been better without US intervention" in WWII. The consequences of "What if" history is difficult to guess. However, you are correct to point out that the US soldiers weren't uniformly White Knights. And, yes, you are correct to point to the WWII timeline that shows when the US landed in Normandy, Germany was about to die anyway. It's very sad the typical American has such a distorted view of WWII history. It doesn't need to be propagandized as much as it is. But it's not as bad as it once was. At least nowadays the elementary school education is more honest than it was when I was at that stage, in the 1960s. Back then, Russia was more often portrayed as an enemy than an ally. Even I, who had a more enlightened education than most American kids, didn't learn (until I was an older adult) that the Soviet Union lost about a hundred times as many people as the US did in the war.
That fake argument has been debunked by interviews with Canadians. I realize it's one-sided, but watch Sick-O. But the burden is on you since you made the statement. State your sources. Show that life expectancy is lower in Canada for a similar genetic group.
It's a comma before a direct address. It shows the difference between talking to someone and about someone. * You certainly know, Ivan, we are familiar with your handlers. Without the pre-address comma, the sentence would be ambiguous.
The sentence at issue is also difficult to understand because it is elliptical in that the verb "go" is left out. *Go back to your handlers, Ivan.
This is not to mention what happens when the cable breaks. If it's in the S Pacific, it can reach anywhere in the US, Death will probably be quick, looking on the bright side.
I built a 320-foot x 6-foot formed, concrete retaining wall. I overbuilt to compensate for my possible ignorance. (I used 6 instead of 5 bag mix, for example.) The result was the best retaining wall in Kansas City (if I say so myself). I have a background in mechanical things and construction, but I had never done any concrete before. It's not that hard to do, and I learned that many concrete experts aren't. Despite being technically easy, there is an economic problem with forms. You really need to own them rather than rent them. A one-off job will suffer this expense. Anyway, at a bit over a $100/cubic yard, concrete is amazingly cheap. That "yard" weighs 3500 pounds, and you get it delivered for that price.
Building a house by placing huge concrete blocks in place would have its own difficulties. These difficulties are the reason concrete is poured in place most of the time. Elon's product's success will depend on its cost.
These are the kind of numbers we need for statistics to make sense. With 13% of the population making up 25% of a statistic, that percentage has a marked increase in chance/risk of whatever the statistic is made to show. In this case, risk of getting shot and killed.
You are correct, if black people are 13% of the population and 25% of people killed by the police, that's not right. However, saying "the majority of people shot by police are black" is still untrue and gives a very wrong picture.
Blacks get killed disproportionately more because they disproportionately behave in ways that give police the excuse to shoot. They commit more crime, drive more erratically, attempt to escape more, run more, talk back more, more often carry weapons, fight more, resist more, disobey more, and are simply more discourteous. The cops aren't racist. They kill plenty of Caucasians too.
Who is the hazard? The SWAT team went to a random address, based on an anonymous phone call, and killed the innocent occupant for basically no reason at all.
Barriss should be held accountable. But he didn't "murder" anyone. The SWAT team did that.
All the media is focusing on the swatting, the guy's history, character, etc. The media seems to ignore the ones who did the killing. Lots of 911 calls have questionable information. Often they are even made by the guilty party in an effort to look innocent. The police know this. They should have been cautious instead of trigger happy.
If anything, the democrats need it to keep whining about "foreign influence"... while importing millions of illegal voters.
That's an established truth. 17 intelligence agencies said so. It doesn't matter if we can't find the document signed by those 17 agencies. https://www.realclearpolitics.... Hillary said it was so, and we should believe someone as courageous as her. She bravely landed under sniper fire at an airport in Bosnia in 1996. http://www.businessinsider.com... Plus, we heard about that Russian meddling every day every hour for months. Something that is repeated that much must be true.
And there isn't a single country on the planet (nor consortium of countries) that could POSSIBLY have "An astronaut wandering the moon next year" -- probably not even in 5 years, even with a MASSIVE multinational effort.
You're thinking of the old-fashion method of having a round-trip plan. One-way could be done in 5 years.
That's just a link to the Wiki article, and it doesn't state anything as real evidence. It just says so-and-so believes so. And what difference does it make that the US went to war on some pretext? The US has gone to war numerous times for no good reason at all.
Russia did do something. The only people who don't know this have two-figure IQ's and still believe Mexico will pay for Trump's wall.
