However, I seem to remember an episode, where a rope, had been lest trailing through from one side of the hole to another...which to my knowledge of inanimate objects might not fall under that rule, maybe organic objects living, that could be severely damaged by such and act would not be allowed, where as a rope, or in this case a tube would be ok...???
I want to know where the line up is for getting our dna altered to remove these telomeres from my body, so I can no longer age. I have a lot of work to do, my boss keeps on piling more, so I need to know I can stick around for another 100 years or so.
Except, that we know the environment of one such case affected the environment of another, which is why they could not close the wormhole...because a blackhole was in the alternate gates envrionment...seriously though I think so far they have been pretty cool with coming up with ways of explaining such things especially things like mythology.
They could create a sort of tubbing that pierces the event horizons protective layer, and let the hole in the tube sticking through both sides fillup the air they need...but then again this is just a show, and not real life, so maybe there are x * x reasons for not being able to!
Did you even read the prior parent post "son", you sound like you just read mine, without checking the post previous. I am also saying that it makes no sense to charge the creator of the nuclear bomb with the deaths, when someone else dropped it on hiroshima.... do you know how to read???
Because the files being encrypted are sensitive materials, they might try to push the legislation (however misinformed) to being that the creators of the application are responsible for making sure the files are not leaked else they face legal recourse... so if the creator of the bomb should not be held accountable for the deaths of his creation, then why should the creator of this app be held accountable if someone is too stupid to enable the proper encryption schema?
This will push the scenario that the application should be knowing which files are which, and what is considered sensitive materials, and will eventually fall upon the program and its creators to block or not block, and unintentionally also legallities associated to sharing such files. The creators are not supposed to limit what files are being shared, and definitely not be held accountable if someone uses the app for their own evil purpose, else the creator of the nuclear bomb should be imprisoned for all the deaths in Hiroshima! This makes no sense, and I see where it is going, hopefully the bill wont pass.
I tend to side with you on this one, I don't know the law that well, and think he might actually have something, if this were someone else, let's say a teenager or something, cyber-bullying and all, might be a lawsuit here, but we will just have to wait and see.
Pretty soon, we will all be driving electric powered mustangs, somehow, that seems so wrong! I am all for electrical powered vehicles, but we need to keep some backwards compatibility...in case the battery runs out... not a full out electric car!
Yeah, I don't think you can compare this to a herd of animals though, maybe a viral population infection, where once the disease is caught it is multiplied exponentially, and if you use a viral infection comparison, you need to use one which can evolve and also can be caught again, not because you had it once, you can't catch it again...same with computer viruses. Also if you have 1 infected pc on the network while you are trying to get rid of it, it's an impossible task, you have to disconnect the pcs from the network, fix all of them , then reconnect else you just keep re-propagating the virus.
>and instead look at how it moves between machines.. Well, actually you would not be able to, because most move in stealth, hidden within other files, blocks of code being split into sections and then added to ends of files, and then reconstructed on the other side...this would not work for this simple reason. You could not look at a file someone is downloading and say it came from such location its ok, you have to look at the content and the file meta tags...this is the premise of file signatures...hence why we live in a world of virus signatures, and dynamic code blocks.
You can't be using raid based drive technology for this discussion, as we are talking about most home users that have computers downloading from the internet some torrent, we are not talking about a setup with commercial like configurations and hardware.
My point was that as I know it, it is impossible with whatever technology you want to use to transfer from one drive to another drive using firewire, internet, ethernet, or usb, or even ram flash drives to transfer a 25gb in 30 seconds...it just doesn't exist , maybe for the military, but even then I would say top notch DoD or NSA, not your regular bestbuy!!!
I hate to say this, but I am not confident this will work, there are reasons we were made the way we were, it will be interesting to see how her body adapts to a CONSTANT blood flow, instead of a pulse blood flow. I am sure there is damage that might build up from having a never ending stream of blood instead of a pulse...maybe the oxygen or blood sugar is intercepted differently because of this...who knows, but she is the first, and will be the guinea pig for the community, that's for sure. I do hope it works out, but I always see disaster happening when man tries to change something that nature intended to work one way, and ends up being too drastic a change.
