because when companies start making little green annoying links to advertising sites instead of links they piss me off the web, and it matters not who is doing it, but that it is being done.
damn the web sucks nowwadays.
the problems is, popups, spyware, malware, far less concern for me (I never see any) that the likes of pipipiqipqiqp and his fuck-tard antics.
I LOVE YOU! I also hate the word blogs. Your comment is... amazing.
My new (and first) sig
#update your host file now. #ultra-fucktard 127.0.0.1 www.primidi.com
I am in the process (ok, it hits his traffic, but, hey gotta do it) of emailing links to his sotries to the copyright owners, so that they can rape his ass for copy/pasting this content (even if it is promotional etc). Quoting sources is notok when you paste so much.
If I paste a dvd into this site, with some funky cool javascript DeCSS, is it ok just to source it?
no. ipipiapquiettee... how the fuck you say it... you are killfiled. thanks.
Well not that I have looked, but the feeling is all thier blog sites that they are getting people to splurg into are fairly spammyesque, they gripe me up in bad ways.
And I do not like weblogs inc, I think that thier veneer of terminology and technology hides nothing more than a two bit review whack site, and it is sad that such an opinion will be modded as a troll.
I hate blogs, always have, always will. Give me news, give me reviews, give me opinions, keep your blogs.
Weblogs inc is evil, sorry, not playing devil advocate or anything, I just do not like it.
In Korea, blogs are only for old people. future slashdot posting.
I have applications that I can submit as prior art from about 5 years ago.
One such system remembered each page that the user visited, and then build up visual cues to web developers of how people use the site, but also fed the results back into the user with a 'suggested link'
Each search result was saved, also, bugzilla allows you to save searches.
My SQLfoo app I wrote to query my db from a page stores all my past sql queries until I hit search.
My ex-ex-ex-browser (something called IE, I don't want to start an IE versus Lynx user war, I know IE is dying, I am not some FreeBSD hang on maniac - I let go...)
I am sure google stores this info (I am sure sure, I mean, check zeitgeist) Now Amazon always plays dirty with patents, I guess there is no charge in submitting prior art to a judge.
I hate the misleading advertising of the wanker who gets caught EVERY FUCKING WEEK without a TV license, and he pretends he is trying to knock on his own door, puts a video of a microwaving chicken on, all sorts of stupid tricks.
The fact is, if a TV license twat comes around, you say fuck off to them, then the cops have to get s warrant, in the meantime you just walk out the door holding your TV in full view of them, which is not a crime, and they cannot say you operate a TV (recieving equipt) on premises.
The fact is, they are powerless really to check, unless you are guillible.
I have had someone come around when I didn't have alicense (moving around as a student) I said fuck off. Heard nothing afterwards, which was wierd as I swear they are on a comission or bonus.
my mate just put the welsh flag over his TV, the guy walked in, kinda KNEW the tv was under the flag, but thought, if I thouch this welsh guys flag he might kill me. SO there you go, sorted.
I pay the license though. but the DVD's shoudl be cheaper to license holders, like almost free (5 squid).
Yeah shouting aside, the problem I have is DVD prices.
Someone said 'the DVD prices are subsidising the tv show costs'. What did they do before DVD?
OK, so maybe DVD sales will fund more shows, that can be shown on tv, and then released on DVD... I swear too much money is being made with the TV -> Dvd route.
TV companies will be/are already pissed when/that we all record HDTV to our own DVD.
Please do not mention moores law. Why not stop all research into CPU core technology, and just wait for my CPU in my computer to double its speed every 18 months.
If anything it is an insult to those minds who give us the CPU power that we have. It is taking it for granted, that these people develop the crazy shit they do.
I have not suggested any book for Javascript, and nor would I.
A search for any kind of book on Javascript woudl show up about 4 million websites, about 100k of them with up to date information, and about 20 books published within the last 3-4 years.
Students can use multiple sources to learn Javascript, a book is not one of them that comes to mind.
In a web design course in general (or web engineering) I usually get them either a resource on non technical aspects of web design tricks, and point them to W3schools, or certainly suggest a complete programming guide to the language they are learning. (which allows them to study it offline so to speak).
Many students may not have web access, but I feel that 3/4 A4 pages can disseminate so much about Javascript for a student based course that you do not need a programmer type reference for Javascript, all those no doubt giving thier O'Reiley versus XYZ Javascript book reviews shoudl bear that in mind.
I say write 4 pages of intro code to javascript and give 4-5 practical examples.
I spoke about this at length, how absurd stating that they have found that any data being hashed into a smaller data space 'has colisions', and got modded a troll.
