Anytime someone quotes a web forum, blog, or otherwise, you could utilize the tag broadly or specifically. For example, at the being of an AC quote, just putting a single [www] would indicate everything you needed to know. However, if the post was well constructed with only one or two issues, you could use them in the appropriate places. Alternatively, we could use a [www] blah blah [/www] style standard to encase any quantity of [www] related ridiculousness.
[www source="7 year old girl"]i is want know baby formedd?[/www]
I recommend they add a valve to everyone's internet pipe. If they become troublesome, you simply close their valve down a little bit to stop the flow of the internet through the pipes.
In response to some of the comments here and elsewhere: No, it's not CALEA. CALEA requires phone companies to give the FBI real time access to call content and call detail information on specific targets when presented with a warrant. It does not oblige them to give the FBI or anyone else direct unmonitored access to switches, billing systems or databases.
That's one of the dumbest comments on the movie industry/hollywood I've seen.
"They do "creative" accounting so that no film ever makes money on paper."
Let's try:
http://www.swivel.com/data_sets/show/1000791
The top 20 movies have made between $284M and $717M, according to that page. I think they are "making money on paper", unless I'm missing something here?
I can't see how modern day subs would have ANY interest in this. Seriously. You would have to modulate your path based on water temperature, and baby-jesus forbid, you are forced to transverse water the same temperature for a few months. This is useless technology unless WWIII starts tomorrow.
Does anyone realize how much money in the last 30-80 years has been spent making a perfected process for delivering gasoline for automobiles to consumers in the U.S.? Then, you point out that making "green" fuel sources is still somewhat behind in its ability to offset greenhouse gases?
That's obscene.
Give "green" fuel a chance to catch up with petroleum, and I challenge you (in 10-20 years) to say the same thing. It is absurd to suggest that in the END most green fuels (solar panels, wind turbines, bio-diesel, etc.) won't far exceed petroleum.
"I would believe a $20 access point or router even in 2002 as they often were that cheap."
Go ahead, bring up a Google cache on this and I'll eat my words. There is NO WAY that legit access points or routers were running $20 in 2002. That is completely ridiculous and outright fabrication.
I am tired of this government that the U.S. continues to perpetuate. If these dipshits are unwilling to satisfy public will, they ought to be stripped of all responsibilities and held up in the public eye as examples of FAILED public service.
The public is what gives them power, and if they seek not to comply reasonably, they ought to be stripped of that power one magnitude greater than their infraction, to remind them who is putting them in charge.
This is not a business or a company. These people are there at our whim. When they fail to provide us with what they want, they ought to be ran out of office, and sent back to public life with the fury of thousands of people accompanying them.
Torrents didn't exist then, and I was around while AOL attempted to add high-speed services to its offerings, but was too late because the technicians and people with persuasion were reccomending other services, both for high-speed and dial-up replacement. The reason Earthlink was such a huge success was largely in part due to people convincing AOL users to switch out of the cluster-fuck that the AOL software was. AOL kept getting increasingly bulky and unmanageable and people ADVISED others to leave them for something simpler, fast, and less resource intensive.
It is the power of the techs (yes, people that use torrents, download distros, download game demos and software, etc) that use bandwidth who are typically the most connected, most knowledgeable, and most influential users on the Internet, and given a market where there is competition, they are the voices that guide the rest of people (ignorant people or otherwise) to certain companies.
You took the one thing from my message that didn't make any sense just so you could make a snarky remark about rewriting history. Thanks for reminding me I'm on./.
This company spent $12M on sales and marketing in '05, and $12M in '06. Meanwhile, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT was $8M / year in 05 and 06.
In 07 they slashed all spending by about 20-30%.
They've been losing 20% / year in UNIX revenue since 06, in spite of price increases.
Obviously, in '07, someone in charge got a realistic expectancy of the company and started cutting cost (as they should), given the fact they had no chance to sustain their business model.
This is how business works. It is fucking cut-throat, and if you can't get your shit together, afford the lawyers, and sustain an operational model, you fail.
Keep this shit up. Those "50% who use 5%" of the network will stop advising your idiot clients. When that happens, you'll see the same demise as "AOL" did. How many idiotic AOL dial-up users still exist?
Get ready for the apocalypse privacy-invading broadband douches.
Sorry, I suppose I should clarify.
