They must charge a smaller fee where you are. Up here, they gouge for 11.7%. I'll do my own rolling (with my handy-dandy motorized coin sorter) and keep my $30-40.
Theoretically. Elections Canada seems to be engaging in much foot dragging regarding investigating apparent instances of that during the last election involving Dean Del Mastro receiving donations from his cousin's company funneled through employees.
Don't mention "plucky" and "O Canada" in the same sentence or you'll have "The Maple Leaf Forever" adherents popping out of the woodwork to proclaim the superiority of their chosen song.
BMG v. John Doe was a ruling by the Federal Court of Appeal, not the Supreme Court. I don't believe they bothered trying to appeal it up, but rather turned their efforts towards parliament.
No, the SCOTUS declined to hear the case, meaning the lower court ruling stands, but is only applicable within that court's jurisdiction. Specifically, the ruling was from the 7th circuit court, so it applies to Illinois, Wisconsin, and Indiana.
Import from Canada. Sapurto will be happy to provide you with your Hostess-brand nutritionally deficient snack foods. They don't currently make Twinkies, but I suspect they may start to do so in the near future.
Zoe appears to be good people. She lead opposition to SOPA and against PCIPA's data retention requirements. I don't like that she supported the Sonny Bono act, but her proposed Public Domain Enhancement Act (Which would require periodic renewal of copyrights after 50 years, though that bill has gone nowhere) redeems her somewhat.
Whether a binding arbitration clause is valid depends on the province's consumer protection laws.
No-class-action clauses have been found invalid in BC and Ontario, in the cases Seidel v. Telus Communications and Griffin v. Dell Canada respectively.
I don't believe there have been cases on this regarding any other provinces' laws.
"6 years ago" lines up with when the FCC decision to reclassify ISPs as "information services" rather than "telecommunications services" following the NCTA v. Brand X ruling started to kick in.
The difference is that "telecommunications services" were required to lease out their lines to independent ISPs, which allowed for competition. "Information services" don't have to and can lock competitors out, creating a nice little mono/duopoly.
Slashdot Mirror
They must charge a smaller fee where you are. Up here, they gouge for 11.7%. I'll do my own rolling (with my handy-dandy motorized coin sorter) and keep my $30-40.
That's not evolution. That's the separate but related field of abiogenesis. Evolution is what happens after abiogenesis results in life existing.
We've used the "hit it with a heavy object at high velocity" method to analyze a comet.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Impact (spacecraft)
Theoretically. Elections Canada seems to be engaging in much foot dragging regarding investigating apparent instances of that during the last election involving Dean Del Mastro receiving donations from his cousin's company funneled through employees.
Don't mention "plucky" and "O Canada" in the same sentence or you'll have "The Maple Leaf Forever" adherents popping out of the woodwork to proclaim the superiority of their chosen song.
No, but it requires the hardware to support it, making it considerably easier to convince then to start routing.
Cable companies have it somewhat easy. DOCSIS 3 requires hardware to support IPv6.
BMG v. John Doe was a ruling by the Federal Court of Appeal, not the Supreme Court. I don't believe they bothered trying to appeal it up, but rather turned their efforts towards parliament.
No, the SCOTUS declined to hear the case, meaning the lower court ruling stands, but is only applicable within that court's jurisdiction. Specifically, the ruling was from the 7th circuit court, so it applies to Illinois, Wisconsin, and Indiana.
Or someone mixed up imagery from different scales.
Amazon.ch redirects to amazon.de. Not sure why, population possibly.
Wasn't this tried and immediately the kids had a system where one kid would swipe your card for you for $5?
"(11) Every old idea will be proposed again with a different name and a different presentation, regardless of whether it works."
"Saliva testing only shows up marijuana usage in the last four to five hours, but 24 hours for all the other drugs, including...THC (cannabis)."
Umm, what? Where is that quote from? I don't see it in your link.
- Ultra low sulfur diesel requirements made diesel fuel more expensive than gasoline
Unrelated. Canada has the same ULSD requirement (15ppm maximum) as the USA and diesel is frequently cheaper than gasoline.
They do/did make chocolate-filled twinkies.
Import from Canada. Sapurto will be happy to provide you with your Hostess-brand nutritionally deficient snack foods. They don't currently make Twinkies, but I suspect they may start to do so in the near future.
Zoe appears to be good people. She lead opposition to SOPA and against PCIPA's data retention requirements. I don't like that she supported the Sonny Bono act, but her proposed Public Domain Enhancement Act (Which would require periodic renewal of copyrights after 50 years, though that bill has gone nowhere) redeems her somewhat.
$5B+ another $10B because they couldn't manage it 2 previous years.
Whether a binding arbitration clause is valid depends on the province's consumer protection laws.
No-class-action clauses have been found invalid in BC and Ontario, in the cases Seidel v. Telus Communications and Griffin v. Dell Canada respectively.
I don't believe there have been cases on this regarding any other provinces' laws.
but 90% are still at nothing higher than 2.3.5
Actually, Gingerbread and below are down to about 70%. Not good (JB is only on an utterly pitiful number of devices), but improving slowly.
Why? Is there seriously a need to come up with new methods other than good old fashioned fucking?
I don't think many people have a problem with the fucking, but rather with the subsequent 9-ish months of issues.
Ah yes, Telus. A textbook example of why only stupid people and corrupt people think crown privatization is a good idea.
"6 years ago" lines up with when the FCC decision to reclassify ISPs as "information services" rather than "telecommunications services" following the NCTA v. Brand X ruling started to kick in.
The difference is that "telecommunications services" were required to lease out their lines to independent ISPs, which allowed for competition. "Information services" don't have to and can lock competitors out, creating a nice little mono/duopoly.
Nevermind, I'm getting my links crossed.
You're comparing between a "customer satisfaction" ranking and a "speed" ranking.