I wonder how much previous data they collected with mice etc... to conclude this works good enough for the ext 10 years say...
Just get nmap, configure it to run as multiple instances form multiple computers, and configure each running instance to have certain search parameters. If this is what they are talking about, not much to see here, you just downplay the load on a server, by telling it to play only certain vulnerabilities, leaving others to look for different types.
Seriously, sounds like alot of BS just to fill up a story, once you find an exploit, it stops there, sends you an email and waits for you to log back on to fix or move on to other things...no need to let all the other instances know there is a vulnerability here, as they will progress there on their own time...if each is set out to look for a specific thing.
I think its a good idea to spread out certain jobs to certain servers to lighten the load, unless you are on a blade server, or cluster then it ends up all being the same.
Probably because ie- like in entrapment with the Chinese bank heist, or oceans 11 or 12 or 13, the Casinos have their own security in place and are always up to date with all technologies, same with overseas banks of a certain level. Banks here like td, or scotia are small in comparison, and don't want to invest money in security.
The TJX problems are the same, a big store like TJX seems to have shortfalls, where someone like Le Chateau have vmware in use, needing the best of the best to keep the networks going and would never be subject to a usb key infiltration because they disabled all the on board usb channels... TJX might have used thrid party vendors and such...like Dell to preconfigure all their hardware, hence the lack of proper security.
At this stage the only thing that could generate interest and also maybe make a new dawn of the windows (tarnished) image...is to have contest like doritos did, so what do we name our next windows, and offer a great reward xxx to the winner...with people posting stuff from youtube etc...image all the great videos you could get from there that would be as good as the mac ones...
But no...let's throw our money at Seinfeld, then change again and again our strategy until we just collapse in a ball in the fetal position on the side of the road...nice one Microsoft....here's MY idea..have a commercial of a great shot of Steve Balmer getting fired , and then having HIS boss throw a chair at him on his way out...and THEN have the balls to say...windows, not afraid to change with the times!....simple sweet, and makes fun of windows past...perfect in my books.
But there are even techniques of showing expenditure stats that will implicate if someone's habits include a certain store or location, banks and cc companies are very up to date on datamining techniques to profile you and your habits. Now go to a bank out of nowhere and then say you had your card stolen, they will look at the tapes, and yes will refund your money, however if they think foul play, they have their own investigation units that follow their customers around a bit and mine up info on friends, and then match head shots to friends, and then bring you in, and say this is YOUR friend, we will not reimburse you, but think it a present that we found out your friend was stealing, so you can press charges against him....then the gig is up.
You would be surprised, on things they do once the money IS stolen, but if they can avoid it all together, and pass the buck, they will, even if they had the best security at their disposal.
Were they even aware this time this was going on, sometimes like the Chinese having malware pre-installed on usb keys and hdd drives, then say it was someone working for them and they would remove it, this too could be an inside job where someone thought it a great opportunity to set up some free web servers and set up some hax0r websites...!
well....actually yes, any website that allows to post html script, which in itself can use links to hyper text to download malware is dangerous and should not be allowed...its all about content filtering before you get it up. If you want an example, I have one here
The problem IS THE BANKS! No matter how you look at it, the simple fact that their stance on identity theft and fraud prevention is this, what ever costs them less to maintain a working capital. If this capital goes down too much then they get driven to find a way to bring that back, however this might not be...create the next foolproof system, it could very well be, find a way to disassociate yourself from the responsibility of being in control of your client's transactions.
Did you know that the banks do not want to invest in the security infrastructure because it costs less to just keep goig the way things are going, and reimburse when they lose the case or obviously have proof against them that it was not your transaction, so they reimburse you, and move along. They do not care to enforce security.
Until banks are made accountable for ALL the fraud they could protect from but don't, they won't learn their lessons. The interesting thing here to note too, is that they will always be interested in the least costly security system (online that is) compared to the banks in zurich that have the highest systems in place. They know it is a loosing battle with the OS systems we have today....the only way I think you could ensure their security, is if they developed their own OS, a banking OS client and server. sort of like sabre for the airlines... and then this could in fact be used in conjunction with higher grade encryption and call systems.