Can you not appreciate that $1,000,000,000.00 USD could go toward something more useful?
Do you really think the FBI deserves a fingerprint database worth nearly $3-4 for every MAN, WOMAN, CHILD, and BABY in the ENTIRE U.S.A derived from TAXES?
I really, honestly, and truly believe the violation of privacy, unconstitutionality nature, and irrelevance of the program isn't even worth $0.000001 / person in the U.S.A. But maybe I don't think we could collect $10 from every taxpayer for fucking finger print wizardry that might identify a few criminals at the FEDERAL LEVEL. This is none of the federal government's business.
Let's not forget it is IMPORTANT to recognize the details between what you believe is right and wrong, and what you think the federal government ought to be paying for with federal money.
I don't think it is right when people feed their babies coca-cola and apple juice (too much sugar)m but do I think we should collect $20 from every tax payer in the U.S.A to start a program to stop it? FUCK NO!
Sorry, been drinking too much and am far too upset about bipartisan, ignorant politics. I mean to say, "house and senate" not "congress and senate", since obviously the legislative branch (i.e. congress) is composed of both. I don't want people to run amok and assume I don't know the difference while I'm at least a semi-strict Constitutionalist. Microsoft Word doesn't even recognize "constitutionalist" as a word... hah!
I'm a libertarian, and I assume, by that virtue, you imply you support Ron Paul.
I'm not worried about the PRESIDENT being libertarian. What I want is a libertarian congress and senate.
Do you realize that if we had the power to overturn useless regulation, wasteful irrelevant government projects, etc in the house and senate, and simultaneous, had the courage to KEEP THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE IN CHECK that the fact the president was democratic, republic, or otherwise wouldn't matter.
We have no reason to be concerned with the political party or views of the president, at least not to such a vast degree socially and fiscally, when we have the house and senate under control of the PEOPLE and not the lobbyists, whores, and unintelligent.
I don't care what other people do peacefully. Our laws encourage illegal behavior, and we facilitate violence by patrolling non-violent and non-criminal offenses. It is our fault that we drive people to violent behavior in many, if not all cases. The idea that we can allow the government to track us by DNA, fingerprints, sperm count, whatever, is simply absurd.
It is absolutely NONE OF THE FENDER GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS.
The FBI does not deserve, nor warrant, any of this information from American citizens. In fact, we should slash their budget by at least 50% for at least 5-10 years to remind them who is in charge.
Where do they get off thinking they can waste tax payer money on something so stupid?
The "hand test" is pointless. *puts hand on the back of my computer* Well, I can feel warm air! My computer must have poor design when it comes to dealing with heat.
Except that is how it is designed to work. I put it together in a way that funnels heat out the back of the computer. And I can monitor temperatures of my CPU, GPU, and hard drives, which could reveal a potential for failure. But sticking my hand on it is a sure fire way of figuring that out too?
Maybe they should have tested a jedi instead?
on
Can Time Slow Down?
·
· Score: 1
I mean, if we're going to use movies as an example, what if they were just ordinary people, while Neo and Anakin Skywalker went untested?
I don't understand how people can have an expectation of privacy. Even if you have no idea how the internet works, wouldn't you have a certain amount of built-in caution at this technology you don't get? For example, when typing to completely anonymous strangers and you are saying things you wouldn't want repeated, why wouldn't you take effort to safeguard *your* anonymity.
The people with these bots obviously took the time to do this surreptitiously, which is the issue at hand here. If they didn't feel what they were doing was wrong, they would not have been using clients that report as Mirc, human nicks, and Tor.
P2P is becoming one of those words like "green" "liberal" "marijuana" etc. It's "loaded" with extra meaning. Some people immediately associate P2P with illegal activity.
Can't they at least take away that bit of the inevitable PR campaign against the new "P2P" protocol?
Starting not too long ago, this happens to me while using torrents.
I'd say it has happened 5 or 6 times.
It never used to occur.
Suddenly, Google will simply not be accessible (connection reset).
I think having FasterFox on, set to exceed RFC, does not help your chances, based on my limited testing.
Slashdot Mirror
The [www] tag would be used in place of [sic].
Anytime someone quotes a web forum, blog, or otherwise, you could utilize the tag broadly or specifically. For example, at the being of an AC quote, just putting a single [www] would indicate everything you needed to know. However, if the post was well constructed with only one or two issues, you could use them in the appropriate places. Alternatively, we could use a [www] blah blah [/www] style standard to encase any quantity of [www] related ridiculousness.
