Impeachment(bringing of charges) does not remove the President. Just ask Bill Clinton. The Senate would have do a trial after impeachment, and good luck getting 2/3s there for conviction.
What would be the "high crimes and misdemeanors" to start the impeachment process?
The commerce clause has been anything but dormant since 1942. The courts have consistently ruled that Congress can regulate pretty much anything and everything because of the commerce clause.
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., is prepared to filibuster the reauthorization of Section 702 of the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act, which is up for a vote in the House to authorize a six-year extension, in an effort to get warrant requirement for Americans.
“My worry is that they also collect information on millions of Americans, and I don’t want that database to be searched without a warrant,” “I will filibuster and do whatever to stop that,” he added.
In the event that protections were included for U.S. citizens’ private information, Paul said he would support reauthorizing Section 702.
Force elected officials to do their job. Congress has been a pack of cowards for the past few dozen years not wanting to be held accountable for actually doing their job by voting on important issues.
Good luck getting the House to take up this issue.
Let us not forget Obama created a cocoon of his own, branding conservatives "bitter clingers," denying the IRS scandal, and presenting misinformation about the attack in Benghazi, Libya. And there was that disastrous Iran deal...
Trump may be dividing America worse than Obama did, but that doesn't mean Obama was guiltless.
The case centers around a person's cellphone tower location logs, but the broader issue is the government's access to tracking data no matter its collection process. These days location data comes from many sources including facial recognition, license plate readers and smart tags. In the future it will probably include drones and driverless vehicles.
The ruling needs to say that a warrant is required for the government to access location data, no matter who or how it was collected.
Meanwhile, our experience of the internet is increasingly controlled by a handful of firms, most especially Google and Facebook. The argument for regulating these companies as public utilities is arguably at least as strong as the argument for thus regulating ISPs, and very possibly much stronger; while cable monopolies may have local dominance, none of them has the ability that Google and Facebook have to unilaterally shape what Americans see, hear, and read.
In other words, we already live in the walled garden that activists worry about, and the walls are getting higher every day.
More money, more time, more experience and more patience. Google only needs to wait for another AG to come along who drops the case for the right campaign contribution.
Slashdot Mirror
The article doesn't mention if they are fireproof and bulletproof. Cash register justice will provoke a violent and justifiable response.
Unnecessary tests and pharmaceuticals. Doctors use unnecessary tests to protect themselves from lawsuits. Then there's the medication problem.
the-myth-of-drug-expiration-dates
The government needs an independent lab to determine the expiry dates, not big pharma.
drug-firms-shipped-208-million-pain-pills-to-west-virginia-town
drug-company-payments-mirror-doctors-brand-name-prescribing
I also have to wonder if doctors prescribe drugs as the easy solution instead telling the patient to make lifestyle choices.
Just 10 rivers carry 90% of plastic polluting the oceans
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci...
What plugin? This is an html5 issue.
Impeachment(bringing of charges) does not remove the President. Just ask Bill Clinton. The Senate would have do a trial after impeachment, and good luck getting 2/3s there for conviction.
What would be the "high crimes and misdemeanors" to start the impeachment process?
Cali politicians act like parasites to advance their failed political policies and transportation boondoggles.
The ethanol lobby beat Obama, Trump and all the congresses since enactment.
Throwing money at a problem is a solution from people who have either run out of ideas or don't want to cede control to others.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., is prepared to filibuster the reauthorization of Section 702 of the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act, which is up for a vote in the House to authorize a six-year extension, in an effort to get warrant requirement for Americans.
“My worry is that they also collect information on millions of Americans, and I don’t want that database to be searched without a warrant,” “I will filibuster and do whatever to stop that,” he added.
In the event that protections were included for U.S. citizens’ private information, Paul said he would support reauthorizing Section 702.
Good luck getting the House to take up this issue.
People are addicted to their social media apps, not the hardware.
That’s valuable zero gravity space research for the future of mankind, right there.
4 x E-4B
2 x VC-25
https://science.slashdot.org/s...
Trump may be dividing America worse than Obama did, but that doesn't mean Obama was guiltless.
Would you want someone with a communicable disease in your back seat? Do you want to be the next passenger?
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...
The ruling needs to say that a warrant is required for the government to access location data, no matter who or how it was collected.
Extradition ebay. See how badly they want him.
Their political partisanship and profit motive should call into question any contributions they make.
Meanwhile, our experience of the internet is increasingly controlled by a handful of firms, most especially Google and Facebook. The argument for regulating these companies as public utilities is arguably at least as strong as the argument for thus regulating ISPs, and very possibly much stronger; while cable monopolies may have local dominance, none of them has the ability that Google and Facebook have to unilaterally shape what Americans see, hear, and read.
In other words, we already live in the walled garden that activists worry about, and the walls are getting higher every day.
Regarding that last fellow, as Liel Leibovitz of Tablet asks, if Twitter is judging verified users’ offline behavior, “Why Is Twitter Endorsing Anti-Semitic, Homophobic Hate-Monger Louis Farrakhan?”
More money, more time, more experience and more patience. Google only needs to wait for another AG to come along who drops the case for the right campaign contribution.
My point is the FBI's computer crimes folks should be working on major league crimes that are too big for state and local law enforcement.