Certain banks have calling systems, that allow you to access banking by phone, speach recognition is a great asset. Also, this could be done when ever their are transactions in place...you could have a phone call that comes to you, and you are solicited to then give acceptance of a transaction.
Sh*t if I had a banking that had a system that I could say, for every transaction (except these types...repetition, pre authorized etc...) i want a phone call to confirm else just refuse it....aside from banking charges, you would know every time you had something come up. This would only work on low volume accounts....but I am sure a system could be devised for higher volume accounts too.
The drive just isn't there...many ideas, but none they want to invest in...
>The difference can be attributed to the resilient and aggressive botnet market as well as a higher volume of global spam that has >ensued since the beginning of the credit crisis toward the end of 2008 Translation...
In the mid USA where most hicks live and breed, is where you will find the most success spreading the Nigerian scams where most people living on the coast (east or west) would have seen this scam coming a mile away.
Seriously though, you WILL find more success where there is less tech presence or more NEWLY introduced tech presence, where such thing as a computer might still not quite be yet a full daily household item. If you go into a very technologically advanced country or state, where everybody is texting, chances are, everybody has heard of most scams and can avoid them no problem.
That's exactly why I said what I said, this does not exist yet...the combo of technology to allow for this to happen at 5 seconds as the person claims to be able to do, is impossible right now, maybe in the near future....
You can backup your dvd unto your pc in 5 seconds with dvd tray. I have never heard of that, are you understanding what I am asking?
Backing up an actually dvd (all its info) from the disc to your hdd, so that after you can actually watch the dvd on your pc's drive WITHOUT having the dvd in the dvdvrom. I have never heard of such a benchmark.
Slashdot Mirror
However, I seem to remember an episode, where a rope, had been lest trailing through from one side of the hole to another ...which to my knowledge of inanimate objects might not fall under that rule, maybe organic objects living, that could be severely damaged by such and act would not be allowed, where as a rope, or in this case a tube would be ok...???
I want to know where the line up is for getting our dna altered to remove these telomeres from my body, so I can no longer age.
I have a lot of work to do, my boss keeps on piling more, so I need to know I can stick around for another 100 years or so.
Except, that we know the environment of one such case affected the environment of another, which is why they could not close the wormhole...because a blackhole was in the alternate gates envrionment ...seriously though I think so far they have been pretty cool with coming up with ways of explaining such things especially things like mythology.
They could create a sort of tubbing that pierces the event horizons protective layer, and let the hole in the tube sticking through both sides fillup the air they need...but then again this is just a show, and not real life, so maybe there are x * x reasons for not being able to!
I'll just have a red bull before hand
Did you even read the prior parent post "son", you sound like you just read mine, without checking the post previous. I am also saying that it makes no sense to charge the creator of the nuclear bomb
with the deaths, when someone else dropped it on hiroshima.... do you know how to read???
Because the files being encrypted are sensitive materials, they might try to push the legislation (however misinformed) to being that the creators of the application are responsible for
making sure the files are not leaked else they face legal recourse... so if the creator of the bomb
should not be held accountable for the deaths of his creation, then why should the creator of this app be held accountable if someone is too stupid to enable the proper encryption schema?
Both you and your parent post deserve much mods informative, which I don't have, but does me saying you should be modded count for something?
: )
"Don't Worry, ....Code Happy"
Forget this , I am getting my adamatium bondings as soon, as quickly as I can get a few broken bones that would need to be mended.
This will push the scenario that the application should be knowing which files are which, and what is considered sensitive materials,
and will eventually fall upon the program and its creators to block or not block, and unintentionally also legallities associated to
sharing such files.
The creators are not supposed to limit what files are being shared, and definitely not be held accountable if someone uses the app for their own evil purpose, else the creator of the nuclear bomb should be imprisoned for all the deaths in Hiroshima!
This makes no sense, and I see where it is going, hopefully the bill wont pass.