[www source="7 year old girl"]i is want know baby formedd?[/www]
I recommend they add a valve to everyone's internet pipe. If they become troublesome, you simply close their valve down a little bit to stop the flow of the internet through the pipes.
That was a good response. I feel like you just did what I want to do every time I see the O'Reilly Factor.
In response to some of the comments here and elsewhere: No, it's not CALEA. CALEA requires phone companies to give the FBI real time access to call content and call detail information on specific targets when presented with a warrant. It does not oblige them to give the FBI or anyone else direct unmonitored access to switches, billing systems or databases.
That's one of the dumbest comments on the movie industry/hollywood I've seen. "They do "creative" accounting so that no film ever makes money on paper." Let's try: http://www.swivel.com/data_sets/show/1000791 The top 20 movies have made between $284M and $717M, according to that page. I think they are "making money on paper", unless I'm missing something here?
My subject is a quote from TFA.
Let's break this down.
"The Lord of teh Ring's trilogy"
You know what, I'm not even going to bother. What kind of retard submitted this?
I can't see how modern day subs would have ANY interest in this. Seriously. You would have to modulate your path based on water temperature, and baby-jesus forbid, you are forced to transverse water the same temperature for a few months. This is useless technology unless WWIII starts tomorrow.
ROFL. People in the government aren't ever "put of a job" by creating public information... that's WHAT THEY ARE PAID FOR.
Does anyone realize how much money in the last 30-80 years has been spent making a perfected process for delivering gasoline for automobiles to consumers in the U.S.? Then, you point out that making "green" fuel sources is still somewhat behind in its ability to offset greenhouse gases? That's obscene. Give "green" fuel a chance to catch up with petroleum, and I challenge you (in 10-20 years) to say the same thing. It is absurd to suggest that in the END most green fuels (solar panels, wind turbines, bio-diesel, etc.) won't far exceed petroleum.
"I would believe a $20 access point or router even in 2002 as they often were that cheap." Go ahead, bring up a Google cache on this and I'll eat my words. There is NO WAY that legit access points or routers were running $20 in 2002. That is completely ridiculous and outright fabrication.
I am tired of this government that the U.S. continues to perpetuate. If these dipshits are unwilling to satisfy public will, they ought to be stripped of all responsibilities and held up in the public eye as examples of FAILED public service.
The public is what gives them power, and if they seek not to comply reasonably, they ought to be stripped of that power one magnitude greater than their infraction, to remind them who is putting them in charge.
This is not a business or a company. These people are there at our whim. When they fail to provide us with what they want, they ought to be ran out of office, and sent back to public life with the fury of thousands of people accompanying them.
Torrents didn't exist then, and I was around while AOL attempted to add high-speed services to its offerings, but was too late because the technicians and people with persuasion were reccomending other services, both for high-speed and dial-up replacement. The reason Earthlink was such a huge success was largely in part due to people convincing AOL users to switch out of the cluster-fuck that the AOL software was. AOL kept getting increasingly bulky and unmanageable and people ADVISED others to leave them for something simpler, fast, and less resource intensive.
./.
It is the power of the techs (yes, people that use torrents, download distros, download game demos and software, etc) that use bandwidth who are typically the most connected, most knowledgeable, and most influential users on the Internet, and given a market where there is competition, they are the voices that guide the rest of people (ignorant people or otherwise) to certain companies.
You took the one thing from my message that didn't make any sense just so you could make a snarky remark about rewriting history. Thanks for reminding me I'm on
This company spent $12M on sales and marketing in '05, and $12M in '06. Meanwhile, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT was $8M / year in 05 and 06.
In 07 they slashed all spending by about 20-30%.
They've been losing 20% / year in UNIX revenue since 06, in spite of price increases.
Obviously, in '07, someone in charge got a realistic expectancy of the company and started cutting cost (as they should), given the fact they had no chance to sustain their business model.
This is how business works. It is fucking cut-throat, and if you can't get your shit together, afford the lawyers, and sustain an operational model, you fail.
Keep this shit up. Those "50% who use 5%" of the network will stop advising your idiot clients. When that happens, you'll see the same demise as "AOL" did. How many idiotic AOL dial-up users still exist?