I think the first ever boring lecture I had was on memory paging and has colision detection of paging algorithms... that is right, hash colisions.
Now, there seems to be too much huff and puff and not enough actual insightful talk about what this actually means, which means the fallout of this will bea bout 68.5/. articles all being submitted by different people, all pointing to different blogs, all written by different people, who all thought different things about different articles they read about this one issue.
Which sucks.
Basically, this seems very unusable, and doesn;t indicate that this goes further (in so much that there might be a step 2).
Is this fuel for someones security consultancy? I think the people behind it are genuinely curious, by the way it has been taken and portrayed in so many different lights is a bit daft, I feel like the whole IT community can be like a school yard of giggling girls at times, instead of the fact based enquiring minds I expected.
"It appears that this area of the brain is somehow figuring out things without you necessarily having to be consciously aware of it,"
So you see, when they come down to it, they do not even try and establish themselves as proponents for the sixth sense idea.
If you search on a p2p network for hypnosis books they even talk about sub conscious (not being consciously aware of actions) systems, such as breathing or even flinching from pain.
Another example would be when you suddenly feel unsafe in a car, when you realise you might be going too fast, this happens before you could possibly calculate that you have not slowed enough (perhaps your peripheral vision has seen something, or you are starting to have to look at too many things so your brain panics).
Again, the study talks about training the brain to autonomously respond to stimulii, in this case white or blue flashes.
Even dogs can learn from the result of things, if you always feed a dog, they will always expect you to feed them.
In this case, if the brain always registers a failuire with a blue flash, then it will expect a failuire to occur when a blue flash occurs, not because of any predictive sensing, but whatever string programming is going on in the brain has written a stronger pathway from 'blue' to 'failuire'.
I think this is weak science. Sorry, but not everyone with a fancy functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) should be allowed to make any claims they want, after discovering something less exciting than the fact that your body remembers how it felt after it ate something, which is why you hate vodka if you ever drink too much and throw up afterwards.
Even CNN was able to report this diligently. They passed on knowledge through their generations that retreating water was a sign of disaster, so when the waters went out (whatever the technical term is) they all scarpered.
I am sure the brain does have sub systems that try and trigger responses from us, like when we tune into a baby crying or other things, I am sure that our senses are more sensitive than we realise, but mostof it is filtered out.
Sounds like headline grabbing terminology bending.
But saying it is a sixth sense does not mean that IT KNEW MORE than what was being told to it by the 5 senses we do actually have (perhaps we can like pigeons sense magnetics also).
So please, like robotics, nanotech and every other buzz word that gets recycled, make sure you really are saying what you are saying.
So either thier accounting is wrong (which means they have no idea if they have lost more, or even if they are always loosing some) or 30kg's is out and about... and thier security didn't track it...
Which is worse?
Plutonium security guard 1:"it was here yesterday... 30kgs" Plutonium security guard new friend:"zzo jim, I be thank you for showing me your job of work, I like you very muchness, do not be going into the London on the Marchy five, ok, ciao ciao buddy buddy, klkazzxk!"
In the office I hear people using IP phones, they sound like mobiles with bad reception (breaking up a lot).
So, in the future where we have spent billions setting up good coverage, and microwaving our innards, we all start going around saying 'can you hear me now? now?' the funny thing will be those not aquainted with network congestion, they will try and move around for better reception, when it is network traffic causing the delays:-)
As a brit male who has sown his seed in many a fine field, both here and abroad - the concentration of fine women does not differ greatly, however in tourist places or high profile places (in city centers) where shopping is good you will find some fine filly.
It is true, there are many corners of foreign fields that will be forever england. I just cannot remember some of thier names.
I know a lot of countries have TV Licenses - but the BBC takes the piss. We *PAY FOR THE PRODUCTION* of a TV show, but then pay OVER THE ODDS for the DVD's when they come out.
BBC make enough money to either a) scrap tv license or b) give us cheaper DVD's.
To be honest, I would preffer latter, Most people spend more on BBC DVD's than they do on licenses nowwadays (only takes one or two Christmas prezzies of the office to do that).
So I say, I paid for it already, give it to me. I think it is legal for me to download the prisoner DVD rips (I have never seen this show, I want to) because I pay the license fees already.
TV rental, a lovely fiscal model already in place.
I have actually seen a home brew on of these in a local store, basically rear projection onto a carefully planned or hacked refraction grid (I cannot wait for make your own sites to be out there)
The point is, if it gives a good picture I would use a 45 angled mirror to reflect a projector from the ceiling onto this surface.