It's been about a year into this Russian thing, and nobody has even offered WMD-quality evidence. So, the burden is still on you, the promoters of this story, to provide persuasive evidence. I recently heard a video of Hillary answer the question regarding (paraphrased) What is the evidence? She replied that the "Evidence is compelling". That's the kind of thing I keep hearing. She, basically, said there IS NO EVIDENCE. Moreover, the accusation is that Russia, by a circuitous route, revealed misbehavior of the DNC, and that swayed voters. Even if that is the case, Russia didn't write the emails, and revealing it is a service to America - not a "meddling".
And please don't forget that this whole thing revolves around proving russia attacked the democrats by exposing DNC corruption. The DNC is responsible for their demise, and for Trump, all wikileaks did was expose their corruption to the public.
You're right, and you represent the typical view of/. readers. But if you read the comments on YahooNews, (judging by "like" ratio) less than half agree with you. The general public believes what they are told to believe.
It seems a fair question: the US has a long history of interference in the democratic processes and/or governments of literally DOZENS of other countries (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change). So why are people so upset if a foreign power plays that game on their own soil?
Nobody is really upset. It just suits the military-industrial complex now to have a good enemy. The strategy made the gang rich during the cold war, and they want the old days back.
I've found that if you can't find a visible reasonable explanation for government action, the unseen explanation will be money.
Slashdot Mirror
None of the articles (that I've found) say *how much* more this disagreement indicator would cost. I can make one for under $100 USD. (I'm estimating, of course.)
Too bad marrying a hot Slovenian fashion model half his age didn't check those boxes...
Melania may be a model because she worked as one, but her primary occupation is good ol' prostitute. Rich-kid Trump bought her. He even bought the use of her womb. I'm not putting a value judgment on the activity. I'm just clarifying.
Are you aware that when US came to Europe, Germany was already being defeated...
Germany was losing on the Russia-front and slowly losing step in Europe...
Without the US, it would have taken one or two more year but Germany would have been eventually defeated...
And US soldiers were no angels... they raped many women... And after that, US "helped" Europe with Marshall's plan which consisted in lending Europe money to have Europe buy them thing that it should have been able to quickly produce... making Europe indebpted by the way.
So Europe would probably have been better without US intervention...
I don't know if Europe would have "been better without US intervention" in WWII. The consequences of "What if" history is difficult to guess. However, you are correct to point out that the US soldiers weren't uniformly White Knights. And, yes, you are correct to point to the WWII timeline that shows when the US landed in Normandy, Germany was about to die anyway.
It's very sad the typical American has such a distorted view of WWII history. It doesn't need to be propagandized as much as it is. But it's not as bad as it once was. At least nowadays the elementary school education is more honest than it was when I was at that stage, in the 1960s. Back then, Russia was more often portrayed as an enemy than an ally.
Even I, who had a more enlightened education than most American kids, didn't learn (until I was an older adult) that the Soviet Union lost about a hundred times as many people as the US did in the war.
That fake argument has been debunked by interviews with Canadians. I realize it's one-sided, but watch Sick-O. But the burden is on you since you made the statement. State your sources. Show that life expectancy is lower in Canada for a similar genetic group.
Both.
When your daughter drives, she is using me as a test subject without my consent - by your argument, anyway.
Cereal box spy ring? I know I'm old but not that old. When was the last CBSR distributed?
And all the communists miraculously became good capitalists over night right?
They weren't really communists in the first place.
It's a comma before a direct address. It shows the difference between talking to someone and about someone.
* You certainly know, Ivan, we are familiar with your handlers.
Without the pre-address comma, the sentence would be ambiguous.
The sentence at issue is also difficult to understand because it is elliptical in that the verb "go" is left out.
*Go back to your handlers, Ivan.
I hate Tom Edison. He electrocuted an elephant just for show.
This is not to mention what happens when the cable breaks. If it's in the S Pacific, it can reach anywhere in the US, Death will probably be quick, looking on the bright side.
I built a 320-foot x 6-foot formed, concrete retaining wall. I overbuilt to compensate for my possible ignorance. (I used 6 instead of 5 bag mix, for example.) The result was the best retaining wall in Kansas City (if I say so myself). I have a background in mechanical things and construction, but I had never done any concrete before. It's not that hard to do, and I learned that many concrete experts aren't.
Despite being technically easy, there is an economic problem with forms. You really need to own them rather than rent them. A one-off job will suffer this expense.
