Pretty much all time-machine-based scams revolve around bringing information back to the past. Hardly a failure, especially considering the time-machine could fund it's own improvement in a recursive feedback loop.
This has nothing to do with a litigious society. T&C's are this way because nobody in their right mind would accept them if they weren't obfuscated beyond comprehension.
I started to loose weight when I woke up every single morning for a few months with a significant back age (sometimes lasting all day) whilst having adjusted my bed for the heaviest weight possible. After 5kg lost, the back pain was gone, now at 15kg down, no longer fearing going to bed but sleeping like a baby and waking earlier. Obesity isn't healthy.
Sorry to be a pessimist, but has anybody ever really had a "major and unacceptable political fallout" due to executing a person that later turned out to be innocent? These types of legal murders apparently happen a couple times a year, yet few people seem to lose their job because of it.
They could have done like Github and provide an infrastructure. As BK's developers, they would have been ideally suited to provide an infrastructure not easily matched by competitors.
Odds makers give worse odds for more likely winners, they do not give every similar type of bet the same odds. It's not roulette.
The odds makers gave this particular bet odds of 540 to 1, meaning the odds makers (who know a hell of a lot better then any of us, because their livelyhood depends on it) thought the chance of this particular combination of winners being correct would be less than 1 in 540. If they would have bet on a less likely combination, it would have been more amazing if they would have won, but then they WOULDN'T have won.
But by all means; if you are so sure of your gambling system, you should bet on the horse races, become filthy rich, purchase Slashdot and remove all comments made by stupid people who you disagree with.
Playing devil's advocate: How do you want to teach children to handle private information responsibly on the internet when their parents have already ruined any chance of keeping such information private in the first place?
Yet this is what all diets seem to be selling; a temporary pain for a lasting gain.
IMHO the entire concept of "dieting" is flawed; any temporary fix is just that; temporary. Unless the changed behaviour becomes the normal (unconscious) behaviour, it will inevitably revert to what was previously normal.
In practice, support for older CPU's died out a while ago. Not because of incompatibilities but simply due to the OS becoming too heavy to run in any reasonable capacity on those CPU's.
Slashdot Mirror
Pretty much all time-machine-based scams revolve around bringing information back to the past.
Hardly a failure, especially considering the time-machine could fund it's own improvement in a recursive feedback loop.
Which begs the question; if those time machines were failures, how could they have been buried there?
The problem with this is that these apps may use actual notifications as well, which you'd also no longer be seeing.
LMFTFY
Lost is the reality of a not sufficiently batshit crazy nut job 'running' for president.
Please tell us what your job is and why you're not doing it for free.
This has nothing to do with a litigious society.
T&C's are this way because nobody in their right mind would accept them if they weren't obfuscated beyond comprehension.
I started to loose weight when I woke up every single morning for a few months with a significant back age (sometimes lasting all day) whilst having adjusted my bed for the heaviest weight possible. After 5kg lost, the back pain was gone, now at 15kg down, no longer fearing going to bed but sleeping like a baby and waking earlier. Obesity isn't healthy.
The limit is when the wet spot is basically any part of the body.
It's like how I try to convince women that a being a fat, alcoholic slob is attractive by posting pictures of myself passed out naked on the street.
So in summary, Facebook is going to become biased in order to prevent being labeled as biased.
Sorry to be a pessimist, but has anybody ever really had a "major and unacceptable political fallout" due to executing a person that later turned out to be innocent?
These types of legal murders apparently happen a couple times a year, yet few people seem to lose their job because of it.
Being a murderer isn't as bad as being a mass murderer, but it's still bad.
19 people to mess with is way too few for an HR manager to satisfy her urges.
Is Twitter making a profit yet, or is it still the posterboy for Bubble 2.0
(re; subject: see subject)
Link three, the last link in the article, is the one that contains actual information.
They could have done like Github and provide an infrastructure.
As BK's developers, they would have been ideally suited to provide an infrastructure not easily matched by competitors.
Odds makers give worse odds for more likely winners, they do not give every similar type of bet the same odds. It's not roulette.
The odds makers gave this particular bet odds of 540 to 1, meaning the odds makers (who know a hell of a lot better then any of us, because their livelyhood depends on it) thought the chance of this particular combination of winners being correct would be less than 1 in 540. If they would have bet on a less likely combination, it would have been more amazing if they would have won, but then they WOULDN'T have won.
But by all means; if you are so sure of your gambling system, you should bet on the horse races, become filthy rich, purchase Slashdot and remove all comments made by stupid people who you disagree with.
So basically their luck was that, in this particular exceptional case, the odds makers were incredibly dumb?
How many other bets did they place on the Kentucky Derby?
Playing devil's advocate: How do you want to teach children to handle private information responsibly on the internet when their parents have already ruined any chance of keeping such information private in the first place?
Diets don't work if you don't stick to them
Yet this is what all diets seem to be selling; a temporary pain for a lasting gain.
IMHO the entire concept of "dieting" is flawed; any temporary fix is just that; temporary.
Unless the changed behaviour becomes the normal (unconscious) behaviour, it will inevitably revert to what was previously normal.
In practice, support for older CPU's died out a while ago. Not because of incompatibilities but simply due to the OS becoming too heavy to run in any reasonable capacity on those CPU's.
And they were actually blocked for a good reason; to prevent drive-by ransomware infection.
Please Mr. Attenborough, please change your legal name to Boaty McBoatface.