Not a transparent solution (because of a mirror) but takes up only about 1 meter behind, and the mirror can fold up into the tv to just be a free standing mirror.
Add a small motor to the wires holding it and it can go up and down auto matically and the projector can start.
child safety is an issue, all that glass seems more scarey that even a large CRT with a vacuum inside.
Napster is currently offering a free trial of its new Napster To Go service, which will enable users for a monthly $US15 ($NZ21.21) fee to download as much music as they want and transfer it to a portable device. They can also pay 99 cents for each track they want to burn to a CD.
That "rental" model for digital entertainment, backed by giant software concern Microsoft Corp and others, is getting its most serious mass-market tryout yet with Napster to Go.
A method of producing a three-dimensional image of an object by recording on a photographic plate or film the pattern of interference formed by a split laser beam and then illuminating the pattern either with a laser or with ordinary light.
Their techniques could be called precise refraction at best.
potentially letting them make CDs with hundreds of thousands of songs for free...
Lets see what this means, it doesn't mean thier music has been comprimised, you can download any song on P2P if you want to break copyright.
The fact is, those people using this service won't care, because they were using this service to support lower cost music and listener flexibility.
Yes DRM sucks, but noone will put up servers to let people who dont want to support the music they download to get free music.
The other issue is, will these guys be tracked down by napster, or will napster loose thier music industry support? why was napster so STUPID to make a crackable system? Is there such a thing as uncrackable music?
Slashdot Mirror
because when companies start making little green annoying links to advertising sites instead of links they piss me off the web, and it matters not who is doing it, but that it is being done.
damn the web sucks nowwadays.
the problems is, popups, spyware, malware, far less concern for me (I never see any) that the likes of pipipiqipqiqp and his fuck-tard antics.
see sig.
I LOVE YOU! I also hate the word blogs. Your comment is... amazing.
My new (and first) sig
#update your host file now.
#ultra-fucktard
127.0.0.1 www.primidi.com
I am in the process (ok, it hits his traffic, but, hey gotta do it) of emailing links to his sotries to the copyright owners, so that they can rape his ass for copy/pasting this content (even if it is promotional etc). Quoting sources is notok when you paste so much.
If I paste a dvd into this site, with some funky cool javascript DeCSS, is it ok just to source it?
no. ipipiapquiettee... how the fuck you say it... you are killfiled. thanks.
Here is a direct link to where he whored his info.
I mean, isn't copying swathes of content without permission STEALING (well no it isn't but I just rented a DVD where it said it was...)
I think I hate this guy, but at least he adds to my argument that blogs are worse than showering in fetid pureed pigs innards.
Well not that I have looked, but the feeling is all thier blog sites that they are getting people to splurg into are fairly spammyesque, they gripe me up in bad ways.
/.
autoblog, engadget, pocketlintblog, ohmygodthinkofsomthingfunnyblog, somethingthatgwillhithighgooglerankblogs
each one posting and cross posting onto each other, and leaching favourable sounding verbiage linkage from sites such as well-meaning users of
They are poisoning google.
I wish google had a blacklist for its users.
Oh wait, I bet amazon have patented it.
(sorry, this isn't a troll, it is my damn solitary and quite lonely opinion of blogs, if you share my qualms over blogs, please do say so)
And I do not like weblogs inc, I think that thier veneer of terminology and technology hides nothing more than a two bit review whack site, and it is sad that such an opinion will be modded as a troll.
I hate blogs, always have, always will. Give me news, give me reviews, give me opinions, keep your blogs.
Weblogs inc is evil, sorry, not playing devil advocate or anything, I just do not like it.
In Korea, blogs are only for old people. future slashdot posting.
I have applications that I can submit as prior art from about 5 years ago.
One such system remembered each page that the user visited, and then build up visual cues to web developers of how people use the site, but also fed the results back into the user with a 'suggested link'
Each search result was saved, also, bugzilla allows you to save searches.
My SQLfoo app I wrote to query my db from a page stores all my past sql queries until I hit search.
My ex-ex-ex-browser (something called IE, I don't want to start an IE versus Lynx user war, I know IE is dying, I am not some FreeBSD hang on maniac - I let go...)
I am sure google stores this info (I am sure sure, I mean, check zeitgeist) Now Amazon always plays dirty with patents, I guess there is no charge in submitting prior art to a judge.
I hate the misleading advertising of the wanker who gets caught EVERY FUCKING WEEK without a TV license, and he pretends he is trying to knock on his own door, puts a video of a microwaving chicken on, all sorts of stupid tricks.