Anyway, at a bit over a $100/cubic yard, concrete is amazingly cheap. That "yard" weighs 3500 pounds, and you get it delivered for that price.
Building a house by placing huge concrete blocks in place would have its own difficulties. These difficulties are the reason concrete is poured in place most of the time. Elon's product's success will depend on its cost.
These are the kind of numbers we need for statistics to make sense. With 13% of the population making up 25% of a statistic, that percentage has a marked increase in chance/risk of whatever the statistic is made to show. In this case, risk of getting shot and killed.
You are correct, if black people are 13% of the population and 25% of people killed by the police, that's not right. However, saying "the majority of people shot by police are black" is still untrue and gives a very wrong picture.
Blacks get killed disproportionately more because they disproportionately behave in ways that give police the excuse to shoot. They commit more crime, drive more erratically, attempt to escape more, run more, talk back more, more often carry weapons, fight more, resist more, disobey more, and are simply more discourteous. The cops aren't racist. They kill plenty of Caucasians too.
Better yet, just don't be a hazard to society.
Who is the hazard? The SWAT team went to a random address, based on an anonymous phone call, and killed the innocent occupant for basically no reason at all.
Barriss should be held accountable. But he didn't "murder" anyone. The SWAT team did that.
All the media is focusing on the swatting, the guy's history, character, etc. The media seems to ignore the ones who did the killing.
Lots of 911 calls have questionable information. Often they are even made by the guilty party in an effort to look innocent. The police know this. They should have been cautious instead of trigger happy.
Scroll down for the video of the shooting http://www.kansas.com/news/loc...
The emphasis on the nature of the 911 call is a diversion. Who shot the guy?
Mosquitoes are God's creatures. Don't fuck with them.
The bacterium Wolbachia pipientis is also a creation of our Lord. We are only being a servant of God.
If anything, the democrats need it to keep whining about "foreign influence" ... while importing millions of illegal voters.
That's an established truth. 17 intelligence agencies said so. It doesn't matter if we can't find the document signed by those 17 agencies. https://www.realclearpolitics.... Hillary said it was so, and we should believe someone as courageous as her. She bravely landed under sniper fire at an airport in Bosnia in 1996. http://www.businessinsider.com...
Plus, we heard about that Russian meddling every day every hour for months. Something that is repeated that much must be true.
I Vit Cng. We think coffee for fat American Joe who shoot us chúng tôi ez bad xu.
And there isn't a single country on the planet (nor consortium of countries) that could POSSIBLY have "An astronaut wandering the moon next year" -- probably not even in 5 years, even with a MASSIVE multinational effort.
You're thinking of the old-fashion method of having a round-trip plan. One-way could be done in 5 years.
That's just a link to the Wiki article, and it doesn't state anything as real evidence. It just says so-and-so believes so.
And what difference does it make that the US went to war on some pretext? The US has gone to war numerous times for no good reason at all.
I've been told that some people go outside in bare feet without a cellphone. How silly can you get?
Russia did do something. The only people who don't know this have two-figure IQ's and still believe Mexico will pay for Trump's wall.
It's been about a year into this Russian thing, and nobody has even offered WMD-quality evidence. So, the burden is still on you, the promoters of this story, to provide persuasive evidence.
I recently heard a video of Hillary answer the question regarding (paraphrased) What is the evidence? She replied that the "Evidence is compelling". That's the kind of thing I keep hearing. She, basically, said there IS NO EVIDENCE.
Moreover, the accusation is that Russia, by a circuitous route, revealed misbehavior of the DNC, and that swayed voters. Even if that is the case, Russia didn't write the emails, and revealing it is a service to America - not a "meddling".
And please don't forget that this whole thing revolves around proving russia attacked the democrats by exposing DNC corruption. The DNC is responsible for their demise, and for Trump, all wikileaks did was expose their corruption to the public.
You're right, and you represent the typical view of /. readers. But if you read the comments on YahooNews, (judging by "like" ratio) less than half agree with you. The general public believes what they are told to believe.
It seems a fair question: the US has a long history of interference in the democratic processes and/or governments of literally DOZENS of other countries (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change). So why are people so upset if a foreign power plays that game on their own soil?
Nobody is really upset. It just suits the military-industrial complex now to have a good enemy. The strategy made the gang rich during the cold war, and they want the old days back.
I've found that if you can't find a visible reasonable explanation for government action, the unseen explanation will be money.
Someday, when Russia really *does* do something, nobody is going to believe the reports about it.