Get ready for the apocalypse privacy-invading broadband douches.
Sorry, I suppose I should clarify. Can you not appreciate that $1,000,000,000.00 USD could go toward something more useful? Do you really think the FBI deserves a fingerprint database worth nearly $3-4 for every MAN, WOMAN, CHILD, and BABY in the ENTIRE U.S.A derived from TAXES? I really, honestly, and truly believe the violation of privacy, unconstitutionality nature, and irrelevance of the program isn't even worth $0.000001 / person in the U.S.A. But maybe I don't think we could collect $10 from every taxpayer for fucking finger print wizardry that might identify a few criminals at the FEDERAL LEVEL. This is none of the federal government's business. Let's not forget it is IMPORTANT to recognize the details between what you believe is right and wrong, and what you think the federal government ought to be paying for with federal money. I don't think it is right when people feed their babies coca-cola and apple juice (too much sugar)m but do I think we should collect $20 from every tax payer in the U.S.A to start a program to stop it? FUCK NO!
This is why rational people do not believe the Federal government has any business handling these things, nor wasting taxpayer dollars on them.
congree? for fuck sucks and this laptop keyboard. nevermind. I'm just going to leave this thread and let your god damn statists battle it out.
THIS IS YOU, WHEN YOU VOTE MAINSTREAM:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statism
Sorry, been drinking too much and am far too upset about bipartisan, ignorant politics. I mean to say, "house and senate" not "congress and senate", since obviously the legislative branch (i.e. congress) is composed of both. I don't want people to run amok and assume I don't know the difference while I'm at least a semi-strict Constitutionalist. Microsoft Word doesn't even recognize "constitutionalist" as a word... hah!
I'm a libertarian, and I assume, by that virtue, you imply you support Ron Paul. I'm not worried about the PRESIDENT being libertarian. What I want is a libertarian congress and senate. Do you realize that if we had the power to overturn useless regulation, wasteful irrelevant government projects, etc in the house and senate, and simultaneous, had the courage to KEEP THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE IN CHECK that the fact the president was democratic, republic, or otherwise wouldn't matter. We have no reason to be concerned with the political party or views of the president, at least not to such a vast degree socially and fiscally, when we have the house and senate under control of the PEOPLE and not the lobbyists, whores, and unintelligent.
I don't care what other people do peacefully. Our laws encourage illegal behavior, and we facilitate violence by patrolling non-violent and non-criminal offenses. It is our fault that we drive people to violent behavior in many, if not all cases. The idea that we can allow the government to track us by DNA, fingerprints, sperm count, whatever, is simply absurd. It is absolutely NONE OF THE FENDER GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS. The FBI does not deserve, nor warrant, any of this information from American citizens. In fact, we should slash their budget by at least 50% for at least 5-10 years to remind them who is in charge. Where do they get off thinking they can waste tax payer money on something so stupid?
The "hand test" is pointless. *puts hand on the back of my computer* Well, I can feel warm air! My computer must have poor design when it comes to dealing with heat. Except that is how it is designed to work. I put it together in a way that funnels heat out the back of the computer. And I can monitor temperatures of my CPU, GPU, and hard drives, which could reveal a potential for failure. But sticking my hand on it is a sure fire way of figuring that out too?
I mean, if we're going to use movies as an example, what if they were just ordinary people, while Neo and Anakin Skywalker went untested?
I don't understand how people can have an expectation of privacy. Even if you have no idea how the internet works, wouldn't you have a certain amount of built-in caution at this technology you don't get? For example, when typing to completely anonymous strangers and you are saying things you wouldn't want repeated, why wouldn't you take effort to safeguard *your* anonymity.
The people with these bots obviously took the time to do this surreptitiously, which is the issue at hand here. If they didn't feel what they were doing was wrong, they would not have been using clients that report as Mirc, human nicks, and Tor.
P2P is becoming one of those words like "green" "liberal" "marijuana" etc. It's "loaded" with extra meaning. Some people immediately associate P2P with illegal activity. Can't they at least take away that bit of the inevitable PR campaign against the new "P2P" protocol?
Starting not too long ago, this happens to me while using torrents. I'd say it has happened 5 or 6 times. It never used to occur. Suddenly, Google will simply not be accessible (connection reset). I think having FasterFox on, set to exceed RFC, does not help your chances, based on my limited testing.