The fact is, if a TV license twat comes around, you say fuck off to them, then the cops have to get s warrant, in the meantime you just walk out the door holding your TV in full view of them, which is not a crime, and they cannot say you operate a TV (recieving equipt) on premises.
The fact is, they are powerless really to check, unless you are guillible.
I have had someone come around when I didn't have alicense (moving around as a student) I said fuck off. Heard nothing afterwards, which was wierd as I swear they are on a comission or bonus.
my mate just put the welsh flag over his TV, the guy walked in, kinda KNEW the tv was under the flag, but thought, if I thouch this welsh guys flag he might kill me. SO there you go, sorted.
I pay the license though. but the DVD's shoudl be cheaper to license holders, like almost free (5 squid).
Yeah shouting aside, the problem I have is DVD prices.
Someone said 'the DVD prices are subsidising the tv show costs'. What did they do before DVD?
OK, so maybe DVD sales will fund more shows, that can be shown on tv, and then released on DVD... I swear too much money is being made with the TV -> Dvd route.
TV companies will be/are already pissed when/that we all record HDTV to our own DVD.
do not use moores law
Please do not mention moores law. Why not stop all research into CPU core technology, and just wait for my CPU in my computer to double its speed every 18 months.
If anything it is an insult to those minds who give us the CPU power that we have. It is taking it for granted, that these people develop the crazy shit they do.
And I hear people using it far too much, please do not use moores law.
I have not suggested any book for Javascript, and nor would I.
A search for any kind of book on Javascript woudl show up about 4 million websites, about 100k of them with up to date information, and about 20 books published within the last 3-4 years.
Students can use multiple sources to learn Javascript, a book is not one of them that comes to mind.
In a web design course in general (or web engineering) I usually get them either a resource on non technical aspects of web design tricks, and point them to W3schools, or certainly suggest a complete programming guide to the language they are learning. (which allows them to study it offline so to speak).
Many students may not have web access, but I feel that 3/4 A4 pages can disseminate so much about Javascript for a student based course that you do not need a programmer type reference for Javascript, all those no doubt giving thier O'Reiley versus XYZ Javascript book reviews shoudl bear that in mind.
I say write 4 pages of intro code to javascript and give 4-5 practical examples.
That is enough.
I spoke about this at length, how absurd stating that they have found that any data being hashed into a smaller data space 'has colisions', and got modded a troll.
/. articles all being submitted by different people, all pointing to different blogs, all written by different people, who all thought different things about different articles they read about this one issue.
I think the first ever boring lecture I had was on memory paging and has colision detection of paging algorithms... that is right, hash colisions.
Now, there seems to be too much huff and puff and not enough actual insightful talk about what this actually means, which means the fallout of this will bea bout 68.5
Which sucks.
Basically, this seems very unusable, and doesn;t indicate that this goes further (in so much that there might be a step 2).
Is this fuel for someones security consultancy? I think the people behind it are genuinely curious, by the way it has been taken and portrayed in so many different lights is a bit daft, I feel like the whole IT community can be like a school yard of giggling girls at times, instead of the fact based enquiring minds I expected.
"It appears that this area of the brain is somehow figuring out things without you necessarily having to be consciously aware of it,"
So you see, when they come down to it, they do not even try and establish themselves as proponents for the sixth sense idea.
If you search on a p2p network for hypnosis books they even talk about sub conscious (not being consciously aware of actions) systems, such as breathing or even flinching from pain.
Another example would be when you suddenly feel unsafe in a car, when you realise you might be going too fast, this happens before you could possibly calculate that you have not slowed enough (perhaps your peripheral vision has seen something, or you are starting to have to look at too many things so your brain panics).
Again, the study talks about training the brain to autonomously respond to stimulii, in this case white or blue flashes.
Even dogs can learn from the result of things, if you always feed a dog, they will always expect you to feed them.
In this case, if the brain always registers a failuire with a blue flash, then it will expect a failuire to occur when a blue flash occurs, not because of any predictive sensing, but whatever string programming is going on in the brain has written a stronger pathway from 'blue' to 'failuire'.
I think this is weak science. Sorry, but not everyone with a fancy functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) should be allowed to make any claims they want, after discovering something less exciting than the fact that your body remembers how it felt after it ate something, which is why you hate vodka if you ever drink too much and throw up afterwards.
ok me out
Even CNN was able to report this diligently. They passed on knowledge through their generations that retreating water was a sign of disaster, so when the waters went out (whatever the technical term is) they all scarpered.