I tend to side with you on this one, I don't know the law that well, and think he might actually have something, if this were someone else, let's say a teenager or something, cyber-bullying and all, might be a lawsuit here, but we will just have to wait and see.
Pretty soon, we will all be driving electric powered mustangs, somehow, that seems so wrong!
I am all for electrical powered vehicles, but we need to keep some backwards compatibility...in case the battery runs out...
not a full out electric car!
Yeah, I don't think you can compare this to a herd of animals though, maybe a viral population infection, where once the disease is caught it is multiplied exponentially, and if you use a viral infection comparison, you need to use one which can evolve and also can be caught again, not because you had it once, you can't catch it again...same with computer viruses.
Also if you have 1 infected pc on the network while you are trying to get rid of it, it's an impossible task, you have to disconnect the pcs from the network, fix all of them , then reconnect else you just keep re-propagating the virus.
>and instead look at how it moves between machines..
Well, actually you would not be able to, because most move in stealth, hidden within other files, blocks of code being split into sections and then added to ends of files, and then reconstructed on the other side...this would not work for this simple reason.
You could not look at a file someone is downloading and say it came from such location its ok, you have to look at the content and the file meta tags...this is the premise of file signatures...hence why we live in a world of virus signatures, and dynamic code blocks.
You can't be using raid based drive technology for this discussion, as we are talking about most home users that have computers downloading from the internet some torrent, we are not talking about a setup with commercial like configurations and hardware.
My point was that as I know it, it is impossible with whatever technology you want to use to transfer from one drive to another drive using firewire, internet, ethernet, or usb, or even ram flash drives
to transfer a 25gb in 30 seconds...it just doesn't exist , maybe for the military, but even then I would say top notch DoD or NSA, not your regular bestbuy!!!
I hate to say this, but I am not confident this will work, there are reasons we were made the way we were, it will be interesting to see how her body adapts to a CONSTANT blood flow, instead of a pulse blood flow. I am sure there is damage that might build up from having a never ending stream of blood instead of a pulse...maybe the oxygen or blood sugar is intercepted differently because of this...who knows, but she is the first, and will be the guinea pig for the community, that's for sure.
I do hope it works out, but I always see disaster happening when man tries to change something that nature intended to work one way, and ends up being too drastic a change.
I wonder how much previous data they collected with mice etc... to conclude this works good enough for the ext 10 years say...
Just get nmap, configure it to run as multiple instances form multiple computers, and configure each running instance to have certain search parameters. If this is what they are talking about, not much to see here, you just downplay the load on a server, by telling it to play only certain vulnerabilities, leaving others to look for different types.
Seriously, sounds like alot of BS just to fill up a story, once you find an exploit, it stops there, sends you an email and waits for you to log back on to fix or move on to other things...no need to let all the other instances know there is a vulnerability here, as they will progress there on their own time...if each is set out to look for a specific thing.
I think its a good idea to spread out certain jobs to certain servers to lighten the load, unless you are on a blade server, or cluster then it ends up all being the same.
Probably because ie- like in entrapment with the Chinese bank heist, or oceans 11 or 12 or 13, the Casinos have their own security in place and are always up to date with all technologies, same with overseas banks of a certain level.
Banks here like td, or scotia are small in comparison, and don't want to invest money in security.
The TJX problems are the same, a big store like TJX seems to have shortfalls, where someone like Le Chateau have
vmware in use, needing the best of the best to keep the networks going and would never be subject to a usb key infiltration because they disabled all the on board usb channels... TJX might have used thrid party vendors and such...like Dell to preconfigure all their hardware, hence the lack of proper security.
At this stage the only thing that could generate interest and also maybe make a new dawn of the windows (tarnished) image...is to have contest like doritos did, so what do we name our next windows, and offer a great reward xxx to the winner...with
people posting stuff from youtube etc...image all the great videos you could get from there that would be as good as the mac ones...
But no...let's throw our money at Seinfeld, then change again and again our strategy until we just collapse in a ball in the fetal position on the side of the road...nice one Microsoft....here's MY idea..have a commercial of a great shot of Steve Balmer getting fired , and then having HIS boss throw a chair at him on his way out...and THEN have the balls to say...windows, not afraid to change with the times!....simple sweet, and makes fun of windows past...perfect in my books.
