GAIM won't let me on, using me@gmail.com as a username, it seems to be trying to resolve me@gmail.com@talk.google.com and fecking it up. anyone have ideas?
If you're going to let anyone onto the network, you may be letting undercover government agents onto the network.
Let them. They still can't track you, and more nodes means more anonymity. Also, by requesting info they disagree with for whatever reason, they are helping to propagate it through the network.
If you're going to transmit data from point A to point B, points A and B have to know something that makes the other unique among all possible points.
Its called cryptography, in this instance signing. You don't need an ip or anything else besides the keys to verify the identity of the nodes.
If you're going to make the network 100% anonymous and available, it'll get blocked by administrators afraid it will be abused, like Tor.
Not so easy, there will be trusted links in a future version, allowing you access to the network as long as you can connect to one other node. It would also be trivial to make it look like https or similar (iirc).
"works" is a relative word when it comes to freenet. i know of better alternatives but cannot disclose them yet do to scaling issues and the main dev biting my head off. expect it soon, and its been mentioned in comments before.
ps, when i say soon, i mean a month or 2
Utter crap. There is no way the system you describe can be anonymous. There are no technical docs on the site, and the instructions are vauge and unprofessional. It seems to be a run-of-the-mill VPN with some tricky configs and off the shelf software. Maybe you can sell it at Frys or Best Buy or wherever the ignorant windows users will think it sounds nice.
From http://jlcooke.ca/hashcash/hashcashv1_jsapplet.htm l -
This was designed for webmail clients. More information is available at my main Hashcash for Webpages site. If you're at all procicent with JavaScript, you can turn this demo page into a snazzy graphical progress bar and any GUI interface you want.
To create a Hashcash token, include the JS and Java implementations and call it with hashcashv1_create() in JavaScript.
hey, if 1 in 4 people have illegally downloaded music, thats a nice voting demographic for some politician. i should run on a pro-p2p pro-tech platform. who's with me!
Slashdot Mirror
I may be very high ... but I think poster has a point .. please mod up ...
Because he would want people to link to it through the Coral Cache, which it has been, to prevent a slashdotting.
HAHAH you're so funny. JKJK :-P
good luck finding a compiler built into the kernel
GAIM won't let me on, using me@gmail.com as a username, it seems to be trying to resolve me@gmail.com@talk.google.com and fecking it up. anyone have ideas?
If you're going to let anyone onto the network, you may be letting undercover government agents onto the network.
Let them. They still can't track you, and more nodes means more anonymity. Also, by requesting info they disagree with for whatever reason, they are helping to propagate it through the network.
If you're going to transmit data from point A to point B, points A and B have to know something that makes the other unique among all possible points.
Its called cryptography, in this instance signing. You don't need an ip or anything else besides the keys to verify the identity of the nodes.
If you're going to make the network 100% anonymous and available, it'll get blocked by administrators afraid it will be abused, like Tor.
Not so easy, there will be trusted links in a future version, allowing you access to the network as long as you can connect to one other node. It would also be trivial to make it look like https or similar (iirc).
oops, lol.
"works" is a relative word when it comes to freenet. i know of better alternatives but cannot disclose them yet do to scaling issues and the main dev biting my head off. expect it soon, and its been mentioned in comments before. ps, when i say soon, i mean a month or 2
how hard would it be to coralize all submitted URLs? one line of code?
available where? ebay? ok good.
this is the most epic and action-packed article i have ever read.
haha.. april fools! (I hope)
Kinda like usenet? Oh yeah, prove your node contains that stuff ;-)
In soviet russia.. aww i hate myself.
Utter crap. There is no way the system you describe can be anonymous. There are no technical docs on the site, and the instructions are vauge and unprofessional. It seems to be a run-of-the-mill VPN with some tricky configs and off the shelf software. Maybe you can sell it at Frys or Best Buy or wherever the ignorant windows users will think it sounds nice.
I don't think thats the problem at TB, i'm a member there and they've had full membership for a while with no problems.
GNAA
hey, if 1 in 4 people have illegally downloaded music, thats a nice voting demographic for some politician. i should run on a pro-p2p pro-tech platform. who's with me!
There is no way this will stand up. No laws are being broken (IANAL), and it would kill pretty much every postnukey news site
am i alone in not even knowing microsoft even HAD a magazine?
try AdBlock, http://adblock.mozdev.org
yeah, but whose gonna watch it long enuf to stumble upon these moist nuggets of good TV?
such a stupid channel. who wants a channel with no content!!! none of the shows even have info on the on-screen guide.
So another good reason to use OGGs. I never trust any non-open-licenced formats (it's all an illuminati plot).