I am sure the brain does have sub systems that try and trigger responses from us, like when we tune into a baby crying or other things, I am sure that our senses are more sensitive than we realise, but mostof it is filtered out.
Sounds like headline grabbing terminology bending.
But saying it is a sixth sense does not mean that IT KNEW MORE than what was being told to it by the 5 senses we do actually have (perhaps we can like pigeons sense magnetics also).
So please, like robotics, nanotech and every other buzz word that gets recycled, make sure you really are saying what you are saying.
This is what I want for my license fee. I am glad they are doing it. I want high quality though.
So either thier accounting is wrong (which means they have no idea if they have lost more, or even if they are always loosing some) or 30kg's is out and about... and thier security didn't track it...
:"it was here yesterday... 30kgs" :"zzo jim, I be thank you for showing me your job of work, I like you very muchness, do not be going into the London on the Marchy five, ok, ciao ciao buddy buddy, klkazzxk!"
Which is worse?
Plutonium security guard 1
Plutonium security guard new friend
In the office I hear people using IP phones, they sound like mobiles with bad reception (breaking up a lot).
:-)
So, in the future where we have spent billions setting up good coverage, and microwaving our innards, we all start going around saying 'can you hear me now? now?' the funny thing will be those not aquainted with network congestion, they will try and move around for better reception, when it is network traffic causing the delays
LOL!!11
;-) no worries, thanks for the info. Don't suppose you know how to make on the cheap, Mr Physics Dude?
Point? What point?
Well done I stopped reading. I hope you realise what a waste of effort your post was, as I do not think another soul will read it.
Just to put parent and sibling down:
As a brit male who has sown his seed in many a fine field, both here and abroad - the concentration of fine women does not differ greatly, however in tourist places or high profile places (in city centers) where shopping is good you will find some fine filly.
It is true, there are many corners of foreign fields that will be forever england. I just cannot remember some of thier names.
Tod the stud (I was drunk)
I know a lot of countries have TV Licenses - but the BBC takes the piss. We *PAY FOR THE PRODUCTION* of a TV show, but then pay OVER THE ODDS for the DVD's when they come out.
BBC make enough money to either a) scrap tv license or b) give us cheaper DVD's.
To be honest, I would preffer latter, Most people spend more on BBC DVD's than they do on licenses nowwadays (only takes one or two Christmas prezzies of the office to do that).
So I say, I paid for it already, give it to me. I think it is legal for me to download the prisoner DVD rips (I have never seen this show, I want to) because I pay the license fees already.
TV rental, a lovely fiscal model already in place.
I have actually seen a home brew on of these in a local store, basically rear projection onto a carefully planned or hacked refraction grid (I cannot wait for make your own sites to be out there)
The point is, if it gives a good picture I would use a 45 angled mirror to reflect a projector from the ceiling onto this surface.
Not a transparent solution (because of a mirror) but takes up only about 1 meter behind, and the mirror can fold up into the tv to just be a free standing mirror.
Add a small motor to the wires holding it and it can go up and down auto matically and the projector can start.
child safety is an issue, all that glass seems more scarey that even a large CRT with a vacuum inside.
backed by giant software concern Microsoft Corp
:-)
in context:
Napster is currently offering a free trial of its new Napster To Go service, which will enable users for a monthly $US15 ($NZ21.21) fee to download as much music as they want and transfer it to a portable device. They can also pay 99 cents for each track they want to burn to a CD.
That "rental" model for digital entertainment, backed by giant software concern Microsoft Corp and others, is getting its most serious mass-market tryout yet with Napster to Go.
somehow that makes the pill easier to swallow
No it isn't holographic at all.
A method of producing a three-dimensional image of an object by recording on a photographic plate or film the pattern of interference formed by a split laser beam and then illuminating the pattern either with a laser or with ordinary light.
Their techniques could be called precise refraction at best.
potentially letting them make CDs with hundreds of thousands of songs for free...
Lets see what this means, it doesn't mean thier music has been comprimised, you can download any song on P2P if you want to break copyright.
The fact is, those people using this service won't care, because they were using this service to support lower cost music and listener flexibility.
Yes DRM sucks, but noone will put up servers to let people who dont want to support the music they download to get free music.
The other issue is, will these guys be tracked down by napster, or will napster loose thier music industry support? why was napster so STUPID to make a crackable system? Is there such a thing as uncrackable music?
But for those 25 million who have broken downloads, try the torrent, or the mirrors, or your best friends, or your local dentist for a copy.
Well done FF!!!11111111111
Awesome logo