But there are even techniques of showing expenditure stats that will implicate if someone's habits include a certain store or location, banks and cc companies are very up to date on datamining techniques to profile you and your habits. Now go to a bank out of nowhere and then say you had your card stolen, they will look at the tapes, and yes will refund your money, however if they think foul play, they have their own investigation units that follow their customers around a bit and mine up info on friends, and then match head shots to friends, and then bring you in, and say this is YOUR friend, we will not reimburse you, but think it a present that we found out your friend was stealing, so you can press charges against him....then the gig is up.
You would be surprised, on things they do once the money IS stolen, but if they can avoid it all together, and pass the buck, they will, even if they had the best security at their disposal.
Were they even aware this time this was going on, sometimes like the Chinese having malware pre-installed on usb keys and hdd drives, then say it was someone working for them and they would remove it, this too could be an inside job where someone thought it a great opportunity to set up some free web servers and set up some hax0r websites...!
well....actually yes, any website that allows to post html script, which in itself can use links to hyper text to download malware is dangerous and should not be allowed...its all about content filtering before you get it up. If you want an example, I have one here
The problem IS THE BANKS! ...create the next foolproof system, it could very well be, find a way to disassociate yourself from the responsibility of
No matter how you look at it, the simple fact that their stance on identity theft and fraud prevention is this, what ever costs them less to maintain a working capital. If this capital goes down too much then they get driven to find a way to bring that back, however this might not be
being in control of your client's transactions.
Did you know that the banks do not want to invest in the security infrastructure because it costs less to just keep goig the way things are going, and reimburse when they lose the case or obviously have proof against them that it was not your transaction, so they reimburse you, and move along. They do not care to enforce security.
Until banks are made accountable for ALL the fraud they could protect from but don't, they won't learn their lessons.
The interesting thing here to note too, is that they will always be interested in the least costly security system (online that is) compared to the banks in zurich that have the highest systems in place. They know it is a loosing battle with the OS systems we have today....the only way I think you could ensure their security, is if they developed their own OS, a banking OS client and server.
sort of like sabre for the airlines... and then this could in fact be used in conjunction with higher grade encryption and call systems.
Certain banks have calling systems, that allow you to access banking by phone, speach recognition is a great asset.
Also, this could be done when ever their are transactions in place...you could have a phone call that comes to you, and
you are solicited to then give acceptance of a transaction.
Sh*t if I had a banking that had a system that I could say, for every transaction (except these types...repetition, pre authorized etc...) i want a phone call to confirm else just refuse it....aside from banking charges, you would know every time you had something come up. This would only work on low volume accounts....but I am sure a system could be devised for higher volume accounts too.
The drive just isn't there...many ideas, but none they want to invest in...
>The difference can be attributed to the resilient and aggressive botnet market as well as a higher volume of global spam that has >ensued since the beginning of the credit crisis toward the end of 2008
Translation...
In the mid USA where most hicks live and breed, is where you will find the most success spreading the Nigerian scams
where most people living on the coast (east or west) would have seen this scam coming a mile away.
Seriously though, you WILL find more success where there is less tech presence or more NEWLY introduced tech presence,
where such thing as a computer might still not quite be yet a full daily household item. If you go into a very technologically advanced country or state, where everybody is texting, chances are, everybody has heard of most scams and can avoid them no problem.
I got most modded funny, and one troll, geez I wonder who might have trolled me!
That's exactly why I said what I said, this does not exist yet...the combo of technology to allow for this to happen at 5 seconds as the person claims to be able to do, is impossible right now,
maybe in the near future....
You can backup your dvd unto your pc in 5 seconds with dvd tray.
I have never heard of that, are you understanding what I am asking?
Backing up an actually dvd (all its info) from the disc to your hdd, so that after
you can actually watch the dvd on your pc's drive WITHOUT having the dvd in the dvdvrom.
I have never heard of such a benchmark.